CN109766026B - Method and device for testing read-write capability - Google Patents

Method and device for testing read-write capability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109766026B
CN109766026B CN201910040432.8A CN201910040432A CN109766026B CN 109766026 B CN109766026 B CN 109766026B CN 201910040432 A CN201910040432 A CN 201910040432A CN 109766026 B CN109766026 B CN 109766026B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
read
write
data
test
index
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910040432.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109766026A (en
Inventor
高芸
徐健
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Zhiyu Jiaye Software Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Beijing Zhiyu Jiaye Software Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Zhiyu Jiaye Software Technology Co ltd filed Critical Beijing Zhiyu Jiaye Software Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN201910040432.8A priority Critical patent/CN109766026B/en
Publication of CN109766026A publication Critical patent/CN109766026A/en
Priority to JP2020004302A priority patent/JP6961022B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109766026B publication Critical patent/CN109766026B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the application provides a method and a device for testing read-write capacity. The method comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of obtaining test data of a tested person, wherein the test data of the tested person is the test data when the tested person writes through input equipment, and the test data comprises a test value of at least one read-write capability index; and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee. The method and the device for testing the read-write capability can improve the efficiency of the read-write capability test.

Description

Method and device for testing read-write capability
Technical Field
The embodiment of the application relates to the technical field of information, in particular to a method and a device for testing read-write capacity.
Background
Dyslexia (Dyslexia) is the most common one of Special Learning Difficulties (Special Learning difficities), generally refers to a disorder in reading, writing or spelling, and belongs to congenital Special Learning disorders. The international learning disability organization (IDA) explains: the cause of the difficulty in reading and writing is derived from the nervous system, is familial learning or language processing difficulty, and can cause differences in severity according to individual differences, and is often difficult in repeating and expressing language, reading, writing, spelling, writing and mathematics. These problems are not directly caused by lack of motivation, sensory disturbance, inadequate teaching skills, and the environment. This is a neuropsychological dysfunction.
The symptoms of literacy usually emerge in the first and second stages. Many children with reading and writing disorder are mistakenly regarded as a lazy and careless group, and the recovery of the children is influenced. The earlier the dyslexia is found to be more beneficial, and preferably the greater the likelihood of returning to normal writing and reading before the child is 12 years old, as by appropriate coaching and training. Therefore, there is a need for an efficient read-write capability test to detect read-write failure as early as possible.
At present, the read-write ability test is completed offline by professional psychiatrists, and the method is complex to implement and high in cost, so that the efficiency of the read-write ability test is influenced. Therefore, how to improve the efficiency of the read/write capability test becomes a technical problem to be solved urgently.
Content of application
The embodiment of the application provides a method and a device for testing read-write capability, which can improve the efficiency of the read-write capability test.
In a first aspect, a method for testing read/write capability is provided, including: the method comprises the steps of obtaining test data of a tested person, wherein the test data of the tested person is the test data when the tested person writes through input equipment, and the test data comprises a test value of at least one read-write capability index; and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee.
According to the technical scheme, the test data of the tested person when the tested person writes through the input device are obtained, the read-write capability of the tested person is determined according to the test data, the test data can be conveniently and rapidly collected and analyzed, and therefore the efficiency of the read-write capability test can be improved.
In some possible implementations, the acquiring test data of the testee includes: and receiving first data of the tested person, which is sent by the input device, wherein the first data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set.
In some possible implementations, the acquiring test data of the testee includes: receiving first data and second data of the testee, wherein the first data and the second data are sent by the input device, the first data comprise a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set, and the second data comprise original data corresponding to each read-write ability index in a second read-write ability index set; and determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set.
In some possible implementations, the first set of literacy indicators includes at least one of the following literacy indicators: writing speed, total writing time, pen falling time, pen lifting time, pen falling time/pen lifting time, word writing time standard deviation, pressure, word pressure standard deviation, and grid output times.
In some possible implementations, the second set of read-write capability indicators includes at least one of the following read-write capability indicators: wrong times of stroke number, wrong times of stroke sequence and wrong times of handwriting.
In some possible implementations, the determining, according to the test data of the testee, the read-write capability of the testee includes: determining the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the testee according to the test data of the testee; and determining the read-write ability of the tested person according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the tested person.
In some possible implementation manners, the determining, according to the test data of the testee, evaluation data of at least one item of the read-write capability index of the testee includes: and determining the evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, wherein the comparison data comprises the test data of a plurality of testees.
In some possible implementations, the comparison data is test data of a plurality of testees who write with the tester at the same time, or the comparison data is existing test data.
In some possible implementation manners, the determining, according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee includes: and determining the deviation of the test value of the specific read-write ability index of the tested person from an average value according to the test data and the comparison data of the tested person, wherein the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested person and the tested persons, or the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested persons.
In some possible implementation manners, the determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of the at least one read-write capability index of the testee includes: and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard.
In some possible implementation manners, the determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of the at least one read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard includes: if the number of the first-level read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write ability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is mild read-write obstacle, wherein the first-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by one standard deviation, the second-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by two standard deviations, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value; or if the number of the first-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches a third threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the first threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is moderate read-write obstacle, wherein the third-level read-write capability indexes are read-write capability indexes with a test value inferior to three standard deviations of the average value, and the third threshold value is larger than the second threshold value; or if the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is severe read-write obstacle; or if the number of the excellent read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is excellent, wherein the excellent read-write ability index is the read-write ability index of which the test value is superior to the average value by two standard deviations.
In some possible implementations, the first threshold is 2; the second threshold is 3; the third threshold is 5.
In some possible implementations, the method further includes: when the read-write capability of the tested person is determined to be read-write obstacle, receiving second data of the tested person, which is sent by the input device, wherein the second data comprises original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in a second read-write capability index set; determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set; and determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the third data.
By adopting the mode of twice testing, the processing complexity can be reduced, and the efficiency of the read-write capability test is further improved.
In some possible implementations, the method further includes: and outputting the test result of the read-write capability of the tested person.
In a second aspect, an apparatus for testing read-write capability is provided, which includes means for performing the method in the first aspect or any possible implementation manner thereof.
In a third aspect, an apparatus for testing read-write capability is provided and includes a processor and a memory. The memory is configured to store computer-executable instructions, and the processor is configured to access the memory and execute the computer-executable instructions to perform the operations in the method of the first aspect or any possible implementation manner thereof.
In a fourth aspect, a computer storage medium is provided, in which program code is stored, and the program code can be used to instruct the execution of the method in the first aspect or any possible implementation manner thereof.
In a fifth aspect, there is provided a computer program product comprising instructions which, when run on a computer, cause the computer to perform the method of the first aspect described above or any possible implementation thereof.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is an architecture diagram of a solution to which an embodiment of the present application is applied.
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart diagram of a method for testing read-write capability according to an embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing read-write capability according to another embodiment of the present application.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an apparatus for testing read/write capability according to an embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 5 is a schematic block diagram of an apparatus for testing read-write capability according to another embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
It should be understood that the specific examples in this specification are provided solely to assist those skilled in the art in better understanding the embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments of the present application.
It should also be understood that, in the various embodiments of the present application, the sequence numbers of the processes do not mean the execution sequence, and the execution sequence of the processes should be determined by the functions and the inherent logic of the processes, and should not constitute any limitation to the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.
It should also be understood that the various embodiments described in this specification can be implemented individually or in combination, and the examples in this application are not limited thereto.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used in the examples of this application have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. The terminology used in the present application is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the scope of the present application.
The technical scheme of the embodiment of the application can be used for carrying out rapid reading and writing capability test on a tested person, such as a child, and is favorable for discovering reading and writing obstacles as early as possible. The tested person may be a person who needs to perform the reading/writing capability test, other than the child, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 1 shows an architecture diagram to which the solution of the embodiment of the present application is applied.
As shown in fig. 1, the apparatus for testing read-write capability 110 is communicatively connected to an input device 120. The device 110 can obtain the test data of the tested person writing through the input device 120, and determine the read-write ability of the tested person according to the test data.
The input device 120 may be a dot-matrix pen or a writing pad, or may be other electronic devices that can be used for writing, which is not limited in this embodiment of the application.
The dot matrix pen, also called dot matrix digital pen, may include pressure sensor, high speed camera, processor, data memory, communication interface and other components. The high-speed camera at the front end of the dot matrix pen can capture the motion track of the pen point at any time, meanwhile, the pressure sensor can acquire pressure data, and the processor can obtain various data of a writer during writing based on the data.
The writing pad may use a special pen or a finger to write text in a specific area. The handwriting pad records the trace of the pen or finger and then recognizes the trace as a character. Similar to the dot matrix pen, the data recorded by the writing pad can also be used to obtain various data when the writer writes.
The apparatus 110 may be an electronic device or system, such as a computer, having data processing capabilities.
The device 110 comprises a processor for performing data processing, e.g. determining the read-write capability of the subject based on the test data. The processor may be any kind of processor, which is not limited in this application.
The apparatus 110 may also include a memory. The memory may be used to store data and instructions, such as computer-executable instructions, that implement aspects of embodiments of the present application. The memory may be any kind of memory, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present application.
The apparatus 110 may further include a communication interface, and the communication interface may be connected to the input device 120 in a wired or wireless manner.
The apparatus 110 may further comprise a display device for displaying the result of the data processing, for example, the result of the test of the read-write ability of the testee.
Fig. 2 shows a schematic flow chart of a method 200 for testing read-write capability according to an embodiment of the present application. The method 200 may be performed by the apparatus 110 of fig. 1.
210, test data of the tested person is obtained.
The test data of the testee is the test data when the testee writes through the input device 120, and the test data includes a test value of at least one item of read-write capability index.
In the embodiment of the present application, the input device 120 is used to collect the test data of the testee during writing. The testee writes through the input device 120, and the input device 120 collects corresponding data in real time. In this way, the apparatus 110 can acquire the test data of the testee writing through the input device 120, so that the read-write capability of the testee can be quickly determined based on the test data.
The test data is data related to writing, and comprises at least one test value of the read-write ability index. For example, the index of the writing and reading capability may be writing speed, total writing time, pen-down time, pen-up time, pen-down time/pen-up time, standard deviation of writing time of a word, pressure, standard deviation of pressure of a word, number of lattice occurrences, number of wrong strokes order or number of wrong strokes, etc., but the present application is not limited thereto.
According to the test requirement, a certain number of read-write ability indexes can be selected, and the test values of the read-write ability indexes are obtained.
For the read-write capability index that can be directly measured by the input device 120, the apparatus 110 may only need to receive the test value sent by the input device 120; the apparatus 110 can obtain the read/write capability index that cannot be directly measured by the input device 120 based on the data received from the input device 120 and the preset data, which will be described below.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the apparatus 110 may receive first data of the testee, where the first data includes a test value of each of the first set of read/write capability indicators, sent by the input device 120.
The first set of literacy indicators comprises literacy indicators that can be directly measured by the input device 120, such as writing speed, total writing time, pen-down time, pen-up time, pen-down/pen-up time, standard deviation of writing time for a word, pressure, standard deviation of pressure for a word, number of passes, etc.
For the read-write capability index in the first set of read-write capability indexes, the input device 120 measures a test value of the read-write capability index and sends the test value to the apparatus 110.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the apparatus 110 may receive first data and second data of the testee, where the first data includes a test value of each read-write capability index in a first read-write capability index set, and the second data includes original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in a second read-write capability index set; and determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set.
In addition to the read-write capability index that the input device 120 can directly measure, the read-write capability test may also require some read-write capability indexes that the input device 120 cannot directly measure, that is, the read-write capability indexes in the second read-write capability index set, for example, the number of times of stroke number errors, the number of times of stroke sequence errors, the number of times of handwriting errors, and the like.
For the read-write capability index in the second read-write capability index set, the device 110 sets corresponding correct data in advance, and obtains a test value of the read-write capability index by comparing the two data after receiving the original data from the input device 120.
For example, for the index of the read-write capability, i.e., the number of times of stroke error, the correct number of strokes of the test text can be preset, the measured number of strokes written by the testee is received from the input device 120, and the test value of the number of times of stroke error can be obtained by comparing the two numbers;
for the reading and writing capability index of the stroke sequence error times, the correct stroke sequence of the test text can be preset, the measured handwriting (or recorded coordinates) written by the tested person is received from the input device 120, and the test value of the stroke sequence error times can be obtained according to the two data;
similarly, for the reading and writing capability index of the number of handwriting errors, the correct handwriting of the test text can be preset, the measured handwriting (or recorded coordinates) written by the testee is received from the input device 120, and the test value of the number of handwriting errors can be obtained according to the two data.
When performing the read-write capability test, the read-write capability index in the first read-write capability index set, the read-write capability index in the second read-write capability index set, or both the read-write capability indexes in the first read-write capability index set and the second read-write capability index set may be used. Corresponding to the employed read-write capability index, the apparatus 110 employs a corresponding data acquisition manner.
Optionally, as an embodiment of the present application, a read-write capability test may be performed by first using the read-write capability index in the first read-write capability index set; and if the read-write capability of the tested person is read-write obstacle, further performing the read-write capability test by adopting the read-write capability index in the second read-write capability index set. The previous test is equivalent to the primary screening, the read-write obstacle is determined for the primary screening, and then the second test is carried out, so that the processing complexity can be reduced, and the efficiency of the read-write capability test is further improved.
220, determining the read-write ability of the testee according to the test data of the testee.
After acquiring the test data of the testee writing through the input device 120, the device 110 processes the test data and determines the read-write capability of the testee accordingly.
Optionally, the apparatus 110 may determine evaluation data of at least one item of the literacy index of the testee according to the test data of the testee; and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of the at least one read-write capability index of the testee.
In the embodiment of the present application, the evaluation data of the readability index may be relative data of the test value of the readability index of the testee among a plurality of testees, which reflects relative situations of the testees in the group to which the testee belongs.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the apparatus 110 may determine the evaluation data of the literacy index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, where the comparison data includes the test data of a plurality of testees.
Alternatively, in an embodiment of the present application, the comparison data may be test data of a plurality of testees who write simultaneously with the tester.
In this case, a plurality of test subjects are simultaneously tested, and the obtained test data is processed to obtain evaluation data of each test subject with respect to the other test subjects.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the comparison data may be existing test data.
In this case, the comparison data may be previously acquired test data of a plurality of testees, or sample data selected from the previously acquired test data of the plurality of testees, and the embodiment of the present application is not limited thereto.
And obtaining the evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee.
For example, for a specific literacy index, the evaluation data may be the deviation of the test value of the specific literacy index of the tested person from the average value. That is, a deviation of the test value of the specific readability index of the test subject from an average value, which is an average value of the test values of the specific readability indexes of the test subject and the plurality of test subjects, or an average value of the test values of the specific readability indexes of the plurality of test subjects, may be determined based on the test data of the test subject and the comparison data.
It should be understood that other data may be used for the evaluation data of the readability index, and the evaluation data is not limited to the above deviation as long as the relative situation of the testee in the population to which the testee belongs can be reflected.
And determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the evaluation data of at least one read-write capability index of the tested person.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the read-write capability of the testee may be determined according to the evaluation data of the at least one read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard.
The evaluation criterion may be an evaluation criterion associated with the literacy index. The evaluation criteria can be obtained by training, which is not limited in the examples of the present application.
Optionally, as an embodiment of the present application, the following method may be adopted to determine the read-write capability of the testee:
if the number of the first-level read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write ability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is mild read-write obstacle, wherein the first-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by one standard deviation, the second-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by two standard deviations, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value; or,
if the number of the first-stage read-write capability indexes of the testee reaches a third threshold value, or the number of the second-stage read-write capability indexes reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the third-stage read-write capability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the testee is a moderate read-write obstacle, wherein the third-stage read-write capability index is a read-write capability index with a test value inferior to the average value by three standard deviations, and the third threshold value is larger than the second threshold value; or,
if the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is severe read-write obstacle; or,
and if the number of the excellent read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is excellent, wherein the excellent read-write ability index is the read-write ability index of which the test value is superior to the average value by two standard deviations.
For example, in the above evaluation criterion, the first threshold value may be 2; the second threshold may be 3; the third threshold may be 5.
It should be understood that the above evaluation criteria are only examples, and other evaluation criteria may also be set according to the adopted reading and writing capability index, and may also be continuously adjusted, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present application.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, if only the read-write capability index in the first read-write capability index set is used in the first read-write capability test, and the measured result indicates that the read-write capability of the testee is a read-write obstacle, the read-write capability index in the second read-write capability index set may be used again to perform a further read-write capability test. That is to say, when it is determined that the read-write capability of the testee is read-write obstacle (which may include mild read-write obstacle, moderate read-write obstacle, or severe read-write obstacle) according to the first data, that is, the test value of each read-write capability index in the first read-write capability index set, the second data of the testee sent by the input device may be received again, where the second data includes original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in the second read-write capability index set; determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set; and determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the third data.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, after obtaining the test result of the read-write capability of the testee, the device 110 may further output the test result of the read-write capability of the testee.
Besides the conclusion of the read-write capability of the testee, the test result may also include corresponding data of the testee, such as test values, evaluation data, and the like, so as to facilitate viewing.
In addition, the test result can be archived or printed, and the like, so that the subsequent viewing is facilitated.
The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application are described below with reference to specific examples, and it should be understood that these are only for helping those skilled in the art to better understand the embodiments of the present application, and do not limit the scope of the embodiments of the present application.
In this example, a dot matrix pen is used as the input device. Correspondingly, the checkered paper is prepared in cooperation with the writing of the dot matrix pen. The checkered paper may be, for example, 10 by 10 squares, i.e., a total of 100 characters may be written.
The number of the dot matrix pens and the checkerboard paper is prepared according to the number of testees. In this example, more than 30 subjects were tested simultaneously. For example, the test population may be a class of children, and the like.
In this example, the readability index employs the writing speed, total writing time, pen-down time, pen-up time, pen-down time/pen-up time, standard deviation of writing time, pressure, standard deviation of pressure, number of lattice occurrences in the first set of readability indices, and the number of stroke errors in the second set of readability indices. For the stroke number error times, the characteristic data needs to be preset. Fig. 3 shows the corresponding flow of this example.
301, select common words.
The common words may be selected based on the population being tested. For example, for children, common words that children know may be selected. For example, 500 common words may be picked.
And 302, extracting characteristic data.
And for the selected common words, extracting characteristic data aiming at the read-write capability indexes in the second read-write capability index set. For example, in the case of employing the stroke number error number, the correct stroke number for each word is extracted and stored as the feature data. For example, the feature data of the "king" word may be represented as a king (4).
303, selecting an evaluation sample for testing.
And randomly selecting an evaluation sample from the common words, for example, selecting 100 words as the evaluation sample. The test sample is adopted to test the testee. For example, the test subject writes 100 words of the evaluation sample on 10 × 10 checkered paper with a dot-matrix pen. The dot matrix pen obtains corresponding data. After the test subject has finished writing, the dot matrix pen sends the data to the device 110.
304, test data acquisition and processing.
For the read-write capability index in the first read-write capability index set, the device 110 directly obtains the test value of the read-write capability index from the data sent by the dot matrix pen. For the number of times of wrong writing ability index strokes in the second set of writing ability indexes, the device 110 obtains the number of strokes of the tested person during writing from the data sent by the dot matrix pen, and compares the number of strokes with the correct number of strokes in the characteristic data to obtain a test value of the number of times of wrong strokes.
For each index of read/write ability, the device 110 calculates the average value and standard deviation of all the testees, and further determines the deviation of the test value of each tester from the average value as the evaluation data of the index of read/write ability.
For example, if the writing speed of a certain test subject is 21.29 words/minute, the average value of all test subjects is 8.5 words/minute, and the standard deviation is 6, the writing speed of the test subject is better than the average value by two standard deviations (i.e., the standard deviation is + 2). The evaluation data indicated that the subject's writing speed was relatively good.
And calculating to obtain the evaluation data of each read-write ability index for each tested person.
And 305, generating a read-write capability test result.
And for each tested person, determining the read-write capability according to the evaluation data of each read-write capability index and a preset evaluation standard.
For example, the following evaluation criteria may be employed, where a deviation of the standard deviation as positive indicates better than the mean and a deviation of the standard deviation as negative indicates worse than the mean:
mild read-write disorder: 1) the standard deviation of the 2 items of read-write ability indexes is-2; or
2) The standard deviation of the 3-4 items of the read-write ability indexes is-1;
moderate read-write disorder: 1) the standard deviation of the 2 items of read-write ability indexes is-3; or
2) The standard deviation of the 3-4 read-write ability indexes is-2; or
3) The standard deviation of the 5-6 items of the read-write ability index is-1;
severe read-write disorder: 1) the standard deviation of more than 3 read-write ability indexes is-3; or
2) The standard deviation of the read-write ability indexes of more than 5 items is-2;
excellent read-write capability: 1) the standard deviation of the literacy index of more than 5 items is 2.
The device 110 can output the conclusion of the read-write ability of each tested person and the corresponding data as the test result of the read-write ability.
According to the technical scheme, the test data of the tested person when the tested person writes through the input device are obtained, the read-write capability of the tested person is determined according to the test data, the test data can be conveniently and rapidly collected and analyzed, and therefore the efficiency of the read-write capability test can be improved.
Compared with the offline one-to-one manual test, the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application has low cost and is convenient to implement, so that the implementation can be carried out on a large scale, and the discovery of read-write obstacles is facilitated.
The method for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application is described above in detail, and the apparatus for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application is described below.
Fig. 4 shows a schematic block diagram of an apparatus 400 for testing read-write capability according to an embodiment of the present application. The apparatus 400 may perform the method for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application, for example, the apparatus 400 may be the apparatus 110.
As shown in fig. 4, the apparatus 400 may include:
an obtaining module 410, configured to obtain test data of a tested person, where the test data of the tested person is test data of the tested person writing through an input device, and the test data includes a test value of at least one read-write capability index;
and the evaluation module 420 is configured to determine the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the obtaining module 410 is configured to:
and receiving first data of the tested person, which is sent by the input device, wherein the first data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the obtaining module is configured to:
receiving first data and second data of the testee, wherein the first data and the second data are sent by the input device, the first data comprise a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set, and the second data comprise original data corresponding to each read-write ability index in a second read-write ability index set;
and determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write capacity index in the second read-write capacity index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write capacity index in the second read-write capacity index set.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the first set of read-write capability indicators includes at least one of the following read-write capability indicators:
writing speed, total writing time, pen falling time, pen lifting time, pen falling time/pen lifting time, word writing time standard deviation, pressure, word pressure standard deviation, and grid output times.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the second set of rdl includes at least one of the following rdl:
wrong times of stroke number, wrong times of stroke sequence and wrong times of handwriting.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the evaluation module 420 is configured to:
determining the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the testee according to the test data of the testee;
and determining the read-write ability of the tested person according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the tested person.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the evaluation module 420 is configured to:
and determining the evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, wherein the comparison data comprises the test data of a plurality of testees.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the comparison data is test data of a plurality of testees who write simultaneously with the tester, or the comparison data is existing test data.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the evaluation module 420 is configured to:
and determining the deviation of the test value of the specific read-write ability index of the tested person from an average value according to the test data and the comparison data of the tested person, wherein the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested person and the tested persons, or the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested persons.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the evaluation module 420 is configured to:
and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the evaluation module 420 is configured to:
if the number of the first-level read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write ability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is mild read-write obstacle, wherein the first-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by one standard deviation, the second-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by two standard deviations, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value; or,
if the number of the first-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches a third threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the first threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is moderate read-write obstacle, wherein the third-level read-write capability indexes are read-write capability indexes with a test value inferior to three standard deviations of the average value, and the third threshold value is larger than the second threshold value; or,
if the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is severe read-write obstacle; or,
and if the number of the excellent read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is excellent, wherein the excellent read-write capability index is the read-write capability index with a test value superior to two standard deviations of the average value.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the first threshold is 2; the second threshold is 3; the third threshold is 5.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the obtaining module 410 is further configured to receive second data of the tested person sent by the input device when it is determined that the read-write capability of the tested person is a read-write obstacle, where the second data includes original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in a second read-write capability index set; determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set;
the evaluation module 420 is further configured to determine the read-write capability of the testee according to the third data.
Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the apparatus 400 further includes:
and the output module is used for outputting the test result of the read-write capability of the tested person.
Fig. 5 shows a schematic block diagram of an apparatus 500 for testing read-write capability according to another embodiment of the present application.
As shown in fig. 5, the apparatus 500 may include a processor 510 and a memory 520.
It should be understood that the apparatus 500 may also include other components commonly included in computer systems, such as input/output devices, communication interfaces, and the like, which are not limited by the embodiments of the present application.
The memory 520 is used to store computer executable instructions.
The Memory 520 may be various types of memories, and may include a high-speed Random Access Memory (RAM), and may further include a non-volatile Memory (non-volatile Memory), such as at least one disk Memory, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention.
The processor 510 is configured to access the memory 520 and execute the computer-executable instructions to perform the operations of the method for testing read-write capability according to the embodiments of the present application.
The processor 510 may be various processors with data processing capability, which is not limited in this application.
The apparatus for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application may correspond to the execution main body of the method for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application, and the above and other operations and/or functions of each module in the apparatus for testing read-write capability are respectively for implementing corresponding processes of each of the foregoing methods, and are not described herein again for brevity.
The embodiment of the present application further provides a system for testing read-write capability, which may include the apparatus for testing read-write capability and the input device according to various embodiments of the present application.
The embodiment of the present application further provides a computer storage medium, where the computer storage medium stores a program code, and the program code may be used to instruct to execute the method for testing read-write capability according to the embodiment of the present application.
The embodiment of the present application further provides a computer program product containing instructions, which when run on a computer, enables the computer to execute the method for testing read-write capability of the embodiment of the present application.
It should be understood that, in the embodiment of the present application, the term "and/or" is only one kind of association relation describing an associated object, and means that three kinds of relations may exist. For example, a and/or B, may represent: a exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, and B exists alone. In addition, the character "/" herein generally indicates that the former and latter related objects are in an "or" relationship.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present application.
It is clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described systems, apparatuses and units may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed system, apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one logical division, and other divisions may be realized in practice, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit.
The functions, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application or portions thereof that substantially contribute to the prior art may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium and including instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of the present application is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present application, and shall be covered by the scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (26)

1. A method of testing read and write capabilities, comprising:
the method comprises the steps of obtaining test data of a tested person, wherein the test data of the tested person is the test data when the tested person writes through input equipment, and the test data comprises a test value of at least one read-write capability index;
the acquiring of the test data of the tested person comprises:
receiving first data and second data of the testee, wherein the first data and the second data are sent by the input device, the first data comprise a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set, and the second data comprise original data corresponding to each read-write ability index in a second read-write ability index set;
determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write capacity index in the second read-write capacity index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write capacity index in the second read-write capacity index set;
determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee, comprising the following steps: and under the condition that the tested person is determined to be read-write obstacle according to the first data, determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the third data.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining test data of the subject comprises:
and receiving first data of the tested person, which is sent by the input device, wherein the first data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the first set of literacy indicators comprises at least one literacy indicator of:
writing speed, total writing time, pen falling time, pen lifting time, pen falling time/pen lifting time, word writing time standard deviation, pressure, word pressure standard deviation, and grid output times.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the second set of readwrite capability indicators comprises at least one of the following readwrite capability indicators:
wrong times of stroke number, wrong times of stroke sequence and wrong times of handwriting.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 or 2, wherein the determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee comprises:
determining the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the testee according to the test data of the testee;
and determining the read-write ability of the tested person according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the tested person.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the evaluation data of the at least one literacy index of the subject based on the test data of the subject comprises:
and determining the evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, wherein the comparison data comprises the test data of a plurality of testees.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the comparison data is test data of a plurality of subjects who write simultaneously with the tester, or the comparison data is existing test data.
8. The method as claimed in claim 6 or 7, wherein the determining the evaluation data of the literacy index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee comprises:
and determining the deviation of the test value of the specific read-write ability index of the tested person from an average value according to the test data and the comparison data of the tested person, wherein the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested person and the tested persons, or the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested persons.
9. The method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the determining the literacy of the testee according to the evaluation data of the at least one literacy index of the testee comprises:
and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein determining the literacy of the subject according to the evaluation data of the at least one literacy index of the subject and a preset evaluation criterion comprises:
if the number of the first-level read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write ability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is mild read-write obstacle, wherein the first-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by one standard deviation, the second-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by two standard deviations, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value; or,
if the number of the first-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches a third threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the first threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is moderate read-write obstacle, wherein the third-level read-write capability indexes are read-write capability indexes with a test value inferior to three standard deviations of the average value, and the third threshold value is larger than the second threshold value; or,
if the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes of the testee reaches the third threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the testee is severe read-write obstacle; or,
and if the number of the excellent read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is excellent, wherein the excellent read-write ability index is the read-write ability index of which the test value is superior to the average value by two standard deviations.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first threshold is 2; the second threshold is 3; the third threshold value is 5.
12. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
when the read-write capability of the tested person is determined to be read-write obstacle, receiving second data of the tested person, which is sent by the input device, wherein the second data comprises original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in a second read-write capability index set;
determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set;
and determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the third data.
13. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the method further comprises:
and outputting the test result of the read-write ability of the tested person.
14. An apparatus for testing read-write capability, comprising:
the device comprises an acquisition module, a storage module and a processing module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring test data of a tested person, the test data of the tested person is test data of the tested person when the tested person writes through an input device, and the test data comprises at least one test value of a read-write capability index;
the acquisition module is configured to:
receiving first data and second data of the testee, wherein the first data and the second data are sent by the input device, the first data comprise a test value of each read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set, and the second data comprise original data corresponding to each read-write ability index in a second read-write ability index set;
determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set;
the evaluation module is used for determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the test data of the testee, and is specifically used for: and under the condition that the tested person is determined to be read-write obstacle according to the first data, determining the read-write capability of the tested person according to the third data.
15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the obtaining module is configured to:
receiving first data of the testee, which is sent by the input device, wherein the first data comprises a test value of each item of the read-write ability index in a first read-write ability index set.
16. The apparatus according to claim 14 or 15, wherein the first set of literacy indicators comprises at least one of the following literacy indicators:
writing speed, total writing time, pen-down time, pen-up time, pen-down time/pen-up time, word writing time standard deviation, pressure, word pressure standard deviation, and number of times of check.
17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the second set of readwrite capability indicators comprises at least one of:
the times of wrong stroke number, the times of wrong stroke sequence and the times of wrong handwriting.
18. The apparatus of claim 14 or 15, wherein the evaluation module is configured to:
determining the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the testee according to the test data of the testee;
and determining the read-write ability of the tested person according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write ability index of the tested person.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the evaluation module is configured to:
and determining the evaluation data of the read-write capability index of the testee according to the test data and the comparison data of the testee, wherein the comparison data comprises the test data of a plurality of testees.
20. The apparatus as claimed in claim 19, wherein the comparison data is test data of a plurality of testees who write simultaneously with the testee, or is existing test data.
21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the evaluation module is configured to:
and determining the deviation of the test value of the specific read-write ability index of the tested person from an average value according to the test data and the comparison data of the tested person, wherein the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested person and the tested persons, or the average value is the average value of the test values of the specific read-write ability indexes of the tested persons.
22. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the evaluation module is configured to:
and determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the evaluation data of at least one item of read-write capability index of the testee and a preset evaluation standard.
23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the evaluation module is configured to:
if the number of the first-level read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the second-level read-write ability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is mild read-write obstacle, wherein the first-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by one standard deviation, the second-level read-write ability index is a read-write ability index with a test value inferior to the average value by two standard deviations, and the second threshold value is larger than the first threshold value; or,
if the number of the first-stage read-write capability indexes of the testee reaches a third threshold value, or the number of the second-stage read-write capability indexes reaches a second threshold value, or the number of the third-stage read-write capability indexes reaches a first threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the testee is a moderate read-write obstacle, wherein the third-stage read-write capability index is a read-write capability index with a test value inferior to the average value by three standard deviations, and the third threshold value is larger than the second threshold value; or,
if the number of the second-level read-write capability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, or the number of the third-level read-write capability indexes reaches the second threshold value, determining that the read-write capability of the tested person is severe read-write obstacle; or,
and if the number of the excellent read-write ability indexes of the tested person reaches the third threshold value, determining that the read-write ability of the tested person is excellent, wherein the excellent read-write ability index is the read-write ability index of which the test value is superior to the average value by two standard deviations.
24. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the first threshold is 2; the second threshold is 3; the third threshold value is 5.
25. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the obtaining module is further configured to receive second data of the testee sent by the input device when it is determined that the read-write capability of the testee is a read-write obstacle, where the second data includes original data corresponding to each read-write capability index in a second set of read-write capability indexes; determining third data of the tested person according to the second data and the characteristic data, wherein the characteristic data comprises correct data corresponding to each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set, and the third data comprises a test value of each read-write ability index in the second read-write ability index set;
and the evaluation module is also used for determining the read-write capability of the testee according to the third data.
26. The apparatus of claim 14 or 15, further comprising:
and the output module is used for outputting the test result of the read-write capability of the tested person.
CN201910040432.8A 2019-01-16 2019-01-16 Method and device for testing read-write capability Active CN109766026B (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910040432.8A CN109766026B (en) 2019-01-16 2019-01-16 Method and device for testing read-write capability
JP2020004302A JP6961022B2 (en) 2019-01-16 2020-01-15 Literacy test method and equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910040432.8A CN109766026B (en) 2019-01-16 2019-01-16 Method and device for testing read-write capability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109766026A CN109766026A (en) 2019-05-17
CN109766026B true CN109766026B (en) 2022-09-27

Family

ID=66452374

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910040432.8A Active CN109766026B (en) 2019-01-16 2019-01-16 Method and device for testing read-write capability

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6961022B2 (en)
CN (1) CN109766026B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117132998B (en) * 2023-08-29 2024-05-03 安徽以观文化科技有限公司 Method and system for identifying single fonts of calligraphic works

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007102817A (en) * 2007-01-09 2007-04-19 Wao Corporation Scoring method, information processor and its program
JP2010131280A (en) * 2008-12-08 2010-06-17 Hitachi Ltd Method and apparatus for assisting mental state determination
CN108428202A (en) * 2017-02-14 2018-08-21 富成人工智能有限公司 A kind of method and system for delivering and managing study training program
CN109044377A (en) * 2018-09-13 2018-12-21 尹志军 A kind of Test of attention device and psychological test equipment

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001350396A (en) * 2000-06-06 2001-12-21 Hitachi Ltd Device and method for teaching writing order and number of strokes and recording medium including the method
US7636457B2 (en) * 2003-07-21 2009-12-22 Gannon Technologies Group Llc Systems and methods for assessing disorders affecting fine motor skills using handwriting recognition
US8506304B2 (en) * 2008-01-23 2013-08-13 Carol Conner Method for recommending a teaching plan in literacy education
US20110217679A1 (en) * 2008-11-05 2011-09-08 Carmel-Haifa University Economic Corporation Ltd. Diagnosis method and system based on handwriting analysis
CN104966096A (en) * 2015-06-10 2015-10-07 南京师范大学 Important writing characteristic tagging-based handwritten Chinese character neatness evaluation method
CN106327049A (en) * 2015-07-08 2017-01-11 广州市第人民医院 Cognitive assessment system and application thereof
JP6256504B2 (en) * 2016-03-16 2018-01-10 アイラボ株式会社 Program, information storage medium, and stroke order determination device
CN107240330A (en) * 2017-06-27 2017-10-10 北京新国人智慧科技股份有限公司 System that handwriting display method and system, the intelligence of practising handwriting practise handwriting terminal and intelligence is practised handwriting

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007102817A (en) * 2007-01-09 2007-04-19 Wao Corporation Scoring method, information processor and its program
JP2010131280A (en) * 2008-12-08 2010-06-17 Hitachi Ltd Method and apparatus for assisting mental state determination
CN108428202A (en) * 2017-02-14 2018-08-21 富成人工智能有限公司 A kind of method and system for delivering and managing study training program
CN109044377A (en) * 2018-09-13 2018-12-21 尹志军 A kind of Test of attention device and psychological test equipment

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
口头复述与书写反应方式对普通话言语识别率的影响;邵广宇等;《听力学及言语疾病杂志》;20090515(第03期);第205-209页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6961022B2 (en) 2021-11-05
CN109766026A (en) 2019-05-17
JP2020113278A (en) 2020-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Loewen et al. Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis
O'Donoghue et al. Data analysis in sport
Colom et al. Fluid intelligence and working memory capacity: Is the time for working on intelligence problems relevant for explaining their large relationship?
CN111938670B (en) Depression identification method and system based on human skeleton kinematics characteristic information
JP7147185B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method and information processing program
CN105787522A (en) Writing attitude evaluation method and writing attitude evaluation system based on handwriting
CN110909035A (en) Personalized review question set generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
US20200251217A1 (en) Diagnosis Method Using Image Based Machine Learning Analysis of Handwriting
CN109766026B (en) Method and device for testing read-write capability
CN111597305B (en) Entity marking method, entity marking device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN115082266A (en) Student education subject comprehensive development analysis and evaluation system based on deep learning
CN109978868A (en) Toy appearance quality determining method and its relevant device
CN108932593B (en) Cognitive influence factor analysis method and device
CN111402924B (en) Spoken language evaluation method, device and computer readable storage medium
KR101996247B1 (en) Method and apparatus of diagnostic test
JP7293658B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method and program
JP4516136B2 (en) Answer analysis processing method and answer analysis processing system
CN112016334A (en) Appraising method and device
CN111090989B (en) Prompting method based on character recognition and electronic equipment
WO2021246923A1 (en) Method for detecting focal epileptiform discharges in a prolonged eeg recording
CN113842113A (en) Developing reading disorder intelligent identification method, system, equipment and storage medium
CN111899137A (en) Examination system and method based on handwriting time sequence data
Swaminathan et al. Research methodology for decision-making in school psychology
US20230091007A1 (en) Information processing device, information processing method, and recording medium
CN113990452B (en) Evaluation method and system based on psychological literacy and readable storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant