EP0389487A1 - Hammermills - Google Patents

Hammermills

Info

Publication number
EP0389487A1
EP0389487A1 EP19880908287 EP88908287A EP0389487A1 EP 0389487 A1 EP0389487 A1 EP 0389487A1 EP 19880908287 EP19880908287 EP 19880908287 EP 88908287 A EP88908287 A EP 88908287A EP 0389487 A1 EP0389487 A1 EP 0389487A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
discharge openings
grating
insert
hammermill
hammer circle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP19880908287
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Edward Aneurin Evans
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
METPRO MACHINERY Ltd
Original Assignee
METPRO MACHINERY Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by METPRO MACHINERY Ltd filed Critical METPRO MACHINERY Ltd
Publication of EP0389487A1 publication Critical patent/EP0389487A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C13/00Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills
    • B02C13/26Details
    • B02C13/282Shape or inner surface of mill-housings
    • B02C13/284Built-in screens

Definitions

  • Ihis invention relates to hammermills, and more particularly to shredder type hammermills in which large metallic objects, such as automobiles, can be shredded into small pieces.
  • Shredder type hammermills are well known (examples of such machines being described in U.S. Patents 3489078 and 3545690).
  • a metallic object fed into the hammermill is subjected to impact by a series of heavy hammers carried on a shaft which is rotated at high speed, the tips of the hammers following a circular path (known as the hammer circle) .
  • Ihis impact within the hammer circle causes relatively small pieces to be torn out of the metallic object.
  • a series of grate bars having discharge openings extend around the hammer circle so that pieces which are small enough fall through the openings can be discharged from the machine; larger pieces are struck repeatedly until they are sufficiently reduced in size.
  • Cne disadvantage of such hammermills is that pieces of metal which are heavy, thick and tough will take more time to be broken into small enough pieces to fall through the discharge openings. The extra time taken within the hammermill to break up the metal pieces results in extra wear on all the internal parts, which means that parts of the . machine have to be maintained and replaced more frequently.
  • a hammermill for shredding bulky metallic objects which comprises an enclosure having therein a rotatably driven shaft having mounted thereon a series of hammers for shredding said objects within the hammer circle defined by the circumferential periphery of said hammers, and a grating which extends around the shaft and hammer circle and has a series of discharge openings for discharge of shredded pieces from within said enclosure, characterised in that means are provided for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings in said grating so as to allow the discharge of shredded pieces of varying size or quantity from said hammer circle.
  • the grating includes an ejection door which is movable between an open position and a closed position.
  • the ejection door may be hinged along one edge so that it can open freely upon impact of a (large) piece of material, such that the latter can pass through the aperture defined by the open door even when it is too large to pass through other discharge openings of the grating. Should the door not freely hinge open, however, it can be opened by externally applied force and held open until the large piece is thrown clear by the forces generated within the hammermill by the driven shaft. he ejection door may itself have discharge openings therethrough.
  • Ihe means for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings preferably comprises at least one apertured insert for the grating, the insert being movable from a first, locked position in which the insert comprises part of the grating and in which the apertures in the insert comprise discharge openings which are of relatively small dimensions, to a second, unl ⁇ cked position in which the insert is remote from the grating and the dimensions of the discharge openings are accordingly relatively large.
  • Ihe insert is preferably hinged at or adjacent one edge about a hinge line which is typically parallel to the shaft.
  • Such an insert also referred to herein as a "key” or “key” device
  • Figure 1 is a schematic cross sectional view of a shredder type hammermill in accordance with the invention
  • Figure 2 is a view of part of the key device in the direction of arrow A;
  • Figure 3 is a view of the grating as it would appear from the interior of the hammer circle.
  • Figures 4a, 4b and 4c are perspective views of, respectively, exemplary grating, key device and combination of grating and key device, for use in the hammermill according to the invention.
  • a shredder type hammermill 10 comprises a feed (not shown) which is arranged to deliver metallic objects into the hammer circle (which will be described below) .
  • a cutter bar (not shown) may be located at the entry 12 into the hammermill, in order to absorb the forces generated as the objects are shredded.
  • a barrel rotor 14 is mounted on and driven by a shaft 16; the rotor carries a plurality of hammers 18 (typically arranged in rows on the rotor) at the periphery of the rotor, rotation of the latter defining the circumferential extent of the hammer circle.
  • a grating 20 having discharge openings 22 extends around the rotor 14 to facilitate removal of pieces of material from the hammer circle. Pieces of material which are torn from the object or objects impacted by the hammers in the hammer circle are dragged around between the perimeter of the rotor 14 and the grating 20 until they are sufficiently reduced in size to fall through the discharge openings 22. If the object fed into the hammer circle contains heavy or thick metal, the time required to cause breakdown into small enough pieces can be fairly lengthy, which increases wear and tear on the internal parts of the hammermill.
  • the key device (or insert) 24 which serves to vary the dimensions of the discharge openings 22. hen the dimensions of the latter openings are relatively large, larger pieces of material are allowed to fall therethrough, thereby reducing wear on the internal parts of the shredder and allowing quicker ejection of the metal, albeit in larger particles.
  • Ihe key device 24 comprises a plurality of cross-shaped members 26 (see Figures 2 and 4b) which locate in discharge openings 22, thereby reducing the effective size of the openings as can be seen more clearly in B ' igure 3.
  • he cross-shaped members are mounted on an arcuate member, pivotally connected to the hammermill body at point X and is able to move from a first, locked position (see Figure 4c) in which the key device cooperates with art of the grating 20 to form small discharge openings defined by the cross-shaped members 26, to a second, unlocked position in which the key device is remote from the grating and the discharge openings have their maximum size as can be clearly seen in Figures- 1 and 4a.
  • the key device is typically pivoted either by mechanical or hydraulic actuation means.
  • a further mechanism is provided to facilitate the removal of pieces of material which are too large to fall through discharge openings 22 even when the latter have their maximum size.
  • Ihe mechanism comprises an ejection door 28 located in the roof of the shredder; the door 28 is hinged at Y, and is arranged to open freely and automatically upon impact of a sufficiently large piece of material, thereby allowing the oversize piece of material to be ejected from the hammermill.
  • the door can be opened by operating a lever (not shown) at hinge point Y, and then held open until the piece is thrown clear by the forces generated within the hammermill by the rotor.
  • the key device is in the locked position and the discharge openings have their smallest dimensions, there is the possibility that the operator may feed metal into the hammermill at a faster rate than it can be broken up into small enough pieces.
  • the metal will build up within the shredder and will force open the ejection door and be ejected before serious congestion occurs in the hammermill.
  • Congestion within the hammermill causes extra loading on the rotor and in turn on the main driving gear which can, in a conventional hammermill, cause the driving gear to stall out completely. If this occurs the hammermill cannot be re-started before all the metal is manually cleared out from within the shredder.
  • the provision of the ejection door in the embodiment according to the invention enables the hammermill to function more efficiently with minimised chances of breakdown.
  • Ihe hammermill according to the invention is therefore more flexible and effective than known hammermills, and is less susceptible to excessive and damaging wear.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)

Abstract

Broyeur à marteaux du type à découpage dans lequel on peut découper en petites pièces de gros objets métalliques tels que des automobiles, comportant une grille (20) entourant un rotor (14) doté d'une série de marteaux dont les bouts suivent une trajectoire circulaire autour du rotor. On peut faire varier la taille des orifices de décharge (22) afin de permettre le passage de pièces découpées plus grosses ou démesurées, par mouvement pivotant d'un dispositif à ''clé'' (24) et/ou par l'ouverture d'une porte d'éjection (28).Cutting-type hammer mill in which large metal objects such as automobiles can be cut into small pieces, comprising a grid (20) surrounding a rotor (14) provided with a series of hammers whose ends follow a circular path around the rotor. The size of the discharge orifices (22) can be varied in order to allow the passage of larger or disproportionate cut pieces, by pivoting movement of a "key" device (24) and / or by the opening of 'an ejection door (28).

Description

Hammermills
Ihis invention relates to hammermills, and more particularly to shredder type hammermills in which large metallic objects, such as automobiles, can be shredded into small pieces.
Shredder type hammermills are well known (examples of such machines being described in U.S. Patents 3489078 and 3545690). In operation of such a hammermill, a metallic object fed into the hammermill is subjected to impact by a series of heavy hammers carried on a shaft which is rotated at high speed, the tips of the hammers following a circular path (known as the hammer circle) . Ihis impact within the hammer circle causes relatively small pieces to be torn out of the metallic object. A series of grate bars having discharge openings extend around the hammer circle so that pieces which are small enough fall through the openings can be discharged from the machine; larger pieces are struck repeatedly until they are sufficiently reduced in size.
Cne disadvantage of such hammermills is that pieces of metal which are heavy, thick and tough will take more time to be broken into small enough pieces to fall through the discharge openings. The extra time taken within the hammermill to break up the metal pieces results in extra wear on all the internal parts, which means that parts of the . machine have to be maintained and replaced more frequently.
The present invention seeks to provide an improved hammmermill, in which the above disadvantages are at least alleviated. According to the present invention, there is provided a hammermill for shredding bulky metallic objects, which comprises an enclosure having therein a rotatably driven shaft having mounted thereon a series of hammers for shredding said objects within the hammer circle defined by the circumferential periphery of said hammers, and a grating which extends around the shaft and hammer circle and has a series of discharge openings for discharge of shredded pieces from within said enclosure, characterised in that means are provided for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings in said grating so as to allow the discharge of shredded pieces of varying size or quantity from said hammer circle.
Preferably the grating includes an ejection door which is movable between an open position and a closed position. The ejection door may be hinged along one edge so that it can open freely upon impact of a (large) piece of material, such that the latter can pass through the aperture defined by the open door even when it is too large to pass through other discharge openings of the grating. Should the door not freely hinge open, however, it can be opened by externally applied force and held open until the large piece is thrown clear by the forces generated within the hammermill by the driven shaft. he ejection door may itself have discharge openings therethrough.
Ihe means for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings preferably comprises at least one apertured insert for the grating, the insert being movable from a first, locked position in which the insert comprises part of the grating and in which the apertures in the insert comprise discharge openings which are of relatively small dimensions, to a second, unlαcked position in which the insert is remote from the grating and the dimensions of the discharge openings are accordingly relatively large. Ihe insert is preferably hinged at or adjacent one edge about a hinge line which is typically parallel to the shaft. Such an insert (also referred to herein as a "key" or "key" device) , may be movable from the locked to the unlocked position and vice versa by mechanical, hydraulic or other suitable means.
Ihe invention will now be described further, by way of example only, with reference to and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic cross sectional view of a shredder type hammermill in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 is a view of part of the key device in the direction of arrow A;
Figure 3 is a view of the grating as it would appear from the interior of the hammer circle; and
Figures 4a, 4b and 4c are perspective views of, respectively, exemplary grating, key device and combination of grating and key device, for use in the hammermill according to the invention.
Referring to the drawings, a shredder type hammermill 10 comprises a feed (not shown) which is arranged to deliver metallic objects into the hammer circle (which will be described below) . A cutter bar (not shown) may be located at the entry 12 into the hammermill, in order to absorb the forces generated as the objects are shredded. A barrel rotor 14 is mounted on and driven by a shaft 16; the rotor carries a plurality of hammers 18 (typically arranged in rows on the rotor) at the periphery of the rotor, rotation of the latter defining the circumferential extent of the hammer circle. The rows of hammers 18 rotate and impact upon the object or objects fed into the hammer circle, thereby chopping slugs of material therefrom in the same way as described and illustrated in U.S. Patents 3545690 and 3489078. A grating 20 having discharge openings 22 extends around the rotor 14 to facilitate removal of pieces of material from the hammer circle. Pieces of material which are torn from the object or objects impacted by the hammers in the hammer circle are dragged around between the perimeter of the rotor 14 and the grating 20 until they are sufficiently reduced in size to fall through the discharge openings 22. If the object fed into the hammer circle contains heavy or thick metal, the time required to cause breakdown into small enough pieces can be fairly lengthy, which increases wear and tear on the internal parts of the hammermill.
According to a first aspect of the invention, therefore, the key device (or insert) 24 is provided which serves to vary the dimensions of the discharge openings 22. hen the dimensions of the latter openings are relatively large, larger pieces of material are allowed to fall therethrough, thereby reducing wear on the internal parts of the shredder and allowing quicker ejection of the metal, albeit in larger particles. Ihe key device 24 comprises a plurality of cross-shaped members 26 (see Figures 2 and 4b) which locate in discharge openings 22, thereby reducing the effective size of the openings as can be seen more clearly in B'igure 3. he cross-shaped members are mounted on an arcuate member, pivotally connected to the hammermill body at point X and is able to move from a first, locked position (see Figure 4c) in which the key device cooperates with art of the grating 20 to form small discharge openings defined by the cross-shaped members 26, to a second, unlocked position in which the key device is remote from the grating and the discharge openings have their maximum size as can be clearly seen in Figures- 1 and 4a. The key device is typically pivoted either by mechanical or hydraulic actuation means. A further mechanism is provided to facilitate the removal of pieces of material which are too large to fall through discharge openings 22 even when the latter have their maximum size. Ihe mechanism comprises an ejection door 28 located in the roof of the shredder; the door 28 is hinged at Y, and is arranged to open freely and automatically upon impact of a sufficiently large piece of material, thereby allowing the oversize piece of material to be ejected from the hammermill. Should the door not freely hinge open, however, it can be opened by operating a lever (not shown) at hinge point Y, and then held open until the piece is thrown clear by the forces generated within the hammermill by the rotor. tøhen the key device is in the locked position and the discharge openings have their smallest dimensions, there is the possibility that the operator may feed metal into the hammermill at a faster rate than it can be broken up into small enough pieces. In such cases the metal will build up within the shredder and will force open the ejection door and be ejected before serious congestion occurs in the hammermill. Congestion within the hammermill causes extra loading on the rotor and in turn on the main driving gear which can, in a conventional hammermill, cause the driving gear to stall out completely. If this occurs the hammermill cannot be re-started before all the metal is manually cleared out from within the shredder. Clearly, therefore, the provision of the ejection door in the embodiment according to the invention enables the hammermill to function more efficiently with minimised chances of breakdown.
Ihe hammermill according to the invention is therefore more flexible and effective than known hammermills, and is less susceptible to excessive and damaging wear.

Claims

Clai s :
1. A hammermill for shredding bulky metallic objects, which comprises an enclosure having therein a rotatably driven shaft having mounted thereon a series of hammers for shredding said objects within the hammer circle defined by the circumferential periphery of said hammers, and a grating which extends around the shaft and hammer circle and has a series of discharge openings for discharge of shredded fragments from within said enclosure, characterised in that means are provided for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings in said grating so as to allow the discharge of shredded fragments of varying size or quantity from said hammer circle.
2. A hammermill according to claim 1, wherein the grating includes an ejection door which is movable between an open position and a closed position and in which the aperture of the open ejection door is large enough to allow the passage therethrough of fragments which are too large to pass through the other discharge openings of the grating.
3. A hammermill according to claim 2, wherein the ejection door is arranged to be opened by an externally applied force and/or is mounted such that it can be opened by the impact thereon of a large fragment of metal or by a large quantity of fragments of metal.
4. A hammermill according to any claim 2 or 3, wherein the ejection door is hinged at one edge thereof and is preferably positioned adjacent the upper part of the hammer circle above the shaft.
5. A hammermill according to any of claims 2 to 4, wherein the ejection door includes discharge openings therethrough,
6. A hammermill according to any preceding claim, wherein said means for varying the dimensions of the discharge openings comprises at least one apertured insert for said grating, said insert being movable from a first, locked position in which the insert comprises part of the grating and in which the apertures in said insert comprise discharge openings which are of relatively small dimensions, to a second, unlocked position in which the insert is remote from the grating and the dimensions of said discharge openings are accordingly relatively large.
7. A hammermill according to claim 6, wherein said insert is hinged at or adjacent one edge thereof about a line substantially parallel to said shaft and is preferably located substantially diametrically opposite the zone at which the object to be shredded enters the hammer circle.
8. A hammermill according to claim 6 or 7, wherein said discharge openings, between the zone in which the object to be shredded enters the hammer circle and the region where said insert can be incorporated in the grating, are of relatively small dimensions, and the insert comprises a plurality of prong members, each of which members is movable into and out of one of said relatively larger discharge openings.
9. A hammermill according to claim 8, wherein said relatively larger discharge openings are of rectangular cross section and said prong members are of cross-shaped cross section.
10. A hammermill according to claim 9, wherein the discharge openings comprising said apertures in said insert are of similar size to said discharge openings of relatively small dimensions.
EP19880908287 1987-09-22 1988-09-22 Hammermills Withdrawn EP0389487A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8722260 1987-09-22
GB878722260A GB8722260D0 (en) 1987-09-22 1987-09-22 Hammermills

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0389487A1 true EP0389487A1 (en) 1990-10-03

Family

ID=10624180

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19880908287 Withdrawn EP0389487A1 (en) 1987-09-22 1988-09-22 Hammermills

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0389487A1 (en)
GB (2) GB8722260D0 (en)
HU (1) HU205280B (en)
WO (1) WO1989002784A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4016295A1 (en) * 1990-05-21 1991-11-28 Lindemann Maschfab Gmbh HAMMER CRUSHER
US5213273A (en) * 1990-05-21 1993-05-25 Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh Hammer mill
DE4317287C2 (en) * 1993-05-25 1997-02-27 Thyssen Industrie Crushing device for scrap in particular
DE19547828A1 (en) * 1995-12-21 1997-06-26 Krupp Foerdertechnik Gmbh Method for adjustment of maximum grain sizing of broken or milled material
JP6921623B2 (en) * 2017-05-17 2021-08-18 株式会社アーステクニカ Crushing machine

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2713177C2 (en) * 1977-03-25 1989-06-08 Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf Hammer crusher
SU957954A1 (en) * 1979-02-16 1982-09-15 Украинская Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Сельскохозяйственная Академия Fodder crusher
DE3235163A1 (en) * 1982-09-23 1984-03-29 PHB Weserhütte AG, 5000 Köln Shredder for a shredder system for crushing and preparing vehicle bodies or the like to form scrap metal
DE3517579A1 (en) * 1985-05-15 1986-11-20 Thyssen Industrie Ag, 4300 Essen TRAINING THE HOUSING OF CRUSHERS
DE3624826A1 (en) * 1986-07-23 1988-02-04 Lindemann Maschfab Gmbh RUST FOR CRUSHING MACHINES
DE3643529C1 (en) * 1986-12-19 1988-03-17 Thyssen Industrie Sorting device in the good outlet of a shredding machine for scrap

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO8902784A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HU205280B (en) 1992-04-28
WO1989002784A1 (en) 1989-04-06
GB8722260D0 (en) 1987-10-28
HU885493D0 (en) 1991-06-28
GB2209962B (en) 1992-02-05
GB8819336D0 (en) 1988-09-14
GB2209962A (en) 1989-06-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE2516014C3 (en) Crushing machine for waste
US4193556A (en) Hammer mill
JP2966137B2 (en) Hammer crusher
EP1536892B1 (en) Comminuting device
US4166583A (en) Hammermill
US3489354A (en) Solid material comminution and disintegration apparatus
EP0103778B1 (en) Hammer mill
US3482788A (en) Hammer mills
US5213273A (en) Hammer mill
US3850375A (en) Mobile shredder
US3482789A (en) Hammers for hammer mills
US5799884A (en) Universal shredder
EP0389487A1 (en) Hammermills
GB1599936A (en) Renewable tip hammer for a crusher
US3260468A (en) Grinding mill and blower combination
US3806048A (en) Reversible over-running down-running shredder machine
AT398712B (en) RESIDUAL WOOD CRUSHING MACHINE
DE4328506C1 (en) Chip breaker
US2036207A (en) Destroyer for tickets
US2940676A (en) Material crushing apparatus
US3662963A (en) Rock crusher
US3202368A (en) Single rotor crusher
JP2974657B1 (en) Two-stage crusher
EP0190417B1 (en) Device for comminuting waste paper
KR20100080291A (en) Powdering machine with a particle sorting part

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900312

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910925

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19931202