Detailed Description
In order to better understand the essence of the present invention, the following examples are further illustrated, but the present invention is not limited to these examples. In these examples, all percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
Example 1: a bactericide composition containing Sinomenine or neosinomenine and micromolecular phenolic compound comprises an active component A and an active component B (shown in structural formula 1), wherein the active component A is Sinomenine or neosinomenine, and the active component B is micromolecular phenolic compound.
Example 2: indoor activity determination of rape sclerotinia sclerotiorum by mixing bynine and active component B
The plant pathogenic bacteria used in the experiment are strains preserved at 4 ℃ in a laboratory, and the adopted culture medium is a potato agar glucose culture medium (PDA for short). The PDA culture medium formula comprises: potato (peeled) 200g, glucose 20g, agar 15g, distilled water 1000mL, natural pH.
The compounding synergy of the bactericide is calculated according to the formula of Wadley (1967) to obtain the synergistic coefficient after mixing different medicaments:
in the formula, a and B represent the ratio EC of two agents of the cryptolepine or the neocryptolepine (A) and the small molecular phenolic compound (B) in the mixture50(A),EC50(B) Respectively represent actual observed EC50Value, EC50(Exp) represents two drugs A and B as aB theoretical EC after mixing50Value, EC50(Obs) actual observed EC after mixing of A and B agents50The value is obtained. SR>1.5 is synergy; SR<0.5 is antagonistic; an SR between 0.5 and 1.5 indicates additive effect.
The indoor toxicity synergism of the mixing of the cryptolepine and the active component B on the sclerotinia rot of colza is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 indoor toxicity synergism of mixing of Sinomenine and active component B on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
As can be seen from Table 1, when the mixing mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:100, the cryptolepine has obvious synergistic effect on sclerotinia rot of rape, and especially when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to P4 is 1:50, the SR is as high as 39.75.
Example 3: indoor activity determination of rhizoctonia solani by mixing cryptolepine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergy of the combination of the byttinine and the active component B to the rhizoctonia solani is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2 indoor toxicity synergism of the blending of Sinomenine and active ingredient B to Rhizoctonia solani
As can be seen from Table 2, when the mixing mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:100, the cryptolepine has obvious synergistic effect on rhizoctonia solani, and especially when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the P1 is 1:1, the SR is as high as 9.75.
Example 4: indoor activity determination of wheat scab by mixing bynine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of the mixing of the cryptolepine and the active component B on wheat scab is shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3 indoor toxicity synergism of the combination of bynine and active ingredient B on wheat scab
As can be seen from table 3, when the mixing mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50, and 1:100, the synergistic effect on wheat scab is not obvious, and only when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to P2 is 1:50, SR is 1.53; when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the P5 is 1:100, SR is 1.52. The remaining compositions show more additive, followed by antagonism.
Example 5: indoor activity determination of tomato gray mold by mixing solanine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of the combination of the bynine and the active component B on the tomato gray mold is shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4 indoor toxicity synergistic effect of mixing of Sinomenine and active component B on Botrytis cinerea
As can be seen from Table 4, when the mixing mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:100, the cryptolepine has obvious synergistic effect on the tomato gray mold, and especially when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the P6 is 1:10, the SR is as high as 14.44.
Example 6: indoor activity determination of mixing of cryptolepine and active component B on rice blast
The indoor toxicity synergism of the mixing of the cryptolepine and the active component B on rice blast is shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5 indoor toxicity synergism of mixing of Sinomenine and active component B on Rice blast
As can be seen from Table 5, when the mixing mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:100, the cryptolepine has obvious synergistic effect on the tomato gray mold, and especially when the cryptolepine and the P1 are in the mass ratio of 1:1, the SR is as high as 2.52.
Example 7: indoor activity determination of cotton wilt by mixing solanine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of the mixing of the byssurine and the active component B on the cotton wilt disease is shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6 indoor toxicity synergism of the blending of bynine and active ingredient B on cotton wilt
As can be seen from table 6, the synergistic effect on cotton wilt is not very obvious when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50, and 1:100, and only when the mass ratio of the cryptolepine to P2 is 1:1, 1:10, SR is 2.01, and 1.86. The remaining compositions show more additive, followed by antagonism.
Example 8: indoor activity determination of rape sclerotinia sclerotiorum by mixing neobylonine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of neocryptolepine and active component B on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7 indoor toxicity synergism of Neosinomenine and active component B blending on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
As can be seen from Table 7, when the weight ratio of the neobylonine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10 and 1:20, the synergistic effect on sclerotinia rot of rape is obvious, and especially when the weight ratio of the neobylonine to the P4 is 1:1, the SR is as high as 3.93.
Example 9: indoor activity determination of rhizoctonia solani by mixing neocryptophylline and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergy of the neobynine and the active component B mixed with rhizoctonia solani is shown in Table 8.
TABLE 8 indoor toxicity synergism of Neochrysogenin and active ingredient B blending vs. Rhizoctonia solani
As can be seen from table 8, the synergistic effect of fraxinella solanacearum is not very obvious when the weight ratio of sinalbine to active component B is 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, and SR is 1.65 when the weight ratio of sinalbine to P3 is 1: 20. The remaining compositions show more additive, followed by antagonism.
Example 10: indoor activity determination of wheat scab by mixing neobynine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of the neobynine and the active component B on wheat scab is shown in Table 9.
TABLE 9 indoor toxicity synergism of Neochrysine and active ingredient B blending for wheat scab
As can be seen from Table 9, the neobynine and the active component B have no synergistic effect on the control of wheat scab at the mass ratio of 1:1, 1:10 and 1:20, most of the neobynine and the active component B have additive effect and simultaneously have a plurality of groups of antagonistic effects.
Example 11: indoor activity determination of tomato gray mold by mixing neobynine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism effect of the neobynine and the active component B on the tomato gray mold is shown in Table 10.
TABLE 10 indoor toxicity synergistic effect of Neosinomenine and active component B on tomato gray mold
As can be seen from Table 10, when the mass ratio of the neobynine to the active component B is 1:1, 1:10 and 1:20, the synergistic effect on the tomato gray mold is obvious, and especially when the mass ratio of the neobynine to the P1 is 1:1, the SR is as high as 5.61.
Example 12: indoor activity determination of rice blast by mixing neocryptolepine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of neocryptolepine and active component B on rice blast is shown in Table 11.
TABLE 11 indoor toxicity synergism of Neosinomenine and active component B blending on Rice blast
As can be seen from Table 11, there was no synergistic effect of neobylonine and active ingredient B on the control of rice blast at the mass ratios of 1:1, 1:10 and 1:20, most of them were antagonistic, and there were several groups of additive effects.
Example 13: indoor activity determination of cotton wilt by mixing neobylonine and active component B
The indoor toxicity synergism of the neosolanine and the active component B on the cotton wilt disease by mixing is shown in Table 12.
TABLE 12 indoor toxicity synergism of Neochrysomeline and active component B compounding on Cotton wilt
As can be seen from Table 12, the neobylonine and the active component B have no synergistic effect on the control of cotton wilt disease in the mass ratio of 1:1, 1:10 and 1:20, most of the effects are additive effects, and meanwhile, a plurality of groups of antagonistic effects also exist.
In summary, it can be seen that the antibacterial activity of the combination of cryptolepine and small molecular weight phenolic compounds is better than that of the new cryptolepine composition, especially cryptolepine: p4 is 1:50, when the rape sclerotiniose is resisted, the SR is as high as 39.75. This is much higher than the conditions that lead to synergy (SR > 1.5). In the control of sclerotinia rot of colza, many synergistic combinations have emerged, for example in the case of cryptolepine: p1, cryptolepine: p2 and cryptolepine: when P3 are all 1:1, the SR is 12.42, 11.74 and 13.09 respectively.