WO2016208315A1 - Dispositif de diagnostic d'installation et procédé de diagnostic d'installation - Google Patents

Dispositif de diagnostic d'installation et procédé de diagnostic d'installation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016208315A1
WO2016208315A1 PCT/JP2016/065373 JP2016065373W WO2016208315A1 WO 2016208315 A1 WO2016208315 A1 WO 2016208315A1 JP 2016065373 W JP2016065373 W JP 2016065373W WO 2016208315 A1 WO2016208315 A1 WO 2016208315A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
plant
diagnosis
diagnostic
abnormality
diagnostic apparatus
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2016/065373
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
孝朗 関合
林　喜治
達矢 前田
和貴 定江
正博 村上
深井　雅之
Original Assignee
株式会社日立製作所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立製作所 filed Critical 株式会社日立製作所
Priority to CN201680036343.0A priority Critical patent/CN107710089B/zh
Publication of WO2016208315A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016208315A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a plant diagnostic apparatus and a plant diagnostic method for diagnosing abnormal plant conditions.
  • the plant diagnostic device detects the occurrence of an abnormality or accident based on the measurement data from the plant when an abnormal transient or accident occurs in the plant.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a diagnostic apparatus using adaptive resonance theory (ART), which is one of clustering technologies.
  • ART is a theory that classifies multidimensional data into categories according to their similarity.
  • normal measurement data is classified into a plurality of categories (normal categories) using ART.
  • the current measurement data is input to the ART and classified into categories.
  • a new category (new category) is generated.
  • the occurrence of a new category means that the state of the plant has changed. Therefore, the occurrence of an abnormality is determined based on the occurrence of a new category, and an abnormality is diagnosed when the occurrence rate of the new category exceeds a threshold value.
  • a parameter that determines the size of the cluster (the size of the category in ART). This parameter is called a resolution parameter.
  • a resolution parameter determines the size of the cluster.
  • the range of change in the data trend in which new categories occur differs depending on whether the resolution is coarse or fine.
  • the resolution is rough, the data tendency is greatly changed from that in the normal state, so the probability that the devices are different is high.
  • the resolution is fine, there is a possibility that a minute tendency change such as measurement noise is detected, so the probability of abnormality is low.
  • the setting values of the parameters that determine the size of the cluster are different, the probability that an abnormality has occurred at the time of detecting an abnormality differs.
  • the probability that an abnormality has occurred at the time of abnormality detection is different.
  • the present invention provides a plant diagnostic apparatus comprising a plurality of diagnostic means for diagnosing a plant state abnormality, based on measurement signal data relating to the plant state and facility management information data relating to a past state abnormality. And a comprehensive diagnosis unit that obtains an accuracy of detection of the state abnormality of each of the plurality of diagnosis units and evaluates an estimated loss amount based on the accuracy and a loss amount associated with the state abnormality.
  • ⁇ ⁇ Estimates the estimated amount of loss when an abnormality is detected, and can provide useful information for determining whether to handle the detected abnormality.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram for explaining a diagnostic apparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
  • the diagnosis device 200 is connected to the plant 100, the screen display device 800, and the external input device 900, and monitors and diagnoses the plant 100.
  • the diagnostic device 200 is configured by connecting a communication unit that performs communication between devices or devices, a computer, a computer server (CPU: Central Processing Unit), a memory, various database DBs, and the like by wired or wireless connection.
  • the external input device 900 includes a keyboard switch, a pointing device such as a mouse, a touch panel, a voice instruction device, and the like, and the screen display device 800 includes a display.
  • the diagnostic device 200 includes a comprehensive diagnostic unit 400 and a diagnostic unit 500 as arithmetic units. A plurality of diagnosis means 500 are provided, and the number thereof can be arbitrarily set.
  • the diagnostic apparatus 200 includes a measurement signal database 300, an equipment management information database 310, and a diagnostic result database 320 as databases. In FIG. 1, the database is abbreviated as DB.
  • the computerized information is stored in the measurement signal database 300, the facility management information database 310, and the diagnosis result database 320, and the information is stored in a form generally called an electronic file (electronic data).
  • the diagnostic apparatus 200 includes an external input interface 210 and an external output interface 220 as interfaces with the outside.
