EP0929056A2 - Installation de surveillance - Google Patents

Installation de surveillance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0929056A2
EP0929056A2 EP98122445A EP98122445A EP0929056A2 EP 0929056 A2 EP0929056 A2 EP 0929056A2 EP 98122445 A EP98122445 A EP 98122445A EP 98122445 A EP98122445 A EP 98122445A EP 0929056 A2 EP0929056 A2 EP 0929056A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
components
monitoring system
application
data
processor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP98122445A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0929056B1 (fr
EP0929056A3 (fr
Inventor
Peter Ungemach
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novar GmbH
Original Assignee
Caradon Esser GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Caradon Esser GmbH filed Critical Caradon Esser GmbH
Publication of EP0929056A2 publication Critical patent/EP0929056A2/fr
Publication of EP0929056A3 publication Critical patent/EP0929056A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0929056B1 publication Critical patent/EP0929056B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B26/00—Alarm systems in which substations are interrogated in succession by a central station
    • G08B26/001—Alarm systems in which substations are interrogated in succession by a central station with individual interrogation of substations connected in parallel

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for configuring a Monitoring system and a monitoring system for implementation of the procedure.
  • the term "surveillance system” is here in its broadest To understand the senses. So it doesn't just include monitoring of state variables but also controlling and regulating of state variables, especially in building technology.
  • Current surveillance systems consist of at least a processor, one containing a processing program Data storage and addressable components with identifiable Function.
  • Components such as sensors electrical contacts, motion detectors or fire detectors and Actuators such as alarms, servomotors or magnetic contacts Understood. These components are over with the processor any data link connected.
  • Fieldbus systems become between the processor and components like EIB or LON.
  • the LON and EIB technology predominantly rework the so-called multi-master concept.
  • Such a monitoring system which consists of a central, higher-level control computer and with it via the fieldbus connected components such as those mentioned above Sensors and actuators exist after installation the hardware configured and parameterized by the installer. To put it simply, the installer gives via a commissioning program from which components the surveillance system exists, assigns addresses for the Components and gives the system the dependencies and functionalities of the components in front of each other.
  • the invention has a significant task simplified procedure for configuring a monitoring system to accomplish.
  • the meaningful through which Processing program controlled interaction of sensors and actuators for maintaining or producing a understood defined state.
  • a Temperature sensor and a heating valve in connection with an application to the processing program, namely an Room temperature control.
  • the essence of the invention consists in an extensive "plug and play "procedure.
  • the system recognizes the with the processor connected components automatically, one searches suitable application, installs it and thus interposes the the components in the operating state of existing dependencies firmly.
  • a major advantage of the invention The procedure is that all steps without Intervention from outside. Fall for the installer no or only very little parameterization work. Thereby input errors during configuration are prevented and shortens the time to start up the system. The installer does not have a precise knowledge of each other Interdependencies between the building blocks required.
  • the applications are essential for carrying out the method. Applications are stored in the application library for all sensible combinations of the components suitable for the system.
  • the component types required for the installation and the minimum and maximum number of the respective component types are defined, for example, according to the scheme shown in the table below.
  • Min Max meaning 0 x The component can be integrated into the application. However, it is not required. 1 x
  • the component must be present at least once 2nd x
  • the component must be present at least twice 3rd 3rd
  • the component must be present exactly 3 times x 0
  • the component must not exist x 1
  • the component may not be present more than once
  • the function of the components is also in the application and the existing dependencies when the application is executed of the components defined among themselves. Furthermore the application can provide control information for downstream Assemblies, such as a visualization system, contain.
  • a component can also be assigned to several applications be (claim 3).
  • a temperature sensor both for room control and for fire detection be used.
  • the applications are ranked according to a given order checked for their applicability (claim 4).
  • This ranking can be predefined or during configuration according to predefined evaluation criteria taking into account of the components and their functions are determined.
  • Complex applications i.e. those who e.g. through an exact, specific specification of the required Components or through a wide variety of required Mark components, first checked. Around avoiding being very similar and essentially applications that perform the same function are installed , it may be useful to have an application assigned components certain other (in general applications related to the same trade no longer To be available. If necessary. can also be configured during configuration Ranking of the individual trades of a monitoring object is taken into account become.
  • the spatial distribution of the components can be determined (Claim 5).
  • the spatial determination is advantageously carried out Distribution of components hierarchically (claim 6). This allows the structure of the object to be monitored captured by the surveillance system and during surveillance be taken into account. This can be done using the data transmission link by addressable line separators in sections be divided. These are used in determining the spatial Distribution included (claim 7).
  • the surveillance system can be so marked by different Line breakers recognize a hierarchical building structure. Appropriate methods are e.g. from this side DE 40 36 639 C2 known.
  • the application can be defined in this way be that they are only at a certain spatial Distribution of the components is installed (claim 8).
  • the monitoring system can be used variably as it not just the parameters defined in an application is bound (claim 9).
  • the state of the monitoring system is advantageous during graphically displayed during installation and / or during operation (Claim 12). There is a sample image for each application specified / filed in the application library.
  • the invention also has a monitoring system for implementation of the method explained to the subject from at least one processor, at least one processing program and containing an application library Data storage and addressable components with identifiable Function over a data link are connected to the processor (claim 13).
  • the installed processing program supports both the configuration of the monitoring system as well as its Business. Alternatively, there are of course two separate ones Programs conceivable.
  • a burglar alarm system consisting of a computer 1 with a processing program and containing an application library Data memory 2, a motion detector 3, a window contact 4, an external signal generator 5 and a key switch 6 as arming unit.
  • Arming unit a numeric keypad or a key switch together with a locking element and a bolt contact be used. Both for that from the key switch 6 existing arming unit as well as for the named
  • One alternative is one application, that is, a total three, stored in the application library. When configuring the monitoring system are all three applications checked for their feasibility. The surveillance system automatically recognizes that as arming unit only the key switch 6 is installed and thus only the application can be executed in the arming unit only a key switch is defined is. As a result, only this is installed.
  • the example can be extended to a monitoring system, in which, additionally or alternatively, a fire alarm system, heating control, escape door monitoring, a light control, a blind control or any other obvious system to be controlled are implemented.
  • Fig. 2 shows the overall process of installing a monitoring system.
  • the components the monitoring system at its respective destination installed and connected to a control unit that comprises at least one processor and a data memory, which is a processing program and an application library contains.
  • the components are in a second Read step from the processing program. Doing so both the number of components and their respective Function determined.
  • the identified components and their functions are assigned to an executable application, it becomes an executable application from the application library installed on the monitoring system, after which the monitoring system is ready for operation.
  • FIG. 3 shows the reading in in detail the components of a monitoring system in which the data transmission link through addressable line separators in Segments is divided.
  • First is the component memory default, i.e. the surveillance system prepares the memory before the import process. Subsequently a location identifier is assigned for a first segment. Then the first line isolator is switched on and in the assigned one Components are searched for the line segment. This happens, for example, via a serial number search. Is If a component is found, it is read in; i.e. of the Component type is identified and information is transferred to the processing program. Then the Initialized component and thus to a defined Initial state set. Are additional information on stored in a memory of the components, they are read and made available to the processing program.
  • the first step is a selection list with all available applications in the working memory loaded. Then the first place within the hierarchical Building structure, e.g. a room, a floor or even the entire building, selected. To this place the in components contained in this area (part of the building). Then a first application from the selection list selected. This will affect their feasibility checked with the selected components. Is the application executable, it will be installed, otherwise not. Then, if available, the next application selected from the selection list, again for their feasibility checked with the selected components and installed if feasible. Is the end of the selection list reached, it is checked whether all locations, i.e. all within existing areas of the building structure were. If not, the next location is selected. For this then according to the scheme described executable applications installed. Are all areas processed on all hierarchical levels of the building the configuration of the monitoring system is completed.
  • the applications are assigned to different trades in a monitoring system.
  • the applications relating to a particular trade are checked for their applicability according to a predetermined ranking, taking into account a ranking of the individual trades.
  • the rankings can be fixed.
  • an evaluation number can be calculated for each application during configuration. This is derived, for example, from the type and / or number of usable and available components. In the simplest case, the number of supported components is determined. In the table below, examples of different trades and the applications intended for them are given with a given ranking.
  • the number of applications installed for a component overall or within a trade can be limited become. By installing / assigning an application the components are "used up”. Other applications (e.g. within a trade) they are no longer available to disposal.
  • application values are parameterized. Each Depending on the application, the application values can vary from the application predefined or entered interactively.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)
  • Hardware Redundancy (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Iron Core Of Rotating Electric Machines (AREA)
EP98122445A 1998-01-08 1998-11-26 Installation de surveillance Expired - Lifetime EP0929056B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19800448 1998-01-08
DE19800448A DE19800448C2 (de) 1998-01-08 1998-01-08 Überwachungsanlage

