EP0102428A1 - Method and system for testing and sorting batteries - Google Patents
Method and system for testing and sorting batteries Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0102428A1 EP0102428A1 EP82304662A EP82304662A EP0102428A1 EP 0102428 A1 EP0102428 A1 EP 0102428A1 EP 82304662 A EP82304662 A EP 82304662A EP 82304662 A EP82304662 A EP 82304662A EP 0102428 A1 EP0102428 A1 EP 0102428A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- battery
- batteries
- value
- testing
- electrical energy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/34—Sorting according to other particular properties
- B07C5/3412—Sorting according to other particular properties according to a code applied to the object which indicates a property of the object, e.g. quality class, contents or incorrect indication
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/34—Sorting according to other particular properties
- B07C5/344—Sorting according to other particular properties according to electric or electromagnetic properties
Definitions
- This invention relates to battery testing and sorting. More particularly, it concerns a method for testing individual batteries for anticipated shelf-life and culling those individual batteries which are not acceptable.
- the sheet-like batteries used in such film packs employ materials selected to require storage conditions which correspond ideally with those of the photographic film units included in the film pack. Also, the construction of such batteries has been developed to a point where the open circuit voltage decay rate is exceptionally low. In this latter respect, the disclosure of U.S. Patent No. 4,028,479 is illustrative. In spite of the complementary storage condition requirements and construction of this type of battery, however, the shelf-life characteristics of a given battery are difficult to discern at the time of battery production and often will have a longevity falling below that of the corresponding shelf-life of the film units with which they are packaged.
- a battery sorting method and system is provided by which each individual battery of a production run is first tested after assembly to obtaifi'a first value of electrical energy and forming on each battery so tested, machine-readable indicia representative of that first value of electrical energy so that each battery carries such information.
- An initial sorting of the batteries may be effected immediately following this step to cull batteries falling below a specified minimum value of stored electrical energy at the time of manufacture.
- the batteries remaining after this first sorting procedure are then stored for a period of time adequate for determining an energy decay rate for each battery.
- the time of storage may vary with the structural characteristics of the batteries so manufactured, the intended use of the batteries, the accuracy of predicted future decay and also the sensitivity of equipment available to detect the value of electrical energy stored in each battery.
- each individual battery of the production run is again tested to obtain a second value of electrical energy.
- the second test value is compared with the first value, as represented by the indicia previously printed on each battery, to compute from this information and the elapsed time an energy decay rate for each battery.
- the batteries are then stored to cull those having a decay rate in excess of a predetermined maximum decay rate.
- the remaining batteries are retained for use on the basis that the shelf-life thereof is acceptable as a projection of the acceptable decay rate computed after the second test.
- the time at which the first value was obtained may also be recorded on the battery in machine-readable form, to assist in the determination of the energy decay rate following the second test. If the storage time is filed,the computed rate of decay is a function solely of the difference between the first and second values.
- the invention is particularly advantageous in the production of batteries designed to be packaged and merchandised with related goods of predictable shelf-life, although it can be used with batteries of other kinds.
- the testing system and method of the present invention is applicable broadly to all type of batteries, the embodiment to be described is particularly intended for production run testing and sorting of sheet like batteries typified by the disclosure of the aforementioned US Patent No.4,028,479.
- An example of such a battery is illustrated most clearly in Figure 2 and is generally designated in the drawings by the reference numeral 10.
- a most salient feature of the battery 10 from the standpoint of accommodation to the system and method of the present invention is that in addition to its flat rectangular sheet-like configuration, the terminals 12 and 14 thereof are presented through openings 16 and 18 is an exterior paper or cardboard layer 20.
- the outer surface 22 of the layer 20, coupled with the uniformly. rectangular peripheral configuration or shape of the battery and of the layer 20, facilitates the reception of printed indicia 24 to be described in more detail below, in a precisely registered position relative to the terminals 12 and 14 and to the peripheral edges of the battery.
- the batteries 10 are mass produced in batches or runs of several hundred or more individual batteries.
- the manufacture or assembly of each battery is completed by application of the cardboard layer 20 to the internal cell structure and by a peripheral heat sealing or bonding of the layer 20 to an insulative layer or covering (not shown) on the opposite side of the battery from the layer 20.
- each battery 10 is passed upon manufacturing completion by an appropriate dispenser or conveyor (not shown) to a first testing station 26.
- a value of electrical energy stored in each battery 10 is, for example, obtained by, but not limited to, detecting the open circuit voltage of each battery. As shown in Fig.
- this voltage is detected by a meter 28 having a pair of contact probes or brushes 30 and 32 adapted to engage both terminals 12 and 14 of each battery.
- the meter 28 may be any of several known types of volt meters capable of generating a signal corresponding to the open circuit voltage across the probes 30 and 32.
- a recording device or printer 34 Located at the first station with the meter 28 is a recording device or printer 34.
- the printer 34 is responsive to'and controlled by the meter 28 and is operative to form the printed indicia 24 directly on the outer surface 22 of the cardboard battery layer 20.
- the printer 34 is preferably spaced from the battery 10 and is a non-contact printer, for example, an ink jet printer which essentially exerts no force, or quite negligible force, on the battery since only the ink contacts the battery surface.
- the non-contact printing eliminates the possibility of battery damage due to printing and also may easily accommodate a wide variety of battery configurations such as, for example, cylindrical. While other non-contact printers such as, for example, a laser type . will also be applicable, the ink jet printer is relatively maintenance-free and provides excellent indicia.
- the indicia is preferably provided as a bar/half bar code in the form of a series of variable height lines representing a binary or other type encoding capable of representing the precise voltage detected by the meter 28 in a form which may be sensed or read by machine.
- Other forms of indica may also be utilized, and while encoded indicia rather than alphanumerical is preferred fcr reliability, the latter could also be employed.
- the meter 28 and printer 34 provide testing and marking means for providing a first value of battery energy and for placing the measured value on each battery in machine readable form. Further, as noted below, these means also preferably determine - and record the time of measurement as well as other manufacturing information.
- the indicia 20 may preferably, but not necessarily,- include machine readable information representative of the time at which the voltage for a particular battery 10 was measured by the meter 28.
- an encoded indicia of the type illustrated may include information relative to month, day of the month, hour and minute of each day.
- the batteries 10 may be advanced to a first sorting station 36 operated under the control of the first testing station 26 to cull those batteries for which the initial voltage detected at the station ' 26 was below a predetermined acceptable limit. Each acceptable battery passing the station 36 is retained and passed to a storage station 38.
- the storage station 38 may take a variety of specific forms such as a plurality of magazine-like receptacles for warehouse storage, or in-line storage bins in which the batteries 10 may be stored for a period of time, or delay period, determined in accordance with such factors as the anticipated voltage decay rate of the batteries as well as the sensitivity of the metering equipment used in the system for detecting the open circuit voltage for each battery. In other words, it is necessary only that the batteries remain at the storage station 38 for a period of time adequate to undergo a discernible voltage decay from the voltage detected at the first testing station 26. However, since the purpose is to extrapolate or predict from a measured decay the subsequent time, many months or years later, at which the battery energy will fall below a given value, a reasonable decay period of several weeks is preferred.
- the batteries are again tested by passing them to a second testing station 40.
- the open circuit voltage of each battery 10 is again detected, the voltage recorded at the first testing station and represented by the indicia 24 on each battery 10 is read, the two voltage readings are compared and the voltage decay rate for each battery computed.
- the station 40 provides testing and reading means for providing or obtaining a second value for each battery after the time interval, for reading the original value (and original test time if provided) and for comparing the first and second values and computing the rate of decay of the battery under test.
- the indicia 24 preferably carries information as to the time at which the first voltage reading was taken at the station 24.
- the availability of this information on each battery 10 at the second testing station 40 provides.data by which the voltage decay rate for each battery may be directly computed. In the latter case, station 40 compares the two voltage values and also the first and second test time to determine the specific length of time the batteries 10 were retained between tests.
- the batteries After passing the second station 40, the batteries are passed through a second sorting station 42, which is responsive to and controlled by the test station 40 and operative to reject those individual batteries 10 for which the computed decay rate is in excess of a pre-established or acceptable decay rate. Thus, only those batteries which pass from the sorting station 42 to a packaging station (not shcwn) will have a tested decay rate corresponding to an acceptable battery shelf-life.
Landscapes
- Secondary Cells (AREA)
- Primary Cells (AREA)
- Tests Of Electric Status Of Batteries (AREA)
- Testing Relating To Insulation (AREA)
- Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
- Battery Mounting, Suspending (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to battery testing and sorting. More particularly, it concerns a method for testing individual batteries for anticipated shelf-life and culling those individual batteries which are not acceptable.
- In the merchandising of most battery powered appliances and the like, it is.accepted practice to separately package and retail the batteries required for use of the appliance. Among the reasons for this practice are a different manufacturing origin of the appliance and the batteries, different storing, shipping and handling requirements of the appliance and battery, and possible damage to the appliance by defective batteries. -Most germane to these reasons and others for separate merchandising of batteries is that the electric charge stored by substantially all batteries deteriorates in time, without use, so that the batteries exhibit a shelf-life of limited duration whereas the appliance with which they are used will last indefinitely without use if proper storage conditions are met.
- An exception to the practice of separately merchandising batteries and related goods is exemplified by the merchandising of photographic film for use in electrically powered cameras. Film packs for use in instant cameras of the type available from Polaroid Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts under the trade designation "POLAROID SX-70 LAND FILM", for example, include a sheet-like battery arranged to be engaged by camera supported contacts upon insertion of the film pack into the camera, thus assuring that the camera powering battery is replaced after exposure and motorized processing of the limited number of film units supplied with each film pack.
- The sheet-like batteries used in such film packs employ materials selected to require storage conditions which correspond ideally with those of the photographic film units included in the film pack. Also, the construction of such batteries has been developed to a point where the open circuit voltage decay rate is exceptionally low. In this latter respect, the disclosure of U.S. Patent No. 4,028,479 is illustrative. In spite of the complementary storage condition requirements and construction of this type of battery, however, the shelf-life characteristics of a given battery are difficult to discern at the time of battery production and often will have a longevity falling below that of the corresponding shelf-life of the film units with which they are packaged.
- To minimize film wastage as a result of abnormally short battery shelf-life, current procedures used in the manufacture and testing of such batteries involve a batch or production run sampling technique by which the anticipated shelf-life of each batch or run of batteries is ascertained before any of the individual batteries in such a batch or run are assembled and packaged with film units in a film pack. Specifically, a sampling of batteries manufactured in each production run or batch is tested immediatcly upon completion for the voltage of the stored electrical charge, and the voltage of the sample is recorded. Samples are then stored for a period of time, retested for voltage'charge, the retested voltage compared-with the original test voltage and the voltage decay rats computed to provide a measure of shelf-life. If the shelf-life of the sampling of any batch indicates a shelf-life shorter than is acceptable, the entire batch or production run corresponding to the sampling is discarded to insure that only those batches or production runs of batteries exhibiting an acceptable shelf-life will be used.
- While the present procedures have demonstrated statistical soundness, it has been found that the shelf-life of individual batteries in a given batch or production run may vary considerably. As a result, many of the batteries discarded as a result of the batch or production run sampling technique are found to exhibit an acceptable shelf-life. Accordingly, current procedures are in need of improvement from the standpoint of reducing battery wastage.
- In accordance with the present invention, a battery sorting method and system is provided by which each individual battery of a production run is first tested after assembly to obtaifi'a first value of electrical energy and forming on each battery so tested, machine-readable indicia representative of that first value of electrical energy
so that each battery carries such information. This eliminates dependence upon and coordination of remotely stored information which presents a major problem in large scale manufacturing. An initial sorting of the batteries may be effected immediately following this step to cull batteries falling below a specified minimum value of stored electrical energy at the time of manufacture. The batteries remaining after this first sorting procedure, assuming such a first sorting step to be used, or all of the batteries if the first sorting step is not employed, are then stored for a period of time adequate for determining an energy decay rate for each battery. The time of storage may vary with the structural characteristics of the batteries so manufactured, the intended use of the batteries, the accuracy of predicted future decay and also the sensitivity of equipment available to detect the value of electrical energy stored in each battery. After storage, each individual battery of the production run is again tested to obtain a second value of electrical energy. The second test value is compared with the first value, as represented by the indicia previously printed on each battery, to compute from this information and the elapsed time an energy decay rate for each battery. The batteries are then stored to cull those having a decay rate in excess of a predetermined maximum decay rate. The remaining batteries are retained for use on the basis that the shelf-life thereof is acceptable as a projection of the acceptable decay rate computed after the second test. - If the storage time varies, the time at which the first value was obtained may also be recorded on the battery in machine-readable form, to assist in the determination of the energy decay rate following the second test. If the storage time is filed,the computed rate of decay is a function solely of the difference between the first and second values.
- The invention is particularly advantageous in the production of batteries designed to be packaged and merchandised with related goods of predictable shelf-life, although it can be used with batteries of other kinds.
- In order that the invention may be better understood, an example of a method and system embodying the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
- Figure 1 is a schematic view illustrating the system of the present invention;
- Figure 2 is a plan view of a battery for which the sorting method and system of the present invention is particularly intended; and
- Figure 3 is a perspective view illustrating in schematic form the organization of a-battery testing station incorporated in the system of the present invention.
- - Although it will be apparent from the detailed description to follow that the testing system and method of the present invention is applicable broadly to all type of batteries, the embodiment to be described is particularly intended for production run testing and sorting of sheet like batteries typified by the disclosure of the aforementioned US Patent No.4,028,479. An example of such a battery is illustrated most clearly in Figure 2 and is generally designated in the drawings by the
reference numeral 10. A most salient feature of thebattery 10 from the standpoint of accommodation to the system and method of the present invention, is that in addition to its flat rectangular sheet-like configuration, theterminals openings cardboard layer 20. Theouter surface 22 of thelayer 20, coupled with the uniformly.
rectangular peripheral configuration or shape of the battery and of thelayer 20, facilitates the reception of printedindicia 24 to be described in more detail below, in a precisely registered position relative to theterminals - The
batteries 10 are mass produced in batches or runs of several hundred or more individual batteries. The manufacture or assembly of each battery is completed by application of thecardboard layer 20 to the internal cell structure and by a peripheral heat sealing or bonding of thelayer 20 to an insulative layer or covering (not shown) on the opposite side of the battery from thelayer 20. In accordance with the present invention and as shown in Fig. 1, eachbattery 10 is passed upon manufacturing completion by an appropriate dispenser or conveyor (not shown) to afirst testing station 26. At thestation 26, a value of electrical energy stored in eachbattery 10 is, for example, obtained by, but not limited to, detecting the open circuit voltage of each battery. As shown in Fig. 3, this voltage is detected by ameter 28 having a pair of contact probes orbrushes terminals meter 28 may be any of several known types of volt meters capable of generating a signal corresponding to the open circuit voltage across theprobes - Located at the first station with the
meter 28 is a recording device orprinter 34. Theprinter 34 is responsive to'and controlled by themeter 28 and is operative to form the printedindicia 24 directly on theouter surface 22 of thecardboard battery layer 20. As shown in Fig. 1, theprinter 34 is preferably spaced from thebattery 10 and is a non-contact printer, for example, an ink jet printer which essentially exerts no force, or quite negligible force, on the battery since only the ink contacts the battery surface. The non-contact printing eliminates the possibility of battery damage due to printing and also may easily accommodate a wide variety of battery configurations such as, for example, cylindrical. While other non-contact printers such as, for example, a laser type.will also be applicable, the ink jet printer is relatively maintenance-free and provides excellent indicia. - As most clearly illustrated in Fig. 2, the indicia is preferably provided as a bar/half bar code in the form of a series of variable height lines representing a binary or other type encoding capable of representing the precise voltage detected by the
meter 28 in a form which may be sensed or read by machine. Other forms of indica may also be utilized, and while encoded indicia rather than alphanumerical is preferred fcr reliability, the latter could also be employed. Hence, themeter 28 andprinter 34 provide testing and marking means for providing a first value of battery energy and for placing the measured value on each battery in machine readable form. Further, as noted below, these means also preferably determine - and record the time of measurement as well as other manufacturing information. Consequently, theindicia 20 may preferably, but not necessarily,- include machine readable information representative of the time at which the voltage for aparticular battery 10 was measured by themeter 28. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, an encoded indicia of the type illustrated may include information relative to month, day of the month, hour and minute of each day. - After passing the
first testing station 26, thebatteries 10 may be advanced to afirst sorting station 36 operated under the control of thefirst testing station 26 to cull those batteries for which the initial voltage detected at thestation '26 was below a predetermined acceptable limit. Each acceptable battery passing thestation 36 is retained and passed to astorage station 38. - In practice, the
storage station 38 may take a variety of specific forms such as a plurality of magazine-like receptacles for warehouse storage, or in-line storage bins in which thebatteries 10 may be stored for a period of time, or delay period, determined in accordance with such factors as the anticipated voltage decay rate of the batteries as well as the sensitivity of the metering equipment used in the system for detecting the open circuit voltage for each battery. In other words, it is necessary only that the batteries remain at thestorage station 38 for a period of time adequate to undergo a discernible voltage decay from the voltage detected at thefirst testing station 26. However, since the purpose is to extrapolate or predict from a measured decay the subsequent time, many months or years later, at which the battery energy will fall below a given value, a reasonable decay period of several weeks is preferred. - After storage, the batteries are again tested by passing them to a
second testing station 40. As suggested by the legend in Fig. 1 of the drawings, at thestation 40 the open circuit voltage of eachbattery 10 is again detected, the voltage recorded at the first testing station and represented by theindicia 24 on eachbattery 10 is read, the two voltage readings are compared and the voltage decay rate for each battery computed. Hence thestation 40 provides testing and reading means for providing or obtaining a second value for each battery after the time interval, for reading the original value (and original test time if provided) and for comparing the first and second values and computing the rate of decay of the battery under test. - As above-indicated, the
indicia 24 preferably carries information as to the time at which the first voltage reading was taken at thestation 24. The availability of this information on eachbattery 10 at thesecond testing station 40 provides.data by which the voltage decay rate for each battery may be directly computed. In the latter case,station 40 compares the two voltage values and also the first and second test time to determine the specific length of time thebatteries 10 were retained between tests. - Alternatively, storage for a fixed period of time might be used in lieu of recording the time of the first test voltage-, In other words, if the time interval between each '
battery 10 passing thefirst test station 26 and passing thesecond test station 40 was constant, the voltage decay rate could be computed without a need for recording the time of the test at thefirst station 26. - After passing the
second station 40, the batteries are passed through asecond sorting station 42, which is responsive to and controlled by thetest station 40 and operative to reject thoseindividual batteries 10 for which the computed decay rate is in excess of a pre-established or acceptable decay rate. Thus, only those batteries which pass from the sortingstation 42 to a packaging station (not shcwn) will have a tested decay rate corresponding to an acceptable battery shelf-life.
Claims (13)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA000410638A CA1187939A (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-02 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
DE8282304662T DE3275634D1 (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-06 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
EP82304662A EP0102428B1 (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-06 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
JP57165183A JPS5961785A (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-24 | Method and device for inspecting and sorting battery of pro-duction lot |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA000410638A CA1187939A (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-02 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
EP82304662A EP0102428B1 (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-06 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
JP57165183A JPS5961785A (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-24 | Method and device for inspecting and sorting battery of pro-duction lot |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0102428A1 true EP0102428A1 (en) | 1984-03-14 |
EP0102428B1 EP0102428B1 (en) | 1987-03-11 |
Family
ID=49640574
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP82304662A Expired EP0102428B1 (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1982-09-06 | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0102428B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS5961785A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1187939A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3275634D1 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3501420A1 (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-08-01 | Ford-Werke AG, 5000 Köln | DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE CHARGING VOLTAGE OF A LEAD BATTERY |
WO1991012094A2 (en) * | 1990-02-13 | 1991-08-22 | Egapro Ag | Process and device for recuperating used batteries |
DE4419461A1 (en) * | 1994-06-05 | 1995-12-07 | Robert Prof Dr Ing Massen | Automatic sorting of domestic batteries esp. for recycling |
CN106807650A (en) * | 2017-01-22 | 2017-06-09 | 江苏安纳金机械有限公司 | A kind of discharge and recharge and the automatic material picking machine and its operation method of dormancy test |
CN107694967A (en) * | 2017-11-06 | 2018-02-16 | 深圳蓬博焊接成套设备有限公司 | Automobile lithium battery voltage internal resistance automatic detection screening installation |
CN109786807A (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2019-05-21 | 肇庆理士电源技术有限公司 | Making sets of batteries system, method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium |
US10613151B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2020-04-07 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Battery pack function test device |
CN111701870A (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2020-09-25 | 浙江浦江中星有限公司 | Simple solar cell sorting machine |
CN113198737A (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2021-08-03 | 重庆骏萱新能源科技有限公司 | Rapid detection process for finished battery pack |
CN113484787A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-10-08 | 上海理工大学 | Electrochemical impedance spectrum-based rapid sorting and recombining method for retired lithium ion battery |
CN115805194A (en) * | 2022-05-25 | 2023-03-17 | 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 | Battery monomer sorting method |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4048905B2 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2008-02-20 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Battery inspection method |
JP2007227071A (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-09-06 | Noritsu Koki Co Ltd | Plasma generating device and workpiece processing device using same |
CN106684472A (en) * | 2016-12-01 | 2017-05-17 | 惠州市豪鹏科技有限公司 | Electricity-supplementing and sorting method and device for reducing dynamic voltage difference among multiple strings of parallel battery packs |
CN109188288A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2019-01-11 | 江西安驰新能源科技有限公司 | A kind of power battery self discharge detection and stepping technique |
CN110420890B (en) * | 2019-08-09 | 2024-03-22 | 苏州富强科技有限公司 | Full-automatic sorting assembly line |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2884130A (en) * | 1954-06-21 | 1959-04-28 | Bosch Julius | Apparatus for sorting steel plates and the like |
US3480140A (en) * | 1967-03-24 | 1969-11-25 | Lockheed Aircraft Corp | Testing and sorting apparatus for batteries |
US3583561A (en) * | 1968-12-19 | 1971-06-08 | Transistor Automation Corp | Die sorting system |
US3787881A (en) * | 1972-09-18 | 1974-01-22 | Mead Corp | Apparatus and method for bar code printing |
US4081743A (en) * | 1976-08-13 | 1978-03-28 | General Electric Company | Cell discharge voltage monitor circuit for cell capacity grading and method for grading |
DE2904031A1 (en) * | 1979-02-02 | 1980-08-07 | Schmid Hans A Dr Phys | Spray printing device for bar chart codings - has pulsed pump which delivers fluid onto spinning disc for discharge onto printing strip |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4028479A (en) * | 1974-12-26 | 1977-06-07 | Polaroid Corporation | Flat battery |
-
1982
- 1982-09-02 CA CA000410638A patent/CA1187939A/en not_active Expired
- 1982-09-06 DE DE8282304662T patent/DE3275634D1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-09-06 EP EP82304662A patent/EP0102428B1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-09-24 JP JP57165183A patent/JPS5961785A/en active Granted
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2884130A (en) * | 1954-06-21 | 1959-04-28 | Bosch Julius | Apparatus for sorting steel plates and the like |
US3480140A (en) * | 1967-03-24 | 1969-11-25 | Lockheed Aircraft Corp | Testing and sorting apparatus for batteries |
US3583561A (en) * | 1968-12-19 | 1971-06-08 | Transistor Automation Corp | Die sorting system |
US3787881A (en) * | 1972-09-18 | 1974-01-22 | Mead Corp | Apparatus and method for bar code printing |
US4081743A (en) * | 1976-08-13 | 1978-03-28 | General Electric Company | Cell discharge voltage monitor circuit for cell capacity grading and method for grading |
DE2904031A1 (en) * | 1979-02-02 | 1980-08-07 | Schmid Hans A Dr Phys | Spray printing device for bar chart codings - has pulsed pump which delivers fluid onto spinning disc for discharge onto printing strip |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2154009A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-08-29 | Ford Motor Co | Battery voltage testing device |
US4607227A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1986-08-19 | Ford Motor Company | Open circuit voltage test device |
DE3501420A1 (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-08-01 | Ford-Werke AG, 5000 Köln | DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE CHARGING VOLTAGE OF A LEAD BATTERY |
WO1991012094A2 (en) * | 1990-02-13 | 1991-08-22 | Egapro Ag | Process and device for recuperating used batteries |
WO1991012094A3 (en) * | 1990-02-13 | 1991-10-03 | Egapro Patent Ag | Process and device for recuperating used batteries |
DE4419461A1 (en) * | 1994-06-05 | 1995-12-07 | Robert Prof Dr Ing Massen | Automatic sorting of domestic batteries esp. for recycling |
DE4419461B4 (en) * | 1994-06-05 | 2004-08-05 | Massen, Robert, Prof. Dr.-Ing. | Automatic sorting of used batteries |
US10613151B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2020-04-07 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Battery pack function test device |
CN106807650A (en) * | 2017-01-22 | 2017-06-09 | 江苏安纳金机械有限公司 | A kind of discharge and recharge and the automatic material picking machine and its operation method of dormancy test |
CN107694967A (en) * | 2017-11-06 | 2018-02-16 | 深圳蓬博焊接成套设备有限公司 | Automobile lithium battery voltage internal resistance automatic detection screening installation |
CN107694967B (en) * | 2017-11-06 | 2024-02-13 | 深圳蓬博精密机械有限公司 | Automatic detecting and sorting equipment for voltage and internal resistance of lithium battery of automobile |
CN109786807A (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2019-05-21 | 肇庆理士电源技术有限公司 | Making sets of batteries system, method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN109786807B (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2021-05-18 | 肇庆理士电源技术有限公司 | Storage battery matching system, method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN111701870A (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2020-09-25 | 浙江浦江中星有限公司 | Simple solar cell sorting machine |
CN113198737A (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2021-08-03 | 重庆骏萱新能源科技有限公司 | Rapid detection process for finished battery pack |
CN113484787A (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2021-10-08 | 上海理工大学 | Electrochemical impedance spectrum-based rapid sorting and recombining method for retired lithium ion battery |
CN113484787B (en) * | 2021-07-27 | 2022-07-29 | 上海理工大学 | Electrochemical impedance spectrum-based rapid sorting and recombining method for retired lithium ion battery |
CN115805194A (en) * | 2022-05-25 | 2023-03-17 | 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 | Battery monomer sorting method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH0366625B2 (en) | 1991-10-18 |
CA1187939A (en) | 1985-05-28 |
JPS5961785A (en) | 1984-04-09 |
EP0102428B1 (en) | 1987-03-11 |
DE3275634D1 (en) | 1987-04-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4363407A (en) | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries | |
EP0102428A1 (en) | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries | |
US20230160967A1 (en) | Inspection equipment for inspecting secondary battery cell | |
US8442877B2 (en) | Simplification of inventory management | |
US8704483B2 (en) | System for automatically gathering battery information | |
US3356936A (en) | Method and means for total battery voltage testing | |
US8436619B2 (en) | Integrated tag reader and environment sensor | |
US20060038572A1 (en) | System for automatically gathering battery information for use during battery testing/charging | |
US3723865A (en) | On-line electronic moisture analysis system | |
JPH0773905A (en) | Battery with test card and its manufacture | |
EP0323539A1 (en) | Method for determining the state-of-charge of batteries, particularly lithium batteries | |
IE53288B1 (en) | Method and system for testing and sorting batteries | |
US3638495A (en) | Method for detecting aging of articles | |
KR20100071737A (en) | Device for measuring voltage of pouch-type battery | |
EP0060947B1 (en) | Time-temperature indicator apparatus | |
JP2001266956A (en) | Delivery test method of battery | |
JPH1130655A (en) | Charging characteristic testing method and device for secondary battery | |
JPH10340325A (en) | Non-contact type ic card reader | |
JP2001023609A (en) | Method and apparatus for sorting battery | |
Kolz et al. | Coulometric recorder for timing and counting events in the field | |
US6307664B1 (en) | Thermochromic game piece | |
JPH06144414A (en) | Confirmation of enclosed card and device thereof | |
JPH1048034A (en) | Metal identifying unit and metal body housing case | |
JPH0715919B2 (en) | Semiconductor wafer prober device | |
JPH0682506A (en) | Characteristics measuring apparatus for annular multipolar electronic component |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19840822 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3275634 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19870416 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19930809 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19930813 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19930816 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19940906 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19940906 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19950531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19950601 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |