EP1116355A1 - Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique - Google Patents

Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique

Info

Publication number
EP1116355A1
EP1116355A1 EP99953652A EP99953652A EP1116355A1 EP 1116355 A1 EP1116355 A1 EP 1116355A1 EP 99953652 A EP99953652 A EP 99953652A EP 99953652 A EP99953652 A EP 99953652A EP 1116355 A1 EP1116355 A1 EP 1116355A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bits
low
transmitted
transmission
reliability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP99953652A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Maximilian Schmautz
Wen Xu
Thomas Hindenlang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP1116355A1 publication Critical patent/EP1116355A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/20—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using signal quality detector

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for estimating the transmission quality of a digital message signal, in which a value of the bit is assigned to bits transmitted by a transmitter at the receiver and a measure of the reliability of the correctness of the assignment is determined.
  • Such a method or such a device is used in particular to estimate the transmission quality in the context of a mobile radio system and to adapt a transmission mode used to the available transmission quality.
  • a voice coder / decoder which is to carry out such an adaptation is currently being used as the next generation at ETSI following the standardization of the GSM Enhanced Full Rate (EFR) voice codec in 1996 under the name Adaptive Multirate (AMR) voice codec SMG11 standardized.
  • the main goals of the AMR codec are to achieve fixed network quality of the voice under different channel conditions and to ensure optimal distribution of the channel capacity.
  • the codec is said to work under good channel conditions and / or in highly utilized cells in the half-rate (HR) channel. Under poor channel conditions, it should switch dynamically to the full rate (FR) channel using the GSM intra-cell handover and vice versa.
  • FR or HR channel mode
  • code modes available for different speech and channel coding rates, which should also be varied according to the channel quality (rate adaptation).
  • transmission should be achieved with the best possible quality.
  • a sufficiently precise estimate of the channel quality plays a decisive role in the selection of the modes used for a transmission (i.e. when switching between channel modes FR and HR and / or between code modes), and therefore also in the entire AMR concept.
  • the voice quality perceived by a user should serve as a criterion for selecting a mode. It is therefore necessary to define a metric that allows such an a priori subjective quality to be measured objectively.
  • Options for deriving such a metric of the channel quality are burst-wise RxLev, RxQual in the GSM system, DTX activation, frequency hopping activation, bit-wise or burst-wise channel state information CSI (Channel State Information) from the equalizer, a residual error rate (residual error rate) ) of the channel decoder, bad frame indicator (BFI), error concealment in the channel or speech decoder etc.
  • CSI Channel State Information
  • the present invention is based on an estimate of the transmission quality on the basis of channel status information (CSI), such as is supplied in the form of soft bits by an equalizer of a conventional mobile radio receiver.
  • CSI channel status information
  • Such soft bits each correspond to one bit of the message signal transmitted by radio and comprise a given number of bits, for example 8 or 16.
  • a value -2 1 "1 of the soft bit denotes the reliable detection of a bit" -1 "of the Message signal
  • the value 2 1_1 -1 the reliable detection of the value “+ l ⁇ , the value -1 being logically assigned to ONE and +1 logically ZERO.
  • Intermediate values in each case correspond to different reliably identifications.
  • the sign (MSB) of the soft bit includes Holds the equalizer's decision as to whether the bit of the message signal sent was +1 or -1.
  • the amount of the soft bit indicates how safe that decision was, that is it is a measure of the reliability that the assignment of the MSB to the transmitted bit is correct.
  • the effects of short time fading on the transmission quality can be reduced in a simple manner by interleaving data blocks.
  • Short-term deteriorations in the received signal have a strong impact on the recognition reliability of the equalizer, but, as long as they can be intercepted by interleaving, do not necessarily lead to a deterioration in the transmitted voice quality and should therefore not be taken into account when estimating them.
  • a simple way of achieving the goal of a simple and quick estimate of the transmission quality is low-pass filtering of reliability values of a transmitted sequence of bits
  • These reliability values are preferably obtained from the soft bits in that the amount of the soft bit assumed to be a signed integer is obtained. It is further preferred that the low-pass filtering is preceded by averaging over the reliability values of a given first number n of transmitted bits, in which the n bits with the lowest reliability of the assignment are selected from a given second number N of bits and the average value over the reliability values of these n bits is formed.
  • the reason for this measure is that even if the transmission quality is poor, the equalizer often still delivers or allocates a very large number of bits with very high reliability, so that when averaging over the reliability values of all transmitted bits, the mean value obtained represents only a very insensitive measure of the transmission quality would.
  • n, N are preferably in a ratio of 5n ⁇ N ⁇ 20n, preferably lOn ⁇ N.
  • the n 10 most uncertain are selected from these and used for averaging.
  • the low-pass filtering is preferably carried out with incomplete suppression in the stop band above a few Hz.
  • an Equipple FIR filter is suitable for this. Incomplete suppression makes it possible to react to abrupt, permanent changes in the transmission quality faster than would be the case with filtering with complete suppression.
  • the low-pass filtered signal is preferably compared with at least one threshold in order to obtain a comparison result which is used as a control signal for switching between different transmission modes of the message signal.
  • a hysteresis when switching between different transmission modes. introduction modes.
  • two different transmission modes can be assigned two thresholds in such a way that a switch is made from a first of the two transmission modes to the second if the lower of the two thresholds is undershot, and a switch from the second to the first transmission mode if the higher of the two thresholds is exceeded.
  • the number N of bits from which the most unreliable soft bits are selected is preferably predetermined for each transmission mode in proportion to its data rate. This ensures that the speed at which a change in the transmission quality can be reacted to is the same for the different transmission modes, regardless of their data rate.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of a base station of a telecommunications system with mobile terminals, which includes a device for estimating the transmission quality according to the present invention
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a mobile terminal which is equipped with a device according to the invention and communicates with the base station from FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 shows a measured course of long-term fading in the course of a message signal
  • FIG. 4 shows the result of an estimation of the reception quality for the same message signal when averaged over the ten bits with the lowest reliability value within a burst
  • FIG. 5 shows the result when averaging over all bits of a burst
  • FIG. 6 shows impulse response and frequency response of a low-pass filter of a device according to the invention.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the conversion of an estimate of the transmission quality of a message signal into a control signal for switching between different types of transmission.
  • FIG. 1 shows a highly schematic section of a base station for a telecommunications system that uses a device 1 to estimate the transmission quality of a digital message signal.
  • the base station receives the digital message signal via an antenna 2.
  • An equalizer 3 connected to the antenna 2 supplies a soft bit for each bit received by the antenna, which has a width of 8 bits, for example.
  • the output signal of the equalizer is fed to processing circuits for reconstructing the transmitted message signal, which are not shown in the figure.
  • the output of the equalizer 3 is also connected to an input of a CSI generator 4 of the estimation device 1.
  • the CSI generator 4 estimates the short term fading of the transmission channel, whereby it determines the transmission quality of each individual burst of the message signal. Depending on the transmission mode of the message signal, it contains a different number of bursts per speech frame. With full rate transmission, a speech frame comprises four bursts, with half rate transmission two.
  • each soft bit always coincides with the presumed value of the bit received, and the amount is a numerical value between 0 and 127, which is a measure of the
  • Reliability of the decision about the sign including tet.
  • An amount of 0 stands for a very uncertain decision and 127 for a very safe decision.
  • a temporary data field “sort” of size 128 is created and initialized with 0.
  • burst [n] 0 ⁇ n ⁇ 114 is given for the individual soft bits
  • a measure of the probability that the sign of the soft bit matches the corresponding bit of the transmitted message signal is first obtained by forming the amount, and the number of bits within the burst with a certain reliability value is determined and corresponding to this value in the “sort ".
  • the reliability values of the 10 least reliable bits are added up.
  • the CSI generator 4 also carries out a second averaging, in which the above-mentioned averages over the 10 bits with the lowest reliability value of a burst are added for a number K of bursts and divided by K.
  • the number K is 2 for a shark rate transmission and 4 for a full rate transmission. It corresponds to the number of bursts per frame, i.e. it is proportional to the data rate of the transmission mode.
  • the dependency of the number of bursts taken into account on the transmission mode ensures that estimates of the transmission quality are available through the second averaging with a fixed repetition rate that is independent of the transmission rate.
  • the output signal of the CSI generator 4 obtained by these averaging is approximately proportional to the short term fading of the mobile radio channel on which the message signal is transmitted.
  • the resulting strong fluctuations in the output signal of the CSI generator 4 are suppressed with the aid of a low-pass filter 5.
  • the reason for using the low-pass filter 5 instead of averaging over a larger time interval is that simple averaging over several frames would not lead to a satisfactory result, since short-term strong disturbances would further lead to a considerable decrease in the estimated transmission quality, which a change in the transmission mode might appear necessary, even if the decrease takes so little time that it can be compensated for by interleaving. An unweighted averaging is therefore a poor low-pass filter. Therefore, in the estimation device 1, the low-pass filter 5 with the following specifications is connected to the output of the CSI generator 4: -Filter type: FIR Equiripple low-pass filter (constant blocking range)
  • Figure 6 shows in part A the transfer function h (t) of such a filter
  • part B shows the frequency response 201og (
  • other options for low-pass filtering are also conceivable, such as For example Butterworth, Tschebyscheff, IIR filters etc. or a weighted averaging, the weight of a soft bit decreasing with age.
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of the measured course of the long-term fading of a real message signal over 2000 frames, corresponding to a time period of 40 seconds (transmission rate 50 frames per second).
  • the signal-to-noise ratio C / (I + N) is plotted in decibels on the abscissa.
  • FIG. 4 shows the estimate of the reception quality of the message signal provided by the low-pass filter 5 with the fading behavior shown in FIG. 3.
  • the numerical values of the output signal of the low-pass filter 5, which can be between 0 and 127 (for 8-bit wide soft bits), are plotted on the abscissa.
  • the times of the occurrence of the extremes of the signal quality from FIG. 3 and the estimation from FIG. 4 are in excellent agreement with approximately 700, 1070 and 1490 frames.
  • the amplitude of the deflections in the estimate from FIG. 4 also agrees well with the course shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 5 shows the result of an estimate in which all 114 soft bits of a burst were taken into account, and not only the ten with the lowest reliability value, as in the case of FIG. 4.
  • the position of the extremes still agrees well with that of the extremes Figure 3 matches, but the amplitude of the rashes is reduced to about half.
  • the estimate shows a minimum to which no minimum corresponds to the measured fading curve from FIG. 3. The reliability of the estimate is therefore lower overall than in the case of FIG. 4.
  • the output signal of the low-pass filter 5 is present at the input of a so-called metric generator 6.
  • This metric generator 6 is a further developed comparator which compares the filter output signal with a plurality of thresholds and generates a control signal of 2 bits width depending on the comparison result. Horizontal lines A, B, C corresponding to the thresholds are shown in FIG. 7 above a curve which corresponds to the curve from FIG. If the output signal L filt of the low-pass filter 5 is greater than the threshold B, so the transmission quality is very good, the control signal has the binary value 10. With a good channel quality with B> L filt > A, it has the binary value 11, with a poor channel quality with A> L filters > C the value 01 and with a very poor channel quality L fi ⁇ t > 10 the value 00. As you can see, only one bit of the control signal changes when the filter output signal L fi ⁇ t one of the Thresholds crossed; that is, the control signal is gray-coded.
  • the thresholds A, B, C are freely selectable and each indicate the limits at which the transmission mode is to be switched. They have the following meaning:
  • Threshold A switching from transmission mode with the highest speech rate to transmission mode with medium speech rate when the threshold is undershot
  • Threshold B switching from the transmission mode with medium speech rate to that with the highest speech rate when the threshold is exceeded; and threshold C: versa switching from the average voice rate to the transmission mode with the lowest rate speech and vice ⁇ .
  • threshold B By choosing a higher value for threshold B than for threshold A, a hysteresis is brought about for the switching process, that is to say the channel quality must be better for switching from the medium to the highest rate than when switching from the highest to the medium rate. This prevents constant switching between these two transmission modes if the channel quality fluctuates in the region of the thresholds A, B.
  • the control signal is present at a first input of a control unit 7.
  • the control unit 7 evaluates the control signal and effects the rate adjustment for the transmission from the mobile terminal to the base station (uplink). For this purpose, it transmits a requested uplink rate (UL_REQ_Rate) inband, that is, together with the voice bits, to the mobile device.
  • UL_REQ_Rate a requested uplink rate
  • the mobile terminal transmits the transmitted uplink rate as UL_RATE and the control signal to the base station.
  • FIG. 2 shows a highly schematic block diagram of a mobile terminal that can work with the base station of Figure 1.
  • the base station comprises an equalizer 3, which supplies soft bits to an estimation device 1 on the basis of message signals received via an antenna 2 and which, like that from FIG. 1, comprises a CSI generator 4, a low-pass filter 5 and a metric generator 6.
  • the control signal generated by the metric generator 6 is transmitted via an antenna 8 to the control unit 7 of the base station, which, as stated above, adapts the downlink transmission mode as a function of the control signal supplied by the mobile terminal.
  • the control unit 7 evaluates the control signal received by the mobile terminal via the antenna 2 in the same way as that supplied by the metric generator 6 to the base station.
  • Speech frames are transmitted to the base station so that it can redefine the transmission mode after each speech frame.
  • control signal values dual 10, 11, 01 and 00 are each assigned numerical values 3, 2, 1 and 0, which are monotonous with the transmission quality to change.
  • the current numerical value and the last seven numerical values are added up, and depending on the sum, a transmission mode is selected which specifies a voice transmission rate.
  • this is used for sending and in the case of the uplink it is sent to the mobile terminal as a command for setting an uplink rate.
  • Successive numerical values may only change by one level, i.e. for example a numerical value of 3 can only be followed by the numerical value 3 or 2 again. Accordingly, the transmission rate defined as a function of this can only change by one stage between two frames. This can be used as a priori information in order to minimize transmission errors and thus very disturbing speech module errors.
  • the mobile terminal independently * decides on the transmission mode to be used for uplink and / or downlink and sends corresponding setting commands to the base station.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
  • Testing, Inspecting, Measuring Of Stereoscopic Televisions And Televisions (AREA)
  • Dc Digital Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé d'évaluation de la qualité de transmission d'un signal de communication numérique, selon lequel, pour chaque bit transmis par un émetteur à un récepteur, une grandeur relative à sa fiabilité de reconnaissance est déterminée et soumise à un filtrage passe-bas. Un dispositif (1) permettant la mise en oeuvre dudit procédé peut être raccordé à un correcteur (3) et comprend un filtre passe-bas (5) qui, par lissage de la grandeur de probabilité, délivre un signal représentatif pour l'évaluation de la qualité de transmission.
EP99953652A 1998-09-22 1999-09-01 Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique Withdrawn EP1116355A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19843468 1998-09-22
DE19843468 1998-09-22
PCT/DE1999/002737 WO2000018058A1 (fr) 1998-09-22 1999-09-01 Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1116355A1 true EP1116355A1 (fr) 2001-07-18

Family

ID=7881860

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99953652A Withdrawn EP1116355A1 (fr) 1998-09-22 1999-09-01 Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1116355A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2002525970A (fr)
KR (1) KR20010088811A (fr)
CN (1) CN1319293A (fr)
AU (1) AU1029900A (fr)
BR (1) BR9913984A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000018058A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100382520C (zh) * 2001-08-07 2008-04-16 富士通株式会社 无线局域网系统

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10164796B4 (de) * 2001-09-06 2004-12-09 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Charakterisieren eines Übertragungskanals
CN100448206C (zh) * 2003-09-18 2008-12-31 西安电子科技大学 无线局域网多速率传输方法
ES2509292T3 (es) 2004-02-12 2014-10-17 Core Wireless Licensing S.à.r.l. Calidad de medios clasificada de una experiencia
CN100574318C (zh) * 2004-09-30 2009-12-23 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种无线局域网多速率自适应传输的方法
JP2019062289A (ja) * 2017-09-25 2019-04-18 日本電気株式会社 通信制御装置、端末、並びに、移動通信システム

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE470372B (sv) * 1992-06-23 1994-01-31 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Metod jämte anordning att uppskatta kvaliten vid ramfelsdetektering i mottagaren hos ett radiokommunikationssystem
FI103850B1 (fi) * 1996-07-12 1999-09-30 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Tiedonsiirtotilan automaattinen ohjaus

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0018058A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100382520C (zh) * 2001-08-07 2008-04-16 富士通株式会社 无线局域网系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20010088811A (ko) 2001-09-28
JP2002525970A (ja) 2002-08-13
BR9913984A (pt) 2001-06-19
WO2000018058A1 (fr) 2000-03-30
AU1029900A (en) 2000-04-10
CN1319293A (zh) 2001-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69409368T2 (de) Verfahren und system zur dynamischen veranderung der einstellparameter in einem sendeleistungskontrollsystem
DE69530554T2 (de) Datenratenermittlung für eine Endstation
DE69518174T2 (de) Rauschkorrektur durch Feststellung der Anwesenheit von Sprachsignalen
DE69222915T2 (de) Adaptive Mittelzuteilung in Mobil-Telefonsystem
DE69621613T2 (de) Anordnung und verfahren zur sprachübertragung und eine derartige anordnung enthaltende fernsprechanlage
DE69027018T2 (de) Maximalwahrscheinlichkeitsdekodierung mit Störungsdetektion für Frequenzsprungsysteme mit kodierter Modulation
DE69430894T2 (de) Schaltung zur Signalqualitätsbestimmung für Empfänger im GSM-System
DE19882404B3 (de) Sprachgütemessung in einem Mobilfunknetzwerk auf der Grundlage von Funkübertragungsparametern
DE3855263T2 (de) Rundfunkempfänger
DE3211325C1 (de) System zum automatischen Aufbau einer Kurzwellen-Telegrafiezeichen-Verbindung
DE69530476T2 (de) Digitales funkkommunikationssystem, funkgerät und digitaler lautsprecher
DE19804581C2 (de) Verfahren und Funk-Kommunikationssystem zur Übertragung von Sprachinformation
EP0659002B1 (fr) Méthode et circuit pour la transmission des signaux vocaux
EP0160993A2 (fr) Système radio
DE69927836T2 (de) Kanalschätzung in einem cdma-system mit leistungsregelungsbits
DE10297176T5 (de) Verfahren und Anordnungen in ein Digital-Kommunikationssystem betreffenden Anwendungen
DE19731976C2 (de) Digitaler Empfänger zum Umwandeln eines empfangenen Signals in ein Sprachsignal und Verfahren zum Erzeugen von Rauschen in diesem Empfänger
DE60036273T2 (de) Verfahren zur Einstellung eines Signalqualitätssollwertes während der Sendeleistungsregelung in einem CDMA-Funkkomminikationsnetzwerk
DE602004004376T2 (de) Anpassungsverfahren für ein Mehrraten-Sprach-Codec
EP1419583A1 (fr) Procede de filtrage adaptatif et filtres permettant de filtrer un signal radio dans un systeme de communication radiomobile
WO2000018058A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour l'evaluation de la qualite de transmission d'un signal de communication numerique
DE19782094B4 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Minimieren äußerer Interferenzsignale in einem Mobiltelefon mit Mehrfachzugriff durch Kodetrennung
DE69130202T2 (de) ADPCM-Dekoder mit Fehlererkennung
DE69804873T2 (de) Verfahren zur Unterdrückung der Klickgeräusche in einem Datenübertragungssystem
DE60021647T2 (de) Verfahren zur Sendeleistungsregelung mit geschlossenem Regelkreis unter Verwendung eines veränderlichen Aktualisierungsbetrags

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010126

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030716

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20040415