EP0513129B1 - Track circuit system - Google Patents

Track circuit system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0513129B1
EP0513129B1 EP91903576A EP91903576A EP0513129B1 EP 0513129 B1 EP0513129 B1 EP 0513129B1 EP 91903576 A EP91903576 A EP 91903576A EP 91903576 A EP91903576 A EP 91903576A EP 0513129 B1 EP0513129 B1 EP 0513129B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
track circuit
information
telegrams
track
fail
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP91903576A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0513129A1 (en
Inventor
Roberto Caporossi
Maurizio Feuli
Gustav Spangberg
Karl-Erik Sundvall
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DaimlerChrysler Rail Systems Signal AB
Original Assignee
EB Signal AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=20378346&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0513129(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by EB Signal AB filed Critical EB Signal AB
Publication of EP0513129A1 publication Critical patent/EP0513129A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0513129B1 publication Critical patent/EP0513129B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L3/00Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal
    • B61L3/16Continuous control along the route
    • B61L3/22Continuous control along the route using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using electromagnetic radiation
    • B61L3/24Continuous control along the route using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using electromagnetic radiation employing different frequencies or coded pulse groups, e.g. in combination with track circuits
    • B61L3/246Continuous control along the route using magnetic or electrostatic induction; using electromagnetic radiation employing different frequencies or coded pulse groups, e.g. in combination with track circuits using coded current
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L1/00Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
    • B61L1/18Railway track circuits
    • B61L1/181Details
    • B61L1/188Use of coded current

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for automatic traffic control in connection with trackbound communication.
  • the method and the device comprise means for detection of rail-mounted vehicles on a track circuit and identification of the track circuit in order to supervise the movement of the rail-mounted vehicle on the circuit in question.
  • the method and the device make possible the transmission of selective information to the supervision units of adjacent track circuits for control of the movement pattern of a leading or trailing rail-mounted vehicle.
  • the device is based on the utilization of digital information transmission between the units included.
  • the EP-A-0 288 564 describes an apparatus for detecting a vehicle on a rail track section.
  • the track is subdivided in various track sections isolated from each other.
  • a so-called alternating voltage local signal is fed via a first transformer into the rails of the track section and as a reference voltage to the detection circuit.
  • the voltage is taken out by a second transformer and compared with the local signal with respect to the phase between these two signals and with respect to its level. In case that a vehicle is on the track section this level will be reduced to near zero, due to the short-circuit cause by the vehicle. If no such reduction occurs, a relay is activated to indicate that the track section is not occupied by a vehicle.
  • the voltages on the two track sections adjoining the track section in question have a phase shift of 180 degree with respect to the voltage of the track section in question.
  • the level of the voltage taken out from the section in question will also be reduced close to zero, preventing thus the output relay from indicating that the track section is unoccupied.
  • Special means are provided to make the apparatus relatively insensitive to the noise channelled into the apparatus by the track signal.
  • the invention aims at developing a method for automatic control of rail-mounted vehicles on a railway line and a device for carrying out the method which operate with a different modulating method and which increase the fail-safety in the transmission of messages.
  • the invention suggests a method for automatic control of rail-mounted vehicles on a railway line according to the introductory part of claim 1, which is characterized by the features of the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • a device for carrying out the method according to the invention is characterized by the features of claim 8.
  • the following describes a system of functions which are applicable to a system concept which includes a track circuit system combined with an automatic train control system for rail-mounted vehicles.
  • standard baseband modulation technique for telecommunication systems is chosen to modulate a signal for a track circuit in order to achieve feeding of serial data by way of the rails.
  • the level of the baseband signal is used to indicate the presence of shunting vehicle axles on the track circuit.
  • Baseband modulation provides a possibility of synchronous serial data transmission.
  • the data to be transmitted are collected in information messages in so-called telegrams. These telegrams are divided into blocks or frames in accordance with the high-level data link control (HDLC) technique, according to the standard worked out by CCITT.
  • HDLC high-level data link control
  • a bitoriented protocol is used for the information transmission. It is, of course, also possible to use other synchronous protocols, or even asynchronous transmission and asynchronous protocols. The latter protocols are, however, less biteffective than bitoriented protocols, such as, for example, HDLC.
  • Transmitting serial data and indicating the presence of vehicle axles within a track circuit by means of the carrier of the signal are known, as previously mentioned, and utilized in other control systems.
  • a novelty in the present supervision or control system is the use of standard transmission technique for, for example, telephony and the like in this application.
  • the address contents of the HDLC telegrams are the basis for track circuit identification, which is of value for separating disturbance signals from the environment or from the influence of other track circuits. Identification by using serial data may also have been performed by others in the past.
  • the telegrams may contain safety information which is picked up by antennas on the rail-mounted vehicles, located, for example, in front of the first axle. These telegrams are evaluated in train-borne equipment for speed supervision.
  • the telegrams for the rail-mounted vehicle may also contain other information of non-safety character. Information may also be conveyed from one track circuit to the next in order to provide a railway line with a block system. This also belongs to the state of the art described, for example, in "Vertician der Systemmerkmaleeaser Switzerlandbeeinhneeinhneeinhneungs respondeden", Köth, Eisenbahn Technische Rundschau 20 (1971).
  • the HDLC telegrams provide freedom to place information in one or a number of the frames which build up the telegram, which gives great flexibility when modelling a system for information transmission.
  • Information to the system may be mixed in or between the frames in different ways. Unspecified information may be put in one of the frames in a data telegram or be mixed with safety information in several different frames. In the latter case, the unspecified information may be multiplexed in several frames and time-shared with the safety information which is transmitted in repeated frames. This is a process which is also not used elsewhere.
  • the track circuit system needs a fail-safe level detector, a function which has been mentioned above. This unit will not be further discussed in this description.
  • Another aspect is the principle of safe detection of data in the track circuit.
  • the generation of the information and the associated and necessary redundancy are achieved in two separate channels, of which one feeds the track circuit with a signal at one end of the track circuit.
  • the signal received at the other end of the track circuit is compared in a fail-safe way with the output signal in a first comparator.
  • the output signal from the first comparator is forwarded, for example to a track relay or some other safety unit as, for example, a computerized interlocking system. In this way, any influence of disturbance in the track as well as failures in the transmitter units connected to the track are discovered.
  • the transmission is also continuously checked by a second comparator which compares the information contents in two telegrams generated in two separate units before the information of the transmitting channel is transmitted to the track. This is necessary because when there is a rail-mounted vehicle on the track circuit, no signals reach the receiving unit on the track, which makes the output signal of the first comparator of no interest.
  • Different temporary disturbances and influences may be filtered out by imparting significance only to repetitive telegrams, where the demand is placed such that at least m out of n telegrams must be unmistakably given the same information content.
  • the proposed method may provide the advantage that a smaller amount of redundant information need be fed to the track, since the information of the output signal has been verified by the above-described signal generation and the ensuing comparison. For that reason the telegrams can also be accepted by rail-mounted vehicles which utilize the same filtering technique and which with certainly sense the information as safe. Thus, more information can be transmitted per unit of time.
  • the safety information must be made relevant of m out of n telegrams, which, of course, reduces the information flow in the channel.
  • the bit error rate in the digital signals must therefore be fairly low to provide an acceptable system. However, this requirement does not affect the safety.
  • the transmitter feeds signals towards the rail-mounted vehicle.
  • the transmitter/receiver must change places.
  • the accompanying figure shows a schematic view of a linking of units which gives the system the functions aimed at in the description.
  • a first encoder E1 produces telegrams to be sent to a track circuit.
  • Each such telegram contains, in the general case, three different parts comprising a to c, in which
  • the a-part of a telegram is always the same in a track circuit, whereas the b- and c-parts may be changed from time to time depending on the traffic situation and the like.
  • a second encoder E2 the same data messages as in the first encoder E1 are produced but not necessarily in the same format.
  • the telegrams which are built up in the two encoders E1 and E2 are controlled by external control signals, which carry the information which is to be conveyed via the track circuit system. These control signals are symbolized in the figure by the arrows at 1.
  • the signal with messages in the form of telegrams from the first encoder E1 is forwarded to a combined code generator-transmitter G as well as to a second comparator C2.
  • the combined code generator-transmitter G is connected to an amplifier A and transmits to this the telegrams which have been produced by the first encoder E1 for the track circuit.
  • a track circuit is a section of a railway line, in which such a section is electrically delimited from adjacent sections by, for example, an electrical insulation 3 between the track circuits.
  • the amplifier A converts the signal voltage from the code generator-transmitter G to a level and shape adapted for transmission to the track circuit.
  • This amplifier A is provided with an adjustment device which makes possible adaptation of the voltage level to the length of the track circuit connected.
  • the signals from the amplifier A are fed to the track circuit with one pole to each rail 2 and are preferably connected at the end point of the track circuit.
  • the signal voltage which is fed via the track is picked up at the other end point of the track circuit by a receiver B with an interface for reception from the track circuit.
  • the receiver B comprises screening circuits which filter out the desired signal from electrical interference, if any, in the track.
  • the received signal is forwarded to a fail-safe level or threshold detector TD, which in a reliable manner measures the amplitude of the signal voltage in the track to determine whether the signal voltage level lies above or below a certain value, which indicates a free track circuit or a track circuit occupied by a vehicle.
  • TD fail-safe level or threshold detector
  • the signal is forwarded in the reception channel to a decoder D, where the code message is again quantified.
  • both encoders E1, E2 produce data codes with the same telegram contents.
  • the signals from the two encoders E1, E2 are brought to the second comparator C2 where the code messages are compared in a fail-safe manner. If there is no correspondence between the two separate signals, the transmission from the code generator G is cut.
  • the signal received from the track circuit is compared with the transmitted signal in a fail-safe manner, among other things to avoid that a signal from adjacent track circuits can be received in case of a fault in insulating joints 3.
  • a comparison is made at least of the a-part in the telegram and is carried out in a first comparator C1, where the signal transmitted to the track circuit is fetched from the data encoder E2 and the signal received from the track circuit is fetched from the decoder D. If the contents of the two channels in the a-part of the telegram are equivalent, a fail-safe output signal 4 is generated from the first comparator C1.
  • This output signal 4 indicates a track circuit free from vehicles.
  • This output signal 4 from the track circuit system is utilized for controlling different devices in the signal system of which the track circuit forms a part.
  • a rail-mounted vehicle adapted to the track circuit system has a receiver with an antenna near the rail in front of the first axle in the direction of travel. Since the signals in the track have different polarities in the two rails, the vehicle may suitably be equipped with two antennas, which pick up the same signal but with opposite polarity. When these signals are added, a more powerful input signal is received by the receiver while at the same time disturbing signals from the two antennas cancel each other.
  • the rail-mounted vehicle according to the above is provided, in principle, with the same type of data communication receiver as the track circuit system and thereby senses telegrams received from the track circuit as failsafe; thus, the rail-mounted vehicle can be supervised by the system.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)

