WO2021192228A1 - Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur - Google Patents

Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021192228A1
WO2021192228A1 PCT/JP2020/014041 JP2020014041W WO2021192228A1 WO 2021192228 A1 WO2021192228 A1 WO 2021192228A1 JP 2020014041 W JP2020014041 W JP 2020014041W WO 2021192228 A1 WO2021192228 A1 WO 2021192228A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
traveler
suspicious person
information
immigration
person detection
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2020/014041
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
香威 則松
Original Assignee
日本電気株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 日本電気株式会社 filed Critical 日本電気株式会社
Priority to JP2022510331A priority Critical patent/JP7420222B2/ja
Priority to PCT/JP2020/014041 priority patent/WO2021192228A1/fr
Publication of WO2021192228A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021192228A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/26—Government or public services

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a suspicious person detection device and a suspicious person detection method using the suspicious person detection device, and relates to a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for realizing these is recorded.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a system that supports the detection of new malicious brokers who assist illegal immigrants by effectively using the information from the illegal immigrants.
  • a large number of testimonies that are individually unreliable are put together for each person who seems to be the same person.
  • the value that will be correct is predicted from the frequency of occurrence and related information. Through such processing, reliable information about the malicious broker is generated, and new detection of the malicious broker is supported.
  • Patent Document 1 can generate highly reliable information about a malicious broker, it is difficult to prevent a suspicious person from entering the country by such information.
  • it is not realistic to carry out immigration inspection uniformly for all people, and it is also required to carry out immigration inspection efficiently.
  • An example of an object of the present invention is a suspicious person detection device, a suspicious person detection method, and a computer-readable person that can identify a person who is likely to be a suspicious person in advance and prevent the suspicious person from entering the country.
  • the purpose is to provide a recording medium.
  • a collation unit that collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • a determination unit that determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information contained in the travel agency's reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • a suspicious person detection device is provided.
  • the traveler's authentication information obtained at the departure point is compared with the traveler's authentication information obtained at the destination.
  • a suspicious person detection method for determining whether or not a traveler is a suspicious person is provided based on the travel agency information contained in the travel agent's reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • a collation unit that collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • a determination unit that determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information contained in the travel agency's reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • a computer-readable recording medium is provided, which contains a program for operating as a suspicious person detection device.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a suspicious person detection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of processing by the suspicious person detection device according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a suspicious person detection device according to the same embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a credit list recorded in the travel agency DB.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of the suspicious person detection method according to the embodiment, and shows the suspicious person detection process based on the credit of the travel agency.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of the suspicious person detection method according to the embodiment, and shows the suspicious person detection process based on the companion information.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a suspicious person detection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of processing by the suspicious person detection device according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an example of the suspicious person detection method according to the same embodiment, and shows the suspicious person detection process based on the traveler information of the specific traveler.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing an example of a computer that realizes the suspicious person detection device according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 is a device for identifying a person who is likely to be a suspicious person in advance and preventing the suspicious person from entering the country.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 determines from the travel agency used by the traveler to arrange an airline ticket whether or not the traveler who is about to enter the country is likely to be a suspicious person. ..
  • a travel agency that has arranged tickets for terrorists, criminals, etc. in the past may repeatedly arrange tickets for such persons.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment identifies a person who is likely to be a suspicious person based on reservation information including information about a travel agency used by a traveler (also referred to as "travel agency information"). do.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 has a collation unit 110 and a determination unit 120, as shown in FIG.
  • the collation unit 110 collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information included in the travel agency reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 can determine whether or not there is a high possibility of a suspicious person before the traveler enters the country. As a result, for a person who is highly likely to be a suspicious person, it is possible to take measures such as strict immigration inspection, and it is possible to prevent the entry of a suspicious person. In addition, it can be determined that it is not necessary to strictly carry out immigration inspection for a person who is unlikely to be a suspicious person. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not immigration inspection should be carried out strictly according to the possibility of a suspicious person, and it is also possible to carry out immigration inspection efficiently.
  • FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of processing by the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a credit list recorded in the travel agency DB23.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 is for a traveler heading from a departure point to a destination by using a means of transportation such as an airplane, for example, a terrorist or a terrorist before entering the country at the destination. Determine whether or not there is a high possibility of being a criminal such as a criminal. Therefore, at the departure point, the traveler information of the traveler is acquired and recorded in the management server 20. In addition, the credit list of the travel agency is recorded on the management server 20. The travel agency credit list is a list of travel agencies that have arranged tickets for terrorists, criminals, etc. in the past.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 increases the possibility that the traveler is a suspicious person based on various information of the management server 20 connected via the network 5 and the authentication information of the traveler acquired at the destination. judge.
  • the determination result by the suspicious person detection device 100 can be used, for example, to determine the necessity of strictly performing immigration inspection. If it is determined that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person, it is necessary to carry out strict immigration examination. It is desirable that the government guides you to the corresponding immigration booth. In addition, if it is determined that the traveler is unlikely to be a suspicious person, it is unlikely that the immigration inspection will be carried out rigorously. May guide you to the corresponding immigration booth.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 determines whether travelers to an appropriate immigration gate or immigration booth according to the possibility of being a suspicious person.
  • the distribution of travelers may be performed by guiding the travelers using the guidance terminal 30 installed at the immigration checkpoint.
  • the determination result of the suspicious person detection device 100 may be notified to the immigration gates 41 to 43, and the strictness of the immigration examination may be changed according to the possibility of being a suspicious person. You may refuse immigration of a person with a high score.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 By using the suspicious person detection device 100, it is possible to prevent the suspicious person from entering the country and to determine whether or not the immigration examination should be strictly carried out according to the possibility of the suspicious person. It is also possible to carry out immigration inspections often.
  • FIG. 3 shows a configuration of a suspicious person detection system constructed by using the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment, and a configuration example of the suspicious person detection device 100.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 communicates with the traveler information server 10, the management server 20, the guidance terminal 30, the immigration gate 40, the immigration terminal 50, and the like via the network 5. It is connected and configured.
  • the traveler information server 10 is a server managed by an airline company or the like, and records the traveler information of the traveler acquired at the departure point.
  • the traveler information server 10 records, for example, the biometric information of the traveler, the name, and the information of the travel agency that arranged the airline ticket, which was acquired at the time of check-in at the airport of the departure place.
  • the biological information of the traveler is, for example, information such as a face, a fingerprint, an iris, and a vein, and can be obtained from the traveler at the time of check-in or before, for example.
  • the biological information is acquired as an image or video by, for example, an imaging device, and is retained as the acquired image or video or a feature amount extracted from the acquired image or video.
  • the name of the traveler, information on the travel agency, etc. can be obtained from API (Advance Passenger Information; Advance Passenger Information) and PNR (Passenger Name Record; Passenger Reservation Record).
  • the API includes, for example, information such as name, nationality, date of birth, passport number, departure place, final destination, and gender.
  • the PNR includes, for example, information about the person making the reservation (name, nationality, date of birth, etc.), information about the contents of the reservation (travel agency that made the reservation, reservation date, ticket number, date of issue, etc.), Information such as information on the reservation person's personal belongings (number of personal belongings, weight, etc.), information on the procedure for the reservation person to board the aircraft (time when the boarding procedure was completed, etc.), etc. are included.
  • the traveler information server 10 transmits the traveler information to the management server 20 at a predetermined timing (for example, 72 hours before the traveler departs from the destination, at the time of departure, etc.).
  • the management server 20 records the traveler information received from the traveler information server 10 and the credit list of the travel agency. As shown in FIG. 3, the management server 20 has, for example, a travel agency information database (DB) 21 that records traveler information and a travel agency database (DB) 23 that records a travel agency credit list. ..
  • DB travel agency information database
  • DB travel agency database
  • the traveler information DB 21 records the information received from the traveler information server 10 for each traveler. That is, the traveler information DB 21 records the traveler information including the authentication information and the reservation information of the traveler acquired at the departure place.
  • the travel agency credit list recorded in the travel agency database 23 is, for example, a list of travel agencies that have arranged tickets for terrorists, criminals, etc. in the past (hereinafter, also referred to as "black list”). You may. Alternatively, it may be a list of credible travel agencies (hereinafter, also referred to as "white list”), such as being a member of a credible organization such as a travel agency association.
  • the credit list of a travel agency is provided by an administrative agency that controls the entry and exit of travelers, such as the Ministry of Justice.
  • a travel agency name 23b and the like are recorded in association with a travel agency ID 23a unique to the travel agency.
  • the information recorded in the management server 20 is used by the suspicious person detection device 100.
  • the information terminal 30, the immigration gate 40, and the immigration terminal 50 are devices installed at the immigration office of the destination.
  • the guidance terminal 30 is a device for guiding a traveler to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth.
  • the immigration gate 40 is a device that performs immigration inspection of travelers.
  • the immigration terminal 50 is installed in the immigration booth and is used by immigration officers.
  • the guidance terminal 30, the immigration gate 40, and the immigration terminal 50 are configured to be able to receive information from the suspicious person detection device 100 via the network 5.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 includes a collation unit 110, a determination unit 120, a determination unit 130, and a storage unit 140.
  • the collation unit 110 collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • the authentication information includes passport information, biometric information, and the like.
  • passport information is used as authentication information, information that can identify the traveler, such as a passport number, is used.
  • biometric information of the traveler acquired at the place of departure is a facial image, a facial photograph of a passport may be used.
  • biometric information is used as authentication information, biometric information that can be collated with the biometric information of the traveler acquired at the departure point is acquired at the destination.
  • an authentication information acquisition device will be installed in the passageway until the traveler arrives at the immigration checkpoint.
  • the guidance terminal 30 installed at the immigration checkpoint at the destination may also retain the function of the authentication information acquisition device.
  • the authentication information acquisition device is a passport reader that acquires passport information from a passport, an imaging device that acquires a face image, and the like. If a face image is used as the authentication information, it is possible to acquire the face image of the traveler by the image pickup device while the traveler is moving, for example, from getting off the airplane to arriving at the immigration checkpoint. As a result, the traveler does not have to present the information by himself / herself, and the suspicious person detection device 100 finishes the suspicious person detection process by the time the traveler arrives at the immigration checkpoint, and the immigration examination of the traveler can proceed smoothly.
  • the collation unit 110 collates the traveler's authentication information acquired by the authentication information acquisition device with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point, and travels recorded in the traveler information DB 21 of the management server 20. Identify the relevant person from the person information. That is, the collation unit 110 collates the passport number or the biometric information, and identifies a person who matches the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination from the traveler information DB 21. The collation unit 110 outputs the collation result to the determination unit 120.
  • the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information included in the travel agency reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • the determination unit 120 identifies the travel agency information associated with the traveler's authentication information in the traveler information DB 21 from the collation result input from the collation unit 110. Then, the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the travel agency used by the traveler is listed in the credit list of the travel agency based on the specified travel agency information. For example, the determination unit 120 acquires the travel agency ID recorded in the traveler information DB 21, and determines whether or not the travel agency ID is listed in the credit list recorded in the travel agency DB 23. ..
  • the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is a suspicious person if the travel agency used by the traveler is listed on the travel agency's credit list. Judge that the possibility is high. On the other hand, if the travel agency used by the traveler is not listed in the travel agency's credit list, the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is unlikely to be a suspicious person. Further, for example, when the credit list of the travel agency is a white list, the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler if the travel agency used by the traveler is listed in the credit list of the travel agency. Judge that the possibility of being a suspicious person is low. On the other hand, if the travel agency used by the traveler is not listed in the travel agency's credit list, the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • Both the blacklist and the whitelist may be used as the credit list of the travel agency. For example, a new travel agency is likely not on either the blacklist or whitelist. Therefore, it is possible that a suspicious person such as a terrorist may use a new travel agency. In this case, the determination unit 120 may determine that a traveler using a travel agency not listed in either the blacklist or the white list is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • the determination unit 120 may output the determination result together with the traveler's authentication information to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration terminal 50 via the network 5.
  • the immigration examiner who uses the immigration gate 40 and the immigration terminal 50 which receives the determination result from the determination unit 120, can determine whether it is necessary to strictly carry out the immigration examination based on the determination result.
  • the determination unit 120 may output the determination result to the determination unit 130.
  • the decision unit 130 determines the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth that examines travelers based on the determination result by the determination unit 120. If there is a high possibility that the traveler is a suspicious person as a result of the judgment by the judgment unit 120, the decision unit 130 will handle the immigration examination by a manned immigration gate or a veteran immigration examiner with long experience in immigration examination. Decide to guide you to the booth. On the other hand, if the traveler is unlikely to be a suspicious person, the decision-making department 130 does not need to carry out strict immigration inspection, so an immigration gate for automatic examination or an inexperienced immigration examiner will handle it. You may be guided to the immigration booth.
  • the determination unit 130 outputs the determined result to the guidance terminal 30 via the network 5.
  • the information terminal 30 guides the traveler to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth determined by the decision-making unit 130.
  • the storage unit 140 stores various information required in the processing performed by the suspicious person detection device 100.
  • the storage unit 140 stores, for example, information about the immigration gate 40 and the immigration booth where the immigration examiner conducts immigration.
  • the memory unit 140 records a manned immigration gate that can strictly carry out immigration, an immigration booth where a veteran immigration examiner conducts immigration, and an immigration terminal. doing. This information can be updated at any time.
  • the information recorded in the storage unit 140 can be referred to by each functional unit constituting the suspicious person detection device 100.
  • FIGS. 5 to 7 are flowcharts showing an example of the suspicious person detection method according to the present embodiment.
  • the suspicious person detection method according to the present embodiment is implemented by operating the suspicious person detection device 100.
  • FIG. 5 shows a suspicious person detection process based on the credit of a travel agency.
  • a suspicious person detection process using a blacklist of a travel agency that describes a travel agency that has arranged a ticket for a terrorist, a criminal, or the like in the past will be described. Blacklisted travel agencies may repeatedly arrange tickets for such persons.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 identifies a person who is likely to be a suspicious person based on the reservation information including the travel agency information used by the traveler.
  • the management server 20 records the traveler information received from the traveler information server 10, and also records the credit list of the travel agency provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the like. This information is obtained before the traveler arrives at the destination.
  • the traveler's authentication information is acquired at the destination (S110).
  • the authentication information is, for example, passport information, biometric information, etc., and is acquired by an authentication information acquisition device installed at the destination.
  • the traveler's authentication information acquired by the authentication information acquisition device is output to the collation unit 110.
  • step S110 the collating unit 110 collates the authentication information and identifies the corresponding person from the traveler information recorded in the traveler information DB 21 of the management server 20 ( S120).
  • the determination unit 120 determines the collation result with the guidance terminal 30 and the immigration gate 40. Alternatively, it may be output to the immigration terminal 50 (S130). For the traveler, it may be judged that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person, and strict immigration inspection may be carried out.
  • the determination unit 120 executes the credit confirmation process of the travel agency (S140). That is, the determination unit 120 determines from the travel agency information recorded in the traveler information whether or not the travel agency used by the traveler is listed in the travel agency's credit list.
  • the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person (S150). On the other hand, if the travel agency used by the traveler is not listed in the travel agency's credit list, the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is unlikely to be a suspicious person (S160).
  • the determination unit 120 outputs the determination result of step S150 or S160 together with the traveler's authentication information to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration terminal 50 via the network 5 (S170).
  • the immigration examiner who uses the immigration gate 40 and the immigration terminal 50 which receives the determination result from the determination unit 120, can determine whether it is necessary to strictly carry out the immigration examination based on the determination result.
  • the determination unit 120 may output the determination result of step S150 or S160 to the determination unit 130.
  • the decision unit 130 determines the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth for examining travelers based on the determination result by the determination unit 120. Then, the determination unit 130 outputs the determined result to the guidance terminal 30 via the network 5.
  • the information terminal 30 guides the traveler to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth determined by the decision-making unit 130.
  • the suspicious person detection process was performed using the black list of the travel agency, but the suspicious person detection process was performed using the white list of the travel agency as the credit list of the travel agency. You may.
  • the determination unit 120 may indicate that the traveler is a suspicious person. It is judged that the sex is low.
  • the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • both the blacklist and the whitelist may be used as the credit list of the travel agency.
  • the determination unit 120 may determine that a traveler using a travel agency not listed in either the blacklist or the white list is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • the traveler is a suspicious person based on, for example, information on the companion of the traveler (also referred to as "accompanying information") in addition to the credit of the travel agency. It is also possible to determine whether or not. If there is a person who is judged to be a suspicious person in the companion of the traveler, it is highly likely that the person who acts with the suspicious person is also a suspicious person. Therefore, when the traveler has a companion, the suspicious person detection device 100 may determine whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the companion information.
  • the suspicious person detection process based on the companion information will be described with reference to FIG.
  • step S200 Acquisition of traveler information
  • traveler information is recorded in advance on the management server 20 (S200).
  • the process of step S200 may be performed in the same manner as in step S100 of FIG.
  • the traveler information is recorded in the management server 20 before the traveler arrives at the destination.
  • step S210 Authentication information acquisition
  • the traveler's authentication information is acquired at the destination (S210).
  • the process of step S210 may be performed in the same manner as in step S110 of FIG.
  • the traveler's authentication information acquired by the authentication information acquisition device is output to the collation unit 110.
  • step S210 When the traveler's authentication information is acquired in step S210, the collating unit 110 collates the authentication information and identifies the corresponding person from the traveler information recorded in the traveler information DB 21 of the management server 20 ( S220). At this time, as a result of collating the authentication information of the traveler, if the person whose authentication information matches cannot be identified from the traveler information DB 21, the determination unit 120 determines the collation result with the guidance terminal 30 and the immigration gate 40. Alternatively, it may be output to the immigration terminal 50 (S230). For the traveler, it may be judged that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person, and strict immigration inspection may be carried out. The processing of steps S220 and S230 may be performed in the same manner as in steps S120 and 130 of FIG.
  • the determination unit 120 confirms the presence or absence of a companion (S235). For example, information about a companion who has booked a ticket or the like with the traveler is recorded in the PNR, such as when the traveler arranges the airline ticket or the like of the companion together. Therefore, the determination unit 120 can confirm that the traveler has a companion if the companion information is described in the traveler information recorded in the traveler information DB 21 of the management server 20. If it is determined in step S235 that there is no companion, the determination unit 120 ends the process.
  • step S235 when it is confirmed in step S235 that the traveler has a companion, the determination unit 120 executes the credit confirmation process of the companion (S240).
  • the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the companion is a suspicious person. Whether or not the companion is a suspicious person may be determined by a determination process of whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person as described with reference to FIG. Alternatively, the determination unit 120 may determine whether or not the companion is a suspicious person based on a list of terrorists, criminals, and the like provided in advance. Such a list may be recorded in the management server 20.
  • the determination unit 120 determines that the companion is a suspicious person, the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler who acts with the companion is also likely to be a suspicious person (S250). On the other hand, if the determination unit 120 determines that the companion is not a suspicious person, it determines that the traveler is unlikely to be a suspicious person (S260).
  • the determination unit 120 outputs the determination result of step S250 or S260 together with the traveler's authentication information to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration terminal 50 via the network 5 (S270).
  • the immigration examiner who uses the immigration gate 40 and the immigration terminal 50 which receives the determination result from the determination unit 120, can determine whether it is necessary to strictly carry out the immigration examination based on the determination result.
  • the determination unit 120 may output the determination result of step S250 or S260 to the determination unit 130.
  • the decision unit 130 determines the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth for examining travelers based on the determination result by the determination unit 120. Then, the determination unit 130 outputs the determined result to the guidance terminal 30 via the network 5.
  • the information terminal 30 guides the traveler to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth determined by the decision-making unit 130.
  • the process of step S270 may be performed in the same manner as in step S170 of FIG.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 can further determine whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on, for example, the traveler information of the specific traveler.
  • the specific traveler refers to a person who is not a companion of the traveler but is a suspicious person such as a terrorist or a criminal. Even if the traveler does not have acquaintance with the specific traveler, he / she may be sitting next to each other in the means of transportation such as an airplane, or the movement route from the departure point to the destination may be the same. It is conceivable to have common traveler information.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 is a suspicious person based on whether or not the traveler who has moved by the same means of transportation as the specific traveler has the same traveler information as the specific traveler. It may be determined whether or not.
  • the suspicious person detection process based on the traveler information of the specific traveler will be described with reference to FIG. 7.
  • step S300 Acquisition of traveler information
  • traveler information is recorded in advance on the management server 20 (S300).
  • the process of step S300 may be performed in the same manner as in step S100 of FIG.
  • the traveler information is recorded in the management server 20 before the traveler arrives at the destination.
  • step S310 Authentication information acquisition
  • the traveler's authentication information is acquired at the destination (S310).
  • the process of step S310 may be performed in the same manner as in step S110 of FIG.
  • the traveler's authentication information acquired by the authentication information acquisition device is output to the collation unit 110.
  • step S320 the collating unit 110 collates the authentication information and identifies the corresponding person from the traveler information recorded in the traveler information DB 21 of the management server 20 ( S320).
  • the determination unit 120 determines the collation result with the guidance terminal 30 and the immigration gate 40. Alternatively, it may be output to the immigration terminal 50 (S330).
  • the processing of steps S320 and S330 may be performed in the same manner as in steps S120 and 130 of FIG.
  • the determination unit 120 may set a person using a travel agency with low credibility, which is specified by the determination process of whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person described in FIG. 5, as the specific traveler. Alternatively, the determination unit 120 may identify a specific traveler based on a list of terrorists, criminals, etc. provided in advance. Alternatively, a person whose departure point or transit point is a place designated as a dangerous area may be a specific traveler. Such a list may be recorded in the management server 20. If it is determined in step S335 that the specific traveler does not exist, the determination unit 120 ends the process.
  • step S340-S360 Confirmation of commonality with specific travelers
  • the determination unit 120 shares the traveler information of the traveler with the traveler information of the specific traveler. Whether or not it is determined (S340).
  • the determination of the commonality of the traveler information may be carried out based on whether or not the items specified in advance in the traveler information match or satisfy a predetermined condition.
  • the items to be specified include, for example, the departure point and destination (if there is a waypoint), the flight number of the means of transportation, the departure date, the seat information, the travel agency used, and the like.
  • the determination unit 120 when the departure place, the waypoint, the destination, the flight number of the means of transportation, and the departure date are the same, and the specific traveler is seated at any of the front, rear, left, and right positions, the traveler It may be determined that the information is common.
  • the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the traveler information of the traveler is common with the traveler information of the specific traveler. If the determination unit determines that the traveler information of the traveler is common to the traveler information of the specific traveler, it determines that the traveler is also likely to be a suspicious person (S350). On the other hand, if the determination unit 120 determines that the traveler information of the traveler is not common to the traveler information of the specific traveler, it determines that the possibility that the traveler is a suspicious person is low (S360).
  • a person who is not accompanied by a traveler because the reservation number is different from that of the traveler, but who is sitting in either the front, back, left, or right position is using a travel agency with low creditworthiness, or the place of departure.
  • the transit point is a designated dangerous area, it will be determined that the traveler is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • the determination unit 120 outputs the determination result of step S350 or S360 together with the traveler's authentication information to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration terminal 50 via the network 5 (S370).
  • the immigration examiner who uses the immigration gate 40 and the immigration terminal 50 which receives the determination result from the determination unit 120, can determine whether it is necessary to strictly carry out the immigration examination based on the determination result.
  • the determination unit 120 may output the determination result of step S350 or S360 to the determination unit 130.
  • the decision unit 130 determines the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth for examining travelers based on the determination result by the determination unit 120. Then, the determination unit 130 outputs the determined result to the guidance terminal 30 via the network 5.
  • the information terminal 30 guides the traveler to the immigration gate 40 or the immigration booth determined by the decision-making unit 130.
  • the process of step S370 may be performed in the same manner as in step S170 of FIG.
  • the suspicious person detection processes shown in FIGS. 5 to 7 may be performed independently or in combination of a plurality of processes.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination by the collating unit 110. Then, the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information included in the travel agency reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 can determine whether or not there is a high possibility of a suspicious person before the traveler enters the country. As a result, for a person who is highly likely to be a suspicious person, it is possible to take measures such as strict immigration inspection, and it is possible to prevent the entry of a suspicious person. In addition, it can be determined that it is not necessary to strictly carry out immigration inspection for a person who is unlikely to be a suspicious person. Therefore, it is possible to determine whether or not immigration inspection should be carried out strictly according to the possibility of a suspicious person, and it is also possible to carry out immigration inspection efficiently.
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 may perform a process of determining whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person by the determination unit 120 at the departure point. That is, by acquiring the traveler's authentication information when registering the traveler information at the departure place, it is possible to acquire the reservation information associated with the authentication information. As a result, it becomes possible to specify the travel agency information included in the reservation information, and the suspicious person detection device 100 can determine whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information. can.
  • the program according to the present embodiment may be any program that causes the computer to be executed as the functional unit shown in FIG. 1 or FIG. By installing this program on a computer and executing it, the suspicious person detection device 100 and the suspicious person detection method according to the present embodiment can be realized.
  • the computer processor functions as a collation unit 110, a determination unit 120, and a determination unit 130 of the suspicious person detection device 100 to perform processing.
  • the storage unit 140 may be realized by storing the data files constituting them in a storage device such as a hard disk provided in the computer, or by a storage device of another computer. It may be realized. Examples of computers include smartphones and tablet terminal devices in addition to general-purpose PCs.
  • each computer may function as any of the collation unit 110, the determination unit 120, and the determination unit 130, respectively.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing an example of a computer 900 that realizes the suspicious person detection device 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the computer 900 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 901, a main memory 902, a storage device 903, an input interface 904, a display controller 905, a data reader / writer 906, and a communication interface 907. And. Each of these parts is connected to each other via bus 911 so as to be capable of data communication.
  • CPU Central Processing Unit
  • the computer 900 may include a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) or an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) in addition to the CPU 901 or in place of the CPU 901.
  • the GPU or FPGA can execute the program in the above embodiment.
  • the CPU 901 expands the program in the embodiment composed of the code group stored in the storage device 903 into the main memory 902, and executes various codes in a predetermined order to perform various operations.
  • the main memory 902 is typically a volatile storage device such as a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory).
  • the program according to the above embodiment is provided in a state of being stored in a computer-readable recording medium 910.
  • the program in the above embodiment may be distributed on the Internet connected via the communication interface 907.
  • the storage device 903 include a semiconductor storage device such as a flash memory in addition to a hard disk drive.
  • the input interface 904 mediates data transmission between the CPU 901 and an input device 908 such as a keyboard and mouse.
  • the display controller 905 is connected to the display device 909 and controls the display on the display device 909.
  • the data reader / writer 906 mediates data transmission between the CPU 901 and the recording medium 910, reads the program from the recording medium 910, and writes the processing result in the computer 900 to the recording medium 910.
  • the communication interface 907 mediates data transmission between the CPU 901 and another computer.
  • the recording medium 910 include a general-purpose semiconductor storage device such as CF (Compact Flash (registered trademark)) and SD (Secure Digital), a magnetic recording medium such as a flexible disk, or a CD-.
  • CF Compact Flash
  • SD Secure Digital
  • a magnetic recording medium such as a flexible disk
  • CD- Compact Digital
  • optical recording media such as ROM (CompactDisk Read Only Memory).
  • the suspicious person detection device 100 can also be realized by using hardware corresponding to each part instead of the computer on which the program is installed. Further, the suspicious person detection device 100 may be partially realized by a program and the rest may be realized by hardware.
  • a collation unit that collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • a determination unit that determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information included in the travel agency's reservation information associated with the collated authentication information. Suspicious person detection device.
  • Appendix 2 The suspicious person detection device according to Appendix 1, wherein the determination unit determines that the traveler is a suspicious person based on whether or not the travel agency information exists in the credit list of the travel agency.
  • Appendix 3 It has a decision unit that decides the immigration gate or immigration booth that examines the traveler based on the judgment result by the judgment unit.
  • the suspicious person detection device according to Appendix 1 or 2, wherein the determination unit notifies the determined immigration gate or the immigration booth to a guide terminal installed at the immigration office.
  • Appendix 4 The suspicious person detection device according to Appendix 1 or 2, wherein the determination unit transmits the determination result to the immigration gate.
  • Appendix 6 The suspicious person detection device according to any one of Appendix 1 to 5, wherein the determination unit determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the companion information regarding the companion of the traveler. ..
  • the determination unit determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on whether or not the specific traveler who has been determined to be a suspicious person has common traveler information.
  • the suspicious person detection device according to item 1.
  • Appendix 8 The suspicious person detection device according to any one of Appendix 1 to 7, wherein the authentication information is biometric information or passport information.
  • Appendix 10 The suspicious person detection method according to Appendix 9, wherein the traveler is determined to be a suspicious person based on whether or not the travel agency information is present in the travel agency's credit list.
  • Appendix 12 The suspicious person detection method according to Appendix 9 or 10, wherein the determination result of whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person is transmitted to the immigration gate.
  • Appendix 14 The suspicious person detection method according to any one of Appendix 9 to 13, wherein it is determined whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the companion information regarding the companion of the traveler.
  • Appendix 15 The description in any one of Appendix 9 to 14, which determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on whether or not the specific traveler who is determined to be a suspicious person has common traveler information. Suspicious person detection method.
  • Appendix 16 The suspicious person detection method according to any one of Appendix 9 to 15, wherein the authentication information is biometric information or passport information.
  • a collation unit that collates the traveler's authentication information acquired at the departure point with the traveler's authentication information acquired at the destination.
  • a determination unit that determines whether or not the traveler is a suspicious person based on the travel agency information included in the travel agency's reservation information associated with the collated authentication information.
  • a computer-readable recording medium on which a program for functioning as a suspicious person detection device is recorded.
  • Appendix 18 On the computer A program for the determination unit to function as a suspicious person detection device for determining that the traveler is a suspicious person based on whether or not the travel agency information is present in the travel agency's credit list.
  • Appendix 19 On the computer It has a decision unit that decides the immigration gate or immigration booth that examines the traveler based on the judgment result by the judgment unit. Appendix 17 or 18 which recorded a program for the decision-making department to function the determined immigration gate or the immigration booth as a suspicious person detection device for notifying a guidance terminal installed at the immigration office.
  • Appendix 17 or 18 which recorded a program for the decision-making department to function the determined immigration gate or the immigration booth as a suspicious person detection device for notifying a guidance terminal installed at the immigration office.
  • Appendix 20 On the computer The computer-readable recording medium according to Appendix 17 or 18, wherein the determination unit records a program for causing the determination unit to function as a suspicious person detection device that transmits the determination result to the immigration gate.
  • Appendix 21 On the computer The computer-readable recording medium according to Appendix 17 or 18, wherein the determination unit records a program for functioning as a suspicious person detection device that transmits a determination result to an immigration inspection terminal used by an immigration inspector.
  • Appendix 24 The computer-readable recording medium according to any one of Appendix 17 to 23, wherein the authentication information is biometric information or passport information.
  • the present invention it is possible to detect a traveler who is likely to be a suspicious person.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is useful for immigration examination of travelers.
  • Traveler information server 20 Management server 21 Traveler information database 23 Travel agency database 30 Information terminal 40 (41-43) Immigration gate 50 Immigration terminal 100 Suspicious person detection device 110 Verification unit 120 Judgment unit 130 Decision unit 140 Memory Part 900 Computer 901 CPU 902 Main memory 903 Storage device 904 Input interface 905 Display controller 906 Data reader / writer 907 Communication interface 908 Input device 909 Display device 910 Recording medium 911 Bus

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de détection de personne suspecte (100) ayant une unité de mise en correspondance (110) qui met en correspondance des informations d'authentification d'un voyageur acquises au niveau d'un endroit de départ avec des informations d'authentification du voyageur acquises au niveau d'une destination, et une unité de détermination (120) qui détermine si le voyageur est une personne suspecte sur la base d'informations d'agence de voyage incluses dans des informations de réservation du voyageur associées aux informations d'authentification mises en correspondance.
PCT/JP2020/014041 2020-03-27 2020-03-27 Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur WO2021192228A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022510331A JP7420222B2 (ja) 2020-03-27 2020-03-27 不審者検知装置、不審者検知方法及びプログラム
PCT/JP2020/014041 WO2021192228A1 (fr) 2020-03-27 2020-03-27 Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2020/014041 WO2021192228A1 (fr) 2020-03-27 2020-03-27 Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021192228A1 true WO2021192228A1 (fr) 2021-09-30

Family

ID=77891120

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2020/014041 WO2021192228A1 (fr) 2020-03-27 2020-03-27 Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7420222B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2021192228A1 (fr)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003196428A (ja) * 2001-12-26 2003-07-11 S Stuff:Kk 出入国管理方法及び出入国管理装置
JP2005018178A (ja) * 2003-06-24 2005-01-20 Hitachi Ltd 顔画像を利用した出入国審査支援システム
JP2013020316A (ja) * 2011-07-08 2013-01-31 Hitachi Ltd 入国審査システム
JP2013092955A (ja) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-16 Hitachi Ltd 映像解析装置及びシステム
US20170032485A1 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-02-02 The Government of the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Homeland Security Identity verification system and method
JP2018037075A (ja) * 2016-08-29 2018-03-08 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 不審者通報システム及び不審者通報方法
WO2019026667A1 (fr) * 2017-07-31 2019-02-07 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif serveur de présentation d'informations de crédit, système et procédé de présentation d'informations de crédit, et support d'enregistrement
WO2019225551A1 (fr) * 2018-05-24 2019-11-28 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif de gestion, dispositif de comparaison, système de comparaison, procédé de gestion, procédé de comparaison et support d'enregistrement

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013092965A (ja) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-16 Hitachi Systems Ltd 外国人出入国情報管理システム及び外国人出入国情報管理プログラム
JP2015222459A (ja) 2014-05-22 2015-12-10 株式会社日立製作所 入国審査システム及び方法

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003196428A (ja) * 2001-12-26 2003-07-11 S Stuff:Kk 出入国管理方法及び出入国管理装置
JP2005018178A (ja) * 2003-06-24 2005-01-20 Hitachi Ltd 顔画像を利用した出入国審査支援システム
JP2013020316A (ja) * 2011-07-08 2013-01-31 Hitachi Ltd 入国審査システム
JP2013092955A (ja) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-16 Hitachi Ltd 映像解析装置及びシステム
US20170032485A1 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-02-02 The Government of the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Homeland Security Identity verification system and method
JP2018037075A (ja) * 2016-08-29 2018-03-08 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 不審者通報システム及び不審者通報方法
WO2019026667A1 (fr) * 2017-07-31 2019-02-07 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif serveur de présentation d'informations de crédit, système et procédé de présentation d'informations de crédit, et support d'enregistrement
WO2019225551A1 (fr) * 2018-05-24 2019-11-28 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif de gestion, dispositif de comparaison, système de comparaison, procédé de gestion, procédé de comparaison et support d'enregistrement

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7420222B2 (ja) 2024-01-23
JPWO2021192228A1 (fr) 2021-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11694204B2 (en) Biometric pre-identification
US11841934B2 (en) Biometric ticketing
US20230214733A1 (en) Interaction between a network identity service and account-based service applications
US20130013527A1 (en) Immigration control system
US10268812B2 (en) Physical token-less security screening using biometrics
Patel Airport passenger processing technology: a biometric airport journey
EP1639736A2 (fr) Systeme et procede pour la securite de transport applicables au transport international
JP2024003090A (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラム
JP7401102B2 (ja) 通知装置、端末、通知システム、通知方法及びプログラム
JP2015222459A (ja) 入国審査システム及び方法
JP2024023992A (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラム
WO2021192228A1 (fr) Dispositif de détection de personne suspecte, procédé de détection de personne suspecte, et support d'enregistrement lisible par ordinateur
JP7444236B2 (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及び、プログラム
JP2022075775A (ja) サーバ装置、システム、サーバ装置の制御方法、端末及びコンピュータプログラム
JP7420221B2 (ja) 検知装置、検知方法及びプログラム
US20240104442A1 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and computer readable recording medium
Abdurasulovna INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF CUSTOMS CONTROL OF PASSENGERSS CROSSING THE CUSTOMS BORDER AT AIR BORDER CHECKPOINT
WO2021166066A1 (fr) Dispositif de porte, serveur de gestion, système d'examen d'émigration et d'immigration, et procédé d'examen d'émigration et d'immigration
Bagdalova et al. BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGIES THAT ENHANCE AVIATION SECURITY AND EFFICIENCY
Yang et al. Automated Decision-making and Artificial Intelligence at European Borders and Their Risks for Human Rights
Cooper Aviation security: biometric technology and risk based security aviation passenger screening program
Lugovskaya Air Passenger Control: Passenger Data Exchange and Biometric Identification
JP2023109869A (ja) 状況通知装置、状況通知方法、及びプログラム
Tsukimori Airports turn to biometrics: devices that can recognize faces, fingerprints and body odor will make flying safer
Piera Facilitation of Air Transport

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20927073

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022510331

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20927073

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1