  • the measurement signal 1 which measured various state quantities which are the operating states of the plant 100 via the external input interface 210, and the external input signal 2 created by operation of the keyboard 910 and the mouse 920 provided in the external input device 900 Is taken into the diagnostic apparatus 200. Further, the comprehensive diagnosis result signal 12 is output to the screen display device 800 via the external output interface 220.
  • the measurement signal 1 obtained by measuring various state quantities of the plant 100 is taken in via the external input interface 210.
  • the measurement signal 3 captured by the diagnostic device 200 is stored in the measurement signal database 300.
  • facility management information such as failure information and maintenance information generated in the plant 100 is taken into the diagnostic apparatus 200 by an external input signal 2 generated by operating the keyboard 910 and the mouse 920.
  • the facility management information signal 4 captured by the diagnostic device 200 is stored in the facility management information database 310.
  • Diagnostic device 200 has two processing modes, an evaluation mode and a diagnostic mode.
  • the flowchart of the evaluation mode and the diagnosis mode and the operations of the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 and the diagnosis unit 500 will be described later with reference to FIGS.
  • the comprehensive diagnostic unit 400, the diagnostic unit 500, the measurement signal database 300, the equipment management information database 310, and the diagnostic result database 320 are provided in the diagnostic apparatus 200. May be arranged outside the diagnostic apparatus 200, and only data may be communicated between the apparatuses.
  • all the information stored in the database installed in the diagnostic device 200 can be displayed on the screen display device 100, and these information are the external input signal 1 generated by operating the external input device 900. It can be corrected.
  • the external input device 900 is composed of a keyboard and a mouse, but any device for inputting data such as a microphone or a touch panel for voice input may be used.
  • the present invention can also be implemented as an information providing service for providing information obtained by operating the diagnostic method and diagnostic apparatus 200.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the comprehensive diagnosis means 400 in the evaluation mode and the diagnosis mode of the diagnosis apparatus 200.
  • FIG. 2 (a) is a flowchart of the evaluation mode.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis means 400 extracts the measurement signal 5 during a predetermined period stored in the measurement signal database 300.
  • step 2010 the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 transmits the measurement signal 9 to the diagnosis unit 500.
  • the diagnosis unit 500 processes the measurement signal 9 to diagnose the state of the plant 100 and transmits the diagnosis result 10 to the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 collects the received diagnosis results 10 and transmits the diagnosis result database information 8 to the diagnosis result database 320 for storage.
  • step 2020 the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 extracts the facility management information signal 6 stored in the facility management information database 310.
  • step 2030 the detection result of each diagnostic means in the diagnosis result database information 7 stored in the diagnosis result database 320 is compared with the facility management information signal 6 extracted in step 2020, and the accuracy and average lead time are calculated.
  • the accuracy is obtained by dividing the number of failures by the number of detections.
  • the average lead time is a time obtained by subtracting the time detected by the corresponding diagnostic means from the time detected by the threshold determination, and is a time indicating how early the time is detected.
  • the accuracy and average lead time of each diagnostic means obtained in step 2030 are stored in the diagnostic result database 320.
  • step 2040 the comprehensive diagnosis means 400 extracts the diagnosis result database information 7 stored in the diagnosis result database 320 and transmits it to the external output interface 220 as the comprehensive diagnosis result signal 11.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis result signal 12 is transmitted to the image display device 800 and displayed on the screen display device 800.
  • FIG. 2B is a flowchart for explaining the operation in the diagnosis mode.
  • step 2100 the comprehensive diagnosis means 400 extracts the operation data 5 for the period to be diagnosed that is stored in the measurement signal database.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 transmits the measurement signal 9 to the diagnosis unit 500.
  • the diagnosis unit 500 processes the measurement signal 9 to diagnose the state of the plant 100 and transmits the diagnosis result 10 to the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 collects the received diagnosis results 10 and transmits the diagnosis result database information 8 to the diagnosis result database 320 for storage.
  • step 2120 the presence / absence of abnormality detection is evaluated. If there is a diagnostic means that has detected the abnormality, the process proceeds to step 2130, and if not, the process proceeds to step 2160.
  • step 2130 the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 extracts the diagnosis result database information 7 stored in the diagnosis result database 320, and grasps the accuracy information regarding the diagnosis unit that detected the abnormality in step 2120.
  • step 2140 the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 extracts the facility management information 6 stored in the facility management information database 310, and grasps the loss due to the failure.
  • the comprehensive diagnosis unit 400 calculates the estimated loss based on the accuracy extracted in step 2130 and the loss extracted in step 2140.
  • the expected loss amount may be obtained in a plurality of ways, such as by multiplying the accuracy and the loss amount, or by using a predetermined parameter.
  • Step 2160 the detection result of each diagnostic means and the estimated loss calculated in Step 2150 when there is a diagnostic means that has detected an abnormality are displayed on the screen display device 800.
  • the diagnostic apparatus 200 of the present invention when the abnormality is detected by the diagnostic unit 500, it is possible to provide useful information for determining whether or not to deal with the detected abnormality by displaying the estimated loss amount.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the timing for operating the evaluation mode and the diagnostic mode.
  • the evaluation mode is operated once and the diagnosis mode is operated at a certain period.
  • the evaluation mode is operated at regular intervals, the accuracy and the average lead time data stored in the diagnosis result database 320 are updated, and then the diagnosis mode is operated.
  • the evaluation mode is activated when an instruction is given from the user.
  • the evaluation mode is executed at an arbitrary timing, the accuracy and the average lead time are updated, and the diagnosis mode is operated.
  • the timing for operating the evaluation mode and the diagnostic mode can be arbitrarily set.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a mode of data stored in the measurement signal database 300 and the facility management information database 310.
  • the value of the measurement signal 1 (data items A, B, and C are shown in the figure) that is operation data measured for the plant 100 is sampled. Stored for each period (time on the vertical axis).
  • scroll boxes 302 and 303 that can move vertically and horizontally on the display screen 301, a wide range of data can be scroll-displayed.
  • the facility management information database 310 stores failure information such as failure contents, countermeasure costs, lead time required for failure avoidance, days of stoppage due to failure, and opportunity loss caused by plant shutdown. Is done.
  • maintenance information such as maintenance contents, cost required for maintenance, the number of days required for maintenance, an opportunity loss due to maintenance, and the like are stored in the facility management information database 310.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a mode of data stored in the diagnosis result database 320.
  • diagnosis result database 320 detection results of the respective diagnosis means (diagnosis means A, B, and C are described in the figure) are stored for each sampling period (time on the vertical axis). Is done.
  • scroll boxes 312 and 313 that can be moved vertically and horizontally on the display screen 311, a wide range of data can be scroll-displayed.
  • diagnosis result database 320 the detection result of each diagnosis means is stored.
  • diagnosis result is replaced with digital information, such as 1 at the time of abnormality determination and 0 at the time of normal determination.
  • the accuracy and average lead time calculated in the evaluation mode are stored for each diagnosis means.
  • FIG. 6 describes a case where an adaptive resonance theory (ART) is applied as an example of the diagnostic means 500. It should be noted that other clustering methods such as vector quantization and support vector machine can be used.
  • ART adaptive resonance theory
  • the data classification function includes a data preprocessing device 610 and an ART module 620.
  • the data preprocessing device 610 converts the operation data into input data for the ART module 620.
  • the data pre-processing device 610 normalizes the data for each measurement item.
  • This input data Ii (n) is input to the ART module 620.
  • the measurement signal 10 or the operation signal 11 which is input data is classified into a plurality of categories.
  • the ART module 620 includes an F0 layer 621, an F1 layer 622, an F2 layer 623, a memory 624, and a selection subsystem 625, which are coupled to each other.
  • the F1 layer 622 and the F2 layer 623 are connected via a weighting factor.
  • the weighting coefficient represents a prototype (prototype) of a category into which input data is classified.
  • the prototype represents a representative value of the category.
  • Process 1 The input vector is normalized by the F0 layer 621, and noise is removed.
  • a suitable category candidate is selected by comparing the input data input to the F1 layer 622 with a weighting factor.
  • Process 3 The validity of the category selected by the selection subsystem 625 is evaluated by the ratio with the parameter ⁇ . If it is determined to be valid, the input data is classified into the category, and the process proceeds to process 4. On the other hand, if it is not determined to be valid, the category is reset, and an appropriate category candidate is selected from the other categories (repeat process 2). Increasing the value of parameter ⁇ makes the category classification finer. That is, the category size is reduced. Conversely, if the value of ⁇ is reduced, the classification becomes coarse. Category size increases. This parameter ⁇ is referred to as a vigilance parameter.
  • Process 4 When all the existing categories are reset in Process 2, it is determined that the input data belongs to the new category, and a new weighting factor representing the prototype of the new category is generated.
  • weight coefficient WJ (new) corresponding to category J uses past weight coefficient WJ (old) and input data p (or data derived from input data). Is updated by equation (1).
  • Kw is a learning rate parameter (0 ⁇ Kw ⁇ 1), and is a value that determines the degree to which the input vector is reflected in the new weighting factor.
  • Equations 1 and 2 to 12 described below are incorporated in the ART module 620.
  • the characteristic of the data classification algorithm of the ART module 620 is the above processing 4.
  • process 4 when input data different from the learned pattern is input, a new pattern can be recorded without changing the recorded pattern. Therefore, it is possible to record a new pattern while recording a pattern learned in the past.
  • the ART module 620 learns the given pattern. Therefore, when new input data is input to the learned ART module 620, it is possible to determine which pattern in the past is close by the above algorithm. If the pattern has never been experienced before, it is classified into a new category.
  • FIG. 6B is a block diagram showing the configuration of the F0 layer 621.
  • the input data I i is normalized again at each time, and a normalized input vector u i 0 to be input to the F1 layer 621 and the selection subsystem 625 is created.
  • W i 0 is calculated from the input data I i according to Equation 2.
  • a is a constant.
  • X i 0 obtained by normalizing W i 0 is calculated using Equation 3.
  • represents the norm of W 0 .
  • u i 0 is input to the F1 layer.
  • FIG. 6C is a block diagram showing the configuration of the F1 layer 622.
  • u i 0 obtained by Expression 5 is held as a short-term memory, and P i to be input to the F2 layer 722 is calculated.
  • Formulas for the F2 layer are collectively shown in Formulas 6 to 12.
  • a and b are constants
  • f (•) is a function expressed by Equation 4
  • T j is a fitness calculated by the F2 layer 623.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of the result of classifying measurement signals into categories.
  • FIG. 7A is a diagram illustrating an example of a classification result obtained by classifying the measurement signal 1 of the plant 100 into categories.
  • FIG. 7 (a) shows, as an example, two items of the measurement signal, which are represented by a two-dimensional graph.
  • the vertical axis and the horizontal axis indicate the measurement signals of the respective items normalized.
  • the measurement signal is divided into a plurality of categories 630 (circles shown in FIG. 4C) by the ART module 620 in FIG. One circle corresponds to one category.
  • measurement signals are classified into four categories.
  • Category number 1 is a group in which item A has a large value and item B has a small value
  • category number 2 is a group in which both items A and B have small values
  • category number 3 has a small value in item A
  • item B A group with a large value of
  • category number 4 is a group with a large value for both items A and B.
  • FIG. 7B is a diagram for explaining the result of classifying the measurement signal 1 acquired from the plant 100 into categories.
  • the horizontal axis represents time, and the vertical axis represents measurement signals and category numbers.
  • the data of the normal period before the start of diagnosis was classified into categories 1 to 3.
  • the first half of data after the start of monitoring is classified into category 2, which is the same category as the model data. In this case, since the data trends are the same, it is determined that the state has not changed.
  • the latter half of data after the start of monitoring is classified into category 4, and is classified into a category different from the model data. Since the data trends are different, it is determined that the state of the plant has changed.
  • diagnostic technology using clustering technology has the feature of detecting changes in data trends.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the category size, detection timing, accuracy, and expected loss.
  • the accuracy increases as the category size increases. If the accuracy is high, the estimated loss amount is also high, so the category size and the estimated loss amount have an exponential relationship as shown in FIG.
  • step 2030 of FIG. 2 past data is analyzed by the comprehensive diagnosis means 400 to obtain the relationship of FIG. 8B and stored in the diagnosis result database 320.
  • step 2040 the relationship of FIG. You may make it display on the apparatus 800.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the change over time in the detection results of each diagnostic means and the estimated loss amount.
  • Diagnostic means A, B, C are composed of three types of ART with different category sizes. Diagnosis means A detects at time 2200, diagnosis means B detects at time 2210, and diagnosis means C detects at time 2220. In addition, the estimated loss amount is calculated by multiplying the maximum value of the accuracy of the detected diagnostic means by the amount of damage (10 million yen in this embodiment).
  • the change in the measured value is small, the time to reach the failure is long, the accuracy is low, and the expected loss is also low.
  • the change in the measured value increases with the passage of time, an abnormality is detected by a highly accurate diagnostic means, and the expected loss is also increased.
  • the diagnosis device 200 of the present invention can acquire information for determining whether to deal with an abnormality based on the estimated loss at each time.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an accuracy correction method.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining an example of a screen displayed on the screen display device 800.
  • FIG. 11A is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen displayed on the screen display device 800 when the diagnosis mode is executed.
  • the diagnostic means that detected the abnormality and the estimated loss amount are displayed on the screen. In this way, by displaying the expected loss amount on the screen display device, it is possible to provide information for determining whether or not to deal with it.
  • FIG. 11B illustrates an example of a screen displayed on the screen display device 800 when the evaluation mode is executed. Assuming that a failure detected earlier than the lead time is a failure that can be prevented by introducing a diagnostic plan, the loss amount of these failures is added and displayed as a cost merit. It is possible to display the calculated cost merit and the service price of the diagnostic plan and determine whether or not to purchase this service.
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram for explaining an example of a screen displayed on the screen display device 800.
  • the system can be utilized as a system for proposing a diagnosis plan that minimizes the expected loss for the input of the maintenance cost target value.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining model diagnosis.
  • a device model that simulates the characteristics of the devices constituting the plant 100 is used.
  • a method for constructing a model that simulates the plant 100 there are a physical model using a physical equation such as a mass conservation equation, a heat transfer equation, and a statistical model such as a neural network, and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2006-57595 is known. .
  • a predicted value of the signal B with respect to the input of the signal A is output.
  • an abnormality is detected when an error between a model predicted value and an actual measurement value of the signal B exceeds a threshold value.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram for explaining the effect of using clustering and model diagnosis together.
  • ART diagnosis for diagnosing device B
  • data B and data C are used as input data to the ART, and a change in the data trend is detected.
  • model diagnosis data B is input, a predicted value of data C is output, and an abnormality is detected when an error between the predicted value of data C and an actual measured value exceeds a threshold value.
  • the ART diagnosis since the change of the signal B is detected by the ART diagnosis, the ART diagnosis detects an abnormality at the timing of time 2300. On the other hand, since the device B is in a normal state, no abnormality is detected in the model diagnosis.
  • the model diagnosis is detected at the timing of time 2310 when trouble occurs in device B.
  • ART diagnosis detects an abnormality earlier than model diagnosis. Further, no trouble has occurred in the device B when detected by ART, and a trouble has occurred when detected by model diagnosis. That is, the probability of abnormality is higher when detected by model diagnosis, and the diagnosis device 200 of the present invention calculates the estimated loss amount in consideration of this accuracy.
  • FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a device configuration of a C / C plant which is an embodiment of the plant 1000.
  • the gas turbine 1080 includes a compressor 1010, an expander 1020, and a combustor 1030.
  • the compressor 1010 takes in air and compresses it, then the combustor 1030 takes in compressed air and fuel to generate combustion gas, and the expander 1020 takes in combustion gas to obtain power.
  • the output of the gas turbine 1080 is the difference between the power output from the expander 1020 and the power used by the compressor 1010.
  • the exhaust heat recovery boiler 1050 is provided with a heat exchanger 1060 and generates high temperature steam using the high temperature exhaust gas from the gas turbine 1080.
  • the high-temperature steam generated by the exhaust heat recovery boiler 1050 is taken in to obtain power.
  • the condenser 1090 the exhaust of the steam turbine 1070 is taken in and heat-exchanged with the cooling water to condense the steam into water.
  • the generator 1040 generates power using the outputs of the gas turbine 1080 and the steam turbine 1070.
  • the fuel flow rate is controlled so that the exhaust gas temperature becomes the target value.
  • An abnormal event that occurs in this plant is that the holes (blade surface cooling holes) for supplying cooling air for the blades in the expander 1020 become very large.
  • the amount of cooling air increases, the exhaust gas temperature decreases, and the fuel flow rate of the combustor 1030 increases.
  • the abnormality of the expander 1020 is spread to the combustor 1030.
  • Example 2 If an abnormal event spreads, as described in Example 2, is it possible to deal with the detected abnormality by calculating and displaying the estimated loss based on the diagnosis result using the diagnostic means with different detection timing and accuracy? It can provide information useful for determining whether or not.
  • the present invention is widely applicable as a plant diagnostic apparatus.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Selon l'invention, lorsqu'une anomalie est détectée, une décision indiquant si l'anomalie doit être traitée ou non est prise sur la base d'expériences dans l'exploitation d'une installation. Cependant, il est préférable de prendre la décision sur la base d'un risque (montant de perte attendu) qui surviendrait si l'anomalie était laissée telle quelle. À cet effet, la présente invention porte sur un dispositif de diagnostic d'installation équipé de multiples moyens de diagnostic destinés à diagnostiquer un état d'anomalie de l'installation, et caractérisé en ce qu'il est équipé d'un moyen de diagnostic complet, lequel, lors de la détermination de degrés de précision dans la détection des états anormaux relativement à chacun des multiples moyens de diagnostic sur la base de données de signaux de mesure concernant des états d'installation et de données d'informations de gestion d'installation concernant des états anormaux passés, évalue des montants de perte attendus sur la base des degrés de précision et de montants de perte associés aux états anormaux.
PCT/JP2016/065373 2015-06-22 2016-05-25 Dispositif de diagnostic d'installation et procédé de diagnostic d'installation WO2016208315A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201680036343.0A CN107710089B (zh) 2015-06-22 2016-05-25 工厂设备诊断装置以及工厂设备诊断方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015-124353 2015-06-22
JP2015124353A JP6523815B2 (ja) 2015-06-22 2015-06-22 プラント診断装置及びプラント診断方法

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016208315A1 true WO2016208315A1 (fr) 2016-12-29

Family

ID=57585493

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2016/065373 WO2016208315A1 (fr) 2015-06-22 2016-05-25 Dispositif de diagnostic d'installation et procédé de diagnostic d'installation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6523815B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN107710089B (fr)
WO (1) WO2016208315A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20200210144A1 (en) * 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. Data sorting device and method, and monitoring and diagnosis device
EP3702861A4 (fr) * 2017-10-25 2021-07-14 Hitachi, Ltd. Dispositif et procédé d'aide au fonctionnement d'une installation
WO2021140742A1 (fr) * 2020-01-08 2021-07-15 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif de support de gestion de fonctionnement et procédé de support de gestion de fonctionnement
US11657121B2 (en) 2018-06-14 2023-05-23 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Abnormality detection device, abnormality detection method and computer readable medium

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6930195B2 (ja) * 2017-04-17 2021-09-01 富士通株式会社 モデル同定装置、予測装置、監視システム、モデル同定方法および予測方法
JP6772963B2 (ja) * 2017-06-05 2020-10-21 トヨタ自動車株式会社 異常診断装置及び異常診断方法
US11361218B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2022-06-14 International Business Machines Corporation Noise and signal management for RPU array

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006277185A (ja) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-12 Osaka Gas Co Ltd 故障予測診断支援システム
JP2007293489A (ja) * 2006-04-24 2007-11-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp 設備機器用故障診断装置および設備機器用故障診断方法
JP2011060088A (ja) * 2009-09-11 2011-03-24 Toshiba Corp 保守計画作成装置および保守計画作成方法

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5566092A (en) * 1993-12-30 1996-10-15 Caterpillar Inc. Machine fault diagnostics system and method
JP2003295937A (ja) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-17 Hitachi Ltd プラント監視装置とプラント監視方法
JP4034195B2 (ja) * 2003-01-23 2008-01-16 株式会社日立製作所 プラントの運転方法およびその運転装置
JP5105218B2 (ja) * 2005-06-06 2012-12-26 トヨタ自動車株式会社 異常判定装置
US7827006B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2010-11-02 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Heat exchanger fouling detection
WO2008114863A1 (fr) * 2007-03-22 2008-09-25 Nec Corporation Dispositif de diagnostic
KR101517917B1 (ko) * 2007-08-09 2015-05-07 히다치 겡키 가부시키 가이샤 작업기계의 기기 진단장치 및 기기 진단시스템
JP5292477B2 (ja) * 2010-01-22 2013-09-18 株式会社日立製作所 診断装置及び診断方法
CN201714747U (zh) * 2010-06-13 2011-01-19 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 一种液压流量报警装置
CN102036287B (zh) * 2011-01-11 2013-09-25 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 终端设备的异常状态的检测方法和设备
CN103617110B (zh) * 2013-11-11 2016-09-07 国家电网公司 服务器设备状态检修系统
CN105278526B (zh) * 2015-11-19 2017-12-01 东北大学 一种基于正则化架构的工业过程故障分离方法

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006277185A (ja) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-12 Osaka Gas Co Ltd 故障予測診断支援システム
JP2007293489A (ja) * 2006-04-24 2007-11-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp 設備機器用故障診断装置および設備機器用故障診断方法
JP2011060088A (ja) * 2009-09-11 2011-03-24 Toshiba Corp 保守計画作成装置および保守計画作成方法

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3702861A4 (fr) * 2017-10-25 2021-07-14 Hitachi, Ltd. Dispositif et procédé d'aide au fonctionnement d'une installation
US11657121B2 (en) 2018-06-14 2023-05-23 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Abnormality detection device, abnormality detection method and computer readable medium
US20200210144A1 (en) * 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. Data sorting device and method, and monitoring and diagnosis device
US11886831B2 (en) * 2018-12-27 2024-01-30 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Data sorting device and method, and monitoring and diagnosis device
WO2021140742A1 (fr) * 2020-01-08 2021-07-15 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif de support de gestion de fonctionnement et procédé de support de gestion de fonctionnement
JP2021111057A (ja) * 2020-01-08 2021-08-02 株式会社日立製作所 運転管理支援装置及び運転管理支援方法
JP7473343B2 (ja) 2020-01-08 2024-04-23 株式会社日立製作所 運転管理支援装置及び運転管理支援方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6523815B2 (ja) 2019-06-05
CN107710089A (zh) 2018-02-16
JP2017010232A (ja) 2017-01-12
CN107710089B (zh) 2020-07-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2016208315A1 (fr) Dispositif de diagnostic d'installation et procédé de diagnostic d'installation
KR101955305B1 (ko) 희소 코딩 방법론을 활용한 가스 터빈 센서 고장 검출
EP2905665B1 (fr) Appareil de traitement d'informations, procédé de diagnostic et programme
JP6116466B2 (ja) プラントの診断装置及び診断方法
US9483049B2 (en) Anomaly detection and diagnosis/prognosis method, anomaly detection and diagnosis/prognosis system, and anomaly detection and diagnosis/prognosis program
US8682616B2 (en) Identifying failures in an aeroengine
JP6856443B2 (ja) 設備機器の異常診断システム
US7933754B2 (en) System and method for damage propagation estimation
JP5292477B2 (ja) 診断装置及び診断方法
WO2014208227A1 (fr) Dispositif de détection de fuite de tube de chaudière, procédé de détection de fuite de tube de chaudière, et centre de surveillance de données, service de fourniture d'informations et installation de chaudière les utilisant
CN104756029B (zh) 一种监控设备的部件组的系统
JPWO2014091952A1 (ja) センサ監視装置、センサ監視方法、及びセンサ監視プログラム
KR102073537B1 (ko) 리스크 평가 장치, 리스크 평가 시스템, 리스크 평가 방법 및 리스크 평가 프로그램
JP6674033B2 (ja) プラント異常診断装置及びプラント異常診断システム
WO2019003703A1 (fr) Dispositif de diagnostic et méthode de diagnostic
KR20200009081A (ko) 리스크 평가 장치, 리스크 평가 시스템, 리스크 평가 방법, 리스크 평가 프로그램 및 데이터 구조
JP6685124B2 (ja) 診断装置及び診断方法
TW202100863A (zh) 異常診斷裝置及方法
JP7358791B2 (ja) プラント監視システムおよびプラント監視方法
WO2021241579A1 (fr) Dispositif, procédé et programme d'identification de cause de modulation anormale
CN117663353A (zh) 核电通风空调系统的故障检测与诊断方法
JP2540727B2 (ja) プラントパラメ―タ異常量検索方法及びその装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16814086

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16814086

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1