EP2193973A2 - Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems - Google Patents

Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2193973A2
EP2193973A2 EP09173669A EP09173669A EP2193973A2 EP 2193973 A2 EP2193973 A2 EP 2193973A2 EP 09173669 A EP09173669 A EP 09173669A EP 09173669 A EP09173669 A EP 09173669A EP 2193973 A2 EP2193973 A2 EP 2193973A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
test
relay
driving
train control
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP09173669A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2193973A3 (en
EP2193973B1 (en
Inventor
Martin Schön
Martin Bachmann
Ulrich Michels
Daniel Wiget
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Schweiz AG
Original Assignee
Siemens Schweiz AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Schweiz AG filed Critical Siemens Schweiz AG
Priority to EP09173669A priority Critical patent/EP2193973B1/en
Publication of EP2193973A2 publication Critical patent/EP2193973A2/en
Publication of EP2193973A3 publication Critical patent/EP2193973A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2193973B1 publication Critical patent/EP2193973B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L19/00Arrangements for interlocking between points and signals by means of a single interlocking device, e.g. central control
    • B61L19/06Interlocking devices having electrical operation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/60Testing or simulation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for the complete testing of train control units with status data of track signals at relay interlockings.
  • the task of the test is particularly difficult at relay interlockings, since these are designed as state machines and thus have no data interfaces, via which individual functional elements outside the driving-path setting process can be influenced by means of a diagnostic computer.
  • the entire spectrum of signal types to be tested includes the main signals, pre-signals, block and coverage signals. In the following, however, only the signal is spoken by way of example, preferably a main signal.
  • relay interlockings usually do not allow intervention for a functional influence, but they do not generally prohibit.
  • all safety relays involved in the function are brought by hand to the required position and locked mechanically by means of a wedge in the attracting position. With the forcibly assumed position of the signal to be tested associated safety relay of the desired signal concept is enforced.
  • a second approach is to set the highest driving concept and, as a result, all lower-level driving concepts are formed by pushing away or by pressing on energized relays.
  • a method and an apparatus is proposed which does not require any interventions on the safety relays of the system units of the relay sets.
  • a check set optimized for the signal type is used in a more uniform manner instead of the signal relay set.
  • This test set has the properties for controlling the signals in the outdoor system. However, it does not have functions for setting a route, but for setting the main signal under test (destination). As a result, the advance of a train in the range of the respective signal to be tested from signaltechnischer- as well as from the demand for scholarer-personal protection - not possible. Dangers from an approaching train no longer exist.
  • the driving terms to be tested are simulated by means of the test record.
  • the input in the test record can be carried out manually or an interface to a test computer is possible via which the test procedure can be systemized.
  • the test set connects the loop of the central lock in the interlocking, so that the function of the interlocking is not impaired overall.
  • a route with a destination test object can therefore only be set again when the test set has been exchanged for the corresponding relay set of the signal.
  • the inventive step is that a new method and a device is set, which eliminates the disadvantages of the wedging method in terms of personal safety and regression, and in particular error-prone by manual manual handling sophisticated.

Abstract

The method involves adjusting a test set according to a testing task, deleting an associated relay set of a track signal, and initiating the test set. A driving concept is simulated at the test set based on a test report, and consistency at a train control unit is tested. Driving concepts of a signal function are tested till safety-relevant driving concepts are tested. The test set is compared to the relay set, and a determination is made to check whether the converted relay set is in active position. The track signal is released for resuming use of the relay set in a normal operating method. An independent claim is also included for a device for testing train control units with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems.

Description

Die vorliegende Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren und eine Vorrichtung zum vollständigen Prüfung von Zugbeeinflussungseinheiten mit Zustandsdaten von Streckensignalen bei Relaisstellwerken.The present invention relates to a method and a device for the complete testing of train control units with status data of track signals at relay interlockings.

Mit der Einführung einer neuen Zugbeeinflussungstechnologie, wie z.B. ETCS, ist es je nach zugehörigem Level des Verfahrens erforderlich, an den Lichtsignalen der Sicherungsanlage zur Anzeige der Fahrberechtigung für den voraus liegenden Abschnitt des im Streckennetzes den jeweils angezeigten Begriff abzugreifen und der Telegrammaufbereitung der neuen beizustellenden Zugbeeinflussungstechnologie zuzuführen.With the introduction of a new train control technology, such as ETCS, depending on the associated level of the procedure, it is necessary to tap the light signals of the security system for displaying the driving authorization for the preceding section of the network in the route network and to supply the message processing to the new train control technology to be provided.

Diese Fahrberechtigungssignale, es sind meist Rot / Orange / Grün - Signalsysteme mit 3 Aspekten, verfügen teilweise zusätzlich über eine Anzeige für von der Streckengeschwindigkeit nach unten abweichende einzuhaltende Geschwindigkeitslimiten für den nächsten Abschnitt.These drive authorization signals, which are mostly red / orange / green - signaling systems with 3 aspects, sometimes additionally have an indication of speed limits for the next section which deviate from the line speed.

Da heute die Netze der Bahnen sehr stark genutzt und bis an die Grenzen ausgelastet werden, ist die vollständige Prüfung der Sicherungsanlagen zu Abnahmezwecken im Streckennetz nach der Installation einer neuen Zugbeeinflussungstechnologie vor deren Nutzung ein schwieriges Unterfangen. Die auf den Sicherheitslevel der neu eingebrachten Funktion abgestimmte Prüfung muss nach Kriterien durchgeführt werden, welche den Richtlinien der Zulassungsbehörden entsprechen.As rail networks are now very heavily used and pushed to their limits, the full testing of backup systems for roadside acceptance after installing a new train control technology prior to their use is a difficult undertaking. The test adapted to the safety level of the newly introduced function must be carried out according to criteria which comply with the guidelines of the approval authorities.

Das verlangt, dass alle Zustände an den für den Fahrzeugführer zu beachtenden funktionalen Elementen des Stellwerkes in der Aussenanlage einzustellen sind, in der Regel sind das Signale, deren korrekte und vollständige Übereinstimmung auf die neu installierte Zugbeeinflussungstechnologie zu prüfen und zu protokollieren ist.This requires that all states are set to be observed by the driver functional elements of the interlocking in the outdoor area, as a rule, the signals are their correct and complete To check and log compliance to the newly installed train control technology.

Konkret heisst dies in der Regel, dass alle Signalbegriffe eines Signals einzustellen sind und die Richtigkeit der Ausgabe an der ETCS Balise mittels Telegrammempfang und Verifikation des gesendeten Inhalts zu prüfen ist.Specifically, this usually means that all the signal terms of a signal must be set and the correctness of the output on the ETCS Balise must be checked by means of telegram reception and verification of the transmitted content.

Die Aufgabe der Prüfung ist bei Relaisstellwerken besonders schwierig, da diese als Zustandsautomaten ausgebildet sind und dadurch über keine Datenschnittstellen verfügen, über welche mittels Diagnoserechner einzelne funktionale Elemente ausserhalb des Fahrstrassen-Stellprozesses beeinflusst werden können.The task of the test is particularly difficult at relay interlockings, since these are designed as state machines and thus have no data interfaces, via which individual functional elements outside the driving-path setting process can be influenced by means of a diagnostic computer.

Eine der generellen Schwierigkeiten besteht darin, dass mittels der Einstellung von Fahrstrassen teilweise nur mit grossem Aufwand oder gar nicht eine Einstellung von bestimmten Fahrbegriffen an einem spezifischen Signal möglich ist. Diese Situation besteht unter anderem bei der Rückfallebene der Signalisierung im Störungsfall, hier ist das Herbeiführen der jeweiligen Störungen erforderlich um die Auswirkungen anzustossen.One of the general difficulties is that by means of the setting of routes it is sometimes possible only with great effort or not at all a setting of certain driving terms on a specific signal. This situation exists, among other things, in the fallback of the signaling in the event of a malfunction, here the induction of the respective disturbances is required to initiate the effects.

Weiter kommt hinzu, dass das gesamte zu prüfende Spektrum der Signaltypen die Hauptsignale, Vorsignale, Block- und Deckungssignale beinhaltet. Nachfolgend wird jedoch exemplarisch nur vom Signal gesprochen, bevorzugt ein Hauptsignal.In addition, the entire spectrum of signal types to be tested includes the main signals, pre-signals, block and coverage signals. In the following, however, only the signal is spoken by way of example, preferably a main signal.

Um diese Fahrbegriffe prüfen zu können, müssen somit verschiedene Fahrwege eingestellt werden (zum Teil quer über die gesamte Gleisanlage eines Bahnhofs), was mit der heutigen Dichte des Zugverkehrs meist nicht mehr vertretbar durchführbar ist.In order to be able to check these driving terms, different routes must therefore be set (sometimes across the entire track system of a station), which is usually no longer feasible feasible with the current density of train traffic.

Die bisherige exemplarische Lösung wird anhand von Spurplan-Relaisstellwerken, wie der Typ DOMINO 67 der Anmelderin, welcher verbreitet in der Schweiz im Einsatz steht, beschrieben.The previous exemplary solution is described on the basis of track-plan relay interlockings, such as the DOMINO 67 of the applicant, which is widely used in Switzerland in use.

Die Betreiber von Relaisstellwerken lassen in der Regel Eingriffe für eine Funktionsbeeinflussung nicht zu, verbieten sie jedoch auch nicht generell. In der Folge werden nach einem bekannten Vorgehen zur Durchführung von Prüfungen im Relaisstellwerk in einer Systemeinheit, das heisst dem einem Signal zugehörigen Relaissatz, alle in die Funktion involvierten Sicherheitsrelais von Hand in die erforderliche Lage gebracht und mechanisch mittels eines Keils in der Anzugslage arretiert. Mit der zwangsweise eingenommenen Stellung der dem zu prüfenden Signals zugehörigen Sicherheitsrelais wird der gewünschte Signalbegriff erzwungen.The operators of relay interlockings usually do not allow intervention for a functional influence, but they do not generally prohibit. As a result, according to a known procedure for carrying out tests in the relay interlocking in a system unit, that is, the relay set associated with a signal, all safety relays involved in the function are brought by hand to the required position and locked mechanically by means of a wedge in the attracting position. With the forcibly assumed position of the signal to be tested associated safety relay of the desired signal concept is enforced.

Verkeilungen sind mechanische Eingriffe an Sicherheitsrelais und dadurch kann unbeabsichtigt und unerkannt eine Beschädigung am Relais verursacht werden. Das kann gravierende sicherheitsrelevante Auswirkungen haben.Keystrokes are mechanical interventions on safety relays, which can cause damage to the relay unintentionally and unrecognized. This can have serious security implications.

Ein zweites Vorgehen besteht im Stellen des höchsten Fahrbegriffs und in der Folge werden mittels Wegdrücken oder Abdrücken von angezogenen Relais alle tieferwertigen Fahrbegriffe gebildet.A second approach is to set the highest driving concept and, as a result, all lower-level driving concepts are formed by pushing away or by pressing on energized relays.

Verkeilen und Abdücken sind Vorgehen ohne einheitliche technische Basis und bergen deshalb Gefahren. Solche Vorgehensweisen erfordern hohes Fachwissen sowie eine genaue Anleitung und eine strenge Protokollierung. Es besteht jedoch infolge der an sich unübersichtlichen Vorgehensweise die Schwierigkeit, die Regressionsfähigkeit der Tests zu gewährleisten.Wedging and pulling down are procedures without a uniform technical basis and therefore harbor dangers. Such procedures require a high level of expertise as well as accurate guidance and strict logging. However, due to the intricate nature of the procedure, there is the difficulty of ensuring the regression capability of the tests.

Generell ist festzuhalten, durch die manuellen Eingriffe im Relaissatz können folgende Gefahren oder Behinderungen entstehen:

  • Manipulation am "falschen" Relais. Dieser Erstfehler kann mit einem zweiten unabhängigen Fehler zu einer Gefährdung führen (Mehrfehlerfall)
  • Mechanische Beschädigung durch das Verkeilen oder Abdrücken der Relais
  • Nach dem Beenden der Prüfung verkeiltes Relais nicht befreien
  • Bei Ausfahrsignal wird Block angeschaltet, was zu betriebshemmenden Zuständen kann und indirekt Risiken bewirken kann.
In general, it should be noted that manual interventions in the relay set may result in the following dangers or obstacles:
  • Manipulation on the "wrong" relay. This first error can lead to a danger with a second independent error (multi-error case)
  • Mechanical damage due to wedging or forcing the relays
  • After completing the test, do not release the wedged relay
  • When the exit signal block is turned on, which can to operating conditions and can cause indirect risks.

Es wird ein Verfahren und eine Vorrichtung vorgeschlagen, welches keine Eingriffe an den Sicherheitsrelais der Systemeinheiten, der Relaissätze erfordert.A method and an apparatus is proposed which does not require any interventions on the safety relays of the system units of the relay sets.

Es sind zwei Funktionsbereiche im Spurplan-Relaisstellwerk von Bedeutung, welche auf eine neue Lösung für die Tests entscheidenden Einfluss haben.

  1. 1. Der Zentralverschluss mit seiner Relaissatzüberwachung, welcher das gesamte Stellwerk sicherheitstechnisch kontrolliert (sozusagen die Achillesferse der Sicherheit).
  2. 2. Die Spurplantechnik mit der Fähigkeit, dass die spezifischen Relais(steuer)sätze der Aussenanlageelemente diejenigen Eigenschaften besitzen, welche sie befähigen, bei der Fahrstrasseneinstellung die Gleisbelegung (Stellen und Auflösung) zu verwalten. Die Relais(steuer)sätze sind selbst Zustandsautomaten und somit deterministisch.
There are two functional areas in the track plan relay interlocking important, which have a decisive influence on a new solution for the tests.
  1. 1. The central lock with its relay set monitoring, which controls the entire interlocking safety-related (so to speak, the Achilles heel of safety).
  2. 2. The track planning technique with the ability that the specific relay (control) sets of outdoor equipment elements have the characteristics that enable them to manage the track occupancy (locations and resolution) in the course setting. The relay (control) sets are themselves state machines and thus deterministic.

Es wird in der Grundsatzfunktion einheitlicher jedoch ein auf den Signaltyp optimierter Prüfsatz verwendet anstelle des Signal-Relaissatzes.
Dieser Prüfsatz verfügt über die Eigenschaften zum Ansteuern der Signale in der Aussenanlage.
Er verfügt jedoch nicht über Funktionen zum Einstellen einer Fahrstrasse, aber zum Einstellen des in Prüfung stehenden Hauptsignals (Ziel). Dadurch ist das Vordringen eines Zuges in den Bereich des jeweils zu prüfenden Signals aus signaltechnischer- wie auch aus der Forderung nach Prüfer-Personenschutz - nicht möglich. Gefahren durch einen herannahenden Zuges bestehen somit nicht mehr.
In the basic function, however, a check set optimized for the signal type is used in a more uniform manner instead of the signal relay set.
This test set has the properties for controlling the signals in the outdoor system.
However, it does not have functions for setting a route, but for setting the main signal under test (destination). As a result, the advance of a train in the range of the respective signal to be tested from signaltechnischer- as well as from the demand for Prüfer-personal protection - not possible. Dangers from an approaching train no longer exist.

Die zu prüfenden Fahrbegriffe werden mittels des Prüfsatzes simuliert.Die Eingabe im Prüfsatz kann manuell erfolgen oder es ist ein Interface zu einem Prüfrechner möglich, über welchen die Prüfprozedur systematisiert werden kann.
Der Prüfsatz beschaltet jedoch die Ringleitung des Zentralverschlusses im Stellwerk, so dass die Funktion des Stellwerkes gesamthaft nicht beeinträchtigt ist.
The driving terms to be tested are simulated by means of the test record. The input in the test record can be carried out manually or an interface to a test computer is possible via which the test procedure can be systemized.
However, the test set connects the loop of the central lock in the interlocking, so that the function of the interlocking is not impaired overall.

Eine Fahrstrasse mit einem Ziel-Prüfling kann daher erst wieder eingestellt werden, wenn der Prüfsatz gegen den entsprechenden Relaissatz des Signals wieder zurück getauscht worden ist.A route with a destination test object can therefore only be set again when the test set has been exchanged for the corresponding relay set of the signal.

Das Vorgehen in Einzelschritten bei der Prüfung eines Signals mit deren zusätzlich installierten ETCS-Zugsicherungseinrichtungen ist vorzugsweise dargestellt.The procedure in individual steps when testing a signal with its additionally installed ETCS train protection devices is preferably shown.

Zugslagen in der Gleisanlage mit Fahrdienst feststellen und Prozedur Startzeitpunkt festlegen

  • 1. (Relais)-Prüfsatz entsprechend der Aufgabe einstellen (Grundstellung)
  • 2. Betreffenden Relaissatz des betreffenden Signals entfernen
  • 3. Prüfsatz einsetzen
  • 4. Gemäss Prüfprotokoll den erstmöglichen Fahrbegriff am Prüfsatz simulieren
  • 5. Prüfung der Übereinstimmung in der Aussenanlage bezüglich Telegramminhalt
  • 6. Die weiteren Fahrbegriffe der Signalfunktion des Standortes gemäss Punkt 3 und 4 prüfen
  • 7. Nach Beenden der Prüfung den Prüfsatz gegen entsprechenden Relaissatz zurücktauschen
  • 8. Prüfen, ob HALT-Rückmelder aktiv ist, das heisst, der Satz ist in Grundstellung
  • 9. Signalfreigabe an Fahrdienstleiter für die Nutzung im Betriebsablauf
Determine train positions in the track system with the driver's service and set the start time procedure
  • 1. Set (relay) test set according to the task (basic position)
  • 2. Remove the relevant relay set of the relevant signal
  • 3. Insert test set
  • 4. According to the test report, simulate the first possible driving concept on the test set
  • 5. Checking the conformity in the outdoor installation regarding telegram content
  • 6. Check the further driving terms of the signal function of the location according to points 3 and 4
  • 7. After completing the test, swap the test set for the corresponding relay set
  • 8. Check if HALT-feedback is active, ie the set is in basic position
  • 9. Signal release to dispatcher for use in operation

Der erfinderische Schritt liegt darin, dass ein neues Verfahren und eine Einrichtung festgelegt wird, welche die Nachteile der Verkeilmethode bezüglich Personensicherheit sowie Regression und insbesondere Fehleranfälligkeit durch manuelle handwerklich anspruchsvolle Handhabungen eliminiert.The inventive step is that a new method and a device is set, which eliminates the disadvantages of the wedging method in terms of personal safety and regression, and in particular error-prone by manual manual handling sophisticated.

Claims (2)

Verfahren zur Prüfung von Zugbeeinflussungseinheiten mit Zustandsdaten von Streckensignalen bei Relaisstellwerken, umfassend die Schritte: a) einen Prüfsatz entsprechend der Prüfaufgabe einstellen (Grundstellung); b) zugehörigen Relaissatz des betroffenen Streckensignals entfernen und den Prüfsatz einsetzen; c) gemäss einem Prüfprotokoll einen erstmöglichen Fahrbegriff am Prüfsatz simulieren; d) Prüfung der Übereinstimmung an der Zugbeeinflussungseinheit in der Aussenanlage bezüglich des den Fahrbegriff reflektierenden Telegramminhalts; e) Prüfen der weiteren Fahrbegriffe der Signalfunktion des Standortes gemäss c) und d) bis alle sicherheitsrelevanten Fahrbegriffe geprüft worden sind; f) Zurücktauschen des Prüfsatzes gegen den entsprechenden Relaissatz nach Beenden der Prüfung; g) Prüfen, ob HALT-Rückmelder aktiv ist, das heisst, der zurückgetauschte Relaissatz in Grundstellung ist, und h) Freigabe des Streckensignals für eine Wiederaufnahme dessen Nutzung im normalen Betriebsablauf. Method for testing train control units with status data of track signals at relay interlockings, comprising the steps: a) stop a test set according to the test task (basic position); b) remove the associated relay set of the relevant path signal and insert the test set; c) simulate a first possible driving term on the test record in accordance with a test protocol; d) checking compliance with the train control unit in the outdoor facility with respect to the content of the telegram reflecting the driving concept; e) checking the further driving terms of the signal function of the location according to c) and d) until all safety-relevant driving terms have been checked; f) exchanging the test set for the corresponding relay set after completion of the test; g) check if HALT-feedback is active, that is, the relayed relay set is in the home position, and h) releasing the path signal to resume its use in normal operation. Vorrichtung zur Prüfung von Zugbeeinflussungseinheiten mit Zustandsdaten von Streckensignalen bei Relaisstellwerken, umfassend: a) einen Prüfsatz entsprechend einer Prüfaufgabe einstellen (Grundstellung); b) zugehörigen Relaissatz des betroffenen Streckensignals entfernen und den Prüfsatz einsetzen; c) gemäss einem Prüfprotokoll einen erstmöglichen Fahrbegriff am Prüfsatz simulieren; d) Prüfung der Übereinstimmung an der Zugbeeinflussungseinheit in der Aussenanlage bezüglich des den Fahrbegriff reflektierenden Telegramminhalts; e) Prüfen der weiteren Fahrbegriffe der Signalfunktion des Standortes gemäss c) und d) bis alle sicherheitsrelevanten Fahrbegriffe geprüft worden sind; f) Zurücktauschen des Prüfsatzes gegen den entsprechenden Relaissatz nach Beenden der Prüfung; g) Prüfen, ob HALT-Rückmelder aktiv ist, das heisst, der zurückgetauschte Relaissatz in Grundstellung ist, und h) Freigabe des Streckensignals für eine Wiederaufnahme dessen Nutzung im normalen Betriebsablauf. Device for testing train control units with status data of track signals at relay interlockings, comprising: a) stop a test set according to a test task (basic position); b) remove the associated relay set of the relevant path signal and insert the test set; c) simulate a first possible driving term on the test record in accordance with a test protocol; d) checking compliance with the train control unit in the outdoor facility with respect to the content of the telegram reflecting the driving concept; e) checking the further driving terms of the signal function of the location according to c) and d) until all safety-relevant driving terms have been checked; f) exchanging the test set for the corresponding relay set after completion of the test; g) check if HALT-feedback is active, that is, the relayed relay set is in the home position, and h) releasing the path signal to resume its use in normal operation.
EP09173669A 2008-12-04 2009-10-21 Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems Active EP2193973B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09173669A EP2193973B1 (en) 2008-12-04 2009-10-21 Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08021018 2008-12-04
EP09173669A EP2193973B1 (en) 2008-12-04 2009-10-21 Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2193973A2 true EP2193973A2 (en) 2010-06-09
EP2193973A3 EP2193973A3 (en) 2011-01-12
EP2193973B1 EP2193973B1 (en) 2013-01-30

Family

ID=41800427

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09173669A Active EP2193973B1 (en) 2008-12-04 2009-10-21 Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2193973B1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102495628A (en) * 2011-12-27 2012-06-13 中铁十局集团电务工程有限公司 Mimic board for signal equipment of station
WO2013026759A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2013-02-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal box computer
CN105549576A (en) * 2016-01-08 2016-05-04 董冬 Maintenance method of intelligent transformer station protective relaying device

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109774744B (en) * 2018-12-18 2021-04-09 浙江众合科技股份有限公司 Interlocking code bit testing tool
CN112198815A (en) * 2020-12-04 2021-01-08 卡斯柯信号(北京)有限公司 Interlocking function simulation automatic test method and system

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006006758A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-19 Korea Railroad Research Institute Automatic test device for electronic interlocking systems and method for controlling the same
US7363187B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2008-04-22 Ultra-Tech Enterprises, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatically testing a railroad interlocking

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7363187B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2008-04-22 Ultra-Tech Enterprises, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatically testing a railroad interlocking
WO2006006758A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-19 Korea Railroad Research Institute Automatic test device for electronic interlocking systems and method for controlling the same

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
SCHWARZWAELDER J ET AL: "UMBAUSTRATEGIEN MIT ELEKTRONISCHEN STELLWERKEN DER BAUFORM EL L", SIGNAL + DRAHT, TELZLAFF VERLAG GMBH. DARMSTADT, DE, Bd. 88, Nr. 1/02, 1. Januar 1996 (1996-01-01), Seiten 17-20, XP000723334, ISSN: 0037-4997 *
VINOD CHANDRA ET AL: "A FAIL-SAFE INTERLOCKING SYSTEM FOR RAILWAYS", IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, NEW YORK, NY, US, Bd. 8, Nr. 1, 1. März 1991 (1991-03-01), Seiten 58-66, XP000202261, ISSN: 0740-7475 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013026759A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2013-02-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Signal box computer
CN102495628A (en) * 2011-12-27 2012-06-13 中铁十局集团电务工程有限公司 Mimic board for signal equipment of station
CN102495628B (en) * 2011-12-27 2013-06-19 中铁十局集团电务工程有限公司 Mimic board for signal equipment of station
CN105549576A (en) * 2016-01-08 2016-05-04 董冬 Maintenance method of intelligent transformer station protective relaying device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2193973A3 (en) 2011-01-12
EP2193973B1 (en) 2013-01-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2193973B1 (en) Method and device for testing units that influence trains with status data of track signals in relay interlocking systems
WO2006056284A1 (en) Method and system for verification of a data transmission unit for control of a travelling object
DE102008045050A1 (en) Method for automatic train control in European train control system track, involves using identical procedures for formation of telegrams to control balises for point-like automatic train control and wireless-based automatic train control
DE102016217902A1 (en) Monitoring a rail vehicle
DE102020206630A1 (en) Simulation device and method for simulating a crossing of at least one trackside position marker
WO2008138761A1 (en) Apparatus and method for automatic train control at a level crossing
EP2088051B1 (en) Method and device for secure setting of a route for a rail vehicle
WO2021032638A1 (en) Method for controlling a train within a train control system, and train control system
EP0920391B1 (en) Process of controlling and monitoring a traffic control system
EP2978654B1 (en) Method for replacing a first signal box with a second signal box
DE102008027488B4 (en) Device for simulating balises
DE102014204146A1 (en) Method for controlling a rail vehicle connected to a CBTC system and CBTC system having at least one rail vehicle
EP4087766B1 (en) Arrangement for testing etcs level 2 functionalities in rail transport
EP3580114B1 (en) Method and apparatus for setting at least one route for a railway installation
EP1396413B1 (en) Method for operating assistance of track elements
EP3109127A1 (en) Method for signalling an expansion of a movement authority from a route control station to a positioning body
EP2945831A2 (en) Method and apparatus for etcs l1 and/or l2 - train control
DE102014214918A1 (en) Method and device for operating a railway safety system
EP0683082B1 (en) Automatic monitoring device of a route control system for rail vehicle
WO2017045863A1 (en) Communication device and method for automatically exchanging messages in a railway system
WO2016113098A1 (en) Method and device for blocking and signaling a track section equipped with axle counters
DE102016210965A1 (en) Method for operating a tracked vehicle and traffic system
DE102022204795A1 (en) Method and system for the automated determination of the train integrity of a train set
DE10239543A1 (en) Operator-personnel support procedure esp. for rail-vehicle travel movements control centers, has selection of parameters input of auxiliary actions restricted by preceding inputs and system states
Frederiksen Safety Concepts for the Copenhagen Metro using the German BOStrab regulations and the CENELEC Norms, Status and Experiences

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110620

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20111123

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B61L 19/06 20060101AFI20120716BHEP

Ipc: B61L 27/00 20060101ALN20120716BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 595655

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130215

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502009006147

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130328

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130530

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130511

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130530

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130501

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502009006147

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ A.G.

Effective date: 20131031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20131021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502009006147

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: FISCHER, MICHAEL, DR., DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502009006147

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, ZUERICH, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: PC

Ref document number: 595655

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Effective date: 20190612

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: FH1C

Free format text: FORMER REPRESENTATIVE(S): MAK ANDRAS, SBGK SZABADALMI UEGYVIVOEI IRODA, HU

Representative=s name: SBGK SZABADALMI UEGYVIVOEI IRODA, HU

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: GB9C

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20211218

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211220

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20220117

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20220912

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502009006147

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221022

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230503

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031