EP1291179A2 - Agent d'essai et procédé pour contrôler l'impression offset et numerique - Google Patents

Agent d'essai et procédé pour contrôler l'impression offset et numerique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1291179A2
EP1291179A2 EP02405744A EP02405744A EP1291179A2 EP 1291179 A2 EP1291179 A2 EP 1291179A2 EP 02405744 A EP02405744 A EP 02405744A EP 02405744 A EP02405744 A EP 02405744A EP 1291179 A2 EP1291179 A2 EP 1291179A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
point
test target
point clusters
clusters
printing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP02405744A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1291179A3 (fr
EP1291179B1 (fr
Inventor
Kurt Münger
Karl Heuberger
Markus Dättwyler
Herbert Janser
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wifag Maschinenfabrik AG
Original Assignee
Wifag Maschinenfabrik AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wifag Maschinenfabrik AG filed Critical Wifag Maschinenfabrik AG
Publication of EP1291179A2 publication Critical patent/EP1291179A2/fr
Publication of EP1291179A3 publication Critical patent/EP1291179A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1291179B1 publication Critical patent/EP1291179B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41FPRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO PRINTING, LINING MACHINES, TYPEWRITERS, AND TO STAMPS
    • B41P2233/00Arrangements for the operation of printing presses
    • B41P2233/50Marks on printed material
    • B41P2233/51Marks on printed material for colour quality control

Definitions

  • Test element based controls provide information about the Printing process. An overview of the current state of the art can be found in the IFRA report reproduced (Ifra, 2001).
  • the MiniTarget measuring system described by kunzli et al pursues the second method (Brunzli, 1998). It represents a big step in the direction of miniaturization of quality control devices. With its dimensions of 7mm x 10mm, it is possible to capture the entire image information of the MiniTarget by single measurement with a CCD camera and derive the printing parameters mathematically.
  • the MiniTarget concept is understood as a continuation of an idea that is already used in conventional print control strips. In particular, it is analogous to how print control strips are constructed on test elements which are arranged on a small area. With the existing dimensions, the MiniTarget still appears disturbing to the reader. In order to be invisible, or more appropriately "imperceptible", a size is required which is significantly less than 1mm 2 .
  • the invention relates to a pattern of recording dots, such as lines and Surfaces with polygonal or circular boundaries, which is reduced so that it as Part of the printed image for the observer is not or almost not visible.
  • This test target is magnified microscopically and preferably via CCD camera detected.
  • the signal to noise ratio of the measurement is advantageously increased, which by averaging over several consecutive print patterns. through sophisticated image analysis, it is possible to directly print out the printing parameters to determine the miniaturized patterns.
  • the measures for the reduction of the Test targets are described. Then, by way of example, the application to the type outlined a process control, which is essentially exemplary of the geometric features of a particular dot pattern.
  • the dot pattern or test target is so small that it is virtually imperceptible to the naked eye by the observer.
  • the dot pattern is formed by a plurality of dot clusters in a typical arrangement, preferably without point closure of the dot clusters with each other.
  • the arrangement of the point clusters is typical in the sense that the dot pattern is identifiable as such in the print copy.
  • the arrangement of the point clusters in the test target, ie the dot pattern is preferably periodic.
  • the test target has a total area, ie area of the point clusters + area of the spaces, of at most one square millimeter and is preferably square. Preferably, its area is less than 0.5 mm 2 .
  • the size specifications with respect to the area advantageously also apply if a virtual frame is drawn around the entirety of the point clusters of the test target, ie the size specification applies to the area within the frame.
  • Each of the dot clusters is preferably printed in exactly one printing ink and is preferably formed from at least two recording dots in the X direction and two recording dots in the Y direction, ie, preferably at least four recording dots immediately adjacent in the X and Y directions.
  • the X and Y directions correspond to the circumferential and lateral directions.
  • the printed pixel can advantageously be understood as a recording point.
  • the point clusters are at least so large that they can be analyzed planimetrically.
  • the Evaluation is advantageously carried out in the printing press during printing.
  • the TestTarget (Dot Pattern) for determining color densities and color locations in the overprinting of several Colors, the TestTarget (Dot Pattern) according to the invention with a complementary TestTarget (Trapping Pattern).
  • the supplementary target preferably the same size and shape as the dot pattern based TestTarget. in the Four-color printing, for example, the supplementary TestTarget, depending on the color order, The following four color patches are included: C / M, C / Y, M / Y and C / M / Y.
  • the Trapping Pattern can either side by side to the Dot Pattern or even independently on the Page of the printed copy.
  • the invention can be used advantageously in offset printing, in particular in wet offset printing.
  • a particularly preferred field of application is newspaper printing Fed rotary printing presses.
  • An inventive test target can advantageously in the image or on non-image areas, in particular on a side edge, printed copy of the newspaper edition.
  • the biggest advantages offers the invention in multi-color printing, although they also with advantage in monochrome Pressure can be used.
  • test target is based on a specific dot pattern as shown in Figure 1.
  • C, M, Y and K in Figure 1a symbolize clusters of recording points in the corresponding colors.
  • n is the total number of point clusters in horizontal or vertical direction.
  • the clusters are preferably equal in number to the x and y directions, i.e. 1x1, 2x2, 3x3, ..., p x p adjacent recording points.
  • the Point size corresponds to the addressability of the output device, which in dpi (dots pro inch).
  • the unprinted space in the TestTarget is q pixels both in the x and y directions.
  • the point clusters are written in matrix notation by elements with the indices (i, j) designated.
  • the dot pattern shown in the case of four-color printing is multi-color printing transferable.
  • the arrangement of the colors is preferably such that the from top left to bottom right diagonal point clusters have the same color and in the top one Line in turn, all primary colors are arranged.
  • a fictitious framework is preferably used in the Way defines that a cell results in a periodic regularity. This Measure is taken with regard to the evaluation, which is not of the Positioning of the measuring aperture should depend. On this topic is below received.
  • control method is characterized by the fact that in Figure 1 at a Example test patterns described both the registration errors as well as the printing parameters can be removed.
  • Area coverage can be determined, but point cluster-based parameters can be determined, which in conventional densitometry or spectrophotometry are not accessible.
  • the presented type of point clusters is characterized by another noteworthy Property off.
  • the dot patterns correspond to small-area halftone dots, which include characteristic information of the printing process.
  • Small-scale point clusters As shown in Figure 1, process-related deviations of the pressure react significantly more sensitive than halftone dots in conventional control strips or in the MiniTarget.
  • the most important influencing factor is the tone gain, which manifests itself in that points in comparison to the theoretical surface occupancy usually too large be reproduced.
  • the effect is visualized in Figure 1b / c.
  • the tone gain increases the point by a fixed amount, which is not the point diameter depends. As a result, the effect increases in inverse proportion to the dot radius.
  • the Type of dot patterns as shown in Figure 1 will respond as a result in particular sensitive to process fluctuations.
  • the page length at 635 dpi output is 0.56 mm.
  • the area is 0.31 mm2. This is more than a hundred times smaller than that MiniTarget after Rienzli, 1998.
  • a supplementary test target was developed especially for the density and color measurements.
  • This test target preferably has the same size and shape as that on a Dot pattern based target. It is in four quadrants in the case of four-color printing divided, which contain printed swatches. These are in the case of Four color printing, depending on the color order, for example, C / M, C / Y, M / Y, and C / M / Y.
  • the target may be side by side with the dot pattern based target, or else be placed independently. It is specially used to increase the color densities in the Overprint and determine the ink acceptance. This is a procedure applied, which is presented in (Rienzli, 2000).
  • the components of the image analysis system preferably close a 3-CCD camera, a microscope, a frame grabber card and an image analysis software.
  • measurement must be done by correctly adjusting the microscope, the lighting and the camera to be taken to get a stable and high-contrast image becomes. Too high amplification of the measurement signal results in a strong noise of the Image.
  • the image analysis system can be used instead of one after the Tristimulus camera working, even with one, according to the spectral method working, spectrophotometer.
  • the size of the orifice as well as its positioning on the sample to be measured. If the orifice is set small, only a few Point cluster detected. It must therefore be risked that the sample is not representative is, i. the differently colored point clusters not according to their proportionate Occurrence in the sample to be considered. This results in a systematic Measurement error (Romano, 1999). This is especially great when the ratio of Orifice size and the point cluster period has a low value and between two consecutive integers, e.g. 1.5 is. That's why the captured image section is adapted by software to the fictitious image frame, which represents an integer multiple of a period. This will get parameters which are independent of the measuring aperture setting. Basically, that's enough a single point cluster per ink to characterize the printing process. Out However, for sample preparation and metrology, it is recommended that for the measurement at least four point clusters per ink are provided.
  • the two test fields presented are suitable despite the extremely small dimensions, to perform color and density measurements.
  • the measurement of the solid density and the Color values of the individual colors are made at point clusters.
  • For the measurements of overprinted colors becomes the color field based supplementary test field used, which is described earlier. This requires that the Measuring ranges are calculated by software.
  • For the measurements is a calibration the 3 chip CCD camera required (Rienzli, 2000).
  • the assessment of the digitized images takes place by means of image analysis (Demant Ch., 1998; Jahn B., 1997).
  • the image analysis is based on the RGB image of the test pattern, which in sufficiently high resolution is shown.
  • the diameter of a point cluster should be be recorded by at least 30 pixels. Most measurements will be for each ink made separately. In this case, the channel becomes one with Color evaluated, which is complementary to the observed ink.
  • the determination Threshold is a basic image analysis process to obtain the point clusters from Paper white to distinguish (Barratte Ch., 1995). In the gray value histogram of the Gray value image, the signals of paper white and the ink are determined. As Threshold will be the arithmetic mean of the modal values of paper white and the Ink taken. Artifacts are eliminated during measurement by: small-area structures outside the point cluster positions are removed by image analysis become.
  • the threshold value method converts the gray value image into a binary one Rendered to separate the point clusters from the paper white.
  • the percentage area coverage is a determining factor in the printing process.
  • the image-analytical surface measurement is based on the principle of planimetry. First, the areas of the point clusters become individual certainly. Then the dot cluster areas are summed for all colors and divided by the area of the fictitious aperture. The resulting value corresponds to the percentage area coverage.
  • the parameter E describes the geometry of the point cluster with respect to an ellipse shape. This parameter is used below to determine push and duplicate.
  • factor R is a measure of the smoothness of the edge course of point clusters (Haberffener, 1995), which is a characteristic variable of the printing process.
  • Pushing and doubling are two typical effects in the printing process, which in one indicate disturbed litigation (Romano F., 1998). Can push through different rotational speeds of the two cylinders are caused and manifests itself in broadened lines across the printing direction. The effect manifests itself visually in vertical lines, which are widened and therefore darker appear.
  • Duplication is caused by register problems between different printing units of Multicolor printing machines cause and express themselves in that the point is sideways shifted and attenuated appears again. Visually, you can see the effect of that Line fields in one direction appear darker as a result of the broadening. In contrast Duplication can occur in any orientation for pushing.
  • Figure 4 shows a computer simulation of the effect.
  • a presence of pushing is calculated according to equation (4) from the factor E in Connection derived with the position angle of the point clusters. From the statistical Treatment trends are visible. A preferred direction is then proven when the standard deviation of the angle is sufficiently small.
  • Figure 2 shows a three-dimensional plot of a point cluster before and after the averaging.
  • Relief representation of a point cluster printed by electrophotographic (left: 126 ⁇ m ⁇ 126 ⁇ m) and in newspaper printing (right: 250 ⁇ m ⁇ 250 ⁇ m).
  • the vertical axis represents gray values.
  • Relief of average dot clusters printed electrophotographically (left: sample size 36, 126 ⁇ m x 126 ⁇ m) and newsprint (right: sample size 41, 250 ⁇ 250 ⁇ m ⁇ m).
  • the vertical axis represents gray values.
  • Figure 3 shows grayscale images of dot clusters before and after the threshold process.
  • Gray value images of four point clusters printed by electrophotography. (left: 250 ⁇ m ⁇ 250 ⁇ m) and in newspaper printing (right: 500 ⁇ m ⁇ 500 ⁇ m).
  • the area coverage of the test sample of sample 1 is 8.7%.
  • the sample size is 36 point clusters.
  • the standard deviation of 0.8% results from random process and material variations, which result in point clusters of different sizes.
  • Orientative measurements show that densitometric area measurements generally give larger values. This is justified by the optical light capture, which is not taken into account in the image analysis.
  • the accuracy of the measurements depends significantly on the lighting as well as the choice of the threshold. It is therefore important to pay particular attention to reproducible measurement conditions.
  • the following parameters refer to geometric point clusters and parameters obtained numerically from the surfaces of the point clusters.
  • the dot circumference is 159 ⁇ m , which is slightly smaller than the specified value of 169 ⁇ m due to the smaller area coverage.
  • the ellipsoid factor E is 87%, from which a roundish geometry is concluded. This finding is confirmed from the averaged structure in Figure 2. This also explains that the angle scatters strongly and thus can not recognize a preferred direction.
  • the mean is 73 degrees and has a standard deviation of 59 degrees.
  • the factor R of 0.72 indicates an uneven edge structure. This finding is visually consistent with the relief representation in Figure 2a and the gray scale images in Figure 3. The results of the newspaper print patterns show a similar behavior as Sample 1.
  • Density and color measurements can be made equally on the test pattern in Figure 1 be performed.
  • the image analysis system is calibrated according to a method which is described in the literature (Rienzli, 1998). It allows the conversion from RGB values to colorimetric and density values.
  • diaphragms which determines the point clusters selectively.
  • Figure 4 shows the computer simulation of pushing and doubling.
  • testTarget can be used in conjunction with the described evaluation methodology for the control of multicolor printing.
  • the process is especially popular where process control is required, but for reasons of space, no control strips can be used.
  • a test pattern area that is well below 1mm 2 .
  • an almost unlimited use is possible.
  • a targeted positioning can now be made close to selected image locations.
  • the limits of what was possible were rigorously explored. They culminate in the statement that the parameters relevant to printing technology can ultimately be taken from a test pattern which is made up of one point cluster per printing ink. However, an averaging over a plurality of successively printed print patterns is advantageous. All of the described measures, which in their entirety allow such a miniaturization of the test target, were tested experimentally or by simulation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Facsimile Image Signal Circuits (AREA)
  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
  • Printing Methods (AREA)
  • Non-Metallic Protective Coatings For Printed Circuits (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
EP02405744A 2001-09-07 2002-08-30 Agent d'essai et procédé pour contrôler l'impression offset et numerique Expired - Lifetime EP1291179B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10143942 2001-09-07
DE10143942A DE10143942A1 (de) 2001-09-07 2001-09-07 Prüfmittel und Verfahren zur Kontrolle des Offset- und Digitaldrucks

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1291179A2 true EP1291179A2 (fr) 2003-03-12
EP1291179A3 EP1291179A3 (fr) 2008-01-02
EP1291179B1 EP1291179B1 (fr) 2010-10-06

Family

ID=7698086

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02405744A Expired - Lifetime EP1291179B1 (fr) 2001-09-07 2002-08-30 Agent d'essai et procédé pour contrôler l'impression offset et numerique

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20030063302A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1291179B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE483584T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE10143942A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10311822A1 (de) * 2003-03-13 2004-10-07 Ekra Eduard Kraft Gmbh Maschinenfabrik Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Kontrolle oder Beeinflussung des Druckprozesses beim Lotpastendruck

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7672013B2 (en) * 2003-11-20 2010-03-02 Electroncics For Imaging, Inc. Methods and apparatus for electronically trapping digital images
CA2499399A1 (fr) * 2004-03-04 2005-09-04 Christian Lambert Dispositif de determination du contretypage precis des couleurs
US8014024B2 (en) * 2005-03-02 2011-09-06 Xerox Corporation Gray balance for a printing system of multiple marking engines
US8259369B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2012-09-04 Xerox Corporation Color characterization or calibration targets with noise-dependent patch size or number
US8203768B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2012-06-19 Xerox Corporaiton Method and system for processing scanned patches for use in imaging device calibration
US7719716B2 (en) * 2005-11-04 2010-05-18 Xerox Corporation Scanner characterization for printer calibration
US8711435B2 (en) * 2005-11-04 2014-04-29 Xerox Corporation Method for correcting integrating cavity effect for calibration and/or characterization targets
US7826090B2 (en) * 2005-12-21 2010-11-02 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for multiple printer calibration using compromise aim
US8102564B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2012-01-24 Xerox Corporation Method and system for color correction using both spatial correction and printer calibration techniques
ES2422979T3 (es) * 2010-03-25 2013-09-16 Modesto Luengo Bada Marca, método y sistema para la medición de parámetros de calidad de color
CN102416760B (zh) 2010-09-24 2016-08-03 海德堡印刷机械股份公司 对版测量元件
CN105302413B (zh) * 2015-10-14 2020-11-13 惠州Tcl移动通信有限公司 控件的ui测试方法及系统

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0847859A2 (fr) 1996-12-13 1998-06-17 Nec Corporation Tête d'impression à jet d'encre électrostatique
DE19738992A1 (de) 1997-09-05 1999-03-11 Empa Messfeldblock und Verfahren zur Erfassung von Qualidätsdaten im Mehrfarben-Auflagendruck

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5105296A (en) * 1989-11-20 1992-04-14 Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for detecting beam spot shape
EP0570167B1 (fr) * 1992-05-11 1997-01-22 Hewlett-Packard Company Procédé et appareil pour régler la densité d'impression dans une imprimante à jet d'encre
DE69412691T2 (de) * 1993-04-30 1999-01-14 Hewlett Packard Co Abgleichsystem für Mehrfach-Tintenstrahldruckpatronen
DE69431460T2 (de) * 1993-05-27 2003-02-27 Canon Kk Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Tintenstrahlaufzeichnung
US5649073A (en) * 1995-12-28 1997-07-15 Xerox Corporation Automatic calibration of halftones
US5980016A (en) * 1996-04-22 1999-11-09 Hewlett-Packard Company Systems and method for determining presence of inks that are invisible to sensing devices
US6623095B1 (en) * 1996-08-01 2003-09-23 Hewlett-Packard Company Print-quality control method and system
ES2160315T3 (es) * 1996-09-23 2001-11-01 Wifag Maschf Grupo de campos de medicion y metodo para detectar datos de calidad en las ediciones de impresion multicolor.
EP0847858B1 (fr) * 1996-12-11 2002-07-24 Agfa-Gevaert Bande de contrôle visible pour milieux de formation d'images
US6219154B1 (en) * 1997-02-13 2001-04-17 David J. Romano Exposure control technique for imagesetting applications
US6036298A (en) * 1997-06-30 2000-03-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Monochromatic optical sensing system for inkjet printing
US6076915A (en) * 1998-08-03 2000-06-20 Hewlett-Packard Company Inkjet printhead calibration
US6654056B1 (en) * 1998-12-15 2003-11-25 Xerox Corporation Geometric configurations for photosites for reducing Moiré patterns
US6185001B1 (en) * 1999-02-01 2001-02-06 The Standard Register Company Printed document and method of determining the print quality of a printed document
DE60124202T8 (de) * 2000-05-30 2008-03-20 Seiko Epson Corp. Einstellung der punktpositionsverschiebung eines druckers
US6547362B2 (en) * 2001-01-19 2003-04-15 Hewlett-Packard Company Test-based advance optimization in incremental printing: median, sensitivity-weighted mean, normal random variation
US6517180B2 (en) * 2001-03-27 2003-02-11 Hewlett-Packard Company Dot sensing, color sensing and media sensing by a printer for quality control
US7116447B2 (en) * 2002-05-24 2006-10-03 Eastman Kodak Company Halftone dot-growth technique using a dot edge-detection scheme
US6883892B2 (en) * 2002-10-31 2005-04-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Printing apparatus calibration

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0847859A2 (fr) 1996-12-13 1998-06-17 Nec Corporation Tête d'impression à jet d'encre électrostatique
DE19738992A1 (de) 1997-09-05 1999-03-11 Empa Messfeldblock und Verfahren zur Erfassung von Qualidätsdaten im Mehrfarben-Auflagendruck

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10311822A1 (de) * 2003-03-13 2004-10-07 Ekra Eduard Kraft Gmbh Maschinenfabrik Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Kontrolle oder Beeinflussung des Druckprozesses beim Lotpastendruck

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1291179A3 (fr) 2008-01-02
DE50214696D1 (de) 2010-11-18
US20030063302A1 (en) 2003-04-03
ATE483584T1 (de) 2010-10-15
DE10143942A1 (de) 2003-03-27
EP1291179B1 (fr) 2010-10-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE4012608C2 (fr)
EP0408507B1 (fr) Méthode de détermination des écarts de couleur entre deux surfaces tramées imprimées avec une machine d'impression ainsi que méthode de commande ou réglage de l'impression couleurs d'une machine à imprimer
DE102017220361B4 (de) Verfahren und Testmuster zur Detektion und Kompensation ausgefallener Druckdüsen in einer Inkjet-Druckmaschine
EP2008818B1 (fr) Bandes de contrôle de pression améliorées destinées à la mesure de la couleur sur une matière d'impression
EP1291179B1 (fr) Agent d'essai et procédé pour contrôler l'impression offset et numerique
EP0914945B1 (fr) Procédé pour régler l'encrage dans une machine d'impression
EP0836942A1 (fr) Bloc de mesure et procédé d'acquisition des données de qualité dans des machines d'impression multicoloré pour feuilles
DD274786A1 (de) Verfahren und anordnung zur ueberwachung der druckqualitaet mehrfarbiger rasterdruckvorlagen einer offset-druckmaschine
EP0676285A1 (fr) Gestion des couleurs dans une machine rotative offset pour feuilles
EP2112818B1 (fr) Procédé de réduction de la couverture de surface d'une plaque de compression
EP0920994B1 (fr) Procédé pour la détermination de valeurs de couleur
EP0916491B1 (fr) Procédé pour déterminer des gradients colorimétriques
DE19830487B4 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Flächendeckungen in einem Druckbild
DE10119368A1 (de) Verfahren zum Variieren der Farbdichte des Volltons beim Offset-Druck innerhalb einer Rotationsdruckmaschine
EP0668164B1 (fr) Acquisition des données de qualité dans une machine rotative offset pour feuilles
EP0522301B1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance et de réglage du processus d'impression, en particulier dans les machines à imprimer en offset
DE4232434A1 (de) Druckkontrollstreifen zur Steuerung und Überwachung des Druckprozesses
DE19638967C2 (de) Messfeldgruppe und Verfahren zur Erfassung von optisch drucktechnischen Größen im Mehrfarben-Auflagendruck
DE19639014C2 (de) Messfeldgruppe und Verfahren zur Erfassung von optisch drucktechnischen Größen im Mehrfarben-Auflagendruck
DE19716445A1 (de) Verfahren zur Verbreiterung von Zeichen
EP1741060A2 (fr) Procede pour comparer une image avec au moins une image reference
CH693533A5 (de) Messfeldblock und Verfahren zur Erfassung von Qualitotsdaten im Mehrfarben-Auflagendruck.
DE19701967C2 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung der farblichen Erscheinung sowie entsprechende Vorrichtung
DE4303081A1 (en) Exposure calibration for colour recorder or printer - involves computation of darkening function for nominal grey values for determn. of corrective transfer function
DE102020129871A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Tintenstrahldruckmaschine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: WIFAG MASCHINENFABRIK AG

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080702

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080818

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50214696

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101118

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20101006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110106

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110207

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110117

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 50214696

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20111121

Year of fee payment: 10

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: WIFAG MASCHINENFABRIK AG

Effective date: 20110831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110831

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 50214696

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110830

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 483584

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110830

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20101006

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101006