WO2016004566A1 - 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap - Google Patents
一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2016004566A1 WO2016004566A1 PCT/CN2014/081741 CN2014081741W WO2016004566A1 WO 2016004566 A1 WO2016004566 A1 WO 2016004566A1 CN 2014081741 W CN2014081741 W CN 2014081741W WO 2016004566 A1 WO2016004566 A1 WO 2016004566A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- bandwidth
- mcs
- sta
- transmission
- smaller
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0009—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
- H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
- H04W28/18—Negotiating wireless communication parameters
- H04W28/20—Negotiating bandwidth
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
- H04W48/08—Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/02—Power saving arrangements
- H04W52/0203—Power saving arrangements in the radio access network or backbone network of wireless communication networks
- H04W52/0206—Power saving arrangements in the radio access network or backbone network of wireless communication networks in access points, e.g. base stations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/02—Power saving arrangements
- H04W52/0209—Power saving arrangements in terminal devices
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/20—Control channels or signalling for resource management
- H04W72/27—Control channels or signalling for resource management between access points
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W84/00—Network topologies
- H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
- H04W84/10—Small scale networks; Flat hierarchical networks
- H04W84/12—WLAN [Wireless Local Area Networks]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
- Y02D30/70—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks
Definitions
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to a wireless communication technology, and in particular, to a bandwidth selection method and an access point AP of a wireless fidelity technology. Background technique
- the WiF i Wireless Fidelity
- the WiF i is a standard of a wireless local area network, and includes a communication network composed of an AP (Acces Point) and an STA (Sta t ion).
- the AP is generally referred to as a network bridge or an access point, and is used to allocate network resources of the uplink segment of the AP, such as a WAN (Wide Area Network) or a LAN (Local Area Network), to the downlink segment of the AP, that is, between the AP and the STA. Communications network.
- the WiFi technology mainly uses a rate adaptive algorithm in the bandwidth selection: the AP obtains the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm, and selects the corresponding MCS from the bandwidth control table according to the negotiation bandwidth with the STA. (Modula t ion and Coding Scheme, modulation and coding strategy).
- the AP sends the MCS selected in the above process to the STA to implement the selection of the transmission bandwidth.
- the technical problem to be solved by the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a bandwidth selection method for the wireless fidelity technology and an access point AP, so as to reduce the transmission bandwidth in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high, thereby reducing The power consumption of the AP and STA side devices increases the battery life.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a bandwidth selection method for a wireless fidelity technology, where an access point AP acquires a negotiation bandwidth with a STA of a station; the method includes:
- the AP sends a first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, where the first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS and the negotiated bandwidth.
- the MCS is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the method further includes:
- the second MCS is an MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the AP sends the first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, including:
- the AP sends a first MCS to the STA.
- the that the AP sends the first MCS to the STA including: the AP is sent to the STA Send a third MCS.
- the method further includes:
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the STA issues a third MCS.
- the uplink bandwidth of the STA is obtained based on a transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and/or a transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is based on a transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and a transmission requirement of the STA Bandwidth acquisition, including:
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is a bandwidth smaller than the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and the transmission required bandwidth of the STA.
- the acquiring the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP includes:
- the AP acquires a transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP based on the resource block size.
- the AP acquires a transmission required bandwidth of the STA based on the service type.
- the method further includes:
- the AP determines whether the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and if yes, updates the first MCS to the STA.
- the updated first MCS is sent.
- the updated first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiated bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the upper transmission bandwidth.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides an access point AP, including: a transmitter, a receiver, and a processor; the transmitter is connected to the processor, and the receiver is connected to the processor; The receiver is configured to receive a data transmission request of a station STA;
- the processor is configured to acquire a negotiated bandwidth of the STA, and obtain, after the receiver receives the data transmission request, a transmission upper bandwidth of the STA;
- the transmitter is configured to: if the processor determines that the upper transmission bandwidth is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth, send a first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA; where the first MCS is smaller than a bandwidth and an MCS
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth in the relationship is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the processor is further configured to acquire a second MCS according to the negotiated bandwidth, and obtain a third MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth;
- the second MCS is The MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the third MCS is the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the transmitter is configured to: if the processor determines that the upper transmission bandwidth is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth, send the first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, including:
- the transmitter is configured to send a first MCS to the STA if the processor determines that the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS.
- the processor is further configured to acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth, where the third MCS is a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS The MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth;
- the sending by the sending, the first modulation and coding policy, the MCS, to the STA, where the transmitter is configured to send a third MCS to the STA.
- the first to the third possible implementation manner of the second aspect in a fourth possible implementation manner of the second aspect, is obtained.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is based on a transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and a transmission requirement of the STA Bandwidth acquisition, including:
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is a bandwidth smaller than the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and the transmission required bandwidth of the STA.
- the acquiring the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP includes:
- the processor acquires a transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP based on the resource block size.
- the processor acquires a transmission required bandwidth of the STA based on the service type.
- the receiver and the transmitter are further used Transmitting data based on the first MCS and the STA;
- the processor is further configured to: if the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth is updated in the process of transmitting data, determine whether the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth of the transmission is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and if yes, update the first MCS. And notifying the sender to send the updated first MCS to the STA; the updated first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth. .
- an embodiment of the present invention provides an access point AP, including:
- a first acquiring module configured to acquire a negotiation bandwidth with the STA of the station
- Receiving a request module configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA
- a second acquiring module configured to acquire, by the receiving requesting module, the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA after receiving the data transmission request
- a sending module configured to send a first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, if the transmission upper limit bandwidth is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth, where the first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS
- the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth of the negotiation is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the method further includes:
- a third acquiring module configured to acquire a second MCS according to the negotiated bandwidth, where the second MCS is An MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- a fourth acquiring module configured to acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth;
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the sending module is configured to send the first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, if the transmission upper limit bandwidth is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth, including:
- the sending module is configured to send a first MCS to the STA if the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS.
- the sending, by the sending, the sending, by the sending, the first MCS includes:
- the sending module is configured to send a third MCS to the STA.
- the method further includes:
- a fourth acquiring module configured to acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth;
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS;
- the sending module is configured to send the first modulation and coding policy MCS to the STA, where the sending module is configured to send a third MCS to the STA.
- the first to the third possible implementation manners of the third aspect in a fourth possible implementation manner of the third aspect, is obtained.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is based on a transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and a transmission requirement of the STA Bandwidth acquisition, including:
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is a bandwidth smaller than the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and the transmission required bandwidth of the STA.
- the acquiring the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP includes:
- the second obtaining module acquires a resource block size allocated for the uplink segment of the AP
- the second obtaining module acquires a transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP based on the resource block size.
- the second obtaining module acquires a service type of the transmission data from the data transmission request; the second acquisition module acquires a transmission required bandwidth of the STA according to the service type.
- the AP further includes:
- a transmission module configured to transmit data based on the first MCS and the STA
- the determining module is configured to: if the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth is updated in the process of transmitting data, determine whether the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth of the transmission is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and if yes, update the first MCS and notify the The sending module sends the updated first MCS to the STA.
- the updated first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiated bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the upper transmission bandwidth.
- the embodiment of the present invention when performing bandwidth selection, not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the access point AP and the station STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the station STA, and in some scenarios where the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the lowering of the transmission coding strategy MCS is implemented according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA, thereby reducing the transmission bandwidth of the delivery, thereby reducing the power consumption of the access point AP and the STA side device, and increasing the battery life.
- FIG. 1 is a specific flowchart of a first embodiment of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a specific flowchart of a second embodiment of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a specific flowchart of a third embodiment of a method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 4 is a specific flowchart of a fourth embodiment of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a first embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of a second embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a third embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a fourth embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 9 is a schematic structural diagram of a fifth embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 10 is a schematic structural diagram of a sixth embodiment of an AP according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- WiFi technology mainly uses a rate adaptive algorithm (also called autor a te algorithm) in bandwidth selection:
- a rate adaptive algorithm also called Autor a te algorithm
- the AP obtains the negotiated bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm, and selects the corresponding MCS from the bandwidth control table according to the negotiated bandwidth with the STA.
- the AP will receive the data transmission request of the STA.
- the AP will send the MCS selected in the above process to the STA to implement the selection of the transmission bandwidth.
- rate adaptive algorithms Although there are a large number of rate adaptive algorithms, and the input parameters of each rate adaptive algorithm are different, the specific calculation methods are also different, but in general, they are based on the channel quality of APs and STAs, such as RSSI and PSR. , PER, etc. calculate the bandwidth negotiated with the STA.
- a bandwidth selection method of the WiFi technology and an access point AP are provided to reduce the transmission bandwidth in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high, thereby reducing power consumption of the AP and the STA side device, and increasing Life time.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a first embodiment of a bandwidth selection method for a WiFi technology.
- the AP acquires a negotiated bandwidth with the STA.
- the AP when the AP negotiates the bandwidth with the STA, the AP may first establish a path with the STA, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the AP may specifically obtain a negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm.
- the rate adaptation algorithm is an algorithm for obtaining the negotiation bandwidth between the AP and the STA in the prior art.
- the AP first obtains the channel quality between the AP and the STA, for example, parameters such as RSSI, PSR, and PER. Then, according to the obtained channel quality, the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is calculated by using any rate adaptive algorithm.
- S101 The AP receives a data transmission request of the STA.
- the AP receives the data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA.
- the STA sends a data transmission request to the AP.
- the request may also be sent by the uplink end of the AP, for example, the WAN side or the LAN side.
- the STA's data transmission request is sent to the AP.
- the AP acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA refers to the maximum actual bandwidth that can be achieved by the STA and the AP during data transmission.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA may impose certain restrictions on the actual transmission bandwidth. For example, if the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, the AP is likely to be made. The actual transmission bandwidth with the STA cannot be achieved based on the existing rate. Adapting to the transmission bandwidth selected by the algorithm, resulting in a problem of high transmission bandwidth. Therefore, in this embodiment, after receiving the data transmission request of the STA, the bandwidth is not directly sent according to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but needs to be considered to limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA. The upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the STA.
- the AP sends the first MCS to the STA.
- the first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS. It is equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the relationship between the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the MCS delivered by the AP to the STA.
- the specific MCS is determined by the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA. Therefore, the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS is set in advance.
- the adaptation algorithm determines the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the existing bandwidth control table is a representation of the above correspondence.
- the corresponding relationship may specifically be a correspondence under a specific communication standard, for example, a correspondence relationship under the IEEE 802. l la/b/g/n/ac standard.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may be selected in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, such as the bandwidth control table, and may be implemented in various manners. Only an alternative embodiment is illustrated below.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may be an MCS corresponding to the bandwidth that is closest to the bandwidth and smaller than the bandwidth in the bandwidth control table.
- the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1 multiple MCSs are included, and each MCS corresponds to a specific bandwidth. If the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is 40 Mbps, the bandwidth closest to 40 Mbps and less than 40 Mbps may be selected, that is, the MCS 4 corresponding to 39 Mbps is used as the second MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the AP directly delivers the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the upper bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, for example, when the bandwidth is If the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the STA, the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA may be sent to the MCS.
- the MCS to be delivered is lower than the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the reduced MCS must be greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA. Obviously, the MCS selected based on this method is more reasonable.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is selected as the MC4, and the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is selected from the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1.
- the corresponding MCS is MCS2. Since the MCS2 is smaller than the MCS4, in this step, the AP selects the MCS that is smaller than the MCS4 and equal to or greater than the MCS2, that is, the MCS2 or the MCS3 is delivered to the STA, thereby implementing the transmission bandwidth selection. For example, if MCS2 is selected for delivery, the transmission bandwidth between the AP and the STA is set to the bandwidth corresponding to MCS2, which is 19.5 Mbps.
- the transmission of the STA is preferred in this step.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth is delivered to the STA.
- the bandwidth selection is performed in this embodiment, not only the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA but also the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is considered, and when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, If the MCS that is based on the AP and the STA negotiates the bandwidth is the same, the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the MCS is delivered, and the first MCS is sent to the STA.
- the first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, so that in a scenario where some transmission bandwidths are falsely high, the bandwidth is reduced according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the delivered MCS is used to reduce the transmission bandwidth of the delivered device. Therefore, the power consumption of the AP and STA devices is reduced, and the battery life is increased.
- the rate adaptive algorithm in the prior art is relatively mature, and the algorithm is relatively complicated. If the algorithm itself is changed, the complexity of the algorithm is further increased, the amount of calculation is increased, and the final bandwidth selection effect is also Difficult to make predictions.
- the existing rate adaptation algorithm is not changed, so it is simple and easy to implement, and the algorithm complexity and the calculation amount are not increased, and the final bandwidth selection effect can be ensured, and is applicable to Any of the prior art rate adaptive algorithms.
- the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, in step S103, the transmission bandwidth is not high, so the AP and the STA are directly selected.
- the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth is delivered to the STA.
- the AP performs data transmission based on the first MCS and the STA delivered in the step.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA may be updated. For example, when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes (for example, when the STA moves), the AP may according to the new channel.
- the status update updates the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth.
- the AP determines whether the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the updated negotiation bandwidth. If yes, the first MCS is updated and the updated first MCS is sent to the STA.
- the first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA may also be updated, and in order to adapt to the update, the embodiment may perform step S102 to step S103 cyclically, or may also be STA every time. After the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth is updated, it is re-updated. Step S 1 03 is performed, so that the final delivered bandwidth is adjusted in real time.
- the AP determines the corresponding MCS according to the negotiation bandwidth and the transmission upper bandwidth respectively.
- the comparison of the negotiated bandwidth and the transmission upper limit bandwidth is realized by comparison of the MCS. This case will be described below by way of an embodiment.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a second embodiment of a bandwidth selection method for Wi F i technology.
- the AP acquires the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, and obtains the second MCS according to the negotiated bandwidth.
- the second MCS is the MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1 is used as an example.
- 40Mbp s you can choose the closest to 40Mbps, and less than 40Mbps bandwidth, that is, the MCS4 corresponding to 39Mbps as the second MCS corresponding to 40Mbps.
- S201 The AP receives a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- S202 The AP acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA refers to the maximum actual bandwidth that can be achieved by the STA and the AP during data transmission.
- S203 Acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth.
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1 shows that if the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is specifically 20 Mbps, the bandwidth closest to 20 Mbps and less than 20 Mbps can be selected, that is, the MCS2 corresponding to 19.5 Mbps is the 20 Mbps corresponding. Three MCS.
- the AP sends a first MCS to the STA; the first MCS is smaller than the second MCS, and is greater than or equal to the third MCS.
- the second MCS is the MCS selected based on the negotiation rate of the AP and the STA
- the third MCS is the MCS selected based on the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the second MCS is directly delivered, but because The upper transmission bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS
- the second MCS is sent to the virtual network.
- the MCS that is delivered is reduced, and the first MCS that is smaller than the third MCS is selected to be delivered.
- the negotiation bandwidth of the STA is 40 Mbps and the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is specifically 20 Mbps
- the corresponding second MCS is selected as MC4 and the third MCS is MCS2 from the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1. Since the MCS2 is smaller than the MCS4, in this step, the MCS that is smaller than the MCS4 and equal to or greater than the MCS2 is selected, that is, the MCS2 or the MCS3 is delivered to the STA, thereby implementing transmission bandwidth selection. For example, if MCS2 is selected for delivery, the transmission bandwidth between the final AP and the STA is set to the bandwidth corresponding to MCS2, which is 19.5 Mbps.
- the third MCS is preferably performed to the STA. Issued.
- the bandwidth of the AP is not only considered by the AP and the STA, but also the bandwidth of the STA is determined according to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the bandwidth control table determines the second MCS and the third MCS.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, it indicates that if the transmission is performed based on the second MCS, the transmission bandwidth is too high, so that the delivered MCS is lowered, and the STA is sent to the STA that is smaller than the second MCS and equal to or greater than the third MCS.
- An MCS is implemented to reduce the final transmission of the MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA side device is reduced. Quantity, increase battery life.
- this embodiment not only considers the negotiation bandwidth with the STA obtained according to the rate adaptive algorithm, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the STA may be limited to the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, and may be obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and/or the transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA. The following is described in detail by way of an embodiment.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a third embodiment of a method for selecting a bandwidth of a WiFi technology.
- This embodiment focuses on the method for acquiring a transmission upper bandwidth of a STA. It should be noted that this The embodiment of the present invention is described in the embodiment of the present invention. The method for obtaining the upper limit bandwidth of the STA in this embodiment may be used in the embodiment of the present invention. In other embodiments.
- the AP acquires the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm, and obtains the second MCS according to the negotiation bandwidth.
- the second MCS is the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS. .
- the correspondence between bandwidth and MCS is different in different transmission systems. Therefore, in the embodiment, when the second MCS is acquired, it may be selected in the MCS corresponding to the transmission system.
- the transmission system can be determined by at least one of the following parameters: channel frequency resource, open state of short guard interval, and I/O (input/output) mode. The following is illustrated by an example.
- the transmission system includes: channel frequency resource, open state of short guard interval, and I/O mode.
- the channel frequency resource includes two types: a 20 MHz channel frequency resource and a 40 MHz channel frequency resource.
- the open state of the short guard interval includes two types: the short guard interval is not turned on and the short guard interval is turned on.
- the I/O mode includes SIS0 (S ing le Input S ing le Output (Single Input and Output), 2 X 2MIM0 (Mul t iple Input Mul t iple Output). Therefore, when acquiring the second MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth, it is first necessary to determine a corresponding transmission system.
- the MCS corresponding to 40 MHz is determined to be MCS4 in the corresponding transmission system.
- MCS 3 26 MCS3 52 MCS3 54 MCS 3 108
- MCS4 39 MCS4 78 MCS4 80 MCS4 162 MCS5 52 MCS5 104 MCS5 108 MCS5 216 Enable Short Protection MCS0 7. 2 MCS0 14. 4 MCS0 15 MCS0 30 Interval MCS1 14. 4 MCS1 28. 9 MCS1 30 MCS1 60
- MCS2 21. 7 MCS2 43. 3 MCS2 45 MCS2 90 This embodiment specifically includes:
- S301 The AP receives a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- S302 The AP acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA may be acquired based on the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and/or the transmission required bandwidth of the STA. The following are explained in three cases.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP.
- the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP refers to the transmission bandwidth negotiated by the uplink segment of the AP when transmitting data.
- the AP when performing data transmission in the uplink segment, the AP generally obtains the channel quality between the AP and the uplink end (the WAN side or the LAN side) of the AP, and negotiates the transmission bandwidth between the AP and the uplink according to the channel quality. .
- the AP finally delivers the bandwidth to the STA, that is, the bandwidth selection of the downlink segment of the AP.
- the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment also plays a certain role in limiting the transmission bandwidth of the downlink segment.
- the uplink segment and the downlink segment are separately performed when performing bandwidth selection. Therefore, the bandwidth selection of the downlink segment is based only on the channel quality of the downlink segment, and the related situation of the uplink segment is not considered. The factors are not comprehensive.
- the transmission bandwidth of the uplink is taken into consideration.
- the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP may be directly used as the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the specific manner of obtaining the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention, and only a few possible modes are illustrated below.
- the method for obtaining the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP may include: the AP acquires the resource block size allocated for the uplink segment of the AP; and the AP obtains the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP according to the resource block size.
- This mode can be specifically used when the uplink end is the WAN side.
- the AP receives the data transmission request from the STA, the WAN side The AP also needs to deliver a transmission rate for the AP. Therefore, the WAN side allocates resource blocks to the AP according to the channel conditions of the AP. Therefore, according to the size of the allocated resource blocks, the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP can be calculated.
- the size of the resource block can be read directly from the modem.
- the method for obtaining the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP can also be obtained by means of speed measurement.
- This mode can be used for the case where the uplink is the WAN side or the LAN side.
- the test software is installed in the uplink segment of the AP, or the actual transmission rate of the uplink segment of the AP can be obtained according to the test site, thereby serving as the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is obtained based on the transmission required bandwidth of the STA.
- the input parameters of the rate adaptive algorithm are the channel quality of the AP and the STA, for example, parameters such as RSS I, PSR, and PER, and the STA is not considered.
- the specific bandwidth requirement for transmitting data, that is, the transmission bandwidth of the STA, is obviously not comprehensive in this way.
- the transmission required bandwidth of the STA can be directly used as the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the specific manner of obtaining the bandwidth of the transmission of the STA is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Only a feasible manner is illustrated below.
- the method for obtaining the transmission required bandwidth of the STA may include: the AP obtains the service type of the transmission data from the data transmission request; and the AP acquires the transmission required bandwidth of the STA based on the service type.
- the request generally includes the service type of the STA's transmission data, such as video, picture or text data. If it is video data, it is HD video or standard definition video. According to the type of service, the transmission demand bandwidth can be calculated.
- the bandwidth is obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and the transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP and the bandwidth of the transmission required bandwidth of the STA are generally used as the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA. For example, if the transmission bandwidth of the uplink segment of the AP is 25 Mbps and the transmission bandwidth of the STA is 20 Mbps, the bandwidth of the upper transmission limit of the STA is determined to be 20 Mbps.
- S 30 3 Acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth; the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS. Similar to the process of selecting the second MCS, this step may also be selected in the MCS corresponding to the transmission system when the third MCS is selected. For details, see the procedure for selecting the second MCS.
- the AP sends a first MCS to the STA; the first MCS is smaller than the second MCS, and is greater than or equal to the third MCS.
- the AP preferably delivers the third MCS.
- the two embodiments of the upper limit bandwidth are used to implement the bandwidth selection, not only considering the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considering the upper limit bandwidth of the STA, thereby solving the problem.
- the problem of high transmission bandwidth is high.
- the corresponding MCS is selected based on the above two bandwidths, and the MCS is finally determined by comparing the MCS.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a fourth embodiment of a bandwidth selection method for a WiFi technology.
- an AP acquires a negotiation bandwidth with a STA.
- the STA may be in the process of obtaining the negotiation bandwidth.
- the AP may specifically obtain a negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm.
- S401 The AP receives a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- the AP acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA refers to the maximum actual bandwidth that can be achieved by the STA and the AP during data transmission.
- S403 Acquire a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to a transmission upper bandwidth of the STA in a correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the mapping between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the negotiation bandwidth between the AP and the STA and the AP delivers the message to the STA.
- One form of expression is the existing bandwidth control table.
- step S403 when it is determined that the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth with the STA, step S403 is performed.
- the corresponding MCS is not selected according to the foregoing two bandwidths, and then the MCS is compared, but the two bandwidths are compared first, and the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is compared. If the negotiation bandwidth is smaller than that of the STA, it indicates that the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the smaller of the two bandwidths, that is, the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth of the STA is sent to the STA. It is also possible to avoid situations where the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the bandwidth control table is as shown in Table 1. If the negotiation bandwidth with the STA is 40 Mbps and the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is 20 Mbps, it is obvious that the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth with the STA. Therefore, the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is selected, that is, 20 Mbps.
- the corresponding MCS2 performs bandwidth delivery.
- the bandwidth of the STA is not only considered to be negotiated, but also the upper bandwidth of the STA is considered.
- the upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth of the STA,
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the smaller STA is selected to be delivered, so that the MCS that is finally delivered is reduced according to the upper limit of the transmission bandwidth in the scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high, thereby reducing the transmission bandwidth. Therefore, the power consumption of the AP and STA side devices is reduced, and the battery life is increased.
- the transmission bandwidth of the STA when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, the transmission bandwidth does not necessarily have a virtual high.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA and the negotiated bandwidth with the STA may both correspond to the same MCS.
- the bandwidth of the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the smaller STA is selected, the bandwidth can be guaranteed to avoid the virtual high bandwidth.
- step S403 if the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to the negotiation bandwidth with the STA, that is, the transmission bandwidth is not high, so the AP is in the band.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth of the STA is sent to the STA in the wide control table.
- this embodiment not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA may limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, and may be obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and/or the transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA.
- the third embodiment of the method For the specific acquisition manner, refer to the third embodiment of the method. The relevant points are not repeated here.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA When the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is selected in this embodiment, the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth that is closest to the upper bandwidth limit and smaller than the upper bandwidth limit may be selected. In addition, the MCS can also be selected in the MCS corresponding to the transmission system.
- the transmission system may be determined based on at least one of the following parameters: a channel frequency of the downlink segment, an open state of the short guard interval, and an I/O mode. For details, refer to the bandwidth selection method in the first embodiment and the third embodiment. Here, I will not repeat them here.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a first embodiment of an AP.
- the AP in this embodiment includes: a receiver 501, a processor 502, and a transmitter 503.
- the transmitter 503 is coupled to the processor 502, and the receiver 501 is coupled to the processor 502.
- the processor 502 can be connected to the transmitter 503 and the receiver 501 via a bus or other means.
- the bus connection is taken as an example.
- the receiver 501 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the receiver 501 receives the data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA. For example, when the user on the STA side clicks to play the video, the STA sends a data transmission request to the receiver 501.
- the request may also be sent by the uplink end of the AP, such as the WAN side or the LAN.
- the side pushes data to the STA, it transmits a data transmission request of the STA to the receiver 501.
- the processor 502 is configured to obtain a negotiated bandwidth of the STA, and obtain a transmission upper bandwidth of the STA after the receiver 501 receives the data transmission request.
- the processor 502 of the embodiment may specifically When the STA first establishes a path, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the processor 502 may specifically obtain the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA refers to the maximum actual bandwidth that can be achieved by the STA and the AP during data transmission.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA may impose certain restrictions on the actual transmission bandwidth. For example, if the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, The actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA cannot reach the transmission bandwidth selected based on the existing rate adaptation algorithm, resulting in a problem that the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, in this embodiment, after receiving the data transmission request of the STA, the bandwidth is not directly sent according to the negotiated bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but needs to be considered to limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA. The upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmitter 503 is configured to: if the processor 502 determines that the transmission upper limit bandwidth is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth, send a first MCS to the STA, where the first MCS is smaller than the corresponding bandwidth of the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the MCS is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the relationship between the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the MCS delivered by the AP to the STA.
- the specific MCS is determined by the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA. Therefore, the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS is set in advance.
- the adaptation algorithm determines the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the existing bandwidth control table is a representation of the above correspondence.
- the corresponding relationship may specifically be a correspondence under a specific communication standard, for example, a correspondence relationship under the IEEE 802. l la/b/g/n/ac standard.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may be selected in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, such as the bandwidth control table, and may be implemented in various manners. Only an alternative embodiment is illustrated below.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may specifically be an MCS corresponding to the bandwidth of the bandwidth control table that is closest to the bandwidth and smaller than the bandwidth.
- the transmitter 503 directly delivers the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA. For example, when the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the MCS of the STA and the negotiation bandwidth of the STA, the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA will be transmitted. If the MCS is lower, the MCS that is delivered is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth of the AP and the STA. However, in order to avoid unrestricted reduction of the MCS and the bandwidth is too low, the transmission efficiency is affected. Therefore, the reduced MCS must be greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA. Obviously, the MCS selected based on this method is more reasonable.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is selected as the MC4, and the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is selected from the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1.
- the corresponding MCS is MCS2. Since the MCS2 is smaller than the MCS4, the transmitter 503 delivers the MCS that is smaller than the MCS4 and equal to or greater than the MCS2, that is, the MCS2 or the MCS3, to achieve the transmission bandwidth selection. For example, if MCS2 is selected for delivery, the transmission bandwidth between the AP and the STA is set to the bandwidth corresponding to MCS2, which is 19.5 Mbps.
- the transmitter 503 preferably transmits the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth is delivered to the STA.
- the bandwidth selection when the bandwidth selection is performed in this embodiment, not only the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA but also the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is considered, and when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, If the MCS that is based on the AP and the STA negotiates the bandwidth is the same, the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the MCS is delivered, and the first MCS is sent to the STA. The first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, so that in a scenario where some transmission bandwidths are falsely high, the bandwidth is reduced according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the delivered MCS is used to reduce the transmission bandwidth of the delivered device. Therefore, the power consumption of the AP and STA devices is reduced, and the battery life is increased.
- the existing rate adaptation algorithm when the transmission bandwidth of the transmission is reduced, the existing rate adaptation algorithm is not changed, so that it is simple and easy to implement, and does not increase the complexity and calculation amount of the algorithm, thereby ensuring the final bandwidth selection effect, and is applicable to Any of the prior art rate adaptive algorithms.
- the processor 502 may be a central processing unit CPU or specific The integrated circuit AS IC (Appli-Calculation Integrated Integrated C i rcui t), or one or more integrated circuits that have been configured to implement the embodiments of the present application.
- Embodiments of the present invention may further include a memory for storing the program.
- the memory may include a high speed RAM memory and may also include a non-vo la tile memory, such as at least one disk memory.
- the processor 502 determines that the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to
- the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA that is, the problem that the transmission bandwidth is not high is high. Therefore, the sender 503 directly selects the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA to deliver the message to the STA.
- the transmitter 503 and the receiver 501 perform data transmission based on the delivered first MCS and the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA may be updated.
- the processor 502 when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes (for example, when the STA moves), the processor 502 according to the new The channel condition update negotiates the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth.
- the processor 502 determines whether the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the updated negotiation bandwidth. If yes, the first MCS is updated and the transmitter 503 is notified to send an update to the STA.
- the updated first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA may also be updated, and in order to adapt to the update, the processor 502 and the transmitter 503 may cyclically perform the acquisition of the upper limit bandwidth of the STA and deliver the bandwidth. First MCS. Alternatively, the transmitter 503 may re-issue the first MCS after the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is updated, so that the final bandwidth is adjusted in real time.
- the AP determines the corresponding MCS according to the negotiation bandwidth and the transmission upper bandwidth respectively.
- the comparison of the negotiated bandwidth and the transmission upper limit bandwidth is realized by comparison of the MCS. This case will be described below by way of an embodiment.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a second embodiment of an AP.
- the AP in this embodiment includes: a receiver 601, a processor 602, and a transmitter 603.
- Transmitter 603 is coupled to processor 602, and receiver 601 is coupled to processor 602.
- the receiver 601 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- the processor 602 is configured to: acquire a negotiation bandwidth of the STA, and acquire a second MCS according to the negotiation bandwidth; after receiving the data transmission request, the receiver 601 acquires a transmission upper bandwidth of the STA, and acquires a third according to the transmission upper bandwidth.
- MCS MCS.
- the second MCS is the MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS; the third MCS is the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the processor 602 When the processor 602 obtains the bandwidth negotiated with the STA, the specific situation may occur when the channel is initially established between the AP and the STA, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the processor 602 may specifically obtain the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm.
- the bandwidth closest to 40 Mbps and less than 40 Mbps can be selected, that is, the MCS4 corresponding to 39 Mbps is the second corresponding to 40 Mbps. MCS. If the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is specifically 20 Mbps, the bandwidth closest to 20 Mbps and less than 20 Mbps may be selected, that is, the MCS2 corresponding to 19.5 Mbps is used as the third MCS corresponding to 20 Mbps.
- the transmitter 603 is configured to: if the processor 602 determines that the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, send the first MCS to the STA.
- the first MCS is smaller than the second MCS and greater than or equal to the third MCS.
- the second MCS is the MCS selected based on the negotiation rate of the AP and the STA
- the third MCS is the MCS selected based on the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the second MCS is directly delivered, but the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, If the second MCS is delivered, the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the MCS to be delivered is reduced.
- the first MCS is smaller than the second MCS.
- the first MCS is greater than or equal to the third MCS.
- the transmitter 603 preferably performs the third MCS to the STA. Issued.
- the bandwidth selection when the bandwidth selection is performed in this embodiment, not only the AP is considered.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, it indicates that if the transmission is performed based on the second MCS, the transmission bandwidth is too high, so that the delivered MCS is lowered, and the STA is sent to the STA that is smaller than the second MCS and equal to or greater than the third MCS.
- An MCS is implemented to reduce the final transmission of the MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA side device is reduced. Quantity, increase battery life.
- the present embodiment not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA, thereby solving the problem that the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the corresponding MCS is selected based on the above two bandwidths, and the final MCS is determined by comparing the MCS. In fact, it is also possible to compare the above two bandwidths first, and determine the final MCS to be issued based on the comparison result. The following is explained by an embodiment.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a third embodiment of an AP.
- the AP in this embodiment includes: a receiver 701, a processor 702, and a transmitter 703.
- the transmitter 703 is coupled to the processor 702, and the receiver 701 is coupled to the processor 702.
- the receiver 701 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- the processor 702 is configured to: acquire, by the AP, a bandwidth negotiated with the STA, and after receiving the data transmission request, the receiver 701 acquires a transmission upper bandwidth of the STA, and acquires a third MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth; the third MCS is a bandwidth and The MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence relationship of the MCS.
- the processor 702 When the processor 702 obtains the bandwidth negotiated with the STA, the AP may periodically establish a path with the STA, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the processor 702 may specifically obtain the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptation algorithm.
- the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the correspondence between the negotiated bandwidth between the AP and the STA and the MCS sent by the AP to the STA.
- One form of expression is the existing bandwidth control table.
- the transmitter 703 is configured to: if the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, The AP sends a third MCS to the STA.
- the corresponding MCS is not selected according to the foregoing two bandwidths, and then the MCS is compared, but the two bandwidths are compared first, and the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is compared. If the negotiation bandwidth is smaller than that of the STA, it indicates that the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the smaller of the two bandwidths, that is, the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth of the STA is sent to the STA. It is also possible to avoid situations where the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the bandwidth of the STA is not only considered to be negotiated, but also the upper bandwidth of the STA is considered.
- the upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth of the STA,
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the smaller STA is selected to be delivered, so that the MCS that is finally delivered is reduced according to the upper limit of the transmission bandwidth in the scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high, thereby reducing the transmission bandwidth. Therefore, the power consumption of the AP and STA side devices is reduced, and the battery life is increased.
- the transmission bandwidth of the STA when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, the transmission bandwidth does not necessarily have a virtual high.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA and the negotiated bandwidth with the STA may both correspond to the same MCS.
- the bandwidth of the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the smaller STA is selected, the bandwidth can be guaranteed to avoid the virtual high bandwidth.
- the processor 702 determines that the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to the negotiation bandwidth with the STA, that is, the transmission bandwidth is not high, so the transmitter 703 sends the address to the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth.
- the embodiment of the present invention not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA may limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, and may be obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and/or the transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA.
- the third embodiment of the method refer to the third embodiment of the method. The relevant points are not repeated here.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA When the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is selected in the embodiment of the present invention, the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth that is closest to the upper bandwidth limit and smaller than the upper limit of the bandwidth may be selected. In addition, the MCS can also be selected in the MCS corresponding to the transmission system.
- the transmission system may be determined based on at least one of the following parameters: a channel frequency of the downlink segment, an open state of the short guard interval, and an I/O mode. For details, refer to the bandwidth selection method of the first embodiment and the third embodiment. Where, no longer here Narration.
- the embodiment of the AP in the embodiment of the present invention is described above from the perspective of hardware processing.
- the AP in the embodiment of the present invention will be described from the perspective of a modular functional entity.
- the embodiment of the present invention provides a fourth embodiment of the AP.
- the AP in this embodiment includes: a first obtaining module 801, a receiving requesting module 802, a second obtaining module 803, and a sending module 804.
- the first obtaining module 801 is configured to obtain a negotiated bandwidth with the STA.
- the AP may first establish a path with the STA, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the first obtaining module 801 may specifically obtain a negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptive algorithm.
- the rate adaptation algorithm is an algorithm for obtaining the negotiation bandwidth between the AP and the STA in the prior art.
- the AP first obtains the channel quality between the AP and the STA, such as RSSI, PSR, and PER. Then, according to the obtained channel quality, the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is calculated by using any rate adaptive algorithm.
- the receiving request module 802 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the receiving request module 802 receives the data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA.
- the STA sends a data transmission request to the receiving request module 802.
- the request may also be sent by the uplink end of the AP, for example, the WAN side or
- the LAN side wants to push data to the STA, it transmits a data transmission request of the STA to the reception requesting module 802.
- the second obtaining module 803 is configured to: after receiving the data transmission request, the receiving request module 802 acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA refers to the maximum actual bandwidth that can be achieved by the STA and the AP during data transmission.
- the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA may impose certain restrictions on the actual transmission bandwidth. For example, if the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth with the STA, The actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA cannot reach the transmission bandwidth selected based on the existing rate adaptation algorithm, resulting in a false high transmission bandwidth. The problem. Therefore, in this embodiment, after receiving the data transmission request of the STA, the bandwidth is not directly sent according to the negotiated bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but needs to be considered to limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA. The upper limit of the transmission bandwidth of the STA.
- the sending module 804 is configured to: send the first MCS to the STA if the transmission upper limit bandwidth is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth; where the first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS and the negotiated bandwidth The MCS is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the relationship between the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the MCS delivered by the AP to the STA.
- the specific MCS is determined by the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA. Therefore, the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS is set in advance.
- the adaptation algorithm determines the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the existing bandwidth control table is a representation of the above correspondence.
- the corresponding relationship may specifically be a correspondence under a specific communication standard, for example, a correspondence relationship under the IEEE 802. l la/b/g/n/ac standard.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may be selected in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, such as the bandwidth control table, and may be implemented in various manners. Only an alternative embodiment is illustrated below.
- the MCS corresponding to a certain bandwidth may specifically be an MCS corresponding to the bandwidth of the bandwidth control table that is closest to the bandwidth and smaller than the bandwidth.
- the sending module 804 directly delivers the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but the upper bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, for example, when the bandwidth is If the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the STA, the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA may be invalidated.
- the MCS to be delivered is lower than the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA.
- the reduced MCS must be greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA. Obviously, the MCS selected based on this method is more reasonable.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit of the transmission upper limit bandwidth is satisfied, the smaller the MCS that is finally used for delivery, the problem that the transmission bandwidth is too high can be better solved, so the module is delivered. 804
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is sent to the STA.
- the bandwidth selection when the bandwidth selection is performed in this embodiment, not only the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA but also the upper limit bandwidth of the STA is considered, and when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, If the MCS that is based on the AP and the STA negotiates the bandwidth is the same, the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the MCS is delivered, and the first MCS is sent to the STA. The first MCS is smaller than the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth in the corresponding relationship between the bandwidth and the MCS, so that in a scenario where some transmission bandwidths are falsely high, the bandwidth is reduced according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the delivered MCS is used to reduce the transmission bandwidth of the delivered device. Therefore, the power consumption of the AP and STA devices is reduced, and the battery life is increased.
- the existing rate adaptation algorithm when the transmission bandwidth of the transmission is reduced, the existing rate adaptation algorithm is not changed, so that it is simple and easy to implement, and does not increase the complexity and calculation amount of the algorithm, thereby ensuring the final bandwidth selection effect, and is applicable to Any of the prior art rate adaptive algorithms.
- the sending module 804 determines that the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, that is, the transmission bandwidth is not high, and the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is directly selected.
- the corresponding MCS is sent to the STA.
- the transmitting module performs data transmission based on the delivered first MCS and the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA may be updated, for example, when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes (for example, when the STA moves), at this time, the embodiment is
- the AP further includes the transmission module and the judging module.
- the judging module determines whether the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the updated negotiation bandwidth. If yes, the first MCS is updated, and the sending module 804 is notified to send the updated STA to the STA.
- the first MCS is smaller than the MCS corresponding to the updated negotiation bandwidth, and is greater than or equal to the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA may also be updated, and in order to adapt to the update, the second obtaining module 803 and the sending module 804 may work cyclically.
- the sending module 804 re-issues the first MCS, so that the final delivered bandwidth is adjusted in real time.
- the AP determines the corresponding MCS according to the negotiation bandwidth and the transmission upper bandwidth respectively. The comparison of the negotiated bandwidth and the transmission upper limit bandwidth is realized by comparison of the MCS. This case will be described below by way of an embodiment.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a fifth embodiment of an AP.
- the AP in this embodiment specifically includes: a first obtaining module 901, a receiving requesting module 902, a second obtaining module 903, a sending module 904, and a third.
- the first obtaining module 901 is configured to obtain a negotiation bandwidth with the STA of the station.
- the first obtaining module 901 in this embodiment may specifically
- the first obtaining module 901 may specifically obtain the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptive algorithm.
- the third obtaining module 905 is configured to obtain a second MCS according to the negotiated bandwidth, where the second MCS is an MCS corresponding to the negotiated bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1 if the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA is specifically 40 Mbps, the bandwidth closest to 40 Mbps and less than 40 Mbps can be selected, that is, the MCS4 corresponding to 39 Mbps is the second corresponding to 40 Mbps. MCS.
- the receiving request module 902 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the second obtaining module 903 is configured to obtain, after the receiving request module receives the data transmission request, a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the fourth obtaining module 906 is configured to obtain a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth.
- the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the bandwidth control table shown in Table 1 is used as an example. If the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA is specifically 20 Mbps, the bandwidth closest to 20 Mbps and less than 20 Mbps may be selected, that is, the MCS2 corresponding to 19.5 Mbps is corresponding to 20 Mbps. Third MCS.
- the sending module 904 is configured to send the first MCS to the STA if the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS.
- the second MCS is the MCS selected based on the negotiation rate of the AP and the STA
- the third MCS is the MCS selected based on the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the second MCS is directly delivered, but the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA also limits the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA. For example, when the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, If the second MCS is delivered, the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the MCS to be delivered is reduced.
- the first MCS is smaller than the second MCS.
- the first MCS is greater than or equal to the third MCS.
- the sending module 904 preferably uses the third MCS to the STA. Issued.
- the bandwidth of the AP is not only considered by the AP and the STA, but also the bandwidth of the STA is determined according to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the bandwidth control table determines the second MCS and the third MCS.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, it indicates that if the transmission is performed based on the second MCS, the transmission bandwidth is too high, so that the delivered MCS is lowered, and the STA is sent to the STA that is smaller than the second MCS and equal to or greater than the third MCS.
- An MCS is implemented to reduce the final transmission of the MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA side device is reduced. Quantity, increase battery life.
- the bandwidth of the AP is not only considered by the AP and the STA, but also the upper bandwidth of the STA is determined according to the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA and the upper bandwidth of the STA.
- the second MCS and the third MCS are out.
- the third MCS is smaller than the second MCS, it indicates that if the transmission is performed based on the second MCS, the transmission bandwidth is too high, so that the delivered MCS is lowered, and the STA is sent to the STA that is smaller than the second MCS and equal to or greater than the third MCS.
- An MCS is implemented to reduce the final transmission of the MCS according to the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA in a scenario where the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA side device is reduced. Quantity, increase battery life.
- the present embodiment not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA, thereby solving the problem that the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the corresponding MCS is selected based on the foregoing two bandwidths, and the final MCS is determined by comparing the MCS. In fact, it is also possible to compare the above two bandwidths first, and determine the final result based on the comparison result.
- an embodiment of the present invention provides a sixth embodiment of an AP.
- the AP in this embodiment specifically includes: a first obtaining module 1001, a receiving requesting module 1002, a second obtaining module 1003, a sending module 1004, and a fourth.
- the module 1005 is obtained.
- the first obtaining module 1001 is configured to acquire a negotiation bandwidth with the STA of the station;
- the AP may first establish a path with the STA, or when the channel condition between the AP and the STA changes, for example, when the STA moves.
- the first obtaining module 1001 may specifically obtain the negotiation bandwidth with the STA according to the rate adaptive algorithm.
- the receiving request module 1002 is configured to receive a data transmission request of the STA.
- the request may be sent by the STA or sent by the uplink of the AP.
- the second obtaining module 1003 is configured to: after receiving the data transmission request, the receiving request module 1002 acquires a transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the fourth obtaining module 1005 is configured to obtain a third MCS according to the transmission upper limit bandwidth, where the third MCS is an MCS corresponding to the transmission upper limit bandwidth in the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS.
- the correspondence between the bandwidth and the MCS reflects the correspondence between the negotiated bandwidth between the AP and the STA and the MCS sent by the AP to the STA.
- One form of expression is the existing bandwidth control table.
- the sending module 1004 is configured to send a third MCS to the STA if the upper transmission bandwidth is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth.
- the corresponding MCS is not selected according to the foregoing two bandwidths, and then the MCS is compared, but the two bandwidths are compared first, and the upper transmission bandwidth of the STA is compared. If the negotiation bandwidth is smaller than that of the STA, it indicates that the transmission bandwidth is too high. Therefore, the smaller of the two bandwidths, that is, the MCS corresponding to the upper bandwidth of the STA is sent to the STA. It is also possible to avoid situations where the transmission bandwidth is too high.
- the bandwidth of the STA is not only considered to be negotiated, but also the upper bandwidth of the STA is considered.
- the upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth of the STA, Select the MCS corresponding to the upper limit transmission bandwidth of the smaller STA.
- the MCS that is finally delivered is reduced according to the upper bandwidth of the transmission, thereby reducing the transmission bandwidth that is delivered, thereby reducing the power consumption of the AP and STA devices. Life time.
- the transmission bandwidth of the STA when the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is smaller than the negotiated bandwidth of the STA, the transmission bandwidth does not necessarily have a virtual high.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA and the negotiated bandwidth with the STA may both correspond to the same MCS.
- the MCS corresponding to the upper limit bandwidth of the smaller STA is selected for bandwidth delivery, it is guaranteed to avoid the virtual high bandwidth.
- the sending module determines that the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA is greater than or equal to the negotiation bandwidth with the STA, that is, the transmission bandwidth is not high, and the negotiation bandwidth is sent to the STA. Corresponding MCS.
- the embodiment of the present invention not only considers the negotiation bandwidth of the AP and the STA, but also considers the transmission upper limit bandwidth of the STA.
- the transmission upper bandwidth of the STA may limit the actual transmission bandwidth of the AP and the STA, and may be obtained based on the transmission bandwidth of the AP uplink segment and/or the transmission requirement bandwidth of the STA.
- the third embodiment of the method refer to the third embodiment of the method. The relevant points are not repeated here.
- the MCS corresponding to the bandwidth that is closest to the upper bandwidth limit and smaller than the upper limit of the bandwidth may be selected.
- the MCS can also be selected in the MCS corresponding to the transmission system.
- the transmission system may be determined based on at least one of the following parameters: a channel frequency of the downlink segment, an open state of the short guard interval, and an I/O mode. For details, refer to the bandwidth selection method of the first embodiment and the third embodiment. Here, I will not repeat them here.
- the disclosed system, apparatus, and method may be implemented in other manners.
- the device embodiments described above are merely illustrative.
- the division of the unit is only a logical function division.
- there may be another division manner for example, multiple units or components may be combined or Can be integrated into another system, or Some features can be ignored or not executed.
- the mutual coupling or direct connection or communication connection shown or discussed may be an indirect engagement or communication connection through some interface, device or unit, and may be in electrical, mechanical or other form.
- the components displayed by the unit may or may not be physical units, that is, may be located in one place, or may be distributed to multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
- each functional unit in each embodiment of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.
- the above integrated unit can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of a software functional unit.
- the integrated unit if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a standalone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium.
- the technical solution of the present invention may contribute to the prior art or all or part of the technical solution may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium.
- a number of instructions are included to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods described in various embodiments of the present invention.
- the foregoing storage medium includes: a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and the like, which can store program codes. medium.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/322,301 US10069593B2 (en) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | Bandwidth selection method of wireless fidelity technology and access point AP |
JP2017500974A JP6440176B2 (ja) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | ワイヤレスフィディリティ技術の帯域幅選択方法およびアクセスポイントap |
CN201480071712.0A CN105900481B (zh) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
EP14896990.0A EP3148249B1 (en) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | Bandwidth selection method of wireless fidelity technology and access point (ap) |
PCT/CN2014/081741 WO2016004566A1 (zh) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2014/081741 WO2016004566A1 (zh) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2016004566A1 true WO2016004566A1 (zh) | 2016-01-14 |
Family
ID=55063471
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2014/081741 WO2016004566A1 (zh) | 2014-07-07 | 2014-07-07 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10069593B2 (zh) |
EP (1) | EP3148249B1 (zh) |
JP (1) | JP6440176B2 (zh) |
CN (1) | CN105900481B (zh) |
WO (1) | WO2016004566A1 (zh) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107708224A (zh) * | 2017-09-29 | 2018-02-16 | 努比亚技术有限公司 | Wi‑Fi控制方法、移动终端及计算机可读存储介质 |
JP2018098699A (ja) * | 2016-12-15 | 2018-06-21 | 富士通株式会社 | 通信制御装置、通信システム、及び通信方法 |
KR20180132698A (ko) * | 2016-04-12 | 2018-12-12 | 광동 오포 모바일 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 코포레이션 리미티드 | 서비스 통신의 코덱 모드 세트를 결정하기 위한 방법 및 장치 |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016004566A1 (zh) * | 2014-07-07 | 2016-01-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
US20160212749A1 (en) * | 2015-01-19 | 2016-07-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for use of multiple modulation and coding schemes in a physical protocol data unit |
US11589353B2 (en) | 2020-09-01 | 2023-02-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Real-time dynamic bandwidth expansion |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060056380A1 (en) * | 2004-08-31 | 2006-03-16 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Radio communication device and radio communication method |
CN101296111A (zh) * | 2007-04-29 | 2008-10-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | 自动实现管理设备和被管理设备链接的方法及系统 |
CN101990315A (zh) * | 2009-08-04 | 2011-03-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 下行调制编码方式和多输入多输出模式的调整方法及设备 |
CN103889007A (zh) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-06-25 | 中国移动通信集团上海有限公司 | 一种带宽配置的方法、认证授权计费服务器、ac和ap |
Family Cites Families (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5862329A (en) * | 1996-04-18 | 1999-01-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method system and article of manufacture for multi-casting audio visual material |
JP2008306409A (ja) * | 2007-06-06 | 2008-12-18 | Toshiba Corp | 無線通信システム |
JP2009055464A (ja) * | 2007-08-28 | 2009-03-12 | Toshiba Corp | 無線通信装置、無線通信装置の制御方法、無線通信装置の制御プログラム、および半導体集積回路 |
WO2009053933A1 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2009-04-30 | Nokia Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer program product for reducing outage probability for mobile devices |
WO2010001928A1 (ja) * | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | 無線通信システムと方法とプログラム並びに基地局装置とマルチセル/マルチキャスト協調制御装置 |
US8244296B2 (en) | 2008-10-15 | 2012-08-14 | Apple Inc. | Dynamic thermal control for wireless transceivers |
EP2460298A2 (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2012-06-06 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Methods and apparatus for wlan transmission |
US8983380B2 (en) * | 2009-10-29 | 2015-03-17 | Mediatek Inc. | Adaptive tuning method and apparatus for a combo wireless system |
JP5470075B2 (ja) * | 2010-02-05 | 2014-04-16 | 京セラ株式会社 | 無線通信システム、主通信装置、従通信装置、およびチャネル割当情報通知方法 |
US8867574B2 (en) * | 2010-06-02 | 2014-10-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Format of VHT-SIG-B and service fields in IEEE 802.11AC |
US9055457B2 (en) * | 2011-08-25 | 2015-06-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmission parameters for very high throughput transmission |
EP2771984A1 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2014-09-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (publ) | Method and apparatus for handling the tdd tail problem for an abs pattern |
US9055468B2 (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2015-06-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frame formats and timing parameters in sub-1 GHz networks |
SG11201407424TA (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2014-12-30 | Agency Science Tech & Res | Methods for determining information about a communication parameter and communication devices |
CN103686866A (zh) | 2012-09-26 | 2014-03-26 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 无线资源调整方法及装置 |
WO2014123386A1 (en) * | 2013-02-08 | 2014-08-14 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for reporting downlink channel state |
US9820287B2 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2017-11-14 | Kyocera Corporation | Mobile communications directed to assignment of radio resources and reporting pathloss of D2D communications |
JP6101544B2 (ja) * | 2013-04-05 | 2017-03-22 | 京セラ株式会社 | 基地局、通信制御方法、及びプロセッサ |
JP6132706B2 (ja) * | 2013-08-22 | 2017-05-24 | パナソニック株式会社 | 無線通信装置、無線通信システム及び無線通信方法 |
US20150249936A1 (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2015-09-03 | Magnolia Broadband Inc. | Parallel aggregate mac protocol data units for fast link adaptation |
WO2016004566A1 (zh) * | 2014-07-07 | 2016-01-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap |
US10128917B2 (en) * | 2014-09-16 | 2018-11-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for tone plans for wireless communication networks |
-
2014
- 2014-07-07 WO PCT/CN2014/081741 patent/WO2016004566A1/zh active Application Filing
- 2014-07-07 US US15/322,301 patent/US10069593B2/en active Active
- 2014-07-07 EP EP14896990.0A patent/EP3148249B1/en active Active
- 2014-07-07 JP JP2017500974A patent/JP6440176B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2014-07-07 CN CN201480071712.0A patent/CN105900481B/zh active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060056380A1 (en) * | 2004-08-31 | 2006-03-16 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Radio communication device and radio communication method |
CN101296111A (zh) * | 2007-04-29 | 2008-10-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | 自动实现管理设备和被管理设备链接的方法及系统 |
CN101990315A (zh) * | 2009-08-04 | 2011-03-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 下行调制编码方式和多输入多输出模式的调整方法及设备 |
CN103889007A (zh) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-06-25 | 中国移动通信集团上海有限公司 | 一种带宽配置的方法、认证授权计费服务器、ac和ap |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP3148249A4 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20180132698A (ko) * | 2016-04-12 | 2018-12-12 | 광동 오포 모바일 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 코포레이션 리미티드 | 서비스 통신의 코덱 모드 세트를 결정하기 위한 방법 및 장치 |
KR102598035B1 (ko) | 2016-04-12 | 2023-11-02 | 광동 오포 모바일 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 코포레이션 리미티드 | 서비스 통신의 코덱 모드 세트를 결정하기 위한 방법 및 장치 |
JP2018098699A (ja) * | 2016-12-15 | 2018-06-21 | 富士通株式会社 | 通信制御装置、通信システム、及び通信方法 |
CN107708224A (zh) * | 2017-09-29 | 2018-02-16 | 努比亚技术有限公司 | Wi‑Fi控制方法、移动终端及计算机可读存储介质 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3148249A4 (en) | 2017-05-31 |
CN105900481A (zh) | 2016-08-24 |
EP3148249B1 (en) | 2019-08-21 |
US20170134119A1 (en) | 2017-05-11 |
JP2017521010A (ja) | 2017-07-27 |
US10069593B2 (en) | 2018-09-04 |
EP3148249A1 (en) | 2017-03-29 |
CN105900481B (zh) | 2019-12-17 |
JP6440176B2 (ja) | 2018-12-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2016004566A1 (zh) | 一种无线保真技术的带宽选择方法及接入点ap | |
US20180270679A1 (en) | Reliability-based multi-link communications | |
CN108141443B (zh) | 用户设备、媒体流传输网络辅助节点和媒体流传输方法 | |
KR101711464B1 (ko) | 와이파이 네트워크에서 차별화된 연결 서비스 제공을 위한 시스템 및 방법 | |
KR100995189B1 (ko) | 무선 네트워크에서의 서비스 품질 차별화 방법 및 무선장치 | |
US20110113146A1 (en) | Dynamic quality of service (qos) setup over wired and wireless networks | |
CN105210407B (zh) | 将通信从蜂窝网络卸载到无线局域网 | |
US20160226785A1 (en) | Device-initiated codec rate change during a voice call | |
KR20200003096A (ko) | 통신 방법, 기지국 및 단말 장치 | |
US9854472B2 (en) | Cooperative communication method, cloud server, and core network server | |
KR102279880B1 (ko) | 무선 통신 시스템에서 베어러의 비트레이트를 동적으로 운영하는 방법 및 장치 | |
CA2946051C (en) | Power configuration method, user equipment, and base station | |
EP3217728B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining transmission power | |
WO2017147760A1 (zh) | 一种非授权频谱下的数据传输方法及系统、终端设备 | |
US20210306913A1 (en) | Sidelink communications method and apparatus | |
WO2006106634A1 (ja) | 無線lanシステム、その基地局および端末局 | |
WO2013166670A1 (zh) | 上行信道资源配置方法和设备 | |
WO2015180157A1 (zh) | 承载建立装置和方法 | |
WO2016011849A1 (zh) | 一种控制空口资源的方法、设备及系统 | |
WO2017000760A2 (zh) | 无线网络功能的配置方法、无线网络节点及核心网设备 | |
US20220386165A1 (en) | Method of wireless communication system for extended reality applications with enhanced quality of service | |
WO2015061943A1 (zh) | 一种资源调度的方法、装置及系统 | |
WO2015143863A1 (zh) | 一种基于流量的网络切换方法、装置和终端 | |
WO2016101148A1 (zh) | 物理无线资源块调度的方法、设备和系统 | |
JP6759354B2 (ja) | フラグメンテーションを利用する無線通信方法及びそれを使用する無線通信端末 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 14896990 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2014896990 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2014896990 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 15322301 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017500974 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |