WO2023276149A1 - Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation - Google Patents

Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023276149A1
WO2023276149A1 PCT/JP2021/025158 JP2021025158W WO2023276149A1 WO 2023276149 A1 WO2023276149 A1 WO 2023276149A1 JP 2021025158 W JP2021025158 W JP 2021025158W WO 2023276149 A1 WO2023276149 A1 WO 2023276149A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
robot
position data
support device
operation program
program
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2021/025158
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
大貴 山口
達也 近江
Original Assignee
ファナック株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ファナック株式会社 filed Critical ファナック株式会社
Priority to PCT/JP2021/025158 priority Critical patent/WO2023276149A1/fr
Priority to DE112021007579.9T priority patent/DE112021007579T5/de
Priority to US18/565,195 priority patent/US20240261969A1/en
Priority to CN202180099926.9A priority patent/CN117561146A/zh
Priority to JP2023531325A priority patent/JPWO2023276149A1/ja
Priority to TW111121023A priority patent/TW202302297A/zh
Publication of WO2023276149A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023276149A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1671—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by simulation, either to verify existing program or to create and verify new program, CAD/CAM oriented, graphic oriented programming systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J13/00—Controls for manipulators
    • B25J13/08—Controls for manipulators by means of sensing devices, e.g. viewing or touching devices
    • B25J13/088—Controls for manipulators by means of sensing devices, e.g. viewing or touching devices with position, velocity or acceleration sensors
    • B25J13/089—Determining the position of the robot with reference to its environment
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1664—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by motion, path, trajectory planning

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an optimization support device.
  • Cartesian coordinate values or axis values are used as position data when creating a robot operation program.
  • Each axis value specifies the value of each axis of the robot.
  • the orthogonal coordinate value specifies the coordinate value (x, y, z) from the origin of the orthogonal coordinate in space to the origin of the orthogonal coordinate system on the tool side, and the X axis, Y axis, Z axis of the orthogonal coordinate system Specifies the rotation angles w, p, r of the tool coordinate system about the axis.
  • Patent Document 1 motion simulation is performed so that all combinations of multiple hand posture candidates for each position data are covered, but the hand posture candidates include hand postures that the robot cannot reach. Therefore, Patent Document 1 has a problem that motion simulation is performed even for a hand posture candidate that does not move. To optimize a motion program by selecting suitable hand posture candidates and combining them to perform a motion simulation without changing the placement or position coordinates of the robot for a motion program that has already been created and can be executed to the end. is desired.
  • the robot in executing the motion simulation, without changing the placement and position coordinates of the robot in the already created motion program that can be executed to the end, the robot can reach the designated position data. It is desired to optimize an operation program by easily setting candidates and simulating the operation.
  • One aspect of the optimization support device of the present disclosure is an optimization support device that optimizes an operation program of the robot in consideration of the form of the robot, and includes an operation trajectory of the robot used in the operation program of the robot.
  • a position data acquisition unit for acquiring a plurality of position data of coordinate values in an orthogonal coordinate system taught according to the above;
  • a posture provisional designation unit that excludes, from among the plurality of shapes, shapes that the robot cannot reach;
  • an operation program selection unit that simulates each of the plurality of operation programs thus obtained, calculates an evaluation index value, and selects an operation program with the smallest calculated evaluation index value as an optimum operation program.
  • the robot in executing the motion simulation, the robot reaches each specified position data without changing the placement and position coordinates of the robot with respect to an already created motion program that can be executed to the end.
  • the operation program can be optimized by easily setting candidates for possible forms and simulating the operation.
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing a functional configuration example of a robot system according to an embodiment
  • FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the modelized robot.
  • It is a functional block diagram which shows the functional structural example of an optimization support apparatus.
  • It is a figure which shows an example of an operation program.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of position data candidates with different joint axis arrangements for one position data
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of robot forms that are different even with the same Cartesian coordinate values
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of robot forms that are different even with the same Cartesian coordinate values
  • It is a figure which shows an example of deletion of position data.
  • It is a figure which shows an example of the singularity of the form of a robot.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of an operation program before update and an operation program after update; 4 is a flowchart for explaining optimization processing of the optimization support device;
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing a functional configuration example of a robot system according to one embodiment.
  • the robot system 1 has a robot 10, a robot controller 20, and an optimization support device 30.
  • the robot 10, robot control device 20, and optimization support device 30 may be directly connected to each other via a connection interface (not shown).
  • the robot 10, the robot control device 20, and the optimization support device 30 may be interconnected via a network such as a LAN (Local Area Network).
  • the robot 10, the robot control device 20, and the optimization support device 30 may have a communication unit (not shown) for mutual communication through such connection.
  • the optimization support device 30 may be included in the robot control device 20 as described later.
  • Robot controller 20 is a device known to those skilled in the art for controlling the motion of robot 10 .
  • the robot control device 20 for example, is taught by the user operating a teaching operation panel (not shown) included in the robot control device 20, and the orthogonal coordinate values of the position of the tip point of the robot 10 in the world coordinate system to be described later.
  • An operation program generated based on each of (x, y, z, w, p, r) is output to the optimization support device 30, which will be described later.
  • the robot control device 20 acquires the optimized motion program from the optimization support device 30 .
  • the robot control device 20 generates a control signal by executing an optimized operation program, and outputs the generated control signal to the robot 10 to operate the robot 10 .
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the robot 10.
  • the robot 10 is a 6-axis vertical articulated robot, and has 6 joints J1 to J6 and an arm portion 12 connecting each of the joints J1 to J6.
  • the robot 10 drives movable members such as the arm section 12 by driving servo motors (not shown) arranged at each of the joints J1 to J6.
  • An end effector T such as a grasping hand is attached to the distal end of the movable member of the robot 10, for example, the distal end of the joint J6.
  • FIG. 1 the robot 10 is a 6-axis vertical articulated robot, and has 6 joints J1 to J6 and an arm portion 12 connecting each of the joints J1 to J6.
  • the robot 10 drives movable members such as the arm section 12 by driving servo motors (not shown) arranged at each of the joints J1 to J6.
  • An end effector T such as a grasping hand is attached to the distal end of the movable member of the robot
  • the robot 10 has a world coordinate system ⁇ w of a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system fixed in space, and a tool coordinate system of three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates set on the flange at the tip of the joint J6 of the robot 10. and ⁇ t.
  • the robot controller 20 can control the position of the tip of the robot 10 to which the end effector T is attached using the position (orthogonal coordinate values) defined by the world coordinate system ⁇ w.
  • the robot 10 is a 6-axis vertical articulated robot, it may be a vertical articulated robot other than 6-axis, a horizontal articulated robot, a parallel link robot, or the like.
  • FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram showing a functional configuration example of the optimization support device 30. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 3, it has a control section 31, an input section 32, a display section 33, and a storage section .
  • the control unit 31 also has a position data acquisition unit 310 , a posture provisional designation unit 311 , an operation program generation unit 312 , and an operation program selection unit 313 .
  • the input unit 32 is, for example, a keyboard or a touch panel arranged on the display unit 33 to be described later. ) is accepted from the user.
  • the display unit 33 is, for example, a liquid crystal display or the like, and displays an operation program and position data acquired by a position data acquisition unit 310 (to be described later), and a form ( Posture), an operation program selected by an operation program selection unit 313 to be described later, and the like are displayed.
  • the storage unit 34 is a ROM (Read Only Memory), a HDD (Hard Disk Drive), or the like, and may store position data 341 together with various control programs.
  • the position data 341 is orthogonal coordinate values (x, y, z, w, p, r ) is stored as position data.
  • the control unit 31 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a ROM, a RAM (Random Access Memory), a CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor) memory, etc., which are configured to communicate with each other via a bus. , are known to those skilled in the art.
  • the CPU is a processor that controls the optimization support device 30 as a whole.
  • the CPU reads the system program and application program stored in the ROM through the bus, and controls the entire optimization support device 30 according to the system program and application program.
  • the control unit 31 is configured to implement the functions of the position data acquisition unit 310, the posture provisional designation unit 311, the operation program generation unit 312, and the operation program selection unit 313.
  • CMOS memory is backed up by a battery (not shown), and configured as a non-volatile memory that retains the memory state even when the power of the optimization support device 30 is turned off.
  • the position data acquisition unit 310 acquires, for example, a plurality of position data of coordinate values of an orthogonal coordinate system (world coordinate system ⁇ w) taught along the motion trajectory of the robot 10 used in the motion program of the robot 10 .
  • the position data acquisition unit 310 acquires, for example, an already created motion program that can be executed to the end from the robot control device 20, and the coordinate values of the world coordinate system ⁇ w ( x, y, z, w, p, r).
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of an operating program. As shown in FIG. 4, the operation program includes coordinate values (x , y, z, w, p, r).
  • the position data acquisition unit 310 extracts and acquires "position data A”, “position data B”, “position data X”, etc. from the operation program of FIG.
  • the position data acquisition unit 310 may store the acquired plurality of position data in the position data 341 .
  • the position data acquisition unit 310 may directly acquire a plurality of position data, which are coordinate values (x, y, z, w, p, r) of the world coordinate system ⁇ w, from the robot control device 20 .
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 provisionally designates a plurality of postures that the robot 10 can take in each of the plurality of position data acquired by the position data acquisition unit 310, and determines whether the robot 10 cannot reach one of the plurality of provisionally designated postures. Exclude bad posture. Specifically, the posture provisional designation unit 311 acquires the coordinate values (x , y, z, w, p, r), the form (posture) of the robot 10 (displacement of the joints J1 to J6) when moving the end point (end effector T) of the robot 10 is calculated by known inverse kinematics calculation. Ask from
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of position data candidates A1 to A8 with different axis arrangements of joints J5, J3, and J1 for one position data. Position data candidates A1 to A8 shown in FIG.
  • the axis arrangement indicates on which side the control points of the arms and wrists of the robot 10 are located with respect to the control surfaces of the joints J1, J3, and J5.
  • the number of morphology (or position data) candidates is eight or more, for example, by considering the number of rotations of the joints J4, J5, and J6.
  • 6A and 6B are diagrams showing an example of the form of the robot 10 that differs even with the same Cartesian coordinate values. 6A shows the form of the robot 10 when the position data is (N, U, T), and FIG. 6B shows the form of the robot 10 when the position data is (N, D, T).
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 provisionally designates a plurality of form (orientation) candidates, such as eight, obtained for each of the plurality of position data by inverse kinematics calculation, and temporarily designates the plurality of form (orientation) candidates.
  • the candidates illegitimate forms that the robot 10 cannot reach are excluded from the candidates.
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 excludes a form that exceeds the stroke limit, a form that interferes with an obstacle, a form that becomes a singular point, and the like.
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 excludes the position data candidates A2, A4, and A6 to A8 from the position data candidates A1 to A8 for the "position data A" shown in FIG.
  • the position data that exceeds the stroke limit is position data that exceeds the stroke limit value
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 may compare the position data with the stroke limit value specific to the robot 10 for determination. Further, regarding the position data that interferes with an interfering object, the posture provisional designation unit 311 may determine whether or not the CAD data of the robot 10 interferes with other CAD data such as peripheral devices and workpieces. Further, the posture provisional designation unit 311 may determine the position data to be the singular point by comparing the provisionally designated form and the singular point unique to the robot 10 .
  • 8A and 8B are diagrams showing an example of singularity in the form of the robot 10. FIG. The form (posture) of the robot 10 in FIG.
  • FIG. 8A is a singular point when the joint J1 and the joint J6 are aligned on a straight line.
  • the form (orientation) of the robot 10 in FIG. 8B is a singular point when the joint J4 and the joint J6 are aligned on a straight line.
  • the motion program generation unit 312 generates a plurality of motion programs by combining position data candidates of forms (postures) that have not been excluded from each of the plurality of position data. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 9 , the motion program generation unit 312 causes the position provisional designation unit 311 to set the “position data A”, “position data B”, “position data X”, etc., which are not excluded but remain. A plurality of operation programs are generated by combining candidates for the position data (morphology) obtained.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 simulates each of the plurality of generated operation programs to calculate the evaluation index value, and selects the operation program with the smallest calculated evaluation index value as the optimum operation program. Specifically, for example, the operating program selection unit 313 interpolates and executes the simulation for each of the generated operating programs as necessary. If the execution of the motion program is not completed in the simulation, the motion program selection unit 313 selects incorrect position data that the robot 10 cannot reach in the execution of the motion program, such as stroke limit, singularity, interference with obstacles, and the like. Excludes and deletes the operation program whose execution is not completed because it passes through the following orthogonal coordinate values.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 calculates the cycle time of the robot 10 as an evaluation index value from the simulation of each of the remaining operation programs.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 selects the operation program with the smallest cycle time among the calculated cycle times as the optimum operation program.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of an operation program before update and an operation program after update.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 selects, for example, position data candidate A1, position An operation program that is a combination of data candidate B3, position data candidate X3, etc. is selected.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 then outputs the selected (optimized) operation program to the robot controller 20 .
  • the operation program selection unit 313 may store the selected (optimized) operation program in the storage unit 34 .
  • the operation program selection unit 313 has calculated the cycle time of the robot 10 as the evaluation index value, it is not limited to this.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 may calculate the power consumption of the robot 10 for each operation program as an evaluation index value by executing a simulation for each operation program.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 may select the operation program that minimizes the amount of power consumption among the calculated amounts of power consumption as the optimum operation program.
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart for explaining optimization processing of the optimization support device 30 . The flow shown here is executed each time the specification of the evaluation index value to be optimized is received from the user.
  • step S11 the input unit 32 receives specification of evaluation index values for the cycle time and power consumption to be optimized from the user.
  • step S ⁇ b>12 the position data acquisition unit 310 acquires the motion program to be optimized from the robot controller 20 .
  • step S13 the position data acquisition unit 310 acquires a plurality of position data of coordinate values (x, y, z, w, p, r) of the world coordinate system ⁇ w used in the operation program acquired in step S12. .
  • step S14 the posture provisional designation unit 311 provisionally designates candidates for a plurality of forms (position data) that the robot 10 can take for each position data acquired in step S13.
  • step S15 the posture provisional designation unit 311 excludes forms (position data) that the robot 10 cannot reach from among the plurality of form (position data) candidates provisionally designated for each position data in step S14.
  • step S16 the operation program generator 312 generates a plurality of operation programs from combinations of the remaining configuration (position data) candidates.
  • step S17 the operating program selection unit 313 executes a simulation of each of the plurality of operating programs generated in step S16.
  • step S18 the operation program selection unit 313 determines whether or not there is an operation program whose execution has not been completed when the simulation of the operation program is executed. If there is an operation program whose execution has not been completed, the process proceeds to step S19. On the other hand, if there is no operation program whose execution has not been completed, the process proceeds to step S20.
  • step S19 the operation program selection unit 313 excludes and deletes the operation program whose execution has not been completed.
  • step S20 the operation program selection unit 313 calculates the evaluation index value specified in step S11 of the robot 10 from the simulation of each operation program, and selects the operation program with the smallest evaluation index value among the calculated evaluation index values. Select as the best operating program. The operation program selection unit 313 then outputs the selected (optimized) operation program to the robot controller 20 .
  • the optimization support apparatus 30 can execute a motion simulation without changing the placement and position coordinates of the robot in an already created motion program that can be executed to the end.
  • a motion program can be optimized by easily setting candidate forms that the robot can reach for each position data and performing motion simulation.
  • the optimization support device 30 is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes modifications, improvements, etc. within a range that can achieve the purpose.
  • the optimization support device 30 acquires from the robot control device 20 a motion program that has already been created and is executable to the end, but is not limited to this.
  • the optimization support device 30 is taught by the user operating a teaching operation panel (not shown) of the robot control device 20, and the position of the end point of the robot 10 in the world coordinate system ⁇ w may be acquired from the robot controller 20 .
  • the robot control device 20 can acquire an operation program optimized from the beginning from the optimization support device 30 .
  • the optimization support device 30 is a device different from the robot control device 20, but it is not limited to this.
  • the optimization support device 30 may be included in the robot control device 20.
  • the optimization support device 30 deletes an operation program whose execution has not been completed, but the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the optimization support device 30 can operate on unreachable incorrect position data of the robot 10 being used even if it is an operation program whose execution is not completed, and has the shortest cycle time or the lowest power consumption. By replacing the position data with the position data of , an optimal program that can complete the execution to the end may be generated.
  • Each function included in the optimization support device 30 can be realized by hardware, software, or a combination thereof.
  • “implemented by software” means implemented by a computer reading and executing a program.
  • each component included in the optimization support device 30 can be realized by hardware including electronic circuits, software, or a combination thereof.
  • Non-transitory computer-readable media include various types of tangible storage media.
  • Examples of non-transitory computer-readable media include magnetic recording media (e.g., flexible discs, magnetic tapes, hard disk drives), magneto-optical recording media (e.g., magneto-optical discs), CD-ROMs (Read Only Memory), CD- R, CD-R/W, semiconductor memory (eg, mask ROM, PROM (Programmable ROM), EPROM (Erasable PROM), flash ROM, RAM).
  • the program may also be supplied to the computer on various types of transitory computer readable medium. Examples of transitory computer-readable media include electrical signals, optical signals, and electromagnetic waves. Transitory computer-readable media can deliver the program to the computer via wired communication channels, such as wires and optical fibers, or wireless communication channels.
  • steps of writing a program recorded on a recording medium include not only processes that are executed chronologically in order, but also processes that are executed in parallel or individually, even if they are not necessarily processed chronologically. is also included.
  • optimization support device of the present disclosure can take various embodiments having the following configurations.
  • the optimization support device 30 of the present disclosure is an optimization support device that optimizes the motion program of the robot 10 in consideration of the form of the robot 10, and is used in the motion program of the robot 10.
  • a position data acquisition unit 310 that acquires a plurality of position data of coordinate values of an orthogonal coordinate system taught along the motion trajectory;
  • a posture provisional designation unit 311 that excludes shapes that the robot 10 cannot reach from among the designated multiple shapes, and an operation program generation unit 312 that combines the shapes remaining in each of the plurality of position data to generate a plurality of motion programs.
  • an operation program selection unit 313 that simulates each of the plurality of generated operation programs to calculate an evaluation index value, and selects an operation program with the smallest calculated evaluation index value as an optimum operation program.
  • this optimization support device 30 in executing a motion simulation, for each designated position data, without changing the robot layout and position coordinates for an already created motion program that can be executed to the end. It is possible to optimize the motion program by easily setting candidate shapes that the robot can reach by using the robot and simulating the motion.
  • the evaluation index value may be the cycle time of the robot 10 .
  • the optimization support device 30 can generate an optimum operation program with the shortest cycle time.
  • the evaluation index value may be the power consumption of the robot 10 .
  • the optimization support device 30 can generate an optimum operation program that minimizes power consumption.
  • the posture provisional designation unit 311 makes interference near stroke limits, singular points, and obstacles unreachable for the robot 10. may be excluded. By doing so, the optimization support device 30 can avoid generation of unnecessary motion programs and execution of unnecessary motion program simulations by preliminarily excluding forms that the robot 10 cannot reach, reducing the processing time to can be shortened.
  • the operation program selection unit 313 deletes an operation program whose execution is not completed when each of the plurality of operation programs is simulated. You may By doing so, the optimization support device 30 can avoid selecting an operation program whose operation is not completed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention définit facilement des candidats pour des configurations qui peuvent être atteintes par un robot concernant des éléments désignés de données de position sans changer l'agencement ou les coordonnées de position du robot par rapport à un programme de mouvements qui peut être exécuté jusqu'à une conclusion déjà créée lors de l'exécution d'une simulation d'action, et réalise la simulation d'action, ce qui permet d'optimiser le programme de mouvements.　Ce dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation comprend : une unité d'acquisition de données de position pour acquérir une pluralité d'éléments de données de position se rapportant à des valeurs de coordonnées d'un système de coordonnées orthogonales à partir d'un programme de mouvements d'un robot ; une unité de désignation provisoire d'orientation pour désigner provisoirement, pour chaque élément de la pluralité d'éléments de données de position, une pluralité de configurations qui peuvent être atteintes par le robot, et à l'exclusion de configurations qui ne peuvent pas être atteintes par le robot ; une unité de génération de programme de mouvements pour combiner les configurations restantes pour chaque élément de la pluralité d'éléments de données de position et générer une pluralité de programmes de mouvements ; et une unité de sélection de programme de mouvements pour simuler chaque programme de la pluralité de programmes de mouvements, calculer des valeurs d'indice d'évaluation, et sélectionner le programme de déplacement ayant la valeur d'indice d'évaluation la plus faible en tant que programme de mouvements optimal.
PCT/JP2021/025158 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation WO2023276149A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2021/025158 WO2023276149A1 (fr) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation
DE112021007579.9T DE112021007579T5 (de) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Optimierungsassistenzvorrichtung
US18/565,195 US20240261969A1 (en) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Optimization assistance device
CN202180099926.9A CN117561146A (zh) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 优化辅助装置
JP2023531325A JPWO2023276149A1 (fr) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02
TW111121023A TW202302297A (zh) 2021-07-02 2022-06-07 最佳化支援裝置

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2021/025158 WO2023276149A1 (fr) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023276149A1 true WO2023276149A1 (fr) 2023-01-05

Family

ID=84690981

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/025158 WO2023276149A1 (fr) 2021-07-02 2021-07-02 Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20240261969A1 (fr)
JP (1) JPWO2023276149A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN117561146A (fr)
DE (1) DE112021007579T5 (fr)
TW (1) TW202302297A (fr)
WO (1) WO2023276149A1 (fr)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09128024A (ja) * 1995-10-27 1997-05-16 Fanuc Ltd 冗長軸を有するロボットの動作プログラムの最適化方法
JP2003103481A (ja) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-08 Honda Motor Co Ltd 多関節ロボットの姿勢適正化方法および適正化装置
JP2005352643A (ja) * 2004-06-09 2005-12-22 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd ロボット動作計画方法、ロボット動作計画装置、プログラムおよび記録媒体
JP2007203380A (ja) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-16 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd ロボットの教示支援装置
JP2009134352A (ja) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-18 Toyota Motor Corp ロボットの動作経路作成装置及びロボットの動作経路作成方法

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5502348B2 (ja) 2009-03-12 2014-05-28 ファナック株式会社 シミュレーション方法

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09128024A (ja) * 1995-10-27 1997-05-16 Fanuc Ltd 冗長軸を有するロボットの動作プログラムの最適化方法
JP2003103481A (ja) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-08 Honda Motor Co Ltd 多関節ロボットの姿勢適正化方法および適正化装置
JP2005352643A (ja) * 2004-06-09 2005-12-22 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd ロボット動作計画方法、ロボット動作計画装置、プログラムおよび記録媒体
JP2007203380A (ja) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-16 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd ロボットの教示支援装置
JP2009134352A (ja) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-18 Toyota Motor Corp ロボットの動作経路作成装置及びロボットの動作経路作成方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE112021007579T5 (de) 2024-02-29
US20240261969A1 (en) 2024-08-08
JPWO2023276149A1 (fr) 2023-01-05
TW202302297A (zh) 2023-01-16
CN117561146A (zh) 2024-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10525594B2 (en) Teaching system, robot system, and teaching method
JP6576255B2 (ja) ロボット軌道生成方法、ロボット軌道生成装置、および製造方法
US20190240833A1 (en) Trajectory generating method, and trajectory generating apparatus
EP1777600B1 (fr) Appareil d'apprentissage hors-ligne pour robot
US9186792B2 (en) Teaching system, teaching method and robot system
US10534876B2 (en) Simulation device and simulation method that carry out simulation of operation of robot system, and recording medium that records computer program
KR20150044812A (ko) 티칭 시스템 및 티칭 방법
CN111791228B (zh) 编程辅助装置、机器人系统和编程辅助方法
JP6750909B2 (ja) ロボット軌道生成方法、ロボット軌道生成装置、および製造方法
JP2015174184A (ja) 制御装置
WO2018229540A1 (fr) Procédé et système d'enseignement d'un robot pour atteindre une cible donnée dans la fabrication de robots
WO2023276149A1 (fr) Dispositif d'assistance pour optimisation
JPH1083208A (ja) ロボット間相対位置演算機構
JP6862849B2 (ja) 演算装置、演算方法、演算プログラムおよびロボットシステム
JP2020175471A (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、プログラム、及び記録媒体
JP2000112510A (ja) ロボットの教示方法及びその装置
TWI847257B (zh) 機器人示教系統
JP7541955B2 (ja) ロボット用走行台車位置決定装置、該方法および該プログラム
JP7232704B2 (ja) ロボットプログラム評価装置、ロボットプログラム評価方法及びロボットプログラム評価プログラム
JP7276359B2 (ja) 動作指令生成装置、機構制御システム、コンピュータプログラム、動作指令生成方法及び機構制御方法
US20240269837A1 (en) Artificial intelligence based robot cable simulation
JP2023180920A (ja) ロボットの動作軌道生成方法、動作軌道生成装置、ロボットシステム、およびプログラム
TW202426221A (zh) 調整機器人的姿勢之裝置、方法、及電腦程式
JPH03288211A (ja) ハンドリングロボットのオフライン教示システム
CN117355395A (zh) 机器人模拟装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21948453

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 18565195

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2023531325

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 112021007579

Country of ref document: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 202180099926.9

Country of ref document: CN

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21948453

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1