EP1852837B1 - Procédé destiné à l'authentification d'un produit - Google Patents
Procédé destiné à l'authentification d'un produit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1852837B1 EP1852837B1 EP07008592.3A EP07008592A EP1852837B1 EP 1852837 B1 EP1852837 B1 EP 1852837B1 EP 07008592 A EP07008592 A EP 07008592A EP 1852837 B1 EP1852837 B1 EP 1852837B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- product
- code
- database
- banknote
- entered
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 23
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000009958 sewing Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004026 adhesive bonding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002390 adhesive tape Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004753 textile Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/004—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using digital security elements, e.g. information coded on a magnetic thread or strip
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/004—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using digital security elements, e.g. information coded on a magnetic thread or strip
- G07D7/0047—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using digital security elements, e.g. information coded on a magnetic thread or strip using checkcodes, e.g. coded numbers derived from serial number and denomination
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for authenticating a single product of a manufacturer by a third party.
- a method according to the preamble of claim 1, is out WO 2005/036504 known.
- a code is first created, as for example in the WO 03/007252 A1 is described.
- This code is a relatively tamper-proof random code that is unique to each product, so it is appropriate to identify a single product in a series of products.
- the code is applied to the product itself or to its packaging, eg printed on a label, the label then being adhered to the packaging.
- the manufacturer enters this code into a database, which contains a list of all assigned and therefore permissible codes.
- This database is public, in particular accessible on the Internet, so that the customer can access it by means of a query.
- the customer can enter the printed code on the Internet after calling the database and receives feedback as to whether the code is contained in the database, ie identical to a stored code and / or if the code has been previously used has been queried. From this feedback, the customer can draw conclusions about the authenticity of the product. If the database information shows that the entered number is not contained in the database, it is obviously not an original product but a plagiarism. Returns the query that the code exists in the database but from one If a third party has ever been retrieved (the database is able to save these queries), this does not give a reliable inference as to whether it is an original or a plagiarism, as either a middleman could have retrieved the number or the number could have been copied by a forger just.
- the DE 199 45 760 A1 has an inspection system for testing an object for its origin from an assumed source of origin to the object, wherein the object is provided with at least one mark recognizable by a recognizer and the mark recognized by the recognizer is comparable with the originating source individualizing features. Also, this test system is not forgery-proof and stays behind the above (with reference to the WO 03/007252 A1 ).
- the DE 198 38 913 A1 The invention relates to a method for checking the authenticity of a product, in which a random code specific thereto is applied to a label-shaped data carrier which is stored in a data memory, which may also be a publicly accessible database. This code can be read by a third party and entered into the data store. On the basis of a comparison of this input code with the codes of all the products of a series stored in the database, the database generates an output as to whether the indicated code is identical to a stored code is / or has already been queried.
- a similar method and test system is the DE 199 45 760 A1 refer to.
- the disadvantage here is that the counterfeiter, starting from a set of banknotes, can readily produce appropriate, counterfeit labels and that does not take place a verification and verification via a database. This is also not necessary in the method described, since this is exhausted in the comparison of the serial number of the banknote with the number applied to the article or its label.
- the existing options indeed provide the brand manufacturer with a certain overview of the distribution channel, provided that the parties involved regularly query the numbers or codes.
- the systems do not offer a sufficiently secure way of ensuring that the parties involved in the distribution channel, and in particular the end customer, have obtained an original product or a plagiarism. This applies in particular to the subject matter of EP 1 176 562 A2 because it is easily possible to fake labels with certain banknote numbers.
- the inventive method is based in principle on a method, as shown in the introduction to the description.
- the brand manufacturer itself does not generate any code or label bearing this code, but uses as banknotes banknotes of a state central bank and as code the serial numbers already provided on these banknotes, which are absolutely unique because of the necessary distinctness of the banknotes.
- These serial numbers consist for example of a number and / or letter sequence or of other visible and data-processing accessible characters.
- the code is sufficiently long and complex for all state-of-the-art banknote systems to ensure that it is only used with a low probability of being randomly accessed by a third party.
- the bill whose value is of course chosen much lower than the value of the product is added by the brand manufacturer the product, for example, placed in its packaging, applied to its packaging, or detachably connected to the product or the packaging, which is useful by gluing, Sewing, stapling or riveting can be done.
- the brand manufacturer leads a publicly accessible, for example, retrievable on the Internet, database for the series.
- This contains the codes (ie the serial numbers of banknotes used) of each branded product.
- the database is preferably able to set a flag when calling the codes, indicating whether the code has already been retrieved once. This information can also be output when retrieving the database.
- the database may be protected against "hackers" in a manner known per se, e.g. through an access code.
- the customer receives feedback from the database, for example, that the code was not issued for an original product. It is then a fake product, which was probably attached to a real banknote.
- Another feedback from the database could be that, while the code is for an original product, it has already been requested at least once. In this case, it is very likely that there will be a forgery of both the product and the banknote. While it can not be completely ruled out that it is an original, if the fake number was first retrieved by a third party. However, this is very unlikely because the original number exists only once, but identical, fake numbers will often exist. The counterfeiter in this case was guilty of counterfeiting, which is why the case is unlikely to occur.
- the database can provide feedback that the code for an original product has been assigned and not yet queried. In this case, it is most likely an original product with an original banknote.
- the bill is attached to the product in a suitable manner, e.g. in its packaging so that the serial number is not immediately recognizable or attached to the product or its packaging.
- fastening methods are adhesive (adhesive or adhesive tape), sewing, stapling or riveting offer, with all other mounting options come into consideration. Sewing will be considered especially for textile materials and shoes.
- the banknote is attached to the product or its packaging so that it can be detached therefrom and subsequently used again as a means of payment.
- the invention is in addition to the method described also a product of a series, which is attached to a banknote or to which the banknote is attached, and the described use of a banknote for the purpose of authenticating a product from a series.
- the output of the database for entering the serial number also includes features of the product, e.g. its size, color, model or design and / or one or more photographic representations of the product.
- the database can log in a manner known per se whether, how often, when and from which IP address the code or another own code has already been queried, which in turn allows conclusions about the distribution of a product and any pirate goods.
- the Internet is a means of access to the database of the manufacturer, since there is a domain name - usually the manufacturer - only once awarded and it is transparent and obvious to the buyer that he is on the right domain, and not on that of a forger.
- the attachment of the banknote on the product is preferably carried out in a manner which allows the banknote to be used without damage or at least to largely detach it in order to be able to use the banknote again as a means of payment.
- banknotes with consecutive numbering and / or the same initial number or letter can be used for a company or product series, so that an immediate assignment of the banknote to the brand manufacturer is possible.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
Claims (8)
- Procédé d'authentification d'un produit individuel parmi une série, auquel est associé au moins un code spécifique à cet effet sur un support de données, ce code étant mémorisé dans une banque de données accessible au public, étant lu par un tiers et étant saisi dans la banque de données, et sur la base d'une comparaison du code saisi avec les codes de tous les produits de la série mémorisés dans la banque de données, la banque de données génère une sortie indiquant si le code est identique à un code mémorisé et/ou s'il a déjà été demandé, caractérisé en ce que le support de données est un billet de banque officiel d'une banque centrale d'état et le code est son numéro de série officiel.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le billet de banque est connecté au produit ou à son emballage, par exemple par collage, couture, agrafage ou rivetage.
- Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le billet de banque est connecté de manière amovible au produit ou à son emballage de sorte qu'il puisse être utilisé à nouveau en tant que monnaie après son détachement.
- Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que l'émission de la banque centrale contient des informations détaillées concernant le produit, dont le code spécifique a été saisi, par exemple le modèle spécifique, la taille, la couleur et/ou une ou plusieurs représentations sous forme d'images.
- Utilisation d'un billet de banque officiel d'une banque centrale d'un état, comprenant un numéro de série officiel, dans un procédé d'authentification d'un produit individuel parmi une série, auquel est associé le numéro de série du billet de banque, celui-ci étant mémorisé dans une banque de données accessible au public, étant lu par un tiers et étant saisi dans la banque de données et, sur la base d'une comparaison du numéro de série saisi avec les numéros de série de tous les produits de la série mémorisée dans la banque de données, la banque de données générant une sortie indiquant si le numéro de série est identique à un numéro de série mémorisé et/ou s'il a déjà été demandé.
- Utilisation selon la revendication 5, caractérisée en ce que le billet de banque est connecté au produit ou à son emballage, par exemple par collage, couture, agrafage ou rivetage.
- Utilisation selon la revendication 6, caractérisée en ce que le billet de banque est connecté de manière amovible au produit ou à son emballage de sorte qu'il puisse être utilisé à nouveau en tant que monnaie après son détachement.
- Utilisation selon l'une quelconque des revendications 5 à 7, caractérisée en ce que l'émission de la banque centrale contient des informations détaillées concernant le produit, dont le numéro de série a été saisi, par exemple le modèle spécifique, la taille, la couleur et/ou une ou plusieurs représentations sous forme d'images.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102006020958A DE102006020958A1 (de) | 2006-05-05 | 2006-05-05 | Verfahren zur Authentifizierung eines Produkts |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1852837A1 EP1852837A1 (fr) | 2007-11-07 |
EP1852837B1 true EP1852837B1 (fr) | 2016-06-08 |
Family
ID=38294004
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07008592.3A Active EP1852837B1 (fr) | 2006-05-05 | 2007-04-27 | Procédé destiné à l'authentification d'un produit |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1852837B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102006020958A1 (fr) |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0647342B1 (fr) * | 1992-05-06 | 2002-03-27 | Cias Inc. | Detection de contrefacons a l'aide de codes d'identification contenant des zones de chiffres aleatoires |
US6442276B1 (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2002-08-27 | Assure Systems, Inc. | Verification of authenticity of goods by use of random numbers |
DE19838913A1 (de) * | 1998-08-27 | 1999-10-21 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren zur Originalitätsprüfung eines Erzeugnisses |
DE19945760A1 (de) * | 1999-09-24 | 2001-03-29 | Christian Ploppa | Prüfsystem und Verfahren zum Prüfen eines Gegenstandes |
CN1332436A (zh) * | 2000-06-22 | 2002-01-23 | 黄金富 | 售卖商品防假冒的方法和相应的防伪商品 |
NO314372B1 (no) * | 2001-06-20 | 2003-03-10 | Kezzler As | Fremgangsmåte for frembringelse og senere benyttelse av autentiseringsinformasjon |
DE10343064A1 (de) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-05-04 | Sata Farbspritztechnik | Verfahren zur Authentifizierung eines Produkts |
-
2006
- 2006-05-05 DE DE102006020958A patent/DE102006020958A1/de not_active Ceased
-
2007
- 2007-04-27 EP EP07008592.3A patent/EP1852837B1/fr active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1852837A1 (fr) | 2007-11-07 |
DE102006020958A1 (de) | 2007-11-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1665199B1 (fr) | Procede pour authentifier un produit | |
EP2433239B1 (fr) | Code original, procédé de génération et utilisation dudit code original | |
EP1459266B1 (fr) | Procédé pour protéger l'authenticité de documents | |
DE69831769T2 (de) | System und Verfahren zur Kontrolle bzw. Überwachung | |
DE2237911A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ermoeglichung einer echtheitskontrolle von serienmaessig durchnummerierten objekten | |
EP3671674B1 (fr) | Objet de réserve de valeur | |
DE102006019557B4 (de) | Verpackungseinheit | |
EP1593088B1 (fr) | Systeme de garantie de produit et procede associe | |
EP1852837B1 (fr) | Procédé destiné à l'authentification d'un produit | |
WO2009013078A1 (fr) | Procédé et système visant à identifier un produit comme étant un produit original d'un fabricant de produits | |
DE202006007218U1 (de) | Produkt aus einer Serie | |
DE2452202A1 (de) | Urkunden mit echtheitspruefmoeglichkeit sowie vorrichtung zur echtheitspruefung | |
EP0829826B1 (fr) | Dispositif pour fabriquer des documents de valeur | |
EP1140521B2 (fr) | Document pouvant etre active et systeme pour documents pouvant etre actives | |
DE102004026557A1 (de) | Authentifizierungsverfahren und Authentifizierungssystem | |
DE10137695B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Identifizieren eines Gegenstands innerhalb einer Mehrzahl von Gegenständen | |
DE202006006773U1 (de) | Personalisierte Verpackungseinheit | |
DE69701414T2 (de) | Sicherheitspapier und Verfahren zum sicheren Transport von Sicherheitspapiere | |
DE202023106413U1 (de) | Fälschungsgeschütztes Etikett | |
DE2809707A1 (de) | Verfahren zum ueberwachen und registrieren des ein- und ausganges von geldscheinen aller waehrungen sowie deren echtheitspruefung und einrichtungen zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens | |
DE102015117093B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Prüfung, ob Produkte auf dem Markt sind, die keine Originalprodukte sind | |
DE29604193U1 (de) | Parkvorrichtung | |
DE102010038045A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Fälschungssicherung für Gegenstände | |
WO2008062014A1 (fr) | Procédé et système de contrôle du fabricant d'un exemplaire d'un produit de masse | |
DE102014101868A1 (de) | An einem Gegenstand anbringbares Identifizierungselement, Verfahren zur Überprüfung eines digitalen Codes und Verfahren zur eindeutigen Markierung eines Gegenstands |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080209 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20081002 |
|
APBK | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE |
|
APBN | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E |
|
APBR | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E |
|
APAF | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE |
|
APBT | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAC | Information related to communication of intention to grant a patent modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20151109 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20151117 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502007014868 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 805712 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160909 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161010 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502007014868 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170430 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170430 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170427 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 502007014868 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 805712 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170427 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170427 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20070427 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20230424 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230424 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240531 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240627 Year of fee payment: 18 |