Abstract

A track circuit system combined with an automatic control system for rail-mounted vehicles, in which the transmission of information to and the detection of rail-mounted vehicles in the system take place by the exchange of digital messages in the form of telegrams. The telegrams have contents with safety information with, above all, information about track cirucit identity but may also have general contents. Separate electronic units (E1, E2) generate two telegrams with the same information contents. These telegrams are compared prior to transmission to a track circuit (2), in which a receiver (B) picks up the telegram. Transmitted and received telegrams are compared for achieving fail-safety. Level indication of the received signal gives information as to whether the track cirucit is occupied. An output signal (4) from the system is used as a fail-safe signal for feeding to a traffic control system.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a method and a device for automatic traffic control in connection with trackbound communication. In particular, the method and the device comprise means for detection of rail-mounted vehicles on a track circuit and identification of the track circuit in order to supervise the movement of the rail-mounted vehicle on the circuit in question. Further, the method and the device make possible the transmission of selective information to the supervision units of adjacent track circuits for control of the movement pattern of a leading or trailing rail-mounted vehicle. The device is based on the utilization of digital information transmission between the units included.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • To obtain different forms of automatic traffic control of rail-mounted vehicles, a number of different methods exist at present. Common for all types of control systems is the need for information to the system and for conveyance of the information to the supervised vehicle units. This is solved in a number of different ways. For transmission of traffic information to the vehicles, transmitters, inter alia, are located at certain intervals along the track. See, for example, patent DE 229878. A considerable disadvantage of similar methods is that the vehicles out on the track cannot be continuously provided with up-to-date or changed information.
  • A solution to the problems which arise when utilizing transmitters and receivers placed along the track for information supervision is to use the track itself as signalling circuit. A switch to a so-called track circuit system has then been made. Track sections are arranged, in which each track section is electrically insulated from other sections. Such a track section is called a track circuit. This is known technique:
  • For example, the EP-A-0 288 564 describes an apparatus for detecting a vehicle on a rail track section. The track is subdivided in various track sections isolated from each other. A so-called alternating voltage local signal is fed via a first transformer into the rails of the track section and as a reference voltage to the detection circuit. At another location of the track section the voltage is taken out by a second transformer and compared with the local signal with respect to the phase between these two signals and with respect to its level. In case that a vehicle is on the track section this level will be reduced to near zero, due to the short-circuit cause by the vehicle. If no such reduction occurs, a relay is activated to indicate that the track section is not occupied by a vehicle. The voltages on the two track sections adjoining the track section in question have a phase shift of 180 degree with respect to the voltage of the track section in question. Thus in case of a failure of the insulation between adjoining track sections the level of the voltage taken out from the section in question will also be reduced close to zero, preventing thus the output relay from indicating that the track section is unoccupied. Special means are provided to make the apparatus relatively insensitive to the noise channelled into the apparatus by the track signal.
  • Various other train block systems are available on the market, in which, inter alia, the tracks are utilized as signalling circuit (see, for example, US-A-4 498 650). Using, for example, rails as conductor of course involves limitations. For example, it has been very difficult to transmit a sufficient amount of information in the systems that have used the rails as transmitting agent for data messages sent via the rails. In addition, the rails are subjected to disturbances of various kinds and the difficulties in creating a fail-safe information transmission are consequently considerable. It is known to use messages in digital form modulated as tone frequency signals, thus reducing the influence of such disturbances, as is described in, for example, "Die neue Gleisfreimeldung FTG 5917", Josef Czehowsky, Signal und Draht 74 (1982).
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention aims at developing a method for automatic control of rail-mounted vehicles on a railway line and a device for carrying out the method which operate with a different modulating method and which increase the fail-safety in the transmission of messages.
  • To achieve this aim the invention suggests a method for automatic control of rail-mounted vehicles on a railway line according to the introductory part of claim 1, which is characterized by the features of the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • Further developments of the method are characterized by the features of the claims 2 to 7.
  • A device for carrying out the method according to the invention is characterized by the features of claim 8.
  • Further developments of this device are characterized by the features of the claims 9 and 10.
  • The following describes a system of functions which are applicable to a system concept which includes a track circuit system combined with an automatic train control system for rail-mounted vehicles.
  • First of all, standard baseband modulation technique for telecommunication systems is chosen to modulate a signal for a track circuit in order to achieve feeding of serial data by way of the rails. At the same time, the level of the baseband signal is used to indicate the presence of shunting vehicle axles on the track circuit. The baseband modulation that is chosen could be, for example, differential phase modulation (DPSK = differential phase shift keying).
  • Baseband modulation provides a possibility of synchronous serial data transmission. The data to be transmitted are collected in information messages in so-called telegrams. These telegrams are divided into blocks or frames in accordance with the high-level data link control (HDLC) technique, according to the standard worked out by CCITT. Thus, a bitoriented protocol is used for the information transmission. It is, of course, also possible to use other synchronous protocols, or even asynchronous transmission and asynchronous protocols. The latter protocols are, however, less biteffective than bitoriented protocols, such as, for example, HDLC.
  • Excellent results have been attained in railways for direct current operation when utilizing the above-mentioned technique in the frequency range of up to 2000 Hz, and this despite the relatively great spectral bandwidth required for this kind of transmission.
  • Transmitting serial data and indicating the presence of vehicle axles within a track circuit by means of the carrier of the signal are known, as previously mentioned, and utilized in other control systems. A novelty in the present supervision or control system is the use of standard transmission technique for, for example, telephony and the like in this application.
  • The address contents of the HDLC telegrams are the basis for track circuit identification, which is of value for separating disturbance signals from the environment or from the influence of other track circuits. Identification by using serial data may also have been performed by others in the past.
  • The telegrams may contain safety information which is picked up by antennas on the rail-mounted vehicles, located, for example, in front of the first axle. These telegrams are evaluated in train-borne equipment for speed supervision. The telegrams for the rail-mounted vehicle may also contain other information of non-safety character. Information may also be conveyed from one track circuit to the next in order to provide a railway line with a block system. This also belongs to the state of the art described, for example, in "Vergleich der Systemmerkmale verschiedener Zugbeeinflussungseinrichtungen", Köth, Eisenbahn Technische Rundschau 20 (1971).
  • All the above-mentioned characteristics are combined and applied to one and the same technical system. The HDLC telegrams provide freedom to place information in one or a number of the frames which build up the telegram, which gives great flexibility when modelling a system for information transmission. Information to the system may be mixed in or between the frames in different ways. Unspecified information may be put in one of the frames in a data telegram or be mixed with safety information in several different frames. In the latter case, the unspecified information may be multiplexed in several frames and time-shared with the safety information which is transmitted in repeated frames. This is a process which is also not used elsewhere.
  • The track circuit system needs a fail-safe level detector, a function which has been mentioned above. This unit will not be further discussed in this description.
  • Another aspect is the principle of safe detection of data in the track circuit. The generation of the information and the associated and necessary redundancy are achieved in two separate channels, of which one feeds the track circuit with a signal at one end of the track circuit. The signal received at the other end of the track circuit is compared in a fail-safe way with the output signal in a first comparator. The output signal from the first comparator is forwarded, for example to a track relay or some other safety unit as, for example, a computerized interlocking system. In this way, any influence of disturbance in the track as well as failures in the transmitter units connected to the track are discovered.
  • The transmission is also continuously checked by a second comparator which compares the information contents in two telegrams generated in two separate units before the information of the transmitting channel is transmitted to the track. This is necessary because when there is a rail-mounted vehicle on the track circuit, no signals reach the receiving unit on the track, which makes the output signal of the first comparator of no interest.
  • Different temporary disturbances and influences may be filtered out by imparting significance only to repetitive telegrams, where the demand is placed such that at least m out of n telegrams must be unmistakably given the same information content. As a consequence of this, the proposed method may provide the advantage that a smaller amount of redundant information need be fed to the track, since the information of the output signal has been verified by the above-described signal generation and the ensuing comparison. For that reason the telegrams can also be accepted by rail-mounted vehicles which utilize the same filtering technique and which with certainly sense the information as safe. Thus, more information can be transmitted per unit of time. However, the safety information must be made relevant of m out of n telegrams, which, of course, reduces the information flow in the channel. The bit error rate in the digital signals must therefore be fairly low to provide an acceptable system. However, this requirement does not affect the safety.
  • In the above-mentioned systems, it is required that the transmitter feeds signals towards the rail-mounted vehicle. When changing the direction of traffic, the transmitter/receiver must change places.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • The accompanying figure shows a schematic view of a linking of units which gives the system the functions aimed at in the description.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • A proposed embodiment of the present invention with a method and a device for carrying out the method will be described with reference to the accompanying figure.
  • A first encoder E1 produces telegrams to be sent to a track circuit. Each such telegram contains, in the general case, three different parts comprising a to c, in which
    • a) is safety information for the receiver of the track circuit, i.e. information which is unique for each track circuit,
    • b) is fail-safe safety information for the rail-mounted vehicle with contents such as, for example, allowed speed over the track circuit,
    • c) is safety information for the rail-mounted vehicle, for example an indication as to the destination, stopping points for the vehicle, order for freewheeling, or some information for the operator.
  • The a-part of a telegram is always the same in a track circuit, whereas the b- and c-parts may be changed from time to time depending on the traffic situation and the like.
  • In a second encoder E2, the same data messages as in the first encoder E1 are produced but not necessarily in the same format.
  • The telegrams which are built up in the two encoders E1 and E2 are controlled by external control signals, which carry the information which is to be conveyed via the track circuit system. These control signals are symbolized in the figure by the arrows at 1.
  • The signal with messages in the form of telegrams from the first encoder E1 is forwarded to a combined code generator-transmitter G as well as to a second comparator C2. The combined code generator-transmitter G is connected to an amplifier A and transmits to this the telegrams which have been produced by the first encoder E1 for the track circuit.
  • A track circuit is a section of a railway line, in which such a section is electrically delimited from adjacent sections by, for example, an electrical insulation 3 between the track circuits.
  • The amplifier A converts the signal voltage from the code generator-transmitter G to a level and shape adapted for transmission to the track circuit. This amplifier A is provided with an adjustment device which makes possible adaptation of the voltage level to the length of the track circuit connected. The signals from the amplifier A are fed to the track circuit with one pole to each rail 2 and are preferably connected at the end point of the track circuit.
  • The signal voltage which is fed via the track is picked up at the other end point of the track circuit by a receiver B with an interface for reception from the track circuit. The receiver B comprises screening circuits which filter out the desired signal from electrical interference, if any, in the track.
  • The received signal is forwarded to a fail-safe level or threshold detector TD, which in a reliable manner measures the amplitude of the signal voltage in the track to determine whether the signal voltage level lies above or below a certain value, which indicates a free track circuit or a track circuit occupied by a vehicle.
  • From the level detector TD the signal is forwarded in the reception channel to a decoder D, where the code message is again quantified.
  • As mentioned above, both encoders E1, E2 produce data codes with the same telegram contents. The signals from the two encoders E1, E2 are brought to the second comparator C2 where the code messages are compared in a fail-safe manner. If there is no correspondence between the two separate signals, the transmission from the code generator G is cut.
  • Also the signal received from the track circuit is compared with the transmitted signal in a fail-safe manner, among other things to avoid that a signal from adjacent track circuits can be received in case of a fault in insulating joints 3. Such a comparison is made at least of the a-part in the telegram and is carried out in a first comparator C1, where the signal transmitted to the track circuit is fetched from the data encoder E2 and the signal received from the track circuit is fetched from the decoder D. If the contents of the two channels in the a-part of the telegram are equivalent, a fail-safe output signal 4 is generated from the first comparator C1. This output signal 4 indicates a track circuit free from vehicles. This output signal 4 from the track circuit system is utilized for controlling different devices in the signal system of which the track circuit forms a part.
  • A rail-mounted vehicle adapted to the track circuit system has a receiver with an antenna near the rail in front of the first axle in the direction of travel. Since the signals in the track have different polarities in the two rails, the vehicle may suitably be equipped with two antennas, which pick up the same signal but with opposite polarity. When these signals are added, a more powerful input signal is received by the receiver while at the same time disturbing signals from the two antennas cancel each other.
  • The rail-mounted vehicle according to the above is provided, in principle, with the same type of data communication receiver as the track circuit system and thereby senses telegrams received from the track circuit as failsafe; thus, the rail-mounted vehicle can be supervised by the system.

Claims (10)

  1. A method for automatic control of rail-mounted vehicles on a railway line comprising track circuits, each comprising a track section of said railway line, which track sections are electrically insulated from each other, wherein there is provided an automatic control system for the automatic control of the rail-mounted vehicles, wherein
    - a modulation technique is used to modulate a signal for a track circuit to achieve feeding of serial data by way of the rails (2), wherein the data to be transmitted to the track circuit are collected in information messages, so called telegrams,
    - a message transmitted to the track circuit by transmitting means (G,A) connected at one location to the track circuit is picked up by a receiver (B) connected at some other location within the track circuit,
    - the level of the received baseband signal is used to indicate the presence of shunting vehicle axles on the track circuit,
    - the method provides for fail-safe signal level detection of the signal received from the track circuit,
    - rail-mounted vehicles located within the track circuit may continuously decode the information sent to the track circuit, and wherein
    - the transmission of information, contained in the information messages, to the rail-mounted vehicles and the detection of rail-mounted vehicles on the track circuit take place by the exchange of digital messages between electronic units (E1, E2, C1, C2, G, A, B, TD, D),
    characterized in that
    - the modulation technique is a standard baseband modulation technique for telecommunication systems,
    - separate electronic units (E1, E2) generate at least two messages with the same information which is to be transmitted to a track circuit, which messages in order to achieve fail-safety are compared in an electronic unit (C2) prior to transmission of the information to the track circuit, and
    - a message transmitted to the track circuit and a message received from the track circuit by said receiver (B) are compared in a fail-safe manner in another electronic unit (C1), which generates a fail-safe output signal comprising information for the automatic control system whether or not the track circuit is occupied by a vehicle.
  2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the transmission of messages between the electronic units (E1,E2,C1,C2,G,A,B,TD,D) takes place in telegrams which are divided into a number of sections, one section containing safety information about the identity of the track circuit, another section containing safety traffic control information and a third section containing varying unspecified information.
  3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that fail-safety upon comparison between a message transmitted to and a message received from the track circuit is achieved in a counter, in which counter at least m out of n telegrams must be identical, at least with respect to sections of the telegrams which are relevant to safety, in order to verify faultless data communication in the track circuit.
  4. The method according to any of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the telegrams to rail-mounted vehicles on the track circuit contain information about travel speed over the track circuit and other information of a safety nature.
  5. The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the telegrams are divided into frames, mixed information being sent separately in one frame or multiplexed in several frames, time-shared with repeated frames containing safety information.
  6. The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the telegrams contain information about a free or occupied track circuit, which information may be used in a block system.
  7. The method according to any of claims 1 or 6, characterized in that the message transmitted to the track circuit contains information for a rail-mounted vehicle located within the track circuit, this information being adapted to be continuously decoded by said vehicle, the vehicle being equipped with a receiver and one or two antennas.
  8. A device for carrying out the method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the device comprises
    - a first encoder (E1) which produces serial data in the form of telegrams divided into different sections which are significant from the point of view of safety,
    - a second redundant encoder (E2) which produces data telegrams with the same information contents as the first encoder (E1) but not necessarily in the same format as the telegrams of the first encoder (E1),
    - a code generator-transmitter (G) which produces a baseband signal, which is modulated with the signal from the first encoder (E1) and the created signal of which is amplified for feeding to a track circuit,
    - a receiving unit (B) connected to a fail-safe level detector (TD) and a decoder (D),
    - a fail-safe first comparator (C1) for comparing the telegrams received from the track circuit and the telegrams sent to the track circuit,
    - a fail-safe second comparator (C2) for comparing the output signal from the encoders (E1, E2) and for breaking the transmission from the code generator-transmitter (G) to the track circuit if the output signals from the respective encoders (E1, E2) do not match each other.
  9. The device according to claim 8, characterized in that the encoders (E1, E2), the code generator-transmitter (G), the level detector (TD), the decoder (D) and the comparators (C1, C2) are implemented in a fail-safe computer unit.
  10. The device according to claim 8 or 9, in combination with a railway line comprising the track circuit, characterized in that a unit (A) transmitting telegrams to the track circuit and the receiving unit (B) receiving telegrams from the track circuit are connected to separate ends of the track circuit.
EP91903576A 1990-01-25 1990-12-21 Track circuit system Revoked EP0513129B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE9000259 1990-01-25
SE9000259A SE465458B (en) 1990-01-25 1990-01-25 SPAARLEDNINGSSYSTEM
PCT/SE1990/000865 WO1991011356A1 (en) 1990-01-25 1990-12-21 Track circuit system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0513129A1 EP0513129A1 (en) 1992-11-19
EP0513129B1 true EP0513129B1 (en) 1996-09-18

Family

ID=20378346

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91903576A Revoked EP0513129B1 (en) 1990-01-25 1990-12-21 Track circuit system

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0513129B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69028638T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0513129T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2094220T3 (en)
SE (1) SE465458B (en)
WO (1) WO1991011356A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3495230A1 (en) * 2017-12-08 2019-06-12 Thales Management & Services Deutschland GmbH Train control network, method for communication and method for controlling train integrity

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2170171A1 (en) * 1996-02-23 1997-08-24 Cyprien Gauthier Broken rail position detection
GB0127927D0 (en) * 2001-11-21 2002-01-16 Westinghouse Brake & Signal Railway track circuits
ATE471857T1 (en) * 2008-03-11 2010-07-15 Bombardier Transp Gmbh DETECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRACK CIRCUIT WITH BPSK MODULATED CODING
CA2768389C (en) 2009-07-17 2017-12-05 Invensys Rail Corporation Track circuit communications
US8500071B2 (en) 2009-10-27 2013-08-06 Invensys Rail Corporation Method and apparatus for bi-directional downstream adjacent crossing signaling
US8660215B2 (en) 2010-03-16 2014-02-25 Siemens Rail Automation Corporation Decoding algorithm for frequency shift key communications
US8297558B2 (en) 2010-03-17 2012-10-30 Safetran Systems Corporation Crossing predictor with authorized track speed input
CN104002833A (en) * 2014-04-28 2014-08-27 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司 Micro-electronic receiving system of phase-sensitive track circuit
CN113184011B (en) * 2021-04-29 2022-08-23 北京和利时系统工程有限公司 Track circuit safety checking method and system

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4498650A (en) * 1982-03-10 1985-02-12 General Signal Corporation Microprocessor based track circuit for occupancy detection and bidirectional code communication
EP0288564B1 (en) * 1986-10-03 1999-01-20 The Nippon Signal Co. Ltd. Device for detecting vehicle on track

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3495230A1 (en) * 2017-12-08 2019-06-12 Thales Management & Services Deutschland GmbH Train control network, method for communication and method for controlling train integrity
WO2019110673A1 (en) * 2017-12-08 2019-06-13 Thales Management & Services Deutschland Gmbh Train control network, method for communication and method for controlling train integrity
AU2018379331B2 (en) * 2017-12-08 2022-06-16 Thales Management & Services Deutschland Gmbh Train control network, method for communication and method for controlling train integrity
US11460288B2 (en) 2017-12-08 2022-10-04 Thales Management & Services Deutschland Gmbh Train control network, method for communication and method for controlling train integrity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK0513129T3 (en) 1997-03-17
SE465458B (en) 1991-09-16
DE69028638D1 (en) 1996-10-24
ES2094220T3 (en) 1997-01-16
WO1991011356A1 (en) 1991-08-08
DE69028638T2 (en) 1997-05-07
SE9000259D0 (en) 1990-01-25
EP0513129A1 (en) 1992-11-19
SE9000259L (en) 1991-07-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0257909B1 (en) Communicating vital control signals
EP0878373B1 (en) Train detection system
EP0513129B1 (en) Track circuit system
EP1314627B1 (en) Railway track circuits
CA1086848A (en) Track signalling system
EP0165048A2 (en) Railway track circuit equipment
US10293840B2 (en) Wayside communication system using power grid lines
RU2746411C1 (en) Digital module for monitoring track circuits with automatic signal level control dm mtc-ac
JP4145456B2 (en) Automatic train control equipment ground equipment
RU2341394C2 (en) Automatic blocking device
KR100344604B1 (en) Method and apparatus for transmitting information by beacon, and beacon for said apparatus
Hill Electric railway traction. V. Train detection, communications and supervision
Hill Optimal construction of synchronizable coding for railway track circuit data transmission
Huemmer Interference-free track vacancy detection
US3286091A (en) Vehicle traffic control system
KR102426980B1 (en) Ultra wide band track circuit of low frequency
KR102094256B1 (en) Track circuit for various/multiple information telegram transmission and control method thereof
KR20230139450A (en) Ultra wide band track circuit apparatus
Miyachi et al. The new generation of ATC system for super high-speed operation on Shinkansen lines
Hill The automation of railways
JPH07277190A (en) Communication device for controlling train
SU1230899A1 (en) Locomotive automatic signalling device
WO2002006103A1 (en) Remote control system for locomotives
Matsumoto et al. Dependable automatic train control system using digital track signals
SU1572894A2 (en) Apparatus for automatic locomotive signalling

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920714

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE DK ES FR GB IT NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930726

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE DK ES FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69028638

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19961024

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19961211

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19961212

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 19961216

Year of fee payment: 7

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19961230

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19961231

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19961231

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2094220

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19970214

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SIEMENS AG

Effective date: 19970618

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: SIEMENS AG

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19971215

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 971215

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition