CN105332685A - Propping agent multistage paving method for improving coal bed complicated crack supporting effect - Google Patents

Propping agent multistage paving method for improving coal bed complicated crack supporting effect Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105332685A
CN105332685A CN201510778950.1A CN201510778950A CN105332685A CN 105332685 A CN105332685 A CN 105332685A CN 201510778950 A CN201510778950 A CN 201510778950A CN 105332685 A CN105332685 A CN 105332685A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
coal seam
type
complex fracture
order
proppant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201510778950.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN105332685B (en
Inventor
赵志红
何颂根
郭建春
张龙胜
熊炜
徐骞
赖建林
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute East China Petroleum Branch Of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp
Southwest Petroleum University
Original Assignee
Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute East China Petroleum Branch Of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp
Southwest Petroleum University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute East China Petroleum Branch Of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp, Southwest Petroleum University filed Critical Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute East China Petroleum Branch Of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp
Priority to CN201510778950.1A priority Critical patent/CN105332685B/en
Publication of CN105332685A publication Critical patent/CN105332685A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN105332685B publication Critical patent/CN105332685B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a propping agent multistage paving method for improving coal bed complicated crack supporting effect. The propping agent multistage paving method comprises the following steps: A, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M1 affected by the content W of a brittle component; B, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M2 affected by a uniaxial strength ratio R; C, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M3 affected by a horizontal stress diversity factor theta; D, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M4 affected by average cleat density as shown in the specification; E, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M5 affected by a cleat approaching angle beta; F, calculating a coal bed complicated crack type grade mark M affected by the above five factors so as to calibrate a coal bed complicated crack type; and G, designing multi-grain-size propping agent combined multistage paving for different crack types. The propping agent multistage paving method is reliable in principle and easy and convenient to operate, and provides guidance for propping agent optimized paving in a coal bed reservoir hydrofracture scheme design, and a supporting effect which is matched with the reservoir and a hydraulic fracture system further is achieved.

Description

A kind of multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect
Technical field
Spread method optimized by the proppant that the present invention relates in oil field bed gas reservoir fracturing design, to ensure that proppant can effectively support coal seam complex fracture, improves fracturing yield increasing effect.
Background technology
China's coal bed gas resource is very abundant, and buried depth 2000m reaches 36.8 trillion sides with shallow total resources.China's coal seam output keeps good volume increase situation at present, but total output is still not high, drilling well in 2014 exploitation output only 3,600,000,000 sides.In general, China's cbm development has a high potential, and is still badly in need of research of technique and improves development effectiveness.
The occurrence status of coal bed gas comprises ADSORPTION STATE, free state and solubilised state, and wherein 75-90% composes with ADSORPTION STATE and is stored in coal seam.High degree of water in coal seam simultaneously, the extraction of coal bed gas need through draining, desorb, diffusion, seepage flow, the several process of output.Therefore how to maximize and improve stratum filtration condition, promote that drainage and step-down desorb is the core of cbm development design.In addition, China's coalbed methane reservoir has " three is low " feature of low gas content saturation ratio, low-permeability, low-pressure.
For reservoir characteristic more than coal bed gas, fracturing, by highly pressurised liquid is injected coal seam, forms man-made fracture and links up extension coal seam hugger in reservoir; In dynamic crack, inject the liquid carrying proppant, through the row of returning, rear support agent stays in complex fracture thereupon, forms the high speed seepage channel that coal seam has certain flow conductivity; Final expansion seepage flow and step-down area, thus promote draining, step-down, desorb, diffusion, the whole process of seepage flow, make the quick output of coal bed gas.Thus, fracturing become coal bed gas can one of the key technology of economical and effective exploitation.
The laid mode of proppant is the importance of coal bed gas fracturing design, be referred from the mentality of designing that a long crack of high flow conductivity is made in conventional reservoir fracturing, current coalbed methane reservoir fracturing still adds sand based on single particle size, effectively supports with the single-stage realizing major fracture.
Be controlled by coal seam component and cement structure, coal seam mechanical property is more crisp, thus causes coal petrography frangible; The buried depth more shallow relative to conventional reservoir, coal seam geostatic stress is relatively lower, is conducive to fracture extension; A large amount of hugger (the orthogonal fracture system combined by end hugger and face cleat) is grown in coal seam simultaneously; And current coal bed fracturing technique is based on lower-cost riverfrac treatment; Under low sticky fracturing fluid (clear water) effect, hugger is easily linked up and is extended to form Fracture System.Therefore, the actual hydraulic fracture in coal seam form is comparatively complicated.The trunk crack that in coal seam, complex fracture has aperture larger, the secondary crack also having aperture less and the small microcrack of aperture.Thus, evenly laid being difficult to effectively supports complex fracture single particle size single-stage, needs according to multiple particle diameter, based on crack, coal seam complicated type, appropriate design many particle diameters multistage-combination is laid, makes master-secondary-microcrack in complex fracture all have enough flow conductivities and efficient combination coupling.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect, the method principle is reliable, easy and simple to handle, can provide guidance for proppant optimization is laid in bed gas reservoir fracturing schematic design.
For reaching above technical purpose, the invention provides following technical scheme.
The present invention approaches angle according to coal seam fragility constituent content, uniaxial strengeth ratio, flatly stress difference coefficient, average hugger density and hugger, coal seam complex fracture type is divided into four kinds of groups, for different coal seam complex fracture types, design different proppants respectively and combine multistage support, obtain with this support effect more mated with reservoir and hydraulic fracture system.
Improve the multistage spread method of proppant of coal seam complex fracture support effect, comprise the following steps successively:
A, height according to the fragility constituent content W in coal seam, calculate the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of fragility constituent content W impact 1, standards of grading are as follows:
As W<10%, M 1=0;
As 10%≤W<20%, M 1=1;
As 20%≤W<30%, M 1=2;
As 30%≤W<40%, M 1=3;
When W>=40%, M 1=4;
B, according to the uniaxial strengeth in the coal seam size than R, calculate uniaxial strengeth and to mark M than the coal seam complex fracture type classification that R affect 2, standards of grading are as follows:
As R<10, M 2=0;
As 10≤R<15, M 2=1;
As 15≤R<20, M 2=2;
As 20≤R<25, M 2=3;
When R>=25, M 2=4;
C, size according to the horizontal stress diversity factor δ in coal seam, the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that calculated level stress difference coefficient δ affects 3, standards of grading are as follows:
When δ>=0.48, M 3=0;
As 0.36≤δ <0.48, M 3=1;
As 0.24≤δ <0.36, M 3=2;
As 0.12≤δ <0.24, M 3=3;
As δ <0.12, M 3=4;
D, average hugger density according to coal seam calculate average hugger density the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of impact 4, standards of grading are as follows:
When time, M 4=0;
When time, M 4=1;
When time, M 4=2;
When time, M 4=3;
When time, M 4=4;
E, approach angle β according to the hugger in coal seam, calculate hugger and approach the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that angle β affects 5, standards of grading are as follows:
As 72 °≤β <90 °, M 5=0;
As 54 °≤β <72 °, M 5=1;
As 36 °≤β <54 °, M 5=2;
As 18 °≤β <36 °, M 5=3;
As 0 °≤β <18 °, M 5=4;
F, the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M affected according to each factor calculated respectively in steps A ~ E 1, M 2, M 3, M 4, M 5, adopt following formula to calculate the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of comprehensive above five factors impact:
M = &Sigma; i = 1 5 ( b i &CenterDot; M i ) / &Sigma; i = 1 5 b i
In formula: M irefer to M respectively 1, M 2, M 3, M 4, M 5; b ifor M 1, M 2, M 3, M 4, M 5shared weight, is respectively 0.15,0.15,0.25,0.25,0.2.
Adopt following standard, demarcate coal seam complex fracture type according to M value:
When 0≤M≤1, coal seam complex fracture type is A type (double-vane seam type);
When 1<M≤2, coal seam complex fracture type is Type B (multiple cracking type);
When 2<M≤3, coal seam complex fracture type is C type (dendritic);
When 3<M≤4, coal seam complex fracture type is D type (network-type);
G, according to the coal seam complex fracture type of demarcating in step F, design for often kind of types of fractures many particle diameters proppant combination multistage laid:
1. for A type (double-vane seam type) crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 7:2:1;
2. for B (multiple cracking type) type crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 3:2:1;
3. for C type (dendritic) crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 4:3:2;
4. for D type (network-type) crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 1:1:1.
Below 1. ~ 4. infusion order is first infusion 40/70 order proppant in situation fracturing process, then infusion 30/50 order proppant, last infusion 20/40 order proppant.
In the present invention, in described steps A, fragility constituent content W is the summation (%) of inertinite content and non-clay inorganic mineral content in coal seam.In coal seam, fragility constituent content is the internal factor determining coal petrography mechanical characteristics, thus also affects crack, coal seam complex characteristic.Fragility constituent content is higher, and crack, coal seam is more complicated, M 1higher.
In described step B, uniaxial strengeth is coal seam uniaxial compressive strength σ than R cwith uniaxial tension test σ tratio (zero dimension).Coal petrography single shaft Compressive Strength σ cwith tensile strength sigma tdifference reflection coal petrography mechanics fragility, difference is larger, and fragility is stronger, and coal petrography is more easily cracked, and crack, coal seam is more complicated, M 2higher.
In described step C, horizontal stress diversity factor δ is the maximum horizontal principal stress σ in coal seam hwith minimum horizontal principal stress σ hdifference divided by minimum horizontal principal stress σ hincome value (zero dimension).Coal seam flatly stress difference is under formation conditions less, and namely horizontal stress diversity factor δ is less, and experience coal seam, crack hugger more easily turns to and prolongs hugger and extends, and thus crack, coal seam is more complicated, M 3higher.
In described step D, the average hugger density in coal seam for end hugger density ω swith face cleat density ω faverage.Hugger density is that number (bar/m) grown by the hugger under unit length, and coal seam hugger is divided into the end hugger and face cleat that move towards mutually orthogonal, and coal seam hugger is educated all the more, hugger density is higher, hydraulic fracture more easily links up cleat system, and crack, coal seam is more complicated, M 4higher.
In described step e, hugger is approached angle β and is calculated by following formula:
β=|θ fs|=|(90-θ s)-θ s|=|90-2θ s|
In formula: θ ffor face cleat trend and orientation of principal stress angle, °,
θ sfor end hugger trend and orientation of principal stress angle, °.
The angle moved towards when major fracture bearing of trend (horizontal biggest principal stress direction) and hugger (holding hugger and face cleat) extends close to 0 ° of time delay hugger; When major fracture bearing of trend and hugger move towards vertical in 90 ° time directly extend through hugger; When major fracture bearing of trend and hugger move towards at about 45 °, the easiest major fracture and hugger extend to form fracture network simultaneously, and coal seam fracture pattern is the most complicated.Move towards mutually orthogonal due to end hugger and face cleat, therefore to approach angle β less for hugger, and major fracture bearing of trend and hugger move towards more close to 45 °, and crack, coal seam is more complicated, M 5higher.
In described step G, A type (double-vane seam type) crack, crack is based on single major fracture, and secondary-microcrack is few, thus laid based on 20/40 order proppant, and 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant use less.From A type ~ D type crack, fracture pattern complicates gradually, the trunk crack proportion that aperture is larger reduces gradually, and the less secondary crack of aperture and the small microcrack proportion of aperture increase gradually, and thus 30/50 order, 40/70 order usage ratio increase gradually.Finally make multistage effective support of major fracture, secondary crack, microcrack in the multistage laid coupling complex fracture of the combination of proppant, thus raising is supported with efficiency, and then improves fracturing effect.
Compared with existing single-stage spread method, the present invention has following beneficial effect: existing single-stage spread method only effectively can support A type (double-vane seam type) crack, for the comparatively complicated Type B (multiple cracking type) of fracture pattern, C type (dendritic), D type (network-type) crack, be supported with efficiency not high.The present invention can according to the difference of coal seam complex fracture type, design different multistage laid modes, thus meet effective support in crack, dissimilar coal seam, make the laid design of the proppant in Fracturing Project more targeted, meet the pressure break demand in coal seam under different geologic feature.
Detailed description of the invention
Embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with embodiment.For south, Yanchuan coal bed gas field coal bed gas well YX well, this well vertical depth 1420m, reservoir thickness is 4.6m.
A, the fragility constituent content W obtaining coal seam according to core test are 30.8% (inertinite content 23.6%, non-clay inorganic mineral content 7.2%), calculate the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of fragility constituent content W impact 1=3;
B, obtain coal seam uniaxial compressive strength σ according to core test cfor 17.5MPa, uniaxial tension test σ tfor 0.93MPa, calculating uniaxial strengeth is 18.8 than R, calculates the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that uniaxial strengeth affects than R 2=2;
C, reservoir maximum horizontal geostatic stress σ hfor 28.4MPa, minimum horizontal principal stress σ hfor 21.3MPa, calculated level stress difference coefficient δ is 0.33, the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that calculated level stress difference coefficient δ affects 3=2;
D, by rock core statistics obtain coal seam end hugger density ω sbe 70/m, face cleat density ω farticle 120 ,/m, calculates average hugger density be 95/m, calculate average hugger density the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of impact 4=3;
E, horizontal major principal stress orientation, this area are NE95 °, and end hugger moves towards NE62 °, and face cleat moves towards NE152 °, θ fbe 57 °, θ sit is 33 °.Utilizing formula (1) calculating hugger to approach angle β is 24 °, calculates the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that hugger approaches angle β impact 5=3;
F, according to calculate M 1, M 2, M 3, M 4, M 5, adopt formula (2), calculate coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M=2.6 (2<M≤3) of comprehensive above five factors impact, demarcating coal seam complex fracture type is C type (dendritic);
G, be C type crack (dendritic) according to coal seam complex fracture type calibration result, select 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant ratio is that 4:3:2 carries out multistage support, in fracturing process, infusion order is first infusion 40/70 order proppant, infusion 30/50 order proppant again, last infusion 20/40 order proppant.
Current the method expands the secondary field conduct application of more than 30 wells at south, Yanchuan coal bed gas field, achieves good result.Compared with the coal bed gas well not adopting the method adjacent with block, after adopting this method, the initial stage on average produces tolerance daily increases 185.3m 3/ d, gas breakthrough time on average shifts to an earlier date 108d.

Claims (6)

1. improve the multistage spread method of proppant of coal seam complex fracture support effect, comprise the following steps successively:
A, height according to the fragility constituent content W in coal seam, calculate the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of fragility constituent content W impact 1, standards of grading are as follows:
As W<10%, M 1=0;
As 10%≤W<20%, M 1=1;
As 20%≤W<30%, M 1=2;
As 30%≤W<40%, M 1=3;
When W>=40%, M 1=4;
B, according to the uniaxial strengeth in the coal seam size than R, calculate uniaxial strengeth and to mark M than the coal seam complex fracture type classification that R affect 2, standards of grading are as follows:
As R<10, M 2=0;
As 10≤R<15, M 2=1;
As 15≤R<20, M 2=2;
As 20≤R<25, M 2=3;
When R>=25, M 2=4;
C, size according to the horizontal stress diversity factor δ in coal seam, the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that calculated level stress difference coefficient δ affects 3, standards of grading are as follows:
When δ>=0.48, M 3=0;
As 0.36≤δ <0.48, M 3=1;
As 0.24≤δ <0.36, M 3=2;
As 0.12≤δ <0.24, M 3=3;
As δ <0.12, M 3=4;
D, average hugger density according to coal seam calculate average hugger density the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M of impact 4, standards of grading are as follows:
When time, M 4=0;
When 25 &le; &omega; &OverBar; < 50 Time, M 4=1;
When 50 &le; &omega; &OverBar; < 75 Time, M 4=2;
When 75 &le; &omega; &OverBar; < 100 Time, M 4=3;
When time, M 4=4;
E, approach angle β according to the hugger in coal seam, calculate hugger and approach the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M that angle β affects 5, standards of grading are as follows:
As 72 °≤β <90 °, M 5=0;
As 54 °≤β <72 °, M 5=1;
As 36 °≤β <54 °, M 5=2;
As 18 °≤β <36 °, M 5=3;
As 0 °≤β <18 °, M 5=4;
F, the coal seam complex fracture type classification scoring M adopting comprehensive above five factors of following formula calculating to affect:
M = &Sigma; i = 1 5 ( b i &CenterDot; M i ) / &Sigma; i = 1 5 b i
In formula: b ifor M 1, M 2, M 3, M 4, M 5shared weight, is respectively 0.15,0.15,0.25,0.25,0.2,
Thus demarcate coal seam complex fracture type according to M value:
When 0≤M≤1, coal seam complex fracture type is A type, i.e. double-vane seam type;
When 1<M≤2, coal seam complex fracture type is Type B, i.e. multiple cracking type;
When 2<M≤3, coal seam complex fracture type is C type, i.e. dendritic;
When 3<M≤4, coal seam complex fracture type is D type, i.e. network-type;
G, according to coal seam complex fracture type, design for often kind of types of fractures many particle diameters proppant combination multistage laid:
For A type crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 7:2:1;
For Type B crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 3:2:1;
For C type crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 4:3:2;
For D type crack, design 20/40 order, 30/50 order, 40/70 order proppant volume ratio be 1:1:1.
2. the multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, in described steps A, fragility constituent content W is the summation of inertinite content and non-clay inorganic mineral content in coal seam.
3. the multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, in described step B, uniaxial strengeth is coal seam uniaxial compressive strength σ than R cwith uniaxial tension test σ tratio.
4. the multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, in described step C, horizontal stress diversity factor δ is the maximum horizontal principal stress σ in coal seam hwith minimum horizontal principal stress σ hdifference divided by minimum horizontal principal stress σ hincome value.
5. the multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, in described step D, and the average hugger density in coal seam for end hugger density ω swith face cleat density ω faverage.
6. the multistage spread method of proppant improving coal seam complex fracture support effect as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, in described step e, hugger is approached angle β and is calculated by following formula:
β=|θ fs|=|(90-θ s)-θ s|=|90-2θ s|
In formula: θ ffor face cleat trend and orientation of principal stress angle, °,
θ sfor end hugger trend and orientation of principal stress angle, °.
CN201510778950.1A 2015-11-13 2015-11-13 A kind of proppant multistage spread method for improving coal seam complex fracture support effect Active CN105332685B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510778950.1A CN105332685B (en) 2015-11-13 2015-11-13 A kind of proppant multistage spread method for improving coal seam complex fracture support effect

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510778950.1A CN105332685B (en) 2015-11-13 2015-11-13 A kind of proppant multistage spread method for improving coal seam complex fracture support effect

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105332685A true CN105332685A (en) 2016-02-17
CN105332685B CN105332685B (en) 2018-05-25

Family

ID=55283418

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510778950.1A Active CN105332685B (en) 2015-11-13 2015-11-13 A kind of proppant multistage spread method for improving coal seam complex fracture support effect

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105332685B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416160A (en) * 2018-03-22 2018-08-17 西南石油大学 A method of optimization pulse fiber sand fracturing parameter
CN111537699A (en) * 2020-05-29 2020-08-14 煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司 Method for distinguishing hard rock stratum of coal mine through multiple indexes
CN114622884A (en) * 2020-12-11 2022-06-14 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Full-support fracturing method for multi-scale fracture of oil and gas well and application

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5424285A (en) * 1993-01-27 1995-06-13 The Western Company Of North America Method for reducing deleterious environmental impact of subterranean fracturing processes
CN103133028A (en) * 2013-03-12 2013-06-05 河南理工大学 Underground coal seam hydrofracture crack oriented developing method
CN103995947A (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-08-20 中国矿业大学(北京) Improved coal seam floor water inrush vulnerability evaluation method
CN104570128A (en) * 2013-10-16 2015-04-29 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Unconventional oil and gas reservoir predicting method based on rock brittleness factors
CN104678434A (en) * 2013-12-02 2015-06-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for predicting storage layer crack development parameters
CN104678432A (en) * 2013-11-27 2015-06-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Glutenite crack recognition method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5424285A (en) * 1993-01-27 1995-06-13 The Western Company Of North America Method for reducing deleterious environmental impact of subterranean fracturing processes
CN103133028A (en) * 2013-03-12 2013-06-05 河南理工大学 Underground coal seam hydrofracture crack oriented developing method
CN103995947A (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-08-20 中国矿业大学(北京) Improved coal seam floor water inrush vulnerability evaluation method
CN104570128A (en) * 2013-10-16 2015-04-29 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Unconventional oil and gas reservoir predicting method based on rock brittleness factors
CN104678432A (en) * 2013-11-27 2015-06-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Glutenite crack recognition method
CN104678434A (en) * 2013-12-02 2015-06-03 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for predicting storage layer crack development parameters

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416160A (en) * 2018-03-22 2018-08-17 西南石油大学 A method of optimization pulse fiber sand fracturing parameter
CN108416160B (en) * 2018-03-22 2020-12-11 西南石油大学 Method for optimizing pulse fiber sand fracturing parameters
CN111537699A (en) * 2020-05-29 2020-08-14 煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司 Method for distinguishing hard rock stratum of coal mine through multiple indexes
CN114622884A (en) * 2020-12-11 2022-06-14 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Full-support fracturing method for multi-scale fracture of oil and gas well and application

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105332685B (en) 2018-05-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103527163B (en) A kind of compact reservoir horizontal well volume fracturing technique
CN108612508B (en) Novel shale gas horizontal well fracturing method utilizing high-strength degradable temporary plugging ball
CN103306660B (en) A kind of method of shale gas reservoir fracturing volume increase
CN107965306B (en) Acid injection fracturing method
CN109838223B (en) Deep complex shale gas volume fracturing method
CN108009670B (en) Optimization design method for improving supercritical carbon dioxide dry fracturing effect
CN109958411B (en) Horizontal well cluster perforation staged fracturing method
CN109958424B (en) Method for effectively plugging end part of hydraulic fracture
CN109958425B (en) Fracturing method for improving multi-scale fracture of deep shale gas
CN102606124A (en) Sectioned multi-cluster synchronous volume fracturing technology for double horizontal wells
CN106567702A (en) Method for improving complexity index of deep shale gas fracture
CN104963671B (en) A kind of fracturing reform method of High angle from formula well reservoir
CN109751029A (en) A kind of method of deep layer shale gas pressure break
CN107654215B (en) A method of coal bed gas well is transform as coal measures gas well
CN109931045A (en) A kind of self-supporting acid fracturing method of double slit system
CN107780913B (en) Atmospheric pressure shale gas reservoir fracturing method for horizontal shaft to penetrate through multiple layers
Gensheng et al. Multistage hydraulic jet acid fracturing technique for horizontal wells
CN110924899B (en) Coal bed gas yield increasing transformation method and development method
CN102865060A (en) Determining method of amount of shale oil deposit hydrofracture propping agent
CN108661616B (en) Layered fracturing method suitable for sandstone oil and gas reservoir
Guo et al. Comprehensive study of fracture flow characteristic and feasibility of hybrid volume stimulation technique in tight fractured carbonate gas reservoir
CN110714747A (en) Three-step control method for improving shale transformation volume
CN105332685A (en) Propping agent multistage paving method for improving coal bed complicated crack supporting effect
Youjing et al. Dynamic fractures are an emerging new development geological attribute in water-flooding development of ultra-low permeability reservoirs
CN112796729A (en) Quasi-dry method liquid supercritical CO2Acid fracturing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Guo Jianchun

Inventor after: He Songgen

Inventor after: Zhang Longsheng

Inventor after: Zhao Zhihong

Inventor after: Xiong Wei

Inventor after: Xu Jian

Inventor after: Lai Jianlin

Inventor before: Zhao Zhihong

Inventor before: He Songgen

Inventor before: Guo Jianchun

Inventor before: Zhang Longsheng

Inventor before: Xiong Wei

Inventor before: Xu Jian

Inventor before: Lai Jianlin

COR Change of bibliographic data
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant