WO2015132836A1 - Cad geometry creation assistance device - Google Patents

Cad geometry creation assistance device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015132836A1
WO2015132836A1 PCT/JP2014/055208 JP2014055208W WO2015132836A1 WO 2015132836 A1 WO2015132836 A1 WO 2015132836A1 JP 2014055208 W JP2014055208 W JP 2014055208W WO 2015132836 A1 WO2015132836 A1 WO 2015132836A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
design rule
design
shape
rule
cad
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2014/055208
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
東 奥野
昌幸 針谷
Original Assignee
株式会社日立製作所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立製作所 filed Critical 株式会社日立製作所
Priority to PCT/JP2014/055208 priority Critical patent/WO2015132836A1/en
Publication of WO2015132836A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015132836A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/04Constraint-based CAD

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a CAD shape creation support apparatus that supports creation of a CAD shape that is a product shape created on a computer in computer-aided design (Computer Aided Design; generally referred to as “CAD”).
  • CAD Computer Aided Design
  • the three-dimensional CAD is a tool for creating a product shape on a computer, and the shape can be freely defined according to the intention of the designer.
  • a designer uses a three-dimensional CAD to design a product
  • the distance between holes and the distance between the holes and the edge of the shape must be greater than or equal to a reference value due to restrictions on processing accuracy.
  • design rules Such constraints to be considered are referred to herein as design rules.
  • design rules when there are many rules to be checked or when there are many parts to be checked, an inexperienced designer may cause a check omission, resulting in a design rework.
  • Patent Document 1 a similar shape is searched for and registered from shape data and design rules registered in a database in advance for a three-dimensional CAD model created by a designer.
  • a device is described in which a computer automatically determines whether a design rule is satisfied and presents it to a designer, thereby preventing a design rule check from being omitted.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems. Design rules are registered in a database without omission, and checking whether the design rules are satisfied at the time of product design prevents rework of design work.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for performing an efficient design.
  • the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention has the following configuration, for example.
  • the present invention includes a plurality of means for solving the above-described problems, and an example thereof is as follows.
  • the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention relates to a design rule draft extraction unit that extracts a design rule draft from an input design document and a design rule template, and the extracted design rule draft is associated with the design document.
  • a design rule proposal verification unit that determines whether or not it conforms to the CAD shape
  • a result display unit that presents a result of suitability determined by the design rule plan verification unit to the user
  • a determination result of the design rule plan verification unit And a design rule registration unit for registering a design rule proposal in association with the CAD shape and the design document.
  • the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention when creating a CAD shape, checks whether the CAD shape conforms to a rule determined in design by a computer, thereby supporting the creation of a CAD shape.
  • This is a support device, and in particular, a CAD shape creation support device provided with means for creating a design rule to be used at the time of the check.
  • the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention includes a design rule draft extraction unit that extracts a design rule draft from an input design document and a design rule template, and the extracted design rule draft is the design document.
  • a design rule proposal verification unit that determines whether or not the CAD shape associated with the design rule is matched; a result display unit that presents a result of suitability determined by the design rule proposal verification unit to the user; and the design rule proposal verification unit And a design rule registration unit for registering a design rule proposal in association with the CAD shape and the design document based on the determination result.
  • a CAD model creation support apparatus that registers a design rule draft extracted from a design document in a database and determines whether a CAD model to be designed satisfies a registered design rule at the time of product design.
  • FIG. 1 shows an example of a system configuration diagram of this embodiment.
  • an input / output device 101 including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, etc. for inputting data and displaying it on a screen, and a design document describing the design rule are input.
  • a design document input unit 103 a design document database 102 capable of registering the input design document, a design rule template input unit 105 for inputting a design rule template in which a design rule template is recorded, and an input design rule
  • a design rule template database 104 capable of registering templates, a design rule plan extraction unit 107 that extracts a design rule plan 106 from an input design document according to the design rule template, and a CAD model input unit 109 that inputs a CAD model shape CAD data that can register CAD models
  • a database 108 a design rule proposal verification unit 110 that verifies whether the design rule proposal 106 matches the input CAD model, a result display unit 111 that displays a verification result, and a design rule that matches the CAD model as a result of the verification.
  • the design rule registration unit 113 registers a plan in the design rule database 112.
  • an input / output device 114 including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, etc. for inputting data and displaying it on a screen, a CAD model input unit 116 for inputting a CAD model 115 to be designed, and a design A design rule input unit 117 for inputting the rule database 112, a similar shape search unit 118 for searching for a shape similar to the CAD model from the input design rules, and a design rule registered for the similar shape are input.
  • the design rule check unit 119 that determines whether or not the CAD model 115 is satisfied, and the warning display unit 120 that displays a warning to the apparatus user when the design rule is not satisfied.
  • a design rule plan that matches the CAD model is registered in the design rule database 112 by the design rule registration unit 113.
  • the device user may be provided with means for determining whether or not the design rule proposal displayed on the screen is appropriate, and only the design rule proposal selected by the device user may be registered in the design rule database 112.
  • the apparatus user may be provided with a means for changing the design rule proposal extracted from the design document.
  • the CAD model database 201 stores three-dimensional CAD data of products that have been designed in the past.
  • the design document database 202 stores reference information when these CAD models are created and stores the created design documents. Has been.
  • the design document is a document in which rules of attributes such as shapes and materials to be protected in product design are described, and includes, for example, a design standard document, a design specification, an analysis report, a past defect report document, and the like.
  • the CAD model and the design document are associated with each other as shown in FIG. 2. For example, in the example of FIG.
  • CAD_A01 is associated with design document_c01 and design document_c02
  • CAD_A02 is associated with design document_d02. This association may be realized by preparing a file that describes the storage location of the design document associated with each CAD model data, or the design document associated with the same storage location as the CAD data on the computer is stored. It may be realized.
  • Figure 3 shows an example of a design rule template.
  • a rule number 301, a rule name 302, a target shape 303, and a design rule template 304 are registered in the design rule template.
  • the target shape is the boss root fillet
  • the registered design rule template is such that the diameter r0 of the boss root fillet is larger than r0_min and smaller than r0_max.
  • design rule templates are registered, so specific values are not registered in r0_min and r0_max, but a rule that r0 is between a certain value and a certain value is registered. .
  • Figure 4 shows an example of the processing flow for extracting design rule proposals.
  • a morpheme / part-of-speech analysis process 401 is performed on a design document that is a design rule extraction target.
  • Morphological analysis is a process of dividing a Japanese sentence into meaningful words
  • part-of-speech analysis is a process of specifying the part of speech of the divided words.
  • a restriction condition extraction process 402 is performed from the word group divided by the morpheme / part of speech analysis.
  • the restriction condition is a condition that a certain dimension value should satisfy.
  • a determination process 403 is performed to determine whether the extracted restriction condition matches the rule registered in the design rule template. If the extracted restriction condition matches, an output process 404 of the design rule draft 405 is performed.
  • the design rule proposal is the one that conforms to the design rule template, but when a rule that does not conform to the design rule template is extracted, the device user adds the rule to the design rule template, Means adopted as a design rule draft may be provided.
  • Figure 5 shows an example of design rule proposal extraction.
  • the subject sentence 501 “The diameter of the fillet at the base of the boss must be between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm” is analyzed, it is divided into words as in 502 and the part of speech is determined.
  • the target shape, parameters, and limiting conditions are extracted as in 503.
  • conformity with the example of the design rule template in FIG. 3 is determined, and it conforms to the rule of No. 1 boss fillet size_001.
  • R0_max can be determined to be 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively.
  • Fig. 6 shows an example of the processing flow for design rule proposal verification.
  • the design rule proposal extracted from the design document is correct is verified using the CAD model data to be designed.
  • CAD model data is input in a data input process 601.
  • the CAD model data input here is CAD model data associated with the design document from which the design rule proposal is extracted.
  • the input CAD model data is one or a plurality of CAD model data. is there.
  • the shape parameter extraction processing 602 the shape parameter targeted by the design rule proposal extracted from the design document is extracted from the input CAD model data. For example, for the design rule draft 504 extracted in FIG.
  • the target shape is a fillet at the root of the boss as shown in 503, and the parameter is the diameter of the fillet.
  • the extraction method of the shape parameter differs depending on the parameter to be extracted. Taking the above fillet diameter as an example, the surface connecting the boss and the bottom surface is assumed to be a fillet. If the surface is a cylindrical surface, its radius and truss In the case of a surface, a small radius is calculated as the fillet diameter. Further, in the design rule draft verification process 603, it is verified whether the extracted shape parameter satisfies the design rule draft.
  • the shape parameter r0 is 0.7 mm and the design rule draft is 0.5 mm ⁇ r0 ⁇ 1.0 mm, it is acceptable, and if r0 is 1.2 mm and the same design rule draft is not suitable.
  • design information of a plurality of parts is included in one sentence, and the correspondence between the part and the numerical value is determined by the morpheme / part-of-speech analysis processing unit 401 or the restriction condition extraction processing unit 402 in FIG. The case where it was not able to extract normally is considered.
  • the design rule proposal when the design rule proposal is extracted from the design document in this way, even if the design rule proposal cannot be extracted normally, the design rule proposal is verified by the CAD model, so that an inappropriate design rule is mistakenly stored in the design rule database. You can avoid registering.
  • the shape parameter verified here may be one or plural depending on the number of target shapes included in the CAD model. When there are a plurality of shape parameters, if any one of the shape parameters does not match the design rule proposal, it is determined that the design rule proposal is inappropriate. The verified result is presented to the apparatus user in the result display unit 111.
  • Figure 7 shows an example of design rule proposal verification.
  • the CAD model associated with the design document from which the design rule proposal 701 is extracted includes the shape 702.
  • a fillet 704 is attached to the root of the boss 703 in the shape 702, and the shape parameter r 0 is calculated as 0.7 mm from the small radius of the truss surface, and the verification result is appropriate as in 705.
  • Figure 8 shows an example of the verification result display screen.
  • a rule name 801, a design document name 802 from which a rule is extracted, a target shape 803, a design rule 804, a CAD model name 805 to be verified, and a suitability result 806 are displayed.
  • a registration button 807 is pressed here, the displayed rule is registered in the design rule database 112.
  • the edit button 808 is pressed, a screen for editing the design rule parameters is opened, and the apparatus user can change the parameter values.
  • An end button 809 ends this screen.
  • An example of the parameter editing screen is shown in FIG. On the parameter editing screen, the parameter name 901 and the value 902 of the design rule to be edited are displayed, and the device user can edit the value.
  • the edited value is registered when the user selects the registration button 903, and the input value is reflected on the verification result display screen of FIG.
  • the end button 904 ends this screen.
  • FIG. 8 an example of one design rule proposal is displayed in FIG. 8, when a plurality of design rule proposals are extracted from the design document, verification results of the plurality of design rule proposals are displayed on the verification result display screen.
  • an edit button and a registration button are prepared for each design rule proposal, and the design rule proposal selected by the apparatus user is registered in the design rule database.
  • the design rule When registration is executed on the verification result display screen, the design rule is registered in the design rule database 112.
  • the format of the design rule database is the same as that of the design rule template of FIG. 3, for example, and an actual numerical value is substituted for the parameter name location of the design rule template 304.
  • the design rule database may store the CAD model data of the target shape as basic shape data for each design rule.
  • basic shape data is included in the design rule database, when performing a design rule check during new or customized design, a shape that is similar to the basic shape is searched by searching for a shape that is similar to the basic shape. However, the design rule check can be applied.
  • Figure 10 shows an example of the design rule check process flow.
  • a design target CAD model 1002 and a design rule database 1003 are input.
  • the similar shape search processing 1004 it is searched from the design target CAD model 1002 whether a shape similar to the basic shape registered in the design rule database 1003 is included.
  • the similar shape search method focuses on, for example, the connection relationship between the shape surfaces and the type of the surface, and makes a shape that has the same shape a similar shape, or divides the shape surface into meshes of surface triangles and includes the surfaces included in the shape.
  • the shape parameter extraction processing 1005 extracts the shape parameters targeted by the design rule.
  • the method here is the same as the shape parameter extraction processing 602 for verifying the design rule proposal extracted from the design document.
  • This method is also the same as the design rule proposal verification processing 603 for verifying the design rule proposal. If the shape parameter does not satisfy the target design rule, a warning display process 1007 is performed for the apparatus user.
  • the procedure for performing the design rule check when the device user designates the design target CAD model and the design rule database has been described. However, the device user designates the CAD model data in advance by designating the design rule database. There may be provided means for operating the CAD software to sequentially check the design rules when the shape is added or changed, and to display a warning when a design rule violation occurs.
  • FIG. 11 shows an example of a screen in the data input process 1001.
  • the apparatus user selects the file name of the CAD model to be checked in the input box 1101 from the input or reference button 1102 and similarly selects the design rule database name in the input box 1103 from the input or reference button 1104.
  • the file selected by the execution button 1105 is read into the computer.
  • the data input screen is ended by an end button 1106.
  • Figure 12 shows an example of design rule check.
  • the design target shape 1203 is searched as a similar shape with respect to the design rule 1201 and its basic shape 1202, and the extracted shape parameter r0 does not satisfy the design rule, so that it is determined as non-conforming as in 1204.
  • Fig. 13 shows an example of the warning display screen.
  • the nonconforming part 1301 of the design rule is highlighted, and the warning display unit 1302 displays the number of the violated design rule, the content of the design rule, and the value of the violated parameter.
  • the device user can modify the shape parameter value in accordance with this warning to correct the shape to conform to the design rule.
  • the design rule is extracted from the design document and the suitability is determined from the CAD model data.
  • Design rules can be registered in the database. Further, by performing a rule check using a design rule registered in the design rule database at the time of new or customized design, rework of the design work can be prevented and the design work can be made highly efficient.

Abstract

In order to register all required design rules in a database and check if design rules are met when a product is designed, so as to prevent design rework and thereby achieve efficient designing, this CAD geometry creation assistance device is characterized by being provided with: a draft design rule extraction unit which extracts a draft design rule from an input design document according to an input design rule template; a draft design rule verification unit which determines whether the extracted draft design rule matches the CAD geometry associated with the design document; a result display unit which presents a user with the determination made by the draft design rule verification unit as to whether the extracted draft design rule matches the CAD geometry; and a design rule registration unit which associates the draft design rule with the CAD geometry and the design document and registers the draft design rule, on the basis of the determination made by the draft design rule verification unit.

Description

CAD形状作成支援装置CAD shape creation support device
 本発明は、コンピュータ支援設計(Computer Aided Design; 一般に「CAD」と呼称される)においてコンピュータ上に作成される製品形状であるCAD形状の作成を支援するCAD形状作成支援装置に関する。 The present invention relates to a CAD shape creation support apparatus that supports creation of a CAD shape that is a product shape created on a computer in computer-aided design (Computer Aided Design; generally referred to as “CAD”).
 従来、設計者が作成した三次元CADモデルに対して、あらかじめデータベースに登録された形状データと設計ルールの中から類似形状を検索し、登録された設計ルールを満たしているかをコンピュータが自動で判断し、設計者に提示することで、設計ルールのチェック漏れを防止しようとする装置があった(例えば、特許文献1参照)。 Conventionally, a 3D CAD model created by a designer is searched for similar shapes from shape data and design rules registered in a database in advance, and the computer automatically determines whether the registered design rules are satisfied. However, there is a device that attempts to prevent omission of design rule check by presenting it to a designer (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
特開2010-211434号公報JP 2010-211144 A
 近年、製造業において三次元CADを用いた製品設計が普及してきている。三次元CADは、製品形状をコンピュータ上に作成するツールであり、設計者の意図に沿って形状を自由に定義することができる。ここで、設計者が三次元CADを使用して製品の設計作業を行う際には、製造上の制限や、製品の強度信頼性の要件などから、形状作成において守らなければならない制約がある。例えば、板金加工においては、穴と穴の距離や、穴と形状の縁の距離は、加工精度の制約から、基準値以上にしなければならないといった制約がある。このような考慮すべき制約を、ここでは設計ルールと呼ぶ。しかしながらこのような設計ルールについて、チェックすべきルール、またはチェックすべき箇所が多い場合などに、経験の浅い設計者は、チェック漏れが生じ、その結果設計手戻りが生じることがある。 In recent years, product design using three-dimensional CAD has become widespread in the manufacturing industry. The three-dimensional CAD is a tool for creating a product shape on a computer, and the shape can be freely defined according to the intention of the designer. Here, when a designer uses a three-dimensional CAD to design a product, there are restrictions that must be observed in shape creation due to manufacturing restrictions, requirements for product strength reliability, and the like. For example, in sheet metal processing, there is a restriction that the distance between holes and the distance between the holes and the edge of the shape must be greater than or equal to a reference value due to restrictions on processing accuracy. Such constraints to be considered are referred to herein as design rules. However, for such design rules, when there are many rules to be checked or when there are many parts to be checked, an inexperienced designer may cause a check omission, resulting in a design rework.
 このような課題に対して、特許文献1には、設計者が作成した三次元CADモデルに対して、あらかじめデータベースに登録された形状データと設計ルールの中から類似形状を検索し、登録された設計ルールを満たしているかをコンピュータが自動で判断し、設計者に提示することで、設計ルールのチェック漏れを防止する装置が記載されている。 In order to deal with such a problem, in Patent Document 1, a similar shape is searched for and registered from shape data and design rules registered in a database in advance for a three-dimensional CAD model created by a designer. A device is described in which a computer automatically determines whether a design rule is satisfied and presents it to a designer, thereby preventing a design rule check from being omitted.
 特許文献1に記載の装置では、あらかじめデータベースに登録された設計ルールに対して、作成した三次元CADモデルがルールに違反しているかどうか判定することができる。しかし、製品設計において守るべき設計ルールは数多くあるため、設計ルールを手動でデータベースに登録するのには多くの手間が必要である。また、この設計ルールをデータベースに登録する作業を、経験の浅い設計者が行う場合、登録自体に漏れが生じたり、設計ルールを正しく登録できなかったりする場合がある。 In the apparatus described in Patent Document 1, it is possible to determine whether or not the created three-dimensional CAD model violates the rules with respect to the design rules registered in advance in the database. However, since there are many design rules to be observed in product design, it takes a lot of trouble to manually register the design rules in the database. In addition, when an inexperienced designer performs the task of registering the design rule in the database, there may be a case where the registration itself is omitted or the design rule cannot be correctly registered.
 本発明は、上記の課題を鑑みてなされたものであり、設計ルールを漏れなくデータベースに登録し、製品の設計時に、設計ルールを満たしているかチェックすることで、設計業務の手戻りを防止し、効率の良い設計を実行するための装置を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems. Design rules are registered in a database without omission, and checking whether the design rules are satisfied at the time of product design prevents rework of design work. An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for performing an efficient design.
 上記課題を解決するために、本発明のCAD形状作成支援装置は、例えば、以下の構成となる。本発明は上記課題を解決する手段を複数含んでいるが、その一例を挙げるならば、以下の構成となる。 In order to solve the above problems, the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention has the following configuration, for example. The present invention includes a plurality of means for solving the above-described problems, and an example thereof is as follows.
 すなわち、本発明のCAD形状作成支援装置は、入力された設計文書と設計ルールテンプレートとから設計ルール案を抽出する設計ルール案抽出部と、抽出された設計ルール案が、前記設計文書と関連づけられたCAD形状に適合するか否かを判定する設計ルール案検証部と、前記設計ルール案検証部が判定した適否の結果をユーザに提示する結果表示部と、前記設計ルール案検証部の判定結果に基づいて設計ルール案を前記CAD形状と前記設計文書とに関連づけて登録する設計ルール登録部とを備えることを特徴とする。 That is, the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention relates to a design rule draft extraction unit that extracts a design rule draft from an input design document and a design rule template, and the extracted design rule draft is associated with the design document. A design rule proposal verification unit that determines whether or not it conforms to the CAD shape, a result display unit that presents a result of suitability determined by the design rule plan verification unit to the user, and a determination result of the design rule plan verification unit And a design rule registration unit for registering a design rule proposal in association with the CAD shape and the design document.
 本発明によれば、経験の浅い設計者であっても、短時間で漏れなく設計ルールをデータベースに登録することができ、これにより設計作業の手戻りを防止するとともに、設計作業を高効率化することができる。 According to the present invention, even an inexperienced designer can register design rules in a database in a short time without omission, thereby preventing rework of design work and improving design work efficiency. can do.
本発明の一実施形態に係るシステム構成の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the system configuration | structure which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計文書データベースおよびCADモデルデータベースの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design document database and CAD model database which concern on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルールテンプレートの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design rule template which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルール案抽出の処理フローの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of design rule proposal extraction which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルール案抽出の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design rule proposal extraction which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルール案検証の処理フローの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of the design rule proposal verification which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルール案検証の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design rule proposal verification which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る検証結果表示画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the verification result display screen which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルール編集画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design rule edit screen which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルールチェックの処理フローの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of the design rule check which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係るデータ入力画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the data input screen which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る設計ルールチェックの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the design rule check which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係る警告表示画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the warning display screen which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention.
 本発明のCAD形状作成支援装置は、CAD形状を作成する際に、CAD形状が設計上定められたルールに合致しているかを計算機でチェックすることにより、CAD形状の作成を支援するCAD形状作成支援装置であって、特に、当該チェックの際に利用する設計ルールを作成する手段を備えたCAD形状作成支援装置である。より具体的には、本発明のCAD形状作成支援装置は、入力された設計文書と設計ルールテンプレートから設計ルール案を抽出する設計ルール案抽出部と、抽出された設計ルール案が、前記設計文書と関連づけられたCAD形状に適合するか否かを判定する設計ルール案検証部と、前記設計ルール案検証部が判定した適否の結果をユーザに提示する結果表示部と、前記設計ルール案検証部の判定結果に基づいて設計ルール案を前記CAD形状と前記設計文書とに関連づけて登録する設計ルール登録部とを備えていることを特徴とする。 The CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention, when creating a CAD shape, checks whether the CAD shape conforms to a rule determined in design by a computer, thereby supporting the creation of a CAD shape. This is a support device, and in particular, a CAD shape creation support device provided with means for creating a design rule to be used at the time of the check. More specifically, the CAD shape creation support apparatus of the present invention includes a design rule draft extraction unit that extracts a design rule draft from an input design document and a design rule template, and the extracted design rule draft is the design document. A design rule proposal verification unit that determines whether or not the CAD shape associated with the design rule is matched; a result display unit that presents a result of suitability determined by the design rule proposal verification unit to the user; and the design rule proposal verification unit And a design rule registration unit for registering a design rule proposal in association with the CAD shape and the design document based on the determination result.
 この構成によれば、従来のCAD形状作成支援装置には無い、ルールチェック時(CAD形状が設計上定められたルールに合致しているかを計算機でチェックする際)に用いる設計ルールを作成する手段を新たに備えることで、短時間に漏れを抑えて設計ルールをデータベースに登録することが可能になる。 According to this configuration, means for creating a design rule that is not used in the conventional CAD shape creation support device and is used at the time of rule check (when the computer checks whether the CAD shape matches a rule determined by design). It becomes possible to register the design rule in the database while suppressing leakage in a short time.
 以下、本発明の実施形態について、一実施例として、図面を用いて詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings as an example.
 本実施例では、設計文書から抽出された設計ルール案をデータベースに登録し、製品設計時に、設計対象のCADモデルが登録された設計ルールを満たすか否かを判定する、CADモデル作成支援装置の例を説明する。 In this embodiment, a CAD model creation support apparatus that registers a design rule draft extracted from a design document in a database and determines whether a CAD model to be designed satisfies a registered design rule at the time of product design. An example will be described.
 図1は、本実施例のシステム構成図の一例を示す。本実施例のシステム構成図は、設計ルール作成時に、データを入力して、画面に表示させるためのキーボード、マウス、ディスプレイ等からなる入出力装置101と、設計ルールが記述された設計文書を入力する設計文書入力部103と、入力された設計文書を登録可能な設計文書データベース102と、設計ルールのテンプレートが記録された設計ルールテンプレートを入力する設計ルールテンプレート入力部105と、入力された設計ルールテンプレートを登録可能な設計ルールテンプレートデータベース104と、入力された設計文書の中から設計ルールテンプレートに従って設計ルール案106を抽出する設計ルール案抽出部107と、CADモデル形状を入力するCADモデル入力部109と、CADモデルを登録可能なCADデータベース108と、設計ルール案106が入力されたCADモデルに合致するか検証する設計ルール案検証部110と、検証結果を表示する結果表示部111と、検証の結果、CADモデルに合致した設計ルール案を設計ルールデータベース112に登録する設計ルール登録部113とで構成される。さらに、新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に、データを入力して、画面に表示させるためのキーボード、マウス、ディスプレイ等からなる入出力装置114と、設計対象CADモデル115を入力するCADモデル入力部116と、設計ルールデータベース112を入力する設計ルール入力部117と、入力された設計ルールの中からCADモデルと類似する形状を検索する類似形状検索部118と、類似の形状に登録された設計ルールを、入力されたCADモデル115が満たすかどうかを判定する設計ルールチェック部119と、上記設計ルールを満たさない場合に装置使用者に警告を表示する警告表示部120とを備える。なお、ここでは設計ルール案検証部110で検証された設計ルールのうち、CADモデルに合致した設計ルール案を、設計ルール登録部113で設計ルールデータベース112に登録するが、結果表示部111で画面に表示した設計ルール案の適否を装置使用者が判定させる手段を設け、装置使用者に選択された設計ルール案のみを設計ルールデータベース112に登録してもよい。また、この際、装置使用者が設計文書から抽出された設計ルール案を変更する手段を備えてもよい。また、ここでは設計文書から抽出した設計ルールを設計ルールデータベースに登録し、新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に設計ルールデータベースを利用して、設計対象のCADモデルがルールを満たすかを計算機がチェックする手段を説明したが、抽出された設計ルールを装置使用者が確認し、手動で設計対象のCADモデルをチェックしてもよい。 FIG. 1 shows an example of a system configuration diagram of this embodiment. In the system configuration diagram of this embodiment, when a design rule is created, an input / output device 101 including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, etc. for inputting data and displaying it on a screen, and a design document describing the design rule are input. A design document input unit 103, a design document database 102 capable of registering the input design document, a design rule template input unit 105 for inputting a design rule template in which a design rule template is recorded, and an input design rule A design rule template database 104 capable of registering templates, a design rule plan extraction unit 107 that extracts a design rule plan 106 from an input design document according to the design rule template, and a CAD model input unit 109 that inputs a CAD model shape CAD data that can register CAD models A database 108, a design rule proposal verification unit 110 that verifies whether the design rule proposal 106 matches the input CAD model, a result display unit 111 that displays a verification result, and a design rule that matches the CAD model as a result of the verification. The design rule registration unit 113 registers a plan in the design rule database 112. In addition, at the time of new or customized design, an input / output device 114 including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, etc. for inputting data and displaying it on a screen, a CAD model input unit 116 for inputting a CAD model 115 to be designed, and a design A design rule input unit 117 for inputting the rule database 112, a similar shape search unit 118 for searching for a shape similar to the CAD model from the input design rules, and a design rule registered for the similar shape are input. The design rule check unit 119 that determines whether or not the CAD model 115 is satisfied, and the warning display unit 120 that displays a warning to the apparatus user when the design rule is not satisfied. Here, among the design rules verified by the design rule draft verification unit 110, a design rule plan that matches the CAD model is registered in the design rule database 112 by the design rule registration unit 113. The device user may be provided with means for determining whether or not the design rule proposal displayed on the screen is appropriate, and only the design rule proposal selected by the device user may be registered in the design rule database 112. At this time, the apparatus user may be provided with a means for changing the design rule proposal extracted from the design document. In this section, we explain how to register design rules extracted from design documents in the design rule database and use the design rule database when designing a new or customized design so that the computer can check whether the CAD model to be designed satisfies the rules. However, the apparatus user may check the extracted design rule and manually check the CAD model to be designed.
 設計ルール作成のため、設計文書から設計ルール案を抽出する手順を説明する。 Explain the procedure for extracting design rule proposals from design documents to create design rules.
 まず、設計文書データベースとCADモデルデータベースの関係を図2で説明する。CADモデルデータベース201には、過去に設計を行った製品の三次元CADデータが保存されており、設計文書データベース202にはこれらのCADモデルを作成した際に参考にしたり、作成した設計文書が保存されている。設計文書とは製品設計において守るべき形状や材料などの属性のルールが記載されている文書であり、例えば、設計基準書、設計仕様書、解析報告書、過去の不具合報告文書などが含まれる。CADモデルと設計文書には図2に示したように関連付けがなされており、例えば図2の例では、CAD_A01には設計文書_c01と設計文書_c02、CAD_A02には設計文書_d02が関連付けされている。この関連付けはそれぞれのCADモデルデータに関連付けされた設計文書の保存場所を記載したファイルを用意することで実現してもよいし、計算機上のCADデータと同じ保存場所に関連付けする設計文書を保存することで実現してもよい。 First, the relationship between the design document database and the CAD model database will be described with reference to FIG. The CAD model database 201 stores three-dimensional CAD data of products that have been designed in the past. The design document database 202 stores reference information when these CAD models are created and stores the created design documents. Has been. The design document is a document in which rules of attributes such as shapes and materials to be protected in product design are described, and includes, for example, a design standard document, a design specification, an analysis report, a past defect report document, and the like. The CAD model and the design document are associated with each other as shown in FIG. 2. For example, in the example of FIG. 2, CAD_A01 is associated with design document_c01 and design document_c02, and CAD_A02 is associated with design document_d02. This association may be realized by preparing a file that describes the storage location of the design document associated with each CAD model data, or the design document associated with the same storage location as the CAD data on the computer is stored. It may be realized.
 図3に設計ルールテンプレートの一例を示す。設計ルールテンプレートには例えば、ルール番号301、ルール名称302、対象形状303と設計ルールテンプレート304が登録されている。例として、No.1のボスフィレットサイズに関するルールでは、対象形状はボス根本のフィレットであり、登録された設計ルールテンプレートは、ボス根本のフィレットの径r0の値がr0_minより大きく、r0_maxより小さい、というルールである。ここでは設計ルールのテンプレートが登録されているため、r0_min、r0_maxには具体的な値が登録されている訳ではなく、r0がある値とある値の間にある、というルールが登録されている。 Figure 3 shows an example of a design rule template. For example, a rule number 301, a rule name 302, a target shape 303, and a design rule template 304 are registered in the design rule template. As an example, no. According to the rule for the boss fillet size of 1, the target shape is the boss root fillet, and the registered design rule template is such that the diameter r0 of the boss root fillet is larger than r0_min and smaller than r0_max. Here, design rule templates are registered, so specific values are not registered in r0_min and r0_max, but a rule that r0 is between a certain value and a certain value is registered. .
 図4に設計ルール案抽出の処理フローの一例を示す。設計ルール抽出の処理フローでは、まず設計ルール抽出対象の設計文書に対して、形態素・品詞解析処理401を行う。形態素解析とは、日本語の文章を意味のある単語ごとに分割する処理であり、品詞解析とは分割された単語の品詞を特定する処理である。次に形態素・品詞解析により分割された単語群から、制限条件抽出処理402を行う。制限条件とは、ある寸法の値が満たすべき条件のことであり、例えば、「0.5mm以上」のように、数詞または単位の直後に「以上」「以下」「未満」「から」「より大きい」「より小さい」という形態素や「>」「<」「>=」「<=」「=」「~」などの等号、不等号、記号が出現する文章から抽出された、数値上の条件である。このような単語、記号が含まれる文に対して、対象の形状およびパラメータとその制限条件を抽出する。次に抽出された制限条件が設計ルールテンプレートに登録されたルールに適合するかの判定処理403を行い、適合する場合、設計ルール案405の出力処理404を行う。なお、ここでは設計ルールテンプレートに適合するものを設計ルール案としたが、設計ルールテンプレートに適合しないルールが抽出された場合で、装置使用者がそのルールを新たに設計ルールテンプレートに追加して、設計ルール案として採用する手段を設けてもよい。 Figure 4 shows an example of the processing flow for extracting design rule proposals. In the design rule extraction process flow, first, a morpheme / part-of-speech analysis process 401 is performed on a design document that is a design rule extraction target. Morphological analysis is a process of dividing a Japanese sentence into meaningful words, and part-of-speech analysis is a process of specifying the part of speech of the divided words. Next, a restriction condition extraction process 402 is performed from the word group divided by the morpheme / part of speech analysis. The restriction condition is a condition that a certain dimension value should satisfy. For example, “more than,” “less than,” “less than,” “greater than,” “greater than” immediately after a number or unit, such as “0.5 mm or more”. ”,“ Less than ”morpheme, and“> ”,“ <”,“> = ”,“ <= ”,“ = ”,“ ˜ ”, etc. is there. For a sentence including such words and symbols, the shape and parameters of the target and its limiting conditions are extracted. Next, a determination process 403 is performed to determine whether the extracted restriction condition matches the rule registered in the design rule template. If the extracted restriction condition matches, an output process 404 of the design rule draft 405 is performed. In this case, the design rule proposal is the one that conforms to the design rule template, but when a rule that does not conform to the design rule template is extracted, the device user adds the rule to the design rule template, Means adopted as a design rule draft may be provided.
 図5に設計ルール案抽出の一例を示す。対象の文章501「ボスの根本にあるフィレットの径は、0.5mm~1.0mmにしなければならない。」に対し、形態素・品詞解析を行うと、502のように単語に分割され、品詞が判定される。次に制限条件を抽出すると、503のように対象形状、パラメータ、制限条件が抽出される。さらに設計ルールテンプレートとの適合判定では、図3の設計ルールテンプレートの例との適合を判定し、No.1のボスフィレットサイズ_001のルールと適合することになり、504のように、パラメータr0_min、r0_maxがそれぞれ0.5mm、1.0mmと判定できる。 Figure 5 shows an example of design rule proposal extraction. When the subject sentence 501 “The diameter of the fillet at the base of the boss must be between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm” is analyzed, it is divided into words as in 502 and the part of speech is determined. The Next, when limiting conditions are extracted, the target shape, parameters, and limiting conditions are extracted as in 503. Further, in the conformity determination with the design rule template, conformity with the example of the design rule template in FIG. 3 is determined, and it conforms to the rule of No. 1 boss fillet size_001. , R0_max can be determined to be 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively.
 次に設計ルール検証の手順を説明する。 Next, the procedure for design rule verification will be described.
 図6に設計ルール案検証の処理フローの一例を示す。ここでは、設計文書から抽出された設計ルール案が正しいかどうかを設計対象のCADモデルデータを用いて検証する。まず、データ入力処理601においてCADモデルデータを入力する。ここで入力するCADモデルデータは、図2に示すように、設計ルール案を抽出した設計文書に対して、関連付けがなされたCADモデルデータであり、入力されるCADモデルデータは一個または複数個である。次に形状パラメータ抽出処理602では、入力されたCADモデルデータに対して、設計文書から抽出された設計ルール案が対象としている形状のパラメータを抽出する。例えば、図5で抽出された設計ルール案504に対しては、503に示すように対象形状はボスの根本にあるフィレットであり、パラメータは上記フィレットの径である。形状パラメータの抽出方法は、抽出するパラメータによって異なるが、上記フィレットの径を例にすると、まずボスと底面をつなぐ面をフィレットと仮定し、その面が円筒面の場合はその半径、ト-ラス面の場合は小半径を算出し、フィレットの径とする。さらに設計ルール案検証処理603において、抽出された形状パラメータが設計ルール案を満たすか検証する。例えば、形状パラメータr0が0.7mmで、設計ルール案が0.5mm<r0<1.0mmであれば適合、r0が1.2mmで同じ設計ルール案であれば不適となる。不適となる場合としては、例えば複数の部品の設計情報が一つの文章に含まれており、図4の形態素・品詞解析処理部401または制限条件抽出処理部402で、部品と数値の対応関係が正常に抽出できなかった場合などが考えられる。本発明では、このように設計文書から設計ルール案を抽出する際に、正常に抽出できなかった場合でもCADモデルで設計ルール案を検証することで、不適な設計ルールを誤って設計ルールデータベースに登録するのを避けることができる。なお、ここで検証される形状パラメータはCADモデルに含まれる対象形状の数によって、一個でもよいし複数でもよい。形状パラメータの数が複数の場合は、形状パラメータのうち、一個でも設計ルール案に適合しないものがある場合、その設計ルール案は不適と判定する。検証された結果は、結果表示部111において装置使用者に提示される。 Fig. 6 shows an example of the processing flow for design rule proposal verification. Here, whether or not the design rule proposal extracted from the design document is correct is verified using the CAD model data to be designed. First, CAD model data is input in a data input process 601. As shown in FIG. 2, the CAD model data input here is CAD model data associated with the design document from which the design rule proposal is extracted. The input CAD model data is one or a plurality of CAD model data. is there. Next, in the shape parameter extraction processing 602, the shape parameter targeted by the design rule proposal extracted from the design document is extracted from the input CAD model data. For example, for the design rule draft 504 extracted in FIG. 5, the target shape is a fillet at the root of the boss as shown in 503, and the parameter is the diameter of the fillet. The extraction method of the shape parameter differs depending on the parameter to be extracted. Taking the above fillet diameter as an example, the surface connecting the boss and the bottom surface is assumed to be a fillet. If the surface is a cylindrical surface, its radius and truss In the case of a surface, a small radius is calculated as the fillet diameter. Further, in the design rule draft verification process 603, it is verified whether the extracted shape parameter satisfies the design rule draft. For example, if the shape parameter r0 is 0.7 mm and the design rule draft is 0.5 mm <r0 <1.0 mm, it is acceptable, and if r0 is 1.2 mm and the same design rule draft is not suitable. For example, design information of a plurality of parts is included in one sentence, and the correspondence between the part and the numerical value is determined by the morpheme / part-of-speech analysis processing unit 401 or the restriction condition extraction processing unit 402 in FIG. The case where it was not able to extract normally is considered. In the present invention, when the design rule proposal is extracted from the design document in this way, even if the design rule proposal cannot be extracted normally, the design rule proposal is verified by the CAD model, so that an inappropriate design rule is mistakenly stored in the design rule database. You can avoid registering. In addition, the shape parameter verified here may be one or plural depending on the number of target shapes included in the CAD model. When there are a plurality of shape parameters, if any one of the shape parameters does not match the design rule proposal, it is determined that the design rule proposal is inappropriate. The verified result is presented to the apparatus user in the result display unit 111.
 図7に設計ルール案検証の一例を示す。設計ルール案701を抽出した設計文書に対して、関連付けられたCADモデルには702の形状が含まれている。形状702にはボス703の根本にフィレット704が付属しており、形状パラメータr0はト-ラス面の小半径から0.7mmと算出され、705のように検証結果は適合となる。 Figure 7 shows an example of design rule proposal verification. The CAD model associated with the design document from which the design rule proposal 701 is extracted includes the shape 702. A fillet 704 is attached to the root of the boss 703 in the shape 702, and the shape parameter r 0 is calculated as 0.7 mm from the small radius of the truss surface, and the verification result is appropriate as in 705.
 図8に検証結果表示画面の一例を示す。検証結果画面では、ルール名称801、ルールを抽出した設計文書名802、対象形状803、設計ルール804、検証対象のCADモデル名称805、適否結果806を表示する。ここで登録ボタン807を押すと表示されたルールが設計ルールデータベース112に登録される。また、編集ボタン808を押すと、設計ルールのパラメータを編集するための画面が開き、装置使用者がパラメータの値を変更することもできる。終了ボタン809で本画面を終了する。パラメータ編集画面の例を図9に示す。パラメータ編集画面では、編集する設計ルールのパラメータ名901とその値902が表示され、装置使用者は値を編集することができる。編集した値は装置使用者が登録ボタン903を選択することで登録され、入力された値が図8の検証結果表示画面に反映される。また、終了ボタン904で本画面を終了する。なお、図8では一個の設計ルール案の例を表示しているが、設計文書から複数の設計ルール案が抽出された場合、検証結果表示画面において複数の設計ルール案の検証結果を表示する。その場合、設計ルール案ごとに編集ボタン、登録ボタンが用意され、ここで装置使用者が選択した設計ルール案が、設計ルールデータベースに登録される。 Figure 8 shows an example of the verification result display screen. On the verification result screen, a rule name 801, a design document name 802 from which a rule is extracted, a target shape 803, a design rule 804, a CAD model name 805 to be verified, and a suitability result 806 are displayed. When a registration button 807 is pressed here, the displayed rule is registered in the design rule database 112. When the edit button 808 is pressed, a screen for editing the design rule parameters is opened, and the apparatus user can change the parameter values. An end button 809 ends this screen. An example of the parameter editing screen is shown in FIG. On the parameter editing screen, the parameter name 901 and the value 902 of the design rule to be edited are displayed, and the device user can edit the value. The edited value is registered when the user selects the registration button 903, and the input value is reflected on the verification result display screen of FIG. In addition, the end button 904 ends this screen. Although an example of one design rule proposal is displayed in FIG. 8, when a plurality of design rule proposals are extracted from the design document, verification results of the plurality of design rule proposals are displayed on the verification result display screen. In this case, an edit button and a registration button are prepared for each design rule proposal, and the design rule proposal selected by the apparatus user is registered in the design rule database.
 検証結果表示画面で登録を実行すると、設計ルールは設計ルールデータベース112に登録される。設計ルールデータベースの形式は、例えば図3の設計ルールテンプレートと同様であり、設計ルールテンプレート304のパラメータ名の場所に実際の数値が代入されたものとなる。また、設計ルールデータベースには、各設計ルールに対して、対象形状のCADモデルデータを基本形状データとして含めて保存してもよい。設計ルールデータベースに基本形状データが含まれる場合、新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に設計ルールチェックを行う際、基本形状に類似する形状を検索することで、全く同じ形状でなくとも、形が類似した形状に対しても設計ルールチェックを適用することができるようになる。 When registration is executed on the verification result display screen, the design rule is registered in the design rule database 112. The format of the design rule database is the same as that of the design rule template of FIG. 3, for example, and an actual numerical value is substituted for the parameter name location of the design rule template 304. Further, the design rule database may store the CAD model data of the target shape as basic shape data for each design rule. When basic shape data is included in the design rule database, when performing a design rule check during new or customized design, a shape that is similar to the basic shape is searched by searching for a shape that is similar to the basic shape. However, the design rule check can be applied.
 続いて新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に、設計対象のCADモデルが、設計ルールデータベースに登録された設計ルールを満たすかをチェックする手順を説明する。 Next, the procedure for checking whether the CAD model to be designed satisfies the design rules registered in the design rule database at the time of new or customized design will be described.
 図10に設計ルールチェックの処理フローの一例を示す。まず、データ入力処理1001において、設計対象CADモデル1002と設計ルールデータベース1003を入力する。次に、類似形状検索処理1004では、設計対象CADモデル1002から、設計ルールデータベース1003に登録された基本形状と類似の形状が含まれるかを検索する。類似形状検索の方法は、例えば形状面の接続関係と、面の種類に着目し、これらが等しい形状を類似形状とする方法や、形状面を表面三角形のメッシュに分割し、形状に含まれる表面三角形の法線ベクトルの分布(ヒストグラム)から求める方法がある。ここで検索された類似の設計対象CADモデルに対して、形状パラメータ抽出処理1005で、設計ルールが対象としている形状のパラメータを抽出する。ここでの方法は設計文書から抽出された設計ルール案を検証する際の形状パラメータ抽出処理602と同様である。次に1006で抽出されたパラメータが対象の設計ルールを満たすかを判定する。ここでの方法も、設計ルール案を検証する際の設計ルール案検証処理603と同様である。ここで形状パラメータが対象の設計ルールを満たさない場合、装置使用者に警告表示処理1007を行う。なお、ここでは装置使用者が設計対象CADモデルと設計ルールデータベースを指定した時点で設計ルールチェックを行う手順を説明したが、あらかじめ設計ルールデータベースを指定しておき、装置使用者がCADモデルデータをCADソフト上で操作して、形状の追加や変更を行った時点で逐次的に設計ルールチェックを計算機が行い、設計ルール違反が発生した時点で警告を表示する手段を備えてもよい。 Figure 10 shows an example of the design rule check process flow. First, in a data input process 1001, a design target CAD model 1002 and a design rule database 1003 are input. Next, in the similar shape search processing 1004, it is searched from the design target CAD model 1002 whether a shape similar to the basic shape registered in the design rule database 1003 is included. The similar shape search method focuses on, for example, the connection relationship between the shape surfaces and the type of the surface, and makes a shape that has the same shape a similar shape, or divides the shape surface into meshes of surface triangles and includes the surfaces included in the shape. There is a method of obtaining from a distribution (histogram) of triangular normal vectors. With respect to the similar design target CAD model searched here, the shape parameter extraction processing 1005 extracts the shape parameters targeted by the design rule. The method here is the same as the shape parameter extraction processing 602 for verifying the design rule proposal extracted from the design document. Next, it is determined whether the parameter extracted in 1006 satisfies the target design rule. This method is also the same as the design rule proposal verification processing 603 for verifying the design rule proposal. If the shape parameter does not satisfy the target design rule, a warning display process 1007 is performed for the apparatus user. Here, the procedure for performing the design rule check when the device user designates the design target CAD model and the design rule database has been described. However, the device user designates the CAD model data in advance by designating the design rule database. There may be provided means for operating the CAD software to sequentially check the design rules when the shape is added or changed, and to display a warning when a design rule violation occurs.
 図11にデータ入力処理1001における画面の一例を示す。データ入力画面では装置使用者がチェック対象CADモデルのファイル名を入力ボックス1101に入力または参照ボタン1102から選択し、同様に設計ルールデータベース名を入力ボックス1103に入力または参照ボタン1104から選択する。次に実行ボタン1105で選択したファイルを計算機に読み込む。また、終了ボタン1106でデータ入力画面を終了する。 FIG. 11 shows an example of a screen in the data input process 1001. On the data input screen, the apparatus user selects the file name of the CAD model to be checked in the input box 1101 from the input or reference button 1102 and similarly selects the design rule database name in the input box 1103 from the input or reference button 1104. Next, the file selected by the execution button 1105 is read into the computer. In addition, the data input screen is ended by an end button 1106.
 図12に設計ルールチェックの一例を示す。設計ルール1201とその基本形状1202に対し、設計対象形状1203が類似形状として検索され、抽出された形状パラメータr0が設計ルールを満たさないため、1204のように不適合と判定される。 Figure 12 shows an example of design rule check. The design target shape 1203 is searched as a similar shape with respect to the design rule 1201 and its basic shape 1202, and the extracted shape parameter r0 does not satisfy the design rule, so that it is determined as non-conforming as in 1204.
 図13に警告表示画面の一例を示す。設計ルールの不適合部分1301がハイライト表示され、警告表示部1302に、違反した設計ルールの番号、設計ルールの内容、違反したパラメータの値が表示される。装置使用者はこの警告に従って、形状のパラメータ値を変更することで、設計ルールに適合した形状に修正することができる。 Fig. 13 shows an example of the warning display screen. The nonconforming part 1301 of the design rule is highlighted, and the warning display unit 1302 displays the number of the violated design rule, the content of the design rule, and the value of the violated parameter. The device user can modify the shape parameter value in accordance with this warning to correct the shape to conform to the design rule.
 このように、本発明の実施例1によれば、設計文書から設計ルールを抽出し、その適否をCADモデルデータから判定することで、経験の浅い設計者であっても、短時間で漏れなく設計ルールをデータベースに登録することができる。さらに新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に、設計ルールデータベースに登録された設計ルールを用いて、ルールチェックを行うことで設計作業の手戻りを防止するとともに、設計作業を高効率化することができる。 As described above, according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the design rule is extracted from the design document and the suitability is determined from the CAD model data. Design rules can be registered in the database. Further, by performing a rule check using a design rule registered in the design rule database at the time of new or customized design, rework of the design work can be prevented and the design work can be made highly efficient.
 101 入出力装置
 102 設計文書データベース
 103 設計文書入力部
 104 設計ルールテンプレートデータベース
 105 設計ルールテンプレート入力部
 106 設計ルール案
 107 設計ルール案抽出部
 108 CADモデルデータベース
 109 CADモデル入力部
 110 設計ルール案検証部
 111 結果表示部
 112 設計ルールデータベース
 113 設計ルール登録部
 114 入出力装置
 115 設計対象CADモデル
 116 CADモデル入力部
 117 設計ルール入力部
 118 類似形状検索部
 119 設計ルールチェック部
 120 警告表示部
 201 CADモデルデータベース
 202 設計文書データベース
 301 ルール番号
 302 ルール名称
 303 対象形状
 304 設計ルールテンプレート
 401 形態素・品詞解析処理部
 402 制限条件抽出処理部
 403 設計ルールテンプレートとの適合判定部
 404 設計ルール案出力処理部
 405 設計ルール案
 501 設計ルールの含まれる文章
 502 形態素・品詞解析結果
 503 制限条件抽出結果
 504 設計ルールテンプレートとの適合判定結果
 601 データ入力処理部
 602 形状パラメータ抽出処理部
 603 設計ルール案検証処理部
 701 検証対象の設計ルール案
 702 ルール対象形状
 703 ボス形状
 704 フィレット形状
 705 検証結果
 801 ルール名称
 802 設計文書名
 803 対象形状
 804 設計ルール
 805 CADモデル名称
 806 適否結果
 807 登録ボタン
 808 編集ボタン
 809 終了ボタン
 901 パラメータ名称
 902 値
 903 登録ボタン
 904 終了ボタン
 1001 データ入力処理部
 1002 設計対象CADモデル
 1003 設計ルールデータベース
 1004 類似形状検索処理部
 1005 形状パラメータ抽出処理部
 1006 設計ルールチェック処理部
 1007 警告表示部
 1101 入力CADモデルデータ指定部
 1102 参照ボタン
 1103 入力設計ルールデータ指定部
 1104 参照ボタン
 1105 実行ボタン
 1106 終了ボタン
 1201 設計ルール
 1202 基本形状
 1203 類似検索された設計対象形状
 1204 ルールチェック結果
 1301 ルールに違反した形状
 1302 警告表示
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 101 Input / output device 102 Design document database 103 Design document input part 104 Design rule template database 105 Design rule template input part 106 Design rule plan 107 Design rule plan extraction part 108 CAD model database 109 CAD model input part 110 Design rule plan verification part 111 Result display unit 112 Design rule database 113 Design rule registration unit 114 Input / output device 115 Design target CAD model 116 CAD model input unit 117 Design rule input unit 118 Similar shape search unit 119 Design rule check unit 120 Warning display unit 201 CAD model database 202 Design document database 301 Rule number 302 Rule name 303 Target shape 304 Design rule template 401 Morphological / part of speech analysis processing unit 02 Restriction condition extraction processing unit 403 Conformity determination unit with design rule template 404 Design rule proposal output processing unit 405 Design rule plan 501 Text including design rule 502 Morphological / part of speech analysis result 503 Restriction condition extraction result 504 With design rule template Conformance judgment result 601 Data input processing unit 602 Shape parameter extraction processing unit 603 Design rule draft verification processing unit 701 Design rule draft to be verified 702 Rule target shape 703 Boss shape 704 Fillet shape 705 Verification result 801 Rule name 802 Design document name 803 Target Shape 804 Design rule 805 CAD model name 806 Appropriate result 807 Registration button 808 Edit button 809 End button 901 Parameter name 902 Value 903 Registration button 904 End button 1001 Data Data input processing unit 1002 Design target CAD model 1003 Design rule database 1004 Similar shape search processing unit 1005 Shape parameter extraction processing unit 1006 Design rule check processing unit 1007 Warning display unit 1101 Input CAD model data specifying unit 1102 Reference button 1103 Input design rule data Designation part 1104 Reference button 1105 Execution button 1106 End button 1201 Design rule 1202 Basic shape 1203 Similar shape searched design target shape 1204 Rule check result 1301 Shape in violation of rule 1302 Warning display

Claims (3)

  1.  入力された設計文書と設計ルールテンプレートとから設計ルール案を抽出する設計ルール案抽出部と、
     抽出された設計ルール案が、前記設計文書と関連づけられたCAD形状に適合するか否かを判定する設計ルール案検証部と、
     前記設計ルール案検証部が判定した適否の結果をユーザに提示する結果表示部と、
     前記設計ルール案検証部の判定結果に基づいて設計ルール案を前記CAD形状と前記設計文書とに関連づけて登録する設計ルール登録部と
    を備える
    ことを特徴とするCAD形状作成支援装置。
    A design rule draft extraction unit that extracts a design rule draft from the input design document and the design rule template;
    A design rule proposal verification unit that determines whether or not the extracted design rule proposal conforms to the CAD shape associated with the design document;
    A result display unit that presents to the user the result of suitability determined by the design rule draft verification unit;
    A CAD shape creation support apparatus comprising: a design rule registration unit that registers a design rule plan in association with the CAD shape and the design document based on a determination result of the design rule plan verification unit.
  2.  請求項1に記載のCAD形状作成支援装置において、
     新規またはカスタマイズ設計時に、入力されたCADデータと、設計ルールデータベースに登録された基本形状との類似形状を検索する類似形状検索部と、
     検索された類似形状に登録された設計ルールに基づき、CAD形状に対して設計ルールをチェックする設計ルールチェック部と、
     設計ルールに違反した場合に警告を装置使用者に提示する、警告表示部と
    を更に備える
    ことを特徴とするCAD形状作成支援装置。
    The CAD shape creation support apparatus according to claim 1,
    A similar shape search unit for searching for a similar shape between the input CAD data and the basic shape registered in the design rule database at the time of new or customized design;
    A design rule check unit that checks the design rule against the CAD shape based on the design rule registered in the searched similar shape;
    A CAD shape creation support apparatus, further comprising a warning display unit that presents a warning to the apparatus user when the design rule is violated.
  3.  請求項1に記載のCAD形状作成支援装置において、
     設計文書と設計ルールテンプレートとから抽出された設計ルール案を、装置使用者が編集し、設計ルールデータベースに登録する手段を更に備える
    ことを特徴とするCAD形状作成支援装置。
    The CAD shape creation support apparatus according to claim 1,
    A CAD shape creation support apparatus, further comprising means for an apparatus user to edit a design rule proposal extracted from a design document and a design rule template and register the draft in a design rule database.
PCT/JP2014/055208 2014-03-03 2014-03-03 Cad geometry creation assistance device WO2015132836A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2014/055208 WO2015132836A1 (en) 2014-03-03 2014-03-03 Cad geometry creation assistance device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2014/055208 WO2015132836A1 (en) 2014-03-03 2014-03-03 Cad geometry creation assistance device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015132836A1 true WO2015132836A1 (en) 2015-09-11

Family

ID=54054681

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2014/055208 WO2015132836A1 (en) 2014-03-03 2014-03-03 Cad geometry creation assistance device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015132836A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416149A (en) * 2018-03-13 2018-08-17 武汉新迪数字工程系统有限公司 The real-time formative method of 3 d part unrelated CAD, terminal and storage medium
CN111557004A (en) * 2018-03-12 2020-08-18 株式会社日立制作所 CAD data inspection system and device
US20210216673A1 (en) * 2020-01-14 2021-07-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Design support device
JP7343348B2 (en) 2019-10-07 2023-09-12 株式会社日立製作所 Programming support device and programming support method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0934925A (en) * 1995-07-17 1997-02-07 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Automatic checking device in printed board design
JP2006350420A (en) * 2005-06-13 2006-12-28 Renesas Technology Corp Device for testing rule file for layout verification and test method and test program
JP2010211434A (en) * 2009-03-10 2010-09-24 Hitachi Ltd Design support device
JP2012038055A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-23 Shimizu Corp Technical standard document determination program and technical standard document determination device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0934925A (en) * 1995-07-17 1997-02-07 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Automatic checking device in printed board design
JP2006350420A (en) * 2005-06-13 2006-12-28 Renesas Technology Corp Device for testing rule file for layout verification and test method and test program
JP2010211434A (en) * 2009-03-10 2010-09-24 Hitachi Ltd Design support device
JP2012038055A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-23 Shimizu Corp Technical standard document determination program and technical standard document determination device

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111557004A (en) * 2018-03-12 2020-08-18 株式会社日立制作所 CAD data inspection system and device
CN111557004B (en) * 2018-03-12 2024-01-30 株式会社日立制作所 CAD data inspection system and device
CN108416149A (en) * 2018-03-13 2018-08-17 武汉新迪数字工程系统有限公司 The real-time formative method of 3 d part unrelated CAD, terminal and storage medium
JP7343348B2 (en) 2019-10-07 2023-09-12 株式会社日立製作所 Programming support device and programming support method
US20210216673A1 (en) * 2020-01-14 2021-07-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Design support device
US11669649B2 (en) * 2020-01-14 2023-06-06 Hitachi, Ltd. Support device
JP7379175B2 (en) 2020-01-14 2023-11-14 株式会社日立製作所 Design support equipment

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20140324904A1 (en) Similar design structure search device and similar design structure search method
WO2015132836A1 (en) Cad geometry creation assistance device
EP3118817A1 (en) Post-processing system for finite element analysis
JP2003296383A (en) Three-dimensional modeling system
JP2013246644A (en) Software object correction support device, software object correction support method and program
JP2014232505A (en) Inter-item association generation support device
JP2009003800A (en) Method for creating model for analysis and program for creating model for analysis
JP2008077594A (en) Design support device, design support method, design support program and design support system
US20130191094A1 (en) Work content creation apparatus and method, and workflow creation apparatus and method
US9501598B1 (en) System and method for assertion publication and re-use
US20240086592A1 (en) Design Support Device, Design Support Method, and Design Support Program
JP2003044544A (en) Support apparatus and program for mold processing
JP7343348B2 (en) Programming support device and programming support method
JP6884071B2 (en) Design support device and design support method
EP3754533A1 (en) Design assistance apparatus and design assistance method
JP4912756B2 (en) Polygon data dividing method and polygon data dividing device
JP7284654B2 (en) Design support system, design support method and design support program
JP2007323508A (en) Design support device
JP7384644B2 (en) Design support device and design support method
Stolt A CAD-integrated system for automated idealization of CAD-models for finite element analysis
JP7085586B2 (en) Design support system, design verification method and design verification program
US8769460B1 (en) Device recognition engine
JP4988367B2 (en) Business system development method related to the agreement
Pomazan NEW WAYS TO CONFIGURE THE PARAMETRIZED MODEL DOCUMENTATION
JP6212341B2 (en) Requirement definition process support method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14884284

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14884284

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP