EP1991970B1 - Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger - Google Patents

Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1991970B1
EP1991970B1 EP07704366A EP07704366A EP1991970B1 EP 1991970 B1 EP1991970 B1 EP 1991970B1 EP 07704366 A EP07704366 A EP 07704366A EP 07704366 A EP07704366 A EP 07704366A EP 1991970 B1 EP1991970 B1 EP 1991970B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
event
unit
gmz
data
hazard alarm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP07704366A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1991970A1 (fr
Inventor
Andreas Huber
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Priority to EP07704366A priority Critical patent/EP1991970B1/fr
Publication of EP1991970A1 publication Critical patent/EP1991970A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1991970B1 publication Critical patent/EP1991970B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/02—Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
    • G08B29/04—Monitoring of the detection circuits
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
    • G08B25/001—Alarm cancelling procedures or alarm forwarding decisions, e.g. based on absence of alarm confirmation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/12—Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems
    • G08B29/14—Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems checking the detection circuits

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method, a system and a danger control center for controlling and transmitting data of an event which has occurred in a danger detection system which has at least one alarm control panel and at least one unit connected to the alarm control panel to at least one further unit.
  • the US 2002/0095490 A1 describes how to determine a set of user-aware audit rules by creating rules for a violation policy value.
  • the data can come from one or more monitoring units.
  • the data obtained is checked by the rule and a result is output depending on the result of the check.
  • the US 5917409 describes how a local warning signal is generated and sent to a warning unit. This is done on the basis of a sensor signal originating from a motion detector, which is sent to a control unit. At the same time, the alarm is sent to a police station via a communication module. If each motion detector sends out a signal, the security system returns to its original state.
  • the US 2003/0062997 A1 describes how a security system, a video surveillance system, verifies remote users and gives them access to their personal account settings. This allows users to be added, Changed passwords and other information will be set.
  • Danger alarm systems such as fire, gas, temperature, etc. detection systems usually consist of detectors or hazard detectors, which are connected to a central office. The danger detection systems are usually still connected via communication facilities with emergency call centers, service centers, etc. Such alarm systems are used in public buildings, office buildings, hotels, industrial buildings, airports, railway stations, workshops, schools, etc. Danger alarm systems usually consist of a control panel, several hazard alarms, alarm signaling units, such as flashing lights, alarm horns, speakers, treadmills, etc., cables that connect the individual units to the control panel, etc., so all the hardware used.
  • the control panels usually have an integrated control panel with a graphic display and interfaces to communication networks.
  • an event for example, a fault, a maintenance notice, a note, a test operation, a deviation from the normal operating mode, etc. at a hazard alarm, a danger control center (hardware defect, logical error such as too long shutdown), one Alarm unit (horn, flashing light, etc.) etc. triggered or detected, the control panel is notified and this derives depending on occurred event the event to a corresponding unit, such as a service point, an emergency call center, a monitoring station, etc., on. Including, for example, the fire brigade, a service, etc. for this event is very costly and costs valuable time to remedy the event.
  • the object of the present invention is to propose a possibility for the fast and efficient repair of events occurring at a unit of a hazard detection system.
  • a core of the invention is to be seen in that for the control and transmission of data in an alarm system, the at least one alarm panel and a unit connected to the alarm unit, occurred event before forwarding to at least one other unit, the security panel the data of the event checked according to at least one stored rule and transmits depending on the result of the check to the further unit.
  • the data of the event are evaluated and assigned to an event category according to the evaluation result.
  • an event category for example, a fault, a notice, a test operation, a maintenance notice, an activation category is considered.
  • Test operation events in a unit for example, a unit in question is in the so-called test mode, a unit in question is in this test mode, etc. are assigned to the test operation category.
  • Another rule may specify a delay time to be used for forwarding. This delay, for example, depends on the size of the event.
  • Another rule could be that a forwarding to the further unit takes place only if, within a time interval, a manual confirmation of the event by the operating personnel has not taken place in accordance with a request from the danger control panel. Such a request may be both graphical, acoustic, or a combination thereof.
  • a request may be both graphical, acoustic, or a combination thereof.
  • the operating personnel must make an entry to the alarm control panel.
  • Such an input may be the pressing of a button, entering a code, touching the screen of the security panel, etc.
  • a rule can specify here that the forwarding of the event to the further unit is delayed by a time interval only in the presence of the operating personnel.
  • the event is a fault, an indication, a test operation (the unit is in test mode and not in normal operating mode, so that, for example, no detection or no alarm can be triggered), an activation message, a technical message, a maintenance notice and / or shutdown of the unit, etc. considered.
  • the entire alarm system with its network units such as a security control center, a hazard detector, a Alarm unit, the cables that connect the units to the alarm panel, etc.
  • the further unit may be a communication unit (communication module, communication terminal, etc.), a central monitoring station, such as the fire brigade, an emergency call center, a service center, for example, the manufacturer of the danger control center, etc.
  • An advantage of the invention is that due to the efficient control and forwarding of events, only those events must be forwarded that can not be remedied on-site by the operating personnel, and thus the method according to the invention is cost-effective.
  • FIG. 1 shows the control and forwarding of a fault in a danger detector GM via a security control center GMZ to another unit NRZ. If the operating personnel of the alarm control panel is registered or reported as "absent" at the GMZ danger center, each malfunction will be addressed directly the further unit NRZ forwarded. On the other hand, if the operating personnel has previously registered or reported to the danger control center GMZ as "present", the fault is checked by the danger warning center GMZ and, for example, a delay time for forwarding the fault to the further unit NRZ is determined on the basis of a stored rule. The security center had previously evaluated the data of the event and assigned the event to an event category, here the category fault.
  • the verification of the event data is now carried out with rules and conditions stored in the danger control panel.
  • Stored rules can be used to check whether an event suburb can be resolved based on the received event data. If it can be assumed on the basis of the result of the check that the event can be remedied locally, for example, the operating personnel is prompted graphically by means of text, signs, pictograms, etc. and / or acoustically by means of a local message at the danger warning center GMZ to confirm the fault. If the operating personnel now confirms this fault at the GMZ alarm control panel within the time interval, the fault will not be forwarded to the further NRZ unit and the operating personnel will be able to rectify the fault themselves.
  • the fault If the fault is not confirmed, it will be forwarded to the other unit NRZ.
  • the confirmation of the fault by the operating personnel can in principle be done in dialogue, that is, due to an interaction with the danger warning center GMZ. This means that, for example, a button pressed, touches the screen of the security panel GMZ, a code must be entered, etc. So it is possible with the inventive method, for example, small local disturbances, such as the failure of a fire alarm, a mistake in a test etc Fast and efficient fix without a global Alerting with the associated measures to, for example, an emergency call center or service control center NRZ must be initiated.
  • the rules stored in the security control center GMZ can be stored in a table, a database, etc., and generally tailored to the needs of the building to be monitored.
  • the danger reporting center GMZ can, for example, determine the potential extent of the event and take the appropriate measures based on the stored rules.
  • the event can be flexibly signaled to another unit NRZ, for example an emergency call center, the fire brigade, an alarm horn, a flashlight, etc., or delayed due to rules, so that, for example, the operator has the opportunity to locally determine the cause of the event remedy.
  • Fig. 2 shows the control and forwarding of a maintenance notice of a danger detector GM.
  • the method according to Fig. 1 carried out. Due to the stored rules, the maintenance notice can be remedied as quickly as possible.
  • the delay time for forwarding, a repair instruction for the service technician etc. can be used here. For example, as a rule, it may be determined that a response of the operator is expected first. This means that a relatively short delay time is used. In another rule, the elimination of the cause of the event could now be monitored. Here, based on empirical values, one will use relatively long delay times. Yet another rule could be, for example, that the danger control center GMZ sends the service technician a description, a message, etc.
  • This description or information can also be output on the screen of the danger control center GMZ, so that a service technician present or the operating personnel present can remedy the maintenance instruction locally as quickly as possible.
  • Fig. 3 shows an alarm center according to the invention with a receiving unit E, a processing unit V and a transmitting unit S for performing the method according to Fig. 1 and 2

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Procédé de commande et de transmission de données d'un événement qui est survenu dans un système ( GM, GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, qui comprend au moins une centrale d'avertissement de danger et au moins une unité reliée à la centrale d'avertissement de danger, à au moins une autre unité ( NRZ ), en considérant comme événement une panne, une indication d'entretien, un fonctionnement de test et/ou un écart au mode de fonctionnement normal concernant le signal d'avertissement de danger,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on exploite des données de l'événement reçues par la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger,
    en ce que, suivant le résultat de l'exploitation, on affecte les données de l'événement à une catégorie d'événement,
    en ce qu'on contrôle les données dans la catégorie d'événement suivant au moins une règle mémorisée,
    en ce qu'il est déclenché comme au moins une règle une invitation à confirmer manuellement l'événement dans un intervalle de temps par le personnel de service desservant la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, l'invitation étant un message graphique et/ou acoustique,
    en ce que, pour la confirmation manuelle de l'invitation, on considère une entrée dans la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger et
    en ce que, en absence de la confirmation, on achemine les données de l'événement en fonction du résultat du contrôle à l'autre unité (NRZ ).
  2. Procédé suivant la revendication 1,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on utilise, comme au moins une règle, le temps de retard pour acheminer un événement qui est survenu.
  3. Procédé suivant la revendication 1 ou 2,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on contrôle, par la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, suivant au moins une règle, si une indication de présence du personnel de service est mémorisée par la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger.
  4. Procédé suivant la revendication 3,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on ne retarde l'acheminement de l'événement qu'en présence du personnel de service.
  5. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on contrôle, sur la base d'au moins une règle, si on peut supprimer sur site la cause de l'événement qui est survenu.
  6. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on considère comme catégorie d'événement une panne, une indication, une indication d'entretien, un fonctionnement de test d'une unité, une activation d'une unité, un message technique et/ou l'arrêt d'une unité.
  7. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on utilise comme unité un avertisseur de danger, des unités de signalisation d'alerte et/ou le câble utilisé pour la liaison.
  8. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'on utilise, comme au moins une autre unité ( NRZ ), un ordinateur, une unité de communication, un poste central de contrôle, une centrale d'appel d'urgence et/ou un service central.
  9. Système de commande et de transmission de données d'un événement qui est survenu dans un système ( GM, GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, qui comprend au moins une centrale d'avertissement de danger et au moins une unité reliée à la centrale d'avertissement de danger à au moins une autre unité ( NRZ ), en considérant comme événement une panne, une indication d'entretien, un fonctionnement de test et/ou un écart au mode de fonctionnement normal concernant le signal d'avertissement de danger,
    - comprenant l'unité ( GM ) ou la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, pour la transmission de données concernant l'événement à la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger,
    - comprenant la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, pour exploiter les données de l'événement pour affecter les données suivant le résultat de l'exploitation au contrôle des données, suivant au moins une règle mémorisée, en considérant comme au moins une règle une invitation à la confirmation manuelle de l'événement dans la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger dans un intervalle de temps, l'invitation étant un message graphique et/ou acoustique, en considérant pour la confirmation manuelle de l'invitation une entrée dans la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger par le personnel de service et en l'absence de la confirmation pour acheminer les données de l'événement en fonction du résultat du contrôle à l'autre unité (NRZ ).
  10. Procédé de commande et de transmission de données d'un événement qui est survenu dans un système ( GM, GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger, qui comporte au moins une centrale d'avertissement de danger et au moins une unité reliée à la centrale d'avertissement de danger à au moins une autre unité ( NRZ ), en considérant comme événement une panne, une indication d'entretien, un fonctionnement de test et/ou un écart au mode de fonctionnement normal concernant le système d'avertissement de danger,
    - comprenant une unité ( E ) de réception, pour la réception de données d'un événement qui est survenu par la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger ou par l'unité ( GM ),
    - comprenant une unité ( V ) de traitement, pour exploiter les données de l'événement pour affecter les données à une catégorie d'événement suivant le résultat de l'exploitation et pour contrôler les données suivant au moins une règle mémorisée, en considérant comme au moins une règle une invitation à la confirmation manuelle de l'événement dans la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger dans un intervalle de temps, l'invitation étant un message graphique et/ou acoustique en considérant pour la confirmation manuelle de l'invitation une entrée dans la centrale ( GMZ ) d'avertissement de danger par le personnel de service,
    - comprenant une unité ( S ) d'émission, pour acheminer des données à l'autre unité ( NRZ ) en fonction du résultat du contrôle s'il n'y a pas de confirmation.
EP07704366A 2006-03-03 2007-02-05 Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger Not-in-force EP1991970B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07704366A EP1991970B1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2007-02-05 Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06110633A EP1830331A1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2006-03-03 Intervention en cas d'évènements dans un système d'alerte de danger
PCT/EP2007/051082 WO2007101763A1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2007-02-05 Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger
EP07704366A EP1991970B1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2007-02-05 Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1991970A1 EP1991970A1 (fr) 2008-11-19
EP1991970B1 true EP1991970B1 (fr) 2011-04-06

Family

ID=36699000

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06110633A Withdrawn EP1830331A1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2006-03-03 Intervention en cas d'évènements dans un système d'alerte de danger
EP07704366A Not-in-force EP1991970B1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2007-02-05 Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06110633A Withdrawn EP1830331A1 (fr) 2006-03-03 2006-03-03 Intervention en cas d'évènements dans un système d'alerte de danger

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (2) EP1830331A1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE504905T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE502007006881D1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2007101763A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105513268A (zh) * 2016-02-26 2016-04-20 中国神华能源股份有限公司 发电厂安保联动系统和方法

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5917409A (en) * 1998-09-02 1999-06-29 Wang; Randall Process and system for reducing motion-type false alarm of security alarm system
US7015806B2 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-03-21 @Security Broadband Corporation Distributed monitoring for a video security system
US6542075B2 (en) * 2000-09-28 2003-04-01 Vigilos, Inc. System and method for providing configurable security monitoring utilizing an integrated information portal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007101763A1 (fr) 2007-09-13
DE502007006881D1 (de) 2011-05-19
EP1830331A1 (fr) 2007-09-05
ATE504905T1 (de) 2011-04-15
EP1991970A1 (fr) 2008-11-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE3885350T2 (de) Überwachtes wechselwirkendes Alarmmeldersystem.
EP2002406B8 (fr) Procede pour evacuer des batiments divises en sections
CN104346430B (zh) 用于飞行器设备的维护辅助的方法和存储介质
EP3834146A2 (fr) Procédé et système de surveillance d'un système de sécurité ou de détection d'incendie et support de stockage
US7161481B2 (en) Intelligent component management for fire and other life safety systems
CN103676863B (zh) 一种采用数字化技术的核电厂报警显示装置
EP1991970B1 (fr) Intervention lors d'événements se produisant dans un système d'avertissement de danger
CN108923840A (zh) 卫星在轨监测信息报警信息推送系统
DE102016212550A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Ticketmanagementsystems und entsprechendes Ticketmanagementsystem
KR102668513B1 (ko) 화재경보 및 비화재보 관리 시스템 및 방법
CN105527909A (zh) 一种数据监控装置、数据监控方法和监控系统
EP2637147A1 (fr) Système d'alerte de danger et procédé de vérification de sa capacité de fonctionnement
KR101879943B1 (ko) 터널 교통안전방재 통합관리 장치 및 방법
CN205844886U (zh) 一种基于物联网的数据采集故障预警系统
KR100515056B1 (ko) 통신네트워크로 연결된 비상상황제어관리시스템과 이를이용한 비상상황제어관리사업방법 및 이를 컴퓨터에 의해실행할 수 있는 프로그램이 수록된 기록매체
JP2598248B2 (ja) エレベータの遠隔監視システム
EP2253570A1 (fr) Guidage d'un utilisateur d'ascenseur
KR102534770B1 (ko) 구내 방송망 관리 시스템 및 그 방법
Allgeier et al. Optimizing alert occurrence in the Cincinnati contamination warning system
JP2505806B2 (ja) エレベ−タの遠隔監視システム
Muna et al. A Reliability Study on the ALERTUS Emergency Management Notification System
DE202023107418U1 (de) Ein zentralisiertes Relaisraum-Steuersystem für Eisenbahn-Hauptstrecken- und U-Bahn-Anwendungen
Ryu A Study on Preemptive Response to Equipment Problems in Public Address System
WO2005052880A1 (fr) Procede commande par processus et installation d'un systeme de gestion acoustique et de securite
JPH0471239B2 (fr)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080822

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502007006881

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20110519

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502007006881

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20110406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110808

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110806

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110717

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502007006881

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120110

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS A.G.

Effective date: 20120228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110406

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20150220 AND 20150225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502007006881

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 80333 MUENCHEN, DE

Effective date: 20150407

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: PC

Ref document number: 504905

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Effective date: 20150421

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH

Effective date: 20160202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170222

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20170213

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20170209

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20170105

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170419

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20170502

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502007006881

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 504905

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180205

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20181031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180205

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180228