EP0897034B1 - Integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in sedimentary seabeds - Google Patents
Integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in sedimentary seabeds Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0897034B1 EP0897034B1 EP19980600013 EP98600013A EP0897034B1 EP 0897034 B1 EP0897034 B1 EP 0897034B1 EP 19980600013 EP19980600013 EP 19980600013 EP 98600013 A EP98600013 A EP 98600013A EP 0897034 B1 EP0897034 B1 EP 0897034B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- metal
- tube
- metal tube
- seabed
- integrated system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D7/00—Methods or apparatus for placing sheet pile bulkheads, piles, mouldpipes, or other moulds
- E02D7/28—Placing of hollow pipes or mould pipes by means arranged inside the piles or pipes
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D13/00—Accessories for placing or removing piles or bulkheads, e.g. noise attenuating chambers
- E02D13/04—Guide devices; Guide frames
Definitions
- the invention refers to an integrated system for the implantation of metal tubes from the surface of the sea to marine sedimentary seabed.
- the system consists of a mechanism with grabs, that can hold tightly the metal tube from its upper part aiming at deploying it from the surface to the bottom in a vertical position.
- the support vessel winch is used for the deployment.
- the grabs hold the metal tube through a watertight seal to the lower part of a flexible water tube which is connected to top of the metal tube.
- the other end of the flexible tube is connected to an autonomous water pump on the working deck of the support vessel. By activating the pump, pressurised water comes out from the lower end of the metal tube, washing out the sediment particles, gradually creating a narrow hole that allows the lowering of the tube to the desired depth.
- the final penetration depth is controlled by special shoes attached to the main body of the mechanism which prevent further penetration of the metal tube when they come in contact with the seabed.
- the operation of the pump is interrupted and a special tube release on the grab holding mechanism is activated
- the main body of the system with the holding grabs and the shoes as well as the flexible tube are brought back to the vessel's working deck in order to be reused for a new tube implantation.
- the invention aims to protect fishing grounds and marine sensitive habitats from the illegal use of towed fishing gears (bottom trawling).
- bottom trawling The adverse effects of trawling activities upon the marine organisms and the biota have been well studied and documented scientifically.
- the use of bottom trawls within the three nautical miles from the coast (or up to the 50 metres contour depth) and also above sea grass meadows (Posidonia oceanica beds) shall be prohibited (article 3).
- the outer ends of the rods of all cylinders act only as guides thus allowing the pile to move freely as it is driven into the ground
- the pile driving apparatus starts being in operation mode only when its footpads are in contact with the seabed, while the tube implantation system stops being operational when it reaches the seabed
- the construction of the pile-driving apparatus is exclusively adapted in supporting a pile-driving hammer operation.
- the integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in soft bottom substrates can offer a high level of protection to marine seagrass beds and nursery grounds from illegal trawling.
- the method can be used as a cost effective alternative to the deployment of antitrawling artificial reefs in areas where urgent action has to be taken. Also, it is by far more economic, is reversible, allows the protection of extensive areas, does not aggregate fish and does not affect passive fishing gears, furthermore it is simple and does not require long term construction implications.
- the metal tubes will be implanted in such a way that their major part will be buried in the sediment and only the upper part of the tube will remain protruding above the seabed.
- the distance between the metal tubes is in the order of tens to hundreds metres, depending on the surface of the area that is preselected for protection.
- a towed fishing gear comes in contact with the metal tube there are two possibilities: either the gear is stopped, or the ground rope of the trawl passes over the metal tube and consequently the trawling net is seriously damaged.
- Another application of the invention is the use of the implanted metal tubes as an alternative to conventional mooring systems in marine and freshwater environments (e.g. concrete blocks, sandbags, embedding anchors, etc.)
- a working platform e.g. vessel
- the main body of the implantation system consists of a metal frame that supports a pair of grabs that could hold tightly a metal tube (e..g. standard 6 metre long galvanised iron or steel tubes) from its upper part aiming at deploying it from the surface to the bottom in a vertical position.
- the vessel's winch wire connected to the system's metal frame and the crane will be used for the metal tube deployment.
- the grabs hold the metal tube through a watertight seal to the lower part of a flexible water tube which is connected to top of the metal tube.
- the other end of the flexible water tube is connected with a water pump located on the working deck.
- the holding mechanism of the grabs could be hydraulic, or simple mechanic (e.g. return springs) or a mixed type.
- the water pump When the lower part of the metal tube comes in contact with the seabed the water pump is activated and as a result pressurised water comes out from the lower end of the metal tube, washing out the sediment particles and thus gradually creating a narrow hole in the seabed
- This procedure allows the lowering of the metal tube to the desired depth controlled by special metal shoes attached to the main metal frame of the system that prevent further tube penetration when they come in contact with the seabed.
- the attachment of these shoes to the main metal frame of the system can be regulated according to the desired penetration depth.
- the tube holding mechanism (hydraulic and/or mechanic) is decoupled and as a result the system minus the tube can be brought back to the vessel's deck in order to be reused for a new tube implantation.
- Figure 1A shows a bird's-eye view of the system's main body with the two grabs (3 and 4) that are stably connected, the first (3,) to the main metal frame of the system (1) and the second (4) to a metal plate that can reciprocate freely on cylindrical guides (5), connected stably to the internal sides of the main metal frame (1).
- a hydraulic piston (6) which is fed by an oil pump located on the support vessel, when activated, moves the metal plate (2) and consequently the grab (4) that is stably connected to it Both grabs hold tightly the upper part of the metal tube (7) and at the same time the lower part of a flexible water tube (8) which by having slightly larger diameter surrounds as external casing the upper part of the metal tube.
- the movement of the metal plate (2) towards the grab (3) creates the hold and seal on both tubes (7, 8) and also compresses the two return spiral springs (9).
- the arrow indicates the direction of the movement of the hydraulic piston (6).
- the arrow shows the removal direction of the metal plate (2) towards the side of the frame that bears the hydraulic piston (6). This removal is caused by the expansion of the two springs (10) when the hydraulic piston (6) is deactivated. The dynamic energy of the two springs move backwards the metal plate (2) and consequently the grab (4), finally releasing both the metal and the flexible tubes (7, 8).
- FIG 2 an enlarged elevated side view of one of the two shoes that are stably attached to the external sides of the main metal frame of the system is shown. It consists of the shoe pad (11), of which the lower surface comes in contact with the seabed, a vertical arm (12) stably connected with the shoe pad and a horizontal arm (13) that is semi-permanently connected with the vertical arm (12) and from the other side is stably connected to the external side of the metal frame of the system (14).
- FIGs 3A, 3B and 3C a diagrammatic presentation of three successive operational phases of a tube implantation is given.
- figure 3A a side view of the metal frame (1) and the two shoes of the system (11) and also the metal tube (7), the flexible water tube (8) and the oil supply tube (16) to the system's hydraulic piston are depicted
- the main metal frame is deployed by wire (15) from the winch of the supporting vessel.
- a water pump located on the supporting vessel deck is activated and pressurised water is pumped through the flexible tube (8) and the metal tube (7), washing out the sediment gradually creating a narrow hole (18) that allows the lowering of the metal tube into the seabed
Description
- The invention refers to an integrated system for the implantation of metal tubes from the surface of the sea to marine sedimentary seabed. The system consists of a mechanism with grabs, that can hold tightly the metal tube from its upper part aiming at deploying it from the surface to the bottom in a vertical position. The support vessel winch is used for the deployment. The grabs hold the metal tube through a watertight seal to the lower part of a flexible water tube which is connected to top of the metal tube. The other end of the flexible tube is connected to an autonomous water pump on the working deck of the support vessel. By activating the pump, pressurised water comes out from the lower end of the metal tube, washing out the sediment particles, gradually creating a narrow hole that allows the lowering of the tube to the desired depth. The final penetration depth is controlled by special shoes attached to the main body of the mechanism which prevent further penetration of the metal tube when they come in contact with the seabed. When the metal tube reaches the desired depth into the sediment the operation of the pump is interrupted and a special tube release on the grab holding mechanism is activated Finally, the main body of the system with the holding grabs and the shoes as well as the flexible tube are brought back to the vessel's working deck in order to be reused for a new tube implantation.
- The invention aims to protect fishing grounds and marine sensitive habitats from the illegal use of towed fishing gears (bottom trawling). The adverse effects of trawling activities upon the marine organisms and the biota have been well studied and documented scientifically. According to recent decision of the European Union in the frame of the Common Fisheries Policy (Council Regulation No 1626/94 of 27 June 1994) the use of bottom trawls within the three nautical miles from the coast (or up to the 50 metres contour depth) and also above sea grass meadows (Posidonia oceanica beds) shall be prohibited (article 3). Unfortunately, the implementation of effective controls is not always possible and as a result in many areas, vessels at sea are not controlled throughout the fishing period The use of illegal bottom trawling causes a continuous and severe deterioration of valuable natural marine habitats as well as overexploitation of marine living resources. In many Mediterranean countries, artificial reefs known in the literature also as antitrawling reefs, are used as simple mechanical obstacles to prevent illegal trawling in marine protected zones. Unfortunately, it seems that the use of artificial reefs i.e. massive structures from concrete, for the creation of protected marine zones presents a series of disadvantages. Considering the proven enhancement and aggregating role of artificial reefs in the absence of proper control measures on fishery operations, their deployment may have the effect of concentrating fishery activity and consequently further exacerbating over-fishing. Among other disadvantages the long term bureaucratic implications and high cost of artificial reef construction, including potential requirements for removal are also included.
- Prior art known to the applicant includes U.S.patent 4,102,147 (JANSZ) describing a submersible pile driving apparatus. This invention comprises a frame assembly defining a guide passage for a pile and aiming at keeping the said pile at a vertical position or at a predefined slight angle to the vertical position. However, the present invention shows various structural and functional features beyond the state of the art. The main frame of the system bears grabs that hold tightly the metal tube from its upper part throughout the implantation operation. On the contrary in the pile driving apparatus, the outer ends of the rods of all cylinders act only as guides thus allowing the pile to move freely as it is driven into the ground The pile driving apparatus starts being in operation mode only when its footpads are in contact with the seabed, while the tube implantation system stops being operational when it reaches the seabed Finally, the construction of the pile-driving apparatus is exclusively adapted in supporting a pile-driving hammer operation.
- The integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in soft bottom substrates can offer a high level of protection to marine seagrass beds and nursery grounds from illegal trawling. The method can be used as a cost effective alternative to the deployment of antitrawling artificial reefs in areas where urgent action has to be taken. Also, it is by far more economic, is reversible, allows the protection of extensive areas, does not aggregate fish and does not affect passive fishing gears, furthermore it is simple and does not require long term construction implications. The metal tubes will be implanted in such a way that their major part will be buried in the sediment and only the upper part of the tube will remain protruding above the seabed. The distance between the metal tubes is in the order of tens to hundreds metres, depending on the surface of the area that is preselected for protection. When a towed fishing gear comes in contact with the metal tube there are two possibilities: either the gear is stopped, or the ground rope of the trawl passes over the metal tube and consequently the trawling net is seriously damaged. Another application of the invention is the use of the implanted metal tubes as an alternative to conventional mooring systems in marine and freshwater environments (e.g. concrete blocks, sandbags, embedding anchors, etc.)
- For the automatic implantation of the metal tubes, a working platform (e.g. vessel) equipped with a hydraulic winch and a crane is needed. The main body of the implantation system consists of a metal frame that supports a pair of grabs that could hold tightly a metal tube (e..g. standard 6 metre long galvanised iron or steel tubes) from its upper part aiming at deploying it from the surface to the bottom in a vertical position. The vessel's winch wire connected to the system's metal frame and the crane will be used for the metal tube deployment. The grabs hold the metal tube through a watertight seal to the lower part of a flexible water tube which is connected to top of the metal tube. The other end of the flexible water tube is connected with a water pump located on the working deck. The holding mechanism of the grabs could be hydraulic, or simple mechanic (e.g. return springs) or a mixed type. When the lower part of the metal tube comes in contact with the seabed the water pump is activated and as a result pressurised water comes out from the lower end of the metal tube, washing out the sediment particles and thus gradually creating a narrow hole in the seabed This procedure allows the lowering of the metal tube to the desired depth controlled by special metal shoes attached to the main metal frame of the system that prevent further tube penetration when they come in contact with the seabed. The attachment of these shoes to the main metal frame of the system can be regulated according to the desired penetration depth. As a result the upper part of the implanted tube protrudes a predefined distance above the seabed Finally, the tube holding mechanism (hydraulic and/or mechanic) is decoupled and as a result the system minus the tube can be brought back to the vessel's deck in order to be reused for a new tube implantation.
- In order for the reader to gain a complete understanding of the present invention, example of one preferred embodiment follow, with reference to the accompanying figures:
- Figure 1A shows a bird's-eye view of the system's main body with the two grabs (3 and 4) that are stably connected, the first (3,) to the main metal frame of the system (1) and the second (4) to a metal plate that can reciprocate freely on cylindrical guides (5), connected stably to the internal sides of the main metal frame (1). A hydraulic piston (6) which is fed by an oil pump located on the support vessel, when activated, moves the metal plate (2) and consequently the grab (4) that is stably connected to it Both grabs hold tightly the upper part of the metal tube (7) and at the same time the lower part of a flexible water tube (8) which by having slightly larger diameter surrounds as external casing the upper part of the metal tube. The movement of the metal plate (2) towards the grab (3) creates the hold and seal on both tubes (7, 8) and also compresses the two return spiral springs (9). The arrow indicates the direction of the movement of the hydraulic piston (6).
- In figure 1B the arrow shows the removal direction of the metal plate (2) towards the side of the frame that bears the hydraulic piston (6). This removal is caused by the expansion of the two springs (10) when the hydraulic piston (6) is deactivated. The dynamic energy of the two springs move backwards the metal plate (2) and consequently the grab (4), finally releasing both the metal and the flexible tubes (7, 8).
- In figure 2 an enlarged elevated side view of one of the two shoes that are stably attached to the external sides of the main metal frame of the system is shown. It consists of the shoe pad (11), of which the lower surface comes in contact with the seabed, a vertical arm (12) stably connected with the shoe pad and a horizontal arm (13) that is semi-permanently connected with the vertical arm (12) and from the other side is stably connected to the external side of the metal frame of the system (14).
- In Figures 3A, 3B and 3C a diagrammatic presentation of three successive operational phases of a tube implantation is given. In figure 3A a side view of the metal frame (1) and the two shoes of the system (11) and also the metal tube (7), the flexible water tube (8) and the oil supply tube (16) to the system's hydraulic piston are depicted The main metal frame is deployed by wire (15) from the winch of the supporting vessel. As soon as the lower part of the metal tube comes in contact with the seabed (17), a water pump located on the supporting vessel deck is activated and pressurised water is pumped through the flexible tube (8) and the metal tube (7), washing out the sediment gradually creating a narrow hole (18) that allows the lowering of the metal tube into the seabed
- In figure 3B the major part of the metal tube is already burried into the seabed and its further deployment is prevented by the two shoes of the system. The supply of pressurised water is stopped and the narrow hole has started to be filled in with sediment.
- In figure 3C the supply of oil by the hydraulic pump has stopped, resulting in the realease of the system from the tube. The metal tube (7) remains implanted in the seabed and the system including both the oil supply tube and the flexible water tube (not shown) are removed back onto the deck in order to be reused for a new implantation.
Claims (3)
- Integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes from the surface of the sea to marine sedimentary seabed comprising a metal frame (1) supporting a hydraulic piston, pressing grabs (3, 4) that can tightly hold the upper part of a metal tube (7) to be lowered in a vertical position to the marine seabed, the hydraulic piston (6), when deactivated, allowing the opening of the pressing grabs (3, 4) caused by expansion springs (10) in order to release the metal tube (7), said pressing grabs (3, 4) further holding through a watertight seal the lower end of a flexible water tube (8) which is adapted to supply pressurised water to the metal tube (7) so as to wash out the sediment thereby creating a narrow hole that allows the lowering of the metal tube (7) up to the desired penetration depth, said metal frame (1) also supporting external arms (12, 13) with footpads (11) at their lower ends which footpads are adapted to prevent further penetration of the metal tube (7) above the desired depth once they come in contact with the marine seabed.
- Integrated system in accordance with claim 1 wherein both grab dosing and opening mechanism is assisted hydraulic piston(6).
- Integrated system in accordance with claim 1 wherein both grab holding and opening mechanism is assisted by expansion springs (9,10) .
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GR97100318 | 1997-08-14 | ||
GR97010318 | 1997-08-14 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0897034A1 EP0897034A1 (en) | 1999-02-17 |
EP0897034B1 true EP0897034B1 (en) | 2003-05-28 |
Family
ID=10943046
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19980600013 Expired - Lifetime EP0897034B1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 1998-07-21 | Integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in sedimentary seabeds |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0897034B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69814996T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0897034T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2200296T3 (en) |
GR (1) | GR1003157B (en) |
PT (1) | PT897034E (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GR1004153B (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2003-02-20 | Κωνσταντινος Ντουνας | Protective-productive artificial reef |
GB0204987D0 (en) | 2002-03-04 | 2002-04-17 | Fast Frames Uk Ltd | Pile driving |
DE102005056461A1 (en) * | 2005-11-26 | 2007-05-31 | Menck Gmbh | Method for stabilizing long thin piles when driving them into the sea floor underwater using pile hammers comprises intermediately guiding the pile using a guiding element which is pre-stressed by a flexible traction element |
GB201407991D0 (en) | 2014-05-06 | 2014-06-18 | Renewable Hydrocarbons Ltd | Sub-sea piling |
BE1022222B1 (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2016-03-02 | D.E.C.O. Nv | SPACING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SPACING FILL MATERIAL IN OFFSHORE STRUCTURES |
GR1009024B (en) | 2015-11-11 | 2017-05-08 | Κωνσταντινος Γεωργιου Ντουνας | Artificial pleasure-diving ledge |
JP6829376B2 (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2021-02-10 | ジャパンパイル株式会社 | Construction equipment cradle |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3750609A (en) * | 1969-02-14 | 1973-08-07 | Bolt Associates Inc | Powerful thruster method and apparatus suitable for driving a member such as an anchor or pile into the earth, and anchoring and pile apparatus |
JPS5217646B2 (en) * | 1972-07-28 | 1977-05-17 | ||
NL158872B (en) * | 1975-10-13 | 1978-12-15 | Hollandsche Betongroep Nv | DEVICE FOR MAINTAINING A POLE TO BE DRIVEN IN THE BOTTOM IN A CERTAIN POSITION. |
US4147036A (en) * | 1977-09-02 | 1979-04-03 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Scissor well template |
US4257721A (en) * | 1979-04-30 | 1981-03-24 | Haynes Harvey H | System for placement of piles into the seafloor |
-
1997
- 1997-08-14 GR GR970100318A patent/GR1003157B/en unknown
-
1998
- 1998-07-21 DE DE1998614996 patent/DE69814996T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-07-21 ES ES98600013T patent/ES2200296T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-07-21 DK DK98600013T patent/DK0897034T3/en active
- 1998-07-21 PT PT98600013T patent/PT897034E/en unknown
- 1998-07-21 EP EP19980600013 patent/EP0897034B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2200296T3 (en) | 2004-03-01 |
DK0897034T3 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
DE69814996T2 (en) | 2004-03-11 |
GR970100318A (en) | 1999-04-30 |
PT897034E (en) | 2003-09-30 |
DE69814996D1 (en) | 2003-07-03 |
GR1003157B (en) | 1999-06-21 |
EP0897034A1 (en) | 1999-02-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2354225C (en) | Fish farming system and method | |
US5412903A (en) | Sea cage fish farming system | |
US9464413B2 (en) | Mooring structure with habitat features for marine animals | |
US4950104A (en) | Artificial substrates for marine biomass enhancement and wave energy absorption | |
JP6709937B2 (en) | Submarine-mounted net cage for abalone cultivation | |
EP0897034B1 (en) | Integrated system for the automatic implantation of metal tubes in sedimentary seabeds | |
US4983072A (en) | Method of protecting submerged piling | |
US4872782A (en) | Artificial substrates for marine biomass enhancement and wave energy absorption | |
US5370476A (en) | Self anchoring tire-made artificial reef | |
KR20180124108A (en) | Undersea base structure and its installation method | |
GB2205123A (en) | Method of installing a buoyant body on a seabed | |
JP5264644B2 (en) | Seaweed block, pedestal on which the seaweed block is installed, structure incorporating the seaweed block, and seaweed bed construction method | |
JP2001207969A (en) | Method of taking deep water and multipurpose working device for mobile ocean deep water intake/water supply/ measure against shore ruining/artificial upwelling, water sprinkle for continuous stratification and the like, and water discharge | |
JP2835311B2 (en) | Weed control boat | |
GB2343473A (en) | Underwater erosion control mat for influencing sedimentation | |
US6827525B2 (en) | Method and system for building up land in a water-covered or water-surrounded area | |
MORAn | Sea scour control systems Some considerations for use | |
KR102264637B1 (en) | River bank Shore Erosion Prevention Structure Using Coated Biopolymer Porous on Concrete block, and Construction Method therefor | |
RU2201078C2 (en) | Beach seine | |
JP2001049648A (en) | Pollution diffusion preventive device by artificial sea weed | |
US4154550A (en) | System for depositing and protecting sediment on the floor of a body of water and a method of installing it | |
RU43435U1 (en) | DEVICE FOR CULTIVATION OF HYDROBIONTS AND ANCHOR FOR THE DEVICE OF CULTIVATION OF HYDROBIONTS | |
WO1994007741A1 (en) | An off-shore mooring and method of installing same | |
JP2003210065A (en) | Simulated sea bottom ground, seaweed bed proliferation bank, method for setting seaweed bed proliferation bank and method for relocating seaweed bed proliferation bank | |
SU1737063A1 (en) | Protective floating structure |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BE CY DE DK ES FR GB IE IT NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19990629 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: BE CY DE DK ES FR GB IE IT NL PT SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20010828 |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE CY DE DK ES FR GB IE IT NL PT SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69814996 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20030703 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20030804 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2200296 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20040302 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20050714 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20050715 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20050718 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050721 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20050721 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20050728 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20050729 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20050729 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060721 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060721 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060722 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060731 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20060911 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070122 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070201 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20070122 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20060721 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20070201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *INSTITUTE OF MARINE BIOLOGY OF CRETA Effective date: 20070731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070731 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090728 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090720 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Payment date: 20090716 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090721 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGRI | Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Effective date: 20091201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100721 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100802 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100721 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100722 |