EP0724489B1 - Gradation method and device for soil material - Google Patents
Gradation method and device for soil material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0724489B1 EP0724489B1 EP94928411A EP94928411A EP0724489B1 EP 0724489 B1 EP0724489 B1 EP 0724489B1 EP 94928411 A EP94928411 A EP 94928411A EP 94928411 A EP94928411 A EP 94928411A EP 0724489 B1 EP0724489 B1 EP 0724489B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- shafts
- screen
- assembly
- disks
- disk
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B1/00—Sieving, screening, sifting, or sorting solid materials using networks, gratings, grids, or the like
- B07B1/12—Apparatus having only parallel elements
- B07B1/14—Roller screens
- B07B1/15—Roller screens using corrugated, grooved or ribbed rollers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
- B07B13/14—Details or accessories
- B07B13/18—Control
Definitions
- the invention is related to a gradation method according to the preamble of claim 1 for screening soil material with a disk screen.
- the invention also concerns a disk screen assembly for implementing the method.
- topsoil in landscaping is high in residential areas and will increase with the higher volume of construction and concomitant landscape design. Landscaping of yards and parks requires high-quality vegetable mould screened free from disturbing irregularities such as rocks and similar aggregates. Furthermore, topsoil intended for landscaping must be suitable for planting and therefore must be prepared by blending from different types of soil materials. Good soil for sowing and planting is specified as nutrient-containing, porous, containing minerals such as sand and clay as well as organic matter which together with the nutrients is capable of sustaining varied microbiological flora in the soil. The topsoil layer must be free from large objects such as rocks, root bundles, stumps and pieces of wood. Such a soil must further have all ingredients homogeneously blended.
- cut/strip soil As a by-product of various heavy construction operations, substantial amounts of cut/strip soil is obtained which cannot be reused due to the rocks or wood contained therein. In fact, such soil is often produced close to a potential point of use, whereby it would be advantageous to be able to reuse such cut/strip soil at a reasonable cost thus achieving significant savings in soil purchasing and hauling costs.
- the cut/strip soil must be screened prior to reuse, and due to the lack of effective screening equipment available commercially, cut/strip soil must conventionally be transported to, e.g., dumps to be disposed of as landfill, and methods of its reuse have been lacking.
- cut/strip soil contains valuable aggregates provided that its different ingredients could be segregated at the site of origination of the cut/strip soil.
- the rocks could be directly utilized in the load-bearing subgrade of a road, for instance, and the more fine-grained mineral soil could be mixed with vegetable mould thus producing topsoil suitable for landscaping.
- Screening is conventionally used for separating unwanted aggregates from raw feed and blending the desired aggregates.
- Screening devices are typically based on a wire cloth which is either moved or vibrated, or is put to a revolving motion in an inclined drum screen.
- Such revolving screens are hampered by heavy weight and relatively low capacity as well as high tendency of plugging particularly at raw feed with clay containing materials.
- bar screens are known in the art with stationary or movable bars or arrangements with vibrating bars.
- Different types of disk screens are conventionally used for screening of soil. These screens are comprised of a number of intermeshing disks mounted on parallel shafts, and the shafts are rotated in the same direction, whereby small aggregates of raw feed fall down through the slots between the disks, whereas aggregate sizes larger than the slots remain on the screen and are transported to the edge of the screen and dumped thereof to a collection bin.
- a disadvantage of such a screen is its inferior performance in the screening of sticky, clay-containing raw feed.
- the disks of the screen are not capable of ripping the clay-containing raw feed and the sticky soil cannot pass through the slots between the disks. Then, the soil clump lifted onto the screen only rides unscreened over the screen and is finally discharged off from atop the disk shafts. Hence, such sticky clay-containing soil is difficult to screen using conventional equipment.
- thixotropic materials whose moisture content is 10 - 90 % of the solids may often be problematic to screen.
- materials rich with fiber- or ribbon-like constituents are difficult to screen and homogenize and/or blend with other materials.
- Such materials include turf, straw, hay, dump waste and clay-containing soil in which the constituents to be screened away include stumps, roots, large rocks and plastic waste mixed with other soil material.
