EP1805824B1 - Use of organic photosensitive devices - Google Patents

Use of organic photosensitive devices Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1805824B1
EP1805824B1 EP05858148.9A EP05858148A EP1805824B1 EP 1805824 B1 EP1805824 B1 EP 1805824B1 EP 05858148 A EP05858148 A EP 05858148A EP 1805824 B1 EP1805824 B1 EP 1805824B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
layer
organic
acceptor
donor
heterojunction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP05858148.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1805824A2 (en
Inventor
Peter Peumans
Stephen R. Forrest
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Princeton University
Original Assignee
Princeton University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Princeton University filed Critical Princeton University
Publication of EP1805824A2 publication Critical patent/EP1805824A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1805824B1 publication Critical patent/EP1805824B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K30/00Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation
    • H10K30/20Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation comprising organic-organic junctions, e.g. donor-acceptor junctions
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L31/00Semiconductor devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation and specially adapted either for the conversion of the energy of such radiation into electrical energy or for the control of electrical energy by such radiation; Processes or apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture or treatment thereof or of parts thereof; Details thereof
    • H01L31/04Semiconductor devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation and specially adapted either for the conversion of the energy of such radiation into electrical energy or for the control of electrical energy by such radiation; Processes or apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture or treatment thereof or of parts thereof; Details thereof adapted as photovoltaic [PV] conversion devices
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y10/00Nanotechnology for information processing, storage or transmission, e.g. quantum computing or single electron logic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K30/00Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation
    • H10K30/20Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation comprising organic-organic junctions, e.g. donor-acceptor junctions
    • H10K30/211Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation comprising organic-organic junctions, e.g. donor-acceptor junctions comprising multiple junctions, e.g. double heterojunctions
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K30/00Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation
    • H10K30/30Organic devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation comprising bulk heterojunctions, e.g. interpenetrating networks of donor and acceptor material domains
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K39/00Integrated devices, or assemblies of multiple devices, comprising at least one organic radiation-sensitive element covered by group H10K30/00
    • H10K39/30Devices controlled by radiation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K85/00Organic materials used in the body or electrodes of devices covered by this subclass
    • H10K85/10Organic polymers or oligomers
    • H10K85/111Organic polymers or oligomers comprising aromatic, heteroaromatic, or aryl chains, e.g. polyaniline, polyphenylene or polyphenylene vinylene
    • H10K85/113Heteroaromatic compounds comprising sulfur or selene, e.g. polythiophene
    • H10K85/1135Polyethylene dioxythiophene [PEDOT]; Derivatives thereof
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K85/00Organic materials used in the body or electrodes of devices covered by this subclass
    • H10K85/20Carbon compounds, e.g. carbon nanotubes or fullerenes
    • H10K85/211Fullerenes, e.g. C60
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K85/00Organic materials used in the body or electrodes of devices covered by this subclass
    • H10K85/30Coordination compounds
    • H10K85/311Phthalocyanine
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10KORGANIC ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES
    • H10K85/00Organic materials used in the body or electrodes of devices covered by this subclass
    • H10K85/60Organic compounds having low molecular weight
    • H10K85/615Polycyclic condensed aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g. anthracene
    • H10K85/621Aromatic anhydride or imide compounds, e.g. perylene tetra-carboxylic dianhydride or perylene tetracarboxylic di-imide
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50Photovoltaic [PV] energy
    • Y02E10/549Organic PV cells

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices. More specifically, it is directed to organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices having a donor-acceptor junction.
  • Optoelectronic devices rely on the optical and electronic properties of materials to either produce or detect electromagnetic radiation electronically or to generate electricity from ambient electromagnetic radiation.
  • Photosensitive optoelectronic devices convert electromagnetic radiation into electricity.
  • Solar cells also called photovoltaic (PV) devices
  • PV devices which may generate electrical energy from light sources other than sunlight, can be used to drive power consuming loads to provide, for example, lighting, heating, or to power electronic circuitry or devices such as calculators, radios, computers or remote monitoring or communications equipment.
  • power generation applications also often involve the charging of batteries or other energy storage devices so that operation may continue when direct illumination from the sun or other light sources is not available, or to balance the power output of the PV device with a specific application's requirements.
  • the term "resistive load” refers to any power consuming or storing circuit, device, equipment or system.
  • photosensitive optoelectronic device is a photoconductor cell.
  • signal detection circuitry monitors the resistance of the device to detect changes due to the absorption of light.
  • photosensitive optoelectronic device is a photodetector.
  • a photodetector is used in conjunction with a current detecting circuit which measures the current generated when the photodetector is exposed to electromagnetic radiation and may have an applied bias voltage.
  • a detecting circuit as described herein is capable of providing a bias voltage to a photodetector and measuring the electronic response of the photodetector to electromagnetic radiation.
  • a photoconductor cell does not have a rectifying junction and is normally operated with a bias.
  • a PV device has at least one rectifying junction and is operated with no bias.
  • a photodetector has at least one rectifying junction and is usually but not always operated with a bias.
  • a photovoltaic cell provides power to a circuit, device or equipment, but does not provide a signal or current to control detection circuitry, or the output of information from the detection circuitry.
  • a photodetector or photoconductor provides a signal or current to control detection circuitry, or the output of information from the detection circuitry but does not provide power to the circuitry, device or equipment.
  • photosensitive optoelectronic devices have been constructed of a number of inorganic semiconductors, e.g., crystalline, polycrystalline and amorphous silicon, gallium arsenide, cadmium telluride and others.
  • semiconductor denotes materials which can conduct electricity when charge carriers are induced by thermal or electromagnetic excitation.
  • photoconductive generally relates to the process in which electromagnetic radiant energy is absorbed and thereby converted to excitation energy of electric charge carriers so that the carriers can conduct, i.e., transport, electric charge in a material.
  • photoconductor and photoconductive material are used herein to refer to semiconductor materials which are chosen for their property of absorbing electromagnetic radiation to generate electric charge carriers.
  • PV devices may be characterized by the efficiency with which they can convert incident solar power to useful electric power.
  • Devices utilizing crystalline or amorphous silicon dominate commercial applications, and some have achieved efficiencies of 23% or greater.
  • efficient crystalline-based devices, especially of large surface area are difficult and expensive to produce due to the problems inherent in producing large crystals without significant efficiency-degrading defects.
  • high efficiency amorphous silicon devices still suffer from problems with stability.
  • Present commercially available amorphous silicon cells have stabilized efficiencies between 4 and 8%. More recent efforts have focused on the use of organic photovoltaic cells to achieve acceptable photovoltaic conversion efficiencies with economical production costs.
  • PV devices may be optimized for maximum electrical power generation under standard illumination conditions (i.e., Standard Test Conditions which are 1000 W/m 2 , AM1.5 spectral illumination), for the maximum product of photocurrent times photovoltage.
  • standard illumination conditions i.e., Standard Test Conditions which are 1000 W/m 2 , AM1.5 spectral illumination
  • the power conversion efficiency of such a cell under standard illumination conditions depends on the following three parameters: (1) the current under zero bias, i.e., the short-circuit current I SC , (2) the photovoltage under open circuit conditions, i.e., the open circuit voltage V OC , and (3) the fill factor, ff .
  • PV devices produce a photo-generated current when they are connected across a load and are irradiated by light.
  • a PV device When irradiated under infinite load, a PV device generates its maximum possible voltage, V open-circuit, or V OC .
  • V open-circuit When irradiated with its electrical contacts shorted, a PV device generates its maximum possible current, I short-circuit, or I SC .
  • I xV the power output is given by the product of the current and voltage
  • the maximum total power generated by a PV device is inherently incapable of exceeding the product, I SC ⁇ V OC .
  • the current and voltage When the load value is optimized for maximum power extraction, the current and voltage have the values, I max and V max , respectively.
  • P inc the power incident on a device
  • a photon can be absorbed to produce an excited molecular state.
  • OMC organic molecular crystal
  • S 0 + hv ⁇ S 0 * denote ground and excited molecular states, respectively.
  • This energy absorption is associated with the promotion of an electron from a bound state in the HOMO energy level, which may be a ⁇ -bond, to the LUMO energy level, which may be a ⁇ *-bond, or equivalently, the promotion of a hole from the LUMO energy level to the HOMO energy level.
  • the generated molecular state is generally believed to be an exciton, i.e., an electron-hole pair in a bound state which is transported as a quasi-particle.
  • the excitons can have an appreciable life-time before geminate recombination, which refers to the process of the original electron and hole recombining with each other, as opposed to recombination with holes or electrons from other pairs.
  • the electron-hole pair becomes separated, typically at a donor-acceptor interface between two dissimilar contacting organic thin films.
  • the charges do not separate, they can recombine in a geminant recombination process, also known as quenching, either radiatively, by the emission of light of a lower energy than the incident light, or non-radiatively, by the production of heat. Either of these outcomes is undesirable in a photosensitive optoelectronic device.
  • Electric fields or inhomogeneities at a contact may cause an exciton to quench rather than dissociate at the donor-acceptor interface, resulting in no net contribution to the current. Therefore, it is desirable to keep photogenerated excitons away from the contacts. This has the effect of limiting the diffusion of excitons to the region near the junction so that the associated electric field has an increased opportunity to separate charge carriers liberated by the dissociation of the excitons near the junction.
  • n-type denotes that the majority carrier type is the electron. This could be viewed as the material having many electrons in relatively free energy states.
  • p-type denotes that the majority carrier type is the hole. Such material has many holes in relatively free energy states.
  • the type of the background, i.e., not photo-generated, majority carrier concentration depends primarily on unintentional doping by defects or impurities.
  • the type and concentration of impurities determine the value of the Fermi energy, or level, within the gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy level and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level, called the HOMO-LUMO gap.
  • the Fermi energy characterizes the statistical occupation of molecular quantum energy states denoted by the value of energy for which the probability of occupation is equal to 1 ⁇ 2.
  • a Fermi energy near the LUMO energy level indicates that electrons are the predominant carrier.
  • a Fermi energy near the HOMO energy level indicates that holes are the predominant carrier. Accordingly, the Fermi energy is a primary characterizing property of traditional semiconductors and the prototypical PV heterojunction has traditionally been the p-n interface.
  • rectifying denotes, inter alia, that an interface has an asymmetric conduction characteristic, i.e., the interface supports electronic charge transport preferably in one direction. Rectification is associated normally with a built-in electric field which occurs at the heterojunction between appropriately selected materials.
  • a first "Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital” (HOMO) or “Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital” (LUMO) energy level is “greater than” or "higher than” a second HOMO or LUMO energy level if the first energy level is closer to the vacuum energy level.
  • IP ionization potentials
  • a higher HOMO energy level corresponds to an IP having a smaller absolute value (an IP that is less negative).
  • a higher LUMO energy level corresponds to an electron affinity (EA) having a smaller absolute value (an EA that is less negative).
  • the LUMO energy level of a material is higher than the HOMO energy level of the same material.
  • a "higher” HOMO or LUMO energy level appears closer to the top of such a diagram than a "lower” HOMO or LUMO energy level.
  • the terms “donor” and “acceptor” refer to the relative positions of the HOMO and LUMO energy levels of two contacting but different organic materials. This is in contrast to the use of these terms in the inorganic context, where “donor” and “acceptor” may refer to types of dopants that may be used to create inorganic n- and p- types layers, respectively.
  • donor and “acceptor” may refer to types of dopants that may be used to create inorganic n- and p- types layers, respectively.
  • the LUMO energy level of one material in contact with another is lower, then that material is an acceptor. Otherwise it is a donor. It is energetically favorable, in the absence of an external bias, for electrons at a donor-acceptor junction to move into the acceptor material, and for holes to move into the donor material.
  • a significant property in organic semiconductors is carrier mobility. Mobility measures the ease with which a charge carrier can move through a conducting material in response to an electric-field.
  • a layer including a material that conducts preferentially by electrons due to a high electron mobility may be referred to as an electron transport layer, or ETL.
  • a layer including a material that conducts preferentially by holes due to a high hole mobility may be referred to as a hole transport layer, or HTL.
  • an acceptor material is an ETL and a donor material is a HTL.
  • the energy level offset at the organic D-A heterojunction is believed to be important to the operation of organic PV devices due to the fundamental nature of the photogeneration process in organic materials.
  • Upon optical excitation of an organic material localized Frenkel or charge-transfer excitons are generated.
  • the bound excitons must be dissociated into their constituent electrons and holes.
  • Such a process can be induced by the built-in electric field, but the efficiency at the electric fields typically found in organic devices (F ⁇ 10 6 V/cm) is low.
  • the most efficient exciton dissociation in organic materials occurs at a donor-acceptor (D-A) interface.
  • the donor material with a low ionization potential forms a heterojunction with an acceptor material with a high electron affinity.
  • the dissociation of the exciton can become energetically favorable at such an interface, leading to a free electron polaron in the acceptor material and a free hole polaron in the donor material.
  • Organic PV cells have many potential advantages when compared to traditional silicon-based devices.
  • Organic PV cells are light weight, economical in materials use, and can be deposited on low cost substrates, such as flexible plastic foils.
  • some organic PV devices typically have relatively low external quantum efficiency, being on the order of 1 % or less. This is, in part, thought to be due to the second order nature of the intrinsic photoconductive process. That is, carrier generation requires exciton generation, diffusion and ionization or collection.
  • associated with each of these processes.
  • the diffusion length (LD) of an exciton is typically much less (L D ⁇ 50 ⁇ ) than the optical absorption length (-500A), requiring a trade off between using a thick, and therefore resistive, cell with multiple or highly folded interfaces, or a thin cell with a low optical absorption efficiency.
  • the electron drift mobilities of Alq 3 is disclosed as 3x10 -6 cm 2 /V ⁇ s and the hole mobilities of Alq 3 is disclosed as 4x10 -8 cm 2 /V ⁇ s.
  • the thicknesses of the organic layers in the electroluminescent devices are disclosed as 50 nm for the donor-type layer and 50 nm for the acceptor-type layer.
  • a use of a photoactive device includes a first electrode, a second electrode, and a photoactive region disposed between and electrically connected to the first and second electrodes.
  • the photoactive region further includes an organic donor layer and an organic acceptor layer that form a donor-acceptor heterojunction.
  • the mobility of holes in the organic donor region exceeds the mobility of electrons in the organic acceptor region by a factor of at least 100, and more preferably a factor of at least 1000.
  • the mobility of holes in the organic donor region greater than 0.001 cm 2 /V ⁇ s, and more preferably greater than 1 cm 2 /V ⁇ s.
  • the heterojunction may be of various types, including a planar heterojunction, a bulk heterojunction, a mixed heterojunction, and a hybrid planar-mixed heterojunction.
  • Organic devices of embodiments of the present invention may be used, for example, to generate a usable electrical current from incident electromagnetic radiation (e.g., PV devices) or may be used to detect incident electromagnetic radiation.
  • Embodiments of the present invention may comprise an anode, a cathode, and a photoactive region between the anode and the cathode.
  • the photoactive region is the portion of the photosensitive device that absorbs electromagnetic radiation to generate excitons that may dissociate in order to generate an electrical current.
  • Organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices may also include at least one transparent electrode to allow incident radiation to be absorbed by the device.
  • Figure 1 shows an organic photosensitive optoelectronic device 100.
  • Device 100 may include a substrate 110, an anode 115, an anode smoothing layer 120, a donor layer 125, an acceptor layer 130, a blocking layer 135, and a cathode 140.
  • Cathode 140 may be a compound cathode having a first conductive layer and a second conductive layer.
  • Device 100 may be fabricated by depositing the layers described, in order. Charge separation may occur predominantly at the organic heterojunction between donor layer 125 and acceptor layer 130. The built-in potential at the heterojunction is determined by the HOMO-LUMO energy level difference between the two materials contacting to form the heterojunction.
  • the HOMO-LUMO gap offset between the donor and acceptor materials produce an electric field at the donor/acceptor interface that facilitates charge separation for excitons created within an exciton diffusion length of the interface.
  • FIG. 1 The specific arrangement of layers illustrated in Figure 1 is exemplary only, and is not intended to be limiting. For example, some of the layers (such as blocking layers) may be omitted. Other layers (such as reflective layers or additional acceptor and donor layers) may be added. The order of layers may be altered. Arrangements other than those specifically described may be used.
  • the substrate may be any suitable substrate that provides desired structural properties.
  • the substrate may be flexible or rigid, planar or non-planar.
  • the substrate may be transparent, translucent or opaque.
  • Plastic and glass are examples of preferred rigid substrate materials.
  • Plastic and metal foils are examples of preferred flexible substrate materials.
  • the material and thickness of the substrate may be chosen to obtain desired structural and optical properties.
  • Electrode and “contact” refer to layers that provide a medium for delivering photo-generated current to an external circuit or providing a bias voltage to the device. That is, an electrode, or contact, provides the interface between the active regions of an organic photosensitive optoelectronic device and a wire, lead, trace or other means for transporting the charge carriers to or from the external circuit.
  • a photosensitive optoelectronic device it is desirable to allow the maximum amount of ambient electromagnetic radiation from the device exterior to be admitted to the photoconductively active interior region.
  • the electromagnetic radiation must reach a photoconductive layer(s), where it can be converted to electricity by photoconductive absorption.
  • the opposing electrode may be a reflective material so that light which has passed through the cell without being absorbed is reflected back through the cell.
  • a layer of material or a sequence of several layers of different materials is said to be "transparent" when the layer or layers permit at least 50% of the ambient electromagnetic radiation in relevant wavelengths to be transmitted through the layer or layers.
  • layers which permit some, but less that 50% transmission of ambient electromagnetic radiation in relevant wavelengths are said to be "semi-transparent.”
  • top means furthest away from the substrate
  • bottom means closest to the substrate.
  • the bottom electrode is the electrode closest to the substrate, and is generally the first electrode fabricated.
  • the bottom electrode has two surfaces, a bottom surface closest to the substrate, and a top surface further away from the substrate.
  • a first layer is described as "disposed over” a second layer
  • the first layer is disposed further away from substrate.
  • a cathode may be described as “disposed over” an anode, even though there are various organic layers in between.
  • the electrodes are preferably composed of metals or "metal substitutes".
  • metal is used to embrace both materials composed of an elementally pure metal, e.g., Mg, and also metal alloys which are materials composed of two or more elementally pure metals, e.g., Mg and Ag together, denoted Mg:Ag.
  • metal substitute refers to a material that is not a metal within the normal definition, but which has the metal-like properties that are desired in certain appropriate applications.
  • ITO indium tin oxide
  • GITO gallium indium tin oxide
  • ZITO zinc indium tin oxide
  • ITO is a highly doped degenerate n+ semiconductor with an optical bandgap of approximately 3.2 eV, rendering it transparent to wavelengths greater than approximately 3900 ⁇ .
  • PANI transparent conductive polymer polyanaline
  • Metal substitutes may be further selected from a wide range of non-metallic materials, wherein the term “non-metallic” is meant to embrace a wide range of materials provided that the material is free of metal in its chemically uncombined form.
  • the metal When a metal is present in its chemically uncombined form, either alone or in combination with one or more other metals as an alloy, the metal may alternatively be referred to as being present in its metallic form or as being a "free metal".
  • the metal substitute electrodes of the present invention may sometimes be referred to as "metal-free” wherein the term “metal-free” is expressly meant to embrace a material free of metal in its chemically uncombined form.
  • Free metals typically have a form of metallic bonding that results from a sea of valence electrons which are free to move in an electronic conduction band throughout the metal lattice. While metal substitutes may contain metal constituents they are "non-metallic" on several bases. They are not pure free-metals nor are they alloys of free-metals. When metals are present in their metallic form, the electronic conduction band tends to provide, among other metallic properties, a high electrical conductivity as well as a high reflectivity for optical radiation.
  • Embodiments of the present invention may include, as one or more of the transparent electrodes of the photosensitive optoelectronic device, a highly transparent, non-metallic, low resistance cathode such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 6,420,031, to Parthasarathy et al. ("Parthasarathy '031"), or a highly efficient, low resistance metallic/non-metallic compound cathode such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,703,436 to Forrest et al. (“Forrest '436").
  • a highly transparent, non-metallic, low resistance cathode such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 6,420,031, to Parthasarathy et al.
  • Parthasarathy '031 to Parthasarathy et al.
  • a highly efficient, low resistance metallic/non-metallic compound cathode such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,703,436 to Forrest et al.
  • Each type of cathode is preferably prepared in a fabrication process that includes the step of sputter depositing an ITO layer onto either an organic material, such as copper phthalocyanine (CuPc), to form a highly transparent, non-metallic, low resistance cathode or onto a thin Mg:Ag layer to form a highly efficient, low resistance metallic/non-metallic compound cathode.
  • an organic material such as copper phthalocyanine (CuPc)
  • cathode is used in the following manner. In a non-stacked PV device or a single unit of a stacked PV device under ambient irradiation and connected with a resistive load and with no externally applied voltage, e.g., a PV device, electrons move to the cathode from the photo-conducting material.
  • anode is used herein such that in a PV device under illumination, holes move to the anode from the photo-conducting material, which is equivalent to electrons moving in the opposite manner. It will be noted that as the terms are used herein, anodes and cathodes may be electrodes or charge transfer layers.
  • An organic photosensitive device will comprise at least one photoactive region in which light is absorbed to form an excited state, or "exciton", which may subsequently dissociate in to an electron and a hole.
  • the dissociation of the exciton will typically occur at the heterojunction formed by the juxtaposition of an acceptor layer and a donor layer.
  • the "photoactive region” may include donor layer 125 and acceptor layer 130.
  • the acceptor material may be comprised of, for example, perylenes, naphthalenes, fullerenes or nanotubules.
  • An example of an acceptor material is 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic bis-benzimidazole (PTCBI).
  • the acceptor layer may be comprised of a fullerene material as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,580,027 .
  • Adjacent to the acceptor layer is a layer of organic donor-type material. The boundary of the acceptor layer and the donor layer forms the heterojunction which may produce an internally generated electric field.
  • the material for the donor layer may be a pthalocyanine or a porphyrin, or a derivative or transition metal complex thereof, such as copper pthalocyanine (CuPc).
  • CuPc copper pthalocyanine
  • devices incorporating such materials may efficiently utilize triplet excitons. It is believed that the singlet-triplet mixing may be so strong for organometallic compounds, that the absorptions involve excitation from the singlet ground states directly to the triplet excited states, eliminating the losses associated with conversion from the singlet excited state to the triplet excited state.
  • the longer lifetime and diffusion length of triplet excitons in comparison to singlet excitons may allow for the use of a thicker photoactive region, as the triplet excitons may diffuse a greater distance to reach the donor-acceptor heterojunction, without sacrificing device efficiency.
  • the stacked organic layers include one or more exciton blocking layers (EBLs) as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,097,147 , Peumans et al, Applied Physics Letters 2000, 76, 2650-52 , and co-pending application serial number 09/449,801 , filed Nov. 26, 11999.
  • EBLs exciton blocking layers
  • Higher internal and external quantum efficiencies have been achieved by the inclusion of an EBL to confine photogenerated excitons to the region near the dissociating interface and to prevent parasitic exciton quenching at a photosensitive organic/electrode interface.
  • an EBL can also act as a diffusion barrier to substances introduced during deposition of the electrodes. In some circumstances, an EBL can be made thick enough to fill pinholes or shorting defects which could otherwise render an organic PV device non-functional. An EBL can therefore help protect fragile organic layers from damage produced when electrodes are deposited onto the organic materials.
  • an EBL derive their exciton blocking property from having a LUMO-HOMO energy gap substantially larger than that of the adjacent organic semiconductor from which excitons are being blocked.
  • the confined excitons are prohibited from existing in the EBL due to energy considerations.
  • an EBL may block one sign of charge carrier.
  • an EBL will exist between two other layers, usually an organic photosensitive semiconductor layer and a electrode or charge transfer layer.
  • the adjacent electrode or charge transfer layer will be in context either a cathode or an anode.
  • the material for an EBL in a given position in a device will be chosen so that the desired sign of carrier will not be impeded in its transport to the electrode or charge transfer layer.
  • Proper energy level alignment ensures that no barrier to charge transport exists, preventing an increase in series resistance.
  • exciton blocking nature of a material is not an intrinsic property of its HOMO-LUMO energy gap. Whether a given material will act as an exciton blocker depends upon the relative HOMO and LUMO energy levels of the adjacent organic photosensitive material. Therefore, it is not possible to identify a class of compounds in isolation as exciton blockers without regard to the device context in which they may be used. However, with the teachings herein one of ordinary skill in the art may identify whether a given material will function as an exciton blocking layer when used with a selected set of materials to construct an organic PV device.
  • an EBL is situated between the acceptor layer and the cathode.
  • a preferred material for the EBL comprises 2,9-dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (also called bathocuproine or BCP), which is believed to have a LUMO-HOMO energy level separation of about 3.5 eV, or bis(2-methyl-8-hydroxyquinolinoato)-aluminum(III)phenolate (Alq 2 OPH).
  • BCP is an effective exciton blocker which can easily transport electrons to the cathode from an acceptor layer.
  • the EBL layer may be doped with a suitable dopant, including but not limited to 3,4,9,10-perylenetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA), 3,4,9,10-perylenetracarboxylic diimide (PTCDI), 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic-bis-benzimidazole (PTCBI), 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (NTCDA), and derivatives thereof.
  • PTCDA 3,4,9,10-perylenetracarboxylic dianhydride
  • PTCDI 3,4,9,10-perylenetracarboxylic diimide
  • PTCBI 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic-bis-benzimidazole
  • NTCDA 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride
  • the resulting morphology change to polycrystalline material results in a lower quality film with possible defects such as shorts, voids or intrusion of electrode material. Accordingly, it has been found that doping of some EBL materials, such as BCP, that exhibit this effect with a suitable, relatively large and stable molecule can stabilize the EBL structure to prevent performance degrading morphology changes. It should be further appreciated that doping of an EBL which is transporting electrons in a giving device with a material having a LUMO energy level close to that of the EBL will help insure that electron traps are not formed which might produce space charge build-up and reduce performance. Additionally, it should be appreciated that relatively low doping densities should minimize exciton generation at isolated dopant sites. Since such excitons are effectively prohibited from diffusing by the surrounding EBL material, such absorptions reduce device photoconversion efficiency.
  • Representative embodiments may also comprise transparent charge transfer layers or charge recombination layers.
  • charge transfer layers are distinguished from acceptor and donor layers by the fact that charge transfer layers are frequently, but not necessarily, inorganic (often metals) and they may be chosen not to be photoconductively active.
  • the term "charge transfer layer” is used herein to refer to layers similar to but different from electrodes in that a charge transfer layer only delivers charge carriers from one subsection of an optoelectronic device to the adjacent subsection.
  • charge recombination layer is used herein to refer to layers similar to but different from electrodes in that a charge recombination layer allows for the recombination of electrons and holes between tandem photosensitive devices and may also enhance internal optical field strength near one or more active layers.
  • a charge recombination layer can be constructed of semi-transparent metal nanoclusters, nanoparticle or nanorods as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,657,378 .
  • an anode-smoothing layer is situated between the anode and the donor layer.
  • a preferred material for this layer comprises a film of 3,4-polyethylenedioxythiophene:polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS).
  • PEDOT:PSS 3,4-polyethylenedioxythiophene:polystyrenesulfonate
  • ITO anode
  • CuPc donor layer
  • one or more of the layers may be treated with plasma prior to depositing the next layer.
  • the layers may be treated, for example, with a mild argon or oxygen plasma. This treatment is beneficial as it reduces the series resistance. It is particularly advantageous that the PEDOT:PSS layer be subject to a mild plasma treatment prior to deposition of the next layer.
  • the simple layered structure illustrated in Figure 1 is provided by way of nonlimiting example, and it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be used in connection with a wide variety of other structures.
  • the specific materials and structures described are exemplary in nature, and other materials and structures may be used.
  • Functional devices may be achieved by combining the various layers described in different ways, or layers may be omitted entirely, based on design, performance, and cost factors. Other layers not specifically described may also be included. Materials other than those specifically described may be used. Although many of the examples provided herein describe various layers as comprising a single material, it is understood that combinations of materials, such as a mixture of host and dopant, or more generally a mixture, may be used. Also, the layers may have various sublayers.
  • Non-photoactive layers Organic layers that are not a part of the photoactive region, i.e., organic layers that generally do not absorb photons that make a significant contribution to photocurrent, may be referred to as "non-photoactive layers.” Examples of non-photoactive layers include EBLs and anode-smoothing layers. Other types of non-photoactive layers may also be used.
  • organometallic refers to compounds which have an organic group bonded to a metal through a carbon-metal bond. This class does not include per se coordination compounds, which are substances having only donor bonds from heteroatoms, such as metal complexes of amines, halides, pseudohalides (CN, etc.), and the like.
  • organometallic compounds generally comprise, in addition to one or more carbon-metal bonds to an organic species, one or more donor bonds from a heteroatom.
  • the carbon-metal bond to an organic species refers to a direct bond between a metal and a carbon atom of an organic group, such as phenyl, alkyl, alkenyl, etc., but does not refer to a metal bond to an "inorganic carbon," such as the carbon of CN or CO.
  • the term cyclometallated refers to compounds that comprise an bidentate organometallic ligand so that, upon bonding to a metal, a ring structure is formed that includes the metal as one of the ring members.
  • Organic layers may be fabricated using vacuum deposition, spin coating, organic vapor-phase deposition, inkjet printing and other methods known in the art.
  • Organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices of embodiments of the present invention may function as a PV, photodetector or photoconductor.
  • the materials used in the photoconductive organic layers and the thicknesses thereof may be selected, for example, to optimize the external quantum efficiency of the device.
  • the materials used in the photoconductive organic layers and the thicknesses thereof may be selected, for example, to maximize the sensitivity of the device to desired spectral regions.
  • the exciton diffusion length, L D is desirable for the exciton diffusion length, L D to be greater than or comparable to the layer thickness, L, since it is believed that most exciton dissociation will occur at an interface. If L D is less than L, then many excitons may recombine before dissociation. It is further desirable for the total photoconductive layer thickness to be of the order of the electromagnetic radiation absorption length, 1/ ⁇ (where ⁇ is the absorption coefficient), so that nearly all of the radiation incident on the PV device is absorbed to produce excitons. Furthermore, the photoconductive layer thickness should be as thin as possible to avoid excess series resistance due to the high bulk resistivity of organic semiconductors.
  • the organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices of the present invention may function as photodetectors.
  • the device may be a multilayer organic device, for example as described in U.S. Application Serial No. 10/723,953, filed November 26, 2003 .
  • an external electric field may be generally applied to facilitate extraction of the separated charges.
  • a concentrator or trapping configuration can be employed to increase the efficiency of the organic photosensitive optoelectronic device, where photons are forced to make multiple passes through the thin absorbing regions.
  • U.S. Patent Nos. 6,333,458 and 6,440,769 addresses this issue by using structural designs that enhance the photoconversion efficiency of photosensitive optoelectronic devices by optimizing the optical geometry for high absorption and for use with optical concentrators that increase collection efficiency.
  • Such geometries for photosensitive devices substantially increase the optical path through the material by trapping the incident radiation within a reflective cavity or waveguiding structure, and thereby recycling light by multiple reflection through the photoresponsive material.
  • 6,333,458 and 6,440,769 therefore enhance the external quantum efficiency of the devices without causing substantial increase in bulk resistance.
  • a first reflective layer included in the geometry of such devices is a first reflective layer; a transparent insulating layer which should be longer than the optical coherence length of the incident light in all dimensions to prevent optical microcavity interference effects; a transparent first electrode layer adjacent the transparent insulating layer; a photosensitive heterostructure adjacent the transparent electrode; and a second electrode which is also reflective.
  • Coatings may be used to focus optical energy into desired regions of a device.
  • US Patent Application No. 10/857,747 provides examples of such a coating.
  • a planar heterojunction occurs when the interface between a layer of donor material and a layer of acceptor material is defined by a surface with a surface roughness not more than a few molecules. The surface area of the contact between the acceptor and donor is approximately the same as the area of the respective layers.
  • a bulk heterojunction occurs when the interface between a layer of donor material and a layer of acceptor material has significant surface roughness, such that the surface area of the contact between the acceptor and donor is significantly greater than the cross sectional area of the respective layers.
  • a mixed heterojunction is a type of bulk heterojunction created by co-depositing acceptor and donor material.
  • a hybrid planar-mixed heterojunction includes at least one layer of acceptor or donor material, as well as a mixed layer, as described in further detail in US Patent Application No. 10/911,559 to Forrest, filed August 5, 2004 .
  • DA donor-acceptor
  • C.W. Tang Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 183 (1986 ); J. J. M. Halls, C. A. Walsh, N. C. Greenham, E. A. Marseglia, R. H. Friend, S. C. Moratti, and A. B. Holmes, Nature 376, 498 (1995 ); G. Yu, J. Gao, J. Hummelen, F. Wudi, and A. J. Heeger, Science 270, 1789 (1995 ).
  • the voltage dependence of the photocurrent for organic DA PV cells may limit the ultimate power efficiency attainable. This is in contrast to conventional semiconductor p-n junctions, where the photocurrent is constant up to an applied voltage considerably exceeding the built-in potential, V bi .
  • a free electron and hole are produced by exciton dissociation, a process that can be induced by an electric field F 10 6 V/cm.
  • a donor material with a low ionization potential forms a heterojunction with an acceptor material with a high electron affinity such that exciton dissociation into free charge carriers is energetically favorable.
  • this condition is satisfied if the difference in the energies of the lowest unoccupied (highest occupied) molecular orbitals, E LUMO (E HOMO ), exceeds the donor (acceptor) exciton binding energy, E B,D (E B,A ).
  • Figure 2 shows an energy level diagram for an anode 210, a donor layer 220, an acceptor layer 230, and a cathode 240.
  • the transport energy gaps of the donor and acceptor are indicated by the symbols E G,D and E O,A , respectively.
  • the HOMO and LUMO band offsets are indicated by ⁇ E HOMO and ⁇ E LUMO , respectively.
  • the hole quasi-Fermi level in the donor, F h,D , and electron quasi-Fermi level in the acceptor, F e,A are shown as dotted lines.
  • the difference in quasi-Fermi level from the donor-acceptor interface represents a loss in electrochemical energy due to a resistive losses and recombination.
  • Four consecutive steps in the generation of photocurrent from incident light are illustrated. Photon absorption leading to the generation of an exciton with absorption efficiency, ⁇ A ; (2) diffussion of the exciton to the DA interface with efficiency ⁇ ED ; (3) exciton dissociation by CT at a DA interface with efficiency ⁇ CT ; and (4) separation of the charge carriers, followed by transport to their respective electrodes with charge collection efficiency, ⁇ cc.
  • the photon energy is extracted as the electrochemical energy of the electron-hole pair, given by the difference of the electron quasi-Fermi energies at the acceptor/cathode contact, and hole quasi-Fermi energies at the donor/anode contact.
  • the ⁇ EQE of an organic DA bi-layer is typically limited by the efficiency of steps (1) and (2), since ⁇ CT ⁇ ⁇ CC may be 100% or approach 100% (steps (3) and (4)). Note that ⁇ CC may be about 100% under short circuit conditions.
  • solar cells may be under a forward bias and deliver a current against that bias.
  • the maximum cell power that can be extracted may depend on how ⁇ CC varies with applied voltage. Embodiments of the invention address the issue of how to keep ⁇ CC high under forward bias.
  • An embodiment of the invention explains the magnitude and voltage dependence of cc.
  • the analysis is based on the Onsager model for the charge-pair separation probability in the bulk of a disordered solid.
  • Onsager calculated the probability that two oppositely charged carriers are separated by an external electric field, F, as a function of the initial separation of the carriers, r 0 , and orientation of the field, assuming that the carrier motion is described by hopping transport (see Figure 3 , photoactive region 310).
  • F external electric field
  • U B is about 0.25 eV >> kT such that separation of the geminate pair in the bulk into free carriers occurs when F > 10 6 V/cm.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates geminate pair dissociation in bulk, as contrasted with geminate pair dissociation in the presence of a DA interface.
  • Photoactive region 310 shows only a single layer 312.
  • a geminate pair 330 dissociates into a hole 332 and an electron 334.
  • r 0 CT is the thermalization radii.
  • the dissociation illustrated in photoactive region 310 is representative of that discussed in L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 54, 554 (1938 ).
  • Photoactive region 320 shows a donor layer 322 and an acceptor layer 324, forming a DA interface (or junction) 326 where they are in contact with each other.
  • a geminate pair 330 dissociates into a hole 332 and an electron 334.
  • the probability for geminate charge separation at a DA interface is expected to be substantially enhanced over the bulk case because (1) the volume available for electron-hole recombination is reduced to a thin section near the DA interface; (2) the DA interface orients the electron-hole pair, favoring carrier separation in the direction normal to the interface plane; and (3) if the mobility of the hole (electron) is significantly higher than that of the electron (hole), the hole (electron) will sample a much larger volume of space prior to the electron (hole) reaching the DA interface. This increases the probability that the hole (electron) will escape during that time and avoid recombination with the electron (hole) from which it separated.
  • the relevant mobilities are of electrons in the acceptor portion of a photoactive region, and of holes in the donor portion of a photoactive region.
  • ⁇ CC may be evaluated using a kinetic Monte Carlo simulation.
  • An example of such a simulation may be found at D. P. Landau and K. Binder, Guide to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000 ).
  • a simulation may be performed on a simple cubic lattice with lattice constant d.
  • r eh r e - r h
  • U LUMO (r) and U HOMO (r) are the LUMO and HOMO energy levels, respectively, as functions of position, r.
  • the second term is the energy of the dipole in the electric field present at the DNA interface, F .
  • Figure 4 shows a comparison between the analytical expression for the probability of exciton dissociation from L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 54, 554 (1938 ) (lines), and the kinetic Monte Carlo model discussed herein (symbols) for various electron and hole thermalization radii, r 0 .
  • d was chosen to be much smaller than the molecular spacing to make the discrete model consistent with the analytical theory for point charges.
  • the dissociation probability of CT pairs at a DA junction at low fields is substantially higher than the probability in the bulk, as shown in Figure 6 .
  • Figure 5 illustrates a somewhat counterintuitive finding, that the efficiency of a PV device may be enhanced by lowering the mobility of a particular charge carrier, because the ratio of mobilities is important to the dissociation probability.
  • the ratio of mobilities is at least 100, and more preferable at least 1000. Since having a high carrier mobility is also preferable, the high ratio of mobilities is preferably combined with a high carrier mobility for the most mobile charge carrier in the relevant portion of the photoactive region.
  • the charge carrier having the highest mobility has a mobility of at least 0.001 cm 2 / V-sec, and more preferably of at least 1 cm 2 / V-sec.
  • the mobilty of a the lower mobility material may be decreased by adjusting deposition conditions to obtain more amorphous films (for example, by using a faster deposition rate and lower substrate temperature during deposition), or by adding steric groups to the molecule (for example, by using copper-octabutoxy-phthalocynanine instead of copper phthalocyanine). Doping may be useful to increase mobility, for example using fluorinated tetracyanoquinodimethane as a p-type dopant in CuPc.
  • the internal field distribution near the DA junction is computed.
  • the donor and acceptor layers are assumed to be p and n-type doped, respectively, since this combination will result in a built-in field that separates the electrons and holes under short-circuit conditions.
  • Capacitance-voltage measurements on the archetype copper phthalocyanine (CuPc)/3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic bisbenzimazole (PTCBI) system have shown that this is indeed the case, see P. Peumans, A. Yakimov, and S. R. Forrest, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3693 (2003 ).
  • the free carrier densities in the donor and acceptor layers are N D and N A , respectively.
  • N LUMO and N HOMO are the acceptor LUMO and donor HOMO effective densities of states, respectively.
  • E G 1.7eV
  • the solid line 510 shows the photocurrent characteristics of a PEDOT:PSS/200 CuPc/200 C60/150 BCP/800 A1 device, per P. Peumans and S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 126 (2001 ).
  • V V bi - FW
  • the depletion layer width W is approximately constant for 0 ⁇ V ⁇ V bi since the DA interface is compensated in the case of a CuPc/PTCBI junction, see P. Peumans, V. Bulovic, and S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3855 (2000 ).
  • Figure 6 shows calculated results for charge separation probability, ⁇ CC , in the presence and absence of a donor-acceptor junction, and for various charge carrier mobility ratios in the presence of a DA junction.
  • the bulk case assumes an isotropic initial dipole distribution, while for the DA junction, the orientation of the initial dipoles was assumed to be a half range isotropic distribution.
  • the thickness of the lines indicate the standard deviation.
  • This behavior is in contrast to conventional semiconductor p-n junctions, where the response remains constant at forward voltages considerably exceeding V bi , and may represent a fundamental limitation to the ultimate power efficiencies attainable employing organic DA junctions.
  • the thermalization distance, r 0 CT over which carrier cooling occurs depends on the amount of excess kinetic energy resulting from the HOMO and LUMO offsets, ⁇ E, as shown schematically in figures 7 and 8 .
  • a material combination with a large energy level offset results in a smaller V bi according to Eq. (3), but larger r 0 CT due to a larger excess kinetic energy of the exciton.
  • V OC is low, but ⁇ CC rises steeply to a large value as a function of the extraction voltage V bi - V due to the large r 0 CT .
  • a DA combination with a small ⁇ E has a large V OC , but ⁇ CC is now less strongly voltage dependent due to a smaller r 0 CT .
  • Figure 7 shows the maximum of the product ⁇ CC V (proportional to total PV cell efficiency) vs HOMO or LUMO energy offset ⁇ E.
  • Figure 8 shows FF plotted as a function of ⁇ E, where FF increases for larger energy offsets.
  • Figure 8 also shows a schematic diagram of a DA junction 810 with a large ⁇ E and r 0 CT , and low V bi , and a DA junction 820 with a small ⁇ E and r 0 CT , and large V bi .
  • the field F is not necessarily aligned perpendicular to the DA junction, and narrow constrictions in the D and A branches enhance back-diffusion, leading to decreased dissociation probabilities. It is therefore expected that the photocurrent-voltage characteristics of BH devices will be less steep, resulting in a lower FF and ⁇ CC ⁇ 1 at short-circuit conditions, in agreement with experimental observations, see J. J. M. Halls, C. A. Walsh, N. C. Greenham, E. A. Marseglia, R. H. Friend, S. C. Moratti, and A. B. Holmes, Nature 376, 498 (1995 ); G. Yu, J. Gao, J. Hummelen, F. Wudi, and A. J. Heeger, Science 270, 1789 (1995 ).

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Nanotechnology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)
  • Light Receiving Elements (AREA)
EP05858148.9A 2004-09-22 2005-09-15 Use of organic photosensitive devices Active EP1805824B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61187404P 2004-09-22 2004-09-22
US10/949,375 US8357849B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2004-09-27 Organic photosensitive devices
PCT/US2005/033258 WO2006137870A2 (en) 2004-09-22 2005-09-15 Organic photosensitive devices

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1805824A2 EP1805824A2 (en) 2007-07-11
EP1805824B1 true EP1805824B1 (en) 2019-03-20

Family

ID=36072641

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05858148.9A Active EP1805824B1 (en) 2004-09-22 2005-09-15 Use of organic photosensitive devices

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US8357849B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP1805824B1 (zh)
JP (1) JP5461775B2 (zh)
KR (1) KR101418124B1 (zh)
CN (1) CN101421863B (zh)
AR (1) AR050885A1 (zh)
AU (1) AU2005333259A1 (zh)
BR (1) BRPI0515707A (zh)
CA (1) CA2580865A1 (zh)
HK (1) HK1131695A1 (zh)
TW (1) TWI430453B (zh)
WO (1) WO2006137870A2 (zh)

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7375370B2 (en) * 2004-08-05 2008-05-20 The Trustees Of Princeton University Stacked organic photosensitive devices
JP2006269100A (ja) * 2005-03-22 2006-10-05 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd 表示装置
CN100466125C (zh) * 2005-04-18 2009-03-04 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所 含有有机异质结的电接触材料及其器件
WO2008085933A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-17 Plextronics, Inc. Quantum dot photovoltaic device
WO2008148031A2 (en) 2007-05-23 2008-12-04 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc Method and apparatus for light absorption and charged carrier transport
ATE498203T1 (de) * 2007-07-23 2011-02-15 Basf Se Photovoltaische tandem-zelle
KR100927721B1 (ko) * 2007-09-17 2009-11-18 삼성에스디아이 주식회사 광전변환소자 및 이의 제조방법
WO2009056626A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-05-07 Basf Se Use of halogenated phthalocyanines
JP4951497B2 (ja) * 2007-12-27 2012-06-13 株式会社日立製作所 有機薄膜太陽電池およびその製造方法
JP5216373B2 (ja) * 2008-03-06 2013-06-19 富士フイルム株式会社 固体撮像素子
AU2009309004B2 (en) 2008-10-27 2015-08-06 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Inverted organic photosensitive devices
WO2010050198A1 (ja) * 2008-10-30 2010-05-06 出光興産株式会社 有機太陽電池
JP2010147135A (ja) * 2008-12-17 2010-07-01 Konica Minolta Holdings Inc 有機光電変換素子の製造方法
WO2010101241A1 (ja) * 2009-03-05 2010-09-10 コニカミノルタホールディングス株式会社 有機光電変換素子、太陽電池及び光センサアレイ
US20100288356A1 (en) * 2009-05-12 2010-11-18 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Photoactive compositions containing plasmon-resonating nanoparticles
JP2012528101A (ja) * 2009-05-26 2012-11-12 ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピア アリール又はヘタリール置換基を有するフタロシアニン化合物を、有機太陽電池で用いる使用
WO2011090336A2 (ko) * 2010-01-25 2011-07-28 (주)루미나노 전기장 향상 효과에 의하여 개선된 광전환 효율을 나타내는 태양전지
CN102148331A (zh) * 2010-02-08 2011-08-10 海洋王照明科技股份有限公司 具有有机小分子混合体异质结的太阳能电池及其制备方法
CN102714277A (zh) * 2010-03-15 2012-10-03 海洋王照明科技股份有限公司 有机太阳能电池及其制备方法
JP2011204802A (ja) * 2010-03-24 2011-10-13 Fujifilm Corp 有機光電変換素子、撮像素子、撮像装置
CA2798276A1 (en) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-10 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method of improving exciton dissociation at organic donor-acceptor heterojunctions
CN102289842A (zh) * 2011-06-13 2011-12-21 天津大学 一种蒙特卡罗整体光照自适应方法
US9431621B2 (en) * 2012-03-13 2016-08-30 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Metal oxide charge transport material doped with organic molecules
KR101580357B1 (ko) 2012-06-18 2015-12-24 주식회사 엘지화학 함질소 헤테로환 화합물 및 이를 포함한 유기 전자소자
FR2992474B1 (fr) 2012-06-21 2015-05-15 Commissariat Energie Atomique Photodetecteur integrant des moyens de concentration du rayonnement lumineux et matrice correspondante.
US9508945B2 (en) * 2012-06-27 2016-11-29 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Spectrally tunable broadband organic photodetectors
WO2014055976A1 (en) 2012-10-05 2014-04-10 University Of Southern California Energy sensitization of acceptors and donors in organic photovoltaics

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002101838A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2002-12-19 The Trustees Of Princeton University Organic photovoltaic devices

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5703436A (en) * 1994-12-13 1997-12-30 The Trustees Of Princeton University Transparent contacts for organic devices
US6420031B1 (en) * 1997-11-03 2002-07-16 The Trustees Of Princeton University Highly transparent non-metallic cathodes
US6198091B1 (en) * 1998-08-19 2001-03-06 The Trustees Of Princeton University Stacked organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices with a mixed electrical configuration
US6451415B1 (en) * 1998-08-19 2002-09-17 The Trustees Of Princeton University Organic photosensitive optoelectronic device with an exciton blocking layer
US6352777B1 (en) * 1998-08-19 2002-03-05 The Trustees Of Princeton University Organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices with transparent electrodes
US6097147A (en) * 1998-09-14 2000-08-01 The Trustees Of Princeton University Structure for high efficiency electroluminescent device
US6333458B1 (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-12-25 The Trustees Of Princeton University Highly efficient multiple reflection photosensitive optoelectronic device with optical concentrator
US6440769B2 (en) * 1999-11-26 2002-08-27 The Trustees Of Princeton University Photovoltaic device with optical concentrator and method of making the same
US6714573B2 (en) * 2000-08-22 2004-03-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Contact scheme for intracavity-contacted vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser
US6657378B2 (en) * 2001-09-06 2003-12-02 The Trustees Of Princeton University Organic photovoltaic devices
US6580027B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-06-17 Trustees Of Princeton University Solar cells using fullerenes
US7301180B2 (en) * 2001-06-18 2007-11-27 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Structure and method for a high-speed semiconductor device having a Ge channel layer
JP2003264085A (ja) 2001-12-05 2003-09-19 Semiconductor Energy Lab Co Ltd 有機半導体素子、有機エレクトロルミネッセンス素子及び有機太陽電池

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002101838A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2002-12-19 The Trustees Of Princeton University Organic photovoltaic devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101418124B1 (ko) 2014-07-10
KR20070073804A (ko) 2007-07-10
HK1131695A1 (en) 2010-01-29
TW200625659A (en) 2006-07-16
BRPI0515707A (pt) 2008-07-29
JP2008514013A (ja) 2008-05-01
CN101421863B (zh) 2012-04-11
WO2006137870A3 (en) 2008-04-03
US20060060239A1 (en) 2006-03-23
CA2580865A1 (en) 2006-12-28
US8357849B2 (en) 2013-01-22
CN101421863A (zh) 2009-04-29
EP1805824A2 (en) 2007-07-11
JP5461775B2 (ja) 2014-04-02
WO2006137870A2 (en) 2006-12-28
AU2005333259A1 (en) 2006-12-28
AR050885A1 (es) 2006-11-29
TWI430453B (zh) 2014-03-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1805824B1 (en) Use of organic photosensitive devices
US20240074218A1 (en) Organic photosensitive devices with exciton-blocking charge carrier filters
JP5270157B2 (ja) 積層型有機感光性デバイス
EP1234338B1 (en) Organic photosensitive optoelectronic device with an exciton blocking layer
EP1774604B1 (en) Stacked organic photosensitive devices
US7230269B2 (en) Organic photosensitive cells having a reciprocal-carrier exciton blocking layer
EP1782471B1 (en) Organic photosensitive devices
EP3065191A1 (en) Inverted organic photosensitive devices
EP3061134B1 (en) Organic photosensitive devices with exciton-blocking charge carrier filters
US20160254101A1 (en) Organic photosensitive devices with exciton-blocking charge carrier filters
TWI660532B (zh) 具有激子障蔽性電荷載體濾波器之有機光敏性裝置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070411

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB

R17D Deferred search report published (corrected)

Effective date: 20080403

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080604

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602005055541

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H01L0051000000

Ipc: H01L0051420000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H01L 51/42 20060101AFI20181015BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20181031

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602005055541

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190320

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005055541

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602005055541

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H01L0051420000

Ipc: H10K0030000000

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230324

P02 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) changed

Effective date: 20230519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230927

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230925

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230927

Year of fee payment: 19