Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Rätten till ersättning vid ingrepp i miljörättsliga tillstånd: En jämförande studie mellan svensk och tysk rätt samt EKMR med särskilt fokus på den tyska kärnkraftsavvecklingen
Nicaea and Its Legacy: An IntroductionI would like to thank Sarah Coakley for her generosity in organizing the conference from which this issue of HTR has been produced, as well as for her comments on an earlier draft of this essay. I would also like to thank Mark DelCogliano, Rebecca Lyman, Andrew Radde-Gallwitz, and Medi Ann Volpe for their comments. It should be noted that throughout this paper my concern is with readers of the fourth-century controversies who have overt theological commitments and ends in view. There are many other scholars of the period for whom the debates I engage here will be initially uninteresting. It remains true, however, both that such scholars find themselves implicated in scholarly opinions driven (to a greater or lesser extent) by modern theological concerns, and that many assumptions about the explanatory power of social-historical theories are themselves deeply theological in nature. Hence it may well be that awareness of these discussions is of importance across the field of early Christian studies.