CN116562784A - Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering - Google Patents

Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116562784A
CN116562784A CN202310239614.4A CN202310239614A CN116562784A CN 116562784 A CN116562784 A CN 116562784A CN 202310239614 A CN202310239614 A CN 202310239614A CN 116562784 A CN116562784 A CN 116562784A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
implementation
engineering
engineering change
change
task
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202310239614.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张成巍
冯万喜
陆汉东
金英伟
苗梦凡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
South China Aircraft Industry Co Ltd of China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd
Original Assignee
South China Aircraft Industry Co Ltd of China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by South China Aircraft Industry Co Ltd of China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd filed Critical South China Aircraft Industry Co Ltd of China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd
Priority to CN202310239614.4A priority Critical patent/CN116562784A/en
Publication of CN116562784A publication Critical patent/CN116562784A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103Workflow collaboration or project management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04Manufacturing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for monitoring the alteration of the final assembly engineering of an aircraft and a system management platform, wherein the method defines the alteration type of the engineering alteration, confirms and records the alteration type of the engineering alteration in a process examination countersignature link, can filter out tasks which do not need to be carried out when the alteration is pushed, and accurately pushes the alteration to an assembly scheme which needs to be carried out, so that an operator receives the implementation interface more clearly, all the alteration is the substantial alteration which needs to be carried out, the artificial omission is avoided, the alteration type can be completely recorded, the implementation condition of the engineering alteration can be completely exported, and the engineering alteration is transferred to a purchasing department by establishing a structured engineering alteration single transfer, so that the implementation condition of the engineering processing can be effectively tracked and recorded, the full-direction control of the alteration process and the file record are finally realized, and basic data are provided for the inspection of the manufacturing compliance verification of the whole aircraft, and the information carding of the navigation is ensured.

Description

Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of aircraft manufacturing, and particularly relates to a method for monitoring the modification implementation condition of an aircraft assembly project and a system management platform.
Background
Modern aircraft manufacturing is a long-period huge system project, and especially for aircraft produced in a main-supply mode in a development period, engineering changes are not only frequent, but also involve multiple suppliers to implement, and are time-consuming and labor-consuming, and the implementation of engineering changes is particularly difficult. The fact that engineering change is not carried out in place directly influences purchasing of finished products, materials, standard components and the like, influences timeliness of on-site production planning and scheduling, and delays a development period. The fact that engineering change is not carried out in place can lead to the fact that components are penetrated, changed and leaked, whether the final physical state of the aircraft meets the technical state requirements of the aircraft or not is determined, and even the quality of an aircraft product and the flight safety are affected. The entity of engineering change implementation is the main data for verifying the manufacturing compliance of the aircraft, and is one of the components of airworthiness evidence submitting and examining manufacturing configuration data.
Currently, with the development of digital management of product data, aircraft manufacturing also adopts a system management platform for management. However, the applicant has found that the system management platform of the existing aircraft manufacturing mainly has the following defect problems in terms of implementation of engineering changes (ECN is engineering change notification, EO is engineering instruction) of the aircraft assembly engineering:
1. engineering changes have missed situations: all the changes are pushed to the process staff according to the relation of the consumption engineering data, when one process file relates to a plurality of changes, the process staff receives a large number of changes of different types which are combined together, the implementation conditions are inconsistent, the identification is difficult, the implementation period is long, and the judgment error causes missing.
2. Engineering change implementation can not be completely exported: for the condition that the implementation is not needed, the system is not recorded, so that the engineering change implementation condition cannot be completely exported, feedback needs to be filled out offline, and moreover, the process staff needs to search for the information one by one, so that the system is difficult and time-consuming, and a large number of repeated work is repeated repeatedly.
3. For the conditions of factory return repair, scrapping new production and the like, the purchasing department needs to realize factory return and new purchasing, and at present, the system management platform can only be free to edit the distribution description file for transmission, inform the purchasing department and have no tracking and record in implementing conditions.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the problems in the prior art, the invention provides a method for monitoring the modification implementation condition of an aircraft assembly project and a system management platform.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
in a first aspect, the invention provides a method for monitoring the implementation condition of the change of the assembly engineering of an airplane, which comprises the following steps:
s1, starting an engineering change audit and signing task, and enabling a division worker to receive the engineering change audit and signing task, so as to complete process route division and meeting and signing task distribution and create a structural engineering change division work order;
s2, carrying out engineering change manufacturability examination and signing, and judging the through-change implementation type of engineering change;
s3, after the engineering change and the engineering change sub-work order approval, generating a main implementation task flow and an EO implementation monitoring task flow, and an engineering change sub-work order monitoring task flow;
s4, pushing the tasks in the main implementation task flow to be implemented according to the implementation type;
the method comprises the steps of confirming and implementing and dividing tasks in EO implementing monitoring task flow, simultaneously continuing pushing the EO implementing monitoring task needing to be implemented according to the implementing type, fusing the EO implementing monitoring task and main implementing task flow, associating data, filtering and recording engineering modifying implementing tasks without implementing;
s5, thawing an assembly scheme of the aircraft assembly, starting an programming process instruction implementation to change EO in a process file according to a main implementation task and an EO implementation monitoring task pushed in S4, and recording the association relation between the EO and the process instruction;
s6, after the process instruction is approved, deriving a temporary production plan, pushing the approved process instruction to a production site, and carrying out physical implementation.
By adopting the technical scheme, on one hand, the project change is defined to be changed into the implementation type, and the implementation type is confirmed and recorded in the process inspection countersignature link, so that the tasks which do not need to be implemented can be filtered out during the implementation task pushing, and the tasks are accurately pushed to the assembly scheme which needs to be implemented, thereby enabling the process staff to receive the implementation interface more clearly, all the substantial changes which need to be implemented are not needed to be identified manually, avoiding the problem of missing the implementation caused by human judgment errors, and effectively shortening the implementation period; the two aspects can completely record the type without implementation while filtering tasks without implementation, and ensure that engineering change implementation conditions can be completely exported; the three aspects are that the construction engineering is established to change the delivery and implementation of the division work order to the purchasing department, so that the condition of the work-in-process delivery can be effectively tracked and recorded.
Further, the method for monitoring the modification implementation of the aircraft assembly engineering further comprises the following steps:
s7, inputting a process instruction closing condition into a field management platform after the physical implementation is completed;
s8, extracting a list of execution conditions of single engineering change implementation according to the effective frame times of engineering change, the effective frame times of route division work and the effective frame times of actual implementation process instructions.
Further, the "carry-through type" includes a main manufacturer carry-through and no carry-through, and the main manufacturer carry-through is a carry-through required.
Further, S1 specifically includes:
creating an engineering change order when the delivered piece penetration involves the implementation of a provider;
deriving a structural data editing task of an engineering change division work order based on engineering change structural data, modifying and adjusting the structural data of the engineering change division work order based on the engineering change structural data, and increasing process attribute information;
and carrying out task flow examination on the engineering change division list, and then transmitting, determining a new task and carrying out process route division.
Further, the data of the main implementation task flow in S3 is the data flow for transmitting manufacturing materials, after engineering change approval, the implementation task from the design EBOM to the process PBOM is created, and the PBOM consumes type complete implementation EBOM data to form a PBOM change list;
after approval of engineering changes, EO execution monitoring tasks are automatically derived, and all changes generate monitoring tasks.
Further, in S5, the assembly plan of the thawed aircraft assembly is identified based on the association of the historical consumption of components in the PBOM change sheet to the assembly plan.
Further, in S4, the "confirm and divide task in EO implementation monitor task flow" is specifically: and according to the engineering change division work order related to reference, confirming division work of the implementation unit, and for the same EO change, implementing different units of different frames, namely, needing to split the frames and modifying the code of the implementation unit.
Further, after step S5 and before step S6, the method further includes: setting engineering data to be full-frame effective, namely for new production of the overhead, compiling a process instruction for the first time, referring to a high-edition digital model, and enabling historical version engineering change data not to be implemented, wherein the latest version of the data effectively contains low-version data; historical version engineering change feedback is implemented "in high version".
In a second aspect, the present invention further provides a system management platform, where the system management platform applies the above-mentioned method for performing monitoring on the modification of the aircraft assembly engineering.
The technical effects of each aspect and the possible technical effects of each aspect in the second aspect are referred to above for the first aspect or the technical effects that may be achieved by each possible solution in the first aspect, and the detailed description is not repeated here.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for monitoring the implementation of a change in aircraft assembly engineering according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of structured data of an engineering change order in the aircraft assembly engineering change execution monitoring method of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the process conditions of the engineering change in the aircraft assembly engineering change execution monitoring method according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a relationship diagram of the engineering change implementation in the aircraft final assembly engineering change implementation monitoring method of the present invention, which is filtered and screened and then pushed to an account of an artist;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a single-frame secondary filtering and screening function software interface in an embodiment of a method for monitoring the implementation of a change in an aircraft assembly project;
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a single machine engineering change execution list in the aircraft final assembly engineering change execution monitoring method according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the drawings and examples, in order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for monitoring the implementation of the change of the aircraft assembly engineering according to the invention is a method based on a system management platform (such as a PDM system platform), and comprises the following steps:
s1, starting an engineering change audit and signing task, and enabling a division worker to receive the engineering change audit and signing task, so as to complete process route division and meeting and signing task distribution and create a structural engineering change division work order; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
s1-1, when the delivered part is delivered to the implementation of a provider, creating an engineering change work order;
s1-2, deriving a structure data editing task of an engineering change division work order based on engineering change structure data, modifying and adjusting the structure data of the engineering change division work order based on the engineering change structure data, and adding process attribute information (such as a component manufacturing process route, a delivery piece, a factory return repair/scrapping new system and the like);
s1-3, performing task flow checking on the engineering change division work order (including a engineering change division work order checking task and an engineering change checking task by engineering change creation structure, wherein all change contents in the engineering change checking task include changed digital-analog, EBOM, structural data and the like, and the process goes to a process staff for technical inspection), and then transmitting, determining a new task and performing process route division work.
In step S1, a process route staff receives an engineering change checking task, carries out process route division editing on components in engineering change, selects a countersign process staff according to change contents, completes the task, and flows to a master process staff account; and meanwhile, judging whether to create a structural engineering change work order according to the engineering change data.
More specifically, the final assembly stage of the aircraft is implemented through design change, and the work-in-process mode comprises the conditions of site reworking, factory returning and repair, scrapping and new manufacturing and the like. And (3) producing in a 'main-supply' mode, delivering the product according to a purchase contract by a provider, receiving and implementing the engineering change task in an engineering change data audit form before delivering the product, and delivering the product after implementing the latest state. The time for sending out engineering change is not fixed, and the main manufacturer cannot carry out the component delivery, and the supplier needs to carry out the change, so that the conditions of returning the component to the supplier, carrying out the component delivery, and the like exist. Therefore, when the engineering change check is in the process of dividing the process route, the route division and the countersignature task distribution are completed, the delivered part is completed by a provider, the engineering change division work order task is created, the structured data of the engineering change division work order is shown as figure 2, the engineering change division work order is edited, the independent check is transmitted to the provider to confirm the acceptance of the division of the new task technology, the engineering change division work order check task and the engineering change countersignature task can be related to each other in number, and the countersignature acceptance progress is inquired. After approval, forming a project change division work order monitoring task, automatically distributing and tracking the work-in-process condition according to a meeting sign record (a work-in-process condition list template is shown in figure 3), deriving and editing a purchase order contract, and starting product scrapping, factory returning and purchase tasks. The principle of dispatching the distribution work order comprises the following points:
engineering change of delivered large components requires new and scrapped components of suppliers to participate in reworking and repairing (containing reserved parts of suppliers);
engineering change of delivered sub-components requires suppliers to discard new products and participate in reworking and repair;
there are new added parts for the delivered sub-package.
S2, carrying out engineering change manufacturability examination and signing, and judging the through-change implementation type of engineering change; the "carry-through type" includes a main manufacturer carry-through and no carry-through, and the main manufacturer carry-through is an engineering change requiring carry-through, i.e., determining that an edit process instruction is required to carry-out; design error change and insubstantial change with no effect on the real object belong to no need of implementation, and then the option of no need of implementation is selected. And pushing the effective penetration task after the selected implementation type option is used as the basis for engineering change approval.
The method comprises the following steps: judging the through implementation type of the engineering change according to the manufacturability of the change content in the engineering change, for example: a manufacturability examination and countersign link, wherein after the manufacturability of the content is examined and changed by a worker, the through improvement implementation category of engineering change is judged and determined; the determination of the corresponding CAS number (CAS is the assembly scheme) or "no need to be performed" should also be selected in the process audit countersign.
S3, after the engineering change and the engineering change division work order are approved, generating a main implementation task flow and an EO implementation monitoring task flow, and an engineering change division work order monitoring task flow;
the method comprises the following steps: and after approval of the engineering change division list, an engineering change list monitoring task is generated, and is transmitted to a purchasing department of a main manufacturer according to a countersignature as action basis of purchasing orders, scrapping return works and the like, and the purchasing list number, the scrapping list number and the return works list number are recorded, and finally, the engineering change management is realized in a closed-loop mode by recording in a work-in-process condition list.
The data of the main implementation task flow is a data flow for transmitting manufacturing materials, after engineering change approval, an implementation task from the design of the EBOM to the process of the PBOM is created, and the PBOM consumes type complete implementation of the EBOM data to form a PBOM change list; meanwhile, after engineering change approval, EO implementation monitoring tasks are automatically derived, and all changes can generate monitoring tasks. The method for generating the main implementation task flow and the EO implementation monitoring task flow belongs to the functions of the existing system management platform and is not described herein.
S4, pushing the tasks in the main implementation task flow to be implemented according to the implementation type;
the method comprises the steps of confirming and implementing and dividing tasks in EO implementing monitoring task flow, simultaneously continuing pushing the EO implementing monitoring task needing to be implemented according to the implementing type, fusing the EO implementing monitoring task and main implementing task flow, associating data, filtering and recording engineering modifying implementing tasks without implementing; the method for confirming and implementing the tasks in the EO implementation monitoring task flow comprises the following steps: confirming the division of the implementation unit according to the reference associated engineering change division bill, and for the same EO change, implementing different units at different times, needing to split the frames and modifying the code of the implementation unit; and the countersign in the step S2 is determined that the assembly main manufacturer who does not need to be implemented can be filtered out and pushed no longer, the assembly scheme implementation task can only receive the task needing to be implemented, the process instruction implementation interface does not display the engineering change implementation task needing to be implemented, meanwhile, the system management platform records that the engineering change implementation task needing to be implemented is not required, the provider who determines the engineering change implementation need not to be implemented continues to push, and the engineering change implementation is filtered and screened and then pushed to the account number of the artist, as shown in the relation diagram of fig. 4. In addition, the monitoring task can be independently started as compared with the judgment of needing to be carried out when the process staff is countersunk, the monitoring task is transmitted to the process staff account number according to the process staff countersign path, the notification reminding effect is achieved, the process staff is spontaneously carried out, the process command has an association relation with EO, and the process command is recorded in a single-machine implementation execution list.
The "fusing the EO implementation monitoring task with the main implementation task flow and associating data" specifically refers to: the main implementation task flow is to push a PBOM change list to change an MBOM change instruction, a thawing assembly scheme is identified according to the step S2, the PBOM change list content is related to change content needing to be implemented, interface tiling and displaying can be unified, EO implementation monitoring tasks are mainly recorded and implemented, the function of closed-loop management is achieved, data tiling and displaying are the same as engineering change formats carried in the PBOM, and three columns of 'implemented instruction number' and 'split-work route' and 'split-work error' are increased on the basis, and the three columns are fused together according to engineering change data, so that super data is formed.
S5, thawing an assembly scheme of the aircraft assembly, starting an programming process instruction implementation to change EO in a process file according to a main implementation task and an EO implementation monitoring task pushed in S4, and recording the association relation between the EO and the process instruction. The method comprises the steps of identifying an assembly scheme of the assembly of the unfreezing aircraft according to the association relation of historical consumption of components in a PBOM change list to the assembly scheme, and specifically comprises the following steps: and the system management platform associates the related CAS numbers according to the historical consumption component relation, and determines the specific CAS numbers.
The step S5 may specifically be: the process staff receives the implementation change task interface, displays the specific content of engineering change and the process division, after the process confirms the task, the assembly scheme is unfreezes, the process instruction is started to implement the process file through change, the process instruction refers to EO (ethylene oxide) required to be implemented in the process of programming, and the system management platform can record the corresponding relation between the process file number and the EO. Combing EO implementation can lead out a single machine implementation execution list.
S6, after approval of the process instruction, deriving a temporary production plan, pushing the approved process instruction (specifically, a process assembly instruction for guiding production) to a production site, and carrying out physical implementation; wherein, the derived temporary production plan is specifically: after the approved process instructions are all transferred to the account of the next planner, the planner arranges a production plan according to the received process instructions, and the process instructions are automatically transferred to the on-site production MES system after the production plan is arranged and approved; after the process command is pushed to the production site, the command input system is started to work by site workers, and physical implementation is carried out.
According to the method, the penetration type is defined and changed for engineering change, and the penetration type is confirmed and recorded in a manufacturability inspection countersign link, so that the tasks which do not need to be performed can be filtered during the task pushing, and the tasks are accurately pushed to an assembly scheme which needs to be performed, so that a worker receives a more clear penetration interface, all the substantial changes which need to be performed are realized, manual identification is not needed, the problem of penetration leakage caused by human judgment errors is avoided, and the implementation period is effectively shortened; the method can also filter tasks which do not need to be implemented, and simultaneously, completely record the types which do not need to be implemented, so that the implementation condition of engineering change can be completely exported; and the construction engineering is established to change the delivery and implementation of the division work order to the purchasing department (other production planning delivery departments can also be adopted), so that the work-in-process delivery situation can be effectively tracked and recorded.
Therefore, the method for monitoring the change of the aircraft assembly engineering can realize the full-scale control and the actual implementation of the change process data of the engineering, can filter and screen the change of the engineering according to different implementation types, accurately push the implementation task, avoid missing the implementation, greatly improve the implementation efficiency and the implementation accuracy, realize the zero-missing management of the whole process monitoring, and greatly reduce the repeated work and errors caused by the secondary feedback of the operators.
In addition, the method for monitoring the modification implementation of the aircraft assembly engineering plays a role in reminding implementation by establishing the implementation monitoring flow, and can further avoid missing the implementation; the method comprises the following steps:
1. the main implementation task flow serves as a push of the implementation task to play a reminding function (namely, identification errors are avoided, EO (ethylene oxide) penetration by the main implementation task flow does not play a reminding role).
2. The EO monitoring task is pushed to the assembly scheme defrosting modification node again to be fused with the EO monitoring task, and meanwhile the EO monitoring task can be used as a implementing reminding;
3. when the EO monitoring task is pushed again, the division is checked again according to the meeting opinion, division and changing content, if the identification error is no need of implementing during the meeting, the monitoring task can be pushed alone to form an EO implementing task, the EO implementing task can be independently used as reminding for implementing the EO task, the process staff can implement the autonomous implementing according to the reminding of the monitoring task, the process instruction is associated with the EO, and the implementing condition can be derived from a later list.
4. The engineering change division work order is approved to form an engineering change division work order monitoring task, the engineering change division work order monitoring task is automatically transferred to a purchasing department according to the transfer of a countersignee, the work-in-process condition is traced, meanwhile, the engineering change task can be transferred to purchasing, factory returning, scrapping and other conditions, the purchasing person is reminded to write and feed back factory returning orders and scrapping orders, the work-in-process result is traced and recorded in a full-machine work-in-process condition list.
In addition, the existing system management platform has no feedback defect when processing high-version implementation conditions, because a large number of high-version implementation conditions exist when counting the single-machine engineering change implementation conditions for new compiling process files in later production in the development period, but the single-machine effective engineering change implementation conditions are counted, the single-machine effective engineering change implementation conditions need to be combed one by one, and the workload is extremely high.
For this purpose, the method for monitoring the implementation of the modification of the aircraft assembly engineering according to the present invention further comprises, after step S5 and before step S6: the engineering data is set to be full-frame effective, and specifically comprises the following steps: for the new production of the overhead, the first process instruction is compiled to refer to the high-version digital model, the history version engineering change data is not required to be implemented, and the latest version of the data effectively contains the low-version data; historical version engineering change feedback is implemented according to a high version; thus, the system management platform automatically calculates according to the principle, and the history version engineering change record is implemented according to the high version, and the implementation condition of direct output is implemented according to the high version when the full-automatic implementation list is extracted.
In the aircraft manufacturing process in the development period, engineering data are multiple-frame effective super data, a manufacturing unit is assembled one by one, instructions are compiled and approved to be issued one by one, when instructions are compiled for subsequent new production of the frames, new digital models are referenced, old digital models are invalid, and history engineering change is not needed to be implemented; when the statistics is needed, the function is endowed to the system management platform to call a background calculation function, the historical version engineering change platform of the digital model is endowed to be implemented according to a high version by taking the first reference digital model version of a single frame as a reference, and finally, feedback exists in a list of implementation conditions of single machine engineering change.
In addition, the list led out by the existing system management platform is a full-frame list, manual extraction is needed, two screening modes of effective frame of engineering change and effective frame of process implementation exist, and the frame of engineering change is inconsistent, so that single-frame data extraction is difficult.
To this end, in one possible implementation, as shown in fig. 1, the method for monitoring the implementation of the modification of the aircraft assembly engineering according to the present invention further includes:
s7, inputting a process instruction closing condition into a field management platform after the physical implementation is completed;
s8, according to the effective frame times of engineering change, the effective frame times of route division and the effective frame times of actual implementation process instructions (namely, the actual implementation process assembly instructions in the field are used for guiding workers to process), a list of implementation conditions of single-machine engineering change is extracted.
The method comprises the following steps: after the real object is finished and the inspection is passed, the on-site inspector inputs the instruction sealing condition into the on-site production MES system management platform, the instruction sealing condition is integrally transmitted to the engineering change checking system platform, and finally, the closing condition information in the single machine engineering change implementation condition list can be derived. The method comprises the steps of effectively setting up engineering change, effectively setting up route division work and effectively setting up actual implementation process instructions, and extracting a single machine engineering change implementation condition list according to the engineering change effective setting up times; the interface diagram of the single-pass filtering function software is shown in fig. 5, and the list of the single-machine engineering change implementation conditions is shown in fig. 6.
Therefore, the aircraft assembly engineering change implementation monitoring method realizes zero-leakage through closed-loop implementation monitoring management of the assembly main manufacturer, further ensures the accuracy and the integrity of implementation, avoids off-line manual carding errors, greatly reduces manual carding workload, provides basic data for full-machine manufacturing compliance verification, provides guarantee for inspection of navigable evidence taking configuration data, can extract a list of single engineering change implementation conditions, does not need manual extraction, and is easy, convenient and quick to extract.
While the foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the principles of the invention, such changes and modifications are also intended to be within the scope of the invention.

Claims (9)

1. The method for monitoring the modification implementation condition of the aircraft assembly engineering is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
s1, starting an engineering change audit and signing task, and enabling a division worker to receive the engineering change audit and signing task, so as to complete process route division and meeting and signing task distribution and create a structural engineering change division work order;
s2, carrying out engineering change manufacturability examination and signing, and judging the through-change implementation type of engineering change;
s3, after the engineering change and the engineering change sub-work order approval, generating a main implementation task flow and an EO implementation monitoring task flow, and an engineering change sub-work order monitoring task flow;
s4, pushing the tasks in the main implementation task flow to be implemented according to the implementation type;
the method comprises the steps of confirming and implementing and dividing tasks in EO implementing monitoring task flow, simultaneously continuing pushing the EO implementing monitoring task needing to be implemented according to the implementing type, fusing the EO implementing monitoring task and main implementing task flow, associating data, filtering and recording engineering modifying implementing tasks without implementing;
s5, thawing an assembly scheme of the aircraft assembly, starting an programming process instruction implementation to change EO in a process file according to a main implementation task and an EO implementation monitoring and merging task pushed in S4, and recording the association relation between the EO and the process instruction;
s6, after the process instruction is approved, deriving a temporary production plan, pushing the approved process instruction to a production site, and carrying out physical implementation.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
s7, inputting a process instruction closing condition into a field management platform after the physical implementation is completed;
s8, extracting a list of execution conditions of single engineering change implementation according to the effective frame times of engineering change, the effective frame times of route division work and the effective frame times of actual implementation process instructions.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the "penetration type" includes a primary manufacturer's penetration and no penetration, and the primary manufacturer's penetration is a penetration required.
4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein S1 comprises in particular:
creating an engineering change order when the delivered piece penetration involves the implementation of a provider;
deriving a structural data editing task of an engineering change division work order based on engineering change structural data, modifying and adjusting the structural data of the engineering change division work order based on the engineering change structural data, and increasing process attribute information;
and carrying out task flow examination on the engineering change division list, and then transmitting, determining a new task and carrying out process route division.
5. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the data of the main implementation task flow in S3 is a data flow for transferring manufacturing materials, and after engineering change approval, an implementation task from design EBOM to process PBOM is created, and PBOM consumption type complete implementation of the EBOM data forms a PBOM change order;
after approval of engineering changes, EO execution monitoring tasks are automatically derived, and all changes generate monitoring tasks.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein in S5, the assembly plan for the thawed aircraft assembly is identified based on the correlation of historical consumption of components in the PBOM change list into the assembly plan.
7. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that in S4, the "confirmation and execution of tasks in EO execution monitor task flow" is specifically: and according to the engineering change division work order related to reference, confirming division work of the implementation unit, and for the same EO change, implementing different units of different frames, namely, needing to split the frames and modifying the code of the implementation unit.
8. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that after step S5 and before step S6, further comprising: setting engineering data to be full-frame effective, namely for new production of the overhead, compiling a process instruction for the first time, referring to a high-edition digital model, and enabling historical version engineering change data not to be implemented, wherein the latest version of the data effectively contains low-version data; historical version engineering change feedback is implemented "in high version".
9. A system management platform, wherein the system management platform applies the method for monitoring the implementation of the modification of the aircraft assembly engineering according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
CN202310239614.4A 2023-03-14 2023-03-14 Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering Pending CN116562784A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310239614.4A CN116562784A (en) 2023-03-14 2023-03-14 Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310239614.4A CN116562784A (en) 2023-03-14 2023-03-14 Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116562784A true CN116562784A (en) 2023-08-08

Family

ID=87502622

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310239614.4A Pending CN116562784A (en) 2023-03-14 2023-03-14 Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116562784A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117827183A (en) * 2023-12-14 2024-04-05 广州合道信息科技有限公司 Contract generation method, platform and storage medium

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117827183A (en) * 2023-12-14 2024-04-05 广州合道信息科技有限公司 Contract generation method, platform and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108971807B (en) Intelligent management control method and management system for field welding construction process
CN109035060A (en) A kind of structured processes management system and management method
CN111459116B (en) Efficient tube intelligent production line digital management system
CN111091352A (en) High-end equipment manufacturing process data management system
CN113610389B (en) Prefabricated component production quality management system based on BIM and RFID
CN113656505B (en) Digitization of distributed project management system and method for synchronizing data thereof
CN116562784A (en) Method and system management platform for implementing modification and monitoring of aircraft assembly engineering
CN112508500A (en) Product development process data integration management method considering multiple technical states
CN111260327A (en) Project construction cooperation management and control platform based on cloud service
CN117591079A (en) Design construction method of enterprise-level integrated operation management system
das Neves et al. Deployment the MES (Manufacturing Execution System) aiming to improve competitive priorities of manufacturing
CN107392385A (en) A kind of production technical reserve method based on qualitative data depth analysis
CN109492953A (en) A kind of provide multiple forms of energy to complement each other monitoring and managing method and system based on Building Information Model
Malley et al. Informational and organizational impacts of implementing a JIT system
JP2004139472A (en) Work schedule planning system, work schedule planning method, program, and medium
Jeon et al. Information Delivery Manual (IDM) Configurator: Previous Efforts and Future Work
CN111222793A (en) Data interaction method and system
Tang et al. Development and implementation of an integrated quality information system—a China experience
de Andrade et al. Production Planning and Control (PPC): production pointing system deployment, use and unfolding
CN110309987A (en) The Optimization Work method of magnanimity document piecemeal distribution editor's collaboration processing
CN117114617A (en) Engine production management system integrating MES and TCM
CN117787880B (en) Industrial digital management system and method based on cloud edge cooperation
CN113569542B (en) Implementation method for automatically drawing and analyzing nuclear power engineering construction plan network diagram
Diallo Using discrete-event simulation to increase system capacity: a case study of an assembly plant
Haijun et al. An application technology research about FO/AO based on MES system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination