EP1319219A1 - Method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface - Google Patents
Method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surfaceInfo
- Publication number
- EP1319219A1 EP1319219A1 EP01964793A EP01964793A EP1319219A1 EP 1319219 A1 EP1319219 A1 EP 1319219A1 EP 01964793 A EP01964793 A EP 01964793A EP 01964793 A EP01964793 A EP 01964793A EP 1319219 A1 EP1319219 A1 EP 1319219A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- watermark
- signature
- printed
- image
- visible
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/004—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using digital security elements, e.g. information coded on a magnetic thread or strip
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/005—Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations
- G07D7/0054—Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations involving markings the properties of which are altered from original properties
- G07D7/0056—Testing security markings invisible to the naked eye, e.g. verifying thickened lines or unobtrusive markings or alterations involving markings the properties of which are altered from original properties involving markings of altered colours
Definitions
- a method of preventing counterfeiting or altering a printed or engraved surface is a method of preventing counterfeiting or altering a printed or engraved surface.
- the present invention relates to a method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface.
- Special ink printing uses special chemical properties of the ink to provide a specific reaction to a particular action.
- fluorescent inks become very bright when they are lit by a particular wavelength, some inks are even invisible to natural light, other inks change color according to their orientation or their temperature (and can be reveal by heating the paper with a finger), etc.
- Special inks have one thing in common: particularly expensive and necessitate making modifications in the usual industrial production chain (additional mask for offset for example).
- additional mask for offset for example.
- Codes using invisible inks allow digital information to be hidden. These codes can be characters, bar codes, 2D codes, etc. In addition to its high cost and specific to invisible inks, this system has two major drawbacks. On the one hand, due to the nature of the codes used, it is located on a certain part of the document or of the packaging and it is therefore possible to destroy it without altering the entire surface. On the other hand, the codes used always have geometric characteristics (bars, geometric figures, characters, etc.) clearly identifying them as anti-copy devices. This greatly facilitates the task of the pirate seeking to reveal and reproduce the ink. In addition, as soon as the pirate knows how to make this reproduction, he ipso facto has the means to reproduce the code.
- systems based on on-board memories or processors combine the disadvantages of being very expensive, unattractive and localized. Their main application is more to secure a communication, or to dynamically store information rather than to distinguish an original from a copy.
- One of the aims of the present invention is to remedy the drawbacks of known methods making it possible to prevent counterfeiting or alteration of documents printed or engraved by digital means.
- the present invention relates to a method intended to prevent counterfeiting or alteration of printed or engraved documents characterized by the incorporation of a digital watermark in part or in the whole of the document.
- the digital watermark technique also known as digital watermarking, is a technique for hiding information in a robust and imperceptible way in multimedia data such as music, video, images, documents, etc.
- the information that is hidden is called the signature.
- This signature can for example be a number, a name or even an image.
- “Hide” has a very specific meaning in this context: for example in the case of an image, we will slightly change the color of certain pixels, and in the case of music we will slightly modify the sound from time to time.
- Imperceptible means that the changes introduced are such that an individual cannot distinguish the original data from the data signed by his own senses. For example, a signed image must have exactly the same appearance as a normal image, a signed music must appear completely normal, the same for a video or any other data. The whole problem is to make a computer capable of detecting this hidden information when it escapes our senses. There are also applications where a visible watermark is acceptable or even desirable. This allows in particular to further increase the robustness and a visual check for the presence of a watermark. The principle that remains is that the watermark should not be visually disturbing.
- the "robustness" of a watermark means that one must be able to find the signature after any manipulation of signed data. Take for example the case of a signed image: we must be able to compress, print, scan or rotate it without ever losing the signature.
- Many publications have been made on the various techniques allowing to hide a watermark in an image, in a video or an audio signal. With regard to images, the latter can be classified according to the technique used for marking: some operate modifications directly in the spatial domain (see for example [1] M. Kutter, F. Jordan, F. Bossen, "Digital watermaking of color images using amplitude modulation", Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 7, n ° 2, pp.
- the digital watermark technique has so far been used in order to find the signature on a possible copy to prove the origin of the information present on the copy, thanks to the presence of the watermark that the 'found on the copy. This in all cases involved the use of a robust watermark.
- the purpose of incorporating the digital watermark on the surface is different, since its presence is intended to prevent authentication or alteration of the surface concerned, i.e. provide proof that this is the authentic surface if the watermark is present or that it is a copy or that the surface has been altered if the watermark is missing.
- the robustness of the watermark must be reduced so that a copy of the surface results in a failure to read the watermark digital.
- a "fragile" watermark A typical example of application consists in preventing the counterfeiting of securities such as banknotes. If the watermark is incorporated to avoid alteration of all or part of the surface, the watermark may be strong or fragile.
- the watermark is printed using colors and resolutions that are invisible to the naked eye. This therefore makes it possible to protect, for example, a package without its graphics being altered, which is important for marketing reasons.
- the watermark can cover the entire surface of a printed document. It is therefore not possible to erase it without altering the document, for example by scratching the surface. In practice, this property makes it possible, for example, to avoid gray markets, ie products sold by unauthorized distributors. Indeed, they sometimes erase the code (invisible 2D code for example) identifying their reseller by "milling" the surface of the packaging where the code is printed. • Price
- the watermark is printed using traditional printing systems. Regarding industrial printing (offset, etc.), it is fully integrated into the production chain and does not incur any additional costs. Regarding personal printing (inkjet, laser, etc.), it is fully compatible with commercial printers. In both cases, the reading is done with a standard digital scanner. This low price opens up new markets: firstly for industrial printing, packaging for luxury or pharmaceutical products, as well as certificates, checks, entry tickets, etc. On the other hand for personal printing, it allows anyone with standard equipment to create and verify secure and personalized documents. For example, a doctor may hide the names of the drugs prescribed in the paper used to print the prescription. It is possible to program a printer so that it hides a watermark in any printed document thus allowing later identification of the date of printing, the name of the user, etc.
- the watermark contains digital information (typically several tens of bits per square centimeter) which is encoded or retrieved using a key.
- this storage makes it possible, for example, to secure information printed in visible text (therefore liable to be modified). Indeed it is then possible to encode the same information in the watermark and therefore to be able to detect any modification in the text of the document (date, amount, identity, etc.).
- One application concerns contracts for which we want to be sure of the date of issue.
- Another example with banknotes the serial number can be hidden in each note, so it is impossible to create counterfeit notes with different numbers because it would be necessary to generate each time the corresponding watermark.
- Figure 1 the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position. The four peaks illustrate the effect of a symmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by locally increasing or decreasing its intensity.
- the present invention proposes to asymmetrically modulate the color of the pixels.
- Figure 2 gives an example of asymmetric modulation obtained by darkening the color of certain pixels. This modulation can then be positive or negative depending on whether color is added or removed.
- the graph in the figure shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position. The two peaks illustrate the effect of an asymmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by only decreasing its intensity.
- Figure 3 gives some examples of digital watermark images.
- Another object of the present invention is therefore to propose a method for hiding and / or finding a digital watermark, characterized by the use of an asymmetrical modulation of the amplitude of a visible or invisible light component.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an example of symmetrical modulation
- FIG. 4 illustrates the implementation of the integrated process with a standard offset printing technique
- FIG. 5 illustrates the implementation of the method with a separate offset printing step
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the process for signing a material in three stages
- - Figure 9 is a block diagram of the process for reading a uniform image signed in three stages; and - Figure 10 is a block diagram of the process for reading a non-uniform image signed in three stages.
- FIG. 1 An example of symmetrical modulation is illustrated in Figure 1.
- the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position.
- the four peaks illustrate the effect of a symmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by locally increasing or decreasing its intensity.
- FIG. 2 An example of asymmetric modulation is illustrated in Figure 2.
- the graph shows the variation in luminance of the pixels of an image as a function of their X position and for an identical Y position.
- the two peaks illustrate the effect of an asymmetrical modulation of this signal obtained by only decreasing its intensity.
- One way of obtaining a positive asymmetric modulation consists in using an overprinting technique by printing the watermark over the own colors of the material and other information already printed and therefore without taking account of local variations in the colors on the surface of this material.
- This approach requires that the values of the color components of the material can only be darkened during the signature since additional ink is added. Mathematically, this corresponds to a positive asymmetric modulation of the color of the points. In principle, this approach can be applied to any printing process. Some specifics of watermark printing may depend on the printing process. The specific cases of offset and inkjet type printing for achieving positive modulation are detailed below.
- Figure 4 illustrates the implementation of the above method using positive modulation with an industrial printing technique of offset type in the case of simultaneous printing of the watermark.
- a four-color printing 45 is carried out (for example for a packaging 40) which means that four different ink colors are used for each of the yellow masks 41, cyan 42, magenta 43 and black 44.
- the digital watermark can have a single color, it is generally desirable to use one of the colors already selected for standard printing for the watermark.
- Figure 4 shows how the different masks can then be applied.
- the watermark printing is fully integrated into the standard industrial printing chain and therefore does not incur any additional cost.
- the yellow mask can be used simultaneously for two different things: on the one hand it contains the yellow component of the image to be printed and on the other hand it contains the image of the watermark.
- the IT tools used when flashing the offset film make this integration easy.
- FIG. 5 Another possible alternative is to use a separate mask for the watermark as shown in Figure 5.
- the watermark is overprinted in an additional step with a mask and possibly its own ink (here magenta) .
- the mask 51 then defines the watermark points which are printed over the previously printed material 50.
- This method although more costly to implement by the printer, has the advantage of being able to easily change the watermark during the production. This allows for example to apply a watermark identifying different countries of sale to a series of identical packages. It should be noted that when non-covering inks are used, it is also possible to print the final image over the digital watermark, as illustrated in Figure 6. In this case, the reverse process is used.
- the watermark being previously printed 60 on the material, the final image being overprinted during an additional step.
- the masks yellow 61, cyan 62, magenta 63 and black 64 are used to overprint the pattern.
- the ink being transparent, the watermark 60 located under the pattern can still be detected in the final result 65.
- FIG. 7 Another usable printing method is of the inkjet type as illustrated in FIG. 7.
- the illustration shows an example of an inkjet printing system using four colors, yellow 71, cyan 72, magenta 73 and black 74, their print heads 75 and the printed material 70.
- the watermark is overprinted on the material. Setting up an inkjet printer for printing a watermark is particularly simple since the vast majority of printer drivers automatically manage the mixing of colors to obtain a particular shade. The four-color decomposition step is therefore most often unnecessary. It should however be noted that, depending on the drivers and printers, it may sometimes be desirable to choose a watermark color corresponding to the basic colors of the printer, this in order to avoid obtaining dithered colors or printing problems. alignment between dots of different colors.
- watermark printing can be simultaneous with the information or patterns intended to be printed normally. It is also possible to print the watermark separately, over or under the final design. In particular, text can be overprinted on the signed material itself, this text possibly being linked to the watermark. For example, the key figures of a contract can thus be hidden in the watermark of the paper and thus make it possible to guarantee its integrity.
- Negative modulation can be achieved during simultaneous printing by following the same principle as described above because it is always possible to subtract color from the electronic file: on the pattern to be printed, the points corresponding to the watermark are then cleared up.
- To achieve a separate printing with negative modulation it is however necessary to use a particular ink: for example, in the case of visible ink, one solution consists in using a covering type ink. The summary of different watermark printing possibilities is presented in the table below:
- Size of the points this is the diameter of the watermark points obtained after printing.
- the minimum dot size is set by printing technology. Values between 300 and 1200 dots per inch are common.
- Color of the points Depending on the color, texture and possible patterns applied to the materials, certain colors may be more or less visible. For example, it is usual to use a yellow color for white backgrounds (separate or simultaneous positive modulation).
- Density of the watermark This defines the ratio between the number of dots printed per unit area (also measured in dots). Typical values of 0.02 or less can be used. A very fine stitch size increases the density of the watermark.
- Screening The screening technique (halftone) makes it possible to reproduce any color from the different fundamental colors. It is then preferable that the size of the screening is sufficiently fine compared to the size of the points.
- Type of ink Non-visible substances can also be used.
- the influence of some of these parameters is illustrated in Figure 3.
- the watermark 1 is visible.
- the lower visibility of watermark 2 is obtained by simultaneously decreasing the density and size of the dots.
- the watermark 3 also has a clarification.
- the main difficulty lies in the ability to find the asymmetrical watermark.
- most tattoo techniques can extract information from the signed image without using the original image.
- Certain techniques first make a prediction of what the original image was from the signed image and can then deduce what the signature is. This technique is still applicable in the present case.
- the material has a uniform and known initial color, it is possible to suppress this prediction. This is particularly the case with a sheet of white paper.
- This increases the reliability of the detection and therefore reduces the visibility of the watermark up to the extreme limit of sensitivity of an optical scanner. Consequently, this makes it very difficult to duplicate the signed material, for example by photocopying: in fact, the losses specific to any reproduction system generally weaken this signature below the detectability threshold.
- One application is to include such a watermark on paper which one wishes to avoid copying, such as banknotes for example.
- One embodiment of the invention consists in using as a basis a digital watermark algorithm of the spatial type with symmetric amplitude modulation, such as for example that described in [1].
- c (k) ' c (k) + v.b.a (k) (1)
- Equation (1) the set of points defined by vba (k) constitutes the watermark ( Figure 8, step 84) which is added to the original image c (k) to give the signed image c (k ) It is the latter which is then printed according to the present invention.
- Equation 8 gives a block diagram of the complete method: the set of points constituting the watermark 85 is calculated 84 on the basis of the value of the bit to be hidden 81 and of the key 82 defining the random sequence a (k). The value of the points being positive or negative, as defined by equation (1). Equation (2) is equivalent to thresholding 86 the values of the watermark 85 while keeping only the positive values and then adding 88 these values 87 to the image to be signed 83 to obtain the signed image 89.
- this technique is qualified as “asymmetric amplitude modulation”.
- the sign of the modulation ba (k) being positive, the modulation is said to be positive.
- Equation (2) It is also possible to obtain a negative modulation by printing a uniform color or "pierced” by the watermark. Equation (2) then becomes:
- the new point value c (k) ' can be measured on the printed sheet using an optical scanner. Two cases then arise depending on whether the color of the material is uniform and known or not.
- Figure 9 is a block diagram describing the process: the signed image obtained by scanner is subtracted from the original image in order to restore the watermark. The bit constituting the signature is then calculated, optionally, an additional filtering step can be carried out if visible information has been printed over the signed uniform image. The signed image 91 is previously filtered 92 in order to eliminate any noise (scratches, dirt, text printed over the watermark, etc.).
- the image obtained 93 is then subtracted 94 from the original image 95 in order to extract the watermark 96.
- the value of bit b is then found according to conventional watermark detection techniques, as described in article [5] M . Kutter, "Watermarking resisting to translation, rotation, and scaling.”, Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Voice, Video, and Data Communications, November 1998, which consists essentially of reversing equation (2) and statistically correlating the value bit b found 99 on several pixels k in order to guarantee good robustness to possible errors which may for example arise during the digital acquisition of the image.
- This method can be generalized to several bits b and then makes it possible to code any digital information such as a number or a character string.
- the second case is illustrated by the block diagram of FIG. 10 where the original image is predicted from the signed image, the signed image is subtracted from the predicted image in order to restore the watermark, the bit constituting the signature is then calculated.
- a denoising filter 105 for example of the Wiener type, is used to make a prediction 106 of the original image o (k) from the signed image 101.
- the difference 102 between these two images then constitutes the watermark 107 which can be decoded 103 using the key 108 to find the bit 104 in the same way as before ( Figure 9).
- the prediction error being significantly greater than in the first case, the number of bits b coded in this way is systematically lower.
- the implementation of the detection requires an optical scanner capable of scanning the document on which the watermark is printed. Since positioning on the scanner is never perfect, it is necessary to be able to find the information coded by the watermark after possible translations and rotations.
- a suitable technique consists in using the method described by [5] which is based on an autocorrelated watermark (to compensate for rotations) and an intercorrelation technique (to compensate for translations).
- the process can also be applied to sectors other than printing.
- a laser to engrave metal surfaces, stones, ceramics, etc., and thus encode a digital watermark.
- the applications concerned are then, for example, parts from the automobile or aeronautical industry or luxury objects in the jewelry or objects sectors. of values.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10174049.6A EP2261867B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method intended for preventing forgery or alteration of a printed or engraved surface. |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH183200 | 2000-09-20 | ||
CH18322000 | 2000-09-20 | ||
PCT/CH2001/000560 WO2002025599A1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10174049.6A Division EP2261867B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method intended for preventing forgery or alteration of a printed or engraved surface. |
EP10174049.6 Division-Into | 2010-08-25 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1319219A1 true EP1319219A1 (en) | 2003-06-18 |
EP1319219B1 EP1319219B1 (en) | 2010-11-17 |
Family
ID=4566438
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10174049.6A Expired - Lifetime EP2261867B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method intended for preventing forgery or alteration of a printed or engraved surface. |
EP01964793A Expired - Lifetime EP1319219B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10174049.6A Expired - Lifetime EP2261867B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-09-17 | Method intended for preventing forgery or alteration of a printed or engraved surface. |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7684088B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2261867B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1252653C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE488822T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60143487D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1319219T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2356598T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002025599A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6728390B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2004-04-27 | Digimarc Corporation | Methods and systems using multiple watermarks |
US7246239B2 (en) | 2001-01-24 | 2007-07-17 | Digimarc Corporation | Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects |
US6899475B2 (en) | 2002-01-30 | 2005-05-31 | Digimarc Corporation | Watermarking a page description language file |
US7974495B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2011-07-05 | Digimarc Corporation | Identification and protection of video |
US7644281B2 (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2010-01-05 | Universite De Geneve | Character and vector graphics watermark for structured electronic documents security |
EP1690697A1 (en) | 2005-02-15 | 2006-08-16 | Alpvision SA | Method to apply an invisible mark on a media |
EP1691539A1 (en) * | 2005-02-15 | 2006-08-16 | European Central Bank | Two-dimensional security pattern that can be authenticated with one-dimensional signal processing |
KR100831601B1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2008-05-23 | 이항경 | Method and system for good authentification on communication network by using serial number and password |
CN101089807A (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2007-12-19 | 光宝科技股份有限公司 | Printing method and device for floating print |
US8770625B1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2014-07-08 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Anti-counterfeiting articles |
DE102008012426A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-05-07 | Bundesdruckerei Gmbh | Document-production method for producing a security inserts imaging information/data into layers of a document to form a total security image |
WO2009134965A2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2009-11-05 | Polyonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the detection of counterfeiting |
US9749607B2 (en) | 2009-07-16 | 2017-08-29 | Digimarc Corporation | Coordinated illumination and image signal capture for enhanced signal detection |
HUP1200097A2 (en) * | 2012-02-15 | 2013-08-28 | Glenisys Kft | Security element and method for checking originality of a printed matter |
EP3103061B1 (en) | 2014-02-04 | 2024-04-03 | Thymaris Ltd. | Method and apparatus for generating and storing an individual imperfection profile related to an original item and method and apparatus for determining an authentication status of a suspect item |
FR3018130B1 (en) * | 2014-03-03 | 2016-03-25 | Advanced Track & Trace | METHOD OF MARKING A HOLOGRAPHIC MATRIX AND HOLOGRAPHIC MATRIX THUS OBTAINED |
US9635378B2 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2017-04-25 | Digimarc Corporation | Sparse modulation for robust signaling and synchronization |
WO2016153936A1 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2016-09-29 | Digimarc Corporation | Digital watermarking and data hiding with narrow-band absorption materials |
US10424038B2 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2019-09-24 | Digimarc Corporation | Signal encoding outside of guard band region surrounding text characters, including varying encoding strength |
US10783601B1 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2020-09-22 | Digimarc Corporation | Digital watermarking and signal encoding with activable compositions |
FR3035819B1 (en) | 2015-05-07 | 2021-04-30 | Honnorat Rech & Services | SMARTPHONE AUTHENTICABLE PAPER |
WO2016202827A1 (en) | 2015-06-18 | 2016-12-22 | Hicof Inc. | Authentication feature in a barcode |
CN106682912B (en) | 2015-11-10 | 2021-06-15 | 艾普维真股份有限公司 | Authentication method of 3D structure |
US11062108B2 (en) | 2017-11-07 | 2021-07-13 | Digimarc Corporation | Generating and reading optical codes with variable density to adapt for visual quality and reliability |
US10896307B2 (en) | 2017-11-07 | 2021-01-19 | Digimarc Corporation | Generating and reading optical codes with variable density to adapt for visual quality and reliability |
US10872392B2 (en) | 2017-11-07 | 2020-12-22 | Digimarc Corporation | Generating artistic designs encoded with robust, machine-readable data |
EP3686027B1 (en) | 2019-01-27 | 2021-07-14 | U-NICA Systems AG | Method of printing authentication indicators with an amplitude-modulated half tone |
TW202100960A (en) | 2019-02-28 | 2021-01-01 | 瑞士商西克帕控股有限公司 | Method for authenticating a magnetically induced mark with a portable device |
PT115571B (en) | 2019-06-08 | 2021-06-07 | Incm Imprensa Nac Casa Da Moeda S A | METHOD FOR VALIDATION OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF AN IMAGE PRESENT IN AN OBJECT, OBJECT WITH INTENSIFIED LEVEL OF SAFETY AND ITS METHOD OF PREPARATION, COMPUTER DEVICE, COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND ADAPTED READING MEDIA |
US11636565B1 (en) | 2019-07-24 | 2023-04-25 | Digimarc Corporation | Tamper detection arrangements, and point of sales systems employing same |
EP3859597A1 (en) | 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-04 | U-NICA Systems AG | A computer implemented method and system of surface identification comprising scales |
AR123354A1 (en) | 2020-09-02 | 2022-11-23 | Sicpa Holding Sa | SECURITY MARK, METHOD AND DEVICE FOR READING THE SECURITY MARK, SECURITY DOCUMENT MARKED WITH THE SECURITY MARK AND METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VERIFYING SUCH SECURITY DOCUMENT |
EP4328879A1 (en) | 2022-08-26 | 2024-02-28 | Alpvision SA | Systems and methods for predicting the authentication detectability of counterfeited items |
Family Cites Families (48)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3984624A (en) | 1974-07-25 | 1976-10-05 | Weston Instruments, Inc. | Video system for conveying digital and analog information |
US4237484A (en) | 1979-08-08 | 1980-12-02 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Technique for transmitting digital data together with a video signal |
FR2515403A1 (en) | 1981-10-28 | 1983-04-29 | Quadrivium Inf | METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING A SOUND RECORDING AND DUPLICATION INSTALLATION IMPLEMENTING THE METHOD |
US5191966A (en) * | 1982-09-02 | 1993-03-09 | Miller Formless Co., Inc. | Apparatus and method for unloading bulk materials |
DE3851724T2 (en) | 1987-07-08 | 1995-05-04 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Method and device for protecting copy signals. |
GB8806452D0 (en) | 1988-03-18 | 1988-04-20 | Imperial College | Digital data security system |
FI80405C (en) | 1988-03-24 | 1990-06-11 | Suomen Pankin Setelipaino | Printed article secured with warning figure and method for its cutting |
NL8901032A (en) | 1988-11-10 | 1990-06-01 | Philips Nv | CODER FOR INCLUDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN A DIGITAL AUDIO SIGNAL WITH A PREFERRED FORMAT, A DECODER FOR DERIVING THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THIS DIGITAL SIGNAL, AN APPARATUS FOR RECORDING A DIGITAL SIGNAL ON A CODE OF RECORD. OBTAINED A RECORD CARRIER WITH THIS DEVICE. |
US5103459B1 (en) | 1990-06-25 | 1999-07-06 | Qualcomm Inc | System and method for generating signal waveforms in a cdma cellular telephone system |
CA2044404C (en) | 1990-07-31 | 1998-06-23 | Dan S. Bloomberg | Self-clocking glyph shape codes |
US5091966A (en) | 1990-07-31 | 1992-02-25 | Xerox Corporation | Adaptive scaling for decoding spatially periodic self-clocking glyph shape codes |
US5315098A (en) * | 1990-12-27 | 1994-05-24 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and means for embedding machine readable digital data in halftone images |
EP0493091A1 (en) | 1990-12-27 | 1992-07-01 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for embedding machine readable digital data in grayscale images |
CA2063785C (en) | 1991-03-25 | 1998-09-29 | Masahiro Funada | Image processing apparatus |
US5363202A (en) | 1991-03-29 | 1994-11-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing apparatus with anti-forgery function |
US6166750A (en) | 1992-01-31 | 2000-12-26 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing apparatus and method for adding predetermined additional information to an image by adding a predetermined number of unit dots to partial color component data of the image |
US5721788A (en) | 1992-07-31 | 1998-02-24 | Corbis Corporation | Method and system for digital image signatures |
US6421145B1 (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 2002-07-16 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing apparatus and method using image information and additional information or an additional pattern added thereto or superposed thereon |
US5421869A (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1995-06-06 | Nocopi Technologies, Inc. | Security marking method and composition |
DE69432480T2 (en) | 1993-11-18 | 2004-03-18 | Digimarc Corp., Tualatin | IDENTIFICATION / CERTIFICATION CODING METHOD AND DEVICE |
US6345104B1 (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 2002-02-05 | Digimarc Corporation | Digital watermarks and methods for security documents |
US5748763A (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1998-05-05 | Digimarc Corporation | Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding |
US7116781B2 (en) | 1993-11-18 | 2006-10-03 | Digimarc Corporation | Counteracting geometric distortions in watermarking |
US5768426A (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1998-06-16 | Digimarc Corporation | Graphics processing system employing embedded code signals |
US6614914B1 (en) * | 1995-05-08 | 2003-09-02 | Digimarc Corporation | Watermark embedder and reader |
US6449377B1 (en) * | 1995-05-08 | 2002-09-10 | Digimarc Corporation | Methods and systems for watermark processing of line art images |
US6882738B2 (en) | 1994-03-17 | 2005-04-19 | Digimarc Corporation | Methods and tangible objects employing textured machine readable data |
US5488664A (en) | 1994-04-22 | 1996-01-30 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for protecting visual information with printed cryptographic watermarks |
US5530751A (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1996-06-25 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Embedded hidden identification codes in digital objects |
US5600732A (en) | 1994-12-08 | 1997-02-04 | Banctec, Inc. | Document image analysis method |
US6728390B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2004-04-27 | Digimarc Corporation | Methods and systems using multiple watermarks |
EP1003324B1 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2003-07-16 | Digimarc Corporation | Forgery-resistant documents with images conveying secret data and related methods |
US6988202B1 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2006-01-17 | Digimarc Corporation | Pre-filteriing to increase watermark signal-to-noise ratio |
US7171018B2 (en) | 1995-07-27 | 2007-01-30 | Digimarc Corporation | Portable devices and methods employing digital watermarking |
US6345145B1 (en) | 1995-08-25 | 2002-02-05 | Sony Corporation | Signal recording/reproducing method and apparatus, signal record medium and signal transmission/reception method and apparatus |
US6750902B1 (en) * | 1996-02-13 | 2004-06-15 | Fotonation Holdings Llc | Camera network communication device |
US5974548A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 1999-10-26 | Novell, Inc. | Media-independent document security method and apparatus |
US5872834A (en) | 1996-09-16 | 1999-02-16 | Dew Engineering And Development Limited | Telephone with biometric sensing device |
US6039257A (en) * | 1997-04-28 | 2000-03-21 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Postage metering system that utilizes secure invisible bar codes for postal verification |
US5960081A (en) | 1997-06-05 | 1999-09-28 | Cray Research, Inc. | Embedding a digital signature in a video sequence |
US6104812A (en) | 1998-01-12 | 2000-08-15 | Juratrade, Limited | Anti-counterfeiting method and apparatus using digital screening |
US5946414A (en) | 1998-08-28 | 1999-08-31 | Xerox Corporation | Encoding data in color images using patterned color modulated image regions |
US6542629B1 (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2003-04-01 | Xerox Corporation | Digital imaging method and apparatus for detection of document security marks |
US6546114B1 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2003-04-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Technique for detecting a watermark in a marked image |
US6442555B1 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2002-08-27 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Automatic categorization of documents using document signatures |
JP2001213015A (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-07 | Fujitsu Ltd | Image recorder |
US6708894B2 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2004-03-23 | Xerox Corporation | Method for invisible embedded data using yellow glyphs |
US7310168B2 (en) * | 2001-07-03 | 2007-12-18 | Infoprint Solutions Company Llc | Method and apparatus for controlling a spot function for digital halftoning |
-
2001
- 2001-09-17 DK DK01964793.2T patent/DK1319219T3/en active
- 2001-09-17 WO PCT/CH2001/000560 patent/WO2002025599A1/en active Application Filing
- 2001-09-17 ES ES01964793T patent/ES2356598T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-17 CN CNB018188141A patent/CN1252653C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-17 US US10/380,914 patent/US7684088B2/en active Active
- 2001-09-17 DE DE60143487T patent/DE60143487D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-17 EP EP10174049.6A patent/EP2261867B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-17 AT AT01964793T patent/ATE488822T1/en active
- 2001-09-17 EP EP01964793A patent/EP1319219B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO0225599A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1252653C (en) | 2006-04-19 |
US7684088B2 (en) | 2010-03-23 |
CN1475001A (en) | 2004-02-11 |
EP1319219B1 (en) | 2010-11-17 |
ATE488822T1 (en) | 2010-12-15 |
US20040013285A1 (en) | 2004-01-22 |
EP2261867A3 (en) | 2012-12-19 |
EP2261867A2 (en) | 2010-12-15 |
DK1319219T3 (en) | 2011-02-21 |
WO2002025599A1 (en) | 2002-03-28 |
EP2261867B1 (en) | 2018-07-18 |
DE60143487D1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
ES2356598T3 (en) | 2011-04-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1319219B1 (en) | Method for preventing counterfeiting or alteration of a printed or engraved surface | |
US6718046B2 (en) | Low visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence | |
US9718296B2 (en) | Authenticating identification and security documents and other objects | |
US8181884B2 (en) | Machine-readable features for objects | |
US7537170B2 (en) | Machine-readable security features for printed objects | |
RU2316058C2 (en) | System and method for product authentication | |
US20030005304A1 (en) | Marking articles using a covert digitally watermarked image | |
US20050013463A1 (en) | Low visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence | |
AU2013220001B2 (en) | Security element and method to inspect authenticity of a print | |
MX2007009522A (en) | Method to apply an invisible mark on a media. | |
EP1433305B1 (en) | Method for robust asymmetric modulation spatial marking with spatial oversampling | |
EP2143082B1 (en) | Method and device for identifying objects or documents | |
FR3068293A1 (en) | SECURITY DOCUMENT COMPRISING AN OPTICAL SECURITY ELEMENT | |
CH694233A5 (en) | Prevention of counterfeiting or alteration to printed or engraved document surfaces uses a numerical watermark in a part or over whole surface of document | |
JP2002532812A (en) | Anti-counterfeiting system | |
FR2932116A1 (en) | FIDUCIARY OR ASSIMILE DOCUMENT HAVING FLAT-SHAPED REASONS AND SOFT-SIZE PRINTING, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | |
Chahal et al. | Digital watermarking on bank note | |
EP1847400A2 (en) | Control element for printed objects |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030326 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061009 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061009 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: KUTTER, MARTIN Inventor name: MEYLAN, ROLAND Inventor name: JORDAN, FREDERIC |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60143487 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20101230 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: LEMAN CONSULTING S.A. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2356598 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20110411 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110317 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101117 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110218 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110818 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Payment date: 20110914 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 60143487 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110818 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110930 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20170922 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20170926 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20170928 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20170921 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20170921 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20170922 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20170906 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20170921 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20170921 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20171025 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20180930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 488822 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180917 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180918 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180917 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180917 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20191031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180918 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20200922 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200914 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200925 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 60143487 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20210916 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20210916 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180917 |