CN110751543A - Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation - Google Patents
Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110751543A CN110751543A CN201910890818.8A CN201910890818A CN110751543A CN 110751543 A CN110751543 A CN 110751543A CN 201910890818 A CN201910890818 A CN 201910890818A CN 110751543 A CN110751543 A CN 110751543A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- score
- bidding
- unit
- scoring
- comprehensive
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0609—Buyer or seller confidence or verification
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0611—Request for offers or quotes
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a bidding method, a system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, wherein the bidding method comprises the following steps: determining a first comprehensive score of a bidding unit according to historical engineering scores of a historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit, integrity scores of a bidding unit on the bidding unit and professional scores of a bid evaluation expert group on the bidding unit; determining a preselected bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score, and sending a score information table to the preselected bidding unit; receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and determining a second comprehensive score of a preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords; and sorting the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, and generating a sorted list. The multi-party comprehensive evaluation bid inviting method and the system can reduce the influence of subjective factors on the bid inviting process to a great extent and improve the bid inviting efficiency and the bid evaluation quality.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of engineering bidding, and particularly relates to a bidding method and system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation.
Background
The bidding refers to the behavior that a tenderer sends out a bidding announcement or a bidding invitation, explains the scope of works, goods and services, section division, quantity of the bidding, qualification requirements of the tenderer and the like of the bidding, and invites a specific or unspecified bidder to bid according to a certain program at a specified time and place. In the traditional bidding process, bidding units and bid evaluation experts are required to review the bidding units and screen out the bidding units which best meet the requirements, but the mode is easily influenced by subjective factors and the bid evaluation quality is poor.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, the embodiment of the invention provides a multi-party evaluation bidding method and system, so as to solve the problems that in the prior art, a bidding unit and a bid evaluation expert manually review the bidding unit, the bidding unit is easily affected by subjective factors, and the bid evaluation quality is poor.
To solve the above problem, a first aspect of the embodiments of the present invention provides a bidding method for multi-party evaluation, including:
receiving a historical project file uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical project file comprises a historical project score of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit;
acquiring the honesty score of a bidding unit on the bidding unit and the professional score of a bid evaluation expert group on the bidding unit;
determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score and the professional score;
determining a preselected bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score, and sending a score information table to the preselected bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the preselected bidding unit to mutually score;
receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords;
and sorting the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, and generating a sorted list.
Further, the determining a first composite score of a bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score, the professional score and a preset score weight includes:
determining the product of the historical engineering score and a first weight as a first calculated score value;
determining a product of the integrity score and a second weight as a second calculated score value;
determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first composite score.
Further, the receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and the determining a second composite score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords comprises:
receiving a grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
removing the highest item score and the lowest item score in the scoring items, and determining the item mean value of the scoring items according to the item scores after the highest item score and the lowest item score are removed;
and taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
Further, the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation further comprises the following steps:
determining a bid-winning unit according to the sorted list, and sending bid-winning information to the bid-winning unit;
and receiving feedback information sent by the bid-winning unit according to the bid-winning information, and judging whether the bid-winning unit accepts the bid-winning according to the feedback information.
And if the winning bid unit accepts the winning bid, sending a contract signing application to the winning bid unit.
Further, the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation further comprises the following steps:
if the winning unit does not accept winning a bid, deleting the winning unit in the sorted list and updating the sorted list;
and re-determining the winning bid unit according to the updated sorted list.
A second aspect of the embodiments of the present invention provides a bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, including:
the file receiving module is used for receiving historical engineering files uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical engineering files comprise historical engineering scores of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit;
the scoring acquisition module is used for acquiring the honesty scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding unit and the professional scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding evaluation expert group;
the first comprehensive score determining module is used for determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honest score and the professional score;
the pre-selection bidding unit determining module is used for determining a pre-selection bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and sending a score information table to the pre-selection bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the mutual scoring of the pre-selection bidding units;
the second comprehensive scoring determination module is used for receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords;
and the ranking list generating module is used for ranking the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score and generating a ranking list.
Further, the first composite score determining module comprises:
the first calculation module is used for determining the product of the historical engineering score and the first weight as a first calculation score value;
the second calculation module is used for determining that the product of the integrity score and the second weight is a second calculated score value;
the third calculation module is used for determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
and the first comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first comprehensive score.
Further, the second composite score determining module comprises:
the grading information table receiving module is used for receiving the grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
the scoring keyword identification module is used for identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
the project mean value determining module is used for removing the highest project score and the lowest project score in the scoring projects and determining the project mean value of the scoring projects according to the project scores after the highest project score and the lowest project score are removed;
and the second comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as the second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
A third aspect of the embodiments of the present invention provides a bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, where the processor implements the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation in the first aspect of the above embodiments when executing the computer program.
A fourth aspect of the embodiments of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer program implements the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation of the first aspect of the embodiments.
Compared with the prior art, the embodiment of the invention has the following beneficial effects: the embodiment of the invention can help the bidding unit to know the completion condition of the historical project of the bidding unit by adding the historical cooperative unit to grade the bidding unit; the bidding unit carries out honest grading on the bidding unit, the bid evaluation expert group carries out professional grading on the bidding unit, and the preselected bidding unit is screened out by integrating the grading of the three parties, so that the influence of subjective factors can be reduced to a great extent; and mutually scoring is carried out among the preselected bidding units so that the bidding units can compare and analyze the preselected bidding units, the preselected bidding units are ranked by comprehensive scoring twice, the bidding efficiency and the bidding quality are improved by a multi-party comprehensive evaluation and progressive screening mode, and the bidding principle of fair and fair selection and preferential selection is ensured.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments or the prior art descriptions will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on these drawings without inventive exercise.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular system structures, techniques, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, devices, circuits, and methods are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present invention with unnecessary detail.
In order to explain the technical means of the present invention, the following description will be given by way of specific examples.
Referring to fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, including:
step S101, receiving a historical project file uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical project file comprises a historical project score of the historical cooperative unit to the bidding unit.
Specifically, the bidding unit invites historical cooperative units of each bidding unit to participate in the bidding process, the historical cooperative units log in the bidding system through a registered account, the server identifies log-in identifiers of the historical cooperative units and grants the historical cooperative units the authority to upload historical engineering documents, the historical engineering documents refer to basic documents of the bidding units in completed projects, the historical engineering documents further comprise scores of project completion conditions of the bidding units, and the historical engineering documents do not relate to commercial secrets of the bidding units. The login mark comprises the mark information of the bidding unit corresponding to the historical cooperative unit, and the server can classify and arrange the historical project files according to the mark information of the bidding unit in the login mark and read the historical project scores in the historical project files.
When the historical cooperation unit carries out bidding, the bidding unit can be invited to participate in evaluation, and mutual-profit and win-win commercial cooperation is realized.
And S102, acquiring the integrity score of a bidding unit for the bidding unit and the professional score of a bid evaluation expert group for the bidding unit.
Specifically, the server may directly obtain the credit score of the bidding unit for each bidding unit from the bidding unit terminal, and obtain the professional score of the bid evaluation expert group for each bidding unit from the bid evaluation expert group terminal.
And S103, determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score and the professional score.
Specifically, weights can be assigned to the historical engineering score, the integrity score and the professional score according to the actual situation of the bidding unit, and the three-party score is comprehensively calculated to obtain a first comprehensive score for the first screening.
And step S104, determining a preselected bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score, and sending a score information table to the preselected bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for mutually scoring by the preselected bidding unit.
Specifically, the bidding units are sorted according to the first comprehensive score, the bidding units with higher scores are selected from the bidding units according to a preset proportion and are used as the preselected bidding units, or the bidding units with lower scores are eliminated from the bidding units according to the preset proportion, and the rest bidding units are used as the preselected bidding units.
