Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
  • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
  • G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
  • G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
  • G03F7/70383—Direct write, i.e. pattern is written directly without the use of a mask by one or multiple beams
  • G03F7/704—Scanned exposure beam, e.g. raster-, rotary- and vector scanning
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
  • G02B26/00—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements
  • G02B26/08—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light
  • G02B26/10—Scanning systems
  • G02B26/12—Scanning systems using multifaceted mirrors
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
  • G02B26/00—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements
  • G02B26/08—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light
  • G02B26/10—Scanning systems
  • G02B26/12—Scanning systems using multifaceted mirrors
  • G02B26/125—Details of the optical system between the polygonal mirror and the image plane

Definitions

• Photolithography is commonly employed to produce repeatable patterns on devices such as integrated circuits, flat panel displays, and printed circuit boards.
• a conventional photolithography process begins with coating a device with a layer of photoresist.
• An image projection system for example, using an object reticle or a sequential scanning, illuminates selected regions of the photoresist with light that changes the properties of the illuminated regions. Using the changed properties, the photoresist is developed by removing the illuminated or not-illuminated regions (depending on the type of photoresist) to create a patterned mask for processing of the device.
• a variety or different photolithography devices have been developed for image projection.
• a laser raster scanner (also known as a raster output scanner, flying spot scanner, or flat-bed scanner) is a photolithography device which scans one or more focused and spatially modulated laser beams in a series of scan lines covering a surface being patterned.
• the laser raster scanning systems can be used as a reticle making tool or as a direct-imaging device, eliminating steps associated with manufacture and use of reticles. Whether a laser raster scanner illuminates a region depends on the laser beam's intensity as the beam passes the region.
• Such laser raster scanners use imaging systems adapted for light having wavelengths at which a photoresist has high sensitivity. This generally occurs in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum.
• a basic architecture for a laser raster scanner includes the f- ⁇ lens system that may or may not include a rotating polygon mirror to sweep the beam and/or prepolygon optical system. Distinguishing features of scanner architectures are described below.
• a first distinguishing feature is spectral performance, in particular the spectral center line and spectral bandwidth.
• Most laser scanners are designed for monochromatic light, but a few scanners are color corrected for 3 -color visible applications.
• Achromatizing a refractive system for a raster scanner is complicated because such systems generally use high-index glasses to aid in aberration control. These glasses tend to limit the spectral range of the scanner to visible and near infra-red wavelengths.
• a second distinguishing feature of scanner optics is use of passive motion compensation (PMC).
• PMC passive motion compensation
• a scan lens has an anamorphic architecture to re-image the polygon facet in the cross-scan (sagittal) direction.
• Most scanners for xerographic laser printers use PMC to remove facet wobble of low-cost ballbearing polygon mirrors.
• scan lenses alternatively use rotationally symmetric optics, and the polygon mirror must be taller to accommodate the height of a four-fold symmetric input beam clear aperture (e.g., round or square). The polygon mirror is therefore more massive and requires more drive power for rotation.
• a third distinguishing feature is the method used to inject a beam onto a polygon mirror and into the scan lens.
• the predominant method is tangential injection in which an input beam is in the plane of the swept scan line.
• Figs. 1 A and IB respectively illustrate top and side views of a scan lens system 100 using tangential injection.
• an input beam 105 reflects from a folding mirror 110 so that input beam 105 and a reflected beam 115 are in a plane that is perpendicular to the rotation axis of a polygon mirror 120 and includes the optical axis of post-polygon lens elements 130 and 140.
• Non-PMC scan lenses use tangential injection unless specialized architectures are used (e.g., U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 4,682,842) since sagittal input places the scan line above or below the tangential meridian of the polygon mirror, and introduces scan line bow with rotationally-symmetric optics due to the distortion present in the lens for f- ⁇ linearity correction.
• a non-telecentric scan lens 350 as shown in Fig. 3B has a scan beam 355 with a chief ray that meets an image plane 360 at a substantial angle to perpendicular.
• the variations in the chief ray angle across the scan field for a non- telecentric scanner causes two problems. First, the spot size on image plane 360 grows at the edges of a scan line, due to oblique projection of the focused spot onto the image plane. Second, small shifts in focal plane location cause absolute pixel placement errors. For a chief ray angle in the cross-scan direction, focal plane shifts result in pixel placement errors that mimic magnification errors. If the chief ray angle is in the cross scan direction, out-of-focus scan lines may appear bowed.
• a fifth distinguishing feature is performance with multiple beam (data channel) input to the scan lens system. Multiple beams allow faster writing speeds with reasonable electronic data rates and polygon mirror rotational velocities. With a single beam system, distortion can be added to the design to provide f- ⁇ linearization of the fast-scan beam position. With a multiple beam system, f- ⁇ linearization is not necessarily sufficient to control the fixed channel-to-channel spacing across the scan line. Localized separation between first and last channels (i.e. fixed magnification in both slow and fast axes) must be maintained across the scan line to prevent pixel placement errors within the multiple beam field of view.
• the variation in beam magnification in the fast-scan direction is referred to as differential distortion. Variation in magnification in the slow scan direction is referred to as differential bow.
• a sixth distinguishing feature of laser scanner architecture is the number of resolvable spots in the scan line.
• Precision applications typically require spot diameters from 25 microns down to 2 microns, with absolute pixel placement accuracy down to a tenth of the spot diameter.
• a precision, refractive telecentric lens system may achieve up to 20,000 resolvable spots per scan line.
• a typical non-telecentric xerographic scanners may have about 9,000 resolvable spots in a scan line, although more spots are achievable if significant spot size variation across the scan line is allowed.
• sagittal input combined with PMC creates a bi-laterally symmetric optical system that allows aberrations to be corrected for greater numerical apertures and scan angles than tangential input systems, yielding more resolvable spots in a scan line.
• the invention provides for sagittal input in a unique manner that fundamentally minimizes cross-scan distortion.
• the telecentricity (perpendicularity of the chief ray in both meridians to the image plane) of the scan lens removes variation in spot placement as a function of image defocus. This eases the requirement on work piece flatness and focal plane alignment with the exposed media.
• the injection optics include a concave cylindrical mirror positioned to receive a beam of collimated light at a non-zero angle with a radius of curvature of the concave cylindrical mirror; a cylindrical lens, and a folding mirror.
• the optical materials and coatings in the scanner are matched to the spectral sensitivity of the photo-sensitive media and for photoresist exposure, are suitable for ultraviolet light having wavelengths of about 340 to 390 nm.
• One embodiment of an optical system in accordance with the invention includes: a cross-scan cylinder mirror, a cross-scan cylinder lens, a folding mirror that provides sagittal input of the beam to a rotating polygon mirror, a spherical meniscus lens, a piano-cylinder lens, a first sphero-cylinder lens, a primary spherical mirror, a secondary cylindrical mirror, and a second sphero-cylinder lens.
• Figs. 1 A and IB show a scan lens with tangential injection of a beam to a polygon mirror.
• Figs. 2A and 2B show a scan lens with sagittal injection of a beam to a polygon mirror.
• Figs. 3 A and 3B respectively show telecentric and non-telecentric scan lenses.
• Figs. 4A and 4B show a top view and a side view of a laser scanner in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
• Figs. 5 A and 5B respectively show a side view and a top view of scan optics in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
• Fig. 6 shows a schematic representation of sagittal input for an embodiment of the invention.
• Figs. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D shows performance curves for an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
• a raster scanner 400 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention shown in Figs. 4A and 4B includes a laser 410 with required beam shaping optics, a multi-channel modulator 420, scan optics 430, and a precision stage 490 for holding a workpiece.
• Laser 410 generates a collimated light beam 415 which modulator 420 converts into a modulated beam 425 containing separate collimated sub-beams.
• laser 410 is a UV argon ion laser
• beam 425 contains ultraviolet light of wavelengths 363.8 nm, 351.4 nm, and 351.1 nm and is split into two or more separate sub-beams.
• Beam 425 from modulator 420 has a diameter that defines a stop size for scan optics 430.
• Scan optics 430 forms an image of beam 425 and sweeps that image across a scan line in an image plane.
• An optional optical relay 480 reforms the image from scan optics 430 on a workpiece held by stage 490 so that a final image of the modulated beam sweeps along a scan direction at the surface of the workpiece.
• Precision stage 490 moves the workpiece perpendicular to the scan line direction. Movement of the workpiece can be continuous during scanning or may only occur each time scan optics 430 completes a scan line.
• a sagittal input system 600 of the class used in exemplary embodiment is schematically illustrated in Fig. 6.
• pre-polygon optics 610 focuses an input beam 605 which a folding mirror 620 directs onto a facet 630 of a polygon mirror.
• Post-polygon optics 640 re-images polygon facet 630 at the focal plane of the scanner as with tangential input systems.
• system 600 accomplishes injection and re-imaging using an off-axis section of the corrected clear aperture of the system rather than using laser beams that are symmetrically centered about the optical axis. Let the focused light from the polygon mirror have a subtended angle of ⁇ .
• beam bundle 455 reflects off of rotating multi-facet polygon mirror 460.
• Beam bundle 455 in the tangential direction underfills a facet of polygon mirror 460. Since sagittal offset is used, the projected beam bundle size on the polygon face in the tangential direction is minimized, and the diameter of polygon mirror 460 can be reduced accordingly.
• the polygon diameter is 5.33 inches in diameter, yielding a scan efficiency of 85% with a 12-facet polygon mirror.
• the passive motion compensation reduces the effects from wobble and keeps an image from forming off the desired scan line. Accordingly, polygon mirror 460 can use roller bearings or other less expensive bearings and still achieve high performance. In addition, the passive motion compensation reduces the required facet height thus reducing air resistance and allowing use of a lower thermal load motor to drive the polygon mirror 460.
• the first post-polygon optical elements, spherical meniscus lens 540 and piano-cylinder lens 550, which form a doublet, and a sphero-cylinder lens 560 are refractive elements of fused silica or BK7, which both effectively transmit light having wavelengths down to 350 nm.
• BK7 fused silica
• System 400 can also work effectively at shorter wavelengths (at least down to 190 nm) if calcium fluoride is substituted for BK7.
• Fig. 7C indicates the differential distortion between sub-beams in the upper-left and lower- left and the differential distortion between sub-beams in the upper-right and lower- right of the beam bundle. As indicated, differential is less than about 0.5%.
• Fig. 7D indicates the cross-scan position of sub-beams 2, 3, 4, and 5 across the range of polygon angles corresponding to a scan line. The position of diagonally located sub-beams 2 and 4 or 3 and 5 track each other to provide uniform spacing between scan lines formed by sub-beams if the sub-beams are oriented along a diagonal running from top-left to bottom-right (or from top-right to bottom left) of a square cross-section (i.e., aperture) for a beam bundle.
• This appendix contains an optical listing of the exemplary embodiment of the invention. The listing formatted and defines parameters as in the "Code V" optical design software available from Optical Research Associates.
• ADC 100 BDC: 100 CDC: 100
• ADC 100 BDC: 100 CDC: 100
• ADC S21 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Landscapes

• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Optics & Photonics (AREA)
• Lenses (AREA)
• Mechanical Optical Scanning Systems (AREA)
• Facsimile Scanning Arrangements (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=26731092

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (7)

Cited By (1)

Families Citing this family (7)

Family Cites Families (7)

• 1998
  • 1998-06-19 WO PCT/US1998/012464 patent/WO1999003012A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1998-06-19 JP JP2000502439A patent/JP2001509613A/ja active Pending
  • 1998-06-19 IL IL13375198A patent/IL133751A0/xx unknown
  • 1998-06-19 KR KR1019997012346A patent/KR20010014242A/ko not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1998-06-19 CA CA002296595A patent/CA2296595A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 1998-06-19 EP EP98930259A patent/EP0995144A1/de not_active Withdrawn
  • 1998-07-07 TW TW087111000A patent/TW394853B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events