WO2017105119A1 - Procédé de traitement de distribution pour recherche sur l'état de la technique, et serveur et système utilisant ledit procédé - Google Patents

Procédé de traitement de distribution pour recherche sur l'état de la technique, et serveur et système utilisant ledit procédé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017105119A1
WO2017105119A1 PCT/KR2016/014766 KR2016014766W WO2017105119A1 WO 2017105119 A1 WO2017105119 A1 WO 2017105119A1 KR 2016014766 W KR2016014766 W KR 2016014766W WO 2017105119 A1 WO2017105119 A1 WO 2017105119A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
search
prior
information
art
search expert
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/KR2016/014766
Other languages
English (en)
Korean (ko)
Inventor
황교광
Original Assignee
노시스 주식회사
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 노시스 주식회사 filed Critical 노시스 주식회사
Publication of WO2017105119A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017105119A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Definitions

  • Various embodiments of the present invention relate to a distribution processing method of a prior art research, a server and a system for operating the same, and more specifically, a task distribution for efficiently performing search, analysis, and report generation of prior art related to the invention. It relates to a processing technique.
  • the conventional automatic translation technique is not yet perfect, and in particular, a language with poor grammatical similarities, such as Korean and English, has very low accuracy and has little utility.
  • a method for distributing a prior art research is a method of distributing and processing a prior art research task to at least one search expert device in a server, and includes target technology information for the prior art research from a client device.
  • a distribution processing method of a prior art research may include: receiving, from each search expert apparatus, a description table of each technology composition in which a predetermined content is prepared for the target technology information; And providing a prior art research report configured based on the respective technical configuration comparison tables to the client device.
  • the providing of the prior art research report may include configuring each of the technical descriptions as a search expert apparatus that satisfies a predetermined condition among the at least one search expert apparatus. Transmitting the comparison table; Receiving a prior art research report generated based on the respective technical configuration comparison tables from a search expert device that satisfies the preset condition; And transmitting the received prior art research report to the client device.
  • the preset condition may include the type number information of the available language information; Rating information previously assigned to the search expert; And at least one of career information of the search expert.
  • the subject technology information includes at least one technology component that is the subject of the prior art research, and the technology composition comparison table, the at least one technology A first region in which the component is described; A second area in which related contents of the prior art are described for each of the technical elements; And a third region in which similarity between the technical components and related contents of the prior art is described.
  • the distribution processing method of the prior art research may further include providing a comparison table creating program for creating the technical composition comparison table to the at least one search expert device, wherein the comparison table creating program includes: Technical composition comparison table preparation area; Drag input items; And outputting a screen including a capture item to the search expert device, wherein a predetermined region of the screen output from the search expert device is selected by drag and drop input, and a click on the drag input item is received.
  • the content corresponding to the selected predetermined area is generated in the second area, and when a predetermined area of the screen output from the search expert device is captured, the content corresponding to the captured area is generated in the second area.
  • the distribution processing method of the prior art research further comprises the step of determining the rating information of the prior art by combining the third region of the respective technical configuration comparison table, and provides the prior art research report
  • the step may include generating a prior art research report including the determined prior art rating information; And providing the configured prior art research report to the client device.
  • the available language information may include a language used to indicate a language that the search expert can read; And a report input language that is a language in which the search expert can write.
  • the language used and the report input language include at least one or more languages
  • the work distribution list includes major technical field information, request cost information, affiliated company information, rating information, and report translation cost for each search expert.
  • the information may further include at least one of request information and work time information.
  • Comprising the task distribution list in the distribution processing method of the prior art research according to various embodiments of the present invention, at least one of the search experts included in the task distribution list based on the target technology information is distinguished and displayed Comprising the task distribution list may comprise.
  • the available language information of the search specialist may include at least two languages.
  • Server is a server for distributing and processing the prior art research task to at least one search expert device, Communication module; A storage unit for storing information of the at least one search expert device and information of a search expert matching each search expert device; And at least one search expert and available language information of each search expert for receiving the target technology information for the prior art search from the client device through the communication module and performing the prior art search for the target technology information for each language.
  • Based on language information A may include a controller requesting the prior art research.
  • control unit may receive, from the respective search expert apparatuses, each technical configuration comparison table in which a predetermined content is written for the target technical information, and is configured based on the respective technical configuration comparison tables.
  • the communication module may be controlled to send a prior art research report to the client device.
  • the control unit transmits each technology configuration comparison table to a search expert device that satisfies a preset condition among the at least one search expert device, and performs a search that satisfies the preset condition.
  • the target technology information may include at least one technology component that is a subject of prior art research
  • the technology configuration comparison table may include a description of the at least one technology component. 1 area; A second area in which related contents of the prior art are described for each of the technical elements; And a third region in which similarity between the technical components and related contents of the prior art is described.
  • the storage unit may further include a comparison table preparation program for creating the technical configuration comparison table, and the controller may provide the comparison table preparation program to the at least one search expert device.
  • the comparison table preparation program includes: a technical configuration comparison table preparation area; Drag input items; Outputting a screen including a capture item to the search expert device, wherein a predetermined region of the screen output from the search expert device is selected by drag and drop input, and a click on the drag input item is received. To generate content corresponding to the selected predetermined area in the second area, and when a predetermined area of the screen output from the search expert device is captured, generate content corresponding to the captured area in the second area. And command to control the search expert device.
  • control unit may combine the third regions of the technical configuration comparison tables to determine the rating information of the prior art, and may include a prior art research report including the determined prior art rating information.
  • the generated prior art research report may be transmitted to the client device through the communication module.
  • the controller may configure the work distribution list so that at least one of the search experts included in the work distribution list is distinguished and displayed based on the target technology information.
  • a system is a system for distributing and processing prior art research tasks, comprising: a client device for transmitting target technology information for the prior art research to a server; Constructing a business distribution list including at least one search expert and language information available for each search expert for performing the prior art research on the target technology information, and transmitting the work distribution list to the client device; A server for receiving a selection input of at least one of the search experts included in the work distribution list from the client device, and identifying each search expert device corresponding to the selected at least one search expert; And at least one search expert device for receiving a request for prior art search based on the available language information with respect to the target technology information from the server.
  • the at least one search expert apparatus transmits each technical configuration comparison table in which predetermined contents are written to the target technical information to the server, and the server is based on the technical configuration comparison table.
  • the prior art research report can be transmitted to the client device.
  • a plurality of search experts collaborate and process prior art research of target technology information, so that the work of prior art research can be efficiently and quickly processed. There is.
  • each search expert prepares the technical composition comparison table using the comparison table creation tool, thereby further improving the processing speed of the prior art research. There is.
  • FIG. 1 is a view showing a prior art research distribution processing system according to various embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a client device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a server according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a search expert device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an operation of distributing a prior art research task in a server according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 6 and 7 are exemplary views illustrating a work distribution list according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an operation of providing a prior art research report to a client device in a server according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an operation of providing, by a server, a prior art research report generated through a specific search expert device to a client device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 10 to 12 are exemplary views illustrating an operation of creating a technical configuration comparison table according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an operation of creating a prior art research report by a server according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 14 to 15 are exemplary views showing a technical configuration comparison table received from each search expert apparatus.
  • 16 is an exemplary view showing a table in which a plurality of technical configuration comparison tables are combined.
  • 17 is a diagram illustrating an operation of executing a prior art research distribution program in a client device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an operation of performing a prior art research task in a search expert device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Target Technology Information may be the subject of prior art research relating to patents / utility models.
  • Such target technology information may be information of a patent / utility model provided by a client, or information (eg, an invention report) including the content of the invention.
  • the "prior art research" referred to in this document is a search of prior art related to the target technology information, determination of similarity between the searched prior art and the target technology information, and the grade information of the searched prior art (e.g., class X, Y or Class A, etc.) and a series of actions such as setting the target technology information and generating a report on the prior art.
  • Such prior art research may be conducted for a variety of purposes, such as patent analysis, invalidity investigation, or determination of scope of rights.
  • search experts can understand the subject technology information and search for similar prior art through various means (eg, patent / utility model search platform). It can mean who can create a report.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a prior art research distribution processing system 10 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the prior art research distribution processing system 10 may include a client device 100, a server 200, at least one search expert device 300_1, 300_2 to 300_N, and a network 400.
  • the prior art research distribution processing system 10 provides a function of distributing and processing a prior art search for a patent / utility model requested from a client to at least one search expert, and providing a report of the processed prior art search to the client. Perform.
  • the client device 100 is an electronic device of various types used by a client of a prior art research.
  • client devices 100 are, for example, smartphones, tablets, mobile phones, desktop personal computers, laptop personal computers, netbook computers, It may be at least one of a workstation, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a portable multimedia player (PMP), an MP3 player, or a wearable device.
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • PMP portable multimedia player
  • MP3 player an MP3 player
  • the server 200 is a device or program that services an intensive function to distribute and process a prior art search for the target technology information to at least one search expert device 300 according to a request of the client device 100.
  • the search expert device 300 is an electronic device used by a search expert who can perform a prior art research task related to a patent / utility model on the target technology information. This search expert device 300 may also have the same or similar hardware / software configuration as the client device 100.
  • the network 400 may be a telecommunications network.
  • the communication network may include at least one of a computer network, the Internet, the Internet of things, and a telephone network.
  • a protocol eg, a transport layer protocol, a data link layer protocol, or a physical layer protocol
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a client device 100 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the client device 100 may include an input module 110, a display module 120, a storage 130, a communication module 140, and a controller 160. According to a non-limiting embodiment, the client device 100 may omit at least one of the components of FIG. 2 or additionally include other components (eg, a power supply module, an audio processing module, a sensor module, etc.). .
  • the input module 110 may receive numeric or character information, and may include a plurality of input keys and function keys for setting various functions.
  • the function keys may include a direction key, a side key, a shortcut key, and the like, which are set to perform a function of requesting a prior art search for target technical information and outputting a prior art research report.
  • the input module 110 may generate a key signal input in connection with a request for prior art research on the target technology information and control of a report output function and transmit the generated key signal to the controller 160.
  • the input module 110 may be implemented by a touch screen method.
  • the touch screen may be formed of a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), or the like, and may be included in the input module 110.
  • the input module 110 including the touch screen may include a panel, a sheet, a digitizer, or the like capable of receiving a general touch input, a proximity touch input, a gesture input, or an electronic pen input.
  • the display module 120 may display various screens generated as the client device 100 operates a function related to a request for prior art research and output of a prior art research report. For example, the display module 120 may output the requested screen on the display screen in response to receiving the request signal for the specific screen from the input module 110 or the controller 160.
  • the display module 120 may provide various screen interfaces such as a home screen, a standby screen, a menu screen, a request menu screen of a prior art research, a search expert selection screen, or a prior art research report output screen.
  • the display module 120 may be implemented as a display module or a touch screen, and when the display module 120 is implemented as a touch screen, the screen of the display module 120 may be operated as the input module 110. .
  • the input module 110 and the display module 120 may be implemented as a touch display screen.
  • the communication module 140 may connect communication between the client device 100 and an external device (eg, the server 200 or the search expert device 300).
  • the communication module 140 may be connected to the network 400 through wireless or wired communication to communicate with the external device.
  • the wireless communication may include, for example, at least one of wireless fidelity (WiFi), Bluetooth (BT), near field communication (NFC), global positioning system (GPS) or cellular communication (GPS).
  • the wired communication may include, for example, at least one of universal serial bus (USB), high definition multimedia interface (HDMI), reduced standard 232 (RS-232), or plain old telephone service (POTS).
  • USB universal serial bus
  • HDMI high definition multimedia interface
  • RS-232 reduced standard 232
  • POTS plain old telephone service
  • the storage unit 130 may store data received or generated from the controller 160, the client device 100, or other components of the prior art research distribution processing system 10.
  • the storage unit 130 may include, for example, a memory, a cash, a buffer, or the like, and may be configured of software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of two or more thereof.
  • the storage unit 130 may store the prior art research distribution program 135.
  • Prior art research distribution program 135 may be an application that can be provided from the server 200 through an open market, such as an app store.
  • the prior art research distribution program 135 may be loaded according to a call of the controller 160 to perform functions related to prior art research distribution and processing operations through respective components of the client device 100.
  • the prior art research distribution program 135 performs a function related to prior art research distribution and processing based on information received from the server 200 through the communication module 140 or information previously stored in the storage unit 130. It can be implemented as routines or instructions (eg instructions) that can do it.
  • the controller 160 may perform a data processing function of controlling a signal flow and processing data between an overall operation such as power supply control of the client device 100 and an internal configuration of the client device 100.
  • the controller 160 may include at least one processor, and the processor may include a central processing unit (CPU), an application processor (AP), or a communication processor (CP). It may include one or more of.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a server 200 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the server 200 may include a language type reader 210, a search expert recommender 220, a search result generator 250, a storage 230, a communication module 240, and a controller 260. According to a non-limiting embodiment, the server 200 may omit at least one of the components of FIG. 3 or additionally include other components (eg, a power supply module, an audio processing module, a sensor module, etc.). Although not shown, the server 200 may include a configuration that is the same as or similar to at least some components (eg, an input module and a display module) of the client device 100.
  • the language type reading unit 210 may perform a function of reading a language described in the object description information.
  • the language type reading unit 210 may check the type of language described in the object description information based on a natural language processing algorithm such as data mining.
  • a natural language processing algorithm such as data mining.
  • various embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto, and the client apparatus 100 may transmit language information corresponding to the target description information to the server 200, and the language type reading unit 210 of the server 200 may be used. ) May identify a language corresponding to the object description information based on the received language information.
  • the language type reading unit 210 may check a family application of the target technology information.
  • Family application means an application claiming priority over a patent / utility model filed on the basis of the above specification or a patent / utility model application on which the priority claim claimed in the specification-based application is based.
  • the language type reading unit 210 may check at least one of a name, an application number, a publication number, a registration notification number of the invention described in the target technical information (eg, a domestic application specification), and a database or a pre-associated database. Communication with an external server may be performed to identify family applications of the subject technology information stored in the database or the external server. Then, the language type reading unit 210 may check the designated country information or the specification of the family application to confirm the language type used in the family application.
  • a name e.g, an application number, a publication number, a registration notification number of the invention described in the target technical information (eg, a domestic application specification), and a database or a pre-associated database. Communication with an external server may be performed to identify family applications of the subject technology information stored in the database or the external server. Then, the language type reading unit 210 may check the designated country information or the specification of the family application to confirm the language type used in the family application.
  • the language type reading unit 210 may provide the search expert recommendation unit 220 or the control unit 260 with at least one language information of the read object description information and the family application related to the object description information.
  • the search expert recommendation unit 220 may construct a work distribution list based on at least one of target technology information, at least one language information received from the language type reading unit 210, and the search expert DB 235.
  • the work distribution list may be a list in which information about the search expert is displayed for each search expert.
  • the work distribution list is available for each search expert, language information, major technical field information, request cost information, company information, rating information, report translation cost information, request format information, and estimated time required information. It may include at least one of.
  • Various examples of the work distribution list will be described in detail later with reference to FIGS. 6 to 7.
  • the search result generator 250 may construct a prior art research report by analyzing the technical composition comparison table received from the at least one search expert device 300.
  • the technical configuration comparison table may be a table in which the prior art corresponding to the technical components of the target technical information is prepared, and the details related to the technical configuration comparison table will be described later with reference to FIGS. 10 to 12.
  • the storage unit 230 may store data received or generated from the controller 260, the server 200, or other components of the prior art research distribution processing system 10.
  • the storage unit 230 may include, for example, a memory, a cash, a buffer, or the like, and may be configured of software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of two or more thereof.
  • the storage unit 230 may include a job DB 231 and a search expert DB 235.
  • the job DB 231 and the search expert DB 235 are separately configured in the storage unit 230, but the job DB 231 and the search expert DB 235 are stored in the storage unit ( 230 and one.
  • the job DB 231 may include language information read by the language type reading unit 210, a job distribution list configured by the search expert recommendation unit 220, and a preceding result configured by the search result generation unit 250. You can save the technical assurance report.
  • the job DB 231 is selected from among the client device 100, the prior art research distribution program 135 of the client device 100, the search expert device 300, and the comparison table creating program 335 of the search expert device 300. Information input or output through at least one may be stored.
  • the job DB 231 may store the search expert device 300 corresponding to the search expert listed in the work distribution list with the search expert.
  • the search expert DB 235 may store various information such as major technical field information, rating information, company information, work time information, request cost information, and report translation cost information of at least one search expert. .
  • the search expert DB 235 may provide the search expert recommendation unit 220 with information that may be used by the search expert recommendation unit 220 to be used in constructing the work distribution list.
  • the communication module 240 may connect communication between the client device 100, the server 200, or the search expert device 300.
  • the communication module 240 may be connected to the network 400 through wireless or wired communication to communicate with the client device 100 or the search expert device 300.
  • the wireless communication may include, for example, at least one of wireless fidelity (WiFi), Bluetooth (BT), near field communication (NFC), global positioning system (GPS) or cellular communication (GPS).
  • the wired communication may include, for example, at least one of universal serial bus (USB), high definition multimedia interface (HDMI), reduced standard 232 (RS-232), or plain old telephone service (POTS).
  • USB universal serial bus
  • HDMI high definition multimedia interface
  • RS-232 reduced standard 232
  • POTS plain old telephone service
  • the controller 260 may perform a data processing function of controlling a signal flow between an overall operation such as power supply control of the server 200 and an internal configuration of the server 200 and processing data.
  • the controller 260 may include at least one processor, and the processor may include a central processing unit (CPU), an application processor (AP), or a communication processor (CP). It may include one or more of.
  • the language type reader 210, the search expert recommender 220, and the search result generator 250 may combine at least some functions of the controller 260 with the general functions of the controller 260. It may be a functional configuration shown separately to distinguish. In FIG. 3, the language type reader 210, the search expert recommender 220, and the search result generator 250 are illustrated in a separate configuration from the controller 260, but various embodiments of the present disclosure are limited thereto. It is not.
  • the language type reader 210, the search expert recommender 220, and the search result generator 250 may be configured as one module with the controller 260.
  • the functions of the language type reader 210, the search expert recommender 220, the search result generator 250, and the controller 260 may be provided in the form of a routine, an instruction, or a program stored in the memory 230.
  • routines, instructions, or programs configured to perform the above operations may be stored on a computer readable storage medium.
  • Such storage media includes all types of storage media on which programs and data are stored so that they can be read by a computer system. Examples include Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), Compact Disk (CD), Digital Video Disk (DVD) -ROM, Magnetic Tape, Floppy Disk, Optical Data Storage, Flash Memory Devices, etc. Can be.
  • these storage media can be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a search expert apparatus 300 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the search expert device 300 may include an input module 310, a display module 320, a storage 330, a communication module 340, and a controller 360. According to a non-limiting embodiment, the search expert apparatus 300 may omit at least one of the components of FIG. 4 or additionally include other components (eg, a power supply module, an audio processing module, a sensor module, etc.). have. In addition, components of the input module 310, the display module 320, the storage unit 330, the communication module 340, and the controller 360 of the search expert device 300 may be inputted by the client device 100 of FIG. 1. The module 110, the display module 120, the storage 130, the communication module 140, and the controller 160 may include the same hardware / software configuration. Therefore, duplicate descriptions of the above components will be omitted.
  • Comparison table creation program 335 may be an application that can be provided from the server 200 through an open market, such as an app store.
  • the comparison table creation program 335 may be loaded according to a call of the controller 360 to perform a function related to the preparation of the technical configuration comparison table through each configuration of the search expert apparatus 300. The operation performed by the search expert apparatus 300 through the comparison table preparation program 335 will be described later in detail with reference to the following drawings.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an operation of distributing a prior art research task in the server 200 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the server 200 may receive the target technology information for the prior art research from the client device 100.
  • the server 200 may receive a patent statement that is subject to prior art research from the client device 100.
  • the server 200 may further receive information related to the target technology information (eg, language information of the target technology, work completion period information, etc.) from the client device 100 in addition to the target technology information.
  • the server 200 may construct a work distribution list for the target technology information received from the client device 100.
  • the server 200 may configure a work distribution list such that at least one search expert is distinguished and displayed based on the target technology information and the information related to the target technology information.
  • the server 200 may transmit the configured work distribution list to the client device 100.
  • the server 200 may receive a selection input for at least one of the search experts included in the work distribution list from the client device 100.
  • the server 200 may request a prior art search based on language information available to the selected at least one search expert device 300.
  • the server 200 may recognize the search expert selected by the client device 100, and identify each search expert device 300 that is matched according to the search expert and stored in the storage 230.
  • the server 200 may request a prior art search from the identified search expert device 300.
  • the request of the prior art search may be transmitted to the search expert device 300 in a text or voice form requesting the prior art search, for example.
  • the server 200 may transmit the target technology information and the work distribution list to the checked search expert device 300 when the prior art research request is made.
  • 6 and 7 are exemplary views illustrating a work distribution list according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 there is shown a work distribution list in which various information about the search expert is classified for each search expert.
  • the subject technology information is assumed to be a registered patent specification.
  • the registered patent specification has a family application written in Korean, English, and Japanese.
  • the server 200 includes at least one search expert for the client to select.
  • the distributed business distribution list may be provided to the client device 100.
  • the search experts may interpret documents written in one or more languages of Korean, German, English, Japanese, or Chinese, and assume that the person has knowledge of a technical field requested by a client or an experience of prior art research.
  • search experts included in the work distribution list are sorted in order based on the language used, reportable languages, and scores.
  • This sorting method is exemplary, and according to various embodiments, search experts of various countries may be sorted together by a predetermined number of people, or a method of sorting by each country is also possible.
  • Search Expert 1 is American and can speak English and Japanese. In addition, Search Expert 1 can also write reports in Japanese. Therefore, as shown, the language used by the search expert 1 is written in English and Japanese, and the reportable languages are also described in English and Japanese. In conclusion, Search Expert 1 can read and understand the contents of a specification written in English or Japanese (including family filed specifications) that has been commissioned by prior art research (i.e., readable), and can also write a report in English or Japanese ( That is, writing is possible), so it is exposed on the work distribution list. Therefore, the search expert 1 is likely to be designated as the person in charge of searching for the prior art in the US written in English or the person in search of the prior art in Japan.
  • Search Expert 2 can speak English but not other foreign languages. Therefore, search expert 2 is likely to be assigned only as the contact person for searching the prior art in the US written in English.
  • Search Expert 3 is Korean and can interpret documents written in Korean and English. However, in English, writing is not possible, so the reportable language is only Korean. Therefore, search expert 3 is likely to be designated only as a contact person for searching the prior art of Korea written in Korean.
  • Search Expert 4 is fluent in reading and writing Korean, Japanese, and English. Therefore, the search expert 4 has both a language used and a report input language in Korean, Japanese, and English. In this case, the search expert 4 is likely to be designated as a contact person for the prior art search in Korea, the prior art in Japan, and the US prior art.
  • a client may select Search Expert 1, Search Expert 4, Search Expert 6, Search Expert 8, and Search Expert 9 to receive prior art research reports in a short time.
  • the client device 100 or the server 200 may display the areas corresponding to the search expert 1, the search expert 4, the search expert 6, the search expert 8, and the search expert 9 separately from other items.
  • the prior art research work takes the most time for 4 days corresponding to search expert 6, and the other selected search experts take less work time, so the client needs to know the prior art within 4 days. Receive a survey.
  • the client is Korean
  • the client is likely to want to receive a prior art research report written in Korean.
  • the currently selected search expert 1 cannot read and write prior art research reports in Korean because only English and Japanese can read and write. Therefore, in order to provide a prior art research report written in Korean, it is necessary to translate the contents of the report by a third party into Korean.
  • the cost incurred by the Korean translation is displayed as a report translation cost (Korean) item.
  • Such a report translation cost may be set to a cost corresponding to a language that can be translated at a lower cost when there are a plurality of report input languages.
  • the cost of translating from English to Korean is $ 5 and the cost of translating from Japanese to Korean is set at $ 3, then the cost of translating the report from Search Expert 1 is the cost of translating from Japanese to Korean.
  • the cost may be listed as three dollars.
  • the search expert 1 can prepare his prior art research report in Japanese for the client.
  • the third party performing the prior art research translation and receiving the cost may be another search person who can write Korean, English, and Japanese, such as search expert 4, or a separate person in charge of translation.
  • Search Expert 4 who is in charge of prior art research in Korea, writes a prior art research report in Korean, so there is no cost to translate the report. However, a message or an alarm is pushed from the client device 100 or the server 200 to the search expert device 300 of the search expert 4 so as to translate the prior art research report of the search experts in charge of the prior art search in another country into Korean. Then, the search expert 4 can also configure the system to receive the translation cost of the prior art research report assigned to the person in charge of another country.
  • Search Expert 8 a German prior art researcher, is able to read and understand specifications written in German and Japanese, but only to enter reports in German. In this case, the translation of the report assigned at $ 7, because none of the client-selected Search Expert 1, Search Expert 4, Search Expert 6, Search Expert 8, and Search Expert 9 can translate German into Korean. -> Korean) Costs are transferred to third parties who can perform the translation. For the same reason as above, the search expert 9 in charge of prior art research in China also performs the same process as the search expert 8.
  • the scope of the concept of people who can read and understand languages other than the native language among the search experts may include those who understand the languages of other countries that are machine translated into their native languages.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example that may be selected if a client wants to take into account the ratings of each search professional or to allow one person to take charge of prior art searches in multiple countries or languages.
  • Search Expert 4 has been appointed as the coordinator for prior art research in Korea, Japan and the United States. Search Expert 4 has relatively high rating information and is highly trusted by other clients. Furthermore, it is a search expert who expects the cost of commissioning to be reduced by the integrated commissions for the three countries, resulting in high-efficiency prior art research. However, since the prior art research of three countries has to be carried out, it may take about 8 days.
  • the task distribution list illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7 may be variously modified and implemented for the client's requirements or work efficiency. Therefore, the work distribution list according to various embodiments of the present disclosure is not limited to the form disclosed in FIGS. 6 and 7.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an operation of providing a prior art research report to a client device 100 in a server 200 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the server 200 may receive a technology configuration comparison table from each search expert device 300.
  • each search expert device 300 may create a technology composition comparison table based on a comparison table creation program when searching the prior art.
  • the server 200 may provide the client device 100 with a prior art research report configured based on a technology configuration comparison table. Various embodiments of providing the prior art research report to the client device 100 will be described later with reference to FIGS. 9 and 13.
  • 9 is a diagram illustrating an operation of providing, by a server 200, a prior art research report generated by a specific search expert device to a client device 100 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • 9 corresponds to a first example operation that may be performed in step S830 of FIG. 8.
  • the example of FIG. 9 discloses that a specific search expert analyzes a technical composition comparison table created from various search experts, and prepares a prior art research report based on this.
  • the server 200 may identify the search expert device 300 that meets a preset condition.
  • the preset condition may be determined according to at least one of the type number information of the available language information, the rating information previously given to the search expert, and the career information of the search expert.
  • a search expert may analyze a plurality of technical composition comparison tables as representatives to produce a prior art report by combining a plurality of technical composition comparison tables.
  • a search expert 4 capable of providing the largest number of report input languages among the search experts of FIG. 6 may analyze the plurality of technical configuration comparison tables. Therefore, when all the technical composition comparison tables are received from the at least one search expert device 300 selected by the client, the server 200 may satisfy the preset condition of the search expert device 300 corresponding to the search expert 4. It may be determined by the search expert device 300.
  • the server 200 may transmit each technology configuration comparison table to the checked search expert device 300. At this time, the server 200 may transmit a message to the search expert apparatus 300 indicating that the corresponding search expert is selected as a search expert to prepare a prior art research report.
  • the search expert may generate a prior art research report through the search expert device 300 by combining the technical composition comparison tables. Subsequently, in operation S950, the server 200 may receive a prior art research report from the identified search expert device 300, and in operation S970, the server 200 sends the received prior art research report to the client device 100. Can transmit
  • FIGS. 10 to 12 are exemplary views illustrating an operation of creating a technical configuration comparison table according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the screen 1001 illustrated in FIGS. 10 to 12 may include a display module performing a prior art search through a search expert device 300 (eg, a PC) after a search expert executes a comparison table preparation program. For example, a monitor screen).
  • a search expert device 300 eg, a PC
  • the search experts in FIGS. 10 to 12 assume that the available language is a search expert designated in English.
  • the search expert apparatus 300 may output the comparison table creation tool 1005 according to the execution of the comparison table creation program.
  • the comparison table creation tool 1005 includes a claim area, a technology component display area 1010, and a prior art display area 1008, and drag input items 1007 and capture in an area adjacent to the technology component display area 1010. Item 1009 may be displayed.
  • the prior art display area 1008 may include a relevant partial area 1012, a contrasting configuration (summary) area and a similarity area 1014.
  • the screen or file created by such a comparison table creation tool 1005 can be used as a technical configuration comparison table.
  • the technical component display area 1010 in which the at least one technical component is described is the first region of the technical configuration comparison table, in which related contents of the prior art are described for each of the technical components.
  • the relevant partial region 1012 may be a second region of the technical composition comparison table, and the similarity region 1014 in which the similarity between the technical component and the related content is described may be allocated to the third region of the technical composition comparison table.
  • the search expert may hide, switch to full screen, or terminate the comparison table creation tool 1005 using the hidden function item 1011, the full screen switching item 1013, and the window closing item 1015.
  • Claims 1, 2 and 3 are displayed in the claims area, and technical components A, B, C and D constituting the claim 1 are shown as an example.
  • the application specification has a total of three claims, it is assumed that can be divided into technical components from A to G.
  • FIG. 10 it is assumed that a search expert uses a patent search service such as GOOGLE TM PATENT for prior art research. If the search expert finds text 1003 having a concept similar to that of the technical component B of the prior art research while reviewing the searched content, the search expert uses the drag-and-drop input of the mouse to search the text 1003. You can choose. This designates a block of text 1003 as shown.
  • a patent search service such as GOOGLE TM PATENT
  • the search expert clicks the drag input item 1007 (1019), and additionally clicks the area 1017 corresponding to the technical component B to display the block-designated text 1003 as shown in FIG. 11. It can be inserted or created in the area 1017 automatically.
  • the comparison table preparation program may detect a drag and drop input on the display module of the search expert device 300, copy the detected area, and copy the detected area to the relevant partial area 1021 adjacent to the technical component B area 1017. Can be pasted with).
  • a search expert may capture the text using the capture item 1009, and the comparison table creating tool 1005 may display the captured text. Can be created in the relevant subregion.
  • the search expert may create and write a summary in the summary description area 1023 corresponding to the technology element B area 1017, and may include a similarity area corresponding to the technology element B. Similarity information may be entered in 1025).
  • the similarity information may be configured as an item that can select high, ambiguity, and low as an example, which is not limited.
  • the embodiment of the present invention is not limited thereto, and the comparison table preparing program stores URL information of the web page (eg, GOOGLE TM PATENT), and then reviews the prior technology report prepared based on the technical composition comparison table or the technical composition comparison table.
  • Link information may be included in the technical configuration comparison table to output contents related to the URL information. For example, on client device 100, server 200, or search expert device 300, for a particular area (eg, related subfield, summary area, and similarity area, etc.) of a technology comparison table or prior art report.
  • the link information assigned to the specific region may be checked and a web page corresponding to the URL may be output.
  • the search expert can review the prior art for the technical components A to G, and if there is a corresponding related content, prepare the technical composition comparison table by the above operation.
  • the technical composition comparison table generated by the comparison table creation tool 1005 may be stored in the search expert device 300 or transmitted to at least one of the client device 100, the server 200, and the specific search expert device 300. Can be.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an operation of creating a prior art research report by the server 200 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. 13 corresponds to a second example operation that may be performed in step S830 of FIG. 8. In addition, an example of contents related to the operation of FIG. 13 will be described with reference to FIGS. 14 to 16.
  • 14 to 15 are exemplary views showing a technical configuration comparison table received from each search expert apparatus 300
  • FIG. 16 is an exemplary diagram showing a table in which a plurality of technical configuration comparison tables are combined.
  • the server 200 may compare a description element description area of each technology composition comparison table and a related content description area of the prior art. Unlike the example of FIG. 9, in this embodiment, the server 200 automatically analyzes the technical composition comparison table and generates a prior art research report.
  • the server 200 may check whether related contents of all technical components are disclosed in a single technical configuration comparison table.
  • the server 200 may determine the prior art as a class X.
  • Class X is a non-limiting embodiment and may mean the grade information that the grade of the prior art is the highest degree of similarity when all the technical components that are the subject of prior art research are disclosed in one prior art. . This prior art of class X can be used as a judgment factor regarding the novelty of patent law.
  • the server 200 may determine the prior art 1 as class X. To this end, the server 200 uses natural language processing algorithms or identifiers for content described in a specific area (eg, the relevant partial area 1012 or the similarity area 1014) of the technical comparison table received from each search expert device 300. It can be recognized using various algorithms such as sensing technology. In addition, the server 400 may compare the technical components with the prior art based on whether the region is recognized and the contents of the recognized region.
  • step S1140 the server 200 checks whether the related information about all the technical components is disclosed by the combination of the technical configuration comparison tables. Can be.
  • the server 200 may determine the corresponding prior art as the Y-class.
  • the class Y may be grade information indicating a case in which a technical component that is a subject of prior art research is disclosed when combining a plurality of prior arts. This prior art of class Y can be used as a judgment factor related to the progress of patent law.
  • FIG. 14 is a technical configuration comparison table that the server 200 receives from the search expert (eg, the search expert 4 of FIG. 6) from the device 300.
  • the search expert 4 compared the documents of KRXXXXXX A, KRXXXXXX B2 with the target technical information (claims 1, 2, 3 and technical components A to G) and prepared a technical composition comparison table as described above.
  • FIG. 15 is a technical configuration comparison table that the server 200 receives from the search expert (eg, the search expert 1 of FIG. 6) device 300.
  • the search expert 1 compared the literatures of USXXXXXX A and USXXXXX B with the technical information of the object, and prepared a technical composition comparison table as described above.
  • FIG. 16 illustrates a table recombined based on a plurality of technical configuration comparison tables after the technical configuration comparison tables of FIGS. 14 and 15 are received by the server 200.
  • the combination method is not limited, but a description will be given of an example in which contents related to the similarity area are set to be combined. In particular, a screen set to highlight and identify a region corresponding to a high level among the similarity areas will be described as an example.
  • KRXXXXXXX A prior art is marked as having high relevance when compared to the technical components A, D, and E of claims 1 and 2.
  • the USXXXXXXX A document is also indicated to be highly relevant to components B, C and E of claims 1 and 2D. Since there is a configuration corresponding to the technical elements A, B, C, D and E of the first and second documents as a combination of the two documents, the server 200 classifies the prior art KRXXXXXX A and the prior art USXXXXXX A documents. And, it can be determined that the claim 1, 2 of the target technology information is not progressive by the prior art of the class Y. In this case, the determination result may include information in which the possibility of patentability is expressed numerically. In addition, the server 200 may include the determination result and the rating information of the prior art in the prior art research report when constructing the prior art research report.
  • the server 200 may determine the corresponding prior arts as the A class in operation S1160.
  • Class A may be grade information indicating that the target technology information and the prior art corresponding to the related art.
  • grade information such as X, Y, and A grades can be changed in various forms according to user settings or prior art research policies, and various embodiments of the present invention limit the grade information of the prior art to the above examples. It is not.
  • the server 200 may generate a prior art research report including prior art rating information.
  • the server 200 may transmit the prior art research report to the client device 100.
  • 17 is a diagram illustrating an operation of executing a prior art research distribution program in the client device 100 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the client device 100 may execute a prior art research distribution program.
  • the prior art research distribution program may input or attach at least one of target technology information and information related to the target technology information (for example, language information, work completion period information, etc.) to the client device 100 on a screen. You can print the screen.
  • the client device 100 may transmit the object technology information to the server 200.
  • the client device 100 may transmit information related to the target description information to the server 200 in addition to the target description information.
  • the client device 100 may receive a work distribution list from the server 200, and in operation S1570, the client device 100 may search search experts included in the received work distribution list. You can choose at least one of them.
  • the client device 100 may receive a prior art research report from the server 200 and output the received prior art research report.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an operation of performing a prior art research task in a search expert apparatus 300 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the search expert apparatus 300 may receive a prior art research request from the server 200.
  • the prior art research request may be, for example, a message including at least one of target technology information and information related to the target technology information.
  • the search expert apparatus 300 may execute a comparison table creating program, and may output a comparison table creating tool to create a technical configuration comparison table. Then, in operation S1670, the search expert apparatus 300 may transmit the created technical configuration comparison table to the server 200.
  • FIG. 1 the search expert apparatus 300 may execute a comparison table creating program, and may output a comparison table creating tool to create a technical configuration comparison table. Then, in operation S1670, the search expert apparatus 300 may transmit the created technical configuration comparison table to the server 200.
  • the search expert apparatus 300 may perform additional operations related to the prior art research report. Can be.
  • the search expert apparatus 300 may receive a request to prepare a prior art research report and a plurality of technical configuration comparison tables from the server 200.
  • the search expert may analyze the plurality of technology configuration comparison tables to create a prior art research report through the search expert apparatus 300, and transmit the created prior art research report to the server 200.
  • the technical composition comparison table generated in each search expert device 300 may be shared between each search expert device 300 in real time or periodically.
  • the technical composition comparison table generated in the first search expert device may be transmitted to the second search expert device through a communication module of the first search expert device.
  • the first search expert apparatus may directly transmit the created technical configuration comparison table or the prepared comparison table to the second search expert apparatus, but may also transmit it to the second search expert apparatus via the server 200. Such an operation may be performed through at least one of the comparison table preparing program 335 and the controller 360 of the search expert apparatus 300.
  • the technical composition comparison table being created through the first search expert device is shared with the second search expert device, so that the second search expert can perform real-time work of another search expert (eg, the first search expert). Can be reviewed.
  • the second search expert may omit the search for the technical components already searched by other search experts, thereby enabling efficient collaboration of the prior art research.
  • module or “unit” may refer to a unit including one or a combination of two or more of hardware, software, or firmware. . “Module” or “unit” is interchangeable with, for example, terms such as unit, logic, logical block, component, or circuit. Can be. “Module” or “part” may be a minimum unit or part of an integrally formed part, or may be a minimum unit or part of one or more functions. The “module” or “ ⁇ part” can be implemented mechanically or electronically.
  • a “module” or “unit” in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention may be an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that perform certain operations, known or developed in the future. ) Or at least one of a programmable-logic device.
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • FPGA field-programmable gate arrays
  • an apparatus eg, modules or functions thereof
  • method eg, operations
  • at least a portion of an apparatus may be, for example, computer readable in the form of a programming module. It may be implemented by instructions stored in a computer-readable storage media. When the instruction is executed by one or more processors, the one or more processors may perform a function corresponding to the instruction.
  • the computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, a memory.
  • the computer-readable recording medium includes magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tapes, and optical recording media such as compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM) and digital versatile disc (DVD).
  • Media, magneto-optical media, such as floppy disks, and program instructions such as read only memory, random access memory, flash memory, Hardware device specifically configured to store and perform modules).
  • the program instructions may also include high-level language code that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter as well as machine code such as produced by a compiler.
  • the hardware device described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operations of the various embodiments of the present invention, and vice versa.
  • Modules or programming modules may include at least one or more of the aforementioned components, omit some of them, or further include additional components.
  • Operations performed by modules, programming modules, or other components in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention may be executed in a sequential, parallel, repetitive, or heuristic manner. In addition, some operations may be executed in a different order, may be omitted, or other operations may be added.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de traitement de distribution pour une recherche sur l'état de la technique, ainsi qu'un serveur et un système utilisant ledit procédé. Selon divers modes de réalisation de l'invention, le procédé de traitement de distribution pour une recherche sur l'état de la technique est un procédé qui permet à un serveur de distribuer et de traiter un travail de recherche sur l'état de la technique pour au moins un dispositif d'expert de recherche, et qui peut consister à : recevoir, d'un dispositif client, des informations technologiques cibles pour la recherche sur l'état de la technique ; configurer une liste de distribution de travaux comprenant au moins un expert de recherche pour effectuer, par langue, la recherche sur l'état de la technique pour les informations technologiques cibles et les informations linguistiques utilisables de chaque expert de recherche ; transmettre la liste de distribution de travaux configurée au dispositif client et recevoir, du dispositif client, une entrée sélective pour au moins l'un des experts de recherche inclus dans la liste de distribution de travaux ; et demander, à chaque dispositif d'expert de recherche correspondant à l'expert ou aux experts de recherche, d'effectuer la recherche sur l'état de la technique d'après les informations linguistiques utilisables pour les informations technologiques cibles.
PCT/KR2016/014766 2015-12-17 2016-12-16 Procédé de traitement de distribution pour recherche sur l'état de la technique, et serveur et système utilisant ledit procédé WO2017105119A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020150180819A KR101757755B1 (ko) 2015-12-17 2015-12-17 선행기술조사의 분배처리 방법 및 이를 운용하는 서버 및 시스템
KR10-2015-0180819 2015-12-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017105119A1 true WO2017105119A1 (fr) 2017-06-22

Family

ID=59057362

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/KR2016/014766 WO2017105119A1 (fr) 2015-12-17 2016-12-16 Procédé de traitement de distribution pour recherche sur l'état de la technique, et serveur et système utilisant ledit procédé

Country Status (2)

Country Link
KR (1) KR101757755B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2017105119A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102139128B1 (ko) * 2018-04-24 2020-08-11 황도일 플랫폼 시스템
KR102662916B1 (ko) * 2022-10-11 2024-05-03 전정욱 빅데이터 기반 업무 관리 시스템 및 방법

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20040107971A (ko) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-23 심학봉 기술평가 방법 및 그 시스템
KR20120081865A (ko) * 2011-01-12 2012-07-20 이주현 언어지식 국제나눔 원스탑 서비스 시스템 및 이를 이용한 서비스 방법
KR20140059999A (ko) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-19 (주)윕스 조사 보고서 작성 장치 및 조사 보고서 작성 디스플레이 방법
KR20150026107A (ko) * 2013-08-30 2015-03-11 주식회사 로앤컴퍼니 법률 서비스 제공 장치 및 방법

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20040107971A (ko) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-23 심학봉 기술평가 방법 및 그 시스템
KR20120081865A (ko) * 2011-01-12 2012-07-20 이주현 언어지식 국제나눔 원스탑 서비스 시스템 및 이를 이용한 서비스 방법
KR20140059999A (ko) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-19 (주)윕스 조사 보고서 작성 장치 및 조사 보고서 작성 디스플레이 방법
KR20150026107A (ko) * 2013-08-30 2015-03-11 주식회사 로앤컴퍼니 법률 서비스 제공 장치 및 방법

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Current Status of the Supply and Demand of IP Human Resources and its Prospect Survey", KOREA INVENTION PROMOTION ASSOCIATION, 30 September 2008 (2008-09-30), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.iphuman.or.kr/ipes2013/front/iphm/bbs/bbs.do? method=download&bbsno=25 3&fno=1> [retrieved on 20170119] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101757755B1 (ko) 2017-07-26
KR20170072541A (ko) 2017-06-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2016099192A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de gestion de contenu basé sur un texte d&#39;un dispositif électronique
WO2016068455A1 (fr) Procédé et système de fourniture d&#39;interface de clavier configurable et procédé de saisie de réponse utilisant ledit clavier configurable en association avec un contenu de conversation
WO2016093552A2 (fr) Dispositif terminal et son procédé de traitement de données
WO2014035199A1 (fr) Appareil d&#39;interface utilisateur dans un terminal d&#39;utilisateur et son procédé de support
WO2014035195A2 (fr) Appareil d&#39;interface utilisateur dans un terminal utilisateur et procédé permettant le fonctionnement de celui-ci
EP3031213A1 (fr) Appareil, serveur et procédé pour fournir un sujet de conversation
EP3504619A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de gestion de notifications
WO2019164119A1 (fr) Dispositif électronique et son procédé de commande
WO2017111195A1 (fr) Procédé de mise en place d&#39;une interface de négoce direct de véhicules basé sur une évaluation de fiabilité, et serveur l&#39;exploitant
WO2014115943A1 (fr) Dispositif d&#39;affichage sensible au toucher pour interface d&#39;entrée et son procédé de commande
WO2019203494A1 (fr) Dispositif électronique de saisie de caractères et procédé de fonctionnement associé
WO2021162323A1 (fr) Dispositif électronique et procédé de fonctionnement d&#39;un contenu à l&#39;aide de celui-ci
WO2017115994A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à fournir des notes au moyen d&#39;un calcul de corrélation à base d&#39;intelligence artificielle
WO2015147599A1 (fr) Procédé de partage de données et un dispositif électronique associé
WO2016021878A1 (fr) Système et procédé de fourniture d&#39;informations
WO2017105119A1 (fr) Procédé de traitement de distribution pour recherche sur l&#39;état de la technique, et serveur et système utilisant ledit procédé
WO2013191408A1 (fr) Procédé pour améliorer une reconnaissance tactile et dispositif électronique correspondant
WO2018143723A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de gestion de contenu à travers des applications
TW201447232A (zh) 電子裝置及其根據地址資訊啓動應用程式的方法
WO2013118971A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour compléter des informations horaires, et support d&#39;enregistrement lisible par ordinateur sur lequel est enregistré un programme d&#39;exécution du procédé
US20190266194A1 (en) Information analysis system, information analysis method, and recording medium
WO2020159213A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de configuration contextuelle personnalisée par l&#39;utilisateur
WO2020149655A1 (fr) Procédé de fourniture de données partagées phrases sur la base d&#39;attribut de dispositif et dispositif électronique correspondant
WO2017052109A1 (fr) Procédé de capture d&#39;écran dans un dispositif électronique
WO2020013579A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de récupération de contenu

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16876061

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16876061

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1