WO2014125443A1 - Moyens et procédés pour évaluer la qualité d'un échantillon biologique - Google Patents

Moyens et procédés pour évaluer la qualité d'un échantillon biologique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014125443A1
WO2014125443A1 PCT/IB2014/059002 IB2014059002W WO2014125443A1 WO 2014125443 A1 WO2014125443 A1 WO 2014125443A1 IB 2014059002 W IB2014059002 W IB 2014059002W WO 2014125443 A1 WO2014125443 A1 WO 2014125443A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
biomarker
sample
acid
quality
assessed
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2014/059002
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Beate Kamlage
Oliver Schmitz
Jürgen KASTLER
Gareth CATCHPOLE
Martin Dostler
Volker Liebenberg
Original Assignee
Metanomics Health Gmbh
Basf (China) Company Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metanomics Health Gmbh, Basf (China) Company Limited filed Critical Metanomics Health Gmbh
Priority to BR112015019453A priority Critical patent/BR112015019453A2/pt
Priority to CN201480020954.7A priority patent/CN105120852A/zh
Priority to JP2015557553A priority patent/JP6388606B2/ja
Priority to KR1020157024681A priority patent/KR20150119118A/ko
Priority to CA2900031A priority patent/CA2900031A1/fr
Priority to DE112014000822.2T priority patent/DE112014000822T5/de
Priority to AU2014217452A priority patent/AU2014217452B2/en
Priority to EP14751739.5A priority patent/EP2956127A4/fr
Priority to US14/767,059 priority patent/US20160003799A1/en
Publication of WO2014125443A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014125443A1/fr
Priority to IL240346A priority patent/IL240346A0/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
    • G01N33/487—Physical analysis of biological material of liquid biological material
    • G01N33/49—Blood
    • G01N33/492—Determining multiple analytes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
    • G01N33/487—Physical analysis of biological material of liquid biological material
    • G01N33/49—Blood
    • G01N33/491—Blood by separating the blood components
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2560/00—Chemical aspects of mass spectrometric analysis of biological material
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2570/00—Omics, e.g. proteomics, glycomics or lipidomics; Methods of analysis focusing on the entire complement of classes of biological molecules or subsets thereof, i.e. focusing on proteomes, glycomes or lipidomes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
    • G16B20/00—ICT specially adapted for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of diagnostic methods. Specifically, the present invention relates to a method for assessing the quality of a biological sample comprising the steps of determining in a sample the amount of at least one biomarker from Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8 and comparing the said amount of the at least one biomarker with a reference, whereby the quality of the sample is assessed.
  • the invention also relates to tools for carrying out the aforementioned method, such as devices and kits.
  • biomarker identification and validation The value of biological material stored in biobanks for any biomedical research related to metabolite profiling, e.g., the potential of biomarker identification and validation, is diminished by pre-analytical confounding factors that interfere with the sample metabolome and may lead to unbalanced study design, increased variability, erratic effects and irreproducible results. It is decisive to assess the quality of biological material in order to assure quality and suitability for metabolite profiling or other analytical or diagnostic methods. Specifically, confounding factors of relevance are increased time and temperature of blood, plasma or serum sample processing and storage, effects of centrifugation protocol, hemolysis, contamination with blood cells, e.g.
  • biobanking There are various standards for quality assurance and quality control for biobanking, e.g., ISO 9001 , ISO guide 34, ISO 17025 and others (see, e.g., Carter 201 1 , Biopreservation and Biobanking 9(2): 157-163; Elliott 2008, Int J Epidemiology 37: 234-244).
  • biochemical standard parameters such as nucleic acid content and integrity, presence of coagulation activity, or cellular composition, cell integrity and number of cells in the sample are determined. The evaluation of such standard parameters, however, will not be suitable for a more defined quality assessment for metabolome analysis.
  • the present invention relates to a method for assessing the quality of a biological sample comprising the steps of:
  • the present invention relates to a method for assessing the quality of a biological sample comprising the steps of:
  • the method as referred to in accordance with the present invention includes a method which essentially consists of the aforementioned steps or a method which includes further steps.
  • the method in a preferred embodiment, is a method carried out ex vivo, i.e. not practised on the human or animal body.
  • the method preferably, can be assisted by automation.
  • the method of the present invention comprises one or more of the following steps: i) contacting said biological sample with an agent specifically interacting with at least one biomarker of the present invention, and determining the amount of a complex formed between said biomarker and said agent specifically interacting with said biomarker; ii) contacting said biological sample with an enzyme specifically reacting with said at least one biomarker of the present invention, and determining the amount of product formed from said biomarker by said enzyme; iii) contacting said biological sample with an agent modifying the chemical structure of at least one biomarker, preferably, to form a non-naturally occurring derivative of said biomarker, and detecting said derivative; iv) discarding said sample in case insufficient quality is assessed, and v) excluding said sample from further analysis in case insufficient
  • assessing refers to distinguishing between insufficient and sufficient quality of a sample for metabolic analysis.
  • Insufficient quality of a sample refers to a composition of a sample which does not allow for a proper analysis of the metabolomic composition, while samples of sufficient quality allow for proper analysis of the metabolomic composition.
  • a sample being of insufficient quality may cause an improper analysis because the metabolic composition is altered with respect to the amounts of metabolites as well as the chemical nature of metabolites.
  • Insufficient quality may be caused, preferably, by degradation of metabolites and/or chemical alterations of the said metabolites. More preferably, the quality of the sample is insufficient because of adverse effects of pre-analytical confounding factors and, preferably, prolonged processing, hemolysis, microclotting, cellular contamination, improper storage conditions and/or improper freezing, preferably slow freezing.
  • biomarker refers to a molecular species which serves as an indicator for a quality impairment or status as referred to in this specification.
  • Said molecular species can be a metabolite itself which is found in a sample of a subject.
  • the biomarker may also be a molecular species which is derived from said metabolite.
  • the actual metab- olite will be chemically modified in the sample or during the determination process and, as a result of said modification, a chemically different molecular species, i.e. the analyte, will be the determined molecular species.
  • the analyte represents the actual metabolite and has the same potential as an indicator for the respective quality impairment.
  • a biomarker according to the present invention is not necessarily corresponding to one molecular species. Rather, the biomarker may comprise stereoisomers or enantiomeres of a compound. Further, a biomarker can also represent the sum of isomers of a biological class of isomeric molecules. Said isomers shall exhibit identical analytical characteristics in some cases and are, therefore, not distinguishable by various analytical methods including those applied in the accompanying Examples described below. However, the isomers will share at least identical sum formula parameters and, thus, in the case of, e.g., lipids an identical chain length and identical numbers of double bonds in the fatty acid and/or sphingo base moieties.
  • Polar biomarkers can be, preferably, obtained by techniques referred to in this specification elsewhere and as described in Examples, below.
  • Lipid biomarkers can be obtained in accordance with the present invention, preferably, as described in this specification elsewhere and, in particular, either as lipid fraction by separation of a sample after protein precipitation into an aqueous polar and an organic lipid phase by, e.g., a mixture of ethanol and dichloromethane as described in Examples, below.
  • Those biomarkers may be marked by "lipid fraction" herein.
  • biomarkers may be enriched from the sample using solid phase extraction (SPE).
  • At least one metabolite of the biomarkers shown in Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8 is to be determined. More preferably, at least one metabolite of the biomarkers shown in Tables 1 a, 1 b, 1 c, 1 d, 1 a', 1 c', 1 d', 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2a', 2b', 2c', 2d', 3a, 3c, 3a', 3c', 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5', 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 7a, 7c, 8a, 8b, 8c, and/or 8d is to be determined.
  • At least one metabolite of the biomarkers shown in Tables 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7 and/or 8 is to be determined.
  • at least one metabolite of the biomarkers shown in Tables 1 a, 1 b, 1 c, 1 d, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3c , 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 7a, 7c, 8a, 8b, 8c, and/or 8d is to be determined.
  • a group of biomarkers will be determined in order to strengthen specificity and/or sensitivity of the assessment.
  • a group preferably, comprises at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 10 or up to all of the said biomarkers shown in the said Tables.
  • a metabolite as used herein refers to at least one molecule of a specific metabolite up to a plurality of molecules of the said specific metabolite. It is to be understood further that a group of metabolites means a plurality of chemically different molecules wherein for each metabolite at least one molecule up to a plurality of molecules may be present.
  • a metabolite in accordance with the present invention encompasses all classes of organic or inorganic chemical com- pounds including those being comprised by biological material such as organisms.
  • the metabolite in accordance with the present invention is a small molecule compound.
  • said plurality of metabolites representing a metabolome, i.e. the collection of metabolites being comprised by an organism, an organ, a tissue, a body fluid or a cell at a specific time and under specific conditions.
  • biomarkers and/or indicators may be, preferably, determined as well in the methods of the present invention.
  • biomarkers may include peptide or polypeptide biomarkers, e.g., those referred to in
  • sample refers to samples comprising biological material and, in particular, metabolic biomarkers including those referred to herein.
  • a sample in accordance with the present invention is a sample from body fluids, preferably, blood, plasma, serum, saliva or urine, or a sample derived, e.g., by biopsy, from cells, tissues or organs. More prefera- bly, the sample is a blood, plasma or serum sample, most preferably, a plasma sample.
  • the aforementioned samples can be derived from a subject as specified elsewhere herein. Techniques for obtaining the aforementioned different types of biological samples are well known in the art. For example, blood samples may be obtained by blood taking while tissue or organ samples are to be obtained, e.g., by biopsy.
  • the aforementioned samples are, preferably, pre-treated before they are used for the method of the present invention.
  • said pre-treatment may include treatments required to release or separate the compounds or to remove excessive material or waste.
  • pre-treatments may aim at sterilizing samples and/or removing contaminants such as undesired cells, bacteria or viruses. Suitable techniques comprise centrifugation, extraction, fractioning, ultrafiltration, protein precipitation followed by filtration and purification and/or enrichment of compounds.
  • other pre-treatments are carried out in order to provide the compounds in a form or concentration suitable for compound analysis. For example, if gas-chromatography coupled mass spectrometry is used in the method of the present invention, it will be required to derivatize the compounds prior to the said gas chromatography.
  • pre-treatment may be the storage of the samples under suitable storage condi- tions.
  • Storage conditions as referred to herein include storage temperature, pressure, humidity, time as well as the treatment of the stored samples with preserving agents.
  • Suitable and necessary pre-treatments also depend on the means used for carrying out the method of the invention and are well known to the person skilled in the art.
  • Pre-treated samples as described before are also comprised by the term "sample” as used in accordance with the present invention.
  • the sample referred to in accordance with the present invention can, preferably, be derived from a subject.
  • a subject as used herein relates to animals and, preferably, to mammals. More preferably, the subject is a rodent and, most preferably, a mouse or rat or a primate and, most preferably, a human.
  • the subject preferably, is suspected to suffer from a disease or medical condition, or not, or be at risk for developing a disease or medical condition, or not.
  • determining the amount refers to determining at least one characteristic feature of a biomarker to be determined by the method of the present invention in the sample.
  • Characteristic features in accordance with the present invention are features which charac- terize the physical and/or chemical properties including biochemical properties of a biomarker. Such properties include, e.g., molecular weight, viscosity, density, electrical charge, spin, optical activity, colour, fluorescence, chemoluminescence, elementary composition, chemical structure, capability to react with other compounds, capability to elicit a response in a biological read out system (e.g., induction of a reporter gene) and the like. Values for said properties may serve as characteristic features and can be determined by techniques well known in the art.
  • the characteristic feature may be any feature which is derived from the values of the physical and/or chemical properties of a biomarker by standard operations, e.g., mathematical calculations such as multiplication, division or logarithmic calculus.
  • the at least one characteristic feature allows the determination and/or chemical identification of the said at least one biomarker and its amount.
  • the characteristic value preferably, also comprises information relating to the abundance of the biomarker from which the characteristic value is derived.
  • a characteristic value of a biomarker may be a peak in a mass spectrum. Such a peak contains characteristic information of the biomarker, i.e. the m/z information, as well as an intensity value being related to the abundance of the said biomarker (i.e. its amount) in the sample.
  • each biomarker comprised by a sample may be, preferably, determined in accordance with the present invention quantitatively or semi-quantitatively.
  • quantitative determination either the absolute or precise amount of the biomarker will be determined or the relative amount of the biomarker will be determined based on the value determined for the characteristic feature(s) referred to herein above.
  • the relative amount may be determined in a case were the precise amount of a biomarker can or shall not be determined. In said case, it can be determined whether the amount in which the biomarker is present is enlarged or diminished with respect to a second sample comprising said biomarker in a second amount.
  • said second sample comprising said biomarker shall be a calculated reference as specified elsewhere herein. Quantitatively analysing a biomarker, thus, also includes what is sometimes referred to as semi-quantitative analysis of a biomarker.
  • determining as used in the method of the present invention includes using a compound separation step prior to the analysis step referred to before.
  • said compound separation step yields a time resolved separation of the metabolites comprised by the sample.
  • Suitable techniques for separation to be used preferably in accordance with the present invention therefore, include all chromatographic separation techniques such as liquid chromatography (LC), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), thin layer chromatography, size exclusion or affinity chromatography. These techniques are well known in the art and can be applied by the person skilled in the art without further ado. Most preferably, LC and/or GC are chromatographic techniques to be envisaged by the method of the present invention.
  • mass spectrometry is used in particular gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), direct infusion mass spectrometry or Fourier transform ion-cyclotrone-resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS), capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry (CE-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), quadrupole mass spectrometry, any sequentially coupled mass spectrometry, such as MS-MS or MS-MS-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), pyrolysis mass spectrometry (Py-MS), ion mobility mass spectrometry or time of flight mass spectrometry (TOF).
  • GC-MS gas chromatography mass spectrometry
  • LC-MS liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
  • FT-ICR-MS Fourier transform ion-cyclotrone-resonance mass spectrome
  • LC-MS and/or GC-MS are used as described in detail below. Said techniques are disclosed in, e.g., Nissen 1995, Journal of Chro- matography A, 703: 37-57, US 4,540,884 or US 5,397,894, the disclosure content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • mass spectrometry techniques the following techniques may be used for compound determination: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Fourier transform infrared analysis (FT- IR), ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy, refraction index (Rl), fluorescent detection, radiochemical detection, electrochemical detection, light scattering (LS), dispersive Raman spectroscopy or flame ionisation detection (FID).
  • the method of the present invention shall be, preferably, assisted by automation.
  • sample processing or pre-treatment can be auto- mated by robotics.
  • Data processing and comparison is, preferably, assisted by suitable computer programs and databases. Automation as described herein before allows using the method of the present invention in high-throughput approaches.
  • the at least one biomarker can also be determined by a specific chemical or biological assay. Said assay shall comprise means which allow to specifically detect the at least one biomarker in the sample.
  • said means are capable of specifically recognizing the chemical structure of the biomarker or are capable of specifically identifying the biomarker based on its capability to react with other compounds or its capability to elicit a response in a biological read out system (e.g., induction of a reporter gene).
  • Means which are capable of specifically recognizing the chemical structure of a biomarker are, preferably, antibodies or other proteins which specifically interact with chemical structures, such as receptors or enzymes. Specific antibodies, for instance, may be obtained using the biomarker as antigen by methods well known in the art.
  • Antibodies as referred to herein include both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, as well as fragments thereof, such as Fv, Fab and F(ab)2 fragments that are capable of binding the antigen or hapten.
  • the present invention also includes humanized hybrid antibodies wherein amino acid sequences of a non-human donor antibody exhibiting a desired antigen- specificity are combined with sequences of a human acceptor antibody. Moreover, encompassed are single chain antibodies.
  • the donor sequences will usually include at least the anti- gen-binding amino acid residues of the donor but may comprise other structurally and/or functionally relevant amino acid residues of the donor antibody as well.
  • Such hybrids can be prepared by several methods well known in the art.
  • Suitable proteins which are capable of specifically recognizing the biomarker are, preferably, enzymes which are involved in the metabolic conversion of the said biomarker. Said enzymes may either use the biomarker as a substrate or may convert a substrate into the biomarker. Moreover, said antibodies may be used as a basis to generate oligopeptides which specifically recognize the biomarker. These oligopeptides shall, for example, comprise the enzyme ' s binding domains or pockets for the said biomarker.
  • Suitable antibody and/or enzyme based assays may be RIA (radioimmunoassay), ELISA (enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay), sandwich enzyme immune tests, electrochemiluminescence sandwich immunoassays (ECLIA), dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoro immuno assay
  • the biomarker may also be determined based on its capability to react with other compounds, i.e. by a specific chemical reaction. Further, the biomarker may be determined in a sample due to its capability to elicit a response in a biological read out system. The biological response shall be detected as read out indicating the presence and/or the amount of the biomarker comprised by the sample. The biological response may be, e.g., the induction of gene expression or a phenotypic response of a cell or an organism. In a preferred embodiment the determination of the least one biomarker is a quantitative process, e.g., allowing also the determination of the amount of the at least one biomarker in the sample.
  • said determining of the at least one biomarker can, preferably, comprise mass spectrometry (MS).
  • MS mass spectrometry
  • mass spectrometry encompasses all techniques which allow for the determination of the molecular weight (i.e. the mass) or a mass variable corresponding to a compound, i.e. a biomarker, to be determined in accordance with the present in- vention.
  • mass spectrometry as used herein relates to GC-MS, LC-MS, direct infusion mass spectrometry, FT-ICR-MS, CE-MS, HPLC-MS, quadrupole mass spectrometry, any sequentially coupled mass spectrometry such as MS-MS or MS-MS-MS, ICP-MS, Py-MS, TOF or any combined approaches using the aforementioned techniques. How to apply these tech- niques is well known to the person skilled in the art. Moreover, suitable devices are commercially available. More preferably, mass spectrometry as used herein relates to LC-MS and/or GC- MS, i.e. to mass spectrometry being operatively linked to a prior chromatographic separation step.
  • mass spectrometry as used herein encompasses quadrupole MS.
  • said quadrupole MS is carried out as follows: a) selection of a mass/charge quotient (m/z) of an ion created by ionisation in a first analytical quadrupole of the mass spectrometer, b) fragmentation of the ion selected in step a) by applying an acceleration voltage in an additional subsequent quadrupole which is filled with a collision gas and acts as a collision chamber, c) selection of a mass/charge quotient of an ion created by the fragmentation process in step b) in an additional subsequent quadrupole, whereby steps a) to c) of the method are carried out at least once and analysis of the mass/charge quotient of all the ions present in the mixture of substances as a result of the ionisation process, whereby the quadrupole is filled with collision gas but no acceleration voltage is applied during the analysis. Details on said most preferred mass spectrometry to be used in
  • said mass spectrometry is liquid chromatography (LC) MS and/or gas chromatography (GC) MS.
  • LC liquid chromatography
  • GC gas chromatography
  • Liquid chromatography as used herein refers to all techniques which allow for separation of compounds (i.e. metabolites) in liquid or supercritical phase. Liquid chromatography is characterized in that compounds in a mobile phase are passed through the stationary phase. When compounds pass through the stationary phase at different rates they become separated in time since each individual compound has its specific retention time (i.e. the time which is required by the compound to pass through the system).
  • Liquid chromatography as used herein also includes HPLC. Devices for liquid chromatography are commercially available, e.g. from Agilent Technologies, USA.
  • Gas chromatography as applied in accordance with the present invention operates comparable to liquid chromatography.
  • the compounds i.e. metabolites
  • the compounds pass the column which may contain solid support materials as stationary phase or the walls of which may serve as or are coated with the stationary phase.
  • each compound has a spe- cific time which is required for passing through the column.
  • the compounds are derivatised prior to gas chromatography. Suitable techniques for derivatisation are well known in the art.
  • derivatisa- tion in accordance with the present invention relates to methoxymation and trimethylsilylation of, preferably, polar compounds and transmethylation, methoxymation and trimethylsilylation of, preferably, non-polar (i.e. lipophilic) compounds.
  • a reference refers to values of characteristic features of each of the biomarker which can be correlated to an insufficient quality of the sample.
  • a reference is a threshold value (e.g., an amount or ratio of amounts) for a biomarker whereby said threshold divides the range of possible values for the characteristic features into a first and a second part.
  • One of these parts is associated with insufficient quality while the other is associated with sufficient quality.
  • the threshold value itself may also be associated with either sufficient or insufficient quality.
  • values found in a sample to be investigated which are, therefore, essentially identical to the threshold or which fall into the part associated with insufficient quality indicate insufficient quality of the sample.
  • the threshold is associated with sufficient quality
  • values found in a sample to be investigated which are essentially identical to the threshold or which fall into the part associated with sufficient qual- ity indicate sufficient quality of the sample.
  • a reference is, preferably, a reference obtained from a sample or plurality of samples (i.e., preferably, more than 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 50 or 100 samples) known to be of insufficient quality.
  • a value for the at least one biomarker found in the test sample being essentially identical is indicative for insufficient quality while a value for the at least one biomarker found in the test sample being different is indicative for sufficient quality.
  • said refer- ence is derived from a sample or plurality of samples known to be of insufficient quality. More preferably, in such a case an amount of the at least one biomarker in the sample being essentially identical to the said reference is indicative for insufficient quality, while an amount which differs therefrom is indicative for sufficient quality. Also preferably, the said reference is derived from a sample or plurality of samples known to be of sufficient quality. More preferably, in such a case an amount of the at least one biomarker in the sample being essentially identical to the said reference is indicative for sufficient quality, while an amount which differs therefrom is indicative for insufficient quality.
  • the relative values or degrees of changes of the at least one biomarker of said individuals of the population can be determined as specified elsewhere herein. How to calculate a suitable reference value, preferably, the average or median, is well known in the art.
  • the value for the at least one biomarker of the test sample and the reference values are essen- tially identical, if the values for the characteristic features and, in the case of quantitative determination, the intensity values are essentially identical.
  • Essentially identical means that the difference between two values is, preferably, not significant and shall be characterized in that the values for the intensity are within at least the interval between 1 st and 99 th percentile, 5 th and 95 th percentile, 10 th and 90 th percentile, 20 th and 80 th percentile, 30 th and 70 th percentile, 40 th and 60 th percentile of the reference value, preferably, the 50 th , 60 th , 70 th , 80 th , 90 th or 95 th percentile of the reference value.
  • a difference in the relative or absolute value is, preferably, significant outside of the interval between 45 th and 55 th percentile, 40 th and 60 th percentile, 30 th and 70 th percentile, 20 th and 80 th percentile, 10 th and 90 th percentile, 5 th and 95 th percentile, 1 st and 99 th percentile of the reference value.
  • Preferred relative changes of the medians or degrees of changes are described in the accompanying Tables as well as in the Examples.
  • the reference i.e. values for at least one characteristic feature of the at least one biomarker or ratios thereof, will be stored in a suitable data storage medium such as a database and are, thus, also available for future assessments.
  • comparing refers to determining whether the determined value of a biomarker is essentially identical to a reference or differs therefrom.
  • a value for a biomarker is deemed to differ from a reference if the observed difference is statistically significant which can be determined by statistical techniques referred to elsewhere in this description. If the difference is not statistically significant, the biomarker value and the reference are essentially identical.
  • the quality of a sample can be assessed, i.e. it can be assessed whether the sample is of sufficient quality, or not.
  • preferred values for the changes in the relative amounts or ratios i.e. the changes expressed as the ratios of the medians are found in the Tables, below.
  • the comparison is, preferably, assisted by automation.
  • a suitable computer program comprising algorithms for the comparison of two different data sets (e.g., data sets comprising the values of the characteristic feature(s)) may be used.
  • Such computer programs and algorithms are well known in the art. Notwithstanding the above, a comparison can also be carried out manually.
  • the biomarker or biomarkers is/are selected according to the criterion "assayability" (Tables 1 a, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 6a, 7a, 8a, 1 a', 2a', 3a', and 5').
  • assayability relates to the property of a biomarker of being analyzable by at least one commercially available clinical laboratory assay, like, preferably, enzymatic, colorimetric or immunological assays.
  • the biomarker or biomarkers is/are selected according to the criterion "performance" (Tables 1 b, 2b, 4b, 5b, 6b, 8b, and 2b').
  • performance relates to the property of a biomarker having an as low as possible p-value.
  • the biomarker or biomarkers is/are selected according to the criterion "GC-polar" (Tables 1 c, 2c, 3c, 4c, 5c, 6c, 7c, 8c, 1 c', 2c', 3c', and 5').
  • GC-polar relates to the property of a biomarker of being analyzable from the polar fraction, preferably obtained as described in the examples herein below, by a gas chromatographic method.
  • the biomarker or biomarkers is/are selected according to the criterion "uniqueness” (Table 9).
  • the term "uniqueness” relates to the property of a biomarker of specifically indicating a specific pre-analytical confounding factor (quality issue).
  • quality issue a pre-analytical confounding factor
  • by determining a biomarker of Table 9 in a sample it can be determined whether said sample was compromised by the quality issue indicated in said Table. It is understood by the skilled person that the direction of change of a specific biomarker can be read from the Table referenced in Table 9.
  • the amounts of the specific biomarkers referred to above are indicators for the quality of a sample of biological material with respect to various pre-analytical confounding factors of relevance, such as improper processing and storage, hemolysis, contamination with blood cells, microclotting of blood samples destined for plasma preparation and other pre-analytical steps.
  • the at least one biomarker as specified above in a sample can, in principle, be used for assessing whether a sample is of sufficient quality for metabolomics analysis, or not. This is particularly helpful for an efficient metabolomic diagnosis of diseases or medical conditions where proper sample quality is decisive for a reliable diagnosis.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for prolonged processing of plasma and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 1 or 1 ', preferably Table 1.
  • the marker is from Table 1 a, 1 b, 1 c, 1 a', and/or 1 c'.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for prolonged processing of blood and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 2 or 2', preferably Table 2.
  • the marker is from Table 2a, 2b, 2c, 2a', 2b', and/or 2c'.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for hemolysis and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 3 or 3', preferably Table 3.
  • the marker is from Table 3a, 3c, 3a', and/or 3c'.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for microclotting and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 4 or 4', preferably Table 4.
  • the marker is from Table 4a, 4b, and/or 4c.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for contamination with blood cells and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 5 or 5', preferably Table 5.
  • the marker is from Table 5a, 5b, and/or 5c.
  • the aforesaid blood cells are white blood cells.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for improper storage and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 6 or 6', preferably Table 6.
  • the marker is from Table 6a, 6b, and/or 6c.
  • the biological sample is assessed for or further assessed for improper freezing and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 7 or 7', preferably Table 7.
  • said marker is from Table 7a and/or 7c.
  • the biological sample is assessed for prolonged coagulation of blood and wherein said at least one biomarker is from Table 8 or 8', preferably Table 8.
  • the marker is from Table 8a, 8b, and/or 8c.
  • the biological material may be assessed for any one of the aforementioned confounding factors individually or a com- bination of confounding factors selected from the group consisting of: prolonged processing of plasma, prolonged processing of blood, hemolysis, microclotting, contamination with blood cells improper storage, improper freezing, and prolonged coagulation of blood.
  • Preferred combinations may be, for example: -prolonged processing of plasma and prolonged processing of blood;
  • the present invention also relates to a device or system for assessing the quality of a biological sample comprising:
  • an analyzing unit for the said sample comprising a detector for at least one bi- omarker of Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8, preferably Tables 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7 and/or 8, said detector allowing for the determination of the amount of the said at least one biomarker in the sample; and operatively linked thereto, (b) an evaluation unit comprising a data processing unit and a data base, said data base comprising a stored reference and said data processing unit having tangibly embedded an algorithm for carrying out a comparison of the amount of the at least one biomarker determined by the analyzing unit and the stored reference and for generating an output information based on which the assessment of the quality is established.
  • a device as used herein shall comprise at least the aforementioned units.
  • the units of the device are operatively linked to each other. How to link the means in an operating manner will depend on the type of units included into the device.
  • the data obtained by said automatically operating analyzing unit can be processed by, e.g., a computer program in order to facilitate the assessment in the evaluation unit.
  • the units are comprised by a single device in such a case.
  • Said device may accordingly include an analyzing unit for the biomarker and a computer or data processing device as evaluation unit for processing the resulting data for the assessment and for stabling the output information.
  • Preferred devices are those which can be applied without the particular knowledge of a specialized clinician, e.g., electronic devices which merely require loading with a sample.
  • the output information of the device preferably, is a numerical value which allows drawing conclusions on the quality of the sample and, thus, is an aid for the reliability of a diagnosis or for troubleshooting.
  • a preferred reference to be used as a stored reference in accordance with the device of the present invention is an amount for the at least one biomarker to be analyzed or values derived therefrom which are derived from a sample or plurality of samples of insufficient quality.
  • the algorithm tangibly embedded preferably, compares the determined amount for the at least one biomarker with the reference wherein an identical or essentially identical amount or value shall be indicative for a sample of insufficient quality while an amount which differs indicates a sample of sufficient quality.
  • another preferred reference to be used as stored reference in accordance with the device of the present invention is an amount for the at least one biomarker to be analyzed or values derived therefrom which are derived from a sample or plurality of samples of sufficient quality.
  • the algorithm tangibly embedded preferably, compares the determined amount for the at least one biomarker with the reference wherein an identical or essentially identical amount or value shall be indicative for a sample of sufficient quality while an amount which differs indicates a sample of insufficient quality.
  • At least one biomarker of Table 1 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of plasma.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 2 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of blood.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 3 can be used for assessing hemolysis.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 4 can be used for assessing microclotting.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 5 can be used for assessing contamination with blood cells.
  • At least one biomarker of Table 6 can be used for assessing improper storage.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 7 can be used for assessing improper freezing.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 8 can be used for assessing prolonged coagulation time of blood.
  • the units of the device also preferably, can be implemented into a system comprising several devices which are operatively linked to each other.
  • said means may be functionally linked by connecting each mean with the other by means which allow data transport in between said means, e.g., glass fiber cables, and other cables for high throughput data transport.
  • wireless data transfer between the means is also envisaged by the present invention, e.g., via LAN (Wireless LAN , W-LAN).
  • a preferred system comprises means for determining biomarkers.
  • Means for determining biomarkers as used herein encompass means for separating biomarkers, such as chromatographic devices, and means for metabolite determination, such as mass spectrometry devices.
  • Preferred means for compound separation to be used in the system of the present invention include chromatographic devices, more preferably devices for liquid chromatography, H PLC, and/or gas chromatography.
  • Preferred devices for compound determination comprise mass spectrometry devices, more preferably, GC-MS, LC-MS, direct infusion mass spectrometry, FT-ICR-MS, CE-MS, HPLC-MS, quad- rupole mass spectrometry, sequentially coupled mass spectrometry (including MS-MS or MS- MS-MS), ICP-MS, Py-MS or TOF.
  • the separation and determination means are, preferably, coupled to each other.
  • LC-MS and/or GC-MS are used in the system of the present invention as described in detail elsewhere in the specification. Further comprised shall be means for comparing and/or analyzing the results obtained from the means for determination of biomarkers.
  • the means for comparing and/or analyzing the results may comprise at least one databases and an implemented computer program for comparison of the results. Preferred em- bodiments of the aforementioned systems and devices are also described in detail below.
  • the present invention relates to a data collection comprising characteristic values of at least one biomarker being indicative for sufficient or insufficient quality of a sample of bio- logical material.
  • the term "data collection” refers to a collection of data which may be physically and/or logically grouped together. Accordingly, the data collection may be implemented in a single data storage medium or in physically separated data storage media being operatively linked to each other.
  • the data collection is implemented by means of a database.
  • a database as used herein comprises the data collection on a suitable storage medium.
  • the database preferably, further comprises a database management system.
  • the database management system is, preferably, a network-based, hierarchical or object-oriented database management system.
  • the database may be a federal or integrated database. More prefer- ably, the database will be implemented as a distributed (federal) system, e.g. as a Client- Server-System.
  • the database is structured as to allow a search algorithm to compare a test data set with the data sets comprised by the data collection. Specifically, by using such an algorithm, the database can be searched for similar or identical data sets being indicative for a sample quality as set forth above (e.g. a query search). Thus, if an identical or similar data set can be identified in the data collection, the test data set will be associated with the said quality. Consequently, the information obtained from the data collection can be used, e.g., as a reference for the methods of the present invention described above. More preferably, the data collection comprises characteristic values of all biomarkers comprised by any one of the groups recited above.
  • the present invention encompasses a data storage medium comprising the aforementioned data collection.
  • data storage medium encompasses data storage media which are based on single physical entities such as a CD, a CD-ROM , a hard disk, optical storage media, or a diskette.
  • the term further includes data storage media consisting of physically separated entities which are operatively linked to each other in a manner as to provide the aforementioned data collection, preferably, in a suitable way for a query search.
  • the present invention also relates to a system comprising:
  • system as used herein relates to different means which are operatively linked to each other. Said means may be implemented in a single device or may be physically separated devices which are operatively linked to each other.
  • the means for comparing characteristic values of biomarkers preferably, based on an algorithm for comparison as mentioned before.
  • the data storage medium preferably, comprises the aforementioned data collection or database, wherein each of the stored data sets being indicative for a sample quality referred to above.
  • means for determining characteristic values of bi- omarkers of a sample are comprised.
  • the term "means for determining characteristic values of biomarkers” preferably relates to the aforementioned devices for the determination of metabolites such as mass spectrometry devices, N MR devices or devices for carrying out chemical or biological assays for the biomarkers.
  • the present invention contemplates the use of at least one biomarker of at least one biomarker from Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8, preferably Tables 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7 and/or 8, or a detection agent therefor for assessing the quality of a sample.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 1 and/or V can be used for assessing prolonged processing of plasma.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 2 and/or 2' can be used for assessing prolonged processing of blood.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 3 and/or 3' can be used for assessing hemolysis.
  • At least one biomarker of Table 4 can be used for assessing microclotting.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 5 and/or 5' can be used for assessing contamination with blood cells.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 6 can be used for assessing improper storage.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 7 can be used for assessing improper freezing.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 8 can be used for assessing prolonged coagulation time of blood.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 1 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of plasma.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 2 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of blood.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 3 can be used for assessing hemolysis.
  • at least one biomarker of Table 5 can be used for assessing contamination with blood cells.
  • detection agents can be manufactured based on the at least one biomarker is well known to those skilled in the art.
  • antibodies or aptameres which specifically bind to the at least one biomarker can be produced.
  • the biomarkers itself may be used as such compositions, e.g., within complexes or in modified or derivatized form, e.g., when analysed by GCMS.
  • the present invention also provides a kit for for assessing the quality of a biological sample comprising a detection agent for at least one biomarker from Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8, preferablyTables 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7 and/or 8, and, preferably, a reference for the said at least one biomarker.
  • kit refers to a collection of the aforementioned components, preferably, provided in separately or within a single container.
  • the container also comprises instructions for carrying out the method of the present invention.
  • kits may comprise at least one standard for a reference as defined herein above, i.e. a solution with a pre-defined amount for the at least one biomarker representing a reference amount.
  • a standard may represent, e.g., the amount of the at least one biomarker from a sample or plurality of samples of sufficient or insufficient quality.
  • the kit of the present invention comprises a detection agent for at least one biomarker from each of Tables 1 , 1 ', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7, and/or 8, preferably Tables 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7 and/or 8, and, preferably, a reference for each of the said at least one biomarker in order to allow for assessing a sample for insufficient quality relating to any one of prolonged processing of plasma, prolonged processing of blood, hemolysis, microclotting, contamination with blood cells, improper storage and improper freezing.
  • the kit may comprise additional components such as buffers, reagents (for example, conjugate and/or substrate), and the like, as disclosed herein. It will be understood that the present invention also relates to the use of the kit of the invention for the aforementioned purposes of assessing sufficient or insufficient quality of a sample.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 1 and/or V can be used for as- sessing prolonged processing of plasma.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 2 and/or 2' can be used for assessing prolonged processing of blood.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 3 and/or 3' can be used for assessing hemolysis.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 4 can be used for assessing micro- clotting.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 5 and/or 5' can be used for assessing contamination with blood cells.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 6 can be used for assessing improper storage.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 7 can be used for assessing improper freezing.
  • a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 8 can be used for assessing prolonged coagulation time of blood.
  • kits comprising at least one biomarker of Table 1 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of plasma. More preferably, a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 2 can be used for assessing prolonged processing of blood. More preferably, a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 3 can be used for assessing hemolysis. More peferably, a kit comprising at least one biomarker of Table 5 can be used for assessing contamination with blood cells.
  • the present invention relates to a method of performing metabolome analysis, comprising assessing the quality of at least one biological sample according to a method of the present invention, and performing metabolome analysis, preferably using only biological samples for which sufficient quality was assessed.
  • the present invention relates to a method of performing metabolome analysis, comprising ordering an assessment of the quality of at least one biologi- cal sample according to one of the methods of the present invention, and performing metabolome analysis, preferably using only biological samples for which sufficient quality was assessed.
  • the present invention relates to a method of stratifying bio- logical samples according to quality, comprising assessing the quality of at least one biological sample according to a method of the present invention, and stratifying said at least one sample according to quality.
  • the present invention relates to a method of stratifying bio- logical samples according to quality, comprising ordering an assessment of the quality of at least one biological sample according to one of the methods of the present invention, and stratifying said at least one sample according to quality.
  • the present invention relates to a method of removing biological samples not conforming to quality criteria from a pool of biological samples, comprising assessing the quality of at least one biological sample from said pool according to a method of the present invention, and removing said sample from said pool in case insufficient quality is as- sessed.
  • the present invention relates to a method of removing biological samples not conforming to quality criteria from a pool of biological samples, comprising ordering an assessment of the quality of at least one biological sample from said pool according to a method of the present invention, and removing said sample from said pool in case insufficient quality is assessed.
  • the present invention relates to a method of including a biological sample in a study, preferably a clinical study, comprising assessing the quality of at least one biological sample according to a method of the present invention, and including said biological sample in said study if sufficient quality is assessed.
  • the present invention relates to a method of including a biological sample in a study, preferably a clinical study, comprising ordering an assessment of the quality of at least one biological sample according to a method of the present invention, and including said biological sample in said study if sufficient quality is assessed.
  • Example 1 Experimental design analysing metabolic effects of processing time and processing temperature on human blood plasma
  • This experiment was designed to analyse the effects of short-term incubation during pre- analytical sample processing on the human plasma metabolome in order to identify biomarkers for quality control of blood plasma biobank specimen.
  • An EDTA plasma pool was divided into 1- ml-aliquots and these were incubated at temperatures of 4°C, 12°C and 21 °C. At the time points 0 h, 0.5 h, 2 h, 5 h and 16 h, each 10 aliquots were frozen at -80°C and analysed as described in example 4 (sphingolipids were not analysed in Example 1 ).
  • Plasma samples were analyzed in randomized analytical sequence design. The raw peak data was normalized to the median of all samples per analytical sequence to account for process variability (so called "ratios").
  • MxPoolTM was analyzed with 12 replicated samples in the experiment and the ratios further normalized to the median of the MxPoolTM samples, i.e. ratios from this studies are on the same level and there- fore comparable to data from other projects that are normalized to other aliquots of the same MxPoolTM.
  • Total quantified data from targeted methods eicosanoids, catecholamines
  • Data was log 10 transformed to approach a normal distribution.
  • Statistical analysis was done by a simple linear model (ANOVA) with the fixed effects "time” and "temperature”.
  • the blood from the 9-ml neutral monovette was decanted into a 9-1T1I-K3EDTA monovette and the plasma prepared by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 15 minutes in a refrigerated centrifuge.
  • the plasma was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until analysis.
  • Prolonged incubation at 0°C 2x 5 ml of the blood pool was incubated at 0°C for 4 h and 6 h, respectively. After that time period, the plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 15 minutes in a refrigerated centrifuge. The plasma was stored at -80°C until analysis. Prolonged incubation at room temperature
  • 2x 6 ml of the blood pool were passed through a syringe with a gauge-25 (grade 1 hemolysis) and gauge-27 needle (grade 2 hemolysis), respectively.
  • the plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 15 minutes in a refrigerated centrifuge. The plasma was stored at -80°C until analysis.
  • the remaining blood pool was centrifuged at 1500 x g for 15 minutes in a refrigerated centrifuge.
  • the upper plasma supernatant was withdrawn and mixed in a centrifugation tube. Aliquots of this plasma sample were frozen and stored at -80°C until analysis to serve as control. Further aliquots of this plasma sample were frozen at -20°C and at the end of the day transferred and stored at -80°C until analysis ("slow freezing" - see Table 7).
  • the lower plasma supernatant was mixed with material from the buffy layer of the centrifugation tube resulting in two grades of contamination with white blood cells.
  • the plasma samples of this experiment were analysed as described in example 4 in randomized analytical sequence design.
  • Metabolite profiling provides a semi-quantitative analytical platform resulting in relative metabolite level to a defined reference group ("ratio").
  • ratio defined reference group
  • two different reference sample types were run in parallel throughout the whole process.
  • a project pool was generated from aliquots of all samples and measured with 4 replicates within each analytical sequence.
  • the data were normalized against the median in the pool reference samples within each analytical sequence to give pool- normalized ratios (performed for each sample per metabolite). This compensated for inter- and intra-instrumental variation.
  • MxPoolTM was analyzed with 12 replicated samples in the experiment and the pool-normalized ratios further normalized to the median of the MxPoolTM samples, i.e. ratios from this studies are on the same level and therefore comparable to data from other projects that are normalized to other aliquots of the same MxPoolTM.
  • Total quantified data from targeted methods eicosanoids, catecholamines remain with their absolute quantification data.
  • Example 3 Experimental design analysing metabolic effects of long-term storage at -20°C on human blood plasma
  • This experiment was designed to analyse the effects of prolonged storage at -20°C on the human plasma metabolome in order to identify biomarkers for quality control of blood plasma bi- obank specimen.
  • Aliquots of an EDTA plasma pool were frozen at -20°C or in liquid nitrogen, respectively.
  • 4 aliquots of samples stored at each temperature were analysed by metabolite profiling as described in example 4 (sphingolipids were not analysed in Example 3).
  • Plasma samples were analyzed in randomized analytical sequence design.
  • a project pool was generated from aliquots of all samples and measured with 4 replicates within each analytical sequence. The raw peak data was normalized to the median of the project pool per analytical sequence to account for process variability (so called "ratios").
  • Ratios were Iog10 transformed to approach a normal distribution of data.
  • Statistical analysis of metabolite changes after storage at -20°C for 181 days and 365 days relative to storage in liquid nitrogen for the same time period was done by a simple linear model (ANOVA) with the fixed effect "tempera- ture” set to a reference of "-196°C”. Significance level was set to an alpha-error of 5%.
  • Metabolites are biomarkers indicating quality issues in biobank specimen that are related to increased plasma storage time or temperature (Table 6).
  • Human plasma samples were prepared and subjected to LC-MS/MS and GC-MS or SPE-LC- MS/MS (hormones) analysis as described in the following. Proteins were separated by precipitation from blood plasma. After addition of water and a mixture of ethanol and dichlormethan the remaining sample was fractioned into an aqueous, polar phase and an organic, lipophilic phase.
  • the methoximation of the carbonyl groups was carried out by reaction with methoxyamine hydrochloride (20 mg/ml in pyridine, 100 I for 1.5 hours at 60°C) in a tightly sealed vessel. 20 ⁇ of a solution of odd-numbered, straight-chain fatty acids (solution of each 0.3 mg/mL of fatty acids from 7 to 25 carbon atoms and each 0.6 mg/mL of fatty acids with 27, 29 and 31 carbon atoms in 3/7 (v/v) pyridine/toluene) were added as time standards.
  • the derivatization was performed in the following way: The methoximation of the carbonyl groups was carried out by reaction with methoxyamine hydrochloride (20 mg/ml in pyridine, 50 I for 1 .5 hours at 60°C) in a tightly sealed vessel. 10 ⁇ of a solution of odd- numbered, straight-chain fatty acids (solution of each 0.3 mg/mL of fatty acids from 7 to 25 carbon atoms and each 0.6 mg/mL of fatty acids with 27, 29 and 31 carbon atoms in 3/7 (v/v) pyri- dine/toluene) were added as time standards.
  • methoxyamine hydrochloride 20 mg/ml in pyridine, 50 I for 1 .5 hours at 60°C
  • 10 ⁇ of a solution of odd- numbered, straight-chain fatty acids solution of each 0.3 mg/mL of fatty acids from 7 to 25 carbon atoms and each 0.6 mg/mL of fatty acids with 27, 29 and 31 carbon atoms in 3
  • the GC-MS systems consist of an Agilent 6890 GC coupled to an Agilent 5973 MSD.
  • the au- tosamplers are CompiPal or GCPal from CTC.
  • RTL Retention Time Locking, Agilent Technologies
  • the H PLC-MS systems consisted of an Agilent 1 100 LC system (Agilent Technologies, Wald- bronn, Germany) coupled with an API 4000 Mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystem/M DS SCI- EX, Toronto, Canada). H PLC analysis was performed on commercially available reversed phase separation columns with C18 stationary phases (for example: GROM ODS 7 pH , Thermo Betasil C18). Up to 10 iL of the final sample volume of evaporated and reconstituted polar and lipophilic phase was injected and separation was performed with gradient elution using metha- nol/water/formic acid or acetonitrile/water/formic acid gradients at a flowrate of 200 ⁇ / ⁇ .
  • Mass spectrometry was carried out by electrospray ionisation in positive mode for the non-polar fraction and negative or positive mode for the polar fraction using multiple-reaction-monitoring- (M RM)-mode and fullscan from 100 - 1000 amu.
  • M RM multiple-reaction-monitoring-
  • Steroids and their metabolites were measured by online SPE-LC-MS (Solid phase extraction- LC-MS).
  • Catecholamines and their metabolites were measured by online SPE-LC-MS as described by Yamada et al. (Yamada H, Yamahara A, Yasuda S, Abe M, Oguri K, Fukushima S, Ikeda-Wada S: Dansyl chloride derivatization of methamphetamine: a methode with advantages for screening and analysis of methamphetamine in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 26(1 ): 17-22 (2002)).
  • Eicosanoids and related were measured out of plasma by offline- and online-SPE LC-MS/MS (Solid phase extraction-LC-MS/MS) (Masoodi M and Nicolaou A: Rapid Commun Mass Spec- trom. 2006 ; 20(20): 3023-3029. Absolute quantification was performed by means of stable isotope-labelled standards.
  • This experiment describes the analysis of effects of increased coagulation time of blood on the human serum metabolome in order to identify biomarkers for quality control of blood serum bi- obank specimen.
  • 145 blood samples were allowed to clot at room temperature for 1-2 h.
  • Another group of 46 blood samples were allowed to clot for 24 h at room temperature.
  • the clotted samples were centrifuged and the serum supernatants were removed and frozen.
  • Serum samples were stored at -80°C previous to metabolite profiling analysis as described in Example 4 (sphingolipids were not analysed in Example 5).
  • the serum samples of this experiment were analysed in a randomized analytical sequence design. A pool was generated from aliquots of all samples and measured with 4 replicates within each analytical sequence.
  • Table 1 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples. Relative ratios of samples processed at different temperatures (4°C, 12°C, 21 °C) and times (0.5h, 2h, 5h, 16h) compared to control samples (upper part o table 1 ) as well as corresponding p-values (lower part of table 1 ) are given.
  • Table 1 Further biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples. Relative ratios of samples processed at indicated temperature ( 21 °C) and times (5h, 16h) compared to control samples as well as corresponding p- values are given.
  • Table 1 a Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 1 a' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples: Selection based on assayability.
  • DOPAC 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
  • DOPA 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine
  • Table 1 c Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 1 c' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of plasma samples: Selection based on method "GC-polar".
  • Table 2 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples. Relative ra of samples processed at different temperatures (0°C, room temperature (RT)) and times (2h, 6h) compared to control samples as well as correspo ing p-values are given.
  • Table 2' Further biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples. Relative ratios of samples processed at different temperatures (0°C, room temperature (RT)) and times (2h, 6h) compared to control samples as well as correspond p-values are given.
  • Table 2a Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 2a' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 2b Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on performance.
  • Table 2b' A further preferred biomarker indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on performance.
  • Table 2c Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 2c' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to increased processing time of blood samples: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 3 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to hemolysis
  • Thromboxane B2 0.225 0.2155 1 .4E-14 2.68E-16
  • Noradrenaline Norepinephrine 0.8309 0.8012 0.00000573 5.62E-08
  • Tricosanoic acid (C23:0) 1 .0906 1 .2294 0.18823507 0.0019529
  • HMPG gamma-Tocopherol 0.9701 1 .1 195 0.68584079 0.1336499
  • Table 3a Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to hemolysis: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 3a' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to hemolysis: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 3c Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to hemolysis: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 3c' Further preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to hemolysis: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 4 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to mi- croclotting
  • Noradrenaline Norepinephrine 0.9296 0.06274978
  • Tricosanoic acid (C23:0) 1 .1099 0.1 1396066
  • Table 4b Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to microclot- ting: Selection based on performance.
  • Table 4c Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to microclot- ting: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Maltotriose Table 5 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with white blood cells.
  • Biomarker Metal control to control p-value p-value
  • Noradrenaline Norepinephrine 1 .0174 1 .0872 0.65922517 0.03319438
  • Tricosanoic acid (C23:0) 1 .0372 1 .1369 0.57872264 0.05225991
  • Linoleic acid (C18:cis[9,12]2) 1 .0555 1 .1 14 0.3470017 0.06108522
  • Oleic acid (C18:cis[9]1 ) 1 .1331 1 .1341 0.08872985 0.0864597
  • Heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) 1 .0605 1 .108 0.34274251 0.09837302
  • Adrenaline (Epinephrine) 1 .0316 1 .0747 0.50829486 0.13200942
  • HMPG 4-Hydroxy-3- methoxyphenylglycol
  • Palmitoleic acid (C16:cis[9]1 ) 1 .1471 1 .1587 0.20444291 0.17321061
  • TAG (C16:0,C18:1 ,C18:3) 1 .0871 1 .0643 0.17839248 0.31459893 threo-Sphingosine (d18:1 ) 0.9892 1 .0717 0.83283371 0.18024004
  • DOPAC 0.9747 1 .062 0.57153816 0.18439449
  • Pantothenic acid 0.9923 1 .1 103 0.92160171 0.18612223
  • Table 5' Further biomarker indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with white blood cells.
  • Threonic acid is also a further preferred biomarker indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with blood cells in selection based on assayability, and/or based on method "GC-polar".
  • Table 5a Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with white blood cells: Selection based on assayability.
  • Table 5b Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with white blood cells: Selection based on performance.
  • Table 5c Preferred biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to contamination with white blood cells: Selection based on method "GC-polar”.
  • Table 6 List of identified biomarkers indicating quality issue in plasma samples related to storage.
  • Phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide (C16:0,C18:2-OOH) 1 .4599 3.1993 0.08455524 0.00010079
  • Phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide (C16:0,C18:1 -OOH) 3.4881 16.1379 0.0000657 0.00000104
  • Noradrenaline Norepinephrine 0.2864 0.0491 0.0000203 0.000002
  • Adrenaline (Epinephrine) 1 .0395 0.1335 0.1334819 0.0000651 delta-12-Prostaglandin J2 5.2127 124.0942 0.28477496 0.0000892
  • Thromboxane B2 0.2906 0.5613 0.14071353 0.00793485

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Ecology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne le domaine des procédés de diagnostic. Spécifiquement, la présente invention concerne un procédé d'évaluation de la qualité d'un échantillon biologique comprenant les étapes de détermination dans un échantillon de la quantité d'au moins un biomarqueur à partir des Tableaux 1, 1', 2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5, 5', 6, 7 et/ou 8, et de comparaison de ladite quantité du ou des biomarqueurs avec une référence, la qualité de l'échantillon étant évaluée. L'invention concerne également des outils pour réaliser le procédé susmentionné, tels que des dispositifs et des kits.
PCT/IB2014/059002 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Moyens et procédés pour évaluer la qualité d'un échantillon biologique WO2014125443A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BR112015019453A BR112015019453A2 (pt) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 método, dispositivo e conjunto para a avaliação da qualidade de uma amostra biológica e uso de pelo menos um biorrotulador
CN201480020954.7A CN105120852A (zh) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 评估生物样品质量的工具和方法
JP2015557553A JP6388606B2 (ja) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 生物学的サンプルの質を評価するための手段及び方法
KR1020157024681A KR20150119118A (ko) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 생물학적 샘플의 품질 평가 수단 및 방법
CA2900031A CA2900031A1 (fr) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Moyens et procedes pour evaluer la qualite d'un echantillon biologique
DE112014000822.2T DE112014000822T5 (de) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Mittel und Verfahren zur Beurteilung der Qualität einer biologischen Probe
AU2014217452A AU2014217452B2 (en) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Means and methods for assessing the quality of a biological sample
EP14751739.5A EP2956127A4 (fr) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Moyens et procédés pour évaluer la qualité d'un échantillon biologique
US14/767,059 US20160003799A1 (en) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Means and Methods for Assessing the Quality of a Biological Sample
IL240346A IL240346A0 (en) 2013-02-14 2015-08-04 Means and methods for assessing the quality of a biological sample

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361764625P 2013-02-14 2013-02-14
US201361764640P 2013-02-14 2013-02-14
US61/764,640 2013-02-14
EP13155318.2 2013-02-14
EP13155310 2013-02-14
US61/764,625 2013-02-14
EP13155310.9 2013-02-14
EP13155318 2013-02-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014125443A1 true WO2014125443A1 (fr) 2014-08-21

Family

ID=51353544

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2014/059002 WO2014125443A1 (fr) 2013-02-14 2014-02-14 Moyens et procédés pour évaluer la qualité d'un échantillon biologique

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US20160003799A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2956127A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP6388606B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR20150119118A (fr)
CN (1) CN105120852A (fr)
AU (1) AU2014217452B2 (fr)
BR (1) BR112015019453A2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2900031A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE112014000822T5 (fr)
IL (1) IL240346A0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014125443A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104713970A (zh) * 2015-04-01 2015-06-17 山东省肿瘤医院 一种血清代谢组学分析模型的构建方法
WO2017079384A1 (fr) 2015-11-04 2017-05-11 Metabolon, Inc. Évaluation automatisée de la qualité d'un échantillon
EP3123174A4 (fr) * 2014-03-26 2017-12-06 Metanomics Health GmbH Moyens et méthodes de détermination de la qualité d'échantillons sanguins en fonction d'un panel de métabolites
US10928363B2 (en) 2017-03-30 2021-02-23 Shimadzu Corporation Method and device for chromatographic mass spectrometry

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105996126B (zh) * 2016-07-12 2019-06-14 福建中烟工业有限责任公司 天冬氨酸甘油酯用于降低卷烟烟气中苯酚释放量的用途
JP2020518834A (ja) * 2017-05-02 2020-06-25 リキッド バイオサイエンシズ，インコーポレイテッド 生体試料の属性を決定するためのシステムおよび方法
JP7348626B2 (ja) * 2019-07-17 2023-09-21 国立大学法人山梨大学 生体試料の状態評価装置、システム、方法、およびプログラム
CN111402961B (zh) * 2020-02-28 2020-11-17 上海鹿明生物科技有限公司 一种多物种gc-ms内源性代谢物数据库及其建立方法
CN116297938A (zh) * 2021-06-25 2023-06-23 郑州大学第一附属医院 3-Methylxanthine在贲门癌诊断中的应用

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030232396A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-12-18 Biolife Solutions, Inc. Method and use of protein microarray technology and proteomic analysis to determine efficacy of human and xenographic cell, tissue and organ transplant
WO2009014639A2 (fr) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-29 Metabolon, Inc. Biomarqueurs du prédiabète, des maladies cardiovasculaires et d'autres troubles liés au syndrome métabolique, et méthodes d'utilisation de ces biomarqueurs
US20090104596A1 (en) * 2007-03-23 2009-04-23 Fariba Masoumeh Assadi-Porter Noninvasive Measurement and Identification of Biomarkers in Disease State
WO2011041892A1 (fr) * 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Carolyn Slupsky Procédés pour le diagnostic, le traitement et la surveillance de la santé d'un patient en utilisant la métabolomique

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007064294A1 (fr) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-07 Denator Aktiebolag Procede de determination de la qualite d’un echantillon biologique
JP5590651B2 (ja) * 2007-11-22 2014-09-17 国立大学法人北陸先端科学技術大学院大学 血液試料の品質評価方法
EP2254586B1 (fr) * 2008-02-22 2015-04-08 Agency For Science, Technology And Research (A*star) Particules de cellules souches mésenchymateuses
US8026102B2 (en) * 2009-01-21 2011-09-27 Blaze Medical Devices, LLC Apparatus and method to characterize blood and red blood cells via erythrocyte membrane fragility quantification
US20140087401A1 (en) * 2011-06-07 2014-03-27 Alexander Oliver Vortmeyer Biomarkers for Assessment of the Molecular Quality in Biospecimens

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030232396A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-12-18 Biolife Solutions, Inc. Method and use of protein microarray technology and proteomic analysis to determine efficacy of human and xenographic cell, tissue and organ transplant
US20090104596A1 (en) * 2007-03-23 2009-04-23 Fariba Masoumeh Assadi-Porter Noninvasive Measurement and Identification of Biomarkers in Disease State
WO2009014639A2 (fr) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-29 Metabolon, Inc. Biomarqueurs du prédiabète, des maladies cardiovasculaires et d'autres troubles liés au syndrome métabolique, et méthodes d'utilisation de ces biomarqueurs
WO2011041892A1 (fr) * 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Carolyn Slupsky Procédés pour le diagnostic, le traitement et la surveillance de la santé d'un patient en utilisant la métabolomique

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2956127A4 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3123174A4 (fr) * 2014-03-26 2017-12-06 Metanomics Health GmbH Moyens et méthodes de détermination de la qualité d'échantillons sanguins en fonction d'un panel de métabolites
CN104713970A (zh) * 2015-04-01 2015-06-17 山东省肿瘤医院 一种血清代谢组学分析模型的构建方法
WO2017079384A1 (fr) 2015-11-04 2017-05-11 Metabolon, Inc. Évaluation automatisée de la qualité d'un échantillon
CN108369612A (zh) * 2015-11-04 2018-08-03 梅塔博隆股份有限公司 自动化样品质量评估
JP2019505005A (ja) * 2015-11-04 2019-02-21 メタボロン，インコーポレイテッド サンプルの質の自動評価
EP3371730A4 (fr) * 2015-11-04 2019-06-19 Metabolon, Inc. Évaluation automatisée de la qualité d'un échantillon
US10890592B2 (en) 2015-11-04 2021-01-12 Metabolon, Inc. Automated sample quality assessment
JP7026625B2 (ja) 2015-11-04 2022-02-28 メタボロン，インコーポレイテッド サンプルの質の自動評価
US10928363B2 (en) 2017-03-30 2021-02-23 Shimadzu Corporation Method and device for chromatographic mass spectrometry

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL240346A0 (en) 2015-09-24
CA2900031A1 (fr) 2014-08-21
KR20150119118A (ko) 2015-10-23
JP2016510414A (ja) 2016-04-07
US20160003799A1 (en) 2016-01-07
DE112014000822T5 (de) 2015-10-29
BR112015019453A2 (pt) 2017-07-18
CN105120852A (zh) 2015-12-02
AU2014217452B2 (en) 2018-10-25
JP6388606B2 (ja) 2018-09-12
EP2956127A1 (fr) 2015-12-23
AU2014217452A1 (en) 2015-08-20
EP2956127A4 (fr) 2016-10-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2014217452B2 (en) Means and methods for assessing the quality of a biological sample
AU2017201020B2 (en) Means and methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer in a subject
US10001468B2 (en) Biomarkers for differentiating between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
US10393762B2 (en) Means and methods for diagnosing heart failure in a subject
JP5933432B2 (ja) 前立腺癌を診断する手段と方法
US8216848B2 (en) Means and method for diagnosing diabetes
AU2012288742B2 (en) Means and methods for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure in a subject
WO2015145387A1 (fr) Moyens et méthodes de détermination de la qualité d'échantillons sanguins en fonction d'un panel de métabolites
US20140323352A1 (en) Means and Methods for Diagnosing Pancreatic Cancer in a Subject
JP2019039915A (ja) 生物学的サンプルの質を評価するための手段及び方法
US20210405054A1 (en) Methods for detecting ovarian cancer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14751739

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2900031

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 240346

Country of ref document: IL

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14767059

Country of ref document: US

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2015557553

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 112014000822

Country of ref document: DE

Ref document number: 1120140008222

Country of ref document: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014217452

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20140214

Kind code of ref document: A

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112015019453

Country of ref document: BR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2014751739

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20157024681

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112015019453

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20150813