Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
  • G02B26/00—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements
  • G02B26/08—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light
  • G02B26/0816—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light by means of one or more reflecting elements
  • G02B26/0833—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light by means of one or more reflecting elements the reflecting element being a micromechanical device, e.g. a MEMS mirror, DMD
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
  • H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
  • H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
  • H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
  • H01L21/027—Making masks on semiconductor bodies for further photolithographic processing not provided for in group H01L21/18 or H01L21/34
  • H01L21/0271—Making masks on semiconductor bodies for further photolithographic processing not provided for in group H01L21/18 or H01L21/34 comprising organic layers
  • H01L21/0273—Making masks on semiconductor bodies for further photolithographic processing not provided for in group H01L21/18 or H01L21/34 comprising organic layers characterised by the treatment of photoresist layers
  • H01L21/0274—Photolithographic processes
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
  • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
  • G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
  • G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
  • G03F7/70058—Mask illumination systems
  • G03F7/70075—Homogenization of illumination intensity in the mask plane by using an integrator, e.g. fly's eye lens, facet mirror or glass rod, by using a diffusing optical element or by beam deflection
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
  • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
  • G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
  • G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
  • G03F7/70058—Mask illumination systems
  • G03F7/70091—Illumination settings, i.e. intensity distribution in the pupil plane or angular distribution in the field plane; On-axis or off-axis settings, e.g. annular, dipole or quadrupole settings; Partial coherence control, i.e. sigma or numerical aperture [NA]
  • G03F7/70116—Off-axis setting using a programmable means, e.g. liquid crystal display [LCD], digital micromirror device [DMD] or pupil facets
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
  • G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
  • G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
  • G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
  • G03F7/70216—Mask projection systems
  • G03F7/70283—Mask effects on the imaging process
  • G03F7/70291—Addressable masks, e.g. spatial light modulators [SLMs], digital micro-mirror devices [DMDs] or liquid crystal display [LCD] patterning devices

Definitions

• the invention generally relates to an illumination system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus, and in particular to such an illumination system comprising an array of micromirrors or other light deflecting elements that can be individually controlled for variably illuminating a pupil plane of the illumination system.
• Microlithography (also referred to as photolithography or simply lithography) is a technology for the fabrication of integrated circuits, liquid crystal displays and other micro- structured devices.
• the process of microlithography in con ⁇ junction with the process of etching, is used to pattern fea- tures in thin film stacks that have been formed on a substrate, for example a silicon wafer.
• the wafer is first coated with a photoresist which is a material that is sensitive to light of a certain wavelength.
• the wafer with the photoresist on top is exposed to projection light through a mask in a projection exposure apparatus.
• the mask contains a circuit pattern to be imaged onto the photoresist.
• a projection exposure apparatus typically includes an illumi ⁇ nation system that illuminates a field on the mask that may have the shape of a rectangular or curved slit, for example.
• the apparatus further comprises a mask stage for aligning the mask, a projection objective (sometimes also referred to as 'the lens') that images the illuminated field on the mask onto the photoresist, and a wafer alignment stage for aligning the wafer coated with the photoresist.
• One of the essential aims in the development of projection exposure apparatus is to be able to lithographically define structures with smaller and smaller dimensions on the wafer.
• Small structures lead to a high integration density, which generally has a favorable effect on the performance of the microstructured components produced with the aid of such ap- paratus.
• higher integration densities more components can be produced on a single wafer, which has a positive effect on the throughput of the apparatus.
• the illumination system of a projection exposure apparatus illuminates each point of the field illumi ⁇ nated on the mask with projection light having a well defined total energy and angular irradiance distribution.
• the term angular irradiance distribution describes how the total light energy of a light bundle, which converges towards a particu ⁇ lar point on the mask, is distributed among the various directions of the rays that constitute the light bundle.
• the angular irradiance distribution of the projection light impinging on the mask is usually adapted to the kind of pat- tern to be imaged onto the photoresist. For example, rela ⁇ tively large sized features may require a different angular irradiance distribution than small sized features.
• the most commonly used angular irradiance distributions are referred to as conventional, annular, dipole and quadrupole illumina ⁇ tion settings. These terms refer to the irradiance distribution in a pupil plane of the illumination system.
• annular illumination setting for example, only an annular re- gion is illuminated in the pupil plane.
• the mirror array is realized as a micro- electromechanical system (MEMS) comprising more than 1000 microscopic mirrors.
• MEMS micro- electromechanical system
• Each mirror can be tilted about two or- thogonal tilt axes so that incident projection light is reflected along a direction which is determined by the tilt angles of the respective mirror.
• a condenser lens arranged between the mirror array and a pupil plane translates the reflection angles produced by the mirrors into locations in the pupil plane.
• an optical integrator which is arranged in or in close vicinity to the pupil plane, each mirror produces a light spot whose position can be varied by tilting the mirror.
• Each light spot is freely movable across the pupil plane or a light entrance surface of the optical integrator by tilting the respective mirror.
• WO 2009/080279 Al proposes to arrange an optical integrator comprising a plurality of microlenses between the light source and the mirror array. Adverse effects of beam pointing fluctuations on the stability of the angular irradiance dis ⁇ tribution at mask level are thus avoided. However, the provision of an optical integrator significantly contributes to the costs of the illumination system and increases its com ⁇ plexity.
• an illumination system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus that comprises a light source being configured to produce a projection light beam, a pupil plane, a control unit and a spatial light modulator.
• the lat- ter is arranged between the light source and the pupil plane and comprises an array of light deflecting elements. Each such element is capable of individually deflecting impinging projection light in a direction which depends on a command signal received from the control unit.
• the projection light produces an irradiance distribution on the array of light deflecting elements.
• the irradiance distribution or its enve ⁇ lope has, along at least one direction, an increasing slope and a decreasing slope.
• control unit is configured to control the light deflecting elements in such a way that a first light deflecting element, which is located at the increasing slope, and a second light deflecting element, which is located at the decreasing slope, deflect impinging projection light so that it at least partly overlaps in the pupil plane.
• the invention is based on the perception that with such a control scheme displacements of the irradiance distribution, which is produced by the projection light beam on the array of light deflecting elements, will not significantly affect the total irradiance at the position in the pupil plane where the projection light deflected from the first and second light deflecting elements at least partly overlaps. This is because an increase of the irradiance on the first light de ⁇ flecting element as a result of a displacement of the irradi- ance distribution is always accompanied by a similar or even identical decrease of the irradiance on the second light de ⁇ flecting element. Due to this partial or even complete mutual compensation the total irradiance is at least substantially constant at a pupil position where the projection light de- fleeted from the first and second light deflecting elements at least partly overlaps.
• the light deflecting elements may also be controlled in such a way that not only two, but three or more light deflecting elements illuminate the same spot in the pupil plane.
• N 1, 2, 3, first light deflecting elements, which are located at the in ⁇ creasing slope
• M 1, 2, 3, 4, ... second light deflecting elements, which are located at the decreasing slope. Then all light deflecting elements deflect impinging projection light so that it at least partly overlaps in the pupil plane. If there are three or more light deflecting elements that contribute to the irradiance at a single pupil plane position, the absolute values of the steepness of the slopes, where the light deflecting elements are located, may differ to a larger extent .
• Si + S 2 ⁇ 0.1 ⁇ ( I S1 I + I S2 I ) may hold.
• I M 'd M I M + (I M 'd M ), wherein I j is the irradiance on the second beam deflecting element D j and d j is the directional derivative of the irradiance distribution along the at least one direction at the location of the second beam deflecting element D j .
• the sum of the directional deriva- fives weighed by the irradiances and taken over all light de ⁇ flecting elements should be small compared to the directional derivative of a single spot. Ideally, said sum is zero.
• the irradiance distribution shifts not only along one direction, but along two orthogonal directions, it may be nec- essary to form groups of at least four light deflecting elements in which four pairs of light deflecting elements are controlled in the manner described above. As a matter of course, this again implies that all four light deflecting elements direct the projection light to the same position in the pupil plane.
• the control scheme as described above may be implemented in the illumination system at any rate, i.e. even if during the later operation of the illumination system the irradiance distribution on the array of light de ⁇ flecting elements shifts only by insignificant distances along the at least one direction.
• the illumination system comprises a first reflecting surface, which is arranged so as to direct the projection light towards the array of light deflecting elements.
• a second reflecting surface is arranged to direct projection light deflected by the array of light deflecting elements towards the pupil plane.
• the first and second reflective surface may be planar, and in particular may be formed by surfaces of a prism.
• the prism (or the arrangement of reflecting surfaces) and the mirror array may simply replace, without a need to completely redesign the illumination system, an exchangeable diffractive optical element that is used in a conventional illumination system to produce different irradiance distributions in the pupil plane.
• the illumination system comprises a zoom optical system which is arranged between the spatial light modulator and the pupil plane. This makes it possible to change the dimensions of the irradiance distribution with ⁇ out changing the deflection angles produced by the light deflecting elements.
• the projection light associated with the first and second light deflecting element overlaps in the pupil plane to such an extent that a first line, on which an irradiance produced in the pupil plane by the first light deflecting element has dropped to 50% of a first maximum irradiance, and a second line, on which an irradiance produced in the pupil plane by the second light deflecting element has dropped to 50% of a second maximum irradiance, abut or overlap .
• the light deflecting elements may, for example, be realized as micromirrors that can be tilted around at least one tilt axis, or as transparent elements that use the electro- or acousto-optical effect to deflect impinging light into various directions.
• Subject of the invention is also a method of operating an il ⁇ lumination system of a microlxthographic projection exposure apparatus. This method comprises the following steps: a) providing a spatial light modulator that comprises an array of light deflecting elements, wherein a light spot in a pupil plane is associated with each light deflecting element; b) producing an irradiance distribution on the array of
• said irradiance dis- tribution or its envelope has, along at least one direction, an increasing slope and a decreasing slope, c) controlling the light deflecting elements in such a way that a first light spot, which is produced by a first light deflecting element located at the increasing slope, and a second light spot, which is produced by a second light deflecting element located at the decreasing slope, at least partly overlap in the pupil plane.
• light denotes any electromagnetic radiation, in particular visible light, UV, DUV and VUV light.
• light ray is used herein to denote light whose path of propagation can be described by a line.
• light bundle is used herein to denote a plurality of light rays that emerge from and/or converge to a single point .
• light beam is used herein to denote all light that passes through a particular lens or another optical element.
• surface is used herein to denote any planar or curved surface in the three-dimensional space. The surface may be part of a body or may be completely separated there ⁇ from, as it is usually the case with a field or a pupil plane.
• optically conjugate is used herein to denote an imaging relationship between two points or two surfaces. Thus a light bundle emerging from a point converges at an optically conjugate point.
• field plane is used herein to denote a plane that is optically conjugate to the mask plane.
• pupil plane is used herein to denote a plane in which marginal rays passing through different points in the mask plane or another field plane intersect.
• the term “pupil plane” is also used if it is in fact not a plane in the mathematical sense, but is slightly curved so that, in a strict sense, it should be referred to as pupil surface .
• condenser is used herein to denote an optical ele- ment or an optical system that establishes (at least approxi ⁇ mately) a Fourier relationship between two planes, for example a field plane and a pupil plane.
• the term "uniform” is used herein to denote a property that does not depend on the position.
• the term “spatial irradiance distribution” is used herein to denote how the total irradiance varies over a surface on which light impinges.
• the spatial irradiance distri ⁇ bution can be described by a function I s (x, y) , with x, y being spatial coordinates of a point in the surface.
• angular irradiance distribution is used herein to denote how the irradiance of a light bundle varies depending - li on the angles of the light rays that constitute the light bundle.
• I a angular coordinates describing the directions of the light rays.
• I a I a (a, ⁇ , x, y) .
• optical integrator is used herein to denote an op ⁇ tical system that increases the product NA-a, wherein NA is the numerical aperture and a is the illuminated field area.
• optical raster element is used herein to denote any optical element, for example a lens, a prism or a dif- fractive optical element, which is arranged, together with other identical or similar optical raster elements, on a com- mon support so that they commonly form an optical raster plate .
• FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a projection ex- osure apparatus in accordance with one embodiment f the present invention
• FIG. 2 is a meridional section through an illumination
• FIG. 1 A first figure.
• FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a micromirror array con ⁇ tained in the illumination system shown in FIG. 2;
• FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an optical integrator that is contained in the illumination system shown in FIG. 2;
• FIG. 5 is a schematic meridional section through the mi- cromirror array, the first condenser and the first optical raster plate of the illumination system shown in FIG. 2;
• FIG. 6 is a graph showing the irradiance distribution
• FIG. 7 is a top view on the micromirror array in which the irradiance distribution shown in FIG. 6 is also indicated;
• FIG. 8 is a graph similar to FIG. 6 which illustrates how the irradiances on two arbitrary micromirrors generally changes if the irradiance distribution on the micromirror array is displaced along the X direction;
• FIG. 9 is a schematic meridional section similar to FIG. 5 that illustrates how spots produced by two micromirrors arranged at opposite sides of the irradiance distribution overlap;
• FIG. 10a and 10b are graphs similar to FIG. 8 which illus- trate how displacements of the irradiance distribu ⁇ tion on the micromirror array along the +X and the -X direction, respectively, affect the irradiances on the two micromirrors in accordance with the present invention
• FIG. 11 is a meridional section through an illumination
• FIG. 12 is a top view on the microlens array of the illumi ⁇ nation system shown in FIG. 11;
• FIG. 13 shows a cross section along line XIII-XIII through the microlens array shown in FIG. 12;
• FIG. 14 is a top view similar to FIG. 12, but also showing the irradiance distribution on the rear side of the microlens array;
• FIG. 15 is a graph similar to FIG. 10a which illustrates how a displacement of the irradiance distribution on the micromirror array along the +X direction af- fects the irradiances on the two micromirrors ;
• FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating important method
• FIG. 1 is a perspective and highly simplified view of a pro ⁇ jection exposure apparatus 10 in accordance with the present invention.
• the apparatus 10 comprises an illumination system 12 which produces a projection light beam.
• the latter illumi- nates a field 14 on a mask 16 containing a pattern 18 of fine features 19.
• the illuminated field 14 has a rectangular shape.
• other shapes of the illuminated field 14, for example ring segments, are contemplated as well .
• a projection objective 20 having an optical axis OA and containing a plurality of lenses 21 images the pattern 18 within the illuminated field 14 onto a light sensitive layer 22, for example a photoresist, which is supported by a substrate 24.
• the mask 16 is positioned by means of a mask stage (not shown) in an object plane of the projection objective 20. Since the latter has a magnification ⁇ with
• the mask 16 and the substrate 24 move along a scan direction which corresponds to the Y direction indicated in FIG. 1.
• the illuminated field 14 then scans over the mask 16 so that patterned areas larger than the illuminated field 14 can be continuously imaged.
• the ratio between the velocities of the substrate 24 and the mask 16 is equal to the magnification ⁇ of the projection objective 20. If the projection objective 20 inverts the image ( ⁇ 0), the mask 16 and the substrate . 24 move in opposite directions, as this is indicated in FIG. 1 by arrows Al and A2.
• the present invention may also be used in stepper tools in which the mask 16 and the substrate 24 do not move during the projec ⁇ tion of the mask.
• FIG. 2 is a meridional section through the illumination sys- tern 12 shown in FIG. ' 1.
• the illustration of FIG. 2 is considerably simplified and not to scale. This particularly implies that different optical units are represented by one or very few optical elements only. In re- ality, these units may comprise significantly more lenses and other optical elements.
• the illumination system 12 includes a housing 29 and a light source 30 that is, in the embodiment shown, realized as an excimer laser.
• the light source 30 emits a beam 31 of projec ⁇ tion light having a wavelength of about 193 nm.
• the projection light beam 31 emitted from the light source 30 passes through a channel which is usually referred to as beam delivery 40.
• beam delivery 40 a first planar beam path folding mirror 42 is arranged in this embodiment.
• the total length of the beam delivery 40 is typically in a range between 2 m and 25 m.
• the dimensions and the shape of the beam delivery 40 and also the number of beam path folding mirrors contained therein depend on the local conditions prevailing where the projection exposure apparatus 10 is to be installed.
• the projection light beam 31 After leaving the beam delivery 40, the projection light beam 31 is deviated by a second beam path folding mirror 44 and enters a beam expansion unit indicated at 32 in which the projection light beam 31 is expanded.
• the beam expansion unit 32 may comprise several lenses, for example a negative and a positive lens as shown in FIG. 2, and/or sev- eral planar mirrors. After the expansion the light beam 31 has still a low divergence, i. e. it is almost collimated.
• the expanded light beam 31 impinges on a spatial light modu ⁇ lator 38 that is used to produce variable spatial irradiance distributions in a subsequent pupil plane.
• the spatial light modulator 38 comprises an array 40 of mi- cromirrors 42 that can be individually tilted about two orthogonal axes with the help of actuators comprising elec ⁇ trodes 41 (see enlarged cutout C) .
• the spatial light modula- tor 38, and in particular the actuators 41 for the micromir- rors 42, are controlled by a control unit 43 which is connected to an overall system control 45.
• FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the array 40 illustrating how light rays Rl, R2 are reflected into different directions depending on the tilting angles of the micromirrors 42 on which the light rays Rl, R2 impinge.
• the array 40 comprises only 6x6 micromirrors 42; in reality the array 40 may comprise several hundreds or even several thousands mi- cromirrors 42.
• the spatial light modulator 38 further comprises a prism 46 having a first planar surface 48a and a second planar surface 48b that are both inclined with respect to an optical axis 47 of the illumination system 12. At these inclined surfaces 48a, 48b the projection light beam 31 is reflected by total internal reflection.
• the first surface 48a reflects the impinging projection light beam 31 towards the micromirrors 42 of the array 40, and the second surface 48b directs the light beams reflected from the mi- cromirrors 42 towards a planar exit surface 49 of the prism
• the prism 46 may be replaced by an arrangement of planar mirrors.
• the directions of the reflected light beams, and thus the angular irradiance distribution of the projection light emerg- ing from the exit surface 49 of the prism 46, can thus be varied by individually tilting the micromirrors 42 of the array 40 around their tilt axes. More details with regard to the spatial light modulator 38 can be gleaned from US
• the angular irradiance distribution produced by the spatial light modulator 38 is transformed into a spatial irradiance distribution with the help of a first condenser 50 which directs the impinging projection light towards an optical inte- grator 52.
• the first condenser 50 is formed by a zoom optical system having a variable focal length.
• the first condenser may comprise a plu ⁇ rality of lenses from which two or more can be displaced along the optical axis 47 with the help of actuators (not shown) .
• the diameter of the irradiance distribution produced by the spatial light modulator 38 can thus be varied " by changing the focal length of the first condenser 50.
• the optical integrator 52 comprises, in the embodiment shown, a first optical raster plate 54a and a second optical raster plate 54b.
• a light entrance surface 55 of the first optical raster plate 54a is arranged in a back focal plane, of the first condenser 50, and the micromirrors 42 are arranged approximately in its front focal plane so that a Fourier rela- tionship is established between the micromirrors 42 on the one hand and the light entrance surface 55 of the first opti ⁇ cal raster plate 54a on the other hand.
• each optical raster plate 54a, 54b includes two orthogonal arrays of first and second cylindri ⁇ cal microlenses 53, 57 that are arranged on opposite sides of the optical raster plates 54a, 54b.
• the second cylindrical microlenses 57 extending along the Y axis are more strongly curved than the first cylindrical microlenses 53 extending along the X direction.
• a volume that is confined by two in ⁇ tersecting orthogonal cylindrical microlenses 53, 57 defines an optical raster element 59 having a refractive power along the X and the Y direction.
• the optical raster elements 59 have a stronger refractive power along the X direction than along the Y direction.
• the optical integrator .52 produces a plurality of secondary light sources in a subsequent pupil plane 56 of the illumination system 12.
• a second condenser 58 establishes a Fourier relationship between the pupil plane 56 and a field stop plane 60 in which -an adjustable field stop 62 is arranged. The second condenser 58 thus superimposes the light beams emerging from the secondary light sources in the field stop plane 60 so that the latter is illuminated very homogenously.
• the field stop plane 60 is imaged by a field stop objective 64 onto a mask plane 66 in which the mask 16 supported on a mask stage (not shown) is arranged. Also the adjustable field stop 62 is thereby imaged on the mask plane 66 and defines at least the lateral sides of the illuminated field 14 extending along the scan direction Y.
• the spatial irradiance distribution on the light entrance surface 55 of the first optical raster plate 54a determines the spatial irradiance distribution in the pupil plane 56 and thus the angular irradiance distribution in the field stop plane 60 and the mask plane 66.
• the spa ⁇ tial irradiance distribution on the light entrance surface 55 is, in turn, determined by the tilting angles of the mi- cromirrors 42.
• Each micromirror 42 illuminated by projection light produces a single light spot 70 on the light entrance surface 55 of the first optical raster plate 54a.
• the posi ⁇ tion of this light spot 70 can be freely varied by tilting the associated micromirror 42.
• the direction of the projection light beam 31 emitted by the light source 30 is usually subject to beam pointing fluctua- tions. This means that the direction of the projection light beam 31 is not perfectly stable in time, but varies to some extent .
• the origin of beam pointing fluctuations may be mechanical vibrations, for example vibrations that have been picked up from the ground or which result from the rapid exchange of gas in excimer lasers. Such beam pointing fluctuations often have a frequency between some 10 Hz up to some 10 kHz.
• Another cause for beam pointing fluctuations are drift effects which are often induced by thermal effects. Drift effects of- ten occur in the long term, and thus the beam pointing fluc ⁇ tuations may become apparent only over longer time periods, for example some minutes, days or even months.
• FIG. 6 is a graph showing in solid lines the irradiance distribution 310 across a diameter of the projection light beam 31 along the X direction at the entrance side of the spatial light modulator 38.
• the irradiance distribution 310 has ap- proximately a Gaussian shape, although it may have in reality a flatter central section than shown.
• With a broken line the irradiance distribution 310' for the projection light beam 31' is shown that has been produced by the light source 30 as a result of beam pointing fluctuations.
• the maximum displace- ment along the X direction is indicated again by ⁇ .
• FIG. 7 is a top view on the array 40 of micromirrors 42 which illustrates how beam pointing fluctuations affect the illumination of the micromirrors 42.
• the irradiance distribution 310 on the array 40 produced by the undisturbed projection light beam 31 is represented by a circular solid line indicating positions where the maximum intensity occurring at the center of the projection light beam 31 has dropped to 10%, and also by a Gaussian curve as shown in FIG. 6. If light losses shall be reduced, it is of course possible to deviate from the square arrangement of micromirrors 42 and to adapt the arrangement of micromirrors 42 better to the substantially circular cross-section of the projection light beam 31.
• the exit aperture of the excimer laser used as light source 30 may be modified so that the cross section of the projection light beam 31 approximates a square, as this is the case in the embodiment shown below in FIG. 14.
• a displaced irradiance distribution 310' is indicated that is produced by the slightly tilted projection, light beam 31'. It can be seen that the irradiance on each individual micromirror 42 changes if the irradiance distribution is displaced in the short or the long term as a result of beam pointing fluctuations.
• the irradi- ance distribution in the pupil plane 56 which is a superpo ⁇ sition of all spots 70 produced by the micromirrors 42, has to be kept constant so as to prevent that the structures 19 on the mask 14 are imaged with varying quality on the light sensitive layer 22.
• FIG. 8 illustrates how beam pointing fluctuations generally modify the irradiances on two different micromirrors which are spaced apart by a distance along the X direction. For the sake of simplicity it is again assumed that the irradiance distribution 310' is displaced only along the X direction.
• the irradiance distribution may be displaced, as a matter of course, also or exclusively along the Y direction.
• irradiances 420a, 420b on two micromirrors 42 having different x coordinates are generally different, as it can be . seen in FIG. 8.
• the irradiances 420a', 420b' on the same micromirrors 42 are significantly higher than before. Consequently, also the light spots 70 produces by these micromirrors 42 will be brighter so that the irradiance distribution in the pupil plane 56 changes. This, in turn, leads to changes of the angular distribution of projec ⁇ tion light at mask level, and thus the beam pointing fluctua- tions eventually result in fluctuations of the imaging qual ⁇ ity. IV.
• the micromirrors 42 are controlled by the control unit 43 in such a way that always pairs of light spots 70a, 70b completely or at least partly overlap in the pupil plane 56. Since the optical integrator 52 modifies only the divergence of light passing through it, this is equivalent to a light spot overlap on the preceding light entrance surface 55 of the first optical raster plate 54a, as this is shown in FIG. 2 and the simplified cutout of FIG. 9.
• the overlap of the spots 70a, 70b may be so large that a first line 71a, on which an irradiance produced in the pupil plane 56 by the first light deflecting element 42a has dropped to 50% of a first maximum irradiance Ii, max , and a second line 71b, on which an irradiance produced in the pupil plane 56 by the second light deflecting element 42b has dropped to 50% of a second maximum irradiance l2,max abut or even overlap.
• the micromirrors 42 producing the overlapping light spots 70a, 70b are selected such that a first light spot 70a is produced by a first micromirror 42a which is located at the increasing slope 72 of the irradiance distribution 310 which is produced by the projec ⁇ tion light beam 31 on the array 40 of micromirrors 42.
• the second light spot 70b is produced by a micromirror 42b which is located on the decreasing slope 74 of the irradiance distribution 310.
• the total irradiance in the pupil plane 56 (or at the preceding light entrance surface 55) at the position, where the two light spots 70a, 70b produced by the micromirrors 42a, 42b completely or at least partly overlap, is substantially (i.e. if light losses are disregarded) the sum of the irradiances on the two micromirrors 42a, 42b. Since a perfect overlap of the light spots 70a, 70b may be difficult to. achieve and the irradiance within each light spot 70a, 70b is generally not uniform, the sum of the irradiances should be considered as an integral over the irradiances over the overlapping areas which are illuminated in the pupil plane 56 by the two light spots 70a, 70b.
• the graph shown in FIG. 10a indicates by white circles the irradiances 420a, 420b on the two micromirrors 42a and 42b, respectively. If the irradiance distribution is displaced along the -X direction as a result of beam pointing fluctua- tions, as it is shown in FIG. 10a with a broken line 310', this will result in different irradiances 420a', 420b' on the micromirrors 42a, 42b, as it has been explained above with reference to FIG. 8.
• the micromirrors 42a, 42b that contribute to the irradiance at the same position in the pupil plane 56 are located at opposite slopes 72, 74 of the irradiance distribution 310, a displacement of the latter along the -X direction has the result that the irradiance on the first micromirror 42a increases from 420a to 420aV, whereas the irradiance on the second micromirror 42b de- creases from 420b to 420b'.
• the increase of the irradiance 420a on the first micromirror 42a is partially or even completely compensated for by a decrease of the ir ⁇ radiance 420b on the second micromirror 42b.
• displacements of the irradiance distribution 310 on the array 40 caused by beam pointing fluctuations have only very little or even no effect at all on the irradiance distribution on the. light entrance surface 55 and thus in the subsequent pupil plane 56.
• FIG. 10b illustrates the situation if the irradiance distri- bution 3.10' produced by the tilted projection light beam 31' is displaced along the +X direction with respect to the un ⁇ disturbed irradiance distribution 310. It can be seen that again the sum of the irradiances on the micromirrors 42a, 42b is not significantly affected by such a displacement. From FIGS.
• This may be “repaired” if there are more than one first and second micromirror that contribute to the irradiance at the same position in the pupil surface 56.
• first micromirror 42a is located as before, and two second micromirrors, which also direct the projection light towards the same position in the pupil plane 56, are located close to the center of the irradiance distribution as it is indicated with irradiance 420c in FIG. 10a, an almost complete mutual compensation is possible.
• FIG. 11 is a meridional section through an illumination system 12 according to an alternative embodiment.
• the first condenser 50 has a fixed focal length.
• a microlens array 36 comprising a plurality of microlenses 37 is arranged between the beam expansion unit 32 and the spatial light modulator 38.
• FIG. 12 is a top view on the microlens array 36
• FIG. 13 shows a cross section through the microlens array 36 along line XIIII-XIII.
• Each microlens 37 has a square borderline.
• the mi- crolenses 37 are planar-convex lenses having a positive refractive power.
• the substantially parallel projection light 31 impinging on the microlens array 36 is divided into a plurality of individual converging light beams, from which only two denoted by LB1, LB2 are shown in FIG. 11.
• each light beam LB1, LB2 After en- tering the prism 46, each light beam LB1, LB2 impinges on one of the micromirrors 42 of the array 40.
• the focal length of the microlenses 37 is determined such that the diameter of the light beams LB1, LB2 at the micromirrors 42 is smaller than the maximum dimension of their mirror surface. Then no projection light is incident on gaps between adjacent micromirrors 42. This has not only the advantage of reducing light losses, but also prevents projection light from heating up electronic components that are arranged at the bottom of the gaps.
• FIG. 14 shows, in a top view similar to FIG.
• the microlens array 36 and the irradiance distribution 310 which is pro ⁇ quizd by the projection light beam 31 on its rear planar sur ⁇ face. Similar to FIG. 7, the irradiance distribution 310 is represented by a line indicating positions where the maximum intensity has dropped to 10%, and a curve indicating the irradiance distribution 310
• Gaussian irradiance profile With broken lines an irradiance distribution 310' is indicated which is displaced along the X direction as a result of beam pointing fluctuations.
• FIG. 15 shows, in a graph similar to FIG. 10a, how such a displacement affects the irradiances on the first and second micromirrors . 2a, 42b along the X direction.
• the irradiance distribution 310M on the array 40 is obtained by a modulation of the irradiance distribution 310 on the rear side of the microlens array 36 with a periodic function hav- ing a spatial frequency which is equal to the pitch of the micromirrors 42.
• the envelope 310E of the irradiance distri ⁇ bution 310M on the array 40 is thus approximately propor ⁇ tional to the irradiance distribution 310 on the rear side of the microlens array 36 shown in FIG. 14.
• the same also ap ⁇ plies to the displaced irradiance distribution 310M' and its envelope 310E' being a result of beam pointing fluctuations.
• the micromirrors 42 are controlled by the control unit 43 in the same manner as it has been explained above with reference to FIGS. 7, 9, 10a and 10b.
• the only modification is that the two micromirrors 42a, 42b which contribute to the irradiance at the same position in the pupil plane are not located at the opposite sides of the modulated irradiance distribution 310M on the array 40, but on opposite sides of its envelope 310E.
• FIG. 16 is a flow diagram which illustrates important steps of operating a microlithographic projection exposure appara- tus in accordance with the present invention.
• a spatial light modulator comprising an array of light deflecting elements is provided.
• a second step S2 an irradiance distribution having an increasing slope and a decreasing slope is produced on the ar- ray.
• a third step S3 the light deflecting elements are con ⁇ trolled in such a way that a first light spot, which is pro ⁇ substituted by a first light deflecting element located at the in ⁇ creasing slope, and a second light spot, which is produced by a second light deflecting element located at the decreasing slope, at least partly overlap in a pupil plane.

Landscapes

• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Optics & Photonics (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
• Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
• Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
• Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
• Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
• Power Engineering (AREA)
• Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
• Lenses (AREA)

Priority Applications (5)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=47178539

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (5)

Families Citing this family (2)

Citations (9)

Family Cites Families (7)

• 2012
  • 2012-10-08 JP JP2014540338A patent/JP5864771B2/ja active Active
  • 2012-10-08 KR KR1020137026834A patent/KR101591155B1/ko active Active
  • 2012-10-08 WO PCT/EP2012/004212 patent/WO2014056513A1/en not_active Ceased
• 2013
  • 2013-09-12 US US14/025,216 patent/US9261695B2/en active Active
  • 2013-10-04 TW TW102135976A patent/TWI536122B/zh active

Patent Citations (9)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events