EP1348609B1 - Process and installation for detecting a rail break - Google Patents
Process and installation for detecting a rail break Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1348609B1 EP1348609B1 EP03447067A EP03447067A EP1348609B1 EP 1348609 B1 EP1348609 B1 EP 1348609B1 EP 03447067 A EP03447067 A EP 03447067A EP 03447067 A EP03447067 A EP 03447067A EP 1348609 B1 EP1348609 B1 EP 1348609B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- track
- current
- detecting
- signal
- mid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning, or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or vehicle trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning, or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or vehicle trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
- B61L23/042—Track changes detection
- B61L23/044—Broken rails
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning, or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or vehicle trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning, or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or vehicle trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process for monitoring the integrity of a railway track, in particular to a process for detecting a rail break.
- the invention likewise concerns the installation intended to implement the process.
- an initial rail break may be followed with a relatively high degree of probability by a second break in the immediate vicinity of the first. This then translates into the creation of a "gap" in detection or the "loss" of a train in the case of a detection system provided by a track circuit.
- a track circuit is known as being a system which uses the two rails as transmission lines.
- a signal is injected in differential form at one point and received by a receiver at another point.
- the presence of an axle between these points is translated into a resistance which short-circuits the two rails, producing in this way an attenuation of the signal received.
- the system thus acts as a detection system capable of detecting with complete security the presence of an axle in a given section.
- the latter is defined as the length of the section delimited respectively by the two points of emission and reception.
- detection can be ensured with a certain probability by following a certain number of rules as regards the positioning of the earthing points and of the return for the traction current towards the substations.
- the present invention aims to propose a solution which does not have the disadvantages of the state of the art by providing a process and installation for secure detection, in the railway engineering sense of the term, of a rail break.
- the present invention thus aims to provide a solution which makes it possible to detect a rail break, either by using a system involving detection with a track circuit or by using a system that does not involve a track circuit.
- An additional aim of the invention is to be able to apply the process and the installation of the invention to a relatively long section of track, e.g. of several tens of kilometres used, in particular in the case of lines for which detection of the trains is not ensured by track circuits.
- An additional aim of the invention is to provide a low-cost solution which minimizes the amount of equipment.
- the present invention relates to a process for monitoring the integrity of two sections belonging respectively to two railway tracks as defined by claim 1.
- the invention is further related to an installation for monitoring the integrity of a section of railway track, as defined by claim 7 or claim 9.
- the detecting means comprise an instrument transformer comprising a first winding serving as a primary, a second winding serving as a secondary, and at least one receiver, wherein said first winding connects the mid-points of two appliances with a mid-point belonging to two different tracks (A and B), and said at least one receiver is capable of detecting a current at a first frequency (F1), corresponding to a first track circuit present on the first track (A), and of detecting a current at a second frequency (F2), corresponding to a second track circuit present on the second track (B).
- F1 first frequency
- F2 second frequency
- Figures 1a and 1b show schematically the use of a track circuit fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks in common mode.
- Figures 2a to 2b represent schematically four versions of a device for detecting rail breaks.
- Figure 3 represents schematically a track circuit for detecting the presence of a train between two electrical joints, with their emitter and their receiver.
- Figure 4 represents schematically a track circuit for detecting a train, fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks.
- Figure 5 represents schematically a track section comprising two parallel tracks fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks, according to the invention.
- the present invention consists in the presence of a signal generator, especially a voltage source or a current source, placed either between the two rails of a railway track or on a common-mode link, and in the detection of the said signal indicating a rail fracture or break.
- a signal generator especially a voltage source or a current source
- Any combination of type of source (voltage or current) and type of detector (measurement of current or of voltage) can be included within the scope of the present invention.
- common mode is understood to signify a means that allows two rails to be joined. These common-mode means are usually constituted by appliances with mid-points, which are either themselves interconnected with the aid of connections or the mid-points of which are directed to earth.
- FIGS 1 and 2 describe schematically the principle of detection for a process and a device implemented according to a preferred embodiment. More detailed explanations can be found by reference to Figure 3 .
- a track circuit is constituted by rails 1 and 2, between which are arranged a source of AC voltage 3 at a frequency F1 and an impedance 4 equivalent to a given impedance at the said frequency of the source 3.
- This source generates a current which is preferably coded at a frequency that is lower the longer the section.
- the process according to the invention advantageously uses a system of coded signals to distinguish the traction current from the current for detecting rail breaks.
- appliances 5 impedance
- These appliances make it possible to achieve the common-mode link.
- appliances 5 are already fitted to track circuits and are, by virtue of this fact, used for the purpose of the invention.
- Such appliances 5 likewise exist in the case of a DC traction current, in order to ensure insulation of the track with respect to earth.
- the traction current is redirected via conductors 8 and from the mid-points of the said appliances 5 and a conductor 14 towards substations 15 ( Fig. 2b ).
- the electrical path formed by two conductors 8, and part of conductor 14 represent a common-mode connection 6.
- This connection 6 ( Fig. 2a or 2b ) will be used, according to the invention, to detect a rail break in the portion of track between the appliances 5.
- a device 7 capable of measuring the said current is arranged preferably in the connection 6 between an appliance 5 and either the conductor 14 or the earthing point 13, depending on the circumstances.
- This device 7 can be constituted by any instrument for measuring current known from the state of the art. It is, of course, configured to distinguish between the passage of a traction current and a current for detecting rail breaks at a frequency F1.
- the current I will pass via the circuit 12 ( Figure 1b ) and will cause an increase in the current (traction current + current due to the common mode) detected by the device 7. It is thus sufficient to detect this increase in current to be able to determine that a discontinuity in the rail 1 or the rail 2 has taken place and thus to detect a rail break in the section of track concerned.
- the tuning of the detection process should take account of the environment of the track (earthing, catenary etc.).
- the limitations on use depend on the type of traction, on the presence of an earthing or of a return to the substations and on the characteristics of the track.
- connection 6 can be made in various forms, depending on the characteristics of the track. There are essentially two possibilities, which are linked to the return of the traction current (AC or DC).
- the traction current can be drained by means of earthing points 13 for the rails of the track, in the case of a 25 kV, at 50 Hz AC traction voltage ( Fig. 2a ) (at regular distance), or through the presence of a conductor 14 which links a plurality of points along a track to a substation 15, which is essentially a common track insulation point for a number of points on the track in the case of a direct traction voltage ( Fig. 2b ).
- Figure 2a in fact describes a non-claimed version (AC voltage), which profits from the earthing points 13 which link the mid-points of the appliances 5.
- the appliances 5 of the invention are advantageously inductive impedances (windings) which exhibit a given value at the frequency F1 of the track circuit while at the same time forming a low impedance at low frequency. In the case appliances are already present on the track, serving as a return path for the traction current, these windings can be used in the process of the invention.
- Figure 2b represents the second non-claimed version in the case of a DC voltage: the conductor 14 is there essentially to drain the traction current towards the substation 15, but likewise serves as a connection 6 for implementing the process of the invention.
- connection consists in using the connection to detect the presence of a common-mode current, the connection being either an earthing link ( Fig. 2a ) or a link redirected towards the substations ( Fig. 2b ).
- a known method is then used to measure the current between a point, for example the mid-point of a winding of the appliance 5, and a point of the connection 6, which is, for example, the earthing or a point on a return path for the traction current towards the substations.
- the signal detected at the frequency F1 at a specific detector 7 present on this connection 6 signifies that a rail fracture has occurred on the section (block system) under consideration.
- the process of the invention may employ track circuits that are already present, such as the track circuits used to locate trains, which are separated by electrical joints.
- an electrical joint (referred to as an RX/TX joint) of the type shown in Figure 3 comprises two tuning units, TU.RX ("Tuning Unit - Receiver") and TU.TX ("Tuning Unit - Transmitter”) respectively, which are arranged between two rails 1 and 2, which connect the two rails and which are arranged at a distance of between 15 and 30 m from one another.
- the distance between the two adjacent joints can vary between a few hundred metres and one or two kilometres.
- Each joint thus separates the track into two sections 50 and 60, called “block systems", with an overlap zone 70, corresponding to the distance between the two units. Detection of the presence of a train is effected by means of electrical signals present in the circuits corresponding to the said block systems, at frequencies typical of each block system, this allowing electrical separation of two adjacent circuits.
- Figure 3 shows two electrical joints forming the limits of a track circuit.
- the unit 20 of the left-hand joint and the unit 21 of the right-hand joint are equivalent to capacitances at a first frequency F1.
- an AC source Tx
- the source Tx is in fact in series with the unit 20, while the unit 21 is provided with a receiver Rx in parallel, which essentially comprises a device for measuring the current in the track circuit.
- the track circuit corresponding to block system 50 is separated from the adjacent circuits 60 by virtue of the fact that the outer units 22 and 23 are equivalent to short circuits at the frequency F1.
- these units are by contrast equivalent to capacitances, in this way allowing detection of the presence of a train in the adjacent block system 60 by currents at this frequency F3.
- Detection of a train on the block system 50 is due to the fact that the axle 24 of this train forms in itself a short circuit between the rails 1 and 2. In reality, the axle exhibits a low impedance which can be likened to a short circuit, which will cause a drop in voltage in the receiver linked to unit 21, which is deactivated in this way. This deactivation thus corresponds to the detection of a train between units 20 and 21.
- a section of track monitored in accordance with the process of the invention may include several detecting track circuits. This allows the installation of appliances 5 with a mid-point close to a limited number of joints along the track, rather than close to each electrical joint.
- FIG. 5 A the invention is shown in Figure 5 .
- the measurement of current is performed on two essentially parallel pairs A and B of rails 1,2 and 1',2'.
- the two tracks A and B are equipped with track circuits for detecting trains, the said circuits being separated by electrical joints (20,22) and (21,23).
- the current-measuring device 7 is in the form of an instrument transformer (18,19,32), which allows a rail break to be detected in either of two block systems (30,31) belonging to either of the two parallel tracks.
- the detection of trains in the block systems 30 and 31 is performed by means of differential signals at different frequencies referred to as F1 and F2. Appliances 5,5' with a mid-point are present between the tuning units of the electrical joints.
- the impedance 18 consists in a self-induction coil with a mid-point earthed, for example, in the case of an AC voltage and acting as a primary of the instrument transformer.
- the mid-point can be connected to a cable which serves as a return connection towards the substations.
- detection of the two currents in the two circuits of the parallel tracks can be achieved with the aid of a single measurement appliance.
- the two windings 18 are used if an earthing is to be provided as shown in Figure 5 .
- At least one specific receiver 32 intended to detect the rail break is connected to the secondary 19 of the transformer.
- the receiver 32 detects a signal above a certain threshold corresponding to the determined frequency (filtering) and to the coding. This detection makes it possible to determine the block system or track in which there is an anomaly.
- receiver 32 per earthing point It is possible to use a single receiver 32 per earthing point, provided that it is equipped with means (of decoding for example) for distinguishing between a signal at frequency F1 and a signal at frequency F2.
- Two receivers 32 per earthing point will advantageously be installed, that is to say one receiver per frequency F1, F2. These receivers will be installed in parallel on the secondary winding 19.
- a rail break in one or the other of two block systems 30 and 31 is detected by a current-measuring device (18,19,32).
- the adjacent block sytems will be monitored by similar devices (18',19',32') linked to inductive connections 5' close to the adjacent joints.
- the presence of an earthing point in proximity to an electrical joint should participate in the common-mode conduction associated with a rail break in this section. It is consequently unnecessary to seek to detect this signal in the adjacent earthing points.
- the current sensor 18,19 and the detector 32 will preferably be incorporated into a single housing, into which there passes, for example, a conductor carrying the common-mode current. Detection by the detector 32 can be effected either at the track or at a distance.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a process for monitoring the integrity of a railway track, in particular to a process for detecting a rail break.
- The invention likewise concerns the installation intended to implement the process.
- Certain rail transport operators and indeed all such operators for certain types of traffic such as passenger lines, lines for speeds above 160 km/h etc. require an autonomous real-time system on the ground for detecting rail breaks. In reality, the term "in real time" is understood to mean a delay in response of the order of at most a few minutes.
- It is in fact imperative that a rail break can be detected in time because it could cause a significant failure, such as a derailment, especially in the case of curved track sections.
- Moreover, the appearance of an initial rail break may be followed with a relatively high degree of probability by a second break in the immediate vicinity of the first. This then translates into the creation of a "gap" in detection or the "loss" of a train in the case of a detection system provided by a track circuit.
- A track circuit is known as being a system which uses the two rails as transmission lines. A signal is injected in differential form at one point and received by a receiver at another point. The presence of an axle between these points is translated into a resistance which short-circuits the two rails, producing in this way an attenuation of the signal received. The system thus acts as a detection system capable of detecting with complete security the presence of an axle in a given section. The latter is defined as the length of the section delimited respectively by the two points of emission and reception.
- One known practice is to limit this track circuit by introducing joints; either insulated joints (mechanical discontinuities) or electrical joints (without a mechanical discontinuity) - which is the currently preferred solution - obtained by the use of radio-frequency signals in tuned track circuits. The track will then be divided into sections, also called "block systems", separated by electrical joints.
- According to the state of the art, it is customary to use electrical joints for large sections of track, that is to say of between 100 metres and 2 kilometres.
- According to the very principle of the track circuit, an accidental electrical discontinuity in the rail should lead to the disappearance of the signal at the receiver but, in practice, this is not always the case: the earthing of the track and the returns for the traction current towards the substations constitute parasitic paths that allow the track circuit current to avoid the rail break and thus prevent its detection.
- Nevertheless, detection can be ensured with a certain probability by following a certain number of rules as regards the positioning of the earthing points and of the return for the traction current towards the substations.
- Moreover, in order to compensate for the self-induction coil of the track per unit length, the trend is to "pupinize" the track, that is to say to place capacitors at regular intervals between the two rails. This makes it possible to achieve a relative increase in the power attenuation introduced by the parasitic path, which is not pupinized. This latter technique makes it possible to mitigate the disadvantages without for all that eliminating them.
- It should be pointed out that this faculty for detection using a track circuit is highly dependent on external parameters such as the type of earthing, the state of the ballast, the geometry of the track (of the catenary type or of the type with a third rail etc).
- Moreover, these techniques do not make it possible to distinguish between the two events of track occupation and the rail break. In fact, both these events lead to a fall in voltage in the track circuit. Furthermore, it is of course important to be able to detect the presence of the train in security while at the same time distinguishing between the two types of information, namely a rail fracture and occupation of the track.
- Moreover, at the moment the various solutions proposed in the state of the art can only be used in the case of a line equipped with track circuits that have electrical or mechanical joints, which is generally not the case with lines carrying light traffic or lines with signalling of the ERTMS level-3 type (European Railway Train Management System).
- To date, there is no device for detecting a rail break for this type of track.
- Known solutions are described in the two
patent documents US 4 389 033 A andUS 4 432 517 A . - The present invention aims to propose a solution which does not have the disadvantages of the state of the art by providing a process and installation for secure detection, in the railway engineering sense of the term, of a rail break.
- The present invention thus aims to provide a solution which makes it possible to detect a rail break, either by using a system involving detection with a track circuit or by using a system that does not involve a track circuit.
- An additional aim of the invention is to be able to apply the process and the installation of the invention to a relatively long section of track, e.g. of several tens of kilometres used, in particular in the case of lines for which detection of the trains is not ensured by track circuits.
- An additional aim of the invention is to provide a low-cost solution which minimizes the amount of equipment.
- The present invention relates to a process for monitoring the integrity of two sections belonging respectively to two railway tracks as defined by
claim 1. - The invention is further related to an installation for monitoring the integrity of a section of railway track, as defined by
claim 7 or claim 9. - According to the invention, the detecting means comprise an instrument transformer comprising a first winding serving as a primary, a second winding serving as a secondary, and at least one receiver, wherein said first winding connects the mid-points of two appliances with a mid-point belonging to two different tracks (A and B), and said at least one receiver is capable of detecting a current at a first frequency (F1), corresponding to a first track circuit present on the first track (A), and of detecting a current at a second frequency (F2), corresponding to a second track circuit present on the second track (B).
-
Figures 1a and 1b show schematically the use of a track circuit fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks in common mode. -
Figures 2a to 2b represent schematically four versions of a device for detecting rail breaks. -
Figure 3 represents schematically a track circuit for detecting the presence of a train between two electrical joints, with their emitter and their receiver. -
Figure 4 represents schematically a track circuit for detecting a train, fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks. -
Figure 5 represents schematically a track section comprising two parallel tracks fitted with a device for detecting rail breaks, according to the invention. - The present invention consists in the presence of a signal generator, especially a voltage source or a current source, placed either between the two rails of a railway track or on a common-mode link, and in the detection of the said signal indicating a rail fracture or break. Any combination of type of source (voltage or current) and type of detector (measurement of current or of voltage) can be included within the scope of the present invention.
- The term "common mode" is understood to signify a means that allows two rails to be joined. These common-mode means are usually constituted by appliances with mid-points, which are either themselves interconnected with the aid of connections or the mid-points of which are directed to earth.
-
Figures 1 and2 describe schematically the principle of detection for a process and a device implemented according to a preferred embodiment. More detailed explanations can be found by reference toFigure 3 . - According to these
Figures 1 and2 , use has been made of the embodiment according to which a voltage source arranged between the two rails is provided and according to which the presence of a common-mode current is detected. Of course, exactly the same analysis could be effected with the opposite configuration, that is to say if a source of current arranged in a common-mode connection were used and a differential voltage between the two rails were detected. - In this first scenario, a track circuit is constituted by
rails AC voltage 3 at a frequency F1 and animpedance 4 equivalent to a given impedance at the said frequency of thesource 3. - This source generates a current which is preferably coded at a frequency that is lower the longer the section.
- The process according to the invention advantageously uses a system of coded signals to distinguish the traction current from the current for detecting rail breaks.
- There are also appliances 5 (impedance) with mid-points that allow earthing in the case of traction with alternating voltage or the return of the said current towards substations in the case of traction with direct current. These appliances make it possible to achieve the common-mode link.
- In reality,
such appliances 5 are already fitted to track circuits and are, by virtue of this fact, used for the purpose of the invention. - In the case of a traction current at alternating voltage, e.g. an AC voltage of 25 kV at 50 Hz,
such appliances 5 with mid-points allow some of the traction current to return viaconductors 8, leading towards earthing points 13 (Fig. 2a ). Between two mid-points ofappliances 5, there is then a common-mode connection 6. -
Such appliances 5 likewise exist in the case of a DC traction current, in order to ensure insulation of the track with respect to earth. In this case, the traction current is redirected viaconductors 8 and from the mid-points of the saidappliances 5 and aconductor 14 towards substations 15 (Fig. 2b ). The electrical path formed by twoconductors 8, and part ofconductor 14 represent a common-mode connection 6. This connection 6 (Fig. 2a or 2b ) will be used, according to the invention, to detect a rail break in the portion of track between theappliances 5. - In order to detect the presence of a common-mode current, a
device 7 capable of measuring the said current is arranged preferably in theconnection 6 between anappliance 5 and either theconductor 14 or theearthing point 13, depending on the circumstances. - This
device 7 can be constituted by any instrument for measuring current known from the state of the art. It is, of course, configured to distinguish between the passage of a traction current and a current for detecting rail breaks at a frequency F1. - In the normal condition, that is to say without rail breaks between the
source 3 and theimpedance 4, a current I passes through the track circuit 10 (Figure 1a ). A limited portion of the said current will pass via theconnection 6 owing to the inherent dissymmetries of the track. - In the case of a
rail break 11, the current I will pass via the circuit 12 (Figure 1b ) and will cause an increase in the current (traction current + current due to the common mode) detected by thedevice 7. It is thus sufficient to detect this increase in current to be able to determine that a discontinuity in therail 1 or therail 2 has taken place and thus to detect a rail break in the section of track concerned. - The tuning of the detection process should take account of the environment of the track (earthing, catenary etc.). The limitations on use depend on the type of traction, on the presence of an earthing or of a return to the substations and on the characteristics of the track.
- As shown in
Figure 2 , theconnection 6 can be made in various forms, depending on the characteristics of the track. There are essentially two possibilities, which are linked to the return of the traction current (AC or DC). The traction current can be drained by means of earthingpoints 13 for the rails of the track, in the case of a 25 kV, at 50 Hz AC traction voltage (Fig. 2a ) (at regular distance), or through the presence of aconductor 14 which links a plurality of points along a track to asubstation 15, which is essentially a common track insulation point for a number of points on the track in the case of a direct traction voltage (Fig. 2b ). -
Figure 2a in fact describes a non-claimed version (AC voltage), which profits from the earthing points 13 which link the mid-points of theappliances 5. Theappliances 5 of the invention are advantageously inductive impedances (windings) which exhibit a given value at the frequency F1 of the track circuit while at the same time forming a low impedance at low frequency. In the case appliances are already present on the track, serving as a return path for the traction current, these windings can be used in the process of the invention. -
Figure 2b represents the second non-claimed version in the case of a DC voltage: theconductor 14 is there essentially to drain the traction current towards thesubstation 15, but likewise serves as aconnection 6 for implementing the process of the invention. - The principle thus consists in using the connection to detect the presence of a common-mode current, the connection being either an earthing link (
Fig. 2a ) or a link redirected towards the substations (Fig. 2b ). - A known method is then used to measure the current between a point, for example the mid-point of a winding of the
appliance 5, and a point of theconnection 6, which is, for example, the earthing or a point on a return path for the traction current towards the substations. The signal detected at the frequency F1 at aspecific detector 7 present on thisconnection 6 signifies that a rail fracture has occurred on the section (block system) under consideration. - The process of the invention may employ track circuits that are already present, such as the track circuits used to locate trains, which are separated by electrical joints.
- Traditionally, an electrical joint (referred to as an RX/TX joint) of the type shown in
Figure 3 comprises two tuning units, TU.RX ("Tuning Unit - Receiver") and TU.TX ("Tuning Unit - Transmitter") respectively, which are arranged between tworails sections overlap zone 70, corresponding to the distance between the two units. Detection of the presence of a train is effected by means of electrical signals present in the circuits corresponding to the said block systems, at frequencies typical of each block system, this allowing electrical separation of two adjacent circuits. -
Figure 3 shows two electrical joints forming the limits of a track circuit. Theunit 20 of the left-hand joint and theunit 21 of the right-hand joint are equivalent to capacitances at a first frequency F1. At this frequency, an AC source (Tx) emits a signal into the track circuit delimited by the two joints. The source Tx is in fact in series with theunit 20, while theunit 21 is provided with a receiver Rx in parallel, which essentially comprises a device for measuring the current in the track circuit. The track circuit corresponding toblock system 50 is separated from theadjacent circuits 60 by virtue of the fact that theouter units adjacent block system 60 by currents at this frequency F3. - Detection of a train on the
block system 50, for example, is due to the fact that theaxle 24 of this train forms in itself a short circuit between therails unit 21, which is deactivated in this way. This deactivation thus corresponds to the detection of a train betweenunits - This situation is clearly similar to that described in
Figure 1 . By usingappliances 5 with a mid-point and the common-mode connection 6 provided with the current-measuringdevice 7, it is possible to securely detect a rail break in each block system, as shown inFigure 4 . Theappliances 5 with a mid-point, which are inductive impedances, do not necessarily have to be situated between the tuning units of an electrical joint. - It is furthermore possible for a section of track monitored in accordance with the process of the invention to include several detecting track circuits. This allows the installation of
appliances 5 with a mid-point close to a limited number of joints along the track, rather than close to each electrical joint. - Thus it will be observed that, when there is a train on a
track circuit 50, the current will pass via the axle of the train and not via theconnection 6. As for the traction current, it is measured by thedevice 7 at the moment when the train passes. - Thus there is no confusion between detection of rail breaks and the presence of a train on the section of track corresponding to the
track circuit 50, provided that adequate coding of the signals allows the traction current to be distinguished from the common-mode signals used to detect rail breaks. - A the invention is shown in
Figure 5 . The measurement of current is performed on two essentially parallel pairs A and B ofrails device 7 is in the form of an instrument transformer (18,19,32), which allows a rail break to be detected in either of two block systems (30,31) belonging to either of the two parallel tracks. The detection of trains in theblock systems Appliances 5,5' with a mid-point are present between the tuning units of the electrical joints. - The
impedance 18 consists in a self-induction coil with a mid-point earthed, for example, in the case of an AC voltage and acting as a primary of the instrument transformer. In the case of a DC voltage, the mid-point can be connected to a cable which serves as a return connection towards the substations. In this case, detection of the two currents in the two circuits of the parallel tracks can be achieved with the aid of a single measurement appliance. The twowindings 18 are used if an earthing is to be provided as shown inFigure 5 . - At least one
specific receiver 32 intended to detect the rail break is connected to the secondary 19 of the transformer. - Since the intention is to avoid the presence of a train being identified with an imaginary fracture, a coded track circuit signal is used.
- Thus the use of a pre-programmed frequency-code pair makes it possible to determine (or more precisely to distinguish) the current coming from the track circuit and the traction current. The
receiver 32 detects a signal above a certain threshold corresponding to the determined frequency (filtering) and to the coding. This detection makes it possible to determine the block system or track in which there is an anomaly. - It is possible to use a
single receiver 32 per earthing point, provided that it is equipped with means (of decoding for example) for distinguishing between a signal at frequency F1 and a signal at frequency F2. Tworeceivers 32 per earthing point will advantageously be installed, that is to say one receiver per frequency F1, F2. These receivers will be installed in parallel on the secondary winding 19. - As illustrated in
Figure 5 , a rail break in one or the other of twoblock systems - The
current sensor detector 32 will preferably be incorporated into a single housing, into which there passes, for example, a conductor carrying the common-mode current. Detection by thedetector 32 can be effected either at the track or at a distance.
Claims (17)
- Process for monitoring the integrity of two sections belonging respectively to two railway tracks (A, B), each section corresponding to a railway track being constituted by two parallel rails (1 and 2), (1', 2') respectively, between which there are arranged, on the one hand, a generator (3) or detector (41) present at one end and an impedance (4) present at the other end, and on the other hand, a detector (7) or a generator (40) arranged in a common-mode link (6), the common-mode link (6) comprising appliances with mid-points which are arranged between the rails, the mid-points being linked at least by conductors (8), the detector (7, 41) being an instrument transformer which comprises a first winding serving as a primary, a second winding (19) serving as a secondary, and at least one receiver (32),
comprising the following steps :- for each section generating a signal with the aid of the said generator at a certain frequency and injecting it into the said section,- for each section picking up and detecting the said signal at the said frequency with the aid of the detector,- for each section carrying out a processing of the said signal and proceeding to an integrity diagnosis of the said section,characterized in that the said first winding (18) connects the mid-points of two appliances (5) with a mid-point belonging to two different tracks (A and B), and in which the said at least on receiver (32) is capable of detecting a current at a first frequency (F1), corresponding to a first track circuit present on the first track (A), and of detecting a current at a second frequency (F2), corresponding to a second track circuit present on the second track (B). - Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that :- a signal at a certain frequency corresponding to a current in a first circuit (10) corresponding to the said section is generated with the aid of an AC voltage source (3) placed between the rails (1 and 2),- the said current at the said frequency is picked up and detected, with the aid of the detector (7) placed in the common-mode link (6), in an additional circuit (12) constituted by at least one common-mode connection (6) linked to the said first circuit.
- Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that :- a signal is generated from a current source (40) in an additional circuit (12) at a certain frequency, the said current source being arranged in the common-mode connection (6),- the said signal at the said frequency is picked up and detected in a first circuit corresponding to the said section (10) in the form of a differential voltage between the two rails with the aid of the said detector (41).
- Process according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the signal is coded.
- Process according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the common-mode link (6) is an earthing connection in the case the traction current is an AC current.
- Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the common-mode link (6) is a connection serving as a return for the traction current towards the substations in the case the traction current is a DC current.
- Installation for monitoring the integrity of a section of railway track, preferably for detecting rail breaks, comprising at least :- a means (3) for generating a signal, arranged between the two rails (1 and 2) of the said railway track,- an impedance (4) connected between the rails (1 and 2) at a predetermined distance from said generating means,- appliances (5) with mid-points, which are arranged between the rails (1, 2) and the mid-points of which are linked, at least by conductors (8) in such a way as to form a common-mode connection (6),- a means (7) for detecting said signal, arranged on the said common-mode connection (6), the means (7) for detecting comprising an instrument transformer comprising a first winding (18) serving as a primary, a second winding (19) serving as a secondary, and at least one receiver (32) and- means for carrying out a processing of the said signal and proceeding to an integrity diagnosis of the said section,characterized in that the said first winding (18) connects the mid-points of two appliances (5) with a mid-point belonging to two different tracks (A and B), and in which the said at least one receiver (32) is capable of detecting a current at a first frequency (F1), corresponding to a first track circuit present on the first track (A), and of detecting a current at a second frequency (F2), corresponding to a second track circuit present on the second track (B).
- Installation according to claim 7, wherein said means for generating a signal, consists of an AC voltage source (3) and said means for detecting said signal consists of an AC current detector (7).
- Installation for monitoring the integrity of a section of railway track, preferably for detecting rail breaks, comprising at least :- a means (41) for detecting a signal, arranged between the two rails (1 and 2) of said railway track, the means (41) for detecting comprising an instrument transformer comprising a first winding (18) serving as a primary, a second winding (19) serving as a secondary, and at least one receiver (32),- an impedance (4) connected between the said rails (1 and 2) at a certain predetermined distance from said detecting means,- appliances (5) with mid-points, which are arranged between the said rails and the mid-points of which are linked, at least by conductors (8), in such a way as to form a common-mode connection (6),- a means (40) for generating said signal, arranged on said common-mode connection (6),- means for carrying out the processing of said signal and proceeding to the integrity diagnosis of said section,characterized in that the said first winding (18) connects the mid-points of two appliances (5) with a mid-point belonging to two different tracks (A and B), and in which the said at least one receiver (32) is capable of detecting a current at a first frequency (F1), corresponding to a first track circuit present on the first track (A), and of detecting a current at a second frequency (F2), corresponding to a second track circuit present on the second track (B).
- Installation according to claim 9, wherein said means for detecting a signal consists of an AC voltage detector (41), and said means for generating a signal consists of an AC current source (40).
- Installation according to claims 7 to 10, characterized in that said common-mode connection (6) comprises an earth connection via earthing points (13).
- Installation according to claims 7 to 10, characterized in that said common-mode connection (6) comprises a conductor (14) which effects the return of the traction current towards substations (15).
- Installation according to claim 7 or 8, characterized in that said appliances (5) with a mid-point are windings with a mid-point.
- Installation according to claim 8, wherein said voltage source (3) plays the part of transmitter (Tx) of a track circuit for the detection of trains, the impedance (4) playing the part of a tuning unit (21) in connection with the receiver (Rx) of a track circuit for the detection of trains.
- Installation according to claim 10, wherein said differential voltage detector (41) plays the part of receiver (Rx) of a track circuit for the detection of trains, the impedance (4) playing the part of a tuning unit (20) in connection with the transmitter (Tx) of a track circuit for the detection of trains.
- Installation according to claim 14 or 15, wherein said track circuits are separated from adjacent track circuits by insulated joints.
- Installation according to claim 14 or 15, wherein said track circuits are separated from adjacent track circuits by electrical joints.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP03447067A EP1348609B1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2003-03-27 | Process and installation for detecting a rail break |
SI200331446T SI1348609T1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2003-03-27 | Process and installation for detecting a rail break |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP02447045A EP1348608A1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2002-03-27 | Broken rail detection method and apparatus |
EP02447045 | 2002-03-27 | ||
EP03447067A EP1348609B1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2003-03-27 | Process and installation for detecting a rail break |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1348609A1 EP1348609A1 (en) | 2003-10-01 |
EP1348609B1 true EP1348609B1 (en) | 2008-10-22 |
Family
ID=27798978
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02447045A Withdrawn EP1348608A1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2002-03-27 | Broken rail detection method and apparatus |
EP03447067A Expired - Lifetime EP1348609B1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2003-03-27 | Process and installation for detecting a rail break |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02447045A Withdrawn EP1348608A1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2002-03-27 | Broken rail detection method and apparatus |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP1348608A1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101044681B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100441460C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE411930T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60324216D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1348609T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2315474T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1058341A1 (en) |
PT (1) | PT1348609E (en) |
SI (1) | SI1348609T1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100730372B1 (en) * | 2005-06-14 | 2007-06-19 | 주식회사 혁신전공사 | Signal control system and method of the same for a train |
NL1033153C2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2008-01-08 | Voestalpine Railpro B V | System is for monitoring condition of electrically separated weld connections in a railway track |
DE102006009962B3 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2007-05-31 | Areva Np Gmbh | Method for monitoring rail track for breaking of rails, involves sampling of operating current flowing from rail vehicle to point of earthing and if difference of operating currents exceeds given threshold then one of the rails is closed |
US7226021B1 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-06-05 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting rail break or vehicle |
DE102006024692B4 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2008-05-29 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for detecting the occupancy or free status of a track section |
US7954770B2 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2011-06-07 | General Electric Company | Methods and system for jointless track circuits using passive signaling |
CN101607565B (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2013-06-19 | 唐德尧 | Ground on-line monitoring device and ground on-line monitoring method for steel rail cracks |
CN102416970B (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2013-11-06 | 北京安通伟业铁路工务技术有限公司 | knock detection method of on-line steel rail fracture monitoring system |
WO2013162472A1 (en) * | 2012-04-23 | 2013-10-31 | Nanyang Technological University | Method and apparatus for detecting railway system defects |
CZ2012558A3 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-05-14 | Eurosignal A.S. | Device to indicate broken rail |
CN106442647A (en) * | 2016-10-27 | 2017-02-22 | 北京国兴力德新材料技术有限公司 | Railway turnout switch rail damage monitoring device and method |
CN107914737B (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2021-02-09 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | Broken rail detection method and device |
CN107985344B (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2021-02-09 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | Broken rail detection method and device |
CN108008210B (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-23 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | Broken rail detection method and device |
KR101949952B1 (en) * | 2018-10-05 | 2019-05-21 | 벽산파워 주식회사 | Monitoring method for unbalances of track circuit |
CN109677447B (en) * | 2018-12-24 | 2024-03-29 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Multi-system track signal acquisition system based on two-by-two-out-of-two architecture |
CN111661105B (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2021-06-01 | 东莞理工学院 | Rail weld detection device for rail transit fault diagnosis |
RU2748826C1 (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-05-31 | Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Российский университет транспорта" (ФГАОУ ВО РУТ (МИИТ), РУТ (МИИТ) | Device for monitoring rail breakage in sections with ac electric traction |
CN113514685B (en) * | 2021-07-26 | 2022-11-08 | 中车株洲电力机车研究所有限公司 | Ground test device and method for train track induced voltage |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3924461A (en) * | 1974-08-20 | 1975-12-09 | Harris A Stover | Monitoring system for detecting defective rails or road beds |
US4005601A (en) * | 1975-08-29 | 1977-02-01 | Amac, Inc. | Apparatus for detecting rail discontinuities |
IT1073468B (en) * | 1977-03-18 | 1985-04-17 | Wabco Westinghouse Spa | PROTECTION DEVICE FOR VIARIO IRON SIGNALING EQUIPMENT |
US4117529A (en) * | 1977-03-23 | 1978-09-26 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Broken rail detecting track circuits |
AU6888181A (en) * | 1980-04-08 | 1981-10-15 | Gec-General Signal Ltd. | Broken power rail detection |
IT1151495B (en) * | 1980-04-18 | 1986-12-17 | Ansaldo Sa | HARMONIC TRACTION CURRENT DISTANCE DETECTOR IN TRACK CIRCUITS |
CN88203203U (en) * | 1988-02-04 | 1988-10-19 | 哈尔滨铁路局工业处哈尔滨通信信号器材厂 | Universal signal detector of locomotive |
DK1028325T3 (en) * | 1999-02-12 | 2010-01-04 | Plasser Bahnbaumasch Franz | Procedure for measuring a track |
US6262573B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-07-17 | General Electric Company | Electromagnetic system for railroad track crack detection and traction enhancement |
DE10022636A1 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2001-10-31 | Siemens Ag | Meshed track circuit |
CN2457601Y (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2001-10-31 | 洛阳市瀍河环星电子标牌厂 | Double zero degree probe rail flaw detector |
CN2473089Y (en) * | 2001-04-28 | 2002-01-23 | 上海理工大学附属二厂 | Track complex measurer |
-
2002
- 2002-03-27 EP EP02447045A patent/EP1348608A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2003
- 2003-03-27 AT AT03447067T patent/ATE411930T1/en active
- 2003-03-27 DE DE60324216T patent/DE60324216D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-03-27 CN CNB031082815A patent/CN100441460C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-03-27 KR KR1020030019106A patent/KR101044681B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2003-03-27 EP EP03447067A patent/EP1348609B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-03-27 ES ES03447067T patent/ES2315474T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-03-27 SI SI200331446T patent/SI1348609T1/en unknown
- 2003-03-27 PT PT03447067T patent/PT1348609E/en unknown
- 2003-03-27 DK DK03447067T patent/DK1348609T3/en active
-
2004
- 2004-02-13 HK HK04101022.6A patent/HK1058341A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE411930T1 (en) | 2008-11-15 |
DE60324216D1 (en) | 2008-12-04 |
CN1451577A (en) | 2003-10-29 |
EP1348608A1 (en) | 2003-10-01 |
HK1058341A1 (en) | 2004-05-14 |
PT1348609E (en) | 2008-12-22 |
DK1348609T3 (en) | 2009-02-09 |
CN100441460C (en) | 2008-12-10 |
EP1348609A1 (en) | 2003-10-01 |
KR20030078030A (en) | 2003-10-04 |
SI1348609T1 (en) | 2009-02-28 |
KR101044681B1 (en) | 2011-06-28 |
ES2315474T3 (en) | 2009-04-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1348609B1 (en) | Process and installation for detecting a rail break | |
EP1268252B1 (en) | Broken rail detection | |
US10093329B2 (en) | Track circuit mechanical joint integrity checker | |
CA1194120A (en) | Circuit for detecting unbalance of the traction current in a track circuit | |
KR20130121461A (en) | Apparatus for detecting impair of rails and method using the same | |
EP3196095B1 (en) | System and method for detecting broken rails on a railway line | |
US9102340B2 (en) | Railway circuit for sending signalling information along a railway line to a vehicle travelling along the railway line | |
EP2216229A2 (en) | Apparatus and method for monitoring insulated rail joints | |
JPS6137576A (en) | Improved type rail circuit for alternating current electrification type railway | |
US20210107541A1 (en) | Broken rail detector | |
US20220234632A1 (en) | Broken rail detector | |
RU2770322C1 (en) | Device for determining the derailment of wheel pairs of rolling stock or a dragging metal part and a sensor for monitoring the obliquity of rolling stock | |
WO2021205944A1 (en) | Maintenance device, maintenance system, and maintenance method | |
CN116520190A (en) | Monitoring system for through ground wire | |
Huemmer | Interference-free track vacancy detection | |
JPH02234875A (en) | Non-insulated track circuit | |
Pinte et al. | HOW TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF TRACK CIRCUIT FAILURES | |
ES2320517B1 (en) | METHOD OF DETECTOR OF OCCUPATION OF CIRCUITS OF RAILWAY, AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE. | |
JPS6026749B2 (en) | Signal power transmission and reception method for non-insulated track circuits | |
GB2134681A (en) | Railway track circuit termination | |
JP2017133986A (en) | Device and method for differentiating electric power line |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040223 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070216 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60324216 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20081204 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20080403212 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20081210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2315474 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Payment date: 20090306 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20090225 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Payment date: 20090218 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20090227 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090723 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Payment date: 20090216 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SK Ref legal event code: MM4A Ref document number: E 4299 Country of ref document: SK Effective date: 20100327 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: EE Ref legal event code: MM4A Ref document number: E002683 Country of ref document: EE Effective date: 20100331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SI Ref legal event code: KO00 Effective date: 20101115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100329 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100327 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20200221 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20200320 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20200317 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20200323 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20200320 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200320 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20200323 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20200225 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20200323 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20200312 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20200324 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20200319 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20200319 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20200319 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20200324 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20200319 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20200327 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200319 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20200318 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20210805 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 60324216 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FI Ref legal event code: MAE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20210331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210401 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 411930 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210327 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20210327 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200328 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210927 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210401 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210328 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210328 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210327 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210331 |