CA1323280C

CA1323280C - Liquid detergent compositions

Info

Publication number: CA1323280C
Application number: CA000573102A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Mario Bulfari; Johannes Cornelis Van De Pas
Original assignee: Unilever PLC
Current assignee: Unilever PLC
Priority date: 1987-07-31
Filing date: 1988-07-25
Publication date: 1993-10-19
Anticipated expiration: 2010-10-19
Also published as: BR8803786A; ES2029025T3; KR890002383A; JPH0684520B2; JPH01103700A; AU600587B2; NO171221B; NO883388D0; AU2007688A; NO171221C; EP0301882B1; KR920000111B1; NO883388L; TR23293A; DE3867749D1; EP0301882A1

Abstract

ABSTRACT

LIQUID DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS

Enhanced levels of viscosity reducing polymer can be stably incorporated in liquid detergent compositions of the kind comprising a structured phase containing detergent active material dispersed in an aqueous phase containing dissolved electrolyte, if the polymer is only partly dissolved in the latter phase.

Description

1 3232~0 - 1 - C.3189 LIQUID DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
~ . .
The present invention is concerned with liquid detergent compositions of the kind containing a structure formed from detergent active material, the active structure existing as a separate phase dispersed within predominantly aqueous continuous phase. This aqueous phase usually contains dissolved electrolyte.

Such structuring is vexy well known in the art and may be deliberately brought about to endow properties such as consumer preferred flow properties and/or turbid appearance. Many active-structured liquids are also capable of suspending parti~ulate solids such as detergency builders and abrasive particles.

Some of the different kinds of active-structurin~
which are possible are descr~bed in the reference H.A.Barnes, 'Detergents', Ch.2. in K~Walters lEd)~
2Q 'Rheometry: Industrial Applications', J.Wiley & Sons, Letchworth 1980. In general, the degree of ordering of such systems increases with increasing surfactant and/or electrolyte concentrations. At very low concentrations, the surfactant can exis~ as a molecular solution, or as a ~ ~ .

.

. . .. ~ ~ .

- 2 - C.3189 solution of spherical micelles, both of these being isotropic. With the addition of further surfactant and/or electrolyte, structured (anisotropic) system~ can form.
They are referred to respectively, by various terms such as rod-micelles, planar lamellar structures, lamellar droplets and liquid crystalline phases. Often, different workers have used different terminology to refer to the structures which are really the same. For instance, in European patent specification EP-A-151 884, lamellar drople~s are called 'spherulites'. The presence and identity of a surfactant s~ructuring system in a liquid may be determined by means known to those skilled in the art for example, optical techniques, various rheometrical ~easurements, x-ray or neutron diffraction, and sometimes, electron microscopy.

One common such type of internal surfactant structure is a dispersion of lamellar droplets ~lamellar dispersion). These droplets consist of an onion-like configuration of concentric bilayers of surfactant molecules, between which is trapped water or electrolyte solution laqueous phase). Systems in which the droplets are close-packed`provide a very desirable combination of physical stability and solid-suspending properties with useful flow properties.

Electrolyte may be only dissolved in the aqueous continuous phase or may also be present as suspended solid particles. Particles of solid which are insoluble in the aqueous phase may be suspended alternatively or in addition to any solid electrolyte particles.

Three common product forms are liquids for heavy duty fabrics washing as well as liquid abrasive and general purpose cleaners. In the first class, the suspended solid can be subskantially the same as the dissolYed ,~
`.: ;. ' :' ' '~. '.

, - 3 - C.3189 electrolyte, being an excess of same beyond the solubility limit. This solid is usually present as a detergency builder, i.e. to counteract the effects of calcium ion water hardness in the wash. In addition, it may be desirable to suspend substantially insoluble particles of bleach, for example diperoxydodecandioic acid (DPDA). In the second class, the suspended solid is usually a particulate abrasive, insoluble in the system. In that case the electrolyte is a different, water soluble material, present to contribute to structuring of the active material in the dispersed phase. In certain cases, the abrasive can however comprise partially soluble salts which dissolve on dilution of the product. In the third class, the structure is used for thickening products to give consumer-preferred flow properties and sometimes to suspend pigment particles. Compositions of the first kind are described, for example, in our patent specification EP-A-38,101 compositions containing suspended DPDA bleach are disclosed in specification EP-A-160 342. Examples of those in the second category are described in our specification EP-A-104,452. Those in the third category are described, for example, in US 4,244,840.

Two problems are commonly encountered when formulating liquids with solids suspended by these systems, especially lamellar droplets. The first is high viscosity, rendering the products difficult to pour and the second is instability, i.e. a tendency for the dispersed and aqueous phases to separate upon storage at elevated, or even ambient temperatures. Thus care must always be exercised when formulating such liquids 80 that the nature and concentration of the actives and electrolyte are selected to give the required rheological properties.

" ; : .

. . .

: .

- 4 - C.3189 However, these formulation techniques are always an exercise in balancing the intended rheology and stability with the ideal ingredients in the formulation and some combinations will not be practicable. One example is when one wishes to make a concentrated product in which the total amount of detergen~ actives is relatively high in proportion to the other components. The main problem which usually manifests itself here is an unacceptable rise in viscosity.
1~
One approach to viscosity control in general is to formulate the liquids to be shear-thinning, i.e. accepting the high viscosity of the product at rest in a bottle but devising the composition such that the action of pouring causes shear beyond the yield point, so that the product then flows more easily. This property is utilised in the compositions described in our aforementioned specification EP-A-38,101. Unfortunately, it has been found that this cannot easily be utilised for all theoretically possible combinations of ingredients, for example in liquids with high levels of active.

It is also known that incorporation of fabric softening clays, (e.g. bentonites) in li~uids can give rise to unacceptably high viscosity. One approach to mitigate this disadvantage has been to also incorporate a small amount of a dissolved low molecular weight polyacrylate. This is described in UK patent specification GB-A-2,168,717. However, if one wishes to use such polymers for viscosity control in the widest possible range of structured liquids, then one is led on occasions to try to incorporate more and more polymer.
Alternatively or additionally to this r~ason, there is also a desire to use increased amounts of polymers for ~5 their detergency builder properties, i.e to counter the effects of calcium ion water hardness. This is , ;- :
: . .

.... ...
,: . . ~ - , .
: ~ : .:

~, . .
., :~ .

- 5 - C.3189 particularly important when one wishes to substitute the polymers for conventional phosphate builders (either in whole or in part~ for environmental reasons.

Unfortunately, when it ls attempted to dissolve more polymer, what is then frequently found (as when trying to incorporate increased amounts of any component in a structured liquid) is an increased tendency to instability, i.e. to separate into two ox more different phases.

The applicants though, have further discovered that where such instability occurs, it is possible to extend the amount of polymer which can be incorporated stably, by adjusting the composition such that only part of the polymer is in solution whilst the rest is incorporated in a stable 'non-dissolved' phase within the composition.

Thus, the present composition provides a liquid detergent composition comprising a structured phase containing detergent active material, dispersed in an a~ueous phase containing dissolved electrolyte, and a viscosity reducing polymer, the ele!ctrolyte containing aqueous phase being such that the polymer is only partly dissolved therein.
.
In preferred embodiments, such compositions are sufficiently stable so as only to yield 2~ or less phase separation upon storage for 21 days at 25C, although sometimes, somewhat less stability may be tolerable.

It is also possible to incorporate larger amounts of polymer without instability and still achieve an acceptably low viscosity, preferably 1 Pas or les~ at a shear rate of 21s 1, although sometimes, slightly higher viscosities may be acceptable.

. :

: `
, ~ :

- 6 - C.3189 Althou~h not wishing to be bound by any interpretation or theory, one explanation the applicants propose for this effect is that the observed undesirable early onset of instabili~y referred to above is due to the fact that the conditions in the liquid minus the polymer are such that as more polymer is added, viscosity decreases but then there is a sudden onset of lack of solubility, beyond which no more will dissolve.

This may be illustrated schematically by the curve A
in the accompanying Figure 1. The broken line indicates the onset of instability, whereafter there is instability.
However, all polymer samples do not contain molecules of identical configuration and molecular weiqht, but a spectrum of molecules with varying degrees of poly-merisation ~and in the case of co-polymers, proportions of different components). To oversimplify the applicants' theory, the present invention may be due to adjustment of conditions in the liquid until one broad category of the polymers remains soluble at much higher concentrations than another. In Figure 1, curve ]3 represents the category which under these particular conditions (different from those for curve A) can remain soluble at higher concentrations, whereas those molecules which become non-dissolved at much lower concentrations are shown as curve C. It is as though the polymer can then be incorporated stably as represented by curve D. This is clearly an over-simplification since it is unlikely that under any set of conditions, the polymer sample could be crudely classified into two such broad categories. In practice, there is more likely to be a continuum of the effect. Nevertheless, this simplified explanation serves ~o illustrate the proposed phenomenon.

The applicants believe that those molecules which are not dissolved ~curve C~ whilst the others remain in . -, : . . ~
: :.... '.. ~' ~ ......... ... .... . .
;, 1 3~3280 - 7 - C.3189 solution ~curve B), are held in a suspended precipitated phase, dispersed within the structured liquid. Evidence suggestive of this phenomenon has been obtained by electron microscopy.
Put another way, the invention entails changing a composition of the kind described above, having an early onset of instability with increasing polymer concentration, to bring about the effect described above.
This means that effectively, one could say that the amount of polymer stably incorporated in a composition according to the present invention is greater than that in a reference composition in which at least one parameter thereof is varied from that in the said composition, to permit the maximum amount of polymer to be incorporated by substantially all being dissolved, beyond which amount, dissolving OL more polymer would cause the reference composition to have a phase separation of 2% or greater upon storage at 25C for 21 days.
The parameter to be varied in the composition to bring about this effect may be pH, the quantity or nature of electrolyte in the composition or occasionally the quantity or nature of the detergent active material, or other parameters.

The viscosity reducing polymers which are ~usceptible of use in the present invention are selected from a very wide range and in particular include those polymer and co-polymer salts known as detergency builders. For example, may be used (including building and non-building polymers) polyethylene glycols, polyacrylates, polymaleates, polysugars, polysugarsulphonates and co-polymers of any of these. In some preferred embodiments, the polymer comprises a co-polymer which includes an alkali metal salt of a polyacrylic, ~"' ' . :
- .; : :-~. ..

. . ~

- 8 - C.3189 polymethacrylic or maleic acid or anhydride. Preferably, compositions with these co-polymers have a pH of above 8Ø In general, the amount of viscosity reducing polymer can vary widely according to the formulation of the rest of the composition. However, typical amounts are from 0.5 to 4.5% by weight, for example from 1 to 3.5% by weight.

In some embodiments of the present invention it is further preferred to also include a second polymer which is substantially totally soluble in the aqueous phase and has an electrolyte resistance of more than S grams sodium nitrilotriacetate in lOOml of a 5~ by weight aqueous solution thereof, said second polymer also having a vapour pressure in 20~ aqueous solution, equal to or less than the vapour pressure of a reference 2% by weight or greater aqueous solution of polyethylene glycol having an average molecular weight of 6000; said second polymer having a molecular weight of at least 1000. Mixtures of such second polymers may also be used.
The incorporation of the second polymer permits formulation with improved stability~ at tha same viscosity ~relative to the composition without the second polymer) or lowex viscosity with the same stability. The second polymer can also reduce an upwards viscosity drift, even when it also brings about a viscosity reduction.

It is especially preferred to incorporate the second polymer when the (first) viscosity reducing polymer has a large insoluble component. That is because although the building capacity of the first polymer will be good (since relakively high quantities can be stably incorporated), the viscosity reduction will not be optimum (since little will be dissolved). Thus, the second polymer can usefully function to reduce the viscosity further, ~o an ideal level.

, . :`: ,:: :.

-:

, ;: -. .
: .
: . . ~ . ~
~:. ~ - ,. :

.. . .
.

- 9 - C~3189 We prefer that the second polymer is incorporated at from 0.05 to 20% by weight, most preferably from 0.1 to 2.5% by weight, and especially from 0.2 to 1.5~ by weight of the total composition. In many compositions (but not all) levels above these can cause instability. A large number vf different polymers may be used as such a second polymer, provided the electrolyte resistance and vapour pressure requirements are met. The former is measured as the amount of sodium nitrilo~riacetate (NaNTA) solution necessary to reach the cloud point of lOOml of a 5%
solution of the polymer in water at 25C, with the system adjusted to neutral pH, i.e. about 7. This is preferably effected using sodium hydroxide. Most preferably, the ~lectrolyte resistance is lOg NaNTA, especially 15g. The latter indicates a vapour pressure low enough to have sufficient water binding capability, as generally explained in the applicants' specification GB-A-2 053 249 Preferably the measurement is effected with a reference solution at 10% by weight aqueous concentration, especially 18~.

Typical classes of polymers which may be used as the second polymer, provided they meet the above requirement, include polyethylene glycols, Dextran, Dextran sulphonates, polyacrylates and polyacrylate/maleic acid co-polymers. Whether a given polymer is only partly, or substantially totally soluble in the total system will depend on the other components, in particular, the amount and type of electrolyte material.
The second polymer must have an average molecular weigh~ of at least 1000 but a minimum average molecular weight of 2000 is preferred. Typical average molecular weight ranges reRulting in beneficial viscosity control 35 are from 1,200 to 30,000 especially from 5,000 to 30,000.

` ~ ; "
:' `

~ 323280 - 10 - C.3189 The detergent active material may be any known in the art for forming structured liquids and in general may be selected from one or more of anionic, cationic, nonionic, zwitterionic and amphoteric surfactants. However, one preferred combination comprises:-a) a nonionic surfactant and/or polyalkoxylated anionic surfactant; and b) a non-polyalkoxylated anionic surfactant.

In some embodiments, the actives may also include an alkali metal soap of a fatty acid~ preferably one containing 12 to 18 carbon atoms. Typical such acids are oleic acid, xicinoleic acid and fatty acids derived from castor oil, rapeseed oil, groundnut oil, coconut oil, palmkernal oil or mixtures thereof. The sodium or potassium soaps of these acids can be us0d, the potassium soaps b~ing preferred.
Suitable nonionic surfactants ~which may be used include in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C6 - C22) phenols-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of aliphatic (C8 C18~ primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylenediamine. Other so-called nonionic detergent compounds include long chain tertiary amine oxides, long chain tertiary phosphine oxides and dialkyl sulphoxides.

.
: -, .
~: ~.-:
. , :

.

1 3~3280 ~ C.3189 The anionic surfactants are usually water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulph~nates having alkyl xadicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples or suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher (C8 -C18) alcohols produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl (Cg ~C~0) benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (ClO -Cl5) benzene sulphonates;
sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum;
sodium coconut oil fatty monoglyceride sulphates and sulphonates; sodium and potassium salts of sulphuric acid esters of higher (C8 -C18) fatty alcohol-alkylene oxide, particularly ethylene oxide, reaction products; the reaction products of fatty acids such as coconut fatty acids esterified with isethionic ac~id and neutralised with sodium hydroxide; sodium and potassium salts of fatty acid amides of methyl taurine; alkane monosulphonates such as those derived by reacting alpha-olefins (C8 -C20) with sodium bisulphite and those derivecl from reacting paraffins with SO2 and C12 and then hydrolysing with a base to producP a xandom sulphonate; and olefin sulphonates, which term is used *o describe the material made by xeacting olefins, particularly C10 -C20 alpha-olefins, with SO3 and then neutralising and hydrolysing the reaction product. The preferred anionic detergent compounds are sodium (Cll -C15~ alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium IC16 -C18) alkyl sulphates.

The compositions of the invention preferably contain a detergency builder material. This may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in ~he - 12 - C.3189 wash liquor and will preferably provide the composition with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH, the suspension of soil removed from the fahric and the dispersion of the fabric softening clay material. They may be classed as inorganic, organic non-polymeric and organic polymeric.

Generally, we prefer that any inorganic builder comprises all or part of the electrolyte (provided water soluble). We also prefer that the liquid contains suspended solids, especially as all or par~ of the builder (which in that case does not have to be water soluble).
The electrolyte will generally form from 1 to 60~ by weight of the total composition. In some preferred embodiments, the suspended solids comprise water-insoluble amorphous or crystalline aluminosilicates, since these liquids tend to induce high viscosity and are thus in need of viscosity reduction by the polymer. As previously mentioned, very often the polymer will itself be a builder and so together with the zeolite forms a very useful phosphorus-free builder system.

However, examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detexgency builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkaline metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, phosphates and hexametaphosphates.
Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates r bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous alumino silicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite . ~ .
- , '~ ~ ' .......... ,~.............. ..

: ~ , , - 13 - C.3189 seeds), potassium carbonate, sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.

Examples of non-polymeric organic detergency builders, when present, include the alkaline metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and polyhydroxsulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid.

Apart from the ingredients already mentioned, a number of optional ingredients may also be present, such as lather boosters, e.g alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, peracid bleach precursors, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inor~anic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent a~ents, perfumes, enzymes such as proteases, lipases (e.g. Lipolase (Trade Mark) ex Novo), and amylases, germicides, colourants and fabric softening clay materials.

The compositions of the present invention may be prepared using the general techniques known in the art of the processin~ of liquid detergent products. However, the order of addition of components can be important. Thus, one preferred order of addition (with con~inuous mixing) is to add to the water, the soluble electrolytes, then any insoluble material such as aluminosilicates, followed by the polymer and then the actives, which may be mixed , - 14 ~ C.3189 before being added to the electrolyte/water phase.
Another preferred order of addition is to add to the water, any insoluble material such as aluminosilicates, the partly soluble polymer and then the detergent active material, followed by the electrolyte. The mixture is then cooled below 30C, whereafter any minors and - additional ingredients can be added. The second polymer tif any) is added to reduce the viscosity to the desired level and it is indeed of~en possible to 'titrate' the viscosity to the required level by progressive addition of the second polymer. Finally, if necessary, the pH of the composition can be adjusted further, e.g. by the addition of a small quantity of caustic material.

The invention will now be illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

.

:, '~"' : ', ~' : .. .. . ..
~:.

, ::

~ 15 - C.3183 Raw Material Specification The following definitions apply throughout the Examples, Unless indicated to the contrary, all percentages are by weight.

Actives Na LAS - Na-Dodecyl benzene sulphonate LES = Lauryl Ether Sulphate tApprox 3EO) Nonionic (1) = ethoxylated fatty alcohol (C13 15EO3) Nonionic (2) = ethoxylated fatty alcohol (C13 15EO7) Main Viecosity Reducing_Polymers Polymer Builder (1) = Co-polymer of Acrylate and Maleate sodium salt, maleic acid: acrylic acid approx 3.8:1, average MW about 70,000.

Polymer Builder (2) = Co-polymer of Acrylate and Maleate sodi~ salt, maleic acid: acrylic acid approx 1.6:1, average M~ about 50,000.

"Second" Polymers (1) Na-polyacrylate, average ~W about 1,200 (2) " " 2,500 (3) " " 5,000 (4) " " 8,000 30 (5) 1l n 15,000 ( 6 ~ ~I 1l 3() ~ 000 Minors Enzyme = proteolytic type j , ~ .
. ' - 16 ~ C.3189 Table 1 The following compositions were prepared and had stability and viscosity as shown.
5 Component Composition ~w/w) I IIl II2 II3 III IV

Na LAS 7.7 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8 9.2 LES 2.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.8 5.0 Nonionic (1~ 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.1 3.3 Zeolite 20.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 - -Polymer Builder(1)3.5 3.S 3.5 var 4.2 Citric Acid 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.0 Glycerol 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.4 8.8 Borax 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.2 7.5 CaC12 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.25 Enzyme 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 - -Fluorescer 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 - -20 Silicone 0.35 Perfume 0.2 0.23 0.23 0.23 NaOH to adjust) 8 5 7.8 8.~ 8.8 var var the pH to Water - - up to 100 - - -25 Stab~lity stable unstable stable var var Viscosity ~mPaS) at21s 1 800 - 750- var var -1050 see see Table ~ Table 3 The parameters marked 'var' were varied and the results of stability and viscosity measurements are shown in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. In the context of these Examples 's~able' means not showing more than ~ phase separation at ambient temperature (ca 21-25C) over three !

. ~' .
'` ` , ' t 323280 - 17 - C.318~

months. 'Unstable' is to be construed accordingly.
T~ble 2 - Effect of Pol~mer Concentration Composition II

Polymer Builder (1) Stabilit~Viscosity tmPas) t%w/w~ at 21s 1 0 Stable 2400 0.6 Stable 2500 1 Stable 950 2 Stable 1050 3 Stable 1050 4 Stable 1300 Unstable 1450 These results show that without polymer, the viscosity of the product is too high for it to be readily pourable. It is clear that up to 4~ polymer can be stably incorporatéd in these compositions :Ln which the polymer is only partly dissolved (cf Table 4 below). In reference composition IIl the polymer is comp:Letely dissolved at 3.5~ but already the composition is unstable.

,. . .

, ~ 18 - C.3189 Table 3 - Variation with pH of Solubility of Polymer Builder (l) and Stability of Total System 5 Composition pH Stability Viscosity (mPaS) at ?ls-III 7.0Unstable 120 III 7.5Unstable 160 III 8.0Unstable 270 III 8.4Stable 230 III 9.1Stable 180 IV 7.0Stable 660 IV 7.5Stable 700 IV 8.0Stable 720 IV 8.4Stable 770 IV 9.1Stable 870 These results demonstrate ~hat viscosity is reduced by incorporation of polymer ~composition III) but that when the poly~er (4.2%) is all dissolved pH<8.0), instability results. These viscosities are all lower than those in Tables 1 and 2 because of the absence of zeolite.

. : :

.
. : ':

1 3232~0 - 19 - C.3189 Table 4 - Existence of Stable Incorporation of Partly Dissolved Polymer Builder (1) - Variation with pH

Composition Parts Water 491 Glycerol 70 Borax 60 NaOH 10 Citric acid 16 Polymer Builder 3.5 (as Table 1) pH ad~usted to Ap~earance* ~_polymer rich phase**

7.80 clear 0 7.95 just turbid 8.01 turbid 4.5 8.36 turbid 8 8.77 turbid 10 9.23 turbid 10 9.61 ~urbid 10 * just a~ter preparation ** after 4 days storage These figures show that below a pH of 7.95, all polymer is dissolved as evidenced by a clear appearance.
Above that pH, the polymer exists also in a polymerorich 'non-dissolved' phase.

. , : : ~
:
:. .
:
.

1 3232~30 - 20 - Co3189 Table 5 The following compositions were prepared and had stability and viscosity as shown in Tables 6-8.

Component Composition (% w/w) V VI VII VIII

10 NaLAS 7.37.3 7.3 7.6 LES 4.04.0 4.0 4.2 Nonionic 2.62.6 2.6 2.7 Z~olit~ 16.0 16.0 16.016.6 Polymer builder (1) var - 3.5 15 Polymer builder (2) - var Citric acid 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 Glycerol 7.0 7.0 7~0 7.3 ~orax 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.3 NaOH to adjust ) 2~ the pH to........ ) var 8.4 vàr var Water -~ ----- up to 100 ------------Stability var var var var Viscosity see see see see Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 8 The parameters marked '~var" were varied and the results of stability and viscosity measurement are shown in Tables 6-8. In the context of the~e examples, ~stable"
means not showing more than 2~ phase separa$ion at ambient temperature t~ 21-25~C) over three months. "Unstable" i5 to be construed accordingly, "`'`' , : ~' , ~:

- 21 - C.3189 Table 6 Effect of Polymer concentration and pH on Compositlon V

Pol~mer Builder (l? ~ Stability Viscosity % w/w mPas_at 21 s 0 7.8Stable 1510 1 7.8 " 1180 2 7.8 " 850 3 7.8Unstable 770 3.5 7.8 " 730 0 8~9Stable 1610 1 8.9 " 1470 2 8.9 " 1220 3 8.9 11 650 3.5 8.9 " 670 These results show that without polymer, the viscosity of the product is too high for it to be readily pourable. It is clear that at leas;t 3. 5% polymer can be stably incorpoxated in these compositions (pH = 8.9) in which the polymer is only partly dissolved ~cf Table 4 above3. In reference compositions at a pH of 7.8, the polymer is completely dissolved and becomes already unstable at 3% polymer.

:, , :
;

: .

-` I 323280 - 22 - C.3189 Table 7 Effect of Polymer concentration on COmpositiQn VI

5 Polymer Builder (2? Stability Viscosit~y (% w/w) mPas at 21 s 0 Stable 1450 0.5 " 1270 1 " 1120 2 " 1270 3 " 1150 3 5 " 1060 This table shows that also with Polymer Builder (2), a viscosity reduction is obtained (so pourability is increased) while maintaining a stable product. Under these conditions (pH 8.4) the Polymer Builder is only partly dissolved.

. .

. . , ~ ,~ . .: j-. "

. .

~ 323280 - 23 - C.31~39 Table 8 Variation of pH on Polymer Solubility and Stability when Zeolite present in formulations Com~ tion pH ~ ~
mPas at 21 s 10 VII 7.4 Unstable 930 VII 7.6 Unstable 960 VII 8.2 S~able 660 VII 8.7 Stable 950 VII 9.1 Stable 840 15 VIII 7.3 Stable 1760 VIII 7.8 Stable 1550 VIII 8.2 Stable 1460 VIII 8.7 Stable 1520 VIII 9 . 3 Stable 1410 2~!
These results demonstrate that viscosity is reduced by incorporation of polymer (VIII - VII) but that when the polymer (3.5~) is all dissolved (pH < 8.0), instability results.

- : :. ~ , , ., . .:- ~ ~ :.: .

, : , ~: . ~

,. . :~ ., :'` ~ . ~ ' .

- 24 - C.3189 Table 9 , The following compositions were prepared and had stability and viscosity as shown in Tables 10-13.

Composition (% w/w) Component IX X XI XII

NaLAS 7.2 6.6 7.2 6.6 LES 2.3 2.4 2.4 3.0 Nonionic (1) 2.3 - 2.4 2.4 Nonionic (2) - 3.0 - -Zeolite 20 20 20 20 Polymer builder (l) 3.0 - - -15 Polymer builder (2) - 2.5 2.5 2.5 Citric acid 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Glycerol 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Borax 5.7 5-7 5-7 5-7 CaCl2 0.15 0.15 20 Enzyme 0.28 0.28 Fluorescer 0.05 0.05 - -Silicone 0,35 0~35 Perfume 0.3 0~3 _ _ NaOH to 25 adjust the pH to 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 "Second" polymer var var var var Water C-~ - up to 100 -~
Stability var var var var Viscosity see Ree see see Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13 ~ 35 ', , , - 25 - C.3189 The parameters marked "var" were varied and the results of stability and viscosity measurements are shown in Tables 10-13. In the context of these examples, "stable" means not showing more than 2% phase separation at ambient temperature (+/- 21-25C) over three months.
"Unstable" is to be construed accordingly.

Table 10 Effect of "second'' ~ymer (2) on viscosity of Com~osition IX

"Second" polymer Viscosity mPas at 21 s 1 Stability 15 (2) after storage direct 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 0% 670 1140 13~0 1220 Stable 0.2% 400 720 790 790 Stable This table shows that addition of the "second"
polymer improves the pourability of the product, especially after storage, due to a reduction of the viscosity drift.

., , ,. : ~ :
- . ...

~ :: . ~: :
: ,, :
. . : : . :

~ 323280 - 26 - C.3189 Table 11 _ _ Effect of "second" ~olymer on viscosity and stability _f Composition X

"Second" onc Viscosity Stability Polymer Ty~e ~ w/w mPas at 21 s 1 - 0 1800-2200 Stable 3 0.05 1520 Stable 3 0,15 1380 Stable 3 0.30 950 Stable 3 0~45 700 Stable 3 0~60 650 Unstable 0.40 780 Stable 6 0.40 860 Stable This table shows that incorporation of the "second"
polymer lowers the viscosity with the same stability.
However, too high a second polymer concentration leads to an unstable product (in this example 0.6% of "second"
polymer ~2)).

1 3232~0 - 27 - C.3189 Table 12 Effect of "second" polYmer on viscosity and stabilitY
of com~osition XI

"Second" conc. Viscosity Stability Polymer Type (~ w/w) mPas at 21s 1 - 0 1250 Stable 10 2 0.1 560 Stable 3 0.1 520 Stable 4 0.1 530 Stable 0.1 570 Stable 6 0.1 580 Stable 15 2-6 0.2 360-530 Unstable This table shows that incorporation of the "second"
polymer improves the pourability oi. the products by reducing the viscosity while retaining its good stability.
However, too high a "second" polymer concentration may lead to unstable products (in this particular case at 0~2%
"second" polymer).

: ~

:
:: , 1 3232~30 - 28 - C.3189 Table 13 -Effect of "second" polymer on viscosity and stability of Com~osition XII

"Second't conc. Viscosity StabilitY
Polymer Type % w/w mPas at 21s 1 - 0 2150 Stable 2 0.2 1060 Stable 3 0.2 790 Stable 4 0.2 800 Stable 0.2 760 Stable 6 0.2 700 Stable 2 0.3 580 Stable 3 0.3 420 Stable 9 0-3 430 Stable 0.3 520 Stable 6 0.3 520 Stable This table shows that a strong viscosity reduction and hence a marked increase of product pourability is obtained on incorporation of 0.2-0.3% "second" polymer with a MW in the range of 1,200-30,000. Note that the higher MW polymers are somewhat more efficient on a weight basis.

, . .

. .
: - ~ `:
.
: .

Claims

- 29 - C.3189 THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
l. A liquid detergent composition comprising a structured phase containing detergent active material, dispersed in an aqueous phase containing dissolved electrolyte, and a viscosity reducing polymer, the electrolyte containing aqueous phase being such that the polymer is only partly dissolved therein.
2. A composition according to claim l, which yields less than 2% phase separation upon storage at 25°C for 21 days.
3. A composition according to either preceding claim, which has a viscosity no greater than 1 Pas at a shear rate of 21s-1.
4. A stable composition according to claim l, in which the total amount of polymer is greater than that in a reference composition in which at least one parameter thereof is varied from that in the said composition, to permit the maximum amount of polymer to be incorporated by substantially all being dissolved, beyond which amount, dissolving of more polymer would cause the reference composition to be unstable, unstable meaning having a phase separation of 2% or greater upon storage at 25°C for 21 days, and stable means having a phase separation less than 2% under the same conditions.
5. A composition according to claim 4, in which the parameter or parameters varied in the reference composition is or are selected from, the pH of the composition, the quantity and nature of the electrolyte and the quantity and nature of the detergent active material.

- 30 - C.3189
6. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the viscosity reducing polymer is a co-polymer which includes an alkali metal salt of a polyacrylic, polymethacrylic or maleic acid or anhydride.
7. A composition according to claim 6, having a pH above 8Ø
8. A composition according to claim 1, comprising from 0.5 to 4.5% by weight of the viscosity reducing polymer.
9. A composition according to claim 8, comprising from 1 to 3.5% by weight of the viscosity reducing polymer.
10. A composition according to claim 1, further comprising a second polymer which is substantially totally soluble in the aqueous phase and has an electrolyte resistance of more than 5 grams sodium nitrilotriacetate in 100 ml of a 5% by weight aqueous solution thereof, said second polymer also having a vapour pressure in 20% aqueous solution, equal to or less than the vapour pressure of a reference 2% by weight or greater aqueous solution of polyethylene glycol having an average molecular weight of 6000; said second polymer having a molecular weight of at least 1000.
11. A composition according to claim 10, comprising from 0.05 to 20% by weight of the second polymer.
12. A composition according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the average molecular weight of the second polymer is from 1,200 to 30,000.

- 31 - C.3189
13. A composition according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the second polymer has an average molecular weight of at least 2,000.
14. A composition according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the second polymer has an average molecular weight of from 5,000 to 30,000.
15. A composition according to any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, in which the detergent active material comprises:-a) a nonionic surfactant and/or a polyalkoxylated anionic surfactant; and b) a non-polyalkoxylated anionic surfactant.
16. A composition according to any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, in which the electrolyte is present from 1 to 60% by weight of the total composition.
17. A composition according to any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, wherein the viscosity reducing polymer has builder properties.
18. A composition according to claim 1, comprising suspended solid particulate material.
19. A composition according to claim 18, in which the suspended solid particulate material comprises a water-insoluble aluminosilicate salt.
20. A composition according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein the suspended particulate material comprises electrolyte which is the same as all or part of the dissolved electrolyte.

- 32 - C.3189
21. A composition according to claim 18, wherein the suspended particulate material comprises a substantially water-insoluble bleach.
22. A composition according to claim 21, wherein the bleach comprises DPDA.