EP1544096A2 - Method for verifying the destruction of a sea mine - Google Patents
Method for verifying the destruction of a sea mine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1544096A2 EP1544096A2 EP04029038A EP04029038A EP1544096A2 EP 1544096 A2 EP1544096 A2 EP 1544096A2 EP 04029038 A EP04029038 A EP 04029038A EP 04029038 A EP04029038 A EP 04029038A EP 1544096 A2 EP1544096 A2 EP 1544096A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- mine
- detonation
- destruction
- explosive charge
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G7/00—Mine-sweeping; Vessels characterised thereby
- B63G7/02—Mine-sweeping means, Means for destroying mines
- B63G7/08—Mine-sweeping means, Means for destroying mines of acoustic type
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G7/00—Mine-sweeping; Vessels characterised thereby
- B63G7/02—Mine-sweeping means, Means for destroying mines
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for testing the Destruction of a sea mine, which by means of an explosive charge is blown in the preamble of claim 1 defined genus.
- Maritime mines are equipped by accordingly Mine hunting boats initially located by means of a sensor and then identified, the identification by optical Means like TV camera in a mine-controlled Underwater vehicle (drone) or visual contact by divers, he follows.
- the mine is fought, for example, by attaching an adhesive charge by a Diver, by depositing a Minneverschungsladung (MVL) at the location of the identified mine by means of a Underwater vehicle or by a remote controlled Underwater vehicle with integrated explosive charge, the on the mine is being steered, being at a given distance from the mine the explosive charge is ignited.
- MDL Minneverschungsladung
- the invention has for its object to provide a method for Examination of the destruction of a sea mine by blasting specify with that without significant delay after Blasting the destruction of the mine found relatively safe can be.
- the inventive method has the advantage that Receive side clearly detected in the received signal can be whether only the explosive or explosive charge detonates or a Sympathiedetonation the mine took place Has. It makes use of the fact that the Explosion of an explosive charge a characteristic Pressure signature generated as a spherical wave in the water spreads and only at a great distance its property, e.g. by damping, loses. The explosives triggered detonation wave spreads in the water with a much higher in comparison to the speed of sound Speed off, for example, at a speed of about 5000 m / s, the propagation velocity in the essentially of the type of explosive or explosive depends. Because z. B.
- the receiver in the Close range of blasting typically within a radius of 300 to 500 m, is located and the detonation wave itself as a shock wave at the speed mentioned in the water spreads, the detonation of the explosive charge can on the one hand and the Sympathiedetonation of the mine on the other hand as temporally offset detonation events in the received signal be detected.
- the received signal two Detonation events detectable, so can with large Security a destruction of the mine can be assumed.
- Time lag between the Detonation events on a time window or Time interval for example, be about 200 to 300 microseconds can, ensures that one on the first Detonation event due to the explosion of the explosive charge goes back, next second detonation event too actually triggered by the Sympathiedetonation the mine has been. Will only be a single in the time interval Detonation event detected, so the mine is very great security not blown up, so not destroyed Service.
- the time window within which the detonation events lie, depending on the distance between Explosive charge and sea mine at the moment of ignition of the Explosive charge and the type of explosive of the explosive charge established.
- a sufficient time window is the Time window chosen less than 2 ms, where in typical Use cases, the time window is about 200 to 300 microseconds.
- Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 is a mine hunting situation schematically sketched in plan view and side view, in which a Overwater ship trained mine hunting boat 11 with a suspendable, via an unwinding cable 16 with the Mine hunting boat 11 connected, remote controlled Underwater vehicle 12, a so-called drone, to evacuate a Sea area of sea mines is used.
- a mine 13 of the Sea area designed lakes is shown in Fig. 1 and 2 represented, as mine type a ground mine assumed is, which is stored on the seabed 15.
- the Mine hunting boat 11 has a so-called mine hunting sonar 18, with the anchored in the sea area or on the seabed 15 deposited mines 13 are detected and classified can.
- Ground mines lying in on the seabed 15 deposited sediment 14 are penetrated by a so-called sediment sonar, e.g. in the underwater vehicle installed, acoustically detected and classified.
- the underwater vehicle 12 exposed by the mines hunting boat 11 is directed to the mine 13 out, the underwater vehicle 12 always brought against the flow 17 to the mine 13 becomes.
- About the cable 16, for example, a Fiber optic cable can be found while a permanent Communication between mine-hunting boat 11 and Underwater vehicle 12 instead.
- the mine 13 is through the Underwater vehicle 12 identified, and the Underwater vehicle 12 is caused by mine-hunting boat 11, an explosive charge 20, in the exemplary embodiment, a so-called.
- Mine destruction charge to settle at the site of the mine 13, where usually settling the explosive charge 20 in one Distance a from 0.5 to 1.5 m away from the mine 13 is made. After discontinuation of the explosive charge 20 is the Underwater vehicle 12 from the mine hunting boat 11 caught up again.
- the explosive charge is in Underwater vehicle integrated, and the latter is at the Blasting the mine 13 with destroyed.
- the destruction of the mine 13 is in all cases by Remote ignition of the explosive charge 20 from the mine hunting boat 11 off triggered, the mine hunting boat 11 a certain distance, the size of the explosive charge 20 and the mine type depends on the location of the mine 13 complies.
- At the usual used mine destruction charges is the distance to be maintained approx. 300 to 500 m, measured from the Projection point of the mine 13 on the water surface 19.
- the mine 13 By the detonation of the explosive charge 20, the mine 13 to Detonation, the so-called Sympathiedetonation brought.
- the blast triggered pressure waves the so-called. Detonation waves, spreading as spherical shockwaves in the water at a very high speed, the much larger than the speed of sound in the water and e.g.
- Fig. 4 and 5 is an example of a Received signal shown schematically, in which within the Time window ⁇ only one detonation event (Fig. 4) or two Detonation events (Fig. 5) were detected.
- the Locating the detonation events can be different Way in the signal processing 23 are performed. So can e.g. the maximums of the signal amplitude, the maxima of the signal amplitude Amount of the signal amplitude, the maxima of the signal level or the maximums of the envelope of the received signal used become.
- the time window ⁇ is dependent on the distance a between explosive charge 20 and mine 13 and the nature of Explosive of the explosive charge 20 set.
- Time window ⁇ selected with less than 2 ms.
- a middle Distance of a 1 m between explosive charge 20 and mine 13 and at a propagation velocity of the detonation wave in Water of 5000 m / s is the time offset ⁇ t the two detonation events about 200 ⁇ s, so that at one Sympathy toning of the mine 13 both detonation events fall into the spanned time window ⁇ .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zum Prüfen der Zerstörung einer Seemine, die mittels einer Sprengladung gesprengt wird, der im Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 definierten Gattung.The invention relates to a method for testing the Destruction of a sea mine, which by means of an explosive charge is blown in the preamble of claim 1 defined genus.
Seeminen werden durch entsprechend ausgerüstete Minenjagdboote zunächst mittels eines Sensors geortet und dann identifiziert, wobei die Identifikation durch optische Mittel, wie TV-Kamera in einem zur Mine gesteuerten Unterwasserfahrzeug (Drohne) oder Sichtkontakt durch Taucher, erfolgt. Nach Identifikation der Mine wird die Mine bekämpft, beispielsweise durch Anbringen einer Haftladung durch einen Taucher, durch Absetzen einer Minnevernichtungsladung (MVL) am Ort der identifizierten Mine mittels eines Unterwasserfahrzeugs oder durch ein ferngesteuertes Unterwasserfahrzeug mit integrierter Sprengladung, das auf die Mine gelenkt wird, wobei in einem vorgegebenen Abstand von der Mine die Sprengladung gezündet wird. Der Erfolg der Bekämpfung der Mine, also deren Zerstörung, wird je nach eingesetztem Sprengverfahren auf unterschiedliche Weise nachträglich festgestellt. Bei Sprengung mittels Haftladung, die eine deutlich kleinere Menge an Explosivstoff besitzt als die Mine, wird die Zerstörung der Mine durch die Gesamtwirkung der Detonation beurteilt. Eine starke Detonation lässt den sicheren Schluss zu, dass die Mine in einer Sympathiedetonation durch die Haftladung zerstört worden ist. Liegt das Sprengladungsgewicht der Mine etwa in der gleichen Größenordnung wie die Minenvernichtungsladung, lässt die Beobachtung der Detonationswirkung, z.B. Wasserfontäne, Stärke des Schocks, keinen sicheren Rückschluss auf die erfolgreiche Bekämpfung der Mine zu. Bei Sprengung durch Minenvernichtungsladungen, die eine relativ große Menge an Explosivstoff besitzen, je nach Bauart z.B. ca. 40 kg oder ca. 130 kg TNT-Äquivalent, wird daher der Bereich der Mine nach der Sprengung mit dem Sonar beleuchtet. Der Einsatz des Sonars ist aber erst nach einer sehr langen Zeitspanne nach Sprengung mit Aussicht auf Erfolg möglich, da durch die Sprengung aufgeworfenes Sediment sich erst wieder ablagern und der durch die Sprengung erzeugte Blasenschleier sich erst wieder auflösen muss, bevor ein aussagefähiges Sonarbild aus dem Bereich der Mine erhalten werden kann. Im Falle von im Sediment vergrabenen Minen kann auch mit der nachträglichen Sonarbeleuchtung des Minengebiets eine Aussage über die Zerstörung der Mine nicht mit absoluter Sicherheit gegeben werden.Maritime mines are equipped by accordingly Mine hunting boats initially located by means of a sensor and then identified, the identification by optical Means like TV camera in a mine-controlled Underwater vehicle (drone) or visual contact by divers, he follows. After identification of the mine, the mine is fought, for example, by attaching an adhesive charge by a Diver, by depositing a Minnevernichtungsladung (MVL) at the location of the identified mine by means of a Underwater vehicle or by a remote controlled Underwater vehicle with integrated explosive charge, the on the mine is being steered, being at a given distance from the mine the explosive charge is ignited. The success of Fighting the mine, so its destruction, depending on used blasting in different ways subsequently determined. In case of detonation by means of static charge, which has a much smaller amount of explosive than the mine, the destruction of the mine by the Overall effect of detonation assessed. A strong Detonation allows for the firm conclusion that the mine is in destroyed sympathy toning by the charge charge has been. Is the explosive charge weight of the mine about in of the same order of magnitude as the mine destruction charge, lets the observation of the detonation effect, e.g. Water fountain, strength of shock, no safe Conclusion on the successful fight against the mine too. at Explosion by mine destruction charges, which is a relative have a large amount of explosive, depending on the type e.g. about 40 kg or about 130 kg of TNT equivalent, is therefore the Mine area after blasting illuminated with the sonar. The use of the sonar is only after a very long Time after blowing up with a chance of success possible because The sediment thrown up by the demolition did not reappear until later deposit and the bubble curtain created by the blast must dissolve again before a meaningful Sonar image from the area of the mine can be obtained. in the Trap of mines buried in the sediment can also be combined with the Subsequent sonar illumination of the mine area a statement about the destruction of the mine not with absolute certainty are given.
Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein Verfahren zur Prüfung der Zerstörung einer Seemine durch Sprengung anzugeben, mit dem ohne nennenswerten Zeitverzug nach Sprengung die Zerstörung der Mine relativ sicher festgestellt werden kann.The invention has for its object to provide a method for Examination of the destruction of a sea mine by blasting specify with that without significant delay after Blasting the destruction of the mine found relatively safe can be.
Die Aufgabe wird erfindungsgemäß durch die Merkmale im Anspruch 1 gelöst.The object is achieved by the features in the Claim 1 solved.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren hat den Vorteil, dass empfangsseitig im Empfangssignal eindeutig festgestellt werden kann, ob nur die Explosiv- oder Sprengladung detoniert ist oder auch eine Sympathiedetonation der Mine stattgefunden hat. Dabei macht man sich die Tatsache zunutze, dass die Explosion einer Sprengladung eine charakteristische Drucksignatur erzeugt, die sich als Kugelwelle im Wasser ausbreitet und erst in großer Entfernung ihre Eigenschaft, z.B. durch Dämpfung, verliert. Die vom Explosivstoff ausgelöste Detonationswelle breitet sich im Wasser mit einer im Vergleich zur Schallgeschwindigkeit deutlich höheren Geschwindigkeit aus, beispielsweise mit einer Geschwindigkeit von ca. 5000 m/s, wobei die Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit im wesentlichen von der Art des Explosiv- oder Sprengstoffes abhängt. Da z. B. beim Einsatz von Minenvernichtungsladungen der Abstand zwischen abgelegter Sprengladung und Mine typischerweise ca. 0,5 bis 1,5 m beträgt, der Empfänger im Nahbereich der Sprengung, typischerweise in einem Umkreis von 300 bis 500 m, angeordnet ist und die Detonationswelle sich als Stoßwelle mit der genannten Geschwindigkeit im Wasser ausbreitet, kann die Detonation der Sprengladung einerseits und die Sympathiedetonation der Mine andererseits als zeitlich versetzte Detonationsereignisse im Empfangssignal detektiert werden. Sind im Empfangssignal zwei Detonationsereignisse feststellbar, so kann mit großer Sicherheit eine Zerstörung der Mine angenommen werden. Infolge der Einengung des Zeitversatzes zwischen den Detonationsereignissen auf ein Zeitfenster oder Zeitintervall, das beispielsweise ca. 200 bis 300 µs betragen kann, wird sichergestellt, dass ein auf ein erstes Detonationsereignis, das auf die Explosion der Sprengladung zurückgeht, folgendes zweites Detonationsereignis auch tatsächlich von der Sympathiedetonation der Mine ausgelöst worden ist. Wird in dem Zeitintervall nur ein einziges Detonationsereignis detektiert, so ist die Mine mit sehr großer Sicherheit nicht gesprengt, also nicht zerstört worden.The inventive method has the advantage that Receive side clearly detected in the received signal can be whether only the explosive or explosive charge detonates or a Sympathiedetonation the mine took place Has. It makes use of the fact that the Explosion of an explosive charge a characteristic Pressure signature generated as a spherical wave in the water spreads and only at a great distance its property, e.g. by damping, loses. The explosives triggered detonation wave spreads in the water with a much higher in comparison to the speed of sound Speed off, for example, at a speed of about 5000 m / s, the propagation velocity in the essentially of the type of explosive or explosive depends. Because z. B. when using mine destruction charges the distance between discarded explosive charge and mine typically about 0.5 to 1.5 m, the receiver in the Close range of blasting, typically within a radius of 300 to 500 m, is located and the detonation wave itself as a shock wave at the speed mentioned in the water spreads, the detonation of the explosive charge can on the one hand and the Sympathiedetonation of the mine on the other hand as temporally offset detonation events in the received signal be detected. Are in the received signal two Detonation events detectable, so can with large Security a destruction of the mine can be assumed. Due to the narrowing of the time lag between the Detonation events on a time window or Time interval, for example, be about 200 to 300 microseconds can, ensures that one on the first Detonation event due to the explosion of the explosive charge goes back, next second detonation event too actually triggered by the Sympathiedetonation the mine has been. Will only be a single in the time interval Detonation event detected, so the mine is very great security not blown up, so not destroyed Service.
Zweckmäßige Ausführungsformen des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens mit vorteilhaften Weiterbildungen und Ausgestaltungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den weiteren Ansprüchen.Advantageous embodiments of the invention Method with advantageous developments and Embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the others Claims.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung wird das Zeitfenster, innerhalb dessen die Detonationsereignisse liegen müssen, in Abhängigkeit von dem Abstand zwischen Sprengladung und Seemine im Moment des Zündens der Sprengladung und der Art des Explosivstoffes der Sprengladung festgelegt. Als ausreichendes Zeitfenster wird das Zeitfenster kleiner 2 ms gewählt, wobei in typischen Anwendungsfällen das Zeitfenster ca. 200 bis 300 µs beträgt.According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention is the time window within which the detonation events lie, depending on the distance between Explosive charge and sea mine at the moment of ignition of the Explosive charge and the type of explosive of the explosive charge established. As a sufficient time window is the Time window chosen less than 2 ms, where in typical Use cases, the time window is about 200 to 300 microseconds.
Die Erfindung ist anhand eines in der Zeichnung illustrierten Ausführungsbeispiels im folgenden näher beschrieben. Es zeigen jeweils in schematischer Darstellung:
- Fig. 1
- eine Draufsicht einer Minenjagdsituation mit Minenjagdfahrzeug, ferngelenktem Unterwasserfahrzeug und Seemine,
- Fig. 2
- eine Seitenansicht der Minenjagdsituation gemäß Fig. 1,
- Fig. 3
- ein Blockschaltbild des am Minenjagdfahrzeugs installierten Empfängers,
- Fig. 4
- ein am Empfänger abgenommenes Empfangssignal bei ausschließlicher Detonation einer am Minenort abgesetzten Sprengladung,
- Fig. 5
- das am Empfänger abgenommene Empfangssignal bei Detonation der Sprengladung und Sympathiedetonation der Mine.
- Fig. 1
- a top view of a mine hunting situation with mine hunting vehicle, guided underwater vehicle and sea mine,
- Fig. 2
- a side view of the mine hunting situation of FIG. 1,
- Fig. 3
- a block diagram of the receiver installed on the mine-hunting vehicle,
- Fig. 4
- a reception signal picked up at the receiver with the sole detonation of an explosive charge placed at the mine site,
- Fig. 5
- the received signal received at the receiver when the explosive charge detonates and the sympathy toning of the mine.
In Fig. 1 und Fig. 2 ist schematisch eine Minenjagdsituation
in Draufsicht und Seitenansicht skizziert, bei der ein als
Überwasserschiff ausgebildetes Minenjagdboot 11 mit einem
aussetzbaren, über ein sich abspulendes Kabel 16 mit dem
Minenjagdboot 11 verbundenen, ferngelenkten
Unterwasserfahrzeug 12, einer sog. Drohne, zur Räumung eines
Seegebiets von Seeminen eingesetzt ist. Eine Mine 13 der im
Seegebiet ausgelegten Seeminen ist in Fig. 1 und 2
dargestellt, wobei als Minenart eine Bodenmine angenommen
ist, die auf dem Meeresboden 15 abgelegt ist. Das
Minenjagdboot 11 verfügt über ein sog. Minenjagdsonar 18, mit
dem im Seegebiet verankerte oder auf dem Meeresboden 15
abgelegte Minen 13 detektiert und klassifiziert werden
können. Bodenminen, die in auf dem Meeresboden 15
abgelagertes Sediment 14 eingedrungen sind, werden mittels
eines sog. Sedimentsonars, das z.B. im Unterwasserfahrzeug
installiert ist, akustisch detektiert und klassifiziert.In Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 is a mine hunting situation schematically
sketched in plan view and side view, in which a
Overwater ship trained
Das vom Minen jagdboot 11 ausgesetzte Unterwasserfahrzeug 12
wird zur Mine 13 hin gelenkt, wobei das Unterwasserfahrzeug
12 immer gegen die Strömung 17 an die Mine 13 herangeführt
wird. Über das Kabel 16, das beispielsweise ein
Glasfaserkabel sein kann, findet dabei eine permanente
Kommunikation zwischen Minenjagdboot 11 und
Unterwasserfahrzeug 12 statt. Die Mine 13 wird durch das
Unterwasserfahrzeug 12 identifiziert, und das
Unterwasserfahrzeug 12 wird vom Minenjagdboot 11 veranlasst,
eine Sprengladung 20, im Ausführungsbeispiel eine sog.
Minenvernichtungsladung, am Ort der Mine 13 abzusetzen, wobei
üblicherweise das Absetzen der Sprengladung 20 in einem
Abstand a von 0,5 bis 1,5 m von der Mine 13 entfernt
vorgenommen wird. Nach Absetzen der Sprengladung 20 wird das
Unterwasserfahrzeug 12 vom Minenjagdboot 11 wieder eingeholt.
In einer alternativen Ausführung ist die Sprengladung im
Unterwasserfahrzeug integriert, und letzteres wird bei der
Sprengung der Mine 13 mit vernichtet.The
Die Vernichtung der Mine 13 wird in allen Fällen durch
Fernzünden der Sprengladung 20 vom Minenjagdboot 11 aus
ausgelöst, wobei das Minenjagdboot 11 eine gewisse Distanz,
die von der Größe der Sprengladung 20 und der Minenart
abhängt, vom Ort der Mine 13 einhält. Bei den üblicherweise
verwendeten Minenvernichtungsladungen beträgt der
einzuhaltende Abstand ca. 300 bis 500 m, gemessen von dem
Projektionspunkt der Mine 13 auf die Wasseroberfläche 19.
Durch die Detonation der Sprengladung 20 wird die Mine 13 zur
Detonation, der sog. Sympathiedetonation, gebracht. Die durch
die Sprengung ausgelösten Druckwellen, die sog.
Detonationswellen, breiten sich als kugelförmige Stoßwellen
im Wasser mit einer sehr hohen Geschwindigkeit aus, die
wesentlich größer als die Schallgeschwindigkeit im Wasser ist
und z.B. 5000 m/s beträgt. Diese Detonationswellen werden von
einem Empfänger 21 im Minenjagdboot 11, das sich im
Nahbereich der Sprengung befindet, aufgefasst. Der Empfänger
21 weist hierzu - wie dies im Blockschaltbild der Fig. 3
skizziert ist - einen breitbandigen elektroakustischen
Wandler, üblicherweise Hydrofon 22 genannt, und eine dem
Ausgang des Hydrofons 22 nachgeordnete, elektrische
Signalverarbeitung 23 sowie eine Anzeigevorrichtung 24 zur
Darstellung des Ergebnisses der Minenvernichtungsaktion auf.
Mittels der Signalverarbeitung 23 wird das Empfangssignal des
Empfängers 21 auf das Auftreten von Detonationsereignissen
innerhalb eines Zeitfensters τ untersucht. Werden innerhalb
des Zeitfensters τ zwei Detonationsereignisse gefunden, so
wird in der Anzeigevorrichtung 24 die Zerstörung der Mine 13
angezeigt. Wird innerhalb des Zeitfensters τ nur ein
Detonationsereignis festgestellt, so wird in der
Anzeigevorrichtung 24 angezeigt, dass die Sprengung nicht zu
einer Vernichtung der Mine 13 geführt hat.The destruction of the
In Fig. 4 und 5 ist jeweils ein Beispiel für ein
Empfangsignal schematisch dargestellt, bei dem innerhalb des
Zeitfensters τ nur ein Detonationsereignis (Fig. 4) bzw. zwei
Detonationsereignisse (Fig. 5) festgestellt wurden. Durch die
Diracstoß-ähnlichen Amplitudenspitzen im Empfangssignal
können die Detonationsereignisse sehr gut erkannt werden. Das
Auffinden der Detonationsereignisse kann auf verschiedene
Weise in der Signalverarbeitung 23 durchgeführt werden. So
können z.B. die Maxima der Signalamplitude, die Maxima des
Betrags der Signalamplitude, die Maxima des Signalpegels oder
die Maxima der Hüllkurve des Empfangssignals herangezogen
werden.In Fig. 4 and 5 is an example of a
Received signal shown schematically, in which within the
Time window τ only one detonation event (Fig. 4) or two
Detonation events (Fig. 5) were detected. By the
Dirac-like amplitude peaks in the received signal
the detonation events can be very well recognized. The
Locating the detonation events can be different
Way in the
Das Zeitfenster τ wird in Abhängigkeit von dem Abstand a
zwischen Sprengladung 20 und Mine 13 und der Art des
Explosivstoffes der Sprengladung 20 festgelegt. Als ein
ausreichend kleines Zeitfenster τ, in dem
Detonationsereignisse festgestellt werden müssen, wird ein
Zeitfenster τ mit kleiner 2 ms gewählt. Bei einem mittleren
Abstand von a = 1 m zwischen Sprengladung 20 und Mine 13 und
bei einer Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit der Detonationswelle im
Wasser von 5000 m/s beträgt der zeitliche Versatz Δt der
beiden Detonationsereignisse ca. 200 µs, so dass bei einer
Sympathiedetonation der Mine 13 beide Detonationsereignisse
in das aufgespannte Zeitfenster τ fallen.The time window τ is dependent on the distance a
between
In Ergänzung des Verfahrens kann durch Auswertung des auf die
Sympathiedetonation der Mine 13 zurückgehenden zweiten
Detonationsereignisses im Empfangssignal mit Hilfe einer
Datenbasis oder eines Expertensystems der Explosivstoff der
detonierten Mine 13 nach Menge und/oder Art bzw. Klasse
klassifiziert werden.In addition to the procedure, by evaluating the on the
Sympathiedetonation of the
Claims (6)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10359855A DE10359855B3 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2003-12-19 | Checking destruction of marine mine involves investigating received pressure wave receiver signal for occurrence of detonation events within time window, with presence of two detonation events indicating destruction of mine |
DE10359855 | 2003-12-19 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1544096A2 true EP1544096A2 (en) | 2005-06-22 |
EP1544096A3 EP1544096A3 (en) | 2007-10-03 |
EP1544096B1 EP1544096B1 (en) | 2010-06-23 |
Family
ID=34202468
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04029038A Not-in-force EP1544096B1 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2004-12-08 | Method for verifying the destruction of a sea mine |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1544096B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE471866T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE10359855B3 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113155264A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2021-07-23 | 长江武汉航道工程局 | Method for testing underwater blasting noise |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3511248C2 (en) * | 1985-03-28 | 1994-11-10 | Deutsche Aerospace | Arrangement for the detection of sound signals |
DE4416848C1 (en) * | 1994-05-13 | 1995-06-08 | Bundesrep Deutschland | Determining sea mine detonation location |
-
2003
- 2003-12-19 DE DE10359855A patent/DE10359855B3/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-12-08 AT AT04029038T patent/ATE471866T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-12-08 DE DE502004011305T patent/DE502004011305D1/en active Active
- 2004-12-08 EP EP04029038A patent/EP1544096B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113155264A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2021-07-23 | 长江武汉航道工程局 | Method for testing underwater blasting noise |
CN113155264B (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2024-02-20 | 长江武汉航道工程局 | Underwater blasting noise testing method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1544096A3 (en) | 2007-10-03 |
DE502004011305D1 (en) | 2010-08-05 |
DE10359855B3 (en) | 2005-03-24 |
ATE471866T1 (en) | 2010-07-15 |
EP1544096B1 (en) | 2010-06-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1791754B1 (en) | Method and system for the destruction of a localized mine | |
DE69113462T2 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEARCHING AN OBJECT. | |
DE4200170A1 (en) | METHOD AND SENSOR FOR DETERMINING THE TARGET DISTANCE OF SOUND GENERATING TARGETS | |
DE69202045T2 (en) | Process for the destruction of an underwater object, in particular a sea mine. | |
EP0247294A2 (en) | Acoustic detecting device on the ground with at least one three-component geophone | |
EP1544096B1 (en) | Method for verifying the destruction of a sea mine | |
DE69406029T2 (en) | Improved process for the destruction of a sunk object, especially a sea mine | |
DE60032306T2 (en) | Container for installation in the seabed | |
DE102005062109A1 (en) | Person e.g. diver, protecting method for use in underwater prohibited area, involves operating unmanned underwater craft equipped with defense unit to expectation area when detecting person entering into prohibited area | |
DE3326748C2 (en) | ||
DE69412038T2 (en) | Method of protecting a ship against an attacker and protective device therefor | |
EP2540914A2 (en) | Method for creating a foundation for marine structures | |
DE4416848C1 (en) | Determining sea mine detonation location | |
DE3442051C2 (en) | ||
DE68911685T2 (en) | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISCOVERING AND DESTROYING SUBMERSIBLES FROM A PLANE. | |
DE2403550A1 (en) | PROCEDURE OR DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT MARINE ICE MEASUREMENTS | |
DE4135225C2 (en) | Methods for simulating the effect of mines on different mine targets and simulation mines for carrying out such a method | |
DE69102429T2 (en) | METHOD FOR COMBATING TORPEDOS. | |
EP0853750B1 (en) | Land mine | |
DE3612526A1 (en) | METHOD FOR DETECTING UNDERWATER OBJECTS | |
DE3433146C2 (en) | ||
DE69405188T2 (en) | Training procedure for mine detection | |
EP0591854B1 (en) | Device for putting out of action a sea mine | |
DE978020C (en) | Acoustic distance igniter for ground and anchor mines and torpedoes | |
DE3624409C1 (en) | Sea-mine destroyer device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20041208 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502004011305 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20100805 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100924 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101023 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101025 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20101214 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20101214 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20101213 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110324 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20110124 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502004011305 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101208 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: S117 Free format text: REQUEST FILED; REQUEST FOR CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 117 FILED ON 3 AUGUST 2011 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: S117 Free format text: CORRECTIONS ALLOWED; REQUEST FOR CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 117 FILED ON 3 AUGUST 2011, ALLOWED 14 FEBRUARY 2012 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 471866 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20101208 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ATLAS ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20111231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20120701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20111208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101224 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20111231 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20111209 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100623 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502004011305 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100923 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101004 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20151210 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20151221 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20151221 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502004011305 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20161208 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170701 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161208 |