EP1319219A1 - Verfahren zur vorbeugung der verfälschung oder änderung von bedruckten oder gravierten flächen - Google Patents

Verfahren zur vorbeugung der verfälschung oder änderung von bedruckten oder gravierten flächen

Info

Publication number
EP1319219A1
EP1319219A1 EP01964793A EP01964793A EP1319219A1 EP 1319219 A1 EP1319219 A1 EP 1319219A1 EP 01964793 A EP01964793 A EP 01964793A EP 01964793 A EP01964793 A EP 01964793A EP 1319219 A1 EP1319219 A1 EP 1319219A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
watermark
signature
printed
image
visible
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP01964793A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1319219B1 (de
Inventor
Frédéric JORDAN
Roland Meylan
Martin Kutter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alpvision SA
Original Assignee
Alpvision SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alpvision SA filed Critical Alpvision SA
Priority to EP10174049.6A priority Critical patent/EP2261867B1/de
Publication of EP1319219A1 publication Critical patent/EP1319219A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1319219B1 publication Critical patent/EP1319219B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/004Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using digital security elements, e.g. information coded on a magnetic thread or strip
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/005Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations
    • G07D7/0054Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations involving markings the properties of which are altered from original properties
    • G07D7/0056Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations involving markings the properties of which are altered from original properties involving markings of altered colours

Definitions

  • a method of preventing counterfeiting or altering a printed or engraved surface is a method of preventing counterfeiting or altering a printed or engraved surface.
  • the present invention relates to a method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface.
  • Special ink printing uses special chemical properties of the ink to provide a specific reaction to a particular action.
  • fluorescent inks become very bright when they are lit by a particular wavelength, some inks are even invisible to natural light, other inks change color according to their orientation or their temperature (and can be reveal by heating the paper with a finger), etc.
  • Special inks have one thing in common: particularly expensive and necessitate making modifications in the usual industrial production chain (additional mask for offset for example).
  • additional mask for offset for example.
  • Codes using invisible inks allow digital information to be hidden. These codes can be characters, bar codes, 2D codes, etc. In addition to its high cost and specific to invisible inks, this system has two major drawbacks. On the one hand, due to the nature of the codes used, it is located on a certain part of the document or of the packaging and it is therefore possible to destroy it without altering the entire surface. On the other hand, the codes used always have geometric characteristics (bars, geometric figures, characters, etc.) clearly identifying them as anti-copy devices. This greatly facilitates the task of the pirate seeking to reveal and reproduce the ink. In addition, as soon as the pirate knows how to make this reproduction, he ipso facto has the means to reproduce the code.
  • systems based on on-board memories or processors combine the disadvantages of being very expensive, unattractive and localized. Their main application is more to secure a communication, or to dynamically store information rather than to distinguish an original from a copy.
  • One of the aims of the present invention is to remedy the drawbacks of known methods making it possible to prevent counterfeiting or alteration of documents printed or engraved by digital means.
  • the present invention relates to a method intended to prevent counterfeiting or alteration of printed or engraved documents characterized by the incorporation of a digital watermark in part or in the whole of the document.
  • the digital watermark technique also known as digital watermarking, is a technique for hiding information in a robust and imperceptible way in multimedia data such as music, video, images, documents, etc.
  • the information that is hidden is called the signature.
  • This signature can for example be a number, a name or even an image.
  • “Hide” has a very specific meaning in this context: for example in the case of an image, we will slightly change the color of certain pixels, and in the case of music we will slightly modify the sound from time to time.
  • Imperceptible means that the changes introduced are such that an individual cannot distinguish the original data from the data signed by his own senses. For example, a signed image must have exactly the same appearance as a normal image, a signed music must appear completely normal, the same for a video or any other data. The whole problem is to make a computer capable of detecting this hidden information when it escapes our senses. There are also applications where a visible watermark is acceptable or even desirable. This allows in particular to further increase the robustness and a visual check for the presence of a watermark. The principle that remains is that the watermark should not be visually disturbing.
  • the "robustness" of a watermark means that one must be able to find the signature after any manipulation of signed data. Take for example the case of a signed image: we must be able to compress, print, scan or rotate it without ever losing the signature.
  • Many publications have been made on the various techniques allowing to hide a watermark in an image, in a video or an audio signal. With regard to images, the latter can be classified according to the technique used for marking: some operate modifications directly in the spatial domain (see for example [1] M. Kutter, F. Jordan, F. Bossen, "Digital watermaking of color images using amplitude modulation", Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 7, n ° 2, pp.
  • the digital watermark technique has so far been used in order to find the signature on a possible copy to prove the origin of the information present on the copy, thanks to the presence of the watermark that the 'found on the copy. This in all cases involved the use of a robust watermark.
  • the purpose of incorporating the digital watermark on the surface is different, since its presence is intended to prevent authentication or alteration of the surface concerned, i.e. provide proof that this is the authentic surface if the watermark is present or that it is a copy or that the surface has been altered if the watermark is missing.
  • the robustness of the watermark must be reduced so that a copy of the surface results in a failure to read the watermark digital.
  • a "fragile" watermark A typical example of application consists in preventing the counterfeiting of securities such as banknotes. If the watermark is incorporated to avoid alteration of all or part of the surface, the watermark may be strong or fragile.
  • the watermark is printed using colors and resolutions that are invisible to the naked eye. This therefore makes it possible to protect, for example, a package without its graphics being altered, which is important for marketing reasons.
  • the watermark can cover the entire surface of a printed document. It is therefore not possible to erase it without altering the document, for example by scratching the surface. In practice, this property makes it possible, for example, to avoid gray markets, ie products sold by unauthorized distributors. Indeed, they sometimes erase the code (invisible 2D code for example) identifying their reseller by "milling" the surface of the packaging where the code is printed. • Price
  • the watermark is printed using traditional printing systems. Regarding industrial printing (offset, etc.), it is fully integrated into the production chain and does not incur any additional costs. Regarding personal printing (inkjet, laser, etc.), it is fully compatible with commercial printers. In both cases, the reading is done with a standard digital scanner. This low price opens up new markets: firstly for industrial printing, packaging for luxury or pharmaceutical products, as well as certificates, checks, entry tickets, etc. On the other hand for personal printing, it allows anyone with standard equipment to create and verify secure and personalized documents. For example, a doctor may hide the names of the drugs prescribed in the paper used to print the prescription. It is possible to program a printer so that it hides a watermark in any printed document thus allowing later identification of the date of printing, the name of the user, etc.
  • the watermark contains digital information (typically several tens of bits per square centimeter) which is encoded or retrieved using a key.
  • this storage makes it possible, for example, to secure information printed in visible text (therefore liable to be modified). Indeed it is then possible to encode the same information in the watermark and therefore to be able to detect any modification in the text of the document (date, amount, identity, etc.).
  • One application concerns contracts for which we want to be sure of the date of issue.
  • Another example with banknotes the serial number can be hidden in each note, so it is impossible to create counterfeit notes with different numbers because it would be necessary to generate each time the corresponding watermark.
  • Figure 1 the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position. The four peaks illustrate the effect of a symmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by locally increasing or decreasing its intensity.
  • the present invention proposes to asymmetrically modulate the color of the pixels.
  • Figure 2 gives an example of asymmetric modulation obtained by darkening the color of certain pixels. This modulation can then be positive or negative depending on whether color is added or removed.
  • the graph in the figure shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position. The two peaks illustrate the effect of an asymmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by only decreasing its intensity.
  • Figure 3 gives some examples of digital watermark images.
  • Another object of the present invention is therefore to propose a method for hiding and / or finding a digital watermark, characterized by the use of an asymmetrical modulation of the amplitude of a visible or invisible light component.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example of symmetrical modulation
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the implementation of the integrated process with a standard offset printing technique
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the implementation of the method with a separate offset printing step
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the process for signing a material in three stages
  • - Figure 9 is a block diagram of the process for reading a uniform image signed in three stages; and - Figure 10 is a block diagram of the process for reading a non-uniform image signed in three stages.
  • FIG. 1 An example of symmetrical modulation is illustrated in Figure 1.
  • the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position.
  • the four peaks illustrate the effect of a symmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by locally increasing or decreasing its intensity.
  • FIG. 2 An example of asymmetric modulation is illustrated in Figure 2.
  • the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position.
  • the two peaks illustrate the effect of an asymmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by only decreasing its intensity.
  • One way of obtaining a positive asymmetric modulation consists in using an overprinting technique by printing the watermark over the own colors of the material and other information already printed and therefore without taking account of local variations in the colors on the surface of this material.
  • This approach requires that the values of the color components of the material can only be darkened during the signature since additional ink is added. Mathematically, this corresponds to a positive asymmetric modulation of the color of the points. In principle, this approach can be applied to any printing process. Some specifics of watermark printing may depend on the printing process. The specific cases of offset and inkjet type printing for achieving positive modulation are detailed below.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the implementation of the above method using positive modulation with an industrial printing technique of offset type in the case of simultaneous printing of the watermark.
  • a four-color printing 45 is carried out (for example for a packaging 40) which means that four different ink colors are used for each of the yellow masks 41, cyan 42, magenta 43 and black 44.
  • the digital watermark can have a single color, it is generally desirable to use one of the colors already selected for standard printing for the watermark.
  • Figure 4 shows how the different masks can then be applied.
  • the watermark printing is fully integrated into the standard industrial printing chain and therefore does not incur any additional cost.
  • the yellow mask can be used simultaneously for two different things: on the one hand it contains the yellow component of the image to be printed and on the other hand it contains the image of the watermark.
  • the IT tools used when flashing the offset film make this integration easy.
  • FIG. 5 Another possible alternative is to use a separate mask for the watermark as shown in Figure 5.
  • the watermark is overprinted in an additional step with a mask and possibly its own ink (here magenta) .
  • the mask 51 then defines the watermark points which are printed over the previously printed material 50.
  • This method although more costly to implement by the printer, has the advantage of being able to easily change the watermark during the production. This allows for example to apply a watermark identifying different countries of sale to a series of identical packages. It should be noted that when non-covering inks are used, it is also possible to print the final image over the digital watermark, as illustrated in Figure 6. In this case, the reverse process is used.
  • the watermark being previously printed 60 on the material, the final image being overprinted during an additional step.
  • the masks yellow 61, cyan 62, magenta 63 and black 64 are used to overprint the pattern.
  • the ink being transparent, the watermark 60 located under the pattern can still be detected in the final result 65.
  • FIG. 7 Another usable printing method is of the inkjet type as illustrated in FIG. 7.
  • the illustration shows an example of an inkjet printing system using four colors, yellow 71, cyan 72, magenta 73 and black 74, their print heads 75 and the printed material 70.
  • the watermark is overprinted on the material. Setting up an inkjet printer for printing a watermark is particularly simple since the vast majority of printer drivers automatically manage the mixing of colors to obtain a particular shade. The four-color decomposition step is therefore most often unnecessary. It should however be noted that, depending on the drivers and printers, it may sometimes be desirable to choose a watermark color corresponding to the basic colors of the printer, this in order to avoid obtaining dithered colors or printing problems. alignment between dots of different colors.
  • watermark printing can be simultaneous with the information or patterns intended to be printed normally. It is also possible to print the watermark separately, over or under the final design. In particular, text can be overprinted on the signed material itself, this text possibly being linked to the watermark. For example, the key figures of a contract can thus be hidden in the watermark of the paper and thus make it possible to guarantee its integrity.
  • Negative modulation can be achieved during simultaneous printing by following the same principle as described above because it is always possible to subtract color from the electronic file: on the pattern to be printed, the points corresponding to the watermark are then cleared up.
  • To achieve a separate printing with negative modulation it is however necessary to use a particular ink: for example, in the case of visible ink, one solution consists in using a covering type ink. The summary of different watermark printing possibilities is presented in the table below:
  • Size of the points this is the diameter of the watermark points obtained after printing.
  • the minimum dot size is set by printing technology. Values between 300 and 1200 dots per inch are common.
  • Color of the points Depending on the color, texture and possible patterns applied to the materials, certain colors may be more or less visible. For example, it is usual to use a yellow color for white backgrounds (separate or simultaneous positive modulation).
  • Density of the watermark This defines the ratio between the number of dots printed per unit area (also measured in dots). Typical values of 0.02 or less can be used. A very fine stitch size increases the density of the watermark.
  • Screening The screening technique (halftone) makes it possible to reproduce any color from the different fundamental colors. It is then preferable that the size of the screening is sufficiently fine compared to the size of the points.
  • Type of ink Non-visible substances can also be used.
  • the influence of some of these parameters is illustrated in Figure 3.
  • the watermark 1 is visible.
  • the lower visibility of watermark 2 is obtained by simultaneously decreasing the density and size of the dots.
  • the watermark 3 also has a clarification.
  • the main difficulty lies in the ability to find the asymmetrical watermark.
  • most tattoo techniques can extract information from the signed image without using the original image.
  • Certain techniques first make a prediction of what the original image was from the signed image and can then deduce what the signature is. This technique is still applicable in the present case.
  • the material has a uniform and known initial color, it is possible to suppress this prediction. This is particularly the case with a sheet of white paper.
  • This increases the reliability of the detection and therefore reduces the visibility of the watermark up to the extreme limit of sensitivity of an optical scanner. Consequently, this makes it very difficult to duplicate the signed material, for example by photocopying: in fact, the losses specific to any reproduction system generally weaken this signature below the detectability threshold.
  • One application is to include such a watermark on paper which one wishes to avoid copying, such as banknotes for example.
  • One embodiment of the invention consists in using as a basis a digital watermark algorithm of the spatial type with symmetric amplitude modulation, such as for example that described in [1].
  • c (k) ' c (k) + v.b.a (k) (1)
  • Equation (1) the set of points defined by vba (k) constitutes the watermark ( Figure 8, step 84) which is added to the original image c (k) to give the signed image c (k ) It is the latter which is then printed according to the present invention.
  • Equation 8 gives a block diagram of the complete method: the set of points constituting the watermark 85 is calculated 84 on the basis of the value of the bit to be hidden 81 and of the key 82 defining the random sequence a (k). The value of the points being positive or negative, as defined by equation (1). Equation (2) is equivalent to thresholding 86 the values of the watermark 85 while keeping only the positive values and then adding 88 these values 87 to the image to be signed 83 to obtain the signed image 89.
  • this technique is qualified as “asymmetric amplitude modulation”.
  • the sign of the modulation ba (k) being positive, the modulation is said to be positive.
  • Equation (2) It is also possible to obtain a negative modulation by printing a uniform color or "pierced” by the watermark. Equation (2) then becomes:
  • the new point value c (k) ' can be measured on the printed sheet using an optical scanner. Two cases then arise depending on whether the color of the material is uniform and known or not.
  • Figure 9 is a block diagram describing the process: the signed image obtained by scanner is subtracted from the original image in order to restore the watermark. The bit constituting the signature is then calculated, optionally, an additional filtering step can be carried out if visible information has been printed over the signed uniform image. The signed image 91 is previously filtered 92 in order to eliminate any noise (scratches, dirt, text printed over the watermark, etc.).
  • the image obtained 93 is then subtracted 94 from the original image 95 in order to extract the watermark 96.
  • the value of bit b is then found according to conventional watermark detection techniques, as described in article [5] M . Kutter, "Watermarking resisting to translation, rotation, and scaling.”, Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Voice, Video, and Data Communications, November 1998, which consists essentially of reversing equation (2) and statistically correlating the value bit b found 99 on several pixels k in order to guarantee good robustness to possible errors which may for example arise during the digital acquisition of the image.
  • This method can be generalized to several bits b and then makes it possible to code any digital information such as a number or a character string.
  • the second case is illustrated by the block diagram of FIG. 10 where the original image is predicted from the signed image, the signed image is subtracted from the predicted image in order to restore the watermark, the bit constituting the signature is then calculated.
  • a denoising filter 105 for example of the Wiener type, is used to make a prediction 106 of the original image o (k) from the signed image 101.
  • the difference 102 between these two images then constitutes the watermark 107 which can be decoded 103 using the key 108 to find the bit 104 in the same way as before ( Figure 9).
  • the prediction error being significantly greater than in the first case, the number of bits b coded in this way is systematically lower.
  • the implementation of the detection requires an optical scanner capable of scanning the document on which the watermark is printed. Since positioning on the scanner is never perfect, it is necessary to be able to find the information coded by the watermark after possible translations and rotations.
  • a suitable technique consists in using the method described by [5] which is based on an autocorrelated watermark (to compensate for rotations) and an intercorrelation technique (to compensate for translations).
  • the process can also be applied to sectors other than printing.
  • a laser to engrave metal surfaces, stones, ceramics, etc., and thus encode a digital watermark.
  • the applications concerned are then, for example, parts from the automobile or aeronautical industry or luxury objects in the jewelry or objects sectors. of values.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Editing Of Facsimile Originals (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Printing Methods (AREA)
  • Dental Preparations (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Treatments Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
EP01964793A 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zur vorbeugung der verfälschung oder änderung von bedruckten oder gravierten flächen Expired - Lifetime EP1319219B1 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10174049.6A EP2261867B1 (de) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zum Schutz gegen Fälschung oder Änderung einer gedruckten oder eingravierten Oberfläche

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH183200 2000-09-20
CH18322000 2000-09-20
PCT/CH2001/000560 WO2002025599A1 (fr) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Procede destine a prevenir la contrefaçon ou l'alteration d'une surface imprimee ou gravee

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10174049.6A Division EP2261867B1 (de) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zum Schutz gegen Fälschung oder Änderung einer gedruckten oder eingravierten Oberfläche
EP10174049.6 Division-Into 2010-08-25

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1319219A1 true EP1319219A1 (de) 2003-06-18
EP1319219B1 EP1319219B1 (de) 2010-11-17

Family

ID=4566438

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10174049.6A Expired - Lifetime EP2261867B1 (de) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zum Schutz gegen Fälschung oder Änderung einer gedruckten oder eingravierten Oberfläche
EP01964793A Expired - Lifetime EP1319219B1 (de) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zur vorbeugung der verfälschung oder änderung von bedruckten oder gravierten flächen

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10174049.6A Expired - Lifetime EP2261867B1 (de) 2000-09-20 2001-09-17 Verfahren zum Schutz gegen Fälschung oder Änderung einer gedruckten oder eingravierten Oberfläche

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US7684088B2 (de)
EP (2) EP2261867B1 (de)
CN (1) CN1252653C (de)
AT (1) ATE488822T1 (de)
DE (1) DE60143487D1 (de)
DK (1) DK1319219T3 (de)
ES (1) ES2356598T3 (de)
WO (1) WO2002025599A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6744906B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2004-06-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US7246239B2 (en) 2001-01-24 2007-07-17 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
US6899475B2 (en) 2002-01-30 2005-05-31 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking a page description language file
US7974495B2 (en) 2002-06-10 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Identification and protection of video
US7644281B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-01-05 Universite De Geneve Character and vector graphics watermark for structured electronic documents security
EP1691539A1 (de) * 2005-02-15 2006-08-16 European Central Bank Zweidimensional-Sicherheitsmuster auf Echtheit bescheinigbar mit Eindimensional-Signalverarbeitung
EP1690697A1 (de) 2005-02-15 2006-08-16 Alpvision SA Verfahren zum Applizieren einer optisch unsichtbaren Markierung auf einen Datenträger
KR100831601B1 (ko) * 2005-10-26 2008-05-23 이항경 일련 번호 및 비밀 번호를 이용한 통신 네트워크상에서의상품 진위 여부 확인 방법 및 시스템
CN101089807A (zh) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-19 光宝科技股份有限公司 浮水印打印方法及打印装置
US8770625B1 (en) * 2006-12-22 2014-07-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Anti-counterfeiting articles
DE102008012426A1 (de) * 2007-10-31 2009-05-07 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Sicherung von Dokumenten
WO2009134965A2 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Polyonics, Inc. Method and apparatus for the detection of counterfeiting
US9749607B2 (en) 2009-07-16 2017-08-29 Digimarc Corporation Coordinated illumination and image signal capture for enhanced signal detection
HUP1200097A2 (hu) * 2012-02-15 2013-08-28 Glenisys Kft Biztonsági elem és eljárás nyomat eredetiség ellenõrzésére
US9635378B2 (en) 2015-03-20 2017-04-25 Digimarc Corporation Sparse modulation for robust signaling and synchronization
US10424038B2 (en) 2015-03-20 2019-09-24 Digimarc Corporation Signal encoding outside of guard band region surrounding text characters, including varying encoding strength
EP3103061B1 (de) 2014-02-04 2024-04-03 Thymaris Ltd. Verfahren und vorrichtung zur generierung und verwahrung eines individuellen imperfektionsprofils eines originalartikels sowie verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung eines authentifizierungsstatus eines verdächtigen objekts
FR3018130B1 (fr) * 2014-03-03 2016-03-25 Advanced Track & Trace Procede de marquage d'une matrice holographique et matrice holographique ainsi obtenue
US10783601B1 (en) 2015-03-20 2020-09-22 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking and signal encoding with activable compositions
US9754341B2 (en) 2015-03-20 2017-09-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking and data hiding with narrow-band absorption materials
FR3035819B1 (fr) 2015-05-07 2021-04-30 Honnorat Rech & Services Papier authentifiable smartphone
WO2016202827A1 (en) 2015-06-18 2016-12-22 Hicof Inc. Authentication feature in a barcode
CN106682912B (zh) 2015-11-10 2021-06-15 艾普维真股份有限公司 3d结构的认证方法
US10872392B2 (en) 2017-11-07 2020-12-22 Digimarc Corporation Generating artistic designs encoded with robust, machine-readable data
US11062108B2 (en) 2017-11-07 2021-07-13 Digimarc Corporation Generating and reading optical codes with variable density to adapt for visual quality and reliability
US10896307B2 (en) 2017-11-07 2021-01-19 Digimarc Corporation Generating and reading optical codes with variable density to adapt for visual quality and reliability
EP3686027B1 (de) 2019-01-27 2021-07-14 U-NICA Systems AG Verfahren zum drucken von authentifizierungskennzeichen mit einem amplitudenmodulierten rasterdruck
AU2020228711A1 (en) 2019-02-28 2021-10-21 Sicpa Holding Sa Method for authenticating a magnetically induced mark with a portable device
PT115571B (pt) 2019-06-08 2021-06-07 Incm Imprensa Nac Casa Da Moeda S A Método para a validação da autenticidade de uma imagem presente num objeto, objeto com nível de segurança intensificado e o seu método de preparo, aparelho computacional, programas de computador e meio de leitura adaptados
US11636565B1 (en) 2019-07-24 2023-04-25 Digimarc Corporation Tamper detection arrangements, and point of sales systems employing same
EP3859597A1 (de) 2020-01-31 2021-08-04 U-NICA Systems AG Computerimplementiertes verfahren und system zur oberflächenidentifizierung mit skalen
AR123354A1 (es) 2020-09-02 2022-11-23 Sicpa Holding Sa Marca de seguridad, método y dispositivo para leer la marca de seguridad, documento de seguridad marcado con la marca de seguridad y método y sistema para verificar dicho documento de seguridad
EP4328879A1 (de) 2022-08-26 2024-02-28 Alpvision SA Systeme und verfahren zur vorhersage der authentifizierungserkennbarkeit gefälschter artikel

Family Cites Families (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3984624A (en) 1974-07-25 1976-10-05 Weston Instruments, Inc. Video system for conveying digital and analog information
US4237484A (en) 1979-08-08 1980-12-02 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Technique for transmitting digital data together with a video signal
FR2515403A1 (fr) 1981-10-28 1983-04-29 Quadrivium Inf Procede d'identification d'un enregistrement sonore et installation de duplication mettant en oeuvre le procede
US5191966A (en) * 1982-09-02 1993-03-09 Miller Formless Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for unloading bulk materials
DE3851724T2 (de) 1987-07-08 1995-05-04 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Verfahren und Gerät zum Schutz von Kopiersignalen.
GB8806452D0 (en) 1988-03-18 1988-04-20 Imperial College Digital data security system
FI80405C (fi) 1988-03-24 1990-06-11 Suomen Pankin Setelipaino Tryckalster saekerstaellt med varningsfigur och foerfarande foer dess utarbetning.
NL8901032A (nl) 1988-11-10 1990-06-01 Philips Nv Coder om extra informatie op te nemen in een digitaal audiosignaal met een tevoren bepaald formaat, een decoder om deze extra informatie uit dit digitale signaal af te leiden, een inrichting voor het opnemen van een digitaal signaal op een registratiedrager, voorzien van de coder, en een registratiedrager verkregen met deze inrichting.
US5103459B1 (en) 1990-06-25 1999-07-06 Qualcomm Inc System and method for generating signal waveforms in a cdma cellular telephone system
CA2044404C (en) 1990-07-31 1998-06-23 Dan S. Bloomberg Self-clocking glyph shape codes
US5091966A (en) 1990-07-31 1992-02-25 Xerox Corporation Adaptive scaling for decoding spatially periodic self-clocking glyph shape codes
EP0493091A1 (de) 1990-12-27 1992-07-01 Xerox Corporation Verfahren und System zum Einlassen maschinenlesbarer Daten in Grautonbildern
US5315098A (en) * 1990-12-27 1994-05-24 Xerox Corporation Methods and means for embedding machine readable digital data in halftone images
CA2063785C (en) 1991-03-25 1998-09-29 Masahiro Funada Image processing apparatus
EP0776120B1 (de) 1991-03-29 2002-09-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Bildverarbeitungsgerät
CA2088235C (en) 1992-01-31 2001-11-27 Akira Negishi Image processing for adding images information unrecognizable to human eyes
US5721788A (en) 1992-07-31 1998-02-24 Corbis Corporation Method and system for digital image signatures
US6421145B1 (en) * 1992-09-28 2002-07-16 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method using image information and additional information or an additional pattern added thereto or superposed thereon
US5421869A (en) * 1993-05-28 1995-06-06 Nocopi Technologies, Inc. Security marking method and composition
US6449377B1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2002-09-10 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for watermark processing of line art images
CA2174413C (en) 1993-11-18 2009-06-09 Geoffrey B. Rhoads Steganographic methods and apparatuses
US6614914B1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2003-09-02 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedder and reader
US7116781B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2006-10-03 Digimarc Corporation Counteracting geometric distortions in watermarking
US6345104B1 (en) * 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
US5768426A (en) 1993-11-18 1998-06-16 Digimarc Corporation Graphics processing system employing embedded code signals
US5748763A (en) 1993-11-18 1998-05-05 Digimarc Corporation Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding
US6882738B2 (en) 1994-03-17 2005-04-19 Digimarc Corporation Methods and tangible objects employing textured machine readable data
US5488664A (en) 1994-04-22 1996-01-30 Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for protecting visual information with printed cryptographic watermarks
US5530751A (en) 1994-06-30 1996-06-25 Hewlett-Packard Company Embedded hidden identification codes in digital objects
US5600732A (en) * 1994-12-08 1997-02-04 Banctec, Inc. Document image analysis method
EP1049320B1 (de) 1995-05-08 2003-01-02 Digimarc Corporation Verbindungsherstellung zwischen Computern beruhend auf der Dekodierung einer steganographisch in einem Audioobjekt eingebetteten Adresse
US6744906B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2004-06-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US6988202B1 (en) 1995-05-08 2006-01-17 Digimarc Corporation Pre-filteriing to increase watermark signal-to-noise ratio
US7171018B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2007-01-30 Digimarc Corporation Portable devices and methods employing digital watermarking
US6345145B1 (en) 1995-08-25 2002-02-05 Sony Corporation Signal recording/reproducing method and apparatus, signal record medium and signal transmission/reception method and apparatus
US6750902B1 (en) * 1996-02-13 2004-06-15 Fotonation Holdings Llc Camera network communication device
US5974548A (en) * 1996-07-12 1999-10-26 Novell, Inc. Media-independent document security method and apparatus
US5872834A (en) 1996-09-16 1999-02-16 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Telephone with biometric sensing device
US6039257A (en) * 1997-04-28 2000-03-21 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage metering system that utilizes secure invisible bar codes for postal verification
US5960081A (en) 1997-06-05 1999-09-28 Cray Research, Inc. Embedding a digital signature in a video sequence
US6104812A (en) * 1998-01-12 2000-08-15 Juratrade, Limited Anti-counterfeiting method and apparatus using digital screening
US5946414A (en) 1998-08-28 1999-08-31 Xerox Corporation Encoding data in color images using patterned color modulated image regions
US6542629B1 (en) * 1999-07-22 2003-04-01 Xerox Corporation Digital imaging method and apparatus for detection of document security marks
US6546114B1 (en) * 1999-09-07 2003-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Technique for detecting a watermark in a marked image
US6442555B1 (en) * 1999-10-26 2002-08-27 Hewlett-Packard Company Automatic categorization of documents using document signatures
JP2001213015A (ja) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-07 Fujitsu Ltd 画像記録装置
US6708894B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2004-03-23 Xerox Corporation Method for invisible embedded data using yellow glyphs
US7310168B2 (en) * 2001-07-03 2007-12-18 Infoprint Solutions Company Llc Method and apparatus for controlling a spot function for digital halftoning

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0225599A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2261867B1 (de) 2018-07-18
CN1252653C (zh) 2006-04-19
US7684088B2 (en) 2010-03-23
EP2261867A3 (de) 2012-12-19
DE60143487D1 (de) 2010-12-30
US20040013285A1 (en) 2004-01-22
EP2261867A2 (de) 2010-12-15
DK1319219T3 (da) 2011-02-21
EP1319219B1 (de) 2010-11-17
ES2356598T3 (es) 2011-04-11
ATE488822T1 (de) 2010-12-15
WO2002025599A1 (fr) 2002-03-28
CN1475001A (zh) 2004-02-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1319219B1 (de) Verfahren zur vorbeugung der verfälschung oder änderung von bedruckten oder gravierten flächen
US6718046B2 (en) Low visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence
US9718296B2 (en) Authenticating identification and security documents and other objects
US8181884B2 (en) Machine-readable features for objects
US7537170B2 (en) Machine-readable security features for printed objects
CA2596103C (en) Method to apply an invisible mark on a media
RU2316058C2 (ru) Система и способ аутентификации изделия
US20030005304A1 (en) Marking articles using a covert digitally watermarked image
US20050013463A1 (en) Low visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence
AU2013220001B2 (en) Security element and method to inspect authenticity of a print
EP1433305B1 (de) Verfahren für robustes räumliches asymmetrisches modulationsmarkieren mit räumlicher überabtastung
EP2143082B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur identifikation von objekten oder dokumenten
FR3068293A1 (fr) Document de securite comportant un element optique de securite
CH694233A5 (fr) Procédé d'application et de reconnaissance d'un filigrane numérique surimprimé.
JP2002532812A (ja) 偽造防止システム
FR2932116A1 (fr) Document fiduciaire ou assimile comportant des motifs sous forme d'a-plats ainsi qu'une impression en taille douce, et son procede de fabrication
Chahal et al. Digital watermarking on bank note
EP1847400A2 (de) Kontrollelement für bedruckte Gegenstände

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030326

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20061009

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20061009

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: KUTTER, MARTIN

Inventor name: MEYLAN, ROLAND

Inventor name: JORDAN, FREDERIC

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60143487

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101230

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: LEMAN CONSULTING S.A.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2356598

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20110411

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110317

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110218

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110818

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20110914

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 60143487

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20170922

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20170926

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20170928

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20170921

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170921

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20170922

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20170906

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20170921

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20170921

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20171025

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20180930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20181001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 488822

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180918

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180917

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20191031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180918

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200922

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200914

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200925

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60143487

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20210916

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20210916

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180917