WO2010010432A1 - Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments - Google Patents

Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010010432A1
WO2010010432A1 PCT/IB2009/005794 IB2009005794W WO2010010432A1 WO 2010010432 A1 WO2010010432 A1 WO 2010010432A1 IB 2009005794 W IB2009005794 W IB 2009005794W WO 2010010432 A1 WO2010010432 A1 WO 2010010432A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
packets
error correction
fec
video
service node
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2009/005794
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Timothy J. Rahrer
Emre Gunduzhan
Martin Jan Soukup
Original Assignee
Nortel Networks Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US12/342,174 external-priority patent/US20100023842A1/en
Application filed by Nortel Networks Limited filed Critical Nortel Networks Limited
Priority to CN2009801373533A priority Critical patent/CN102165781A/zh
Priority to BRPI0916837A priority patent/BRPI0916837A2/pt
Priority to EP09800123A priority patent/EP2308235A1/fr
Priority to JP2011519247A priority patent/JP2012513689A/ja
Publication of WO2010010432A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010010432A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37—Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/3761—Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35 using code combining, i.e. using combining of codeword portions which may have been transmitted separately, e.g. Digital Fountain codes, Raptor codes or Luby Transform [LT] codes
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37—Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0009—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0025—Transmission of mode-switching indication
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/102—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or selection affected or controlled by the adaptive coding
    • H04N19/117—Filters, e.g. for pre-processing or post-processing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/85—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression
    • H04N19/89—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression involving methods or arrangements for detection of transmission errors at the decoder
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
    • H04N21/238—Interfacing the downstream path of the transmission network, e.g. adapting the transmission rate of a video stream to network bandwidth; Processing of multiplex streams
    • H04N21/2383—Channel coding or modulation of digital bit-stream, e.g. QPSK modulation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to providing packetized video over a segmented network, and in particular to using error correction processes based on attributes of each network segment.
  • Video such as a television broadcast or an on-demand program
  • digitized video is first packetized by encapsulating sequential units of the digitized video into a stream of Internet Protocol packets and then forwarded from a headend towards a premises, such as a residence or business.
  • Packetized video offers many advantages over non-packetized video, including the ability to use emerging technologies, such as switched digital video, to allocate network bandwidth more efficiently than previously possible.
  • each packet must traverse multiple network segments coupled together by different types of equipment that may operate in different energy domains, such as optical or electrical. Each packet faces potential disruption along the way from cable cuts, equipment failure, transient noise, and congested network nodes. Once the packet reaches the destination premises, the packet must be carried over a local area network that can vary widely from premises to premises, that the service provider may have little knowledge of or control over, and that may change at the whim of the end-user.
  • the packets are ultimately delivered to a device, such as a set top box or a computer, for display on a monitor, such as a television or liquid crystal display (LCD) computer screen.
  • a device such as a set top box or a computer
  • a monitor such as a television or liquid crystal display (LCD) computer screen.
  • LCD liquid crystal display
  • Video distribution networks can generally be described as having three network segments: a core network segment that extends from a super headend to a regional video serving office, an access network segment that extends from the regional video serving office to a premises, and a local network segment that carries video packets within a premises.
  • Each network segment has different attributes and presents unique challenges relating to the delivery of packetized video.
  • the core network segment is typically a fiber network and may have a high amount of bandwidth.
  • the access network segment may be an xDSL network and may have very limited bandwidth.
  • a local network segment in one premises may use a wired Ethernet technology and have high robustness, while a local network segment in an adjacent premises may use a wireless technology and have low robustness and high susceptibility to interference.
  • FEC FEC is typically provided from a headend of the service provider all the way to a set top box in a premises, and the amount of FEC used is limited by the most bandwidth-constrained segment of the network. Consequently, while FEC may, for example, be sufficient to correct a majority of packet losses that may occur in an access segment of the network, FEC may be insufficient to correct packet losses that may occur in the core or local segments of the network. Moreover, the amount of FEC necessary to correct video quality problems occurring in a local network segment in one premises may be insufficient to correct video quality problems occurring in a local network segment of another premises.
  • ARQ can be useful when used in the access network segment or the local network segment, but is typically not used in the core network segment because of the amount of storage and processing that would be necessary to implement ARQ in a core network segment. Consequently, a service provider implementing ARQ may not provide any error correction for the core network segment. Therefore, it would be beneficial for a service provider to provide different error correction processes for different network segments based on the loss profile and bandwidth of the particular network segment. Further, it would be beneficial for a network provider to dynamically alter the error correction process used on a network segment in response to feedback regarding real-time error conditions associated with the network segment.
  • the present invention implements different error correction processes, sometimes referred to as loss mitigation processes, in different segments of a network coupled together by service nodes.
  • the error correction processes can include forward error correction (FEC), automatic repeat request (ARQ), call admission control (CAC), any other suitable mechanism adapted to prevent or correct packet loss, and any combination thereof.
  • the present invention implements an appropriate error correction process based on bandwidth associated with the respective network segment and types of errors typically or actually experienced by the respective network segment.
  • a service node may receive packets via a first network segment, use a first error correction process to recover lost or corrupted packets, and forward the packets via a second network segment to a service node that uses a second error correction process to recover lost or corrupted packets.
  • monitoring agents in one or more service nodes monitor error conditions on an associated network segment and communicate with an upstream error correction controller (ECC) to dynamically modify the amount or type of error correction being used for the associated network segment.
  • ECC upstream error correction controller
  • the error correction processes associated with two different network segments can be different error correction processes, such as FEC and ARQ, or can be different types of error correction processes that use the same type of error correction, such as FEC, but use different amounts of error correction.
  • a service node associated with a core network segment may use an amount of FEC suitable for protecting a first number of lost packets that might be lost on the core network segment
  • a service node associated with an access network segment may use an amount of FEC suitable for protecting a second, and smaller, number of lost packets since the access network segment may have significantly less bandwidth than the core network segment.
  • a service node associated with a core network segment uses a sufficient number of FEC packets suitable to protect a relatively large number of video packets that may be lost during a 50 milliseconds (ms) - 100 ms protection switch event on the core network segment, such as re-routing traffic around a severed fiber cable.
  • a service node associated with the access network segment uses a smaller number of FEC packets suitable to protect a relatively small number of video packets that may be lost during a short duration impulse loss on the access network segment, such as caused by transient noise.
  • the FEC packets used on the access network segment are a subset of the FEC packets received via the core network segment.
  • the present invention enables the reuse of FEC packets to tailor FEC for a particular network segment without the overhead required to recalculate FEC packets.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a switched digital media network according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a premises according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram of service nodes implementing error correction according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a process for implementing error correction at a headend service node in a switched digital media network according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 5 is a flowchart illustrating error correcting processing at a service node according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 6 is a flowchart illustrating error correcting processing at a service node according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 7 is a block diagram of service nodes implementing monitoring agents according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 8 is a flowchart illustrating altering an error correction process in response to feedback relating to a changed loss profile associated with a network segment.
  • Fig. 9 is a block diagram of a forward error correction (FEC) block according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 10 is a block diagram showing a loss of sequential packets from a
  • Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a FEC block according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 12 is a block diagram of a service node according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 13 is a block diagram of a customer premises equipment (CPE) according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • CPE customer premises equipment
  • Switched digital media networks allow delivery of streaming media in the form of media streams for various channels, or on-demand programs, which can be selected by customers for listening or viewing.
  • Switched digital media networks may represent satellite, cable, internet protocol television (IPTV) 1 or like networks used to deliver audio or video for a public or private setting.
  • IPTV internet protocol television
  • a service node such as a media head end (MHE) 10, which is configured to deliver the various media streams for the corresponding channels to premises 12 through core network segments 14 and access network segments 16.
  • MHE media head end
  • the access network segments 16 provide wired or wireless access to the premises 12 and the core network segments 14 represent the primary transport networks that connect the various access network segments 16 to the MHE 10.
  • the MHE 10 such as a super head end for video, will generally have access to various satellite dish farms, media servers, encoders, or the like, which provide various media content for corresponding channels to the MHE 10. While for purposes of illustration the MHE 10 is depicted as a single entity, the MHE 10 may comprise a number of pieces of equipment to accomplish the required functions of the MHE 10, including content management, content encoding, the provision of video on demand services, and the like.
  • the MHE 10 aggregates the media content from the various sources and allocates the media content for delivery toward the premises 12 at the appropriate time and on the appropriate channel. Notably, the media content may be delivered to the premises 12 according to a predefined schedule or in response to a customer request, as is provided for video on demand services.
  • the media content may include advertising content, which is slotted into appropriate slots within the media content.
  • the advertising content provided by the MHE 10 is generally national advertising intended for delivery to customers over a wide geographic area.
  • a switched digital media network may have multiple MHEs 10 for purposes of redundancy, as illustrated by the two MHEs 10 as shown in Fig. 1.
  • Media content delivered toward one or more premises 12 may pass through a media hub office (MHO) 18, which resides in the core network segment 14.
  • MHO media hub office
  • a single MHO 18 may be allocated to a single city or metro area.
  • the MHO 18 may have access to local media content, including local advertising, which may be provided in association with the media content being provided by the MHE 10.
  • Both the MHE 10 and the MHOs 18 may provide various types of encoding and decoding as well as transcoding to effectively change encoding, compression, and formatting associated with the media content being delivered toward the customer premises 12.
  • the next service node in the path towards the customer premises 12 may include a media serving office (MSO) 20, which generally resides in the city or metro area being served by the MSO 20. Further, the MSOs 20 may be distributed throughout the corresponding geographic location, such as in association with one or more neighborhoods. Within each of these neighborhoods or corresponding areas, each MSO 20 may be associated with one or more access nodes (AN) 22, which may also be referred to as access multiplexers. These access nodes 22 effectively aggregate all of the wired or wireless connections between the various premises 12. The MSO 20 and the access node 22 are generally associated with the corresponding access network segment 16. As illustrated, a single access node 22 may serve any number of premises 12.
  • MSO media serving office
  • AN access nodes
  • Exemplary access network segments 16 include digital subscriber lines (DSL), passive optical networks (PON), Ethernet networks, cellular networks, broadband wireless networks such as a WiMAX network, and the like.
  • the access nodes 22 may include digital subscriber line access multiplexers (DSLAMs), optical line terminals (OLT), Ethernet modems, cellular base stations, wireless access points, and the like.
  • DSL digital subscriber line access multiplexers
  • ONT optical line terminals
  • Ethernet modems cellular base stations
  • wireless access points and the like.
  • the media content may be delivered to any number of devices, as illustrated in Figure 2.
  • the customer premises 12 may, but need not, include a premises gateway (PG) 24, such as a residential gateway, that provides a gateway function between the access network segment 16 and any customer premises equipment (CPE) 26, such as a set top box (STB), a personal video recorder (PVR), a personal computer (PC), a telephone, or the like.
  • the PG 24 may be coupled to the CPE 26 via a local network segment 28, which may include one or more switching devices 30 such as a router 3OA and an Ethernet switch 3OB.
  • the PG 24 may be implemented as a stand-alone device, or can be integrated into another network element, such as a cable or DSL modem.
  • Communications links 34 used in the local network segment 28 may comprise any conventional or proprietary network technologies, including wireless such as WiFi, data over coaxial cable, Ethernet over various physical media such as Category 5 cable or phone lines, and the like, and each communications link 34 may have a different bandwidth and robustness than another communications link 34.
  • Fig. 2 is used to illustrate that the local network segment 28 may take various forms and may include various types of communications links 34, CPEs 26, and switching devices 30.
  • Lost, damaged, or delayed media packets in any of the network segments 14, 16, 28 can result in noticeable audio or video aberrations at the CPE 26.
  • each network segment typically has a separate and different loss profile that characterizes the type of packet losses that may occur or typically occur on the respective network segment.
  • packet losses on the core network segment 14 due to interference are relatively rare.
  • the type of event that may cause a packet loss on the core network segment 14, such as a severed cable or network element failure may result in a relatively large number of lost packets, and may impact all premises 12 served by the service provider.
  • a typical loss profile for an access network segment 16 may include more frequent problems, such as transient impulse noise or crosstalk, that likely result in fewer lost packets than that caused by a severed cable, but that affect fewer premises 12 than a cable cut on the core network segment 14.
  • the local network segments 28 which differ from one premises 12 to another premises 12, each of which may involve myriad different switching devices 30, CPEs 26, and communications links 34, and whose configuration may change at the whim of the customer with no advance warning to the service provider.
  • the net result of the variable and changing dynamic of the local network segment 28 is that service providers incur significant expenses setting up media services for a premises 12 and maintaining media quality in the premises 12 on an ongoing basis.
  • Some service providers attempt to diminish the impact of lost packets through mechanisms such as error correction. Error correction typically involves a tradeoff between bandwidth and delay.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a respective path through a switched digital media network from a MHE 10 to a premises 12 according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • ECCs 36A-36D implement error correction processes at a respective service node, such as the MHE 10, the MSO 20, the PG 24, and the CPE 26. According to one embodiment of the invention, error correction processes may differ at each respective service node.
  • the MHE 10 may implement a FEC process using a particular size FEC block of media packets and both row and column FEC packets to ensure sufficient media packets can be recovered by a MSO 20 in the event of a cable cut or similar event. While such FEC processes may require substantial bandwidth, the core network segment 14 may comprise a fiber network that has excess bandwidth and thus the capability to enable such FEC processes.
  • the MSO 20 may be coupled to an access network segment 16 that has very limited bandwidth, such as an xDSL communications path, and that has insufficient excess bandwidth to provide a similar FEC block size and both row and column FEC packets.
  • the MSO 20 may therefore alter the FEC block size and generate only column FEC packets to significantly reduce the amount of bandwidth required to implement FEC on the access network segment 16. While the different FEC block size and fewer FEC packets reduces the number of lost media packets that may be recovered, such a tradeoff provides sufficient reliability in view of the actual loss profile for the access network segment 16, which differs from the loss profile of the core network segment 14.
  • the PG 24 may be coupled to a local network segment 28 that has high bandwidth communications links 34, but which suffers significant media data packet loss due to interference with wireless or other electronic devices in the premises 12.
  • the PG 24 therefore alters the FEC encoding to better suit the loss profile associated with the local network segment 28, such as by altering the FEC block size and generating both row and column FEC packets to enable the CPE 26 to recover a substantial number of media packets that may be lost en route from the PG 24 to the CPE 26.
  • Fig. 4 is a flowchart illustrating error correction processing that may occur in a MHE 10 according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the MHE 10 receives a stream of media, such as a broadcast television channel, from a broadcast feed (step 200).
  • the media stream may be in an analog or a digital format. If analog, the MHE 10 may digitize and encode the media stream into any suitable format suitable for delivering the media over the digital switched media network, such as Moving Pictures Experts Group-2 (MPEG-2) or MPEG-4. If the media stream is already digitized, the MHE 10 may transcode the media stream into a desired bit rate or format (step 202). The encoded media stream is then segmented into media segments (step 204). Segmentation may comprise any suitable grouping of digitized media units, and may differ based on the digital encoding used, as is understood by those skilled in the art.
  • the media segments may comprise one or more Transport Stream packets.
  • the media segments may comprise one or more Network Abstraction Layer units.
  • the media segments are then packetized into a suitable transport packet, such as a Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) packet (step 206).
  • RTP Real-time Transport Protocol
  • a desired first FEC error correction process is then applied to the media packets to generate a plurality of error correction packets (step 208).
  • FEC error correction typically involves forming a two-dimensional block, or matrix, of a desired size of media packets that are to be protected, and then generating FEC packets that can be used to recreate one or more of the media packets if such media packets are lost or corrupted in transit through a network.
  • the MHE 10 is coupled to a core network segment 14 that is a fiber network segment and has some excess bandwidth capacity. Further assume that the core network segment 14 may, from time to time, be impacted by a network element failure or cable cut that might occur, for example, during construction of a new office building miles away from the MHE 10.
  • the MHE 10 may select a FEC block size and generate sufficient FEC packets to enable the recovery of up to 16 media packets so that media packets that are lost during the switchover can be recovered by the downstream MHE 10 without disrupting the presentation of the media on a CPE 26.
  • the media packets and the FEC packets are then transmitted over the core network segment 14 (step 210).
  • Fig. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating error correcting processing at the MSO 20 according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the MSO 20 receives the media packets and FEC packets sent from the MHE 10 (step 300).
  • the MSO 20 may apply a first FEC process on the media packets to recover any media packets that may have been lost as the result of a cable cut or other disruption (step 302). Assume that the MSO 20 is coupled to an access network segment 16 that comprises an xDSL communications link and is bandwidth limited.
  • the loss profile for the access network segment 16 may mainly comprise transient impulse noise events that typically result in fewer than five lost packets per loss event.
  • the MSO 20 may apply a second FEC process using a second FEC block size that is different from the FEC block size used by the MHE 10, and generate fewer FEC packets than generated by the MHE 10 such that the FEC process is suited to recovering only up to five lost packets per FEC block (step 304), but requiring less additional bandwidth for the error correction packets.
  • the MSO 20 then transmits the media packets and FEC packets over the access network segment 16 (step 306).
  • Fig. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating error correcting processing at the MSO 20 according to another embodiment of the invention.
  • the MSO 20 receives a plurality of media packets and FEC packets (step 400) and recovers any packets that were lost using the FEC process and the FEC packets (step 402).
  • the MSO 20 uses an ARQ error correction process in conjunction with the access network segment 16.
  • the ARQ process initially stores the media packets in a local storage device prior to sending the media packets to the PG 24 (step 404).
  • the ARQ process then forwards the media packets to the PG 24 (step 406). If the PG 24 acknowledges receipt of the media packets, the ARQ process can remove or overwrite the media packets in the local storage device.
  • the ARQ process will retransmit the media packets until an acknowledgment is received from the PG 24.
  • the ARQ process may use a circular buffer of length sufficient to cover typical loss profiles and to respond to requests from the PG 24 for retransmission of specific lost packets.
  • the ARQ process may be implemented between the MSO 20 and the CPE 26 rather than the MSO 20 and the PG 24. [0040] While ARQ requires less bandwidth than an FEC error correction process if no packet loss occurs, ARQ can introduce significant delay associated with retransmissions.
  • ARQ may not be suitable in some network segments where requests for retransmissions after a substantial packet loss event may overwhelm the capability of the sending service node to service the retransmission requests, or where the amount of processing and storage required to store the media packets requires excessive resources.
  • an ARQ error correction process may not be an appropriate error correction process for the core network segment 14 due to the significant amount of media packets being sent over the core network segment 14, and the large number of retransmission requests that would need to be serviced in the event of a packet loss event such as a cable cut.
  • a block diagram of the service nodes illustrated in Fig. 3 is shown.
  • the service nodes such as the MSO 20, the PG 24, and the CPE 26, may include a monitoring agent (MA) 38 capable of monitoring the respective network segment to which the service node is coupled, and determine a loss profile associated with the particular network segment.
  • the MAs 38 can provide information or requests to an upstream ECC 36 to dynamically alter an error correction process used to recover packets lost over the respective network segment.
  • a monitoring agent suitable for use in the present invention is described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/961 ,879 filed December 20, 2007, entitled “MEDIA MONITORING," the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Fig. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process for altering an error control process on a network segment according to one embodiment of the invention. For purposes of illustration, Fig. 8 will be discussed in conjunction with Fig. 7. Assume that the PG 24 uses a first FEC process that provides sufficient error correction for the CPE 26 to recover lost data packets sent by the PG 24 given the loss profile of the local network segment 28 at a particular time. Assume further that an event occurs that changes the loss profile of the local network segment 28.
  • the MA 38C determines that the loss profile for the local network segment 28 has changed (step 500). For example, the MA 38C may determine that in a significant number of transmissions the FEC packets are insufficient to recover all the packets that were lost.
  • the MA 38C may provide an error control message to an upstream ECC 36, such as the ECC 36C associated with the PG 24, informing the ECC 36C that the existing error correction process is insufficient (step 502).
  • the error control message could be a request for an increased number of FEC packets, data identifying the loss profile, or any other message capable of apprising the PG 24 that a new error correction process providing increased error protection is required to maintain a suitable media presentation quality.
  • the ECC 36C can initiate a different error control process on subsequently received media packets that provides additional error correction beyond what had previously been provided by the ECC 36C, assuming that the communications links 34 between the PG 24 and the CPE 26 have sufficient bandwidth (step 504). Assume that the PG 24 receives a plurality of media packets from the MSO 20 via the access network segment 16 destined for the CPE 26 (step 506). The ECC 36C performs error correction on the media packets according to the error correction process associated with the network segment 16 (step 178).
  • the ECC 36C Prior to receiving the error control message from the CPE 26, the ECC 36C might have provided media packets in a particular FEC block size and with sufficient FEC packets to enable recovery of up to five sequential lost packets.
  • the ECC 36C now alters the FEC block size and generates a larger number of FEC packets from the media packets to enable recovery of up to ten sequential lost packets by the CPE 26 (step 510).
  • the PG 24 sends the plurality of media packets to the CPE 26 using the new FEC block size and the increased number of FEC packets (step 512). This process may be repeated until the level of error control processing provided by the ECC 36C is sufficient to provide the appropriate media presentation quality at the CPE 26.
  • a service node can implement a first FEC error correction process on a first network segment, and a second FEC error correction process on a second network segment without having to regenerate FEC packets received via the first network segment.
  • the present invention enables a processing node to easily reduce bandwidth used for error correction processing without expending resources recalculating new FEC packets.
  • the present invention uses a Pro-MPEG Forum Code of Practice (COP) #3 FEC process as described in Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Standards SMPTE 2002-1 and SMPTE 2022-1 , both of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety.
  • Pro-MPEG FEC involves generating an FEC matrix having a number of columns, referred to as the "L" dimension of the matrix, and having a number of rows, referred to as the "D" dimension of the matrix.
  • the dimensions of a FEC matrix will be described herein with reference first to the L dimension (number of columns) and then to the D dimension (number of rows).
  • an FEC matrix having five columns and ten rows will be referred to herein as a 10 (L) x 5 (D) FEC matrix.
  • Error correction is provided in the form of FEC packets that are derived based on the media packets in a particular row or column of the FEC matrix.
  • FEC packets that are generated to correct packet loss associated with a particular row will be referred to herein as row FEC packets.
  • FEC packets that are generated to correct packet loss associated with a particular column will be referred to herein as column FEC packets.
  • a relatively high amount of error correction may be provided by generating both row and column FEC packets.
  • a lesser amount of error correction may be provided by generating only column FEC packets.
  • FEC matrix will be used herein to refer to a respective matrix of media packets.
  • FEC block will be used herein to refer to both a respective FEC matrix and the FEC packets that are generated based on the FEC matrix.
  • the present invention interleaves transmission of an FEC block of media packets and FEC packets in a manner that increases the number of sequential packets that may be recovered without the need to generate additional FEC packets.
  • the present invention also enables reuse of a proper subset of the FEC packets for subsequent error correction on a second network segment without the need to regenerate FEC packets even though the FEC block size is changed.
  • Fig. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary FEC block 50 showing a plurality of media packets 52 and FEC packets 54 in a 5x10 FEC matrix according to one embodiment of the invention. For purposes of illustration, both media packets 52 and FEC packets 54 may be referred to collectively herein as packets 52, 54.
  • each packet 52, 54 bears two numbers, a leftmost number separated by a T from a rightmost number.
  • the leftmost number represents a packet sequence number of the order in which the media packets 52 are sequentially decoded for display on a CPE 26.
  • the leftmost number represents the sequential order in which the FEC packet 54 would typically be intermixed with sequentially ordered media packets 52.
  • Each FEC packet 54 at the end of each row of the FEC block 50 (column 56F) can be used to correct or recover any media packet 52 that resides in the same row as the FEC packet 54 so long as the other media packets 52 in that row were not lost, or can be recreated using column FEC packets 54.
  • Each FEC packet 54 at the end of each column of the FEC block 50 (row 58K) can be used to correct any single media packet 52 that resides in the same column as the FEC packet 54 so long as the other media packets 52 in that column were not lost, or can be recreated using a row FEC packet 54.
  • the rightmost number in each packet 52, 54 represents an interleaved packet transmission order according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the ability to recover 16 sequential lost packets represents a 167% increase over a conventional FEC block 50.
  • the interleaved order of packets 52, 54 according to one embodiment of the invention is as follows.
  • the first media packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the media packet 52 at row 58A and column 56A.
  • the next packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the media packet 52 at row 58B and column 56B.
  • the third packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the media packet 52 at row 58C and column 56C.
  • the process continues along a diagonal path 60 until the FEC packet 54 at row 58F and column 56F is put in interleaved order.
  • the next column in interleaved order is the first column, column 56A.
  • row 58F is not the final row in the FEC block 50
  • the next row in interleaved order is row 58G.
  • next media packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the media packet 52 at row 58G and column 56A.
  • the process continues along a diagonal path 62 until the FEC packet 54 at row 58K and column 56E is put in interleaved order.
  • row 58K is the last row in the FEC block 50
  • the next row in interleaved order is the first row, row 58A.
  • column 56E is not the final column in the FEC block 50
  • the next column in interleaved order is column 56F.
  • the next media packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the FEC packet 54 at row 58A and column 56F as shown by a diagonal path 64.
  • column 56F is the last column in FEC block 50, so the next media packet 52, 54 in interleaved order is the media packet 52 at row 58B and column 56A. This process continues in the same manner as illustrated by diagonal paths 66-90 until all the packets 52, 54 are in interleaved order.
  • the MSO 20 After receipt of the interleaved packets 52, 54 by a downstream service node such as the MSO 20, the MSO 20 arranges the interleaved packets 52, 54 in sequential order as represented by the leftmost number associated with each packet 52, 54 in Fig. 9. Assume that a cable cut occurred during the transmission of the FEC block 50 to the MSO 20, and during the switchover to a backup MHE 10, a number of sequential packets 52, 54 were lost.
  • Fig. 10 is a block diagram of the FEC block 50 illustrated in Fig. 9 after receipt and arrangement in sequential order by the MSO 20.
  • the packets 52, 54 bearing an "X" represent lost media packets. Note that sixteen media packets 52, 54 were lost due to the cable cut. Note further that the lost packets 52, 54 are not in sequential order in Fig. 10 because they were transmitted in an interleaved order. Because the present invention interleaved the transmission order of the packets 52, 54, each of the sixteen lost packets 52, 54 can be recovered. For purposes of clarity while discussing the recovery of lost packets, each lost packet will be identified by the number the respective lost packet bears in Fig. 10. Each of the lost packets 5, 42, 43, 50, 57, and 64 may first be recovered by either the respective FEC packet 54 in the associated row or, in the case of lost packet 42, by recreating the lost packet 42 from the existing packets in row 58G.
  • Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a FEC block 92 according to another embodiment of the invention. Assume that the MSO 20 received the FEC block 50 illustrated in Fig. 10 and recovered all lost packets.
  • the access network segment 16 does not have sufficient bandwidth to incur the 32% overhead which would be required to include both row and column FEC packets 54 with the FEC block 50.
  • the loss profile associated with the access network segment 16 indicates that the average sequential packet loss is five or fewer sequential packets.
  • the MSO 20 may prune, or drop, the row FEC packets 54 from the FEC block 50 and reuse the column FEC packets 54 to create the FEC block 92 illustrated in Fig. 11.
  • the five column FEC packets 54 will be sufficient to recover the typical number of lost packets according to the loss profile associated with the access network segment 16.
  • the column FEC packets 54 did not need to be regenerated from the FEC matrix, but were reused, reducing processing time and decreasing visible artifacts on a CPE 26 that may be caused by processing delay.
  • the service node 94 is a generic control entity that may provide the functionality of the MSO 20, the MHE 10, the MHO 18, or the PG 24.
  • the service node 94 may include a control system 96 with sufficient memory 98 for requisite software 100 and data 102 to facilitate operation as described above.
  • the software 100 may provide the MA 38 and the EEC 36, depending on the configuration.
  • the control system 96 may be associated with one or more communication interfaces 104 to facilitate communications as necessary for operation.
  • the service node 94 may be a stand alone entity or may be part of another element such as a switch, a router, or the like.
  • the CPE 26 may include a control system 106 with sufficient memory 108 for requisite software 110 and data 112 to operate as described above.
  • the software 110 may provide the functionality of the CPE 26 in general, as well as the MA 38 and the EEC 36, depending on the configuration.
  • the control system 106 may be associated with one or more communication interfaces 114 to facilitate communications as described above. Further, the control system 106 may be associated with a user interface 116 to facilitate interactions with a customer as well as provide streaming media in an audible or viewable format to the customer as well as receive information from the customer.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention se rapporte à un procédé destiné à fournir une correction d'erreurs de paquets multimédias. Des nœuds de service associés à un segment de réseau d'infrastructure utilisent un premier processus de correction d'erreurs et des nœuds de service associés à un segment de réseau d'accès utilisent un deuxième processus de correction d'erreurs. Les nœuds de service associés à un segment de réseau local peuvent utiliser un troisième processus de correction d'erreurs. La présente invention fait appel à différents processus de correction d'erreurs sur différents segments de réseau selon les besoins. Les nœuds de service peuvent recevoir des indicateurs en provenance d’agents de surveillance selon lesquels une correction d'erreurs est insuffisante et, en réponse, un nœud de service peut augmenter une quantité de correction d'erreurs associée à un segment de réseau. Les paquets multimédias peuvent être entrelacés dans un bloc de correction d'erreurs sans voie de retour (FEC) de manière à augmenter la quantité de récupération de paquets.
PCT/IB2009/005794 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments WO2010010432A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2009801373533A CN102165781A (zh) 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 多段丢失保护
BRPI0916837A BRPI0916837A2 (pt) 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 proteção contra perda de multi-segmentos
EP09800123A EP2308235A1 (fr) 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments
JP2011519247A JP2012513689A (ja) 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 マルチセグメント損失の保護

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8371008P 2008-07-25 2008-07-25
US61/083,710 2008-07-25
US12/342,174 2008-12-23
US12/342,174 US20100023842A1 (en) 2008-07-25 2008-12-23 Multisegment loss protection

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010010432A1 true WO2010010432A1 (fr) 2010-01-28

Family

ID=41569732

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2009/005794 WO2010010432A1 (fr) 2008-07-25 2009-06-01 Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2308235A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2012513689A (fr)
KR (1) KR20110036754A (fr)
CN (1) CN102165781A (fr)
WO (1) WO2010010432A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012114588A (ja) * 2010-11-22 2012-06-14 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> データ伝送システム及び方法及び受信装置及びデータ受信方法
JP2012129751A (ja) * 2010-12-14 2012-07-05 Canon Inc 受信装置及び、受信装置による処理方法

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9232433B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2016-01-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic coding for network traffic by fog computing node
CN108075859A (zh) * 2016-11-17 2018-05-25 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 数据传输方法及装置

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2296091A1 (fr) * 1997-07-15 1999-01-28 Comsat Corporation Procede et appareil de commande adaptative de codes de correction aval d'erreurs
US20030005386A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-01-02 Sanjay Bhatt Negotiated/dynamic error correction for streamed media
US20050010850A1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2005-01-13 Driessen Peter Frank System and methods for transmitting data
US20060159026A1 (en) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-20 Sbc Knowledge Ventures L.P. Method and apparatus for managing a quality of service for a communication link
US20070230496A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for improved multicast streaming in wireless networks

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6195689B1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2001-02-27 Mediaone Group, Inc. Headend provisioning agent
JP2003152752A (ja) * 2001-08-29 2003-05-23 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd データ送受信方法
JP3757857B2 (ja) * 2001-12-12 2006-03-22 ソニー株式会社 データ通信システム、データ送信装置、データ受信装置、および方法、並びにコンピュータ・プログラム
JP2004015551A (ja) * 2002-06-07 2004-01-15 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd 中継装置、中継用プログラム及び自律型誤り訂正ネットワーク
JP3701956B2 (ja) * 2003-05-29 2005-10-05 日本電信電話株式会社 パケット中継装置及びその方法と、パケット受信装置及びその方法と、パケット中継プログラム及びそのプログラムを記録した記録媒体と、パケット受信プログラム及びそのプログラムを記録した記録媒体
JP2005065100A (ja) * 2003-08-19 2005-03-10 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> データ配信方法、中継装置及びコンピュータプログラム
JP4252596B2 (ja) * 2004-03-03 2009-04-08 三菱電機株式会社 パケット転送装置
JP2005323171A (ja) * 2004-05-10 2005-11-17 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd 送信装置、誤り訂正装置、ネットワーク接続装置およびパケット中継方法
US8135041B2 (en) * 2004-12-06 2012-03-13 Thomson Licensing Multiple closed captioning flows and customer access in digital networks
JP4250654B2 (ja) * 2006-11-17 2009-04-08 株式会社東芝 通信装置、通信方法および通信プログラム

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2296091A1 (fr) * 1997-07-15 1999-01-28 Comsat Corporation Procede et appareil de commande adaptative de codes de correction aval d'erreurs
US20050010850A1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2005-01-13 Driessen Peter Frank System and methods for transmitting data
US20030005386A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-01-02 Sanjay Bhatt Negotiated/dynamic error correction for streamed media
US20060159026A1 (en) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-20 Sbc Knowledge Ventures L.P. Method and apparatus for managing a quality of service for a communication link
US20070230496A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for improved multicast streaming in wireless networks

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012114588A (ja) * 2010-11-22 2012-06-14 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> データ伝送システム及び方法及び受信装置及びデータ受信方法
JP2012129751A (ja) * 2010-12-14 2012-07-05 Canon Inc 受信装置及び、受信装置による処理方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102165781A (zh) 2011-08-24
EP2308235A1 (fr) 2011-04-13
JP2012513689A (ja) 2012-06-14
KR20110036754A (ko) 2011-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100023842A1 (en) Multisegment loss protection
US8787153B2 (en) Forward error correction based data recovery with path diversity
JP5442816B2 (ja) 可変ｆｅｃオーバヘッド及び保護期間を利用したストリーミング及びバッファリング
US9661053B2 (en) Generating a plurality of streams
CN100592670C (zh) 一种在iptv网络中动态自适应前向差错控制的系统及方法
US20070266398A1 (en) Method for fast zapping between tv channels
US20060150055A1 (en) Adaptive information delivery system using FEC feedback
CN104737514A (zh) 用于分布媒体内容服务的方法和设备
US20090164550A1 (en) Media monitoring
JP3701956B2 (ja) パケット中継装置及びその方法と、パケット受信装置及びその方法と、パケット中継プログラム及びそのプログラムを記録した記録媒体と、パケット受信プログラム及びそのプログラムを記録した記録媒体
WO2007045141A1 (fr) Procede de prise en charge de transmission de donnees multimedias avec tolerance aux erreurs
EP2308235A1 (fr) Protection contre une perte de plusieurs segments
WO2017000836A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de transmission de message
CN111935485A (zh) 一种rs码前向纠错方法及装置
Begen Error control for IPTV over xDSL networks
US10833710B2 (en) Bandwidth efficient FEC scheme supporting uneven levels of protection
CN101645903A (zh) 一种多媒体数据的传输方法及装置
JP2014225900A (ja) マルチセグメント損失の保護
Sasaki et al. Rapid channel zapping for IPTV broadcasting with additional multicast stream
CN114422864A (zh) 一种音视频抗弱网传输方法及系统
CN104429089A (zh) 用于确定复合视频服务流的方法和设备
Degrande et al. Protecting IPTV against packet loss: Techniques and trade‐offs
Mammi et al. Evaluation of AL-FEC performance for IP television services QoS
Caenegem et al. Maintaining video quality and optimizing video delivery over the bandwidth constrained DSL last mile through intelligent packet drop
Li et al. Forward and retransmitted Systematic Lossy Error Protection for IPTV video multicast

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200980137353.3

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09800123

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009800123

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2011519247

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 549/CHENP/2011

Country of ref document: IN

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20117004337

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: PI0916837

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20110124