EP2060646A1 - Stainless steel sheet for structural members excellent in impact -absorbing characteristics - Google Patents
Stainless steel sheet for structural members excellent in impact -absorbing characteristics Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2060646A1 EP2060646A1 EP07831178A EP07831178A EP2060646A1 EP 2060646 A1 EP2060646 A1 EP 2060646A1 EP 07831178 A EP07831178 A EP 07831178A EP 07831178 A EP07831178 A EP 07831178A EP 2060646 A1 EP2060646 A1 EP 2060646A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- impact
- steel sheet
- strength
- deformation
- static
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title description 20
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 title description 16
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 75
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 38
- 229910000734 martensite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 15
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229910001566 austenite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000013585 weight reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910000963 austenitic stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000314 lubricant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001105 martensitic stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052758 niobium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004881 precipitation hardening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000171 quenching effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012779 reinforcing material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003568 thioethers Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/02—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/04—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/001—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/06—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/20—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with copper
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/34—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.5% by weight of silicon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/36—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.7% by weight of carbon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/42—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/58—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
Definitions
- This invention relates to a stainless steel sheet used chiefly in structural components requiring strength and impact absorption capability, and particularly to a stainless steel sheet for automobile and bus impact absorption components such as front side members, pillars and bumpers, and for structural components such as vehicle suspension members and rims, railcar bodies and the like.
- Cr-containing stainless steels are far superior to ordinary steels in corrosion resistance and are therefore viewed as having the potential to reduce weight by lowering the corrosion margin (extra thickness to compensate for expected corrosion) and to eliminate the need for painting.
- austenitic stainless steels are excellent in strength-ductility balance and are considered capable of achieving high strength in combination with high ductility through chemical composition adjustment.
- collision safety improvement utilizing a steel having high impact absorption capability in the vehicle frame makes it possible, for example, to absorb crash impact by component collapse deformation and thus to lessen the impact on passengers during a collision. In other words, considerable merits can be realized regarding fuel economy improvement through body weight reduction, painting simplification and safety enhancement.
- Austenitic stainless steels such as SUS301L and SUS304 are used in the structural components of railcars, for instance, because they are excellent in corrosion resistance, ductility and formability.
- Japanese Patent Publication (A) No. 2002-20843 teaches an austenitic stainless steel with high strain rate and excellent impact absorption capability that is intended for use mainly in structural components and reinforcing materials for railcars and ordinary vehicles. This is a steel containing 6 to 8% Ni and having an austenite structure that achieves high strength during high-speed deformation owing to the formation of deformation-induced martensite phase.
- This prior art defines the deformation strengths under dynamic deformation and static deformation, maximum strength, work-hardening index and other properties of the steel.
- the dynamic/static ratio is defined as the ratio between the maximum dynamic and static strengths. But strength, e.g., yield strength, in the relatively low strain range is strongly affected by the impact absorption property at the time of collision, so the definition based on the maximum strength ratio may become a problem in some cases.
- martensitic stainless steel sheets imparted with high strength by quenching have very low ductility and are extremely poor in weld toughness. Since automobiles, buses and railcars have many welded structures, their structural reliability is greatly impaired by poor weld toughness.
- ferritic stainless steel sheets e.g., SUS430
- SUS430 ferritic stainless steel sheets are low in strength and not suitable for members requiring strength, and they are incapable of improving collision safety performance owing to their low impact energy absorption at the time of high-velocity deformation.
- the present invention is directed to overcoming the foregoing issues by providing a stainless steel sheet that is both high in strength and excellent in impact absorption property during high-speed deformation.
- the inventors carried out a study on metal structure in relation to deformation mechanism at the time of sustaining high-speed deformation. As a result, they discovered a technique that enables improvement of impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation of an austenitic stainless steel while simultaneously achieving excellent sheet workability. Specifically, for increasing deformation resistance during ultra-high speed deformation of a strain rate of 10 3 /sec, deformation-induced transformation is positively exploited to increase work hardenability, thereby increasing impact energy absorption through a dramatic improvement in strength and ductility when the component collides. Therefore, a vehicle body fabricated using the steel sheet absorbs the impact at the time of a collision and minimizes body collapse, thereby markedly increasing the safety of passengers.
- the gist of the present invention is as set out in the following.
- Total impact energy absorption in dynamic tensile testing is defined as the impact energy absorption up to break when a high-velocity tensile test is conducted at a strain rate of 10 3 /sec corresponding to that at the time of a vehicle collision
- impact energy absorption to 10% strain is defined as the impact energy absorption up to the 10% strain region in the high-velocity tensile test.
- the static tensile test is a tensile test conducted at the usual strain rate (strain rate of 10 -3 to -2 /sec).
- the important point in the present invention is the impact absorption upon incurring a high-speed impact.
- the impact force at the time of a vehicle collision is applied to structural components of the vehicle.
- the impact absorption capability of the steel constituting the components is therefore important.
- Most vehicle structural components have angular cross-sections as typified by hat-shaped formed components.
- the strain region that absorbs impact differs among different structural components, what is important at locations that collapse during collision is the impact energy absorption up to material destruction.
- Total impact energy absorption is therefore used as an index.
- Total impact energy absorption improves as both strength and ductility are higher during high-speed deformation.
- conventional high-strength steel sheet while high in strength, is low in fracture ductility and is therefore limited in total energy absorption.
- the present invention improves collision safety performance to the utmost from the material standpoint by utilizing high ductility and high work hardenability property during deformation to dramatically improve total energy absorption. Moreover, since some locations need to absorb impact up to the 10% strain region, i.e., a relatively low strain rate region, impact energy absorption to strain rate of 10% is adopted as an index. Although this depends on the component shape, it applies to automobile front side member regions and the like, as indicated in " Report on Research Group Results Regarding High-Speed Deformation of Automotive Materials” (compiled by The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, p12 ).
- the inventors carried out a study based on the foregoing indexes, by which they learned that that the optimum stainless steel in terms of excellent impact absorption property is an austenitic stainless steel utilizing work hardening by deformation-induced transformation. They further learned that desired impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation can be achieved by adjusting the various constituents to control austenite so that deformation-induced martensite transformation occurs suitably during high-speed deformation.
- Austenite stability constituting an index of deformation-induced martensite transformation is calculated based on Md 30 value shown below (from the Stainless Steel Handbook compiled by the Japan Stainless Steel Association).
- the Md 30 value is the temperature at which 50% of martensite is formed at the time of imparting tensile strain to a true strain of 0.3. When impact energy absorption was assessed using this value, it was found that the excellent impact energy absorption prescribed by the present invention could be obtained.
- Md 30 551 - 462 C + N - 9.2 Si - 8.1 Mn - 13.7 Cr - 29 Ni + Cu - 18.5 Mo - 68 Nb .
- Md 30 551 - 462 C + N - 9.2 Si - 8.1 Mn - 13.7 Cr - 29 Ni + Cu
- C must be added to a content of 0.005% or greater to achieve high strength.
- C content is defined as 0.05% or less, because addition of a large amount degrades formability and weldability. Taking refining cost and grain boundary corrosion property into account, the more preferable content range is 0.01 to 0.02%.
- N like C
- N content is defined as 0.30% or less, because excessive addition degrades formability and weldability. Taking refining cost, manufacturability and grain boundary corrosion property into account, the more preferable content range is 0.015 to 0.025%.
- Si is a deoxidizing element that is also a solution hardening element effective for achieving high strength. For these purposes, it must be added to a content of 0.1% or greater. On the other hand, Si content is defined as 2% or less, because addition of a large amount degrades formability and markedly lowers the dynamic/static ratio. Taking manufacturability into account, the more preferable content range is 0.2 to 1%.
- Mn is a deoxidizing element and a solution hardening element effective for achieving high strength. Mn also promotes work hardening of austenite phase during high-speed deformation. For these purposes, it must be added to a content of 0.1% or greater. On the other hand, Mn content is defined as 15% or less, because when added in a large amount, deformation-induced martensite is not formed and formation of MnS, which is a water-soluble inclusion, degrades corrosion resistance. Taking descaling property in the manufacturing process into account, the more preferable content range is 1 to 10%.
- Ni is an element that improves corrosion resistance. For this, and for austenite phase formation, Ni must be present at a content of 0.5% or greater. On the other hand, Ni content is defined as 8% or less, because when added in a large amount, raw material cost is markedly higher and deformation-induced martensite is not formed. Taking manufacturability, stress corrosion cracking and the like into account, the more preferable content range is 1.5 to 7.5%.
- Cu improves formability and contributes to dynamic/static ratio improvement. It is added to a content of 0.1% or greater. Cu also produces its effects when included from scrap or the like in the composition adjustment process. When added in excess of 5%, however, deformation-induced martensite formation no long occurs, so the content is defined as 5% or less. The more preferable range is 0.1 to 4%.
- Cr is an important element that must be added to a content of 11% or greater from the viewpoint corrosion resistance.
- the upper limit of Cr addition is defined as 20%, because excessive addition necessitates addition of large amounts of other elements for structure regulation.
- the content range is preferably 14 to 18%.
- Al is added as a deoxidizing element and also because it renders sulfides harmless and contributes to improvement of workability aspects such as hole expandability during component processing. These effects appear at an Al content of 0.01% or greater, so the lower limit of content is defined as 0.01%.
- the upper content limit is defined as 0.5%, because addition in excess of this level leads to surface flaw occurrence and manufacturability degradation. Taking cost and the like into account, the more preferable content range is 0.1 to 0.5%.
- the present invention provides a steel having much higher impact absorption property than the conventional high-strength steel, wherein the total impact energy absorption is defined as 500 MJ/m 3 or greater and, from FIG.s. 1 and 2 , the range of Md 30 value is defined as 0 to 100 °C.
- the impact energy absorption to 10% strain obtained is 50 MJ/m 3 or greater.
- Studies conducted by the inventors showed that if impact energy absorption of 50 MJ/m 3 can be obtained, that is adequate as the impact absorption property in the relatively low strain region. So the impact energy absorption to 10% strain is defined as 50 MJ/m 3 or greater. No upper limit value is defined for the impact energy absorption because the effect of the present invention can be realized without defining one.
- the dynamic/static ratio is an index representing the deformation rate dependence of work hardening. It is the ratio of yield strength in dynamic tensile testing to yield strength in static tensile testing and is here defined specifically as (yield strength in dynamic tensile test when conducting dynamic tensile testing at strain rate of 10 3 /sec) / (yield strength when conducting static tensile testing at strain rate of 10 -2 /sec). Since the dynamic/static ratio indicates the degree of hardening at the time of deformation at high speed as in an automobile collision, the suitability of a steel for use in an impact absorption structural component increases in proportion as the value of the dynamic/static ratio increases.
- the stainless steel of the present invention is intended for fabrication into structural components. It is therefore important for it to have good formability. As pointed out earlier, most vehicle structural components have angular cross-sections as typified by hat-shaped formed components. As the fabrication involves bending and drawing, the steel requires ductility. A study was carried out regarding methods of fabricating impact absorption components. It was found with regard to steel for which tensile strength was 600 MPa or greater in static tensile testing, adequate forming was possible if elongation at break was 40% or greater. Elongation at break in static tensile testing was therefore defined as 40% or greater.
- Some components require high strength of 700 MPa or greater.
- Such high-strength steels are adjusted in strength by cold rolling and annealing followed by temper rolling. Although no upper limit of strength is necessary from the material aspect, the upper limit is defined as 1600 MPa in view of manufacturing and practical concerns.
- temper rolling is conducted, the reduction can be set in accordance with the required strength level. However, taking manufacturability into consideration, it is preferably around 1 to 70%.
- the steel sheet manufactured in this manner is reduced in elongation at break in static tensile testing.
- the elongation at break in static tensile testing of a steel sheet of the foregoing tensile strength level is required to be 5% or greater. It is therefore defined as 5% or greater and is preferably 10% or greater.
- the method of manufacturing the steel sheet of the present invention is not particularly defined and the product thickness can be decided based on requirements.
- the hot rolling conditions, hot rolled sheet thickness, hot rolled sheet and cold rolled sheet annealing temperature and atmosphere, and other matters can be suitably selected. No special equipment is required in connection with the pass schedule, cold rolling reduction and roll diameter in cold rolling, and efficient use of existing equipment suffices. Use/non-use of lubricant during temper rolling, the number of temper rolling passes and the like are also not particularly specified. If desired, shape correction utilizing a tension leveler can be applied after cold rolling and annealing or after temper rolling.
- the product structure is fundamentally austenite, formation of a second phase, such as of ferrite or martensite, is also acceptable.
- Table 1 includes examples corresponding to claims 1 to 6.
- the steels having chemical compositions prescribed by the present invention were superior to the comparison steels in both total impact energy absorption to destruction and impact energy absorption in the low strain region to 10% strain, so that that they were excellent in impact absorption property.
- Such steels are suitable for use in impact absorption components at risk of experiencing relatively large deformation
- the steels were also suitable for formation into complex structural members, as evidenced by their high elongation at break and excellent ductility in static tensile testing.
- Table 2 includes examples corresponding to claim 7.
- the invention examples whose temper rolling reduction was adjusted to achieve tensile strength of 700 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 5% or greater, exhibited high impact energy absorption to 10% strain of 50 MJ/m 3 or greater in dynamic tensile testing, as well as a dynamic/static ratio of 1.4 or greater, making them suitable for use in high-strength members required to absorb impact in the low strain region.
- the present invention enables provision of a high-strength stainless steel sheet excellent in impact absorption capability even without addition of large amounts of alloying elements.
- the stainless steel sheet manifests outstanding industrial usefulness, including environmental protection through weight reduction and improved collision safety, especially when utilized in the structural components of transport means such as automobiles, buses and railcars.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a stainless steel sheet used chiefly in structural components requiring strength and impact absorption capability, and particularly to a stainless steel sheet for automobile and bus impact absorption components such as front side members, pillars and bumpers, and for structural components such as vehicle suspension members and rims, railcar bodies and the like.
- Environmental concerns have in recent years made improvement of the fuel economy of cars, motorcycles, buses, railcars and other means of transport a critical issue. One aggressively-pursued approach to boosting fuel economy has been car body weight reduction. Car body weight reduction relies heavily on lowering the weight of the materials used to fabricate the body components, specifically on reducing the thickness of sheet steels. However, sheet metal thickness reduction has the undesirable effect of degrading rigidity and collision (crash) safety performance. As strength enhancement of the steels used for component' fabrication is an effective way to increase collision safety, ordinary steels and high-strength steels are utilized in automobile impact absorption components. Ordinary steels are, however, poor in corrosion resistance and multi-coat coating is essential for their use. They cannot be used for unpainted or lightly painted components, and multi-coat painting increases cost. Although ordinary steels can be imparted with high strength by various methods such as solution hardening, precipitation hardening, dual phasing, and deformation-induced transformation, all of the methods are disadvantageous in the point that the strengthening is accompanied by a marked decline in ductility. As ductility declines, fabrication into the structural component becomes increasingly difficult, so that the degree of structural freedom is greatly degraded.
- Cr-containing stainless steels are far superior to ordinary steels in corrosion resistance and are therefore viewed as having the potential to reduce weight by lowering the corrosion margin (extra thickness to compensate for expected corrosion) and to eliminate the need for painting. In addition, austenitic stainless steels are excellent in strength-ductility balance and are considered capable of achieving high strength in combination with high ductility through chemical composition adjustment. Moreover, as regards collision safety improvement, utilizing a steel having high impact absorption capability in the vehicle frame makes it possible, for example, to absorb crash impact by component collapse deformation and thus to lessen the impact on passengers during a collision. In other words, considerable merits can be realized regarding fuel economy improvement through body weight reduction, painting simplification and safety enhancement.
- Austenitic stainless steels such as SUS301L and SUS304 are used in the structural components of railcars, for instance, because they are excellent in corrosion resistance, ductility and formability. Japanese Patent Publication (A) No.
2002-20843 2002-20843 - Further, martensitic stainless steel sheets imparted with high strength by quenching (e.g., SUS420) have very low ductility and are extremely poor in weld toughness. Since automobiles, buses and railcars have many welded structures, their structural reliability is greatly impaired by poor weld toughness. On the other hand, ferritic stainless steel sheets (e.g., SUS430) are low in strength and not suitable for members requiring strength, and they are incapable of improving collision safety performance owing to their low impact energy absorption at the time of high-velocity deformation.
- Thus no technology has been available for enabling a vehicle structural component made of stainless steel sheet to achieve good collision safety performance by improving its impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation, while simultaneously ensuring good formability of the stainless steel sheet. The present invention is directed to overcoming the foregoing issues by providing a stainless steel sheet that is both high in strength and excellent in impact absorption property during high-speed deformation.
- The inventors carried out a study on metal structure in relation to deformation mechanism at the time of sustaining high-speed deformation. As a result, they discovered a technique that enables improvement of impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation of an austenitic stainless steel while simultaneously achieving excellent sheet workability. Specifically, for increasing deformation resistance during ultra-high speed deformation of a strain rate of 103/sec, deformation-induced transformation is positively exploited to increase work hardenability, thereby increasing impact energy absorption through a dramatic improvement in strength and ductility when the component collides. Therefore, a vehicle body fabricated using the steel sheet absorbs the impact at the time of a collision and minimizes body collapse, thereby markedly increasing the safety of passengers.
- The gist of the present invention is as set out in the following.
- A steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property comprising, in mass%, C: 0.005 to 0.05%, N: 0.01 to 0.30%, Si: 0.1 to 2%, Mn: 0.1 to 15%, Ni: 0.5 to 8%, Cu: 0.1 to 5%, Cr: 11 to 20%, Al: 0.01 to 0.5%, and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities, wherein Md30 value given by equation (A) is 0 to 100 °C, and total impact energy absorption in dynamic tensile testing is 500 MJ/m3 or greater:
- (2) The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to (1), wherein dynamic/static ratio of yield strength is 1.4 or greater.
- (3) The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to (1) or (2), wherein tensile strength is 600 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 40% or greater in static tensile testing.
- (4) A steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property comprising, in mass%, C: 0.005 to 0.05%, N: 0.01 to 0.30%, Si: 0.1 to 2%, Mn: 0.1 to 15%, Ni: 0.5 to 8%, Cu: 0.1 to 5%, Cr: 11 to 20%, Al: 0.01 to 0.5%, and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities, wherein Md30 value given by equation (A) is 0 to 100 °C, and impact energy absorption to 10% strain in dynamic tensile testing is 50 MJ/m3 or greater:
- (5) The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to (4), wherein dynamic/static ratio of yield strength is 1.4 or greater.
- (6) The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to (4) or (5), wherein tensile strength is 600 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 40% or greater in static tensile testing.
- (7) The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to (4) or (5), wherein tensile strength is 700 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 5% or greater in static tensile testing.
- "Total impact energy absorption in dynamic tensile testing" is defined as the impact energy absorption up to break when a high-velocity tensile test is conducted at a strain rate of 103/sec corresponding to that at the time of a vehicle collision, and "impact energy absorption to 10% strain" is defined as the impact energy absorption up to the 10% strain region in the high-velocity tensile test. The static tensile test is a tensile test conducted at the usual strain rate (strain rate of 10-3 to -2/sec).
-
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship between Md30 value and total impact energy absorption in high-speed tensile testing. -
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between Md30 value and impact energy absorption to 10% strain in high-speed tensile testing. - The reasons for the limitations of the invention are explained in the following.
- The important point in the present invention is the impact absorption upon incurring a high-speed impact. The impact force at the time of a vehicle collision is applied to structural components of the vehicle. The impact absorption capability of the steel constituting the components is therefore important. Up to now, no attempt has been made to provide a stainless steel that takes into account the impact energy absorption at high strain rate and high speed, nor has vehicle design with this in mind been carried out. Most vehicle structural components have angular cross-sections as typified by hat-shaped formed components. Although the strain region that absorbs impact differs among different structural components, what is important at locations that collapse during collision is the impact energy absorption up to material destruction. Total impact energy absorption is therefore used as an index. Total impact energy absorption improves as both strength and ductility are higher during high-speed deformation. However, conventional high-strength steel sheet, while high in strength, is low in fracture ductility and is therefore limited in total energy absorption.
- The present invention improves collision safety performance to the utmost from the material standpoint by utilizing high ductility and high work hardenability property during deformation to dramatically improve total energy absorption. Moreover, since some locations need to absorb impact up to the 10% strain region, i.e., a relatively low strain rate region, impact energy absorption to strain rate of 10% is adopted as an index. Although this depends on the component shape, it applies to automobile front side member regions and the like, as indicated in " Report on Research Group Results Regarding High-Speed Deformation of Automotive Materials" (compiled by The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, p12).
- The larger is the ratio between yield strength in static tensile testing and yield strength in dynamic tensile testing, the more preferable for an impact absorption structural member. Moreover, a steel with high ductility is preferable for fabrication into vehicle structural components. The elongation at break in static tensile testing was therefore used as a general material index.
- The inventors carried out a study based on the foregoing indexes, by which they learned that that the optimum stainless steel in terms of excellent impact absorption property is an austenitic stainless steel utilizing work hardening by deformation-induced transformation. They further learned that desired impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation can be achieved by adjusting the various constituents to control austenite so that deformation-induced martensite transformation occurs suitably during high-speed deformation.
- Austenite stability constituting an index of deformation-induced martensite transformation is calculated based on Md30 value shown below (from the Stainless Steel Handbook compiled by the Japan Stainless Steel Association). The Md30 value is the temperature at which 50% of martensite is formed at the time of imparting tensile strain to a true strain of 0.3. When impact energy absorption was assessed using this value, it was found that the excellent impact energy absorption prescribed by the present invention could be obtained.
-
- Explanation will be made first regarding the steel composition.
- C must be added to a content of 0.005% or greater to achieve high strength. On the other hand, C content is defined as 0.05% or less, because addition of a large amount degrades formability and weldability. Taking refining cost and grain boundary corrosion property into account, the more preferable content range is 0.01 to 0.02%.
- N, like C, is effective for strength enhancement and beneficial for improving impact energy absorption. For these purposes, it must be added to a content of 0.01% or greater. On the other hand, N content is defined as 0.30% or less, because excessive addition degrades formability and weldability. Taking refining cost, manufacturability and grain boundary corrosion property into account, the more preferable content range is 0.015 to 0.025%.
- Si is a deoxidizing element that is also a solution hardening element effective for achieving high strength. For these purposes, it must be added to a content of 0.1% or greater. On the other hand, Si content is defined as 2% or less, because addition of a large amount degrades formability and markedly lowers the dynamic/static ratio. Taking manufacturability into account, the more preferable content range is 0.2 to 1%.
- Mn is a deoxidizing element and a solution hardening element effective for achieving high strength. Mn also promotes work hardening of austenite phase during high-speed deformation. For these purposes, it must be added to a content of 0.1% or greater. On the other hand, Mn content is defined as 15% or less, because when added in a large amount, deformation-induced martensite is not formed and formation of MnS, which is a water-soluble inclusion, degrades corrosion resistance. Taking descaling property in the manufacturing process into account, the more preferable content range is 1 to 10%.
- Ni is an element that improves corrosion resistance. For this, and for austenite phase formation, Ni must be present at a content of 0.5% or greater. On the other hand, Ni content is defined as 8% or less, because when added in a large amount, raw material cost is markedly higher and deformation-induced martensite is not formed. Taking manufacturability, stress corrosion cracking and the like into account, the more preferable content range is 1.5 to 7.5%.
- Cu improves formability and contributes to dynamic/static ratio improvement. It is added to a content of 0.1% or greater. Cu also produces its effects when included from scrap or the like in the composition adjustment process. When added in excess of 5%, however, deformation-induced martensite formation no long occurs, so the content is defined as 5% or less. The more preferable range is 0.1 to 4%.
- Cr is an important element that must be added to a content of 11% or greater from the viewpoint corrosion resistance. On the other hand, the upper limit of Cr addition is defined as 20%, because excessive addition necessitates addition of large amounts of other elements for structure regulation. The content range is preferably 14 to 18%.
- Al is added as a deoxidizing element and also because it renders sulfides harmless and contributes to improvement of workability aspects such as hole expandability during component processing. These effects appear at an Al content of 0.01% or greater, so the lower limit of content is defined as 0.01%. The upper content limit is defined as 0.5%, because addition in excess of this level leads to surface flaw occurrence and manufacturability degradation. Taking cost and the like into account, the more preferable content range is 0.1 to 0.5%.
- When the material is impacted, it manifests deformation-induced transformation that transforms austenite phase into martensite phase, thereby effectively giving rise to work hardening during deformation. The efficient formation of martensite phase during deformation causes high strengthening and also prevents necking, thereby contributing to ductility improvement. Since martensite transformation is affected by strain and temperature, martensite formation is inhibited by the heat of deformation generated during high-speed deformation. However, in the stainless steel sheet of the present invention, it was found that martensite formation at the initial stage of deformation is sometimes promoted more during dynamic deformation than during static deformation. This is attributable to the strain rate dependence of transformation dependent on composition and the effect thereof dramatically improves impact energy absorption during high-speed deformation.
- Various stainless steel sheets (thickness; 1.5 mm) were subjected to dynamic tensile testing at a strain rate of 103/sec. The effect of Md30 value on total impact energy absorption and impact energy absorption to 10% strain at this time are shown in
FIG.s 1 and2 , respectively. - It can be seen that within the range of the present invention both total impact energy absorption and impact energy absorption to 10% strain exhibit excellent values. When Md30 value is too high, ductility is thought to be lowered because cracking occurs at the boundary between austenite phase and martensite phase owing to excessive formation of martensite during deformation. Heretofore, total impact energy absorption at the time of high-speed deformation of high-strength steel has been thought to be on the order of less than 400 MJ/m3 (see, for example, CAMP-ISIJ, Vol9 (1996), P1101, Fig. 4 and Symposium on Automobile Materials, Japan Stainless Steel Association, 1997, p71).
- The present invention provides a steel having much higher impact absorption property than the conventional high-strength steel, wherein the total impact energy absorption is defined as 500 MJ/m3 or greater and, from
FIG.s. 1 and2 , the range of Md30 value is defined as 0 to 100 °C. In the Md30 value range of the present invention, the impact energy absorption to 10% strain obtained is 50 MJ/m3 or greater. Studies conducted by the inventors showed that if impact energy absorption of 50 MJ/m3 can be obtained, that is adequate as the impact absorption property in the relatively low strain region. So the impact energy absorption to 10% strain is defined as 50 MJ/m3 or greater. No upper limit value is defined for the impact energy absorption because the effect of the present invention can be realized without defining one. - The dynamic/static ratio is an index representing the deformation rate dependence of work hardening. It is the ratio of yield strength in dynamic tensile testing to yield strength in static tensile testing and is here defined specifically as (yield strength in dynamic tensile test when conducting dynamic tensile testing at strain rate of 103/sec) / (yield strength when conducting static tensile testing at strain rate of 10-2/sec). Since the dynamic/static ratio indicates the degree of hardening at the time of deformation at high speed as in an automobile collision, the suitability of a steel for use in an impact absorption structural component increases in proportion as the value of the dynamic/static ratio increases. For example, " Report on Research Group Results Regarding High-Speed Deformation of Automotive Materials" (compiled by The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 2001, p12, Fig.6) gives dynamic/static ratios for conventional steels, with the dynamic/static ratio of a steel having a tensile strength of 600 MPa or greater shown as 1.3 or less. The present invention defines the dynamic/static ratio as 1.4 or greater and provides a steel of high strength and high dynamic/static ratio unattainable by conventional steels. No upper limit value is defined for the dynamic/static ratio because the effect of the present invention can be realized without defining one.
- The stainless steel of the present invention is intended for fabrication into structural components. It is therefore important for it to have good formability. As pointed out earlier, most vehicle structural components have angular cross-sections as typified by hat-shaped formed components. As the fabrication involves bending and drawing, the steel requires ductility. A study was carried out regarding methods of fabricating impact absorption components. It was found with regard to steel for which tensile strength was 600 MPa or greater in static tensile testing, adequate forming was possible if elongation at break was 40% or greater. Elongation at break in static tensile testing was therefore defined as 40% or greater.
- Some components require high strength of 700 MPa or greater. Such high-strength steels are adjusted in strength by cold rolling and annealing followed by temper rolling. Although no upper limit of strength is necessary from the material aspect, the upper limit is defined as 1600 MPa in view of manufacturing and practical concerns. When temper rolling is conducted, the reduction can be set in accordance with the required strength level. However, taking manufacturability into consideration, it is preferably around 1 to 70%. The steel sheet manufactured in this manner is reduced in elongation at break in static tensile testing. However, the elongation at break in static tensile testing of a steel sheet of the foregoing tensile strength level is required to be 5% or greater. It is therefore defined as 5% or greater and is preferably 10% or greater.
- The method of manufacturing the steel sheet of the present invention is not particularly defined and the product thickness can be decided based on requirements. The hot rolling conditions, hot rolled sheet thickness, hot rolled sheet and cold rolled sheet annealing temperature and atmosphere, and other matters can be suitably selected. No special equipment is required in connection with the pass schedule, cold rolling reduction and roll diameter in cold rolling, and efficient use of existing equipment suffices. Use/non-use of lubricant during temper rolling, the number of temper rolling passes and the like are also not particularly specified. If desired, shape correction utilizing a tension leveler can be applied after cold rolling and annealing or after temper rolling. Although the product structure is fundamentally austenite, formation of a second phase, such as of ferrite or martensite, is also acceptable.
- The present invention will be concretely explained in the following with reference to working examples.
- Steels having the chemical compositions shown in Table 1 were produced and cast into slabs. Each slab was hot rolled, annealed, pickled, cold rolled to a thickness of 1.5 mm, annealed, pickled, and temper rolled to obtain a product sheet. The so-obtained product sheet was subjected to the aforesaid static tensile test and dynamic tensile test.
- Table 1 includes examples corresponding to
claims 1 to 6. The steels having chemical compositions prescribed by the present invention were superior to the comparison steels in both total impact energy absorption to destruction and impact energy absorption in the low strain region to 10% strain, so that that they were excellent in impact absorption property. Such steels are suitable for use in impact absorption components at risk of experiencing relatively large deformation The steels were also suitable for formation into complex structural members, as evidenced by their high elongation at break and excellent ductility in static tensile testing. - Table 2 includes examples corresponding to claim 7. The invention examples, whose temper rolling reduction was adjusted to achieve tensile strength of 700 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 5% or greater, exhibited high impact energy absorption to 10% strain of 50 MJ/m3 or greater in dynamic tensile testing, as well as a dynamic/static ratio of 1.4 or greater, making them suitable for use in high-strength members required to absorb impact in the low strain region.
- As is clear from the foregoing explanation, the present invention enables provision of a high-strength stainless steel sheet excellent in impact absorption capability even without addition of large amounts of alloying elements. The stainless steel sheet manifests outstanding industrial usefulness, including environmental protection through weight reduction and improved collision safety, especially when utilized in the structural components of transport means such as automobiles, buses and railcars.
Claims (7)
- A steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property comprising, in mass%:C: 0.005 to 0.05%,N: 0.01 to 0.30%,Si: 0.1 to 2%,Mn: 0.1 to 15%,Ni: 0.5 to 8%,Cu: 0.1 to 5%,Cr: 11 to 20%,Al: 0.01 to 0.5%, anda balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities,
- The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to claim 1, wherein dynamic/static ratio of yield strength is 1.4 or greater.
- The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to claim 1 or 2, wherein tensile strength is 600 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 40% or greater in static tensile testing.
- A steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property comprising, in mass%:C: 0.005 to 0.05%,N: 0.01 to 0.30%,Si: 0.1 to 2%,Mn: 0.1 to 15%,Ni: 0.5 to 8%,Cu: 0.1 to 5%,Cr: 11 to 20%,Al: 0.01 to 0.5%, anda balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities,
- The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to claim 4, wherein dynamic/static ratio of yield strength is 1.4 or greater.
- The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to claim 4 or 5, wherein tensile strength is 600 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 40% or greater in static tensile testing.
- The steel sheet for structural components excellent in impact absorption property according to claim 4 or 5, wherein tensile strength is 700 MPa or greater and elongation at break is 5% or greater in static tensile testing.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2006350722A JP5165236B2 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2006-12-27 | Stainless steel plate for structural members with excellent shock absorption characteristics |
PCT/JP2007/071445 WO2008078457A1 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2007-10-30 | Stainless steel sheet for structural members excellent in impact -absorbing characteristics |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2060646A1 true EP2060646A1 (en) | 2009-05-20 |
EP2060646A4 EP2060646A4 (en) | 2014-01-01 |
EP2060646B1 EP2060646B1 (en) | 2015-06-17 |
Family
ID=39562251
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07831178.4A Active EP2060646B1 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2007-10-30 | Stainless steel sheet for structural members excellent in impact -absorbing characteristics |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100233015A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2060646B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5165236B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20080106200A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101410543B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008078457A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120237388A1 (en) * | 2009-11-18 | 2012-09-20 | Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | Austenitic stainless steel sheet and a method for its manufacture |
WO2012143610A1 (en) | 2011-04-18 | 2012-10-26 | Outokumpu Oyj | Method for manufacturing and utilizing ferritic-austenitic stainless steel |
EP2566994A1 (en) * | 2010-05-06 | 2013-03-13 | Outokumpu Oyj | Low-nickel austenitic stainless steel and use of the steel |
ITRM20120647A1 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-06-20 | Ct Sviluppo Materiali Spa | AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL WITH HIGH PLASTICITY INDUCED BY GEMINATION, PROCEDURE FOR ITS PRODUCTION, AND ITS USE IN THE MECHANICAL INDUSTRY. |
EP3239341A4 (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2018-10-31 | Posco | Austenitic stainless steel having excellent flexibility |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104428435A (en) * | 2012-04-10 | 2015-03-18 | 新日铁住金株式会社 | Steel sheet suitable as impact absorbing member, and method for manufacturing same |
KR101779305B1 (en) * | 2013-12-09 | 2017-09-18 | 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 | Austenitic stainless steel sheet and method for producing same |
JP6477181B2 (en) * | 2015-04-07 | 2019-03-06 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Austenitic stainless steel |
KR101952818B1 (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2019-02-28 | 주식회사포스코 | Low alloy steel sheet with high strength and ductility and method of manufacturing same |
CN107747025B (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2019-08-16 | 浙江双森金属科技股份有限公司 | A kind of stainless steel tube and its processing technology |
KR102326262B1 (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2021-11-15 | 주식회사 포스코 | High yield ratio high strength austenitic stainless steel |
KR102385472B1 (en) * | 2020-04-22 | 2022-04-13 | 주식회사 포스코 | High-strength, high-formability, low cost austenitic stainless steel and manufacturing method thereof |
KR102403849B1 (en) * | 2020-06-23 | 2022-05-30 | 주식회사 포스코 | High strength austenitic stainless steel with excellent productivity and cost saving effect, and method for manufacturing the same |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH10158735A (en) * | 1996-11-28 | 1998-06-16 | Nippon Steel Corp | Hot-rolled high strength steel sheet for automobile excellent in collision resistant safety and formability and its production |
JPH10273752A (en) * | 1997-01-29 | 1998-10-13 | Nippon Steel Corp | Automotive high strength steel sheet excellent in collision resisting safety and formability and its production |
JPH11100640A (en) * | 1997-09-24 | 1999-04-13 | Nippon Steel Corp | High strength hot rolled steel sheet having high dynamic deformation resistance and its production |
EP0952235A1 (en) * | 1996-11-28 | 1999-10-27 | Nippon Steel Corporation | High-strength steel plate having high dynamic deformation resistance and method of manufacturing the same |
EP0969112A1 (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-01-05 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Dual-phase high-strength steel sheet having excellent dynamic deformation properties and process for preparing the same |
JP2002020843A (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2002-01-23 | Nippon Steel Corp | Austenitic stainless steel excellent in collision absorbing performance |
WO2003056041A1 (en) * | 2001-12-27 | 2003-07-10 | Posco | High strength cold rolled steel sheet with superior formability and weldability, and manufacturing method therefor |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3282684A (en) * | 1963-07-31 | 1966-11-01 | Armco Steel Corp | Stainless steel and articles |
US3806337A (en) | 1972-01-03 | 1974-04-23 | Int Nickel Co | Austenitic stainless steel resistant to stress corrosion cracking |
JPS5129854B2 (en) * | 1973-04-21 | 1976-08-27 | ||
JPS60255960A (en) | 1984-05-31 | 1985-12-17 | Aichi Steel Works Ltd | Stainless steel for cold forging |
JP4173609B2 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2008-10-29 | 日新製鋼株式会社 | Austenitic stainless steel and steel plate for press forming with excellent formability and hot workability |
JP4760031B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2011-08-31 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Austenitic ferritic stainless steel with excellent formability |
JP4327030B2 (en) | 2004-07-07 | 2009-09-09 | 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 | Low Ni austenitic stainless steel with excellent overhanging and rust resistance |
JP4587739B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2010-11-24 | 日新製鋼株式会社 | Austenitic stainless steel plate and deep-drawn container with excellent secondary workability and corrosion resistance after deep drawing |
KR100641577B1 (en) | 2005-04-19 | 2006-10-31 | 주식회사 포스코 | Austenitic Stainless steel with High Mn and N |
-
2006
- 2006-12-27 JP JP2006350722A patent/JP5165236B2/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-10-30 WO PCT/JP2007/071445 patent/WO2008078457A1/en active Application Filing
- 2007-10-30 EP EP07831178.4A patent/EP2060646B1/en active Active
- 2007-10-30 CN CN2007800111498A patent/CN101410543B/en active Active
- 2007-10-30 KR KR1020087020686A patent/KR20080106200A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2007-10-30 US US12/225,327 patent/US20100233015A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH10158735A (en) * | 1996-11-28 | 1998-06-16 | Nippon Steel Corp | Hot-rolled high strength steel sheet for automobile excellent in collision resistant safety and formability and its production |
EP0952235A1 (en) * | 1996-11-28 | 1999-10-27 | Nippon Steel Corporation | High-strength steel plate having high dynamic deformation resistance and method of manufacturing the same |
JPH10273752A (en) * | 1997-01-29 | 1998-10-13 | Nippon Steel Corp | Automotive high strength steel sheet excellent in collision resisting safety and formability and its production |
EP0969112A1 (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-01-05 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Dual-phase high-strength steel sheet having excellent dynamic deformation properties and process for preparing the same |
JPH11100640A (en) * | 1997-09-24 | 1999-04-13 | Nippon Steel Corp | High strength hot rolled steel sheet having high dynamic deformation resistance and its production |
JP2002020843A (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2002-01-23 | Nippon Steel Corp | Austenitic stainless steel excellent in collision absorbing performance |
WO2003056041A1 (en) * | 2001-12-27 | 2003-07-10 | Posco | High strength cold rolled steel sheet with superior formability and weldability, and manufacturing method therefor |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2008078457A1 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120237388A1 (en) * | 2009-11-18 | 2012-09-20 | Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | Austenitic stainless steel sheet and a method for its manufacture |
EP2566994A1 (en) * | 2010-05-06 | 2013-03-13 | Outokumpu Oyj | Low-nickel austenitic stainless steel and use of the steel |
EP2566994A4 (en) * | 2010-05-06 | 2017-04-05 | Outokumpu Oyj | Low-nickel austenitic stainless steel and use of the steel |
WO2012143610A1 (en) | 2011-04-18 | 2012-10-26 | Outokumpu Oyj | Method for manufacturing and utilizing ferritic-austenitic stainless steel |
EP2699704A4 (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2015-03-11 | Outokumpu Oy | Method for manufacturing and utilizing ferritic-austenitic stainless steel |
AU2012246194B2 (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2017-10-05 | Outokumpu Oyj | Method for manufacturing and utilizing ferritic-austenitic stainless steel |
ITRM20120647A1 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-06-20 | Ct Sviluppo Materiali Spa | AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL WITH HIGH PLASTICITY INDUCED BY GEMINATION, PROCEDURE FOR ITS PRODUCTION, AND ITS USE IN THE MECHANICAL INDUSTRY. |
WO2014097184A3 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-10-30 | Centro Sviluppo Materiali S.P.A. | Austenitic twip stainless steel, its production and use |
US10066280B2 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2018-09-04 | Centro Sviluppo Materiali S.P.A. | Austenitic TWIP stainless steel, its production and use |
EP3239341A4 (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2018-10-31 | Posco | Austenitic stainless steel having excellent flexibility |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN101410543A (en) | 2009-04-15 |
US20100233015A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 |
JP5165236B2 (en) | 2013-03-21 |
WO2008078457A1 (en) | 2008-07-03 |
CN101410543B (en) | 2011-04-06 |
EP2060646B1 (en) | 2015-06-17 |
EP2060646A4 (en) | 2014-01-01 |
KR20080106200A (en) | 2008-12-04 |
JP2008163358A (en) | 2008-07-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2060646B1 (en) | Stainless steel sheet for structural members excellent in impact -absorbing characteristics | |
US8303733B2 (en) | Ferrite-austenite stainless steel sheet for structural component excellent in workability and impact-absorbing property and method for producing the same | |
KR100334949B1 (en) | Dual-phase high-strength steel sheet having excellent dynamic deformation properties and process for preparing the same | |
EP1675970B1 (en) | A cold-rolled steel sheet having a tensile strength of 780 mpa or more an excellent local formability and a suppressed increase in weld hardness | |
JP5597006B2 (en) | High strength and high ductility austenitic stainless steel sheet for structural members and method for producing the same | |
JP5544633B2 (en) | Austenitic stainless steel sheet for structural members with excellent shock absorption characteristics | |
JP6628561B2 (en) | Stainless steel sheet for structural member excellent in workability and method for producing the same | |
KR20090016480A (en) | High-strength steel sheet and process for producing the same | |
CN111492076A (en) | High-strength hot-rolled steel and method for producing high-strength hot-rolled steel | |
JPH11193439A (en) | Steel plate combining good workability with high strength and having high dynamic deformation resistance, and its production | |
JP5220311B2 (en) | Stainless steel plate for structural members with excellent shock absorption characteristics | |
JPH1161326A (en) | High strength automobile steel plate superior in collision safety and formability, and its manufacture | |
JP3936440B2 (en) | High-strength steel sheet for automobiles with excellent collision safety and formability and its manufacturing method | |
US20200224295A1 (en) | Hot-working material, component and use | |
JP2007321182A (en) | Automobile member having high collision absorbing performance | |
JP4369545B2 (en) | Ferritic sheet steel with excellent strain rate dependency and automobile using the same | |
JPH10273752A (en) | Automotive high strength steel sheet excellent in collision resisting safety and formability and its production | |
EP3730651B1 (en) | High yield ratio-type high-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing same | |
JP2000290745A (en) | High strength steel sheet for working, excellent in fatigue characteristic and safety against collision, and its manufacture | |
JP3166765B2 (en) | 60kg-class direct quenched and tempered steel with excellent weldability and toughness after strain aging | |
JPH10317096A (en) | High strength steel sheet for automobile use, excellent in collision-proof stability, and its production | |
Elsayed | Steels for car-body applications: state of the art and future trends |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20081001 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FI FR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20131202 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: C22C 38/40 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/18 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/58 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/20 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101AFI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/42 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/06 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/34 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/36 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/02 20060101ALI20131126BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/04 20060101ALI20131126BHEP |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101AFI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/20 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/04 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/34 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/18 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/40 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/42 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/36 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/58 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/06 20060101ALI20141031BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/02 20060101ALI20141031BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20141216 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: KIMURA, KEN Inventor name: HAMADA, JUNICHI Inventor name: FUDANOKI, FUMIO Inventor name: TANOUE, TOSHIO Inventor name: KAJIMURA, HARUHIKO |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: KAJIMURA, HARUHIKO Inventor name: TANOUE, TOSHIO Inventor name: KIMURA, KEN Inventor name: FUDANOKI, FUMIO Inventor name: HAMADA, JUNICHI |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FI FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602007041817 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 602007041817 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: OUTOKUMPU OYJ Effective date: 20160316 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: OUTOKUMPU OYJ Effective date: 20160316 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R100 Ref document number: 602007041817 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLCK | Communication despatched that opposition was rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1 |
|
PLBN | Opposition rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED |
|
27O | Opposition rejected |
Effective date: 20171124 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230901 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20231017 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231027 Year of fee payment: 17 |