After the preselected bidding units are screened out, the server sends a grading information table to the preselected bidding units, the grading information table comprises anonymous information and grading items of the preselected bidding units except the filling party, and the filling party grades according to the anonymous information provided by the server under the grading items.
And step S105, receiving and identifying the scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords.
Specifically, the server receives a grading information table filled by the preselected bidding unit, extracts the item scores of the preset bidding unit in each grading item by identifying the grading keywords, processes the item scores according to a set algorithm, and calculates a second comprehensive grade.
And S106, sorting the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, and generating a sorted list.
Specifically, the server performs calculation processing on the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, simply speaking, the sum of the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score can be directly used as a sorting standard, weights can also be assigned to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, scores finally used for sorting are obtained through calculation, the preselected bidding units are sorted according to the order of the scores from high to low, a sorted list is generated, and the sorted list can be published publicly, wherein the sorted list can include specific scores or not.
As can be seen from the above discussion, the embodiment of the invention can help the bidding entity to know the completion condition of the historical project of the bidding entity by adding the historical cooperative entity to grade the bidding entity; the bidding unit carries out honest grading on the bidding unit, the bid evaluation expert group carries out professional grading on the bidding unit, and the preselected bidding unit is screened out by integrating the grading of the three parties, so that the influence of subjective factors can be reduced to a great extent; and mutually scoring is carried out among the preselected bidding units so that the bidding units can compare and analyze the preselected bidding units, the preselected bidding units are ranked by comprehensive scoring twice, the bidding efficiency and the bidding quality are improved by a multi-party comprehensive evaluation and progressive screening mode, and the bidding principle of fair and fair selection and preferential selection is ensured.
Further, the determining a first composite score of a bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score, the professional score and a preset score weight includes:
determining the product of the historical engineering score and a first weight as a first calculated score value;
determining a product of the integrity score and a second weight as a second calculated score value;
determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first composite score.
Specifically, the weight of the historical engineering score is a first weight, the weight of the integrity score is a second weight, the weight of the professional score is a third weight, and the weights are respectively calculated according to different weights, so that a first comprehensive score for first screening is finally obtained.
Further, the receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and the determining a second composite score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords comprises:
receiving a grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
removing the highest item score and the lowest item score in the scoring items, and determining the item mean value of the scoring items according to the item scores after the highest item score and the lowest item score are removed;
and taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
Specifically, the server summarizes the scoring items and the scoring scores in each scoring information table, removes the highest item score and the lowest item score in the scoring items for each scoring item of one preselected bidding unit, calculates the item mean values of the scoring items, adds the item mean values of the scoring items to obtain a second comprehensive score of one preselected bidding unit, and similarly, calculates the second comprehensive score of each preset bidding unit.
Further, a bid-winning unit is determined according to the sorted list, and bid-winning information is sent to the bid-winning unit;
and receiving feedback information sent by the bid-winning unit according to the bid-winning information, and judging whether the bid-winning unit accepts the bid-winning according to the feedback information.
And if the winning bid unit accepts the winning bid, sending a contract signing application to the winning bid unit.
Specifically, the preselected bidding unit with the highest score selected according to the sorted list is the bidding unit, and the bidding unit sends the bidding information, specifically, the generated bidding notice is sent to the bidding unit. In order to avoid the drift marks, the feedback information of the winning bid unit is required to be received for confirmation, if the winning bid unit receives the winning bid, a signing application is sent to the winning bid unit, the signing application can comprise information such as signing time and signing content, the signing application is sent, meanwhile, a privacy protocol is also sent, and the signing application can be checked only after the winning bid unit agrees with the privacy protocol.
Further, the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation further comprises the following steps:
if the winning unit does not accept winning a bid, deleting the winning unit in the sorted list and updating the sorted list;
and re-determining the winning bid unit according to the updated sorted list.
Specifically, the winning unit may give up the winning opportunity for winning the bid for a variety of reasons, and at this time, the winning unit giving up the winning bid is deleted from the sorted list of the preselected bidding units, updated, the preselected bidding unit with the highest score is selected from the updated sorted list as the winning unit, and the above-described process of confirming the winning bid is subsequently performed continuously.
Referring to fig. 2, another embodiment of the present invention provides a bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, including:
the file receiving module is used for receiving historical engineering files uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical engineering files comprise historical engineering scores of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit;
the scoring acquisition module is used for acquiring the honesty scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding unit and the professional scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding evaluation expert group;
the first comprehensive score determining module is used for determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honest score and the professional score;
the pre-selection bidding unit determining module is used for determining a pre-selection bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and sending a score information table to the pre-selection bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the mutual scoring of the pre-selection bidding units;
the second comprehensive scoring determination module is used for receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords;
and the ranking list generating module is used for ranking the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score and generating a ranking list.
The embodiment of the invention can help the bidding unit to know the completion condition of the historical project of the bidding unit by adding the historical cooperative unit to grade the bidding unit; the bidding unit carries out honest grading on the bidding unit, the bid evaluation expert group carries out professional grading on the bidding unit, and the preselected bidding unit is screened out by integrating the grading of the three parties, so that the influence of subjective factors can be reduced to a great extent; and mutually scoring is carried out among the preselected bidding units so that the bidding units can compare and analyze the preselected bidding units, the preselected bidding units are ranked by comprehensive scoring twice, the bidding efficiency and the bidding quality are improved by a multi-party comprehensive evaluation and progressive screening mode, and the bidding principle of fair and fair selection and preferential selection is ensured.
Further, the first composite score determining module comprises:
the first calculation module is used for determining the product of the historical engineering score and the first weight as a first calculation score value;
the second calculation module is used for determining that the product of the integrity score and the second weight is a second calculated score value;
the third calculation module is used for determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
and the first comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first comprehensive score.
Further, the second composite score determining module comprises:
the grading information table receiving module is used for receiving the grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
the scoring keyword identification module is used for identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
the project mean value determining module is used for removing the highest project score and the lowest project score in the scoring projects and determining the project mean value of the scoring projects according to the project scores after the highest project score and the lowest project score are removed;
and the second comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as the second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
Further, the bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation further comprises:
the bid-winning unit determining module is used for determining bid-winning units according to the sorted list and sending bid-winning information to the bid-winning units;
the bid-winning judging module is used for receiving feedback information sent by the bid-winning unit according to the bid-winning information and judging whether the bid-winning unit accepts the bid-winning according to the feedback information;
and the contract signing application sending module is used for sending the contract signing application to the bid winning unit if the bid winning unit accepts the bid winning.
Further, the bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation further comprises:
the sorted list updating module is used for deleting the bid-closing units in the sorted list and updating the sorted list if the bid-closing units do not accept the bid-closing;
and the bid-winning unit re-determination module is used for re-determining the bid-winning unit according to the updated sorted list.
Referring to fig. 3, another embodiment of the present invention provides a bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, and as shown in fig. 3, the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation of this embodiment includes: a processor 30, a memory 31 and a computer program 32, such as a bidding program for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, stored in said memory 31 and executable on said processor 30. The processor 30, when executing the computer program 32, implements the steps in the aforementioned embodiments of the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, such as the steps S101 to S106 shown in fig. 1. Alternatively, the processor 30, when executing the computer program 32, implements the functions of each module/unit in the above-mentioned device embodiments, for example, the functions of the modules 201 to 206 shown in fig. 2.
Illustratively, the computer program 32 may be partitioned into one or more modules/units that are stored in the memory 31 and executed by the processor 30 to implement the present invention. The one or more modules/units may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of performing specific functions, which are used to describe the execution process of the computer program 32 in the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation. For example, the computer program 32 may be divided into a file receiving module, a score obtaining module, a first composite score determining module, a preselected bidding unit determining module, a second composite score determining module, and a sorted list generating module (module in the virtual device), and the specific functions of each module are as follows:
receiving a historical project file uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical project file comprises a historical project score of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit;
acquiring the honesty score of a bidding unit on the bidding unit and the professional score of a bid evaluation expert group on the bidding unit;
determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score and the professional score;
determining a preselected bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score, and sending a score information table to the preselected bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the preselected bidding unit to mutually score;
receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords;
and sorting the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, and generating a sorted list.
Further, the specific functions of each module further include:
determining the product of the historical engineering score and a first weight as a first calculated score value;
determining a product of the integrity score and a second weight as a second calculated score value;
determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first composite score.
Further, the specific functions of each module further include:
receiving a grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
removing the highest item score and the lowest item score in the scoring items, and determining the item mean value of the scoring items according to the item scores after the highest item score and the lowest item score are removed;
and taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
Further, the specific functions of each module further include:
determining a bid-winning unit according to the sorted list, and sending bid-winning information to the bid-winning unit;
and receiving feedback information sent by the bid-winning unit according to the bid-winning information, and judging whether the bid-winning unit accepts the bid-winning according to the feedback information.
And if the winning bid unit accepts the winning bid, sending a contract signing application to the winning bid unit.
Further, the specific functions of each module further include:
if the winning unit does not accept winning a bid, deleting the winning unit in the sorted list and updating the sorted list;
and re-determining the winning bid unit according to the updated sorted list.
The bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation may be a desktop computer, a notebook, a palm computer, a cloud server, or other computing devices. The bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation may include, but is not limited to, a processor 30 and a memory 31. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that fig. 3 is only an example of the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, and does not constitute a limitation to the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, and may include more or less components than those shown, or combine some components, or different components, for example, the bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation may further include an input and output device, a network access device, a bus, etc.
The Processor 30 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), an off-the-shelf Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, discrete Gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, etc. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.
The storage 31 may be an internal storage unit of the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, such as a hard disk or a memory of the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation. The memory 31 may also be an external storage device of the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, such as a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), and the like, which are equipped on the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation. Further, the memory 31 may also include both an internal storage unit and an external storage device of the bidding terminal device 3 for multi-party comprehensive evaluation. The memory 31 is used for storing the computer program and other programs and data required by the bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation. The memory 31 may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, only the above-mentioned division of the functional units and modules is illustrated, and in practical applications, the above-mentioned function distribution may be performed by different functional units and modules according to needs, that is, the internal structure of the apparatus is divided into different functional units or modules to perform all or part of the above-mentioned functions. Each functional unit and module in the embodiments may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated in one unit, and the integrated unit may be implemented in a form of hardware, or in a form of software functional unit. In addition, specific names of the functional units and modules are only for convenience of distinguishing from each other, and are not used for limiting the protection scope of the present application. The specific working processes of the units and modules in the system may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
In the embodiments provided in the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described system embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the modules or units is only one logical division, and there may be other divisions when actually implemented, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated modules/units, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as separate products, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, all or part of the flow of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention may also be implemented by a computer program, which may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method embodiments may be implemented. Wherein the computer program comprises computer program code, which may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, usb disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signals, telecommunications signals, software distribution medium, and the like. It should be noted that the computer readable medium may contain other components which may be suitably increased or decreased as required by legislation and patent practice in jurisdictions, for example, in some jurisdictions, computer readable media which may not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunications signals in accordance with legislation and patent practice.
The above-mentioned embodiments are only used for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention, and not for limiting the same; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some technical features may be equivalently replaced; such modifications and substitutions do not substantially depart from the spirit and scope of the embodiments of the present invention, and are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation is characterized by comprising the following steps: receiving a historical project file uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical project file comprises a historical project score of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit; acquiring the honesty score of a bidding unit on the bidding unit and the professional score of a bid evaluation expert group on the bidding unit; determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honesty score and the professional score; determining a preselected bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score, and sending a score information table to the preselected bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the preselected bidding unit to mutually score; receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords; and sorting the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score, and generating a sorted list.
2. The bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation as claimed in claim 1, wherein determining the first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical project score, the honesty score and the professional score comprises:
determining the product of the historical engineering score and a first weight as a first calculated score value;
determining a product of the integrity score and a second weight as a second calculated score value;
determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first composite score.
3. The bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to claim 1, wherein a scoring keyword in the scoring information table is received and identified, and determining the second comprehensive score of the pre-selected bidding unit according to the scoring keyword comprises:
receiving a grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
removing the highest item score and the lowest item score in the scoring items, and determining the item mean value of the scoring items according to the item scores after the highest item score and the lowest item score are removed;
and taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
4. The bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to claim 1, further comprising:
determining a bid-winning unit according to the sorted list, and sending bid-winning information to the bid-winning unit;
receiving feedback information sent by the bid-winning unit according to the bid-winning information, and judging whether the bid-winning unit accepts the bid-winning according to the feedback information;
and if the winning bid unit accepts the winning bid, sending a contract signing application to the winning bid unit.
5. The bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to claim 4, further comprising:
if the winning unit does not accept winning a bid, deleting the winning unit in the sorted list and updating the sorted list;
and re-determining the winning bid unit according to the updated sorted list.
6. A bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, comprising:
the file receiving module is used for receiving historical engineering files uploaded by a historical cooperative unit of a bidding unit, wherein the historical engineering files comprise historical engineering scores of the historical cooperative unit on the bidding unit;
the scoring acquisition module is used for acquiring the honesty scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding unit and the professional scoring of the bidding unit by the bidding evaluation expert group;
the first comprehensive score determining module is used for determining a first comprehensive score of the bidding unit according to the historical engineering score, the honest score and the professional score;
the pre-selection bidding unit determining module is used for determining a pre-selection bidding unit from the bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and sending a score information table to the pre-selection bidding unit, wherein the score information table is used for the mutual scoring of the pre-selection bidding units;
the second comprehensive scoring determination module is used for receiving and identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table and determining a second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit according to the scoring keywords;
and the ranking list generating module is used for ranking the preselected bidding units according to the first comprehensive score and the second comprehensive score and generating a ranking list.
7. The bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to claim 6, wherein said first comprehensive scoring determination module comprises:
the first calculation module is used for determining the product of the historical engineering score and the first weight as a first calculation score value;
the second calculation module is used for determining that the product of the integrity score and the second weight is a second calculated score value;
the third calculation module is used for determining the product of the professional score and the third weight as a third calculated score value;
and the first comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the first calculated score value, the second calculated score value and the third calculated score value as the first comprehensive score.
8. The bidding system for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to claim 6, wherein said second comprehensive scoring determination module comprises:
the grading information table receiving module is used for receiving the grading information table uploaded by the preselected bidding unit;
the scoring keyword identification module is used for identifying scoring keywords in the scoring information table, wherein the scoring keywords comprise scoring items and item scores;
the project mean value determining module is used for removing the highest project score and the lowest project score in the scoring projects and determining the project mean value of the scoring projects according to the project scores after the highest project score and the lowest project score are removed;
and the second comprehensive score calculating module is used for taking the sum of the item mean values of all the scoring items as the second comprehensive score of the preselected bidding unit.
9. A bidding terminal device for multi-party comprehensive evaluation, comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the processor when executing the computer program implements the steps of the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the bidding method for multi-party comprehensive evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910890818.8A CN110751543A (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-20 | Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910890818.8A CN110751543A (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-20 | Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110751543A true CN110751543A (en) | 2020-02-04 |
Family
ID=69276821
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910890818.8A Pending CN110751543A (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-20 | Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110751543A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111652492A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2020-09-11 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Administrator evaluation system, method, electronic device and storage medium |
| CN111932199A (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-13 | 广州云硕科技发展有限公司 | Intelligent bid evaluation decision-making method and system |
| CN112085576A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-12-15 | 上海容基工程项目管理有限公司 | Online bidding method, device, system and storage medium |
| CN112529662A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 林凯 | Bidding method and system based on big data platform and storage medium |
| CN113627701A (en) * | 2020-05-08 | 2021-11-09 | 中国移动通信集团广东有限公司 | Method and electronic device for scoring bid document |
| CN114281001A (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2022-04-05 | 深圳采骏绿碳供应链有限公司 | Intelligent bidding method, system, robot and storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107194552A (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2017-09-22 | 安徽谦通信息科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligence bid platform |
| CN107993135A (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2018-05-04 | 广州科瑞工程信息咨询有限公司 | A kind of way of invitation for bid and its system |
| CN109615267A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-04-12 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Evaluating Methods of Inviting Bidding and system |
-
2019
- 2019-09-20 CN CN201910890818.8A patent/CN110751543A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107194552A (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2017-09-22 | 安徽谦通信息科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligence bid platform |
| CN107993135A (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2018-05-04 | 广州科瑞工程信息咨询有限公司 | A kind of way of invitation for bid and its system |
| CN109615267A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-04-12 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Evaluating Methods of Inviting Bidding and system |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113627701A (en) * | 2020-05-08 | 2021-11-09 | 中国移动通信集团广东有限公司 | Method and electronic device for scoring bid document |
| CN111652492A (en) * | 2020-05-28 | 2020-09-11 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Administrator evaluation system, method, electronic device and storage medium |
| CN111932199A (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-13 | 广州云硕科技发展有限公司 | Intelligent bid evaluation decision-making method and system |
| CN112085576A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-12-15 | 上海容基工程项目管理有限公司 | Online bidding method, device, system and storage medium |
| CN112529662A (en) * | 2020-12-11 | 2021-03-19 | 林凯 | Bidding method and system based on big data platform and storage medium |
| CN114281001A (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2022-04-05 | 深圳采骏绿碳供应链有限公司 | Intelligent bidding method, system, robot and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110751543A (en) | Bidding method, system and terminal equipment for multi-party comprehensive evaluation | |
| CN109615267B (en) | Bid-recruiting and bid-evaluating method and system | |
| CN111143339B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for distributing service resources | |
| CN112184175B (en) | Whole process project management platform | |
| CN107016132B (en) | Online question bank quality improving method and system and terminal equipment | |
| CN110852882B (en) | Packet consensus method, apparatus, device, and medium for blockchain networks | |
| CN108492188B (en) | Client recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111367965B (en) | Target object determining method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110766278A (en) | Automatic bidding method and device and terminal equipment | |
| CN109582550B (en) | Method, device and server for acquiring full-service scene fault set | |
| CN115730605B (en) | Data analysis method based on multidimensional information | |
| CN113112026A (en) | Optimization method and device for federated learning model | |
| CN108596516A (en) | A kind of automation appraisal procedure and system | |
| CN111212082B (en) | Resource value evaluation user management method based on cloud platform and related product | |
| CN108055272B (en) | Remote authorization-based bid document screening method and system | |
| CN116342177B (en) | BIM-based whole-process cost consultation service management system | |
| CN116883108A (en) | Bidding method, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN110930238A (en) | Method, device, equipment and computer readable medium for improving audit task efficiency | |
| CN109034402B (en) | Information processing method, device and system | |
| CN113158044B (en) | Method, system, terminal equipment and storage medium for on-line full-media reading | |
| CN105225153A (en) | Data processing method and device | |
| CN116402366A (en) | Data contribution evaluation method and device based on joint learning | |
| CN110458707B (en) | Behavior evaluation method and device based on classification model and terminal equipment | |
| CN113822704A (en) | Method and device for calculating discount cost, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN114285896A (en) | Information pushing method, device, equipment, storage medium and program product |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200204 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |