EP0480890B1 - A reinforced soil vegetative wall and method for realizing the same - Google Patents

A reinforced soil vegetative wall and method for realizing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0480890B1
EP0480890B1 EP91830422A EP91830422A EP0480890B1 EP 0480890 B1 EP0480890 B1 EP 0480890B1 EP 91830422 A EP91830422 A EP 91830422A EP 91830422 A EP91830422 A EP 91830422A EP 0480890 B1 EP0480890 B1 EP 0480890B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
geogrid
layer
soil
biomat
wall
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP91830422A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0480890A1 (en
Inventor
Franco Chiccoloni
Antonino Schiliro' Rubino
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
COMES SpA
Original Assignee
COMES SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by COMES SpA filed Critical COMES SpA
Priority to AT91830422T priority Critical patent/ATE101891T1/en
Publication of EP0480890A1 publication Critical patent/EP0480890A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0480890B1 publication Critical patent/EP0480890B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D17/00Excavations; Bordering of excavations; Making embankments
    • E02D17/20Securing of slopes or inclines
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D17/00Excavations; Bordering of excavations; Making embankments
    • E02D17/20Securing of slopes or inclines
    • E02D17/202Securing of slopes or inclines with flexible securing means
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D29/00Independent underground or underwater structures; Retaining walls
    • E02D29/02Retaining or protecting walls
    • E02D29/0225Retaining or protecting walls comprising retention means in the backfill
    • E02D29/0241Retaining or protecting walls comprising retention means in the backfill the retention means being reinforced earth elements

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a reinforced soil vegetative wall and to a method for realizing the same.
  • the invention relates to a wall of the said type, suitable for creating more or less steep walls or embankments where it is necessary to reinforce the structure of the soil within the full respect of the characteristics of the landscape.
  • the innovatory characteristics described in said patent consist in the fact that the front walls of the support grids have an inclination corresponding to that of the steep escarp, in the fact that among the superposed support grids reinforcement members in a geotextile material are arranged, fixed by fasteners, and in the fact that said reinforcement members cover the inserts in correspondence with the horizontal walls of the grids.
  • a process for realizing the said arrangement that provides the realization of a support floor; the arrangement of a first reinforcement thereon; the incorporation of a support grid with the geotextile insert already coupled; the introduction of soil into the grid, compacting it; the realization of another support floor to execute the preceding stages again, and the turning green of the escarp.
  • the structure described in said patent turns out to be very complex in that it provides, besides the geotextile material, a reinforcement indispensable to be able to obtain the necessary strength characteristics.
  • the Applicant with the soluticn suggested according to the present invention intends obviating all the mentioned drawbacks realizing a vegetative wall having a very simple structure, that allows the realization of efficacious anchorages with a reduced length, without having to employ external reinforcements.
  • vegetative wall according to the present inventicn ensures a staticity equal to that deriving from the structures in concrete.
  • This type of solution combines the strength typical of two different materials: the soil and the extruded geogrid.
  • a comparatively great amount of the cheaper and more resistant to compression - soil - is improved in its strength characteristics by the combination with a comparatively small amount of a more costly and much more traction stress resistant material, such as the extruded geogrid.
  • a synergy is so realized between the strength to compression and to traction of the two materials, which improves the global characteristics of the composite material, as occurs with concrete and steel.
  • the extruded geogrid in a plastic material, will have, preferably, openings with a maximum size between 7 and 16 cm and an empty area greater than the 50% of the total.
  • Said presown biomat, in a long decay nonwoven fabric preferably will have the following features:
  • the vegetative wall 1 in reinforced soil comprises a series of superposed horizontal layers 2, each one made up of an extruded geogrid 3, upon which a presown biomat 4 is arranged.
  • an inert material layer 5 of about 15 to 20 cm is distributed onto the base.
  • a temporarary front caisson work is then erected and the geogrid 3 is tentered on the inert material 5, so as to recover it for all the length and the presown biomat 4 is internally deposited onto the same geogrid 3.
  • each layer 2 and therefore the filler material amount to be utilized will be everytime calculated as a function of the characteristics of the slope and of the soil.
  • the extruded geogrid 3 in a plastic material is a particular plane structure made up of a regular arrangement of members resistant to traction, which structure is endowed with openings of a size sufficient to allow the jointing of the surrounding soil, so as to accomplish the functions of reinforcement and/or separation.
  • An extruded geogrid 3 is dimensionally stable, with rigid threads and fixed joints, and this ensures the integrity of the structure and of the geometry of the grid 3 during the laying and the tamping of the soil.
  • the geogrids 3 most used by far have openings with a maximum size comprised between 7 and 16 cm, and an empty area greater than the 50% of the total.
  • the resistance capacity of the geogrid 3 is "utilized" at the moment in which the soil particles push jointing themselves between the longitudinal loop members; the latter transfer the stress, through the junctions, to the adjacent transverse members, which resist to the traction stress.
  • the transfer of the load through the junctions is the mechanism by which the geogrid 3 causes the reinforcement action in the surrounding soil.
  • the extruded geogrid 3 compared with the traditional geotextiles, has shown that: it reacts well to "creep" - a strain under load in time - a phenomenon to which traditional geotextiles, for which, as already mentioned, it is necessary to provide strengthening reinforcements (electrowelded nets; iron rods; tie rods), are on the contrary subject; and it possesses a high resistance to both chemical and physiical agents, such that practically it can be considered very durable in time.
  • the choice of the type and of the amount of geogrid 3 to be utilized is a function of the characteristics of the soil and of the characteristics of the slope.
  • the inner friction angle and the specific weight of the filler soil 6 assumes a peculiar importance; among the characteristics of the slope the height of the slope, the angle of inclination of the outer face, the breaking depth, the overload, etc., are pointed out.
  • the filler material 6 of the layers formed by the geogrid 3 can be of the most different types and even possess poor geomechanical characteristics (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
  • the biomat 4 is made up of a long decay nonwoven fabric mat, comprised of biodegradable fibres made cohesive mechanically by stretching, without employing bonding agents or sizes or sewings, and/or of filaments and a plastics net (Fig. 2).
  • the aforesaid material possesses the following characteristics:
  • the choice of the seeds to be inserted into the mat 4 is based in particular upon the biotechnical aptitudes of the vegetable.
  • Euriecal,perennial species with deep and wide hypogeal apparatuses will be chosen, in order to aggregate the filler material and the geogrids 3 in a compact mass.
  • the characteristics of the placement station such as the climate and the autochtonous vegetation, turn out to be not less important for the choice of the vegetable.
  • the vegetation will reach an optimum- development and the external face will turn out to be entirely turned green and the various constructive handworks will turn out to be obstructed to the view.
  • the vegetation once reached the omeostasis, will be able to live, progress and autonomously reproduce, without any external intervention.
  • the outerest portion of the layers 2 will be occupied by vegetable soil 7 (Fig. 2) so as to create the optimum habitability and nutrition conditions for the development of the vegetation.
  • the easy radication scions or rhyzoms 8, interposed between the layers 2, will ensure, with their developed and deep root apparatus, an aggregation and a further consolidation of the earthy particles, of the filler material 6 and of the geogrid 3 in a stable and compact mass.
  • the vegetative wall according to the present invention allows a support and consolidation embankment to be realized having even considerable slopes, and therefore reduced depth encumbrances, with a completely turned green outer face.
  • the resulting structure besides not requiring a further ordinary maintenance, resists seismic stresses, is perfectly draining and is comprised of unalterable materials.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
  • Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
  • Bulkheads Adapted To Foundation Construction (AREA)
  • Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
  • Curing Cements, Concrete, And Artificial Stone (AREA)

Abstract

The object of the invention is a vegetative wall (1) made up of superposed horizontal layers (2) and having a front face inclined to the horizontal level everytime for an angle corresponding to the desired one, in which each of said horizontal layers (2) comprises an extruded geogrid (3), frontly arranged, folded inwards; a presown biomat (4), arranged inside said geogrid (3), at least in correspondence with its front wall; vegetable soil (7), arranged on said layer (2) in its front zone, in correspondence with the geogrid (3) and the biomat (4); and a filler material (6), arranged at the rear of said vegetable soil (7), and the method for the realization of the same. <IMAGE>

Description

  • The present invention relates to a reinforced soil vegetative wall and to a method for realizing the same.
  • More particularly, the invention relates to a wall of the said type, suitable for creating more or less steep walls or embankments where it is necessary to reinforce the structure of the soil within the full respect of the characteristics of the landscape.
  • As is known, this type of reinforcements are necessary, in particular, in proximity to realizations of motor-ways, roads generally, railways and the like.
  • It is likewise known that one tries more and more to safeguard the impact that this type of realizations has on the landscape.
  • Many of the solutions suggested in the past provided reinforcements mainly realized in reinforced concrete or the like.
  • These solutions, if on a hand were able to constitute a good solution to the specified problem of the reinforcement of the soil, on the other hand went to make the situation considerably worse from the viewpoint of the landscape, a situation already ruined enough by the road and/or railway realized structure.
  • In successive times, just to obviate this drawback, solutions have been suggested that provide the utilization of the soil bottom as a carrier material and the employment of geotextile materials to realize the structure and allow the turning green of the wall.
  • Among the various suggested solutions there is that disclosed in EP-A-197 000, of the Fritz Landolt AG.
  • In said patent an arrangement is claimed of the realization of a turned green steep escarp of the type that provides, according to already known techniques, several support grids, having two substantially parallel horizontal walls and a front wall covered by an insert in a geotextile material.
  • The innovatory characteristics described in said patent consist in the fact that the front walls of the support grids have an inclination corresponding to that of the steep escarp, in the fact that among the superposed support grids reinforcement members in a geotextile material are arranged, fixed by fasteners, and in the fact that said reinforcement members cover the inserts in correspondence with the horizontal walls of the grids.
  • Moreover, a turning green of the front wall of the grids is provided.
  • Moreover, a process is disclosed for realizing the said arrangement that provides the realization of a support floor; the arrangement of a first reinforcement thereon; the incorporation of a support grid with the geotextile insert already coupled; the introduction of soil into the grid, compacting it; the realization of another support floor to execute the preceding stages again, and the turning green of the escarp.
  • It is to be pointed out first of all that geotextiles are made up of very flexible threads and that the junctions of the threads in the knots are not perfectly connected.
  • The structure described in said patent turns out to be very complex in that it provides, besides the geotextile material, a reinforcement indispensable to be able to obtain the necessary strength characteristics.
  • Moreover, besides requiring the employment of filler soil with particular characteristics, it provides the turning green, and therefore the sowing in situ.
  • In Polymer Grid Reinforcement, Thomas TELFORD LTD, London/ 1985, a vegetative wall is described having the features included in the preamble of claim 1.
  • The Applicant with the soluticn suggested according to the present invention, intends obviating all the mentioned drawbacks realizing a vegetative wall having a very simple structure, that allows the realization of efficacious anchorages with a reduced length, without having to employ external reinforcements.
  • Indeed, the vegetative wall according to the present inventicn ensures a staticity equal to that deriving from the structures in concrete.
  • These and other results are obtained by a vegetative wall having the features recited in claim 1.
  • This type of solution combines the strength typical of two different materials: the soil and the extruded geogrid.
  • A comparatively great amount of the cheaper and more resistant to compression - soil - is improved in its strength characteristics by the combination with a comparatively small amount of a more costly and much more traction stress resistant material, such as the extruded geogrid.
  • A synergy is so realized between the strength to compression and to traction of the two materials, which improves the global characteristics of the composite material, as occurs with concrete and steel.
  • The extruded geogrid, in a plastic material, will have, preferably, openings with a maximum size between 7 and 16 cm and an empty area greater than the 50% of the total.
  • Said presown biomat, in a long decay nonwoven fabric, preferably will have the following features:
    • weight: 750±5% g/m ²;
    • composition:
      vegetable fibres and cellulose
      85% by wt.
      fertilizer
      3% by wt.
      water holder
      5% by wt.
      blend of seeds
      7% by wt.
  • It is a further object of the invention a process for the realization of a vegetative wall according to claim 4, which provides the stages of:
    • breaking digging of the embankment which it is intervened upon, thath ensures the minimum project depth;
    • distributing and rolling an inert material to a thickness of 15 to 20 cm at the base of the breaking;
    • erecting a temporery front caisson work, with a containment function, inclined according to the project data;
    • tentering the extruded geogrid onto all the precedently tamped inert material, for such a length as to ensure the successive recovering of the same:
    • close contact depositing a presown biomat onto the internal portion of the geogrid that will be folded:
    • stratifying the filler material, and carefully roll tamping the same, on the geogrid, with a simultaneous deposition of vegetable soil into the portion of the layer closest to the face itself;
    • folding of the geogrid on the filler material, respecting the inclination of the outer face, according to the project calculations and slightly soil filling of the same in the most internal portion in order to close the first horizontal layer;
    • depositing a row of scions and/or rhyzomes over the previously folded geogrid, in the most external portion;
    • realizing the second layer with the deposition of the geogrid and then execution of the preceding stages up to the project height.
  • Now the present invention will be disclosed according to its preferred embodiments, with particular reference to the figures of the annexed drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a vertical section view of a vegetative wall according to the invention;
    • Figure 2 shows a detail of the wall of Figure 1;
    • Figure 3 shows, in axonometry, the detail relevant to the extruded geogrid, with the presown biomat applied.
  • With reference now to the annexed drawings, it can be seen that the vegetative wall 1 in reinforced soil according to the invention comprises a series of superposed horizontal layers 2, each one made up of an extruded geogrid 3, upon which a presown biomat 4 is arranged.
  • After having carried out the breaking digging of the embankment which it is to be so intervened, as to ensure the minimum project depth, an inert material layer 5 of about 15 to 20 cm is distributed onto the base.
  • A temporarary front caisson work, not shown, is then erected and the geogrid 3 is tentered on the inert material 5, so as to recover it for all the length and the presown biomat 4 is internally deposited onto the same geogrid 3.
  • Then one stratifies the filter material 6, carefully tamped, onto the geogrid 3 and, simultaneously, a certain amount of vegetable soil 7, in the front portion of the layer 2.
  • At this point the geogrid 3 is bent onto itself, respecting the slope of the external face, so closing the first horizontal layer 2.
  • Over the geogrid 3 a row of rhizomes or scions is arranged and then the sucessive layers are analogously realized.
  • The thickness of each layer 2, and therefore the filler material amount to be utilized will be everytime calculated as a function of the characteristics of the slope and of the soil.
  • The extruded geogrid 3, in a plastic material, is a particular plane structure made up of a regular arrangement of members resistant to traction, which structure is endowed with openings of a size sufficient to allow the jointing of the surrounding soil, so as to accomplish the functions of reinforcement and/or separation.
  • An extruded geogrid 3 is dimensionally stable, with rigid threads and fixed joints, and this ensures the integrity of the structure and of the geometry of the grid 3 during the laying and the tamping of the soil.
  • As regards the geometry, the geogrids 3 most used by far have openings with a maximum size comprised between 7 and 16 cm, and an empty area greater than the 50% of the total.
  • As regards the dimensional stability, it is to be recalled that the resistance capacity of the geogrid 3 is "utilized" at the moment in which the soil particles push jointing themselves between the longitudinal loop members; the latter transfer the stress, through the junctions, to the adjacent transverse members, which resist to the traction stress.
  • The transfer of the load through the junctions is the mechanism by which the geogrid 3 causes the reinforcement action in the surrounding soil.
  • Not at the end, the extruded geogrid 3, compared with the traditional geotextiles, has shown that: it reacts well to "creep" - a strain under load in time - a phenomenon to which traditional geotextiles, for which, as already mentioned, it is necessary to provide strengthening reinforcements (electrowelded nets; iron rods; tie rods), are on the contrary subject; and it possesses a high resistance to both chemical and physiical agents, such that practically it can be considered very durable in time.
  • The choice of the type and of the amount of geogrid 3 to be utilized is a function of the characteristics of the soil and of the characteristics of the slope.
  • Among the first characteristics the inner friction angle and the specific weight of the filler soil 6 assumes a peculiar importance; among the characteristics of the slope the height of the slope, the angle of inclination of the outer face, the breaking depth, the overload, etc., are pointed out.
  • The filler material 6 of the layers formed by the geogrid 3 can be of the most different types and even possess poor geomechanical characteristics (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
  • This means a great advantage, as is apparent, because it allows the utilization, as the building material, a great portion of that actually present in situ.
  • Only in particular cases it is timely to correct the composition of the soil with sand and/or an inert material.
  • The biomat 4 is made up of a long decay nonwoven fabric mat, comprised of biodegradable fibres made cohesive mechanically by stretching, without employing bonding agents or sizes or sewings, and/or of filaments and a plastics net (Fig. 2).
  • Moreover, the aforesaid material possesses the following characteristics:
    • weight:   750± g/m²
    • composition:
      vegetable fibres and cellulose
      85% by wt.
      fertilizer
      3% by wt.
      water holder
      5% by wt.
      blend of seeds
      7% by wt.
  • The choice of the seeds to be inserted into the mat 4 is based in particular upon the biotechnical aptitudes of the vegetable.
  • Euriecal,perennial species, with deep and wide hypogeal apparatuses will be chosen, in order to aggregate the filler material and the geogrids 3 in a compact mass.
  • The characteristics of the placement station, such as the climate and the autochtonous vegetation, turn out to be not less important for the choice of the vegetable.
  • In this way, the essences most consonant from both the biotechnical and the phytosociological point of view will be chosen as a function of the location of the vegetative wall.
  • In a short time, the vegetation will reach an optimum- development and the external face will turn out to be entirely turned green and the various constructive handworks will turn out to be obstructed to the view.
  • The vegetation, once reached the omeostasis, will be able to live, progress and autonomously reproduce, without any external intervention.
  • As already mentioned, the outerest portion of the layers 2 will be occupied by vegetable soil 7 (Fig. 2) so as to create the optimum habitability and nutrition conditions for the development of the vegetation.
  • The easy radication scions or rhyzoms 8, interposed between the layers 2, will ensure, with their developed and deep root apparatus, an aggregation and a further consolidation of the earthy particles, of the filler material 6 and of the geogrid 3 in a stable and compact mass.
  • In this case also, the essences most consistent from the phytosociological and biotechnical point of view will be chosen, as a function of the placement site.
  • It turns out apparent, from the above, that the vegetative wall according to the present invention allows a support and consolidation embankment to be realized having even considerable slopes, and therefore reduced depth encumbrances, with a completely turned green outer face.
  • Moreover, it is possible to employ autochtonous material to fill the layers 2, even if a poor carrying capacity material iis dealt with.
  • The resulting structure, besides not requiring a further ordinary maintenance, resists seismic stresses, is perfectly draining and is comprised of unalterable materials.
  • Finally, it involves considerable decreases of labour and furniture costs.
  • The present invention has been disclosed with specific reference to some its preferred embodiments, but it is to be understood that variations and/or modifications can be made by those skilled in the art, without so departing from the scope of protection of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (4)

  1. A vegetative wall (1) having a front face included to the horizontal level, said wall being made up of superimposed layers (2), each layer having a front face inclined for an angle corresponding to the slope of the front face, wherein each one of said horizontal layers comprises an extruded geogrid (3) arranged in front of the layers and having upper and lower bent inwards portions; a presown biomat (4) arranged inside said geogrid, at least in correspondance with its front face; vegetable soil (7), arranged in the front zone of the layer, in proximity of the geogrid (3) and of the biomat; and filler material arranged at the rear of said vegetable soil, characterized in that said vegetative wall comprises a plurality of rows of rhyzomes and/or scions, each row being arranged between the outermost portion of the upper bent inwards geogrid portion of each layer and the outermost portion of the lower bent inwards portion of the subsequent superposed layer.
  2. A vegetative wall according to Claim 1, characterized in that said extruded geogrid presents openings with a maximum size comprised between 7 and 16 cm and an empty area greater than the 50% of the total.
  3. A vegetative wall according to anyone of the preceding claims, characterized in that said presown biomat, in a long decay nonwoven fabric, presents the following characteristics:
    - weight 750±5% g/m²;
    - composition:
    vegetable fibres and cellulose   85% by wt.
    fertilizer   3% by wt.
    liquid holder   5% by wt.
    blend of seeds   7% by wt.
  4. A method for the realization of a reinforced soil vegetative wall according to one of the preceding claims, comprising the stages of:
    - breaking digging of the embankment which it is intervened upon, that ensures the minimum project depth;
    - distributing and rolling an inert material to a thickness of 15 to 20 cm at the base of the breaking;
    - erecting a temporary front caisson work, with a containment function, inclined according to the project data;
    - tentering the extruded geogrid onto all the precedently tamped inert material, for such a length as to ensure the successive recovering of the same;
    - close contact depositing a presown biomat onto the internal portion of the geogrid that will be folded;
    - stratifying the filler material, and carefully roll tamping the same, on the geogrid, with a simultaneous deposition of vegetale soil into the portion of the layer closest to the face itself;
    - folding of the geogrid on the filler material, respecting the inclination of the outer face, according to the project calculations and slightly soil filling of the same in the most internal portion in order to close the first horizontal layer;
    - depositing a row of scions and/or rhyzomes over the previously folded geogrid, in the most external portion;
    - realization of the second layer with deposition of the geogrid and then execution of the preceding stages up to the project height.
EP91830422A 1990-10-12 1991-10-09 A reinforced soil vegetative wall and method for realizing the same Expired - Lifetime EP0480890B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT91830422T ATE101891T1 (en) 1990-10-12 1991-10-09 PLANTABLE REINFORCED EARTH WALL AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION THEREOF.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT48360A IT1242074B (en) 1990-10-12 1990-10-12 REINFORCED VEGETATIVE WALL IN THE EARTH AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS REALIZATION
IT4836090 1990-10-12

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0480890A1 EP0480890A1 (en) 1992-04-15
EP0480890B1 true EP0480890B1 (en) 1994-02-23

Family

ID=11266098

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91830422A Expired - Lifetime EP0480890B1 (en) 1990-10-12 1991-10-09 A reinforced soil vegetative wall and method for realizing the same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0480890B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE101891T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69101235D1 (en)
IT (1) IT1242074B (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995002091A1 (en) * 1993-07-09 1995-01-19 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Simplified ground-stabilization method
US5658096A (en) * 1994-02-17 1997-08-19 Sytec Bausystm Ag Embankment element for stabilizing or supporting a slope
ES2179710B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2004-04-01 Teconma, S.A. GREEN WALL AND PROCEDURE FOR USING THE SAME.
US6893193B2 (en) * 2002-01-30 2005-05-17 B. Lanka Santha Self-anchoring fiber block system
JP6161924B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2017-07-12 公益財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 Revegetation method of earthquake-resistant seawall embankment slope
US9315962B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2016-04-19 B. Lanka Santha Fiber block planting system
IT201600127800A1 (en) * 2017-01-31 2018-07-31 Geoflum Eng Srl Facing for reinforcement structures for soils, embankments and excavation fronts.
US10280578B2 (en) 2017-08-21 2019-05-07 B. Lanka Santha Fiber block system
US10648149B1 (en) 2019-09-26 2020-05-12 B. Lanka Santha Fiber block system
US11965301B2 (en) 2021-11-23 2024-04-23 B. Lanka Santha Fiber sheet system

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0197000A1 (en) * 1985-03-05 1986-10-08 Fritz Landolt Aktiengesellschaft Element for realizing steep plant-accommodating slopes

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2590291B1 (en) * 1985-11-21 1988-08-19 Guintoli Freres MEANS FOR STABILIZING HIGH-TILT EMBANKMENTS
FR2628771B1 (en) * 1988-03-18 1992-06-12 Inst Textile De France THREE-DIMENSIONAL MATERIAL FOR SOIL REINFORCEMENT
GB2221134B (en) * 1988-07-30 1992-09-16 Macewan Robert Smillie Laying lawns
US4960349A (en) * 1988-12-05 1990-10-02 Nicolon Corporation Woven geotextile grid

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0197000A1 (en) * 1985-03-05 1986-10-08 Fritz Landolt Aktiengesellschaft Element for realizing steep plant-accommodating slopes

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Polymer Grid Reinforcement., 1985, Thomas Telford Limited, London. * page 200, left column, line 62 - right column, line 28, figures 5-10* page 193, right column, line 1 - page 195, right columnm line 16 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE101891T1 (en) 1994-03-15
IT9048360A0 (en) 1990-10-12
IT9048360A1 (en) 1992-04-12
EP0480890A1 (en) 1992-04-15
IT1242074B (en) 1994-02-08
DE69101235D1 (en) 1994-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0197000B1 (en) Element for realizing steep plant-accommodating slopes
KR100924933B1 (en) Construction method of retaining wall using soil sack block for vegetation and fixed device and Structure for installation thereof
DE69935987T2 (en) FUNDAMENTAL CONSTRUCTION OF TIRES
EP0480890B1 (en) A reinforced soil vegetative wall and method for realizing the same
EP0235218B1 (en) Process for constructing a sloping wall or embankment in particular a sound-proofing embankment
EP0603460A1 (en) Internally reinforced geotechnical structure and process for manufacturing the same
WO2007133001A1 (en) Construction method of breast wall for tree planting
CN118087566A (en) Highway side slope reinforcing structure with good anti-scouring effect and reinforcing method
KR100959828B1 (en) A vegetation slope structure
JP2003232023A (en) Gabion and retaining wall using the same
KR100350423B1 (en) Landscape block for protecting a slop side and carrying out method of using it
JP3431783B2 (en) Protection structure for slopes and walls
JP3472708B2 (en) Slope and seawall retaining wall structures and their construction methods
KR19990046526A (en) A structure for establing a slope and execution method using it
JP3720969B2 (en) Greening structures such as slopes and walls
KR100419883B1 (en) Method for constructing green reinforcement slope; R, S Green
JP2750363B2 (en) Steep embankment
JP3601947B2 (en) Vegetation
GB2292763A (en) Slope reinforcing structure
CN215290186U (en) One-way geogrid combines counterfort retaining wall side slope supporting construction
DE3516969C2 (en) Plantable support structure
CN217078846U (en) Geogrid reverse-wrapping ecological bag reinforced retaining wall
KR100430245B1 (en) Method for constructing green reinforcement slope R, S Green
CN217602661U (en) Gabion tunnel door wall
JPH0549766B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB LI LU NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920626

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19921016

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB LI LU NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19940223

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19940223

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 101891

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19940315

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69101235

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19940331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EN Fr: translation not filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19941031

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19951009

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19951009