EP0068543B1 - Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture - Google Patents

Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0068543B1
EP0068543B1 EP19820200689 EP82200689A EP0068543B1 EP 0068543 B1 EP0068543 B1 EP 0068543B1 EP 19820200689 EP19820200689 EP 19820200689 EP 82200689 A EP82200689 A EP 82200689A EP 0068543 B1 EP0068543 B1 EP 0068543B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
rct
residue
experiments
catalytic hydrotreatment
reduction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP19820200689
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0068543A3 (en
EP0068543A2 (en
Inventor
Jacobus Eilers
Willem Hartman Jurriaan Stork
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Original Assignee
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from NL8103067A external-priority patent/NL8103067A/en
Priority claimed from NL8103121A external-priority patent/NL8103121A/en
Priority claimed from NL8103396A external-priority patent/NL8103396A/en
Priority claimed from NL8103576A external-priority patent/NL8103576A/en
Priority claimed from NL8104327A external-priority patent/NL8104327A/en
Priority claimed from NL8104326A external-priority patent/NL8104326A/en
Application filed by Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV filed Critical Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Publication of EP0068543A2 publication Critical patent/EP0068543A2/en
Publication of EP0068543A3 publication Critical patent/EP0068543A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0068543B1 publication Critical patent/EP0068543B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof
    • C10G45/08Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof in combination with chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/107Atmospheric residues having a boiling point of at least about 538 °C

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture having a Ramsbottom Carbon Test Value (RCT) of a%w and an initial boiling point of T 1 °C.
  • RCT Ramsbottom Carbon Test Value
  • the RCT is an important parameter in the assessment of the suitability of heavy hydrocarbon mixtures as feed stocks for catalytic conversion processes, such as catalytic cracking, carried out in the presence or absence of hydrogen, for the preparation of light hydrocarbon distillates, such as gasoline and kerosine. According as the feed has a higher RCT, the catalyst will be deactivated more rapidly in these processes.
  • Residual hydrocarbon mixtures such as residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of the said distillation residues or of residues obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil generally have too high an RCT to be suitable without previous treatment for use as feeds for the above-mentioned catalytic conversion processes. Since the RCT of residual hydrocarbon mixtures is mainly determined by the percentage of asphaltenes present in the mixtures, a reduction of the RCT of these mixtures can be obtained by reducing the asphaltenes content. Basically, this may be achieved in two ways.
  • Part of the asphaltenes may be separated from the mixture by solvent deasphalting, or part of the asphaltenes may be converted by subjecting the mixture to a catalytic hydrotreatment.
  • the latter method is preferred, in the first place, because its yield of heavy product with a low RCT is higher and further because, in contrast to the former method, where asphaltic bitumen is obtained as a by-product, it yields a valuable C 5 + atmospheric distillate as a by-product.
  • yields are low
  • only the latter method is eligible for the preparation of heavy product with a low RCT from asphaltic bitumen or from mixtures of asphaltic bitumen and distillation residue.
  • a drawback to the latter method is that it gives rise to the formation of an undesirable C 4 - fraction which, moreover, contributes considerably to the hydrogen consumption of the process.
  • asphaltic bitumen may be separated by solvent deasphalting that a deasphalted atmospheric residue is obtained which has the desired RCT of a%w.
  • the atmospheric residue may be separated by distillation into a vacuum distillate and a vacuum residue, and from the vacuum residue so much asphaltic bitumen may be separated by solvent deasphalting that a deasphalted vacuum residue is obtained having an RCT which is such that, when this deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the previously separated vacuum distillate, an oil is obtained which has the desired RCT of a%w.
  • Go as well as the conditions at which G reaches a value between 1.5 x G e and 2.0 x Go may be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments with the asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture carried out at different severities and in which the occurring G's have been plotted against the severities applied.
  • the space velocity which is variable
  • the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process is applied in practice.
  • the present patent application therefore relates to a process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture with an RCT of a%w and an initial boiling point of T 1 °C, in which an asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture is subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment, the product obained being separated by distillation into an atmospheric distillate and an atmospheric residue having an initial boiling point of T 1 °C, in which either a deasphalted atmospheric residue having the desired RCT of a%w is obtained from the said atmospheric residue by solvent deasphalting, or in which the atmospheric residue is first separated by distillation into a vacuum distillate and a vacuum residue, from which vacuum residue asphaltic bitumen is separated by solvent deasphalting such that a deasphalted vacuum residue is obtained having an RCT such that, when this latter deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the said vacuum distillate, a mixture having the desired RCT of a%w is obtained, the catalytic hydrotreatment being carried out under such conditions that the C 4 - production per
  • the process according to the invention is a two-step process in which reduction of the RCT is attained through reduction of the asphaltenes content.
  • the asphaltenes content is reduced by converting part of the asphaltenes by means of a catalytic hydrotreatment.
  • the asphaltenes content is reduced by separating part of the asphaltenes by means of solvent deasphalting.
  • Asphaltenes containing hydrocarbon mixtures usually contain an appreciable percentage of metals, especially vanadium and nickel. When such mixtures are subjected to a catalytic treatment, e.g.
  • asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures having a vanadium + nickel content of more than 50 ppmw should preferably be subjected to demetallization before being contacted with the RCT-reduction catalyst.
  • This demetallization may very suitably be carried out by contacting the mixture in the presence of hydrogen, with a catalyst consisting of more than 80%w of silica.
  • Very suitable demetallization catalysts are those which meet certain given requirements as regards their porosity and particle size and which are described in Netherlands Patent Application No. 7309387.
  • a catalytic demetallization in the presence of hydrogen is applied to the hydrocarbon mixture, this demetallization may be carried out in a separate reactor.
  • both processes may very suitably be carried out in the same reactor containing, successively, a bed of demetallization catalyst and a bed of RCT-reduction catalyst.
  • RCT reduction should be taken to be the total RCT reduction occurring in the catalytic hydrotreatment (i.e. including the RCT reduction occurring in a possible catalytic demetallization process).
  • Suitable catalysts for carrying out the catalytic RCT reduction are those which contain at least one metal chosen from the group formed by nickel and cobalt and, in addition, at least one metal chosen from the group formed by molybdenum and tungsten on a carrier, which carrier consists more than 40%w of alumina.
  • Very suitable RCT-reduction catalysts are those which comprise the metal combination nickel/ molybdenum or cobalt/molybdenum on alumina as the carrier.
  • the conditions to be used in a catalytic demetallization process in the presence of hydrogen to be carried out if necessary, the same preference applies as that stated hereinbefore for the catalytic RCT reduction.
  • the desired RCT reduction in the first step of the process according to the invention may, for instance, be achieved by application of the space velocity pertaining to that RCT reduction, which can be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments with the asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture carried out at different space velocities and in which the RCT reductions achieved have been plotted against the space velocities used.
  • the space velocity which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process according to the invention is applied in practice.
  • the second step of the process according to the invention is a solvent deasphalting step applied to a residue from the distillation of the hydrotreated product of the first step.
  • the distillation residue to which the solvent deasphalting step is applied may be an atmospheric residue or a vacuum residue from the hydrotreated product.
  • a vacuum residue from the hydrotreated product is used for the purpose.
  • Suitable solvents for carrying out the solvent deasphalting are paraffinic hydrocarbons having 3-6 carbon atoms per molecule, such as n-butane and mixtures thereof, such as mixtures of propane with n-butane and mixtures of n-butane with n-pentane.
  • Suitable solvent/oil weight ratios lie between 7:1 and 1:1 and in particular between 4:1 and 2:1.
  • the solvent deasphalting is preferably carried out at a pressure between 20 and 100 bar.
  • the deasphalting is preferably carried out at a pressure of 35 ⁇ 45 bar and a temperature of 100-150 0 C.
  • the desired RCT of the deasphalted atmospheric residue may be attained, for instance, by using the deasphalting temperature pertaining to that RCT, which can be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of deasphalting scouting experiments with the atmospheric residue carried out at different temperatures in which the RCT's of the deasphalted atmospheric residues obtained have been plotted against the temperatures applied.
  • the temperature which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process according to the invention is applied in practice.
  • the RCT and the quantity of the deasphalted vacuum residue should be adjusted to the quantity and the RCT of the vacuum distillate as follows.
  • VD vacuum distillate
  • B pbw of deasphalted vacuum residue will have to be prepared, its RCT DVR being such that it obeys the relation: or, expressed otherwise,
  • the left-hand member is known.
  • RCT M is known.
  • a graph can be composed in which the term B(RCTo vR - RCT M ) has been plotted against the temperature used.
  • the temperature to be applied in the deasphalting in the second step of the process according to the invention may be read from this graph, this being the temperature at which the term B(RCT DVR - RCT M ) has the given value A(RCT M - RCT VD ).
  • the other conditions in the scouting experiments on deasphalting are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be applied when the process according to the invention is used in practice.
  • the metal content is also an important parameter in assessing the suitability of heavy hydrocarbon oils as feeds for catalytic conversion processes, in the presence or absence of hydrogen, for the preparation of light hydrocarbon distillates, such as gasoline and kerosine. According as the feed has a higher metal content, the catalyst will be deactivated more rapidly in these processes. As a rule, residual feed mixtures have not only too high an RCT, but also too high a metal content to be suitable, without treatment, as feeds for the afore-mentioned catalytic conversion processes.
  • the product obtained in the process according to the invention is a deasphalted atmospheric residue or a mixture of a vacuum distillate and a deasphalted vacuum residue, which product, in addition to a low RCT, has a very low metal content.
  • This is due to a considerable extent to the fact that the metal-containing distillation residue which is subjected to solvent deasphalting has been catalytically hydrotreated.
  • the solvent deasphalting of such metal-containing residues shows a very high metal-removing selectivity.
  • asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures As asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures to be used as feed for the process according to the invention the following six are preferred:
  • a mixture of an asphaltic bitumen I separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and an asphaltic bitumen II separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil which mixture comprises less than 50 pbw of asphaltic bitumen II per 100 pbw of asphaltic bitumen I.
  • the average molecular weight M of the asphaltic bitumen I used as feed component in feed 6 as well as the average molecular weight M of the asphaltic bitumen used as feed 3 are determined by ASTM method D 3592-77 using toluene as solvent.
  • the relations 1-6 mentioned above offer an opportunity of determining whether, in view of the maximum acceptable value of G (corresponding to 2.0 x Go), it is possible by catalytic hydrotreatment alone, starting from the feeds 1-6, to prepare a product from which, by distillation, an atmospheric residue can be obtained which has a given initial boiling point of T 1 °C and a given RCT of a%w. If, according to the relations, this proves impossible and, therefore, the combination route has to be applied, the relations further indicate the limits between which, in the catalytic hydrotreatment of the combination route, the RCT reductions should be chosen to ensure optimum efficiency of the combination route.
  • the feeds 4 ⁇ 6 are composed of two blending components.
  • One of these blending components (blending component I) is selected from the group consisting of atmospheric residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, vacuum residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil.
  • the other blending component (blending component II) is an asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil. Examples of the latter residual fractions are atmospheric residues and vacuum residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of these residues.
  • a very attractive embodiment of the process according to the invention in which one of the feeds 4-6 is used is that in which the blending component II used as a component of the feed for the first step is the asphaltic bitumen obtained in the solvent deasphalting in the second step.
  • the conditions for attaining the desired RCT reduction in the first step of the process, with recirculation of asphaltic bitumen may be determined as follows. The relation found is used to determine the RCT reduction to be employed in the catalytic hydrotreatment in order to ensure optimum efficiency in the combination process, when blending component I is the only feed used.
  • the space velocity to be used for the purpose is determined on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment experiments using blending component I as the feed.
  • an oil is prepared which has the desired RCT of a%w and the desired initial boiling point of T i °C, and an asphaltic bitumen (asphaltic bitumen A) is obtained as a by-product.
  • the relation found is used to determine the RCT reduction to be employed in the catalytic hydrotreatment in order to ensure optimum efficiency in the combination process when a mixture of blending component I, and asphaltic bitumen A having the desired ratio r is used as the feed.
  • the space velocity to be used for the purpose is determined on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments using the mixture of blending component I and asphaltic bitumen A as the feed.
  • Atmospheric residue A had an RCT of 10%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 50%w.
  • Atmospheric residue B had an RCT of 15.6%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 500 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 29.4%w.
  • atmospheric residue A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments.
  • the experiments were carried out in a 1000 ml reactor containing two fixed catalyst beds of a total volume of 600 ml.
  • the first catalyst bed consisted of a Ni/V/SiO 2 catalyst containing 0.5 pbw of nickel and 2.0 pbw of vanadium per 100 pbw of silica.
  • the second catalyst bed consisted of a Co/Mo/Al 2 O 3 catalyst containing 4 pbw of cobalt and 12 pbw of molybdenum per 100 pbw of alumina.
  • the weight ratio between the NiN/Si0 2 and Co/Mo/AI 2 0 3 catalysts was 1:3. All the experiments were carried out at a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 125 bar and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. Various space velocities were used in the experiments. The results of Experiments 1-13 at run hour 450 are listed in Table A.
  • the table gives the space velocity used, the RCT reduction achieved and the corresponding C 4 - production (calculated as %w on feed).
  • Experiments 1-12 were carried out in pairs, the difference in space velocity between the two experiments of each pair being such as to achieve a difference in RCT reduction of about 1.0%.
  • the table further gives the C 4 - production per % RCT reduction (G) for each pair of experiments.
  • the 520°C + vacuum residue was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 115°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the vacuum distillate.
  • the results of this experiment No. 17 according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • vacuum residue A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments in a similar way as described for Experiments 1-13, using the same catalysts in the weight ratio indicated.
  • the reaction conditions were: a temperature of 385°C, a pressure of 150 bar and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg.
  • Various space velocities were used in the experiments.
  • the results of Experiments 18-30 at run hour 500 are listed in Table C.
  • a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is insufficient to prepare from vacuum residue B an oil with an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G.
  • a solvent deasphalting step has to be applied.
  • Vacuum residue B was subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment to prepare an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0%w from it.
  • the experiment No. 34 was carried out in a 1000 ml reactor containing a fixed catalyst bed of 600 ml volume of the same Co/Mo/Al 2 O 3 catalyst as used in Example 1. Reaction conditions were: a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 125 bar, a space velocity of 1.0 g.g -3 .h -1 and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg.
  • the RCT reduction was 35.5%.
  • the 520°C + vacuum residue obtained after vacuum distillation of the product of the catalytic hydrotreatment was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 127°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the 370°-520°C vacuum distillate.
  • the results of this experiment according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • Asphaltic bitumen A had been obtained through deasphalting with propane of a vacuum residue from a crude mineral oil. It had an RCT of 25.4%w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 1400 (determined by ASTM method D 3592/77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had been obtained by deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue from a crude mineral oil. It had an RCT of 48.0%w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 2000 (determined by ASTM method D 8592/77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 420 ppmw.
  • Asphaltic bitumen A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c).
  • the experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si0 2 and Co/Mo/AI 2 0 3 catalysts however being 1:2.
  • the reaction conditions were: a temperature of 400°C, a pressure of 145 bar and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, and varying space velocities.
  • the results of Experiments 35-46 at run hour 450 are listed in Table E.
  • a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is insufficient to prepare from asphaltic bitumen B an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 4%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G.
  • a solvent deasphalting step should be applied.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B was subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment to prepare an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 4.0%w from it.
  • the experiment was similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the Ni/V/SiO 2 and Co/Mo/A1 2 0 3 catalysts however being 1:1.
  • Reaction conditions were: a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 150 bar, a space velocity of 0.41 g.g -1 .h -1 and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg.
  • the RCT reduction was 61.0%.
  • the 520°C + vacuum residue obtained after vacuum distillation of the product of the catalytic hydrotreatment was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 120°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the 370°-520°C vacuum distillate.
  • the results of this experiment according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 9.8%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), and a vanadium + nickel content of 95 ppmw and boiled below 520°C to an extent of 50%w.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 35%w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 110 ppmw.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 1.5%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied.
  • relation 4 in the form:
  • a mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e).
  • the experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 18-30, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si0 2 and Co/Mo/A1 2 0 3 catalysts however being 1:2.5.
  • the reaction conditions were: a temperature of 385°C, a pressure of 150 bar and a H 2 / oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, with varying space velocities.
  • the results of Experiments 52-62 at run hour 425 are listed in Table G.
  • Atmospheric residue C obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 10%w (determined by ASTM method D 524) and a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw, and boiled below 520°C to an extent of 50%w.
  • a heavy mixture AB was used which had been obtained by mixing 100 pbwof a vacuum residue A and 30 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen B.
  • Vacuum residue A had an RCT of 19 %w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 180 ppmw and a 5% boiling point of 520°C.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 35 %w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 110 ppmw. It was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 2.5 %w in view of the maximum permissible value of G.
  • a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied.
  • the mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e).
  • the experiments were similarto those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si0 2 and Co/MO/Al 2 O 3 catalysts however being 1:2.
  • the reaction conditions were: a temperature of 380°C, a pressure of 170 bar and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, varying space velocities being used.
  • the results of Experiments 69-79 at run hour 400 are listed in Table J.
  • the feed used in this experiment was a mixture AC obtained by mixing 100 pbw of vacuum residue A with pbw of asphaltic bitumen C obtained in the above Experiment 83.
  • Application of relation 5 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 38.4 and 50.4%.
  • the space velocity applied was 0.29 g.g -1 .h -1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 45%.
  • an asphaltic bitumen D was separated which had an RCT of 39 %w.
  • the feed used in this experiment was a mixture AD obtained by mixing 100 pbw of vacuum residue A with pbw of asphaltic bitumen D obtained in the above Experiment 84.
  • Application of relation 5 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 37.8 and 49.8%.
  • the space velocity applied was 0.28 g.g -1 .h -1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 44%.
  • an asphaltic bitumen E was separated which had an RCT of 39 %w. Since the RCT of asphaltic bitumen E is equal to that of asphaltic bitumen D, this is the moment when in recycling the asphaltic bitumen the process has reached its stationary state.
  • the results of Experiments 83-85 are listed in Table L.
  • Asphaltic bitumen A obtained by solvent deasphalting with propane of a mineral oil vacuum residue had an RCT of 25.4%w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw and an average molecular weight of 1400.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 40 %w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 125 ppmw. It was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated asphaltic bitumen which latter asphaltic bitumen was obtained by solvent deasphalting of a mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0 %w in view of the maximum permissible value of G.
  • a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied.
  • Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 36.7 and 50.7%.
  • the residual feed mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e).
  • the experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 18-30, the weight ratio between the NiN/ Si0 2 and Co/Mo/Al 2 O 3 catalysts however being 1:2. All other reaction conditions were identical.
  • the results of Experiments 86-96 at run hour 430 are listed in Table M.
  • the feed used in this experiment was asphaltic bitumen A of Example 7.
  • Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 51.0 and 61.4%.
  • the space velocity applied was 0.22 g.g -1 .h -1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 56%.
  • an asphaltic bitumen C was separated which had an RCT of 36 %w.
  • the feed used in this experiment was a mixture AC obtained by mixing 100 pbw of asphaltic bitumen A with 25 pbw of asphaltic bitumen C obtained in the above Experiment 100.
  • Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 41.0 and 54.0%.
  • the space velocity applied was 0.21 g.g -1 .h -1 , and the RCT reduction achieved was 47.5%.
  • an asphaltic bitumen D was separated which had an RCT of 36 %w.
  • a heavy mixture ABC was used which had been obtained by mixing 55 pbw of an atmospheric residue A with 30 pbw of a vacuum residue B and with 15 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen C.
  • Atmospheric bitumen A which was obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 10 %w (determined by ASTM method 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 50 %w.
  • Vacuum residue B which was obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 20,6 %w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), a vanadium + nickel content of 170 ppmw and a 5 %w boiling point of 500°C.
  • Asphaltic bitumen C had been obtained in the deasphalting with propane of a mineral oil vacuum residue. It had an RCT of 25.4 %w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 1400 (determined by ASTM method D 3592-77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw.
  • the mixture ABC had an RCT of 15.5 %w, a vanadium + nickel content of 127 ppmw and 29.5 %w of the mixture boiled below 520°C.
  • the mixture ABC with an RCT of 15.5 %w (b) was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in fifteen experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c).
  • the experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the Ni/V/ Si0 2 and Co/Mo/Al 2 O 3 catalysts however being 1:2.
  • the reaction conditions were: a temperature of 400°C, a pressure of 160 bar and a H 2 /oil ratio of 1500 Ni/kg, varying space velocities being used.
  • the results of Experiments 102-116 at run hour 250 are listed in Table P.
  • Experiments 111, 112 and 116 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table P in Experiments 110-111 and 112-113, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 60 and 70%, respectively, G was about 1.5 Go and 2.0 G c , respectively.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

  • The invention relates to a process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture having a Ramsbottom Carbon Test Value (RCT) of a%w and an initial boiling point of T1°C.
  • The RCT is an important parameter in the assessment of the suitability of heavy hydrocarbon mixtures as feed stocks for catalytic conversion processes, such as catalytic cracking, carried out in the presence or absence of hydrogen, for the preparation of light hydrocarbon distillates, such as gasoline and kerosine. According as the feed has a higher RCT, the catalyst will be deactivated more rapidly in these processes.
  • Residual hydrocarbon mixtures, such as residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of the said distillation residues or of residues obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil generally have too high an RCT to be suitable without previous treatment for use as feeds for the above-mentioned catalytic conversion processes. Since the RCT of residual hydrocarbon mixtures is mainly determined by the percentage of asphaltenes present in the mixtures, a reduction of the RCT of these mixtures can be obtained by reducing the asphaltenes content. Basically, this may be achieved in two ways. Part of the asphaltenes may be separated from the mixture by solvent deasphalting, or part of the asphaltenes may be converted by subjecting the mixture to a catalytic hydrotreatment. For the reduction of the RCT of distillation residues the latter method is preferred, in the first place, because its yield of heavy product with a low RCT is higher and further because, in contrast to the former method, where asphaltic bitumen is obtained as a by-product, it yields a valuable C5 + atmospheric distillate as a by-product. In view of the fact that when the former method is applied to asphaltic bitumen, yields are low, only the latter method is eligible for the preparation of heavy product with a low RCT from asphaltic bitumen or from mixtures of asphaltic bitumen and distillation residue. A drawback to the latter method, however, is that it gives rise to the formation of an undesirable C4 - fraction which, moreover, contributes considerably to the hydrogen consumption of the process.
  • It was found that during the reduction of the RCT through catalytic hydrotreatment of heavy hydrocarbon mixtures, according as the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out under more severe conditions in order to attain a greater RCT reduction, the parameter "C4 production per % RCT reduction" (for the sake of brevity hereinafter referred to as "G") at first remains virtually constant (Go) and subsequently shows a fairly sharp increase. In view of the hydrogen consumption of the process it is however important to take care that the RCT reduction is not carried beyond the value corresponding to G = 2 x Ge. This means that in practice there will be a number of cases in which it is undesirable, starting from a heavy hydrocarbon mixture, to employ nothing but a catalytic hydrotreatment for preparing a product from which, after separation of an atmospheric distillate, an oil can be obtained which has an initial boiling point of T1°C and an RCT of a%w. In those cases there is nevertheless an attractive manner of preparing an oil having the afore-mentioned initial boiling point and RCT from a heavy hydrocarbon mixture. To this end the product obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment is separated by distillation into an atmospheric distillate and an atmospheric residue having an initial boiling point of T1°C. The process may be continued in two ways. First, from the atmospheric residue so much asphaltic bitumen may be separated by solvent deasphalting that a deasphalted atmospheric residue is obtained which has the desired RCT of a%w. Secondly, the atmospheric residue may be separated by distillation into a vacuum distillate and a vacuum residue, and from the vacuum residue so much asphaltic bitumen may be separated by solvent deasphalting that a deasphalted vacuum residue is obtained having an RCT which is such that, when this deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the previously separated vacuum distillate, an oil is obtained which has the desired RCT of a%w. The most attractive balance between yields of C4 fraction, C5 + atmospheric distillate, asphaltic bitumen and oil having an initial boiling point of T1°C and an RCT of a%w is obtained when the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out under such conditions that G lies between 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Ge. When the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out under such conditions that G < 1.5 x Gc, a low C4- production is still obtained, but the yield of oil having an initial boiling point of T1°C and an RCT of a%w in the combination process is unsatisfactory. When the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out under such conditions that G > 2.0 x G., a high yield of oil having an initial boiling point of T1°C and an RCT of a%w is still obtained in the combination process, but it is attended with an unacceptably high C4- production.
  • Go as well as the conditions at which G reaches a value between 1.5 x Ge and 2.0 x Go may be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments with the asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture carried out at different severities and in which the occurring G's have been plotted against the severities applied. Apart from one parameter e.g. the space velocity, which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process is applied in practice.
  • The present patent application therefore relates to a process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture with an RCT of a%w and an initial boiling point of T1°C, in which an asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture is subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment, the product obained being separated by distillation into an atmospheric distillate and an atmospheric residue having an initial boiling point of T1°C, in which either a deasphalted atmospheric residue having the desired RCT of a%w is obtained from the said atmospheric residue by solvent deasphalting, or in which the atmospheric residue is first separated by distillation into a vacuum distillate and a vacuum residue, from which vacuum residue asphaltic bitumen is separated by solvent deasphalting such that a deasphalted vacuum residue is obtained having an RCT such that, when this latter deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the said vacuum distillate, a mixture having the desired RCT of a%w is obtained, the catalytic hydrotreatment being carried out under such conditions that the C4 - production per % RCT reduction (G) lies between 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Go. Go represents the virtually constant value of G which appears when the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out at low severity.
  • As regards the way in which RCT's of hydrocarbon mixtures are determined, the following three cases may be distinguished.
    • a) The viscosity of the hydrocarbon mixture to be investigated is so high that it is impossible to determine the RCT by ASTM method D 524. In this case, the CCT (Conradson Carbon Test value) of the mixture is determined by ASTM method D 189, and the RCT is computed from the CCT according to the formula:
      Figure imgb0001
    • b) The viscosity of the hydrocarbon mixture to be investigated is such that the RCT can still be determined according to the ASTM D 524 method, but this method gives an RCT value which lies above 20.0%w. In this case, as in the case mentioned under a), the CCT of the mixture is determined by ASTM method D 189 and the RCT is computed from the CCT according to the formula mentioned under a).
    • c) The viscosity of the hydrocarbon mixture to be investigated is such that the RCT can be determined by ASTM method D 524 and this method gives an RCT value not higher than 20.0%w. In this case the value thus found is taken to be the RCT of the mixture concerned.
  • In practice, for the determination of the RCT's of vacuum distillates, atmospheric residues, deasphalted distillation residues and mixtures of vacuum distillates and deasphalted distillation residues, the direct method described under c) will in many cases be sufficient. In the determination of the RCT of vacuum residues both the direct method described under c) and the indirect method described under b) are used. In the determination of the RCT of asphaltic bitumen the indirect method described under a) is usually the only one eligible.
  • The process according to the invention is a two-step process in which reduction of the RCT is attained through reduction of the asphaltenes content. In the first step of the process the asphaltenes content is reduced by converting part of the asphaltenes by means of a catalytic hydrotreatment. In the second step of the process the asphaltenes content is reduced by separating part of the asphaltenes by means of solvent deasphalting. Asphaltenes containing hydrocarbon mixtures usually contain an appreciable percentage of metals, especially vanadium and nickel. When such mixtures are subjected to a catalytic treatment, e.g. a catalytic hydrotreatment for RCT reduction, as in the process according to the invention, these metals will be deposited on the RCT-reduction catalyst, thus shortening its life. In view of this, asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures having a vanadium + nickel content of more than 50 ppmw should preferably be subjected to demetallization before being contacted with the RCT-reduction catalyst. This demetallization may very suitably be carried out by contacting the mixture in the presence of hydrogen, with a catalyst consisting of more than 80%w of silica. Both catalysts consisting entirely of silica and catalysts containing one or more metals having hydrogenating activity, in particular a combination of nickel and vanadium, on a carrier substantially consisting of silica, are eligible for the purpose. Very suitable demetallization catalysts are those which meet certain given requirements as regards their porosity and particle size and which are described in Netherlands Patent Application No. 7309387. When in the process according to the invention a catalytic demetallization in the presence of hydrogen is applied to the hydrocarbon mixture, this demetallization may be carried out in a separate reactor. Since the catalytic demetallization and the catalytic RCT reduction can be carried out under the same conditions, both processes may very suitably be carried out in the same reactor containing, successively, a bed of demetallization catalyst and a bed of RCT-reduction catalyst.
  • It should be noted that in the catalytic demetallization the reduction of the metal content is accompanied by some reduction of the RCT. The same applies to the catalytic RCT reduction in which the RCT reduction is accompanied by some reduction in the metal content. In this patent application, RCT reduction should be taken to be the total RCT reduction occurring in the catalytic hydrotreatment (i.e. including the RCT reduction occurring in a possible catalytic demetallization process).
  • Suitable catalysts for carrying out the catalytic RCT reduction are those which contain at least one metal chosen from the group formed by nickel and cobalt and, in addition, at least one metal chosen from the group formed by molybdenum and tungsten on a carrier, which carrier consists more than 40%w of alumina. Very suitable RCT-reduction catalysts are those which comprise the metal combination nickel/ molybdenum or cobalt/molybdenum on alumina as the carrier.
  • The catalytic RCT reduction is preferably carried out at a temperature of 300-500°C, a pressure of 50-300 bar (1 bar = 0,1 MPa), a space velocity of 0.02-10 g.g-1.h-1 and a H2/feed ratio of 100-5000 NI/kg. Particular preference is given to carrying out the catalytic RCT reduction at a temperature of 350-450°C, a pressure of 75-200 bar, a space velocity of 0.1-2 g.g-'.h-' and a H2/feed ratio of 500-2000 NI/kg. As regards the conditions to be used in a catalytic demetallization process in the presence of hydrogen, to be carried out if necessary, the same preference applies as that stated hereinbefore for the catalytic RCT reduction.
  • The desired RCT reduction in the first step of the process according to the invention may, for instance, be achieved by application of the space velocity pertaining to that RCT reduction, which can be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments with the asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture carried out at different space velocities and in which the RCT reductions achieved have been plotted against the space velocities used. Apart from the space velocity, which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process according to the invention is applied in practice.
  • The second step of the process according to the invention is a solvent deasphalting step applied to a residue from the distillation of the hydrotreated product of the first step. The distillation residue to which the solvent deasphalting step is applied may be an atmospheric residue or a vacuum residue from the hydrotreated product. Preferably, a vacuum residue from the hydrotreated product is used for the purpose. Suitable solvents for carrying out the solvent deasphalting are paraffinic hydrocarbons having 3-6 carbon atoms per molecule, such as n-butane and mixtures thereof, such as mixtures of propane with n-butane and mixtures of n-butane with n-pentane. Suitable solvent/oil weight ratios lie between 7:1 and 1:1 and in particular between 4:1 and 2:1. The solvent deasphalting is preferably carried out at a pressure between 20 and 100 bar. When n-butane is used as the solvent, the deasphalting is preferably carried out at a pressure of 35―45 bar and a temperature of 100-1500C.
  • When the RCT reduction in the second step of the process according to the invention takes place by solvent deasphalting of an atmospheric residue, the desired RCT of the deasphalted atmospheric residue may be attained, for instance, by using the deasphalting temperature pertaining to that RCT, which can be read from a graph composed on the basis of a number of deasphalting scouting experiments with the atmospheric residue carried out at different temperatures in which the RCT's of the deasphalted atmospheric residues obtained have been plotted against the temperatures applied. Apart from the temperature, which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be used when the process according to the invention is applied in practice.
  • When the RCT reduction in the second step of the process according to the invention takes place by solvent deasphalting of a vacuum residue, after which the deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the vacuum distillate separated earlier, the RCT and the quantity of the deasphalted vacuum residue should be adjusted to the quantity and the RCT of the vacuum distillate as follows. When a given quantity of vacuum distillate (VD) of A pbw having a given RCTvD is available, then, in order to obtain a mixture M having a given RCTM by mixing the vacuum distillate with deasphalted vacuum residue (DV-R), B pbw of deasphalted vacuum residue will have to be prepared, its RCTDVR being such that it obeys the relation:
    Figure imgb0002
    or, expressed otherwise,
    Figure imgb0003
  • In the equation mentioned hereinabove the left-hand member is known. In addition, in the right-hand member RCTM is known. On the basis of a number of deasphalting scouting experiments carried out with the vacuum residue at, for instance, different temperatures, a graph can be composed in which the term B(RCTovR - RCTM) has been plotted against the temperature used. The temperature to be applied in the deasphalting in the second step of the process according to the invention may be read from this graph, this being the temperature at which the term B(RCTDVR - RCTM) has the given value A(RCTM - RCTVD). Apart from the temperature, which is variable, the other conditions in the scouting experiments on deasphalting are kept constant and chosen equal to those which will be applied when the process according to the invention is used in practice.
  • Besides the RCT, the metal content is also an important parameter in assessing the suitability of heavy hydrocarbon oils as feeds for catalytic conversion processes, in the presence or absence of hydrogen, for the preparation of light hydrocarbon distillates, such as gasoline and kerosine. According as the feed has a higher metal content, the catalyst will be deactivated more rapidly in these processes. As a rule, residual feed mixtures have not only too high an RCT, but also too high a metal content to be suitable, without treatment, as feeds for the afore-mentioned catalytic conversion processes. The product obtained in the process according to the invention is a deasphalted atmospheric residue or a mixture of a vacuum distillate and a deasphalted vacuum residue, which product, in addition to a low RCT, has a very low metal content. This is due to a considerable extent to the fact that the metal-containing distillation residue which is subjected to solvent deasphalting has been catalytically hydrotreated. For, the solvent deasphalting of such metal-containing residues shows a very high metal-removing selectivity.
  • As examples of asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures which may be used as feed for the process according to the invention the following may be mentioned:
    • a) atmospheric residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil,
    • b) vacuum residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil,
    • c) asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of the residues mentioned under a) and b),
    • d) asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of residues obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil,
    • e) mixtures of two or more of the heavy hydrocarbon mixtures mentioned under a)―d),
    • f) heavy crude oils,
    • g) heavy hydrocarbon mixtures extracted from tar sands,
    • h) residues ex thermal cracking, and
    • i) mixtures of one or more of the asphaltenes-rich hydrocarbon mixtures mentioned under a)-h) with one or more asphaltenes-poor or asphaltenes-free hydrocarbon mixtures such as aromatic extracts ex lubricating oil production and cycle oils and slurry oils ex catalytic cracking.
  • As asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixtures to be used as feed for the process according to the invention the following six are preferred:
  • Feed 1
  • An atmospheric residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond with 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Go, are dependent on T1, the RCT of the atmospheric residue (b%w) and the percentage by weight of the atmospheric residue which boils below 520°C (d%w), and are given by the following relation (relation 1)
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
    where c is the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of T1°C of the hydrotreated product.
  • Feed 2
  • A vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond with 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Gc, are dependent on Ti, the RCT of the vacuum residue (b%w) and the 5%w boiling point of the vacuum residue (T5°C), and are given by the following relation (relation 2)
    Figure imgb0006
    Figure imgb0007
    where c is the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of T,°C of the hydrotreated product.
  • Feed 3
  • An asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a distillation residue from a crude mineral oil.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond with 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Gc, are dependent on T1, the RCT of the asphaltic bitumen (b%w) and the average molecular weight (M) of the asphaltic bitumen, and are given by the following relation (relation 3).
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
    • where c is the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling
    • point of T1°C of the hydrotreated product.
    Feed 4
  • A mixture of an atmospheric residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and an asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil, which mixture comprises less than 50 pbw of the asphaltic bitumen per 100 pbw of the atmospheric residue.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond to 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Go, are dependent on
    • 1) T1,
    • 2) the RCT of the atmospheric residue (b%w),
    • 3) the percentage by weight of the atmospheric residue boiling below 520°C (f%w),
    • 4) the RCT of the asphaltic bitumen (c%w), and
    • 5) the asphaltic bitumen/atmospheric residue mixing ratio in the feed mixture, expressed in pbw of the asphaltic bitumen per 100 pbw of the atmospheric residue (r pbw),

    and are given by the following relation (relation 4)
    Figure imgb0010
    Figure imgb0011
    where
    Figure imgb0012
    • d = the RCT of the feed mixture, and
    • e = the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of T1°C of the hydrotreated product.
    Feed 5
  • A mixture of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and an asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil, which mixture comprises less than 50 pbw of the asphaltic bitumen per 100 pbw of the vacuum residue.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond to 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Go, are dependent on
    • 1) T1,
    • 2) the RCT of the vacuum residue (b%w),
    • 3) the 5%w boiling point of the vacuum residue (T5 °C),
    • 4) the RCT of the asphaltic bitumen (c%w), and
    • 5) the asphaltic bitumen/vacuum residue mixing ratio in the feed mixture, expressed in pbw of the asphaltic bitumen per 100 pbw of the vacuum residue (r pbw),

    and are given by the relation (relation 5)
    Figure imgb0013
    Figure imgb0014
    where
    Figure imgb0015
    • d = the RCT of the feed mixture, and
    • e = the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of T1°C of the hydrotreated product.
    Feed 6
  • A mixture of an asphaltic bitumen I separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and an asphaltic bitumen II separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil which mixture comprises less than 50 pbw of asphaltic bitumen II per 100 pbw of asphaltic bitumen I.
  • The investigation has shown that the RCT reductions in the catalytic hydrotreatment in which for G values are reached which correspond to 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Gc, are dependent on
    • 1) T1,
    • 2) the RCT of the asphaltic bitumen I (b%w),
    • 3) the average molecular weight of the asphaltic bitumen I (M),
    • 4) the RCT of the asphaltic bitumen II (c %w), and
    • 5) the asphaltic bitumen II/asphaltic bitumen I mixing ratio in the feed mixture, expressed in pbw of the asphaltic bitumen II per 100 pbw of the asphaltic bitumen I (r pbw),

    and are given by the relation (relation 6)
    Figure imgb0016
    Figure imgb0017
    Figure imgb0018
    • d = the RCT of the feed mixture, and
    • e = the RCT of the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of T1°C of the hydrotreated product.
  • The average molecular weight M of the asphaltic bitumen I used as feed component in feed 6 as well as the average molecular weight M of the asphaltic bitumen used as feed 3 are determined by ASTM method D 3592-77 using toluene as solvent.
  • The relations 1-6 mentioned above offer an opportunity of determining whether, in view of the maximum acceptable value of G (corresponding to 2.0 x Go), it is possible by catalytic hydrotreatment alone, starting from the feeds 1-6, to prepare a product from which, by distillation, an atmospheric residue can be obtained which has a given initial boiling point of T1°C and a given RCT of a%w. If, according to the relations, this proves impossible and, therefore, the combination route has to be applied, the relations further indicate the limits between which, in the catalytic hydrotreatment of the combination route, the RCT reductions should be chosen to ensure optimum efficiency of the combination route.
  • The feeds 4―6 are composed of two blending components. One of these blending components (blending component I) is selected from the group consisting of atmospheric residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, vacuum residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil. The other blending component (blending component II) is an asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil. Examples of the latter residual fractions are atmospheric residues and vacuum residues obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil and asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of these residues. A very attractive embodiment of the process according to the invention in which one of the feeds 4-6 is used, is that in which the blending component II used as a component of the feed for the first step is the asphaltic bitumen obtained in the solvent deasphalting in the second step. The conditions for attaining the desired RCT reduction in the first step of the process, with recirculation of asphaltic bitumen, may be determined as follows. The relation found is used to determine the RCT reduction to be employed in the catalytic hydrotreatment in order to ensure optimum efficiency in the combination process, when blending component I is the only feed used. The space velocity to be used for the purpose is determined on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment experiments using blending component I as the feed. Using this space velocity, in the combination process, an oil is prepared which has the desired RCT of a%w and the desired initial boiling point of Ti°C, and an asphaltic bitumen (asphaltic bitumen A) is obtained as a by-product. Subsequently, the relation found is used to determine the RCT reduction to be employed in the catalytic hydrotreatment in order to ensure optimum efficiency in the combination process when a mixture of blending component I, and asphaltic bitumen A having the desired ratio r is used as the feed. The space velocity to be used for the purpose is determined on the basis of a number of catalytic hydrotreatment scouting experiments using the mixture of blending component I and asphaltic bitumen A as the feed. Using this space velocity in the combination process an oil is prepared which has the desired RCT of a%w and the desired initial boiling point of T,oC, and an asphaltic bitumen (asphaltic bitumen B) is obtained as a by-product. These experiments are repeated optionally once or several times, in each case using the asphaltic bitumen separated from a preceding series of experiments as the mixing component for blending component I (at constant values of r) in a following series of experiments, until the moment has come when two successive series of experiments yield separated asphaltic bitumens having virtually equal RCT's. Thus the space velocity is determined which is required for the application in actual practice of the process according to the invention with recirculation of asphaltic bitumen. Generally, two or three series of experiments are sufficient to produce the stationary state.
  • The invention is now illustrated with the aid of the following examples.
  • Example.1
  • In the investigation two atmospheric residues were used which had been obtained in the distillation of crude mineral oils (Atmospheric residues A and B).
  • Atmospheric residue A had an RCT of 10%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 50%w.
  • Atmospheric residue B had an RCT of 15.6%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 500 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 29.4%w.
  • As regards the question whether it is possible, in view of the maximum permissible value of G, starting from atmospheric residue A, to prepare by nothing but catalytic hydrotreatment a product from which, by distillation, an atmospheric residue can be obtained which has an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT lower than that of atmospheric residue A, application of relation 1 in the form
    Figure imgb0019
    (where Fmax is the maximum value of the right-hand member of the relation), with substitution of b = 10, T = 370 and d = 50, shows that this is quite feasible provided that the atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of 370°C to be prepared has an RCT (c) higher than 3.6%w. This means, for instance, that, starting from atmospheric residue A, for the preparation of an atmospheric residue having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT (c) of 4.5%w a catalytic hydrotreatment alone will be sufficient.
  • If, however, from atmospheric residue A an oil is to be prepared having an initial boiling point of 370°C and a much more reduced RCT of 1.5%w a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied. Application of relation 1, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmln

    (where Fmax and Fmin are the maximum and the minimum value, respectively, of the right-hand member of the relation), with substitution of b = 10, T = 370 and d = 50, shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 54.1 and 64.1%.
  • With the object of preparing atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c), atmospheric residue A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments. The experiments were carried out in a 1000 ml reactor containing two fixed catalyst beds of a total volume of 600 ml. The first catalyst bed consisted of a Ni/V/SiO2 catalyst containing 0.5 pbw of nickel and 2.0 pbw of vanadium per 100 pbw of silica. The second catalyst bed consisted of a Co/Mo/Al2O3 catalyst containing 4 pbw of cobalt and 12 pbw of molybdenum per 100 pbw of alumina. The weight ratio between the NiN/Si02 and Co/Mo/AI203 catalysts was 1:3. All the experiments were carried out at a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 125 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. Various space velocities were used in the experiments. The results of Experiments 1-13 at run hour 450 are listed in Table A.
  • For each experiment the table gives the space velocity used, the RCT reduction
    Figure imgb0020
    achieved and the corresponding C4- production (calculated as %w on feed). Experiments 1-12 were carried out in pairs, the difference in space velocity between the two experiments of each pair being such as to achieve a difference in RCT reduction of about 1.0%. The table further gives the C4- production per % RCT reduction (G) for each pair of experiments.
    Figure imgb0021
  • Only Experiments 8, 9 and 13 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table A, in Experiments 1-2,3-4 and 5-6, G remains virtually constant (Go). In Experiments 7-8 and 9-10, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 54 and 64%, respectively; G was about 1.5 Go and 2.0 Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiments 5, 11 and 13 were separated by successive atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation into a C4 fraction, a H2S + NH3 fraction, a C5―370°C atmospheric distillate, a 370―520°C vacuum distillate and a 520°C+ vacuum residue. The vacuum residues were deasphalted with n-butane at a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residues obtained were mixed with the corresponding vacuum distillates. The results (of which only Experiment 16 is an experiment according to the invention) are listed in Table B.
    Figure imgb0022
  • Application of relation 1, in the form:
    Figure imgb0023
    with substitution of b = 15.6, T = 370 and d = 29.4, shows that this is quite feasible to prepare an atmospheric residue with an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT lower than that of atmospheric residue B by catalytic hydrotreatment and distillation of the product so obtained, provided that the atmospheric residue to be prepared has an RCT (c) higher than 4.7%w.
  • If from atmospheric residue B however an oil is to be prepared which has an initial boiling point of 370°C and a much more reduced RCT of 2.5%w, a catalytic hydrotreatment alone is insufficient in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment a solvent deasphalting step should be applied. Application of relation 1, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    with substitution of b = 15.6, T = 370 and d = 29.4, shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 60.0 and 70.0%.
  • With the object of preparing an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of-2.5%w from atmospheric residue B this atmospheric residue B was subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment in a similar way as described for Experiments 1-13, using the same catalysts. The reaction conditions were slightly different, viz. a temperature of 395°C, a pressure of 150 bar, a space velocity of 1.05 g.g-1.h-1 and a H2"oil ratio of 1000 Ni/kg. The RCT reduction was 65%. The product of the catalytic hydrotreatment was separated likewise as described hereinbefore by consecutive atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation into several fractions. The 520°C+ vacuum residue was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 115°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the vacuum distillate. The results of this experiment No. 17 according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • Experiment No. 17
  • Figure imgb0024
  • Example 2
  • In the example two different vacuum residues were used:
    • (i) Vacuum residue A with an RCT of 19%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 160 ppmw and a 5%w boiling point of 500°C, and
    • (ii) Vacuum residue B with an RCT of 11 %w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 20 ppmw and a 5%w boiling point of 520°C.
  • From vacuum residue A an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 2.5%w cannot be prepared by catalytic hydrotreatment alone in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied.
  • Application of relation 2 in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    (where Fmax and Fmin are the maximum and the minimum value, respectively, of the right-hand member of the relation), with substitution of b = 19, T, = 370 and T = 500, shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 52.0 and 62.0%.
  • With the object of preparing atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c), vacuum residue A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments in a similar way as described for Experiments 1-13, using the same catalysts in the weight ratio indicated. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 385°C, a pressure of 150 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. Various space velocities were used in the experiments. The results of Experiments 18-30 at run hour 500 are listed in Table C.
    Figure imgb0025
  • Only Experiments 25, 26 and 30 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table C in Experiments 18―19, 20―21 and 22-23, G remains virtually constant (Gc). In Experiments 24-25 and 26-27, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 52 and 62%, respectively, G was about 1.5 Go and 2.0 Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiments 22, 28 and 30 were separated by consecutive atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation into several fractions as described hereinbefore. The vacuum residues were deasphalted with n-butane and the deasphalted vacuum residues so obtained were mixed with the corresponding vacuum distillates. The results of these experiments of which only Experiment 33 is an experiment according to the invention, are listed in Table D.
    Figure imgb0026
  • A catalytic hydrotreatment alone is insufficient to prepare from vacuum residue B an oil with an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. In addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment a solvent deasphalting step has to be applied. Application of relation 2, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 30.6 and 40.6%.
  • Vacuum residue B was subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment to prepare an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0%w from it. The experiment No. 34 was carried out in a 1000 ml reactor containing a fixed catalyst bed of 600 ml volume of the same Co/Mo/Al2O3 catalyst as used in Example 1. Reaction conditions were: a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 125 bar, a space velocity of 1.0 g.g-3.h-1 and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. The RCT reduction was 35.5%. The 520°C+ vacuum residue obtained after vacuum distillation of the product of the catalytic hydrotreatment was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 127°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the 370°-520°C vacuum distillate. The results of this experiment according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • Experiment No. 34
  • Figure imgb0027
  • Example 3
  • In the following experiments two asphaltic bitumens were used.
  • Asphaltic bitumen A had been obtained through deasphalting with propane of a vacuum residue from a crude mineral oil. It had an RCT of 25.4%w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 1400 (determined by ASTM method D 3592/77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B had been obtained by deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue from a crude mineral oil. It had an RCT of 48.0%w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 2000 (determined by ASTM method D 8592/77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 420 ppmw.
  • Catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from asphaltic bitumen A an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied. Application of relation 3, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax' and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 51.0 and 61.4%.
  • Asphaltic bitumen A was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in thirteen experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c). The experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si02 and Co/Mo/AI203 catalysts however being 1:2. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 400°C, a pressure of 145 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, and varying space velocities. The results of Experiments 35-46 at run hour 450 are listed in Table E.
    Figure imgb0028
  • Only Experiments 42, 43 and 47 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table E in Experiments 35-36, 37-38 and 39―40, G remains virtually constant (Go). In Experiments 41-42 and 43-44, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 51 and 61 %, respectively, G was about 1.5 Gc and 2.0 Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiments 39, 45 and 47 were separated by consecutive atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation into separate fractions. The 520°C+ vacuum residues were deasphalted with n-butane and the deasphalted vacuum residues obtained were mixed with the corresponding 370-520°C vacuum distillates. The results are listed in Table F, Experiment 50 being according to the invention.
    Figure imgb0029
  • A catalytic hydrotreatment alone is insufficient to prepare from asphaltic bitumen B an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 4%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. In addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment a solvent deasphalting step should be applied. Application of relation 3, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 56.1 and 66.5%.
  • Asphaltic bitumen B was subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment to prepare an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 4.0%w from it. The experiment was similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the Ni/V/SiO2 and Co/Mo/A1203 catalysts however being 1:1. Reaction conditions were: a temperature of 390°C, a pressure of 150 bar, a space velocity of 0.41 g.g-1.h-1 and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. The RCT reduction was 61.0%. The 520°C+ vacuum residue obtained after vacuum distillation of the product of the catalytic hydrotreatment was deasphalted with n-butane at a temperature of 120°C, a pressure of 40 bar and a solvent/oil weight ratio of 3:1, and the deasphalted vacuum residue obtained was mixed with the 370°-520°C vacuum distillate. The results of this experiment according to the invention are given hereinafter.
  • Experiment No. 51
  • Figure imgb0030
  • Example 4
  • In this experiment a mixture AB was used which had been obtained by mixing 100 pbw of an atmospheric residue A and 15 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen B. Atmospheric residue A had an RCT of 9.8%w (determined by ASTM method D 524), and a vanadium + nickel content of 95 ppmw and boiled below 520°C to an extent of 50%w. Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 35%w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 110 ppmw. Asphaltic bitumen B was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • A catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 1.5%w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. Then, in addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied. Application of relation 4, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax' and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    with substitution of b = 9.8, c = 35, r = 15, T, = 370 and f = 50, shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 34.6 and 46.2%.
  • A mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e). The experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 18-30, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si02 and Co/Mo/A1203 catalysts however being 1:2.5. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 385°C, a pressure of 150 bar and a H2/ oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, with varying space velocities. The results of Experiments 52-62 at run hour 425 are listed in Table G.
    Figure imgb0031
  • Only Experiments 57, 58 and 62 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table G in Experiments 52-53 and 54―55, G remains virtually constant (Gc). In Experiments 56-57 and 58-59, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 35 and 47%, respectively, G was about 1.5 x Gc and 2.0 x Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiments 54, 60 and 62 were separated by consecutive atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation into separate fractions and the 520°C+ vacuum residues were deasphalted with n-butane under standard conditions. The results (of which only Experiment 65 is an experiment according to the invention) are listed in Table H.
    Figure imgb0032
  • Three further experiments (Experiments 66-68) were carried out to prepare an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°Cand an RCT of 1.5%w. In the experiments three different residual feedstocks were subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment in the same reactor as described for Experiments 1-13 and applying the same reaction conditions and catalysts at the weight ratio indicated there. The products from the catalytic hydrotreatment were further treated as described for Experiments 14, 15 and 16.
  • Experiment 66
  • The feed used in this experiment was atmospheric residue C. Atmospheric residue C obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 10%w (determined by ASTM method D 524) and a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw, and boiled below 520°C to an extent of 50%w. Application of relation 4, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 54.1 and 64.1 %. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 66 the space velocity applied was 0.50 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 59%. In the solvent deasphalting of Experiment 66 an asphaltic bitumen D was separated which had an RCT of 41 %w. Experiment 67
  • The feed used in this experiment was a mixture CD obtained by mixing 100 pbw of atmospheric residue C with 12 pbw of asphaltic bitumen D obtained in the above Experiment 66. Application of relation 4 in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 36.5 and 47.7%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 67 the space velocity used was 0.43 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 42.1 %. In the solvent deasphalting an asphaltic bitumen E was separated which had an RCT of 39%w. Experiment 68
  • The feed used in this experiment was a mixture CE obtained by mixing 100 pbw of atmospheric residue C with 12 pbw of asphaltic bitumen E obtained in the above Experiment 67. Application of relation 4 in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 37.1 and 48.3%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 68 the space velocity used was 0.43 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 42.7%. In the solvent deasphalting an asphaltic bitumen F was separated which had an RCT of 39%w. Since the RCT of asphaltic bitumen F is equal to that of asphaltic bitumen E, this is the moment when in recycling the asphaltic bitumen the process has reached its stationary state. The results of Experiments 66-68 are listed in Table I.
    Figure imgb0033
    Example 5
  • A heavy mixture AB was used which had been obtained by mixing 100 pbwof a vacuum residue A and 30 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen B. Vacuum residue A had an RCT of 19 %w (determined by ASTM method D 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 180 ppmw and a 5% boiling point of 520°C. Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 35 %w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 110 ppmw. It was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • A catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 2.5 %w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. In addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied. Application of relation 5, in the form:
    • maximum RCT reduction = Fmax, and
    • minimum RCT reduction = Fmin

    shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 34.0 and 47.0 %w.
  • The mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e). The experiments were similarto those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the NiN/Si02 and Co/MO/Al2O3 catalysts however being 1:2. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 380°C, a pressure of 170 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg, varying space velocities being used. The results of Experiments 69-79 at run hour 400 are listed in Table J.
  • For each experiment the table gives the space velocity used, the RCT reduction
    Figure imgb0034
    achieved and the corresponding C4- production (calculated as %w on feed). Experiments 69-78 were carried out in pairs, the difference in space velocity between the two experiments of each pair being such as to achieve a difference in RCT reduction of about 1.0%. The table further gives the C4 production per % RCT reduction (G) for each pair of experiments.
    Figure imgb0035
  • Only Experiments 74, 75 and 79 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table J in Experiments 69-70 and 71-72, G remains virtually constant (Gc). In Experiments 73-74 and 75-76, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 34 and 47%, respectively, G was about 1.5 x Go and 2.0 x Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment according to Experiments 71, 77 and 79 were further treated as hereinbefore described for Experiments 14, 15 and 16. The results (of which only Experiment 82 is an experiment according to the invention) are listed in Table K.
    Figure imgb0036
  • Example 6
  • Three experiments (Experiments 83-85) were carried out with the object of preparing an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 2.5 %w and to investigate the feasibility of recycle of the asphaltic bitumen produced to the catalytic hydrotreatment. In the experiments three different residual feedstocks were subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment in the same reactor and applying the same reaction conditions as described for Experiments 18-30. The products from the catalytic hydrotreatment were further treated as described for Experiments 14, 15 and 16.
  • Experiment 83
  • The feed used in this experiment was the vacuum residue A of Example 5. Application of relation 5 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 52 and 62%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 83 the space velocity applied was 0.30 g.g-'.h-' and the RCT reduction achieved was 57%. In the solvent deasphalting of Experiment 83 an asphaltic bitumen C was separated which had an RCT of 36 %w.
  • Experiment 84
  • The feed used in this experiment was a mixture AC obtained by mixing 100 pbw of vacuum residue A with pbw of asphaltic bitumen C obtained in the above Experiment 83. Application of relation 5 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 38.4 and 50.4%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 84 the space velocity applied was 0.29 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 45%. In the solvent deasphalting an asphaltic bitumen D was separated which had an RCT of 39 %w.
  • Experiment 85
  • The feed used in this experiment was a mixture AD obtained by mixing 100 pbw of vacuum residue A with pbw of asphaltic bitumen D obtained in the above Experiment 84. Application of relation 5 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 37.8 and 49.8%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 85 the space velocity applied was 0.28 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 44%. In the solvent deasphalting an asphaltic bitumen E was separated which had an RCT of 39 %w. Since the RCT of asphaltic bitumen E is equal to that of asphaltic bitumen D, this is the moment when in recycling the asphaltic bitumen the process has reached its stationary state. The results of Experiments 83-85 are listed in Table L.
    Figure imgb0037
  • Example 7
  • A heavy mixture AB was used which had been obtained by mixing 100 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen A and 35 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen B. Asphaltic bitumen A obtained by solvent deasphalting with propane of a mineral oil vacuum residue had an RCT of 25.4%w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw and an average molecular weight of 1400. Asphaltic bitumen B had an RCT of 40 %w (calculated from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189) and a vanadium + nickel content of 125 ppmw. It was obtained by solvent deasphalting with n-butane of a vacuum residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated asphaltic bitumen which latter asphaltic bitumen was obtained by solvent deasphalting of a mineral oil vacuum residue.
  • A catalytic hydrotreatment alone is not sufficient to prepare from mixture AB an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0 %w in view of the maximum permissible value of G. In addition to the catalytic hydrotreatment, a solvent deasphalting treatment should be applied. Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 36.7 and 50.7%.
  • The residual feed mixture AB was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in eleven experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (e). The experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 18-30, the weight ratio between the NiN/ Si02 and Co/Mo/Al2O3 catalysts however being 1:2. All other reaction conditions were identical. The results of Experiments 86-96 at run hour 430 are listed in Table M.
    Figure imgb0038
  • Only Experiments 91, 92 and 96 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table M in Experiments 86-87 and 88-89, G remains virtually constant (Gc). In Experiments 90-91 and 92-93, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 37 and 51 %, respectively, G was about 1.5 x Gc and 2.0 x Gc, respectively.
  • The products obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiments 89, 94 and 96 were further treated as described hereinbefore for Experiments 14,15 and 16. The results (of which only Experiment 99 is an experiment according to the invention) are listed in Table N.
    Figure imgb0039
  • Example 8
  • Two experiments were carried out with the object of preparing an oil having an initial boiling point of 370°C and an RCT of 3.0 %w and to investigate the feasibility of recycle of the asphaltic bitumen produced to the catalytic hydrotreatment. In these experiments two different residual feedstocks were subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment in a 1000 ml reactor containing two fixed catalyst beds of a total volume of 600 ml. The catalyst beds consisted of the same Ni/V/SiO2 and Co/Mo/Al2O3 catalysts as were used in Example 1, the weight ratio however being 1:2. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 400°C, a pressure of 145 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1000 NI/kg. The products from the catalytic hydrotreatment were further treated as described for Experiments 14, 15 and 16.
  • Experiment 100
  • The feed used in this experiment was asphaltic bitumen A of Example 7. Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 51.0 and 61.4%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 100 the space velocity applied was 0.22 g.g-1.h-1 and the RCT reduction achieved was 56%. In the solvent deasphalting of Experiment 100 an asphaltic bitumen C was separated which had an RCT of 36 %w.
  • Experiment 101
  • The feed used in this experiment was a mixture AC obtained by mixing 100 pbw of asphaltic bitumen A with 25 pbw of asphaltic bitumen C obtained in the above Experiment 100. Application of relation 6 shows that for optimum utilization of the combination process care should be taken that the RCT reduction in the catalytic hydrotreatment is between 41.0 and 54.0%. In the catalytic hydrotreatment of Experiment 101 the space velocity applied was 0.21 g.g-1.h-1, and the RCT reduction achieved was 47.5%. In the solvent deasphalting an asphaltic bitumen D was separated which had an RCT of 36 %w.
  • Since the RCT of asphaltic bitumen D is equal to that of asphaltic bitumen C, this is the moment when in recycling the asphaltic bitumen the process has reached its stationary state. The results of Experiments 100 and 101 are listed in Table O.
    Figure imgb0040
  • Example 9
  • A heavy mixture ABC was used which had been obtained by mixing 55 pbw of an atmospheric residue A with 30 pbw of a vacuum residue B and with 15 pbw of an asphaltic bitumen C. Atmospheric bitumen A which was obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 10 %w (determined by ASTM method 524), a vanadium + nickel content of 70 ppmw and a percentage boiling below 520°C of 50 %w. Vacuum residue B which was obtained in the distillation of a crude mineral oil, had an RCT of 20,6 %w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), a vanadium + nickel content of 170 ppmw and a 5 %w boiling point of 500°C. Asphaltic bitumen C had been obtained in the deasphalting with propane of a mineral oil vacuum residue. It had an RCT of 25.4 %w (computed from the CCT determined by ASTM method D 189), an average molecular weight of 1400 (determined by ASTM method D 3592-77, using toluene as the solvent) and a vanadium + nickel content of 250 ppmw.
  • The mixture ABC had an RCT of 15.5 %w, a vanadium + nickel content of 127 ppmw and 29.5 %w of the mixture boiled below 520°C.
  • The mixture ABC with an RCT of 15.5 %w (b) was subjected to catalytic hydrotreatment in fifteen experiments to prepare atmospheric residues having an initial boiling point of 370°C and different RCT's (c). The experiments were similar to those described for Experiments 1-13, the weight ratio between the Ni/V/ Si02 and Co/Mo/Al2O3 catalysts however being 1:2. The reaction conditions were: a temperature of 400°C, a pressure of 160 bar and a H2/oil ratio of 1500 Ni/kg, varying space velocities being used. The results of Experiments 102-116 at run hour 250 are listed in Table P.
    Figure imgb0041
  • Of Experiments 102-116 only Experiments 111, 112 and 116 are experiments according to the invention. The other experiments have been included for reasons of comparison. As can be seen in Table P in Experiments 110-111 and 112-113, in which RCT reductions were achieved of about 60 and 70%, respectively, G was about 1.5 Go and 2.0 Gc, respectively.
  • The product obtained in the catalytic hydrotreatment carried out according to Experiment 116 was further separated by successive atmospheric distillation, vacuum distillation and solvent deasphalting as described hereinbefore. The results are listed hereinafter.
    Figure imgb0042

Claims (9)

1. A process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture having an RCT of a %w and an initial boiling point of T,°C, characterized in that an asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture is subjected to a catalytic hydrotreatment for reducing its RCT, the product obtained being separated by distillation into an atmospheric distillate and an atmospheric residue having an initial boiling point of T,°C that either a deasphalted atmospheric residue having the desired RCT of a %w is obtained from the said atmospheric residue by solvent deasphalting or that the atmospheric residue is first separated by distillation into a vacuum distillate and a vacuum residue, from which vacuum residue asphaltic bitumen is separated by solvent deasphalting such that a deasphalted vacuum residue is obtained having an RCT such that, when this latter deasphalted vacuum residue is mixed with the said vacuum distillate, a mixture is obtained which has the desired RCT of a %w, the catalytic hydrotreatment being carried out under such conditions that the C4 production per % RCT reduction ("G" lies between 1.5 x Gc and 2.0 x Gc as defined.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that in the catalytic hydrotreatment for the reduction of the RCT a catalyst is used which comprises at least one metal chosen from the group formed by nickel and cobalt and in addition at least one metal chosen from the group formed by molybdenum and tungsten on a carrier, which carrier consists more than 40 %w of alumina.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that in the catalytic hydrotreatment for the reduction of the RCT a catalyst is used which comprises the metal combination nickel-molybdenum or cobalt-molybdenum on alumina as the carrier.
4. A process as claimed in claims 2-3, characterized in that the asphaltenes-containing hydrocarbon mixture has a vanadium + nickel content of more than 50 ppmw and that in the catalytic hydrotreatment this mixture is contacted with two successive catalysts, the first catalyst being a demetallization catalyst consisting more than 80 %w of silica and the second catalyst being an RCT reduction catalyst as described in claim 2 or 3.
5. A process as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the demetallization catalyst comprises the metal combination nickel-vanadium on silica as the carrier.
6. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-5, characterized in that the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out at a temperature of from 300-500°C, a pressure of from 50-300 bar (5-30 MPa), a space velocity of from 0.02-10 g.g-1.g-1 and a Hz/feed ratio of from 100-5000 NI/kg.
7. A process as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that the catalytic hydrotreatment is carried out at a temperature of from 350-450°C, a pressure of from 75-200 bar (7,5-20 MPa), a space velocity of from 0.1-2 g.g-1.h-1 and a H2/feed ratio of from 500-2000 NI/kg.
8. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-7, characterized in that the solvent deasphalting is carried out using n-butane as solvent, at a pressure of from 35―45 bar and a temperature of from 100-150°C.
9. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-8, characterized in that an asphaltic bitumen separated in the solvent deasphalting of a residue obtained in the distillation of a hydrotreated residual fraction of a crude mineral oil, which asphaltic bitumen is used as a mixing component in the feed for the first step of the process, originates from the solvent deasphalting carried out in the second step of the process.
EP19820200689 1981-06-25 1982-06-04 Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture Expired EP0068543B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (12)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL8103067A NL8103067A (en) 1981-06-25 1981-06-25 PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
NL8103067 1981-06-25
NL8103121 1981-06-29
NL8103121A NL8103121A (en) 1981-06-29 1981-06-29 PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
NL8103396A NL8103396A (en) 1981-07-17 1981-07-17 PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
NL8103396 1981-07-17
NL8103576A NL8103576A (en) 1981-07-29 1981-07-29 Upgrading of heavy oil - by catalytic hydrotreating and solvent deasphalting
NL8103576 1981-07-29
NL8104327A NL8104327A (en) 1981-09-21 1981-09-21 PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
NL8104326 1981-09-21
NL8104326A NL8104326A (en) 1981-09-21 1981-09-21 PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
NL8104327 1981-09-21

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0068543A2 EP0068543A2 (en) 1983-01-05
EP0068543A3 EP0068543A3 (en) 1985-12-11
EP0068543B1 true EP0068543B1 (en) 1988-09-21

Family

ID=27555211

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19820200689 Expired EP0068543B1 (en) 1981-06-25 1982-06-04 Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0068543B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0631334B2 (en)
AR (1) AR241922A1 (en)
AU (1) AU543734B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1182770A (en)
DE (1) DE3279051D1 (en)
FI (1) FI78496C (en)
GB (1) GB2100748B (en)
MX (1) MX170898B (en)
SG (1) SG67784G (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL8202827A (en) * 1982-07-13 1984-02-01 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF LOW-ASPHALTENE HYDROCARBON MIXTURES.
NL8301352A (en) * 1983-04-18 1984-11-16 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF LOW-ASPHALTENE HYDROCARBON MIXTURES.
JPS60152594A (en) * 1984-01-23 1985-08-10 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd Desulfurization of residual oil from direct desulphurizer
JPS60248421A (en) * 1984-05-21 1985-12-09 Diesel Kiki Co Ltd Air conditioner for car
JPS6133313A (en) * 1984-07-25 1986-02-17 Diesel Kiki Co Ltd Air conditioning unit for car
JPS6172410U (en) * 1984-10-19 1986-05-16
CA1222471A (en) * 1985-06-28 1987-06-02 H. John Woods Process for improving the yield of distillables in hydrogen donor diluent cracking
JPH03281570A (en) * 1990-03-30 1991-12-12 Ube Ind Ltd Alkylene oxide-grafted polyamide composition
US8215306B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2012-07-10 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Respiratory access port assembly with push button lock and method of use
US8256422B2 (en) 2009-05-15 2012-09-04 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc Respiratory access port assembly with passive lock and method of use
CA2862613C (en) * 2009-12-11 2016-02-23 Uop, Llc Hydrocarbon composition
US9078987B2 (en) 2011-12-23 2015-07-14 Avent, Inc. Clutch brake assembly for a respiratory access port
EP3325576A1 (en) * 2015-07-24 2018-05-30 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Fixed bed hydroprocessing of deasphalter rock

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3549517A (en) * 1968-07-23 1970-12-22 Hydrocarbon Research Inc High conversion level hydrogenation of residuum
US3723297A (en) * 1971-10-18 1973-03-27 Universal Oil Prod Co Conversion of asphaltene-containing charge stocks
NL175732C (en) * 1972-07-07 Shell Int Research PROCEDURE FOR THE CATALYTIC DEMETALLIZATION OF RESIDUAL HYDROCARBON OILS AND THE FURTHER CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF THE OIL OBTAINED THEREIN.
NL7512090A (en) * 1975-10-15 1977-04-19 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
NL7612960A (en) * 1976-11-22 1978-05-24 Shell Int Research METHOD FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
US4082648A (en) * 1977-02-03 1978-04-04 Pullman Incorporated Process for separating solid asphaltic fraction from hydrocracked petroleum feedstock
NL7702161A (en) * 1977-03-01 1978-09-05 Shell Int Research METHOD FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
JPS541306A (en) * 1977-06-07 1979-01-08 Chiyoda Chem Eng & Constr Co Ltd Hydrogenation of heavy hydrocarbon oil
JPS5850636B2 (en) * 1977-07-15 1983-11-11 千代田化工建設株式会社 Desulfurization treatment method for heavy hydrocarbon oil
NL7805421A (en) * 1978-05-19 1979-11-21 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FOOD FOR A CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2100748B (en) 1984-08-30
FI78496B (en) 1989-04-28
DE3279051D1 (en) 1988-10-27
EP0068543A3 (en) 1985-12-11
JPS587486A (en) 1983-01-17
FI822278A0 (en) 1982-06-24
GB2100748A (en) 1983-01-06
AR241922A1 (en) 1993-01-29
JPH0631334B2 (en) 1994-04-27
CA1182770A (en) 1985-02-19
SG67784G (en) 1985-03-15
FI78496C (en) 1989-08-10
EP0068543A2 (en) 1983-01-05
FI822278L (en) 1982-12-26
AU8519682A (en) 1983-01-06
AU543734B2 (en) 1985-05-02
MX170898B (en) 1993-09-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4006076A (en) Process for the production of low-sulfur-content hydrocarbon mixtures
US4447314A (en) Demetalation, desulfurization, and decarbonization of petroleum oils by hydrotreatment in a dual bed system prior to cracking
CA1196879A (en) Hydrocracking process
US5158668A (en) Preparation of recarburizer coke
EP0068543B1 (en) Process for the preparation of a hydrocarbon mixture
EP0537500A2 (en) A method of treatment of heavy hydrocarbon oil
US4126538A (en) Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons
EP0090437B1 (en) Process for the production of hydrocarbon oil distillates
US6623624B2 (en) Process for preparation of fuels and lubes in a single integrated hydrocracking system
JP2020533453A (en) Low quality oil reforming method and reforming system
US4405441A (en) Process for the preparation of hydrocarbon oil distillates
JP2825570B2 (en) Method for preparing low and high sulfur coke
EP0082555B1 (en) Process for the production of hydrocarbon oil distillates
US3308055A (en) Hydrocracking process producing lubricating oil
US4565620A (en) Crude oil refining
US4120778A (en) Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons in atmospheric crude residue
US5098551A (en) Process for the manufacture of lubricating base oils
US4396493A (en) Process for reducing ramsbottom test of short residues
EP0099141B1 (en) Process for the production of low-asphaltenes hydrocarbon mixtures
US4396494A (en) Process for reducing ramsbottom carbon test of asphalt
JPH04239094A (en) Method for desulfurizing and demetallizing residual oil
US4397734A (en) Process for reducing ramsbottom carbon test of short residues
US4005006A (en) Combination residue hydrodesulfurization and thermal cracking process
US4397733A (en) Process for reducing the Ramsbottom carbon test of asphalt
US4461699A (en) Process for reducing Ramsbottom Carbon Test of short residues

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19820604

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR IT LI NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19870803

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR IT LI NL SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3279051

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19881027

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
ITTA It: last paid annual fee
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 82200689.6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19950627

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19950710

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19950829

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960425

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19960513

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19960606

Year of fee payment: 15

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19960630

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19960630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19970101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19970301

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19970101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19970605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19970630

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.

Effective date: 19970630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980227

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 82200689.6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST