CN104568605A - Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode - Google Patents

Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104568605A
CN104568605A CN201410855005.2A CN201410855005A CN104568605A CN 104568605 A CN104568605 A CN 104568605A CN 201410855005 A CN201410855005 A CN 201410855005A CN 104568605 A CN104568605 A CN 104568605A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
sample
load
rattan
curve
crack
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201410855005.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
刘杏娥
杨淑敏
田根林
尚莉莉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Center for Bamboo and Rattan
Original Assignee
International Center for Bamboo and Rattan
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Center for Bamboo and Rattan filed Critical International Center for Bamboo and Rattan
Priority to CN201410855005.2A priority Critical patent/CN104568605A/en
Publication of CN104568605A publication Critical patent/CN104568605A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a method for testing the fracture toughness of rattan canes based on a three-point bending mode. The method comprises the following steps: preparing a sample, and regulating a water content rate so as to obtain a sample of which the water content rate is 10-12%; recording a load-crack opening displacement (PV) curve, measuring actual crack depths, and calculating critical loads PQ and critical stress intensity factors KQ. According to the method provided by the invention, the crack opening displacement is measured by a C.O.D Gauge, and the test precision is improved. Aiming at the characteristics of the rattan materials, the sampling method for testing the fracture toughness of rattan canes is ensured, and the measured results having high accuracy and good reproducibility are obtained. The calculation method for testing the fracture toughness of rattan cane, provided by the invention, provides qualitative and quantitative bases for the utilization of the rattan canes.

Description

Based on the method for three-point bending pattern test rattan material fracture toughness
Technical field
The invention belongs to fields of measurement, be specifically related to a kind of method that mechanical stress surveys rattan material strength characteristics.
Background technology
Fracturing mechanics simulates a kind of rational method having stress and concentrate timber compoment to destroy.The principle of fracturing mechanics is applied to the progress that wood materials is existing deep abroad, when the ultimate principle of fracturing mechanics is widely used in knot in timber structure and cementing port size Control, strength of wood are estimated, lumber grading, the drying of wood cause cracking, wood cutting by foreign scholar in the research such as crack propagation law, and there are many respective experimental techniques to determine the fracture toughness K of timber iC.According to the force way of component, its Crack Extension is divided into opening mode, sliding mode and tearing mode, and opening mode (I type) Crack Extension mode is the most common in loading, is also the most dangerous destruction form causing fracture, therefore, in wooden bamboo fracture mechanics to I mode-Ⅲ crack research maximum.Therefore patent provides emphatically is the fracture toughness K of windmill palm vine material I mode-Ⅲ crack iC.
There is the testing standard measuring material at present both at home and abroad.Such as: the ASTM-E399 of ASTM (American society for testing materials), ASTM-E1826, the BS5447-1977 of material standard association of Britain, CNS GB4161-2007, the ISO12737-2005 of International Standardization Association (ISA), their measurement ultimate principle is all consistent.But nature material category is thousands of, although some material is widely used, because of himself complex structure, performance test can not be carried out comprehensively, the development of materials application of the parameter influence of processor's the unknown.
Windmill palm vine material is important non-timber forest product, belongs to wood materials together, its profile and textural with bamboo wood relatively, difference to be bamboo wood be hollow have every, and windmill palm vine material is solid, identical with timber, but much less than timber in stem level.Windmill palm vine material is a kind of natural material, has obvious orthotropy, and xsect shows again the feature of functionally gradient material (FGM).The intensity of windmill palm vine material is not only by the impact of its structural attitude, chemical composition, and defect such as knot, crackle that rattan material is formed in growth course and in process also have significant impact to it.The existence of crackle can have influence on quality and the safe design of material, and also never someone relates to the fracture toughness of windmill palm vine material, therefore, inquires into and measure the K of windmill palm vine material iCvalue has important practice significance.
Summary of the invention
For the deficiency that prior art exists, the object of the invention is to propose a kind of method based on three-point bending pattern test rattan material fracture toughness.
The technical scheme realizing the object of the invention is:
Based on a method for three-point bending pattern test rattan material fracture toughness, comprise step:
1) sample preparation: rattan material to be measured is processed as rectangular block shape sample, and specimen width W is 1 ~ 2 times of the minimum diameter value of rattan material to be measured, and length L is 4 ~ 5W, and thickness is 0.4 ~ 0.7W; Crackle is processed in the middle of rectangular specimen;
2) water percentage is adjusted: temperature 20 DEG C put into by sample, humidity is climatic chamber adjustment under 65% condition, obtains the sample that water percentage is 10-12%;
3) load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve is recorded: adopt three-point bending pattern to load, fulcrum span S is 4W.Sample is vertically put in the middle of backing roll, COD displacement meter is placed in crack opening mouth place.At the uniform velocity load with the speed of 0.5mm/min, record load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve;
4) actual crack depth survey: sample, after destroying by curved loading, is gone bail for and stayed the sample of fracture section, measure the length a of crackle under the microscope n, because cut sharp crack processed with thin blade, section can clearly see straight line impression, due to bottom surface can not be parallel to completely when cutting crackle processed, thus measure the degree of depth a of sample crackle at sample different-thickness place 1, a 2... .a n, finally get its mean value (a 1+ a 2+ ... .a n)/n is the effective length of crackle; N is the positive integer between 2 ~ 10;
5) critical load P is calculated qwith critical stress intensity factors K q: according to step 3) load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve of recording tries to achieve load p qvalue and K q;
6) validity of test result is assessed.
Wherein, described step 2) adjustment water percentage be sample is put into temperature 20 DEG C, humidity is climatic chamber under 65% condition, through 26-35 days, obtains the sample that water percentage is 10-12%.Normally through one month.
Further, the width of described sample is 10 ~ 50mm.The diameter of rattan material common are 10 ~ 50mm, can processing sample width 10mm; Crack depth a=0.4 ~ 0.6W.
Or, described crack depth a=0.45 ~ 0.55W.
Wherein, described step 3) middle load transducer and COD Gauge carry out automatic record to the bending load in process of the test and displacement.
Preferably, described step 4) in, the length a of crackle is measured at 1/4,1/2,3/4 thickness place of sample n, n=3.
Wherein, described step 5) in the computing formula of critical stress intensity factors be:
K Q = P Q S BW 3 / 2 · f ( a w ) - - - ( 1 )
f ( a w ) = 3 a w · 1.99 - ( a w ) ( 1 - a w ) [ 2.15 - 3.93 a w + 2.7 ( a w ) 2 ] 2 ( 1 + 2 a w ) ( 1 - a w ) 3 / 2 - - - ( 2 )
In formula, S is fulcrum span,
P qthe determination of value: for the PV curve of test gained, first do the matched curve of stretch section (OA), this matched curve and X-axis and crack opening displacement axle meet at O point, cross O point and be secant OP5, and make the slope of OP5 be 95% of initial matched curve slope, obtain the load p 5 corresponding to intersection point of secant and this curve, measure the maximum load Pmax that test specimen can bear simultaneously, calculate Pmax/P5, if both ratios are less than or equal to 1.1, then P5 is P qvalue, P qsubstitution formula (1) tries to achieve K qvalue.
Wherein, described step 6) method of assessment test result validity is: calculate 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2value, and compare with sample thickness, if 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2be less than or equal to sample thickness, then critical stress intensity factors is valid data; If 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2be greater than sample thickness, then critical stress intensity factors data invalid; Wherein, σ sfor the yield strength of material.
The yield strength σ of material sthe method of this area routine can be adopted to measure, such as " windmill palm vine material tensile strength method of testing " [Lv Wenhua, Liu Xinge, Wang Youhong. wood processing machinery, 2010, (1): 20-23].
Beneficial effect of the present invention is:
(1) use C.O.D Gauge to measure the displacement of crack opening mouth, improve measuring accuracy.
(2) for the characteristic of rattan material, determine the fracture toughness test sampling method of windmill palm vine material, obtain that accuracy is high, the measurement result of favorable reproducibility.
(3) propose the fracture toughness measuring and calculation method of windmill palm vine material, provide quantitative and qualitative analysis foundation for rattan material utilizes.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is three point bending specimen dimensional drawing.
Fig. 2 is rattan core SEB sample and end face (A face), and Fig. 2 (a) is full face, and Fig. 2 (b) is end face photo.
Fig. 3 is actual crack linear measure longimetry schematic diagram (observation place is the I cross section of Fig. 1).
Fig. 4 is the outdoor scene photo that crack opening displacement is measured.
Fig. 5 is the PV curve of hook leaf rattan material rattan core.
Embodiment
Following examples for illustration of the present invention, but are not used in restriction scope of the present invention.
Experimental apparatus: omnipotent mechanics machine, COD Gauge (U.S. instron Instron, 2670-116).
Embodiment 1:
1. experiment material and specimen size
Hook leaf rattan material, diameter 30-40mm, is collected in Dehong prefecture Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province.The size of SEB test specimen according to " ASTM E399 metal material is linear-elastic linear strain fracture toughness K ictest method " in requirement obtained (as shown in Figure 1, S=4W, B=W/2, a/W=-0.45 ~ 0.55).Specimen thickness is 10mm, and width is 20mm, and crack depth is 10mm, and test specimen number is no less than 20.Temperature 20 DEG C put into by the test specimen processed, humidity is climatic chamber adjustment under 65% condition, and sample water percentage is 10-12%.
2. crackle is prefabricated
Vascular bundle skewness in rattan diametric(al), vascular bundle distribution in rattan peel place is close, and vascular bundle distribution in rattan core place is dredged, and meets personally Fig. 2 (a) and Fig. 2 (b) from the crack tip that rattan core is prefabricated.In the centre position of piece lengths, be 0.45 ~ 0.55 precrack by a/w.First on sample, crack position and the degree of depth is marked with pencil before precrack, then on miniature band saw (saw blade thickness is about 0.7mm), saw out the saw kerf of 3/4ths of total crack length, then cut out remaining crack length with thin blade (thickness about 0.3mm) along saw kerf, make the sharp crack that total length is a.Measure B and W of each sample before test respectively at crackle section part, average at least in triplicate, precision is at 0.01mm.
3. actual crack depth survey
Sample, after destroying by curved loading, is gone bail for and is stayed the sample of fracture section, measure the length a of crackle under the microscope.Because cut sharp crack processed with thin blade, section can clearly see straight line impression, due to bottom surface can not be parallel to completely when cutting crackle processed, thus measure the degree of depth a of sample crackle at 1/4,1/2,3/4 3 places of sample thickness 1, a 2, a 3, finally get its mean value (a 1+ a 2+ a 3)/3 are the effective length of crackle, as shown in Figure 3.
4. loading equipemtn is the omnipotent test machine for mechanism of American I nstron 5582, and adopt three-point bending load mode, the diameter of loaded roll and backing roll is 5mm, and span is 4W.C.O.DGauge is adopted to measure the displacement of crack opening, as shown in Figure 4.At the uniform velocity load with the speed of 0.5mm/min, by load transducer and C.O.D Gauge, automatic record is carried out to the tensile load in process of the test and displacement, obtain PV curve.
5. computing formula and data processing
Computing formula is formula (1) ~ (3), K in formula qunit be p qunit be the unit of KN, B, a, W, S be all cm.Adopt EXCEL and SPSS software statistics measurement result.
6 results and analysis
1) the PV curve in hook leaf rattan material destructive process and P qdetermination
Rattan material is viscoelastic material, and in the bending starting stage, elastic deformation occurs, when stress reaches proportional limit, rattan material enters the viscoelasticity stage, until reach maximal destruction load and destroy.As shown in Figure 5, as can be seen from the figure, the starting stage that hook leaf rattan material is bending is elastic stage (OA section) to PV curve in hook leaf rattan material loading procedure, and bending load becomes positive correlation with bending displacement, and loading curve is straight line.Along with the increase of load, rattan material starts surrender, and plastic yield occurs, and bending load slowly increases with the increase of displacement.When load increases to failing load, different from hard brittle material, hook leaf rattan material partial destruction before this, then destroys gradually completely, and when load displacement reaches maximum, indentation destroys, similar with the failure mode of bamboo wood.PV curve with the hook leaf rattan material rattan core rupture failure of precrack meets the feature of I class curve.For the PV curve of test gained, first be stretch section (OA, line the thickest in Fig. 5) best matched curve, this matched curve and X-axis and crack opening displacement axle meet at O point, cross O point and are secant OP5, and make the slope of OP5 be 95% of initial matched curve slope, obtain the load p 5 corresponding to intersection point of secant and this curve, measure the maximum load Pmax that test specimen can bear simultaneously, calculate Pmax/P5, if both are less than or equal to 1.1 by ratio, then P5 is P qvalue.
2) fracture toughness of rattan core
The K of hook leaf rattan material rattan core qvalue is by P qvalue and obtained by formula the results are shown in table 1, carry out validity check: calculate 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2value, compares with sample thickness; In the present embodiment, the yield strength σ of material sfor 9.8MPa, the 2.5 (K tried to achieve q/ σ s) 2all be less than or equal to the sample thickness of 10mm.
Pass through K qthe detection that value is carried out, can meet the condition of plane strain when showing that thickness is 10mm, therefore calculated K qvalue is the fracture toughness K of hook leaf rattan material rattan core iCvalue.
The nominal fracture toughness mean value of the rattan core measured by SEB test specimen is 0.476, much smaller than bamboo wood and the timber such as China fir, masson pine, show that Fracture Toughness is relevant with constituent to the structure of material on the one hand, on the other hand may be relevant with precision with the method calculated.
From the statistics of this test, the coefficient of variation of hook leaf rattan material rattan core name Fracture Toughness is 12.41% be less than 20%, and accurate index is 1.39% be less than 5%, shows that experimental data is effective.
The size of table 1 rattan core SEB test specimen and K qvalue
Above embodiment is only be described the preferred embodiment of the present invention; not scope of the present invention is limited; under not departing from the present invention and designing the prerequisite of spirit; the various modification that the common engineering technical personnel in this area make technical scheme of the present invention and improvement, all should fall in protection domain that claims of the present invention determine.

Claims (8)

1., based on a method for three-point bending pattern test rattan material fracture toughness, it is characterized in that, comprise step:
1) sample preparation: rattan material to be measured is processed as rectangular block shape sample, and specimen width W is 1 ~ 2 times of the minimum diameter value of rattan material to be measured, and length L is 4 ~ 5W, and thickness is 0.4 ~ 0.7W; Crackle is processed in the middle of rectangular specimen;
2) water percentage is adjusted: temperature 20 DEG C put into by sample, humidity is climatic chamber adjustment under 65% condition, obtains the sample that water percentage is 10-12%;
3) load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve is recorded: adopt three-point bending pattern to load, fulcrum span S is 4W, sample is vertically put in the middle of backing roll, COD displacement meter is placed in crack opening mouth place, at the uniform velocity load with the speed of 0.5mm/min, record load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve;
4) actual crack depth survey: sample, after destroying by curved loading, is gone bail for and stayed the sample of fracture section, measure the length a of crackle under the microscope n, the degree of depth a of sample crackle is measured at sample different-thickness place 1, a 2... .a n, finally get its mean value (a 1+ a 2+ ... .a n)/n is the effective length of crackle; N is the positive integer between 2 ~ 10;
5) critical load P is calculated qwith critical stress intensity factors K q: according to step 3) load-crack opening mouth displacement (PV) curve of recording tries to achieve load p qvalue and K q;
6) validity of test result is assessed.
2. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, the width of described sample is 10 ~ 50mm; Crack depth a=0.4 ~ 0.6W.
3. method according to claim 2, is characterized in that, described crack depth a=0.45 ~ 0.55W.
4. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described step 2) adjustment water percentage be sample is put into temperature 20 DEG C, humidity is climatic chamber under 65% condition, through 26-35 days, obtains the sample that water percentage is 10-12%.
5. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described step 3) middle load transducer and COD Gauge carry out automatic record to the bending load in process of the test and displacement.
6. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described step 4) in, the length a of crackle is measured at 1/4,1/2,3/4 thickness place of sample n, n=3.
7., according to the arbitrary described method of claim 1 ~ 6, it is characterized in that, described step 5) in the computing formula of critical stress intensity factors be:
K Q = P Q S BW 3 / 2 · f ( a w ) - - - ( 1 )
f ( a w ) = 3 a w · 1.99 - ( a w ) ( 1 - a w ) [ 2.15 - 3.93 a w + 2.7 ( a w ) 2 ] 2 ( 1 + 2 a w ) ( 1 - a w ) 3 / 2 - - - ( 2 )
In formula, S is fulcrum span,
Wherein, P qbeing defined as of value: for the PV curve of test gained, do matched curve, this matched curve and X-axis and crack opening displacement axle meet at O point, cross O point and be secant OP5, and make the slope of OP5 be 95% of initial matched curve slope, obtain the load p 5 corresponding to intersection point of secant and this curve, measure the maximum load P that test specimen can bear simultaneously max, calculate P max/ P 5if both are less than or equal to 1.1 by ratio, then P5 is P qvalue, P qsubstitution formula (1) tries to achieve K qvalue.
8., according to the arbitrary described method of claim 1 ~ 6, it is characterized in that, described step 6) method of assessment test result validity is: calculate 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2value, and compare with sample thickness, if 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2be less than or equal to sample thickness, then critical stress intensity factors is valid data; If 2.5 (K q/ σ s) 2be greater than sample thickness, then critical stress intensity factors data invalid; Wherein, σ sfor the yield strength of material.
CN201410855005.2A 2014-12-31 2014-12-31 Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode Pending CN104568605A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410855005.2A CN104568605A (en) 2014-12-31 2014-12-31 Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410855005.2A CN104568605A (en) 2014-12-31 2014-12-31 Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104568605A true CN104568605A (en) 2015-04-29

Family

ID=53085184

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410855005.2A Pending CN104568605A (en) 2014-12-31 2014-12-31 Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104568605A (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105823686A (en) * 2016-04-14 2016-08-03 华北水利水电大学 Method for measuring tensile strength and fracture toughness of cement mortar or concrete
CN105865896A (en) * 2016-05-19 2016-08-17 华北水利水电大学 Method for determining fracture toughness and tensile strength of brittle material through two-point loading test piece
CN105910899A (en) * 2016-04-14 2016-08-31 华北水利水电大学 Method for simultaneous determination of tensile strength and fracture toughness of rock material
CN105938072A (en) * 2016-06-21 2016-09-14 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Three-point bending sample ductile fracture toughness (JIC) testing device and test method thereof
CN105973701A (en) * 2016-04-29 2016-09-28 华北水利水电大学 Method for simultaneous determination of yield strength and fracture toughness of low-alloy high-strength steel
CN106404553A (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-02-15 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Auxiliary testing apparatus for ductile fracture toughness J<IC> of three-point bending sample and testing method thereof
CN108169021A (en) * 2018-01-26 2018-06-15 内蒙古农业大学 The flexible assay method of shrub plant
CN108844806A (en) * 2018-05-30 2018-11-20 中国科学院金属研究所 A method of estimation metal material plane strain fracture toughness
CN108956328A (en) * 2018-09-06 2018-12-07 国际竹藤中心 A kind of bamboo wood flexibility characterizing method
CN109115630A (en) * 2018-08-27 2019-01-01 河南海格尔高温材料有限公司 The characterizing method of refractory material toughness
CN109543352A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-03-29 西南石油大学 Shale fracture toughness prediction technique, device and electronic equipment
CN109540694A (en) * 2018-11-27 2019-03-29 浙江工业大学 Precrack for testing II type crack fracture toughness biases 3 points of curved experimental rigs
CN110646286A (en) * 2019-10-10 2020-01-03 安徽农业大学 Method for semi-divisionally measuring tensile strength of palm rattan grain
CN112326429A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-05 安徽新力电业科技咨询有限责任公司 Method for determining plane strain fracture toughness of steel
CN113453818A (en) * 2019-02-26 2021-09-28 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Bending crack evaluation method, bending crack evaluation system, and method for manufacturing press-formed component
CN113466043A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-10-01 蒙娜丽莎集团股份有限公司 Method for testing fracture toughness of ceramic rock plate
CN113670682A (en) * 2021-07-22 2021-11-19 包头钢铁（集团）有限责任公司 Preparation method and test method of 50kg/m steel rail fracture toughness sample

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102353595A (en) * 2011-07-01 2012-02-15 华东理工大学 Test method for J-R resistance curve of high-toughness material
CN102519805A (en) * 2011-12-01 2012-06-27 三峡大学 Method and system for testing fracture toughness of incompact soil body
CN103616299A (en) * 2013-12-12 2014-03-05 山东大学 Test piece and method for testing fracture toughness of hybrid mode of double-material interface
CN103698224A (en) * 2013-11-11 2014-04-02 水利部交通运输部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 Self-weight influence-free concrete material fracture toughness testing method
CN104062188A (en) * 2014-06-26 2014-09-24 上海交通大学 Method for measuring fracture toughness J<IC> of heat affected zone of welded joint

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102353595A (en) * 2011-07-01 2012-02-15 华东理工大学 Test method for J-R resistance curve of high-toughness material
CN102519805A (en) * 2011-12-01 2012-06-27 三峡大学 Method and system for testing fracture toughness of incompact soil body
CN103698224A (en) * 2013-11-11 2014-04-02 水利部交通运输部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 Self-weight influence-free concrete material fracture toughness testing method
CN103616299A (en) * 2013-12-12 2014-03-05 山东大学 Test piece and method for testing fracture toughness of hybrid mode of double-material interface
CN104062188A (en) * 2014-06-26 2014-09-24 上海交通大学 Method for measuring fracture toughness J<IC> of heat affected zone of welded joint

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
尚莉莉: "钩叶藤材的基本性能及增强增韧改性研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 农业科技辑》 *

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105910899A (en) * 2016-04-14 2016-08-31 华北水利水电大学 Method for simultaneous determination of tensile strength and fracture toughness of rock material
CN105823686A (en) * 2016-04-14 2016-08-03 华北水利水电大学 Method for measuring tensile strength and fracture toughness of cement mortar or concrete
CN105973701A (en) * 2016-04-29 2016-09-28 华北水利水电大学 Method for simultaneous determination of yield strength and fracture toughness of low-alloy high-strength steel
CN105973701B (en) * 2016-04-29 2018-10-23 华北水利水电大学 Measure the yield strength of Hi-Stren steel and the method for fracture toughness simultaneously
CN105865896A (en) * 2016-05-19 2016-08-17 华北水利水电大学 Method for determining fracture toughness and tensile strength of brittle material through two-point loading test piece
CN105938072B (en) * 2016-06-21 2018-12-25 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 A kind of Three Points Bending Specimen ductile fracture toughness JIC test device and test method
CN105938072A (en) * 2016-06-21 2016-09-14 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Three-point bending sample ductile fracture toughness (JIC) testing device and test method thereof
CN106404553A (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-02-15 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Auxiliary testing apparatus for ductile fracture toughness J<IC> of three-point bending sample and testing method thereof
CN106404553B (en) * 2016-06-21 2023-06-30 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 Three-point bending sample ductile fracture toughness JIC auxiliary test device and test method
CN108169021A (en) * 2018-01-26 2018-06-15 内蒙古农业大学 The flexible assay method of shrub plant
CN108844806A (en) * 2018-05-30 2018-11-20 中国科学院金属研究所 A method of estimation metal material plane strain fracture toughness
CN109115630A (en) * 2018-08-27 2019-01-01 河南海格尔高温材料有限公司 The characterizing method of refractory material toughness
CN108956328A (en) * 2018-09-06 2018-12-07 国际竹藤中心 A kind of bamboo wood flexibility characterizing method
CN109540694A (en) * 2018-11-27 2019-03-29 浙江工业大学 Precrack for testing II type crack fracture toughness biases 3 points of curved experimental rigs
CN109540694B (en) * 2018-11-27 2024-05-03 浙江工业大学 Prefabricated crack bias three-point bending test device for testing fracture toughness of II type crack
CN109543352A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-03-29 西南石油大学 Shale fracture toughness prediction technique, device and electronic equipment
CN113453818A (en) * 2019-02-26 2021-09-28 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Bending crack evaluation method, bending crack evaluation system, and method for manufacturing press-formed component
CN113453818B (en) * 2019-02-26 2023-11-28 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Method for evaluating bending crack, system therefor, and method for manufacturing press-formed part
US12017265B2 (en) 2019-02-26 2024-06-25 Jfe Steel Corporation Method for evaluating bending crack, system for evaluating bending crack, and method for manufacturing press-formed component
CN110646286B (en) * 2019-10-10 2022-04-26 安徽农业大学 Method for semi-divisionally measuring tensile strength of palm rattan grain
CN110646286A (en) * 2019-10-10 2020-01-03 安徽农业大学 Method for semi-divisionally measuring tensile strength of palm rattan grain
CN112326429A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-05 安徽新力电业科技咨询有限责任公司 Method for determining plane strain fracture toughness of steel
CN113466043A (en) * 2021-07-19 2021-10-01 蒙娜丽莎集团股份有限公司 Method for testing fracture toughness of ceramic rock plate
CN113670682A (en) * 2021-07-22 2021-11-19 包头钢铁（集团）有限责任公司 Preparation method and test method of 50kg/m steel rail fracture toughness sample

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104568605A (en) Method for testing fracture toughness of rattan canes based on three-point bending mode
Gao et al. A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees
Tannert et al. In situ assessment of structural timber using semi-destructive techniques
CN103604694B (en) Utilize the method that pipe line steel fracture toughness is measured in SEN tension test
Feio et al. Testing and modeling of a traditional timber mortise and tenon joint
Kloiber et al. Mechanical properties of wood examined by semi-destructive devices
Slater et al. Determining the mechanical properties of hazel forks by testing their component parts
Kloiber et al. Prediction of mechanical properties by means of semi-destructive methods: A review
Dahlen et al. Bending strength and stiffness of in-grade Douglas-fir and southern pine No. 2 2× 4 lumber
Zhou et al. Acoustic Testing and Sorting of Chinese Poplar Logs for Structural LVL Products.
Konukcu et al. Effect of growth rings on fracture toughness of wood
Závacký et al. Strains of rock during uniaxial compression test
Efimov Determination of tensile strength by the measured rock bending strength
Hidayati et al. Variation in tree growth characteristics, pilodyn penetration, and stress-wave velocity in 65 families of Acacia mangium trees planted in Indonesia
Caplescu et al. The fracture of polyurethane materials in the presence of stress concentrators
Biswal et al. Determination of fracture toughness and traction–separation relation in Mode I/II of a natural quasi-brittle orthotropic composite using multi-specimen approach
Zhu Fracture-toughness (K, J) testing, evaluation, and standardization.
Xu et al. Mode I fracture toughness of tangential moso bamboo
Martins et al. Non-destructive methodologies for assessment of the mechanical properties of new utility poles
Liu et al. Effects of moisture content and fiber proportion on stress wave velocity in cathay poplar (Populus cathayana) wood
Cheng et al. Variation of larch wood property indexes based on nondestructive testing data
Dahle et al. Non-destructive measurement of the modulus of elasticity of wood using acoustical stress waves
Zziwa et al. Inferring strength of structural timbers from small clear specimen strength test data
Haiyan Damage of bamboo and wooden materials based on linear elastic fracture mechanics in garden design
Kolawole et al. Strength and elastic properties of cassava tuber

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20150429

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication