EP1960439A1 - Verfahren zur herstellung eines trägers für olefinpolymerisationskatalysatoren - Google Patents

Verfahren zur herstellung eines trägers für olefinpolymerisationskatalysatoren

Info

Publication number
EP1960439A1
EP1960439A1 EP06829255A EP06829255A EP1960439A1 EP 1960439 A1 EP1960439 A1 EP 1960439A1 EP 06829255 A EP06829255 A EP 06829255A EP 06829255 A EP06829255 A EP 06829255A EP 1960439 A1 EP1960439 A1 EP 1960439A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
extraction
organic solvent
weight
hydrogel
water
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP06829255A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Christoph Kiener
Ingo Treffkorn
Guido Funk
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Basell Polyolefine GmbH
Original Assignee
Basell Polyolefine GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102005060770A external-priority patent/DE102005060770A1/de
Application filed by Basell Polyolefine GmbH filed Critical Basell Polyolefine GmbH
Publication of EP1960439A1 publication Critical patent/EP1960439A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F10/00Homopolymers and copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for preparing an essentially spherical support for olefin polymerization catalysts, which comprises the steps
  • Silica gels are the starting material for the preparation of Phillips catalysts for the polymerization of olefins.
  • Important polymer parameters such as the melt flow rate (MFR 2 i) or the intrinsic viscosity and also important process parameters such as formation of fine dust or the bulk density of the polymer depend critically on the support material used.
  • Supports based on silica gel are usually prepared by firstly preparing a hydrogel in a gel formation process, subjecting this to an appropriate aging process, washing it with water and subsequently extracting the water by means of solvents having a lower surface tension or adding detergents to the water, before final milling, sieving and impregnation takes place.
  • the gel comprises a rigidly crosslinked, three-dimensional network of particles or short particle chains, it is clear that the network will collapse when the gel is dried. This is attributable to the high surface tension of the water present in the pores. It is therefore usual to replace the water by other solvents before drying or add detergents to the water in order to obtain a product having a high pore volume. Since a large pore volume is of critical importance for the quality of the supported catalyst, the extraction step is also of considerable importance.
  • DE 25 40 279 A1 likewise discloses the use of organic solvents for the continuous extraction of the water.
  • Solvents disclosed include tert-butanol, isobutanol, ethanol and methanol. Ethanol is used in the sole example.
  • DE 25 09 286 discloses the use of two different solvents in succession.
  • the water is firstly extracted completely by means of C r C 4 -alkanols or C 3 -C 5 -alkanones and the alkanol or alkanone is subsequently extracted by means of a low-boiling hydrocarbon or oxahydrocarbon in order to reduce the molecular weight of the ethylene polymers prepared using the catalyst.
  • a further object of the present invention is to minimize the consumption and costs of solvents.
  • Another object of the present invention is to minimize the energy consumption during the extraction.
  • step c) comprising
  • the process of the invention allows the extraction time to be shortened significantly. Furthermore, the quality of the supports in terms of the pore volume can be improved. It is particularly surprising that the efficiency of the process and also the quality of the products can be improved simultaneously by means of the solvent combination used according to the invention.
  • solvents which are at least partially miscible with water are generally all polar organic protic or aprotic polar solvents as long as they are at least partially miscible with water.
  • miscibility of the solvent should be above 1 g, preferably above 2 g, particularly preferably above 5 g, per 100 ml of water in order to achieve satisfactory extraction.
  • the first and second organic solvents should likewise be at least partially, preferably completely, miscible with one another.
  • the solvent is preferably a saturated organic liquid comprising heteroatoms of groups 15, 16 and/or 17.
  • the solvents can be protic or aprotic organic solvents. Preference is given to organic protic solvents.
  • Protic solvents are, for example, alcohols R 1 -OH, amines NRV x H x+1 , C ⁇ Cs-carboxylic acids or mixtures thereof, preferably alcohols R 1 -OH, where R 1 is C 1 -C 2O -SlKyI, C 2 -C 2 o-alkenyl, C 6 -C 20 -aryl, alkylaryl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms in the alkyl radical and 6-20 carbon atoms in the aryl radical, or SiR 2 3 , where the radicals R 2 are each, independently of one another, CrC ⁇ -alkyl, C 2 -C 20 -alkenyl, C 6 -C 20 -aryl, alkylaryl having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms in the alkyl radical and
  • Aprotic solvents are, for example, ketones, ethers, esters and nitriles, without being restricted thereto.
  • radicals R 1 or R 2 preference is given to using C ⁇ Ce-alkyl which may be unbranched or branched, e.g. methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, n-heptyl, n-octyl, 5- to 7-membered cycloalkyl which may in turn be alkyl-substituted, e.g.
  • organic radicals R 1 and R 2 may also be substituted by halogens such as fluorine, chlorine or bromine.
  • Preferred alcohols R 1 -OH are methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, 2-butanol, 1-pentanol, 2-pentanol, 1-hexanol, 2-ethylhexanol, 2,2-dimethylethanol and 2,2-dimethylpropanol, in particular methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol, 1-pentanol, 1-hexanol and 2-ethylhexanol.
  • the first organic solvent and the second organic solvent are particularly preferably selected independently from among R 1 OH, R 2 -CO-R 3 , R 2 -O-R 3 , where R 1 is CrCe-alkyl and R 2 , R 3 are each, independently of one another, C 1 -C 4 -SIkVl, with R 1 and R 2 each being able to be branched or unbranched and R 1 OH being most preferred both for the first organic solvent and the second organic solvent.
  • the boiling point of the organic solvents is less than or equal to 15O 0 C, preferably less than or equal to 100°C, particularly preferably less than or equal to 80°C, so that they can be easily recovered by distillation. The recovery can also be made easier by the solvent not forming an azeotrope with water.
  • At least two different solvents are used in two successive extraction steps.
  • the second organic solvent has either at least one carbon atom or at least one branch more than the first organic solvent.
  • the branches formed by heteroatoms are also taken into account.
  • 2-propanol has by definition one branch more than 1-propanol, since the hydroxyl group represents a branch. Hydrogen atoms are not counted.
  • the organic radicals R 1 , R 2 , R 3 of the second organic solvent together having at least one, in particular at least two, particularly preferably from two to three, more carbon atoms than the first organic solvent.
  • the second organic solvent preferably has a boiling point which is at least 1O 0 C 1 in particular at least 15°C, higher than that of the first organic solvent. In this way, the first organic solvent which is easier to recover by distillation can be used for removing the main part of the water, while the higher-boiling second organic solvent ensures a larger pore volume.
  • the second organic solvent particularly preferably has the same functional group(s) as the first organic solvent, i.e. the first and second organic solvents belong to a homologous series.
  • the first organic solvent is selected from among methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and n-propanol and the second organic solvent is selected from among isopropanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, isobutanol and t-butanol.
  • methanol is used in combination with isopropanol, since methanol is cheap and can readily be worked up by distillation, while isopropanol provides a large pore volume and, owing to the fact that its boiling point is not too high, can easily be removed from the support.
  • the extractions with the first organic solvent take place, according to the invention, down to a water content of less than 50% by weight, preferably less than 20% by weight, more preferably less than 10% by weight, particularly preferably less than 5% by weight.
  • the extractions with the first organic solvent preferably take place down to a water content of more than 0.1% by weight, more preferably more than 0.5% by weight, more preferably more than 1% by weight, particularly preferably more than 2% by weight.
  • the extractions with the first organic solvent are carried out to a water content of from 10 to 0.5% by weight.
  • the extraction with the first organic solvent as per step (1) can be carried out batchwise or continuously, with batchwise extraction being preferred.
  • the batchwise extraction is preferably carried out as follows.
  • the isolated particles are placed in an extraction vessel which is provided with an inlet at the top, a horizontal screen and an outlet connected to the underside of the extraction vessel.
  • the liquid level in the extraction vessel is selected so that the hydrogel particles are completely covered with liquid.
  • the charging process usually takes from 5 to 15 minutes.
  • the system is then preferably allowed to stand for from 5 to 20 minutes. Particular preference is here given to starting with short times and increasing these on each repetition so that the duration of the batchwise extractions increases with decreasing water content.
  • the organic solvent concerned is then pumped out. This process likewise usually takes from 5 to 15 minutes.
  • the extractions with the first organic solvent are followed by the extractions with the second organic solvent. This is, according to the invention, carried out until a water content of less than 5% by weight has been reached.
  • the continuous extraction is preferably carried out until a water content of less than 3% by weight, more preferably less than 2% by weight, more preferably less than 1% by weight, particular preferably less than 0.5% by weight, has been reached.
  • the extractions with the second organic solvent as per step (2) can likewise be carried out batchwise or continuously, with continuous extraction being preferred.
  • the continuous extraction is preferably carried out as described in DE 25 40 279 A1.
  • the isolated particles are placed in an extraction vessel provided with an inlet at the top, a horizontal screen and a swan-neck-shaped overflow which is connected to the underside of the extraction vessel, and the liquid level in the extraction vessel is kept high enough for the hydrogel particles to be completely covered with liquid.
  • the organic solvent concerned is then allowed to run in until the outflowing mixture of water and organic solvent has attained the desired water content.
  • the inflow rate of the organic solvent is preferably from 0.2 to 10 l/h per kilogram of hydrogel, particularly preferably from 0.5 to 5 l/kg/h.
  • Both the extraction with the first organic solvent and the extractions with the second organic solvent can comprise one or more extraction steps which can each be carried out continuously or batchwise. Preference is given to more than 2, more preferably more than 3, particularly preferably more than 5, batchwise extractions being carried out in step (1). The number of continuous extractions has no upper limit, but more than 10 extractions give little advantage.
  • step (2) preference is given to carrying out not more than 2 continuous extractions, particularly preferably a single continuous extraction. In a particularly preferred embodiment, from 2 to 5 batchwise extractions with the first organic solvent are carried out in step (1) and one continuous extraction with the second organic solvent is carried out in step (2).
  • the extractions with the first organic solvent preferably each have a duration of from 30 seconds to 1 hour, more preferably from 1 minute to 40 minutes, more preferably from 2 minutes to 30 minutes, particularly preferably from 3 minutes to 20 minutes.
  • the total duration of the extractions with the first organic solvent should not exceed 5 hours, preferably 3 hours.
  • the extractions with the second organic solvent preferably each have a duration of from 5 minutes to 5 hours, more preferably from 10 minutes to 4 hours, more preferably from 15 minutes to 3 hours, particularly preferably from 20 minutes to 2 hours, but in any case until the desired final water content has been reached.
  • the total duration of the extractions with the second organic solvent should not exceed 5 hours, preferably 3 hours.
  • the water content is based, in the case of a batchwise extraction, on the proportion of water in the extraction mixture immediately after separation from the hydrogel relative to the total extraction mixture.
  • the water content in the case of a continuous extraction is based on the proportion of water in the eluate coming from the hydrogel to be extracted relative to the total eluate.
  • the determination of the water content in the extraction solvent can be carried out by all known methods. It is preferably carried out by Karl-Fischer titration.
  • the Karl-Fischer method is based on the oxidation of sulfur dioxide by iodine according to the following chemical reaction:
  • the titration can be followed volumetrically or colorimetrically.
  • the advantage of the Karl-Fischer method is that both relatively large amounts and traces of water can be determined very precisely.
  • the density of the solvent mixture can also be employed for determining the water content.
  • a hydrogel is firstly prepared.
  • the hydrogel comprises a cogel of silicon oxide and at least one further metal oxide. Preference is given to a cogel consisting of silicon oxide and at least one further metal oxide.
  • hydrogel encompasses all hydrogels which are suitable for preparing supports and are based on silicon-comprising starting materials; the term “hydrogel” preferably refers to hydrogels based on silica.
  • the hydrogels comprise a cogel with at least one further metal oxide.
  • the proportion of the cogel is preferably more than 20% by weight, more preferably more than 50% by weight. Particular preference is given to the hydrogel consisting of a cogel.
  • the water content of the hydrogel is preferably at least 80% by weight, preferably at least 90% by weight, based on the total weight of the hydrogel.
  • the preparation of a silica hydrogel or cogel is preferably carried out by acidic or basic precipitation from water glass.
  • the preparation of the hydrogel is preferably carried out by introducing a sodium or potassium water glass solution into a rotating stream of a mineral acid, e.g. sulfuric acid.
  • the silica hydrosol formed is subsequently sprayed into a gaseous medium by means of a nozzle.
  • the nozzle mouthpiece used here leads, after solidification of the hydrosol in the gaseous medium, to hydrogel particles having a mean particle size which can be varied in a range from, for example, 1 mm to 20 mm by choice of the nozzle.
  • the hydrogel particles preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 2 mm to 10 mm, preferably in the range from 5 mm to 6 mm.
  • the hydrogel particles can be sieved and fractions having the preferred diameter can be isolated.
  • hydrogels preferably silica hydrogels, which can be prepared in a manner known from the prior art, for example from silicon-comprising starting materials such as alkali metal silicates, alkyl silicates and/or alkoxysilanes, can likewise be used for preparing supports according to the invention.
  • the size of hydrogel particles which can be used can vary within a wide range, for example in a range from a few microns to a few centimeters.
  • the size of hydrogel particles which can be used is preferably in the range from 1 mm to 20 mm, but hydrogel cakes can likewise be used. It can be advantageous to use hydrogel particles having a size of ⁇ 6 mm. These are obtained, for example, as by-product in the production of granular supports.
  • the hydrogels which can be prepared in step a) are preferably largely spherical. Hydrogels which can be prepared in step a) also preferably have a smooth surface. Silica hydrogels which can be prepared in step a) preferably have a solids content in the range from 10% by weight to 25% by weight, more preferably in the region of 17% by weight, calculated as SiO 2 .
  • Step a) can optionally be followed by milling of the hydrogel to a finely particulate hydrogel.
  • preference is given to at least 5% by volume of the particles, based on the total volume of the particles, having a particle size in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 3 ⁇ m; and/or at least 40% by volume of the particles, based on the total volume of the particles, having a particle size in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 12 ⁇ m, and/or at least 75% by volume of the particles, based on the total volume of the particles, having a particle size in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 35 ⁇ m.
  • a finely particulate silica hydrogel having a solids content in the range from > 0% by weight to ⁇ 25% by weight, preferably in the range from 5% by weight to 15% by weight, more preferably in the range from 8% by weight to 13% by weight, particularly preferably in the range from 9% by weight to 12% by weight, very particularly preferably in the range from 10% by weight to 11% by weight, calculated as SiO 2 , in step b).
  • the solids content is preferably adjusted by dilution, for example by addition of deionized water.
  • the milling of the hydrogel can be carried out in a suitable mill, for example a pin mill or an impingement plate mill; the hydrogel is preferably milled wet in a stirred ball mill.
  • the milling of the hydrogel can be carried out in one step and/or in one mill or in a plurality of steps and/or various mills.
  • the hydrogel can be subjected to preliminary comminution or preliminary milling.
  • the gel is a cogel with a further metal oxide.
  • Suitable metal oxides are the oxides of the elements Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, B, Al, P, Bi, Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Hf, Ta and W and also, if appropriate, one or more activators.
  • Preference is given to using an element selected from among Mg, Ca, B, Al, P, Ti, V, Zr and Zn.
  • Further preference is given to the use of Ti, Zr or Zn. Particular preference is given to the use of Ti.
  • the content of the elements mentioned in the hydrogel is preferably from 0.1 to 20% by weight, more preferably from 0.3 to 10% by weight, particularly preferably from 0.5 to 5% by weight.
  • the hydrogel is, if necessary, washed with water until the content of alkali metal ions is less than 0.1% by weight, based on the weight of solids.
  • the residue content of alkali metal ions is preferably less than 0.05% by weight, particularly preferably less than 0.01% by weight.
  • the washing of the hydrogel is carried out by generally known methods. Washing is preferably carried out with weakly ammoniacal water having a temperature of from about 5O 0 C to 80°C in a continuous countercurrent process.
  • the residue sodium content can be determined, for example, by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
  • the hydrogel particles can optionally be subjected to an aging step in the range from 1 hour to 100 hours, preferably in the range from 5 hours to 30 hours, before washing and/or after washing with the alkaline solution to enable pore volume, surface area and/or mean pore radius of the support to be set.
  • step d) After extraction of the water from the hydrogel down to a water content of less than 5% by weight, based on the total content of liquid, in step c), the hydrogel is finally dried in step d) to form a xerogel.
  • drying is the removal of the solvent from the gel.
  • Drying of the finely particulate hydrogel can be carried out by all customary methods such as thermal drying, drying under reduced pressure or spray drying, with a combination of various methods also being possible.
  • the spray-dried support particles can additionally be thermally dried.
  • the support particles in the form of xerogels generally have a spheroidal, i.e. ball-like, shape.
  • the desired mean particle size of the supports after drying can be varied within a wide range and can be matched to the use of the supports.
  • the mean particle size of the supports can thus, for example, be set according to various processes of the polymerization.
  • the support particles preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 1 ⁇ m to 350 ⁇ m, preferably in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 150 ⁇ m and particularly preferably in the range from 40 ⁇ m to 100 ⁇ m.
  • the support particles which can preferably be produced by means of spray drying particularly preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 90 ⁇ m, more preferably in the range from 40 ⁇ m to 70 ⁇ m, even more preferably in the range from 40 ⁇ m to 50 ⁇ m and very particularly preferably in the range from 40 ⁇ m to 55 ⁇ m.
  • Particular preference is given to from 70% by volume to 90% by volume of the support particles, preferably 80% by volume of the particles, based on the total volume of the particles, having a mean particle size in the range from > 40 ⁇ m to ⁇ 90 ⁇ m.
  • Support particles which are preferably used for polymerization in slurry polymerization processes preferably have mean particle sizes of up to 350 ⁇ m, preferably a mean particle size in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 150 ⁇ m.
  • Support particles which are preferably used for polymerization in gas- phase fluidized-bed processes preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 120 ⁇ m.
  • Support particles which are preferably used for polymerization in suspension processes preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 300 ⁇ m, and support particles which are preferably used for polymerization in loop processes preferably have a mean particle size in the range from 30 ⁇ m to 150 ⁇ m.
  • Support particles which can be used, for example, for polymerization in fixed-bed reactors preferably have mean particle sizes of ⁇ 100 ⁇ m, preferably ⁇ 300 ⁇ m, more preferably in the range from 1 mm to 10 mm, particularly preferably in the range from 2 mm to 8 mm and even more preferably in the range from 2.5 mm to 5.5 mm.
  • the support particles preferably have a particle size distribution in which ⁇ 90% by volume, based on the total volume of the particles, of particles have a size in the range from ⁇ 16 ⁇ m to ⁇ 500 ⁇ m, > 75% by volume of the particles have a size in the range from > 32 ⁇ m to ⁇ 200 ⁇ m and ⁇ 30% by volume of the particles have a size in the range from ⁇ 48 ⁇ m to ⁇ 150 ⁇ m.
  • the support particles particularly advantageously have a low fines content after drying.
  • the fines content of the support particles is the proportion of support particles which have a particle size of less than 25 ⁇ m, preferably less than 22 ⁇ m, particularly preferably less than 20.2 ⁇ m. It is advantageous for less than 5% by volume of the particles after drying, based on the total volume of the particles, to have a particle size in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 25 ⁇ m, preferably in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 22 ⁇ m, particularly preferably in the range from > 0 ⁇ m to ⁇ 20.2 ⁇ m.
  • the support particles prepared by this process have a pore volume which is preferably less than 1.6 ml/g; the support particles more preferably have a pore volume of less than 1.2 ml/g, particularly preferably in the range from 0.8 ml/g to 1.25 ml/g.
  • the support particles prepared have a pore diameter which is preferably less than 20 nm; the support particles more preferably have a pore volume of less than 15 nm, particularly preferably in the range from 5 nm to 13 nm.
  • the surface area of the inorganic support can likewise be varied within a wide range by means of the drying method, in particular by the spray drying process. Preference is given to producing particles of the inorganic support, in particular a product from a spray drier, which have a surface area in the range from 100 m 2 /g to 1000 m 2 /g, preferably in the range from 150 m 2 /g to 700 m 2 /g and particularly preferably in the range from 200 m 2 /g to 500 m 2 /g. Supports which can be used for polymerization preferably have a surface area in the range from 200 m 2 /g to 500 m 2 /g.
  • the specific surface area of the support particles is based on the surface area of the support particles determined by means of nitrogen adsorption according to the BET technique.
  • the bulk density of the inorganic supports for catalysts is preferably in the range from 250 g/l to 1200 g/l, with the bulk density being able to vary depending on the water content of the support.
  • the bulk density of water-comprising support particles is preferably in the range from 500 g/l to 1000 g/l, more preferably in the range from 600 g/l to 950 g/l and particularly preferably in the range from 650 g/l to 900 g/l.
  • the bulk density is preferably from 250 g/l to 600 g/l.
  • the supports which can be prepared according to the invention are particularly useful as supports for olefin polymerization catalysts These can be any type of catalysts, for example Phillips, Ziegler or single-site catalysts, e g metallocene catalysts
  • the supports which can be prepared according to the invention are particularly suitable for preparing Phillips catalysts
  • a Phillips catalyst is a catalyst system comprising a support which can be prepared according to the invention, the element chromium and at least one element selected from among Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, B, Al, Si, P, Bi, Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Hf, Ta and W and also, if appropriate, one or more activators Preference is given to using an element selected from among Mg, Ca, B, Al, P 1 Ti, V, Zr and Zn in addition to chromium Particular preference is given to using Ti, Zr or Zn It should be emphasized that combinations of the abovementioned elements are also possible according to the invention The elements mentioned can be constituents of the hydrogel or can be applied by subsequent doping of xerogel particles It should be emphasized that mixtures of compounds of the elements mentioned are also encompassed
  • the xerogel particles are doped with chromium and, if appropriate, with further elements and are subsequently subjected to calcination Doping can be carried out by all known methods, with the process described in PCT/EP2005/052681 being preferred for joint application to the support
  • chromium is applied together with further elements from a homogenous solution to the support
  • the calcination of the doped xerogel particles is carried out at temperatures of from 350 to
  • calcination is the thermal activation of the catalyst in an oxidizing atmosphere, unless indicated otherwise, with the chromium compound applied being converted completely or partly into the hexavalent state, i e activated, if the chromium is not already present in the hexavalent state
  • the choice of calcination temperature is determined by the properties of the polymer to be prepared and the activity of the catalyst
  • the upper limit to it is imposed by the sintering of the support and the lower limit is imposed by the activity of the catalyst becoming too low Calcination is preferably carried out at a temperature which is at least 20 - 100 0 C below the sintering temperature
  • the influence of the calcination conditions on the catalyst are known in principle and are described, for example, in Advances in Catalysis, VoI 33, page 48 ff Calcination preferably takes place in an oxygen-comprising atmosphere
  • the intermediate obtained from step b) or c) is a temperature which is at least 20 - 100 0 C below the
  • Activation can be carried out in a fluidized bed and/or in a fixed bed. Preference is given to carrying out a thermal activation in fluidized-bed reactors.
  • the catalyst precursor can also be doped with fluoride. Doping with fluoride can be carried out during the preparation of the support, the application of the transition metal compounds or during activation. In a preferred embodiment of the preparation of the supported catalyst, a fluorinating agent is brought into solution together with the desired chromium compound and, if appropriate, further metal compound and the solution is applied to the support in step (a).
  • the determination of the surface area, the pore radii and the pore volume of the support particles was carried out by means of nitrogen adsorption according to the BET Technique (S. Brunauer et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60, pp. 209-319, 1939).
  • Example 1 (Comparative example) 150 g of water-comprising hydrogel beads having a diameter of 5-25-mm were introduced into a glass cylinder which was provided at the bottom with a coarse glass frit. A constant continuous solvent flow of methanol was fed onto the hydrogel beads from a reservoir located at a higher level. The flow rate was from 150 to 300ml/hour. The hydrogel beads were always covered with solvent during the entire experiment. This was achieved by means of a siphon-like construction. The water content of the outflowing solvent was checked by Karl-Fischer titration at intervals of one hour.
  • the alkogel was subsequently dried at 8O 0 C under reduced pressure and the pore volume and the specific surface area were determined. The results are shown in Table 1.
  • Example 1 was repeated using isopropanol instead of methanol as solvent. The results are shown in Table !
  • Example 1 was repeated with the hydrogel beads being extracted firstly with methanol for 4 hours and subsequently with isopropanol for 4 hours. The results are shown in Table 1.
  • Example 3 was repeated with the hydrogel beads being extracted firstly with methanol for 2 hours and subsequently with isopropanol for 2 hours. The results are shown in Table 1.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Polymerization Catalysts (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
EP06829255A 2005-12-16 2006-12-04 Verfahren zur herstellung eines trägers für olefinpolymerisationskatalysatoren Withdrawn EP1960439A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005060770A DE102005060770A1 (de) 2005-12-16 2005-12-16 Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Trägers für Olefinpolymerisationskatalysatoren
US76297806P 2006-01-27 2006-01-27
PCT/EP2006/011597 WO2007068365A1 (en) 2005-12-16 2006-12-04 Process for preparing a support for olefin polymerization catalysts

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1960439A1 true EP1960439A1 (de) 2008-08-27

Family

ID=37814034

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06829255A Withdrawn EP1960439A1 (de) 2005-12-16 2006-12-04 Verfahren zur herstellung eines trägers für olefinpolymerisationskatalysatoren

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1960439A1 (de)
JP (1) JP2009519358A (de)
WO (1) WO2007068365A1 (de)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES291617A1 (es) * 1962-10-18 1964-01-16 Phillips Petroleum Co Procedimiento para el tratamiento de un hidrogel de óxido metálico
DE2509261C2 (de) * 1975-03-04 1984-03-01 Basf Ag, 6700 Ludwigshafen Verfahren zum Herstellen von Olefinpolymerisaten durch Polymerisation von C↓2↓- bis C↓8↓-α-Monoolefinen
US4042769A (en) * 1975-03-12 1977-08-16 Gulf Research & Development Company Catalysts for the polymerization of ethylene

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2007068365A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007068365A1 (en) 2007-06-21
JP2009519358A (ja) 2009-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1080200A (en) Catalyst support prepared by alcohol treatment of hydrogels
KR101582497B1 (ko) 올레핀 중합 촉매용 구형 입자
JPH0422922B2 (de)
US10875014B2 (en) Surface-modified calcium carbonate as carrier for transition metal-based catalysts
EP2593488B1 (de) Abriebfestes katalysatorsystem zur herstellung von polyolefinen
CN102962084A (zh) 一种负载型磷钨酸催化剂及其制备方法和乙酸甲酯的制备方法
EP1784432B1 (de) Chrom und zirconium enthaltender katalysator für die polymerisation und/oder copolymerisation von olefinen
EP1778748B1 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung eines auf chrom basierenden katalysators für die polymerisation und/oder copolymerisation von olefinen
US7598201B2 (en) Process for preparing a support for olefin polymerization catalysts
US6699947B1 (en) Method for producing Phillips catalysts for polymerizing olefins with better productivity rates in the particle-form process
WO2007068365A1 (en) Process for preparing a support for olefin polymerization catalysts
AU610577B2 (en) Particulate solid, production and use
US20090286671A1 (en) Process for Preparing a Support for Olefin Polymerization Catalysts
EP2808351B1 (de) Polymer hergestellt durch Ziegler-Natta-Katalyse
WO2012160574A2 (en) Controlled morphology high activity polyolefin catalyst system
KR20120123053A (ko) 폴리올레핀 제조용 촉매의 반연속 합성 공정
US11732065B2 (en) Chromium-on-silica catalysts and methods of making the same
JP2023528922A (ja) 球状様超マクロ多孔質メソ多孔質材料、およびそれを含有するポリオレフィン触媒
EP3083041B1 (de) Katalysatorträger und zugehörige verfahren
US10407518B2 (en) Catalyst support and related processes
JP2008502757A (ja) オレフィン重合のためのクロムと亜鉛とを含む触媒およびその調製法
KR20220149711A (ko) 크롬-온-실리카 촉매 및 이의 제조 방법
CN107417830B (zh) 一种乙烯聚合方法和聚乙烯
US9895678B2 (en) Catalyst and method of manufacture
CN117839701A (zh) 一种铜锌催化剂的制备方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080609

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090424

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20100701