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0929056A2 true EP0929056A2 (fr) 1999-07-14
EP0929056A3 EP0929056A3 (fr) 2000-04-26
EP0929056B1 EP0929056B1 (fr) 2004-02-11

Family

ID=7854160

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98122445A Expired - Lifetime EP0929056B1 (fr) 1998-01-08 1998-11-26 Installation de surveillance

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0929056B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE259528T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE19800448C2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2215265T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT929056E (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001065324A1 (fr) * 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procede et dispositif pour traiter les donnees d'un systeme d'automatisation pour une installation relevant de la technique des systemes de batiments
EP1233315A1 (fr) * 2001-02-19 2002-08-21 Abb Research Ltd. Méthode et dispositif de configuration d'un appareil électrique
WO2011006030A1 (fr) * 2009-07-09 2011-01-13 Siemens Industry, Inc. Procédés et appareil pour centre de commande de moteurs amélioré
US8842747B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2014-09-23 Honeywell International Inc. Method for digital communication between a plurality of nodes connected by a serial field bus and corresponding system, in particular a field control system or field surveyance system
DE102022116894A1 (de) 2022-07-06 2024-01-11 Cariad Se Kraftfahrzeug-Steuergerät mit einem Adaptermodul zum Empfangen von Zustandssignalen anderer Steuergeräte über ein Datennetzwerk sowie Verfahren zum Betreiben des Adaptermoduls, Speichermedium und Kraftfahrzeug

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10057360C2 (de) 2000-11-18 2003-10-23 Danfoss As Verfahren zum Überprüfen eines Heizungssystems

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0485878A2 (fr) * 1990-11-16 1992-05-20 Caradon Esser GmbH Procédé pour déterminer la configuration des détecteurs d'un système d'alarme
EP0734005A1 (fr) * 1995-03-24 1996-09-25 Bticino S.P.A. Système de réception/gestion pour signaux numériques issus de dispositifs électroniques, et capables d'apprendre la configuration des capteurs, en particulier pour système d'alarme
EP0806724A2 (fr) * 1996-05-10 1997-11-12 General Signal Corporation Système de programmation de configuration pour un réseau de sécurité de vie

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0485878A2 (fr) * 1990-11-16 1992-05-20 Caradon Esser GmbH Procédé pour déterminer la configuration des détecteurs d'un système d'alarme
EP0734005A1 (fr) * 1995-03-24 1996-09-25 Bticino S.P.A. Système de réception/gestion pour signaux numériques issus de dispositifs électroniques, et capables d'apprendre la configuration des capteurs, en particulier pour système d'alarme
EP0806724A2 (fr) * 1996-05-10 1997-11-12 General Signal Corporation Système de programmation de configuration pour un réseau de sécurité de vie

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001065324A1 (fr) * 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procede et dispositif pour traiter les donnees d'un systeme d'automatisation pour une installation relevant de la technique des systemes de batiments
EP1233315A1 (fr) * 2001-02-19 2002-08-21 Abb Research Ltd. Méthode et dispositif de configuration d'un appareil électrique
WO2011006030A1 (fr) * 2009-07-09 2011-01-13 Siemens Industry, Inc. Procédés et appareil pour centre de commande de moteurs amélioré
US8670859B2 (en) 2009-07-09 2014-03-11 Siemens Industry, Inc. Methods and apparatus for an improved motor control center
US8842747B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2014-09-23 Honeywell International Inc. Method for digital communication between a plurality of nodes connected by a serial field bus and corresponding system, in particular a field control system or field surveyance system
DE102022116894A1 (de) 2022-07-06 2024-01-11 Cariad Se Kraftfahrzeug-Steuergerät mit einem Adaptermodul zum Empfangen von Zustandssignalen anderer Steuergeräte über ein Datennetzwerk sowie Verfahren zum Betreiben des Adaptermoduls, Speichermedium und Kraftfahrzeug

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE19800448A1 (de) 1999-07-22
ES2215265T3 (es) 2004-10-01
EP0929056B1 (fr) 2004-02-11
ATE259528T1 (de) 2004-02-15
DE59810752D1 (de) 2004-03-18
EP0929056A3 (fr) 2000-04-26
PT929056E (pt) 2004-06-30
DE19800448C2 (de) 2000-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69819211T2 (de) Verteilte interfacearchitektur einer programmierbaren industriellen steuerung
DE69414609T2 (de) Informationsanzeigesystem zur aktiven redundanten rechnergestützten prozesssteuerung
EP1703350B1 (fr) Diagnostic d'un système d'automatisation
EP1430369B1 (fr) Acces dynamique a des ressources d'automatisation
DE102011051212A1 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtungen und Herstellungsartikel zum Auswechseln von Feldgeräten in Prozessleitsystemen
EP1096348A1 (fr) Intégration d'un appareil de commande sur site dans un système de commande d'une installation
EP2081415B1 (fr) Installation d'éclairage d'urgence commandée par microcontrôleur et procédé de communication approprié
WO2005119381A1 (fr) Systeme d'utilisation d'une installation par edition d'objets graphiques
EP2506096B1 (fr) Procédé de combinaison logique de capteurs et d'actionneurs dans le cadre de la mise en service d'un système d'installation
EP1296207B1 (fr) Appareil HMI et procédé de commande d'une installation technique, système d'automatisation avec cet appareil HMI et produit de programme informatique avec un programme pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procédé dans un appareil HMI ou dans un système d'automatisation
DE10208146A1 (de) Verfahren zum rechnergestützten Erzeugen einer graphischen Benutzeroberfläche und Geräteüberwachungs-/Steuerungseinheit
EP0929056B1 (fr) Installation de surveillance
DE4216242A1 (de) Identifizierung von Sensoren / Aktuatoren in Bussystemen
DE112014004208T5 (de) Integrationsverfahren und -System
EP1199846A1 (fr) Procédé de configuration automatique d'un appareil dans un bus de secteur
EP3948446A1 (fr) Génération et distribution de structures de données de configuration pour des systèmes de commande
WO2011120856A1 (fr) Procédé d'adressage et réseau de communication utilisant un tel procédé d'adressage
WO2001018632A2 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour controler et commander le comportement en service d'un systeme d'ordinateur ou de processeur
EP1345097B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de génération d'une couche de commande dans un système de contrôle de batiment
EP1338961A2 (fr) Procédé pour la génération d'un interface utilisateur assistée par ordinateur
EP0904644B1 (fr) Dispositif de regulation et/ou de commande a repartition pour la gestion de systemes avec bus reseau et bus local
DE19731026C2 (de) Fernwartung eines Bus-Systems auf der Basis des SNMP-Protokolls
DE112006000806T5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Verwalten eines Objekts sowie Teilen davon
DE102004051834B4 (de) Prüfgerät und Prüfverfahren für programmierbare Elektroinstallationen, sowie entsprechendes Computerprogramm und entsprechendes computerlesbares Speichermedium
DE69420606T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Adressenzuweisung in einem Unternetz

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000420

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ESSER SECURITY SYSTEMS GMBH.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020603

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOVAR GMBH

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040211

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040211

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040211

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59810752

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040318

Kind code of ref document: P

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20040315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040511

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040511

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20040507

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2215265

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041126

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20041112

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *NOVAR G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20041130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *NOVAR G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20041130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59810752

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE HENKEL, BREUER & PARTNER, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20171127

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20171122

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20171222

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20171106

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20171130

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180131

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59810752

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20181125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20200724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181127