AU2015203091B1

AU2015203091B1 - A synergistic composition comprising insecticides and fungicides

Info

Publication number: AU2015203091B1
Application number: AU2015203091A
Authority: AU
Inventors: James Timothy Bristow
Original assignee: Rotam Agrochem International Co Ltd
Current assignee: Rotam Agrochem International Co Ltd
Priority date: 2015-06-10
Filing date: 2015-06-10
Publication date: 2015-12-10
Anticipated expiration: 2035-06-10
Also published as: AU2015100792A4; AU2015271898A1; CN106234396A; TWI662898B; AU2015271898B2; WO2016197457A1; AU2015203091C1; BR102015028219A2; AR101585A1; TW201642746A

Abstract

The present invention relates to a synergistic composition comprising an insecticidal component (A) comprising fipronil and thiodicarb; and a fungicidal component (B) comprising azoxystrobin and thiophanate-methyl. The present invention 5 also relates to a method to prevent, control and/or treat insect, nematode and fungal infestations in plants, plant parts and/or surroundings by applying the synergistic composition.

Description

A SYNERGISTIC COMPOSITION COMPRISING INSECTICIDES AND FUNGICIDES The present invention relates to a synergistic composition comprising (A) an insecticidal component comprising fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) a fungicidal 5 component comprising one or more selected from azoxystrobin and thiophanate-methyl. The present invention is also related to a method to prevent, control and/or treat insect, nematode and fungal infestations in plants, plant parts and/or their surroundings by applying a synergistic composition according to the present invention to the locus to be treated. The present invention also relates to the use of the aforementioned composition, o in particular in the treatment of seeds, foliage and soil applications. BACKGROUND Nematode and insect infestations and fungal diseases represent a major threat to economically important agricultural crops, like cereals, fiber, leguminous plants and 5 sugarcane. The yield of plants, for example, sugarcane and soybean are adversely impacted by nematode, insect and fungi attack. Therefore, there is a continuing need to provide a composition for preventing, controlling and/or treating nematode, insect and fungal infestations, thereby increasing the yield of plant. Researchers in the field of chemistry have synthesized lots of chemicals and 20 formulations to treat nematode, insect and fungal infestations. Different types of insecticides and fungicides are known and available in the market. In some cases, insecticidal and fungicidal active ingredients have been shown to be more effective in combination than when applied individually, and this is referred to as "synergism." As defined in the Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America, Seventh 25 Edition, 1994, page 318, "'synergism'[is] an interaction of two or more factors such that the effect when combined is greater than the predicted effect based on the response to each factor applied separately." The present invention is based on the discovery that certain fungicides and insecticides display a synergistic effect when applied in combination. 1 The insecticidal and fungicidal active ingredients forming the synergistic composition of this invention are independently known in the art for their effects on plant protection. They are all disclosed in The Pesticides Manual, Twelfth Edition, 2000, published by The British Crop Protection Council. They are also commercially available. 5 Azoxystrobin, a strobilurin-type fungicide, is a well-known fungicide having a broad spectrum of disease control. It is extracted from the fungus Strobilurus tenacelus. It has a suppressive effect on other fungi, reducing competition for nutrients; it inhibits electron transfer between cytochrome b and cytochrome C 1 at the ubiquinol oxidising site in mitochondria, disrupting metabolism and preventing growth of the target fungi. 0 Thiophanate-methyl is a systemic fungicide with protective and curative action. It is being absorbed by leaves and roots. Fipronil belongs to a class of insecticides known as phenylpyrazoles. Fipronil interferes with the passage of chloride ions through the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-regulated chloride channel disrupting CNS activity. It is moderately systemic 5 and can be used to control insects when applied as a soil or seed treatment. A method to prepare fipronil is disclosed in W02013037291 Al. Thiodicarb is a N-methyl oxyimidothioate carbamate insecticide. It is a neurotoxic compound and its mode of action is via the inhabitation of cholinesterase enzymes. 20 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a synergistic composition comprising: (A) an insecticidal component comprising fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) a fungicidal component comprising azoxystrobin. The synergistic compositions of the present invention can provide advantages 25 over the use of the individual components (A) and (B). The rates of application of the individual components can be markedly reduced while maintaining a high level of insecticidal or fungicidal efficacy. The composition can have a considerably broader spectrum against which it is effective than does either of the components alone. The 2 composition can have the potential to control fungal and/or insect and/or nematode species at a low application rate at which the individual compounds alone were ineffective. The composition can have a speed of action which is faster than that which would have been predicted from the speed of the individual components. 5 The composition contains an insecticidal effective amount of component (A) and a fungicidal effective amount of component (B). The term "effective amount" means the quantity of such a compound or combination of such compounds that is capable of providing preventing, controlling and/or treating insect, nematode and/or fungal infestations of plants. o "Plant" as used herein, refers to all plant and plant populations such as desired and undesired wild plants or crop plants. "Plant parts" as used herein, refers to all parts and organs of plants, such as shoot, leaves, needles, stalks, stems, fruit bodies, fruits, seeds, roots, tubers and rhizomes. Harvested materials, and vegetative and generative propagation materials, 5 for example, cutting, tubers, meristem tissue, rhizomes, offsets, seeds, single and multiple plant cells and any other plant tissues, are also included. The word "surrounding" or "locus" refers to the place on which the plants are growing, the place on which the plant propagation materials of the plants are sown or the place on which the plant propagation materials of the plants will be sown. 20 The invention also relates to a method of preventing, controlling and/or treating insecticidal, nematode and fungicidal infestations, and to the use of this synergistic composition. It has now surprisingly been found that when applying a synergistic composition comprising (A) an insecticidal component comprising fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) a 25 fungicidal component comprising azoxystrobin on the plants, plant parts and/or their surroundings, particularly on cereals, fiber plants, leguminous plants and sugarcane, an excellent performance in preventing, controlling and/or treating insect, nematode and fungal infestations may be observed. 3 The insecticidal component (A) may be present in the composition of the present invention in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 20% to about 80% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 30% to about 70% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 35 % to about 65 % be 5 weight or from about 40% to about 65% by weight of the composition. Fipronil may be present in the composition of the present invention in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 1% to about 50% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 1% to about 30% or from about 5% to about 20% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 5% to about o 15% by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, fipronil present in an amount of about 10% by weight of the composition. In certain embodiments, fipronil present in an amount of about 7% by weight of the composition. Thiodicarb may be present in the composition of the present invention in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 1% to about 70% 5 by weight of the composition, preferably from about 1% to about 55% or from about 30% to about 55% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 32% to about 50% by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, thiodicarb present in an amount of about 44% by weight of the composition. In certain embodiments, thiodicarb present in an amount of about 35% by weight of the composition. o The fungicidal component (B) may be present in the composition of the present invention in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 0.5% to about 30% or from about 0.5% to about 20% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 0.5% to about 15% by weight of the composition. 25 Azoxystrobin may be present in the composition of the present invention in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 0.5% to about 30% or from about 0.5% to about 15% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, azoxystrobin is 4 present in an amount of about 6% by weight of the composition. In certain embodiments, azoxystrobin present in an amount of about 0.6% by weight of the composition. The fungicidal component (B) may further comprise thiophanate-methyl. Thiophanate-methyl may be present in the composition of the present invention 5 in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 0.5% to about 30% or from about 0.5% to about 15% by weight of the composition, more preferably from about 5% to about 10% by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, thiophanate-methyl present in an amount of about 7.4% by weight of the composition. o In some embodiments, the weight percentages of the components in the composition are independently: from about 5% to about 12% of fipronil; from about 40% to about 50% of thiodicarb; and from about 5% to about 10% of azoxystrobin by weight of the composition. In certain embodiments, the weight percentages of components in the 5 composition are independently: from about 5% to about 10% of fipronil; from about 30% to about 40% of thiodicarb; from about 0.5% to about 1% of azoxystrobin; and from about 5% to about 10% of thiophanate-methyl by weight of the composition. The components (A) and (B) may be present in the composition or applied in any amounts relative to each other, to provide the enhanced or synergistic effect of the 1o mixture. In particular, the weight ratio of the components (A) and (B) in the composition independently is preferably in the range of from about 50:1 to about 1:50 or from about 15:1 to about 1:15, more preferably from about 12:1 to about 1:12, even more preferred from about 9:1 to about 1:9. In some embodiments, the weight ratio of the components (A) to (B) in the composition is about 9:1, or 8:1 or 7:1 or 6:1 or 5: 1 or 4:1 or 3:1 or 2:1 25 or 1:1. In some embodiments, for seed treatment, the weight ratio of the components (A) to (B) in the composition is about 5:1. The components (A) and (B) together may be present in the composition in any suitable amount, and is generally present in an amount of from about 2% to about 95% by weight of the composition, preferably from about 25% to about 80% by weight of the 5 composition more preferably from about 35% to about 70%, even more preferred from about 45% to about 65% by weight of the composition. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, each combination is a composition comprising, components (A) and (B), and optionally one or more auxiliaries. The 5 auxiliaries employed in the composition will depend upon the type of formulation and/or the manner in which the formulation is to be applied by the end user. Formulations incorporating the composition of the present invention are described hereinafter. Suitable auxiliaries which may be comprised in the composition according to the invention are all customary formulation adjuvants or components, such as extender, o carriers, solvents, surfactants, stabilizers, anti-foaming agents, anti-freezing agents, preservatives, antioxidants, colorants, thickeners, solid adherents and inert fillers. Such auxiliaries are known in the art and are commercially available. Their use in the formulation of the compositions of the present invention will be apparent to the person skilled in the art. 5 The composition may further comprise one or more inert fillers. Such inert fillers are known in the art and available commercially. Suitable fillers in a form of a solid include, for example, natural ground minerals, such as kaolins, aluminas, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, and diatomaceous earth, or synthetic ground minerals, such as highly dispersed silicic acid, aluminum oxide, silicates, and calcium o phosphates and calcium hydrogen phosphates. Suitable inert fillers for granules include, for example, crushed and fractionated natural minerals, such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, and dolomite, or synthetic granules of inorganic and organic ground materials, as well as granules of organic material, such as sawdust, coconut husks, corn cobs, and tobacco stalks. 25 The composition optionally includes one or more surfactants which are preferably non-ionic, cationic and/or anionic in nature and surfactant mixtures which have good emulsifying, dispersing and wetting properties, depending on the nature of the active compound to be formulated. Suitable surfactants are known in the art and are commercially available. Suitable anionic surfactants can be both so-called water-soluble 30 soaps and water-soluble synthetic surface-active compounds. Soaps which may be 6 used are the alkali metal, alkaline earth metal or substituted or unsubstituted ammonium salts of higher fatty acid (C1-C22), for example the sodium or potassium salt of oleic or stearic acid, or of natural fatty acid mixtures. The surfactant can be an emulsifier, dispersant or wetting agent of ionic or nonionic type. Examples which may be used are 5 salts of polyacrylic acids, salts of lignosulphonic acid, salts of phenylsulphonic or naphthalenesulphonic acids, polycondensates of ethylene oxide with fatty alcohols or with fatty acids or with fatty amines, substituted phenols, especially alkylphenols, sulphosuccinic ester salts, taurine derivatives, especially alkyltaurates, or phosphoric esters of polyethoxylated phenols or alcohols. The presence of at least one surfactant is o generally required when the active compound and/or the inert carrier and/or auxiliary/adjuvant are insoluble in water and the vehicle for the final application of the composition is water. The composition optionally further comprises one or more polymeric stabilizer. The suitable polymeric stabilizers that may be used in the present invention include, but 5 are not limited to, polypropylene, polyisobutylene, polyisoprene, copolymers of monoolefins and diolefins, polyacrylates, polystyrene, polyvinyl acetate, polyurethanes or polyamides. Suitable stabilizers are known in the art and commercially available. The surfactants and polymeric stabilizers mentioned above are generally believed to impart stability to the composition, in turn allowing the composition to be o formulated, stored, transported and applied. Suitable anti-foams include all substances which can normally be used for this purpose in agrochemical compositions. Suitable anti-foam agents are known in the art and are available commercially. Particularly preferred antifoam agents are mixtures of polydimethylsiloxanes and perfluroalkylphosphonic acids, such as the silicone anti-foam 25 agents available from GE or Compton. Suitable organic solvents are selected from all customary organic solvents which thoroughly dissolve the active compounds employed. Again, suitable organic solvents for the active components (A) and (B) are known in the art. The following may be mentioned as being preferred: N-methyl pyrrolidone, N-octyl pyrrolidone, cyclohexyl-1 7 pyrrolidone; or SOLVESSO T M 200, a mixture of paraffinic, isoparaffinic, cycloparaffinic and aromatic hydrocarbons. Suitable solvents are commercially available. Suitable preservatives include all substances which can normally be used for this purpose in agrochemical compositions of this type and again are well known in the art. 5 Suitable examples that may be mentioned include PREVENTOL* (from Bayer AG) and PROXEL* (from Bayer AG). Suitable antioxidants are all substances which can normally be used for this purpose in agrochemical compositions, as is known in the art. Preference is given to butylated hydroxytoluene. 0 Suitable thickeners include all substances which can normally be used for this purpose in agrochemical compositions. For example xanthan gum, PVOH, cellulose and its derivatives, clay hydrated silicates, magnesium aluminum silicates or a mixture thereof. Again, such thickeners are known in the art and available commercially. The composition may further comprise one or more solid adherents. Such 5 adherents are known in the art and available commercially. They include organic adhesives, including tackifiers, such as celluloses of substituted celluloses, natural and synthetic polymers in the form of powders, granules, or lattices, and inorganic adhesives such as gypsum, silica or cement. In addition, depending upon the formulation, the composition according to the 1o invention may also comprise water. In some embodiments, the compositions according to the present invention comprise the following combinations of components: (A) fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) azoxystrobin; and (A) fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) azoxystrobin and thiophanate-methyl. 25 Each composition of the present invention can be used in the agricultural sector and related fields of use for control insects, including termite, beetle, moth, weevils, millipedes; nematodes; and fungi, for example, but not limited to: 8 Wheat: Nematodes- Meloidogyne javanica; Pratylenchus brachyurus; Ant: Acromyrmex landolti landolti, Atta capiguara, Atta sexdens rubropilosa Beetle: Migdolus fryanus; Diloboderus abderus 5 Termite: Cornitermes cumulans; Heterotermes tenuis; Neocapritermes opacus; Procornitermes triacifer Fungi: Bipolaris oryzae, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Drechslera teres, Drechslera tritici repentis, Puccinia coronata var. avenae, Puccinia triticina, Pyricularia grisea o Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus; Spodoptera frugiperda; Agrotis ipsilon; Diatraea saccharalis Cotton: Nematodes- Meloidogyne javanica; Pratylenchus brachyurus; Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus; Spodoptera frugiperda; Agrotis ipsilon; Heliothis 5 virescens Ant: Acromyrmex landolti landolti, Atta sexdens rubropilosa Beetle: Anthonomus grandis Fungi: Ramularia areola Thrip: Frankliniella schultzel o Worm: Alabama argillacea Sugarcane: Nematodes- Meloidogyne javanica; Pratylenchus brachyurus; Termite Heterotermes tenuis; Cornitermes cumulan; Beetle Migdolus fryanus; Sphenophorus levi; 25 Fungi: Pineapple diseases (fungus complex, the major one is: Ceratocystis paradoxa); Root rots (Pythium spp); Phytophthora rot of cuttings (Phytophthora spp.); fusariose (Fusarium semitectum) Soybean: Nematodes- Meloidogyne javanica; Pratylenchus brachyurus; 9 Beetles: Phyllophaga cuyabana; Diabrotica speciosa; Megascelis aeruginosa; Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus; Spodoptera frugiperda; Agrotis ipsilon; Weevils: Sternechus subsignatus; Millipedes: Julus Hesperus; 5 Fungi: Purple seed stain (Cercospora kikuchii); stem anthracnose (Colletotrichum dematium f. sp. Truncatum); fusariose (Fusarium semitectum); Pod and stem blight, Stem canker, seed decay (Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae); stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum); Damping-off, Pythium rot (Pythium spp); Phytophthora rot of cuttings (Phytophthora spp.) 0 The composition according to the present invention is suitable for plants of the crops: cereals (wheat, barley, rye, oats, maize, rice, sorghum, triticale and related crops); beet (such as sugar beet and fodder beet); fruit, such as pomes, stone fruit and soft fruit, such as apples, grapes, pears, plums, peaches, almonds, cherries, and berries, for example strawberries, raspberries and blackberries; leguminous plants 5 (drybeans, lentils, peas, soybeans); oil plants (rape, mustard, sunflowers); cucurbitaceae (marrows, cucumbers, melons); fibre plants (cotton, flax, hemp, jute); citrus, such as oranges, lemons, grapefruit and mandarins; vegetables (spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbages, carrots, onions, tomatoes, potatoes, paprika); coffee; sugarcane; as well as ornamentals (flowers, such as rose, shrubs, broad-leaved trees and 0 evergreens, such as conifers). In certain embodiments, the composition of the present invention is applied on cereals, fibre plants, leguminous plants and sugarcane. In some embodiments, the composition of the present invention is applied on wheat, soybean, cotton and sugarcane. The synergistic composition of the present invention is particularly effective in 25 preventing, controlling and/or treating of insect, nematode and fungal infestations as mentioned above in wheat, soybean, cotton and sugarcane, their plant parts and/or surroundings. The rates of application (use) of the composition of the present invention may vary, for example, according to the degree of control required, type of use, type of crop, 30 10 the specific active compounds in the combination, type of plants, but is such that the active compounds in the combination in an effective amount to provide the desired action (such as insects, nematode or fungal control). The application rate of the composition for a given set of conditions can readily be determined by trials. In general 5 the composition of the invention can be applied at an application rate of between about 0.1 kilograms/hectare (kg/ha) and about 4 kg/ha, based on the total amount of active ingredient (component (A) + component (B)) in the composition. An application rate of between about 1 kg of active ingredient (a.i.)/ha and 1.5 kg a.i./ha is preferred. For seed treatment, the application rate may be between about 10 g a.i./ha and about 500 g o a.i./ha preferably about 150 g a.i./ha and about 250 g a.i./ha, based on the total amount of active ingredient (component (A) + component (B)) in the composition. The compositions of this invention are useful as insecticides, nematicides and fungicides, demonstrating synergistic activity for preventing, controlling and/or treating insect, nematode and fungal infestations. The compositions can be formulated in the 5 same manner in which insecticides, nematicides and fungicides are generally formulated. The compounds may be applied either separately or combined as part of a two-part system, three-part or four-part. The components (A) and (B) or active ingredients may be applied in any desired sequence, any combination, consecutively or simultaneously. In the event components (A) and (B) or active ingredients are applied o simultaneously in the present invention, they may be applied as a composition containing components (A) and (B) or active ingredients, in which case components (A) and (B) or active ingredients can be obtained from a separate formulation source and mixed together (known as a tank-mix, ready-to-apply, spray broth, or slurry), optionally with other pesticides, or components (A) and (B) or active ingredients can be obtained 25 as a single formulation mixture source (known as a pre-mix, concentrate, formulated compound (or product)), and optionally mixed together with other pesticides. The compositions of the present invention can be applied in a variety of ways known to those skilled in the art, at various concentrations. The compositions are useful in preventing, controlling and/or treating insect, nematode and fungal infestations in 30 plants, plant parts and/or surroundings by preemergence or postemergence application to plants, plant parts and/or surroundings is desired. 11 The synergistic compositions of this invention preferably also comprise an agriculturally acceptable carrier therefor. In practice, the composition is the industry for facilitating dispersion. The choice of formulation and mode of application for any given compound may affect its activity, and selection will be made accordingly. The 5 compositions of the invention may thus be formulated as: a water-soluble concentrate (SL), an emulstifiable concentrate (EC), an emulsion (EW), a micro-emulsion (ME), a suspension concentrates (SC), an oil-based suspension concentrates (OD), a flowable suspension (FS), a water-dispersible granule (WG), a water-soluble granule (SG), a water-dispersible powder (WP), a water soluble powder o (SP), a granule (GR), an encapsulated granule (CG), a fine granule (FG), a macrogranule (GG), an aqueous suspo-emulsion (SE), a microencapsuleated suspension (CS), and a microgranule (MG), or preferably a suspension concentrates (SC) and a flowable suspension (FS). Using such formulations, either straight (that is undiluted) or diluted with a 5 suitable solvent, especially water, plants, plant parts and/or the surroundings can be treated and protected against insect, nematode and fungi by spraying, pouring immersing or treating. Generally, formulation can be diluted with water having the rate of about 100 mL - 5L of composition in 100 L of water. In some embodiments, the composition is formulated as suspension concentrate. For SC formulation, the o composition can be diluted with water having the rate of 2 L of composition in 100 L of water. For FS formulation, the composition can be diluted with water having a concentration of 360 mL of composition in 100 L of water. The composition can be applied with the methods known in the art. These methods include coating, spraying, dipping, soaking, injection, irrigation etc. 25 Further, other biocidally active ingredients or compositions may be combined with the synergistic composition of this invention. For example, the compositions may contain, in addition to components (A) and (B), herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, bactericides, acaracides or nematicides, in order to broaden the spectrum of activity. The compositions according to the invention are distinguished by the fact that they are 30 especially well tolerated by plants and are environmentally friendly. 12 As one skilled in the art is aware, in insect, nematode and fungal testing, a significant number of factors that are not readily controllable can affect the results of individual tests and render them non-reproducible. For example, the results may vary depending on environmental factors, such as amount of sunlight and water, soil type, 5 pH of the soil, temperature, and humidity, among other factors. Also, the depth of planting, the application rate of individual and combined insecticides and fungicides, and the ratio of each insecticide and fungicide, as well as the nature of crops or weeds being tested, can affect the results of the test. Results may vary from crop to crop within the crop varieties. o The following examples are given by way of illustration and not by way of limitation of the invention. FORMULATION EXAMPLES Example 1 - 10% Fipronil + 44% Thiodicarb SC Fipronil 10% Thiodicarb 44% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L 15 13 Example 2 - 15% Fipronil + 25% Thiodicarb SC Fipronil 15% Thiodicarb 25% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L Example 3 - 7% Fipronil + 35% Thiodicarb FS Fipronil 7% Thiodicarb 35% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% PVP K-30 1% Pigment 2% Xanthan gum 0.2% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.2% Water Balance to 1L 5 14 Example 4 - 6% Azoxystrobin SC Azoxystrobin 6% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.2% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.2% Water Balance to 1L Example 5 - 0.6% Azoxystrobin + 7.4% Thiophanate-methyl FS Azoxystrobin 0.6% Thiophanate-methyl 7.4% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% PVP K-30 1% Pigment 2% Xanthan gum 0.2% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.2% Water Balance to 1L 5 15 Example 6 - 15% Thiophanate-methyl SC Thiophanate-methyl 15% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.2% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.2% Water Balance to 1L Example 7 - 10% Fipronil + 44% Thiodicarb + 6% Azoxystrobin SC Fipronil 10% Thiodicarb 44% Azoxystrobin 6% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L 5 16 Example 8 - 15% Fipronil + 25% Thiodicarb + 15% Thiophanate-methyl SC Fipronil 15% Thiodicarb 25% Thiophanate-methyl 15% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L Example 9 - 5% Fipronil + 55% Thiodicarb + 1% Azoxystrobin + 2.5% Thiophanate-methyl SC Fipronil 5% Thiodicarb 55% Azoxystrobin 1% Thiophanate methyl 2.5% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1% Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L 5 17 Example 10 - 7% Fipronil + 35% Thiodicarb + 0.6% Azoxystrobin + 7.4% Thiophanate-methyl FS Fipronil 7% Thiodicarb 35% Azoxystrobin 0.6% Thiophanate methyl 7.4% Propylene glycol 10% Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5% Sodium lignosulfonate 1% Carboxymethylcel lulose 1% Silicone oil (in the form of a 75% emulsion in water) 1 % Xanthan gum 0.1% NIPACIDE BIT 20 0.1% Water Balance to 1L 5 BIOLOGICAL EXAMPLES FIELD TEST 1 - SOYBEAN - CERCOSPORA KIKUCHII (FUNGI) Soybean seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Cercospora kikuchii, and incubated at 20 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. The soybean seeds were planted. 1A After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 1). 18 Table 1. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity (g a.i.Iha) (g a.i.Iha) (g a.i.Iha) methyl (g a.i .ha) (%) Untreated 0 0 0 0 95% Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 90% Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 50% Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 5% Example 10 FIELD TEST 2 - SOYBEAN - COLLETOTRICHUM DEMATIUM F. SP. 5 TRUNCATUM Soybean seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Colletotrichum dematium f. sp. Truncatum, and incubated at 20 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. The soybean seeds were planted. After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative o atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 2). Table 2. Test Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g a.i.Iha) (%) Untreated 0 0 0 0 90% Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 80% Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 45% Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 5% Example 10 19 FIELD TEST 3 - SOYBEAN - MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA - NEMATODE A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Meloidogyne javanica kept from tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of 5 perineal patterns prepared as per TAYLOR & NETSCHER (1974), on the morphology of the mouth region of males (EISENBACK et al., 1981), and on the isoenzymatic phenotype for esterasis obtained by the technique by ESBENSHADE & TRIANTAPHYLLOU (1990), using a traditional vertical electropheresis system, namely Mini Protean II by BIO-RAD. o A suspension containg eggs and second stage jveniles (J2) was prepared from the tomato roots. 10mL of the suspension was inoculated with eggplant for 22 days. Thereafter, the eggplant was transplanted to pots and kept in the greenhouse. After 100 days, the roots of the eggplant were washed and ground in a blender with a solution of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite. The suspension was then passed through a 5 sieve of 200 mesh (0.074 mm openings) on 500 (0.025 mm openings). The eggs and juveniles retained on the 500 mesh sieve were collected and washed. Soybean seeds were treated with the Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10. The seeds were then inoculated with 3 mL of a suspension containing 3,000 eggs and second stage juveniles of Meloidogynejavanica. o The number of galls on 10 grams of roots of the soybean plants was counted 50 days after sowing. The results are set out in Table 3 below. Table 3. Thiophanate- Number of Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin methyl galls on 10 (g a.i .ha) (g a.i .ha) (g a.i .ha) (g a.i./ha) grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 15 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 8 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 14 Example 5 Formulation 25216262.42 Example 10 25216212.42 20 FIELD TEST 4 - SOYBEAN - PRATYLENCHUS BRACHYURUS - NEMATODE A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Pratylenchus Brachyurus recovered from sugarcane crops. The subpopulation was multiplied from corn plants in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously 5 identified based on morphological characters of adult females mounted in temporary slides by using a dicotomic key created by SANTOS et al. (2005). Soybean seeds were treated with the Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10. The seeds were then inoculated with 3 mL of a suspension containing Pratylenchus Brachyurus in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with o soil. The number of nematode eggs in the roots of the plants was counted 100 days after sowing. The results are set out in Table 4 below. Table 4. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Number of (g a.i.Iha) (g a.i.Iha) (g a.i.Iha) methyl eggs of (g a.i .ha) nematodes in roots Control 0 0 0 0 910 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 104 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 861 Example 5 Eomul 1t 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 24 15 FIELD TEST 5 - SOYBEAN - PHYLLOPHAGA CUYABANA (BEETLES) Soybean seeds were treated with the Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and planted. Beetles (Phyllophaga cuyabana) were reared in the laboratory. The number of 2o beetles were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of beetle was examined after sowing of 10 days. (Table 5) 21 Table 5. The Fipronil Thiodicarb (g Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of beetle (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 40 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 65 Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 5 Example 10 2. 5 FIELD TEST 6 - SOYBEAN - ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (SNOUT MOTH) Soybean seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Moths (larvae) (Elasmopalpus lignosellus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The o remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 6) Table 6. The Fipronil Thiodicarb (g Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 35 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 75 Example 5 Formulation 252126 2.16 26.64 0 Example 10 2. 22 FIELD TEST 7 - SOYBEAN - SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (MOTH) Moths (larvae) (Spodoptera frugiperda) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young soybean plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then 5 sprayed on the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 7) Table 7. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i.ha) (g a.ijha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 200 880 0 0 60 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 55 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 70 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 0 Example 8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 FIELD TEST 8 - SOYBEAN - STERNECHUS SUBSIGNATUS - WEEVIL Weevil (Sternechus subsignatus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of weevils were counted, collected and then put on healthy young soybean plants. The 15 Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed on the 23 plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of weevils was examined. (Table 8) Table 8. Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- The remaining Test a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g a.i./ha) pweulati of Control 0 0 0 0 70 Formulation 200 880 0 0 45 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 40 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 65 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 65 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 10 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 10 Example 9 5 FIELD TEST 9 - SOYBEAN - JULUS HESPERUS - MILLIPEDES Soybean seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Millipedes (Julus Hesperus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of millipedes were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of millipedes was examined after sowing of 10 days. (Table 9) 10 Table 9 The Thiophanate- remaining Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin methyl population (g a.l./ha) (g a.lha) (g a.i.l./ha) of millipedes (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 30 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 75 Example 5 Formulation 252126 2.16 26.64 0 Example 10 2. 24 FIELD TEST 10 - SOYBEAN - FUSARIOSE (FUSARIUM SEMITECTUM) Young soybean plants were treated with Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Fusarium semitectum), and incubated at 20 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. After staying in a 5 greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 10). Table 10. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate-methyl Severity (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 200 880 0 0 70 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 75 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 30 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 30 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 FEomul 8n 300 500 0 300 0 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 o FIELD TEST 11 - SOYBEAN - STEM ROT (SCLEROTINIA SCLEROTIORUM) Young soybean plants were treated with Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and incubated at 20 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of 15 the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 11). 25 Table 11. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g a.i .ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 70 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 75 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 35 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 30 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 FIELD TEST 12 - SOYBEAN - PYTHIUM ROT PYTHIUMM SPP) 5 Young soybean plants were treated with Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Pythium spp, and incubated at 20 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 12). 0 Table 12. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity (g a.i.Iha) (g a.i .ha) (g a.i .ha) methyl (g a.i.Iha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 200 880 0 0 75 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 75 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 35 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 45 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 0 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 26 FIELD TEST 13 - SOYBEAN - PHYTOPHTHORA ROT OF CUTTINGS (PHYTOPHTHORA SPP.) Young soybean plants were treated with Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of Phytophthora spp., and incubated at 20 5 0C and 100 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 13). Table 13. Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g a.i .ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 70 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 70 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 40 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 40 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 0 FIELD TEST 14 - SUGARCANE - MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA - NEMATODE A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Meloidogyne javanica kept in soybean plants (Glycine max L.) in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of 15 perineal patterns prepared as per TAYLOR & NETSCHER (1974), on the morphology of the mouth region of males (EISENBACK et al., 1981), and on the isoenzymatic phenotype for esterasis obtained by the technique by ESBENSHADE & TRIANTAPHYLLOU (1990), using a traditional vertical electropheresis system, namely Mini Protean II by BIO-RAD. 27 3 mL samples of the Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots at the rate indicated in the table. Thereafter, the roots of the sugarcane plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing 3000 eggs (Meloidogyne javanica) and second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne javanica, after 5 which the roots were covered with soil. The number of Meloidogyne javanica in various developmental stages in 10 grams of roots was counted 100 days after application. The results are set out in Table 14 below. 0 Table 14. Number of Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Meloidogynejavanica Test a.iha) (g a.idha) (g a.itha) methyl in various development (g a.i./ha) stages in 10 grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 268 Formulation 200 880 0 0 54 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 67 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 237 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 253 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 4 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 4 Example 9 FIELD TEST 15 - SUGARCANE - PRATYLENCHUS BRACHYURUS NEMATODE 15 A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Pratylenchus Brachyurus recovered from sugarcane crops. The subpopulation was multiplied from corn plants in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously 28 identified based on morphological characters of adult females mounted in temporary slides by using a dicotomic key created by SANTOS et al. (2005). 3 mL samples of the Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots of the sugarcane plants. Thereafter, the roots 5 of the sugarcane plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing Pratylenchus Brachyurus in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with soil. The number of Pratylenchus zeae in various developmental stages in 10 gram samples of the roots of the sugarcane plants were counted after 45 days. The results o are set out in Table 15 below. Table 15 Number of Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Pratylenchus Test a.iha) (g a.iiha) (g a.itha) methyl brachyurus in various (g a.i./ha) development stages in 10 grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 272 Formulation 200 880 0 0 79 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 63 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 266 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 250 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 8 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 6 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 4 Example 9 FIELD TEST 16 - SUGARCANE - HETEROTERMES TENUIS - TERMITE 15 Termites (Heterotermes tenuis) were reared in the laboratory. The number of termites were counted, collected and then put on healthy young sugarcane plants. Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then applied to the soil. 29 After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of termites was examined. (Table 16) Table 16 Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- The remaining Test (g a.iha) (g a.iha) (g a.iha) methyl population of termite (g a.i./ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 45 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 75 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 5 FIELD TEST 17 - SUGARCANE - CORNITERMES CUMULAN - TERMITE Termite (Cornitermes cumulan) were reared in the laboratory. The number of termites were counted, collected and then put on healthy young sugarcane plants. The 10 Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then applied on the soil. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of termites was examined. (Table 17) 30 Table 17 Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- The remaining Test (g a.iha) (g a.iha) (g a.iha) methyl population of termite (g a.i./ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 200 880 0 0 50 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 45 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 80 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 9 Example 9 FIELD TEST 18 - SUGARCANE - MIGDOLUS FRYANUS (BEETLES) Beetle (Migdolus fryanus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of beetles 5 were counted, collected and then put on healthy young sugarcane plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then applied to the soil. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of beetles was examined. (Table 18) Table 18. Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- The remaining Test a.iha) (g a.icha) (g a.itha) methyl population of beetles (g a.i./ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 200 880 0 0 50 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 50 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 70 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 10 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 10 Example 9 31 FIELD TEST 19 - SUGARCANE - SPHENOPHORUS LEVI (BEETLES) Beetle (Sphenophorus Levi) were reared in the laboratory. The number of beetles were counted, collected and then put on healthy young sugarcane plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then applied to the soil. 5 After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of beetles was examined. (Table 19) Table 19. Fipronil (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- The remaining Test a.iha) (g a.icha) (g a.itha) methyl population of beetles (g a.i./ha) (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 60 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 75 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 505 Example 9 10 FIELD TEST 20 - SUGARCANE - PINEAPPLE DISEASES Young sugarcane plants were treated with Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 and then sprayed with a conidial suspension of fungus complex (the major one is: Ceratocystis paradoxa) (causing Pineapple diseases), and incubated at 20 0C and 100 15 % relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours. After staying in a greenhouse at 15 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 15 days. Severity of the young soybean plants were assessed (Table 20). 32 Table 20. Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- Severity Test (g g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g a../ha) a.i./ha) a.i./ha) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 75 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 70 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 45 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 55 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 , _ __ _ I _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ I__ _ _ _ _ FIELD TEST 21 - WHEAT - MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA - NEMATODE 5 A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Meloidogyne javanica in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of perineal patterns, on the morphology of the mouth region, and on the isoenzymatic phenotype for esterasis. 10 3 mL samples of the Formulation examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots at the rate indicated in the table. Thereafter, the roots of the wheat plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing Meloidogyne javanica in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with soil. 15 The number of galls on 10 grams of roots was measured 90 days after application. The results are set out in Table 21 below. 33 Table 21 Fipronil Thiophanate- galls of1 Test (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin methyl (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) a.i./ha) grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 25 Formulation 200 880 0 0 14 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 17 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 23 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 24 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 2 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 2 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 3 Example_9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FIELD TEST 22 - WHEAT - PRATYLENCHUS BRACHYURUS - NEMATODE 5 A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Pratylenchus brachyurus in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.)in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of perineal patterns, on the morphology of the mouth region, and on the isoenzymatic phenotype for esterasis. 10 3 mL samples of the Formulation examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots at the rate indicated in the table. Thereafter, the roots of the wheat plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing Pratylenchus brachyurus in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with soil. 34 The number of Pratylenchus brachyurus in various development stages in the roots of the wheat plants were counted 90 days after application. The results are set out in Table 22 below. 5 Table 22 Number of Pratylenchus Fipronil Thiophanate- brachyurus Test (g Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin methyl (g in various a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) a.i./ha) development stages in 10 grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 291 Formulation 200 880 0 0 159 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 140 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 276 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 284 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 20 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 23 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 21 Example 9 FIELD TEST 23 - WHEAT - MIGDOLUS FRYANUS - BEETLES Wheat seeds were treated with the Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and 10 planted. Beetles (Migdolus fryanus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of beetles were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of beetle was examined after sowing of 10 days. (Table 23) 35 Table 23. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of beetle (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 50 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 70 Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 5 Example 10 25.2 11 FIELD TEST 24 - WHEAT - HETEROTERMES TENUIS - TERMITE 5 Termite (Heterotermes tenuis) were reared in the laboratory. The number of termites were counted, collected and then put on healthy young wheat plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then applied to the soil. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of termites was examined. (Table 24) 0 36 Table 24 The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g Tg a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of termite (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 45 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 70 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 70 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 11111 FIELD TEST 25 - WHEAT - SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA - MOTH 5 Moths (larvae) (Spodoptera frugiperda) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young wheat plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed on the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 25) 10 37 Table 25. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g Tg a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 60 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 55 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 75 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 0 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 FIELD TEST 26 - COTTON - MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA - NEMATODE 5 A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Meloidogyne javanica in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of perineal patterns, on the morphology of the mouth region, and on the isoenzymatic phenotype for esterasis. 10 3 mL samples of the Formulation examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots at the rate indicated in the table. Thereafter, the roots of the cotton plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing Meloidogyne javanica in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with soil. 15 The number of galls on 10 grams of roots was measured 90 days after application. The results are set out in Table 26 below. 38 Table 26 Test Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiohanate- galls on 10 a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) a.i./ha) grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 22 Formulation 200 880 0 0 10 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 13 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 20 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 22 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 1 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 3 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 1 Example 9 5 FIELD TEST 27 - COTTON - PRATYLENCHUS BRACHYURUS - NEMATODE A nematode inoculum was prepared from a pure subpopulation of Pratylenchus brachyurus recovered from sugarcane crops. The subpopulation was multiplied from corn plants in clay recipients in a greenhouse. The subpopulation was previously identified based on morphological characters of adult females mounted in temporary lo slides by using a dicotomic key created by SANTOS et al. (2005). 3 mL samples of the Formulation examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were applied uniformly on the soil and around the roots of the cotton plants. Thereafter, the roots of the cotton plants were inoculated with 10 mL of a suspension containing Pratylenchus brachyurus in various developmental stages, after which the roots were covered with soil. 39 The number of Pratylenchus brachyurus in various developmental stages in 10 gram samples of the roots of the cotton plants were counted after 45 days. The results are set out in Table 27 below. 5 Table 27 Number of Pratylenchus brachyurus Test Fipronil (g Thiodicarb (g Azoxystrobin (g Thiophanate- in various a.i./ha) a.i./ha) a.i./ha) methyl (g a.i./ha) development stages in 10 grams of roots Control 0 0 0 0 272 Formulation 200 880 0 0 79 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 63 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 266 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 250 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 10 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 6 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 4 Example 9 11111 FIELD TEST 28 - COTTON - SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (MOTH) Moths (larvae) (Spodoptera frugiperda) were reared in the laboratory. The 10 number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young cotton plants. 200 mL of the Formulations Examples were diluted with water and then sprayed on the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 28) 40 Table 28. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g Tg a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 55 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 70 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 0 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 FIELD TEST 29 - WHEAT - ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (SNOUT MOTH) Wheat seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then 5 planted. Moths (larvae) (Elasmopalpus lignosellus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 29) Table 29. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 75 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 40 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 65 Example 5 Formulation 252126 2.16 26.64 5 Example 10 25. 41 FIELD TEST 30 - WHEAT - AGROTIS IPSILON (MOTH) Wheat seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of 5 larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 30) Table 30. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 35 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 75 Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 0 Example 10 2. 0 FIELD TEST 31 - COTTON - ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (SNOUT MOTH) Cotton seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Moths (larvae) (Elasmopalpus lignosellus) were reared in the laboratory. The 15 number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 31) 42 Table 31. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 70 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 35 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 70 Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 5 Example 10 25.2 1 FIELD TEST 32 - COTTON - AGROTIS EPSILON (MOTH) 5 Cotton seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 32) 0 Table 32. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 40 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 80 Example 5 Formulation 25216262.45 Example 252161.62660 43 FIELD TEST 33 - SOYBEAN- AGROTIS EPSILON (MOTH) Soybean seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then planted. Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining 5 population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 33) Table 33. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 35 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 70 Example 5 Formulation 25.2 126 2.16 26.64 0 Example 10 2. FIELD TEST 34 - COTTON - SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (MOTH) Cotton seeds were treated with Formulations Examples 3, 5 and 10 and then o planted. Moths (larvae) (Spodoptera Frugiperda) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on the planting area. The remaining population of larvae was examined after sowing of 15 days. (Table 34) Table 34. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl population (g a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 25.2 126 0 0 40 Example 3 Formulation 0 0 2.16 26.64 70 Example 5 Formulation 252126 2.16 26.64 5 Example 10 2. 44 FIELD TEST 35 - WHEAT - ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (MOTH) Moths (larvae) (Elasmopalus Lignosellus) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young wheat plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed to 5 the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 35) Table 35. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 95 Formulation 200 880 0 0 65 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 60 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 90 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 90 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 10 FIELD TEST 36 - WHEAT - AGROTIS EPSILON (MOTH) Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young wheat plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed to the 15 plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 0C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 36) 45 Table 36. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g Tg a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 80 Formulation 200 880 0 0 50 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 50 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 75 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 11111 5 FIELD TEST 37 - COTTON - ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (MOTH) Moths (larvae) (ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young cotton plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed to the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative 10 atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 37) 46 Table 37. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g Tg a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 90 Formulation 200 880 0 0 50 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 60 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 85 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 90 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 10 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 10 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 10 Example 9 FIELD TEST 38 - COTTON - AGROTIS EPSILON (MOTH) 5 Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young cotton plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed to the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 38) 10 47 Table 38. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test (g (g a.i./ha) (g a.i./ha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 85 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 50 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 80 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 75 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 0 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 Formulation 100 1100 20 50 0 Example 9 FIELD TEST 39 - SOYBEAN - AGROTIS EPSILON (MOTH) 5 Moths (larvae) (Agrotis ipsilon) were reared in the laboratory. The number of larvae were counted, collected and then put on healthy young soybean plants. The Formulations Examples 1, 2, 4, 6 - 9 were diluted with water and then sprayed to the plants. After staying in a greenhouse at 21-25 *C and 80 % relative atmospheric humidity for 10 days, the remaining population of larvae was examined. (Table 39) 10 48 Table 39. The Fipronil Thiodicarb Azoxystrobin Thiophanate- remaining Test g a.i./ha) (g a.i.ha) (g a.ijha) methyl (g population a.i./ha) of larvae (%) Control 0 0 0 0 90 Formulation 200 880 0 0 55 Example 1 Formulation 300 500 0 0 60 Example 2 Formulation 0 0 120 0 85 Example 4 Formulation 0 0 0 300 85 Example 6 Formulation 200 880 120 0 5 Example 7 Formulation 300 500 0 300 5 Example 8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Formulation 100 1100 20 50 5 Example 9 __ __ _ I__ _ _ _ I__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ All publications, patents and patent applications cited in this specification are 5 herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and 10 modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims. Throughout the specification and the claims that follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the words "comprise" and "include" and variations such as "comprising" and "including" will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer 15 or group of integers, but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers. 49 The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgement of any form of suggestion that such prior art forms part of the common general knowledge. 50

Claims

1. A synergistic composition comprising (A) an insecticidal component comprising fipronil and thiodicarb; and (B) a fungicidal component comprising azoxystrobin. 5

2. The synergistic composition of claim 1, wherein the fungicidal composition (B) further comprises thiophanate-methyl.

3. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein the the insecticidal component (A) is present in an amount of from about 20% to about 80% by weight of the composition. o

4. The synergistic composition of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the fungicidal component (B) is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition.

5. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein fipronil is present in an amount of from about 1% to about 50% by weight of the composition. 5

6. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein fipronil is present in an amount of from about 5% to about 15% by weight of the composition.

7. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein thiodicarb is present in an amount of from about 1% to about 70% by weight of the composition.

8. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein thiodicarb is present in an 20 amount of from about 32% to about 50% by weight of the composition.

9. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein azoxystrobin is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition.

10. The synergistic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein azoxystrobin is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the composition. 25

11. The synergistic composition of claim 2, wherein thiophanate-methyl is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 50% by weight of the composition. 51

12. The synergistic composition of claim 2, wherein thiophanate-methyl is present in an amount of from about 5% to about 10% by weight of the composition.

13. The synergistic composition of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the weight ratio of the components (A) and (B) in the composition is in the range of from 5 about 50:1 to about 1:50.

14. The synergistic composition of any one of the preceding claims further comprising extenders, carriers, solvents, surfactants, stabilizers, anti-foaming agents, anti-freezing agents, preservatives, antioxidants, colorants, thickeners, solid adherents and inert fillers; and/or additional insecticides and/or nematicides and/or fungicides. o

15. The synergistic composition of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the synergistic composition is in a form of a water-soluble concentrate (SL), an emulstifiable concentrate (EC), an emulsion (EW), a micro-emulsion (ME), a suspension concentrates (SC), an oil-based suspension concentrates (OD), a flowable suspension (FS), a water-dispersible granule (WG), a water-soluble granule (SG), a water 5 dispersible powder (WP), a water soluble powder (SP), a granule (GR), an encapsulated granule (CG), a fine granule (FG), a macrogranule (GG), an aqueous suspo-emulsion (SE), a microencapsuleated suspension (CS), or a microgranule (MG).

16. A method of preventing, controlling and/or treating insect, nematode and fungal infestations, comprising applying the synergistic composition of any one of the o preceding claims to plants, plant parts and/or their surroundings.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the plants are selected from a group consisting of cereals, fibre plants, leguminous plants and sugarcane.

18. The method of claim 16 or 17, wherein the infestations are: Wheat: 25 Nematodes: Meloidogyne ja vanica, Pratylenchus brachyurus; Ant: Acromyrmex landolti landolti, Atta capiguara, Atta sexdens rubropilosa; Beetle: Migdolus fryanus, Diloboderus abderus; Termite: Cornitermes cumulans, Heterotermes tenuis, Neocapritermes opacus, Procornitermes triacifer; 52 Fungi: Bipolaris oryzae, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Drechslera teres, Drechslera tritici repentis, Puccinia coronata var. avenae, Puccinia triticina, Pyricularia grisea; Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Spodoptera frugiperda, Agrotis ipsilon, Diatraea saccharalis; 5 Cotton: Nematodes: Meloidogyne ja vanica, Pratylenchus brachyurus; Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Spodoptera frugiperda, Agrotis ipsilon, Heliothis virescens; Ant: Acromyrmex landolti landolti, Atta sexdens rubropilosa; o Beetle: Anthonomus grandis; Fungi: Ramularia areola; Thrip: Frankliniella schultzel; Worm: Alabama argillacea; Sugarcane: 5 Nematodes: Meloidogyne javanica, Pratylenchus brachyurus; Termite: Heterotermes tenuis, Cornitermes cumulan; Beetle: Migdolus fryanus, Sphenophorus levi; Fungi: Pineapple diseases (fungus complex, the major one is: Ceratocystis paradoxa), Root rots (Pythium spp), Phytophthora rot of cuttings (Phytophthora spp.), fusariose 0 (Fusarium semitectum); Soybean: Nematodes: Meloidogyne ja vanica, Pratylenchus brachyurus; Beetles: Phyllophaga cuyabana, Diabrotica speciosa, Megascelis aeruginosa; Moth: Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Spodoptera frugiperda, Agrotis ipsilon; 25 Weevils: Sternechus subsignatus; Millipedes: Julus Hesperus; Fungi: Purple seed stain (Cercospora kikuchii); stem anthracnose (Colletotrichum dematium f. sp. Truncatum), fusariose (Fusarium semitectum), Pod and stem blight, 53 Stem canker, seed decay (Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae), stem rot (Sc/erotinia sclerotiorum), Damping-off, Pythium rot (Pythium spp); Phytophthora rot of cuttings (Phytophthora spp.).

19. Use of the composition of any one of claims 1 to 15, for preventing, controlling 5 and/or treating insect, nematode and fungal infestations in plants, plant parts and/or their surroundings. 54