CN110991811A - Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode - Google Patents
Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110991811A CN110991811A CN201911084800.5A CN201911084800A CN110991811A CN 110991811 A CN110991811 A CN 110991811A CN 201911084800 A CN201911084800 A CN 201911084800A CN 110991811 A CN110991811 A CN 110991811A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- row
- per plant
- yield
- yield per
- average yield
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000009345 mixed intercropping Methods 0.000 title description 19
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 230000036963 noncompetitive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007605 air drying Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000009342 intercropping Methods 0.000 description 35
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 34
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 16
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 16
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 241000209094 Oryza Species 0.000 description 7
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了混合间栽种植模式下作物产量评价方法技术领域，具体领域为一种对混合间栽种植模式下作物产量评价的方法，本发明利用了平均单株产量的测定方法，采取净栽时的竞争环境与间栽时的竞争环境和净栽时的非竞争环境与间栽时的非竞争环境分别比较的原则，来消除竞争作用对作物产量带来的影响，这种比较方法对于目标植物的产量测定更为精确和有效。
The invention discloses the technical field of a crop yield evaluation method in a mixed interplanting planting mode, and the specific field is a method for crop yield evaluation in a mixed interplanting planting mode. The principle of comparing the competitive environment of time and the competitive environment of interplanting and the non-competitive environment of net planting and the non-competitive environment of interplanting, to eliminate the influence of competition on crop yield, this comparison method is very important for the target. Yield measurements in plants are more precise and efficient.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of crop yield evaluation methods in a mixed intercropping mode, in particular to a method for evaluating crop yield in the mixed intercropping mode.
Background
The diversity intercropping of crops is an important representative of the traditional intensive cultivation agriculture in China, and has profound significance for promoting the sustainable development of agriculture. Although the correlation between the decrease in the severity of disease and the increase in yield of crops is clear in single variety planting, in analyzing the correlation between the disease control effect and the yield increase effect in the diversity intercropping mode of crops, it is concluded that there is no correlation between the severity of disease and yield, because competitive interactions between varieties are critical for the influence on yield in addition to the influence on yield caused by the increase and decrease in the severity of disease in the diversity intercropping system. In the current research on yield increase effect of diversity intercropping, for example, rice mostly utilizes the total yield of rice in an intercropping mode unit area to compare with the total yield of rice in a net planting mode unit area to count the yield increase effect of the intercropping mode (Zhu Yong et al, 2003; Wang Wen faith et al, 2010), and the method is difficult to define whether the yield increase is caused by disease reduction or traditional variety planting or competition, namely the method is difficult to subdivide the contribution of the yield, so that a method is necessary to be established for more accurately measuring the yield in the crop diversity intercropping mode.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to a method for evaluating crop yield in a hybrid intercropping mode, which solves the above-mentioned problems of the background art.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: a method for evaluating crop yield in a mixed intercropping mode comprises the following steps:
1) comparison of the yield of crops in the Mixed intercropping mode and the Net planting mode with the average Individual yield of the crops
Comparing the average single plant yield of the main cultivar in the net planting mode on the side rows with the average single plant yield of the main cultivar in the mixed intercropping mode on the side rows, and comparing the average single plant yield of the intercropping cultivar in the net planting mode on the inner rows with the average single plant yield of the intercropping cultivar in the mixed intercropping mode;
wherein the average yield of the single plant is calculated according to the formula:
wherein Y is the average individual plant yield and N is the total number of the plants tested;
2) yield correction factor determination for competitive and non-competitive environments
The calculation formula is as follows:
in the formula Y1Average yield per plant, Y, for mixed intercropping rows2The average individual plant yield of the mixed intercropping side row and the K correction coefficient are obtained;
3) yield increase calculated using average individual plant yields for different row positions
The calculation formula is as follows:
wherein E is the yield increase effect of the average single plant yield; y is1Average yield per plant for mixed intercropping rows, Y2The yield increase effect is calculated according to the principle of comparing competition lines with competition lines and comparing side lines with side lines when comparing the average yield of the single plants in net planting lines.
Preferably, the grain number of the spike is the total grain number of the main stem spike of the test seed after being harvested and dried, including the total number of solid grains, empty grains and fallen grains, and the unit is grain.
Preferably, the thousand kernel weight is the moisture content of the grain after harvest and air drying, and 1000 mature grains are randomly selected and weighed according to GB/T3543.6-1995. The unit is g.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: a method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode, the invention has utilized the determination method of the average single plant yield, adopt the competitive environment and non-competitive environment of intercropping that are compared separately in net cultivation while being net cultivation in the competition environment and principle of the non-competition environment and non-competition environment while intercropping while being net cultivation, eliminate the influence that the competition effect brings on the crop yield, thus the very good analysis goes out the disease and prevents and controls the relevant relation with increasing production effect, this comparison method has got rid of the output influence that the competition effect brings, the output determination to the goal plant is more accurate and effective, can dissect the contribution that the output increases at the same time, confirm whether the change of the output is because the disease reduces or because the change that the competition brings; determining yield correction factors in competitive and non-competitive environments, and when the yield of the mixed intercropping out-row is known and the yield of the mixed intercropping in-row is desired to be predicted, the yield can be determined by Y1＝K*Y2When the yield of the mixed intercropping inner row is known and the yield of the mixed intercropping outer row is desired to be predicted, the correction can be carried out by the calculation formula
The calculation method of the formula can be applied to the mode of mixed intercropping of other varieties or crops in the same way after correction; and finally, calculating the yield increasing effect by adopting the average single plant yield of different row positions to analyze the correlation between the disease control effect and the yield increasing effect.
The evaluation method is simple and easy to operate, the average yield of each plant can be calculated only by measuring the thousand kernel weight and the ear kernel number of each plant on different row positions, and the method can be widely applied to the comparative analysis of the yield in the diversity planting mode of any variety or crop.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a hybrid intercropping cell of the present invention, wherein "P" is a protection row variety; x is a main cultivated variety, and O is an intercropped variety;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a net cultivated plot of the present invention (main cultivar crop-only on the left, intercropped cultivar crop-only on the right), wherein "P" is a protected row cultivar; x is a main cultivated variety, and O is an intercropped variety;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the difference in average individual plant yield between the inner row and the side row of the mixed interspersion of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph of the difference in average individual plant yield between clean-cultivated lines and side lines of the present invention;
FIG. 5 shows the 2013 and 2014 correction factors of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the correlation between the control effect and yield increase effect of the main cultivar of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the correlation between the control effect and the yield increasing effect of the mixed intercropped cultivar of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions of the present invention will be described clearly and completely with reference to the following embodiments of the present invention, and it should be understood that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Examples
The test was carried out in the Shidian county of Bashan city in the mixed indica-japonica rice growing region of Yunnan province from 4 to 10 months in 2013, and the test was repeated in the Shidian county of Bashan city in the mixed indica-japonica rice growing region of Yunnan province from 4 to 10 months in 2014.
The experiment set up 3 treatments, respectively:
(1) mixed intercropping planting, namely mixed planting of main rice cultivars and intercropping cultivars, wherein the planting mode adopts a 'double-dragon water outlet' planting mode, every two rows of the main cultivars form a group, the row spacing in the group is 15cm, the row spacing between the groups is 30cm, the plant spacing is 15cm, the intercropping cultivars are planted in the middle of every two groups, and the length and the width of a cell are (400cm multiplied by 235 cm). (see FIG. 1)
(2) The main cultivar is single-cropping, the single-cropping mode is that every two lines of the single-cropping cultivar form a group, the row spacing in the group is 15cm, the row spacing between the groups is 30cm, the plant spacing is 15cm, and the length and the width of the cell are (200cm multiplied by 117.5 cm). (see FIG. 2)
(3) The single cropping mode of the intercropped variety is completely the same as that of the main variety, and the length and the width of the cell are (200cm multiplied by 117.5 cm). (see FIG. 2)
The test adopts a complete random block experimental design, the test is repeated for 3 times, the net planting cells are separated by 1 row of protection rows, and the main purpose is to ensure that the intercropped varieties of adjacent protection rows form inner rows.
The experimental design scheme is a complete random block experiment, wherein 12 combinations are provided, each combination is subjected to 3 treatments, each treatment is repeated for 3 times, 108 experimental cells are provided, 112 experimental materials of 14 multiplied by 8 are planted in a net planting cell, 224 experimental materials of 14 multiplied by 16 are planted in a diversity intercropping cell according to a main planting variety and an intercropping variety ratio of 4:1, and 56 experimental materials of 14 multiplied by 4 are planted in an intercropping variety.
The sampling mode of the test adopts single-row collection, the inner rows according to different cultivation modes are the left and right sides of the plant without empty rows, the side rows are the plants with empty rows and no empty rows, and each row of the net cultivation district and the diversity intercropping district collects 14 plants. The field management is kept consistent.
Through two years of field experiments, the average individual plant yield of rice with different row positions in a mixed intercropping mode is compared, and the main cultivar is found to have larger difference in intercropping rows under the intercropping mode, namely, the average individual plant yield of one row close to the intercropping cultivar and the average individual plant yield of one row far away from the intercropping cultivar are significantly higher than those of the intercropping rows (see figure 3), and have the same trend for two years; the net planting row of the intercropped variety under net planting conditions, i.e., the row near the protected row, and the net planting side row, i.e., the row far from the protected row, also have the same difference in average individual plant yield (see fig. 4), which has the same tendency in two years. The results show that the average single plant yield of the side row is obviously higher than that of the inner row, and the reason that the yield difference is caused by competitive environment and non-competitive environment in the same variety and the same field management is shown.
The results show that the yield of the intercropping side rows of the main cultivar in the intercropping mode is higher than the yield of the net-planting side rows and the yield of the intercropping side rows is lower than the yield of the net-planting side rows by comparing the yields of different row positions in different planting modes, which shows that the difference of the yields of the intercropping side rows and the net-planting side rows of the main cultivar is caused by the change of diseases, and the difference of the yields of the intercropping side rows and the net-planting side rows is caused by the change of the competitive environment and the change of the diseases at the same time, so that the comparison of the yield increase caused by the diseases is more accurate for the comparison of the intercropping side rows and the net-planting side rows.
The yield of the intercropped variety in the net planting mode, whether the net planting side row or the net planting inside row, is significantly lower than that in the intercropped mode, while the whole intercropped variety in the mixed planting mode is always in a competitive environment, so that the yield difference between the net planting inside row and the intercropped inside row is caused by the change of disease, and the yield difference between the net planting side row and the net planting inside row is caused by the change of disease and the competition effect simultaneously, therefore, the yield increase due to the disease in comparison with the intercropped variety should be more accurate in comparison with the net planting inside row and the intercropped inside row.
The average single plant yield of the sideline and the Chinese line is obtained by using field test data of 2013 and 2014, the correction coefficient of each pair of combinations is calculated according to a formula of the correction coefficient, the correction coefficient of 2013 is 0.88, the correction coefficient of 2014 is 0.87, the average correction coefficient of two years is 0.87, and the difference between the yield of a non-competitive environment (the sideline) and the yield of a competitive environment (the Chinese line) is about 13% (see fig. 5).
It was found through the above experiments that it was confirmed that there was a large difference in the individual yields of the inner row (competitive environment) and the outer row (non-competitive environment) and that the intercropping inner row was greatly affected, and therefore the total yield was corrected by the correction coefficient in analyzing or predicting the yield, and when there is only the yield data of the side row, it can be obtained by multiplying the yield of the side row by the correction coefficient, and when there is only the yield data of the inner row, it can be obtained by dividing by the correction coefficient, and when it is planted in other ratios, it can be obtained based on the ratio of the side row to the inner row and the correction coefficient.
The experiment utilizes an average single plant yield measuring method to calculate the yield increasing effect according to the principle that competitive rows are compared with competitive rows and side rows are compared with side rows. By comparing the disease control effect and the yield increase effect of the diversity intercropping mode and the net planting mode, the control effect of the main cultivar and the single plant yield increase effect of the main cultivar have obvious positive correlation (see fig. 6), and the control effect of the intercropping cultivar and the single plant yield increase effect of the intercropping cultivar also have obvious correlation (see fig. 7). The same trend was observed for two years, indicating that disease reduction in a diversity intercropping system would achieve yield enhancement.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911084800.5A CN110991811A (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2019-11-08 | Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911084800.5A CN110991811A (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2019-11-08 | Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110991811A true CN110991811A (en) | 2020-04-10 |
Family
ID=70083536
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911084800.5A Pending CN110991811A (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2019-11-08 | Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110991811A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116862702A (en) * | 2023-07-12 | 2023-10-10 | 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所 | Method for evaluating relative competitiveness of corn inter-variety plants |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6009955A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 2000-01-04 | Tarver, Iii; Sam A. | Enhanced minimum tillage planter/renovator system |
| CN102172159A (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2011-09-07 | 四川农业大学 | Three-dimensional cultivation method of interplanting soybeans and sorghums |
| WO2014083484A2 (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | High yield bamboo plantation |
| CN105830702A (en) * | 2016-03-30 | 2016-08-10 | 山东省农业科学院农产品研究所 | Chinese honey locust intercropping pinellia ternate and corn stereo cultivation method |
| CN106856914A (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2017-06-20 | 济宁市农业科学研究院 | Make the efficient cultivation method of the tuber of pinellia between a kind of sylvan life |
| CN107164347A (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2017-09-15 | 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所 | Control Culm of Rice rugosity, tiller number, grain number per spike, mass of 1000 kernel and the ideotype gene NPT1 of yield and its application |
| CN109156246A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-08 | 温州科技职业学院 | A kind of cultural method of blueberry interplanting saving water, resisting drought rice |
| US20190012749A1 (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2019-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic cost function calculation for agricultural users |
| US20190050948A1 (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2019-02-14 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Machine learning in agricultural planting, growing, and harvesting contexts |
-
2019
- 2019-11-08 CN CN201911084800.5A patent/CN110991811A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6009955A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 2000-01-04 | Tarver, Iii; Sam A. | Enhanced minimum tillage planter/renovator system |
| CN102172159A (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2011-09-07 | 四川农业大学 | Three-dimensional cultivation method of interplanting soybeans and sorghums |
| WO2014083484A2 (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | High yield bamboo plantation |
| CN105830702A (en) * | 2016-03-30 | 2016-08-10 | 山东省农业科学院农产品研究所 | Chinese honey locust intercropping pinellia ternate and corn stereo cultivation method |
| CN106856914A (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2017-06-20 | 济宁市农业科学研究院 | Make the efficient cultivation method of the tuber of pinellia between a kind of sylvan life |
| CN107164347A (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2017-09-15 | 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所 | Control Culm of Rice rugosity, tiller number, grain number per spike, mass of 1000 kernel and the ideotype gene NPT1 of yield and its application |
| US20190012749A1 (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2019-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic cost function calculation for agricultural users |
| US20190050948A1 (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2019-02-14 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Machine learning in agricultural planting, growing, and harvesting contexts |
| CN109156246A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-08 | 温州科技职业学院 | A kind of cultural method of blueberry interplanting saving water, resisting drought rice |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘郁娜等: "杏棉间作系统棉花冠层小气候特征及棉花产量边际效应研究", 《新疆农业科学》 * |
| 王竹等: "玉/豆套作荫蔽对大豆光合特性与产量的影响", 《作物学报》 * |
| 王荣栋等: "《作物高产理论与实践》", 31 October 2007, 中国农业出版社 * |
| 赵亚妮等: "施氮对单作和套作小麦产量和氮素利用特征的影响", 《中国生态农业学报》 * |
| 陈戈平: "间、混、套作的理论基及其实践意义", 《中国农业科学》 * |
| 雷海霞等: "我国套作栽培技术应用现状分析", 《湖北农业科学》 * |
| 齐万海等: "间作小麦的边行效应及其与根系空间分布的关系", 《甘肃农业大学学报》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116862702A (en) * | 2023-07-12 | 2023-10-10 | 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所 | Method for evaluating relative competitiveness of corn inter-variety plants |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dornbos | Production environment and seed quality | |
| Zhu et al. | Panicle blast and canopy moisture in rice cultivar mixtures | |
| WO2021003879A1 (en) | Inferior elimination and superior selection breeding method for improving both wheat yield and quality | |
| Monpara | Grain filling period as a measure of yield improvement in bread wheat | |
| CN107494259B (en) | Method for identifying and screening field water-saving high-yield wheat varieties | |
| Moragues et al. | Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin: II. Biomass production and allocation | |
| Hellal et al. | Yield characterization of mediterranean barley under drought stress condition. | |
| Jouyban et al. | Relationship between agronomic and morphological traits in barley varieties under drought stress condition | |
| Bensemane et al. | Assessment of the phenotypic variation within two-and six-rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) breeding lines grown under semi-arid conditions | |
| Ghassemi-Golezani et al. | Seed development and quality in maize cultivars | |
| Abdelghany et al. | Evaluation of some Egyptian wheat cultivars under water stress condition in the North Western Coast of Egypt | |
| Aliakbari et al. | Suitable stress indices for screening resistant wheat genotypes under water deficit conditions. | |
| CN109122128A (en) | A kind of corn inbred line Heat tolerance identification method | |
| Hudec et al. | Influence of temperature and species origin on Fusarium spp. and Microdochium nivale pathogenicity to wheat seedlings | |
| CN101696446A (en) | Method for identifying smut resistance in sugarcane | |
| Shahin et al. | Assessment of grain yield losses caused by Puccinia triticina in some Egyptian wheat genotypes | |
| CN110991811A (en) | Method for evaluating crop yield under mixed intercropping mode | |
| Zhang et al. | Change of water use efficiency and its relation with root system growth in wheat evolution | |
| de Oliveira et al. | Analysis of cassava growth at different harvest times and planting densities | |
| CN113179883A (en) | Evaluation method of wheat with tolerance to yin | |
| Kumar et al. | Effect of temperature and photothermal quotient on the yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India | |
| Varga et al. | Relationship between seed harvesting method and seed physiological quality for a number of Pioneer maize hybrids. | |
| Paul et al. | Studies on direct and indirect effects of different plant characters on yield of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) Var. Antiquorum | |
| Maksimović et al. | Effect of different concentrations of mannitol on germination of pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.) | |
| Kahlon et al. | Tillage effects on corn soil-plant-water continuum in Alfisols of southern Ohio |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200410 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |