WO2018021452A1 - Steel for machine structures - Google Patents

Steel for machine structures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018021452A1
WO2018021452A1 PCT/JP2017/027154 JP2017027154W WO2018021452A1 WO 2018021452 A1 WO2018021452 A1 WO 2018021452A1 JP 2017027154 W JP2017027154 W JP 2017027154W WO 2018021452 A1 WO2018021452 A1 WO 2018021452A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
steel
inclusions
mns
content
less
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2017/027154
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
橋村 雅之
江頭 誠
尚二 藤堂
孝典 岩橋
Original Assignee
新日鐵住金株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 新日鐵住金株式会社 filed Critical 新日鐵住金株式会社
Priority to CN201780046552.8A priority Critical patent/CN109496239A/en
Priority to KR1020197005585A priority patent/KR20190034273A/en
Priority to US16/320,651 priority patent/US20190169723A1/en
Priority to EP17834454.5A priority patent/EP3492615A4/en
Priority to JP2018530376A priority patent/JP6760379B2/en
Publication of WO2018021452A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018021452A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/001Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths of specific alloys
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/12Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ
    • B22D11/124Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ for cooling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/04Removing impurities by adding a treating agent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/002Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing In, Mg, or other elements not provided for in one single group C22C38/001 - C22C38/60
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/20Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/24Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with vanadium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/26Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with niobium or tantalum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/28Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/32Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with boron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/58Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/0006Adding metallic additives
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/04Removing impurities by adding a treating agent
    • C21C7/06Deoxidising, e.g. killing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/10Handling in a vacuum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/004Dispersions; Precipitations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to steel, and more particularly to steel for machine structural use.
  • ⁇ Excellent rolling fatigue characteristics may be required for mechanical parts used for structural and power transmission of general machines and automobile parts.
  • An example of a method for manufacturing such a machine part is as follows. Machine structural steel is hot-worked (hot forging, etc.) to produce intermediate products. Intermediate parts are machined (cutting, grinding) to produce machine parts. If necessary, surface hardening treatment may be performed on the machine part. The surface hardening process is, for example, a carburizing process. Machine structural steel for producing such machine parts is required to have not only excellent hot workability but also excellent machinability.
  • Machine structural steel with excellent machinability is also called free-cutting steel, and is defined in JIS G 4804 (2008) (Non-patent Document 1). Free-cutting steel increases the machinability by containing Pb.
  • Patent Document 1 A machine structural steel containing Pb is disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-282172 (Patent Document 1).
  • the steel for machine structure described in Patent Document 1 is mass%, C: 0.05 to 0.55%, Si: 0.50 to 2.5%, Mn: 0.01 to 2.00%, S : 0.005 to 0.080%, Cr: 0 to 2.0%, P: 0.035% or less, V: 0 to 0.50%, N: 0.0150% or less, Al: 0.04%
  • Pb 0 ⁇ 0.12%
  • Zr 0 to less than 0.04%
  • Nd 0 to 0.05%
  • Nb 0 to 0.1%
  • the ratio of the ferrite phase to the structure in the area ratio is 10 to 80%, and the Hv hardness is 160 to 350.
  • fn1 100C + 11Si + 18Mn + 32Cr + 45Mo + 6V
  • fn2 ⁇ 23C + Si (5-2Si) -4Mn + 104S-3Cr-9V + 10
  • fn3 3.2C + 0.8Mn + 5.2S + 0.5Cr ⁇ 120N + 2.6Pb + 4.1Bi ⁇ 0.001 ⁇ 2 + 0.13 ⁇ .
  • the element symbol in each formula indicates the content in mass% of the element, and ⁇ indicates the area ratio (%) of the ferrite phase in the structure.
  • Patent Document 1 describes that this steel for machine structure is excellent in machinability and toughness.
  • machining such as cutting may be performed by an automated manufacturing facility.
  • a machine part is manufactured by cutting a large amount of intermediate products such as several hundred or more in an automated manufacturing facility per day, excellent chip disposal is required. It is preferable that the chips discharged with the cutting are divided into small pieces and discharged. When the chips remain connected for a long time, the chips are entangled with the intermediate product, and wrinkles are likely to occur on the surface of the machine part after cutting.
  • chips are entangled with machine parts, it is further necessary to temporarily stop the production line in order to remove the entangled chips. In this case, unmanned manufacturing becomes difficult, and personnel assignment for monitoring is required.
  • the chip disposability affects both the quality of the machine part and the manufacturing cost. Further, in an automated manufacturing facility, if the tool is worn much, the productivity is lowered. Therefore, the steel for machine structure is required to have high machinability such that tool wear can be suppressed and chip disposal is excellent.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a steel for machine structure that provides a machine part having excellent machinability, cracking characteristics, hot workability, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics.
  • the steel for machine structural use according to the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01 to 0.80%, Mn: 0.20 to 2.00%, P: 0 0.030% or less, S: 0.010 to 0.100%, Pb: 0.010 to 0.100%, Al: 0.010 to 0.050%, N: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0.
  • the balance is composed of Fe and impurities, and has a chemical composition satisfying the formula (1).
  • the total number of specific inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more is 40 / mm 2. That's it.
  • the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
  • the machine structural steel according to the present invention is excellent in machinability, cracking characteristics, hot workability, and mechanical parts having excellent rolling fatigue characteristics.
  • FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram showing an S distribution in an observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis.
  • FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram showing a Pb distribution in the same observation surface as that of FIG. 1A obtained by EPMA analysis.
  • FIG. 1C is a schematic diagram of an image obtained by combining FIGS. 1A and 1B.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining a criterion for determining whether or not adjacent inclusions are regarded as one inclusion.
  • FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the cast material.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a cutting test machine for explaining a cutting test.
  • FIG. 5A is a perspective view of chips.
  • FIG. 5B is a plan photograph of chips.
  • FIG. 6 is a front view and a side view of a rolling fatigue test piece used in the rolling fatigue test.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a thrust type rolling fatigue tester for explaining the rolling fatigue test.
  • the present inventors investigated and examined the machinability, the cracking characteristics, and the hot workability of the steel for machine structures.
  • C 0.15 to less than 0.30%
  • Si 0.01 to 0.80%
  • Mn 0.20 to 2.00%
  • P 0.030% or less
  • S 0.010 to 0.100%
  • Pb 0.010 to 0.100%
  • Al 0.010 to 0.050%
  • N 0.015% or less
  • O 0.0005 to 0.0030% Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%
  • B 0 to 0.0050%
  • Mo 0 to 0.70%
  • W Contains 0 to 0.70%
  • Nb 0 to less than 0.050%
  • Cu 0 to 0.50%
  • Ti 0 to 0.100%
  • Ca 0 to 0.0030%
  • the balance If it is a steel for mechanical structures having a chemical composition consisting of Fe and impurities, excellent machinability and excellent hot workability
  • Mn in steel combines with S to produce MnS.
  • MnS is divided into MnS inclusions and MnS precipitates depending on the production process.
  • MnS inclusions crystallize in the molten steel before solidification.
  • MnS precipitates precipitate in the steel after solidification.
  • MnS inclusions are generated in the molten steel. Therefore, the size of the MnS inclusion tends to be larger than the MnS precipitate generated after solidification.
  • Pb in steel hardly dissolves in steel and exists as Pb inclusions (Pb grains). Both MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions enhance the machinability of steel.
  • Mn and Pb are not only MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions mentioned above, but also composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb (hereinafter simply referred to as “composite inclusions”). Formed).
  • the composite inclusions contain MnS and Pb, and the balance means inclusions made of impurities. More specifically, the composite inclusion may be configured such that MnS and Pb are adjacent to each other, or Pb may be dissolved in MnS to form a composite inclusion.
  • “MnS inclusions”, “Pb inclusions”, and “composite inclusions” are specified by the method described in the item “Method for measuring number TN and RA” described later.
  • the MnS inclusion is an inclusion containing Mn and S and not containing Pb.
  • the Pb inclusion is an inclusion made of Pb and impurities and not containing Mn.
  • the composite inclusion is an inclusion containing Mn, S, and Pb.
  • MnS inclusions are known as inclusions that enhance machinability.
  • the melting point of the Pb inclusion is lower than the melting point of the MnS inclusion. Therefore, the Pb inclusion exhibits a lubricating action during cutting, and as a result, improves the machinability of the steel.
  • the composite inclusions enhance the machinability of steel more than the MnS inclusions and the Pb inclusions alone.
  • a crack occurs around the composite inclusion, liquefied Pb enters the opened crack.
  • stimulated and machinability increases. Therefore, not only MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions are generated, but if composite inclusions are generated, machinability is further enhanced.
  • the mechanism by which complex inclusions are generated is considered as follows. Pb is more mobile in the liquid phase than in the solid phase. Therefore, the composite inclusion can hardly be generated from the MnS precipitate generated after the solidification of the steel, and is generated when Pb adheres to the MnS inclusion generated in the molten steel before the solidification. Therefore, in order to generate a large amount of composite inclusions, it is desirable to generate a large amount of MnS inclusions in the molten steel rather than to generate MnS precipitates after solidification.
  • MnS inclusions are produced in molten steel by crystallization. Furthermore, as described above, the more complex inclusions are generated the more MnS inclusions. Therefore, it is considered that the machinability of the steel increases if a large amount of MnS inclusions are crystallized in the molten steel.
  • the steel for machine structural use containing MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions is prone to wrinkling.
  • the present inventors conducted investigations and studies on the mechanism of the germination. As a result, the present inventors obtained the following knowledge.
  • MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions themselves are the starting point of soot.
  • the easiness of generation is MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions rather than the size of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions.
  • the steel is more likely to start.
  • the present inventors have determined the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions in order to obtain excellent machinability and suppress rusting. We thought that it was effective to reduce. Therefore, the present inventors examined a method for reducing the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions.
  • MnS inclusions generated by crystallization in molten steel are likely to grow (coarse) in molten steel. Therefore, the MnS inclusion is larger in size than the MnS precipitate produced by precipitation in the solidified steel. That is, the MnS precipitate precipitates finer than the MnS inclusion. Therefore, in a steel with a constant Mn content and S content, when assuming the case where MnS inclusions are crystallized and the case where MnS precipitates are precipitated, rather than the number of MnS inclusions generated by crystallization, The number of MnS precipitates generated by precipitation is significantly increased. Therefore, in order to enhance the cracking characteristics of steel, MnS inclusions may be crystallized and grown (coarse) in the molten steel to suppress the precipitation of MnS precipitates.
  • the Mn content may be sufficiently increased as compared with the S content. If the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content, coarse MnS inclusions are easily generated in the molten steel. In this case, since S is consumed for crystallization of coarse MnS inclusions, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification becomes low. Therefore, precipitation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed, and the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be reduced. As a result, excellent firing characteristics can be obtained.
  • the Mn content and the S content satisfy the following formula (1).
  • the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element symbol in the formula (1).
  • F1 Mn / S. If F1 is less than 8.0, MnS inclusions are not easily crystallized in the molten steel. Therefore, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are produced after solidification. In this case, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the cracking characteristics of the steel are deteriorated. On the other hand, if F1 is 8.0 or more, the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content. In this case, by using an appropriate manufacturing method, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grown in the molten steel.
  • the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed.
  • the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
  • inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more are defined as “specific inclusions”.
  • the equivalent circle diameter means the diameter of a circle when the area of inclusions or precipitates observed in the microstructure observation is converted into a circle having the same area.
  • the total number of specific inclusions is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more in the mechanical structural steel having the above chemical composition and satisfying the formula (1).
  • the number of specific inclusions in the steel is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more, coarse MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized, and generation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed. As a result, it is possible to sufficiently reduce the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions, which are the starting points of rusting. Therefore, it is possible to achieve both excellent machinability and excellent cracking characteristics.
  • the number of specific inclusions in the steel is less than 40 / mm 2 , MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized, and a large number of MnS precipitates are generated. As a result, generation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed.
  • the steel for machine structural use according to the present embodiment completed based on the above knowledge is, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01 to 0.80%, Mn: 0.20. ⁇ 2.00%, P: 0.030% or less, S: 0.010 ⁇ 0.100%, Pb: 0.010 ⁇ 0.100%, Al: 0.010 ⁇ 0.050%, N: 0 .015% or less, O: 0.0005 to 0.0030%, Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%, Ni: 0 to 3.50%, B: 0 to 0.0050%, V: 0 to 0 70%, Mo: 0 to 0.70%, W: 0 to 0.70%, Nb: 0 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0 to 0.50%, Ti: 0 to 0.100%, And Ca: 0 to 0.0030% is contained, the balance is made of Fe and impurities, and has a chemical composition satisfying the formula (1).
  • the total number of specific inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more is 40 / mm 2. That's it.
  • the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
  • the chemical composition of the mechanical structural steel is as follows: Ni: 0.02 to 3.50%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%, V: 0.05 to 0.70%, Mo: 0.05 to 0 .70%, W: 0.05 to 0.70%, Nb: 0.001 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0.05 to 0.50%, and Ti: 0.003 to 0.100% You may contain 1 type, or 2 or more types selected from the group which consists of.
  • the chemical composition of the steel for machine structural use may contain Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0030%.
  • the number ratio of the composite inclusions to the specific inclusions may be 40% or more.
  • C 0.15 to less than 0.30% Carbon (C) increases the strength of steel.
  • carburizing treatment may be performed after forging the steel for machine structure. In this case, C increases the strength of the steel surface layer. If the C content is less than 0.15%, the steel cannot provide sufficient strength. In soft steel, chips are connected at the time of cutting, and may wrap around tools and materials and break them. If the C content is less than 0.15%, the cutting resistance of the steel is further increased.
  • the C content is 0.15 to less than 0.30%.
  • the minimum with preferable C content is 0.16%, More preferably, it is 0.18%.
  • the upper limit with preferable C content is 0.25%, More preferably, it is 0.23%.
  • Si 0.01 to 0.80% Silicon (Si) deoxidizes steel.
  • Si modifies the oxide by adding Si after adding Mn.
  • Si added to molten steel modifies an oxide mainly composed of Mn into an oxide mainly composed of Si.
  • Al After adding Si, by adding Al, a composite oxide containing Si and Al is generated in the steel.
  • the composite oxide serves as a nucleus from which MnS inclusions crystallize. Therefore, the composite oxide enhances the glazing characteristics of the steel. Si further increases temper softening resistance and strength. If the Si content is less than 0.01%, the above effect cannot be obtained.
  • Si is a ferrite forming element. If the Si content exceeds 0.80%, the steel surface layer may be decarburized. If the Si content exceeds 0.80%, the ferrite fraction may increase and the strength may decrease. Therefore, the Si content is 0.01 to 0.80%.
  • the minimum with preferable Si content for raising temper softening resistance is 0.10%, More preferably, it is 0.20%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Si content for suppressing a ferrite fraction is 0.70%, More preferably, it is 0.50%.
  • Mn 0.20 to 2.00%
  • Manganese (Mn) generates MnS inclusions and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb, and improves the machinability of steel.
  • Mn further deoxidizes steel.
  • the deoxidizing power of Mn is weak compared to Si and Al. Therefore, a large amount of Mn may be contained.
  • an oxide mainly composed of Mn is formed in the molten steel.
  • Si, Al another strong deoxidizing element
  • Mn in the oxide is discharged into the molten steel and the oxide is modified.
  • the modified oxide is referred to as a composite oxide. Mn discharged from the oxide into the molten steel combines with S to form MnS inclusions.
  • reformation of an oxide tends to become the nucleus which MnS inclusion crystallizes. Therefore, when a composite oxide is produced, crystallization of MnS inclusions is promoted. Further, the MnS inclusions generated by crystallization are likely to form composite inclusions.
  • the Mn content is 0.20 to 2.00%.
  • a preferable lower limit of the Mn content is 0.50%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Mn content is 1.50%, More preferably, it is 1.20%.
  • P 0.030% or less Phosphorus (P) is unavoidably contained. P embrittles steel and improves machinability. On the other hand, if the P content exceeds 0.030%, the hot ductility decreases. In this case, productivity is reduced, such as the occurrence of rolling wrinkles. Therefore, the P content is 0.030% or less.
  • the minimum with preferable P content for improving machinability is 0.005%. In this case, machinability, in particular, chip disposal is improved.
  • the upper limit with preferable P content is 0.015%.
  • S 0.010 to 0.100% Sulfur (S) generates MnS in steel and improves machinability.
  • MnS suppresses tool wear. If the S content is less than 0.010%, MnS does not crystallize sufficiently, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb are difficult to generate. As a result, the sprout characteristics are degraded. On the other hand, if the S content exceeds 0.100%, S segregates at the grain boundaries, the steel becomes brittle, and the hot workability of the steel decreases. Accordingly, the S content is 0.010 to 0.100%.
  • the preferred lower limit of the S content when giving priority to mechanical properties is 0.015%
  • the preferred upper limit is 0.030%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the S content when priority is given to machinability is 0.030%, and the preferable upper limit is 0.050%.
  • Pb 0.010 to 0.100%
  • the preferable lower limit of the Pb content for promoting the formation of composite inclusions and enhancing the machinability is 0.020%, more preferably 0.025%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Pb content for improving the glazing property is 0.050%.
  • Al 0.010 to 0.050%
  • Aluminum (Al) deoxidizes steel.
  • deoxidation with Al kill is performed in order to suppress the formation of vacancies and surface defects during solidification.
  • the oxide in the steel is modified to produce a composite oxide containing Si and Al.
  • the composite oxide tends to become a crystallization nucleus of MnS inclusions. Therefore, MnS inclusions disperse and crystallize, grow and coarsen easily, and complex inclusions containing MnS and Pb are easily generated. In this case, the machinability of the steel is increased.
  • the MnS inclusions When the MnS inclusions are dispersed and crystallized, the precipitation of fine MnS precipitates is further suppressed. In this case, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases. As a result, the glazing characteristics of the steel are enhanced.
  • Al further combines with N to form AlN, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening in various heat treatments. If the Al content is less than 0.010%, the above effect cannot be obtained.
  • the Al content exceeds 0.050%, a coarse composite oxide is likely to be generated.
  • coarse complex oxide is produced in steel, surface flaws are likely to occur in the steel.
  • coarse complex oxide is formed in steel, the fatigue strength of the steel is further reduced.
  • the Al content exceeds 0.050%, deoxidation proceeds excessively, and the amount of oxygen in the molten steel decreases.
  • MnS inclusions are not easily formed, and the machinability (particularly, tool wear suppression) of steel is reduced.
  • the Al content is 0.010 to 0.050%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the Al content for further obtaining the effect of suppressing the coarsening of crystal grains due to the generation of AlN is 0.015%, and more preferably 0.020%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Al content is 0.035%.
  • the Al content referred to in this specification means the content of acid-soluble Al (sol. Al).
  • N 0.015% or less Nitrogen (N) is inevitably contained. N combines with Al to form AlN, suppresses coarsening of austenite grains during heat treatment, and increases the strength of the steel. On the other hand, if the N content exceeds 0.015%, the cutting resistance of the steel increases and the machinability decreases. If N content exceeds 0.015%, hot workability will fall further. Therefore, the N content is 0.015% or less.
  • the minimum with preferable N content is 0.002%, More preferably, it is 0.004%.
  • the upper limit with preferable N content is 0.012%, More preferably, it is 0.008%.
  • the N content means the total N (tN) content.
  • Oxygen (O) is included not only in the oxide but also in MnS inclusions. O produces
  • the O content is 0.0005 to 0.0030%.
  • a preferable lower limit of the O content for further enhancing the machinability of the steel and the cracking characteristics of the steel is 0.0007%, more preferably 0.0010%.
  • the upper limit with preferable O content is 0.0025%, More preferably, it is 0.0020%.
  • the O content means the total oxygen (t—O) content.
  • Chromium (Cr) dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability and temper softening resistance of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. As a result, the rolling fatigue characteristics of the steel are enhanced. Further, when the carburizing treatment is performed as the surface hardening treatment, Cr deepens the hardened layer depth. If the Cr content is less than 0.50%, the above effect cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the Cr content exceeds 2.00%, the hardenability becomes too high, and a supercooled structure (martensite) is generated during cooling, and the steel becomes too hard. In this case, the machinability of steel decreases.
  • the Cr content is 0.50 to 2.00%.
  • the minimum with preferable Cr content is 0.70%, More preferably, it is 0.90%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Cr content is 1.80%, More preferably, it is 1.60%.
  • the remainder of the chemical composition of the machine structural steel according to the present embodiment is composed of Fe and impurities.
  • the impurities are mixed from ore as a raw material, scrap, or the manufacturing environment when industrially producing steel for machine structural use, and have an adverse effect on the steel for machine structural use of the present embodiment. It means that it is allowed in the range that does not give.
  • the chemical composition of the steel for machine structure of the present embodiment may further contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Ni, B, V, Mo, W, Nb, Cu, and Ti. .
  • Nickel (Ni) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Ni dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. Ni further increases the ductility of the matrix. Ni further increases the toughness of the steel. Ni further enhances the corrosion resistance of the steel. If Ni is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Ni content exceeds 3.50%, a large amount of retained austenite remains. In this case, part of the retained austenite is transformed into martensite due to the processing-induced transformation, and the ductility of the steel is lowered. Therefore, the Ni content is 0 to 3.50%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the Ni content for stably obtaining the above effect is 0.02%, more preferably 0.05%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Ni content for further suppressing a retained austenite is 2.50%, More preferably, it is 2.00%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the Ni content is 0.20%.
  • Ni detoxifies Cu and increases toughness.
  • steel contains Cu the minimum with preferable Ni content is more than Cu content.
  • B 0 to 0.0050% Boron (B) is an optional element and may not be contained.
  • B increases the hardenability of the steel and increases the strength of the steel. B further suppresses segregation of P and S to the grain boundary, which lowers toughness, and improves fracture characteristics. If B is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
  • the B content exceeds 0.0050%, a large amount of BN is generated and the steel becomes brittle. Therefore, the B content is 0 to 0.0050%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the B content when Ti or Nb which is a nitride-forming element is contained is 0.0005%.
  • the upper limit with preferable B content is 0.0020%.
  • V Vanadium (V) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, V precipitates as V carbide, V nitride, or V carbonitride during tempering and nitriding, and increases the strength of the steel. V precipitates (V carbide, V nitride and V carbonitride) further suppress the austenite grain coarsening and increase the toughness of the steel. V further dissolves in the steel and increases the temper softening resistance of the steel. If V is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
  • V content if it exceeds 0.70%, V precipitates to produce even three or more points A.
  • a V precipitates generated at 3 points or more are not easily dissolved in steel and remain in the steel as undissolved precipitates.
  • the amount of solid solution V decreases. Therefore, the tempering softening resistance of steel falls.
  • fine V precipitates are hardly deposited by subsequent heat treatment. In this case, the strength of the steel decreases. Therefore, the V content is 0 to 0.70%.
  • the minimum with preferable V content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.05%, More preferably, it is 0.10%.
  • the upper limit with preferable V content is 0.50%, More preferably, it is 0.30%.
  • Mo Molybdenum
  • Mo is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Mo precipitates as Mo carbide in heat treatment at a low temperature of A 1 point or less such as tempering or nitriding. Therefore, the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel are increased. Mo further dissolves in the steel to enhance the hardenability of the steel. If Mo is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Mo content exceeds 0.70%, the hardenability of the steel becomes too high. In this case, a supercooled structure is likely to be generated by rolling, softening heat treatment before wire drawing, or the like. Therefore, the Mo content is 0 to 0.70%.
  • the preferable lower limit of the Mo content for stably obtaining the above effect is 0.05%, more preferably 0.10%, and still more preferably 0.15%.
  • a preferable upper limit of the Mo content for stably obtaining ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the steel microstructure is 0.40%, and more preferably 0.30%.
  • W 0 to 0.70% Tungsten (W) is an optional element and may not be contained.
  • W precipitates as W carbide in the steel, increasing the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel.
  • W carbide generates at a low temperature of less than three points A. Therefore, unlike V, Nb, Ti, etc., W hardly generates undissolved precipitates.
  • W carbide increases the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel by precipitation strengthening. W further dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. If W is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
  • the W content is 0 to 0.70%.
  • a preferable lower limit of the W content for stably increasing the temper softening resistance of the steel is 0.05%, more preferably 0.10%.
  • a preferable upper limit of the W content for stably obtaining ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the steel microstructure is 0.40%, and more preferably 0.30%.
  • W and Mo hardly generate nitrides. Therefore, these elements can increase the temper softening resistance of steel without being affected by the N content.
  • the preferred total content of W and Mo for obtaining high temper softening resistance is 0.10 to 0.30%.
  • Niobium is an optional element and may not be contained. When Nb is contained, Nb produces Nb nitride, Nb carbide, or Nb carbonitride, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening during quenching and normalization. Nb further increases the strength of the steel by precipitation strengthening. If Nb is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Nb content exceeds 0.050%, undissolved precipitates are generated and the toughness of the steel is lowered. If the Nb content exceeds 0.050%, a supercooled structure is likely to be generated, and the hot workability of steel is reduced.
  • the Nb content is 0 to less than 0.050%.
  • the minimum with preferable Nb content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.001%, More preferably, it is 0.005%.
  • the upper limit with preferable Nb content is 0.030%, More preferably, it is 0.015%.
  • Cu 0 to 0.50% Copper (Cu) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Cu prevents decarburization. Cu further enhances corrosion resistance like Ni. If Cu is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Cu content exceeds 0.50%, the steel becomes embrittled and rolls are likely to occur. Therefore, the Cu content is 0 to 0.50%.
  • the minimum with preferable Cu content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.05%, More preferably, it is 0.10%. When Cu is contained in an amount of 0.30% or more, hot ductility can be maintained if the Ni content is higher than the Cu content.
  • Titanium is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Ti produces nitrides, carbides, or carbonitrides, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening during quenching and normalization. Ti further increases the strength of the steel by precipitation strengthening. Ti further deoxidizes the steel. When Ti further contains B, it combines with solute N to maintain the amount of solute B. In this case, hardenability increases. If Ti is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
  • Ti since Ti generates the nitrides and sulfides, it affects MnS inclusions and composite inclusions. Specifically, when the Ti content exceeds 0.100%, the crystallization amount of MnS inclusions decreases and the generation of composite inclusions also decreases. In this case, the cracking characteristics of the steel are reduced. If the Ti content is too high, further, nitrides and sulfides are generated and the fatigue strength decreases. Therefore, the Ti content is 0 to 0.100%. A preferable lower limit of the Ti content for effectively obtaining the above effect is 0.003%. In particular, when B is contained, the preferable lower limit of the Ti content for reducing the solid solution N is 0.005%. The upper limit with preferable Ti content for improving corrosion resistance is 0.090%, More preferably, it is 0.085%.
  • the mechanical structural steel of this embodiment may further contain Ca.
  • Ca 0 to 0.0030%
  • Calcium (Ca) is an optional element and may not be contained.
  • Ca generates CaS or (Mn, Ca) S to spheroidize the MnS inclusions and reduce the amount of tool wear.
  • the machinability of the steel is increased. If Ca is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
  • the Ca content exceeds 0.0030%, the oxide inclusions become coarse and the fatigue strength of the steel decreases. Therefore, the Ca content is 0 to 0.0030%.
  • a preferable lower limit of the Ca content for further improving the machinability is 0.0001%.
  • the preferable upper limit of Ca content is 0.0015%, more preferably 0.0003%.
  • F1 Mn / S.
  • F1 means Mn content with respect to S content. If F1 is less than 8.0, MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized. Therefore, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are produced after solidification. In this case, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the galling property of steel is deteriorated. When the amount of solid solution S in the steel after solidification cannot be reduced sufficiently, the solid solution S after solidification remains at the grain boundaries. As a result, the hot workability of steel may be reduced.
  • F1 is 8.0 or more
  • the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content.
  • MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow in the molten steel.
  • the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. Therefore, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions in the steel can be sufficiently reduced, and the firing characteristics of the steel are enhanced.
  • a preferable lower limit of F1 for enhancing the cracking characteristics of steel is 10.0, and more preferably 20.0.
  • the microstructure of the mechanical structural steel according to the present invention is mainly composed of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite. Specifically, the total area ratio of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the microstructure of the mechanical structural steel having the above chemical composition is 99% or more.
  • the total area ratio of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the microstructure can be measured by the following method.
  • a sample is taken from the machine structural steel.
  • the machine structural steel is a steel bar or a wire rod
  • a sample is taken from the central portion of the radius R (hereinafter referred to as R / 2 portion) connecting the surface and the central axis in the cross section (surface perpendicular to the axial direction). Collect.
  • the surface perpendicular to the central axis of the machine structural steel is taken as the observation surface.
  • the observation surface is polished, it is etched with 3% nitric acid alcohol (nitral etchant). The etched observation surface is observed with a 200 ⁇ optical microscope, and photographic images with arbitrary five fields of view are generated.
  • each phase such as ferrite, pearlite, and bainite has a different contrast for each phase. Therefore, each phase is specified based on the contrast.
  • the total area ( ⁇ m 2 ) of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in each visual field is obtained.
  • the total area in each field is summed for all fields (5 fields), and the ratio to the total area of all fields is determined. The obtained ratio is defined as the total area ratio (%) of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite.
  • the steel for machine structural use according to the present invention is one of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb in steel, and an inclusion having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more ( That is, the total number TN of specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more.
  • the number of specific inclusions TN is 40 / mm 2 or more, coarse MnS inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more are sufficiently crystallized. As a result, MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions The total number of objects and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced. Therefore, it is possible to achieve both excellent machinability and excellent cracking characteristics.
  • the number TN of specific inclusions in the steel is less than 40 / mm 2 , coarse MnS inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more are not sufficiently crystallized, and as a result, MnS inclusions are obtained. The total number of MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be sufficiently reduced.
  • the minimum with the preferable number TN of specific inclusions is 80 pieces / mm ⁇ 2 >, More preferably, it is 150 pieces / mm ⁇ 2 >.
  • a preferable upper limit of the number TN of specific inclusions is 300 / mm 2 .
  • the upper limit of the circle equivalent diameter of a specific inclusion is not specifically limited, For example, it is 200 micrometers.
  • the steel is likely to start.
  • the composite ratio RA is preferably 40% or more. In this case, the cracking characteristics of the steel can be further enhanced.
  • the minimum with more preferable composite ratio RA is 60%, More preferably, it is 75%.
  • the number TN of specific inclusions and the composite ratio RA can be measured by the following method.
  • a sample is taken from the machine structural steel in the manner described above. 20 fields of view are randomly observed at a magnification of 1000 times using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) on the cross section (surface) of the R / 2 part sample.
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • specific inclusions any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions with an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more
  • Specific inclusions and other inclusions can be distinguished by contrast.
  • MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions are specified by the following methods, respectively.
  • FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram showing the S distribution in the observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis
  • FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram showing the Pb distribution in the same observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis as in FIG. 1A. is there.
  • Numeral 10 in FIG. 1A is an area where S exists. Since S exists almost as MnS, it can be considered that MnS exists in the code
  • Reference numeral 20 in FIG. 1B is an area where Pb exists.
  • Pb may be divided by rolling or the like and arranged in the rolling direction as shown by reference numeral 20A.
  • the equivalent circle diameter means the diameter of a circle when the area of each inclusion or each precipitate is converted into a circle having the same area. Even in the inclusion group defined as one inclusion, the equivalent circle diameter is the diameter of the same circle as the total area of the inclusion group.
  • FIG. 1C is an image obtained by synthesizing FIG. 1B with FIG. 1A.
  • Pb inclusion 20 overlaps with MnS inclusion 10
  • the inclusion is recognized as composite inclusion 30.
  • MnS inclusion 10 and Pb inclusion 20 do not overlap (region A1, region A2, etc. in FIG. 1C)
  • these inclusions are MnS inclusion 10 and Pb inclusion. 20 is specified.
  • MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions are specified using a scanning microscope and EPMA.
  • the area of each specified inclusion is obtained, and the diameter of a circle having the same area is obtained as the equivalent circle diameter ( ⁇ m) of each inclusion.
  • An example of a manufacturing method includes a steel making process in which molten steel is refined and cast to manufacture a material (slab or ingot), and a hot working process in which the material is hot-worked to manufacture steel for machine structural use.
  • a steel making process in which molten steel is refined and cast to manufacture a material (slab or ingot)
  • a hot working process in which the material is hot-worked to manufacture steel for machine structural use.
  • the steel making process includes a refining process and a casting process.
  • refining process In the refining process, refining in the converter (primary refining) is first performed on the hot metal produced by a well-known method. Secondary refining is performed on the molten steel produced from the converter. In secondary refining, alloy addition for component adjustment is performed to produce molten steel having the above chemical composition.
  • Mn is added to the molten steel that has been removed from the converter.
  • an oxide mainly composed of Mn is generated in the molten steel.
  • Si having a stronger deoxidizing power than Mn is added.
  • the oxide mainly composed of Mn is modified to an oxide mainly composed of Si.
  • Al having a stronger deoxidizing power than Si is added.
  • the oxide mainly composed of Si is modified into a complex oxide containing Si and Al (hereinafter also simply referred to as “composite oxide”).
  • the composite oxide generated by the above refining process becomes a crystallization nucleus of MnS inclusions. Therefore, by producing the composite oxide, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow coarse. That is, when the composite oxide is generated, specific inclusions, which are inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 ⁇ m or more, are easily generated, and the number TN of the specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more. As a result, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
  • a well-known removal treatment is performed.
  • secondary refining is performed.
  • composite refining is performed.
  • LF Laser Furnace
  • VAD Vauum Arc Degassing
  • RH Rasterstahl-Hausen vacuum degassing treatment
  • Mn, Si, and other elements are added as necessary to adjust the components of the molten steel. After adjusting the components of the molten steel, the casting process is performed.
  • a raw material (slab or ingot) is manufactured using the molten steel manufactured by the refining process. Specifically, a slab is manufactured by continuous casting using molten steel. Or you may manufacture an ingot by an ingot-making method using molten steel.
  • slabs and ingots are collectively referred to as materials.
  • the cross-sectional area of the material here is, for example, 200 to 350 mm ⁇ 200 to 600 mm.
  • Solidification cooling rate RC at the time of casting is 100 degrees C / min or less.
  • the solidification cooling rate RC is 100 ° C./min or less, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow in the molten steel. Therefore, specific inclusions are easily generated, and the number TN thereof is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more.
  • the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed.
  • the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
  • the solidification cooling rate RC exceeds 100 ° C./min, the MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized, and the MnS inclusions are not sufficiently grown. Therefore, specific inclusions are not easily generated, and the number TN of specific inclusions is less than 40 / mm 2 . In this case, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are formed after solidification. As a result, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the steel firing characteristics are deteriorated. Therefore, the solidification cooling rate RC is 100 ° C./min or less.
  • a preferable solidification cooling rate RC is 8 to less than 50 ° C./min. In this case, MnS inclusions are more likely to crystallize and grow. If the solidification cooling rate RC is less than 8 to 50 ° C./min, the time until solidification is further long, so that a sufficient time for Pb to move through the molten steel and adhere to the MnS inclusions can be secured. Therefore, composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb are easily generated, and the composite ratio RA is 40% or more.
  • a more preferable upper limit of the solidification cooling rate RC is 30 ° C./min.
  • the more preferable lower limit of the solidification cooling rate RC is 10 ° C./min, and more preferably 15 ° C./min.
  • the solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained from the cast material.
  • FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the cast material.
  • the cooling rate from the liquidus temperature to the solidus temperature at the point P1 at the position W / 4 from the surface toward the material center is the solidification cooling rate RC in the casting process. (° C / min).
  • the solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained by the following method. Cut the solidified material in the transverse direction. Of the cross section of the material, the secondary dendrite arm interval ⁇ 2 ( ⁇ m) in the thickness direction of the solidified tissue at the point P1 is measured. Using the measured value ⁇ 2, the solidification cooling rate RC (° C./min) is obtained based on the following equation (3).
  • RC ( ⁇ 2 / 770) ⁇ (1 / 0.41) (3)
  • the secondary dendrite arm interval ⁇ 2 depends on the solidification cooling rate RC. Therefore, the solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained by measuring the secondary dendrite arm interval ⁇ 2.
  • Hot working process In the hot working step, one or more hot workings are usually performed. The material is heated before each hot working. Thereafter, hot working is performed on the material. Hot working is, for example, hot forging or hot rolling. In the case where a plurality of hot workings are performed, the first hot working is, for example, block rolling or hot forging, and the next hot working is finish rolling using a continuous rolling mill. In a hot rolling mill, horizontal stands having a pair of horizontal rolls and vertical stands having a pair of vertical rolls are alternately arranged in a line. The material after hot working is cooled by a known cooling method such as air cooling.
  • the machine structural steel is, for example, a steel bar or a wire rod.
  • Machine structural steel manufactured by the above method is excellent in machinability and cracking characteristics.
  • Manufacture of machine structural steel to machine parts is performed, for example, by the following method.
  • Hot forging is performed on machine structural steel to produce a rough intermediate product. Normalize the intermediate product as necessary. Further, machining is performed on the intermediate product. The machining is, for example, cutting.
  • a tempering treatment quenching and tempering
  • machining such as cutting may be performed on the intermediate product after the tempering treatment.
  • a machine part is manufactured by the above process. Machine parts may be manufactured by cold forging instead of hot forging.
  • the molten steel which has the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was manufactured.
  • the molten steel of each test number was manufactured by the following method.
  • the primary refining in the converter was produced under the same conditions for the hot metal produced by a known method.
  • molten steels with test numbers other than test numbers 65 and 66 Mn, Si, and Al were added in this order after the steel was removed from the converter and subjected to deoxidation treatment.
  • Mn, Si, and Al were added in this order after the steel was removed from the converter and subjected to deoxidation treatment.
  • test number 65 after the steel was removed from the converter, it was added in the order of Si, Al, and Mn and deoxidized.
  • Mn, Al, and Si were added in this order to perform deoxidation treatment.
  • the molten steel was cast to produce a rectangular parallelepiped experimental ingot.
  • the cross shape of the ingot was rectangular and was 190 mm ⁇ 190 mm.
  • the solidification cooling rate RC (° C./min) of each test number was as shown in Table 2.
  • the solidification cooling rate RC was obtained from the above equation (3) by measuring the secondary dendrite arm interval of the ingot.
  • the steel bar was manufactured by carrying out hot working twice on the manufactured experimental ingot. In hot working, partial rolling was performed, and then finish rolling (bar rolling) was performed. The manufactured experimental ingot was hot forged to produce a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm. Alternatively, a block rolling was performed on the experimental ingot, and then finish rolling was performed to produce a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm. A normalizing treatment at 800 to 950 ° C. was performed on the manufactured steel bar. The cooling method in the normalizing treatment was left to cool. A steel bar (steel for machine structure) having a diameter of 50 mm was manufactured by the above manufacturing process.
  • Machineinability As for machinability, tool life characteristics and chip disposal with a normal drill were evaluated.
  • Tool life characteristics CL1000 A steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm was cut to a length of 20 mm to obtain a perforated test piece. Perforation was performed on the perforated specimen. Table 3 shows the conditions for drilling.
  • the accumulated hole depth until the drill breakage was measured by changing the drill outer peripheral speed.
  • a high-speed steel straight drill was used as the drill.
  • the nose radius of the drill was 3 mm and the tip angle was 118 °.
  • Drilling was performed at a cutting speed of 10 to 70 m / min, a feed rate of 0.25 mm / rev, and a hole depth of 9 mm.
  • the accumulated hole depth (hole depth x number of drill holes) reached 1000 mm, drilling with one drill was completed. In this case, the drill was replaced, and the test was repeated until breakage at a higher drill peripheral speed.
  • the maximum drill peripheral speed at which a cumulative hole depth of 1000 mm can be drilled was defined as CL1000 (m / min) and used as an index of machinability.
  • CL1000 The results are shown in the column “CL1000” in Table 2.
  • CL1000 was 50 m / min or more, it was judged that the tool life characteristics were excellent.
  • CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, it was judged that the tool life characteristics were not excellent.
  • the tool 50 was a P20 class cemented carbide tool.
  • the nose R of the tool 50 was 0.4, and the rake angle was 5 °.
  • the peripheral turning was carried out at a cutting speed V1: 250 m / min, a feed speed V2: 0.2 mm / rev, a cutting amount D1: 2 mm, and a longitudinal cutting length L1: 200 mm. After cutting the outer periphery, the cutting turning was repeated so that the diameter again decreased by D1: 2 mm, and the test piece 5 was subjected to a turning test under the above conditions for 4 minutes.
  • the chips shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B were obtained. Therefore, the length L20 of the chips and the diameter D20 were measured. Based on the measurement results, the evaluation was as follows. When the chip diameter D20 has a coil shape of 30 mm or less, or when the chip length L20 is less than 50 mm even when the chip has no coil shape, it is determined that the chip disposal is excellent (see “ ⁇ "). On the other hand, when the chip diameter D20 was not a coil shape of 30 mm or less and the chip length L20 was 50 mm or more, it was determined that the chip disposal was not excellent (“ ⁇ ” in Table 2). .
  • a cracking test piece was prepared by cutting a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm into a predetermined length. The sputter test piece was turned under the same conditions as in the above cutting test. Thereafter, the test piece was stored in an atmosphere of 70% humidity and 20 ° C. for 1 hour while spraying tap water on the cut surface. After storage, the cut surface of the test piece was observed and the number of saddle points was measured. The measurement results are shown in the “Identification” column of Table 2. When the saddle point is less than 10 points (“ ⁇ ”in Table 2) and when the saddle point is 10 points or more and less than 20 points (“ ⁇ ”in Table 2), the glazing characteristics are excellent. It was judged. On the other hand, when the saddle point was 20 points or more (“ ⁇ ” in Table 2), it was determined that the glazing characteristics were not excellent.
  • the rolling fatigue life was evaluated by the Mori-type thrust rolling fatigue test.
  • Ten disc-shaped rolling fatigue test pieces 100 having a diameter of 60 mm and a thickness of 5 mm shown in FIG. 6 were collected from R / 2 part of the steel bars of each test number.
  • the rolling fatigue test specimen 100 was carburized to harden the surface.
  • the effective hardened layer depth was 0.8 mm or more.
  • the surface of the rolling fatigue test piece 100 subjected to the carburizing treatment was ground to remove the carburized abnormal layer, and the effective hardened layer depth was set to 0.7 mm.
  • the effective hardened layer depth was set to the depth from the surface of the position which becomes HV550.
  • the removal by grinding was 0.2 mm or less.
  • the hardness distribution and effective hardened layer depth in each rolling fatigue test piece were adjusted by adjusting Cp and the amount of grinding removal.
  • the rolling fatigue test piece 100 is immersed in a lubricating oil 102 of 70% oil and 30% water, and water in the lubricating oil evaporates due to heat generation, so 30 ml of water is once a day. Added.
  • the test surface pressure was constant at 4 kN.
  • As the hard sphere a Si 3 N 4 ceramic hard sphere was used.
  • the number of hard balls in contact with the rolling fatigue test piece 100 was 3, and the rotation speed was 1200 rpm.
  • “time until occurrence of pitching at a cumulative failure probability of 10% obtained by plotting test results on Weibull probability paper (time)” was used as the durability life.
  • the results are shown in the “Rolling fatigue life” column of Table 2. When the rolling fatigue life was 4.0 hours or longer, it was judged that the rolling fatigue characteristics were excellent. On the other hand, when the rolling fatigue life was less than 4.0 hours, it was determined that the rolling fatigue characteristics were not excellent.
  • Hot ductility (hot workability) evaluation test A hot tensile test by electric heating was performed to evaluate hot ductility (hot workability). Specifically, a round bar test piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 100 mm and having both ends threaded was produced from the slabs of each test number. The round bar test piece was heated to 1100 ° C. by electric heating and held for 3 minutes. Then, the round bar test piece was cooled to 900 degreeC by standing_to_cool. A tensile test was performed with the round bar test piece at 900 ° C., and a drawing value (%) at the time of breakage was obtained.
  • test results In test numbers 1 to 31, the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, the deoxidation order was appropriate, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was 40 / mm 2 or more. As a result, CL1000 was 50 m / min or more, and excellent chip disposal was obtained. That is, excellent machinability was obtained. Furthermore, in the glazing characteristic evaluation test, the scoring point was less than 20 points, and excellent scouring characteristics were obtained. Furthermore, in all the rolling fatigue tests, the rolling fatigue life was 4.0 hours or more, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics were obtained. Furthermore, in the hot ductility evaluation test, the drawing value was 70% or more, and excellent hot ductility was obtained.
  • test numbers 1 to 7, 26, 30, and 31 the solidification cooling rate RC was 8 to 50 ° C./min. Therefore, not only the number TN of specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more, but also the composite ratio RA is 40% or more. As a result, the scoring point was less than 10 in all cases, and even better sprinkling characteristics were obtained as compared with test numbers 8 to 25 and 27 to 29.
  • test numbers 32 to 42 the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, and the deoxidation order was appropriate, but the solidification cooling rate RC exceeded 100 ° C./min. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
  • test numbers 43 and 44 the chemical composition was appropriate, the order of deoxidation was appropriate, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less, but F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test number 45 the chemical composition was appropriate and the order of deoxidation was appropriate, but the solidification cooling rate RC exceeded 100 ° C./min, and F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test numbers 48 and 49 the Mn content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test number 50 the S content was too high. As a result, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test number 51 the S content was too high. Furthermore, F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test numbers 52 and 53 the S content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
  • test numbers 54 and 55 the Pb content was too high. As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test numbers 56 and 57 the Pb content was too low. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent chip disposal was not obtained. That is, excellent machinability was not obtained.
  • test number 58 the Al content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
  • test number 59 the N content was too high.
  • CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent machinability was not obtained.
  • the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
  • test number 62 the O content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent chip disposal was not obtained. That is, excellent machinability was not obtained.
  • test number 64 the Cr content was too low. As a result, the rolling fatigue life was less than 4.0 hours, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics were not obtained.
  • test numbers 65 and 66 the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less, but the deoxidation order was inappropriate.
  • the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.

Abstract

A steel for machine structures is provided which has excellent machinability, rusting characteristics and hot rolling properties and from which carburized components with excellent rolling fatigue characteristics can be obtained. This steel for machine structures has a chemical composition which satisfies expression (1) and contains, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01-0.80%, Mn: 0.20-2.00%, P: 0.030 or less, S: 0.010-0.100%, Pb: 0.010-0.100%, Al: 0.010-0.050%, N: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0005-0.0030% and Cr: 0.50%-2.00%, the remainder being Fe and impurities. The total number of specific inclusions included in the steel that are MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, or composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and that have a circle equivalent diameter of greater than or equal to 5μm is greater than or equal to 40 inclusions/mm2. Mn/S ≥ 8.0 (1) Here, each element in formula (1) is substituted with the amount contained (mass%) of the corresponding element.

Description

機械構造用鋼Steel for machine structure
 本発明は、鋼に関し、さらに詳しくは機械構造用鋼に関する。 The present invention relates to steel, and more particularly to steel for machine structural use.
 一般機械や自動車の部品等の構造用及び動力伝達用に用いられる機械部品には、優れた転動疲労特性が要求される場合がある。このような機械部品の製造方法の一例は、次のとおりである。機械構造用鋼を熱間加工(熱間鍛造等)して、中間品を製造する。中間品を機械加工(切削加工、研削加工)して機械部品を製造する。必要に応じて、機械部品に対して表面硬化処理を実施する場合もある。表面硬化処理はたとえば、浸炭処理である。このような機械部品を製造するための機械構造用鋼には、優れた熱間加工性だけでなく、優れた被削性も求められる。 ¡Excellent rolling fatigue characteristics may be required for mechanical parts used for structural and power transmission of general machines and automobile parts. An example of a method for manufacturing such a machine part is as follows. Machine structural steel is hot-worked (hot forging, etc.) to produce intermediate products. Intermediate parts are machined (cutting, grinding) to produce machine parts. If necessary, surface hardening treatment may be performed on the machine part. The surface hardening process is, for example, a carburizing process. Machine structural steel for producing such machine parts is required to have not only excellent hot workability but also excellent machinability.
 被削性に優れた機械構造用鋼は快削鋼とも呼ばれ、JIS G 4804(2008)(非特許文献1)に規定されている。快削鋼はPbを含有することにより、被削性を高める。 Machine structural steel with excellent machinability is also called free-cutting steel, and is defined in JIS G 4804 (2008) (Non-patent Document 1). Free-cutting steel increases the machinability by containing Pb.
 Pbを含有する機械構造用鋼はたとえば、特開2000-282172号公報(特許文献1)に開示されている。特許文献1に記載の機械構造用鋼材は、質量%で、C:0.05~0.55%、Si:0.50~2.5%、Mn:0.01~2.00%、S:0.005~0.080%、Cr:0~2.0%、P:0.035%以下、V:0~0.50%、N:0.0150%以下、Al:0.04%以下、Ni:0~2.0%、Mo:0~1.5%、B:0~0.01%、Bi:0~0.10%、Ca:0~0.05%、Pb:0~0.12%、Ti:0~0.04%未満、Zr:0~0.04%未満で、且つ、Ti(%)+Zr(%):0~0.04%未満、Te:0~0.05%、Nd:0~0.05%、Nb:0~0.1%、Cu:0~1.5%、Se:0~0.5%を含有し、下記式で表されるfn1の値が100以下、下記式で表されるfn2の値が0以上、下記式で表されるfn3の値が3.0以上を満たし、残部がFe及び不純物からなる化学組成を有する。さらに、面積割合で組織に占めるフェライト相の割合が10~80%であり、Hv硬さが160~350である。ここで、fn1=100C+11Si+18Mn+32Cr+45Mo+6V、fn2=-23C+Si(5-2Si)-4Mn+104S-3Cr-9V+10、fn3=3.2C+0.8Mn+5.2S+0.5Cr-120N+2.6Pb+4.1Bi-0.001α+0.13αである。各式における元素記号はその元素の質量%での含有量を示し、αは組織におけるフェライト相の面積割合(%)を示す。この機械構造用鋼材は、被削性及び靭性に優れる、と特許文献1には記載されている。 A machine structural steel containing Pb is disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-282172 (Patent Document 1). The steel for machine structure described in Patent Document 1 is mass%, C: 0.05 to 0.55%, Si: 0.50 to 2.5%, Mn: 0.01 to 2.00%, S : 0.005 to 0.080%, Cr: 0 to 2.0%, P: 0.035% or less, V: 0 to 0.50%, N: 0.0150% or less, Al: 0.04% Hereinafter, Ni: 0 to 2.0%, Mo: 0 to 1.5%, B: 0 to 0.01%, Bi: 0 to 0.10%, Ca: 0 to 0.05%, Pb: 0 ~ 0.12%, Ti: 0 to less than 0.04%, Zr: 0 to less than 0.04%, and Ti (%) + Zr (%): 0 to less than 0.04%, Te: 0 to 0.05%, Nd: 0 to 0.05%, Nb: 0 to 0.1%, Cu: 0 to 1.5%, Se: 0 to 0.5%, represented by the following formula The value of fn1 is 100 or less, fn represented by the following formula Value is 0 or more, satisfying the value of fn3 represented by the following formula is 3.0 or more, having a chemical composition the balance being Fe and impurities. Further, the ratio of the ferrite phase to the structure in the area ratio is 10 to 80%, and the Hv hardness is 160 to 350. Here, fn1 = 100C + 11Si + 18Mn + 32Cr + 45Mo + 6V, fn2 = −23C + Si (5-2Si) -4Mn + 104S-3Cr-9V + 10, fn3 = 3.2C + 0.8Mn + 5.2S + 0.5Cr−120N + 2.6Pb + 4.1Bi−0.001α 2 + 0.13α . The element symbol in each formula indicates the content in mass% of the element, and α indicates the area ratio (%) of the ferrite phase in the structure. Patent Document 1 describes that this steel for machine structure is excellent in machinability and toughness.
特開2000-282172号公報JP 2000-282172 A
 ところで、切削加工等の機械加工は、自動化された製造設備で実施される場合がある。自動化された製造設備で1日に数百個以上等、大量に中間品を切削加工して機械部品を製造する場合、優れた切り屑処理性が求められる。切削に伴って排出される切り屑は小さく分断されて排出される方が好ましい。切り屑が長くつながったままの場合、中間品に切り屑が絡みつき、切削後の機械部品の表面に疵が発生しやすくなる。切り屑が機械部品に絡みついた場合はさらに、絡みついた切り屑を除去するために、製造ラインを一時的に停止する必要がある。この場合、無人での製造が困難になり、監視のための人員配置が必要になる。このように、切り屑処理性は、機械部品の品質及び製造コストの両面に影響する。さらに、自動化された製造設備において、工具の摩耗が多ければ、生産性が低下する。したがって、機械構造用鋼では、工具の摩耗を抑制でき、切り屑処理性に優れるといった、高い被削性が求められる。 By the way, machining such as cutting may be performed by an automated manufacturing facility. When a machine part is manufactured by cutting a large amount of intermediate products such as several hundred or more in an automated manufacturing facility per day, excellent chip disposal is required. It is preferable that the chips discharged with the cutting are divided into small pieces and discharged. When the chips remain connected for a long time, the chips are entangled with the intermediate product, and wrinkles are likely to occur on the surface of the machine part after cutting. When chips are entangled with machine parts, it is further necessary to temporarily stop the production line in order to remove the entangled chips. In this case, unmanned manufacturing becomes difficult, and personnel assignment for monitoring is required. As described above, the chip disposability affects both the quality of the machine part and the manufacturing cost. Further, in an automated manufacturing facility, if the tool is worn much, the productivity is lowered. Therefore, the steel for machine structure is required to have high machinability such that tool wear can be suppressed and chip disposal is excellent.
 自動化された製造設備を用いた切削加工ではさらに、機械部品に銹が発生する場合がある。自動化された製造設備では、無人での操業の観点から、水溶性の切削油が利用される。そのため、機械部品が発銹する場合がある。銹は形状誤差を生じる原因となるだけでなく、機械部品にめっき処理を実施する場合には、品質不良の原因にもなる。さらに、切削後の機械部品は、切削後次工程までの間に、バケット内等で長期間待機する場合がある。たとえば、国内で切削加工し、次工程が他国の別工場で処理される場合、切削後、次工程が実施されるまで、数日~数カ月の期間が経過する場合がある。したがって、機械構造用鋼には、被削性だけでなく、銹の発生を抑制する特性(以下、発銹特性という)も求められる。 In addition, there is a case where wrinkles are generated in machine parts in the cutting process using the automated manufacturing equipment. In an automated manufacturing facility, water-soluble cutting oil is used from the viewpoint of unattended operation. For this reason, mechanical parts may be generated. The wrinkle not only causes a shape error, but also causes a quality defect when plating a machine part. Furthermore, the machine parts after cutting may wait for a long time in a bucket or the like before the next process after cutting. For example, when cutting in Japan and the next process is processed in another factory in another country, a period of several days to several months may elapse after cutting until the next process is performed. Therefore, not only machinability but also a characteristic for suppressing the generation of wrinkles (hereinafter referred to as a wrinkling characteristic) is required for steel for machine structural use.
 本発明の目的は、被削性、発銹特性、及び、熱間加工性に優れ、転動疲労特性に優れる機械部品が得られる機械構造用鋼を提供することである。 An object of the present invention is to provide a steel for machine structure that provides a machine part having excellent machinability, cracking characteristics, hot workability, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics.
 本発明による機械構造用鋼は、質量%で、C:0.15~0.30%未満、Si:0.01~0.80%、Mn:0.20~2.00%、P:0.030%以下、S:0.010~0.100%、Pb:0.010~0.100%、Al:0.010~0.050%、N:0.015%以下、O:0.0005~0.0030%、Cr:0.50~2.00%、Ni:0~3.50%、B:0~0.0050%、V:0~0.70%、Mo:0~0.70%、W:0~0.70%、Nb:0~0.050%未満、Cu:0~0.50%、Ti:0~0.100%、及び、Ca:0~0.0030%を含有し、残部はFe及び不純物からなり、式(1)を満たす化学組成を有する。鋼中において、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物のいずれかであって、円相当径が5μm以上である特定介在物の総個数が40個/mm以上である。
 Mn/S≧8.0 (1)
 ここで、式(1)中の各元素には、対応する元素の含有量(質量%)が代入される。
The steel for machine structural use according to the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01 to 0.80%, Mn: 0.20 to 2.00%, P: 0 0.030% or less, S: 0.010 to 0.100%, Pb: 0.010 to 0.100%, Al: 0.010 to 0.050%, N: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0. 0005 to 0.0030%, Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%, Ni: 0 to 3.50%, B: 0 to 0.0050%, V: 0 to 0.70%, Mo: 0 to 0 70%, W: 0 to 0.70%, Nb: 0 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0 to 0.50%, Ti: 0 to 0.100%, and Ca: 0 to 0.0030 %, And the balance is composed of Fe and impurities, and has a chemical composition satisfying the formula (1). In steel, the total number of specific inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more is 40 / mm 2. That's it.
Mn / S ≧ 8.0 (1)
Here, the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
 本発明による機械構造用鋼は、被削性、発銹特性、及び、熱間加工性に優れ、転動疲労特性に優れる機械部品が得られる。 The machine structural steel according to the present invention is excellent in machinability, cracking characteristics, hot workability, and mechanical parts having excellent rolling fatigue characteristics.
図1Aは、EPMA分析により得られた、観察面中のS分布を示す模式図である。FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram showing an S distribution in an observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis. 図1Bは、EPMA分析により得られた、図1Aと同じ観察面中のPb分布を示す模式図である。FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram showing a Pb distribution in the same observation surface as that of FIG. 1A obtained by EPMA analysis. 図1Cは、図1A及び図1Bを合成した画像の模式図である。FIG. 1C is a schematic diagram of an image obtained by combining FIGS. 1A and 1B. 図2は、隣り合う介在物を1つの介在物とみなすか否かの判断基準を説明するための模式図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining a criterion for determining whether or not adjacent inclusions are regarded as one inclusion. 図3は、鋳造された素材の横断面図である。FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the cast material. 図4は、切削試験を説明するための切削試験機の模式図である。FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a cutting test machine for explaining a cutting test. 図5Aは、切り屑の斜視図である。FIG. 5A is a perspective view of chips. 図5Bは、切り屑の平面写真図である。FIG. 5B is a plan photograph of chips. 図6は、転動疲労試験に用いた転動疲労試験片の正面図及び側面図である。FIG. 6 is a front view and a side view of a rolling fatigue test piece used in the rolling fatigue test. 図7は、転動疲労試験を説明するためのスラスト型転動疲労試験機の模式図である。FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a thrust type rolling fatigue tester for explaining the rolling fatigue test.
 本発明者らは、機械構造用鋼の被削性、発銹特性、及び、熱間加工性について調査及び検討を実施した。その結果、質量%で、C:0.15~0.30%未満、Si:0.01~0.80%、Mn:0.20~2.00%、P:0.030%以下、S:0.010~0.100%、Pb:0.010~0.100%、Al:0.010~0.050%、N:0.015%以下、O:0.0005~0.0030%、Cr:0.50~2.00%、Ni:0~3.50%、B:0~0.0050%、V:0~0.70%、Mo:0~0.70%、W:0~0.70%、Nb:0~0.050%未満、Cu:0~0.50%、Ti:0~0.100%、及び、Ca:0~0.0030%を含有し、残部はFe及び不純物からなる化学組成を有する機械構造用鋼であれば、優れた被削性と、優れた熱間加工性とが得られ、浸炭処理後に優れた転動疲労特性が得られる可能性があると考えた。 The present inventors investigated and examined the machinability, the cracking characteristics, and the hot workability of the steel for machine structures. As a result, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01 to 0.80%, Mn: 0.20 to 2.00%, P: 0.030% or less, S : 0.010 to 0.100%, Pb: 0.010 to 0.100%, Al: 0.010 to 0.050%, N: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0005 to 0.0030% Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%, Ni: 0 to 3.50%, B: 0 to 0.0050%, V: 0 to 0.70%, Mo: 0 to 0.70%, W: Contains 0 to 0.70%, Nb: 0 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0 to 0.50%, Ti: 0 to 0.100%, and Ca: 0 to 0.0030%, the balance If it is a steel for mechanical structures having a chemical composition consisting of Fe and impurities, excellent machinability and excellent hot workability can be obtained, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics after carburizing treatment. Thought that there may be obtained.
 鋼中のMnは、Sと結合してMnSを生成する。MnSは、その生成過程によって、MnS介在物と、MnS析出物とに分けられる。MnS介在物は、凝固前の溶鋼中に晶出する。一方、MnS析出物は凝固後に鋼中に析出する。MnS介在物は溶鋼中に生成する。そのため、MnS介在物のサイズは、凝固後に生成するMnS析出物と比較して、大きくなりやすい。 Mn in steel combines with S to produce MnS. MnS is divided into MnS inclusions and MnS precipitates depending on the production process. MnS inclusions crystallize in the molten steel before solidification. On the other hand, MnS precipitates precipitate in the steel after solidification. MnS inclusions are generated in the molten steel. Therefore, the size of the MnS inclusion tends to be larger than the MnS precipitate generated after solidification.
 一方、鋼中のPbは、鋼にほとんど固溶せず、Pb介在物(Pb粒)として存在する。MnS介在物及びPb介在物はいずれも、鋼の被削性を高める。 On the other hand, Pb in steel hardly dissolves in steel and exists as Pb inclusions (Pb grains). Both MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions enhance the machinability of steel.
 さらに、鋼中にMn及びPbが存在する場合、Mn及びPbは、上述のMnS介在物、Pb介在物の他に、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物(以後、単に「複合介在物」とも称する)を形成する。複合介在物は、MnS及びPbを含有し、残部は不純物からなる介在物を意味する。より具体的には、複合介在物は、MnSとPbとが互いに隣接して構成される場合もあるし、MnS中にPbが固溶して複合介在物を形成する場合もある。本明細書において「MnS介在物」、「Pb介在物」、「複合介在物」は、後述の「個数TN及びRA測定方法」の項目に記載の方法で特定される。本明細書において、MnS介在物は、MnとSとを含有し、Pbを含有しない介在物である。Pb介在物は、Pb及び不純物からなり、Mnを含有しない介在物である。複合介在物は、Mnと、Sと、Pbとを含有する介在物である。 Further, when Mn and Pb are present in the steel, Mn and Pb are not only MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions mentioned above, but also composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb (hereinafter simply referred to as “composite inclusions”). Formed). The composite inclusions contain MnS and Pb, and the balance means inclusions made of impurities. More specifically, the composite inclusion may be configured such that MnS and Pb are adjacent to each other, or Pb may be dissolved in MnS to form a composite inclusion. In this specification, “MnS inclusions”, “Pb inclusions”, and “composite inclusions” are specified by the method described in the item “Method for measuring number TN and RA” described later. In the present specification, the MnS inclusion is an inclusion containing Mn and S and not containing Pb. The Pb inclusion is an inclusion made of Pb and impurities and not containing Mn. The composite inclusion is an inclusion containing Mn, S, and Pb.
 MnS介在物は、被削性を高める介在物として知られている。一方、Pb介在物の融点はMnS介在物の融点よりも低い。そのため、Pb介在物は切削時に潤滑作用を発揮し、その結果、鋼の被削性を高める。 MnS inclusions are known as inclusions that enhance machinability. On the other hand, the melting point of the Pb inclusion is lower than the melting point of the MnS inclusion. Therefore, the Pb inclusion exhibits a lubricating action during cutting, and as a result, improves the machinability of the steel.
 さらに、複合介在物は、MnS介在物、及び、Pb介在物単体よりも、鋼の被削性を高めると考えられる。複合介在物周辺で亀裂が発生した場合、開口したクラックに液状化したPbが侵入する。これにより、クラックの進展が促進され、被削性が高まる。したがって、MnS介在物、Pb介在物が生成するだけでなく、複合介在物が生成すれば、被削性がさらに高まる。 Furthermore, it is considered that the composite inclusions enhance the machinability of steel more than the MnS inclusions and the Pb inclusions alone. When a crack occurs around the composite inclusion, liquefied Pb enters the opened crack. Thereby, progress of a crack is accelerated | stimulated and machinability increases. Therefore, not only MnS inclusions and Pb inclusions are generated, but if composite inclusions are generated, machinability is further enhanced.
 複合介在物が生成する機構は次のとおりと考えられる。Pbは固相よりも液相の方が動きやすい。したがって、複合介在物は、鋼の凝固後に生成するMnS析出物からはほとんど生成できず、凝固前の溶鋼中に生成するMnS介在物にPbが付着することにより、生成する。したがって、複合介在物を多く生成するためには、凝固後にMnS析出物を生成するよりも、溶鋼中においてMnS介在物を多く生成する方が望ましい。 The mechanism by which complex inclusions are generated is considered as follows. Pb is more mobile in the liquid phase than in the solid phase. Therefore, the composite inclusion can hardly be generated from the MnS precipitate generated after the solidification of the steel, and is generated when Pb adheres to the MnS inclusion generated in the molten steel before the solidification. Therefore, in order to generate a large amount of composite inclusions, it is desirable to generate a large amount of MnS inclusions in the molten steel rather than to generate MnS precipitates after solidification.
 以上のとおり、鋼の被削性を高めるためには、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物を多数生成すればよい。上述のとおり、MnS介在物は晶出によって溶鋼中に生成する。さらに、上述のとおり、複合介在物は、MnS介在物が多いほど多く生成する。したがって、溶鋼中において、MnS介在物を多く晶出させれば、鋼の被削性が高まると考えられる。 As described above, in order to improve the machinability of steel, a large number of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions may be generated. As described above, MnS inclusions are produced in molten steel by crystallization. Furthermore, as described above, the more complex inclusions are generated the more MnS inclusions. Therefore, it is considered that the machinability of the steel increases if a large amount of MnS inclusions are crystallized in the molten steel.
 一方、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物を含有する機械構造用鋼は、銹が発生しやすい。しかしながら、機械構造用鋼の発銹のメカニズムについては、これまでに詳細な検討がなされていなかった。そこで、本発明者らは、発銹のメカニズムについて、調査及び検討を実施した。その結果、本発明者らは次の知見を得た。 On the other hand, the steel for machine structural use containing MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions is prone to wrinkling. However, no detailed examination has been made so far on the mechanism of the mechanical structural steel. Therefore, the present inventors conducted investigations and studies on the mechanism of the germination. As a result, the present inventors obtained the following knowledge.
 MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物自体が、銹の起点となる。ここで、発銹のしやすさは、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の大きさよりも、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数に依存する。具体的には、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が増加するほど、鋼は発銹しやすい。以上の知見に基づいて、本発明者らは、優れた被削性を得つつ、発銹を抑えるために、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減することが有効と考えた。そこで、本発明者らは、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減する方法について検討した。 MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions themselves are the starting point of soot. Here, the easiness of generation is MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions rather than the size of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions. Depends on the total number of Specifically, as the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases, the steel is more likely to start. Based on the above findings, the present inventors have determined the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions in order to obtain excellent machinability and suppress rusting. We thought that it was effective to reduce. Therefore, the present inventors examined a method for reducing the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions.
 上述のとおり、溶鋼中で晶出により生成したMnS介在物は、溶鋼中で成長(粗大化)しやすい。そのため、MnS介在物は、凝固後の鋼中で析出により生成するMnS析出物よりもサイズが大きい。つまり、MnS析出物はMnS介在物よりも微細に析出する。そのため、Mn含有量及びS含有量が一定の鋼において、MnS介在物を晶出させる場合とMnS析出物を析出させる場合とを想定した場合、晶出により生成するMnS介在物の個数よりも、析出により生成するMnS析出物の個数の方が顕著に多くなる。したがって、鋼の発銹特性を高めるためには、溶鋼中においてMnS介在物を晶出し、成長(粗大化)させることにより、MnS析出物の析出を抑制すればよい。 As described above, MnS inclusions generated by crystallization in molten steel are likely to grow (coarse) in molten steel. Therefore, the MnS inclusion is larger in size than the MnS precipitate produced by precipitation in the solidified steel. That is, the MnS precipitate precipitates finer than the MnS inclusion. Therefore, in a steel with a constant Mn content and S content, when assuming the case where MnS inclusions are crystallized and the case where MnS precipitates are precipitated, rather than the number of MnS inclusions generated by crystallization, The number of MnS precipitates generated by precipitation is significantly increased. Therefore, in order to enhance the cracking characteristics of steel, MnS inclusions may be crystallized and grown (coarse) in the molten steel to suppress the precipitation of MnS precipitates.
 溶鋼中でMnS介在物を晶出して成長させることにより、MnS析出物の析出を抑制し、その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減するためには、S含有量と比較してMn含有量を十分に高めればよい。Mn含有量がS含有量よりも十分に高ければ、溶鋼中において粗大なMnS介在物が生成しやすくなる。この場合、粗大MnS介在物の晶出にSが消費されるため、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が低くなる。そのため、MnS析出物の析出を抑制でき、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減できる。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られる。 By crystallizing and growing MnS inclusions in molten steel, precipitation of MnS precipitates is suppressed, and as a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions is reduced. For this purpose, the Mn content may be sufficiently increased as compared with the S content. If the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content, coarse MnS inclusions are easily generated in the molten steel. In this case, since S is consumed for crystallization of coarse MnS inclusions, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification becomes low. Therefore, precipitation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed, and the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be reduced. As a result, excellent firing characteristics can be obtained.
 具体的には、Mn含有量及びS含有量は次の式(1)を満たす。
 Mn/S≧8.0 (1)
 ここで、式(1)中の各元素記号には、対応する元素の含有量(質量%)が代入される。
Specifically, the Mn content and the S content satisfy the following formula (1).
Mn / S ≧ 8.0 (1)
Here, the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element symbol in the formula (1).
 F1=Mn/Sと定義する。F1が8.0未満であれば、溶鋼中においてMnS介在物が十分に晶出しにくい。そのため、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減できず、凝固後に、微細なMnS析出物が多数生成する。この場合、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減できないため、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。一方、F1が8.0以上であれば、S含有量と比較してMn含有量が十分に高い。この場合、適切な製造方法を用いることにより、溶鋼中においてMnS介在物が十分に晶出し、成長する。その結果、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減され、凝固後の鋼中におけるMnS析出物の析出を抑制できる。そのため、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が十分に低減でき、鋼の発銹特性が高まる。 Defined as F1 = Mn / S. If F1 is less than 8.0, MnS inclusions are not easily crystallized in the molten steel. Therefore, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are produced after solidification. In this case, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the cracking characteristics of the steel are deteriorated. On the other hand, if F1 is 8.0 or more, the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content. In this case, by using an appropriate manufacturing method, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grown in the molten steel. As a result, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
 ここで、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物のいずれかであって、円相当径が5μm以上の介在物を「特定介在物」と定義する。本明細書において、円相当径とは、ミクロ組織観察において観察される介在物又は析出物の面積を、同じ面積を有する円に換算した場合の円の直径を意味する。この場合、本実施形態ではさらに、上記化学組成を有し、式(1)を満たす機械構造用鋼において、特定介在物の総個数が40個/mm以上である。 Here, inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more are defined as “specific inclusions”. In this specification, the equivalent circle diameter means the diameter of a circle when the area of inclusions or precipitates observed in the microstructure observation is converted into a circle having the same area. In this case, in the present embodiment, the total number of specific inclusions is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more in the mechanical structural steel having the above chemical composition and satisfying the formula (1).
 鋼中の特定介在物が40個/mm以上であれば、粗大なMnS介在物が十分に晶出し、MnS析出物の生成を抑制できる。その結果、発銹の起点となるMnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を十分に低減することができる。そのため、優れた被削性と、優れた発銹特性とを両立することができる。一方、鋼中の特定介在物が40個/mm未満であれば、MnS介在物が十分に晶出されず、MnS析出物が多数生成する。その結果、MnS析出物の生成を抑制できる。その結果、発銹の起点となるMnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を十分に低減できない。その結果、優れた被削性は得られるものの、十分な発銹特性が得られない。 If the number of specific inclusions in the steel is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more, coarse MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized, and generation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed. As a result, it is possible to sufficiently reduce the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions, which are the starting points of rusting. Therefore, it is possible to achieve both excellent machinability and excellent cracking characteristics. On the other hand, if the number of specific inclusions in the steel is less than 40 / mm 2 , MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized, and a large number of MnS precipitates are generated. As a result, generation of MnS precipitates can be suppressed. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions that are the starting points of the cracking cannot be sufficiently reduced. As a result, although excellent machinability can be obtained, sufficient cracking characteristics cannot be obtained.
 以上の知見に基づいて完成した本実施形態による機械構造用鋼は、質量%で、C:0.15~0.30%未満、Si:0.01~0.80%、Mn:0.20~2.00%、P:0.030%以下、S:0.010~0.100%、Pb:0.010~0.100%、Al:0.010~0.050%、N:0.015%以下、O:0.0005~0.0030%、Cr:0.50~2.00%、Ni:0~3.50%、B:0~0.0050%、V:0~0.70%、Mo:0~0.70%、W:0~0.70%、Nb:0~0.050%未満、Cu:0~0.50%、Ti:0~0.100%、及び、Ca:0~0.0030%を含有し、残部はFe及び不純物からなり、式(1)を満たす化学組成を有する。鋼中において、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物のいずれかであって、円相当径が5μm以上である特定介在物の総個数が40個/mm以上である。
 Mn/S≧8.0 (1)
 ここで、式(1)中の各元素には、対応する元素の含有量(質量%)が代入される。
The steel for machine structural use according to the present embodiment completed based on the above knowledge is, in mass%, C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%, Si: 0.01 to 0.80%, Mn: 0.20. ~ 2.00%, P: 0.030% or less, S: 0.010 ~ 0.100%, Pb: 0.010 ~ 0.100%, Al: 0.010 ~ 0.050%, N: 0 .015% or less, O: 0.0005 to 0.0030%, Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%, Ni: 0 to 3.50%, B: 0 to 0.0050%, V: 0 to 0 70%, Mo: 0 to 0.70%, W: 0 to 0.70%, Nb: 0 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0 to 0.50%, Ti: 0 to 0.100%, And Ca: 0 to 0.0030% is contained, the balance is made of Fe and impurities, and has a chemical composition satisfying the formula (1). In steel, the total number of specific inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more is 40 / mm 2. That's it.
Mn / S ≧ 8.0 (1)
Here, the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
 上記機械構造用鋼の化学組成は、Ni:0.02~3.50%、B:0.0005~0.0050%、V:0.05~0.70%、Mo:0.05~0.70%、W:0.05~0.70%、Nb:0.001~0.050%未満、Cu:0.05~0.50%、及び、Ti:0.003~0.100%からなる群から選択される1種又は2種以上を含有してもよい。 The chemical composition of the mechanical structural steel is as follows: Ni: 0.02 to 3.50%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%, V: 0.05 to 0.70%, Mo: 0.05 to 0 .70%, W: 0.05 to 0.70%, Nb: 0.001 to less than 0.050%, Cu: 0.05 to 0.50%, and Ti: 0.003 to 0.100% You may contain 1 type, or 2 or more types selected from the group which consists of.
 上記機械構造用鋼の化学組成は、Ca:0.0001~0.0030%を含有してもよい。 The chemical composition of the steel for machine structural use may contain Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0030%.
 上記機械構造用鋼において、複合介在物の特定介在物に対する個数比率は、40%以上であってもよい。 In the machine structural steel, the number ratio of the composite inclusions to the specific inclusions may be 40% or more.
 以下、本実施形態の機械構造用鋼について詳細に説明する。化学組成における「%」は、特に断りがない限り、質量%を意味する。 Hereinafter, the steel for machine structure of the present embodiment will be described in detail. “%” In the chemical composition means mass% unless otherwise specified.
 [化学組成]
 本実施形態の機械構造用鋼の化学組成は、次の元素を含有する。
[Chemical composition]
The chemical composition of the steel for machine structural use of this embodiment contains the following elements.
 C:0.15~0.30%未満
 炭素(C)は、鋼の強度を高める。機械構造用鋼を用いて部品を製造する場合、機械構造用鋼を鍛造後、浸炭処理が実施される場合がある。この場合、Cは鋼の表層の強度を高める。C含有量が0.15%未満であれば、鋼は十分な強度が得られない。軟質な鋼においては、切削時に切り屑がつながり、工具や材料に巻き付き、それらを破損させる場合がある。C含有量が0.15%未満であればさらに、鋼の切削抵抗が高まる。一方、C含有量が0.30%以上であれば、浸炭処理後の部品の芯部の硬さが高まり、表層の強度に対する靭性のバランスが低下する。したがって、C含有量は0.15~0.30%未満である。C含有量の好ましい下限は0.16%であり、より好ましくは0.18%である。C含有量の好ましい上限は0.25%であり、より好ましくは0.23%である。
C: 0.15 to less than 0.30% Carbon (C) increases the strength of steel. When parts are manufactured using steel for machine structure, carburizing treatment may be performed after forging the steel for machine structure. In this case, C increases the strength of the steel surface layer. If the C content is less than 0.15%, the steel cannot provide sufficient strength. In soft steel, chips are connected at the time of cutting, and may wrap around tools and materials and break them. If the C content is less than 0.15%, the cutting resistance of the steel is further increased. On the other hand, if the C content is 0.30% or more, the hardness of the core part of the part after carburizing treatment increases, and the balance of toughness with respect to the strength of the surface layer decreases. Therefore, the C content is 0.15 to less than 0.30%. The minimum with preferable C content is 0.16%, More preferably, it is 0.18%. The upper limit with preferable C content is 0.25%, More preferably, it is 0.23%.
 Si:0.01~0.80%
 シリコン(Si)は、鋼を脱酸する。脱酸処理時において、Mnを添加した後にSiを添加することにより、Siは酸化物を改質する。具体的に、溶鋼中に添加されたSiは、Mnを主体とする酸化物を、Siを主体とする酸化物に改質する。Siを添加した後、Alを添加することにより、鋼中にSi及びAlを含有する複合酸化物が生成する。複合酸化物は、MnS介在物が晶出する核となる。そのため、複合酸化物は鋼の発銹特性を高める。Siはさらに、焼戻し軟化抵抗を高め、強度を高める。Si含有量が0.01%未満であれば、上記効果が得られない。
Si: 0.01 to 0.80%
Silicon (Si) deoxidizes steel. In the deoxidation treatment, Si modifies the oxide by adding Si after adding Mn. Specifically, Si added to molten steel modifies an oxide mainly composed of Mn into an oxide mainly composed of Si. After adding Si, by adding Al, a composite oxide containing Si and Al is generated in the steel. The composite oxide serves as a nucleus from which MnS inclusions crystallize. Therefore, the composite oxide enhances the glazing characteristics of the steel. Si further increases temper softening resistance and strength. If the Si content is less than 0.01%, the above effect cannot be obtained.
 一方、Siはフェライト生成元素である。Si含有量が0.80%を超えれば、鋼の表層が脱炭される場合がある。Si含有量が0.80%を超えればさらに、フェライト分率が高まり強度が低下する場合がある。したがって、Si含有量は0.01~0.80%である。焼戻し軟化抵抗を高めるためのSi含有量の好ましい下限は0.10%であり、より好ましくは0.20%である。フェライト分率を抑えるためのSi含有量の好ましい上限は0.70%であり、より好ましくは0.50%である。 On the other hand, Si is a ferrite forming element. If the Si content exceeds 0.80%, the steel surface layer may be decarburized. If the Si content exceeds 0.80%, the ferrite fraction may increase and the strength may decrease. Therefore, the Si content is 0.01 to 0.80%. The minimum with preferable Si content for raising temper softening resistance is 0.10%, More preferably, it is 0.20%. The upper limit with preferable Si content for suppressing a ferrite fraction is 0.70%, More preferably, it is 0.50%.
 Mn:0.20~2.00%
 マンガン(Mn)はMnS介在物と、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物とを生成し、鋼の被削性を高める。
Mn: 0.20 to 2.00%
Manganese (Mn) generates MnS inclusions and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb, and improves the machinability of steel.
 Mnはさらに、鋼を脱酸する。Mnの脱酸力はSiやAlと比較して弱い。そのため、Mnを多量に含有してもよい。溶鋼中に他の強脱酸元素が存在しない場合、溶鋼中にMnを主体とする酸化物が生成する。その後、溶鋼に他の強脱酸元素(Si、Al)が添加されると、酸化物中のMnが溶鋼中に排出され、酸化物が改質される。以下、改質された酸化物を複合酸化物と称する。酸化物から溶鋼中に排出されたMnは、Sと結合してMnS介在物を形成する。なお、酸化物の改質により生成した複合酸化物は、MnS介在物が晶出する核になりやすい。そのため、複合酸化物が生成された場合、MnS介在物の晶出が促進される。晶出によって生成したMnS介在物はさらに、複合介在物を生成しやすい。 Mn further deoxidizes steel. The deoxidizing power of Mn is weak compared to Si and Al. Therefore, a large amount of Mn may be contained. When no other strong deoxidizing element is present in the molten steel, an oxide mainly composed of Mn is formed in the molten steel. Thereafter, when another strong deoxidizing element (Si, Al) is added to the molten steel, Mn in the oxide is discharged into the molten steel and the oxide is modified. Hereinafter, the modified oxide is referred to as a composite oxide. Mn discharged from the oxide into the molten steel combines with S to form MnS inclusions. In addition, the composite oxide produced | generated by modification | reformation of an oxide tends to become the nucleus which MnS inclusion crystallizes. Therefore, when a composite oxide is produced, crystallization of MnS inclusions is promoted. Further, the MnS inclusions generated by crystallization are likely to form composite inclusions.
 Mn含有量が0.20%未満の場合、MnS介在物が十分に晶出しにくい。そのため、凝固後の鋼中にMnS析出物が多数生成する。この場合、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び複合介在物の総個数が増加する。そのため、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。一方、Mn含有量が2.00%を超えれば、鋼の焼入れ性が高くなりすぎ、その結果、鋼の硬さが高くなりすぎる。この場合、鋼の被削性が低下する。この場合さらに、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。したがって、Mn含有量は0.20~2.00%である。Mn含有量の好ましい下限は0.50%である。Mn含有量の好ましい上限は1.50%であり、より好ましくは1.20%である。 When the Mn content is less than 0.20%, MnS inclusions are not easily crystallized. Therefore, a large number of MnS precipitates are generated in the solidified steel. In this case, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases. As a result, the galling characteristics of the steel are reduced. On the other hand, if the Mn content exceeds 2.00%, the hardenability of the steel becomes too high, and as a result, the hardness of the steel becomes too high. In this case, the machinability of steel decreases. In this case, the hot workability of the steel further decreases. Therefore, the Mn content is 0.20 to 2.00%. A preferable lower limit of the Mn content is 0.50%. The upper limit with preferable Mn content is 1.50%, More preferably, it is 1.20%.
 P:0.030%以下
 りん(P)は、不可避に含有される。Pは鋼を脆化し、被削性を高める。一方、P含有量が0.030%を超えれば、熱間延性が低下する。この場合、圧延疵が発生する等、生産性が低下する。したがって、P含有量は0.030%以下である。被削性を高めるためのP含有量の好ましい下限は0.005%である。この場合、被削性、特に、切り屑処理性が高まる。P含有量の好ましい上限は0.015%である。
P: 0.030% or less Phosphorus (P) is unavoidably contained. P embrittles steel and improves machinability. On the other hand, if the P content exceeds 0.030%, the hot ductility decreases. In this case, productivity is reduced, such as the occurrence of rolling wrinkles. Therefore, the P content is 0.030% or less. The minimum with preferable P content for improving machinability is 0.005%. In this case, machinability, in particular, chip disposal is improved. The upper limit with preferable P content is 0.015%.
 S:0.010~0.100%
 硫黄(S)は、鋼中でMnSを生成し、被削性を高める。MnSは特に、工具摩耗を抑制する。S含有量が0.010%未満であれば、MnSは十分に晶出せず、MnSとPbとを含有する複合介在物が生成しにくい。その結果、発銹特性が低下する。一方、S含有量が0.100%を超えれば、Sが粒界に偏析して、鋼が脆化し、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。したがって、S含有量は0.010~0.100%である。被削性及び機械特性のうち、機械特性を優先する場合のS含有量の好ましい下限は0.015%であり、好ましい上限は0.030%である。被削性を優先する場合のS含有量の好ましい下限は0.030%であり、好ましい上限は0.050%である。
S: 0.010 to 0.100%
Sulfur (S) generates MnS in steel and improves machinability. In particular, MnS suppresses tool wear. If the S content is less than 0.010%, MnS does not crystallize sufficiently, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb are difficult to generate. As a result, the sprout characteristics are degraded. On the other hand, if the S content exceeds 0.100%, S segregates at the grain boundaries, the steel becomes brittle, and the hot workability of the steel decreases. Accordingly, the S content is 0.010 to 0.100%. Among machinability and mechanical properties, the preferred lower limit of the S content when giving priority to mechanical properties is 0.015%, and the preferred upper limit is 0.030%. The preferable lower limit of the S content when priority is given to machinability is 0.030%, and the preferable upper limit is 0.050%.
 Pb:0.010~0.100%
 鉛(Pb)は単独でPb介在物(Pb粒)を生成し、鋼の被削性を高める。Pbはさらに、MnS介在物と結合して複合介在物を生成し、鋼の被削性を高め、特に切り屑処理性を高める。Pb含有量が0.010%未満であれば、上記効果が得られない。一方、Pb含有量が0.100%を超えれば、被削性は高まるものの、鋼が脆化する。その結果、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。Pb含有量が0.100%を超えればさらに、Pb介在物が過剰に増加するため、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。したがって、Pb含有量は0.010~0.100%である。複合介在物の生成を促進し、被削性を高めるためのPb含有量の好ましい下限は0.020%であり、より好ましくは0.025%である。発銹特性を高めるためのPb含有量の好ましい上限は0.050%である。
Pb: 0.010 to 0.100%
Lead (Pb) alone generates Pb inclusions (Pb grains) and improves the machinability of steel. Furthermore, Pb combines with MnS inclusions to form composite inclusions, which enhances the machinability of steel, and in particular improves chip disposal. If the Pb content is less than 0.010%, the above effect cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the Pb content exceeds 0.100%, the machinability increases, but the steel becomes brittle. As a result, the hot workability of the steel is reduced. If the Pb content exceeds 0.100%, the Pb inclusions are excessively increased, so that the galling property of the steel is deteriorated. Therefore, the Pb content is 0.010 to 0.100%. The preferable lower limit of the Pb content for promoting the formation of composite inclusions and enhancing the machinability is 0.020%, more preferably 0.025%. The upper limit with preferable Pb content for improving the glazing property is 0.050%.
 Al:0.010~0.050%
 アルミニウム(Al)は、鋼を脱酸する。本発明による機械構造用鋼では、凝固時の空孔及び表面疵の生成を抑制するため、Alキルドによる脱酸を実施する。後述のとおり、溶鋼中にMn、Siに次いでAlを添加して脱酸を行えば、鋼中の酸化物が改質され、Si及びAlを含有する複合酸化物が生成する。複合酸化物はMnS介在物の晶出核になりやすい。そのため、MnS介在物が分散して晶出し、成長して粗大化しやすく、かつ、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物が生成しやすい。この場合、鋼の被削性が高まる。MnS介在物が分散して晶出した場合はさらに、微細なMnS析出物の析出が抑制される。この場合、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び複合介在物の総個数が増加する。そのため、鋼の発銹特性が高まる。Alはさらに、Nと結合してAlNを形成して、各種の熱処理におけるオーステナイト粒の粗大化を抑制する。Al含有量が0.010%未満であれば、上記効果が得られない。
Al: 0.010 to 0.050%
Aluminum (Al) deoxidizes steel. In the steel for machine structure according to the present invention, deoxidation with Al kill is performed in order to suppress the formation of vacancies and surface defects during solidification. As will be described later, when deoxidation is performed by adding Al after Mn and Si in the molten steel, the oxide in the steel is modified to produce a composite oxide containing Si and Al. The composite oxide tends to become a crystallization nucleus of MnS inclusions. Therefore, MnS inclusions disperse and crystallize, grow and coarsen easily, and complex inclusions containing MnS and Pb are easily generated. In this case, the machinability of the steel is increased. When the MnS inclusions are dispersed and crystallized, the precipitation of fine MnS precipitates is further suppressed. In this case, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases. As a result, the glazing characteristics of the steel are enhanced. Al further combines with N to form AlN, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening in various heat treatments. If the Al content is less than 0.010%, the above effect cannot be obtained.
 一方、Al含有量が0.050%を超えれば、粗大な複合酸化物が生成しやすい。粗大な複合酸化物が鋼中に生成した場合、鋼に表面疵が発生しやすい。粗大な複合酸化物が鋼中に生成した場合さらに、鋼の疲労強度が低下する。Al含有量が0.050%を超えればさらに、過度に脱酸が進み、溶鋼中の酸素量が低下する。この場合、MnS介在物が形成されにくく、鋼の被削性(特に、工具摩耗抑制)が低下する。この場合さらに、MnS介在物にPbが結合した複合介在物が生成しにくくなり、Pb介在物が単独で鋼中に多数残存する。その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が増加し、発銹特性が低下する。したがって、Al含有量は0.010~0.050%である。AlNの生成による結晶粒の粗大化を抑制する効果をさらに得るためのAl含有量の好ましい下限は0.015%であり、より好ましくは0.020%である。Al含有量の好ましい上限は0.035%である。本明細書にいうAl含有量は、酸可溶Al(sol.Al)の含有量を意味する。 On the other hand, if the Al content exceeds 0.050%, a coarse composite oxide is likely to be generated. When coarse complex oxide is produced in steel, surface flaws are likely to occur in the steel. When coarse complex oxide is formed in steel, the fatigue strength of the steel is further reduced. If the Al content exceeds 0.050%, deoxidation proceeds excessively, and the amount of oxygen in the molten steel decreases. In this case, MnS inclusions are not easily formed, and the machinability (particularly, tool wear suppression) of steel is reduced. In this case, furthermore, it becomes difficult to produce composite inclusions in which Pb is bonded to MnS inclusions, and many Pb inclusions remain alone in the steel. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases, and the firing characteristics deteriorate. Therefore, the Al content is 0.010 to 0.050%. The preferable lower limit of the Al content for further obtaining the effect of suppressing the coarsening of crystal grains due to the generation of AlN is 0.015%, and more preferably 0.020%. The upper limit with preferable Al content is 0.035%. The Al content referred to in this specification means the content of acid-soluble Al (sol. Al).
 N:0.015%以下
 窒素(N)は不可避に含有される。NはAlと結合してAlNを形成し、熱処理時のオーステナイト粒の粗大化を抑制し、鋼の強度を高める。一方、N含有量が0.015%を超えれば、鋼の切削抵抗が高まり、被削性が低下する。N含有量が0.015%を超えればさらに、熱間加工性が低下する。したがって、N含有量は0.015%以下である。N含有量の好ましい下限は0.002%であり、より好ましくは0.004%である。N含有量の好ましい上限は0.012%であり、より好ましくは0.008%である。本明細書でいうN含有量は、全N(t-N)の含有量を意味する。
N: 0.015% or less Nitrogen (N) is inevitably contained. N combines with Al to form AlN, suppresses coarsening of austenite grains during heat treatment, and increases the strength of the steel. On the other hand, if the N content exceeds 0.015%, the cutting resistance of the steel increases and the machinability decreases. If N content exceeds 0.015%, hot workability will fall further. Therefore, the N content is 0.015% or less. The minimum with preferable N content is 0.002%, More preferably, it is 0.004%. The upper limit with preferable N content is 0.012%, More preferably, it is 0.008%. As used herein, the N content means the total N (tN) content.
 O:0.0005~0.0030%
 酸素(O)は酸化物中に含まれるだけでなく、MnS介在物にも含まれる。Oは、MnS介在物の晶出核となる複合酸化物を生成する。O含有量が0.0005%未満であれば、複合酸化物の生成量が不足し、溶鋼中でMnS介在物が晶出しにくくなる。この場合、鋼の被削性が低下する。この場合さらに、凝固後に微細なMnS析出物が多数生成する。その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が増加し、発銹特性が低下する。O含有量が0.0030%を超えればさらに、粗大なアルミナ系酸化物が生成し、切削工具の摩耗を促進するため、鋼の被削性が低下する。したがって、O含有量は0.0005~0.0030%である。鋼の被削性及び鋼の発銹特性をさらに高めるためのO含有量の好ましい下限は0.0007%であり、より好ましくは0.0010%である。O含有量の好ましい上限は0.0025%であり、より好ましくは0.0020%である。本明細書でいうO含有量は、全酸素(t-O)の含有量を意味する。
O: 0.0005 to 0.0030%
Oxygen (O) is included not only in the oxide but also in MnS inclusions. O produces | generates the complex oxide used as the crystallization nucleus of a MnS inclusion. If the O content is less than 0.0005%, the amount of complex oxide produced is insufficient, and MnS inclusions are difficult to crystallize in the molten steel. In this case, the machinability of steel decreases. In this case, a large number of fine MnS precipitates are further formed after solidification. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases, and the firing characteristics deteriorate. If the O content exceeds 0.0030%, coarse alumina-based oxides are generated, and the wear of the cutting tool is promoted, so that the machinability of the steel is lowered. Therefore, the O content is 0.0005 to 0.0030%. A preferable lower limit of the O content for further enhancing the machinability of the steel and the cracking characteristics of the steel is 0.0007%, more preferably 0.0010%. The upper limit with preferable O content is 0.0025%, More preferably, it is 0.0020%. As used herein, the O content means the total oxygen (t—O) content.
 Cr:0.50~2.00%
 クロム(Cr)は鋼中に固溶して、鋼の焼入れ性及び焼戻し軟化抵抗を高め、鋼の強度を高める。その結果、鋼の転動疲労特性が高まる。Crはさらに、表面硬化処理として浸炭処理を実施する場合、硬化層深さを深くする。Cr含有量が0.50%未満であれば、上記効果が得られない。一方、Cr含有量が2.00%を超えれば、焼入れ性が高くなりすぎ、冷却時に過冷組織(マルテンサイト)を生成し、鋼が硬くなりすぎる。この場合、鋼の被削性が低下する。Cr含有量が2.00%を超えればさらに、オーステナイトが低温でも安定化し、鋼が脆化する場合がある。したがって、Cr含有量は0.50~2.00%である。Cr含有量の好ましい下限は0.70%であり、より好ましくは0.90%である。Cr含有量の好ましい上限は1.80%であり、より好ましくは1.60%である。
Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%
Chromium (Cr) dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability and temper softening resistance of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. As a result, the rolling fatigue characteristics of the steel are enhanced. Further, when the carburizing treatment is performed as the surface hardening treatment, Cr deepens the hardened layer depth. If the Cr content is less than 0.50%, the above effect cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the Cr content exceeds 2.00%, the hardenability becomes too high, and a supercooled structure (martensite) is generated during cooling, and the steel becomes too hard. In this case, the machinability of steel decreases. If the Cr content exceeds 2.00%, the austenite may be stabilized even at a low temperature, and the steel may become brittle. Therefore, the Cr content is 0.50 to 2.00%. The minimum with preferable Cr content is 0.70%, More preferably, it is 0.90%. The upper limit with preferable Cr content is 1.80%, More preferably, it is 1.60%.
 本実施の形態による機械構造用鋼の化学組成の残部は、Fe及び不純物からなる。ここで、不純物とは、機械構造用鋼を工業的に製造する際に、原料としての鉱石、スクラップ、または製造環境などから混入されるものであって、本実施形態の機械構造用鋼に悪影響を与えない範囲で許容されるものを意味する。 The remainder of the chemical composition of the machine structural steel according to the present embodiment is composed of Fe and impurities. Here, the impurities are mixed from ore as a raw material, scrap, or the manufacturing environment when industrially producing steel for machine structural use, and have an adverse effect on the steel for machine structural use of the present embodiment. It means that it is allowed in the range that does not give.
 [任意元素について] [About optional elements]
 本実施形態の機械構造用鋼の化学組成はさらに、Ni、B、V、Mo、W、Nb、Cu、及び、Tiからなる群から選択される1種又は2種以上を含有してもよい。 The chemical composition of the steel for machine structure of the present embodiment may further contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Ni, B, V, Mo, W, Nb, Cu, and Ti. .
 Ni:0~3.50%
 ニッケル(Ni)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Niは鋼に固溶して鋼の焼入れ性を高め、鋼の強度を高める。Niはさらに、マトリクスの延性も高める。Niはさらに、鋼の靭性を高める。Niはさらに、鋼の耐食性を高める。Niが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、Ni含有量が3.50%を超えれば、残留オーステナイトが多く残存する。この場合、加工誘起変態により、残留オーステナイトの一部がマルテンサイトに変態し、鋼の延性が低下する。したがって、Ni含有量は0~3.50%である。
Ni: 0 to 3.50%
Nickel (Ni) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Ni dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. Ni further increases the ductility of the matrix. Ni further increases the toughness of the steel. Ni further enhances the corrosion resistance of the steel. If Ni is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Ni content exceeds 3.50%, a large amount of retained austenite remains. In this case, part of the retained austenite is transformed into martensite due to the processing-induced transformation, and the ductility of the steel is lowered. Therefore, the Ni content is 0 to 3.50%.
 上記効果を安定して得るためのNi含有量の好ましい下限は0.02%であり、より好ましくは0.05%である。残留オーステナイトをさらに抑制するためのNi含有量の好ましい上限は2.50%であり、より好ましくは2.00%である。靭性を優先する場合、Ni含有量の好ましい下限は0.20%である。なお、NiはCuを無害化して靭性を高める。鋼がCuを含有する場合、Ni含有量の好ましい下限は、Cu含有量以上である。 The preferable lower limit of the Ni content for stably obtaining the above effect is 0.02%, more preferably 0.05%. The upper limit with preferable Ni content for further suppressing a retained austenite is 2.50%, More preferably, it is 2.00%. When giving priority to toughness, the preferable lower limit of the Ni content is 0.20%. Ni detoxifies Cu and increases toughness. When steel contains Cu, the minimum with preferable Ni content is more than Cu content.
 B:0~0.0050%
 ボロン(B)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Bは鋼の焼入れ性を高め、鋼の強度を高める。Bはさらに、靭性を低下するP、Sの粒界への偏析を抑制し、破壊特性を高める。Bが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、B含有量が0.0050%を超えれば、BNが多量に生成して鋼が脆化する。したがって、B含有量は0~0.0050%である。窒化物生成元素であるTi又はNbを含有した場合のB含有量の好ましい下限は0.0005%である。B含有量の好ましい上限は0.0020%である。
B: 0 to 0.0050%
Boron (B) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, B increases the hardenability of the steel and increases the strength of the steel. B further suppresses segregation of P and S to the grain boundary, which lowers toughness, and improves fracture characteristics. If B is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the B content exceeds 0.0050%, a large amount of BN is generated and the steel becomes brittle. Therefore, the B content is 0 to 0.0050%. The preferable lower limit of the B content when Ti or Nb which is a nitride-forming element is contained is 0.0005%. The upper limit with preferable B content is 0.0020%.
 V:0~0.70%
 バナジウム(V)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Vは焼戻し時及び窒化処理時にV炭化物、V窒化物、又はV炭窒化物として析出し、鋼の強度を高める。V析出物(V炭化物、V窒化物及びV炭窒化物)はさらに、オーステナイト粒の粗大化を抑制し、鋼の靭性を高める。Vはさらに、鋼に固溶して、鋼の焼戻し軟化抵抗を高める。Vが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。
V: 0 to 0.70%
Vanadium (V) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, V precipitates as V carbide, V nitride, or V carbonitride during tempering and nitriding, and increases the strength of the steel. V precipitates (V carbide, V nitride and V carbonitride) further suppress the austenite grain coarsening and increase the toughness of the steel. V further dissolves in the steel and increases the temper softening resistance of the steel. If V is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
 一方、V含有量が0.70%を超えれば、V析出物がA点以上でも生成する。A点以上で生成したV析出物は、鋼に固溶しにくく、未溶解析出物として鋼中に残存する。未溶解析出物が残存する場合、固溶V量が低減する。そのため、鋼の焼戻し軟化抵抗が低下する。未溶解析出物が残存する場合さらに、その後の熱処理により微細なV析出物が析出しにくい。この場合、鋼の強度が低下する。したがって、V含有量は0~0.70%である。上記効果を安定して得るためのV含有量の好ましい下限は0.05%であり、より好ましくは0.10%である。V含有量の好ましい上限は0.50%であり、より好ましくは0.30%である。 On the other hand, V content if it exceeds 0.70%, V precipitates to produce even three or more points A. A V precipitates generated at 3 points or more are not easily dissolved in steel and remain in the steel as undissolved precipitates. When undissolved precipitates remain, the amount of solid solution V decreases. Therefore, the tempering softening resistance of steel falls. In the case where undissolved precipitates remain, fine V precipitates are hardly deposited by subsequent heat treatment. In this case, the strength of the steel decreases. Therefore, the V content is 0 to 0.70%. The minimum with preferable V content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.05%, More preferably, it is 0.10%. The upper limit with preferable V content is 0.50%, More preferably, it is 0.30%.
 Mo:0~0.70%
 モリブデン(Mo)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Moは焼戻しや窒化処理等のA点以下の低温での熱処理において、Mo炭化物として析出する。そのため、鋼の強度及び焼戻し軟化抵抗が高まる。Moはさらに、鋼に固溶して、鋼の焼入れ性を高める。Moが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、Mo含有量が0.70%を超えれば、鋼の焼入れ性が高くなりすぎる。この場合、圧延や、伸線前の軟化熱処理等で過冷組織が生じやすくなる。したがって、Mo含有量は0~0.70%である。
Mo: 0 to 0.70%
Molybdenum (Mo) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Mo precipitates as Mo carbide in heat treatment at a low temperature of A 1 point or less such as tempering or nitriding. Therefore, the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel are increased. Mo further dissolves in the steel to enhance the hardenability of the steel. If Mo is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Mo content exceeds 0.70%, the hardenability of the steel becomes too high. In this case, a supercooled structure is likely to be generated by rolling, softening heat treatment before wire drawing, or the like. Therefore, the Mo content is 0 to 0.70%.
 上記効果を安定して得るためのMo含有量の好ましい下限は0.05%であり、より好ましくは0.10%であり、さらに好ましくは0.15%である。鋼のミクロ組織にフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトを安定して得るためのMo含有量の好ましい上限は0.40%であり、より好ましくは0.30%である。 The preferable lower limit of the Mo content for stably obtaining the above effect is 0.05%, more preferably 0.10%, and still more preferably 0.15%. A preferable upper limit of the Mo content for stably obtaining ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the steel microstructure is 0.40%, and more preferably 0.30%.
 W:0~0.70%
 タングステン(W)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Wは鋼中でW炭化物として析出し、鋼の強度及び焼戻し軟化抵抗を高める。W炭化物は、A点以下の低温で生成する。そのため、Wは、VやNb、Ti等とは異なり、未溶解析出物を生成しにくい。その結果、W炭化物は、析出強化により鋼の強度及び焼戻し軟化抵抗を高める。Wはさらに、鋼に固溶して鋼の焼入れ性を高め、鋼の強度を高める。Wが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。
W: 0 to 0.70%
Tungsten (W) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, W precipitates as W carbide in the steel, increasing the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel. W carbide, generates at a low temperature of less than three points A. Therefore, unlike V, Nb, Ti, etc., W hardly generates undissolved precipitates. As a result, W carbide increases the strength and temper softening resistance of the steel by precipitation strengthening. W further dissolves in the steel to increase the hardenability of the steel and increase the strength of the steel. If W is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
 一方、W含有量が0.70%を超えれば、過冷組織が生成しやすくなり、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。したがって、W含有量は0~0.70%である。鋼の焼戻し軟化抵抗を安定して高めるためのW含有量の好ましい下限は0.05%であり、より好ましくは0.10%である。鋼のミクロ組織にフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトを安定して得るためのW含有量の好ましい上限は0.40%であり、より好ましくは0.30%である。 On the other hand, if the W content exceeds 0.70%, a supercooled structure is likely to be generated, and the hot workability of steel decreases. Therefore, the W content is 0 to 0.70%. A preferable lower limit of the W content for stably increasing the temper softening resistance of the steel is 0.05%, more preferably 0.10%. A preferable upper limit of the W content for stably obtaining ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the steel microstructure is 0.40%, and more preferably 0.30%.
 W及びMoは窒化物を生成しにくい。そのため、これらの元素は、N含有量の影響を受けずに鋼の焼戻し軟化抵抗を高めることができる。高い焼戻し軟化抵抗を得るためのW及びMoの好ましい総含有量は0.10~0.30%である。 W and Mo hardly generate nitrides. Therefore, these elements can increase the temper softening resistance of steel without being affected by the N content. The preferred total content of W and Mo for obtaining high temper softening resistance is 0.10 to 0.30%.
 Nb:0~0.050%未満
 ニオブ(Nb)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、NbはNb窒化物、Nb炭化物、又はNb炭窒化物を生成し、焼入れ時や焼準時においてオーステナイト粒の粗大化を抑制する。Nbはさらに、析出強化により鋼の強度を高める。Nbが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、Nb含有量が0.050%を超えれば、未固溶析出物が生成して鋼の靭性が低下する。Nb含有量が0.050%を超えればさらに、過冷組織が生成しやすくなり、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。したがって、Nb含有量は0~0.050%未満である。上記効果を安定して得るためのNb含有量の好ましい下限は0.001%であり、より好ましくは0.005%である。Nb含有量の好ましい上限は0.030%であり、より好ましくは0.015%である。
Nb: 0 to less than 0.050% Niobium (Nb) is an optional element and may not be contained. When Nb is contained, Nb produces Nb nitride, Nb carbide, or Nb carbonitride, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening during quenching and normalization. Nb further increases the strength of the steel by precipitation strengthening. If Nb is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Nb content exceeds 0.050%, undissolved precipitates are generated and the toughness of the steel is lowered. If the Nb content exceeds 0.050%, a supercooled structure is likely to be generated, and the hot workability of steel is reduced. Therefore, the Nb content is 0 to less than 0.050%. The minimum with preferable Nb content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.001%, More preferably, it is 0.005%. The upper limit with preferable Nb content is 0.030%, More preferably, it is 0.015%.
 Cu:0~0.50%
 銅(Cu)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Cuは脱炭を防止する。Cuはさらに、Niと同様に耐食性を高める。Cuが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、Cu含有量が0.50%を超えれば、鋼が脆化して圧延疵が発生しやすくなる。したがって、Cu含有量は0~0.50%である。上記効果を安定して得るためのCu含有量の好ましい下限は0.05%であり、より好ましくは0.10%である。Cuを0.30%以上含有する場合、Ni含有量がCu含有量よりも高ければ、熱間延性を維持できる。
Cu: 0 to 0.50%
Copper (Cu) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Cu prevents decarburization. Cu further enhances corrosion resistance like Ni. If Cu is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Cu content exceeds 0.50%, the steel becomes embrittled and rolls are likely to occur. Therefore, the Cu content is 0 to 0.50%. The minimum with preferable Cu content for acquiring the said effect stably is 0.05%, More preferably, it is 0.10%. When Cu is contained in an amount of 0.30% or more, hot ductility can be maintained if the Ni content is higher than the Cu content.
 Ti:0~0.100%
 チタン(Ti)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、Tiは窒化物、炭化物、又は炭窒化物を生成し、焼入れ時や焼準時においてオーステナイト粒の粗大化を抑制する。Tiはさらに、析出強化により鋼の強度を高める。Tiはさらに、鋼を脱酸する。Tiはさらに、Bを含有する場合、固溶Nと結合して固溶B量を維持する。この場合、焼入れ性が高まる。Tiが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。
Ti: 0 to 0.100%
Titanium (Ti) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Ti produces nitrides, carbides, or carbonitrides, and suppresses austenite grain coarsening during quenching and normalization. Ti further increases the strength of the steel by precipitation strengthening. Ti further deoxidizes the steel. When Ti further contains B, it combines with solute N to maintain the amount of solute B. In this case, hardenability increases. If Ti is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent.
 一方、Tiは上記窒化物及び硫化物を生成するため、MnS介在物及び複合介在物に影響する。具体的には、Ti含有量が0.100%を超えれば、MnS介在物の晶出量が減少し、複合介在物の生成も減少する。この場合、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。Ti含有量が高すぎればさらに、窒化物及び硫化物を生成して疲労強度が低下する。したがって、Ti含有量は0~0.100%である。上記効果を有効に得るためのTi含有量の好ましい下限は0.003%である。特に、Bを含有した場合であって、固溶Nを低減するためのTi含有量の好ましい下限は0.005%である。耐食性を高めるためのTi含有量の好ましい上限は0.090%であり、より好ましくは0.085%である。 On the other hand, since Ti generates the nitrides and sulfides, it affects MnS inclusions and composite inclusions. Specifically, when the Ti content exceeds 0.100%, the crystallization amount of MnS inclusions decreases and the generation of composite inclusions also decreases. In this case, the cracking characteristics of the steel are reduced. If the Ti content is too high, further, nitrides and sulfides are generated and the fatigue strength decreases. Therefore, the Ti content is 0 to 0.100%. A preferable lower limit of the Ti content for effectively obtaining the above effect is 0.003%. In particular, when B is contained, the preferable lower limit of the Ti content for reducing the solid solution N is 0.005%. The upper limit with preferable Ti content for improving corrosion resistance is 0.090%, More preferably, it is 0.085%.
 本実施形態の機械構造用鋼はさらに、Caを含有してもよい。 The mechanical structural steel of this embodiment may further contain Ca.
 Ca:0~0.0030%
 カルシウム(Ca)は任意元素であり、含有されなくてもよい。含有される場合、CaはCaS又は(Mn,Ca)Sを生成してMnS介在物を球状化し、工具摩耗量を低減する。その結果、鋼の被削性が高まる。Caが少しでも含有されれば、上記効果がある程度得られる。一方、Ca含有量が0.0030%を超えれば、酸化物系介在物が粗大化し、鋼の疲労強度が低下する。したがって、Ca含有量は0~0.0030%である。被削性をより高めるためのCa含有量の好ましい下限は0.0001%である。被削性よりも疲労強度を優先する場合、Ca含有量の好ましい上限は0.0015%であり、より好ましくは0.0003%である。
Ca: 0 to 0.0030%
Calcium (Ca) is an optional element and may not be contained. When contained, Ca generates CaS or (Mn, Ca) S to spheroidize the MnS inclusions and reduce the amount of tool wear. As a result, the machinability of the steel is increased. If Ca is contained even a little, the above effect can be obtained to some extent. On the other hand, if the Ca content exceeds 0.0030%, the oxide inclusions become coarse and the fatigue strength of the steel decreases. Therefore, the Ca content is 0 to 0.0030%. A preferable lower limit of the Ca content for further improving the machinability is 0.0001%. When giving priority to fatigue strength over machinability, the preferable upper limit of Ca content is 0.0015%, more preferably 0.0003%.
 [式(1)について]
 本実施形態の機械構造用鋼の化学組成はさらに、式(1)を満たす。
 Mn/S≧8.0 (1)
 ここで、式(1)中の各元素には、対応する元素の含有量(質量%)が代入される。
[Regarding Formula (1)]
The chemical composition of the machine structural steel of this embodiment further satisfies the formula (1).
Mn / S ≧ 8.0 (1)
Here, the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
 F1=Mn/Sと定義する。F1はS含有量に対するMn含有量を意味する。F1が8.0未満であれば、MnS介在物が十分に晶出しにくい。そのため、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減できず、凝固後に、微細なMnS析出物が多数生成する。この場合、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が低減できないため、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減できない場合さらに、凝固後の固溶Sが結晶粒界に残留する。その結果、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する場合がある。 Defined as F1 = Mn / S. F1 means Mn content with respect to S content. If F1 is less than 8.0, MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized. Therefore, the amount of solute S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are produced after solidification. In this case, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the galling property of steel is deteriorated. When the amount of solid solution S in the steel after solidification cannot be reduced sufficiently, the solid solution S after solidification remains at the grain boundaries. As a result, the hot workability of steel may be reduced.
 一方、F1が8.0以上であれば、S含有量と比較してMn含有量が十分に高い。この場合、溶鋼中においてMnS介在物が十分に晶出し、成長する。その結果、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減され、凝固後の鋼中におけるMnS析出物の析出を抑制することができる。そのため、鋼中のMnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が十分に低減でき、鋼の発銹特性が高まる。鋼の発銹特性を高めるためのF1の好ましい下限は10.0であり、より好ましくは20.0である。 On the other hand, if F1 is 8.0 or more, the Mn content is sufficiently higher than the S content. In this case, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow in the molten steel. As a result, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. Therefore, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions in the steel can be sufficiently reduced, and the firing characteristics of the steel are enhanced. A preferable lower limit of F1 for enhancing the cracking characteristics of steel is 10.0, and more preferably 20.0.
 [鋼のミクロ組織について]
 本発明による機械構造用鋼のミクロ組織は、主としてフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトからなる。具体的に、上記化学組成の機械構造用鋼の、ミクロ組織におけるフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトの合計面積率は、99%以上である。
[About the microstructure of steel]
The microstructure of the mechanical structural steel according to the present invention is mainly composed of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite. Specifically, the total area ratio of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the microstructure of the mechanical structural steel having the above chemical composition is 99% or more.
 ミクロ組織中のフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトの合計面積率は、次の方法で測定できる。機械構造用鋼からサンプルを採取する。たとえば、機械構造用鋼が棒鋼又は線材である場合、横断面(軸方向に垂直な面)のうち、表面と中心軸とを結ぶ半径Rの中央部(以下、R/2部という)からサンプルを採取する。R/2部のサンプルの横断面(表面)のうち、機械構造用鋼の中心軸と垂直な表面を観察面とする。観察面を研磨した後、3%硝酸アルコール(ナイタル腐食液)にてエッチングする。エッチングされた観察面を200倍の光学顕微鏡にて観察して、任意の5視野の写真画像を生成する。 The total area ratio of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in the microstructure can be measured by the following method. A sample is taken from the machine structural steel. For example, when the machine structural steel is a steel bar or a wire rod, a sample is taken from the central portion of the radius R (hereinafter referred to as R / 2 portion) connecting the surface and the central axis in the cross section (surface perpendicular to the axial direction). Collect. Of the cross section (surface) of the R / 2 part sample, the surface perpendicular to the central axis of the machine structural steel is taken as the observation surface. After the observation surface is polished, it is etched with 3% nitric acid alcohol (nitral etchant). The etched observation surface is observed with a 200 × optical microscope, and photographic images with arbitrary five fields of view are generated.
 各視野において、フェライト、パーライト、ベイナイト等の各相は、相ごとにコントラストが異なる。したがって、コントラストに基づいて、各相を特定する。特定された相のうち、各視野でのフェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトの合計面積(μm)を求める。各視野での合計面積を全ての視野(5視野)で合計し、全ての視野の総面積に対する比を求める。求めた比を、フェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトの合計面積率(%)と定義する。 In each field of view, each phase such as ferrite, pearlite, and bainite has a different contrast for each phase. Therefore, each phase is specified based on the contrast. Among the identified phases, the total area (μm 2 ) of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in each visual field is obtained. The total area in each field is summed for all fields (5 fields), and the ratio to the total area of all fields is determined. The obtained ratio is defined as the total area ratio (%) of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite.
 [特定介在物の個数TN]
 本発明による機械構造用鋼は、鋼中において、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物のいずれかであって、円相当径が5μm以上である介在物(つまり、特定介在物)の総個数TNが40個/mm以上である。
[Number of specific inclusions TN]
The steel for machine structural use according to the present invention is one of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb in steel, and an inclusion having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more ( That is, the total number TN of specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more.
 特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm以上であれば、円相当径が5μm以上の粗大なMnS介在物が十分に晶出しており、その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を十分に低減できている。そのため、優れた被削性と優れた発銹特性とを両立することができる。一方、鋼中の特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であれば、円相当径が5μm以上の粗大なMnS介在物が十分に晶出されておらず、その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を十分に低減できていない。そのため、十分な発銹特性は得られない。特定介在物の個数TNの好ましい下限は80個/mmであり、より好ましくは150個/mmである。特定介在物の個数TNの好ましい上限は300個/mmである。なお、特定介在物の円相当径の上限は特に限定されないが、たとえば、200μmである。 When the number of specific inclusions TN is 40 / mm 2 or more, coarse MnS inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more are sufficiently crystallized. As a result, MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions The total number of objects and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced. Therefore, it is possible to achieve both excellent machinability and excellent cracking characteristics. On the other hand, if the number TN of specific inclusions in the steel is less than 40 / mm 2 , coarse MnS inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more are not sufficiently crystallized, and as a result, MnS inclusions are obtained. The total number of MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be sufficiently reduced. For this reason, sufficient firing characteristics cannot be obtained. The minimum with the preferable number TN of specific inclusions is 80 pieces / mm < 2 >, More preferably, it is 150 pieces / mm < 2 >. A preferable upper limit of the number TN of specific inclusions is 300 / mm 2 . In addition, although the upper limit of the circle equivalent diameter of a specific inclusion is not specifically limited, For example, it is 200 micrometers.
 [特定介在物のうち、複合介在物の個数の比(複合比率)RA]
 好ましくは、円相当径が5μm以上である複合介在物の総個数(個/mm)の、特定介在物に対する個数(個/mm)の比(以下、「複合比率」ともいう)RAが40%以上である。
[Ratio of the number of composite inclusions among specific inclusions (composite ratio) RA]
Preferably, circle the total number of equivalent diameter of the composite inclusions is 5μm or more (number / mm 2), the ratio of the number (pieces / mm 2) for the particular inclusions (hereinafter, also referred to as "composite ratio") RA is 40% or more.
 上述のとおり、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が増加するほど、鋼は発銹しやすい。ここで、MnS介在物とPb介在物とが複合介在物を多く生成するほど、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減できる。特に、鋼中のPb介在物の総個数を低減できる。Pb介在物は特に、発銹特性を低下しやすい。複合比率が40%以上であれば、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減でき、かつ、単独で存在するPb介在物の個数も低減できる。その結果、鋼の発銹特性がさらに高まる。したがって、好ましくは複合比率RAが40%以上である。この場合、鋼の発銹特性をさらに高めることができる。複合比率RAのより好ましい下限は60%であり、さらに好ましくは75%である。 As described above, as the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions increases, the steel is likely to start. Here, as the MnS inclusions and the Pb inclusions generate more complex inclusions, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be reduced. In particular, the total number of Pb inclusions in the steel can be reduced. In particular, Pb inclusions tend to deteriorate the glazing characteristics. If the composite ratio is 40% or more, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be reduced, and the number of Pb inclusions present alone can also be reduced. As a result, the starting characteristics of the steel are further enhanced. Therefore, the composite ratio RA is preferably 40% or more. In this case, the cracking characteristics of the steel can be further enhanced. The minimum with more preferable composite ratio RA is 60%, More preferably, it is 75%.
 [特定介在物の個数TN及び複合比率RAの測定方法]
 特定介在物の個数TN及び複合比率RAは次の方法で測定できる。上述の方法で、機械構造用鋼からサンプルを採取する。R/2部のサンプルの横断面(表面)に対して、走査型電子顕微鏡(SEM)を用いて1000倍の倍率でランダムに20視野観察する。各視野(観察面という)において、特定介在物(MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物のいずれかであり、円相当径が5μm以上である)を特定する。特定介在物と他の介在物とは、コントラストで区別可能である。さらに、特定介在物のうち、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物は、それぞれ次の方法で特定する。
[Measurement Method of Number of Specific Inclusions TN and Composite Ratio RA]
The number TN of specific inclusions and the composite ratio RA can be measured by the following method. A sample is taken from the machine structural steel in the manner described above. 20 fields of view are randomly observed at a magnification of 1000 times using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) on the cross section (surface) of the R / 2 part sample. In each field of view (referred to as an observation surface), specific inclusions (any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions with an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more) are specified. Specific inclusions and other inclusions can be distinguished by contrast. Furthermore, among the specific inclusions, MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions are specified by the following methods, respectively.
 各観察面において、波長分散型X線解析装置(EPMA)により、観察面中のS分布及びPb分布の画像を得る。図1Aは、EPMA分析により得られた、観察面中のS分布を示す模式図であり、図1Bは、EPMA分析により得られた、図1Aと同じ観察面中のPb分布を示す模式図である。 At each observation surface, an image of the S distribution and the Pb distribution in the observation surface is obtained by a wavelength dispersive X-ray analyzer (EPMA). FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram showing the S distribution in the observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis, and FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram showing the Pb distribution in the same observation surface obtained by EPMA analysis as in FIG. 1A. is there.
 図1A中の符号10は、Sが存在する領域である。SはほぼMnSとして存在するため、図1A中の符号10にはMnSが存在するとみなすことができる。図1B中の符号20は、Pbが存在する領域である。 Numeral 10 in FIG. 1A is an area where S exists. Since S exists almost as MnS, it can be considered that MnS exists in the code | symbol 10 in FIG. 1A. Reference numeral 20 in FIG. 1B is an area where Pb exists.
 図1Bに示すとおり、Pbは符号20Aに示すとおり、圧延等により分断され、圧延方向に配列される場合がある。Sについても同様である。図2に示すとおり、EPMA分析で得られた画像において、隣り合う介在物INがいずれも5μm以上の円相当径を有する場合、隣り合う介在物INの間隔Dが10μm以内であれば、これらの介在物INは1つの介在物とみなす。なお、上述のとおり、円相当径とは、各介在物又は各析出物の面積を、同じ面積を有する円に換算した場合の円の直径を意味する。1つの介在物と定義された介在物群であっても、円相当径は、介在物群の総面積と同一の円の直径である。 As shown in FIG. 1B, Pb may be divided by rolling or the like and arranged in the rolling direction as shown by reference numeral 20A. The same applies to S. As shown in FIG. 2, in the image obtained by the EPMA analysis, when all the adjacent inclusions IN have an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more, if the interval D between the adjacent inclusions IN is within 10 μm, these The inclusion IN is regarded as one inclusion. As described above, the equivalent circle diameter means the diameter of a circle when the area of each inclusion or each precipitate is converted into a circle having the same area. Even in the inclusion group defined as one inclusion, the equivalent circle diameter is the diameter of the same circle as the total area of the inclusion group.
 図1Cは、図1Aに図1Bを合成した画像である。図1Cを参照して、MnS介在物10にPb介在物20が重複する場合、その介在物は複合介在物30であると認定する。一方、図1Cを参照して、MnS介在物10とPb介在物20とが重複しない場合、(図1C中の領域A1、領域A2等)、それらの介在物はMnS介在物10、Pb介在物20であると特定する。 FIG. 1C is an image obtained by synthesizing FIG. 1B with FIG. 1A. Referring to FIG. 1C, when Pb inclusion 20 overlaps with MnS inclusion 10, the inclusion is recognized as composite inclusion 30. On the other hand, referring to FIG. 1C, when MnS inclusion 10 and Pb inclusion 20 do not overlap (region A1, region A2, etc. in FIG. 1C), these inclusions are MnS inclusion 10 and Pb inclusion. 20 is specified.
 以上の方法により、走査型顕微鏡及びEPMAを用いて、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物を特定する。特定された各介在物の面積を求め、同じ面積の円の直径を、各介在物の円相当径(μm)として求める。 By the above method, MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions are specified using a scanning microscope and EPMA. The area of each specified inclusion is obtained, and the diameter of a circle having the same area is obtained as the equivalent circle diameter (μm) of each inclusion.
 各介在物のうち、円相当径が5μm以上の特定介在物を特定する。特定された特定介在物の総個数(20視野での個数)を求め、1mm当たりの個数TN(個/mm)に換算する。以上の方法により、特定介在物の個数TNを求める。さらに、特定された特定介在物のうち、円相当径が5μm以上の複合介在物の個数MN(個/mm)を求め、次の式(2)に基づいて、複合比率RA(%)を求める。
 RA=MN/TN×100 (2)
Among each inclusion, a specific inclusion having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more is specified. Obtains the total number of the identified specific inclusions (number at 20 fields), is converted into 1 mm 2 number per TN (pieces / mm 2). The number TN of specific inclusions is obtained by the above method. Further, among the specified inclusions, the number MN (pieces / mm 2 ) of composite inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more is obtained, and the composite ratio RA (%) is calculated based on the following equation (2). Ask.
RA = MN / TN × 100 (2)
 [製造方法]
 本発明による機械構造用鋼の製造方法の一例を説明する。本実施形態では、機械構造用鋼の一例として、棒鋼又は線材の製造方法を説明する。しかしながら、本発明による機械構造用鋼は、棒鋼又は線材に限定されない。
[Production method]
An example of a method for producing machine structural steel according to the present invention will be described. In the present embodiment, a method for manufacturing a steel bar or wire will be described as an example of steel for machine structural use. However, the machine structural steel according to the present invention is not limited to steel bars or wires.
 製造方法の一例は、溶鋼を精錬し、鋳造して素材(鋳片又はインゴット)を製造する製鋼工程と、素材を熱間加工して機械構造用鋼を製造する熱間加工工程とを備える。以下、それぞれの工程について説明する。 An example of a manufacturing method includes a steel making process in which molten steel is refined and cast to manufacture a material (slab or ingot), and a hot working process in which the material is hot-worked to manufacture steel for machine structural use. Hereinafter, each process will be described.
 [製鋼工程]
 製鋼工程は、精錬工程と、鋳造工程とを含む。
[Steel making process]
The steel making process includes a refining process and a casting process.
 [精錬工程]
 精錬工程では、初めに周知の方法で製造された溶銑に対して、転炉での精錬(一次精錬)を実施する。転炉から出鋼した溶鋼に対して、二次精錬を実施する。二次精錬において、成分調整の合金添加を実施して、上記化学組成を有する溶鋼を製造する。
[Refining process]
In the refining process, refining in the converter (primary refining) is first performed on the hot metal produced by a well-known method. Secondary refining is performed on the molten steel produced from the converter. In secondary refining, alloy addition for component adjustment is performed to produce molten steel having the above chemical composition.
 具体的に、転炉から出鋼した溶鋼に対して、Mnを添加する。その結果、溶鋼中にはMnを主体とする酸化物が生成する。Mnの添加を完了した後、Mnよりも脱酸力の強いSiを添加する。その結果、Mnを主体とする酸化物は、Siを主体とする酸化物に改質される。Siの添加を完了した後、Siよりさらに脱酸力の強いAlを添加する。その結果、Siを主体とする酸化物は、Si及びAlを含有する複合酸化物(以後、単に「複合酸化物」とも称する)に改質される。 Specifically, Mn is added to the molten steel that has been removed from the converter. As a result, an oxide mainly composed of Mn is generated in the molten steel. After completing the addition of Mn, Si having a stronger deoxidizing power than Mn is added. As a result, the oxide mainly composed of Mn is modified to an oxide mainly composed of Si. After completing the addition of Si, Al having a stronger deoxidizing power than Si is added. As a result, the oxide mainly composed of Si is modified into a complex oxide containing Si and Al (hereinafter also simply referred to as “composite oxide”).
 以上の精錬工程により生成した複合酸化物は、MnS介在物の晶出核となる。そのため、複合酸化物を生成することにより、MnS介在物が十分に晶出し、粗大に成長する。すなわち、複合酸化物が生成すれば、円相当径が5μm以上の介在物である特定介在物が生成しやすく、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm以上となる。その結果、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減され、凝固後の鋼中におけるMnS析出物の析出を抑制できる。そのため、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が十分に低減でき、鋼の発銹特性が高まる。 The composite oxide generated by the above refining process becomes a crystallization nucleus of MnS inclusions. Therefore, by producing the composite oxide, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow coarse. That is, when the composite oxide is generated, specific inclusions, which are inclusions having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more, are easily generated, and the number TN of the specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more. As a result, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
 脱酸処理を実施した後、周知の除滓処理を実施する。除滓処理後、二次精錬を実施する。二次精錬はたとえば、複合精錬を実施する。たとえば、初めに、LF(Ladle Furnace)又はVAD(Vacuum Arc Degassing)を用いた精錬処理を実施する。さらに、RH(Ruhrstahl-Hausen)真空脱ガス処理を実施してもよい。二次精錬において、Mn、Si、及びその他の元素を必要に応じて添加して、溶鋼の成分調整を実施する。溶鋼の成分調整後、鋳造工程を実施する。 After performing the deoxidation treatment, a well-known removal treatment is performed. After the removal process, secondary refining is performed. In the secondary refining, for example, composite refining is performed. For example, first, a refining process using LF (Laddle Furnace) or VAD (Vacuum Arc Degassing) is performed. Further, RH (Ruhrstahl-Hausen) vacuum degassing treatment may be performed. In secondary refining, Mn, Si, and other elements are added as necessary to adjust the components of the molten steel. After adjusting the components of the molten steel, the casting process is performed.
 [鋳造工程]
 上記精錬工程により製造された溶鋼を用いて、素材(鋳片又はインゴット)を製造する。具体的には、溶鋼を用いて連続鋳造法により鋳片を製造する。又は、溶鋼を用いて造塊法によりインゴットを製造してもよい。以下、鋳片及びインゴットを総称して素材という。ここでいう素材の横断面積はたとえば、200~350mm×200~600mmである。
[Casting process]
A raw material (slab or ingot) is manufactured using the molten steel manufactured by the refining process. Specifically, a slab is manufactured by continuous casting using molten steel. Or you may manufacture an ingot by an ingot-making method using molten steel. Hereinafter, slabs and ingots are collectively referred to as materials. The cross-sectional area of the material here is, for example, 200 to 350 mm × 200 to 600 mm.
 鋳造時の凝固冷却速度RCは100℃/分以下である。凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分以下であれば、溶鋼においてMnS介在物が十分に晶出し、成長する。そのため、特定介在物が生成しやすく、その個数TNが40個/mm以上となる。その結果、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減され、凝固後の鋼中におけるMnS析出物の析出を抑制できる。そのため、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数が十分に低減でき、鋼の発銹特性が高まる。 Solidification cooling rate RC at the time of casting is 100 degrees C / min or less. When the solidification cooling rate RC is 100 ° C./min or less, MnS inclusions are sufficiently crystallized and grow in the molten steel. Therefore, specific inclusions are easily generated, and the number TN thereof is 40 pieces / mm 2 or more. As a result, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification is sufficiently reduced, and precipitation of MnS precipitates in the steel after solidification can be suppressed. As a result, the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions can be sufficiently reduced, and the steel firing characteristics are enhanced.
 一方、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分を超えれば、MnS介在物が十分に晶出せず、さらに、MnS介在物が十分に成長しない。そのため、特定介在物が生成されにくく、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満となる。この場合、凝固後の鋼中の固溶S量が十分に低減できず、凝固後に、微細なMnS析出物が多数生成する。その結果、MnS介在物、MnS析出物、Pb介在物、及び、複合介在物の総個数を低減できないため、鋼の発銹特性が低下する。したがって、凝固冷却速度RCは100℃/分以下である。 On the other hand, if the solidification cooling rate RC exceeds 100 ° C./min, the MnS inclusions are not sufficiently crystallized, and the MnS inclusions are not sufficiently grown. Therefore, specific inclusions are not easily generated, and the number TN of specific inclusions is less than 40 / mm 2 . In this case, the amount of dissolved S in the steel after solidification cannot be sufficiently reduced, and many fine MnS precipitates are formed after solidification. As a result, since the total number of MnS inclusions, MnS precipitates, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions cannot be reduced, the steel firing characteristics are deteriorated. Therefore, the solidification cooling rate RC is 100 ° C./min or less.
 好ましい凝固冷却速度RCは8~50℃/分未満である。この場合、MnS介在物がさらに晶出及び成長しやすい。凝固冷却速度RCが8~50℃/分未満であればさらに、凝固するまでの時間が長いため、Pbが溶鋼中を移動してMnS介在物に付着するための十分な時間を確保できる。そのため、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物が生成しやすくなり、複合比率RAが40%以上になる。凝固冷却速度RCのより好ましい上限は30℃/分である。凝固冷却速度RCのより好ましい下限は10℃/分であり、さらに好ましくは15℃/分である。 A preferable solidification cooling rate RC is 8 to less than 50 ° C./min. In this case, MnS inclusions are more likely to crystallize and grow. If the solidification cooling rate RC is less than 8 to 50 ° C./min, the time until solidification is further long, so that a sufficient time for Pb to move through the molten steel and adhere to the MnS inclusions can be secured. Therefore, composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb are easily generated, and the composite ratio RA is 40% or more. A more preferable upper limit of the solidification cooling rate RC is 30 ° C./min. The more preferable lower limit of the solidification cooling rate RC is 10 ° C./min, and more preferably 15 ° C./min.
 凝固冷却速度RCは、鋳造された素材から求めることができる。図3は、鋳造された素材の横断面図である。厚さW(mm)の素材のうち、表面から素材中心に向かってW/4の位置の地点P1において、液相線温度から固相線温度までの冷却速度を、鋳造工程における凝固冷却速度RC(℃/分)と定義する。凝固冷却速度RCは次の方法で求めることができる。凝固後の素材を横断方向に切断する。素材の横断面のうち、地点P1での凝固組織の厚み方向の2次デンドライトアーム間隔λ2(μm)を測定する。測定値λ2を用いて、次の式(3)に基づいて凝固冷却速度RC(℃/分)を求める。
 RC=(λ2/770)-(1/0.41) (3)
The solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained from the cast material. FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the cast material. Among the materials of thickness W (mm), the cooling rate from the liquidus temperature to the solidus temperature at the point P1 at the position W / 4 from the surface toward the material center is the solidification cooling rate RC in the casting process. (° C / min). The solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained by the following method. Cut the solidified material in the transverse direction. Of the cross section of the material, the secondary dendrite arm interval λ2 (μm) in the thickness direction of the solidified tissue at the point P1 is measured. Using the measured value λ2, the solidification cooling rate RC (° C./min) is obtained based on the following equation (3).
RC = (λ2 / 770) − (1 / 0.41) (3)
 2次デンドライトアーム間隔λ2は凝固冷却速度RCに依存する。したがって、2次デンドライトアーム間隔λ2を測定することにより凝固冷却速度RCを求めることができる。 The secondary dendrite arm interval λ2 depends on the solidification cooling rate RC. Therefore, the solidification cooling rate RC can be obtained by measuring the secondary dendrite arm interval λ2.
 [熱間加工工程]
 熱間加工工程では通常、1又は複数回の熱間加工を実施する。各熱間加工を実施する前に、素材を加熱する。その後、素材に対して熱間加工を実施する。熱間加工はたとえば、熱間鍛造や、熱間圧延である。複数回熱間加工を実施する場合、最初の熱間加工はたとえば、分塊圧延又は熱間鍛造であり、次の熱間加工は、連続圧延機を用いた仕上げ圧延である。熱間圧延機では、一対の水平ロールを有する水平スタンドと、一対の垂直ロールを有する垂直スタンドとが交互に一列に配列される。熱間加工後の素材は空冷等の周知の冷却法により冷却される。
[Hot working process]
In the hot working step, one or more hot workings are usually performed. The material is heated before each hot working. Thereafter, hot working is performed on the material. Hot working is, for example, hot forging or hot rolling. In the case where a plurality of hot workings are performed, the first hot working is, for example, block rolling or hot forging, and the next hot working is finish rolling using a continuous rolling mill. In a hot rolling mill, horizontal stands having a pair of horizontal rolls and vertical stands having a pair of vertical rolls are alternately arranged in a line. The material after hot working is cooled by a known cooling method such as air cooling.
 以上の工程により、本実施の形態による機械構造用鋼を製造する。機械構造用鋼はたとえば、棒鋼又は線材である。 Through the above process, the steel for machine structure according to the present embodiment is manufactured. The machine structural steel is, for example, a steel bar or a wire rod.
 以上の方法で製造された機械構造用鋼は、被削性及び発銹特性に優れる。機械構造用鋼から機械部品への製造は、たとえば、次の方法で実施される。 Machine structural steel manufactured by the above method is excellent in machinability and cracking characteristics. Manufacture of machine structural steel to machine parts is performed, for example, by the following method.
 機械構造用鋼に対して熱間鍛造を実施して、粗形状の中間品を製造する。中間品に対して、必要に応じて焼準処理を実施する。さらに、中間品に対して機械加工を実施する。機械加工はたとえば切削加工である。機械加工を実施した中間品に対して調質処理(焼入れ焼戻し)を実施してもよい。調質処理した場合、調質処理後の中間品に対して切削加工等の機械加工を実施してもよい。以上の工程により、機械部品が製造される。熱間鍛造に代えて、冷間鍛造により機械部品を製造してもよい。 熱 Hot forging is performed on machine structural steel to produce a rough intermediate product. Normalize the intermediate product as necessary. Further, machining is performed on the intermediate product. The machining is, for example, cutting. A tempering treatment (quenching and tempering) may be performed on the intermediate product subjected to machining. When the tempering treatment is performed, machining such as cutting may be performed on the intermediate product after the tempering treatment. A machine part is manufactured by the above process. Machine parts may be manufactured by cold forging instead of hot forging.
 表1に示す化学組成を有する溶鋼を製造した。 The molten steel which has the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was manufactured.
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000001
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000001
 各試験番号の溶鋼は次の方法で製造した。周知の方法で製造された溶銑に対して転炉での一次精錬を同じ条件で製造した。 The molten steel of each test number was manufactured by the following method. The primary refining in the converter was produced under the same conditions for the hot metal produced by a known method.
 試験番号65及び66以外の試験番号の溶鋼に対しては、転炉から出鋼後、Mn、Si、Alの順に添加して脱酸処理を実施した。試験番号65の溶鋼に対しては、転炉から出鋼後、Si、Al、Mnの順に添加して脱酸処理を実施した。試験番号66の溶鋼に対しては、転炉から出鋼後、Mn、Al、Siの順に添加して脱酸処理を実施した。 For the molten steels with test numbers other than test numbers 65 and 66, Mn, Si, and Al were added in this order after the steel was removed from the converter and subjected to deoxidation treatment. For the molten steel of test number 65, after the steel was removed from the converter, it was added in the order of Si, Al, and Mn and deoxidized. For the molten steel of test number 66, after the steel was removed from the converter, Mn, Al, and Si were added in this order to perform deoxidation treatment.
 脱酸処理後、除滓処理を実施した。除滓処理後、VADを用いた精錬処理を実施し、その後、RH真空脱ガス処理を実施した。RH真空脱ガス処理後、合金元素の最終調整を実施した。以上の工程で、表1に示す化学組成の溶鋼を製造した。 滓 After the deoxidation treatment, the removal treatment was performed. After the removal process, a refining process using VAD was performed, and then an RH vacuum degassing process was performed. After the RH vacuum degassing treatment, final adjustment of the alloy elements was performed. Through the above steps, molten steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was manufactured.
 溶鋼を鋳造して直方体状の実験用のインゴットを製造した。インゴットの横断形状は矩形状であり、190mm×190mmであった。各試験番号の凝固冷却速度RC(℃/分)は表2に記載のとおりであった。凝固冷却速度RCは、インゴットの2次デンドライトアーム間隔を測定して、上述の式(3)により求めた。 The molten steel was cast to produce a rectangular parallelepiped experimental ingot. The cross shape of the ingot was rectangular and was 190 mm × 190 mm. The solidification cooling rate RC (° C./min) of each test number was as shown in Table 2. The solidification cooling rate RC was obtained from the above equation (3) by measuring the secondary dendrite arm interval of the ingot.
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000002
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000002
 製造された実験用のインゴットに対して2回の熱間加工を実施して、棒鋼を製造した。熱間加工では、分塊圧延を実施し、その後、仕上げ圧延(棒鋼圧延)を実施した。製造された実験用インゴットに対して熱間鍛造を実施して、直径50mmの棒鋼を製造した。又は、実験用インゴットに対して分塊圧延を実施し、次いで仕上げ圧延を実施して、直径50mmの棒鋼を製造した。製造された棒鋼に対して、800~950℃の焼準処理を実施した。焼準処理における冷却方法は放冷であった。以上の製造工程により、直径50mmの棒鋼(機械構造用鋼)を製造した。 The steel bar was manufactured by carrying out hot working twice on the manufactured experimental ingot. In hot working, partial rolling was performed, and then finish rolling (bar rolling) was performed. The manufactured experimental ingot was hot forged to produce a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm. Alternatively, a block rolling was performed on the experimental ingot, and then finish rolling was performed to produce a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm. A normalizing treatment at 800 to 950 ° C. was performed on the manufactured steel bar. The cooling method in the normalizing treatment was left to cool. A steel bar (steel for machine structure) having a diameter of 50 mm was manufactured by the above manufacturing process.
 [評価試験]
 [ミクロ組織観察]
 各試験番号の棒鋼のR/2部から、組織観察用の試験片を採取した。試験片の表面のうち、棒鋼の長手方向(つまり、圧延方向又は延伸方向)と平行な断面を観察面と定義した。上述の方法に基づいて、フェライト、パーライト、及び、ベイナイトの合計面積率(%)を求めた。各試験番号の棒鋼のミクロ組織は、いずれも合計面積率が99%以上であった。合計面積率が99%以上のミクロ組織について、「F+P+B」として表2に示す。
[Evaluation test]
[Microstructure observation]
A specimen for observing the structure was collected from R / 2 part of the steel bar of each test number. Of the surface of the test piece, a cross section parallel to the longitudinal direction of the steel bar (that is, the rolling direction or the stretching direction) was defined as an observation surface. Based on the above method, the total area ratio (%) of ferrite, pearlite, and bainite was obtained. All the microstructures of the steel bars of each test number had a total area ratio of 99% or more. The microstructure with a total area ratio of 99% or more is shown in Table 2 as “F + P + B”.
 [特定介在物の個数TN及び複合比率RA]
 各試験番号の棒鋼のR/2部から、組織観察用の試験片を採取した。試験片の表面のうち、棒鋼の長手方向(つまり、圧延方向又は延伸方向)と平行な断面を観察面と定義した。各試験番号の組織観察用の試験片の観察面について、上述の方法に基づいて、特定介在物個数TN(個/mm)と、複合比率RA(%)とを求めた。結果を表2に示す。
[Number of specific inclusions TN and composite ratio RA]
A specimen for observing the structure was collected from R / 2 part of the steel bar of each test number. Of the surface of the test piece, a cross section parallel to the longitudinal direction of the steel bar (that is, the rolling direction or the stretching direction) was defined as an observation surface. Based on the above-described method, the number of specific inclusions TN (pieces / mm 2 ) and the composite ratio RA (%) were determined for the observation surface of the test piece for tissue observation of each test number. The results are shown in Table 2.
 [被削性]
 被削性は、通常ドリルによる工具寿命特性及び切り屑処理性を評価した。
[Machinability]
As for machinability, tool life characteristics and chip disposal with a normal drill were evaluated.
 [工具寿命特性CL1000]
 直径50mmの棒鋼を20mmの長さで切断して穿孔試験片とした。穿孔試験片に対して、穿孔を実施した。穿孔の条件を表3に示す。
[Tool life characteristics CL1000]
A steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm was cut to a length of 20 mm to obtain a perforated test piece. Perforation was performed on the perforated specimen. Table 3 shows the conditions for drilling.
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000003
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000003
 具体的に、ドリル外周速度を変化させて、ドリル折損までの累積穴深さを測定した。ドリルは高速度鋼ストレートドリルを用いた。ドリルのノーズRは3mmであり、先端角は118°であった。切削速度:10~70m/分、送り量:0.25mm/rev、穴深さ9mmとして、穿孔を実施した。累積穴深さ(穴深さ×穿孔数)が1000mmに達した場合は、ひとつのドリルでの穿孔を終了した。この場合、ドリルを付け替え、さらにドリル外周の速度を高速にして破損まで試験を繰り返した。累積穴深さ1000mmを穿孔可能な最大ドリル外周速度をCL1000(m/分)と定義して、被削性の指標とした。結果を表2の「CL1000」の欄に示す。CL1000が50m/分以上の場合、工具寿命特性が優れると判断した。一方、CL1000が50m/分未満の場合、工具寿命特性が優れないと判断した。 Concretely, the accumulated hole depth until the drill breakage was measured by changing the drill outer peripheral speed. A high-speed steel straight drill was used as the drill. The nose radius of the drill was 3 mm and the tip angle was 118 °. Drilling was performed at a cutting speed of 10 to 70 m / min, a feed rate of 0.25 mm / rev, and a hole depth of 9 mm. When the accumulated hole depth (hole depth x number of drill holes) reached 1000 mm, drilling with one drill was completed. In this case, the drill was replaced, and the test was repeated until breakage at a higher drill peripheral speed. The maximum drill peripheral speed at which a cumulative hole depth of 1000 mm can be drilled was defined as CL1000 (m / min) and used as an index of machinability. The results are shown in the column “CL1000” in Table 2. When CL1000 was 50 m / min or more, it was judged that the tool life characteristics were excellent. On the other hand, when CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, it was judged that the tool life characteristics were not excellent.
 [切り屑処理性評価]
 直径50mmの棒鋼を所定の長さで切断して切削試験片とした。切削試験片に対して、図4に示す外周旋削を実施した。外周旋削の条件を表4に示す。
[Evaluation of chip disposal]
A steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm was cut at a predetermined length to obtain a cutting test piece. The outer periphery turning shown in FIG. 4 was implemented with respect to the cutting test piece. Table 4 shows the peripheral turning conditions.
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000004
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000004
 具体的に、工具50は、P20種超硬合金工具を用いた。工具50のノーズRは0.4であり、すくい角は5°であった。切削速度V1:250m/分、送り速度V2:0.2mm/rev、切り込み量D1:2mm、長手方向切削長さL1:200mmとして、外周旋削を実施した。外周を切削後、再度D1:2mmだけ小径になるように切り込み旋削を繰り返し、試験片5に対して4分間の上記条件の旋削試験を実施した。 Specifically, the tool 50 was a P20 class cemented carbide tool. The nose R of the tool 50 was 0.4, and the rake angle was 5 °. The peripheral turning was carried out at a cutting speed V1: 250 m / min, a feed speed V2: 0.2 mm / rev, a cutting amount D1: 2 mm, and a longitudinal cutting length L1: 200 mm. After cutting the outer periphery, the cutting turning was repeated so that the diameter again decreased by D1: 2 mm, and the test piece 5 was subjected to a turning test under the above conditions for 4 minutes.
 1000個目の試験片の旋削では、図5A及び図5Bに示す切り屑が得られた。そこで、切り屑の長さL20と、直径D20とを測定した。測定結果に基づいて、次のとおり評価した。切り屑の直径D20が30mm以下のコイル形状である場合、又はコイル形状でなくても切り屑長さL20が50mm未満であった場合、切り屑処理性が優れると判断した(表2中の「○」)。一方、切り屑の直径D20が30mm以下のコイル形状ではなく、かつ、切り屑長さL20も50mm以上であった場合、切り屑処理性が優れないと判断した(表2中の「×」)。 In turning the 1000th test piece, the chips shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B were obtained. Therefore, the length L20 of the chips and the diameter D20 were measured. Based on the measurement results, the evaluation was as follows. When the chip diameter D20 has a coil shape of 30 mm or less, or when the chip length L20 is less than 50 mm even when the chip has no coil shape, it is determined that the chip disposal is excellent (see “ ○ "). On the other hand, when the chip diameter D20 was not a coil shape of 30 mm or less and the chip length L20 was 50 mm or more, it was determined that the chip disposal was not excellent (“×” in Table 2). .
 [発銹特性(耐食性)評価試験]
 直径50mmの棒鋼を所定の長さに切断した発銹試験片を作製した。発銹試験片に対して、上述の切削試験と同様の条件で旋削加工を行った。その後、切削面に水道水を噴霧しながら、湿度70%、20℃の雰囲気内に1時間試験片を保管した。保管後、試験片の切削面を観察し、銹点の個数を測定した。測定結果を表2の「発銹特定」欄に示す。銹点が10点未満であった場合(表2中の「◎」)、及び、銹点が10点以上20点未満であった場合(表2中の「○」)、発銹特性が優れると判断した。一方、銹点が20点以上であった場合(表2中の「×」)、発銹特性が優れないと判断した。
[Evaluation test of rust characteristics (corrosion resistance)]
A cracking test piece was prepared by cutting a steel bar having a diameter of 50 mm into a predetermined length. The sputter test piece was turned under the same conditions as in the above cutting test. Thereafter, the test piece was stored in an atmosphere of 70% humidity and 20 ° C. for 1 hour while spraying tap water on the cut surface. After storage, the cut surface of the test piece was observed and the number of saddle points was measured. The measurement results are shown in the “Identification” column of Table 2. When the saddle point is less than 10 points (“」 ”in Table 2) and when the saddle point is 10 points or more and less than 20 points (“ ◯ ”in Table 2), the glazing characteristics are excellent. It was judged. On the other hand, when the saddle point was 20 points or more (“×” in Table 2), it was determined that the glazing characteristics were not excellent.
 [転動疲労試験]
 転動疲労寿命の評価は、森式スラスト型転動疲労試験によって行った。各試験番号の棒鋼のR/2部から、図6に示す、直径60mm、厚さ5mmの円盤状の転動疲労試験片100を各10枚採取した。転動疲労試験片100に対して、浸炭を実施し、表面を硬化させた。有効硬化層深さは0.8mm以上とした。
[Rolling fatigue test]
The rolling fatigue life was evaluated by the Mori-type thrust rolling fatigue test. Ten disc-shaped rolling fatigue test pieces 100 having a diameter of 60 mm and a thickness of 5 mm shown in FIG. 6 were collected from R / 2 part of the steel bars of each test number. The rolling fatigue test specimen 100 was carburized to harden the surface. The effective hardened layer depth was 0.8 mm or more.
 浸炭処理の条件は以下のとおりであった。Cp=0.7~0.8、930℃×2時間、870℃×1時間、油焼入れ、洗浄、170℃×2時間の低温焼戻しを行った。浸炭処理を実施した転動疲労試験片100に対して、表面を研削して、浸炭異常層を除去し、有効硬化層深さを0.7mmとした。有効硬化層深さは、HV550となる位置の表面からの深さとした。研削による除去は0.2mm以下とした。Cp及び研削除去量を調節して、各転動疲労試験片における硬度分布及び有効硬化層深さを調整した。 The carburizing conditions were as follows. Cp = 0.7 to 0.8, 930 ° C. × 2 hours, 870 ° C. × 1 hour, oil quenching, washing, and low temperature tempering at 170 ° C. × 2 hours. The surface of the rolling fatigue test piece 100 subjected to the carburizing treatment was ground to remove the carburized abnormal layer, and the effective hardened layer depth was set to 0.7 mm. The effective hardened layer depth was set to the depth from the surface of the position which becomes HV550. The removal by grinding was 0.2 mm or less. The hardness distribution and effective hardened layer depth in each rolling fatigue test piece were adjusted by adjusting Cp and the amount of grinding removal.
 図7に示すとおり、転動疲労試験片100を、油70%及び水30%の潤滑油102に浸漬し、潤滑油中の水分は発熱により蒸発するため、1日に1回、水30mlを追加した。試験面圧は4kNで一定とした。硬球は、Siセラミックス硬球を用いた。転動疲労試験片100上に接する硬球は3球とし、回転数は1200rpmとした。転動疲労寿命の尺度として、「試験結果をワイブル確率紙にプロットして得られる累積破損確率10%におけるピッチングを生じるまでの時間(時間)」を耐久寿命として用いた。結果を表2の「転動疲労寿命」の欄に示す。転動疲労寿命が4.0時間以上の場合、転動疲労特性が優れると判断した。一方、転動疲労寿命が4.0時間未満の場合、転動疲労特性が優れないと判断した。 As shown in FIG. 7, the rolling fatigue test piece 100 is immersed in a lubricating oil 102 of 70% oil and 30% water, and water in the lubricating oil evaporates due to heat generation, so 30 ml of water is once a day. Added. The test surface pressure was constant at 4 kN. As the hard sphere, a Si 3 N 4 ceramic hard sphere was used. The number of hard balls in contact with the rolling fatigue test piece 100 was 3, and the rotation speed was 1200 rpm. As a measure of the rolling fatigue life, “time until occurrence of pitching at a cumulative failure probability of 10% obtained by plotting test results on Weibull probability paper (time)” was used as the durability life. The results are shown in the “Rolling fatigue life” column of Table 2. When the rolling fatigue life was 4.0 hours or longer, it was judged that the rolling fatigue characteristics were excellent. On the other hand, when the rolling fatigue life was less than 4.0 hours, it was determined that the rolling fatigue characteristics were not excellent.
 [熱間延性(熱間加工性)評価試験]
 通電加熱による熱間引張試験を実施して、熱間延性(熱間加工性)を評価した。具体的には、各試験番号の鋳片から、直径10mm、長さ100mmであって、両端がねじ加工された丸棒試験片を作製した。丸棒試験片を通電加熱により1100℃に加熱し、3分保持した。その後、放冷により丸棒試験片を900℃まで冷却した。丸棒試験片が900℃の状態で引張試験を実施し、破断時の絞り値(%)を求めた。各試験番号につき3本の丸棒試験片で引張試験を実施して、3つの値の平均を、その試験番号の絞り値(%)と定義した。絞り値を表2の「熱間延性」の欄に示す。絞り値が70%以上の場合、熱間延性(熱間加工性)が優れると評価した。一方、絞り値が70%未満の場合、熱間延性(熱間加工性)が優れないと評価した。
[Hot ductility (hot workability) evaluation test]
A hot tensile test by electric heating was performed to evaluate hot ductility (hot workability). Specifically, a round bar test piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 100 mm and having both ends threaded was produced from the slabs of each test number. The round bar test piece was heated to 1100 ° C. by electric heating and held for 3 minutes. Then, the round bar test piece was cooled to 900 degreeC by standing_to_cool. A tensile test was performed with the round bar test piece at 900 ° C., and a drawing value (%) at the time of breakage was obtained. Tensile tests were performed with three round bar specimens for each test number, and the average of the three values was defined as the squeeze value (%) for that test number. The aperture value is shown in the “hot ductility” column of Table 2. When the aperture value was 70% or more, it was evaluated that the hot ductility (hot workability) was excellent. On the other hand, when the drawing value was less than 70%, it was evaluated that the hot ductility (hot workability) was not excellent.
 [試験結果]
 試験番号1~31では、化学組成が適切であり、F1が8.0以上であり、脱酸順が適切であり、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分以下であった。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm以上であった。その結果、CL1000が50m/分以上であり、かつ、優れた切り屑処理性が得られた。すなわち、優れた被削性が得られた。さらに、発銹特性評価試験において、いずれも、銹点が20点未満であり、優れた発銹特性が得られた。さらに、転動疲労試験において、いずれも、転動疲労寿命が4.0時間以上であり、優れた転動疲労特性が得られた。さらに、熱間延性評価試験において、絞り値が70%以上であり、優れた熱間延性が得られた。
[Test results]
In test numbers 1 to 31, the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, the deoxidation order was appropriate, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was 40 / mm 2 or more. As a result, CL1000 was 50 m / min or more, and excellent chip disposal was obtained. That is, excellent machinability was obtained. Furthermore, in the glazing characteristic evaluation test, the scoring point was less than 20 points, and excellent scouring characteristics were obtained. Furthermore, in all the rolling fatigue tests, the rolling fatigue life was 4.0 hours or more, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics were obtained. Furthermore, in the hot ductility evaluation test, the drawing value was 70% or more, and excellent hot ductility was obtained.
 試験番号1~7、26、30、及び、31ではさらに、凝固冷却速度RCが8~50℃/分であった。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm以上であるだけでなく、複合比率RAが40%以上であった。その結果、いずれも、銹点が10点未満であり、試験番号8~25、及び、27~29と比較して、さらに優れた発銹特性が得られた。 In test numbers 1 to 7, 26, 30, and 31, the solidification cooling rate RC was 8 to 50 ° C./min. Therefore, not only the number TN of specific inclusions is 40 / mm 2 or more, but also the composite ratio RA is 40% or more. As a result, the scoring point was less than 10 in all cases, and even better sprinkling characteristics were obtained as compared with test numbers 8 to 25 and 27 to 29.
 一方、試験番号32~42では、化学組成が適切であり、F1が8.0以上であり、脱酸順が適切であったが、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分を超えた。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。 On the other hand, in test numbers 32 to 42, the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, and the deoxidation order was appropriate, but the solidification cooling rate RC exceeded 100 ° C./min. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
 試験番号43及び44では、化学組成が適切であり、脱酸順が適切であり、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分以下であったが、F1が8.0未満であった。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 43 and 44, the chemical composition was appropriate, the order of deoxidation was appropriate, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less, but F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号45では、化学組成が適切であり、脱酸順が適切であったが、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分を超え、さらにF1が8.0未満であった。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test number 45, the chemical composition was appropriate and the order of deoxidation was appropriate, but the solidification cooling rate RC exceeded 100 ° C./min, and F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号46及び47では、Mn含有量が高すぎた。その結果、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、優れた被削性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 46 and 47, the Mn content was too high. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent machinability was not obtained.
 試験番号48及び49では、Mn含有量が低すぎた。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 48 and 49, the Mn content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号50では、S含有量が高すぎた。その結果、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test number 50, the S content was too high. As a result, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号51では、S含有量が高すぎた。さらに、F1が8.0未満であった。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test number 51, the S content was too high. Furthermore, F1 was less than 8.0. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号52及び53では、S含有量が低すぎた。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 52 and 53, the S content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
 試験番号54及び55では、Pb含有量が高すぎた。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 54 and 55, the Pb content was too high. As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号56及び57では、Pb含有量が低すぎた。その結果、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、さらに、優れた切り屑処理性が得られなかった。すなわち、優れた被削性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 56 and 57, the Pb content was too low. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent chip disposal was not obtained. That is, excellent machinability was not obtained.
 試験番号58では、Al含有量が低すぎた。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。 In test number 58, the Al content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
 試験番号59では、N含有量が高すぎた。その結果、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、優れた被削性が得られなかった。さらに、絞り値が70%未満であり、優れた熱間延性が得られなかった。 In test number 59, the N content was too high. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent machinability was not obtained. Furthermore, the aperture value was less than 70%, and excellent hot ductility was not obtained.
 試験番号60及び61では、O含有量が高すぎた。その結果、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、優れた被削性が得られなかった。さらに、転動疲労寿命が4.0時間未満であり、優れた転動疲労特性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 60 and 61, the O content was too high. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent machinability was not obtained. Furthermore, the rolling fatigue life was less than 4.0 hours, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics were not obtained.
 試験番号62では、O含有量が低すぎた。そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。さらに、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、優れた切り屑処理性も得られなかった。すなわち、優れた被削性が得られなかった。 In test number 62, the O content was too low. Therefore, the number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained. Furthermore, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent chip disposal was not obtained. That is, excellent machinability was not obtained.
 試験番号63では、Cr含有量が高すぎた。その結果、CL1000が50m/分未満であり、優れた被削性が得られなかった。 In test number 63, the Cr content was too high. As a result, CL1000 was less than 50 m / min, and excellent machinability was not obtained.
 試験番号64では、Cr含有量が低すぎた。その結果、転動疲労寿命が4.0時間未満であり、優れた転動疲労特性が得られなかった。 In test number 64, the Cr content was too low. As a result, the rolling fatigue life was less than 4.0 hours, and excellent rolling fatigue characteristics were not obtained.
 試験番号65及び66では、化学組成が適切であり、F1が8.0以上であり、凝固冷却速度RCが100℃/分以下であったが、脱酸順が不適切であった、そのため、特定介在物の個数TNが40個/mm未満であった。その結果、優れた発銹特性が得られなかった。 In test numbers 65 and 66, the chemical composition was appropriate, F1 was 8.0 or more, and the solidification cooling rate RC was 100 ° C./min or less, but the deoxidation order was inappropriate. The number TN of specific inclusions was less than 40 / mm 2 . As a result, excellent ripening characteristics could not be obtained.
 以上、本発明の実施の形態を説明した。しかしながら、上述した実施の形態は本発明を実施するための例示に過ぎない。したがって、本発明は上述した実施の形態に限定されることなく、その趣旨を逸脱しない範囲内で上述した実施の形態を適宜変更して実施することができる。 The embodiment of the present invention has been described above. However, the above-described embodiment is merely an example for carrying out the present invention. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and can be implemented by appropriately changing the above-described embodiment without departing from the spirit thereof.
10 MnS介在物
20 Pb介在物
30 複合介在物
10 MnS inclusions 20 Pb inclusions 30 Composite inclusions

Claims (4)

  1.  質量%で、
     C:0.15~0.30%未満、
     Si:0.01~0.80%、
     Mn:0.20~2.00%、
     P:0.030%以下、
     S:0.010~0.100%、
     Pb:0.010~0.100%、
     Al:0.010~0.050%、
     N:0.015%以下、
     O:0.0005~0.0030%、
     Cr:0.50~2.00%、
     Ni:0~3.50%、
     B:0~0.0050%、
     V:0~0.70%、
     Mo:0~0.70%、
     W:0~0.70%、
     Nb:0~0.050%未満、
     Cu:0~0.50%、
     Ti:0~0.100%、及び、
     Ca:0~0.0030%を含有し、残部はFe及び不純物からなり、式(1)を満たす化学組成を有し、
     鋼中において、MnS介在物、Pb介在物、及び、MnS及びPbを含有する複合介在物のいずれかであって、円相当径が5μm以上である特定介在物の総個数が40個/mm以上である、機械構造用鋼。
     Mn/S≧8.0 (1)
     ここで、式(1)中の各元素には、対応する元素の含有量(質量%)が代入される。
    % By mass
    C: 0.15 to less than 0.30%,
    Si: 0.01-0.80%
    Mn: 0.20 to 2.00%,
    P: 0.030% or less,
    S: 0.010 to 0.100%,
    Pb: 0.010 to 0.100%,
    Al: 0.010 to 0.050%,
    N: 0.015% or less,
    O: 0.0005 to 0.0030%,
    Cr: 0.50 to 2.00%,
    Ni: 0 to 3.50%,
    B: 0 to 0.0050%,
    V: 0 to 0.70%,
    Mo: 0 to 0.70%,
    W: 0 to 0.70%,
    Nb: 0 to less than 0.050%,
    Cu: 0 to 0.50%,
    Ti: 0 to 0.100%, and
    Ca: 0 to 0.0030% is contained, the balance consists of Fe and impurities, and has a chemical composition satisfying the formula (1),
    In steel, the total number of specific inclusions that are any of MnS inclusions, Pb inclusions, and composite inclusions containing MnS and Pb and having an equivalent circle diameter of 5 μm or more is 40 / mm 2. This is steel for machine structural use.
    Mn / S ≧ 8.0 (1)
    Here, the content (mass%) of the corresponding element is substituted for each element in the formula (1).
  2.  請求項1に記載の機械構造用鋼であって、
     前記化学組成は、
     Ni:0.02~3.50%、
     B:0.0005~0.0050%、
     V:0.05~0.70%、
     Mo:0.05~0.70%、
     W:0.05~0.70%、
     Nb:0.001~0.050%未満、
     Cu:0.05~0.50%、及び、
     Ti:0.003~0.100%からなる群から選択される1種又は2種以上を含有する、機械構造用鋼。
    The mechanical structural steel according to claim 1,
    The chemical composition is
    Ni: 0.02 to 3.50%,
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
    V: 0.05 to 0.70%,
    Mo: 0.05 to 0.70%,
    W: 0.05-0.70%
    Nb: 0.001 to less than 0.050%,
    Cu: 0.05 to 0.50%, and
    Ti: Steel for machine structure containing one or more selected from the group consisting of 0.003 to 0.100%.
  3.  請求項1又は請求項2に記載の機械構造用鋼であって、
     前記化学組成は、
     Ca:0.0001~0.0030%を含有する、機械構造用鋼。
    The steel for machine structure according to claim 1 or 2,
    The chemical composition is
    Ca: Steel for machine structure containing 0.0001 to 0.0030%.
  4.  請求項1~請求項3のいずれか1項に記載の機械構造用鋼であって、
     前記複合介在物の前記特定介在物に対する個数比率が40%以上である、機械構造用鋼。
    A machine structural steel according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
    Machine structural steel, wherein the number ratio of the composite inclusions to the specific inclusions is 40% or more.
PCT/JP2017/027154 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for machine structures WO2018021452A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201780046552.8A CN109496239A (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for mechanical structure
KR1020197005585A KR20190034273A (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for machine structural use
US16/320,651 US20190169723A1 (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for Machine Structural Use
EP17834454.5A EP3492615A4 (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for machine structures
JP2018530376A JP6760379B2 (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Machine structural steel

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016-147194 2016-07-27
JP2016147194 2016-07-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018021452A1 true WO2018021452A1 (en) 2018-02-01

Family

ID=61016225

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2017/027154 WO2018021452A1 (en) 2016-07-27 2017-07-27 Steel for machine structures

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20190169723A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3492615A4 (en)
JP (1) JP6760379B2 (en)
KR (1) KR20190034273A (en)
CN (1) CN109496239A (en)
WO (1) WO2018021452A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110205557B (en) * 2019-07-17 2020-08-18 贝斯山钢(山东)钢板有限公司 350-plus 380HBW hardness-grade thick-specification high-toughness wear-resistant steel plate and preparation method thereof
MX2022007868A (en) * 2019-12-23 2022-07-19 Jfe Steel Corp Free cutting steel and method for manufacturing same.
CN114645208B (en) * 2022-03-23 2023-04-25 青海西钢特殊钢科技开发有限公司 Tellurium-treated non-quenched and tempered steel for connecting rod and production method thereof
CN114959429A (en) * 2022-05-31 2022-08-30 本钢板材股份有限公司 Manufacturing method of steel 18CrNiMo7-6 for engineering machinery gear

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11217650A (en) * 1998-01-28 1999-08-10 Aichi Steel Works Ltd Free-drilling steel
JPH11222646A (en) * 1998-02-05 1999-08-17 Kobe Steel Ltd Steel for machine structural use having excellent chip treatability
JP2000282172A (en) 1999-01-28 2000-10-10 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Steel for machine structure excellent in machinability and toughness, and machine structural parts
JP2003183770A (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-07-03 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Steel for machine structure and manufacturing method therefor
JP2005350702A (en) * 2004-06-08 2005-12-22 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Steel having superior machinability for machine structural use
JP2008174830A (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-07-31 Nippon Steel Corp Steel for machine structure having excellent mechanical property and machinability
JP2017057474A (en) * 2015-09-18 2017-03-23 Jfeスチール株式会社 Free cutting steel

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1113973C (en) * 1999-01-28 2003-07-09 住友金属工业株式会社 Machine structural steel product
CN1169992C (en) * 2001-11-15 2004-10-06 住友金属工业株式会社 Steel for mechanical structure
US6764645B2 (en) * 2001-11-28 2004-07-20 Diado Steel Co., Ltd. Steel for machine structural use having good machinability and chip-breakability
JP3758581B2 (en) * 2002-02-04 2006-03-22 住友金属工業株式会社 Low carbon free cutting steel
TWI391500B (en) * 2008-08-06 2013-04-01 Posco Eco-friendly pb-free free-cutting steel and manufacturing method thereof
CN102378822B (en) * 2009-04-06 2014-05-14 新日铁住金株式会社 Steel for case hardening which has excellent cold workability and machinability and which exhibits excellent fatigue characteristics after carburizing and quenching, and process for production of same
US9725783B2 (en) * 2009-05-22 2017-08-08 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Steel for machine structure use excellent in cutting tool lifetime and machining method of same
KR101355666B1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2014-01-27 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 Steel for nitrocarburizing high frequency quenching for machine structural use, and steel component for machine structural use and process for producing same
WO2014125770A1 (en) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-21 新日鐵住金株式会社 Lead-containing free-machining steel
WO2015125915A1 (en) * 2014-02-24 2015-08-27 新日鐵住金株式会社 Steel material for induction hardening

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11217650A (en) * 1998-01-28 1999-08-10 Aichi Steel Works Ltd Free-drilling steel
JPH11222646A (en) * 1998-02-05 1999-08-17 Kobe Steel Ltd Steel for machine structural use having excellent chip treatability
JP2000282172A (en) 1999-01-28 2000-10-10 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Steel for machine structure excellent in machinability and toughness, and machine structural parts
JP2003183770A (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-07-03 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Steel for machine structure and manufacturing method therefor
JP2005350702A (en) * 2004-06-08 2005-12-22 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Steel having superior machinability for machine structural use
JP2008174830A (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-07-31 Nippon Steel Corp Steel for machine structure having excellent mechanical property and machinability
JP2017057474A (en) * 2015-09-18 2017-03-23 Jfeスチール株式会社 Free cutting steel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2018021452A1 (en) 2019-05-30
JP6760379B2 (en) 2020-09-23
EP3492615A1 (en) 2019-06-05
US20190169723A1 (en) 2019-06-06
CN109496239A (en) 2019-03-19
EP3492615A4 (en) 2019-12-25
KR20190034273A (en) 2019-04-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2018021451A1 (en) Steel for machine structures
WO2018008621A1 (en) Steel for mechanical structures
JP6468366B2 (en) Steel, carburized steel parts, and method of manufacturing carburized steel parts
JP6468365B2 (en) Steel, carburized steel parts, and method of manufacturing carburized steel parts
WO2018021452A1 (en) Steel for machine structures
JP6642237B2 (en) Cold forging steel and method for producing the same
JP6683075B2 (en) Steel for carburizing, carburized steel parts and method for manufacturing carburized steel parts
JP6683074B2 (en) Steel for carburizing, carburized steel parts and method for manufacturing carburized steel parts
JPWO2017068935A1 (en) Hot forging steel and hot forging
JP6668741B2 (en) Hot rolled bar
JP6465206B2 (en) Hot-rolled bar wire, parts and method for producing hot-rolled bar wire
JP6642236B2 (en) Cold forging steel
JP6683073B2 (en) Steel for carburizing, carburized steel parts and method for manufacturing carburized steel parts
JP6683072B2 (en) Steel for carburizing, carburized steel parts and method for manufacturing carburized steel parts
CN109790604A (en) Cold Forging Steel and its manufacturing method
JP2018035411A (en) Steel for cold forging and manufacturing method therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17834454

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018530376

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20197005585

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2017834454

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20190227