DE102021203044A1 - Control method for controlling the calcination of clays for the cement industry - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a control method for optimizing the product quality in the calcination of clays with regard to the reactivity of the end product.

Description

The invention relates to a control method for optimizing the product quality in the calcination of clays with regard to the reactivity of the end product.

In order to get the CO ₂ emission problem under control, plans are now being made to replace scarce composite materials such as blast furnace slag and fly ash with calcined clay as a cement component.

From the EP 3 218 320 B1 methods for the heat treatment of natural clays and/or zeolites are known, the clay and/or the zeolite being calcined in the calcining zone in an entrained flow calciner or a fluidized bed in a temperature range from 350° C. to 1050° C. under reducing conditions, wherein during the Calcination under reducing conditions means that reddish trivalent iron is reduced to bivalent iron.

From the U.S. 9,458,059 B2 a method for producing synthetic pozzolan with desired color characteristics with cooling under reducing conditions is known.

From the DE 10 2011 014 498 B4 discloses a process for producing a clinker substitute for use in cement production, in which the clay is thermally treated under reducing conditions at a temperature of 600 °C to 1,000 °C and the reduction product is intermediately cooled to a temperature of <300 °C in the absence of oxygen .

From the DE 10 2008 020 600 B4 a process for the heat treatment of fine-grained mineral solids is known, in which the solids are passed through a flash reactor in which they are heated at a temperature of 450 °C to 1500 °C and for a residence time of between 0.5 and 20 seconds, with hot gases in are brought into contact, and the solids are then conducted at a temperature of 500° C. to 890° C. through a residence time reactor, from which they are drawn off after a residence time of 1 to 600 minutes.

From the US 2012 / 160 135 A1 a method for producing synthetic pozzolan with desired color properties with cooling under a reducing atmosphere is known.

From the EP 3 615 489 A2 a process for the production of gray synthetic pozzolana with a first rapid cooling below 600 °C is known.

From the WO 2015 / 039 198 A1 discloses a process for preparing a preparation for partially substituting portland cement having a gray color.

From the WO 2016 / 041 717 A1 the determination of the reactivity of a product is known.

While the conversion of lime (roughly simplified CaCO ₃ ) into cement clinker (roughly simplified CaO) also produces one mole of CO ₂ per mole of CaO, only water is released during the calcination of clays. Here, the silicates or aluminates in the clay are converted and converted from a non-reactive form into a reactive form in which the silicates or aluminates are initially soluble after reaction in a basic environment and then further reacted with the calcium released during the reaction of clinker to form calcium Aluminum silicate hydrate phases (CASH) can react. However, if these substances are heated further or for longer, they change into a glassy phase and, at higher temperatures, into inert mineral phases (spinels, mullite) and thus lose their reactive state again.

If you look at the calcination of a theoretical clay at different temperatures with a constant residence time, for example, you will see that the first increase in reactivity can only be observed at a temperature above 500 °C, for example, which increases significantly above 600 °C. In the range from 700 °C to 850 °C, for example, an approximate plateau with maximum reactivity forms. At temperatures above 900 °C, for example, a rapid decrease in reactivity can then be observed. It is therefore desirable to carry out a calcination as close to this plateau as possible (usually at the lower end for cost reasons).

However, clays and the products that can be produced from them by calcination are very difficult to characterize analytically with regard to their reactive properties. For example, crystalline components such as quartz can be easily identified and quantified using X-ray diffraction, but these are precisely not reactive. For this reason, some attempts are being made to obtain information about the composition by means of NIR spectroscopy, which, however, gives only inadequate information about the reactivity.

On the other hand, there are measurement methods that can determine the reactivity of calcined clays well, such as from F. Avet et al., Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R ³ ) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clay, Cement and Concrete Research 85 (2016) 1-11, Elsevier. This The method is designed for a measurement time of 7 days, as in point 3 Methods, sub-point 3.1. Such a period makes active control of a production plant impossible.

From the WO 2016 / 096 911 A1 a calorimetric measuring device for determining the reactivity is known.

The object of the invention is to create a new type of control that is not aimed at other material parameters but at the actual reactivity and can be used as real-time feedback and thus active control.

This problem is solved by the control method with the features specified in claim 1. Advantageous developments result from the dependent claims, the following description and the drawings.

• a) Erfassen wenigstens einer Temperatur im Calcinator und optional einer ersten mittleren Verweilzeit des Tones im Calcinator,
• b) Entnehmen wenigstens einer Probe des calcinierten Tones,
• c) Herstellen einer reproduzierbaren Größenverteilung der Probe,
• d) Einstellen der Probenmasse auf eine vordefinierte Probenmasse,
• e) Temperieren der Probe auf eine erste Messtemperatur,
• f) Vermengen der Probe mit einer Lauge, welche bevorzugt ebenfalls auf eine erste Messtemperatur temperiert ist,
• g) Zeitliches Erfassen der von der Probe-Laugen-Mischung erzeugten Energie bei konstanter erster Messtemperatur für einen ersten Zeitraum,
• h) Quantitatives Auswerten des in Schritt g) erfassten Zeit-Energie-Verlaufs für die erste exotherme Reaktion und Ermitteln der durch die Probe freigesetzten Energiemenge für die erste exotherme Reaktion,
• i) Korrelation der in Schritt h) erfassten Energiemenge mit der in Schritt a) erfassten Temperatur und Verweilzeit sowie Vergleich mit vorher erfassten Wertekombinationen aus Energiemenge, Temperatur und Verweilzeit,
• j) Aktives Regeln der Temperatur und/oder der Verweilzeit im Calcinator in Richtung der Erhöhung der für eine weitere Probe zu erwartende Energiemenge.

The control method of the present invention is for controlling a calcined clay manufacturing process using a calciner. Such methods are extensively known from the prior art. The control method is independent of the specific production process and can be applied to all corresponding process variants for the production of calcined clays. The control procedure consists of the following steps:

• a) detecting at least one temperature in the calciner and optionally a first average residence time of the clay in the calciner,
• b) taking at least one sample of the calcined clay,
• c) production of a reproducible size distribution of the sample,
• d) setting the sample mass to a predefined sample mass,
• e) tempering the sample to a first measurement temperature,
• f) Mixing the sample with a lye, which is preferably also tempered to a first measurement temperature,
• g) Temporal recording of the energy generated by the sample-liquor mixture at a constant first measurement temperature for a first period of time,
• h) quantitative evaluation of the time-energy curve recorded in step g) for the first exothermic reaction and determination of the amount of energy released by the sample for the first exothermic reaction,
• i) Correlation of the amount of energy recorded in step h) with the temperature and residence time recorded in step a) and comparison with previously recorded value combinations of energy quantity, temperature and residence time,
• j) Actively controlling the temperature and/or the residence time in the calciner in the direction of increasing the amount of energy to be expected for a further sample.

In step a), the temperature in the calciner is recorded. Since the temperature in the calciner varies at different points, it is essential for the method that the temperature is always measured in the same way, for example with the same sensor at the same point. In addition, other temperatures can of course also be recorded and taken into account at other points in order to produce a more precise picture, for example if different temperature profiles are achieved through the use of very different fuels with very different combustion behavior.

In step a), the average residence time can also be recorded, provided that this can be controlled in a targeted manner, in particular separately from the temperature in the calciner. If the dwell time cannot be adjusted, in particular cannot be changed or can only be changed by changing the temperature, it is not necessary to record the dwell time in addition to the temperature in the calciner.

The sampling of the calcined clay in step b) can preferably be automated. The automated sampling is preferably connected to an automated sample preparation. The sample taken can be significantly larger than the predefined sample mass in order to be able to simultaneously take a reference sample from the sample taken in addition to carrying out the method according to the invention.

It is essential that in step h) only the so-called initial peak, the first measurable exothermic reaction, is recorded. While the further steps take place over a period of up to seven days and give an exact picture of the reactivity and the setting behavior, according to the invention only this first reaction step is considered. It has been shown that the amount of heat released here has a very good correlation to the reactivity of the calcined clay. Up until now, this area has not been taken into account, because, on the one hand, quick manual sample preparation takes several minutes and, on the other hand, opening the measuring cell introduces a thermal disturbance that requires a verification of the so-called baseline. Both effects disturb the initial range of the measurement, which already shows the initial peak, due to the variation in duration and intensity. It is therefore essential to the invention that a size comparable for all samples distribution is set. Setting a specific average size or a specific width of the size distribution is less relevant here, and precise knowledge of the size distribution is also not necessary. It is only sufficient if continuity can be achieved across all measurements. A reproducible size distribution of the sample is preferably produced in step c) by grinding. It has been found that with the same preparation in the same mill for the same time, a sufficiently uniform size distribution is established even with certain fluctuations in the original sample. The sample preparation is therefore also particularly preferably automated, since this can further increase the uniformity.

Adjusting the sample to the first measurement temperature has also proven to be very advantageous. In addition to step e), this can also take place earlier. However, a comparatively large amount of energy is regularly introduced during a grinding process, so that the sample heats up. The lye added in step f) is also particularly preferably tempered to exactly the first measuring temperature before the addition. The closer the sample-lye mixture introduced into the measurement comes to the first temperature, the more exact are the measurement results for the initial peak, which is recorded in step g) and evaluated in step h).

Most preferably, the measurement is started as soon as possible after adding the base to the sample. On the one hand, this is made easier if both components already have the same first measurement temperature before they are brought together. On the other hand, the mixing in step f) takes place with as little energy input as possible, for example by means of ultrasound or an intensive mixer based on compressed air. Brief, intimate mixing is preferred so that the sample can then be measured without further tempering times, since the reaction between the calcined clay and the lye begins immediately with the addition. Electrical or mechanical mixing devices are only suitable if it is possible to ensure the introduction of heat that is well below the heat released during the reaction.

This focus on equalization and thermal stabilization of the sample before adding the caustic solution and starting the measurement means that the initial peak can already be meaningfully evaluated.

A correlation is carried out in step i) in order to obtain a control statement for the active control in step j). A correlation between the amount of energy determined in step h) and the temperature recorded in step a) is necessary here, since the reactivity and thus the amount of energy recorded by the initial peak does not show a monotonically increasing or decreasing dependence on the temperature, but rather reaches a maximum in the optimum . If, in comparison with previous measured values, a falling amount of energy and thus a drop in the reactivity of the product is determined, this information alone would not yet indicate whether the temperature must be increased or decreased to regain the optimum. This only results from the correlation with the respective temperature values. A further complication is that the educts, the clays used, are also different, so that it may be determined after a correction in the next cycle that the correction should have been made in the other direction and then corrected accordingly. In this case, it is not absolutely necessary to regulate to the maximum, especially since the maximum is part of a plateau, so that regulation is more aimed at moving within the plateau. The energy requirement of the system can also be included in the regulation, so that, for example, to reduce heating costs and the associated emissions, production tends to be at the lower (colder) end of the plateau. Other parameters can also be used as additional control criteria for optimization within the plateau.

In a further embodiment of the invention, an alkali metal hydroxide solution with a pH between 9 and 15, preferably between 10.25 and 15, more preferably between 12 and 14.6, is selected as the lye in step f). The lye is particularly preferably an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution with a concentration of between 0.1 ^mol /l and 1 ^mol /l. For example, a sodium hydroxide solution with a concentration of 1 ^mol /i is used (pH ~ 14).

In a further embodiment of the invention, the added mass of the lye corresponds to 1 to 5 times, preferably 2 to 3 times, the mass of the sample. If, for example, 5 g is used as a predefined sample mass, then 5 to 15 g of a 1 ^mol /l aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, for example 10 g, are added to the sample and mixed with it. As a result, on the one hand, a sufficient amount of hydroxide ions is made available. In addition, there is also enough volume available to completely wet the sample surface and also to fill all pores. The amount of lye added is preferably automated in the same ratio to the sample amounts determined to deviate from the target value, customized. This ensures a constant ratio between sample and lye. This also facilitates a subsequent normalization of the energy obtained from the initial peak to the exact weight.

In a further embodiment of the invention, a lye former and water are added as the lye in step f), the lye former and the water reacting with one another to form a solution with a pH between 9 and 15, preferably between 10.25 and 15, more preferably between 12 and 14.6. For example and in particular, the lye-forming agent is selected from the group comprising alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal oxide, alkaline earth metal hydroxide, alkaline earth metal oxide and substances, mixtures or compositions which contain these or release them on reaction with water. In particular, the alkaline earth metal oxide can be calcium oxide; a composition which contains calcium oxide is particularly preferably a cement clinker. For example, a 2.5 g sample of calcined clay can be mixed with 2.5 g cement clinker and 5 g water. This allows the reactivity of the calcined clay to be examined in a particularly practical environment.

In a further embodiment of the invention, steps c) to g) take place automatically in an environment that is air-conditioned to the first measurement temperature. This allows the sample to be thermally stabilized relatively quickly.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the sample mass in step d) is accurate to at least 2%, preferably at least 0.5%, more preferably at least 0.1%, particularly preferably at least 0.02%, of the specified sample mass set. The more precisely the sample mass is adjusted to the specified sample mass, the smaller the influence on the amount of energy released in the initial peak. If the amount of lye added is adjusted to the exact weight, subsequent standardization is also easier.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the time-energy curve recorded in step g) is quantitatively evaluated for the first exothermic reaction for the period from the second minute to the 120th minute, preferably from the second minute to the 70th minute. Thus, preferably only the first two minutes are not considered in order to rule out artefacts from the sample preparation. Thus, the full response time of about 7 days is not considered, but only for a period of about one hour. This also enables timely feedback on the manufacturing process. This time window has proven to be meaningful, yet short enough. Of course, it would be advantageous if the addition of suds and the mixing process could already take place within the recording, so that the immediate beginning, i.e. the period of the first two minutes, could also be recorded.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the first temperature is selected in the range from 20°C to 40°C. By way of example and preferably, 20° C., 21° C. or 22° C. is selected in Europe, while in warmer regions, for example the subtropics, a temperature of for example 27° C. is selected. A higher temperature, e.g. 38 °C to 40 °C, can be chosen to increase the reaction rate and thus reduce the time interval for the initial peak. A higher temperature is possible, but requires more heating and therefore running costs.

In a further embodiment of the invention, in addition to the first measurement temperature, the method is carried out alternately or in parallel with a second measurement temperature. For example, 20 °C is selected as the first measurement temperature and 40 °C as the second measurement temperature. In this way, additional information about the thermal influence of the temperature on the reactivity can be determined via the activation energy.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the predefined sample mass is selected between 1 g and 200 g, preferably between 2 g and 20 g.

In a further embodiment of the invention, in step a) it is additionally recorded from which educt batches and in which mixing ratio the clay is fed to the calcination. For example, an educt batch can be a stockpile or a similar storage area with a generally uniform material. In step i), the information from which educt batches and in which mixing ratio the clay was added to the calcination is also used. In particular, it is taken into account which educt batches lead to a higher or lower reactivity with a higher proportion of the mixture. As a result, the desired target reactivity for the product can be produced with the lowest starting material reactivities and thus the cheapest starting material. The selection and the mixing ratio between the educt batches are therefore also taken into account for the regulation in step j).

1. A) Erwärmen einer Chargenprobe auf eine Chargentemperatur von 600 °C bis 1000 °C, bevorzugt 600 °C bis 950 °C für eine Chargenzeit von 1 s bis 60 min, bevorzugt von 30 s bis 20 min, besonders bevorzugt von 30 s bis 5 min,
2. B) Herstellen einer reproduzierbaren Größenverteilung der Chargenprobe,
3. C) Einstellen der Chargenprobenmasse auf eine vordefinierte Probenmasse,
4. D) Temperieren der Chargenprobe auf eine erste Messtemperatur,
5. E) Vermengen der Chargenprobe mit einer Lauge,
6. F) Zeitliches Erfassen der von der Chargenprobe-Laugen-Mischung erzeugten Energie bei konstanter erster Messtemperatur für einen ersten Zeitraum,
7. G) Quantitatives Auswerten des in Schritt F) erfassten Zeit-Energie-Verlaufs für die erste exotherme Reaktion und Ermitteln der durch die Chargenprobe freigesetzten Energiemenge für die erste exotherme Reaktion.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the control method has a batch characterization method in addition to the characterization of each product batch, the batch characterization method being carried out with the following steps:

1. A) heating a batch sample to a batch temperature of 600 °C to 1000 °C, preferably 600 °C to 950 °C for a batch time of 1 s to 60 min, preferably 30 s to 20 min, particularly preferably 30 s to 5 minutes,
2. B) Establishing a reproducible size distribution of the batch sample,
3. C) setting the batch sample mass to a predefined sample mass,
4. D) temperature control of the batch sample to a first measurement temperature,
5. E) mixing the batch sample with a lye,
6. F) timing the energy generated by the batch sample-liquor mixture at a constant first measurement temperature for a first period of time,
7. G) Quantitative evaluation of the time-energy curve recorded in step F) for the first exothermic reaction and determination of the amount of energy released by the batch sample for the first exothermic reaction.

In step A), a model calcination of the batch sample is thus carried out. This preferably takes place under strictly controlled laboratory conditions and thus under clearly reproducible conditions. This batch sample prepared in this way is then treated like the normal sample from the manufacturing process. Thus, step B) is performed identically to step c), step C) is performed identically to step d), step D) is performed identically to step e), step E) is performed identically to step f), step F) becomes identical carried out with step g), step G) is carried out identically to step h). This also applies in particular to further developments of the process steps of the control process that are used accordingly in the batch characterization process.

In step A), the preparation can be carried out, for example, in a crucible in a muffle furnace. A period of 15 minutes to 1 hour is often necessary for such a method. However, the preparation is advantageously carried out directly on a hot and heated metal, on which the sample is simultaneously transported through the heating device. Due to the more direct contact and the resulting improved heat transfer, significantly shorter times, in particular between 1 minute and 5 minutes, are possible.

In particular, a first database can be used for the control method in step i) even before new starting materials are used, before data from the production method are available.

In a further embodiment of the invention, an identical first batch temperature and an identical first batch time are selected in step A) for all batch samples.

In another embodiment of the invention, the batch characterization method is repeated with a second batch temperature and a second batch time. For example, the first batch temperature is 750°C and the second batch temperature is 850°C. In order to increase the accuracy, other batch temperatures and/or batch times are of course also conceivable.

• 1 Schematische Darstellung einer Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
• 2 Initialpeak
• 3 Reaktivität in Abhängigkeit der Calcinationstemperatur
• 4 Automatisierte Analysevorrichtung in der Draufsicht

The control method according to the invention is explained in more detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment illustrated in the drawings.

• 1 Schematic representation of a device for carrying out the method
• 2 initial peak
• 3 Reactivity as a function of the calcination temperature
• 4 Automated analyzer in top view

In 1 a device is shown in which the control method according to the invention is used. The sequence of the method is to be explained on the basis of the device. A clay is calcined in a calciner 20 and the calcined clay is transferred from the calciner 20 to a product store 40 via a product removal 30 . In the area of product removal 30, a sampling device 50 takes a sample of the calcined clay and transfers the sample to an analysis device 10, which has an air-conditioned housing. For example, 21° C. is selected as the first measurement temperature and the interior of the analysis device 10 is tempered to 21° C. The sample is first ground using a mill 60, for example a ball mill with a sample chamber and grinding balls made of agate, for a predefined time, for example 2 minutes. This sets a size distribution that is reproducible for all samples. A predefined sample mass is then weighed out using a balance 70, for example 5 g±0.002 g, and then the sample is mixed with, for example, 10 g of a 1 ^mol /l aqueous sodium hydroxide solution and mixed briefly and intensively in a mixing device. The sample-lye mixture is then introduced into an isothermal calorimeter 100 and the energy flows resulting from the reaction are recorded against time. In an analysis electronics 110, the total Energy of the initial peak, which evaluates the energy released in a first reaction step within the first hour. At the time the sample is taken by the sampler 50, the control electronics 120 detects the temperature of the calciner 20 and correlates this information with the energy of the initial peak of the sample determined by the analysis electronics 110 (e.g. maximum of the peak or integral of the peak area). By comparing it with previous measurements, the control electronics 120 can then determine whether a temperature change in the calciner 20 makes sense to improve the reactivity of the calcined clay. The control electronics 120 can then either control the calciner 20 directly, for example by changing the fuel feed rate, or the control electronics 120 can suggest such a change to the operator of the system.

2 shows quite schematically the energy measured in an isothermal calorimeter as a function of time for three samples which were produced under different manufacturing conditions. The initial peak within the first hour of the reaction when calcined clay is reacted with three times the amount of 1 ^mol /l NaOH solution is shown. The integral under the curve corresponds to the energy released during hydrolysis and is therefore proportional to the number of reactive centers. It has been shown that the in 2 The sample shown with the solid line shows the highest reactivity even after a measurement time of several days, followed by the sample with the dashed line. The sample with the dotted line shows the lowest reactivity both at the initial peak and when measured over several days. Therefore, the area under the initial peak can be found simply by integrating over the first hour, and this area is a good direct measure of sample reactivity. The maximum is in a range from 2 min to 10 min, after about 30 min the measured value has already fallen below the starting value.

In 3 is a greatly simplified plot of the reactivity R (proportional to the measured energy) as a function of the temperature in the calciner 20 is applied. Below 600 °C is very low reactivity, above 950 °C the reactivity drops very rapidly due to vitrification or partial crystallization of the product. The aim of the control method is to run the manufacturing process as close to the maximum of this curve as possible.

In 4 An exemplary automated analyzer 10 is shown in plan view. The sample is introduced into the analysis device 10 via a sample feed 170, for example via a vibrating conveyor trough, and is preferably also weighed or portioned in the process. For this purpose, a robot 160 has previously removed a sample container from the sample container store 140 and inserted it into the mill 60 . A sample is introduced into the sample container and ground in the mill 60 in the sample container. From there, the robot 160 transports the sample container to a parking space in a storage and temperature control area 150. For example, a storage and temperature control area 150 has around 25 storage spaces, which in the example shown would have a total of around 100 storage spaces, where the samples can be stored after grinding and can be tempered before adding a layer. For example and preferably, the storage and temperature control area 150 is therefore flowed through by a heat exchanger fluid in order to enable the fastest and best possible temperature control. The storage and temperature control area 150 preferably adjusts the sample to the first measurement temperature ±0.1K. The sample container with the sample is then brought into the lye addition device 130 by the robot 160 . The lye addition device 130 preferably has a lye reservoir 90 with lye, for example 1 ^mol /l sodium hydroxide solution, heated to the first measuring temperature. The lye is added according to the exact weight of the sample, for example three times the amount, i.e. 15 g lye to 5 g sample. A mixing device 80 is also arranged in the liquor adding device 130, preferably in the form of a compressed air supply. Furthermore, the suds addition device 130 has a camera for optically capturing the sample. This serves to detect whether drops of lye and sample are adhering to the upper wall area of the sample container. If this is the case, the amount of heat released there is not reliably recorded, which could lead to measurement errors. From here the sample container is placed in an isothermal 100 calorimeter. For example and preferably, each isothermal calorimeter has 8 measuring positions. After the sample container has been introduced into the isothermal calorimeter, the measuring station is preferably closed by the robot 160 with two lids.

Reference List

10

analysis device

20

calciner

30

product withdrawal

40

product warehouse

50

sampling

60

Mill

70

Scale

80

mixing device

90

lye supply

100

isothermal calorimeter

110

analysis electronics

120

control electronics

130

suds addition device

140

sample container stock

150

Storage and temperature control area

160

robot

170

sample introduction

QUOTES INCLUDED IN DESCRIPTION

This list of documents cited by the applicant was generated automatically and is included solely for the better information of the reader. The list is not part of the German patent or utility model application. The DPMA assumes no liability for any errors or omissions.

Patent Literature Cited

• EP 3218320 B1 [0003]
• US 9458059 B2 [0004]
• DE 102011014498 B4 [0005]
• DE 102008020600 B4 [0006]
• US 2012/160135 A1 [0007]
• EP 3615489 A2 [0008]
• WO 2015/039198 A1 [0009]
• WO 2016/041717 A1 [0010]
• WO 2016/096911 A1 [0015]

Claims (15)

A control method for controlling a calcined clay manufacturing process with a calciner (20), the control method comprising the steps of: a) detecting at least one temperature in the calciner (20) and optionally a first average residence time of the clay in the calciner (20), b) taking at least one sample of the calcined clay, c) production of a reproducible size distribution of the sample, d) setting the sample mass to a predefined sample mass, e) tempering the sample and a lye to a first measurement temperature, f) mixing the sample with a lye, g) Temporal recording of the energy generated by the sample-liquor mixture at a constant first measurement temperature for a first period of time, h) quantitative evaluation of the time-energy curve recorded in step g) for the first exothermic reaction and determination of the amount of energy released by the sample for the first exothermic reaction, i) Correlation of the amount of energy recorded in step h) with the temperature and residence time recorded in step a) and comparison with previously recorded value combinations of energy quantity, temperature and residence time, j) Actively controlling the temperature and/or the residence time in the calciner (20) in the direction of increasing the amount of energy to be expected for a further sample. regulatory procedure claim 1 , characterized in that a reproducible size distribution of the sample is produced in step c) by grinding. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that an alkali metal hydroxide solution with a pH between 9 and 15, preferably between 10.25 and 15, more preferably between 12 and 14.6, is selected as the base in step f). regulatory procedure claim 3 , characterized in that the added mass of the lye corresponds to 1 to 5 times, preferably 2 to 3 times, the mass of the sample. Regulatory procedure according to one of Claims 1 until 2 , characterized in that a lye former and water are added as the lye in step f), the lye former and the water reacting with one another to form a solution with a pH between 9 and 15, preferably between 10.25 and 15, more preferably between 12 and 14.6, produce. regulatory procedure claim 5 , characterized in that the lye former is selected from the group comprising alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal oxide, alkaline earth metal hydroxide, alkaline earth metal oxide and substances, mixtures or compositions containing these. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that steps c) to g) take place automatically in an environment that is air-conditioned to the first measurement temperature. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sample mass in step d) is accurate to at least 2%, preferably at least 0.5% accurate, more preferably at least 0.1% accurate, particularly preferably at least 0.02% accurate, adjusted to the specified sample mass. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the quantitative evaluation of the time-energy curve recorded in step g) for the first exothermic reaction for the period from the second minute to the 120th minute, preferably from the second minute to the 70th minutes, done. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the first temperature is selected in the range from 20°C to 40°C. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the predefined sample mass is selected between 1 g and 200 g, preferably between 2 g and 20 g. Control method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that in step a) it is additionally recorded from which educt batches in which mixing ratio the clay is supplied to the calcination, wherein in step i) the information from which educt batches in which mixing ratio the clay of the calcination is added was supplied, is used, the selection and the mixing ratio between the starting material batches being additionally taken into account for the regulation in step j). regulatory procedure claim 12 , characterized in that in addition to the characterization of each product batch, the following batch characterization method is carried out with the following steps: A) heating a batch sample to a batch temperature of 600 °C to 1000 °C, preferably 600 °C to 950 °C for a batch time of 1 s to 60 min, preferably 30 s to 20 min, particularly preferably 30 s to 5 min, B) Establishing a reproducible size distribution of the batch sample, C) Adjusting the batch sample mass to a predefined sample mass, D) Tempering the batch sample to a first measurement temperature, E) Mixing the batch sample with a lye, F) Temporal recording of the lyes from the batch sample Mixture generated energy at a constant first measurement temperature for a first period of time, G) quantitative evaluation of the time-energy curve recorded in step F) for the first exothermic reaction and determination of the amount of energy released by the batch sample for the first exothermic reaction. regulatory procedure Claim 13 , characterized in that in step A) an identical first batch temperature and an identical first batch time is selected for all batch samples. Regulatory procedure according to one of Claims 13 until 14 , characterized in that the batch characterization method is repeated with a second batch temperature and a second batch time.

Images