EP2176836A1 - Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule - Google Patents

Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule

Info

Publication number
EP2176836A1
EP2176836A1 EP08774766A EP08774766A EP2176836A1 EP 2176836 A1 EP2176836 A1 EP 2176836A1 EP 08774766 A EP08774766 A EP 08774766A EP 08774766 A EP08774766 A EP 08774766A EP 2176836 A1 EP2176836 A1 EP 2176836A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
transmitting
receiving device
signal
identity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP08774766A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2176836B1 (fr
Inventor
Johannes-Christof Rebsch
Michael Friese
Marco Fiedler
Sven Holbruegge
Thorsten Michler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP2176836A1 publication Critical patent/EP2176836A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2176836B1 publication Critical patent/EP2176836B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B15/00—Arrangements or apparatus for collecting fares, tolls or entrance fees at one or more control points
    • G07B15/06—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems
    • G07B15/063—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems using wireless information transmission between the vehicle and a fixed station
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/20—Monitoring the location of vehicles belonging to a group, e.g. fleet of vehicles, countable or determined number of vehicles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/008—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for checking a vehicle emitted from a position of the vehicle. Furthermore, the invention relates to a vehicle with a transmitting and receiving device.
  • the toll to be paid by the owner of the toll vehicle is determined by means of an in-vehicle device.
  • a device is for example an OBU unit (on-board unit). Since this device is mounted on the toll vehicle, there is a risk that the vehicle owner will try to manipulate the function of the device in order to reduce in this way the toll to be paid.
  • OBU unit on-board unit
  • a conventional electronic toll collection system In order to check the correctness of the OBU unit mounted on a tolled vehicle, a conventional electronic toll collection system often has a higher number of control devices.
  • a corresponding control device may be, for example, a mobile test device or a test bridge. If a toll vehicle is located in an environment of such a control device, the OBU unit of the vehicle is checked via a data query. This can be done by the controller sending an interrogation signal to the OBU unit. The OBU unit responds to a received interrogation signal, for example, by transmitting a determined current position and an identity of the own vehicle. The control device then compares the received position of the toll vehicle with the stored position of the control device.
  • the control device detects a contradiction between the position of the vehicle subject to the toll and its stored position, it informs the operator of the system for electronic toll collection in this regard.
  • the tolled vehicles can only be checked during the passage of a road equipped with a control device for correct operation of their OBU units. This requires the existence and operation of expensive infrastructure from such control devices on virtually all tolled roads. The associated costs significantly reduce the profits made by such electronic toll collection.
  • the invention provides a method with the features of claim 1 and 2 and a transmitting and receiving device for use in a vehicle according to claim 10.
  • the present invention is based on the recognition that the conventionally necessary control devices for checking the vehicle-owned devices necessary for determining the toll can be replaced by a mutual checking of the respective devices of different vehicles.
  • the on-vehicle toll collection devices may contact one another during a ride or during an operational vehicle standstill and perform a mutual integrity check.
  • the results of such mutual integrity checks may then be communicated to a toll center computer center.
  • a reliable integrity check of many vehicles is possible without having to be mounted control devices on busy roads. This saves the cost of the additional infrastructure of such control devices, especially in a
  • Area toll on all road classes is beneficial. An area toll on all roads of a state is thus technically easier to implement and is economically more profitable.
  • a further advantage of the present invention is that the integrity checks of the vehicles carried out with the aid of the invention can be carried out far more comprehensively because the likelihood of two toll vehicles meeting each other is much higher than that of a toll vehicle being a stationary or mobile one Testing station happens. The frequency with which such a check on the toll vehicle is feasible, can thus be increased.
  • the checks made using the present invention are time and location independent.
  • a signal having a range of less than 1 km, in particular less than 100 m, preferably less than 10 m is emitted as the short-range signal.
  • a WLAN signal Wireless Local Area Network
  • a DSRC signal Dedicated Short Range Communication
  • a Bluetooth signal is transmitted as a short-distance signal.
  • transmitting and receiving devices have only a relatively small space requirement, which simplifies the equipping of a vehicle with such a transmitting and receiving device.
  • the first transmitting and receiving device sends a position signal with a position specification directly to the central evaluation device, wherein the central evaluation device compares the position information with the first position of the long-distance signal. If the central evaluation device recognizes that the position statement contradicts the first position although the position specification and the first position are received within a relatively short period of time, the central evaluation device can output a corresponding error notification to the operator of the electronic toll collection system. This makes it possible to detect manipulations on a device for determining a toll for a toll vehicle even in cases where the respective device is manipulated so that it outputs to another vehicle a correct first position, while it to the central evaluation device for Determining the toll sent an incorrect position.
  • the first transmitting and receiving device transmits a toll determination signal as a position signal.
  • the position signal is then sent to the central office for toll collection.
  • the central evaluation device determines whether a third vehicle with the first and / or the second identity is reported within a predetermined period of time after receiving the long-distance signal at a third position which corresponds to the first and / or the second position has a distance greater than a predetermined comparison distance. In this way, such manipulati- be recognized on a device for determining a toll, in which a toll vehicle reports under a false identity to the operator of the electronic toll collection system.
  • the first vehicle sends a short-distance signal which, together with the first position and the first identity of the first vehicle, also contains additional information about a traffic jam, an accident, a road course, a road condition and / or a speeding-over.
  • the vehicle-owned devices required for carrying out the method described here can also be used for an information transfer between the own vehicle and a foreign vehicle. This multi-functionality of facilities is cost saving for a vehicle owner.
  • FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of the method for checking a vehicle emitted position of the vehicle
  • FIG. 2 shows two vehicles which, with the aid of the embodiment of the method for checking a position of the vehicle emitted by a vehicle, mutually check their devices necessary for determining a toll.
  • FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of the method for checking a position of the vehicle emitted by a vehicle.
  • a vehicle A is equipped with a transmitting and receiving device a.
  • a transmitting and receiving device b is attached to a vehicle B.
  • a position ⁇ and an identity ⁇ 'of the vehicle A are provided to the transmitting and receiving device a.
  • the position ⁇ of the vehicle A is continuously output by a position detection device or by a navigation device to the transmitting and receiving device a during a travel of the vehicle A.
  • the position ⁇ of the vehicle A may be, for example, a vehicle position indicated in coordinates or a road section being traveled by the vehicle A.
  • the identity ⁇ 'of the vehicle A is entered into this prior to commissioning of the transmitting and receiving device a.
  • the identity ⁇ ' is preferably a license plate of the vehicle A, an identification number of the transmitting and receiving device a and / or at least one person specification for the vehicle Holder of the vehicle A.
  • a position ß and an identity ß 'of the vehicle B is provided to the transmitting and receiving device b in a corresponding manner.
  • the vehicle A is in a vicinity of the vehicle B. Since the distance between the vehicles A and B is smaller than a range of a short-distance signal emitted by the transmitting and receiving device a, the short-distance signal is transmitted from the transmitting and receiving device b received.
  • the transmitting and receiving device a send out the short-distance signal always after receiving a query signal of the transmitting and receiving device b.
  • the transmitting and receiving device a can also be designed to transmit the short-range signal continuously according to a predetermined time frame. In both cases, the short-distance signal contains the position ⁇ and the identity ⁇ 'of the vehicle A.
  • the short-range signal is, for example, a WLAN signal (Wireless Local Area Network), a DSRC signal (Dedicated Short Range Communication) and / or a Bluetooth signal ,
  • the data of the short-distance signal can be encrypted before transmission, which is not necessary to carry out the method.
  • the transmitting and receiving device b sends a long distance signal with the received data for the position ⁇ and the identity ⁇ 'and with the provided data for the position ß and the identity ß' to a central processing device of an operator of a system electronic toll collection.
  • the data of the positions ⁇ and ⁇ and the identities ⁇ 'and ⁇ ' can be encrypted.
  • the long-distance signal preferably has a range of up to 100 km or even greater. In this case, the operator of the system for electronic toll collection only has to provide a central evaluation device for receiving the long-distance signals.
  • a distance D between the positions ⁇ and ⁇ is determined in a step S4.
  • the central evaluation device compares the determined distance D with a predetermined reference distance DO in a subsequent step S5. If the determined distance D is below the comparison distance DO, the central evaluation device recognizes in a step S6 that the vehicles with the identities ⁇ 'and ⁇ ' send out correct positions.
  • the central evaluation device determines that the determined distance D is greater than the predetermined comparison distance DO, the central evaluation device recognizes in a step S7 that at least one of the vehicles with the identities ⁇ 'and ⁇ ' transmits an incorrect position. This may be due to the fact that at a position detection device or at a transmitting and receiving Device direction a or b of one of the vehicles A or B is a manipulation. Therefore, after the step S7, the central evaluation device issues a warning to the operator of the electronic toll collection system.
  • the central evaluation device may also be designed to determine whether the respective road segments ⁇ and ⁇ are identical or at least adjacent to each other. If this is not true, the central evaluation device issues a corresponding warning.
  • FIG. 2 shows two vehicles which, with the aid of the embodiment of the method for checking a position of the vehicle emitted by a vehicle, mutually check their devices necessary for determining a toll.
  • Each of the two vehicles A and B has a position detection device or a navigation device which determines a current position ⁇ or ⁇ of the associated vehicle A or B and then outputs it.
  • the vehicles A and B are each equipped with a non-sketched transmitting and receiving device.
  • the transmitting and receiving devices of the vehicles A and B serve to notify a central evaluation device Z, for example a data center of an electronic toll collection system, when the respective vehicle A or B is driving on a tolled road.
  • the central evaluation device Z processes the route information / amounts communicated by the transmitting and receiving devices of the vehicles A and B into monthly totals and communicates them to the respective owner of the vehicle A or B.
  • the vehicles A and B are at a distance from one another, which is within a range of a short-distance communication technology, with which the transmitting and receiving devices of the vehicles A and B are equipped. This allows a data exchange between the transmitting and receiving devices of the two vehicles A and B.
  • the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle A receives from the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle B emitted short-distance signal 1 Ob with a determined position ß and one on the Transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle B stored identity ß 'of the vehicle B.
  • the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle A sends a short-distance signal 10a with a current position ⁇ and a stored identity ⁇ 'of the own vehicle to the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle B.
  • the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle A After receiving the short-distance signal 1 Ob emitted by the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle B, the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle A transmits a long-distance signal 12 a to the central evaluation device.
  • the long-distance signal 12a contains the positions NEN ⁇ and ß and the identities ⁇ 'and ß' of the vehicles A and B. Accordingly, the transmitting and receiving device of the vehicle B transmits a long-distance signal 12b with the data ⁇ , ß ⁇ 'and ß' to the central evaluation device Z.
  • the central evaluation device Z checks whether long distance signals 12a and 12b are received by both vehicles A and B. If this is not the case, for example, if only one long-distance signal 12a or 12b is received, it is suspected that one of the two transmitting and receiving devices of the vehicles A and B is manipulated in such a way that it does not send any data to the central evaluation device Z. If this is the case, a corresponding message is output to the operator of the central evaluation device Z.
  • the central evaluation device Z can check whether further cases of non-received long-distance signals of the respective vehicle A or B have already been detected and, if this is true, issue a corresponding message to the operator of the central evaluation device Z. Even with a single detection of a message not received, of course, a corresponding message to the operator can be issued.
  • the central evaluation device Z checks whether further vehicles in a near vicinity of the detected foreign vehicle send a corresponding error message and attempts to guide a checking command to the foreign vehicle located in this way.
  • the central evaluation device Z compares the transmitted positions ⁇ and ⁇ of the two long-distance signals 12a and 12b with one another in a further method step. It is found that between the transmitted positions ⁇ and ß is a distance which is greater than the range of the short-distance communication technology of transmitting and
  • the central evaluation device Z evaluates this as an indication of a malfunction of at least one position detection devices or a transmitting and receiving device of the vehicles A and B. Such a malfunction can also target a specific manipulation of the relevant position detection device or be relevant attributable transmitting and receiving device. A corresponding error message is then output from the central evaluation device Z to its operator. On the other hand, if the positions ⁇ and ⁇ appear plausible, then in a subsequent evaluation step they are compared with position information transmitted by the transmitting and receiving devices to the central evaluation device Z for calculating the toll to be paid. If the positions ⁇ and ⁇ deviate from the transmitted position information, then there may be a malfunction, which is due to a manipulation attempt. The operator of the central evaluation device Z is therefore notified immediately.
  • the central evaluation device can check whether one of the two vehicles A or B is determined within a time span at a plurality of positions which are too far apart with respect to the time span.
  • the central evaluation device Z also interprets this as possible manipulation of the respective vehicle A or B, which causes the associated transmitting and receiving device for toll control indicates a false identity.
  • the transmitting and receiving devices of the vehicles A and B can also be designed to position ⁇ or ⁇ received from the other vehicle A or B by means of the short-distance signal 1 Oa or 1 Ob a plausibility with regard to their own position ⁇ or ß.
  • a long-distance signal is only output to the central evaluation device Z if deviations occur between the compared positions ⁇ and ⁇ .
  • the transmitting and receiving device used for the described method can still be used for further communication options between the vehicles A and B.
  • the vehicles may interchange congestion alerts, accident alerts, turn warnings, smoother warnings, and / or overspeed warnings.
  • the transmitting and receiving devices of the two vehicles A and B can be used for data transmission to other destinations if mobile or stationary access points to the destination network are available.
  • Corresponding access points are, for example, stationary access points or mobile gateways. In this way a GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) can be replaced.
  • programming data between the vehicles A and B can be exchanged with the aid of the transmitting and receiving devices.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de contrôle d'un message de position (α,ß) du véhicule (A,B) émis par un véhicule (A,B) comprenant les étapes suivantes : envoi d'un signal à courte distance (10a, 10b) avec une première position (α,ß) et une première identité (α',ß') du premier véhicule (A,B) par un premier émetteur-récepteur à un deuxième émetteur-récepteur ; envoi d'un signal à longue distance (12a, 12b) avec la première position reçue (α,ß) et la première identité (α',ß') du premier véhicule (A,B) et de la deuxième position (α,ß) mise à disposition et de la deuxième identité (α',ß') du deuxième véhicule (A,B) provenant du deuxième émetteur-récepteur vers un poste central d'exploitation (Z) ; détermination si la première position (α,ß) reçue correspond à la deuxième position (α,ß) reçue par le poste central d'exploitation (Z) ; et détection qu'au moins un des véhicules (A,B) émet un faux message de position (α,ß) avec la première et la deuxième identité (α',ß'), si la première position (α,ß) reçue ne correspond pas à la deuxième position (α,ß) reçue.
EP08774766.3A 2007-07-30 2008-07-04 Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule Not-in-force EP2176836B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007035737A DE102007035737A1 (de) 2007-07-30 2007-07-30 Verfahren zum Überprüfen einer von einem Fahrzeug ausgesendeten Positionsnachricht des Fahrzeugs und Sende- und Empfangseinrichtung zur Verwendung in einem Fahrzeug
PCT/EP2008/058661 WO2009015989A1 (fr) 2007-07-30 2008-07-04 Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2176836A1 true EP2176836A1 (fr) 2010-04-21
EP2176836B1 EP2176836B1 (fr) 2019-05-22

Family

ID=39769380

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08774766.3A Not-in-force EP2176836B1 (fr) 2007-07-30 2008-07-04 Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2176836B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102007035737A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2009015989A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SI2490183T1 (sl) 2011-02-16 2013-07-31 Kapsch Trafficcom Ag Naprava v vozilu, ad-hoc omreĹľje in postopek za sistem cestninjenja
GB201105385D0 (en) * 2011-03-30 2011-05-11 Act Wireless Ltd Vehicle usuage verification system
WO2014060117A1 (fr) * 2012-10-17 2014-04-24 Toll Collect Gmbh Procédé et dispositifs de prélèvement d'une taxe de péage liée au trafic
GB201904165D0 (en) * 2019-03-26 2019-05-08 Eygs Llp Vehicle position validation
WO2022128135A1 (fr) * 2020-12-18 2022-06-23 Stoneridge Electronics Ab Système et procédé de vérification de la précision de données de tachygraphe

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10015069A1 (de) * 2000-03-25 2001-09-27 Alcatel Sa Straßenbenutzungsgebühren-Abrechnungssystem
DE10258653A1 (de) * 2002-12-13 2003-09-11 Daimler Chrysler Ag Einrichtung und Verfahren zur Benutzungsgebührenerfassung
KR100515952B1 (ko) * 2003-09-22 2005-09-23 (주) 에이티엔 차량간 직접통신을 이용한 교통 정보교환 방식
DE102005018301B4 (de) * 2005-04-15 2007-06-06 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Datenübertragungsvorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009015989A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2176836B1 (fr) 2019-05-22
WO2009015989A1 (fr) 2009-02-05
DE102007035737A1 (de) 2009-02-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE602005004931T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erkennung einer Gefahrensituation infolge gefährdeter Verkehrsteilnehmer und zur Warnung eines Fahrzeuglenkers vor dieser Gefahrensituation
EP2953111B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à déterminer des aires de stationnement libres sur des parkings de camions et communication au conducteur de camion
EP2195796B1 (fr) Procédé de mise à disposition de données de marche de véhicule
EP0860954A1 (fr) Méthode pour le transfert d'information entre des objets en mouvement et dispositif de communication utilisant ladite méthode
EP2858039A1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle automatique de l'arrivée d'un véhicule routier dans une section de route contrôlée, système de contrôle et son système côté véhicule et programme informatique
EP3264390A2 (fr) Procédé de détermination efficace spectrale d'informations d'environnement collectives pour la conduite autonome et/ou coopérative, véhicule rapporteur et autre véhicule à utiliser selon le procédé
DE102013224167A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zum Plausibilisieren einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
EP3504697B1 (fr) Procédé pour mesurer un événement de conduite, dispositif serveur et système constitué de ce dispositif serveur et de plusieurs véhicules automobiles
EP2662848A2 (fr) Procédé de fabrication dýun profil de conduite
EP2176836B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle d'un message de position du véhicule émis par un véhicule et un émetteur-récepteur destiné à être utilisé dans un véhicule
EP2662846A1 (fr) Procédé de réduction d'un risque d'embouteillage
DE112018005737T5 (de) Fahrzeugflottenmanagement mit einer hiearachie von prioritätsfaktoren
DE102014202509A1 (de) Steuerung einer hoch- oder vollautomatischen Fahrfunktion
EP3446302B1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et agencement de poursuite d'objets en mouvement
DE102007030839B4 (de) Sicherheitssystem und Verfahren zum Betreiben des Sicherheitssystems
WO2009015987A2 (fr) Dispositif de transmission et procédé pour la transmission d'une position actuelle d'un véhicule à une centrale d'exploitation
DE102019206870A1 (de) Verfahren zum Ermitteln einer durch einen Verkehrsteilnehmer verursachten Gefährdung und zum Einleiten einer Überwachung des Verkehrsteilnehmers und Steuergerät
DE102018201273A1 (de) Verfahren zum Überwachen eines Fahrstils eines Fahrers eines Kraftfahrzeugs und Kraftfahrzeug
WO2023011814A1 (fr) Procédé et circuit de commande pour surveiller une condition d'approbation pour un mode de conduite automatique d'un véhicule à moteur, et véhicule à moteur comportant le circuit de commande
DE102006027676A1 (de) Verfahren zur Fahrstreckenerkennung in einem Mautsystem
DE102021201129A1 (de) Vorrichtung zum infrastrukturgestützten Assistieren eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE19828161B4 (de) Navigationsvorrichtung für ein Kraftfahrzeug
WO2020114698A1 (fr) Procédé et système d'avertissement d'un véhicule à moteur avant toute collision avec un véhicule ferroviaire
EP3724867A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour avertir les usagers de la route d'une conduite en sens inverse d'un véhicule avec commande de données d'émetteur
DE102023204821A1 (de) Unregelmässigkeitsbestimmungsvorrichtung, unregelmässigkeitsbestimmungssystem, unregelmässigkeitsbestimmungsverfahren und unregelmässigkeitsbestimmungsprogramm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100301

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130423

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07B 15/06 20110101ALI20181212BHEP

Ipc: G07C 5/00 20060101ALI20181212BHEP

Ipc: G07B 15/00 20110101AFI20181212BHEP

Ipc: G08G 1/00 20060101ALI20181212BHEP

Ipc: G08G 1/123 20060101ALI20181212BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190208

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502008016766

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1137009

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190522

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190922

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190822

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190823

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190822

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502008016766

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190731

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200225

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190822

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190731

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190704

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190731

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190704

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190822

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1137009

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190704

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200727

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200924

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190704

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20200731

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190522

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080704

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502008016766

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210704