EP1497331A2 - Multispezifische bindungsmoleküle - Google Patents

Multispezifische bindungsmoleküle

Info

Publication number
EP1497331A2
EP1497331A2 EP03700256A EP03700256A EP1497331A2 EP 1497331 A2 EP1497331 A2 EP 1497331A2 EP 03700256 A EP03700256 A EP 03700256A EP 03700256 A EP03700256 A EP 03700256A EP 1497331 A2 EP1497331 A2 EP 1497331A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ligand
moiety
target
affinity
composition according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP03700256A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
William Herman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from PCT/CA2002/000317 external-priority patent/WO2002072141A2/en
Priority claimed from CA 2397169 external-priority patent/CA2397169A1/en
Priority claimed from CA 2402930 external-priority patent/CA2402930A1/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to EP09003542A priority Critical patent/EP2075256A2/de
Publication of EP1497331A2 publication Critical patent/EP1497331A2/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/46Hybrid immunoglobulins
    • C07K16/468Immunoglobulins having two or more different antigen binding sites, e.g. multifunctional antibodies
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K2039/505Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising antibodies
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/30Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by aspects of specificity or valency
    • C07K2317/31Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by aspects of specificity or valency multispecific
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/60Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/62Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments comprising only variable region components
    • C07K2317/626Diabody or triabody
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2319/00Fusion polypeptide

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to multispecific ligands, for example a heterofunctional ligand comprising at least first and second binding moieties which have cooperating functional affinities including a multispecific ligand, for example, a bispecific antibody, having at least a first portion which binds to a 'lymphatic vessel associated' antigen/receptor and a second portion having at least one immune- affecting functionality including, without limitation, functions related to antigen presentation, immune signaling, suppression or enhancement of immune tolerance or immune stimulation, or binding to a target molecule, for example a cell surface antigen, receptor etc.
  • a heterofunctional ligand comprising at least first and second binding moieties which have cooperating functional affinities including a multispecific ligand, for example, a bispecific antibody, having at least a first portion which binds to a 'lymphatic vessel associated' antigen/receptor and a second portion having at least one immune- affecting functionality including, without limitation, functions related to antigen presentation, immune signaling, suppression or
  • Immunotherapy has gained wide acceptance as a promising measure to address several disease states including autoimmune disease, transplant rejection, infectious disease and cancer. Despite rapid and exciting progress in approaches to treatment, the disease burden attributable to such illnesses has not significantly abated. The complex nature of the normal and pathologic immunologic processes associated with such diseases, coupled with logistical problems in evaluating and implementing methods for immunotherapy in human subjects, continue to be some of the obstacles to successful advances in treatment.
  • cytokines, chemokines, growth factors colony stimulating factors) receptor agonists orantagonists etc. which will bind to or otherwise interact with or trigger responses in or towards target entities, including pathogenic organisms, tissue specific cells.diseased cells, immune cells etc.
  • target entities including pathogenic organisms, tissue specific cells.diseased cells, immune cells etc.
  • a recent example is a renewed interest to find molecules and methods of triggering an interaction with CD45 (see for example Nature (2001) Vol. 409 p. 349-354). Evaluating the biological effect of interactions with such target ligands is often obfuscated and retarded by the biodistribution of such ligands on cells other than the target population which results in undesired and/or confusing pleiotropic effects.
  • the present invention facilitates scientific assessment, development, role evaluation, therapeutic evaluation, and delivery, particularly targeted delivery of molecules that exert biologic functions and particularly immune relatedfunctions.
  • the targeting agents and methods which are the subject of the invention herein facilitate scientific evaluation of the biological effects of a more targeted biodistribution of such targeting agents, by limiting undesired or confusing side effects.
  • the invention contemplates compositions of matter and methods of delivery, in some cases using ligands that but for the targeting methods herein defined would be ineffective or have a broader effect than is desirable; or similarly, but for the severity of the disease or the absence of other therapeutic alternatives for which such ligands are useful, they would otherwise be inappropriate for therapeutic use.
  • the present invention accommodates evaluation of the biological role and/or effects of such ligands for therapeutic or other scientific purposes using such targeting strategies.
  • the present invention provides a vehicle to preferentially target, on a sub-population of cells for which there is a cell-associated marker, a receptor or receptor ligand which is present on a more heterogeneous population of cells.
  • the invention contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand containing at least a first ligand binding moiety and a second ligand binding moiety.
  • the first ligand binding moiety specifically binds with a pre-selected first affinity to at least a first ligand.
  • the first ligand has a first biodistribution.
  • the second ligand binding moiety specifically binds with a pre-selected affinity to at least a second ligand.
  • the second ligand has a second biodistribution.
  • the affinity and/or on-rate of first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favour of a selected location of one or both of the ligands.
  • the first ligand binding moiety has a higher intrinsic affinity and/or a higher on-rate.
  • the invention contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand.
  • the multispecific ligand contains at least a first ligand binding moiety and a second ligand binding moiety.
  • the first ligand binding moiety specifically binds to a first ligand having a first biodistribution.
  • the second ligand binding moiety specifically binds to a second ligand having a second biodistribution.
  • the second biodistribution is different from that of the first biodistribution, and the affinity and/or on-rate of the first and second ligand binding moieties to their respective ligands are different and selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand towards the first or second biodistribution.
  • the invention contemplates further, a composition containing a multispecific ligand.
  • the multispecific ligand contains a first ligand binding moiety and a second ligand binding moiety.
  • the first ligand binding moiety specifically binds with a pre- selected first affinity to a first ligand.
  • the first ligand has a first biodistribution.
  • the second ligand binding moiety specifically binds with a pre-selected affinity to a second ligand.
  • the second ligand has a second biodistribution.
  • the affinity and/or on-rate of first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand.
  • the multispecific ligand specifically binds to a target ligand.
  • the target ligand is specific to a selected sub-population of a heterogeneous cell population.
  • This embodiment of the multispecific ligand contains a first ligand binding moiety and a second ligand binding moiety.
  • the first ligand binding moiety specifically binds to a cell sub-population associated ligand.
  • the second ligand binding moiety binds to the target ligand.
  • the first ligand binding moiety has an affinity and/or a higher on-rate for the sub-population associated ligand higher than the affinity and/or on-rdte of the second ligand binding moiety for the target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a bispecific ligand containing a first ligand and a second ligand.
  • the first ligand binds to a first target ligand and the second ligand binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand is selected to enable binding to the first target ligand independently of the ability of the second ligand to bind to the second target ligand.
  • the affinity and/or on-rate of the second ligand is selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first ligand binding first or substantially contemporaneously to the first target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a bispecific antibody containing a first antibody component and a second antibody component.
  • the first antibody component binds to a first target ligand and the second antibody component binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity and/or on-rate and/or avidity of the first antibody component are selected to enable binding to the first target ligand independently of the ability of the second antibody component to bind to the second target ligand.
  • the avidity or affinity and/or on-rate of the second ligand are selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first ligand binding first or substantially contemporaneously to the first target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a multispecific ligand containing a first moiety and a second moiety.
  • the first moiety binds to a first target ligand.
  • the second moiety binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity and/or avidity and/or on-rate of the first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of the second moiety to bind to the second target ligand.
  • the avidity and/or affinity and/or on-rate of the second moiety are selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first moiety, first or substantially contemporaneously, binding to the first target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a multispecific ligand containing a first moiety and a second moiety.
  • the first moiety binds to a first target ligand.
  • the second moiety binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity and/or avidity and/or on-rate of the first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of the second moiety to bind to the second target ligand.
  • the avidity and/or affinity and/or on-rate of the second moiety are selected to substantially reduce the probability of either moiety binding first or for a sufficient duration or series of durations to its respective target ligand to accomplish a therapeutic function without the other moiety, first or substantially contemporaneously, binding to its respective target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand containing a first moiety and a second moiety.
  • the first moiety binds to a first target ligand.
  • the second moiety binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity or avidity or both the afi ⁇ nity and avidity of the first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of the second moiety to bind to the second target ligand.
  • the avidity or afi ⁇ nity or both the affinity and avidity of the second moiety are selected to enable the second moiety to bind to the second entity in preference to the first moiety binding to the first entity when both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the respective first and second entities.
  • the invention contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand containing a first moiety, a second moiety and a third ligand binding moiety.
  • the first moiety binds to a first target ligand and the second moiety binds to a second target ligand.
  • the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of the first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand in preference to the second moiety binding to the second entity when both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the respective first and second entities
  • the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of the second moiety are selected to enable the third target ligand to bind to the second entity in preference to the second moiety binding to the second entity when both the third target ligand and the second moiety are substantially contemporaneously bound to the second entity.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing an antibody which specifically binds to an epitope on a ligand.
  • the ligand recognized by the antibody exerts a biologic effect by binding to a target site on a target ligand.
  • the epitope bound by the antibody is proximal to the binding site of the ligand for the target ligand, so that binding of the antibody reduces but does not prevent the affinity of the ligand for its target ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand containing a first ligand binding moiety and a second moiety.
  • the first ligand binding moiety specifically binds to a lymphatic endothelial cell associated marker.
  • the second moiety contains an independent therapeutic function.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing an immunocytokine containing an anti-idiotypic antibody component and a cytokine component.
  • the anti-idiotypic antibody component recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand.
  • the invention further contemplates a composition containing a bispecific antibody containing an anti-idiotypic antibody component and an anti-CD3 antibody or an anti-CD28 antibody component.
  • the anti-idiotypic antibody recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds specifically to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand.
  • the invention additionally contemplates physiologically acceptable compositions of the compositions encompassed by the invention.
  • the invention likewise contemplates methods of use of the compositions encompassed by the invention.
  • a composition comprising a multispecific ligand comprising at least a first ligand binding moiety which specifically binds to a first ligand having a first biodistribution and a second ligand binding moiety which specifically binds to a second ligand having a second biodistribution different from that of the first ligand, and wherein the affinity of the first and second ligand binding moieties are different and selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand.
  • the dual "affinity"/"on-rate” based targeting strategy of the invention may be understood in one aspect, in terms of a strategic allocation of the respective affinity properties of the multispecific ligand to at least one "targeting" function and at least one "effector” function. Accordingly, with respect to some embodiments of the invention, the term “multifunctional" ligand is used interchangeably.
  • At least one of the ligand binding moieties is a "targeting" arm in the sense that it at least preferentially recognizes a marker that is associated with one or more specific target entities eg. cell populations, and the other ligand binding moiety is an "effector" arm which binds with relatively less affinity or functional affinity and/or less quickly to a target ligand which optionally has a more diverse biodistribution.
  • the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand is biased in favour of the location(s) of both ligands relative to the location(s) of the target ligand so as to limit the big distribution to non-target entities.
  • binding or recognition is preferably understood throughout to be specific, in contrast to non-specific binding.
  • a multispecific ligand which comprises, at least, a targeting moiety which specifically binds to a first ligand having a first cell surface biodistribution and an effector moiety which binds to a second ligand having a second cell surface biodistribution different from but overlapping that of the first ligand, and wherein the targeting moiety is intrinsically predisposed to bind to the first ligand in preference to the effector moiety binding to the second ligand so as to bias the distribution of the multispecific ligand to a target cell population in a mammal on which both said first and seconds ligands are bioavailable for recognition by said multispecific ligand, said second ligand characterized in that it is bioavailable for recognition on at least one population of cells other than the target cell population.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 1 wherein the first ligand is pre-targeted to the surface of the target cell population. 3. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 1 , wherein the first ligand is expressed on the surface of the target cell population.
  • the effector moiety may be a coybody, which may be generated for example by a process of mutagenesis in which one or more residues in at least one CDR or FR are mutated or added, preferably residues which do not contribute to the specificity and off-rate of a reference antibody for example an antibody of medium or high affinity and desired specificity, for example as determined by alanine scanning mutangenesis, preferably residues located in a CDR loop which does not contribute to the specificity and off-rate of the antibody and are residues which are most likely to border the target ligand binding site for example as determined by well-known methods of three dimensional modeling or statistical plots of residue which are most variable or correspond to mutational hot- spots (these residues may also be residues in the neighbouring FRs, in any case optionally residues which are not conserved (and
  • the intrinsic off-rate of the targeting moiety is optionally at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, or 90-100 (or more) fold .
  • the intrinsic off-rate of the targeting moiety is optionally at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, or 90-100 (or more) fold less than the intrinsic off-rate of the effector moiety.
  • the intrinsic on- rate of the targeting moiety is selected so as to exceed the on-rate of the effector moiety.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the first and/or second ligand is expressed predominantly on one or more cell populations of hemapoietic origin.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the first and/or second ligand is an ABC transporter protein, a ligand that is over-expressed on tumor cells, an adhesion molecule, a ligand that is expressed exclusively or predominantly on one or more types of leucocytes, one or more sub- populations of T cells or B cells, a cytokine receptor, a growth factor receptor, a molecule or complex comprising a transmembrane protein, or a CD molecule, other than CD59, a receptor is selected from the group consisting of tyrosine kinase type receptors, serine kinase type receptors, heterotrimeric G-protein coupled receptors, receptors bound to tyrosine kinase, TNF family receptors, notch family receptors, guanylate cyclase types, tyrosine phosphatase types, decoy receptors, inhibitory receptors and adhesion receptors (other than CD59) or
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein said second ligand binding moiety specifically recognizes said second ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the sum of bioavailable second ligands on said target cell population is less that the sum of bioavailable second ligands on cells other than said target cell population.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the first ligand is preferentially bioavailable for targeting purposes on said target cell population.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the multispecific ligand is adapted to bind contemporaneously to said first and second ligands 2 .
  • fist and second ligand can be also be influenced by the likelihood that both would be found within or unassociated with lipid rafts (in some cases this may be more important than others), as determined for example by the length of the transmembrane domain, if any, or in some cases whether the ligand is one which is anchored by GPI, whether the effector moiety is selected to agonize or antagonize a receptor and the functional sensitivity of the 21.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 20 wherein the surface cell density of the first ligand on the target cell population exceeds the surface cell density of the second ligand on said target cell population.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs, wherein the first and second ligand binding moieties are small molecules 3 that are conjugated to a fullerene or a peptide.
  • a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs comprising a bispecific antibody in which the Fc portion of the molecule is absent or incapable of finding to an Fc receptor.
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding paragraphs and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • small molecule typically connotes small synthetic or semi-synthetic organic molecules which are not macromolecules such as proteins, lipoproteins, glycoproteins, long chain fatty acids etc.
  • effector is used to refer to the ability to effect a biological consequence through binding, for example effecting a signal transduction event by activating a receptor, or blocking the target ligand from associating with a complementary ligand, for example blocking a receptor from associating with a complementary ligand (eg. its natural ligand whether soluble or on another cell) and thereby, for example, preventing a signal transduction, or for example in the case of a decoy receptor preventing the biological consequence (eg. protective effect) associated with the function of such receptor, or blocking a ligand from associating with a complementary ligand eg. receptor on another entity eg. a cancer cell, infectious agent or immune cell.
  • a complementary ligand eg. its natural ligand whether soluble or on another cell
  • targeting moiety means capable of distinguishing at least in part between the target entities (eg. cells according to one embodiment), which target entities are defined at least in part by a first ligand, typically found on the target cell population (and at least some entities eg. cells other than the target population of entities) that bear the second ligand acted on by the effector moiety.
  • target entities eg. cells according to one embodiment
  • first ligand typically found on the target cell population (and at least some entities eg. cells other than the target population of entities) that bear the second ligand acted on by the effector moiety.
  • a biased biodistribution is preferably accomplished by the multispecific ligand contemporaneously recognizing both ligands on the same entity eg cell, and may be accomplished by such contemporanous recognition occurring on adjacent entities or by increasing the propensity of the multispecfic ligand to locate in proximity to a target entity in virtue of the relatively high affinity targeting arm.
  • the targeting arm may itself be an effector .
  • the biological consequence accomplished by the effector arm is at least minimally retargeting, for example wherein the lesser affinity or functional affinity of the first binding moiety is selected to permit the multispecific ligand to preferentially bind to an adjacent entity, for example, a circulating entity which circulates in proximity to a lymphatic endothelial cell to which the multifunctional ligand is bound with lesser affinity.
  • the relatively high affinity first binding moiety may itself be an effector.
  • the biological consequence accomplished by the effector arm is minimally cooperative targeting, for example where the biodistributions of at least one of the first and second ligands extends to a diverse population of cells other than target cell population and where binding is only possible or consequential if both ligands are available for contemporaneous binding, in this case due to the affinities of the first and second ligand binding being individually insufficient for effective targeting (eg. insufficient for other than ephemeral binding).
  • the "cooperative targeting" is not simply ameliorated by the effector arm, it is predicated and reliant on this arm.
  • One or both ligand binding moieties may exert additional effector properties.
  • any multispecific ligand of the invention or any component thereof may be fused or conjugated to a separate effector as exemplified below, including toxins, cytokines, adhesion molecules etc.
  • the ligand binding moiety is preferably an antibody or a sequence or sequences of amino acids etc.which are the natural ligand for the target ligand, for example where the ligand is a cytokine or lymphokine receptor, such as IL-2 receptor, the ligand binding moiety may comprise a sequence of amino acids which is IL-2.
  • the ligand binding moiety may also be a mutated or a newly developed form of the natural ligand (eg. developed through combinatorial libraries) or a natural or synthetic chemical ligand (developed through combinatorial chemistry).
  • the invention contemplates a composition containing a multispecific ligand containing at least a first ligand binding moiety and a second ligand binding moiety, the first ligand binding moiety specifically binding with a pre-selected first affinity to at least a first ligand, having a first biodistribution and the second ligand binding moiety specifically binding with a pre-selected affinity to at least a second ligand with a second biodistribution and wherein the affinity of first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biological site of biologic activity of the multispecific ligand; and wherein the first ligand binding moiety preferably binds with high affinity (preferably nanamolar affinity or greater) to a specific cell associated marker (e.g.
  • a CD marker a marker associated with diseased cells, a a marker associated cells in a particular physiological state (e.g. activated T cells, B cells) etc.
  • markers may be associated with a particular class of cell or a subclass thereof (if applicable) or particular subpopulation within the subclass (if applicable), however classified, such as epithelial cells, endothelial cells, immune cells (lymphocytes, memory cells, effector cells) monocytes.Tcells (CD4+, CD8+, CD45RO+), hepatocytes, stem cells, etc.(expand) and wherein said second ligand binding binding moiety binds with relatively low, or medium affinity (preferably 0.1 micromolar or less) to a receptor (eg.
  • chemokine chemokine, growth factor, cytokine involved in cell signaling or a decoy receptor
  • a cell surface receptor ligand eg. the ligand for such receptor which effects a signal or inhibits a signal (eg. CTLA4)
  • a ligand involved in cell adhesion e.g. CTLA4
  • a receptor or channel ion channel for a molecule involved in cell regulation or homeostasis etc.
  • the invention contemplates that the difference in affinity will in most cases be an essential element in biasing the location of action of the multispecific ligand to yield an acceptable or desired safety profile and that the high affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the cell associated marker will be optimized for this purpose insofar as the safety profile of the multispecific ligand dictates maximizing its affinity characteristics.
  • the invention also recognizes that choosing the relatively lower affinity of the second ligand binding moiety may assist in this regard up to a point where its effectiveness to bind to the second ligand is significantly comprimised.
  • the invention also contemplates that factors other than the choice of affinityof the first and second ligand binding moieties (and of course the avidity effect resulting from having two ligands on the target cell and only one on the non- target cell) may be taken into consideration or optimized to balance the safety and effectiveness profiles of the multispecific ligand, especially if such careful balance is required.
  • cell associated marker in terms of its cell surface density relative to cell density of the second ligand.
  • the number of first and second ligand can readily be assessed by radiolabelling studies or approximated by flow cytometric methods relative to a standard.
  • the selection of the cell surface marker in this respect will depend on the function of the relatively low affinity binding moiety (whether it causes a signal transduction (directly or indirectly eg.
  • agonist antibodies are well known in the art and include those described in US 6,342,220, US 6,331 ,302, US 5,635,177, US 6,099,841 see also Cancer Res 2001 Mar 1;61 (5): 1846-8 and can be made according to routine screening techniques, especially using antibodies capable of cross-linking receptor components (see references below) including antibodies in which the VH and VL are capable of binding individually to different receptor components), binding to a decoy receptor, binding to an inhibitory receptor etc.) or prevents a signal transduction (directly or indirectly, e.g.
  • binding to a receptor, binding to receptor ligand and in the final analysis how many binding events per cell are required to cause or prevent the sought-after biological effect.
  • This can be assayed in vitro through well known assay methods established in the art for measuring responses to external stimuli such as cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, colony stimulating factors using various immunostaining techniques including flow cytometry (eg. to measure apoptosis (e.g. annexin V binding assay) signal transduction (e.g.
  • the cell specific marker may also be necessary or desirable for the cell specific marker to approximate (preferably the the number of cell specific markers on the target cell population is no less in number than 50% more preferably no less than 90% in number relative to the second ligand - as stated above, which will depend on what degree of causation or prevention of the signaling/interaction will cause the desired biologic effect) or preferably out-number (by greater than 50%, preferably by greater that 100% (greater than two fold), preferably by greater that 200% (greater than 3 fold), by greater than 300% (greater than 4 fold)) the target ligand for the relatively low affinity binding moiety especially, for example, if the goal is to block interaction of a receptor with a high affinity ligand that exerts a biological effect in low concentration (eg. a cytokine).
  • the target ligand for the relatively low affinity binding moiety especially, for example, if the goal is to block interaction of a receptor with a high affinity ligand that exerts a biological effect in low concentration (eg. a
  • the affinity of the first binding moiety will preferably be selected to approximate (preferably no less than one order of magnitude, more preferably no less than 5 fold less, more preferably no less three fold less, more preferably no less two fold less, more preferably no less one fold (100%) less), and will preferably equal or exceed the affinity of the natural ligand.
  • the concentration (in virtue of the choice of administered dose) of the multispecific ligand in the target cell microenvironment may also be selected to exceed that of the natural ligand (MTD permiting).
  • the choice of construct will maximize the steric blocking of the target (IgG or F(ab') 2 vs diabody).
  • the hinge region is naturally longer and this effect can be mimicked for human antibodies through a hinge extension on the N-terminal side of the hinge region using well known neutral linkers (gly4ser) or a repeat of all or a portion of the natural hinge sequence. This extension will also permit a greater span between first and second ligands to be bridged.
  • the choice of construct will include an Fc portion or partial Fc portion (eg. CH2 or minibody-CH3) or weighted Fc eg. by pegylation (site specific pegylation is well known in the art) or IgG subtype naturally having additional Fc domains (e.g.
  • an IgE which Fc if it includes the CH3 is preferably mutated to preclude its binding and/or increase its half life as is known in the art see USP 6,121, 022 so as to maximize the shear effects on the multispecific ligand which will be most consequential in the case of univalent binding in order to minimize the duration of such binding (maximun shear force is also preferred where there is an excess in the total number of bioavailable targets of the second ligand binding moiety relative to the total number of bioavailable targets of first ligand binding moiety(greater number of cells and/or greater number of targets per cell and/or increased bioavailablity of such targets eg. on normal cells relative to cancer cells).
  • the multispecific ligand will include a 3 rd binding moiety which binds to and neutralizes the natural ligand for the receptor sought to be blocked.
  • Such formats are well known in the art (see for example particularly Schoonjans R et al. A new model for intermediate molecular weight recombinant bispecific and trispecific antibodies by efficient heterodimerization of single chain variable domains through fusion to a Fab-chain. Biomol Eng. 2001 Jun;17(6): 193-202. Schoonjans R et al. Fab chains as an efficient heterodimerization scaffold for the production of recombinant bispecific and trispecific antibody derivatives.J Immunol. 2000 Dec 15;165(12):7050-7.
  • two multispecific ligands each binding to different cell specific markers and each having a second ligand binding moiety which binds to the same second ligand eg. a receptor, optionally to a different polypeptide/component of the receptor, may be employed to achieve the desired biologic effect.
  • One or both may also be trispecific as discussed above.
  • the multispecifc ligand binds is used to protect a first target cell population in virtue of its high affinity (and/or faster on-rate) first ligand binding moiety from the effects of a therapeutic entity which desirably binds to a second target cell population via the second ligand but also undesirably binds to the first target cell population.
  • the second ligand binding moiety can be used to selectively block the binding of the therapeutic entity e.g. an interleukin, interferon, immunotoxin, etc. to the first target cell population in virtue of the relatively low affinity second ligand binding moiety.
  • the multispecific ligand may also comprise a third ligand binding moiety which binds to the therapeutic entity, particularly where the multispecific ligand is first administered first, optionally an anti-idiotypic binding moiety component where the therapeutic comprises an antibody component.
  • the multispecific ligand may also comprise an enzyme cleavage site, wherein the cleavage is effected at the second target cell population in virtue of the particular enzyme constitution in the vicinity of that target cell population (e.g.
  • pancreas beta cells using markers such as GAD65,
  • Type 1 Diabetes is characterized by the destruction of insulin producing Beta Cells in the pancreas.
  • One method in which Beta cells are destroyed is thought to be through apoptosis mediated by CD95 receptors on Beta cells.
  • CD-95 seems to be upregulated in Beta cells of those with Type 1 diabetes (see Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002 Apr 958 297-304; J Clin Immunol 2001 Jan;21(1):15- 8).
  • Tg TPO ligands as cell associated markers CD95, TRAILR1, TRAILR2 can be blocked on thyroid cells.
  • Hashimoto's Thyroiditis (HT) is characterized by the destruction of thyroid hormone producing cells and therefore hypothyroidism.
  • the CD95 receptor which is responsible for apoptosis is up regulated in thyroids affected by HT. Blocking the CD95 receptor by the RLAA may reduce the amount of apoptosis.
  • the HAA can target either Tg or TPO which are unique to thyroid tissue. 1
  • TRAILR1 and TRAILR2 see Nat Rev Immunol 2002 Mar;2(3):195-204
  • Fas can also be selectively activated on distinct subsets of disease mediating immune cells associated with autoimmune and inflammatory disorders such as activated T cells, regulatory T cells, CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells etc.
  • the invention is also directed to multifunctional ligands which comprise antibodies which recognize cell type specific markers (hereinbefore or hereinafter exemplified), including those available commercially or published in the art, in any combination with those antibodies (hereinbefore or hereinafter exemplified, including those available commercially or published in the art) that recognize ligands on a broader population of cells including the cell population bearing the cell type specific marker, wherein the instrinsic affinity difference is maintained or adjusted to one, two, three, four, five, six or seven orders of magnitude.
  • cell type specific markers hereinbefore or hereinafter exemplified
  • the invention contemplates that affinity differences (increases or decreases in affinity) can be readily generated by modifying amino acids that are expected a piori to result in changes in affinity (see for example Chowdhury P. et al. Improving antibody affinity by mimicking somatic hypermutation in vitro (1999) Nature Biotechnology Jun; 17 p.568-572), or by a variety of other well-known high throughput methods that can readily be applied to this task, for example by light chain shuffling, CDR grafting, parsimonious mutagenesis, shotgun scanning mutagenesis etc. Methods of affinity mat ⁇ ration are well kwown in the art.
  • the invention also contemplates that two hybrisoma derived antibodies can be digested eg.
  • hybridoma derived IgG antibodies can be used for the relatively high affinity cell targeting moiety and that hybridoma derived IgMs can be used for the relatively low affinity binding arm.
  • the invention also contemplates that the repective high and low affinity arms can be conjugated, fused etcaccording to well known methods to respective complementary ligands such as fas/jun strepavidin/biotin (making it possible to pre-target the high affinity arm independently, particularly where the affinity of the complementary ligands for each other is greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for its target ligand.
  • respective complementary ligands such as fas/jun strepavidin/biotin
  • the first ligand binding moiety can bind to a cell specific marker and and said second ligand binding moiety binds to the extrracellular portion of a ligand involved involved in membrane transport across the cell membrane, for example an ion channel, vitamin recepetor etc. to inhibit uptake or export.
  • the first ligand binding moiety may bind to a cancer cell specific marker and the second ligand binsing moiety can bind to p- glycoprotein.
  • High affinity tumor specific antibodies are well known and anti-PGP antibodies are well known (see for example 6,479,639 Monoclonal antibody to a human MDR1 multidrug resistance gene product and uses 6,365,357 Methods and reagents for preparing and using immunological agents specific for P-glycoprotein 6,171 ,786 Methods for preventing multidrug resistance in cancer cells 6,030,796 Monoclonal antibody to a human MDR1 multidrug resistance gene product, and uses 5,994,088 Methods and reagents for preparing and using immunological agents specific for P-glycoprotein 5,972,598 Methods for preventing multidrug resistance in cancer cells 5,773,280 Monoclonal antibody to a human MDR1 multidrug resistance gene product, and uses 5,434,075 Monoclonal antibody to a human MDR1 multidrug resistance gene product, and uses; Chen Y et al.
  • a cell specific marker need not differentiate between sub-populations of cells that do not express the second target ligand eventhough those cells are not the targets of action of the multispecific ligand. Examples of bispecific antibody technologies are described in Appendix C.
  • a first ligand binding moiety which recognizes a cell specific marker on a non-diseased cell is combined with a second ligand binding moiety which binds with a lower intrinsic affinity and/or slower on-rate to a ligand which is the target of a cytotoxic molecule eg. a radiolabelled cytokine, cytokine-toxin fusion protein eg. IL-2-diptheria toxin or PE fusion, an immunotoxin etc.
  • a cytotoxic molecule eg. a radiolabelled cytokine, cytokine-toxin fusion protein eg. IL-2-diptheria toxin or PE fusion, an immunotoxin etc.
  • first ligands which protect non-diseased cells bearing a corresponding target ligand from the effects of a second cytotoxic ligand (e.g an immunotoxin, cytokine-toxin fusion protein, radionuclide bearing ligand, etc.) having the same target specificity and which targets diseased cells through the instrumentality of the target ligand eg. a cancer associated marker e.g Lewis Y antigen, EPCAM, MK-1 antigen.
  • a cancer associated marker e.g Lewis Y antigen, EPCAM, MK-1 antigen.
  • the first ligand which is intended to bind preferentially to non-diseased cells will be selected to have one or more and preferably all of the following characteristics:
  • a cell-specific binding moiety of higher affinity and/or on- rate which targets the non-diseased cells e.g. through an epithelial cell marker which is expressed on normal epithelial cells
  • associated in relation to markers that are dominantly distributed on one or more particular entities is used to mean exclusively expressed, primarily expressed, or over-expressed to advantage from a targeting standpoint.
  • receptor ligand means a target ligand which is a ligand for a receptor, for example, a receptor on a cell or infectious agent or a receptor which circulates independently of another entity.
  • affinity is contrasted to functional afi ⁇ nity which may result from avidity.
  • epitope though technically understood to be specific for a given antibody, is used in a preferred embodiments to refer to antigenic determinants that are situated proximally to one another so that two antibodies will be considered to bind to the same epitope if one competively inhibits the binding of the other through any probative competitive inhibition experiment known to those skilled in the art.
  • the invention contemplates that two antibodies with the same epitope specificity may have substantially the same amino acid composition ie. with possible exception of one or more additions, deletions or substitutions including conservative amino acid substitutions which do not substantially affect the specificity and amino acid composition of the paratope
  • overlap and related terms connote that notwithstanding the difference in distributions of the first and second ligands the first and second ligands are bioavailable for recognition on the same entity.
  • This term and related terms exemplified below, are intended to exclude a situation where both ligands are preferentially expressed on substantially the same entity, for example two different tumor associated antigens associated differentially with a differentiated population of cells within a tumor , most particularly in the case where they are individually suitable targets for delivery of a toxic payload.
  • receptor ligand means a target ligand which is a ligand for a receptor, for example, a receptor on a cell or infectious agent or a receptor which circulates independently of another entity.
  • antigen binding fragment refers to a polypeptide or a plurality of associated polypeptides comprising one or more portions of an antibody including at least one VH or VL or a functional fragment thereof.
  • a moiety that exerts a biologic function is understood to be a "biologic effector" in the sense that its intended interaction with an entity in the lymphatic system or elsewhere in the organism has a biological consequence.
  • the tern neutralizing in regard to an an immune function is used broadly to refer to any interposition, interference or impediment which affects the function of the target entity
  • modulating preferably refers to effecting a change
  • mediating preferably connotes an indirect effect achieved through the instrumentality of another entity, for example a cell, cytokine, chemokine etc..
  • biologic effector ligands is used to refer to any ligand for which there is a complementary target ligand on a target entity, and wherein binding of the biologic effector ligand to the target ligand exerts a biologic effect.
  • the target ligand is typically a receptor and the biologic effector ligand may be any complementary ligand such as a cytokine, chemokine, hormone, colony stimulating factor, growth factor, receptor inhibitor, agonistor antagonist, which binds to the receptor with resulting biologic effect.
  • pre-selected in reference to the affinity of ligand binding moiety refers to any selection or choice of differential or cooperative affinities relative to a second ligand binding moiety which is generated as a result of a mental or physical process or both, preferably through a process of prediction or post-facto validation of the effects of the choice of the first and second affinities and/or more preferably through an empirical evaluation of different choices for at least one of the first and second affinities, and preferably both.
  • ligand is used broadly to refer to any entity or part thereof which can participate in an intermolecular interaction that can result in specific binding of suitable affinity for the interaction in question.
  • entity includes without limitation any molecule including without limitation, antibodies, complex or association of molecules, drugs, drug carriers (eg.vesicles eg. liposomes, nanoparticles.etc.) or any cell as well as any infectious agent or parasite (including, without limitation, spores, viruses, baceria, fungi ) as well as any other immune or therapeutic target.
  • drug carriers eg.vesicles eg. liposomes, nanoparticles.etc.
  • infectious agent or parasite including, without limitation, spores, viruses, baceria, fungi ) as well as any other immune or therapeutic target.
  • low affinity means an affinity of approximately (this term is defined herein) 10 " molar to micromolar affinity, preferably (subject to safety considerations), approximately, 10 's molar affinity, more preferably (subject to safety considerations), approximately micromolar affinity, the term “medium afi ⁇ nity” means approximately 10 "7 to nanomolar affinity, preferably approximately 10 '8 molar affinity, more preferably approximately nanomolar affinity, and the term “high affinity” means approximately 10 "10 affinity or greater.
  • the multispecific ligand comprises a "target-ligand” binding moiety which binds with low or medium affinity to a target ligand present on a diverse population of cells (preferably this moiety is an effector moiety ie. one which exerts a biological effect attributable to its binding eg. blocking or activating a receptor or blocking a cell membrane channel) and a "targeting", ligand binding moiety, which binds with medium or high affinity to a ligand associated with a sub- population of those cells so as to bias the biodistribution of the multifunctional ligand in favor of said sub-population.
  • the multispecific ligand is adapted to be bound contemporaneously to the same cell.
  • first and second ligands binding moieties each bind to ligands present on diverse overlapping populations of entities eg. cells ( ie. neither ligand being preferentially associated with a target cell population) and are adapted to be bound contemporaneously and to both bind individually with low affinity, so as to bias the distribution of the multispecific ligand to the population of cells bearing both ligands.
  • the invention is directed to an antibody termed a "coybody".
  • a “coybody” is an antibody in which the on-rate contribution to the affinity of the antibody is proportionally less than the off-rate contribution relative to a reference antibody of the same specificity and a greater affinity of up to several orders of magnitude, preferably a reference antibody of approximately one to three orders of magnitude greater instrinsic affinity, preferably a reference antibody of medium affinity or preferably high affinity, optionally a reference antibody with an optimally high on-rate, for example in which the intrinsic affinity or intrinsic on-rate has been optimized after an antibody of the desired specicity has been generated.
  • the reduction in on-rate is brought about by modifying amino acids that are known or engineered to so as contribute minimally to the specificity and slow off-rate of the antibody.
  • the reference antibody may be derived from a hybridoma or from a phage, yeast bacerial or ribosome display library.
  • the reference antibody optionally comprises cooperating light and heavy variable regions in which 2 of 6, 3 of 6, 4 of 6 or 5 of 6 of the CDRs, optionally CDRs of both the VH and VL, including preferably at least one CDR3, optionally that of the heavy chain, are collectively made or selected to be primarily or exclusively responsible for the binding affinity of the coybody, such that alterations in the length (e.g.
  • alanine scanning or high throughput mutagenesis may be randomized or partially randomized in the one or both of the CDR1s and CDR2s or in one CDR1 and one CDR2 to permit selection of an antibody with a reduced intrinsic on-rate.
  • contact or potentially affinity contributing amino acids may have been deleted or modified to residues with reduced capacity for intermolecular interaction in the initial selection of the relatively high affinity reference antibody or in a later step after generation of the parental template with the desired specificity but prior to a subsequent affinity maturation step to generate the reference antibody.
  • This approach among others may be used to set up a scenario in which select portions of one or more CDRs are modified to organize that they contribute minimally to the specificity and affinity (slow off-rate) of the antibody.
  • at least one and preferably two of the CDRs are primarily or exclusively responsible for the binding.
  • the on-rate is reduced by a factor of 2 to 100x.
  • the coybody binds to a ligand which is over- expressed on a target population of entities (eg. cells) relative to a non-target population of entities such that the biodistribution of the coybody to the non-target population (and target population) is diminished in a given increment of time following administration.
  • This targeting strategy is understandably adapted to situations where the resulting delay in biodistribution is preferable for diminished toxicity attributable to reduced non-target entity binding in a given unit of time especially where the effectiveness threshold in that same amount of time is not significantly if at all compromised or is preferable due to a sustained release effect (for example using a larger antibody format that is not readily cleared).
  • suitable targets for cobodies per se include hormones or other secreted growth regulatory factor, differentiation factor, or intercellular mediators (e.g., cytokine) such as TNF alpha, FAS L, IL-8, IL-6, IL-5, VEGFs, fibroblast growth factors.
  • coybodies have multiple independent applications, including tempering the effects through antibody mediated neutralization of an over-production or sensivity to biologic effector ligands (eg. cytokines eg. TNF a ⁇ Ph a > chemokines eg. IL-16 (crohns disease) etc. which are over-produced and/or mediate or aggravate eg.
  • biologic effector ligands eg. cytokines eg. TNF a ⁇ Ph a > chemokines eg. IL-16 (crohns disease) etc.
  • a chronic medical condition (which for example is not an acute phase) by binding to such ligands, over a prolonged periods, preferably using larger antibody formats which are not readily cleared, especially where such tempering has side effects which are better spread over time and/or where effectiveness is not a limiting factor and/or where a second therapeutic with different non-cumulative side-effects shares the therapeutic burden and/or where a the same antibody with a higher on-rate is used in combination.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety is comparable (equal to or no greater than one order of magnitude less that than, preferably no greater than five times less, preferably no greater than four times less, preferably no greater than three fold less, preferably no greater than two fold less etc.) or preferably greater than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety and the on-rate of the first ligand binding moiety is greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety.
  • binders with high on-rates via BIACORE or other methods of on-rate measurement are well known in the art (see particularly WO 02/36615, US 2002/098189, US 2002/164326 and WO 01/64751; see also WO 01/55217 and WO 01/27160). It will be appreciated that best safety/effectivenss profile will be achieved by selecting the relative on-rates and/or off-rates of both binding moieties. For example: in one embodiment the on-rate of the first ligand binding moiety is five to 500 fold greater that the on-rate of the second ligand binding moiety (including all the increments therebetween), optionally one to two orders of magnitude greater (including all the increments therebetween).
  • the on-rate of the first ligand binding moiety may also be 2, 3 or 4 times greater than the on-rate of the second ligand binding moiety.
  • the intrinsic affinity of the first ligand binding moiety is preferably anywhere between 2 to 100,000 times, preferably 5 to 1000 times, greater that of the second ligand binding moiety.
  • antibody is used broadly, unless the context dictates otherwise, to refer without limitation, to a whole antibody of any class or biologic origin, or chimeric combinations of antibody regions or domains (eg. FRs and CDRs) of different origins or species eg, humanized, any combination of one or more antibody fragments or recombinant reconstructions (scFvs) of antibodies including dimers, diabodies, triabodies, a myriad of known bispecific, trispecific, tetraspecific antibody formats or monovalent, divalent, trivalent, tetravalent or other multivalent antibody formats (see for example review in Kriangkum J, et al. Bispecific and bifunctional single chain recombinant antibodies.
  • scFvs antibody fragments or recombinant reconstructions
  • antibody any fragment, portion, or reconstruction of one or more portions of an antibody (scFv) or any truncated form a ligand binding entity, such antibody typically comprising at least a VH or VL portion or both or a functional portion of same (eg microbodies), including single domain antibodies, F(ab') 2 , Fab, Fab', Facb, Fc, etc.
  • the term antibody also includes fusions of such an antibody so defined and other functional moieties (eg. toxins, cytokines, chemokines, streptavidin, adhesion molecules).
  • the invention is directed to a multispecific ligand with at least two different binding specificities for different target ligands on the same target entity eg. a cell and which is preferably adapted to bind contemporaneously to (ie. there are no geometric or other constraints which preclude both moieties from functionally interacting with their respective target ligands at the same time)the different target ligands, said multispecific ligand comprising a first target binding moiety which preferentially(some cross-reactivity(s) does not preclude the utility of the invention) recognizes a first target ligand and a second target binding moiety which preferentially recognizes a second target ligand, and wherein the ability of the second target binding moiety to bind to the second target ligand is diminished relative the ability of the first target binding moiety to bind to the first target ligand, the first target binding moiety having an ability to bind to the first target ligand which is at least sufficient for the first target moiety to bind to the first target ligand
  • the first target binding moiety assisting (ie. providing opportunity) the second target binding moiety to bind to the second target ligand and preferably out of proportion to what could be statistically attributed to the presence of two targets ligands on the target cell eg. the binding of the first target binding moiety providing necessary assistance for the second target moiety to bind is relatively increased (ie. relative to the situation where both of are of comparable afi ⁇ nity).
  • the affinity of the first target binding moiety for the first target ligand may well be sufficient if initially approximatingnanomolar affinity and the affinity of the second target binding moiety for the second target ligand will be selected to limit the number of effective binding events on the population of cells bearing only the second target moiety; an affinity which is inversely proportional to the number of bioavailable second target ligands on the population of cells bearing only the second target ligand ie.
  • the non-target population (relative to the number of first target ligands on the target population of cells). For example, this may be assessed by determining the amount of labelled multispecific ligand on the target and non-target populations of cells in vivo (or in vitro where the number of bioavailable first and second target ligands can be roughly estimated). This selected affinity, from a effectiveness point of view, will then be assessed as to whether it is sufficient for the second ligand binding moiety to bind to the second target ligand on the target population of cells, with the benefit of the first ligand binding moiety bound or having been bound to first target ligand. For example, where the binding of the second target binding moiety may be assessed through an in vitro assay (eg.
  • an assay in which the blocking or activating of a receptor is measurable eg. through inhibition of binding of the natural ligand for a target receptor or through some measurable parameter associated with effective binding for example the release of cytokines or other biologic effector ligand.
  • the effect of binding may be also be assessed by comparing the effects over time relative to a higher affinity second binding moiety which is not associated with a first ligand binding moiety. It will be appreciated that a more ubiquitous second target ligand may require selecting a higher initial affinity of the first target binding moiety for the first target ligand eg. picomolar affinity, and selecting an affinity of the second target ligand which may for example be of micromolar affinity plus/minus approximately one order of magnitude.
  • a suitable difference in affinity between the two binding affinities may well be at least, approximately, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude. In this connection the term approximately refers to +/- up to a half order of magnitude ( ⁇ 5x).
  • variants of a dual affinity multispecific ligand may be assessed in a high throughput screen or series of such screens with a view to selecting a variant that has one or more predefined properties, alluded to above such as a) the ability to mediate a biologic effect on a target population relative to a negative control; b) the ability to mediate an improved or diminished biologic effect on a target population relative to a positive control. This ability may also be assessed in a competition experiment of any probative type well-known to those skilled in the art; c) the inability or diminished ability to mediate a biologic effect on a non-target population relative to negative and positive controls.
  • the multispecific ligand may bind to a ligand which is cell specific in the sense that it binds to cells to which it has been delivered by prior administration (eg an antibody or fusion protein thereof which only binds to the target cells or at least to cells which do not have the ligand recognized by the second ligand binding moiety present in any significant amount), akin to the pre- targetting strategies well known in the art. For example, this strategy could be used to increase the number of first ligands relative to second ligands, where indicated.
  • said first target binding moiety recognizes an entity-associated ligand eg. a target cell-associated* target ligand, for example a ligand which is exclusively expressed, primarily expressed or over-expressed to advantage on the target cell population and said second target binding moiety recognizes a non- target cell-associated target ligand which is present on target cells and non-target cells, for example a receptor, including a decoy receptor eg. for TRAIL.
  • the multispecific ligand is thereby adapted to block or activate the receptor primarily on the target population of cells.
  • the invention is also directed to methods of evaluating or implementing the effects of this enhanced selectivity for the receptor on the target cell population and can be employed to diminish the adverse consequences and evaluate the benefits associated with using a ligand binding moiety that would otherwise undesirably bind to receptors on non-target cells.
  • the invention contemplates that a variety of different strategies that can be used alone, or in any variety of compatible permutations to differentiate between target cells and/or between target and non-target cells.
  • the choice of strategies may depend at least in part on the circumstances, including the nature of the fluid environment in question, including the rapidity and pressure of flow and the direction(s) of this pressure, the method of delivery, the medical condition for which the molecule is being evaluated, whether the target is moving or stationary, or both, the location or various locations of the target, the targeting venue or venues that is/are most effective and the importance of the size of the molecule for reaching the target as well as bioavailablility, and the importance of creating immunoconjugates and immunofusions with other molecules (insofar as this affects the size and distribution of weight in the molecule).
  • constructs contemplated by the invention is a multispecific antibody, for example a bispecific antibody having a configuration which allows for binding to two antigens on the same cell, for example a traditional four chain immunoglobulin configuration having a hinge region (including F(ab') 2 minibodies etc.), a diabody configuration (depending on the relative positions of the target ligands) and others herein referenced and known to those skilled in the art.
  • a multispecific antibody for example a bispecific antibody having a configuration which allows for binding to two antigens on the same cell, for example a traditional four chain immunoglobulin configuration having a hinge region (including F(ab') 2 minibodies etc.), a diabody configuration (depending on the relative positions of the target ligands) and others herein referenced and known to those skilled in the art.
  • the mode of action of the multifunctional ligand may be contributed to by fusing or conjugating the multifunctional ligand to another functional moiety, for example, as described in the literature referenced
  • the intrinsic affinity of the first target binding moiety for the first target is greater than the intrinsic affinity of the second target binding moiety for the second target.
  • intrinsic affinity connotes a measure of the affinity of a given target binding moiety for its target ligand which is independent of the affinity of the at least one other target binding moiety for its target ligand and as used herein could theoretically be evaluated in the context of the multispecific ligand as a whole, if the other target binding moiety had an irrelevant specificity and therefore could not bind to its target ligand.
  • the invention contemplates that at least approximately one, two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude differences in "intrinsic affinity" may be required to accomplish the targeting objectives of the invention.
  • the relative on-rate* of the first target binding moiety is greater than the relative on-rate of the second target binding moiety.
  • the term relative on rate is used to connote an effective difference in on-rate that may be instrinsic to the individual target binding ligand or may attributable to its configuration or relationship vis-a-vis other parts of the molecule.
  • the invention contemplates that the off-rate contribution to the affinity of the second target binding moiety may be proportionally greater than the off-rate contribution to the afi ⁇ nity of the first target binding moiety.
  • the invention contemplates that the binding of the second target ligand binding moiety to its target ligand may be more effective if its lower affinity is attributable in part due its reduced on-rate.
  • the invention contemplates methods for reducing the affinity a target binding moiety by reducing its on rate for example by mutating or adding amino acid residues in regions of the VH or VL that don't directly contribute to the off-rate (of a relatively high affinity binder for the target, for example, as determined by modeling and structural analysis, for example, by evaluating x-ray crystal structure and evaluating NMR data of the binding, or by mutagenesis, preferably by introducing a diversity of changes in a high-throughput manner (eg. phage display, ribsome display, microarray or other expression library) including substitutions, additions and deletions within various regions of the VH or VL and determining their effect.
  • a high-throughput manner eg. phage display, ribsome display, microarray or other expression library
  • the invention contemplates that the second target binding moiety is generated using a library characterized by members in which one of the regions of VH or VL, including particularly the CDR1 and CDR2, for example the CDR1 of the VH or CDR2 of the VL, is shortened and/or mutated in a manner to reduce the probability of its having any direct contribution to the affinity of the selected molecule (through molecular interaction), for example mutated to introduce amino acids that are least important for intermolecular interactions, for example by minimizing the occurrence of amino acids that are important for electrostatic interactions and optionally also hydrogen binding, generating a binder whose affinity will be postulated to be independent of the contribution of the modified CDR, and then optionally evaluating the success of this latter step through further mutagenesis (this step is most revealing if the CDR
  • the actual on-rate if the on-rate was to be measured independently of the on-rate of the other binding moiety is shortened but not mutated or mutated to introduce amino acids important for intermolecular interactions) and then using the library to incrementally lengthen the region and/or introduce amino acids important for intermolecular interaction at a distance (eg. electrostatic interactions and optionally also hydrogen binding) to introduce minimal steric hindrance or intermolecular repulsion.
  • the invention also contemplates that introducing amino acids that have the greatest potential for hydrogen bonding may introduce an aqueous cushion into the interface region with the target ligand to diminish the on-rate contribution to affinity.
  • the invention also contemplates modifying the amino acid composition of an existing binder by introducing or one or amino acids or mutations into a framework region at a location which is proximal to the binding region or a region which borders the interface of approach to the binding region or any interface between the target binding moiety and the target ligand.
  • the invention contemplates that the on-rate and off-rate can be routinely measured using various technologies (eg. Biacore) known to those skilled in the art, including various techniques of measuring these rates in real-time, for example those that measure the deflection pattern of an incident form of radiation (eg. Biosite).
  • the antibodies each have unique preferably cleavable peptide tags that are generated for example through a random or partially random insertion of nucleotides into the DNA encoding the antibody and that serve to link them to their DNA eg a phage (as per techniques known to those skilled artisans or published in the art) and the antibodies are evaluated independently of a phage (eg. they may even be cleavable from the phage) or other expression system linkage which allows a more accurate measure of their true on rates and off-rates.
  • FR1 could be lengthened in a relatively high affinity second target binding moiety to reduce its on rate.
  • the cleanable peptide could be a unique identifying CDR.
  • the multispecific ligand may comprise an Fc portion and a hinge portion and that one or both of a) the length, amino acid composition or* molecular weight (or various combinations of these interrelated factors) of the Fab or Fc portion; and b) the amino acid composition (including length) of the hinge portion (eg. any polypeptide segment that provides means for linking two typically heavy chains, eg. through one or more disulfide bonds, leucine zipper fos-jun, optionally a flexible hinge typical of an lgG1 or having one to several more disulfide bonds eg. lgG3) are selected to reduce the 03/057732
  • circumstantial affinity broadly contemplates that the length and molecular weight of the Fc and the flexibility of the hinge region will individually and collectively contribute to the affinity of the molecule in proportion the shear rate of the fluid environment to a degree depending on whether the target is stationary or moving, once the multispecific ligand is bound.
  • any increase in the molecular weight especially a distribution of the molecular weight towards the Fc or first ligand binding moiety will serve as a lever in a moving fluid environment, to favor disengagement from binding especially since the off-rate of this binding arm is relatively low to begin with.
  • This same lever effect will impinge on the binding of the first ligand binding moiety but to a lesser functional degree due to its higher affinity.
  • the invention also contemplates that the high affinity ligand binding moiety will draw the multispecific ligand from the circulation into a desired target tissue and that the low affinity binding arm will then have greater opportunity to bind even if it does not bind simultaneously with the high affinity binding arm.
  • the hinge region is extra flexible or has several regions of flexibility (for example where the heavy chains are linked through several disulfide bonds with regions of flexibile linker therebetween) the disengaging effect on the individual and paired binding of both the first and second ligand binding moieties will be less Similarly, using a truncated Fc portion (CH3 deleted, F(ab') 2 or minibody format) will assist the first ligand binding moiety to remain bound or foster binding of the second ligand moiety and will assist the second ligand binding moiety to remain bound.
  • a truncated Fc portion CH3 deleted, F(ab') 2 or minibody format
  • This construct may be preferred from an effectiveness standpoint (getting both ligand binding moieties bound), where the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety is low to begin with.On the other hand, decreasing the flexibility of the hinge region by alteration to its length and/or amino acid composition and increasing the molecular weight distribution towards the "free" end of the Fc will affect all binding scenarios to a greater extent.
  • the latter strategy may be less desirable where the Fab of the first ligand binding moiety is lengthened (eg. has a longer hinge region at the N-terminus of the disulphide bond linking the heavy chains, than the low affinity binding arm) to increase its propensity for individual binding.
  • the hinge region could be lengthened or shortened on the amino terminus side of the disulfide bond linking the heavy chains to an extent that does interfere with the simultaneous binding to both the first and second target binding moieties.
  • the target cell environment naturally or through intervention, is a fluid environment (low shear rate) or enzyme environment which will favor a greater impact on disengagement of the second ligand binding moiety, in the case of an enzyme, one which will cleave off an Fc into which a cleavage site has been introduced so that disengagement due to the lever effect will primarily impinge on binding of the second ligand moiety to the non-target cell population (eg. low shear rate or presence of MMP type enzymes in a targeted solid tumor environment).
  • second ligand binding moiety may be selected in an environment in which there is a selective pressure (moderate fluid flow eg. using live cells or tissue, candidate ligand binding molecules or pairs of the target ligands on latex beads, where the substrate to which they are bound is on an incline or otherwise subject to fluid flow (optionally with rigid or high mol.
  • a selective pressure moderate fluid flow eg. using live cells or tissue, candidate ligand binding molecules or pairs of the target ligands on latex beads, where the substrate to which they are bound is on an incline or otherwise subject to fluid flow (optionally with rigid or high mol.
  • the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety is selected on the basis of its ability to augment the binding affinity of a first ligand binding moiety of preselected affinity for the first target ligand (after or optionally before its affinity maturation, depending on the shear force and affinity in question) and thereby augment the affinity of the multispecific binding ligand as a whole, while the first ligand binding moiety is bound.
  • the strength of the binding affinity of the second ligand may be predicated on the first ligand moiety being bound.
  • the foregoing strategy may have accentuated or at least equal application where the first ligand binding moiety has a longer Fab or for example where both the first and second ligand binding moiety are devoid of a light chain ie. where having the correct binding interface for the second target binding moiety might be more acute.
  • the invention contemplates that the individual affinity of second ligand binding moiety selected in the above manner would be tested to ensure that its individual affinity was not sufficient for substantial independent targeting.
  • the invention also contemplates that engineering a suitable affinity antibody for solid tumor targeting in which the on-rate contribution to affinity is reduced (according to the strategy suggested above) may assist a dose of such antibody in achieving better tumor penetration.
  • An antibody having a reduced on rate could be fused to a toxin such as a truncated version of PE or conjugated to a radionuclide, etc. the reduced on-rate contribution ensuring that the antibody will be less likely to bind at sites proximal to the point of entry to relieve congestion in that area and better ensure its diffusion throughout a tumor.
  • the invention contemplates that the strategies decribed above will better permit the affinity to be more suitably apportioned between the on-rate and the off-rate.
  • the invention contemplated that a higher on-rate lower off-rate Ab could be delievered in alternating days or other cycles of treatment.
  • the invention is directed to an antibody conjugated or fused to a functional moiety, wherein the on-rate contribution to the affinity of the antibody is anywhere between 3x and two order of magnitudes less than typical molecules having suitable properties for tumor penetration through diffusion, for example molecules having anywhere (any increments) between 10 "7 and 10 "10 molar affinities (eg. 5x 10 "7 , 3x10 "8 ) preferably increments between 10 "8 to 10 '10 (molecules where the on rate is normally approx. 10 "5 ) molar affinities, more preferably increments between 5x10 '8 and 5x10 "9-
  • this construct can be employed to evaluate the effect of blocking two receptors on the same cell, for example chemokine receptors eg. CCR7 and CXCR4 on a breast cancer cell.
  • the off-rate of one or optionally both ligand binding moities is sufficient in the circumstances to permit the moiety to remain bound for a sufficient duration for the other moiety to bind j it exceeds its effective or intrinsic on-rate.
  • both arms of such multispecific ligand bind to their respective ligands with low affinity.
  • one such arm is a "coybody”.
  • the hinge region may be lengthened on the N-terminal side of the most N- terminus linker between the heavy chains so as to permit greater flexibility in the binding of different antigens at different possible proximities to one another.
  • the invention also contemplates that the two heavy chains of an IgG (with or without light chains and/or CH1/CL domains), minibody/ F(ab') 2 (with or without light chains and/or CH1/CL domains), may be linked (whether they have a full size or fully truncated Fc or elongated hinge regions) through a flexible peptide linker (such as used for making scFvs i.e. multiples of gly4ser) in order to ensure correct pairing of the heavy chains by expressing the linked heavy chains in E. Coli, for example, as inclusion bodies, which are refolded in refolding solution according to well established techniques in the art.
  • the light chains may be linked through a disulphide bond linking according to well known methods of making disulphide stabilized Fvs (dsFvs) and the same light chain may be employed for both the high and low affinity arms.
  • the invention also directed to a multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand moiety which recognizes a first target ligand that is over-expressed on a disease associated entity for example a diseased or disease-causing or mediating cell or infectious agent and a second ligand binding moiety that recognizes a target ligand and wherein the first target ligand is characterized in that it does not lend itself to facililating or permitting internalization of the second ligand binding moiety.
  • the invention also contemplates that a target ligand can be distributed in various concentrations for testing purposes on cell sized latex beads, columnar packing materials or flat substrates having a high density dispersion of both target ligands.
  • the invention is also directed to combination therapies with the foregoing multispecific ligands including, without limitation, immunotoxins, drugs, therapies with other multispecific ligands herein described and particularly for cancer therapies directed at interfering with the integrity of tumor cell vasculature.
  • the second ligand binding moiety may be constituted in whole or in part by a ligand which binds to a biologic effector ligand (such as a cytokine, colony stimulating factor, chemokine, growth factor etc. or related extracellularly expressed regulatory molecules that control their expression such as inhibitors, agonists, antagonists of same, which may have corresponding biological receptors), the ligand optionally having a higher affinity for the biologic effector ligand than the affinity of that biologic effector ligand for its receptor, and wherein the ligand, combined with the biologic effector ligand (ie.
  • a biologic effector ligand such as a cytokine, colony stimulating factor, chemokine, growth factor etc. or related extracellularly expressed regulatory molecules that control their expression such as inhibitors, agonists, antagonists of same, which may have corresponding biological receptors
  • the ligand optionally having a higher affinity for the biologic effector ligand than the affinity of that biologic effector ligand for its receptor, and
  • the foregoing construct can be used to deliver the biologic effector ligand more selectively to the target cell population recognized by the first ligand binding moiety.
  • the second ligand binding moiety may be an antibody portion of a multispecific ligand of the invention and the invention contemplates that a library of second ligand binding moieties, recognizing multiple different epitopes on the biologic effector ligand, can be screened for their ability to bind to the biologic effector ligand, while it is bound in situ to its receptor, for example, using a microarrary of such antibodies, and the affinities of the binders can be evaluated.
  • suitable antibodies could be generated by "panning" (with an expression library, eg. phage display, ribosome display, or other similar display systems including yeast, bacterial, viral, cell based or cell-free display systems) or otherwise screening (eg.
  • the invention contemplates that an array of antibodies which recognize all different epitopes o a given biologic effector ligand could be generated and tested for their ability to accommodate binding of a biologic effector ligand to a first but not a second in a related family of receptors.
  • the invention is also directed to an antibody which accommodates binding of the BEL to one receptor but hinders the binding to at least one second receptor, preferably by steric, charge or other inter-molecular hindrance, attributable to the proximity of the antibody epitope on the BEL to the BEL's receptor binding site and optionally also the amino acid composition of the antibody at that interface.
  • fluid flow can be simulated in a purification or immunoaffinity column packed with one or more known packing materials to simulate flow over a ligand coated substrate.
  • the invention also contemplates an apparatus and method for testing ligand binding in a circulating fluid environment in which the multispecific ligands of the invention can be tested and wherein a continous flow of ligands, including target ligands, ligands of the invention and/or ligand bearing entities (eg. cells or synthetic eg. latex spheres which can be adjusted to a cell size) to which one or types of ligands have been affixedly associated accordingly to known methods) can be generated.
  • the fluid contact interface of the apparatus has a generally circular shape and is convex or otherwise capable of containing the fluid and thereby preferably permits fluid to flow around the surface continuously.
  • this surface may be enclosed with a bagel-shaped cylinder which is optionally open at a location opposite the fluid contact surface for introducing and/or removing its contents, or it may completely enclosed with the exception of an access port, from which any air may optionally be displaced or evacuated.
  • the invention contemplates that the apparatus (at least the fluid contact vessel) can be rotated or oscillated (eg. in an elliptical, oval or similar shape well known to those skilled in the arts of fluid mechanics and related engineering arts) in a variety of different planes or with rocking-like motion in multiple planes or subject to peristaltic pressure (ie.
  • the fluid contact surface may be provided with a 1) substrate for linking ligands of the invention or target ligands or ligand bearing entities to permit fluid flow across the substrate in a plane substantially parallel or conforming to the axis of flow.
  • the invention is directed to methods of making a multispecific antibody in which:
  • the light chains are the same for both the VL domains .
  • the light chains (assuming the construct has two light chains) are generated for a first target binding moiety eg. in one aspect of the invention, the relatively high affinity binder, optionally from a light chain germline sequence, and this light chain is then coupled with a diversity of heavy chains to select a pair of chains which bind to the second target ligand, thereby constituting the second ligand binding moiety, which may be a relatively low affinity binder.
  • An alternate or concomitant strategy to generate a lower affinity second ligand binding moiety would simply be to substitute the light chain of the first ligand binding moiety for that of the second ligand binding moiety and to test the affinity.
  • the heavy chain and light chain binding to the BEL can be truncated correspondingly at the CH1/CL region so that the VH/VL interfaces and cysteines pairing these heavy and light chains are similarly spaced but spaced differently from the other VH/VL chains.
  • the heavy chains By linking the heavy chains as explained above, all chains will pair correctly. Jt will be appreciated that the foregoing production strategies could be applied to the production of heavy chain antibodies (two chains structures without associated light chains), wherein the heavy chains are from human or other species and that production in this case could be adapted to E. Coli.
  • Antibody Fusion Proteins Wiley-Liss 1999 (infra) eg. particularly p 131 et seq., and Chapter 7 and the discussion, Methodologies improving the correct pairing of heavy chains are well-known in the art.
  • Such a construct could also be employed in conjunction with other functional moieties fused or conjugated thereto, for example toxins, cytokines, enzymes, prodrugs, radionuclides etc.
  • the invention is directed to a multispecific ligand* with at least two different binding specificities for different target ligands* on the same target cell* and adapted to bind contemporaneously to the different target ligands, said multispecific ligand comprising a first target binding moiety which preferentially* recognizes a first target ligand and a second target binding moiety which preferentially recognizes a second target ligand, and wherein said first target binding moiety recognizes a target cell-associated* target ligand and said second target binding moiety recognizes a non-cell-associated target ligand which is present on target cells and non-target cells; and wherein the ability of the second target binding moiety to bind to the second target is diminished relative the ability of the first target binding moiety to bind to the first target ligand, the first target binding moiety having an ability to bind to the first target ligand which is at least sufficient for the first target moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the second target binding moiety binding to
  • the invention is directed to heterofunctional ligand comprising a first moiety which binds to a first target ligand and a second moiety which binds to a second target ligand, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the relative avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said second moiety are selected or adjusted to substantially reduce the probability of the second moiety binding to the second target ligand without the first moiety, first or substantially contemporaneously, binding to the first target ligand.
  • the first moiety is divalent and the second moiety is monovalent.
  • the affinity of the first moiety for its target ligand is for example up to several orders of magnitude greater than the affinity of the second moiety for its target ligand, as discussed below.
  • both moieties are capable of binding to different target ligands on the same cell, for example as hereinafter specified, although in the case of tumor cell targeting, particularly with respect to cells that are growing adjacent to another the invention contemplates that the first moiety may bind to one cell and the second moiety may bind to a neighbouring cell.
  • the invention contemplates that such same cell interactions and adjacent cell interactions are optionally accomplished when the second moiety is bivalent.
  • at least one of said first and second moities comprise one or more antibody components.
  • said first moiety binds to at least one cell-surface ligand which differentiates between cells of the same population or sub-population, for example, at least one ligand which diffentiates which between populations or sub-populations of immune cells (eg. see WO 01/21641, US 6156878), for example, activated vs.
  • non-activated, disease-associated or non-disease-associated over-expressing or uniquely expressing certain receptors or other ligands [for example cytokine or growth factor receptors, particular immunoglobulin like molecules or MHC peptide complexes] or other differentiating markers hereinafter exemplified or apparent to those skilled in the art)
  • said second moiety in virtue of its binding to the second target ligand, directly or indirectly exerts a biologic effect eg. a therapeutic effect, for example an immune modulating effect.
  • said second moiety has a broader target cell population than said first moiety Eg. see Wiley H. et al. Expression of CC Chemokine Receptor-7 and Lymph Node Metastasis...
  • the invention contemplates that by targeting CCR7 receptor selectively on tumor cells, for example using a relatively high affinity binding moiety for a tumor associated antigen and a relatively low affinity moiety which binds to and blocks CCR7 receptor, eg. when combined in therapy with a chemotherapeutic agent or an immunotixun for the same tumor, metastasis can be inhibited).
  • said first moiety binds to a tumor associated antigen on a tumor cell and said second moiety binds to a receptor which is found on the tumor cell but also on a broader population of cells.
  • said first moiety binds to an antigen associated with particular population of leukocytes and said second moiety binds to a receptor which is found on that population of cells but also on a broader population of cells (eg. apoptosis mediating receptors Journal of Immunology 1998 160:3-6, Nat Med 2001 Aug; 7(8)954-960, WO 01/85782; ICAM-R WO 00/29020; see also WO 01/85768, WO 01/85908; WO 01/83755, WO 01/83560, WO 01/29020; Vitale et al. Prpc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
  • the second moiety does not necessarily bind with lower affinity to its target however it may bind to a first ligand which in turn binds to a second ligand on a target cell (eg. a receptor on the target cell eg.
  • a cytokine, chemokine or growth factor receptor for example the receptor being on the same cell to which he first moiety binds, and it binds in a manner in which it partially interferes with the binding of the first ligand to the second ligand and thereby directs or retargets that first ligand to the second ligand in a manner which accomplishes the intended interaction of the the first with the second ligand (eg a signal transduction or blocking interaction ie. the second moiety causes the eg. cytokine to bind to its receptor without engendering the biological effects attributable to receptor binding eg. signal transduction, which may be assessed by assaying for effects of eg.
  • the binding of the second moiety may also be compatible with the first ligand binding to one cell surface ligand but not another eg. see WO 00/64946 the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • the ability to identify ligand residues of importance to binding or residues other these, the alteration of which might interfere with binding is well established in the art.
  • the invention contemplates varying, by high throughput techniques eg. phage display, residues of an antibody that are not involved in first ligand binding to create variants which can be tested for partial interference with first ligand binding to the second ligand eg. receptor binding.
  • receptors for blocking or activation by the targeting methods described herein include tyrosine kinase type recptors, serine kinase type receptors, heterotrimeric G-protein coupled receptors, receptors bound to tyrosine kinase, TNF family receptors, notch family receptors, guanylate cyclase types, tyrosine phosphatase types, adhesion receptors etc. (for example receptors see those discussed in Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology 6 th Ed. De Vita et al.
  • interleukin and interferon type receptors HGF receptor (see for example USP 6,214,344), CD45, CXC family receptors including CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors including IL-8 receptor, EGFRs, receptors for molecules with functions in apoptosis or homeostasis, receptors such as FGF which sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents, etc. It is known for example to modify receptor ligands in a way which does not interfere with a signaling function (the residues important for signaling may be known or can be readly ascertained eg.
  • the second moiety may be an antibody which is agonistic or antagonistic and used to block, activate, neutralize etc the receptor.
  • the second moiety may also be targeted to a specific portion of a receptor which differentiates it from other receptors of its class and more generally contemplates that the second moiety may contribute to the targeting ability of the multifunctional ligand. Examples of antibodies that bind to receptors for application of the are also listed in Appendix B.
  • the invention also contemplates that the first moiety binds to a target cell and said second moiety binds to a ligand, for example a natural ligand, (eg. a cytokine or chemokine circulating at normal levels or at higher levels attributable to a disease or treatment of a disease with another therapeutic molecule) and retargets that ligand (for example, the ligand may be retargetted from circulation) to a targeted cell.
  • a natural ligand eg. a cytokine or chemokine circulating at normal levels or at higher levels attributable to a disease or treatment of a disease with another therapeutic molecule
  • ligand for example, the ligand may be retargetted from circulation
  • the invention comtemplates that IL- 2 may be retargeted to LAK cells or CTLs via a high affinity Leu-19 binding first moiety.
  • antibodies including fragments thereof which bind to cytokines or other natural ligands for retargeting purposes can be made by phage display against the cytokine or ligand while bound in situ to its receptor.
  • the invention also contemplates that the affinity for the cytokine may be adjusted to regulate the degree of targeting and that serum samples may be evaluated to assess the degree of bound cytokine and the relative degree of bound and unbound cytokine.
  • the invention contemplates that a radiolabelled multifunctional ligand may be used assess the amount of label associated with the multifunctional ligand when bound to the cytokine, by capturing the 'complex' with an antibody that recognizes both antigenic determinants on both the cytokine and an adjacent portion of the ligand binding thereto ie. forming a composite epitope), such as may be generated by phage display and assessing the amount of label relative to the amount of captured complex.
  • the invention also contemplates administration of supplemental amounts of natural ligand to compensate for the degree in which the ligand is retargeted insofar as such retargeting might impact negatively on immune or other physiological processes.
  • the invention contemplates that patients treated with antibodies to a particular biologic effector ligand eg. a natural ligand eg. a cytokine, for example TNF ⁇ , may preferably be treated with a multifunctional ligand having a first moiety which binds to at least one cell type and a second moiety which binds to a natural ligand such as a cytokine for retargeting that cytokine to that cell type, as in a preventative method for treating a disease, eg. cancer.
  • a particular biologic effector ligand eg. a natural ligand eg. a cytokine, for example TNF ⁇
  • a multifunctional ligand having a first moiety which binds to at least one cell type and a second moiety which binds to a natural ligand such as a cytokine for retargeting that cytokine to that cell type, as in a preventative method for treating a disease, eg.
  • the invention contemplates that the antibody is capable of binding to the cytokine but once bound the cytokine, the cytokine is incapable and/or only weakly capable of binding to its receptor and/or that the multifunctional ligand also comprises a higher affinity receptor blocking moiety to minimize retargeting of the primary disease site.
  • the first moiety binds with relatively higher functional affinity (ie. avidity, affinity, and/or relatively advantageous binding capacity in virtue of multiple ligand binding arms, each binding to different ligands on the target cell) to ensure binding to the retarget cell.
  • the bound cytokine is capable of binding to the cytokine receptor at the retarget site but incapable of binding to the receptor at the disease site owing to differences in the receptors at the two sites.
  • the nvention also contemplates using antibodies which interfere but do not preclude binding of the biologic effector to provide a less toxic effect.
  • patients with Crohn's disease that are treated with anti-TNF ⁇ may be treated according to the invention with a bispecific antibody having, in addition to an anti-TNF ⁇ binding moiety, which reduces the affinity of the bound
  • TNF for the receptor, but also an antibody moiety which binds to tumor antigen which is expressed on many different tumor types or optionally a trispecific; antibody which additionally binds to a second multi-carcinomic antigen, preferably one which broadens the range of targeting against prevalent cancers.
  • a second multi-carcinomic antigen preferably one which broadens the range of targeting against prevalent cancers.
  • tumor antigens mention may be made of EGFR, EPCAM, MUCINs, TAG-72, CEA, H11 among other known multicarcinomic antigens (see also Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology 6 th Ed. De Vita et al. Eds Lippincott 2001 Chapters 18 and 20.5).
  • the second moiety differentially retargets a cytokine to one receptor in preference to another, for example, to a TNF receptor over-expressed on tumor cells in preference to a TNF receptor associated with Crohns disease.
  • the invention contemplates a method of screening for an antibody which preferentially binds to a ligand when bound to a first receptor relative to another second receptor by screening for antibodies (eg. by phage display, ribosome display, etc.) which bind to the ligand eg. a cytokine, when bound in situ to the first receptor, and selecting among them those that bind to the ligand eg.
  • cytokine but do not bind (substractive screening) or bind with lesser affinity to the cytokine when bound to the second receptor, as well as to antibodies and multifunctional ligands created by this method (see also USP 6,046,048 and WO 99/12973 and references cited therein with respect to TNF family of receptors). Variations in the extracellular domains of such receptors are known and can be ascertained by methods known to those skilled in the art.
  • the second moiety may be for example an antibody or other ligand which interferes with the binding of the regular ligand for this receptor.
  • the invention comtemplates a first ligand binding moiety which recognizes activated T-cells and a second ligand binding moiety which blocks the IL-16 receptor for testing the effect on Crohns disease (or alternatively activates an IL-16 receptor on those cells eg. by using a high affinity IL-16 bound second moiety which becomes relatively low affinity IL-16 receptor ligand when bound to the antibody, again to test the effect on Crohn's disease (see Gut 2001 Dec.
  • the invention contemplates that the second moiety blocks a receptor that are found on cells other than the target cell, the blockage of which leads to the apoptosis of or destruction of the cell eg. CD95 (eg. see Jung G. et al. arget cell-restricted triggering of the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) death receptor with bispecific antibody fragments Cancer Res 2001 Mar 1;61(5):1846-8).
  • CD95 eg. see Jung G. et al. arget cell-restricted triggering of the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) death receptor with bispecific antibody fragments Cancer Res 2001 Mar 1;61(5):1846-8.
  • insulin like growth factor receptor, insulin receptor etc. see The IGF system in thyroid cancer: new concepts.
  • the invention also contemplates a method of optimizing the cooperative affinities of respective binding ligands of a multifunctional ligand described herein and the length of a linker therebetween for the above and applications described below by phage or ribosome display etc.
  • the multifunctional ligand is a single polypeptide chain, for example, two single chain Fvs or single domain antibodies linked in sequence, or a diabody (see USP 5,837,242), by varying the DNA sequence corresponding to amino acids that represent linker and/or for example CDR regions that are postulated to impact on affinity according to methods and strategies that well known in the art for affinity maturation. These same strategies can be employed for engineering lower affinity molecules.
  • the invention is directed to a phage display or similar library (eg. a ribosome display library or a microarray) in which the population of variants is a multispecific ligand, including a multispecific ligand according to the invention herein defined.
  • a phage display or similar library eg. a ribosome display library or a microarray
  • the population of variants is a multispecific ligand, including a multispecific ligand according to the invention herein defined.
  • ligand binding moiety includes any ligand that can be used as a targeting arm or to bind to the second ligand for example cytokines, chemokines, etc and optionally those that can be modified, preferably by high throughput means to adjust its affinity and/or specificity, including scaffolds comprising a polypeptide, a peptide, a carbohydrate, a ribonucleic acid, a lipid and a small molecule, or a binding moiety consisting essentially of a combination of such types of molecules.
  • Example include non-immunoglobulin protein scaffolds such affibodies (see US 5831012, US 5958736, EP 0486525) Trinectin domains (Phylos Inc.), TCRs, peptide mimetics, peptides located within a antibody variable region scaffold (eg. see
  • peptide fusion proteins and stabilized polypeptide loops, disulfide stabilized loops eg. see WO 99/23222; all known in the art for such uses.
  • These may be linked by peptide linkers of for example 10 to 50 amino acids.
  • linkers including flexible linkers such as multiples of gly4ser are well known in the art.
  • blockage of a receptor does not necessarily lead to cell death but may lead only to decreased or increased release of certain cytokines etc, for example as mediated via the IL-6 receptor.
  • the second moiety may achieve the desired therapeutic effect by constituting the normal ligand for that receptor or a functional substitute.
  • the multispecific ligand may also be fused or conjugated to a toxic moiety or other effector.
  • said first moiety comprises two binding ligands (eg.
  • ligands which binds to a specific MHC peptide complex and a second reduced affinity ligand which binds to a ligand on an APC.
  • This approach also obviates the need to create high affinity ligand for a particular MHC petide complex, although this can been accomplished.
  • the target cell is an immune cell and the second moiety binds to a molecule involved in cellular adhesion, a cytokine receptor, a ligand which stimulates the activity of said immune cell, a ligand which inhibits the activity of said immune cell, a ligand which causes one or more cytokines to be released, a ligand which prevent one or more cytokines from being released, a ligand which causes or facilitates apoptosis of said immune cell or a ligand which permits internalization of said multispecific ligand.
  • the heterofunctional ligand is fused or conjugated to a therapeutic agent or a moiety that binds to a therapeutuc agent (exemplified below) or a ligand which effects binding to another immune cell, for example a T cell.
  • the multispecific ligand is a bispecific antibody, a trispecfic antibody or a tetraspecific antibody.
  • the first moiety binds to but is incapable of modulating the activity of said immune cell and said second moiety modulates the activity of said immune cell independently of said first moiety.
  • the multispecific ligand further comprises a moiety that binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel, preferably a lymphatic vessel associated ligand, as hereinafter defined.
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising such a multispecific ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterofunctional ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the invention is also directed to a multispecific ligand which comprises a first ligand binding moiety which neutralizes a ligand eg. a natural ligand such as a cytokine, chemokine, colony stimulating factor or growth factor and a second ligand binding moiety which binds to a cell marker associated with a cell through which the natural ligand exerts a deleterious affect.
  • a ligand eg. a natural ligand such as a cytokine, chemokine, colony stimulating factor or growth factor
  • a second ligand binding moiety which binds to a cell marker associated with a cell through which the natural ligand exerts a deleterious affect.
  • affinity for the first ligand binding moiety for the natural ligand will be greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the cell associated marker.
  • the construct will be selected so that the binding interfaces are pointed in opposite directions and the lever effect is maximized, for example a bispecific construct where the heavy chains are joined directly or through an inflexible linker and are optionally linked to their respective (optionally common respective light chains) through a disulphide linker via framework residues as is well known in the art.
  • the molecular weight of the first ligand binding moiety is substantially less or more (by at least 10%, preferably at least 20%, more preferably at least 25%) and preferably less than that of the second ligand binding moiety as may be effected or maximized through mutating from higher to lower (on the first ligand binding moiety) and lower to higher mol.
  • wt residues on the second ligand binding moiety
  • the native residues which are not exposed ( to avoid immunogenicity) and not essential for proper folding and function of the VH/VL (as may be determined from the degree of conservation of such residues among immunoglobulins of the species, through % frequency tables available through the Kabat database and well known published determinations in this regard (see for example WO 02/40545).
  • Examples include neutralizing IL-2 via a marker on activated T cells, blocking IL-15 via CD8+ T cells, blocking TNFalpha on mast cells; binding thrombin via activated endothelial cells etc.
  • heterofunctional is used broadly to refer to a ligand: 1) comprising at least two functional moieties that have different functions or different capacities to perform the same function and 2) which is typically and preferably heterospecific (having two binding specificities).
  • avidity when used in a comparative, quantifiable or controllable sense is used to refer the valency of the binding entity or moiety.
  • functional affinity is used a composite term referring to a quantitative and contollable (though not necessarily quantifiable, especially when its consists of both avidity and affinity components) propensity to specific binding attributable to one or both of avidity and afi ⁇ nity effects.
  • the invention contemplates that cells, particularly immune cells, that are expected to be present at or proximal to a disease site (eg. at the site where an immune cell crosses the vascular endothelial cell wall), in virtue of the disease or a therapeutic modality which is employed in relation to the disease or a concurrent disease, including cells that directly mediate the disease, may be targetted in virtue of a marker associated with such cells, eg. markers associated with activated immune cells or disease mediating immune cells eg.
  • a marker associated with such cells eg. markers associated with activated immune cells or disease mediating immune cells
  • LEU-19 a marker associated with activated or killerT-cells, etc for example with an antibody, which is linked to a moiety that is capable of exerting a therapeutic effect in relation to the disease, for example, an immunoliposome or an antibody linked to another therapeutic delivery system (for example example streptavidin or biotin fused, coated or conjugated entities or other payload carrying entities (see for example US patents 5439686, 6007845, 5879712, 5456917, 6165502, 5079005, 5888500, 5861159, 6193970, 6190692, 6,077, 499, WO 00/69413, WO 01/07084, etc.).
  • an immunoliposome or an antibody linked to another therapeutic delivery system for example streptavidin or biotin fused, coated or conjugated entities or other payload carrying entities (see for example US patents 5439686, 6007845, 5879712, 5456917, 6165502, 5079005, 5888500, 5861159, 61939
  • an immunoliposome may carry one of or a combination of cytokines, chemokines, toxins or other therapeutic molecules suitable for treating the disease directly or indirectly, for example by attracting or preventing the attraction, activating, anergizing or otherwise modulating the activity of immune cells for therapeutic or related purposes.
  • the invention is directed to a multifunctional ligand characterized in that it exerts an independent biologic function said multifunctional ligand comprising a ligand which binds to a non-diseased disease associated cell and: a) a therapeutic entity; b) a ligand which binds to a therapeutic entity; or c) a ligand which binds to a disease mediating entity eg.
  • said multifunctional ligand comprises at least two of a), b) or c) and preferably all three.
  • independent refers to a function which is primarily exerted in relation to an entity other than the entity that is targeted (save for possible entity associated side effects).
  • the invention contemplates that targeting a cell which localizes to a disease site will better localize the independent effect of the targeting ligand to that locale.
  • the invention is directed to a heterofunctional ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least a first target ligand on a first entity and a second moiety which specifically binds to at least a second target ligand on a second entity, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the at least one first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the at least one second target ligand and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the afi ⁇ nity and avidity of said second moiety are selected to enable the second moiety to bind to the second entity in preference to the first moiety binding to the first entity when both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the respective first and second entities.
  • the first moiety comprises at least one ligand preferably at least one antibody which binds to a first cell, for example an intraluminal lymphatic endothelial cell and the second moiety comprises a ligand, preferably at least one antibody which binds to a different cell, for example a disease associated cell (hereinafter exemplified and meaning, unless the context implies otherwise, diseased cells or disease causing, mediating (ie. having a role whicn is known to be intermediary or indirectly facilitating eg. antigen presenting cells) or mitigating cells (cells, typically immune cells, which directly or indirectly counteract the diseased or disease causing or mediating cells).
  • a disease associated cell hereinafter exemplified and meaning, unless the context implies otherwise, diseased cells or disease causing, mediating (ie. having a role whicn is known to be intermediary or indirectly facilitating eg. antigen presenting cells) or mitigating cells (cells, typically immune cells, which directly or indirectly counteract the disease
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising such a heterofunctional ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterofunctional ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the invention is directed to a multispecific ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least one first target ligand on a first entity (eg. a lymphatic endothelial cell, a diseased cell or a cell proximal to a site of disease) and a second moiety which specifically binds to a second target ligand or site on a second entity, and wherein the second entity binds to a third target ligand, and wherein the first and third target ligands may be on the same or different entities eg.
  • a first entity eg. a lymphatic endothelial cell, a diseased cell or a cell proximal to a site of disease
  • a second moiety which specifically binds to a second target ligand or site on a second entity
  • the second entity binds to a third target ligand
  • the first and third target ligands may be on the same or different entities eg.
  • the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the second target ligand and independently of the ability of the second moiety to bind to the third target ligand (the first moiety optionally comprising more than one ligand (which may be the same ligand or a different ligand) one or more of which are necessary for binding and optionally each of which is sufficient for specific binding) to corresponding first target ligands) and preferably wherein 1) the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety is/are selected to enable it to bind to the at least first target ligand in preference to the second moiety binding to the third target ligand when both said first and second moieties and the second entity are substantially contemporaneously bound to their respective target ligands eg.
  • the first entity is a diseased or disease causing, mediating or mitigating cell, for example an immune cell (the first moiety preferably binding to a particular population or sub-population of the first target entity eg. the immune cell, for example activated T cells), the first moiety optionally comprising two or more ligands which may be the same or different and which bind to two or more respective first target cell surface ligands (though not necessarily to any particular effect (and in one embodiment to no effect at all) other than to better bind to and thereby target the cell, preferably in competition with the second entity, which in a preferred embodiment targets a broader population of cells), and the second entity eg.
  • an immune cell the first moiety preferably binding to a particular population or sub-population of the first target entity eg. the immune cell, for example activated T cells
  • the first moiety optionally comprising two or more ligands which may be the same or different and which bind to two or more respective first target cell surface ligands (though not necessarily
  • a biologic effectore ligand is an entity that binds to a third target ligand, the third target ligand preferably being expressed on the surface of a cell for example the same immune cell, for example a natural cell surface ligand, to which binding yields a desired effect, for example a therapeutic advantage, the second moiety being, for example, the natural ligand for the cell surface ligand or functional mimitope or antagonist or agonist thereof, for example a cytokine, the third target ligand in this case being a cytokine receptor on the immune cell.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of "targeted delivery" of a therapeutic entity to a cell in need of such therapy by administering said heterofunctional ligand.
  • the heterofunctional ligand (and similarly in the case of other multispecific ligands of the invention described above which are adapted to deliver a BEL) is delivered with the second entity, preferably in the same composition (preferably bound).
  • the second entity is a natural ligand circulating in the path of delivery of the heterofunctional ligand, some proportion (0- 100%) of the heterofunctional ligand may be delivered without supplied second entity, particularly if the treatment or the disease generates an abundance of the natural ligand.
  • the first moiety binds to a target ligand on a stationary cell (for example a vascular endothelial cell or a lymphatic endothelial cell), preferably a tissue or cell type "associated" ligand (more abundantly expressed uniquely expressed on target cells relative to non-target cells), and the third target ligand and the second moiety are cell-suface target and ligand therefor as stated above, for example the second moiety binds to a cytokine and the third target ligand is a cytokine receptor, for example on an immune cell.
  • a target ligand on a stationary cell
  • a tissue or cell type "associated" ligand more abundantly expressed uniquely expressed on target cells relative to non-target cells
  • the third target ligand and the second moiety are cell-suface target and ligand therefor as stated above, for example the second moiety binds to a cytokine and the third target ligand is a cytokine receptor, for example on an immune cell.
  • the first moiety binds to at least one target ligand which differentiates between populations or sub-populations of immune cells and the second entityin virtue of its binding to the third target ligand, directly or indirectly exerts a therapeutic effect, for example by modulating the activity of said immune cell.
  • the first moiety is incapable of modulating the activity of said immune cell and said second entity modulates the activity of said immune cell independently of said first moiety.
  • the second entity binds to a molecule involved in cellular adhesion, a cytokine receptor, a ligand which stimulates the activity of said immune cell, a ligand which inhibits the activity of said immune cell (eg.
  • the heterofunctional ligand is fused or conjugated to a therapeutic agent or a moiety (eg. biotin, avidin) that binds to a therapeutuc agent (exemplified below) or a ligand which effects binding to another immune cell, for example a T cell.
  • a therapeutic agent or a moiety eg. biotin, avidin
  • the heterofunctional ligand is a bispecific antibody, a trispecfic antibody or a tetraspecific antibody.
  • the heterofunctional ligand further comprises a moiety that binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel, preferably a lymphatic vessel associated ligand, as hereinafter defined.
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising such aforementioned heterofunctional ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterofunctional ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising such aforementioned heterofunctional ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterofunctional ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the foregoing strategy could be used in combination with other targeting strategies herein mentioned or known in the art.
  • the invention contemplates making antibodies to second entities, for example, while bound to their natural receptor, by phage or ribosome display, by methods as hereinafter disclosed.
  • the invention is directed to a heterofunctional ligand comprising at least a first moiety which specifically binds to a first target ligand on a cell and a second moiety which specifically binds to at least a second target ligand on the same cell, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety and the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of the second moiety are selected to substantially reduce the probability of the either moiety singly binding to its respective ligand for a sufficient duration or series of durations to accomplish the function of said heterofunctional ligand unless both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the cell.
  • the first moiety binds to at least one target ligand which differentiates between populations or sub-populations of immune cells and the second moiety in virtue of its binding to the second target ligand, directly or indirectly exerts a therapeutic effect, for example by modulating the activity of said immune cell.
  • the first moiety is incapable of modulating the activity of said immune cell and said second moiety modulates the activity of said immune cell independently of said first moiety.
  • the second moiety binds to a BEL, for example a molecule involved in cellular adhesion, a cytokine receptor, a ligand which stimulates the activity of said immune cell, a ligand which inhibits the activity of said immune cell (eg.
  • the heterofunctional ligand is fused or conjugated to a therapeutic agent or, a moiety (eg. biotin, avidin) that binds to a therapeutuc agent (exemplified below) or a ligand which effects binding to another immune cell, for example a T cell.
  • a therapeutic agent or, a moiety (eg. biotin, avidin) that binds to a therapeutuc agent (exemplified below) or a ligand which effects binding to another immune cell, for example a T cell.
  • the heterofunctional ligand is a bispecific antibody, a trispecfic antibody or a tetraspecific antibody.
  • the heterofunctional ligand further comprises a moiety that binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel, preferably a lymphatic vessel associated ligand, as hereinafter defined.
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising such a heterofunctional ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterofunctional ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the invention is directed to a method of in vivo modeling or testing using one or more foregoing targeting strategies by administering a heterofunctional / multifunctional ligand as hereinbelow disclosed as well as a method of intra-lymphatic drug delivery employing such ligand and such strategies including adaptations thereof for such purposes, as hereinafter described.
  • the invention is directed to a test ligand in the form of such a heterofunctional / multifunctional ligand and compositions thereof.
  • the invention is directed to a heterofunctional ligand, comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel and a second moiety which specifically binds to a disease associated cell and the use of such heterofunctional ligand in treating or preparing a pharmaceutical composition for treating disease associated cells, including diseased cells or disease causing, mediating (ie. having a role whicn is known to be intermediary or indirectly facilitating eg. antigen presenting cells) or mitigating cells (cells, typically immune cells, which directly or indirectly counteract the diseased or disease causing or mediating cells), within a lymphatic vessel.
  • the ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel is a lymphatic vessel associated ligand.
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and a heterofunctional ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to a ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel and a second moiety which specifically binds to said disease associated cell and the use of such ligand in treating treating disease associated cells, including diseased cells or disease causing or mediating cells, within a lymphatic vessel.
  • the ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel is a lymphatic vessel associated ligand.
  • the invention is directed to a method of treating disease associated cells, including diseased cells or disease causing or mediating cells, within a lymphatic vessel comprising administering to a subject a heterofunctional ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to a ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel and a second moiety which specifically binds to said disease associated cell.
  • disease causing cells as used herein includes diseased cells and pathogens, including micro-organisms and viruses.
  • the invention is directed to a heterofunctional ligand, comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel and a second moiety which specifically binds to a therapeutic entity for example a cytotoxin or cytotoxin-linked-entity or a non-toxic entity which is present in toxic amounts and to a method of reducing the toxic effect of such entity in a subject by administering said heterofunctional ligand to said subject.
  • a heterofunctional ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least one ligand located on the intraluminal surface of a lymphatic vessel and a second moiety which specifically binds to a therapeutic entity for example a cytotoxin or cytotoxin-linked-entity or a non-toxic entity which is present in toxic amounts and to a method of reducing the toxic effect of such entity in a subject by administering said heterofunctional ligand to said subject.
  • the invention is directed to a method of therapeutic evaluation and/or targeting / intervention in which such heterofunctional ligand is administered substantially contemporaneously with a cytotoxic substance for example a cytotoxic substance useful for treatment of cancer.
  • a cytotoxic substance for example a cytotoxic substance useful for treatment of cancer.
  • substantially contemporaneously is used in this connection to mean in a time frame that permits both to exert their respective effects, preferably one or both exerting their respective effect optimally, or one exerting its effect dominantly. It will be appreciated that this might entail that one such entity is advanced in its delivery over the other.
  • one or both of these cooperating entities are delivered proximally to their respective target cells, for example by cannulating one or more blood vessels as proximally as possible to the site(s) of a tumor and/or actual or anticipated site(s) of metastases (as discerned by using one or more tumor and vascular imaging agents, for example, one or a combination two or more agents selected from a vascular opaquing agent, a radionuclide conjugated anti- angiogenic antibody, and a radionuclide conjugated anti-vascular endothelial cell marker antibody, which cannulation may occur for example in the course of initial surgical intervention with respect to the primary tumor site) and/or at the same time cannulating one or more lymphatic vessels (which may optionally be located which the help of a radionuclide conjugated anti-lymphatic vessel marker antibody) leading to or from such tumor sites or metastases.
  • one or more tumor and vascular imaging agents for example, one or a combination two or more agents selected from a
  • the invention contemplates that small sections of vascular prostheses, well known to those skilled the art (eg. Dacron types) may be grafted into those locations to permit a prolonged and secure attachment of such prosthesis to an intra-vascular cannula for secure delivery to such vascular or lymphatic locations for repeated and/or prolonged administration, optionally while the patient is mobile, optionally using one or more portable infusion devices, including micropumps designed for such purpose (see for example J Neurosci Methods 1997 Mar;72(1):35-8, US 5180365:lmplantable infusion device. See also Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology (infra). Numerous embodiments and improvements in vascular prosthesis and in such portable infusion devices and micopumps are described in the relevant scientific and patent literature known to those skilled in the art. The invention also contemplates delivering any multifunctional ligand herein disclosed in the above manner.
  • vascular prostheses well known to those skilled the art (eg. Dacron types) may be grafted into those locations to permit a prolonged and secure
  • targeting strategies employing the cooperative action of ligands with different affinities for their targets exemplified above may preferably have affinities which differ, depending on the application and their avidity, by a factor of 20% up to a number of orders of magnitude which may one, two, three, four, five, six and even seven or eight order of magnitude, in order to achieve substantial advantage, as herefter detailed in connection with one such strategy.
  • the invention is directed to a heterospecific ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to at least a first disease associated ligand located on a diseased or disease causing, mediating or mitigating cell for example a cancer cell or an immune cell, as well as on non- diseased or disease causing, mediating or mitigating cells (non-target cells) and at least a second moiety which specifically binds to a second different disease associated ligand on the same cell and wherein each ligand is expressed on a substantially (see definition below) different, n-overlapping, subset of non-target cells, so that functional binding to a non-target tissue is substantially (see definition below) precluded.
  • the functional affinities of the respective ligands may be selected in accordance with the strategies suggested above, to further facilitate targeting.
  • both different ligands are required for internalization.
  • the heterofunctional ligand comprises at least two different pairs of binding moieties (eg. a trispecific or tetraspecific antibody which depending on its construction will permit 2, 3 or 4 such different pairs eg. a tetraspecific single domain type antibody (ie.
  • the invention is directed to a pharmaceutical composition
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising such a heterospecific ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a method of using the heterospecific ligand in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating a disease, and to a method of treating a subject by administering same in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • the foregoing general strategy can be accomplished with two or more different antibodies have differing and preferably non-overlapping normal ie. non-targeted cell distributions, preferably administered in the same composition and preferably cross-linked by biotin-avidin like complementary pairs to facilitate cross-linking for internalization or targeting of therapeutic agents.
  • each such independent antibody carries a different complimentary aspect of a toxic payload eg. a different liposome (or other payload carrying entity for example a micro or nano particle or sphere or albumin) which complement each other in virtue of their respective contents (eg. one carries the prodrug and the other the necessary converting enzyme).
  • the invention is directed to a multifunctional ("multi" meaning at least two) ligand having, at least, a first portion which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand and a second portion, comprising an immune function-exerting moiety.
  • lymphatic vessel is used to facilitate broader reference to ligands (eg. antigens / receptors) present on cells bordering the intra-luminal pathway through the lymphatic system including preferably the lymphatic vessels and optionally also parts of the lymph nodes, and refers in the case of the lymphatic vessels, primarily (from a functional standpoint) to the intra-luminal cell surfaces (not necessarily to the exclusion of non-luminal surfaces) on the intra-luminal endothelial cells (not necessarily to the exclusion of non-luminal lymphatic endothelial cells) of those vessels.
  • ligands eg. antigens / receptors
  • lymphatic vessels are used to mean differentially expressed on the surface of endothelial cells of those vessels for targeting purposes, such as to accomplish an object of the invention, but unless otherwise expressly indicated in a particular instance, it is used limitatively, to reference ligands that are predominantly, if not exlusively, found on the aforementioned endothelial cell surface (as well as in lymph nodes), such that the first portion of the multifunctional ligand is for all intents and purposes functionally targeted to the intra-luminal surface of the lymphatic system.
  • the ligand in question may be targetted to a limited extent elsewhere eg. in the case of preferred LYVE-1 ligand discussed below, to parts of the spleen (which also provides a venue for immune cell interactions).
  • the multifunctional ligand of the invention is intended to exclude only, unless otherwise specifically stated in the claims, only those embodiments disclosed in WO 98/06839 or other references describing ligands, antagonists or antibodies which bind to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand or receptor (see examples of such references below), insofar as such embodiments comprise lymphatic vessel associated ligands as hereinabove limitatively defined, and to this limited extent only, the term therapeutic function exerting moiety or immune function exerting moiety preferably excludes: 1) an antibody Fc receptor, insofar as such limitation excludes from the scope of the multifunctional ligand (per se) aspects of the invention, substantially intact naked antibodies which simply bind to a lymphatic vessel associated ligands, as well as preferably excluding 2) cytotoxins or drugs, insofar as this excludes from the scope of the mutifunctional ligands of the
  • cytotoxic molecule including an atom
  • drug ie. an antibody linked to a cytotoxin or drug only, which is not per se an or is not integrated with an independent biologic or immune function exerting component
  • the invention is not concerned with multifunctional ligands which are adapted to be internalized into a lymphatic endothelial cell and the invention is specifically concerned with targeting a lymphatic vessel associated marker which does not promote internalization and/or in which the first portion has an affinity (high or medium) which limits this effect (ie. to a side effect)
  • immune function is broad in intent (as discussed below, and includes particularly any function, including binding, capable of being exerted by an ligand preferably an antibody (eg. multifunctional ligands which are bispecific antibodies) however it is to be understood that the invention and particularly the immune function exerting moiety does not have as an object (despite possible incidental effects) evaluating or exerting a disease responsive or immune function vis-a-vis ligands / cells lining the intra-luminal surface of the lymphatic system ie.
  • an independent biologic or immune function which is not predicated on blocking the lymphatic endothelial receptor or treating cells bearing the receptor, ie. exerted vis-a-vis targets other than the lymphatic endothelium target, for example 1) in the case of stationary diseased cells or disease causing cells or molecules, targets at the site of the disease (which may optionally be effected, for example, in case of immunization or other immune cell stimulation, inhibition etc. in the lymphatic system); and 2) in the case of non-stationary diseased or disease causing cells or molecules, at the site of those cells / molecules including, preferably, within the lymphatic system, for example by binding to or signaling those cells in the lymphatic system.
  • the first portion of the multifunctional ligand is an antibody.
  • the immune function exerting moiety binds to a target ligand and thereby directly or indirectly accomplishes its effect (in whole or part).
  • the target ligand may be a cytokine, for example in order to target immune cells to the lymphatic system to assist in, diseased, disease causing or other target cell ablation or phagocytic type activity (eg.
  • cytokine in turn binding to a ligand, for example on an immune cell having phagocytic activity) or exerting a chemotactic effect within the lymphatic system, or to mop up cytokines, for example, when released in toxic amounts due, for example due to effects of a disease or particular immunotherapy (such as anti-CD3 therapy; see for example USP 6193969, Kummer U. et al., Immunol Lett 2001 Jan 1; 75(2): 153-158) (with respect to removing disease associated antibodies from circulation see for example a bispecific dsDNAx monoclonal antibody construct for clearance of anti-dsDNA IgG in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol Methods. 2001 Feb 1; 248(1-2):125-138). (see also, for example, US 5,968,510 with respect to antibody-CTLA-4 fusion proteins for use in binding to various target ligands).
  • said immune function exerting moiety comprises an antibody and optionally both the first portion and the immune function exerting moiety are antibodies (with respect to bispecific antibodies, and a recent review of some of the technologies referred to or applicable to various aspects of the invention (see particularly, Journal of Immunological Methods February 2001 Vol. 248(1-2) page 1-200)
  • said immune function exerting moiety binds to an immune cell, a diseased host cell or a disease causing cell or entity (eg see US6193968).
  • disease is used broadly to refer to any undesirable condition.
  • the term diseased host cell includes but is not limited to a cancerous (in the broadest sense of that term) cell and a virally infected cell (these examples are given inasmuch as the invention in a preferred embodiment involves targeting such cells for destruction) and the term disease causing cell includes but is not limited to a virus or other infectious agent and as well as immune cell which is directly or indirectly involved in mediating or causing a undesired, deleterious or pathologic consequence, including but not limited to autoimmune disorders, transplant rejection, and other immune system linked diseases.
  • disease causing entity is used to refer, without limitation, to any molecule, atom, peptide, ligand, complex, chemical, component, epitope etc. that is directly or indirectly involved or associated in mediating or causing a disease or disease causing event including an antibody.
  • binding to the entity may be effected through the instrumentality of one or more (same or different) multifunctional ligands and through binding to any ligand or set of ligands, including receptors, multi-component epitopes etc, including for example, tumor "associated" (ie.
  • epitopes which may or may not or may only be partially present on tumor associated antigens, or commonly, for example antigens / epitopes / ligands / receptors etc. which are over- expressed in association with cancer cells; or for example, antigens J epitopes / ligands / receptors etc.
  • cytokine receptors include CCR5, CTLA-peptide type ligands / and correlative ligands.
  • ligands include CCR5, CTLA-peptide type ligands / and correlative ligands.
  • ICAMs eg. ICAM-1 , ELAM-1 , CD2, CD3, CD4 (eg see US 6,136,310), CD5, CD6, CD18, CD22, CD40, CD44; CD80, CD86, CD134 and CD154, to name only a . few (see also US6087475: PF4A receptor, US6135941, WO 01/13945 Such ligand may also selectively be targeted using any dual affinity strategy according to the invention..
  • the invention is also directed to a multifunctional ligand and a method which comprises using the multifunctional ligand to assess the toxicity of directly or indirectly targeting, for example, primarily within the lymphatic vessel system (see discussion below), cells having well known markers that are associated with immune cells, for example, those exclusively associated with activated immune cells, in-so-far as such targeting has a role in prolonging or counteracting the activated state, destroying the cell (eg. where the multifunctional ligand is a immunotoxin) causing the cell to be destroyed (eg. through apoptosis (eg.
  • markers associated with activated immune cells etc.
  • markers such as CD23, CD25, CD26, CD28, CD30, CD38, CD49a, CD69, CD70, are just some of the markers associated with activated immune cells.
  • markers associated with activated immune cells see for example Roitt I et al. Immunology, sixth edition, Mosby 2001 referenced below and Encyclopedia of Immunology (1998), Abbas et al. Cellular and Molecular Immunology 2000, Harcourt & Brace, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein).
  • Antibodies for many such ligands are known or could be readily made by eg. phage display (see references herein including J Immunol Methods 1999 Dec 10;231(1-2):65-81), and natural ligands for such markers or functional analogues thereof are in some cases known or could be made by recombinant DNA technologies referenced herein (see also Cellular & Molecular Immunology 4 th Edition, Abbas Ak et al.
  • modulation is used broadly to refer to any change, directly or indirectly, in an immune function or effect, as broadly understood. Many such forms of modulation are well known in the art (some are exemplified herein), and therefore these need not be specifically recited (for a review of such effects see for example Roitt I et al. Immunology, sixth Edition, Mosby 2001 ; Encyclopedia of Immunology ; (1998) Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, ISBN:0122267656).
  • the multifunctional ligand exerts its function substantially (ie. upon gaining entry into lymphatic system and when bound to the lymphatic endothelial cells, which is dependant on the mode of administration) within the lymphatic system, on cells and/or molecules circulating through the lymphatic system, for example with respect to some embodiments, for greatest effect, to avoid an undesired degree of immunosuppression (for example, embodiments where immune cells are targeted for ablation and/or apoptosis).
  • such effect is exerted at least in part, and preferably substantially to the exclusion of regions within lymphatic system that house at the time of administration non-circulating cells (eg.
  • thymus, bone marrow, and various parts of the secondary lymphoid tissues or/and with respect to some embodiments (excluding for example those related to immunization or mopping up toxins or antibodies) preferably, non-activated cells.
  • This specificity of targeting can be accomplished in part to the natural distribution of the lymphatic endothelium associated marker of choice, the mode of administration and various targeting strategies herein described. 7.
  • the invention contemplates modes of delivery that to varying degrees ensure a greater degree of lymphatic system targeting, for example administration directly within the lymphatics, adminstration in tissues that drain to the lymphatics or parts thereof, intravenous delivery, as are well known to those skilled in the art, preferably in each individual case at strategic sites of administration that are most pertinent or selective for the disease in question, to the extent that selectivity is desired.
  • the invention contemplates a variety of different size multifunctional ligands (MRU, single domain, scFv, Fab, minibodies, F(ab) 2 , F(ab') 2 , substantially whole antibodies etc. and known or obvious multimers thereof referenced herein and in the referenced literature) that are most suitable (eg. for small enough or, for example, having longest half life in circulation) for particlar modes of administration to the extent that this is a limitation (eg. size, where drainage into the lymphatic system is sought to be increased or optimized).
  • the immune function exerting moiety of the multifunctional ligand comprises (eg. by way of recombinant fusion, conjugation etc.), or binds to (such antibodies are known or may be made by phage, ribosome or other such 'display' methods), so as to present the functional part of an adhesion molecule (molecule involved in cellular adhesion), for example an endothelial adhesion molecule such as a selectins, ICAMs (eg. ICAM-1 , ICAM-2) V-CAM, MAdCAM-1 or functional analogues or portions thereof (see for example USP6143298, 5512660, 5861151 ,
  • multifunctional ligand or an immune cell or a cell-sized latex sphere as described herein - for this pupose the adhesion molecule may be on the surface of another, preferably multifunctional-ligand-anchored latex sphere or on a similarly anchored cell) as well as combination therapies, for example, with therapeutic entities that enhance or inhibit leucocyte adhesion, or multifunctional ligands or antibodies that bind to - 70
  • adhesion molecules may be the subject of targeting with dual afi ⁇ nity ligands of the invention and that such ligands may include a moiety which binds to a lymphatic endothelial cell.
  • the invention also contemplates that one or more multifunctional ligands in which the immune function exerting moiety comprises an antibody type molecule targeted to a particular cell surface ligand may be able to mimic effect of such adhesion molecules, as discussed below (any such discussion of an antibody mimicking this function is unless otherwise stated not intended to limit the broader concept of utilizing any class of molecule that would facilitate anchoring or controlling, eg. slowing the passage of cells through the lymphatic vessels).
  • the invention may have greatest application when the multifunctional ligand is administered so as to primarily target cells within the circulatory system, or as an adjunct therapy, or for remission or near remission conditions, or when combined with hyaluronic acid therapy.
  • the invention contemplates that an effective amount of hyaluronic acid is pre-administered to tissues draining to the lymphatic system so as to initially occupy binding sites on LYVE-1 primarily in the smallest lymphatic vessels and thereby minimize excessive binding within the narrowest vessels.
  • said first portion binds to LYVE-1 or podoplantin described below.
  • the anti-lymphatic marker antibody may be fused for example to a liver enzyme which is known to metabolize chemotherapetic agents or an affinity matured variant thereof, so as to to degrade such agents that are not taken up by the diseased tissue to which they are targeted.
  • said first portion is fused, conjugated or otherwise linked directly or indirectly to an immunizing moiety, for example an antigen, epitope, mimotope or peptide etc. presenting/incorporating entity/scaffold that generates by itself or with the help of one or more cytokines, costimulatory molecules and/or adjuvants etc. an immune response to a desired antigenic determinant (this term is used broadly to correspond at least in scope to the overlapping groupings: antigen, epitope, mimotope or peptide), for example an anti-idiotypic antibody, an antibody component which is capable of binding to a T cell activating entity for example a cell (eg. an antigen, epitope, mimotope or peptide etc.
  • an immunizing moiety for example an antigen, epitope, mimotope or peptide etc.
  • an antigen, epitope, mimotope or peptide etc. presenting/incorporating entity/scaffold that generates by itself or with the help of one or more cyto
  • the invention is also directed to a multifunctional ligand comprising an immune function exerting moiety which comprises an MHC, preferably complexed or otherwise linked to a peptide.
  • Peptide linking may for example be effected independently, naturally or for example through causing release of peptides from an MHC peptide or HSP peptide complex by injecting a weak acidic solution into tumor eg. just prior to excision. Suitable such solutions which may for example be combined with a cytokine , eg.lL-12 and/or adjuvant are known in the art.
  • said immune function exerting moiety comprises an anti-idiotypic antibody, for example an antibody that a) mimics, for example, a cell surface expressed tumor associated epitope, a virus or other infectious agent associated surface epitope, a toxin, an immune stimulatory, costimulatory, inhibitory, or otherwise interactive ligand; or b) serves to bind to the idiotype (ie. paratope) bearing antibody to which it binds as an anti-idiotype, for example an autoimmune antibody, etc. or an antibody bearing a toxic moiety for removing such antibody from passage into the circulation.
  • an anti-idiotypic antibody for example an antibody that a) mimics, for example, a cell surface expressed tumor associated epitope, a virus or other infectious agent associated surface epitope, a toxin, an immune stimulatory, costimulatory, inhibitory, or otherwise interactive ligand; or b) serves to bind to the idiotype (ie. paratope) bearing antibody to which it binds as an anti-idiotype,
  • the invention contemplates that the first multifunctional ligand is used for development, therapeutic evaluation or combination therapy in conjunction with a second different multifunctional ligand of the invention, to achieve a cooperative effect (for example, in the same composition or substantially contemporaneously administered (ie. to reach the same or an interrelated destination in a cooperative time frame) or in necessary or desired sequence/interval, etc.).
  • a cooperative effect for example, in the same composition or substantially contemporaneously administered (ie. to reach the same or an interrelated destination in a cooperative time frame) or in necessary or desired sequence/interval, etc.
  • An example of such cooperative effect is an interaction (not necessarily simultaneously) with two different immune cell surface ligands (for example via an antibody binding interaction), or to deliver different payloads eg. toxins, to a diseased cell see (USP 6,077,499).
  • the invention also contemplates a method of effecting substantially coordinated interactions of differing temporal and spatial complexities, ranging from a somewhat proximal and contemporaneous delivery (eg. in the same composition) of a first multifunctional ligand having, for example, a cancer cell binding second portion, and a second multifunctional ligand having, for example, a cytokine binding Ab, eg. to reduce any toxic effects associated with toxic levels of cytokine release, a cytokine component (for example to harness the effect of such component as a means to attract one or more immune cells to kill a diseased cell or to harness the inhibitory effect of such component (eg. using one or more cytokines employed by cancer cells to evade immune cell targeting) eg.
  • a cytokine component for example to harness the effect of such component as a means to attract one or more immune cells to kill a diseased cell or to harness the inhibitory effect of such component (eg. using one or more cytokines employed by cancer cells to evade immune
  • T-cell binding component eg. anti-CD3
  • a concomitant object of assessing possible counterproductive immune cell elimination eg. as would be enabled by using a radiolabelled multifunctional ligand and determining the disposistion of the label over time
  • Two different such multifunctional ligands may be used, for example, to deliver two different immune function exerting moieties in substantial proximity to one another for contemporaneous interaction with two different ligands on an immune cell (ie. when it approaches the luminal wall of a lymphatic vessel).
  • this approach may be used to implement one or more effects including increased avidity to the cell for prolonged cell anchoring, which may positively impact on desired (in some embodiments) transfer of the multifunctional ligand from the lymphatic vessel wall to the target cell eg. for achieving an inhibitory effect via ligand binding (eg. assessed via duration of multifunctional ligand binding eg. quantitative or radioimage approximated label elimination)(N.B. this effect may be assessed with multiple copies of the same multifunctional ligand), delivery of a cooperative payload eg.
  • ligand binding eg. assessed via duration of multifunctional ligand binding eg. quantitative or radioimage approximated label elimination
  • biotin-avidin which preferably yields evidence (preferably quantifiable evidence) of the interaction, for example an enzyme- substrate interaction to quantitatively assay the amount of an enzyme converted substrate (eg. using a conjugated prodrug and pro-drug conversion akin to ADEPT and assessing the extent of prodrug conversion eg by labeled anti-drug specific antibody).
  • an enzyme- substrate interaction to quantitatively assay the amount of an enzyme converted substrate (eg. using a conjugated prodrug and pro-drug conversion akin to ADEPT and assessing the extent of prodrug conversion eg by labeled anti-drug specific antibody).
  • the invention contemplates the use of a respectively linked catalytic antibody component (see for example US5658753:Catalytic antibody components) and labeled substrate or RNAase and labeled RNA etc.for this purpose.
  • the invention contemplates that such interactive entities may be conjugated fused or otherwise linked to a respective first and second multifunctional ligand for achieving a cooperative interaction between adjacently bound such ligands.
  • the invention contemplates that adjacently interacting multifunctional ligands yielding detectable evidence of the interaction, could be use in a method to assess eg. a) luminal ligand saturation for dosing, b) multiple simultaneous binding interactions, and c) perhaps most spatially sensitive, development of a process to achieve cross-linked binding with multiple eg. immune cell ligands eg. a costimulatory immune effect (ie. the effect of different simultaneous interactions eg. on stimulation, inhibition etc.of eg.
  • an immune cell for example combining a first multifunctional ligand capable of selectively binding to, conjugated to or fused to a B7component (see J Immunother 2001 Jan-Feb; 24(1):27-36; J Immunol 2001 Feb 15; 166(4):2505-2513; Chalitta PM et al. J. Immunol. 160:3419-3426) and a second multifunctional ligand capable of selectively binding to, conjugated to or fused to an MHC molecule delivered initially with or without peptide.
  • a first multifunctional ligand capable of selectively binding to, conjugated to or fused to a B7component
  • a second multifunctional ligand capable of selectively binding to, conjugated to or fused to an MHC molecule delivered initially with or without peptide.
  • the invention contemplates using various amounts/proportions of multifunctional ligands having antibody components fused or conjugated to or capable of binding selectively to, for example an MHC class l or ' ll peptide complex and recombinant B7-1-Fc and/or B7-2-Fc respectively (see Eur J Immunol 2001 Jan; 31 (1):32-38; Eur J Immunol 2001 Feb; 31 (2):440- 449) (for tumor reactive peptides see for example J Immunother 2001 Jan-Feb; 24(1): 1-9).
  • the invention also contemplates enhancing the cross-linking of the multifunctional ligands of the invention through complementary components such as biotin and avidin.
  • the invention also contemplates that a first multifunctional ligand is used to bind to a marker specific to a particular kind of cell (eg. activated immune cells) and a second multifunctional ligand (which may not be specific for activated immune cells) is used to modulate the activity of the immune cell (for example inactivate it or reduce its disease causing capability directly or indirectly by binding to it ).
  • a marker specific to a particular kind of cell eg. activated immune cells
  • a second multifunctional ligand which may not be specific for activated immune cells
  • the functional affinity of one or both the first portion and second portions of one or both of the cooperating multifunctional ligands can be selected to at least partially control the selective modulating effect of the pair, for example both interactions would be required for the second multifunctional ligand to have an optimal opportunity to bind.
  • the functional affinity for the target cell is relatively weak for the purpose of attaching to the eg. immune cell for a sufficient duration (eg.
  • the functional affinity of the first portion to the lymph vessel can be greater than that of its second portion, while the reverse could be true for the second multifunctional ligand.
  • antibodies which cross-link for example an integrin and a marker of immune cell activation could be used to limit the number of activated immune cells that migrate through the lymphatic system.
  • bispecific d Abs, diabodies, etc. in which the functional affinity of each specific binding portion individually does not srongly favour binding could be used to selectively target specific sub- populations of immune cells or even specifically activated immune cells (for example antibodies that recognize particular antigen / peptide specific T cell or B cells).
  • the invention is directed a bispecific ligand, preferably a bispecific antibody, having a first portion which binds to a ligand which differentiates between members of the same immune cell population (eg a particular type of T cell) and a second portion which binds to a second ligand on the same cell, which binding exerts directly or indirectly a desired effect, wherein the functional affinity of said first and second portions are selected so as to substantially increase amount of immune cells in which both such portions are bound to their respective ligands relative to those which a single such portion is bound to a single ligand and preferably wherein the amount of immune cells to which the bispecific ligand is not bound is substantially greater than the number of immune cells that are not bound when compared to using a bispecific ligand having the same specificity and for example a 10 1 to 10 7 (preferably 10 1 to 10 6 , preferably 10 3 to 10 6 , preferably 10 3 to 10 5 ) increase in affinity of one or both portions.
  • a ligand which differentiates between members of
  • This invention also contemplates that binding to the ligand which differentiates between members of the same population (a particular type of T cell) does not have a negative consequence other than to cause the molecule to be ineffectual unless both of its portions are bound and that its binding is itself sufficient for binding and/or stronger relative to the second portion by two fold to 5 orders of magnitude .preferably 1 to 3 orders of magnitude.
  • the invention more broadly speaking contemplates a two ligand interaction (using one or more multifunctional ligands) wherein for example both are required or increase the likelihood of interaction and wherein the interaction of at least one contributes to specificity, though not necessarily to modulation, thus permitting a broader selection of modulators including those that but for the selectivity enhancing effect of the cooperating ligand and the lymphatic system venue, would be toxic in the desired therapeutic dose.
  • modulators including those are unique to, for example, activated B cells or T cells or those having particular specificites in virtue of unique Ig type receptors.
  • a combination of factors such as dose, using additional molecules that increase or decrease migration or adhesion optionally in a tissue targeted manner, route of administration (eg within tissue that best drain to lymphatic vesssels or a portion thereof), use of cytokines, etc. and immune modulating drugs, as well combination therapies with known entities, can be employed in various combinations for strategies of harnessing the unique properties of the multifunctional ligand of the invention, to achieve a selectivity enhancing and/or modulatory/inhibitory/stimulatory etc or otherwise cooperating effects with respect to the desired target population of cells.
  • the immune function exerting moiety binds with greater functional affinity to its target ligand than said first portion binds to its target ligand.
  • said immune function exerting moiety may bind with greater avidity (preferably at least 2 times greater
  • the invention contemplates that this increased functional affinity can be employed to effect transfer of a lymphatic vessel bound multifunctional ligand (eg. a bispecific antibody) to a cell passing through lymphatic system.
  • a lymphatic vessel bound multifunctional ligand eg. a bispecific antibody
  • the invention also contemplates a method comprising radiolabelling the mutifunctional ligand to assess, for example, the degree to which immune cells at a disease site have passed through the lymphatic system.
  • Certain aspects of the invention relate to a multifunctional ligand based system of targeting a particular immune cell ligand for stimulation, inhibition etc. predominantly within select portions, of the lymphatic system that contain migrating cells (although some general targeting can controllably occur before the multifunctional ligand binds to the lymphatic system or when the multifunctional ligand releases from the lymphatic system without having found its target within the lymphatic system) will have at least a partially selective effect on targeting disease causing/mediating immune cells (eg. activated with a specificity that causes the disease) as opposed to non-disease causing/mediating cells, in the case where such ligand is also expressed on such other immune cells eg. of the same type eg. T cells.
  • disease causing/mediating immune cells eg. activated with a specificity that causes the disease
  • the invention permits targeting of immune cells primarily within the portions of the lymphatic system that contain migrating cells particularly disease causing/mediating cells while minimizing immune system dysfunction.
  • This effect can be even more selectively accomplished, for example, by delivering the multifunctional ligand directly into the lymphatic system and within a time frame which is shorter that the normal duration of binding of the multifunctional ligand determining the degree to which the multifunctional ligand is bound to such diseased related cells at the disease site and similarly the degree to which it is bound to the cells unrelated to the same disease eg. via radiolabel.
  • the invention also contemplates a multifunctional ligand based system of assessing the effects of certain types of immune stimulation eg.
  • cytokine eg. TNF ⁇
  • anti-angiogenic marker antibodies optionally, preferably in combination with anti-tumor vaccination strategies, to direct disease activated immune cells to tumor site and the lymphatic system for further immune stimulation.
  • ligands such as OX40L and CD44 may also be assessed for this purpose.
  • the invention also contemplates using a bi-specific antibody, for example having a lymphatic endothelial binding first portion and for example a cytokine binding second portion, wherein the cytokine binding portion has a lower functional affinity for the cytokine (for example 1 x 10 -6 to 0.9 fold) compared with that of its natural receptor on an immune cell.
  • a bi-specific antibody for example having a lymphatic endothelial binding first portion and for example a cytokine binding second portion, wherein the cytokine binding portion has a lower functional affinity for the cytokine (for example 1 x 10 -6 to 0.9 fold) compared with that of its natural receptor on an immune cell.
  • a multifunctional ligand of the invention could be used optionally in conjunction with a multifunctional ligand which displays a functional adhesion molecule (a selectin, ICAM, etc.) to assess the optimal parameters for transfer of the cytokine, for example, as is known to occur by monitoring the effects of cytokine release attributable to such cytokine transfer.
  • a functional adhesion molecule a selectin, ICAM, etc.
  • this information or approach could be used to optimize the binding parameters for other ligands as well (eg. anti CD3) and could be employed not only in lymphatic system but to locally deliver inhibitory or stimulatory cytokines or other ligands to certain tissue targets, for example new blood vessels forming within tumors or other tissue specific markers.
  • the second portion comprises a ligand which is capable of binding to an immune cell for example B cells, T cells etc, preferably in one embodiment to assist in cell killing or immune modulation of a target cell (re NK cells see for example US 5770387)(see also US6071517:Bispecific heteroantibodies with dual effector functions; Bispecific antibody-mediated destruction of
  • the multifunctional ligand may be, for example, a bispecific antibody having a monovalent first portion and a monovalent second portion, a bispecific antibody having a divalent first portion and a divalent second portion, a trivalent trispecific antibody having a monovalent first portion and a second portion comprising a monovalent immune function exerting moiety which binds, for example, to a target ligand on a target diseased, disease causing or immune cell, and for example, a monovalent portion which binds to an immune cell which assists in killing or modulation for example anti-CD3 or anti-CD28 antibody component, a tetravalent trispecific antibody having a monovalent first portion and a second portion comprising a divalent immune function exerting moiety which binds, for example, to a target ligand on a target diseased, disease causing or immune cell, and for example, a monovalent anti-CD3 or anti-CD28 antibody
  • the antibody subunit may be for example, a Fab, a substantially intact antibody, a single domain antibody (see also Hufton SE. Dis Markers 2000;16(1,2):37 Single domain human immunoglobulin fold-based biomolecules; Antigen specificity and high affinity binding provided by one single loop of a camel single-domain antibody. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 13;276(28):26285-90. Optimal Design Features of Camelized Human Single-domain Antibody Libraries. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 6;276(27):24774-24780; Recognition of antigens by single-domain antibody fragments: the superfluous luxury of paired domains.Trends Biochem Sci.
  • the multifunctional ligand binds to an immune cell which is associated with an autoimmune" reaction, for example a CCR5-expressing cell, (see also Apoptosis genes and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000 Dec; 12(6):719-24. for application herein)
  • the second portion comprises a cytokine component.
  • the second portion comprises a cytotoxic component.
  • the second portion of the multifunctional ligand comprises an internalizing antibody and a cytotoxic component.
  • the second portion consists of an antibody which binds to T cells, for example, an anti-CD3 antibody or an anti- CD28 antibody.
  • the second portion consists of a cytokine component.
  • the second portion comprises an antibody which binds to a target diseased, disease causing or immune cell and further comprises one or more components selected from the group consisting of a cytokine component, a cytotoxic component and an anti- CD3/CD28 component.
  • the invention is directed to a composition comprising a multifunctional ligand and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • the invention is directed to a composition comprising a plurality of different multifunctional ligands.
  • the invention is directed to methods and compositions for developing and evaluating the therapeutic value of stimulators, mediators, inhibitors, etc. of immune cell signaling (eg. stimulatory, inhibitory, costimulatory), adhesion, migration.etc. including the effects of ligand/receptor blocking and supply of specific cooperative ligands, using the multifunctional ligands of the invention.
  • the multifunctional ligands of the invention may be used to assess the effects of such compositions on the sub-populaton of cells that migrates into lymphatic vessels.
  • the invention is directed to assessing the expectation that some disease causing, mediating or otherwise disease active immune cells have an enhanced ability/opportunity (and/or can be enhanced in their ability/opportunity to make their way into the lymphatic system) so that targeting of relevant ligands on that sub-population of cells within ' the lymphatic system will cause at least a partial selective targeting effect, preferably with positive effect on the dosing capability and choice of ligands ie. in terms of limiting more universal and/or deleterious consequences.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of reducing the toxic side effects of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a multifunctional ligand in which the immune function exerting moiety is targeted to a ligand that is not found exclusively on disease causing, mediating or otherwise disease active immune cells, by administering said composition in a manner in which it enter more directly into the lumen of a lymphatic vessel.
  • the invention is directed to a multifunctional ligand, a pharmaceutically acceptable composition therof and method of using same for assessing enhanced migration or enhancing migration of disease-active immune cells, said multifunctional ligand comprising an immune function effecting moiety which has an immune effect on an immune cell surface ligand ie. effects including signaling (eg. stimulatory, inhibitory, costimulatory, antagonistic, agonistic), including for adhesion and migration effects.etc.
  • signaling eg. stimulatory, inhibitory, costimulatory, antagonistic, agonistic
  • the invention is directed to a multifunctional ligand in which the immune function exerting moiety is an antibody that binds to a ligand selected, for example from the group consisting of CTLA-4, IL-2 receptor, CCR5, CD44, CD134, CD3, CD28, CD2.
  • the invention is directed to a composition
  • a composition comprising a plurality of different multifunctional ligands which exert a potentially cooperative immune effect with respect to an immune cell, for example binding to two or more different ligands on an immune cell, wherein said ligands are selected, for example from the group consisting of CTLA-4, IL-2 receptor, CCR5, CD44, CD134, from any of the ligands herein mentioned or referenced or preferably CD3, CD28, CD2.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of inhibiting metastasis during the course of surgical removal of a tumor comprising administering to a patient prior to surgical treatment of the tumor site, a pharmacetical composition comprising a multifunctional ligand in which the immune function effecting moiety binds to a tumor associated epitope on a cancer cell.
  • the invention is directed to an immunocytokine having an anti-idiotypic antibody component which recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand and a cytokine component fused therewith or conjugated thereto.
  • the cytokine component comprises IL-2 or a functional fragment thereof and/or IL-12 or a functional fragment thereof.
  • combinations of II-2 and IL-12 have been used successfully for this purpose.
  • cytokine fusion could be used to target T-cells or phagocytic cells to a multifunctional ligand that has bound to its disease causing or diseased cell target, preferably having left the lymphatic vessel endothelium in preference for binding its target.
  • the functional affinity of the anti- idiotypic Ab for the first portion would be less than that of the first portion to the lymphatic endothelium, so as to minimize competition between the two.
  • the delivery of the immunocytokine occur substantially contemporaneously but separately and after that of the multifunctional ligand, optionally by a different route of administration.
  • a bispecific antibody having an anti-idiotypic antibody component which recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds specifically to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand (preferably with lower affinity than that of the Ab for its target) and for example an immune cell binding portion eg. an anti-CD3 antibody or an anti-CD28 antibody component.
  • the invention is directed to a method of targeting a diseased or disease causing cell for destruction by the immune system comprising administering separately but substantially contemporaneously to a subject hosting the diseased or disease causing cell, preferably in sequence with an interposed interval and/or by different routes of administration, first a multifunctional ligand in which the immune function effecting moiety binds to a diseased or disease causing cell surface associated epitope, and an immunocytokine or bispecific antibody as decribed in the immediately preceding two paragraphs.
  • the invention contemplates modification of the multi-functional ligand to substitute one or more amino acids which reduce without functional impact on the molecule the number of immunogenic MHC II class peptide sequences within the molecule. This can be accomplished through procedures available to those skilled in the art, for example through the Delmmunisation services of Biovation Limited (see also US 5821123 and related Xoma patents).
  • lymphatic system targeting such lymph associaton may be alternatively implemented, in suitable circumstances by the method of delivering the multifunctional ligand, for example into the lumen of a lymphatic system vessel or (where the multifunctional ligand is not of an unsuitable size (see for example Ikomi, F. et al. Lymphology 32 (1999) 90-122, within a portion of body that drains to the lymphatic system (ie a portion of the lymphatic system), for eventual migration to the lymphatic system.
  • the immune function exerting moiety is targeted with greater functional affinity to a therapeutic target (ie.
  • the invention is directed a lymphatic system targeted multifunctional ligand in which the second portion is as described herein and in which the specificity of the first portion exclusively for a lymphatic system is inessential.
  • the invention contemplates targeting markers on lymphatic vessels that are also present, for example on blood vessel endothelial cells (eg. VEGF2). (with respect to lymph specific markers see also Birner P. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2001 Jan; 7(1):93-7 "Selective immunohistochemica! staining of blood and lymphatic vessels reveals independent prognostic influence of blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in early-stage cervical cancer" and published references to the markers therein mentioned.)
  • VEGF2 blood vessel endothelial cells
  • the use of term immune function affecting moiety with reference to the role of the second portion does not adequately accommodate the breadth of the invention since any form of disease palliating active moiety or entity which exerts its effect elsewhere than at the lymphatic endothelial cell may gain advantage from this form of delayed delivery (depot effect) or anchoring.
  • the second portion is capable of binding directly or indirectly (eg. binding to an entity which in turn binds to a target entity) to a target entity, for example a therapeutic entity (for example to mop up excess such entity that does not immediately reach its target (eg. an entity that is toxic elsewhere in the body), a toxic entity including an entity which is not per se toxic but the presence of which is undesirable at a particular time or in particular amount or concentration (eg. a cytokine, for example when released as a result of anti-CD3 therapy), to redirect an an entity to a target, for example a therapeutic entity, for example through the instrumentality of an antibody portion that is directed to that target (eg.
  • the second portion comprises an anti-tumor antibody portion that is conjugated to streptavidin, to retarget biotin conjugated radionuclide back to the tumor (see Martin J. et al. (1997) Cancer Chemother, Pharmacol. 40:189-201), to temporarily anchor liposomes or other carriers of entities (eg. drugs) having an direct or indirect beneficial effect elsewhere.
  • entities eg. drugs
  • the invention provides a multifunctional ligand having, at least, a first portion which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated antigen/receptor (and thereby exerts, not necessarily to the exclusion of other effects) at least an anchoring function, and a second portion having at least one independent immune function.
  • immuno function is broad in intent including but not limited to direct or indirect and primary or corollary effects related to simple targeting, tolerance, immunization, stimulation, inhibition, modulation or various other immune related effects (other than simply forming part of the entity which blocks the lymphatic endothelial associated ligand).
  • independent is
  • the invention contemplates rather that the immune function is exerted, for example, vis-a-vis immune cells or molecules or against cancer or infected cells to affect an immune function that relates to assessment, diagnosis, therapeutic modeling, or treatment of various disease states such as autoimmune disease, transplant rejection, cancer and infectious disease.
  • the invention contemplates that the independent immune function is exerted through a physical ligand-ligand interaction.
  • the multifunctional ligand has an ability to bind in the manner of an antibody in virtue of at least one of the first or second portions, and preferably at least the first portion.
  • the lymphatic system directed first portion may in some embodiments (LYVE-1) be hyaluronic acid or analogues thereof that have the appropriate binding capacity.
  • the second portion binds to a target ligand on a cell or molecule (eg. a cytokine or autoimmune antibody) which passes through the lymphatic system.
  • the multifunctional ligand is a bispecifc antibody.
  • antibody is used to refer to any antigen binding fragment of an antibody that substantially has the binding capability of an antibody including anti-idiotypic antibodies, and therefore the term bispecific antibody is used (unless the context implies a more specific usage) in a functional sense to refer to at least two different specificities (including trispecifc antibodies etc.) and includes well known entities which are diabodies, triabodies, tetrabodies, minibodies, scFv dimers, etc., and entities in which one or both binding moieties are scFv or single domain type antibody fragments or dimers etc of such fragments (with respect to single domain antibodies see for example Camel single-domain antibodies as modular building units in J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 25, & Mulligan-Kehoe U.S. patents ).
  • anchoring function is used broadly to refer to physical attachment for a period which renders the second portion of the multi-functional ligand capable of exerting its immune function.
  • the function of the second portion is to interact with a cell passing through the lymphatic vessels, for at least a period which permits sufficient interaction for the desired effect.
  • ligand is used very broadly herein to refer to any moiety, preferably in some cases, a specifically interacting moiety including binding moieties (eg antibodies, receptors etc.) and bound moieties (eg antigens, epitopes etc) and/including otherwise interacting moieties (eg. chemotactic interactions or interactions that require multiple points of interface eg. cross-linking or multi- component epitopes).
  • binding moieties eg antibodies, receptors etc.
  • bound moieties eg antigens, epitopes etc
  • otherwise interacting moieties eg. chemotactic interactions or interactions that require multiple points of interface eg. cross-linking or multi- component epitopes.
  • ligand is used broadly to refer to any entity or part thereof which can be subject to an intermolecular interaction that can result in binding.
  • moiety is used broadly and non-limitatively to refer primarily to a functional part of an entity, and may refer to even the whole of the entity depending on the
  • the multi-functional ligands of the present invention may exert their immune function primarily in lymphatic system and also significantly before and optionally after entry into the lymphatic system.
  • the multifunctional ligand is capable of simulating a depot effect by binding for a prolonged period to the intra-luminal lymphatic endothelium for later release over time back into the circulation.
  • the choice (avidity effect resulting from multiple binding "arms") and affinity of the binding molecule as well as various, preferably controllable factors impacting on any "undulating" movements of the lymphaticvessels (eg. water consumption)or competitive binding is contemplated to impact the binding time.
  • the second portion of the multi-functional ligand of the invention may have at least primary medicinal effects that are not immune function related as broadly understood.
  • Some immune interactions require, prefer or are capable of being enhanced via coordinated ligand interactions, for example for optimal immune stimulation, for example, specific costimulatory ligand interactions eg. CD80/CD86 interactions with CD28, or for example, interactions aimed at tolerizing or otherwise inhibiting or reducing immune effects or preventing such inhibition (for example using anti- CTLA-4/CD152 see related U.S. patents, for example 6,051 ,227, 5,844,095) (see also Hodge JW et al. Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop 2000 (30): 23-52 and Immunological Reviews Vol 172 Dec 1999, Entire Issue).
  • the invention contemplates modeling, evaluating and/or effecting these interactions for therapeutic intervention within the lymphatic system through the substantially contemporaneous use of different multifunctional ligands of the invention. Furthermore, control of the relative proportion of each of the different ligands permits different spatial interspersion of these ligands on the intraluminal suface of the lymphatic system (primarily) so as to provide controlled variability of spatial configurations appropriate for optimizing the coordinate interaction with multiple ligands on another entity, for example immune cells or cancer cells.
  • This strategy also permits controls on avidity that extend beyond the choice of valency for a given single multifunctional ligand for controlling the nature and duration of the coordinate interactions including the duration of temporary anchoring, for example to allow cancer cells to be killed by immune cells, as well delivery of, for example, cytokines (through cytokine antibody fusions), superantigens etc. to the site of interaction.
  • coordinate interactions may be substantially contemporaneous or sequential, for example the effect of a first interaction with a first multifunctional ligand slowing the progression of a cell or infectious agent through the lymphatic system for eventual rection with another first multifunctional ligand (ie of the same type) or reaction with a second type of multifunctional ligand.
  • the invention also contemplates as a strategy, alone or in combination with other strategies: 1) delivery of a multifunctional ligand of the invention to a particular site of action for the purpose of exerting, for example a local effect, with the result of causing the multifunctional ligand (whether or not it has exerted its effect, provided that or to the extent that it remains functional in at least one aspect) to subsequently be targeted to the lymphatic system for exerting a second effect (be it the same or a different disease counteracting effect) including simply elimination, or return back to the circulation (ie. where the ligand is selected (eg.
  • multifunctional ligand which is an antitumor ligand that has some residual binding to normal tissues, to set up, in effect, a site of competitive binding that advantageously impacts ( ie.reduces) undesired binding more than desired target binding; 2) delivery of a multifunctional ligand of the invention or an entity that binds to a multifunctional ligand of the invention to a particular site of action eg. local disease mediating immune cells, for the purpose of simple binding with the expectation that a delayed immune or other effect will be exerted within the lymphatic system.
  • site of action eg. local disease mediating immune cells
  • the invention is also directed to a composition comprising at least one and optionally a plurality of different multifunctional ligands of the invention.
  • the invention is also directed to such a composition when combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for example those that may be suitable for one or more of the various well known and heretofore used routes of administration including intravenous, intradermal etc which (for present purposes) are preferably not incompatible with delivering a multifunctional ligand of the invention to the lymphatic system.
  • the invention is also directed to therapeutic compositions comprising a multifunctional ligand of the invention and to methods of treatment using such compositions.
  • the invention is also directed to method of : 1) evaluating the therapeutic effect of a particular therapeutic entity against a particular target with reduced effect on undesired targets; 2) facilitating elimination a therapeutic entity; - by administering the therapeutic entity as part of or in circumstances which permit interaction with, a multifunctional ligand of the invention.
  • the invention also contemplates cannulating particular portions of the lymphatic system to localize the delivery of a multifunctional ligand (see United States Patent 4,911 ,690 ) , for example 1) to accommodate or further accommodate the treatment of conditions in which the immune affecting molecule has an undesirable systemic or localized side-effect if delivered otherwise; 2) for the localized delivery, as required, of larger molecules, complexes (eg. for temporarily anchoring MHC-peptide complexes) or otherwise associated (at least temporarily) entities (ie. associated other than through complex formation) etc. and/or 3) for the localized delivery of additional compositional elements eg. adjuvants, cytokines (see Immunological Reviews 2000 Vol 177 p. 5-246; Nature Immunology Feb 2001 Vol 2 No.
  • a multifunctional ligand see United States Patent 4,911 ,690 , for example 1) to accommodate or further accommodate the treatment of conditions in which the immune affecting molecule has an undesirable systemic or localized side-effect if delivered otherwise; 2) for the localized
  • the invention also contemplates methods of selective, enhanced or localized, targeting/ delivery by administering multifunctional ligands of the invention as well as methods (including methods directly or indirectly employing the multifunctional ligands of the invention) of enhancing / inducing entry of cells or molecules, particularly immune cells (ie.
  • cells having an immune system function as broadly understood) or subsets thereof, to the lymphatic system or a portion of the lymphatic system for example for the purpose of direct or indirect interaction with the multifunctional ligands of the invention (in order to be acted on directly or indirectly, by multifunctional ligands of the invention) or for recruiting cells that will for example kill or modulate the activity of other cells, for example kill cancer cells or infected cells that will have, are having or have had direct or indirect interaction with the multifunctional ligands of the invention, as discussed further below, for example in the case of cancer, by targeting immunocytokines to the disease affected tissue eg. using cytokines eg. TNF ⁇ fused to antibody that binds specifically to tumor cell markers or markers for angiogenesis.
  • cytokines eg. TNF ⁇ fused to antibody that binds specifically to tumor cell markers or markers for angiogenesis.
  • tissue targetted as opposed to disease targeted immunocytokines could be used selectively recruit immune cells within that tissue for example a diseased tissue to enter the lymphatic system for such purposes including for example interaction with a multifunctional ligand of the invention.
  • a single multifunctional ligand can have multiple requisite interactive functionalities for example to stimulate, attract, anergize (or otherwise inactivate) sub-populations of B-cells of T cells via the use, for example, of trivalent or tetravalent antibodies and antibody conjugates/fusions thereof having multiple ligand interactive capabilities (see also for example technologies being developed for selection of successful binders by phage or ribosome display (see for example WO 01/00866; Adv Protein Chem 2000; 55:367-403).
  • a particular application of this technology for application to this invention are antibodies which retarget T-cells to tumor cells (see for example Manzke O. et al. Int. J. Cancer 82, 700-708 (1999); Br J Cancer 2000 Jan; 82(2):472-9; J Control Release 2000 Feb 14; 64(1-3):229-39 as well as related references, cited therein or citing these publications.
  • the present invention accommodates such technology through multispecific antibodies or alternatively obviates the need for combining a T-cell receptor type molecule with the primary immune function effecting moiety (eg. a cancer cell binding moiety) by using a separate multifunctional ligand which combines, for example, a first portion and a second portion comprising a T-cell interacting moiety (eg. anti-CD3).
  • a separate multifunctional ligand which combines, for example, a first portion and a second portion comprising a T-cell interacting moiety (eg. anti-CD3).
  • This is accomplished by administering in the same composition or substantially contemporaneously an amount of the second multifunctional ligand that provides, as may empirically predicted by assessing the dispersion of the marker on the endothelial cell, a strong probability (eg.
  • the T cell will be targeted in the vicinity of a given lymphatic endothelial cell that happens be proximal to the cell sought be targeted eg the cancer cell. It is self-evident that a 50/50 proportion of the first and second multifunctional ligand will yield a strong chance that a second multifunctional ligand will be immediately adjacent on a particular given side (assuming for the sake of argument that there are sides when in reality the dispersion of the lymphatic endothelial marker is governing).
  • adjacent multifunctional ligands may be linked for example through linkage effective pairs of ligands (avidin-biotin), the second portions having an antibody component which binds to a common ligand (eg on a liposome (see US 6197333 and refs. therein cited) or other pharmaceutically acceptable micro/nano particle/sphere of preferably selectable size for optimal spacer or endothelial cell protective purposes) and that such entities could optionally also be employed to house and deliver a payload to a given target vicinity.
  • ligands avidin-biotin
  • the second portions having an antibody component which binds to a common ligand (eg on a liposome (see US 6197333 and refs. therein cited) or other pharmaceutically acceptable micro/nano particle/sphere of preferably selectable size for optimal spacer or endothelial cell protective purposes) and that such entities could optionally also be employed to house and deliver a payload to a given target vicinity.
  • the multi-functional ligands of the present invention provide for a method and preferably a means for evaluating and/or inducing immune tolerance (with respect to B cells see strategies discussed in Immunological Reviews 2000 Vol. 176 pp. 5-247).
  • the multi-functional ligands of the present invention depending on their mode of administration (direct application by cannulating a lymphatic vessel or conventionally eg. intradermally or intravenously), can be advantageously employed to provide prolonged/strategic exposure to tolerance enhancing molecules (for example by employing a multivalent eg.
  • bi-specific Ab fragment or diabody which hs a first portion which binds to a lymph associated antigen and second portion which optionally comprises anti-idiotypic Ab portion mimicking the desired Ag or the antigen itself or a suitable portion thereof fused or conjugated to the first portion) on the intra-luminal surface of the lymphatic vessels, optionally, in addition to its conventional effects, when administered intradermally or intravenously, etc.. It is anticipated that the multi-functional ligands of the present invention would be useful to assess and/or effect tolerance induction (see Bassadona GP et al.
  • the present invention could be used to strategically mediate, CD45 (or variants/other PTPs) related "cell signaling", for example through signaling molecules (eg. inhibitors) using multifunctional ligands of the invention including but not limited to bispecific antibodies, antibody fusions/conjugates eg. where the immune affecting antibody portion or other moiety is conjugated, fused etc. to an antibody or fragment that binds to an entity associatied marker eg. LYVE- 1 (1999) Journal of Cell Biology Vol 144 No 4 p.
  • the invention is directed to multifunctional ligands that comprise immune function exerting moieties having functionalities of molecules currently in clinical trials or proposed for clinical trials (see for example Glennie MJ > et al. Aug 2000, Immunology Today 408 Vol 21(8); see also Journal of Immunological Methods 237 (2000) 131-145; Mol Immunol 2000 Jun; 37(9) 515- 526; Annu Rev Med 2001 ; 52:125-145; Annu Rev Med 2001 52:63-78; Q J Nucl Med 2000 Sep; 44(3) 268-83) including those that have an anti-CD2 functionality (see USP 5,795,572) anti-CD4 functionality (see for example USP 6,136,310 Herzyk D, J Infect Immun 2000 Feb; 69(2): 1032-1043) anti-CD3 functionality (for example WO 00/41474; WO 98139363; USP 6,113,901 ; Transplantation 2000 Dec 27 70 (12) 1707-12); Anti-CD44 functionality see for example Weiss L, et
  • the invention contemplates assessment and therapeutic benefit of lymphatic localization in the case of antibodies and multispecific ligands which are toxic to non-target cell populations which express the targeted ligand to a limited extent or in the case of toxic cross-reactivity of the second portion eg. antibody for its desired target with an undesired target (see eg. Lancet 1999 Nov 13; 354(9191):1691-5). It is contemplated that the toxic effect of a given effector moiety of a multifunctional ligand of the invention could be alternated using an additional binding arm for a lymphatic marker.
  • Antibody structure and function has bee extensively described in the literatue. For example see Antibody Engineering 2 nd ed. Carl A.K. Borrebaeck, Oxford University Press 1995 p 3-44.
  • bispecific antibodies including conventional four chain antibodies (including truncated version thereof such minibodies (see USP 5,837,821), F(ab') 2 (see Antibody Fusion Proteins, Steven M Chamow , Avi Ashkenazi Eds. ISBN 047118358X May 1999 Wiley p.136-144; or using CH3-truncated heavy chains), diabodies (see USP 5,837,242 Multivalent and multispecific binding proteins, their manufacture and use) constructs in which of one or two diabody molecules are heterodimerized by creating a fusion protein with the CL and CH1 immunoglobulin constant domains (see WO 02/02781).
  • Multivalency has been achieved by the addition of multimerization sequences at the carboxy or amino terminus of the scFv or Fab fragments, by using for example, p53, streptavidin and helix-turn-helix motifs.
  • a tetravelent bispecific is produced having two scFv binding sites for each of two target antigens.
  • IgG type bispecific antibodies which resemble IgG antibodies in that they posses a more or less complete IgG constant domain structure, has been achieved by chemical cross-linking of two different IgG molecules or by co- expression of two antibodies from the same cell. Both methods result in production of significant amounts of undesired and non-functional species due to mispairing among the component heavy and light chains. Methods have been employed to reduce or eliminate mispairing.
  • bispecific antibodies that are in a conventional IgG-like and Fab-like format have been developed by Zhu as tetravalent or bivalent molecules, respectively with each of the chains serving to anchor a binding moiety (see WO 01/90192 and Figure 1 therein), preferably consisting of a scFv.
  • each side of the molecule comprises a CH1 domain and a CL domain and each CH and CL domain is linked through its N-terminus to a scFv of different specificity.
  • this construct can readily be adapted to have each each half of the molecule associated with a polypeptide eg.
  • a scFv of the same specificity so that each half of the molecule is monospecific (or to have each half of the molecule associated with different pairings of scFvs) so that each half of the molecule is effectively monospecific.
  • the invention herein contemplates that a bivalent relatively low affinity second ligand binding moiety is used to activate receptors that require cross-linking for activity.
  • the invention also contemplates that numerous permutations in which the functional affinity of the first ligand binding moiety whether monospecific or bispecific can be accentuated relative the functional afi ⁇ nity of the second ligand binding moiety including employing a first ligand high affinity scFvs for a single antinstances in which the second ligand binding moiety is effectively monovalent (has one, or one useful binding moiety).
  • this construct can have a truncated Fc portion and various known methods in the art for improving the pairing efficiency of the heavy chains.
  • the CH1 and CL domains of the second ligand binding moiety can be truncated as in camelid antibodies for efficient delivery eg. of biologic effector ligands.
  • Antibody Conjugates Methods of chemical manipulation of antibodies for attachment of ligands (eg.biotin), radionuclides etc. are well known in the art and have been extensively reviewed (for example see review in Basic Methods in Antibody Production & Characteriztion G.C. Howard et al. eds. CRC Press 2001 , p. 199; with respect to therapeutic principles see for example, Antibody Therapeutics WJ Harris et al. eds. CRC Press 1997 p 53-88).
  • ligands eg.biotin
  • radionuclides e.biotin
  • bispecific antibodies include methods of making and using them (ee for example van Spriel AB, van Ojik HH, van De Winkel JG. Immunotherapeutic perspective for bispecific antibodies. Immunol Today. 2000 Aug; 21(8):391-7; Weiner LM. Bispecific antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000 May; 6 Suppl 3:S265-71. Barbet J, et al. Pretargeting with the affinity enhancement system for radioimmunotherapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 1999 Jun; 14(3):153-66. de Wolf FA, Brett GM. Ligand- binding proteins: their potential for application in systems for controlled delivery and uptake of ligands. Pharmacol Rev.
  • the invention is directed to presenting antigen within the lymphatic system (eg. in the form of an anti-idiotype antibody) such as to facilitate a desired immune response eg. vaccination type responses).
  • adjuvants can be conventionally employed to assist initial immune stimulation eg. intradermally when appropriately delivered.
  • Activating cytokines for example as specified above, can also be employed to enhance the immune response.
  • Examples of antibodies having an anti-idiotypic counterpart or for which an anti- idiotypic counterpart could made by well known techniques in the art (and that are capable of exerting the desired anti-idiotypic effect) are numerous and numerous such antiidiotypic antibodies have application to immunization as well as applications relating to tolerance (see for example US patents: 6,146,627 Method for reducing T cel ⁇ iediated cytotoxicity in HIV using anti-idiotypic antibody; 6,063,679 Anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies and compositions including the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies; 6,060,049 Surrogate tolerogenesis for the development of tolerance to xenografts; 6,042,827Anti-idiotypic antibody induction of anti-tumor response; 6,007,815 Anti-idiotype vaccination against diseases resulting from pathogenic responses by specific T cell populations; 5,981,502 Methods and compositions for inducing apoptosis in tumor cells; 5,766,588 Tumor immunotherapy using anti-idiotypic antibodies;
  • the multi-functional ligand comprises a first portion which binds to a lymph associated antigen and a second portion which binds to a tumor cell infected cell or infectious agent.
  • This embodiment of the invention can be used for example, to assess and affect the ability of the tumor- binding portion to more advantageously inhibit metastasis.
  • the portion which binds to a lymph associated antigen has a lower affinity and/or avidity so that the tumor cell binding portion preferentially binds to the tumor cell and is therefore more likely to accompany its passage through the lymphatic system.
  • This strategy also has application to bi-specific antibodies of the invention in which the second portion is for example targeted to an immune cell.
  • multiple such muti-functional ligands may permit sufficient tumor cell anchoring to permit the tumor cell to be killed within the lymphatic system via a toxic payload carried by the multifunctional ligand or through the recruitment of immune cells which accomplish this end (eg using the same or a different multifunctional ligand fused or conjugated to a suitable cytokine (eg IL-2, IL-12).
  • a suitable cytokine eg IL-2, IL-12
  • cytokines including cytokines fused or conjugated in whole or functional part to a lymph targeted Ab on the same, or a different multifunctional ligand delivered in a suitable dose
  • cytokines including cytokines fused or conjugated in whole or functional part to a lymph targeted Ab on the same, or a different multifunctional ligand delivered in a suitable dose
  • WO 00/50008 WO 01/01137
  • WO 97/37791 W0 99/37791
  • WO 97/10003 Hoogenboom et al. Nat. Biotechnology 15(2) Feb 1997 p125-126; Fell H. et al.
  • the tumor binding portion internalizes and/or delivers a toxic payload, for example a radionuclide, or other toxin, or a cytokine to the tumor cell (with respect to selection of tumor internalizing human antibodies see for example Pool M et al. J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 1 ; 301 (5): 1149-61, see also Kohl MD et al. J Mol. Biol.
  • a toxic payload for example a radionuclide, or other toxin, or a cytokine
  • the multi-functional ligands of the invention when provided in a sufficient dose to both target the tumor and line a portion of the lymphatic system to which the target tumor is likely to drain, acts as a cancer treatment as well as a sentry system for assessing / augmenting (for example as an adjunct therapy) the ability of the tumor binding portion with/without payload to inhibit metastasis.
  • a sentry system for assessing / augmenting (for example as an adjunct therapy) the ability of the tumor binding portion with/without payload to inhibit metastasis.
  • functional cytokine and toxin fusions used for example in cancer therapy that may have application to the invention herein (for examples and reviews see references herein cited as well as WO 99/37791; WO99 WO00/06605 ; WO 99/52562WO 99/37791
  • the invention contemplates that the passage of tumor cells can be inhibited within the tumor vasculature using a bispecific ligand, optionally a bispecific antibody, which targets on the one hand a well known vascular endothelial marker and one the other hand binds to a ligand on the surface of the tumor.
  • a bispecific ligand optionally a bispecific antibody, which targets on the one hand a well known vascular endothelial marker and one the other hand binds to a ligand on the surface of the tumor.
  • Other aspects of the invention related to tumor cell targeting are understood to described in reference to this aspect of the invention as well. It is also contemplated that markers which are present on both the lymphatic endothelium and the tumor vasculature can be simultaneously targeted with bispecific ligands of the invention to inhibit tumor metastasis and/or immunize a subject against tumor cells.
  • multifunctional ligands of the invention when used to inhibit metastasis, for example, in . the manner described above, could be advantageously employed in combination with other well known therapies foe example cytoxic drugs, other tumor targeted antibodies and conjugate/fusions therewith used or currently being evaluate for immunotherapies, angiogenesis targeted drugs etc. (re angiogenesis see for example Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature.2000 Sep 14; 407(6801 ):249-57).
  • a bi-specific antibody of the invention could be used to bind to antigens/ligands on lymphocytes which are known or become known to inhibit or enhance immune function or mediate a disease eg. CD45.
  • lymphatic antigen refers to antigens that are expressed significantly on lymphatic endothelial cells but not significantly expressed, if at all, on other tissues.
  • antigen include LYVE-1 a CD44 receptor analogue which binds to HA (February 22, 1999, Banerji et. al., Journal of Cell Biology Vol. 144, #4, p789-801) and which is expressed primarily on lymphatic endothelial cells.
  • LYVE-1 specific antisera have been shown to inhibit binding of HA.
  • the invention contemplates research and treatments using multi-functional ligands of the invention with respect to non-human mammals, including preferably agricultural animals, canine species, primates and mice having similar receptors/antigens.
  • non-human mammals including preferably agricultural animals, canine species, primates and mice having similar receptors/antigens.
  • LYVE-1 a murine counterpart to LYVE-1 (published in Prevo R. et al. 2001 Feb 20, J. Biol.
  • Chem.; Manuscript M011004200 can be employed to implement the various methods and embodiments described herein in a mouse model, for example to assess the extent of inhibition of metastasis effected by a multifunctional ligand (optionally comprising for example to a toxin, cytokine T cell receptor etc) which has a first portion which binds to LYVE-1 and a second portion which binds to, for example to GI-101 , a breast tumor which is known to metastisize to the lung (see USP 6037520 and 5, 693, 533 see also US patents 5,643, 551, 5491284, 5569812, 5917124 and 6107540 and references cited in these patents, particularly with respect to other metastatic models and methods of evaluating anticancer drugs in mice).
  • a multifunctional ligand optionally comprising for example to a toxin, cytokine T cell receptor etc
  • a breast tumor which is known to metastisize to the lung
  • LYVE-1 counterparts in other mammals can be identified in the manner described by Prevo R. et al. (see also Skobe M. et al. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis Nat. Med. Feb; 7(2) 192-8.)
  • Other models of metastasis in animals are well known in the art (see for example Chirgwin JM, Guise TA.Molecular mechanisms of tumor-bone interactions in osteolytic metastases. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2000; 10(2): 159-78. 3: Kobaek-Larsen M, et al Review of colorectal cancer and its metastases in rodent models: comparative aspects with those in humans. Comp Med.
  • Russo J Russo IH.The pathway of neoplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells.Radiat Res. 2001 Jan; 155(1 Pt 2): 151 -154.
  • Duffy MJ McCarthy K.Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: prognostic markers and targets for therapy(review).lnt J Oncol. 1998 Jun;12(6):1343-8. 22: Banerjee A, Quirke P. Experimental models of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Apr;41(4):490-505.
  • the invention contemplates a bispecific antibody comprising an antigen binding component specific for a tumor cell associated antigen and a relatively low affinity anti-IL-6 receptor antibody component.
  • a bispecific antibody comprising an antigen binding component specific for a tumor cell associated antigen and a relatively low affinity anti-IL-6 receptor antibody component.
  • TCRs and modified TCRs may be used as ligands, in place of antibody fragments for binding to target ligands such as peptide/MHC ligands.
  • Techniques for generating antibodies, and methods, for example of subtractive screening useful to identify other lymphatic vessel associated antibodies, including those optionally having smaller scFv, Fab and dAb (single domain antibody or functional fragment thereof) component (more easily passaging to lymphatic vessels from tissues particularly when constructed in the form of bispecific antibodies eg. diabodies etc.) by phage or ribosome display are well known in the art (see for example Hoogenbom HR et al. Immunol. Today (Aug. 2000) Vol 8 p 371 ; Schaffitzel C. et al. J Immunol. Methods (Dec. 10, 1999) 231(1-2) p. 119; Roberts RW et al. Curr Opin Chem Biol.
  • Triabodies and other known multivalent antibodies etc. could advantageously be employed to provide additional functionalities, as well as variation in avidity etc. for the purposes of variously exploiting the invention herein.
  • Methods of expressing and identifying new molecules like LYVE-1 are also well known in the art (see WO 98/06839)
  • the invention also contemplates using chemokines and variously targeted antibodies and fragments thereof fused or conjugated to chemokines or other molecules with for example, lymphocyte or other immune cell attractant properties (see for example Sun J. et al. Lymphology 32 (1999) 166-170; and Gerard C. et al. Nature Immunology (2001, Feb.) 2(2): p108; Immunological Reviews 1999 Vol 170 p 5-197) to attract immune cells into target tissues for eventual penetration into the lymphatic vessels for activation, signalling, binding to, inhibition, etc..
  • lymphocyte or other immune cell attractant properties see for example Sun J. et al. Lymphology 32 (1999) 166-170; and Gerard C. et al. Nature Immunology (2001, Feb.) 2(2): p108; Immunological Reviews 1999 Vol 170 p 5-197
  • cancer treatment antibodies that bind to angiogenesis markers fused to such type such molecules eg.
  • TNF- ⁇ can be advantageously employed optionally in conjunction with various vaccination strategies (including the use of the muti- functional ligands of the present invention) to attract immune cells including, optionally, vaccination-activated tumor targeting lymphocytes to the tumor site.
  • the invention is also directed to an antibody that targets an angiogenesis marker fused/conjugated to a cytokine or antibody (ie a bispecific antibody) which binds to a cytokine, which cytokine augments adhesion of immune cells to blood vessels and method of using same (by administration to a subject), alone, in combination with multifunctional ligands of the invention or with other vaccination strategies to increase immune cell targeting to a solid tumor.
  • the cytokine binding portion has a relatively low functional affinity to the cytokine so as to compete unfavourably for its binding to its natural receptor.
  • bispecific antibodies which are adapted to bind two different ligands on the same cell, for example so called antigen-forks as disclosed in USP 5,705,614 (see also Shi T et al. Murine bispecific antibody 1A10 directed to human transferrin receptor and a 42-kDa tumor-associated glycoprotein also Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1996 Feb;78(2): 188-95; Amoroso AR et al., Binding characteristics and antitumor properties of 1A10 bispecific antibody recognizing gp40 and human transferrin receptor Cancer Res 1996 Jan 1 ;56(1):113-20; Ring DB et al., Antigen forks: bispecific reagents that inhibit cell growth by binding selected pairs of tumor antigens, Cancer Immunol Immunother 1994 Jul;39(1):41-8; Lu D et al., Complete inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) activities with a bifunctional diabody directed against both VEGF kina
  • VEGF vascular endot
  • ADEPT use of anti-eotaxin antibodies, Delmmunization, antibody-cytokine fusions, ribosome display, xenomouse technology; cutting edge phage display techniques, construction of human antibody fragment based phage display libraries, selection of internalizing antibodies by phage-display, cancer targeting antibodies, antibody arrays, plantibodies, design of mutant IGSF domains of CD2, CD58 and TCR; oligopeptide eg.
  • the invention also contemplates control of such migration by inhibition of receptors that mediate such migration (see for example Sun J. et al. Lymphology 32 (1999) 166-170) for controlled application of the multifunctional ligands of the invention.
  • the invention also contemplates that a multifunctional ligand that recognizes an immune cell as a target in virtue of a particular cell marker and will be able to deliver a toxic payload to the cell, for example, in virtue of its second portion comprising such toxic component fused or conjugated thereto.
  • the invention also contemplates attracting or supplying other immune cells or molecules to kill, or otherwise inactivate the target immune cell (eg. lymphocytes eg. by TH cell modulation or CD4 cell modulation or using antibodies including anti-idiotypic antibodies.
  • the invention therefore contemplates that treatment of such immune cells can be accomplished by a combination of different mechanisms or drugs depending on the disease so as to reduce immunosuppression due to immune cell ablation where this is the dominant consideration.
  • Such interactions may require interaction with one or more ligands on the surface of the targeted immune cell, as facilitated via anchoring interactions of varying affinity/avidity/duration.
  • the invention also contemplates using multifunctional ligands comprising or bound to selectins and ICAMs etc. to facilitate such targeting, for example co-adminstering same in a proportion which is for example 0.01 % to 25% of the targeting multifunctional ligand.
  • the relative amounts of the selectin/ICAM etc. (including antibody mimics) bearing multifunctional ligand as compared with the targeting multifunctional ligand can be determined empirically by varying the proportions and assessing any objective indicator of successful targeting in a disease related or purely experimental context. For example successful targeting (eg. antibody binding to eg.
  • CD3, CD28, CD2 using multifunctional ligands of the invention could be monitored by evaluating levels of cytokines normally attributable to such binding (see for example CD8 T cell activation after intravenous administration of CD3 x CD19 bispecific antibody in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1995 Jun; 40(6):390-6. Definition of a lamina limba T cell responsive state. Enhanced cytokine responsiveness of T cells stimulated through the CD2 pathway. J Immunol. 1995 Jan 15; 154(2):664-75.
  • Tumour vaccines a new immunotherapeutic approach in oncology.Ann Hematol. 2000 Dec; 79(12):651-9; Human tumor-rejection antigens and peptides from genes to clinical research Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2000 Sep; 101 (9):612-7. Pinilla-lbarz J, et al CML vaccines as a paradigm of the specific immunotherapy of cancer. Blood Rev. 2000 Jun; 14(2):111-20).
  • the invention contemplates using, in addition to varying amounts (varying from a 50/50 proportion) of adjacent multifunctional ligands (which may be a dAb, diabody etc.) preferably cross-linked by an avidin component, -- as a different strategy - cross-linking with avidin or the like adjacent arms of a single diabody, triabody or tetrabody etc.
  • adjacent multifunctional ligands which may be a dAb, diabody etc.
  • B7 and MHC peptide components which binds to or has been fused or conjugated individually to respective B7 and MHC peptide components (with respect to recombinant B7 and MHC molecules and fusion proteins thereof including antibody fusions and related technologies see references above and EP 99/97477 WO 99/42597, WO 97 28191, US 6, 197, 302, US6015884 US6140113, US 6,045,796, US 5580756, EP0935607, WO 9806749 WO9803552, EP 1054984, US 5869270, Construction and characterization of bispecific costimulatory molecules containing a minimized CD86 (B7-2) domain and single-chain antibody fragments for tumor targeting; method is useful for cancer therapy Rohrbach F et al., Clin.
  • the invention similarly contemplates using or more antibodies (optionally biotinylated and cross-linked by an avidin component) that bind to the same or different epitopes on a tumor including, where two such antibodies are used different proportions of MHC and B7 linked (ie fused, conjugated or capable of binding to) antibodies as well as different proportions of different epitope-specific antibodies to optimize the distribution of such cross-linked B7 and MHC peptide complexes for T-cell recognition.
  • any strongly immunogenic peptide may be used in conjunction with suitable vaccination strategies to create a universal cancer antigen.
  • a single multifunctional ligand or pair of multifunctional ligands optionally biotinylated and cross-linked by an avidin (or variants), is used to bind to both the lumen of the lymphatic system and to a tumor cell, (using for example a trispecific antibody with monovalent linkage to both the cancer cell and lymphatic endothelial cell and a third antibody component having respective fusions to one of MHC-peptide and B7 on heavy and light chain, or a trispecific or tetraspecific tetrabody having an antibody component devoted to each or the B7 and MHC linkages).
  • MHC-peptide complex This permits a single molecule to be used for both the immunization within the lymphatic system and the tumor targeted antigen display.
  • presentation of MHC-peptide complex on a tumor does not necessarily require costimulatory B7 presentation to induce a cytotoxic T cell response which is specific for the peptide and that multiple such presentations, preferably in a cross-linkable fashion may be preferable.
  • strategies herein for costimulatory presentation of MHC-peptide and B7 may be differently applied to a lymphatic endothelial cell surface for immunization purposes and and a tumor cell surface (primarily for recognition purposes), for example by using avidin facilitated cross-linking of in the former but not the latter (tumor) context or using different sets of molecules in each case or using modularly reconstructing the tumor cell suface with a bispefic antibody that binds to a separately administered MHC and/or B7 component.
  • the invention contemplates using as separate counterparts 1) separate trispecific Abs, each including for example, one antibody component which binds to the each of the respective B7 and MHC molecules which are preferably together, separately administered.
  • Such multifunctional ligands are preferably biotinylated for cross-linking - both between adjacent trispecific Abs and adjacent T-cell stimulatory/co-stimulatory arms; or 2) separate bispecific pairs of Abs each respectively having 1) either a B7 and lymphatic vessel or B7 and tumor binding portion or 2) a MHC peptide complex and a lymphatic vessel or MHC complex and tumor binding, portions which again are prefereably cross-linked by an avidin.streptavidin or a variant (ie.
  • Antibody components which recognize the non-T cell interactive portion of the B7 or MHC molecule can be readily generated by phage display, for example in the case of a known peptide specific antibody to an MHC peptide complex (see Chames et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 7969 and Chames et. al. "Affinity Maturation of TCR-Like MHC-peptide specific antibody: peptide specificity is possible over a wide affinity range" Proceedings of IBC Conference on Antibody Engineeering Dec. 2000) eg.
  • the MHC-peptide binding function may be supplied using a linked superantigen (US 6197299, WO 9601650 25 Jan 1996; Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.; (1994) 91 , 19, 8945-49) in both the tumor and lymphatic system binding sites.
  • the tumor antigen or one or both of the antigens are a pan-carcinomic antigen like TAG-72, CEA, H11 (WO 97/44461).
  • the invention also contemplates using one or more phage display libraries to optimize the development of MHC/B7 costimulatory bispecific antibodies, by using cell sized latex spheres coated with an antigen eg.
  • the invention also contemplates use of recently published antibodies in the context of the invention (see WO 01/19861 , WO 01/19990, WO 01/19860, WO 01/19987, WO 01/19990, WO 99/58678, WO 00/59943, WO 01/18014, WO 01/18016, WO 01/18204, WO 01/18042, WO 01/18021 , WO 01/18014, WO 01/18046, WO 01/16166, WO 01/15731 , WO 01/15728, WO 01/16183, WO 01/16170, WO 01/15732.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of evaluating dosing, ligand saturation, avidity effects of simultaneous ligand binding on prolonged anchoring and associated benefits (eg. to delay a cancer cell for targeted killing or facilitate transfer of the multifunctional ligand to the targeted cell), cooperative interactions, cross-linking interactions (see J Immunol 2001 Mar 1; 166(5):3256-3265; Nippon Rinsho. 1999 Dec; 57 Suppl:428-32; Harefuah. 2000 Jun 15; 138(12):1046-50. Leuk Lymphoma. 1998 Mar; 29(1 -2): 1-15 ) and costimulatory interactions by administering to a test subject two different multifunctional ligands of the invention with cooperating second portions.
  • the invention also contemplates bispecific multifunctional ligands in which the immune function exerting moiety exerts its function through binding to an immunogenic component or carrier for such component as discussed above, for example an Fc domain fused to a peptide, a heat shock protein (see for example Wang XY, Immunol Invest 2000 May 29(2): 131-7 and references cited therein as well as US6168793; US6071956 ; US05981706; US05948646 Methods for preparation of vaccines against cancer comprising heat shock protein-peptide complexes; US05830464 Compositions and methods for the treatment and growth inhibition of cancer using heat shock/stress protein-peptide complexes in combination with adoptive immunotherapy as well as patents, scientific atricles and patent applications referenced in these patenta; with respect to MHC peptide complexes( see for example WO 99/64597, WO 98/03552, WO 98/06749 and references cited therein).
  • the lower affinity ligand binding arm of the aforementioned multifunctional ligand is constituted by a high affinity ligand, for example an high affinity antibody or functional fragment thereof, which binds to a target biological effector (eg. a cytokine, chemokine, growth factor, hormone or other biological response modifier or drug) with high affinity, in a manner which permits the effector to continue to bind to its desired target receptor while bound to the antibody (ie.
  • a target biological effector eg. a cytokine, chemokine, growth factor, hormone or other biological response modifier or drug
  • the antibody binds to a portion of the effector which is not critically involved in the effector binding to its receptor) provided that when bound to the effector the antibody or fragment thereof has, when combined with the effector, a suitably lower affinity for the receptor than the ligand binding arm which functions as the high affinity binder has for its target cell marker.
  • the binding moiety which binds to the biological effector binds to it with higher affinity than the affinity that the effector has for the effector receptor.
  • this binding arm can bind to biological effector in a manner which permits it to bind to one receptor but not a related receptor to which the effector would otherwise bind (see examples below).
  • the invention also contemplates that antibody arrays are used to screen for antibodies which are capable of binding to such biological effectors, while bind in situ to their receptors.
  • the invention also contemplates that such binders, when bound to the biological effector, can be used to test their ability to bind to related receptors, such as those within the same family eg. within the same family of TNF like receptors.
  • antibody microarrays see for example Cahill DJ. Protein and antibody arrays and their medical applications. J Immunol Methods. 2001 Apr;250(1-2):81- 91. MacBeath G. Proteomics comes to the surface.Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Sep;19(9):828-9. Clewley JP.
  • receptor as used herein for greater certainty includes decoy receptors. Examples of decoy receptors in udeTRAIL decoy receptors (APO-2L), CD44 decoy like receptors (hyaluronan), interleukin receptor like protein (IL-17) ( see J Biol Chem 2001 Nov 12), CD95-Fc decoy receptor, TRAMP, IL-1 Rll receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG), IL13Ralpha2.
  • Agonist Antibodies see USP 6342220; USP 6475487; WO 00/75348; Affinity maturation US 6,127,524; WO 01/14424; WO 01/009192; Pre-targetting WO 02/082041 , US 2002/0114808; US 6,458, 933; EP 1194167; WO 0074718; WO 99/66951 ; US 6492496; WO 02/058717; WO01/62905; WO02/079232; WO00/78815; EP 0654085; US 6492497; EP1251695; WO 0202641 ; WO1/667754
  • an antibody fragment can be made to bind with the same antigen that is recognized by the intact antibody.
  • antibody or antibody fragment in addition to fragments formed by enzymaic digestion of an intact Ab also includes any synthetic or genetically engineered protein that acts like an antibody by binding to a specific antigen to form a complex including/as applicable, cysteine noose peptides and minimal recognition units consisting of the amino acid residues that mimic the hypervariable region.
  • fully human antibodies for example, antibodies generated via human-human hybridomas or through phage display using human antibody based libraries, are preferred, the invention does not preclude other strategies to avoid a HAMA type response.
  • a chimeric antibody is a recombinant protein that contains the variable domains and complementary determining regions derived from, for example, a rodent antibody, while the remainder of the antibody molecule is derived from a human antibody.
  • Humanized antibodies are recombinant proteins in which murine LDR's of a monoclonal antibody have been transferred from heavy and light variable chains of the murine immunoglobulin into a human variable domain.
  • therapeutic agent as used herein, is a molecule or atom which is conjugated etc. to an antibody moiety to produce combination including a conjugate which is useful for therapy. Examples of therapeutic agents include drugs, toxins, immunomodulators, chelators, boron compounds, photoactive agents or dyes, and radioisotopes.
  • naked antibody may be used to refer specifically to an entire antibody, as opposed to an antibody fragment, which is not conjugated with a therapeutic agent.
  • naked antibodies include both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, as well as certain recombinant antibodies, such as chimeric and humanized antibodies.
  • immunoconjugate may be used to refer a conjugate of an antibody component with a therapeutic agent.
  • antibody fusion protein refers to a recombinant molecule that comprises an antibody component and a second functional component for example a therapeutic agent.
  • therapeutic agents suitable for such fusion proteins include immunomodulators ("antibody-immunomodulator fusion protein”) and toxins (“antibody-toxin fusion protein”).
  • Rodent monoclonal antibodies to antigen can be obtained by methods known to those skilled in the art. See generally, for example, Kohler and Milstein, Nature 256:495 (1975), and Coligan et al. (eds.), Current Protocols in Immunology, Vol.1, pages 2.5.1-2.6.7 (John Wiley & Sons 1991) ["Coligan”].
  • monoclonal antibodies can be obtained by injecting mice with a composition comprising the antigen in a question (Ag), verifying the presence of antibody production by removing a serum sample, removing the spleen to obtain B-lymphocytes, fusing the B-Iymphocytes with myeloma cells to produce hybridomas, cloning the hybridomas, selecting positive clones which produce anti-Ag antibodies, culturing the clones that produce antibodies to the antigen, and isolating the antibodies from the hybridoma cultures.
  • Transgenic mice having for example engineered immune systems to create human antibodies such those used by Medarex and Abgenix are also contemplated for use herein to create suitably targeted antibodies.
  • Monoclonal antibodies can be isolated and purified from hybridoma cultures by a variety of well-established techniques. Such isolation techniques include affinity chromatography with Protein-A Sepharose, size-exclusion chromatography, and ion-exchange chromatography. See, for example, Coligan at pages 2.7.1-2.7.12 and pages 2.9.1-2.9.3. Also, see Baines et al., "Purification of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) ,” in Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 10, pages 79-104 (The Humana P r e s s , I n c . 1 9 9 2 ) .
  • IgG Immunoglobulin G
  • an antibody of the present invention is a "humanized" monoclonal antibody. That is, mouse complementarity determining regions are transferred from heavy and light variable chains of the mouse immunoglobulin into a human variable domain, followed by the replacement of some human residues in the framework regions of their murine counterparts.
  • Humanized monoclonal antibodies in accordance with this invention are suitable for use in therapeutic methods. General techniques for cloning murine immunoglobulin variable domains are described, for example, by the publication of Orlandi et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad.
  • the multifunctional ligand has a unique portion which differentiates it from other antibodies and preferably other co- administered different multifunctional ligands, which unique portion, allows the multifunctional ligand to be efficiently segregated on an immunoaffinity column.
  • an anti-idiotype assuming the first portion consists of an antibody
  • other antibody uniquely recognizing the first portion could be employed. Modifying a portion of the first portion, for example in the case where it is antibody component and creating a antibody thereto, for example by phage display, is a matter of routine skill in the arts of antibody engineering and phage display.
  • an antibody of the present invention is a human monoclonal antibody.
  • Such antibodies are obtained from transgenic mice that have been "engineered” to produce specific human antibodies in response to antigenic challenge.
  • elements of the human heavy and light chain locus are introduced into strains of mice derived from embryonic stem cell lines that contain targeted disruptions of the endogenous heavy chain and light chain loci.
  • the transgenic mice can synthesize human antibodies specific for human antigens, and the mice can be used to produce human antibody-secreting hybridomas.
  • Methods for obtaining human antibodies from transgenic mice are described by Green et al., Nature Genet. 7:13 (1994), Lonberg et al., Nature 368:856 (1994), and Taylor et a l . , I n t . I m m u n . 6 : 5 7 9 ( 1 9 9 4 ) .
  • Antibody fragments can be prepared, for example, by proteolytic hydrolysis of an antibody or by expression in E. coli of the DNA coding for the fragment.
  • Antibody fragments can be obtained by pepsin or papain digestion of whole antibodies by conventional methods.
  • antibody fragments can be produced by enzymatic cleavage of antibodies with pepsin to provide a 5 S fragment denoted F(ab') 2 .
  • This fragment can be further cleaved using a thiol reducing agent, and optionally a blocking group for the sulfhydryl groups resulting from cleavage of disulfide linkages, to produce 3.5 S Fab' monovalent fragments.
  • an enzymatic cleavage using pepsin produces two monovalent Fab fragments and an Fc fragment directly.
  • cleaving antibodies such as separation of heavy chains to form monovalent light-heavy chain fragments, further cleavage of fragments, or other enzymatic, chemical or genetic techniques may also be used, so long as the fragments bind to the antigen that is recognized by the intact antibody.
  • Fv fragments comprise an association of V H and VL chains.
  • This association can be noncovalent, as described in Inbar et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 69:2659 (1972).
  • the variable chains can be linked by an intermolecular disulfide bond or cross-linked by chemicals such as glutaraldehyde.
  • the Fv fragments comprise VH and VL chains which are connected by a peptide linker.
  • These single-chain antigen binding proteins are prepared by constructing a structural gene comprising DNA sequences encoding the V H and V L domains which are connected by an oligonucleotide. The structural gene is inserted into an expression vector which is subsequently introduced into a host cell, such as E. coli. The recombinant host cells synthesize a single polypeptide chain with a linker peptide bridging the two V domains.
  • scFvs are described, for example, by Whitlow et al., Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 2:97 (1991).
  • CDR peptides (“minimal recognition units") can be obtained by constructing genes encoding the CDR of an antibody of interest. Such genes are prepared, for example, by using the polymerase chain reaction to synthesize the variable region from RNA of antibody-producing cells. See, for example, Larrick et al., Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 2:106 (1991); Courtenay-Luck, "Genetic Manipulation of Monoclonal Antibodies,"- in Monoclonal Antibodies: Production, Engineering and Clinical Application, Ritter et al.
  • the present invention contemplates immunoconjugates to assess and effect treatment of various disease conditions.
  • immunoconjugates can be prepared by indirectly conjugating a therapeutic agent to an antibody component.
  • general techniques are described in Shih et al., Int. J. Cancer 41:832-839 (1988); Shih et al., Int. J. Cancer 46:1101-1106 (1990); and Shih et al., U.S. Pat. No.5,057,313.
  • the general method involves reacting an antibody component having an oxidized carbohydrate portion with a carrier polymer that has at least one free amine function and that is loaded with a plurality of drug, toxin, chelator, boron addends, or other therapeutic agent.
  • the carrier polymer is preferably an aminodextran or polypeptide of at least 50 amino acid residues, although other substantially equivalent polymer carriers can also be used.
  • the final immunoconjugate is soluble ' in an aqueous solution, such as mammalian serum, for ease of administration and effective targeting for use in therapy.
  • solubilizing functions on the carrier polymer will enhance the serum solubility of the final immunoconjugate.
  • an ami nodextran wi l l be preferred .
  • the process for preparing an immunoconjugate with an aminodextran carrier typically begins with a dextran polymer, advantageously a dextran of average molecular weight of about 10,000-100,000.
  • the dextran is reacted with an oxidizing agent to effect a controlled oxidation of a portion of its carbohydrate rings to generate aldehyde groups.
  • the oxidation is conveniently effected with glycolytic chemical reagents such as NalO.sub.4, according to conventional procedures.
  • the oxidized dextran is then reacted with a polyamine, preferably a diamine, and more preferably, a mono- or polyhydroxy diamine.
  • Suitable amines include ethylene diamine, propylene diamine, or other like polymethylene diamines, diethylene triamine or like polyamines, 1 ,3-diamino-2-hydroxypropane, or other like hydroxylated diamines or polyamines, and the like.
  • An excess of the amine relative to the aldehyde groups of the dextran is used to insure substantially complete conversion of the aldehyde functions to Schiff. base groups.
  • a reducing agent such as NaBH 4 , NaBH 3 CN or the like, is used to effect reductive stabilization of the resultant Schiff base intermediate.
  • the resultant adduct can be purified by passage through a conventional sizing column to remove cross-linked dextrans.
  • aminodextran is then reacted with a derivative of the particular drug, toxin, chelator, immunomodulator, boron addend, or other therapeutic agent to be loaded, in an activated form, preferably, a carboxyl-activated derivative, prepared by conventional means, e.g., using dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) or a water soluble variant thereof, to form an intermediate add uct.
  • a derivative of the particular drug, toxin, chelator, immunomodulator, boron addend, or other therapeutic agent to be loaded, in an activated form, preferably, a carboxyl-activated derivative, prepared by conventional means, e.g., using dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) or a water soluble variant thereof, to form an intermediate add uct.
  • DCC dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
  • polypeptide toxins such as pokeweed antiviral protein or ricin A-chain, and the like, can be coupled to aminodextran by glutaraldehyde condensation or by reaction of activated carboxyl groups on the protein with amines on the aminodextran.
  • Chelators for radiometals or magnetic resonance enhancers are well-known in the art. Typical are derivatives of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). These chelators typically have groups on the side chain by which the chelator can be attached to a carrier. Such groups include, e.g., benzylisothiocyanate, by which the DTPA or EDTA can be coupled to the amine group of a carrier. Alternatively, carboxyl groups or amine groups on a chelator can be coupled to a carrier by activation or prior derivatization and then coupling by well-known means.
  • Carrier addends such as carboranes
  • carboranes can be prepared with carboxyl functions on pendant side chains, as is well known in the art. Attachment of such carboranes to a carrier, e.g., aminodextran, can be achieved by activation of the carboxyl groups of the carboranes and condensation with amines on the carrier to produce an intermediate conjugate. Such intermediate conjugates are then attached to antibody components to produce therapeutically useful immunoconjugates, as described below.
  • a polypeptide carrier can be used instead of aminodextran, but the polypeptide carrier must have at least 50 amino acid residues in the chain, preferably 100-5000 amino acid residues. At least some of the amino acids should be lysine residues or glutamate or aspartate residues.
  • the pendant amines of lysine residues and pendant carboxylates of glutamine and aspartate are convenient for attaching a drug, toxin, immunomodulator, chelator, boron addend or other therapeutic agent.
  • suitable polypeptide carriers include polylysine, polyglutamic acid, polyaspartic acid, copolymers thereof, and mixed polymers of these amino acids and others, e.g., serines, to confer desirable solubility properties on the resultant loaded carrier and i munoconjugate.
  • Conjugation of the intermediate conjugate with the antibody component is effected by oxidizing the carbohydrate portion of the antibody component and reacting the resulting aldehyde (and ketone) carbonyls with amine groups remaining on the carrier after loading with a drug, toxin, chelator, immunomodulator, boron addend, or other therapeutic agent.
  • an intermediate conjugate can be attached to an oxidized antibody component via amine groups that have been introduced in the intermediate conjugate after loading with the therapeutic agent.
  • Oxidation is conveniently effected either chemically, e.g., with NalO or other glycolytic reagent, or enzymatically, e.g., with neuraminidase and galactose oxidase.
  • an aminodextran carrier not all of the amines of the aminodextran are typically used for loading a therapeutic agent.
  • the remaining amines of aminodextran condense with the oxidized antibody component to form Schiff base adducts, which are then reductively stabilized, normally with a borohydride reducing agent.
  • Analogous procedures are used to produce other immunoconjugates according to the invention.
  • Loaded polypeptide carriers preferably have free lysine residues remaining for condensation with the oxidized carbohydrate portion of an antibody component. Carboxyls on the polypeptide carrier can, if necessary, be converted to amines by, e.g., activation with DCC and reaction with an excess of a diamine.
  • the final immunoconjugate is purified using conventional techniques, such as s i z i n g c h ro m atog ra p hy o n S e p h a cry l S - 300.
  • immunoconjugates can be prepared by directly conjugating an antibody component with a therapeutic agent.
  • the general procedure is analogous to the indirect method of conjugation except that a therapeutic agent is directly atta ch ed to a n oxid ized a ntibody co m pon ent .
  • biotin can be conjugated to a part of a latex sphere which is then linked to MHC peptide and B7 molecules by placing the spheres in a confluent layer or in the spheres in a microwells such that only part of the sphere is exposed for conjugation and then coating the spheres onto avidin coated plates for the B7 and MHC linkage.
  • a therapeutic agent can be attached at the hinge region of a reduced antibody component via disulfide bond formation.
  • the tetanus toxoid peptides can be constructed with a single cysteine residue that is used to attach the peptide to an antibody component.
  • such peptides can be attached to the antibody component using a heterobifunctional cross-linker, such as N-succinyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)proprionate (SPDP). Yu et al., Int. J. Cancer 56:244 (1994). General techniques for such conjugation are well-known in the art.
  • carbohydrate moieties in the Fc region of an antibody can be used to conjugate a therapeutic agent.
  • the Fc region is absent if an antibody fragment is used as the antibody component of the immunoconjugate.
  • the engineered carbohydrate moiety is then used to attach a therapeutic agent.
  • the carbohydrate moiety can be used to attach polyethyleneglycol in order to extend the half-life of an intact antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, in blood, lymph, or other extracellular fluids.
  • a "divalent immunoconjugate" by attaching therapeutic agents to a carbohydrate moiety and to a free sulfhydryl group. Such a free sulfhydryl group may be located in the hinge region of the antibody component.
  • the invention is directed to a bispecific ligand, preferably a bispecifc antibody, comprising at least a first ligand, preferably an antibody component, which binds specifically to a first cell surface associated ligand and at least a second ligand, preferably a second antibody component which binds specifically to a second cell surface associated ligand on the same cell, and wherein the functional afi ⁇ nity of at least one and preferably both of said antibody components is selected so as to substantially limit functional binding unless both of said first and second antibody components are substantially contemporaneously bound to said cell.
  • a bispecific ligand preferably a bispecifc antibody
  • the functional afi ⁇ nity of at least one and preferably both of said antibody components is selected so as to substantially limit functional binding unless both of said first and second antibody components are substantially contemporaneously bound to said cell.
  • the invention excludes known such bispecific ligands which inherently have a suitable differential functional affinity. Such bispecific ligand are mentioned herein.
  • the invention contemplates that a substantially greater percentage of the administered dose of the bispecific ligand will affect cells in which only both ligands are present, and/or that a reduced percentage of the dose administered will functionally bind to the cells in virtue only of the reduced functional affinity ligand.
  • the invention also contemplates that functional affinity of one ligand is greatly increased to establish the functional affinity differential arid that the functional affinity of both ligands is reduced relative to that of a standard, for example relative to that of a comparable ligands in hand or known in the art or identified by phage display, ribsome display or other comparable techniques using a single such ligand.
  • the invention also contemplates that a microarray (or library) of bispecific ligands in which for example, the bispecific ligand is "tethered" (ie.
  • the signal eg its intensity
  • the ligands or cell may be immobilized
  • ribsome and phage display could be adapted to bispecific single domain antibodies constituting a single chain (see references herein) by elongating the end of the chain from which the molecule is tethered.
  • the invention contemplates that the affinity of one such ligand may be fixed and that the variability in members of the library lies in the permutations of certain key residues to which binding is attributable which can readily be identified by persons skilled in the art.
  • the invention also contemplates assessing single ligand binding capability of successful bi-ligand binders for example by blocking the other (non-assessed at that time) ligand (eg.
  • correlative ligand or a mimotope thereof for example determining limited or non-existent such binding to as well as using inclined ligand testing surfaces for washing over the correlative ligand, for example of defined surface area, including preferably defined lengths and widths and concentrations / distributions / amounts of the bound ligand, where the degree of incline is selected to roughly simulate the micro-environment of the comparable in vivo target, be it a stationary cell with a roughly defined average shear force of bathing fluids eg. within a tumor or in the lymphatic system, or a mobile cell within a vein, artery, or lymphatic vessel, including those of different sizes.
  • the invention is also directed to a mthod of generating a target ligand or improving the target specificity of any ligand by using a population of variants of that ligand within a micro-environment simulated microarray system in which the at least one of the follwing factors is simulated: concentration or amount or distribution of correlative ligand, shear force and shape using length and width parameters to simulates intraluminal diameter and length.
  • the invention also contemplates in the case of a multifunctional ligand or in the case of a bispecific or multispecfic ligand (as herein described) that the affinity of its component binding ligands may be selected for venous or arterial tageting or to accommodate lymphatic system targeting or targeting within or through tissues or combinations of the aforementioned eg.
  • the first ligand is selected on the basis of its ability to at least partially discriminate between a target population of cells (eg. a ligand that is "associated" with a target population of cells) and a non-target population of cells (in one embodiment it is selected so as to have no other effect other than binding for targeting purposes) and the second ligand is selected for its ability to modulate the activity of the targeted cell, optionally in virtue of binding alone eg.
  • a target population of cells eg. a ligand that is "associated" with a target population of cells
  • a non-target population of cells in one embodiment it is selected so as to have no other effect other than binding for targeting purposes
  • the second ligand is selected for its ability to modulate the activity of the targeted cell, optionally in virtue of binding alone eg.
  • the functional affinity for the ligand which is targeted for modulating the activity of the cell is selected so as to reduce the likelihood of binding unless binding has first or contemporaneously occurred to the first ligand targeted for selectivity (eg. the second ligand would have monovalent as opposed to divalent binding to the ligand required for selectivity and/or from 0.20 to 10 "9 fold reduction in affinity (for example as measured by Biacore) relative to the binding affinity for the first ligand.
  • This reduction in affinity is preferably greater than a 100% reduction in affinity (multiply by 0.1), preferably greater than a 200% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 300% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 400% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 500% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 600% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 700% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 800% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 900% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 1000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 2000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 3000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 4000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 5000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 6000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 7000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 8000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 9000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 10000% reduction in affinity, preferably greater than a 20000% reduction in affinity, preferably
  • a suitable reduction in affinity will depend on the valency of the respective first and second ligands and the selected affinity of the first ligand, which for example may have been augmented.
  • the invention also contemplates a trispecific (and triavalent) ligand in which two ligands differently define its specificity to reduce the likelihood of an undesired effect attributable to the function exerting moiety binding alone.
  • the invention also contemplates linking three monovalent dabs, MRUs or the like or mixed combinations thereof or two bivalent dabs, MRUs or the like or mixed combinations thereof (see WO 99/42077, US 6174691, WO0029004, Camel single-domain antibodies as modular building units in J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 25, & Mulligan-Kehoe U.S.
  • the first ligand may be used to target activated immune cells, and the second ligand may be different and may upon being bound to, for example result in inactivation, anergy, apoptosis or reduced capacity for endothelial adhesion of the immune cell.
  • the invention contemplates that the functional affinity of the antibody component which binds to the second ligand is selected such that binding is unlikely to occur without binding to the specificity dictating ligand, for example the ratio of targeted relative non-targeted cells affected by the dose administered is approximately 1.10 to 1 , preferably approximately 1.15 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.20 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.25 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.30 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.35 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.40 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.45 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.50 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.55 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.60 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.60 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.65 to 1 , more preferably approximately 1.70 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.75 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.80 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.85 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.90 to 1, more preferably approximately 1.95 to 1, more preferably approximately 2 to 1 , more preferably greater than 2 to 1 , more
  • ICAM-1 ICAM-1, CD2, CD3, CD4 (eg see US 6,136,310), CD18, CD22, CD40, CD44; CD80, CD86, CD134 and CD154, to name only a few (see also US6087475: PF4A receptor) (see also Glennie MJ et al. Clinical Trial of Antibody Therapy. Immunology Today Aug 2000, Vol. 21 (no. 8) p.406).
  • the therapeutic function or immune function effecting ligand is also a specificity imparting ligand, which in the case of for example, an antigen presenting cell may be an antibody which recognizes and binds to a specific MHC peptide complex, as is established in the art (see pertinent Chames et al. references herein, see also WO 97/02342 , Direct selection of a human antibody fragment directed against the tumor T-cell epitope HLA-A1- MAGE-A1 from a nonimmunized phage-Fab library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5; 97(14):7969-74). In this case it will be appreciated that the APC targeting ligand assist the particular MHC peptide binding antibody to bind to its target.
  • the respective antibody components of the multispecific ligand recognize a substantially different subset of non-targetted tissues so that functional binding to a non-targetted tissue is substantially precluded. It will be appreciated that this strategy can be accomplished with two different antibodies have differing and preferably non-overlapping normal ie. non-targeted tissue distributions.
  • the target cell is a cancer cell and the respective first and second cell surface associated ligands are expressed on different subsets of normal cells, which are non-overlapping subsets, so as to minimize deleterious normal cell targeting and distibute the undesired effects or normal cell targeting (eg. with a toxin), to different cell populations.
  • tumor cell targeting one or both ligands may be expressed exclusively on a single tumor type (eg. a human sarcoma or carcinoma, e.g., fibrosarcoma, myxosarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, chordoma, angiosarcoma, endotheliosarcoma, lymphangiosarcoma, lymphangioendotheliosarcoma, synovioma, mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor, leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, colon carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sweat gland carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, papillary adenocarcinomas, cystadenocarcinoma, medullary carcinoma, bronchogenic
  • the bispecific antibody comprises two dAb components comprising linked via a linker (see above) and having at least at least part of a constant region for fusion for example to a toxin (eg.
  • a trispecific antibody or tetraspecific antibody with at least two different and preferably 3 or 4 subsets (preferably at least one or more of such subsets being non-overlapping subsets) of non-targeted cell reactivities may be employed in the form of a trispecific or tetraspecific antibody respectively whereby up to three or four different pairs of ligands are targeted, so as further minimize normal cell targeting and also preferably target a heterogenous population of cells within the same tumor.
  • Ligands with distributions on normal tissues are well known, some being referenced herein, for example CEA, CD-20, P53, epidermal growth factor, including known multicarcinomic and pancarcinomic ligands (eg. see US5, 171,665, US 4349528.
  • the term functional binding is used to mean binding for the purpose of accomplishing the object of the binding, for example binding for a sufficient duration to inhibit or enhance a particular effect, such as cell killing, for example in the case where one both antibody components are selected for their ability to internalize, binding for a sufficient duration to permit internalization, for example to deliver a toxic payload.
  • a particular effect such as cell killing
  • binding for a sufficient duration to permit internalization for example to deliver a toxic payload.
  • substantially in reference to therapeutic advantage is used to refer to a degree which provides a significant benefit from a therapeutic standpoint. Examples of tumor associated antigens (eg.
  • bispecific antibodies including trispecific and tetraspecific antibodies, optionally including a component which also binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand
  • target cell diseased, disease causing or immune
  • Preferred immunoconjugates include radiolabeled antibody components and conjugates of an anti-Lyve-1 antibody component and an antbody component which comprises an immunomodulator.
  • a radiolabeled immunoconjugate may comprise an .alpha.-emitting radioisotope, a .B-emitting radioisotope, a gamma emitting radioisotope, an Auger electron emitter, a neutron capturing agent that emits alpha-particles or a radioisotope that decays by electron capture.
  • Suitable radioisotopes include Au, 32 p,. 125 1, 131 1, 90 Y, 186 Re, 1 8 8 Re, 6 7 Cu, 2 1 1 At, and the like.
  • a radioisotope can be attached to an antibody component directly or indirectly, via a chelating agent.
  • 6T Cu considered one of the more promising radioisotopes for radioimmunotherapy due to its 61.5 hour half- life and abundant supply of beta particles and gamma rays, can be conjugated to an antibody component using the chelating agent, p-bromoacetamido-benzyl- tetraethylaminetetraacetic acid (TETA) .
  • TETA p-bromoacetamido-benzyl- tetraethylaminetetraacetic acid
  • 90 Y which emits an energetic beta particle, can be coupled to an antibody component using diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA).
  • DTPA diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
  • therapeutic immunoconjugates can comprise an immunomodulator moiety suitable for application for the purposes herein.
  • immunomodulator includes cytokines, stem cell growth factors, lymphotoxins, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and hematopoietic factors, such as interleukins (e.g., interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-2, IL-3, IL6, IL-10 and IL-12), colony stimulating factors (e.g., granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)), interferons (e.g., interferonsalpha, -beta and gamma.), the stem cell growth factor designated "S1 factor,” erythropoietin and thrombopoietin. Examples of suitable
  • a related form of therapeutic protein is a fusion protein comprising an antibody m o i e ty a n d a n i m m u n o m o d u l a t o r m o i ety .
  • antibody fusion proteins comprising an interleukin-2 moiety are described by Boleti et al., Ann. Oncol. 6:945 (1995), Nicolet et al., Cancer Gene Ther. 2:161 (1995), Becker et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 93:7826 (1996), Hank et al., Clin. Cancer Res. 2:1951 (1996), and Hu et al., Cancer Res. 56:4998 (1996).
  • Yang et al., Hum. Antibodies Hybridomas 6:129 (1995) describe a fusion protein that includes an F(ab') 2 fragment and a tumor necrosis factor alpha moiety.
  • Such immunoconjugates and antibody-immunomodulator fusion proteins provide a means to deliver an immunomodulator to a target cell and are particularly useful against tumor cells.
  • the cytotoxic effects of immunomodulators are well known to those of skill in the art. See, for example, Kle et al., "Lymphokines and Monokines," in Biotechnology and Pharmacy, Pessuto et al. (eds.), pages 53-70 (Chapman & Hall 1993) as well as other references herein cited.
  • interferons can inhibit cell proliferation by inducing increased expression of class I histocompatibility antigens on the surface of various cells and thus, enhance the rate of destruction of cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
  • tumor necrosis factors such as TNF-alpha.
  • TNF-alpha tumor necrosis factors
  • therapeutically useful immunoconjugates can be prepared in which an antibody component is conjugated to a toxin or a chemotherapeutic drug.
  • toxins which are suitably employed in the preparation of such conjugates are ricin, abrin, ribonuclease, DNase I, Staphylococcal enterotoxin-A, pokeweed antiviral protein, gelonin, diphtherin toxin, Pseudomonas exotoxin, and Pseudomonas endotoxin. See, references herein as well as for example, Pastan et al., Cell 47:641 (1986), and Goldenberg, CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 44:43 (1994). Other suitable toxins are known to those of skill in the art.
  • antibody-toxin fusion proteins are a fusion protein that comprises an antibody moiety and a toxin moiety.
  • Methods for making antibody-toxin fusion proteins are known to those of skill in the art (see references cited herein); antibody-Pseudomonas exotoxin A fusion proteins have been described by Chaudhary et al., Nature 339:394 (1989), Brinkmann et al., Proc.
  • Antibody-toxin fusion proteins containing a diphtheria toxin moiety have been described by Kreitman et al., Leukemia 7:553 (1993), Nicholls et al., J. Biol. Chem. 268:5302 (1993), Thompson et al., J. Biol. Chem. 270:28037 (1995), and Vallera et al., Blood 88:2342 (1996).
  • Deonarain et al., Tumor Targeting 1 :177 (1995) have described an antibody-toxin fusion protein having an RNase moiety, while Linardou et al., Cell Biophys. 24-25:243 (1994), produced an antibody-toxin fusion protein comprising a DNase I component.
  • Useful cancer chemotherapeutic drugs for the preparation of immunoconjugates include nitrogen mustards, alkyl sulfonates, nitrosoureas, triazenes, folic acid analogs, pyrimidine analogs, purine analogs, antibiotics, epipodophyllotoxins, platinum coordination complexes, hormones, and the like.
  • Suitable chemotherapeutic agents are described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 19th Ed. (Mack Publishing Co. 1995), and in Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th Ed. (MacMillan Publishing Co. 1985).
  • Other suitable chemotherapeutic agents, such as experimental drugs are known to t h o s e o f s k i l l i n t h e a r t .
  • therapeutically useful immunoconjugates can be obtained by conjugating photoactive agents or dyes to an antibody composite.
  • Fluorescent and other chromogens, or dyes, such as porphyrins sensitive to visible light have been used to detect and to treat lesions by directing the suitable light to the lesion. In therapy, this has been termed photoradiation, phototherapy, or photodynamic therapy (Jori et al. (eds.), Photodynamic Therapy of Tumors and Other Diseases (Libreria Progetto 1985); van den Bergh, Chem. Britain 22:430 (1986)).
  • monoclonal antibodies have been coupled with photoactivated dyes for achieving phototherapy. Mew et al., J. Immunol.
  • the invention contemplates using phage display or ribosome display to generate an antibody that binds to vefgr-3 as well as one or both of of vegfr-2 or vegfr-1 , having regard to the sequences of those respective receptors (see USPs 5,776,755, 5877020, 5952199, 6107046, 6130071 , 6221839, 6235713, 6245530; see also WO 00/21560, WO 95/33772, WO 97/05250, WO 98/33917).
  • the antibody does not internalize, particularly in the case where the multifunctional ligand is fused or conjugated to a toxic moiety.
  • the invention also contemplates, for example, fusing the binding domain of VEGF-C or VEGF-D to antitumor antibody.
  • the invention also contemplates that the risk of retargeting cancer cells to non-tumor sites of angiogenesis, can be minimized by employing one or more of the following strategies pre- and/or co-treatment with inhibitors of angiogenesis, providing the multifunctional ligand with an effector function, such as a toxic moiety, cytokine or antibody component which retargets immune cells capable of killing such cancer cells.
  • the invention also contemplates using in combination or alone a multifunctional ligand having a second portion that comprises an anti-VEGF antibody portion which binds to one or more of the VEGF family of ligands in order to inhibit lymphangiogenesis and/or angiogenesis.
  • a multifunctional ligand having a second portion that comprises an anti-VEGF antibody portion which binds to one or more of the VEGF family of ligands in order to inhibit lymphangiogenesis and/or angiogenesis.
  • angiogenesis and particularly lymphangiogenesis see also:1: Shibuya M. Structure and function of VEGF/VEGF-receptor system involved in angiogenesis. Cell Struct Funct. 2001 Feb;26(1):25-35: Yonemura Y, et al.
  • subjects receive the multifunctional ligands of the present inventionand standard cancer chemotherapy.
  • CVB (1.5 g/m.sup.2 cyclophosphamide, 200-400 mg/m 2 etoposide, and 150-200 mg/m 2 carmustine) is a regimen used to treat non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patti et al., Eur. J. Haematol. 51 :18 (1993).
  • Other suitable combination chemotherapeutic regimens are well-known to those of skill in the art. See, for example, Freedman et al., "Non- Hodgkin's Lymphomas," in Cancer Medicine, Volume 2, 3rd Edition, Holland et al.
  • first generation chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma include C-MOPP (cyclophosphamide,. vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).
  • a useful second generation chemotherapeutic regimen is m-BACOD (methotrexate, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone and leucovorin), while a suitable third generation regimen is MACOP-B (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin and leucovorin).
  • Additional useful drugs include phenyl butyrate and brostatin-1.
  • the dosage of administered multifunctional ligands, immunoconjugates, and fusion proteins will vary depending upon such factors as the patient's age, weight, height, sex, general medical condition and previous medical history.
  • a dosage of antibody component, immunoconjugate or fusion protein which is generally at least in the range of from about 1 pg/kg to 10 mg/kg (amount of agent/body weight of patient), although a lower or higher dosage also may be administered as circumstances dictate, particularly to take advantage of the depot effect of the invention.
  • Administration of the invention including, immunoconjugates or fusion proteins to a patient can be intravenous, intraarterial, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intrapleural, intrathecal, by perfusion through a regional catheter, or by direct intralesional injection.
  • the administration may be by continuous infusion or by single or multiple boluses.
  • Intravenous injection provides a useful mode of administration due to the thoroughness of the circulation in rapidly distributing antibodies.
  • Intravenous administration is subject to limitation by a vascular barrier comprising endothelial cells of the vasculature and the subendothelial matrix. Still, the vascular barrier is a more notable problem for the uptake of therapeutic antibodies by solid tumors. Lymphomas have relatively high blood flow rates, contributing to effective antibody delivery. Intralymphatic routes of administration, such as subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, or by catherization of lymphatic vessels, also provide a useful means of treating lymphomas.
  • the invention includes a dosage is in the range of 15 to 40 mCi, 20 to 30 mCi.
  • a preferred dosage of 90 Y-labeled immunoconjugates is in the range from 10 to 30 mCi, while the more preferable range is 10 to 20 mCi.
  • Immunoconjugates having a boron addend-loaded carrier for thermal neutron activation therapy will normally be effected in similar ways. However, it will be advantageous to wait until non-targeted immunoconjugate clears before neutron irradiation is performed. Clearance can be accelerated using an antibody that binds to the immunoconjugate. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,624,846 for a description of this g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e .
  • the immunoconjugates, and fusion proteins of the present invention can be formulated according to known methods to prepare pharmaceutically useful compositions, whereby the therapeutic proteins are combined in a mixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • a composition is said to be a "pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” if its administration can be tolerated by a recipient patient.
  • Sterile phosphate-buffered saline is one example of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Other suitable carriers are well-known to those in the art. See, for example, REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 19th E d . ( 1 9 9 5 ) .
  • antibody components or immunoconjugates/fusion proteins
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier are administered to a patient in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • a combination of an antibody component, optionally with an immunoconjugate/fusion protein, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is said to be administered in a "therapeutically effective amount" if the amount administered is physiologically significant.
  • An agent is physiologically significant if its presence results in a detectable change in the physiology of a recipient patient. In one aspect, an agent is physiologically significant if its presence results in the inhibition of the growth of target tumor cells.
  • Yet another therapeutic method included in the invention is a method of treating cancer by administering to an animal suffering from cancer a pharmaceutically effective amount of one or more multifunctional ligands capable of binding to cancer cells, wherein the compound is associated with a substance capable of damaging cancer cells.
  • compositions herein described or alluded to include multifunctional ligands of the invention or therapeutics used in combination therapy which may be administered by a variety of routes of adminstration.
  • an "effective amount” an amount of the compound that is sufficient to enhance or inhibit a response, is some embodiments particularly an immune response or cellular response to a multifunctional ligand.
  • effective amounts of a multifunctional ligand can be determined empirically and. may be employed in pure form or, where such forms exist, in pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester or prodrug form.
  • the multifunctional ligand may be administered in compositions in combination with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. It will be understood that, when administered to a human patient, the total daily usage of the compounds and compositions of the present invention will be decided by the attending physician within the scope of sound medical judgement.
  • the specific therapeutically effective dose level for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors including the type and degree of the cellular response to be achieved; activity of the specific multifunctional ligand employed; the specific composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration, route of administration, and rate of excretion of the agonist or antagonist; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidental with the specific agonist or antagonist; and like factors well known in the medical arts.
  • dosages optionally at leasr on the order of from 0.01 to 5 mg/kg/day, optionally 0.05 to 1.0 mg/kg/day and more preferably 0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg/day can be used.
  • Suitable daily dosages for patients are thus on the order of from 2.5 to 500 mg p.o., optionally 5 to 250 mg p.o., optionally 5 to 100 mg p.o., or on the order of from 0.5 to 250 mg i.v., optionally 2.5 to 125 mg i.v. and optionally 2.5 to 50 mg i.v.
  • Dosaging may also be arranged in a patient specific manner to provide a predetermined concentration of an agonist or antagonist in the blood, as determined by the RIA technique.
  • patient dosaging may be adjusted to achieve regular on-going trough blood levels, as measured by RIA, optionally on the order of at least from 50 to 1000 ng/ml, preferably 150 to 500 ng/ml.
  • compositions comprising an agonist or antagonist and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient, which may be administered orally, rectally, parenterally, intracistemally, intravaginally, intraperitoneally, topically (as by powders, ointments, drops or transdermal patch), bucally, or as an oral or nasal spray.
  • pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is meant a non-toxic solid, semisolid or liquid filler, diluent, encapsulating material or formulation auxiliary of any type.
  • parenteral refers to modes of administration which include intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intrasternal, subcutaneous and intraarticular injection and infusion.
  • a composition for for parenteral injection can comprise pharmaceutically acceptable sterile aqueous or nonaqueous solutions, dispersions, suspensions or emulsions as well as sterile powders for reconstitution into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions just prior to use.
  • suitable aqueous and nonaqueous carriers, diluents, solvents or vehicles include water, ethanol, polyols (such as glycerol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and the like), carboxymethylceuulose and suitable mixtures thereof, vegetable oils (such as olive oil), and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate.
  • Proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of coating materials such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersions, and by the use o f s u r f a c t a n t s .
  • compositions herein descibed may also contain adjuvants such as preservatives, wetting agents, emulsifying agents, and dispersing agents. Prevention of the action of microorganisms may be ensured by the inclusion of various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, paraben, chlorobutanol, phenol sorbic acid, and the like. It may also be desirable to include isotonic agents such as sugars, sodium chloride, and the like. Prolonged absorption of the injectable pharmaceutical form may be brought about by the inclusion of agents which delay absorption such as aluminum monostearate and gelatin.
  • the absorption from subcutaneous or intramuscular injection in order to prolong the effect of one or therapeutic components herein described, it is desirable to slow the absorption from subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. This may be accomplished by the use of a liquid suspension of crystalline or amorphous material with poor water solubility. The rate of absorption of the drug then depends upon its rate of dissolution which, in turn, may depend upon crystal size and crystalline form. Alternatively, delayed absorption of a parenterally administered drug form is accomplished by dissolving or su spe nding th e drug in a n o i l veh icle .
  • Injectable depot forms are made by forming microencapsule matrices of the drug in biodegradable polymers such as polylactide-polyglycolide. Depending upon the ratio of drug to polymer and the nature of the particular polymer employed, the rate of drug release can be controlled. Examples of other biodegradable polymers include poly(orthoesters) and poly(anhydrides). Depot injectable formulations are also prepared by entrapping the drug in liposomes or microemulsions which are c o m p a t i b l e w i t h b o d y t i s s u e s .
  • the injectable formulations can be sterilized, for example, by filtration through a bacterial-retaining filter, or by incorporating sterilizing agents in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved or dispersed in sterile water or other ste ri le injectable med i u m just prior to use .
  • the multifunctional ligand can also be administered in the form of liposomes.
  • liposomes are generally derived from phospholipids or other lipid substances. Liposomes are formed by mono- or multi-lameflar hydrated liquid crystals that are dispersed in an aqueous medium. Any non-toxic, physiologically acceptable and metabolizable lipid capable of forming liposomes can be used.
  • the present compositions in liposome form can contain, in addition to the agonist or antagonist, stabilizers, preservatives, excipients, and the like.
  • the preferred lipids are the phospholipids and the phosphatidyl choaes (lecithins), both natural and synthetic.
  • the present invention also contemplates a method of treatment in which immunomodulators are administered to prevent, mitigate or reverse radiation- induced or drug-induced toxicity of normal cells, and especially hematopoietic cells.
  • Adjunct immunomodulator therapy allows the administration of higher doses of cytotoxic agents due to increased tolerance of the recipient mammal.
  • adjunct immunomodulator therapy can prevent, palliate, or reverse dose-limiting marrow toxicity.
  • suitable immunomodulators for adjunct therapy include G-CSF, GM-CSF, thrombopoietin, IL-1 , IL-3, IL-12, and the like.
  • the method of adjunct immunomodulator therapy is disclosed by Goldenberg, U.S. Pat. N o . 5 , 1 2 0 , 5 2 5 .
  • recombinant IL-2 may be administered intravenously as a bolus at 6 x 10 5 lU/kg or as a continuous infusion at a dose of 18 x 10 6 IU/m 2 /d. Weiss et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 10:275 (1992). Alternatively, recombinant IL-2 may be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 12 x 10 s IU. Vogelzang et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 11 :1809 (1993). Moreover, INF-.gamma. may be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 1.5 x10 6 U. Lienard et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 10:52 (1992).
  • Suitable IL-2 formulations include PROLEUKIN (Chiron Corp./Cetus Oncology Corp.; Emeryville, Calif.) and TECELEUKIN (Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.; Nutley, N.J.). ACTIMMUNE (Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, Calif.) is a suitable INF-.gamma. preparation.
  • anti-CCR5 antibodies used to kill CCR5-expressing cells, with for example, bi-specific antibody chemokine fusions see Bruhl H. et al. J Immunol. 2001 Feb 15 166(4): 2420-2426.
  • tumor specific antigens are numerous and are referred to in the hereinabove cited references and as well as the in the following references: US06132980 10/17/2000 Antibodies specific for TRP-2 a human tumor antigen recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes US06165464Monoclonal antibodies directed to the HER2 receptor, US05824311 Treatment of tumors with monoclonal antibodiesagainst oncogene antigens.
  • Tumor rejection antigens which correspond to amino acid sequences in tumor rejection antigen precursor bage, and uses thereof US05681701 Immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cellsUS0568156210/28/1997 US0567717110/14/1997 M o n o c l o n a l a n t i b o d i e s d i r e c t e d t o t h e HER2receptorUS0567448610/07/1997US0566535709/151997 Antibodies recognizing tumor associated antigen CA 55.1; Fonsatti E, et al Emerging role of protectin (CD59) in humoral immunotherapy of solid malignancies.
  • Ligands on immune or other cells which may be targeted with bispecific ligands in which one ligand of the pair dictates specificity for a population of cells or particular sub-population of those cells and a second ligand with reduced functional affinity is used to effect a specific immune function include those referenced in the following patents and publications therein referenced: US06132992 Expression vectors encoding bispecific fusionproteins and methods of producing biologically active bispecific fusion proteins in a mammalian cell; Antibody heteroconjugates and bispecificantibodies for use in regulation of lymphocyte activity; WO09942077 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REGULATINGLYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; US059165600 Methods for inhibiting an immune response byblocking the GP39/CD40 and CTLA4/CD28/B7 pathways and compositionsfor use therewith; US05876718 Methods of inducing T cell non-responsiveness to transplanted tissues and of treating graft-versus-host-disease with anti-
  • the invention also contemplates multifunctional ligands comprising various combinations and permutations of such ligands including pairs and three different such ligands including multifunctional ligands including such combinations and a ligand which binding to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand.
  • Additional pertinent references pertaining to formation of antibody dimers, microarrays of (and tissue microarrays) proteins including heterofunctional proteins and recombinant, ligands having application to the invention, and phage or ribosome display strategies having relevance herein include Zhu H. et al. Protein arrays and microarrays.Curr Opin Chem Biol.
  • lymphatic vessel associated ligands see also US 5, 776,755 (flt4), Mod Pathol 2000 Feb;13(2):180-5; EMBO J 2001 Mar 15;20(6):1223-1231 , Nat Med 2001 Feb;7(2):199-205 Inhibition of lymphangiogenesis with resulting lymphedema in transgenic mice expressing soluble VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3), J Pathol 2001 Feb; 193 (2): 147-54 Localization of vascular endothelial growth factor-D in malignant melanoma suggests a role in tumour angiogenesis.
  • TNF and TNFR variants, and functional fragments thereof, for use as antibody targets and binding moieties with respect to various aspects of the invention herein see WO 00/67793, WO 01/30300, WO 01/49321 , WO 00/62790, WO 01/03720, WO 00/60079, WO 97/46686, WO 01/41803, WO 01/38526, WO 01/37874, WO 01/12812, WO 01/12671 , WO 01/05834, WO 01/03720, WO 00/77191 WO 00/73321 , WO 00/71150, WO 00/67793, WO 00/67034, WO 00/66608, WO 00/66156., WO 01/24811 , as well as references cited therein. Many other TNFR variants and TNF analogs are known in the art.
  • Cytokine Reference A Compendium of Cytokines and Other Mediators of Host Defense by Joost J. Qppenheim (Editor), Jan Vilcek. Nicos A. Nicola (Editor); Cytokine Molecular Biology : A Practical Approach by Frances R. Balkwill (Editor), Fran Balkwill (Editor); Guidebook to Cytokines and Their Receptors by Nicos Nicola (Editor); The Cytokine Network and Immune Functions by Jacques Theze; Novel Cytokine Inhibitors by Gerry A.
  • chemokine receptors cytokine and other receptors that can be exploited according to one or more aspects of the invention herein see 1 : Csaszar A, Abel T.Receptor polymorphisms and diseases.Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Feb 23;414(1):9-22.
  • 2 Gibejova A.Chemokine receptors.Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 2000;143:9-18.
  • 3 Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T, Yoshizaki K.Anti- interleukin 6 receptor antibody treatment in rheumatic disease.Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Nov;59 Suppl 1 :i21-7.
  • COMPOUNDS AND METHODS 285. (WO 97/07135) BINDING OF OSTEOGENIC PROTEIN-I (OP-1) AND ANALOGS THEREOF TO THE CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR ALK-1 AND ANALOGS THEREOF)
  • marker is used broadly to refer to any ligand or binding site for a "targeting" or an “effector” moiety of a multispecific ligand or antibody of the invention and is primarily used herein to refer to ligands which are the target of a "targeting" moiety (most often though not exclusively referred to herein as a first ligand binding moiety).
  • Such markers could be used for example to target RANK (associated with bone resorption etc.) on osteoclasts using a relatively low affinity second ligand binding moiety.
  • target applications of multispecific ligands of the invention include particularly receptors associated with angiogenesis (eg.VEGFRs 1 ,2,3) such as KDR, FLK-1 and FLT-1, and various cancers cell types eg. HER-2 and EGF-R, including FGF- R, PDGF-R, Tek and Tie2.
  • angiogenesis eg.VEGFRs 1 ,2,3
  • various cancers cell types eg. HER-2 and EGF-R, including FGF- R, PDGF-R, Tek and Tie2.
  • Suitable markers for many types of target entities eg. cells bearing such receptors are referred to or referenced herein or described in various subject reviews and texts herein cited, in connection with one or more aspects and embodiments of the invention described in this application, and many others are known to those skilled in the art and desribed in the literature including antibodies.
  • the multispecific ligand may comprise a recombinatly produced receptor for such ligand.
  • the multispecfic ligands herein may be used for cancer
  • combination therapies with chemotherapeutic and biotherapeutic agents may be used to advantage.
  • agents are well known to those skilled in the art and include for example, alkylating agents, cisplatin and its analogues, antimetabolites, topoisomerase interactive agents, antimicrotubule agents, interferons, interleukins, hormonal therapeutics, differentiation agents, antiangiogenesis agents (see Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology 6 th Ed. De Vita et al. Eds Lippincott 2001 pp.335-517).
  • Mcl-1 VARIANT US2001001712 Monoclonal antibodies having property of causing apoptosis WO0134798 CLONING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF VIRAL IAP ASSOCIATED FACTOR (VIAF) IN SEVERAL ORGANISMS CZ20000907 Monoclonal antibody inducing apoptosis HU0003513 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY INDUCING APOPTOSIS EP1094316 Method for the detection of DNA replicating cells US6207452 Antibody of the anti-proliferation domain of human Bcl-2 WO0123568 NOVEL MEMBERS OF THE- IAP GENE FAMILY US6190661 Methods and compositions for the use of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases EP1087993 FAS PEPTIDES AND ANTIBODIES FOR MODULATING APOPTOSIS WO0119861 APO-2 RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES US6184034 Deoxyribonuclease II proteins
  • the invention contemplates a method of screening for an antibody which preferentially binds to a ligand when bound to a first receptor relative to another second receptor by screening for antibodies (eg. by phage display, ribosome display, etc.) which bin to the ligand eg. a cytokine, when bound in situ to the first receptor, and selecting among them those that bind to the ligand eg.
  • the invention is directed to an antibody characterized in that it binds to an epitope on the ligand which permits the ligand to bind, while the antibody is bound to it, to a first receptor but not a second receptor. In a preferred embodiment both are cell surface receptors.
  • the ligand is a natural ligand, preferably a growth factor, cytokine or chemokine.
  • one of the receptors is a soluble receptor.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of evaluating the pleitropic effects of a natural ligand by administering the said antibody Including antigen binding fragments thereof and MRUs) and monitoring its effects.
  • this antibody is a first or second moiety of a multifunctional ligand disclosed herein.
  • receptors include the classes of VEGF receptors (see also 1:Sheppard D.lntegrin- mediated activation of transforming growth factor-beta(l) in pulmonary fibrosis.Chest.
  • Standard reference works setting forth the general principles of recombinant DNA technology include Watson, J. D. et al, Molecular Biology of the Gene, Volumes I and II, the Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., publisher, Menlo Park, Calif. (1987), Darnell, J. E. et al., Molecular Cell Biology, Scientific American Books, Inc., Publisher, New York, N.Y. (1986); Lewin, B. M. Genes II, John Wiley & Sons, publishers, New York, N.Y. (1985); Old, R. W., et al., Principles of Gene Manipulation: An Introduction to Genetic Engineering, 2d edition, University of California Press, publisher, Berkeley, Calif.
  • the invention is directed to multifunctional ligand comprising at least a first moiety which specifically binds to a ligand on the surface of a virus particle that is capable of infecting a mammalian and particularly a human cell including a cancer cell (excluding viruses which are known for use in gene therapy) and is preferably selected from the group consisting viruses which infect substantial populations of individuals including for example influenza virus and at least a second moiety which specifically recognizes a cancer cell, in one embodiment preferably a marker present on multiple different cancer types, especially cancer types that are individually or collectively most prevalent in the general population.
  • such multifunctional ligand is a bispecific, trispecific or tetraspecific antibody.
  • the invention contemplates that such a multifunctional ligand may be used to target such viruses to tumors in a manner which preferentially kills the cancer cells either through the action of the virus and/or by causing the immune response to the virus or virus infected cell to preferentially (relative to non-cancer cells) target the cancer cell for ablation.
  • the invention is also directed to a method of treating cancer by retargeting virus with which an idividual is otherwise infected to the cancer cell eg. influenza.
  • the multifunctional ligand includes one or more effector moieties which assist in killing the virus and/or cancer cell or directing immune cells to the virus and/or cancer cell, if and when present in the individual, for example a moiety which specifically binds to such immune cell eg. a T cell, as discussed above.
  • the invention also contemplates that such multifunctional ligand may be used to treat influenza virus infections and secondarily to act prophylactically as a sentinel against any cancer cells which might develop during the course of the viral infection or a period of immune suppression or increased succeptibility to infection or cancer, including for example, as experienced by individuals with a particular immune suppressive disorder or condition or under treatment with immune suppressive drugs, individuals at risk for cancer or recurrence of a cancer, individuals of a particular age group, individuals experiencing a period of unusual stress which increases their succeptibility to disease or infection.
  • the invention also contemplates that such a moiety is used in concert with prior immunization against the virus, so that the augemented immune response to the virus benefits the treatment of the cancer cells (see for example USP 6169175 and the art cited therein).
  • the invention also directed to such a virus (excluding viruses known for use in gene therapy applications eg. adenovirus) which is engineered to expresses on its surface a cancer targeting moiety such as a scFv (see for example EP 1038967, WO 94/10323 and the art cited therein).
  • the invention is also directed to a method of identifying the expression or over-expression of cell surface markers associated with infection by such a virus, by substractive screening relative to markers also expressed on non-infected such cells, for example using phage display or the like.
  • markers may be used for vaccine-type or other immunotherapeutic strategies.
  • Anti-virus markers including influenza virus markers and methods of identifying new such markers are well known in the art (see for example USP 5689174) (see also The role of the antibody response in influenza virus infection., Gerhard W.,Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2001 ;260:171-90, Fernandez-Sesma A, Schulman JL, Moran TM.A bispecific antibody recognizing influenza A virus M2 protein redirects effector cells to inhibit virus replication in vitro. J Virol. 1996 Jul;70(7):4800-4; Todorovska A, Roovers RC, Dolezal O, Kortt AA, Hoogenboom HR, Hudson PJ. Design and application of diabodies, triabodies and tetrabodies for cancer targeting.
  • the invention is also directed to a multifunctional ligand having at least a tumor ceil targeting moiety and a moiety which binds to a tumor antigen which is shed from a cancer cell.
  • the tumor antigen binding moiety preferably does not recognize the portion of the antigen which is most immunogenic and leaves that portion exposed for recognition by the immune system.
  • the invention contemplates generating such preferred antibody or fragment thereof by using an an immune complex between an antibody that binds to such immunogenic portion and the antigen as a target for phage display or generation or polyclonal sera.
  • the invention also contemplates identifying antibodies which recognize immunogenic portions of the antigen by screening patient sera for antibodies which recognize the antigen.
  • such multifunctional ligand includes one or more effector moieties which assist in killing the cancer cell or directing immune cells to the cancer cell, for example a moiety which specifically binds to such immune cell eg. a T cell receptor, as discussed above.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising at least a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds with a first affinity 5 to a first ligand having a first biodistribution* and at least a second ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds with a second affinity to a second ligand having a second biodistribution which is different 6 from that of the first ligand, and wherein the affinity of first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 1 wherein said multifunctional ligand comprises one or more ligand binding moieties which are antibodies. 3.
  • a multispecfic ligand according to paragraph 1 or 2 wherein the affinity of said first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is higher than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand so as to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favor of the the first ligand.
  • a multispecfic ligand according to paragraph 1 wherein the affinity of said first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is higher than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand so as to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favor of the the first ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 3 wherein the first and second ligands have overlapping biod
  • epitope though technically understood to be specific for a given antibody, is used to refer to antigenic determinants that are situated proximally to one another so that two antibodies will be considered to bind to the same epitope if one competively inhibits the binding of the other through any probative competitive inhibition experiment known to those skilled in the art.
  • ligand according to paragraph 4 wherein the first ligand is a target cell population associated ligand and wherein said second ligand is present on a broader population of cells and wherein the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand is skewed in favour of the target cell population. 6.
  • said marker is a specific biological structure.
  • said marker is a specific receptor or receptor ligand.
  • said marker is a specific antigen.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is a specific epitope.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with a cancer cell or pre-cancerous cell. 13. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with an autoimmune disorder or rheumatic disease. 14. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with a specific tissue type. 15. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with a specific organ. 16. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with a cell or tissue of specific origin or class. 17. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is an MHC-peptide complex. 18. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 6, wherein said marker is associated with a cell surface immunoglobulin. 19.
  • the invention contemplates targeting any receptor present on any population of entities for which there is an entity associated marker. 20.
  • said receptor requires cross-linking for biological activity. 22.
  • 23. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 1 , ⁇ or 6, wherein said second ligand is a receptor ligand and wherein said second ligand binding moiety blocks interaction with the corresponding receptor.
  • 24. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 5 or 6, wherein said second ligand is a cell surface receptor which initiates a signal transduction and wherein said second ligand binding moiety effects a signal transduction. 25.
  • 26. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 25, wherein at least one of said first and second VHs require the cooperation of a VL for binding to their respective ligands.
  • 27. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 25, comprising a first VL associated with said first VH and a second VL associated with said second VH and wherein both said first and second VHs require the cooperation of a VL for binding to the first and second ligands, respectively, and wherein said first and second VLs are the same 8 or functionally interchangeable*.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 31, wherein said bispecific antibody comprises a pair of disulfide linked heavy chains or heavy chain portions each comprising at least a VH region, a hinge region and preferably, at least a portion of an Fc region at the carboxy terminus of the hinge region.
  • said bispecific antibody comprises a pair of VHs linked via a polypeptide linker.
  • 34. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 3, 5, 6 or 19 wherein the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is at least approximately 9 , one, two,
  • the term approximately in the context of orders of magnitude variations in affinity refers a variability that is up to a half an order or magnitude. three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude greater than the affinity of said second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand. 35.
  • a composition comprising a multispecific ligand in a pre-determined dosage, said multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds with a pre- selected first affinity to a first ligand having a first biodistribution and a second ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds with a pre-selected affinity to a second ligand having a second biodistribution, which is different from that of the first ligand, and wherein the affinity of the first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favor of a selected location of one or both of the ligands 10 such that a desired proportion of the dosage is delivered to the selected location.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 1 or 35 wherein the biodistributions of said first and second ligands overlap 11 and wherein the affinities of the first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favour of a target cell population on which both first and second ligands are bioavailable for recognition by the first and second ligand binding moieties, relative to one or more non-target cell populations.
  • the affinity of first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is at least, approximately, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude greater than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • 39. A method of controlling the biodistribution of a ligand which interacts with a target ligand present on a heterogenous population of ligand bearing entities, said method comprising using a multispecific ligand comprising at least a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially* binds with a pre-selected*
  • overlap connotes that notwithstanding the difference in distributions of the first and second ligands the first and second ligands are bioavailable for recognition on the same entity.
  • This term and related terms are intended to exclude a situation where both ligands are preferentially expressed on substantially the same entity, for example two different tumor associated antigens associated differentially with a differentiated population of cells within a tumor , most particularly in the case where they are individually suitable targets for delivery of atoxic payload, and the terms "different" distributions and "heterogeneous" population are similarly understood to exclude such a common distribution, in the appreciation that the invention primarily represents an improved strategy for targeting two different ligands, in which one ligand has a broader distribution than the other or both have distributions that may overlap but are different from that of the target population.
  • a method of testing the biological effects of limiting the biodistribution of a ligand which interacts with a target ligand present on a heterogenous population of ligand bearing entities comprising the step of administering a multispecific ligand comprising at least a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially* binds with a pre-selected* first affinity 13 to at least a first ligand associated with a target sub-population of said population of ligand bearing entities on which said first ligand and target (second) ligand are bioavaible for contemporanous recognition and a second ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds with a pre-selected lesser affinity to said target ligand, and wherein the affinity of first and second ligand binding moieties are selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand in favor of said target sub- population of ligand bearing entities.
  • a multispecific ligand which preferentially binds to a target ligand on a selected sub-population of a heterogeneous population of cells bearing the target-ligand, the multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds to a cell sub-population associated ligand and a second ligand binding moiety which binds to the target- ligand, said first ligand binding moiety having an affinity for the sub-population associated ligand that is higher than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety for the target ligand. 42.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 41 wherein the affinity of said first ligand binding moiety for the cell sub-population associated ligand is approximately, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude greater than the affinity of said second ligand binding moiety for said target ligand.
  • said target ligand is a receptor or a receptor ligand 14 .
  • at least one of said first or second ligand binding moieties comprises an antibody heavy chain or functional portion(s) thereof including a VH or fragment thereof and an antibody light chain or functional
  • a method of selectively, exerting a biological effect mediated through binding a target-ligand on a selected sub-population of a population of cells bearing the target-ligand comprising the step of exposing the cells to a multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds to a cell sub-population associated ligand and a second ligand binding moiety which binds to the target ligand, said first ligand moiety having an affinity for the sub-population associated ligand that is higher than the affinity of the second ligand binding moiety for the target ligand.
  • a method according to paragraph 45 wherein the affinity of said first ligand binding moiety for the cell sub-population associated ligand is at least approximately, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight orders of magnitude greater than the affinity of said second ligand binding moiety for said target ligand.
  • said target ligand is a receptor or a receptor ligand.
  • at least one of said first or second ligand binding moieties is an antigen binding fragment 15 of an antibody.
  • a method of testing or controlling the biological effects of a ligand binding molecule by circumscribing its ability to bind to a diverse population of cells bearing a complementary target ligand comprising using said ligand binding molecule together with a different ligand binding molecule which preferentially binds to another target ligand which is exclusively or preferentially associated with one or more sub-population(s) of said population of cells, and wherein the biological effects of said ligand binding molecule are controlled through prior association of said ligand binding molecule with said other ligand binding molecule to form a multispecific ligand and through the affinity of at least one of said ligand binding molecules being pre-selected to limit the propensity of said ligand binding molecule to bind to cells within said population of cells which do not preferentially express said other target ligand.
  • a method according to paragraph 49 wherein the affinity of said ligand binding molecule for said complementary target ligand is less than the affinity of the other ligand binding molecule for the other target ligand. 51. A method according to paragraph 49 or 50, wherein at least one of said first and second ligand binding molecules is an antibody*. 52. A method according to paragraph 49 wherein said first ligand binding molecule is an entity which exerts a
  • receptor ligand means a target ligand which is a ligand for a receptor, for example, a receptor on a cell or infectious agent or a receptor which circulates independently of another entity.
  • antigen binding fragment refers to a polypeptide or a plurality of associated polypeptides comprising one or more portions of an antibody including at least one VH or VL or a functional fragment thereof.
  • biologic effect and said second ligand binding molecule is a multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety that binds to a cell sub-population associated ligand and a second ligand binding moiety which binds to said entity.
  • said second ligand binging moiety is an antibody which binds to a pre-selected epitope on said entity and wherein the epitope of said second ligand binding moiety is selected on the basis of its proximity to a ligand binding portion of said entity such that the entity when bound to said multifunctional ligand has an affinity for said ligand which is less than the affinity of said first ligand binding moiety for said cell sub-population associated ligand.
  • said second ligand is a IL-8 receptor, a CCR7 receptor, a FAS receptor, or a CXCR4 receptor.
  • 56. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 55, wherein said marker is CD4.
  • 57. A multispecific ligand according to paragraph 55 or 56, wherein said second ligand is a CCR5 or CXCR4 receptor.
  • 58. A multifunctional ligand according to paragraph 52, wherein said entity is a biologic effector ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety which binds with a pre-selected affinity to a target entity associated ligand and a second ligand binding moiety which binds with pre-selected affinity to an epitope on a biologic effector ligand which exerts a biologic effect via a binding interaction with a target ligand , said epitope being proximal to the binding site of said biologic effector ligand for the target ligand, such that the second ligand moiety bound to the biologic effector ligand reduces the affinity of the molecule for the target ligand without precluding its functional binding activity vis-a-vis said ligand and wherein said target ligand is present on a diverse population of entities consisting of the target entity and one or more non-target entities and wherein the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the target entity associated ligand is greater than that of the biologic effoctor ligand for the target, ligand when bound to second ligand molecule,
  • first ligand binding moiety comprises a light chain linked to an antibody heavy chain portion comprising at least a VH, CH1 domain, hinge region and preferably at least a truncated Fc portion and said second ligand binding moiety comprises at least a VL linked to a heavy chain portion, optionally through a disulfide bond 16 and wherein the heavy chain portion of said second ligand binding moiety is devoid of CH1 domain, and comprises a hinge region and preferably at least a truncated Fc portion, and wherein said heavy chain portions are linked via their respective hinge regions and optionally wherein the respective hinge regions are wholly or partially substituted or supplemented by a another linkage pair 17 eg.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first ligand binding moiety which preferentially binds to a lymphatic endothelial cell associated marker and a second moiety which exerts a biologic function 18 , optionally a therapeutic function, optionally an immune function*, optionally at least one of an immunizing 19 function, a tolerizing function, a neutralizing 20 function, an immune mediating function, and immune modulating function 21 , in relation* to an independent 22 entity, preferably within the lymphatic system.
  • a biologic function 18 optionally a therapeutic function, optionally an immune function*, optionally at least one of an immunizing 19 function, a tolerizing function, a neutralizing 20 function, an immune mediating function, and immune modulating function 21 , in relation* to an independent 22 entity, preferably within the lymphatic system.
  • a multifunctional ligand having, at least, a first portion which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated
  • the moiety that exerts a biologic function is understood to be a biologic effector in the sense that its intended interaction with an entity in the lymphatic system or elsewhere in the organism has a biological consequence.
  • the tern neutralizing is used broadly to refer to any interposition, interference or impediment which affects the function of the target entity
  • modulating, mediating, neutralizing function etc. are not intended to be mutully exclusive and are each used broadly, for example the term modulating referring to effecting a change, and the term mediating preferably connoting an indirect effect achieved through the instrumentality of another entity, for example a cell, cytokine, chemokine etc..
  • said immune function exerting moiety comprises an anti-idiotypic antibody.
  • said anti-idiotypic antibody binds to an autoimmune antibody.
  • said immune function exerting moiety binds to a diseased cell.
  • said immune function exerting moiety binds to an infectious agent or parasite.
  • said diseased cell is a cancer cell.
  • said diseased cell is a virally infected cell. 80.
  • a multifunctional ligand as defined in paragraph 69, 76 or 80 wherein said immune function exerting moiety binds with greater affinity to its target ligand than said first portion binds to its target ligand.
  • 83. A multifunctional ligand as defined in paragraph 69, 76 or 80, wherein said binds with greater avidity to its target ligand than said first portion binds to its target ligand.
  • a multifunctional ligand as defined in paragraph 78 or 80 which is a trispecific antibody having a monovalent first portion and a second portion comprising a divalent immune function exerting moiety which binds to one or more target ligands on a target diseased cell or immune cell and a movovalent anti-CD3 or anti-CD28 antibody.
  • a multifunctional ligand as defined in paragraph 78 or 80 which is a trivalent trispecific antibody having a monovalent first portion and a second portion comprising a divalent immune function exerting moiety which binds to a target ligand on a target diseased or immune cell.
  • said second portion comprises a cytokine component.
  • said second portion comprises a ligand which is capable of binding to T cells.
  • said ligand is an antibody which binds to T cells.
  • said second portion comprises an anti-CD3 antibody or anti-CD28 antibody.
  • second portion further comprises one or more components selected from the group consisting of a cytokine component, a cytotoxic component and an anti-CD3/CD28 component.
  • said second portion further comprises one or more components selected from the group consisting of a cytokine component, a cytotoxic component and an anti-CD3/CD28 component.
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising a multifunctional ligand as defined in paragraph 101.
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising a plurality of different multifunctional ligands. 102.
  • said plurality of different multifunctional ligands comprise a multifunctional ligand as described in paragraph 76 and at least one or both of the multifunctional ligands described in paragraph 95 or 96.
  • a method of inhibiting , the formation of metastasis during the course of surgical removal of a tumor comprising administering to a patient prior to surgical treatment of the tumor site, a pharmacetical composition comprising a multifunctional ligand as described in paragraph 78. 105.
  • An immunocytokine comprising an anti-idiotypic antibody which recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand and a cytokine fused therewith or conjugated thereto.
  • said cytokine component comprises IL-2 or a functional fragment thereof and/or IL-12 or a functional fragment thereof.
  • An immunocytokine as defined in paragraph 42, wherein said cytokine component comprises TNF- ⁇ or a functional fragment thereof.
  • a bispecific antibody comprising an anti-idiotypic antibody which recognizes the paratope of an antibody which binds specifically to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand and an anti-CD3 antibody or an anti-CD28 antibody.
  • a multifunctional ligand according to paragraph 66 comprising one or more amino acids that are substituted for amino acids that contribute to an immunogenic epitope.
  • a multifunctional ligand having, at least, a first portion which binds to a lymphatic vessel associated ligand and a second portion comprising an independent therapeutic function exerting moiety.
  • a bispecific ligand comprising a first ligand which binds to a first target ligand and a second ligand which binds to a second target ligand, and wherein the affinity of said first ligand is selected to enable binding to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second ligand to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the affinity of said second ligand is selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first ligand binding first or substantially contemporaneously to the first target ligand.
  • a bispecific antibody comprising a first antibody component which binds to a first target ligand and a second antibody component which binds to a second target ligand, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first antibody component are selected to enable binding to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second antibody component to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said second ligand are selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first ligand binding first or substantially contemporaneously to the first target ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first moiety which binds to a first target ligand and a second moiety which binds to a second target ligand, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said second moiety are selected to substantially reduce the probability of its binding to the second target ligand without the first moiety, first or substantially contemporaneously, binding to the first target ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first moiety which binds to a first target ligand and a second moiety which binds to a second target ligand, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety and the avidity or afi ⁇ nity or both the affinity and avidity of said second moiety are selected to substantially reduce the probability of either moiety binding for a sufficient duration or series of durations to its respective target ligand to a accomplish a therapeutic function without the other moiety, first or substantially contemporaneously, binding to its respective target ligand 116.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to a first target ligand on a first entity and a second moiety which specifically binds to a second target ligand on a second entity, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said second moiety are selected to enable the second moiety to bind to the second entity in preference to the first moiety binding to the first entity when both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the respective first and second entities.
  • a multispecific ligand comprising a first moiety which specifically binds to a first target ligand on a first entity and a second moiety which specifically binds to a second target ligand on a second entity, and wherein the second entity binds to a third target ligand, and wherein the affinity or avidity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first target ligand independently of the ability of said second moiety to bind to the second target ligand and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said first moiety are selected to enable the first moiety to bind to the first entity in preference to the second moiety binding to the second entity when both first and second moieties are substantially contemporaneously bound to the respective first and second entities, and wherein the avidity or affinity or both the affinity and avidity of said second moiety are selected to enable the third target ligand to bind to the second entity in preference to the second moiety binding to the second entity' when both said third
  • a multispecific ligand comprising at least a first ligand binding moiety which specifically binds to a first ligand having a first biodistribution and a second ligand binding moiety which specifically binds to a second ligand having a second biodistribution, and wherein the affinity of the first and second ligand binding moieties are different and selected to bias the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand, and wherein the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is at least, approximately, one order of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, two orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, three orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, four orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, five orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, six orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, seven orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • the affinity of the first ligand binding moiety for the first ligand is optionally at least, approximately, eight orders of magnitude greater than that of the second ligand binding moiety for the second ligand.
  • a multispecific ligand according to paragraph 118 wherein the first ligand is present on a first target cell population and wherein said second ligand is present on a second target cell population comprising the first target cell population and wherein the biodistribution of the multispecific ligand favours the first target cell population.
  • said multispecific ligand is capable of contemporaneously binding the first and second ligands on said target population.
  • a host cell or cell free expression medium comprising one or more polynucleotides, said one or more polynucleotides comprising one or more DNA sequences, said one or more DNA sequences comprising one or more polypeptides which are sufficient to constitute a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs .
  • a kit comprising one or more polynucleotides, said one or more polynucleotides comprising one or more DNA sequences, said one or more DNA sequences encoding one or more polypeptides which are sufficient to constitute a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs.
  • a liquid medium comprising comprising one or more polypeptides which are sufficeint to constitute a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs.
  • a liquid medium comprising one or more host cells, said one or more host cells comprising one or more polynucleotides, said one or more polynucleotides comprising one or more DNA sequences, said one or more DNA sequences encoding one or more polypeptides which are sufficeint to constitute a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs.
  • a substantially isolated polynuceotide comprising a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide portion of a second ligand binding moiety as defined in any of the preceding claims, said polypeptide portion comprising a VH or VL, said second ligand binding moiety having a low affinity for said second ligand.
  • 126. A substantially isolated polynucleotide according to paragraph 125, wherein said polynucleotide is a substantially isolated expression or cloning vector.
  • a method of making a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs comprising expressing at least one polynucleotide as defined in paragraph 122 or 125. 128.
  • a pharmaceutical composition comprising a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • a therapeutic composition comprising a multispecific ligand as defined in any of the preceding paragraphs and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • a method of treating a disease in a mammal comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a multispecific ligand according to any of the preceding claims.
  • a kit comprising a plurality of different multispecific ligands as defined herein.
  • composition comprising an antibody to macrophage-derived inflammatory mediator (MIP-2) 6,090,383
  • MIP-2 macrophage-derived inflammatory mediator
  • platelet derived growth factor receptor 5,830,471 Methods and compositions comprising anti-lam-1 antibodies 5,830,469 Fas antagonists and uses thereof 5,824,311 Treatment of tumors with monoclonal antibodies against oncogene antigens 5,821 ,123 Modified antibody variable domains 5,820,859 Method of targeting a therapeutic agent to cells expressing the erb B-3 receptor 5,817,311 Methods of inhibiting T-cell medicated immune responses with LO-CD2a-specific antibodies 5,808,002 Stem cell factor receptor-(c-kit)-specific monoclonal antibody A3C6E2 5,800,815 Antibodies to P-selectin and their uses 5,795,572 Monoclonal antibodies and FV specific for CD2 antigen 5,788,966 Antibody which is directed against and inhibits collagen binding to a VLA-1 epitope and uses thereof 5,785,967 Antibodies immunoreactive with leukemia inhibitory factor receptors 5,783,186 Antibody-induced apoptosis
  • alpha..sub.v .beta.. sub.5 antibodies 6,143,873 Monoclonal anti-multiple drug resistance antibody, methods of production and uses thereof 6,143,559 Methods for the production of chicken monoclonal antibodies 6,143,297 Methods of promoting immunopotentiation and preparing antibodies with anti-CD3 antibodies 6,143,292 Allogeneic cell therapy for cancer following allogeneic stem cell transplantation 6,143,273 Therapeutic composition containing antibodies to soluble polypeptide fractions of LAG-3 protein 6,136,309 Antibodies against the interferon (IFN) .alpha./.beta. receptor ⁇ 1FNAR2) that preferentially block the activity of IFN-.alpha.
  • IFN interferon
  • D-specific antibodies 6,420,126 Tumor specific internalizing antigens and methods for targeting therapeutic agents 6,413,514
  • Methods of using antibodies against human CD40 6,406,695 Treatment of hepatitis C by administration of anti-IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibody 6,406,694 Anti-CCR2 antibodies 6,403,091
  • Monoclonal antibodies directed to the HER2 receptor 6,399,061 Chimeric and radiolabelled antibodies specific to human CD20 antigen and use thereof for treatment of B-cell lymphoma 6,395,272
  • Therapeutic compounds comprised of anti-Fc receptor antibodies 6,392,020 Monoclonal antibody to the clonotypic structure of a T-cell receptor, a pharmaceutical compostion and a diagnostic reagent comprising the same 6,387,371 Monoclonal antibodies directed to the HER2 receptor 6,380,363 Antibodies to the Ob receptor 6,379,668 Use
  • Miniantibodies use of amphipathic helices to produce functional, flexibly linked dimeric FV fragments with high avidity in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 18; 31 (6): 1579-84 Smith W, et allmmunoglobulins secreted by a hybrid-hybridoma: analysis of chain assemblies. Hybridoma. 1992 Feb; 11 (1):87-98. Suresh MR,et al Bispecific monoclonal antibodies from hybrid hybridomas. Methods Enzymol. 1986; 121:210-28. Paulus H. Preparation and biomedical applications of bispecific antibodies. Behring Inst Mitt. 1985 Dec; (78):118-32. Brennan M, et al Preparation of bispecific antibodies by chemical recombination of monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 fragments. Science. 1985 Jul 5; 229(4708):81-3.
  • Target cell-associated markers and their tissue distribution and antibodies thereto are well known to those skilled in the art and described in standard reference works in immunology, rheumatology, pathology, internal medicine, experimental medicine, cell biology and clinical and experimental laboratory manuals, and source works on CD antigens.
  • CD antigens For example with respect to cells of hemapoietic origin see Cell and Molecular Immunology Fourth Ed. (supra) Appendix II, Manual Of Clinical Chemical Immunology Sixth Ed. Rose NR et al Eds.
  • Antibodies to CD antigens are described at the following exemplary websites (most of whom also publish product catalogs and lists):
  • first and second target ligands see also US Application 20020197655; US 20020168362; Methods Mol Biol 2001 ; 166:177-92; USP 6,071 ,517; USP 5,897,861 ; USP 6,096,311 ; USP 5,922,845, Journal of Immunological Methods February 2001 Vol.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Steroid Compounds (AREA)
EP03700256A 2002-01-14 2003-01-14 Multispezifische bindungsmoleküle Withdrawn EP1497331A2 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09003542A EP2075256A2 (de) 2002-01-14 2003-01-14 Gezielte Liganden

Applications Claiming Priority (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2368708 2002-01-14
CA2368708 2002-01-14
PCT/CA2002/000317 WO2002072141A2 (en) 2001-03-09 2002-03-11 Targeted ligands
WOPCT/CA02/00317 2002-03-11
CA 2397169 CA2397169A1 (en) 2002-08-13 2002-08-13 Targeted ligands
CA2397169 2002-08-13
CA 2402930 CA2402930A1 (en) 2002-09-19 2002-09-19 Targeted ligands
CA2402930 2002-09-19
PCT/CA2003/000044 WO2003057732A2 (en) 2002-01-14 2003-01-14 Multispecific binding molecules

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09003542A Division EP2075256A2 (de) 2002-01-14 2003-01-14 Gezielte Liganden

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1497331A2 true EP1497331A2 (de) 2005-01-19

Family

ID=27426779

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03700256A Withdrawn EP1497331A2 (de) 2002-01-14 2003-01-14 Multispezifische bindungsmoleküle

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1497331A2 (de)
AU (1) AU2003201559A1 (de)
CA (1) CA2513287A1 (de)
WO (1) WO2003057732A2 (de)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103172747A (zh) 2005-01-25 2013-06-26 细胞治疗学公司 体内半衰期改变的生物活性蛋白质偶联物
EP3634999A1 (de) * 2017-06-07 2020-04-15 Philogen S.p.A. Gefässendothelwachstumsfaktor-/antifibronectin-antikörper-fusionsproteine
WO2022036495A1 (en) 2020-08-17 2022-02-24 Utc Therapeutics Inc. Lymphocytes-antigen presenting cells co-stimulators and uses thereof
AU2021329378A1 (en) 2020-08-19 2023-03-23 Xencor, Inc. Anti-CD28 compositions

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002072141A2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-09-19 William Herman Targeted ligands

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0479909B1 (de) * 1989-06-29 1996-10-30 Medarex, Inc. Bispezifische reagenzien für die aids-therapie
JPH05504841A (ja) * 1990-09-14 1993-07-22 バイオサイト・ダイアグノスティックス・インコーポレイテッド リガンドレセプター及びリガンドのコンプレックスに対する抗体及びリガンド―レセプターアッセーでのそれらの用途
DK0932417T3 (da) * 1996-10-17 2003-04-14 Immunomedics Inc Non-antigent toxinkonjugat og fusionsprotein af internaliserende receptorsystem
JP2002509158A (ja) * 1998-01-15 2002-03-26 センター・フォー・モレキュラー・メディシン・アンド・イムノロジー アーム付きリガンドの送達向上のための抗体と受容体ターゲティング部分
WO2000018806A1 (de) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 Horst Lindhofer Bispezifische und trispezifische antikörper, die spezifisch mit induzierbaren oberflächenantigenen als operationelle zielstrukturen reagieren
JP4439808B2 (ja) * 2000-06-05 2010-03-24 アルター・バイオサイエンス・コーポレーション T細胞レセプター融合体および結合体ならびにそれらの使用方法

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002072141A2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-09-19 William Herman Targeted ligands

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO03057732A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2003057732A2 (en) 2003-07-17
WO2003057732A3 (en) 2003-10-02
AU2003201559A1 (en) 2003-07-24
AU2003201559A8 (en) 2003-07-24
CA2513287A1 (en) 2003-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090104195A1 (en) Targeted ligands
US20050069549A1 (en) Targeted ligands
US20050142539A1 (en) Targeted ligands
Labrijn et al. Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline
JP6929951B2 (ja) 抗lag−3抗体およびその使用
CN112789294A (zh) 含有受限cd3结合结构域和受体结合区的多特异性多肽构建体及其使用方法
JP6873901B2 (ja) Tnfファミリーリガンド三量体を含む抗原結合分子
JP6996979B2 (ja) 三量体tnfファミリーリガンドを含む抗原結合分子
US11091546B2 (en) Optimized PNE-based chimeric receptor T cell switches and uses thereof
CN104114578B (zh) Bcma和cd3的结合分子
JP2020531438A (ja) Nkg2d、cd16、およびegfr、hla−e、ccr4、またはpd−l1に結合するタンパク質
TW201945390A (zh) 靶向cd33之抗體可變域及其用途
WO2015091853A2 (en) Antibodies
JP2019523651A (ja) 抗psma抗体およびその使用
TW201942134A (zh) 結合cd33、nkg2d及cd16之多特異性結合蛋白及使用方法
KR20180098672A (ko) 자가-가교결합 항체
CN109929037B (zh) 针对程序性死亡配体的结合物及其应用
WO2019195408A1 (en) Antibody variable domains targeting dll3, and use thereof
US9200078B2 (en) Antibodies against prostate-specific stem cell antigen and use thereof
CA2414148A1 (en) Targeted ligands
JP2021501575A (ja) 二重特異性抗体並びにその製造方法及び使用方法
JP2023501379A (ja) ガイダンス及びナビゲーションコントロールタンパク質、その製造方法及び使用方法
WO2003057732A2 (en) Multispecific binding molecules
US20210163590A1 (en) Novel anti-tim-3 antibodies
CA2402930A1 (en) Targeted ligands

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20041122

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071008

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20090312