- Plastic waste and other materials occurring as long ribbons easily plug a number of screen types, particularly disk screens in which the disk-shaped screen elements are rotatingly mounted on parallel shafts, whereby the material ribbons become wound about the shafts.
- the invention is based on operating the shafts of the disk screen in a cyclically reversible manner, whereby the soil to be screened stays on the screen and is ripped by virtue of reversal of the direction of rotation of the shafts into a material mass from whose underside the ripped aggregates can pass through the screen.
- the screen assembly according to the invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 4.
- the invention offers significant benefits.
- the screen assembly according to the invention is capable of effectively handling wet clay, manure with a high content of straw and other difficult-to-screen materials.
- the screening capacity of the screen assembly with these problematic materials is higher than that of other screen types known in the art.
- a conventional revolving screen used for screening difficult materials may achieve a screening capacity of approx. 0.5 m 3 /min per screen square meter
- the screen assembly according to the present invention may reach a capacity of approx. 1.5 m 3 /min per screen square meter for the same material.
- the size of the screen openings is readily alterable.
- the shafts of the screen can be mounted by means of conical bushings, whereby the shafts are easy to dismantle and replace by another set of shafts equipped with a different set of screen disks.
- the screen disks themselves are provided with projections which during the rotation of the disks pierce the material to be screened in a ripping manner, whereby the material is transformed into a form suited to pass through the screen.
- the drive machinery and power transmission chain of the screen assembly can be provided with a torque converter, thus protecting the screen device against damage to the shafts and screen disks due to wedging of the material.
- the diagrams show only one end of the screen.
- the dimensions of the screen deck may be varied by using, e.g., a greater number of shafts, whereby the screen deck formed thereof will be correspondingly longer.
- the construction principle of using parallel shafts will also be evident from the cross-sectional diagrams.
- Fig. 1 shows the screen assembly according to the invention mounted on a transport carrier 1.
- a transport carrier is not actually related to the invention, whereby its detailed description is omitted herein.
- the screen assembly proper comprises a box-shaped framework 2 having the screen shaft set mounted on its upper level.
- the shaft set is comprised of shafts 3 having screen disks 4 mounted thereon spaced at a distance from each other along the longitudinal axis of each shaft.
- the disks 4 of each adjacent pair of shafts 3 are shifted sideways in a manner that makes the disks 4 mesh and thus form the openings of the screen deck.
- the perimeter of each screen disk 4 is provided with four ripping teeth 5 interspaced from each other at 90° angles.
- the teeth widen toward the outer perimeter of the disk so as to form a claw-like projection at both edges of the tooth.
- the assembly is driven by means of hydraulic machinery 6 mounted to the end of the framework 2, said machinery being adapted to drive the shafts 3 via a chain transmission 7.
- the shafts 3 are connected via two parallel roller chains 8 and chain sprockets 9 into a power transmission chain, whereby the hydraulic motor 6 can drive all shafts 3 synchronously.
- the end edges of the framework box 2 are provided with fixed baffles 10 which together with the disks of the last shaft closest to the end baffle form an intermeshed screen in the same manner as the shafts 3 with each other.
- the framework end to which the hydraulic motor 6 is mounted is further provided with a collection bin 11 for rocks and other separated aggregates.
- a conveyor 12 for the removal of the screened material.
- the operation of the screen is as follows: The raw feed to be screened is lifted by means of loader onto the shaft set of the screen. Powered by the hydraulic motor, the shafts of the screen are brought to rotate first in one direction, and subsequently the direction of rotation of the shafts is reversed and the shafts are rotated backward as many turns as they were rotated forward during the first cycle. When the second rotating cycle is completed, the direction of rotation is reversed again and such rotating/reversing cycles are repeated until all desired material being screened has passed through the screen and only the segregated aggregates remain on the shafts. Then, the screen shafts are controlled to rotate toward the collection bin, whereby the aggregates remaining on the shafts will be discharged into the collection bin.
- each rotating cycle may be selected relatively freely, and in fact, are advantageously adapted variable by means of, e.g., a programmable logic controller, whereby the operation of the screen device may be adjusted according to the material being handled.
- the duration of a rotating cycle may not be adjusted unidirectionally so long as to remove the material being screened away from screen deck.
- maximum efficiency in conjunction with several types of materials is attained if the disk tooth travel during a single cycle is very short, whereby the maximum number of ripping actions working on the underside of the material is achieved per time unit.
- a high tooth tip speed is desirable, whereas the inertial of the material mass being screened then tends to keep the material stationary while the disks impose the ripping action from underneath the material.
- the ripping edge of the disk may advantageously be formed by either an arc segment of a circle having a larger radius than that of the disk on the average and further so that the discontinuity of the disk radius is radially perpendicular at an angle of 90° to the tangent of the disk, or alternatively, advantageously aligned at an acute angle.
- the shape of the disk does not become, e.g., star-like in such a manner that readily permits the aggregate being screened to wedge between the shaft and the spokes of the star-shaped disk. It is also important that the ripping projections of the ripping disks of screen do not radially deviate excessively from the average radius of the disk or the radius of the other parts of the disk.
- the radial height of the ripping part of the rotating disk should not exceed the radius of the disk by more than 1/4 of the disk radius. Otherwise, the rotating disks may permit the aggregates of the material being screened to reach a situation in which the material being screened wedges between the disk and the shaft.
- the disks need not be circular, but instead, also triangular, square and other shapes of the disk are feasible.
- the screen assembly framework, the shafts and their mounting fixtures and drive means may advantageously be mounted on springed chassis to prevent bending damages on the shafts.
- the power transmission of screen shafts can be arranged in several different ways, one of the preferred methods being the adaptation of a hydraulic motor and a torque converter on each shaft. Electric or combustion motors are also possible alternatives to the hydraulic drive machinery, while then the implementation of a rapid reversal of the direction of rotation of the shaft will be more difficult than with hydraulics.
Landscapes
- Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
Description
Claims (8)
- A method for screening soil or similar material by means of a disk screen comprising a number of parallel shafts on which are adapted intermeshing screen disks, in which methodthe material to be screened is lifted onto a screen deck formed by the shaft set (3) of the screen, andthe shafts are rotated whereby the material to be screened can pass through the screen deck via the slots between the shafts (3) and the screen disks (4), whilst such material aggregates that are oversized to pass through said slots remain on the screen deck,
characterized in thatthe shafts (3) are rotated in a cyclically reversible manner whose angle of rotation during a cycle of one direction is so limited as not to permit the material resting on the screen deck from being transferred away from atop the screen deck formed by the shafts (3) of the screen assembly. - A method as defined in claim 1, characterized in that the angle of rotation during a cycle of one direction is smaller than a full revolution of the shafts (3).
- A method as defined in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the reversal of the direction of rotation of the shafts is performed without essential pausing of the rotational motion of the shafts.
- An assembly for screening soil or similar material, said assembly comprisinga framework (2),a plurality of parallel and aligned shafts (3) adapted supported by said framework (2) and spaced at a distance from each other, said shafts forming a screen deck,a plurality of screen disks (4) adapted on each shaft (3) and having such a diameter and position on the shafts (3) that the disks (4) on adjacent shafts (3) partially intermesh, andat least one actuator means (6) for rotating said shafts (3),
characterized bymeans for controlling said actuator means (6) cyclically so as to perpetually reverse the direction of rotation of said shafts (3) after a predetermined duration of each rotating cycle. - An assembly as defined in claim 4, characterized in that ripping teeth (5) are adapted to the perimeter of the screening disks (4) in a projecting manner from the perimeter of said disk (4).
- An assembly as defined in claim 4 or 5, characterized in that said actuator means is a hydraulic motor (6) connected via a torque limiter.
- An assembly as defined in claim 4 or 5, characterized in that said actuator means is comprised of separate hydraulic motors adapted on each shaft (3) and connected to their respective shaft (3) via a torque converter.
- An assembly as defined in any of foregoing claims 4 - 7, characterized by a programmable logic controller or similar data processing means adapted to the control of the assembly functions.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FI934662A FI94729C (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1993-10-22 | Method and apparatus for screening soil mass |
FI934662 | 1993-10-22 | ||
PCT/FI1994/000446 WO1995011093A1 (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1994-10-06 | Gradation method and device for soil material |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0724489A1 EP0724489A1 (en) | 1996-08-07 |
EP0724489B1 true EP0724489B1 (en) | 1999-06-02 |
Family
ID=8538821
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP94928411A Expired - Lifetime EP0724489B1 (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1994-10-06 | Gradation method and device for soil material |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0724489B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU7784994A (en) |
DE (1) | DE69418890T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0724489T3 (en) |
FI (1) | FI94729C (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995011093A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AUPP220498A0 (en) | 1998-03-05 | 1998-04-02 | Forress Pty Ltd | Screening apparatus |
FI113846B (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-06-30 | Yhteisviejaet Tamex Oy | Soil screening method for dredging rivers, city canals and harbors, involves scooping soil with scoop equipment and sucking soil and water from scoop equipment into outlet tube |
EP1725335B1 (en) | 2004-01-30 | 2011-10-05 | Mmd Design & Consultancy Limited | Rotating mineral breaker |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2846941A1 (en) * | 1977-11-09 | 1979-10-04 | Rader Int Ab | DEVICE FOR THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF GRAIN OR PIECE-SHAPED MATERIAL |
SE442174C (en) * | 1981-05-11 | 1987-06-29 | Oscar Wilje | SKIVSALL |
DE3301766A1 (en) * | 1983-01-20 | 1984-07-26 | Günter 2730 Zeven Gerlach | DEVICE (KRAUTFAHRGER) for separating fibrous objects from a mixture comprising sugar beets |
DE3818946A1 (en) * | 1988-06-03 | 1989-12-14 | Passavant Werke | Method for operating a drum screening machine |
US4972959A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1990-11-27 | Beloit Corporation | Compressible ring spacer disk screen |
US5133852A (en) * | 1990-07-30 | 1992-07-28 | Wark Rickey E | Coal sizing grid |
-
1993
- 1993-10-22 FI FI934662A patent/FI94729C/en active IP Right Grant
-
1994
- 1994-10-06 EP EP94928411A patent/EP0724489B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-10-06 AU AU77849/94A patent/AU7784994A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1994-10-06 DE DE69418890T patent/DE69418890T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-10-06 WO PCT/FI1994/000446 patent/WO1995011093A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1994-10-06 DK DK94928411T patent/DK0724489T3/en active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE69418890T2 (en) | 1999-12-23 |
AU7784994A (en) | 1995-05-08 |
DK0724489T3 (en) | 1999-12-06 |
WO1995011093A1 (en) | 1995-04-27 |
FI94729B (en) | 1995-07-14 |
FI94729C (en) | 1995-10-25 |
DE69418890D1 (en) | 1999-07-08 |
FI934662A0 (en) | 1993-10-22 |
FI934662A (en) | 1995-04-23 |
EP0724489A1 (en) | 1996-08-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5619811A (en) | Bucket equipped with grinding and loosening device | |
US5988937A (en) | Crawler type soil improving machine | |
WO1997020987A1 (en) | Asphalt paver with remixing conveyor system | |
US7007877B1 (en) | Screening apparatus | |
US20240238844A1 (en) | A screening hopper | |
JP2007312632A (en) | Separator for soil attached to plant root | |
EP0724489B1 (en) | Gradation method and device for soil material | |
US20070272776A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Processing Excavated Earth | |
KR100730281B1 (en) | Separator for tree waste and its method | |
JP2669792B2 (en) | Sorter rotor | |
JP2669791B2 (en) | Sorter rotor | |
JP3590935B2 (en) | Grass root mixed soil separation equipment | |
CN211412230U (en) | Grading plant for granulation of attapulgite clay dry powder | |
US20230256471A1 (en) | Screening Apparatus | |
GB2614904A (en) | Improved screen | |
AU735090B3 (en) | Screening apparatus | |
AU733244B2 (en) | Screening apparatus | |
JPH0721201B2 (en) | Debris separator | |
JPH029897Y2 (en) | ||
JP2555543B2 (en) | Sorting machine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960415 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BE DE DK FR GB NL SE |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19980904 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE DE DK FR GB NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69418890 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19990708 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20021004 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20021009 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20021022 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20021022 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20021030 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20021031 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20021129 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031006 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031007 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031031 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *HUMUSPEHTOORI OY Effective date: 20031031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040501 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040501 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20031006 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040630 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20040501 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |