EP0354626A1 - Verfahren zum Hydrokracken von Kohlenwasserstoffeinsätzen - Google Patents

Verfahren zum Hydrokracken von Kohlenwasserstoffeinsätzen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0354626A1
EP0354626A1 EP89202073A EP89202073A EP0354626A1 EP 0354626 A1 EP0354626 A1 EP 0354626A1 EP 89202073 A EP89202073 A EP 89202073A EP 89202073 A EP89202073 A EP 89202073A EP 0354626 A1 EP0354626 A1 EP 0354626A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
effluent
process according
stage
hydrogen
reaction stage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP89202073A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0354626B1 (de
Inventor
Swan Tiong Sie
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Original Assignee
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV filed Critical Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Publication of EP0354626A1 publication Critical patent/EP0354626A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0354626B1 publication Critical patent/EP0354626B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/10—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only cracking steps

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock in which a plurality of reaction stages are employed.
  • Hydrocracking is a well-established process in which heavy hydrocarbons are contacted in the presence of hydrogen with a hydrocracking catalyst.
  • the temperature and the pressure are relatively high, so that the heavy hydrocarbons are cracked to products with a lower boiling point.
  • the process can be carried out in one stage, it has been shown to be advantageous to carry out the process in a plurality of stages. In a first stage the feedstock is subjected to denitrogenation, desulphurisation and some hydro­cracking, and in a second stage most of the hydro­cracking reactions occur.
  • amorphous hydrocracking catalyst tend to be nitrogen-sensitive and may be deactivated by the nitrogen compounds.
  • a solution to this problem was considered to be the use of a hydrocracking catalyst with hydrodenitrogenating activity in a first reaction stage and the use of a zeolitic hydrocracking catalyst which is less nitrogen-­sensitive, in a second reaction stage.
  • these zeolitic catalysts incurred the drawback that bulky molecules containing several ring structures could not be adequately cracked unless very high temperatures were employed.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,702,818 describes one proposed solution to this problem in which two second stage reactors are employed, one containing a zeolite catalyst and the other an amorphous base catalyst. While bulky ring structures will be cracked by the amorphous catalyst, the recycle stream will still contain a substantial quantity of medium heavy products which will result in unduly high catalyst loading.
  • the present invention provides a solution to the problem of nitrogen-sensitivity and inadequate hydro­cracking of bulky materials.
  • the present invention provides a process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock in a plurality of reaction stages, comprising contacting the feedstock with a first hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure in the presence of hydrogen in a first reaction stage to yield a first effluent, mixing at least a liquid portion of the first effluent with a second effluent that originates from a second reaction stage, contacting the mixture obtained in a third reaction stage with a third hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure in the presence of hydrogen to yield a third effluent, passing the third effluent to a separation stage where at least one top fraction and a residual fraction are obtained and passing the residual fraction to the second reaction stage where it is contacted with a second hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure in the presence of hydrogen to yield the second effluent.
  • the first hydrocracking catalyst has a denitrogenating activity
  • the third catalyst is relatively nitrogen-insensitive and the second hydro­cracking catalyst is capable of hydrocracking bulky molecules, the above-mentioned problems are obviated.
  • the present invention can be embodied in various embodiments, which are variations of a series-flow hydrocracker and a two-stage hydrocracker.
  • a series-flow hydrocracker and a two-stage hydrocracker.
  • For the flow scheme of these known processes reference is made to "The Petroleum Handbook", 6th ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 294-300.
  • a first embodiment is based on a series-flow hydrocracker.
  • the effluent from a first reaction stage is passed to a second one, and the effluent from the second reaction stage is subjected to a work-up procedure including fractionation.
  • the fractionation yields a residual fraction which is combined with the first effluent to be passed to the second reaction stage.
  • the third stage according to the invention corresponds with the conventional second stage.
  • the combination of at least part of the first effluent and the second effluent is passed to the third reaction stage.
  • the third effluent emanating from the third reaction stage is subjected to the work-up procedure in which the product distillation fractions are recovered and a residual fraction.
  • the residual fraction from the fractionation is recycled to the second stage to yield the second effluent.
  • the first effluent is subjected to a separation in a liquid and a gaseous phase.
  • the gaseous phase is combined with the third effluent and subjected to the work-up procedure.
  • This has the advantage that the gaseous phase will contain most of the ammonia, hydrogen sulphide and also cracked products. Hence there is no risk of over-­cracking the desired products to undesired C1 ⁇ 4 hydro­carbon products.
  • the liquid phase which contains only a minute proportion of the the ammonia in the first effluent, is combined with the second effluent to be hydrocracked in the third stage.
  • first effluent it is, of course, possible to separate the first effluent at different temperature and pressure conditions.
  • this separation is carried out at substantially the same temperature and pressure as prevailing in the first reaction stage. This is accomplished advantageously by refraining from heating or cooling of the first effluent.
  • this separation is carried out in the same reaction vessel as that in which the first reaction stage is carried out. This can be achieved by the creation of a settling area in the bottom part of the reaction vessel, from which the gaseous phase and the liquid phase are withdrawn via different openings. It will be appreciated that minor fluctuations in the first reaction stage may occur. Then it is preferred to carry out the separation at substantially the same temperature and pressure as prevailing in the exit part of the first stage.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention is derived from a conventional two-stage hydrocracker.
  • a conventional hydrocracker the effluent from a first reaction stage is combined with the effluent from a second reaction stage, and the combined effluents are subjected to a work-up procedure including fractionation which yields the desired distillate products and a residual fraction that is to be passed to the second reaction stage.
  • the residual fraction of the fractionation is mixed with the effluent of the second stage and the mixture is passed to the third reaction stage.
  • the effluent of this third stage is separated into a gaseous top fraction and a liquid bottom fraction.
  • the top fraction obtained after the separation of the third effluent is combined with the first effluent and the combination is subjected to a work-up procedure from which the products are recovered by fractionation.
  • the liquid bottom fraction from the third effluent is passed to the second reaction stage.
  • one or more distillate fractions are obtained from the first effluent by fractionation and recovered as products and further a residual liquid portion is obtained that is mixed with the second effluent.
  • the top fraction obtained in the separation stage may be processed separately.
  • the top fraction obtained in the separation stage is combined with the first effluent to be fractionated.
  • the separation of the third effluent is accomplished in the way as described above for the first effluent in the scheme based on a series-­flow hydrocracking process.
  • this separation is carried out at substant­ially the same temperature and pressure as prevailing in(the exit part of) the third reaction stage. This is accomplished advantageously by refraining from heating or cooling of the third effluent.
  • this separation is carried out in the same reaction vessel as in which the third reaction stage is carried out. This can be achieved by the creation of a settling area in the bottom part of the reaction vessel, from which the gaseous phase and the liquid phase are withdrawn via different openings.
  • the second reaction stage and the third reaction stage may be carried out in different reactors. It is, however, preferred to carry out both stages in one reaction vessel. Usually that does not involve too many technically difficult adjustments, since most conventional hydrocrackers comprise a plurality of catalysts beds, and by some alterations of feed conduits and a different loading of the catalyst beds conventional hydrocrackers can be accommodated to the process of the present invention.
  • the first hydrocracking catalyst is preferably a catalyst with hydrodenitro­genating and/or hydrodesulphurising activity.
  • Suitable catalysts include first hydrocracking catalysts comprising at least one component of a group 8 and/or 6b metal of the Periodic Table of the Elements on an amorphous carrier.
  • the carrier is selected from the group consisting of silica, alumina, thoria, titania, magnesia, zirconia and mixtures thereof.
  • the carrier more preferably comprises alumina. Reference is made to the Periodic Table of the Elements as published in the "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", 55th edition (1975), C R C Press, Ohio, USA.
  • the same or different hydrocracking catalysts may be used.
  • Mixtures or combinations of different catalysts can be used in each stage: such mixtures or combinations may be the same or different for each stage.
  • the catalyst, catalyst mixture or catalyst combination used in the second stage is different from that used in the third stage.
  • the second hydrocracking catalyst is preferably a catalyst with a good performance for the cracking of bulky molecules containing a plurality of rings.
  • a very good catalyst in this respect is a second hydrocracking catalyst comprising at least one component of a group 8 and/or group 6b metal on a silica-alumina-containing carrier.
  • This catalyst tends to be very nitrogen-­sensitive. Since the hydrocarbonaceous feed to be cracked by this silica-alumina catalyst has already twice been subjected to a hydrocracking process by which also nitrogen is removed, the drawbacks of the use of a nitrogen-sensitive catalyst do not occur here. It is emphasised that also other catalysts may be used in the second stage, e.g.
  • zeolitic catalysts based on alumina, silica, titania, magnesia, zirconia, or mixtures thereof.
  • the use of zeolitic catalysts in the second stage is also possible, but less preferred since, though the catalysts are very active, their activity towards the conversion of bulky molecules leaves room for improvement.
  • the third hydrocracking catalyst is preferably a zeolitic catalyst, i.e. a catalyst comprising at least one component of a group 8 and/or group 6b metal on a zeolite-containing carrier.
  • the zeolite in the third hydrocracking catalyst is preferably a faujasite-type zeolite, and in particular zeolite Y.
  • the silica/­alumina molar ratio in such zeolites may vary from 4 to 25, in particular 6 to 15.
  • the unit cell size of zeolite Y may vary from 2.419 to 2.475 nm, in particular from 2.425 to 2.460 nm.
  • the third hydrocracking catalyst conveniently comprises further at least one binder.
  • the binder is suitably selected from silica, alumina, silica-alumina, thoria, titania, zirconia, magnesia and mixtures thereof.
  • alumina is preferred, optionally in combination with silica-alumina.
  • the cataly­tically active metal from groups 8 and 6b are preferably selected from cobalt, nickel, platinum, palladium, tungsten and molybdenum.
  • non-noble metal mixtures are used, such as Ni-W, Ni-Mo, Co-Mo and Co-W.
  • the catalysts may further contain phosphorus and/or fluorine to boost their activity.
  • the catalytically active metals are non-noble they are preferably present on the hydrocracking catalysts in an amount of 1 to 16 %wt of a group 8 metal and/or from 6 to 24 %wt of a group 6 metal, the weight percentages being based on the total catalyst.
  • Noble metals are suitably present in a lower amount, e.g. from 0.2 to 2 %wt.
  • Noble metals can especially be used on the third and/or second hydrocracking catalyst.
  • the catalytically active metals are non-noble they are preferably present in their oxidic or even more preferred in their sulphidic form.
  • the preparation of the hydrocracking catalysts is known in the art.
  • Hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks that can be used in the present process include gas oils, vacuum gas oils, deasphalted oils, long residues, short residues, catalytically cracked cycle oils thermally cracked gas oils and syncrudes, optionally originating from tar sands, shale oils, residue upgrading processes or biomass. Combinations of various hydrocarbonaceous feedstock can also be employed.
  • the hydrocarbonaceous feedstock will generally be such that a major part, say over 50 %wt, has a boiling point above 370 o C.
  • the present process is most advantageous when the feedstock contains nitrogen. Typical nitrogen contents are in the range of up to 5000 ppmw. Nitrogen contents may start from 50 ppmw.
  • the feedstock will generally also comprise sulphur compounds. The sulphur content will usually be in the range from 0.2 to 6 %wt.
  • the temperature in any reaction stage is preferably from 300 to 450 o C, in particular from 350 to 420 o C, the pressure from 50 to 250 bar, in particular from 75 to 150 bar, the space velocity from 0.1 to 10 kg/l/h, in particular from 0.2 to 5 kg/l/h, and the hydrogen/­oil ratio from 500 to 5000 Nl/kg, in particular from 1000 to 2500 Nl/kg.
  • a reaction vessel 1 is shown, containing a catalyst bed 2.
  • Catalyst bed 2 comprises the first hydrocracking catalyst.
  • the figure further shows a second reaction vessel comprising a catalyst bed 4 with the second hydrocracking catalyst and a catalyst bed 5 with the third hydrocracking catalyst.
  • a gas purification section 6 is shown and a fractionator 7.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock is passed to the reaction vessel 1 via a line 8, together with a hydrogen containing gas supplied via a line 9.
  • the mixture of hydrocarbons and hydrogen is withdrawn from the reaction vessel 1 via a line 10.
  • To the mixture additional hydrogen is added via a line 11 and the resulting mixture is fed into the reaction vessel 3 at a position between the catalyst beds 4 and 5.
  • the mixture then combines with an effluent emanating from catalyst bed 4, i.e. the second effluent, and together the mixtures are passed over the catalyst bed 5, yielding the third effluent that is withdrawn via a line 12.
  • the effluent in the line 12 is passed to the gas purification section where it is freed from ammonia and/or hydrogen sulphide that is removed from the system via a line 13.
  • the operation of the purification section is known in the art. It may make use of several gas-liquid separators at different temperatures and/or pressures to separate a hydrogen-containing gas from the desired products and of a wash section to remove ammonia and/or hydrogen sulphide.
  • the hydrogen-con­taining gas may contain some light (C1 ⁇ 2) hydrocarbons and/or hydrogen sulphide.
  • Hydrogen that is recovered in the section 6 is recycled to the system via a line 14, and hydrocarbon products are passed to the fractionator 7 via a line 15. There they are separated to yield product streams 16, 17 and 18, and a residual fraction withdrawn from the fractionator 7 via a line 19.
  • the residual fraction is recycled to the reaction vessel 3 and introduced into the vessel 3, after having been mixed with hydrogen coming from a line 20, at a position above the catalyst bed 4.
  • the residual fraction is hydrocracked in the catalyst bed 4 to yield the second effluent.
  • the hydrogen for the lines 9, 11 and 20 originates from a feeding line 21, that is provided with hydrogen by the recycle hydrogen in the line 14 and make-up hydrogen supplied via a line 22.
  • a reaction vessel 31 comprising a catalyst bed 32 in which the first reaction stage is carried out. It further shows a reaction vessel 33 with a catalyst bed 34 for the third reaction stage, and a reaction vessel 35 with a catalyst bed 36 for the second reaction stage.
  • the figure shows a gas purification section 37, a fractionator 38 and a separator 39.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock from a line 40 is mixed with a hydrogen-containing gas from a line 41 and together passed into the reaction vessel 31, where the mixture is hydrocracked over the catalyst bed 32 comprising the first hydrocracking catalyst.
  • the first effluent is withdrawn from the reaction vessel 31 via a line 42 and passed to the separator 39.
  • the separator 39 can be any device known in the art to accomplish a gas-liquid separation. It is preferably at the same temperature and pressure as reaction vessel 31. From the separator 39 a gaseous phase is withdrawn via a line 43 and a liquid phase via a line 44. The liquid phase is mixed with a second effluent in a line 45 coming from the reaction vessel 15, and the mixture is passed to the reaction vessel 33 via a line 46 to which hydrogen is added via a line 47. In the reaction vessel 33 the mixture from the line 46 is hydrocracked over the third hydrocracking catalyst in catalyst bed 34 to yield the third effluent withdrawn from the reaction vessel 33 via a line 48.
  • the gaseous phase of the first effluent in line 43 is added, and the combined streams are fed into the gas purification section 37 to yield a waste stream of ammonia and/or hydrogen sulphide discharged via a line 49, recycle hydrogen discharged via a line 50 and the hydrocarbon product, discharged via a line 51.
  • the line 51 debouches into the fractionator 38 where product streams 52, 53 and 54 are recovered. Distillation in the fractionator 38 further yields a residual fraction that is passed via a line 55 to the reaction vessel 35. In the presence of hydrogen coming from a line 56 the residual fraction is hydrocracked over the second hydrocracking catalyst in catalyst bed 36.
  • the second effluent resulting from the hydrocracking over the catalyst bed 36 is withdrawn via the line 45 and mixed with the liquid phase in the line 44.
  • Hydrogen in the process is suppied via a line 57 that is fed by make-up hydrogen from a line 58 and recycle hydrogen from the line 50.
  • separator 39 can be incorporated in the reaction vessel 31 as a settling area. That would save the cost of a separate vessel. It is also possible to provide catalyst beds 36 and 34 in one reaction vessel as has been shown in Figure 1 for catalyst beds 4 and 5.
  • Figure 3 shows a reaction vessel 61 with a catalyst bed 62 comprising the first hydrocracking catalyst, a gas purification section 63, a fractionator 64, and a second reaction vessel 65 comprising a catalyst bed 66 for the second reaction stage and a catalyst bed 67 for the third reaction stage.
  • the reaction vessel 65 further comprises a settling area 68 where a gas-liquid separation takes place.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock in a line 69 is combined with hydrogen from a line 70, introduced into the reaction vessel 61 and hydrocracked over the first hydrocracking catalyst in catalyst bed 62.
  • the resulting first effluent is withdrawn from the reaction vessel 61 via a line 71.
  • the residual fraction of the line 80 mixes with the effluent coming from the catalyst bed 66 and together they are passed over the catalyst bed 67 to yield a third effluent.
  • the third effluent comes into the settling are 68, where a gas-liquid separation occurs.
  • the gaseous top fraction is withdrawn via the line 72 and mixed with the first effluent, and the liquid residual portion is withdrawn from the reaction vessel 65 via a line 82, combined with hydrogen from a line 83 and recycled to the reaction vessel 65, but introduced at a position above the catalyst bed 66.
  • the liquid residual portion is hydrocracked over the second hydrocracking catalyst in catalyst bed 66 to yield the second effluent.
  • the hydrogen for the process is supplied via a line 84 that is fed by make-up hydrogen from a line 85 and the recycle hydrogen in the line 75.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
EP19890202073 1988-08-11 1989-08-08 Verfahren zum Hydrokracken von Kohlenwasserstoffeinsätzen Expired - Lifetime EP0354626B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB888819121A GB8819121D0 (en) 1988-08-11 1988-08-11 Process for hydrocracking of hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
GB8819121 1988-08-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0354626A1 true EP0354626A1 (de) 1990-02-14
EP0354626B1 EP0354626B1 (de) 1995-01-04

Family

ID=10641987

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19890202073 Expired - Lifetime EP0354626B1 (de) 1988-08-11 1989-08-08 Verfahren zum Hydrokracken von Kohlenwasserstoffeinsätzen

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0354626B1 (de)
JP (1) JPH0288694A (de)
CN (1) CN1021341C (de)
AU (1) AU614865B2 (de)
BR (1) BR8904006A (de)
CA (1) CA1320468C (de)
DE (1) DE68920377T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2066836T3 (de)
GB (1) GB8819121D0 (de)
IN (1) IN174056B (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1112335A1 (de) * 1998-05-06 2001-07-04 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Dreistufiges verfahren zur hydrierung mit dampfstufe

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7156977B2 (en) * 2000-11-11 2007-01-02 Haldor Topsoe A/S Hydroprocessing process and method of retrofitting existing hydroprocessing reactors
US6841062B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2005-01-11 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Crude oil desulfurization
CN101993720A (zh) * 2009-08-11 2011-03-30 中国石化集团洛阳石油化工工程公司 一种烃油液相加氢方法
CN106111134A (zh) * 2016-06-14 2016-11-16 四川大学 一种碳氢燃料裂解催化剂的制备、涂覆及其应用

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3203890A (en) * 1962-11-01 1965-08-31 Universal Oil Prod Co Catalytic hydrocracking process with hydrogenation of the hydrocracked products
US3385781A (en) * 1965-04-01 1968-05-28 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrocracking process
GB1191958A (en) * 1968-10-08 1970-05-13 Shell Int Research Three-Stage Hydrocracking Process
US4404088A (en) * 1981-10-02 1983-09-13 Chevron Research Company Three-stage hydrocracking process

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3203890A (en) * 1962-11-01 1965-08-31 Universal Oil Prod Co Catalytic hydrocracking process with hydrogenation of the hydrocracked products
US3385781A (en) * 1965-04-01 1968-05-28 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrocracking process
GB1191958A (en) * 1968-10-08 1970-05-13 Shell Int Research Three-Stage Hydrocracking Process
US4404088A (en) * 1981-10-02 1983-09-13 Chevron Research Company Three-stage hydrocracking process

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1112335A1 (de) * 1998-05-06 2001-07-04 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Dreistufiges verfahren zur hydrierung mit dampfstufe
EP1112335A4 (de) * 1998-05-06 2009-11-25 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Dreistufiges verfahren zur hydrierung mit dampfstufe

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0354626B1 (de) 1995-01-04
JPH0288694A (ja) 1990-03-28
CN1040612A (zh) 1990-03-21
CN1021341C (zh) 1993-06-23
DE68920377T2 (de) 1995-05-24
IN174056B (de) 1994-09-03
BR8904006A (pt) 1990-03-20
AU3953489A (en) 1990-02-15
CA1320468C (en) 1993-07-20
GB8819121D0 (en) 1988-09-14
AU614865B2 (en) 1991-09-12
DE68920377D1 (de) 1995-02-16
ES2066836T3 (es) 1995-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6179995B1 (en) Residuum hydrotreating/hydrocracking with common hydrogen supply
US4950384A (en) Process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
JP4074667B2 (ja) 単一反応槽における多段水素処理方法
US4713167A (en) Multiple single-stage hydrocracking process
EP0954557B1 (de) Mehrstufenwasserstoffbehandlung mit mehrstufenentgasung in einem einzigen entgasungsgefäss
US6200462B1 (en) Process for reverse gas flow in hydroprocessing reactor systems
US5522983A (en) Hydrocarbon hydroconversion process
EP0909304B1 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung von basisschmierölen
US4183801A (en) Process for preparing hydrocarbons
US20030089637A1 (en) Process for converting heavy petroleum fractions for producing a catalytic cracking feedstrock and middle distillates with a low sulfur content
JPH0756035B2 (ja) 水素化分解方法
CA2323910A1 (en) Integrated hydroconversion process with reverse hydrogen flow
KR100939698B1 (ko) 중간 순간 영역이 구비된 다중 수소가공 반응기
CN113383057B (zh) 包括在第二加氢裂化步骤下游进行的氢化步骤的生产石脑油的两步加氢裂化方法
EP0354626B1 (de) Verfahren zum Hydrokracken von Kohlenwasserstoffeinsätzen
EP0550079B1 (de) Verfahren zur Aufarbeitung einer Kohlenwasserstoffbeschickung
US4163707A (en) Asphalt conversion
AU615565B2 (en) Process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
CN113348229B (zh) 包括在第二加氢裂化步骤上游的氢化步骤的生产中间馏出物的两步加氢裂化方法
CN113557289A (zh) 用于生产中间馏分油的包括第二氢化裂解步骤下游的氢化步骤的两步氢化裂解方法
US11891300B2 (en) Clean liquid fuels hydrogen carrier processes
US20210261872A1 (en) Two-step hydrocracking method using a partitioned distillation column
PL203657B1 (pl) Sposób obróbki wodorem surowca w eglowodorowego i zintegrowany sposób hydrokonwersji

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900619

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910715

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68920377

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19950216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2066836

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19950627

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19950707

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19950707

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19950818

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19950830

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19950830

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19950911

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19960808

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19960809

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 19960809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19960831

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.

Effective date: 19960831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19970301

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19960808

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19970430

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19970301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19970501

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 89202073.6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 19990601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050808

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO