EP1234017A1 - Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques - Google Patents

Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques

Info

Publication number
EP1234017A1
EP1234017A1 EP00968779A EP00968779A EP1234017A1 EP 1234017 A1 EP1234017 A1 EP 1234017A1 EP 00968779 A EP00968779 A EP 00968779A EP 00968779 A EP00968779 A EP 00968779A EP 1234017 A1 EP1234017 A1 EP 1234017A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
yeast
oxygen
membrane
slurry
yeast slurry
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00968779A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Nick J. Huige
Murthy Tata
Jeffrey F. Fehring
Michael C. Barney
David S. Ryder
Alfonso Navarro
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Miller Brewing Co
Original Assignee
Miller Brewing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Miller Brewing Co filed Critical Miller Brewing Co
Publication of EP1234017A1 publication Critical patent/EP1234017A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12C—BEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C11/00—Fermentation processes for beer
    • C12C11/003—Fermentation of beerwort
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12C—BEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C11/00—Fermentation processes for beer
    • C12C11/02—Pitching yeast

Definitions

  • Brewer's yeast is used as a biocatalyst to promote fermentation of carbohydrates to ethanol in the production of beer and other fermented beverages.
  • fermentation is performed by mixing brewer's yeast with a source of fermentable carbohydrate (usually wort) and incubating the mixture under conditions suitable for fermentation.
  • wort is inoculated or "pitched" with yeast harvested from a previous fermentation.
  • pitching yeast has experienced anaerobic conditions during fermentation. Before a subsequent fermentation can occur, the anaerobic pitching yeast must first synthesize essential lipid components, including sterols and unsaturated fatty acids. Synthesis of these lipids requires oxygen and a sufficient reserve of glycogen.
  • U.S. Serial No. 899,756 discloses a method of enhanced fermentation that includes aerating or oxygenating wort after pitching with the yeast culture. Aerating the wort after pitching is routinely done in the brewing industry to promote fermentation. However, it is thought that aerating the yeast in wort may contribute to the production of staling precursors.
  • UK Patent Application GB 2 197 341 discloses a method of aerating yeast prior to fermentation in which the pitching yeast is first diluted with water and then exposed to oxygen for a period of time until the yeast reaches its maximum rate of oxygen consumption. The yeast is then used to pitch oxygen-free wort.
  • oxygen is supplied through a fritted gas distributor. Oxygen thus supplied enters the slurry in the form of small gas bubbles that cause foaming, especially at higher supply rates, which increase bubble size. To reduce foaming, the yeast slurry was diluted 10-fold, thereby reducing the oxygen requirement by 10 times.
  • Belgian patent Be 1010885A3 discloses a method of oxygenating yeast by means of a micro-porous ceramic membrane contactor through which a dense yeast slurry is circulated.
  • the aluminum oxide membrane has an average pore size of 0.5 micron.
  • a higher pressure must be maintained on the gas side of the membrane, relative to the pressure on the liquid side of the membrane. Under these conditions, oxygen enters the yeast slurry as micro bubbles. In this system, formation of foam is reduced but not eliminated. Because of the smaller bubble size and the large number of pores per unit surface area, this method affords improved mass transfer of oxygen to the yeast slurry over that of the method disclosed in GB 2 197 341.
  • mass transfer is not optimal because oxygen supplied in the form of bubbles is slow to dissolve because the bubbles move along with the liquid, causing a relatively large liquid boundary layer and a slow dissolution rate. Delivery of sufficient oxygen to the yeast by this method would depend on providing a very large contactor made of relatively expensive ceramic material.
  • US Patent 5,565,149 discloses a method for delivering oxygen with a membrane system that supplies oxygen without forming bubbles.
  • the membrane is 99.9% non-porous.
  • Oxygen is transferred across the membrane by diffusion. The efficiency of oxygen transfer and the oxygen transfer rate are reduced by the additional diffusion step.
  • Oxygenating the yeast prior to pitching is known to be superior to oxygenating the wort in terms of producing a consistently good product. Despite this, yeast oxygenation prior to pitching is not generally practiced in breweries because of difficulties associated with supplying oxygen to pitching yeast at a rate sufficient to keep up with the very high oxygen uptake rate of the yeast. Those systems described in literature that report high oxygen supply rates are uneconomical or cause excessive foaming.
  • the present invention includes an economical method of efficiently oxygenating yeast slurry prior to pitching comprising passing the yeast slurry through a membrane contactor having at least one microporous hydrophobic polymeric membrane, the membrane having a gas side and a liquid side, wherein the contactor is connected to an oxygen source, and wherein at least a portion of the yeast slurry is in proximity to the membrane on the liquid side, and delivering oxygen from the oxygen source through the membrane to the yeast slurry. It is an object of the invention to provide a cost- effective method of oxygenating yeast slurry.
  • Fig. 1 shows the flow of yeast slurry from a tank to an oxygenation membrane and the return of the oxygenated slurry to the tank.
  • Fig. 2 shows fermentation times for aerated and nonaerated wort as a function of yeast oxygenation time.
  • the present invention provides an economical method of oxygenating or aerating yeast slurry prior to pitching that does not cause foaming.
  • oxygenate or "aerate” are used interchangeably herein; for ease of reading, the term oxygenate will be used throughout the remainder of the specification.
  • Oxygenating yeast prior to pitching allows the yeast cells to obtain sufficient oxygen to synthesize sterols and fatty acids, which are needed for cell growth during the fermentation process. By oxygenating the yeast slurry rather than the wort, greater consistency of the final product may be attained with reduced levels of staling precursors.
  • undiluted yeast is oxygenated by means of a microporous hydrophobic polymeric membrane across which gas may be exchanged.
  • the membrane provides a high surface area contact between- the liquid yeast slurry without direct mixing.
  • the high surface area to volume ratio provides a high specific surface area for mass transfer.
  • the method by which oxygen is delivered to the slurry does not cause the formation of foam-producing bubbles.
  • the present invention allows operation at higher K L values.
  • yeast slurry is contained in a tank 10.
  • a portion of the yeast is transferred from the tank 10 to a membrane oxygenator 20 equipped with at least one microporous hydrophobic membrane 30 having a liguid side 40 and a gas side 50.
  • the slurry is passed over the liquid side 40 of the membrane.
  • Oxygen gas from an oxygen tank 60 is delivered into the gas side 50 of the membrane and passes across the membrane to the slurry.
  • Oxygenated yeast slurry is returned to the tank 10.
  • the system may include means 70 for measuring dissolved oxygen in the slurry.
  • the oxygen uptake rate in a yeast suspension can be calculated from the measured dissolved oxygen evolution profiles at any time during oxygenation using the following equations:
  • the oxygen mass balance can be written as:
  • VdC F(C d -C)-rV (1) dt
  • C and C d are the dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg/L) in the yeast slurry and the oxygenator discharge, respectively
  • V is the slurry volume (L)
  • F is the slurry flow rate through the oxygenator (recirculation rate, L/min)
  • r is the instantaneous oxygen uptake rate (mg/min-L) of the yeast after time (t) in the oxygenator, measured in minutes.
  • Equation (1) may be rearranged to calculate the oxygen uptake rate from the measured dissolved oxygen concentrations and the rate of change of dissolved oxygen in the yeast tank:
  • the oxygen uptake rate r is usually expressed in mg O 2 /min/10 9 cells.
  • the mass transfer efficiency is usually expressed by the factor k L a in which k L is the mass transfer coefficient (cm/min) and a is the interfacial area between gas and liquid divided by the liquid volume in cm "1 .
  • k L is the mass transfer coefficient (cm/min)
  • a is the interfacial area between gas and liquid divided by the liquid volume in cm "1 .
  • C * is the concentration of oxygen in the liquid in equilibrium with the partial pressure of oxygen in the gas.
  • the following changes to variables affecting the rate of oxygen uptake were considered: (1) Increasing the k L a. As shown in the examples, the method of the invention affords a k L a value that is at least an order of magnitude greater than the maximum previously reported k L a -value (Masschelein, CA. et al. Congress Proceedings, European Brewing Conference, 1995, 377-386).
  • the oxygen supply requirement may be reduced by diluting the yeast slurry, as disclosed in GB 2197341. This option requires larger equipment and is also uneconomical .
  • an increase in gas delivery pressure or flow rate will produce larger bubbles that cause greater foaming and a lower k L a value.
  • an increase in gas pressure requires a pressure increase on the liquid side, because the liquid pressure must be higher than the gas pressure to prevent bubble formation.
  • the system gas is supplied in the form of molecular oxygen (0 2 ) .
  • The-, oxygen is supplied using a hydrophobic membrane system.
  • High k L a values can be achieved by renewing the liquid surface continuously through the application of a high cross flow velocity.
  • a hydrophobic membrane oxygenator of the type used as a blood oxygenator (Model Max-FTE, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was employed, with the yeast slurry flowing at a cross flow to the membranes.
  • this type of mass transfer device comprises hollow fiber membranes. Yeast slurry flowed about the exterior (liquid side) of the fibers and oxygen was delivered to the interior of the fibers (gas side) .
  • a portion of the yeast slurry was pumped to the membrane contactor at a flow rate of about 800 ml/min.
  • the residence time of the slurry in the contactor was about 9 seconds.
  • the average velocity was about 41 cm/min in the fiber bed and the superficial velocity (flow rate/cross sectional area of the fiber bed) was about 13.7 cm/min.
  • the k L a value is high.
  • the k L a values employed in the examples were in the range of from about 0.1 sec "1 to about 0.4 sec "1 .
  • k L a values will give acceptable results using the method of the invention, provided that the k L a is at least about 0.005 sec "1 . More preferably, the k L a is at least about 0.1 sec "1 . More preferably still, the k L a is 0.4 sec "1 or greater.
  • membrane contactor disclosed in the examples, there are other membrane configurations that are also suitable for use in the invention. It is expected that spiral wound, vibrating, rotary and tubular hollow fiber membranes may also be used in the practice of the invention.
  • the membrane contactor used in the examples is suitable for relatively small fermentation volumes.
  • One of skill in the art would appreciate that for relatively large fermentations, one would wish to use a larger contactor.
  • yeast slurry flows over the liquid side of the membrane and oxygen is delivered to the gas side.
  • the flow path of the yeast slurry within the fiber was in a direction substantially perpendicular to the fiber axis (cross flow) . It is expected that parallel and counter current flows may also be successfully employed.
  • the hydrophobic membrane contactor used in the examples below comprises a plurality of hollow fiber membranes having an inner diameter of about 200 um and an outer diameter of about 300 um. Hollow fiber membranes having an outer diameter in the range of from about 10 um to about 3 mm, and an inner diameter in the range of from about 5 um to about 2.9 mm are expected to be suitable in the practice of the present invention.
  • the membranes have a plurality of pores through which oxygen may be transferred.
  • the membranes used in the examples had a pore size of about 0.03 um.
  • membranes having larger or smaller pore sizes may be used, provided that the pore size is sufficiently large to allow oxygen to transfer across the membrane but not so large as to allow liquid to break through the membrane at the operating transmembrane pressure differential.
  • Suitable micro-porous membranes should have pores in the range of from about 0.1 nm to about 2 um.
  • the membranes used in the examples have a porosity of about 40% of the membrane contact area.
  • the porosity is percentage of membrane area that is open. It is expected that membranes having a porosity in the range of from about 2% to about '95% would be suitable in the practice of the present invention.
  • the membranes used in the examples were made of microporous polypropylene.
  • the membranes may be made from any suitable nonreactive, hydrophobic polymeric material. Such materials include, but are not limited to, polypropylene, polysulfone, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE or Teflon) , polyvinylidenedifluoride, polyvinylidenedichloride, and polyethylene.
  • Molecular oxygen is delivered in an oxygen-containing gas.
  • the molecular oxygen is deliver as oxygen gas containing greater than 10% oxygen.
  • the oxygen may be delivered as air, oxygen-enriched air, or any other suitable gas containing oxygen.
  • oxygen was delivered at a flow rate of 0.25 L/min. Lower or higher rates may be employed, as long as oxygen is provided at a rate that is at least is at least two fold greater than the expected oxygen uptake rate. Still more preferably, the oxygen delivery rate is at least five fold greater than the oxygen uptake rate.
  • the yeast used in the examples below was an undiluted brink yeast used in lager beer fermentations at Miller Brewing Company.
  • the yeast slurry of the present invention comprises from about 40 g/L yeast (dry weight) to about 80 g/L yeast (dry weight) .
  • the temperature of the yeast slurry was maintained at about 60°F during oxygenation. This temperature was chosen because that it is the typical fermentation temperature of the particular yeast used in the examples.
  • temperature during oxygenation is not critical to the practice of the invention.
  • the yeast slurry may be oxygenated at ambient temperature, or the yeast may be maintained at a desired temperature or range of temperatures during oxygenation using a temperature control system.
  • the temperature of the yeast slurry may be controllably altered during the course of oxygenation by using a programmable temperature control system. Conveniently, the oxygenation may be conducted at a temperature close to the temperature at which subsequent fermentations will be conducted. Following oxygenation, the yeast may be used for pitching. Fermentation is allowed to proceed using standard fermentation conditions. Depending on the brewer's objective, the yeast may be used to pitch aerated or unaerated wort. If the primary objective is affecting or controlling flavor profiles or to prevent formation of staling precursors, nonaerated wort should be used in the fermentation. As shown in the examples, fermentations in which nonaerated wort was pitched with yeast oxygenated by the method of the invention were characterized by substantially decreased production of higher alcohols and increased production of esters. Esters are generally considered to confer desirable flavors to beer.
  • the method of the invention may be used to obtain high fermentation rates by using oxygenated yeast to pitch aerated wort.
  • fermentation may be completed in a shorter time using yeast aerated by the method of the invention than by conventional fermentation methods, in which aerated wort is pitched with non-aerated yeast slurry.
  • yeast oxygenated by the method of the invention may be used -in other aspects of the brewing process, including krauesening, lagering, or any other application in which yeast is generally used. It is envisioned that oxygenated yeast may also be used in the wine industry to manipulate flavor.
  • the yeast slurry was decarbonated and stripped of entrained oxygen prior to oxygenating yeast. This step was included to ensure accurate measurements of oxygen concentrations during the course of oxygenation. This step may be omitted, particularly if the primary objective of yeast oxygenation is to boost fermentation rates in subsequent fermentations.
  • the following nonlimiting examples are intended to be purely illustrative.
  • Yeast was oxygenated by a process as represented schematically in Figure 1.
  • a yeast suspension was placed in a 12 liter stainless steel tank ("yeast tank") equipped with an overhead agitator for continuous mixing.
  • the temperature of the yeast slurry was maintained at a predetermined, constant temperature (60°F) by means of a temperature control system.
  • the tank was equipped with ports for transferring the yeast from the tank to a membrane oxygenator and returning the oxygenated yeast from the oxygenator to the tank.
  • the tank included an additional port connected to a sensor for measuring dissolved oxygen.
  • the system was equipped with an additional oxygen sensor that allowed the dissolved oxygen in the yeast slurry to be measured as the yeast was discharged from the oxygenator.
  • the yeast slurry was decarbonated and stripped of any oxygen entrained during the vessel filling prior to beginning the oxygenation experiments.
  • Decarbonation and deoxygenation was accomplished by purging the membrane oxygenator with nitrogen gas at ambient pressure while the yeast is circulating. After the yeast suspension was decarbonated, deoxygenated, and had achieved the desired temperature (e.g., 60 °F) (10 to 30 minutes), the nitrogen purge was discontinued and oxygen supply initiated at ambient pressure.
  • Yeast slurry was transferred from the tank to the membrane oxygenator at a rate of 0.8 L/min.
  • Oxygen was delivered from an oxygen supply cylinder to the oxygenator at a rate of about 0.25 L/min.
  • Residence time for the yeast slurry in the oxygenator was about nine seconds.
  • the dissolved oxygen levels in the yeast suspension in the tank as well as at the oxygenator discharge were recorded continuously. Yeast samples were collected every several hours and were used to inoculate separate beer fermentations. An aliquot of each yeast sample collected was analyzed for sterols content.
  • Yeast oxygenated as described above was pitched into fermentors containing 2 L volumes of sterile wort to a target 12xl0 6 cells mL "1 .
  • the fermentors were vented through thermal mass flowmeters to measure fermentation rates on-line " .
  • Daily samples were taken from the vessels to determine the pH and extract content. Total cell growth and cell viability were determined at the end of fermentation by hemocytometer cell counts.
  • Yeast oxygenated by the method of the invention was pitched in both oxygenated and nonoxygenated wort.
  • the time required to reach the end of fermentation (defined the time when the carbon dioxide evolution rate reaches 0.4 ml/min-L) as a function of the time of yeast oxygenation is shown in Fig. 2 for both aerated and nonaerated wort.
  • fermentation rates of aerated (closed circles) or nonaerated (open circles) wort was increased by pitching with oxygenated yeast. Fermentations using nonoxygenated wort and pitched with yeast aerated about 8-10 hours had fermentation times approximately the same as those obtained with aerated wort pitched with nonoxygenated yeast (closed circle time zero) . Yeast viability was not affected by oxygenation. Yeast growth was reduced, which resulted in reduced fusel oil and increased esters.
  • Fermentations in which nonaerated wort was pitched with yeast oxygenated by the method of the invention showed a 10% decrease in production of higher alcohols and a 5% increase in production of esters.
  • the present invention is not limited to the exemplified embodiments, but is intended to encompass all such modification and variation as come within the scope of the following claims.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé économique d'oxygénation efficace d'une suspension de levure sans formation de bulle. Le procédé comprend un oxygénateur à membrane comportant au moins une membrane hydrophobe, microporeuse présentant un côté gaz et un côté liquide. La suspension de levure s'écoule dans le côté liquide de la membrane; l'oxygène est libéré dans le côté gaz de la membrane et passe à travers les pores de la suspension de levure.
EP00968779A 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques Withdrawn EP1234017A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2000/027578 WO2002028995A1 (fr) 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1234017A1 true EP1234017A1 (fr) 2002-08-28

Family

ID=21741854

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00968779A Withdrawn EP1234017A1 (fr) 2000-10-05 2000-10-05 Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1234017A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2004510430A (fr)
AU (1) AU2000278644A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2394871A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2002028995A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4865633B2 (ja) * 2007-05-14 2012-02-01 アサヒビール株式会社 麦汁輸送システム

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2197341A (en) * 1986-09-18 1988-05-18 Bass Plc Brewing beer
BE1010885A3 (nl) * 1997-01-30 1999-02-02 Meura Delta Naamloze Vennootsc Werkwijze en inrichting voor het oxigeneren van gist.

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AT309361B (de) * 1971-06-02 1973-08-10 Vogelbusch Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung von alkoholischen bzw. alkoholfreien Gärgetränken
FR2629096B1 (fr) * 1988-03-22 1992-01-10 Air Liquide Procede d'oxygenation controlee d'un mout de fermentation alcoolique, et installation correspondante
WO1999047636A2 (fr) * 1998-03-16 1999-09-23 Environment Products Limited Procede et appareil ameliores de traitement d'une preparation

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2197341A (en) * 1986-09-18 1988-05-18 Bass Plc Brewing beer
BE1010885A3 (nl) * 1997-01-30 1999-02-02 Meura Delta Naamloze Vennootsc Werkwijze en inrichting voor het oxigeneren van gist.

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO0228995A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2394871A1 (fr) 2002-04-11
WO2002028995A1 (fr) 2002-04-11
AU2000278644A1 (en) 2002-04-15
JP2004510430A (ja) 2004-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4581236A (en) Process and apparatus for reduction of alcohol by dialysis in fermented beverages
AU624362B2 (en) Process for the controlled oxygenation of an alcoholic fermentation must or wort, and plant for carrying out said process
EP2582782B1 (fr) Dispositif de fermentation
Sablayrolles et al. Effectiveness of combined ammoniacal nitrogen and oxygen additions for completion of sluggish and stuck wine fermentations
US4041180A (en) Introducing gases into fermentation liquids
JP2004532646A (ja) 組み合わせ連続／バッチ発酵プロセス
JPS63230079A (ja) 動物細胞大量培養用通気装置
US20230084750A1 (en) Single-serve capsule for preparing alcoholic beer
US7186428B1 (en) Method of oxygenating yeast slurry using hydrophobic polymer membranes
JP6138390B1 (ja) マイクロナノバブルを用いた生物反応装置およびこの生物反応装置を用いた生物反応方法
Su et al. Production of rosmarinic acid from perfusion culture of Anchusa officinalis in a membrane-aerated bioreactor
US3425839A (en) Continuous beer making process wherein the wort and yeast are separated by a porous partition
EP1234017A1 (fr) Procede d'oxygenation de suspension de levure au moyen de membranes hydrophobes polymeriques
ZA200204062B (en) Method of oxygenating yeast slurry using hydrophobic polymeric membranes.
Ishizaki et al. Optimization of substrate feed for continuous production of lactic acid by Lactococcus lactis IO-1
GB2197341A (en) Brewing beer
Maule A century of fermenter design
JP2003510042A (ja) 細胞の培養方法、膜モジュール、膜モジュールの使用および細胞の培養のための反応系
Munroe Fermentation
Fregapane et al. Continuous production of wine vinegar in bubble column reactors of up to 60-litre capacity
WO2002028994A1 (fr) Procede d'elimination du dioxyde de carbone depuis un milieu de fermentation, utilisant une membrane polymere
JP2500353B2 (ja) 凝集性微生物をリサイクルするアルコ―ルの連続生産方法
JPH0513625B2 (fr)
EP1164185A2 (fr) Procédé et appareil déstinés à réduire la formation de mousse pendant la fermentation
US4358463A (en) Method for the production of fermentation vinegar

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020611

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030417

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: TATA, MURTHY

Inventor name: FEHRING, JEFFREY, F.

Inventor name: NAVARRO, ALFONSO

Inventor name: BARNEY, MICHAEL, C.

Inventor name: HUIGE, NICK, J.

Inventor name: RYDER, DAVID, S.

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: HUIGE, NICK, J.

Inventor name: FEHRING, JEFFREY, F.

Inventor name: NAVARRO, ALFONSO

Inventor name: BARNEY, MICHAEL, C.

Inventor name: TATA, MURTHY

Inventor name: RYDER, DAVID, S.

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20040318