EP0459563A2 - Système de commutation avec un dispositif de conférence - Google Patents

Système de commutation avec un dispositif de conférence Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0459563A2
EP0459563A2 EP91201219A EP91201219A EP0459563A2 EP 0459563 A2 EP0459563 A2 EP 0459563A2 EP 91201219 A EP91201219 A EP 91201219A EP 91201219 A EP91201219 A EP 91201219A EP 0459563 A2 EP0459563 A2 EP 0459563A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
speech
conference
conference participant
switching system
participants
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP91201219A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0459563A3 (en
EP0459563B1 (fr
Inventor
Rudolf Dipl.-Ing. Hofmann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Philips Intellectual Property and Standards GmbH
Koninklijke Philips NV
Original Assignee
Philips Patentverwaltung GmbH
Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken NV
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Philips Patentverwaltung GmbH, Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken NV, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV filed Critical Philips Patentverwaltung GmbH
Publication of EP0459563A2 publication Critical patent/EP0459563A2/fr
Publication of EP0459563A3 publication Critical patent/EP0459563A3/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0459563B1 publication Critical patent/EP0459563B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56—Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities
    • H04M3/568—Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities audio processing specific to telephonic conferencing, e.g. spatial distribution, mixing of participants
    • H04M3/569—Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities audio processing specific to telephonic conferencing, e.g. spatial distribution, mixing of participants using the instant speaker's algorithm
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56—Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities
    • H04M3/561—Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities by multiplexing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a switching system, in particular PCM switching system with a conference facility, in which a summation signal is formed for each conference participant from speech samples of the conference participants and a speech intensity is determined for each conference participant, by means of which the respective proportion of the speech samples in the summation signal is determined.
  • a method for establishing conference connections in a switching system in particular in a PCM private branch exchange, is known in which the compressed code words received by conference participants are linearized and buffered during a pulse frame in a conference facility and in which before transmission to a conference participant during a subsequent pulse frame, an end part sum code word is formed and this is delinearized to the compressed code word.
  • the speech intensity of the individual conference participants is measured during the pulse frame, and weighting factors are adapted as a function of these speech intensities.
  • the speech samples of each conference participant are each fed to a measuring device which measures the speech intensities of the individual conference participants.
  • a conference participant whose measured speech intensity exceeds a predefinable threshold is classified as speaking active.
  • This predefinable threshold can be set separately for each conference participant be adapted to the speech intensity measured in the course of the previous conversation.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a switching system of the type mentioned at the beginning, in which the definition of the speech states takes the current conversation situation better into account in the simplest possible way.
  • This object is achieved in that a speech intensity is also determined for the sum signal and, in order to determine the proportion of the speech sample of a conference participant in the sum signal, its speech intensity is compared with the speech intensity determined for the sum signal.
  • a particularly simple embodiment of the conference arrangement results from the fact that a each conference participant and the outgoing sum signal a difference in amount is formed and this is compared with a threshold value.
  • low-pass filtering of the difference in amount is carried out to take into account the chronological history of the speech intensities of both the conference participant concerned and the relevant partial sum signal, the effort for determining the speech states can be reduced since the level of the partial sum signal does not have to be calculated separately. In this way, two multiplications and one addition can be saved with each calculation of the low-pass filtering.
  • circuit complexity can be reduced by using only a single arrangement for forming the difference in amount and the threshold value comparison for all participants, which arrangement is operated in time-division multiplex operation.
  • the time gaps between the related speech samples of all participants in a conference are selected so that they correspond at least to the processing time (sum formation, determination of the speech status, etc.). In this way it is also possible to operate a relatively slow arrangement for conference formation in time multiplex mode.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of a switching system with a conference facility with four participants as a block diagram.
  • a signal processor In addition to such a discrete structure, it is of course also possible to implement such a conference facility by means of a signal processor. The functions of the individual blocks of the block diagram can then be simulated by programming the signal processor accordingly.
  • the switching system shown in the exemplary embodiment is a switching system in which the speech signals of the individual subscribers are supplied to a code converter 2 as PCM-coded speech samples via a PCM busbar 1.
  • the code converter 2 converts the serially arriving PCM values into linear speech samples A, B, C, D, with each speech sample passing through a binary data word with a length of 13 bits is shown.
  • the speech samples of each conference participant are temporarily stored in a buffer 3 until the next speech sample of the respective conference participant arrives.
  • Each speech sample A, B, C, D is fed via a first multiplier 41 to a summer 5.
  • the summer 5 forms a sum code word (sum signal) from all speech samples which may be weakened by the first multipliers 41. So that a conference participant does not hear himself (echo in the case of long durations), the sum code word must not be fed directly to a conference participant.
  • a subtraction circuit 6 provided for each conference participant, the own share of each speech sample of the conference participant in the sum code word is removed from the sum code word S.
  • the code word thus obtained for each conference participant is referred to as a partial sum code word y (or generally as a partial sum signal).
  • each first input of the subtraction circuit 6 is connected to an output of one of the first multipliers 41.
  • the sum code word of the summer 5 is fed to every second input of the subtraction circuits 6.
  • the outputs of the subtraction circuits 6 are connected to first inputs of second multipliers 42.
  • the outputs of these second multipliers 42 are connected to a second code converter 7, which converts partial sum code words to be supplied to the conference participants into corresponding delinearized PCM values and again at the appropriate place in the PCM frame inserts and feeds the conference participants via a second busbar 8.
  • the setting of the weighting factors for the multipliers 41, 42 takes place in the evaluation unit 40 depending on whether a participant is classified as "speaking” or as “listening". This distinction is made in a level comparator 90 in which the unevaluated incoming voice signal of a subscriber is compared with respect to its level with the unevaluated outgoing partial sum signal of the same subscriber. If, on average, the level of the incoming signal is greater than the level of the outgoing signal, the subscriber is classified as "speaking”.
  • the evaluation unit 40 controls the multipliers 41 in such a way that the incoming signals are attenuated by participants classified as "listening". In this way, quiescent signals or noise are not included in the summation at full power. By contrast, signals from participants classified as "speaking” are not attenuated by the evaluation unit 40. In addition, it can be ensured by appropriate selection of the weighting factors for the multipliers 41 that the adders 5 and subtractors 6 do not overflow.
  • adder 5 and subtractor 6 are designed for an extended number range (for example 16 bit adders for 13 bit input data words), then these second multipliers 42 can also be used to reduce partial sum signals which exceed the number range of the subsequent code converter 7 by weakening the permissible range Area to lead (limiter function).
  • the evaluation unit 40 controls the second multipliers 42 in such a way that the outgoing partial sum signals of the participants classified as "listening" are evaluated with a factor of one. In this way, the speech samples of non-speaking participants get through this part of the conference facility without attenuation.
  • Partial sum signals of the participants classified as "speaking” are attenuated by the multipliers 42.
  • the setting of the weighting factors for the multipliers 41, 42 is interdependent in such a way that the product of the two factors does not exceed a predetermined threshold. It is particularly advantageous to choose the attenuation factors as a function of the number of participants in the conference. This avoids that in the presence of hybrid circuits in the transmission line, noise is fed back into the conference and thus instabilities occur.
  • the level comparators 9 provided are therefore designed such that the speech intensities of the speech samples of a conference participant preceding the speech sample to be evaluated are appropriately taken into account.
  • Fig. 2 shows the structure of a single level comparator 90.
  • the respective speech sample u fed to the level comparator 90 and the partial sum signal y are fed to an amount subtractor 901 in the level comparison unit 90.
  • the amount subtractor 901 forms the amount! Y! From the partial sum signal y arriving at its first input. and subtract the amount of the speech sample! u! of the conference participant to be assessed.
  • the difference! Y! ! u! is multiplied by a first coefficient K1 in a first multiplier 902 and fed to a first input of an adder 903.
  • the output of a buffer 905 is fed to the second input of the adder 903 via a second multiplier 904.
  • the content of the buffer 905 is multiplicatively linked with a second coefficient K2.
  • the output of adder 903 is fed back to the input of buffer 905.
  • the coefficients K1 and K2 are chosen so that both are smaller than the numerical value one and the coefficient K1 is equal to the difference between the numerical value one and the coefficient K2.
  • the value 0.875 was selected for K1 and the value 0.125 for K2.
  • the output of adder 903 is also fed to a threshold switch 906. Output values of adder 903 that are less than or equal to zero graduate the conference participants to be rated as speaking active.
  • the decision threshold By setting the decision threshold to zero, you can already achieve satisfactory results.
  • the decision threshold can also be designed to be changeable here by further evaluation and control devices.
  • the weighting factor is increased by a certain value, which is referred to below as an increment value, from one PCM frame to the subsequent PCM frame or after a certain number of PCM frames. This process is carried out until the weighting factor in this way reaches a certain upper limit value specified by the weighting control circuit 40.
  • the weighting factor is reduced in each corresponding PCM frame by subtracting a certain second numerical value, which is referred to below as a decrement value.
  • the decrement value is selected so that it is greater than the increment value.
  • the number of PCM frames in which a weighting factor is reduced from an upper value to a lower value is less than the number of PCM frames in which a weighting factor is increased from its lower value to an upper value.
  • FIG. 5 schematically shows the time profile of the weighting factor G for a conference participant whose weighting factor is reduced from an upper limit value g1 to a lower limit value.
  • the gradation of the weighting factor from PCM frame to PCM frame is clearly visible.
  • the diagram below shows the raising of a weighting factor G. Because of the lower increment value, the longer time span which the weighting factor G needs to reach its upper limit value g1 from its lower limit value g0 is clearly shown.
  • the weighting factors of the individual conference participants begin to be lowered or increased at different times. Even if reductions and increases overlap in the course of the reduction or increase in the weighting factors, an override can nevertheless be avoided in a simple manner in the manner described above. If the number of weighting factors to be incremented and decremented is unequal, the decrement values or the increment values are adjusted such that the sum of the decrement values is greater by a certain factor (for example twice) than the sum of the increment values.
  • the line V shows the damping curve which is obtained by driving the first multiplier 41 and W shows the damping curve which is obtained by the second multiplier 42.
  • the total attenuation VW briefly exceeds the total attenuation of -15db.
  • a part of a PCM frame is shown schematically in FIG.
  • the speech sample of the first conference participant A is inserted in a first time slot 1 of the PCM frame
  • the speech sample of the second conference participant B is inserted in a fifth time slot 5 and so on.
  • Voice samples from other participants who are not involved in this conference call are arranged within the gaps, for example between time slot 1 and time slot 5. For the sake of clarity, the speech samples of these other participants are not shown in FIG. 4.
  • the time interval at which the speech samples of two conference participants involved in a conference call are successively chosen is expediently selected such that the evaluation of a conference participant is completed within this time.
  • a level comparator 90 is not required for each conference participant, even in the case of evaluation circuits which cannot carry out an evaluation within the time period of a time slot, but, as described, a single evaluation circuit is sufficient for all conference participants participating in a conference circuit.
  • the language samples are always evaluated when a new language sample arrives.
  • the evaluation circuit for example when evaluating the conference participant C, to form the sum signal y in the time slot 9, the speech samples A, B, C of the same time slot, and since the speech sample D of the same time slot has not yet arrived, the speech sample D of the previous one Time slot fed.
  • the speech sample u of the conference participant to be evaluated in each case is selected by a first multiplexer 91 and the respective assigned sum signal y by a second multiplexer 92 by means of control signals of the weighting control circuit 40 and fed to the single level comparator 90.
  • the output signal of the level comparator is fed to the weighting control circuit 40 via a demultiplexer 93. Since for each speech sample in general the one in the buffer 904 stored value is different, an addressable buffer is provided in the embodiment.
EP91201219A 1990-05-26 1991-05-22 Système de commutation avec un dispositif de conférence Expired - Lifetime EP0459563B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE4017027 1990-05-26
DE4017027A DE4017027A1 (de) 1990-05-26 1990-05-26 Vermittlungssystem mit einer konferenzeinrichtung

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0459563A2 true EP0459563A2 (fr) 1991-12-04
EP0459563A3 EP0459563A3 (en) 1993-06-16
EP0459563B1 EP0459563B1 (fr) 1998-03-25

Family

ID=6407268

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91201219A Expired - Lifetime EP0459563B1 (fr) 1990-05-26 1991-05-22 Système de commutation avec un dispositif de conférence

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US5260938A (fr)
EP (1) EP0459563B1 (fr)
JP (1) JPH04230153A (fr)
DE (2) DE4017027A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5533112A (en) * 1994-03-31 1996-07-02 Intel Corporation Volume control in digital teleconferencing
CA2143591C (fr) 1994-04-29 1999-01-26 David N. Horn Pont audio pour teleconferences
FR2720577B1 (fr) * 1994-05-27 1996-08-14 Sgs Thomson Microelectronics Circuit de détection de tonalité téléphonique.
US5712954A (en) * 1995-08-23 1998-01-27 Rockwell International Corp. System and method for monitoring audio power level of agent speech in a telephonic switch
US5898675A (en) * 1996-04-29 1999-04-27 Nahumi; Dror Volume control arrangement for compressed information signals
US5923747A (en) * 1996-09-27 1999-07-13 Rockwell International Corp. Communications system and interface circuit for interconnecting telephonic switch and agent computer
US6181707B1 (en) 1997-04-04 2001-01-30 Clear Com Intercom system having unified control and audio data transport
US7386238B2 (en) 2000-08-15 2008-06-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for infrared data communications
US6954893B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2005-10-11 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and apparatus for reliable unidirectional communication in a data network
US6792092B1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2004-09-14 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for independent participant control of audio during multiparty communication sessions
CN100340094C (zh) * 2004-12-01 2007-09-26 何顺兰 电话会议板
US8311085B2 (en) 2009-04-14 2012-11-13 Clear-Com Llc Digital intercom network over DC-powered microphone cable
US9639906B2 (en) 2013-03-12 2017-05-02 Hm Electronics, Inc. System and method for wideband audio communication with a quick service restaurant drive-through intercom

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4416007A (en) * 1981-11-20 1983-11-15 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Digital conferencing method and arrangement
DE3329779C2 (de) * 1983-08-18 1985-06-27 Philips Patentverwaltung Gmbh, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren und Schaltungsanordnung zur Herstellung von Konferenzverbindungen in einem Vermittlungssystem
US4658398A (en) * 1984-10-29 1987-04-14 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Framed digital voice summing for teleconferencing

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60176356A (ja) * 1984-02-22 1985-09-10 Hitachi Ltd Ｐｃｍ符号復号器

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4416007A (en) * 1981-11-20 1983-11-15 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Digital conferencing method and arrangement
DE3329779C2 (de) * 1983-08-18 1985-06-27 Philips Patentverwaltung Gmbh, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren und Schaltungsanordnung zur Herstellung von Konferenzverbindungen in einem Vermittlungssystem
US4658398A (en) * 1984-10-29 1987-04-14 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Framed digital voice summing for teleconferencing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5260938A (en) 1993-11-09
EP0459563A3 (en) 1993-06-16
DE59108957D1 (de) 1998-04-30
JPH04230153A (ja) 1992-08-19
EP0459563B1 (fr) 1998-03-25
DE4017027A1 (de) 1991-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0371567B1 (fr) Annuleur d'écho
DE2207141C3 (de) Schaltungsanordnung zur Unterdrückung unerwünschter Sprachsignale mittels eines vorhersagenden Filters
DE19848588B4 (de) Nichtlinearer Prozessor für akustische Echokompensatoren
DE2546926C3 (de) System zur Steuerung der Sprechrichtung in Duplex-Sprechverkehr-Anlagen
EP0459563B1 (fr) Système de commutation avec un dispositif de conférence
DE3706128C1 (de) Verfahren fuer Konferenzverbindungen in rechnergesteuerten digitalen Fernsprechvermittlungsanlagen
DE69926451T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Unterdrückung von Mehrkanalechos
DE2624560C3 (de) Echo-Unterdrückungssystem für Zeitmultiplex-Telefonieschakkreise
EP0175147B1 (fr) Circuit conférence numérique
EP0135229B1 (fr) Procédé et circuit pour la réalisation de connexions en conférence dans un système de commutation
DE2526503A1 (de) Echounterdruecker
DE2455584C3 (de) Freisprecheinrichtung
EP0554494A1 (fr) Filtre numérique non récursif adaptatif
DE2842082B2 (de) Echounterdrücker für eine vieradrige Telefonleitung
DE2457876A1 (de) Echounterdruecker fuer ein endgeraet einer elektrischen vierdrahtleitung
DE3040241C2 (fr)
DE3308703C2 (fr)
EP0992151B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif permettant d'attenuer l'echo dans un dispositif mains libres, tel qu'un telephone
EP0902416B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour reconnaitre une entrée de parole pendant la diffusion d'une annonce
DE2739778A1 (de) Digitale fernmeldevermittlungsanlage und teilnehmerstation dazu
DE3702316C1 (en) Method and circuit arrangements for adaptive echo cancellation in terminals for duplex transmission
EP0238075B1 (fr) Méthode pour distinguer des signaux de parole de signaux de pauses de parole bruités
DE3831047C2 (fr)
CH660105A5 (de) Schaltungsanordnung zum herstellen einer konferenzverbindung in einer digitalen fernmeldevermittlungsstelle.
DE3432056C2 (fr)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19931213

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970604

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980325

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980325

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980325

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59108957

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980430

EN Fr: translation not filed
RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: PHILIPS PATENTVERWALTUNG GMBH

Owner name: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.

GBV Gb: ep patent (uk) treated as always having been void in accordance with gb section 77(7)/1977 [no translation filed]

Effective date: 19980325

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20070713

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081202