EP1452825A1 - Verfahren zur Programmierung der Zerlegung von Projektilen und Rohrwaffen mit Programmiersystem - Google Patents
Verfahren zur Programmierung der Zerlegung von Projektilen und Rohrwaffen mit Programmiersystem Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1452825A1 EP1452825A1 EP03028938A EP03028938A EP1452825A1 EP 1452825 A1 EP1452825 A1 EP 1452825A1 EP 03028938 A EP03028938 A EP 03028938A EP 03028938 A EP03028938 A EP 03028938A EP 1452825 A1 EP1452825 A1 EP 1452825A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- projectiles
- programming
- weapon
- target
- muzzle velocity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 title 1
- 238000005474 detonation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011049 pearl Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 8
- 206010041662 Splinter Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000024703 flight behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002223 garnet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000225 lethality Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003387 muscular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008672 reprogramming Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42C—AMMUNITION FUZES; ARMING OR SAFETY MEANS THEREFOR
- F42C17/00—Fuze-setting apparatus
- F42C17/04—Fuze-setting apparatus for electric fuzes
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for programming the decomposition of projectiles according to claim 1 and a barrel weapon with a programming system according to claim 6.
- barrel weapons in connection with the invention, such Guns are understood to be used to fire projectiles, in particular of grenades, whose trajectories are strongly curved and preferably are in the lower angle group.
- the falling angles of the projectiles are fired with such barrel weapons in the sense of the invention are in an area that is greater than about 5 °.
- Such guns are common used to combat land and sea targets.
- projectiles with programmable Detonators generally called programmable or tempable projectiles are used.
- the goal of programming is to achieve that projectiles, in themselves, shot down with the same elevation and they basically fly along the same trajectory, each according to the location of the target in relation to the barrel weapon at different cutting locations detonate.
- the disassembly of the projectiles should take place at an optimal distance from the target.
- the reason for this is the following: When disassembling or detonating such projectiles numerous fragments or fragments arise. These splinters generally have low mass, but high initial speed. However, this speed decreases due to the air resistance quickly. The fragments move in one, starting from the detonation site Splinter space, which can be called a scattering cone, for example.
- the effectiveness the splinter is essentially a function of its mass, its material, their shape and their speed in the target.
- the flight time to the disassembly must be determined in this way that the disassembly takes place before the serve.
- the conditions mentioned set narrow limits for the optimal area of the disassembly location and especially for the height range of the disassembly location.
- Cannons are generally used to combat targets in range Shot used.
- the projectile trajectories of the projectiles fired here are therefore stretched or relatively little exaggerated and therefore point everywhere a small height distance above the ground and the fighting Aim at.
- the projectiles are conventionally programmed that they detonate at a certain distance from the weapon. Due to the elongated trajectories, the projectiles detonate everyone Fall slightly above the target.
- US 5,814,756 describes how the disassembly time can be corrected so that the horizontal disassembly distance remains as constant as possible before the goal.
- US 5,894,102 also describes a method of correcting disassembly time to meet a constant disassembly distance between weapon and disassembly location.
- the disadvantage of using the traditional one is original programming method for projectile shooting, which are shot along strongly curved trajectories, in that these Projectiles are not at the optimal height because of their inflated trajectories detonate over the target and therefore have no satisfactory effect.
- the new process will be used especially, but not exclusively, on barrel weapons, hereinafter referred to as weapons, applied with those in the lower Angle group is shot.
- the projectiles are transferred by a Programming or a corresponding signal programmed.
- the calculations for programming take into account the location of the Target, external and final ballistic criteria, a known muzzle velocity, an actual or measured muzzle velocity at least one of the projectiles and the constraint that the detonation is on a disassembly location that is at an optimal height above the target lies.
- the pre-calculation can be carried out before measuring the actual muzzle velocity be carried out and after measuring the actual Muzzle velocity can be a calculation correction and thus the final Calculation to be performed; or the entire final calculation can take place after determining the actual muzzle velocity.
- the new procedure and the new programming system are, as already several times mentioned, especially for barrel weapons, for example infantry weapons or machine guns, determines which one to shoot projectiles longitudinally strong curved trajectories and preferably in the lower angular group are, the angles of fall exceeding about 5 ° relative to the horizontal.
- the barrel weapons are within the scope of the invention used to be at least semi-automatic or automatic Guns, especially around grenade launchers or machine guns.
- the programming but can also be carried out by the method according to the invention are used for projectiles fired in single shot.
- a barrel weapon with a programming system is used to carry out the method.
- the programming system has v 0 measuring means, calculation means, including storage means, for calculating data for programming, and transmission means for transmitting the programming or corresponding signals to the projectiles.
- Integrated distance measuring means are preferably provided to determine the length distance of the target from the barrel weapon. But it can also do this external distance measuring devices are used, and in certain cases the mentioned distance can also be determined with the help of topographic maps.
- the design of the barrel weapon with the programming system is preferably such that that the delivery of projectiles is blocked if as a result of the calculations for programming would result in a disassembly location that is within a security field would lie around the barrel weapon.
- the security field is in Basically dependent on the projectiles and their sphere of action.
- Guns for the delivery of projectiles in series fire and with the new programming system are preferably designed so that a series or a burst of fire is initiated by a shooter and continues until one Interrupted by the shooter.
- Application-specific variables are a control distance or a length distance x Z of a target Z, a length distance x Q of a disassembly location Q and an optimal length distance x Q * of an optimal disassembly location Q * from a barrel weapon 12, furthermore tz, i.e. the detonator runtime, which starts with the firing of the projectiles G and at the end of which the projectiles G are disassembled at the disassembly locations Q.
- tz i.e. the detonator runtime
- Further influencing variables are a previously known or standard muzzle velocity v 0 (0) of the projectiles G and an actual muzzle velocity v 0 (eff) of the projectiles G.
- the known or predetermined or standard muzzle velocity v 0 (0) used it is stipulated that the decomposition takes place at a time t, which can be calculated from various influencing factors.
- the effective muzzle velocity v 0 (eff) generally deviates from the previously known muzzle velocity v 0 (0) and must therefore be measured.
- the effective muzzle velocity v 0 (eff) is taken into account for the final calculation.
- the projectiles G are broken down on the basis of a signal to be transmitted after a flight duration t. If the actual muzzle velocity v 0 (eff) is used in the final calculation, the signal to be transmitted to the projectile G, which determines the flight time to the disassembly, must be changed so that the disassembly or detonation after the flight duration t + ⁇ t takes place; ⁇ t is a timing error and can take positive or negative values; ⁇ t should be as low as possible.
- the target speed v z must also be taken into account in these calculations, in particular when rapidly moving targets approach the cannon weapon; in the context of the present description, however, it is assumed that the target speed is zero or negligibly small.
- the elevation ⁇ of the weapon barrel 13 of the barrel weapon 12 is before the launch the projectile G set; it follows from the solution of the well-known ballistic Basic equation with which the flight duration is determined.
- the projectiles G with which the target Z is to be combated, move as a function of the set elevation ⁇ of the Gun barrel 13 on different projectile trajectories g and g *.
- the suitable elevation ⁇ * is the one at which the projectile G moves on the optimal projectile trajectory g *, so that when the projectile G is disassembled, it is at a distance x Q * from the barrel weapon 12 and at an optimal height y * above the target Z is located.
- Optimal programming means that the projectile G detonates at this optimal height y * at an optimal disassembly location Q *.
- fragments When a projectile G is disassembled, fragments are formed which move away from the disassembly site on all sides at a relative fragment speed.
- the absolute speed of the fragments is made up of the fragment speed and the projectile speed.
- the target Z is optimally located approximately in the middle of an area in which the plane of the target Z and the splinter space in which the splinters of the projectiles G detonated at Q * move intersect.
- the precalculation gives a flight time t until the detonation; this pre-calculation is based on the previously known muzzle velocity v 0 (0).
- the disassembly locations Q of the projectiles G are then theoretically at the optimal height y * above the target Z to be combated and at a distance x Q * from the barrel weapon 12, in the present case the disassembly site Q is somewhat less far from the barrel weapon 12 than that Target Z, which is located at a distance x z from the barrel weapon 12.
- the actual muzzle velocity v 0 (eff) of at least one of the projectiles G is measured.
- the final calculation or a calculation correction is carried out, and the projectiles are programmed on the basis of the results of the final calculation.
- the trajectories g on which the projectiles G move are the same as in FIG. 3, that is to say the same as if the programming is carried out only on the basis of the precalculation without taking into account the actual muzzle velocity v 0 (eff).
- the final calculation for the programming is carried out in such a way that the locations Q of all projectiles G are at the optimal height y * of the optimal location Q * above the target Z, as shown in FIG. 4.
- the mean value of measured muzzle velocities of previously or previously fired projectiles can also be used as the known muzzle velocity v 0 (eff).
- the gun 12 is included equipped with a programming system.
- Common barrel weapons such as infantry weapons like grenade launchers or machine guns, can possibly by the new programming system can be retrofitted so that an increase in combat value can be achieved.
- the programming system has v 0 measuring means 14, computing means 16 and transmission means 18 for transmitting calculated data from the computing means 16 to the projectiles G, including a transmission unit on the barrel weapon 12.
- the v 0 measuring means 14 are generally in the area of the muzzle the weapon barrel 13, before or after the muzzle cross section.
- the transmission means 16 are designed and arranged such that the data are transmitted to the projectiles G, for example before the projectiles G are fired between a projectile store and the end of the gun barrel 13.
- the final calculation according to the new method means that the projectiles G are programmed in such a way that they detonate at the optimal height y * above the target Z, but that not all projectiles G have the optimal length distance x Q * from detonate the gun.
- This problem arose earlier when fighting area targets, and shooting in a so-called pearl necklace mode was suggested as a solution.
- the gun barrels of infantry weapons are mostly directed with muscular strength and can be used while dispensing a series of projectiles easily change in azimuth.
- a surface can Point shot mode by swiveling the weapon barrel in azimuth in your Width can be covered with fire, whereby longitudinal scattering can help the area also over a certain but limited length with fire stock up. In this way, areas that, viewed in the firing direction, do not have too large dimensions, satisfactorily with fire stock up.
- the paintable area consists only of an oblique in front of the Gun lying strip of land, in which the detonation sites of the successive shot projectiles gradually approach the weapon.
- the projectiles are usually programmed so that the flight times of the The projectiles of the first group continuously decrease and the flight times of the projectiles increase in the second group.
- the number of projectiles in each group can be predetermined or as the case may be on a case-by-case basis.
- a lock is advantageously provided to end a group before a projectile detonates The safety distance from the weapon is less.
- the second group of projectiles generally follow other groups, with the projectiles of successive groups are programmed in reverse become.
- the programming can be expanded so that a reprogramming of approaching detonation sites to detonation sites with a Swiveling the gun barrel coupled by a certain minimum angle is.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Drilling And Exploitation, And Mining Machines And Methods (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- ein Verfahren anzugeben, mit welchem die Wirkung von Projektilen verbessert wird, deren Trajektorien nicht gestreckt sind, auch wenn eine Abweichung der tatsächlichen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit der Projektile von der theoretischen Mündungsgeschwindigkeiten vorhanden ist; und
- eine Rohrwaffe mit einem Programmiersystem vorzuschlagen, welches zur Durchführung des Verfahrens geeignet ist.
- für das Verfahren durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 1; und
- für die Rohrwaffe mit dem Programmiersystem durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 6.
- Fig. 1
- das Flugverhalten zerlegbarer Projektile, zur Erläuterung von im Rahmen der Beschreibung verwendeten Begriffen;
- Fig. 2
- eine Rohrwaffe und ein zu bekämpfendes Ziel, zur Erläuterung der Festlegung geeigneter Einstellungen, in schematischer Darstellung;
- Fig. 3
- eine Rohrwaffe und ein Ziel sowie Flugbahnen gleicher Projektile mit gleicher Programmierung, wobei nur Berechnungen zur Vorprogrammierung aber nicht zur Korrektur der Letzteren erfolgten, in gleicher Darstellung wie Fig. 2;
- Fig. 4
- eine Rohrwaffe und ein Ziel sowie Flugbahnen gleicher Projektile, wobei Berechnungsschritte zur Vorberechnung und zur definitiven Berechnung erfolgen, in gleicher Darstellung wie Fig. 2 und 3; und
- Fig. 5
- eine Rohrwaffe mit einem Programmiersystem nach der Erfindung, in schematischer Darstellung.
