EP0419479B1 - A method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts - Google Patents

A method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0419479B1
EP0419479B1 EP89900667A EP89900667A EP0419479B1 EP 0419479 B1 EP0419479 B1 EP 0419479B1 EP 89900667 A EP89900667 A EP 89900667A EP 89900667 A EP89900667 A EP 89900667A EP 0419479 B1 EP0419479 B1 EP 0419479B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
liquid
barrier
jet
gas
media
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89900667A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0419479A1 (en
Inventor
Hans-Gunnar Larsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HG Tech AB
Original Assignee
HG Tech AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HG Tech AB filed Critical HG Tech AB
Priority to AT89900667T priority Critical patent/ATE93750T1/en
Publication of EP0419479A1 publication Critical patent/EP0419479A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0419479B1 publication Critical patent/EP0419479B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B05SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
    • B05BSPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES
    • B05B7/00Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas
    • B05B7/02Spray pistols; Apparatus for discharge
    • B05B7/08Spray pistols; Apparatus for discharge with separate outlet orifices, e.g. to form parallel jets, i.e. the axis of the jets being parallel, to form intersecting jets, i.e. the axis of the jets converging but not necessarily intersecting at a point
    • B05B7/0807Spray pistols; Apparatus for discharge with separate outlet orifices, e.g. to form parallel jets, i.e. the axis of the jets being parallel, to form intersecting jets, i.e. the axis of the jets converging but not necessarily intersecting at a point to form intersecting jets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • B22F2009/088Fluid nozzles, e.g. angle, distance

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of atomizing a liquid to form a fine powder, where liquid, preferably metal melt, is mixed into a media jet consisting of gas and/or liquid, so that it is disintegrated into small particles, i.e. atomization is achieved.
  • the invention also relates to a means for performing said method.
  • Such atomization is effected by disintegration of a preferably vertical tapping stream or other pool of liquid, with the aid of preferably horizontal or vertical media flows consisting of gas or liquid.
  • the size of particles formed in a certain volume element in the atomization process is affected by a number of parameters.
  • the surface tension of the melt and the density and velocity of the atomizing medium are the most influential parameters, besides the geometrical design of the atomization process.
  • a larger or smaller proportion of the melt will be disintegrated to particles in a region further away from the nozzle, where the velocity is considerably less, in some cases even as low at 10% of the maximum velocity. This gives a coarse powder with a wide spread between the smallest and largest particles.
  • Another problem entails the difficulty of getting the atomizing medium to get a "grip" on the liquid, and a large quantity thus passes outside the actual atomizing region, with low effectivity as a result.
  • the method according to the invention aims at a solution of the problems mentioned above and these related thereto and is characterized in that in the method there is comprised projecting at a high rate of speed a first fluid medium jet containing disintegrated liquid into a barrier means comprising a second fluid medium jet, projected by a nozzle in a direction substantially 180 o to said first fluid medium jet, such that the said first medium jet and fine particles diverge away from and around said barrier means, thus increasing contact surface between said first fluid medium jet and said liquid and increasing intermixing there between and after diverging solidifying said disintegrated liquid into a fine powder downstream of said barrier means.
  • the atomization process takes place within a short distance of the nozzle, where the velocity of the atomising medium is still high, as well as a large proportion of the gas participating in the atomizing process. A high degree of efficiency is thereby obtained.
  • This method thus enables a radical reduction in the average particle size and less spread in the size distribution, at low cost.
  • the barrier consists of a counterdirected media flow of gas and/or fluid, i.e. the barrier in this case constitutes the limit/contact surface between the mixed stream and the counter-directed media jet.
  • the method can be applied to both vertical and horizontal atomizing processes. With a suitable choice of barrier, it is even possible to atomize a steel melt or alloys with an even higher melting point.
  • the invention also relates to a means for performing said method, and the features characteristic of this means are defined in the appended claims 8 and 9.
  • the medium for the media flow or the counter-directed media flow may be water, some other liquid such as liquid gas, or only gas such as nitrogen or argon or mixtures thereof. Alternatively the gas being blown in can be rotated.
  • a vertical atomizing chamber 1 having a casting box 2 for metal melt.
  • Media gas and/or fluid
  • a gas cooler 3 and a compressor 4 to nozzles in the chamber 1.
  • Atomized powder is carried from the chamber 1 via a pipe system to a cyclone 5 for treatment and separation.
  • Metal melt e.g. steel
  • Metal melt is tapped from the casting box 2 ( Figure 2a) through a tapping arrangement in the bottom of this box, in the form of a preferably circular tapping stream 6 flowing vertically downwards into an atomizing chamber 1 filled with inert gas.
  • a gas nozzle 7 consisting of an annular nozzle or several smaller nozzles.
  • the nozzle(s) create(s) an annular gas curtain 9 around the tapping stream which encounters (8) the tapping stream at an acute angle, some way from the nozzle(s) 7.
  • the barrier 10 of the invention is located at a suitable distance below the point of encounter.
  • the barrier 10 consists of a gas barrier 11. This is produced by directing a gas and/or fluid jet upwardly, preferably in the same centre line as the tapping stream and the gas curtain, at a suitable distance below the nozzle (s), i.e. a second jet is directed preferably immediately towards the first jet 9-6 which contains fragments of melt 13 in its central portion.
  • the velocity decreases in the region of the collision, and the pressure thus increases. Due to the increase in pressure, the gas expands radially outwards so that the velocity again increases. If the kinetic energy is equal in the two jets, the resulting direction will be substantially radial, i.e. perpendicular to the direction of the jets. The melt in the central portion of the first jet 13 will alter course in the collision region and will accompany the radially expanding gas, thus achieving efficient atomization.
  • the atomization process is further improved if the kinetic energy of the counter-directed jet is chosen less or greater than that of the first.
  • the expanding gas will assume a curved path, most resembling parabolic shape, ( Figure 2a).
  • the improved atomizing process is due to fragments of the melt drawn along with the gas being constantly forced to change direction, thus giving them greater exposure of the gas.
  • the kinetic energy in the counter-directed gas flow is advantageously chosen less than that in the first, thus producing the effect described above, while the overall direction of the gas/particle mixture will be obliquely downwards. If the ratio of kinetic energy is inverted the overall flow will be obliquely upwards.
  • the kinetic energy in the counter-directed jet may be 10 to 1000% of the first, preferably 30-60%.
  • the barrier may be obtained from a nozzle as shown in Figure 2b, with one or more central nozzles 14 for barrier jets.
  • auxiliary nozzles 15 can be arranged to prevent liquid (melt) from coming into contact with undesired parts of the barrier nozzle.
  • the barrier may preferably have a geometry congruent with the cross section of the portion of the gas jet mixed with melt 13.
  • the size of the barrier is suitably such that its longitudinal dimensions are equal to the cross section of the part of the gas stream mixed with melt, at the point of encounter, or up to 20 times greater, preferably 4 to 10 times greater than said cross section.
  • auxiliary nozzles suitably located, with the object of eliminating turbulence in critical areas, thus preventing molten particles from becoming attached.
  • auxiliary nozzles may have the appearance of those shown at 15 in Figure 2b.
  • Figure 4 shows a horizontal atomizing equipment with its atomizing chamber 19 and cyclone 20.
  • the atomizing equipment comprises a closed system, preferably kept under a certain overpressure (see Figures 1 and 4). This may be 500 mm water column, for instance, so that air is prevented from entering.
  • the casting box 2 is arranged at one end of the box (1, 19).
  • Figues 5a and 5b show atomization as performed in the equipment shown in Figure 4.
  • Medium 22 flows from nozzles 21 (for instance elongate, slot-shaped or a row or small nozzles) towards the tapping stream 23.
  • the mixed stream thus obtained then encounters a barrier (produced by one or more nozzles 25) and is deflected thereby, thus producing excellent atomization.
  • the auxiliary nozzles are arranged in Figure 5b as one slot-shaped nozzle 26 and several small, separate nozzles 27. The nozzle 26 may even produce the barrier itself.
  • the angle between the media jets may be 0 - 60 o , but is preferably 5 - 20 o .
  • the nozzles 21, 21 may be arranged to give two horizontally directed media jets, parallel in vertical equipment, with great extension vertically as compared with the width, and with an angle in the horizontal plane in relation to each other.
  • the zone described above will then be formed.
  • the tapping stream 23 will flow from the top, down in the vertical zone formed all along the height of the nozzle.
  • the stream will be successively disintegrated on its way down, and mixed into the passing atomizing medium.
  • Media jets with considerable extension in one direction can be achieved by means of slot-shaped nozzles or by a number of circular nozzles, for instance, arranged close together in a row.
  • the nozzles for the media jets may be designed for sub-pressure or over-critical pressure conditions (Laval nozzle).
  • the advantage of the arrangement of nozzles 21 described above is that a more homogenous mixing (partial atomization) of the liquid into the media can be achieved which, even after passing a barrier, results in a narrower fraction for the particles.
  • FIG. 3 shows an alternative embodiment of the method and means according to the invention.
  • An electric arc 30 is arranged between two electrodes 28, 29.
  • Media streams 31 gas and/or fluid
  • media jets from the opposite direction 32 act as barrier. Efficient atomization of the liquid 35 formed in the electric arc is obtained.
  • the liquid to be atomized is obtained from at least one of the electrodes 29.
  • liquid can also be obtained from a solid body which is melted by a laser or the like (not shown) in similar manner.
  • Feeding the electrodes in Figure 3 along, or the laser, can be arranged by means of a feeder 34.
  • the nozzles for both the first media and the barrier media may be annular, or may consist of several small nozzles.
  • the method according to Figure 3 is preferably carried out in a chamber similar to that described earlier (not shown).
  • Particles formed at the atomization are drawn into the gas jets towards the other end of the chamber, and before encountering the end of the chamber, they will have solidified to powder due to radiation and convective heat dissipation to the gas.
  • An outlet is arranged in the chamber, preferably at its end, towards which the gas/powder mixture flows.
  • the chamber is connected from the outlet by pipes, to a cyclone where the powder and gas are separated. After separation, the gas may travel to a compressor via a gas cooler, for recirculation to the atomizing nozzles.
  • the system includes other requisite valves, cooling equipment and control means for regulating gas pressure, temperature and the various media flows, etc.

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method and a means for atomizing liquids, such as metal melts in which a tapping stream (6) of the liquid encounters one or more media jets (9), e.g. gas and/or liquid. The mixed stream obtained is directed towards a barrier (10) with the object of achieving effective dispersion of the liquid in the media, i.e. atomization.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method of atomizing a liquid to form a fine powder, where liquid, preferably metal melt, is mixed into a media jet consisting of gas and/or liquid, so that it is disintegrated into small particles, i.e. atomization is achieved. The invention also relates to a means for performing said method.
  • Such atomization is effected by disintegration of a preferably vertical tapping stream or other pool of liquid, with the aid of preferably horizontal or vertical media flows consisting of gas or liquid.
  • When liquids are being atomized by disintegration of the liquid with the aid of a gas or fluid, extremely small particles are obtained within certain size intervals, the intervals sometimes being considerable. These known methods can be used for most types of liquids. However, they apply primarily to the production of powder from metal melts where a gas, e.g. nitrogen or argon, is used as atomization medium. Powder manufactured in this manner is often said to be manufactured inertly and is characterised by its low oxygen content and spherical form.
  • Power-metallurgy processes using inertly manufactured powder encounter various problems relating to the size of the powder particles and/or their distribution. Finer and/or more restricted fractions of inertly manufactured powder are desirable for many applications nowadays. Such powder is conventionally obtained by screening off a coarser fraction, resulting in low yield, or via atomization processes using extreme gas flows and pressures. This powder is only used to a limited extent due to its high cost.
  • When atomizing metal melts in which a tapping stream is encountered by one or more gas jets, instability is produced on the surface of the melt in the contact surface between melt and gas, causing the melt to be stretched out in thin films. When these films have reached a certain thickness they will be broken up into threadlike pieces due to the surface tension of the melt and these pieces will be twisted off into a number of bits which assume a shape having the least possible surface energy, i.e. spherical shape.
  • These spherical drops solidify to powder particles extremely rapidly due to thermal radiation and convective dissipation of heat to the gas.
  • The size of particles formed in a certain volume element in the atomization process is affected by a number of parameters. The surface tension of the melt and the density and velocity of the atomizing medium are the most influential parameters, besides the geometrical design of the atomization process.
  • It is difficult to influence the surface tension or density for a given melt, atomizing nozzle and atomizing medium, and it is therefore simplest to influence the particle size by means of the velocity of the atomizing medium. In most established atomizing processes, therefore, high velocities are strived for by means of high pressure in the atomizing medium and, in the case of gaseous media, by Laval design of the nozzles. However, the velocity of gaseous atomizing media decreases extremely rapidly after the nozzle so that usually only a small proportion of the atomizing process occurs within the region of maximum velocity.
  • A larger or smaller proportion of the melt will be disintegrated to particles in a region further away from the nozzle, where the velocity is considerably less, in some cases even as low at 10% of the maximum velocity. This gives a coarse powder with a wide spread between the smallest and largest particles.
  • Another problem entails the difficulty of getting the atomizing medium to get a "grip" on the liquid, and a large quantity thus passes outside the actual atomizing region, with low effectivity as a result.
  • From US 4559187 there is known atomization, where molten metal in a tank is fed into a media stream M, which is directed towards a solid barrier in order to increase the turbulence and rapidly increase the cooling. The idea in this publication is to collect the combined jet at the barrier, not to increase the contact surface molten media-media stream.
  • In CH 198468 there is shown disintegration of a liquid metal stream by means of a pressure media stream, after which the obtained jet of disintegrated metal is directed towards a movable, cooled surface, which is highly polished. The purpose of this known means is to produce flakes.
  • The method according to the invention aims at a solution of the problems mentioned above and these related thereto and is characterized in that in the method there is comprised projecting at a high rate of speed a first fluid medium jet containing disintegrated liquid into a barrier means comprising a second fluid medium jet, projected by a nozzle in a direction substantially 180o to said first fluid medium jet, such that the said first medium jet and fine particles diverge away from and around said barrier means, thus increasing contact surface between said first fluid medium jet and said liquid and increasing intermixing there between and after diverging solidifying said disintegrated liquid into a fine powder downstream of said barrier means.
  • This is thus achieved by greatly increasing the contact surface between melt and atomizing medium, at the same time as a strong turbulence, favourable to the dispersion/atomization is obtained in the contact region.
  • Furthermore, the atomization process takes place within a short distance of the nozzle, where the velocity of the atomising medium is still high, as well as a large proportion of the gas participating in the atomizing process. A high degree of efficiency is thereby obtained.
  • This method thus enables a radical reduction in the average particle size and less spread in the size distribution, at low cost.
  • The barrier consists of a counterdirected media flow of gas and/or fluid, i.e. the barrier in this case constitutes the limit/contact surface between the mixed stream and the counter-directed media jet.
  • The method can be applied to both vertical and horizontal atomizing processes. With a suitable choice of barrier, it is even possible to atomize a steel melt or alloys with an even higher melting point.
  • The invention also relates to a means for performing said method, and the features characteristic of this means are defined in the appended claims 8 and 9.
  • The medium for the media flow or the counter-directed media flow may be water, some other liquid such as liquid gas, or only gas such as nitrogen or argon or mixtures thereof. Alternatively the gas being blown in can be rotated.
  • The invention, both method and means, is described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
  • Fig 1
    shows a means for performing the method according to the invention,
    Fig 2a
    shows the actual atomization process with a gas barrier,
    Fig 2b
    shows an example of a nozzle producing the barrier,
    Fig 3
    shows an alternative atomizing process,
    Fig 4
    shows an alternative means for performing the method,
    Fig 5a
    shows the corresponding atomizing process with a gas barrier, seen from above, and
    Fig 5b
    shows this process seen from the side with a detail of the nozzle producing the barrier.
  • In Figure 1 a vertical atomizing chamber 1 is shown, having a casting box 2 for metal melt. Media (gas and/or fluid) are supplied via a gas cooler 3 and a compressor 4 to nozzles in the chamber 1. Atomized powder is carried from the chamber 1 via a pipe system to a cyclone 5 for treatment and separation. Metal melt, e.g. steel, is tapped from the casting box 2 (Figure 2a) through a tapping arrangement in the bottom of this box, in the form of a preferably circular tapping stream 6 flowing vertically downwards into an atomizing chamber 1 filled with inert gas. In the upper part of the chamber, around the down-wardly flowing tapping stream, is a gas nozzle 7 consisting of an annular nozzle or several smaller nozzles. The nozzle(s) create(s) an annular gas curtain 9 around the tapping stream which encounters (8) the tapping stream at an acute angle, some way from the nozzle(s) 7. When the gas encounters the tapping stream it is disintegrated and accompanies the gas flow. The barrier 10 of the invention is located at a suitable distance below the point of encounter.
  • The barrier 10 consists of a gas barrier 11. This is produced by directing a gas and/or fluid jet upwardly, preferably in the same centre line as the tapping stream and the gas curtain, at a suitable distance below the nozzle (s), i.e. a second jet is directed preferably immediately towards the first jet 9-6 which contains fragments of melt 13 in its central portion.
  • When the two jets encounter each other, the velocity decreases in the region of the collision, and the pressure thus increases. Due to the increase in pressure, the gas expands radially outwards so that the velocity again increases. If the kinetic energy is equal in the two jets, the resulting direction will be substantially radial, i.e. perpendicular to the direction of the jets. The melt in the central portion of the first jet 13 will alter course in the collision region and will accompany the radially expanding gas, thus achieving efficient atomization.
  • The atomization process is further improved if the kinetic energy of the counter-directed jet is chosen less or greater than that of the first. In this case the expanding gas will assume a curved path, most resembling parabolic shape, (Figure 2a). The improved atomizing process is due to fragments of the melt drawn along with the gas being constantly forced to change direction, thus giving them greater exposure of the gas.
  • The kinetic energy in the counter-directed gas flow is advantageously chosen less than that in the first, thus producing the effect described above, while the overall direction of the gas/particle mixture will be obliquely downwards. If the ratio of kinetic energy is inverted the overall flow will be obliquely upwards.
  • The kinetic energy in the counter-directed jet may be 10 to 1000% of the first, preferably 30-60%. According to this embodiment, the barrier may be obtained from a nozzle as shown in Figure 2b, with one or more central nozzles 14 for barrier jets. Besides these, auxiliary nozzles 15 can be arranged to prevent liquid (melt) from coming into contact with undesired parts of the barrier nozzle.
  • The barrier may preferably have a geometry congruent with the cross section of the portion of the gas jet mixed with melt 13. The size of the barrier is suitably such that its longitudinal dimensions are equal to the cross section of the part of the gas stream mixed with melt, at the point of encounter, or up to 20 times greater, preferably 4 to 10 times greater than said cross section.
  • With the method and means described above, where gas flows out of nozzles or over the edge of a surface, secondary currents (turbulence) will occur in the boundary between the flowing and the stationary gas.When liquids having a high melting point are being atomized, this turbulence may cause molten particles to be drawn into and welded fast on the nozzles and other surfaces where it is not desired. In order to prevent such effects on nozzles creating gas barriers, these may be provided with auxiliary nozzles, suitably located, with the object of eliminating turbulence in critical areas, thus preventing molten particles from becoming attached. These auxiliary nozzles may have the appearance of those shown at 15 in Figure 2b.
  • Figure 4 shows a horizontal atomizing equipment with its atomizing chamber 19 and cyclone 20. The atomizing equipment comprises a closed system, preferably kept under a certain overpressure (see Figures 1 and 4). This may be 500 mm water column, for instance, so that air is prevented from entering. As mentioned, the casting box 2 is arranged at one end of the box (1, 19). Figues 5a and 5b show atomization as performed in the equipment shown in Figure 4. Medium 22 flows from nozzles 21 (for instance elongate, slot-shaped or a row or small nozzles) towards the tapping stream 23. The mixed stream thus obtained then encounters a barrier (produced by one or more nozzles 25) and is deflected thereby, thus producing excellent atomization. The auxiliary nozzles are arranged in Figure 5b as one slot-shaped nozzle 26 and several small, separate nozzles 27. The nozzle 26 may even produce the barrier itself.
  • A flow phenomenon which arises when two jets of gas or fluid encounter each other at a certain angle is utilized to create the mixed jet 24 in Figures 5a-b.
  • It is known that at or immediately before the point of intersection between two media jets encountering each other at an angle, a flow phenomenon occurs which dominates the process to a greater or less extent depending on the size of the angle. At small angles, e.g. smaller than 5o, the injector action due to the sub-pressure immediately before the point of intersection is the dominant property, whereas at larger angles, e.g. 120o, there will be a backward flow of media in relation to the main direction of flow of the media jets.
  • Both these phenomena can be exploited by selecting an angle between two media jets 22, 22 so that a backward flow of media occurs and that, within a short distance, it is drawn back into the media jets by the injector action. The result will be that a zone is formed in front of the intersection point, where there is no defined direction, but two vortex eddies with a constant exchange between returning media and media drawn in. Altering the angle will increase or decrease the extent of this zone.
  • The angle between the media jets may be 0 - 60o, but is preferably 5 - 20o.
  • The nozzles 21, 21 may be arranged to give two horizontally directed media jets, parallel in vertical equipment, with great extension vertically as compared with the width, and with an angle in the horizontal plane in relation to each other. The zone described above will then be formed. The tapping stream 23 will flow from the top, down in the vertical zone formed all along the height of the nozzle. The stream will be successively disintegrated on its way down, and mixed into the passing atomizing medium.
  • Media jets with considerable extension in one direction can be achieved by means of slot-shaped nozzles or by a number of circular nozzles, for instance, arranged close together in a row.Depending on prevailing pressure and the medium used, the nozzles for the media jets may be designed for sub-pressure or over-critical pressure conditions (Laval nozzle).
  • When the flow of melt is correctly adjusted to the capacity of the media nozzle, mixing, i.e. partial atomization, will occur along the entire height of the nozzle.
  • The advantage of the arrangement of nozzles 21 described above is that a more homogenous mixing (partial atomization) of the liquid into the media can be achieved which, even after passing a barrier, results in a narrower fraction for the particles.
  • Figure 3 shows an alternative embodiment of the method and means according to the invention. An electric arc 30 is arranged between two electrodes 28, 29. Media streams 31 (gas and/or fluid) are directed towards the electric arc, and media jets from the opposite direction 32 act as barrier. Efficient atomization of the liquid 35 formed in the electric arc is obtained.
  • In this case the liquid to be atomized is obtained from at least one of the electrodes 29. However, liquid can also be obtained from a solid body which is melted by a laser or the like (not shown) in similar manner. Feeding the electrodes in Figure 3 along, or the laser, can be arranged by means of a feeder 34. The nozzles for both the first media and the barrier media may be annular, or may consist of several small nozzles. The method according to Figure 3 is preferably carried out in a chamber similar to that described earlier (not shown).
  • Particles formed at the atomization are drawn into the gas jets towards the other end of the chamber, and before encountering the end of the chamber, they will have solidified to powder due to radiation and convective heat dissipation to the gas. An outlet is arranged in the chamber, preferably at its end, towards which the gas/powder mixture flows.
  • The chamber is connected from the outlet by pipes, to a cyclone where the powder and gas are separated. After separation, the gas may travel to a compressor via a gas cooler, for recirculation to the atomizing nozzles. The system includes other requisite valves, cooling equipment and control means for regulating gas pressure, temperature and the various media flows, etc.
  • The means and the methods described above can be varied in many ways within the scope of the claims.

Claims (9)

  1. A method of atomizing a liquid to form a fine powder, where liquid, preferably metal melt, is mixed into a media jet (9, 22, 31) consisting of gas and/or liquid, so that it is disintegrated into small particles, i.e. atomization is achieved,
    characterized in that the method comprises projecting at a high rate of speed a first fluid medium jet containing disintegrated liquid into a barrier means (10, 25, 32) comprising a second fluid medium jet, projected by a nozzle in a direction substantially 180o to said first fluid medium jet, such that the said first medium jet and fine particles diverge away from and around said barrier means, thus increasing contact surface between said first fluid medium jet and said liquid and increasing intermixing there between and after diverging solidifying said disintegrated liquid into a fine powder downstream of said barrier means.
  2. A method as claimed in claim 1,
    characterized in that the barrier (10, 25, 32) is formed by a flow (11) of gas and/or fluid, directed substantially in opposite direction to and directed towards the jet composed of liquid and media.
  3. A method as claimed in one or more of the preceding claims,
    characterized in that a barrier (11) is utilized having a geometry which is preferably congruent with the cross section of the portion of the media jet containing liquid (13) (mixed jet), at the point where it encounters the barrier, and that the barrier is given longitudinal dimensions equal to or up to 20 times greater than said cross section, preferably 4 to 10 times the cross section.
  4. A method as claimed in one or more of the preceding claims,
    characterized in that the gas and/or liquid flow constituting the barrier, is produced by one or more nozzles (12, 25, 26) and that the kinetic energy from these is 10 to 1000% of the kinetic energy in the media jet (s), preferably 30 to 60%.
  5. A method as claimed in one or more of the preceding claims,
    characterized in that the nozzles for gas and/or liquid are provided with auxiliary nozzles (15, 18, 26, 27) preventing liquid/melt, due to turbulence/injector action, from coming into contact with undesired parts of the gas nozzles.
  6. A method as claimed in one or more of the preceding claims,
    characterized in that liquid is produced by supplying energy to a metal or metal alloy (28, 29) and that media (31) are supplied to the liquid (35) in order to obtain a mixed jet and that the mixed jet is directed towards a barrier, e.g. a media jet (32) flowing in counter direction thereto.
  7. A method as claimed in claim 6,
    characterized in that the energy is produced by means of an electric arc (30), laser or the like.
  8. A means for performing the method as claimed in one or more of the preceding claims, comprising a casting box (2) or other pool of liquid (35) constituting a tapping means for producing a tapping stream (6, 23) of liquid, such as metal melt, to be atomized, and further comprising a first nozzle (7, 21) connected to a source of fluid for providing a first fluid medium jet (9, 22, 31) adapted, in conjunction with said tapping means, for mixing with the liquid stream (6, 23) to be atomized, and a barrier means (10, 25, 32) oriented with respect to said first nozzle means so that it is in the path of the first fluid medium jet, said barrier means adapted for causing divergence of said first fluid medium jet away from and around said barrier means, and comprising a second nozzle means (12, 14, 26) connected to a source of fluid and oriented for directing a second fluid medium jet in a direction substantially 180o to the first fluid medium jet, and means for solidifying atomized metal downstream of said barrier means.
  9. A means as claimed in claim 8,
    characterized in that the barrier is also provided with auxiliary nozzles (15, 18, 26, 27) to prevent liquid from coming into contact with undesired parts of the gas nozzles and/or barrier body, due to turbulence/injector action.
EP89900667A 1987-12-09 1988-12-05 A method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts Expired - Lifetime EP0419479B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT89900667T ATE93750T1 (en) 1987-12-09 1988-12-05 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE MICROATOMIZATION OF LIQUIDS, ESPECIALLY MELTS.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE8704905 1987-12-09
SE8704905A SE462704B (en) 1987-12-09 1987-12-09 PROCEDURES FOR ATOMIZING SCIENCES AND DEVICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROCEDURE

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0419479A1 EP0419479A1 (en) 1991-04-03
EP0419479B1 true EP0419479B1 (en) 1993-09-01

Family

ID=20370540

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89900667A Expired - Lifetime EP0419479B1 (en) 1987-12-09 1988-12-05 A method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0419479B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2703378B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE93750T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2821589A (en)
BR (1) BR8807838A (en)
DE (1) DE3883788T2 (en)
FI (1) FI87053C (en)
SE (1) SE462704B (en)
WO (1) WO1989005196A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE507828C2 (en) * 1992-01-28 1998-07-20 Hg Tech Ab Atomiseringsförfarande
GB9703673D0 (en) 1997-02-21 1997-04-09 Bradford Particle Design Ltd Method and apparatus for the formation of particles
DE19831335A1 (en) * 1998-07-13 2000-02-10 Michael Angermann Appts to produce micro droplets of molten conductive metals uses a magneto-hydrodynamic pump with modulation to give a clean and controlled droplet ejection
SE9901667D0 (en) 1999-05-07 1999-05-07 Astra Ab Method and device for forming particles
DE10205897A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2003-08-21 Mepura Metallpulver Process for the production of particulate material
US20040098839A1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2004-05-27 Pfizer Inc. Crystallization method and apparatus using an impinging plate assembly
FR2960164B1 (en) * 2010-05-21 2014-03-28 Centre Nat Rech Scient PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A NANOMETRY MATERIAL AND REACTOR FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION
JP5662274B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-01-28 株式会社東芝 Flow rate and particle size measuring method and system

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE901855C (en) * 1939-12-13 1954-01-14 Degussa Device for transferring molten substances or mixtures of substances into finely divided form
JPS59171307A (en) * 1983-03-18 1984-09-27 Fujitsu Ltd Tap coefficient switching system
US4559187A (en) * 1983-12-14 1985-12-17 Battelle Development Corporation Production of particulate or powdered metals and alloys
JPS59214340A (en) * 1983-12-15 1984-12-04 Nec Corp System and device for amplitude equalization
NO853772L (en) * 1984-11-02 1986-05-05 Universal Data Systems Inc PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHING A COMMUNICATION CHANNEL, MODEM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND MICROPROCESSORED MODEM.

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Derwent's abstract No 30615/ E/15, SU 839694, Sibe Metal Inst. publ. 1981-06-26 *
Derwent's abstract No 76336 C/43, SU 719802, Sibe Metal Inst., publ. 1980-03-15 *
Derwent's abstract no 86 257345/39, SU 1210989, Zaporo Mech Eng Cons, publ. 86-02-15 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1989005196A1 (en) 1989-06-15
SE8704905D0 (en) 1987-12-09
EP0419479A1 (en) 1991-04-03
SE462704B (en) 1990-08-20
ATE93750T1 (en) 1993-09-15
JP2703378B2 (en) 1998-01-26
DE3883788T2 (en) 1993-12-16
BR8807838A (en) 1990-10-23
FI87053B (en) 1992-08-14
FI902863A0 (en) 1990-06-08
SE8704905L (en) 1989-06-10
FI87053C (en) 1992-11-25
AU2821589A (en) 1989-07-05
JPH03501629A (en) 1991-04-11
DE3883788D1 (en) 1993-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2956304A (en) Apparatus for atomizing molten metal
US11298746B2 (en) Metal powder producing apparatus and gas jet device for same
KR930019275A (en) Jet grinding method of silicon particles
EP0419479B1 (en) A method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts
CN113993642A (en) Method for discharging powder produced by ultrasonic atomization and device for carrying out said method
KR20200007911A (en) Metal Powder Manufacturing Equipment And Its Gas Injector And Crucible
US3813196A (en) Device for manufacture of a powder by atomizing a stream of molten metal
JP2703818B2 (en) Method for spraying a melt and apparatus using the method
UA61959C2 (en) Method and device for production of metal powder
KR20010024728A (en) Method and device for producing fine powder by atomizing molten materials with gases
US5190701A (en) Method and equipment for microatomizing liquids, preferably melts
KR20210101086A (en) fluid spraying nozzle assembly
US4401609A (en) Metal atomization
JPS6350404A (en) Spray nozzle for producing metallic powder
WO1993014877A1 (en) Atomization process
JPH04173906A (en) Atomizing nozzle device
JPH0649512A (en) Device for producing gas-atomized metal powder
RU2119389C1 (en) Device for deposition of metal coatings by electric arc
SU1161248A1 (en) Method of producing metallic granules
JPH05255711A (en) Atomizing method and device for the method
JPH01219110A (en) Production of metal powder
WO2023110151A1 (en) Controlled atmosphere and optimised atomisation for powder production
RU2017588C1 (en) Device for production of metal powder
JPS63241104A (en) Production of fine spherical metal powder
JP2951414B2 (en) Gas nozzle for atomization

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900515

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920907

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 93750

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19930915

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3883788

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931007

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI CASETTA & PERANI S.P.A.

EPTA Lu: last paid annual fee
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20031120

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20031203

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20031203

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20031204

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20031208

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20031209

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041205

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041205

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041231

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050701

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20041205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050831

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20050701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051205

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20071206

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20071206

Year of fee payment: 20

BE20 Be: patent expired

Owner name: HG TECH A.B.

Effective date: 20081205