Claims (10)
- Verfahren zur Programmierung der Zerlegung von Projektilen (G), die dazu bestimmt sind, zur Bekämpfung eines Zieles (Z) von einem Rohr (13) einer Waffe (12) längs einer stark gekrümmten Trajektorie (g, g*) abgeschossen zu werden und an einem Zerlegungsort (Q*) in der Umgebung des Zieles (Z) zu detonieren, wobeieine Abstandsmessung zur Ermittlung des Längenabstandes (xz) des Zieles (Z) von der Waffe (12) durchgeführt wird,das Rohr (13) auf eine geeignete Elevation (λ) eingestellt wird,unter Berücksichtigung einer vorbekannte Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(0)) der Projektile (G) und des Längenabstandes (xz) des Zieles (Z) von der Waffe (12) sowieunter Einhaltung einer optimalen Höhe (y*) des Zerlegungsortes (Q*) über dem Ziel (Z)eine tatsächliche Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) eines Projektils (G) ermittelt wird,eine Berechnung für die Programmierung durchgeführt wirdunter Berücksichtigung der tatsächlichen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) undunter Beibehaltung der optimalen Höhe (y*) des Zerlegungsortes (Q*) über dem Ziel (Z), unddie Programmierung dem jeweiligen Projektil (G) übertragen wird.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei zur Berechnung der Programmierung der Projektile (G)eine Vorberechnung unter Berücksichtigung der vorbekannten Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(0)) undeine endgültige Berechnung unter Berücksichtigung der tatsächlichen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) durchgeführt wird.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 2, wobei die Projektile (G) einen Fallwinkel relativ zur Horizontalen haben, der den Bereich von 5° übersteigt.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, wobei die Flugbahnen (g, g*) der Projektile (G) in der unteren Winkelgruppe liegen.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, wobei die Projektile (G) einzeln oder in Serien verschossen werden.
- Waffe (12) mit einem Rohr (13) zum Abschuss von Projektilen (G) längs stark gekrümmter Trajektorien (g, g*), und mit einem Programmiersystem (14, 16, 18), um die Projektile (G) so zu programmieren, dass sie im Flug an einem Zerlegungsort (Q*) detonieren, um ein Ziel (Z) zu bekämpfen, das in einem Längenabstand (xz) von der Waffe (12) entfernt ist, welches Programmiersystem aufweist:v0-Messmittel (14) zur Ermittlung der tatsächlichen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) der Projektile (G),Berechnungsmittel (16) zur Berechnung der Programmierung der Projektile (G)unter Berücksichtigung einer vorbekannten Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(0)) der Projektile (G) und des Längenabstandes (xz) des Zieles (Z) von der Waffe (12), undunter Einhaltung einer optimalen Höhe (y*) des Zerlegungsortes (Q*) über dem Ziel (Z) und), undunter Berücksichtigung der gemessenen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) der Projektile (G), sowieÜbertragungsmittel (18) zur Übertragung der Programmierung an die Projektile (G).
- Waffe (12) mit Programmiersystem (14, 16, 18) nach Anspruch 6, wobei die Berechnungsmittel (16) dazu ausgebildet sind,eine Vorberechnung unter Berücksichtigung der vorbekannten Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(0)) durchzuführen,eine endgültige Berechnung unter Berücksichtigung der tatsächlichen Mündungsgeschwindigkeit (v0(eff)) durchzuführen, und wobeiden Berechnungsmitteln (16) Speichermittel zugeordnet sind, um das Ergebnis der Vorberechnung bis zur Korrekturberechnung zu speichern.
- Waffe (12) mit Programmiersystem (14, 16, 18) nach einem der Ansprüche 6 bis 7, wobei die Projektile (G) so ausgebildet und abschiessbar sind, dass ihr Fallwinkel relativ zur Horizontalen den Bereich von 5° übersteigt.
- Waffe (12) mit Programmiersystem (14, 16, 18) nach einem der Ansprüche 6 bis 8, wobei die Projektile (G) längs Trajektorien (g, g*) abschiessbar sind, die in der unteren Winkelgruppe liegen.
- Waffe (12) mit Programmiersystem (14, 16, 18) nach einem der Ansprüche 6 bis 9, wobei die Waffe (12) dazu ausgebildet ist, die Projektile (G) einzeln oder in Serien zu verschiessen.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH2982003 | 2003-02-26 | ||
CH2982003 | 2003-02-26 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1452825A1 true EP1452825A1 (de) | 2004-09-01 |
EP1452825B1 EP1452825B1 (de) | 2008-04-09 |
Family
ID=32739311
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP03028938A Expired - Lifetime EP1452825B1 (de) | 2003-02-26 | 2003-12-17 | Verfahren zur Programmierung der Zerlegung von Projektilen und Rohrwaffen mit Programmiersystem |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7044045B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1452825B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE391893T1 (de) |
CA (1) | CA2456897C (de) |
DE (1) | DE50309574D1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2301750T3 (de) |
SG (1) | SG127710A1 (de) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007025258A1 (de) | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Gefechtskopf |
DE102009011447B9 (de) * | 2009-03-03 | 2012-08-16 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Zünden eines Gefechtskopfs einer Granate und Fahrzeug |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7121210B2 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2006-10-17 | Kdi Precision Products, Inc. | Accuracy fuze for airburst cargo delivery projectiles |
US7533612B1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2009-05-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Projectile height of burst determination method and system |
DE102005024179A1 (de) * | 2005-05-23 | 2006-11-30 | Oerlikon Contraves Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Tempierung und/oder Korrektur des Zündzeitpunktes eines Geschosses |
DE102009016147A1 (de) | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Rheinmetall Soldier Electronics Gmbh | Zerlegendes Geschoss |
KR101498195B1 (ko) | 2012-12-28 | 2015-03-05 | 주식회사 한화 | 탄속 측정 장치 및 방법 |
US11933585B2 (en) | 2013-03-27 | 2024-03-19 | Nostromo Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for improving the aim of a weapon station, firing a point-detonating or an air-burst projectile |
US10514234B2 (en) * | 2013-03-27 | 2019-12-24 | Nostromo Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for improving the aim of a weapon station, firing a point-detonating or an air-burst projectile |
DE102013007229A1 (de) | 2013-04-26 | 2014-10-30 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Waffensystems |
SE2200100A1 (en) * | 2022-09-09 | 2024-03-10 | Bae Systems Bofors Ab | Fragmentation analysis method |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5814756A (en) | 1996-04-19 | 1998-09-29 | Oerlikon Contraves Ag | Method and device for determining the disaggregation time of a programmable projectile |
US5894102A (en) | 1997-12-31 | 1999-04-13 | Aai Corporation | Self-correcting inductive fuze setter |
US20020088367A1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2002-07-11 | Macaleese Gregory B. | Non-lethal ballistic |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4267776A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1981-05-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Muzzle velocity compensating apparatus and method for a remote set fuze |
EP0769673B1 (de) * | 1995-09-28 | 2002-03-20 | Oerlikon Contraves Pyrotec AG | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Programmieren von Zeitzündern von Geschossen |
NO311954B1 (no) * | 1996-04-19 | 2002-02-18 | Contraves Ag | Fremgangsmåte for å bestemme et programmerbart prosjektils oppdelingstidspunkt |
FR2761767B1 (fr) * | 1997-04-03 | 1999-05-14 | Giat Ind Sa | Procede de programmation en vol d'un instant de declenchement d'un element de projectile, conduite de tir et fusee mettant en oeuvre un tel procede |
-
2003
- 2003-12-17 ES ES03028938T patent/ES2301750T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-17 EP EP03028938A patent/EP1452825B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-17 DE DE50309574T patent/DE50309574D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-12-17 AT AT03028938T patent/ATE391893T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2004
- 2004-02-04 CA CA2456897A patent/CA2456897C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-02-13 SG SG200400669A patent/SG127710A1/en unknown
- 2004-02-24 US US10/785,910 patent/US7044045B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5814756A (en) | 1996-04-19 | 1998-09-29 | Oerlikon Contraves Ag | Method and device for determining the disaggregation time of a programmable projectile |
US5894102A (en) | 1997-12-31 | 1999-04-13 | Aai Corporation | Self-correcting inductive fuze setter |
US20020088367A1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2002-07-11 | Macaleese Gregory B. | Non-lethal ballistic |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007025258A1 (de) | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Gefechtskopf |
US8528480B2 (en) | 2007-05-30 | 2013-09-10 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Warhead |
DE102009011447B9 (de) * | 2009-03-03 | 2012-08-16 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Zünden eines Gefechtskopfs einer Granate und Fahrzeug |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2301750T3 (es) | 2008-07-01 |
CA2456897A1 (en) | 2004-08-26 |
US20050126380A1 (en) | 2005-06-16 |
EP1452825B1 (de) | 2008-04-09 |
ATE391893T1 (de) | 2008-04-15 |
US7044045B2 (en) | 2006-05-16 |
DE50309574D1 (de) | 2008-05-21 |
CA2456897C (en) | 2010-08-10 |
SG127710A1 (en) | 2006-12-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3430998C2 (de) | ||
DE2844870C2 (de) | Unterkalibriges Übungsgeschoß | |
CH626442A5 (de) | ||
WO2008098562A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schutz gegen fliegende angriffsmunitionskörper | |
EP1452825B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Programmierung der Zerlegung von Projektilen und Rohrwaffen mit Programmiersystem | |
WO2008098561A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur fernauslösung eines geschosses | |
DE2900802C1 (de) | Gefechtskopf gegen befestigte oder gepanzerte Ziele,insbesondere zum Beschaedigen von Startbahnen,Fahrbahndecken,Bunkerwaenden oder dergleichen | |
EP3601938B1 (de) | Geschoss, insbesondere im mittelkaliberbereich | |
DE2919358C2 (de) | Geschoß für Handfeuerwaffe | |
DE2845414A1 (de) | Beim ueberfliegen des ziels wirksam werdendes geschoss | |
CH627550A5 (de) | Drallstabilisiertes treibspiegelgeschoss zur ueberwindung eines heterogenen widerstandes. | |
EP0547391A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit bei der Flugkörperabwehr mittels eines fernzerlegbaren Geschosses | |
CH664009A5 (de) | Panzerbrechendes geschoss. | |
DE3531596C2 (de) | Verfahren zum Bekämpfen eines Zieles mit einem Geschütz | |
DE2452586B2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Festlegung der Dauer des Flugweges eines Geschosses | |
DE2813840A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum wegschleudern eines wurfkoerpers | |
DE1553994A1 (de) | Kurzstreckengeschuetz fuer nicht gelenkte Geschosse | |
DE2322505A1 (de) | Toedliche ausdehnbare patrone | |
DE3605579C1 (en) | Missile for attacking targets underneath the flight path (trajectory) of the missile | |
DE3233045A1 (de) | Uebungsgeschoss | |
DE69925368T2 (de) | Methode und Vorrichtung zur Korrektur der Flugbahn eines rotationsstabilisierten Geschosses | |
WO2017060109A1 (de) | Selbstverzehrendes geschoss | |
DE19845611A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Flugbahnkorrektur von Flugkörpern | |
DE1578077C2 (de) | Gefechtskopf fuer ein Panzerabwehrgeschoss | |
DE3904293A1 (de) | Flaechenwaffe |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040805 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: RWM SCHWEIZ AG |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20050727 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080521 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: OK PAT AG PATENTE MARKEN LIZENZEN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2301750 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080709 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080909 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: EERR Free format text: CORRECTION DE BOPI 09/05 - BREVETS EUROPEENS DONT LA TRADUCTION N A PAS ETE REMISE A L INPI. IL Y A LIEU DE SUPPRIMER : LA MENTION DE LA NON-REMISE. LA REMISE DE LA TRADUCTION EST PUBLIEE DANS LE PRESENT BOPI. |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: RWM SCHWEIZ A.G. Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081217 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081010 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081217 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080409 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080710 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFUS Owner name: RWM SCHWEIZ AG, CH Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RWM SCHWEIZ AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20221222 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20221222 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20221222 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220620 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20230224 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230103 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20221228 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 50309574 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20231227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20231216 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20231216 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20231218 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20231216 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20231218 |