WO2006095432A1 - Procede de transmission - Google Patents

Procede de transmission Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006095432A1
WO2006095432A1 PCT/JP2005/004247 JP2005004247W WO2006095432A1 WO 2006095432 A1 WO2006095432 A1 WO 2006095432A1 JP 2005004247 W JP2005004247 W JP 2005004247W WO 2006095432 A1 WO2006095432 A1 WO 2006095432A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
data unit
transmission
frame
data units
packet
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2005/004247
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Rahul Malik
Pek Yew Tan
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
Priority to PCT/JP2005/004247 priority Critical patent/WO2006095432A1/fr
Publication of WO2006095432A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006095432A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a transmission method in which a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame or collectively transmitted.
  • a radio channel has frequency selectivity.
  • the state of the radio channel changes over time.
  • OFDM orthogonal frequency division multiple access
  • a radio channel with frequency selectivity can be divided into a number of subcarriers, each of which can be regarded as receiving frequency non-selectivity Z flat fading, It is possible to use a simple 1-tap equalizer for channel compensation.
  • FIG. 1 A conventional general packet structure will be described with reference to FIG.
  • the figure shows the structure of a packet that is ready for transmission by the physical layer, as defined in the wireless AN (registered trademark) Physical Layer Protocol Data Unit (PPDU), or Non-Patent Document 1 mentioned above.
  • This packet also has three main section capabilities with different functions, as described in the following paragraphs.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 the figure shows between MAC layer service data unit (MSDU), MAC layer protocol data unit (MPDU), physical layer service data unit (PSDU), PPDU and The relationship between is also illustrated.
  • MSDU MAC layer service data unit
  • MPDU MAC layer protocol data unit
  • PSDU physical layer service data unit
  • PPDU Physical layer service data unit
  • PLCP preamble 110 is a short training sequence
  • STS 10 iterations of (STS) 111 and 2 iterations of long training sequence (LTS) 112.
  • STS is used by the receiver to perform the functional operations of AGC confluence, diversity selection, timing acquisition, and coarse frequency estimation.
  • LTS uses fine frequencies to correctly equalize received packets against the effects of the channel. Used to perform number estimation and channel estimation.
  • the signal field 120 has a robust modulation scheme, that is, it is hardly affected by the communication environment !, and the modulation scheme (6 Mbps in the minimum speed mode defined in Non-Patent Document 1 described above).
  • the data power transmitted using is also configured. This consists of parameters (eg, modulation and coding scheme, packet length, etc.) used to initialize the receiver to correctly demodulate the data (payload) segment 130 of the packet.
  • the data field 130 is the payload of the PPDU. This consists of a physical layer service data unit (PSD U) 132 passed from the MAC layer to the physical layer, a service field 131, a pad field 133, and a tail field 134.
  • PSDU physical layer service data unit
  • the PSDU is called a MAC protocol data unit (MPDU) 150 in the MAC layer.
  • MPDU also includes a MAC header field 151 and an FCS field 1 53, and a MAC service data unit (MSDU) 152 encapsulated by them.
  • the data field 130 is transmitted using the modulation code method defined in the signal field 120.
  • Non-competitive polling mode operation in which each terminal receives an inquiry (polling) from the AP for the presence of data to be transmitted, and the polling terminal starts transmission if there is transmission data
  • the above-mentioned Non-Patent Document 2 is mainly directed to the asynchronous contention-based network.
  • each individual device In order to make it possible for terminal equipment that conforms to this new method and legacy terminal equipment that does not conform to this to coexist in the same network, each individual device In order to allow the station to correctly set the network allocation vector (NAV), which is a local counter used to track the usage of shared media, poll frames are transmitted using the “basic rate”. This is a significant overhead for data transmission.
  • NAV network allocation vector
  • Non-patent Document 3 Non-patent Document 4
  • TGn MAC frame aggregation
  • Non-Patent Document 3 describes MAC frame aggregation as a means for reducing access overhead and improving network throughput. This results in a reduction in the number of media access events as a result of aggregation and saves additional overhead such as IFS, backoff period, training sequence, PLCP header, etc. It is intended to improve this.
  • the frame structure of this document the frame is composed of a MAC header and a frame body composed of a plurality of MSDU compartments.
  • the MAC header characteristically includes an aggregation control field and a header FCS field.
  • the aggregation control field has one compartment count information (subfield) at its head, and then the number of compartments corresponding to the number of compartments (value corresponding to the length of each compartment) compartment length) information.
  • An aggregate data frame can be viewed as a “carrier” for multiple packets, which facilitates point-to-multipoint transmission.
  • the number of compartments is the number of MSDU compartments carried by one aggregated data frame.
  • the frame body will be described.
  • Each MSD U compartment of the body includes a header, a data unit body, and an FCS.
  • Special Reference 1 Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-specific Requirements-Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Higher-Speed Physical Layer Extension in the 5 GHz Band ", IEEE Std 802.11a—1999, IEEE, September 1999.
  • MAC Medium Access Control
  • PHY Physical Layer
  • Non-Patent Document 2 "Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Specific Requirements-Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications", IEEE Std 802.11-1999, IEEE, August 1999.
  • MAC Medium Access Control
  • PHY Physical Layer
  • Non-Patent Document 3 T. Fukagawa, et al, 'Partial Proposal for TGn, doc: IEEE
  • Non-Patent Document 4 A. S. Mujtaba, et al, TGnSync Proposal Technical Specification, doc: IEEE 802.11- 04 / 889r0, September 2004.
  • the transmission method of the present invention is a transmission method in which a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame and transmitted in packet-type wireless transmission, and each data unit is extended from the head of the frame body.
  • the method includes an arranging step of arranging the data units in the shortest order and a transmitting step of collecting and transmitting the arranged data units.
  • the transmission method of the present invention is a transmission method in which a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame and transmitted in packet-type wireless transmission, and each of the above-mentioned data units is based on the priority of each data unit.
  • the transmission method of the present invention is a transmission method in which a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame and transmitted in packet-type wireless transmission.
  • the predetermined threshold fragment error rate requirement is satisfied for the plurality of fragment data units. Determine the optimal size and ensure that the MPDU fragment error probability is below a given threshold, regardless of its position in the aggregate MPDU If you can do it!
  • FIG. 1 A diagram showing a packet structure of a wireless LAN physical layer protocol data unit.
  • FIG. 7 Overall diagram of a configuration example for realizing the present invention in a radio transceiver
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a procedure for allocation allocation for the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a dynamic fragmentation mechanism as a third embodiment, which is specified by the present invention.
  • aggregation is not limited to the general meaning of these terms.
  • a plurality of data units are aggregated in a frame, that is, taught and paraphrased. For example, it shall imply a summarized state or result or effect.
  • the contents defined in some of the reference documents listed in this specification are incorporated by reference where appropriate.
  • This embodiment improves the overall throughput by selectively arranging individual data units in the order of smaller size in the context of the transmitted packet. It is something to be made. The occurrence of a single bit error in a data unit causes an error in the entire data unit. In this embodiment, a larger number of data units are likely to be successfully transmitted. is there. Furthermore, throughput can be improved in the form of a reduction in the number of retransmissions as overhead associated with each data mute.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a conventional MAC aggregate frame format described in Non-Patent Document 3 mentioned above.
  • the format described here includes an aggregated MAC header that describes the location of multiple compartments MPD U in the frame body, and each of these multiple compartment MPDUs is individually FCS.
  • Have Reference numeral 210 in the figure represents the MAC header of the aggregated MPDU, and 220 represents the frame body of the aggregated MPDU. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that for power-intensive MPDUs for which FCS was previously shown in data 130 in Figure 1, an “overall” FCS is not required.
  • the format proposed here uses the header FCS212 to protect the contents of the MAC header information 211 in the aggregated frame MAC header 210. Shall be.
  • the frame body 220 of the aggregated MPDU is configured with several compartment MPDU forces, denoted in this example as reference numerals 230, 240, 250 and 260.
  • Each conversion MPDU has its own MAC header (231, 241, 251, and 261), its own frame body (ie, MSDU) (232, 242, 252, and 262), and its own FCS (233, 243, 262). 253 and 263).
  • the receiver Upon receiving the aggregated MAC frame described in Non-Patent Document 3 above, the receiver First, the checksum is compared with the header FCS 212 to confirm that the MAC header 210 is affected by the error (sanctity). This aggregate MAC header is used to facilitate the determination of the boundaries between the individual MPDU compartments (230, 240, 250 and 260 in this example) within the aggregate frame body. Contains multiple pointers to the MPDU companion of the current.
  • Each individual MPDU compartment has its own FCS (233, 243, 253, and 263), which allows the receiver to detect errors in that individual MPDU separately.
  • FCS 233, 243, 253, and 263
  • block ACK can be described in a word. This technology improves channel utilization efficiency by consolidating or consolidating several acknowledgments (ACK) into one frame.
  • the radio channel changes over time.
  • a standard wireless LAN system is designed for indoor use where there is no mobility or low mobility of terminals, and the channel variation with respect to the time length of the packet itself is very slow.
  • the power seen As a result of using techniques such as frame aggregation, aggregated frames are all received by using longer packets or by using a MAC mechanism that supports point-to-multipoint transmission. Need to be sent at a common minimum rate supported by the subscriber. This means that the packet transmission time is longer than that of the current 802.11a system.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates the bit error rate according to the bit position in the ideal case without thermal noise under the above-described simulation conditions.
  • the overall packet error rate is determined to be 2.36%. Since there is no AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise), the only source of bit errors (and packet errors) in Figure 3A is due to the Doppler shift caused by the channel.
  • AWGN additive white Gaussian noise
  • FIG. 3B is a force that illustrates the bit error rate corresponding to the relationship with the bit position under the simulation conditions described above.
  • the packet error rate Is 7.63%, which is a typical PER (packet error rate) for wireless LAN.
  • PER packet error rate
  • FIG. 4 shows the effect of Doppler on the channel estimation as illustrated in FIG. 3, ie, the actual channel 420 relative to the channel estimation 410 derived from the training sequence 401 at the beginning of the bucket 400. This is a description of the drift.
  • This figure illustrates the problem that is addressed by the present invention, that is, the improvement of transmission reliability and, as a result, the improvement of throughput in an aggregated frame transmitted via a radio channel. Show.
  • the training sequence reinsertion method which is well described in the prior art, particularly in the field of continuous transmission methods such as DAB, has a training sequence so that the error rate does not exceed a predetermined threshold.
  • FIG. 5 shows important information (for example, information that is extremely important for accurate reception of the entire packet or a packet later. (Information important for correctly decoding the following part or information important for the entire packet, etc.) Force The figure shows how it is placed at the beginning of the packet body. This indicates, for example, that the important information power S that is essential for accurate decoding of the entire frame and that it is placed at the beginning of the packet where the possibility of bit errors is the lowest.
  • Reference numeral 500 in FIG. 5 represents a packet including a training sequence 510 and a packet body 520.
  • the important information 521 is located at the head of the packet body where the error due to channel drift is expected to be minimal, and is closest to the training sequence 510.
  • the likelihood of bit errors is expected to increase as the distance from the training sequence increases. Scheduling highly important information in the portion of the packet where the BER is expected to be low makes it possible to improve the overall throughput of the packet-type communication system.
  • aggregate MPDU According to Non-Patent Document 3, the force that the aggregated information is placed in the MAC header at the beginning of the packet (see 211 in FIG. 2). This is in contrast to the distributed format described.
  • a plurality of compartment MPDUs are included in the aggregate MPDU, and the shortest of these is the start of the aggregate MPDU. They are scheduled in ascending order of their packet length in the form of being placed in the close part (at the start of the aggregated MPDU).
  • the relatively small size of the compre- hensive MPDU power is scheduled to a position portion (zones) in which the BER of the packet is expected to be relatively low.
  • these position portions are portions that are relatively close to the head portion of the packet, and the possibility of bit error increases as the distance from the head portion increases.
  • the present invention can result in a greater number of successful MSDU transmissions, thereby reducing retransmission overhead. Become.
  • Reference numeral 600 in FIG. 6A illustrates a conventional aggregate MPDU in which a plurality of component MPDUs A to D represented by 602 force 60 5 are arranged in a random order, where “random”. This phrase suggests something that has nothing to do with the embodiment of the present invention. Note that the term “component” is used, which means the component of the frame and is synonymous with the compartment.
  • Reference numeral 610 in FIG. 6B indicates an aggregate M PDU generated using the technique of the present invention. Here, a plurality of component MPDUs A to D represented by 612 to 615 are represented. These are arranged in the order of short MSDU length.
  • the aggregated frame header is represented by 601 and 611 in the aggregated MPDU 600 and aggregated MPDU 610, respectively.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a wireless LAN transceiver (Transino system 700 as a wireless network adapter for network node communication, with reference numeral 701
  • the MAC processor 702 represents a PHY (physical layer) modem.
  • Reference numeral 703 denotes an interface between the MAC and the PHY
  • reference numeral 704 denotes an antenna array (which functions as an interface between the modem and the transmission medium (line)).
  • reference numeral 705 denotes an interface between the MAC processor and an upper layer of the network node, and a control signal, transmitted data, and received data are transmitted through the interface.
  • Non-Patent Document 3 The aggregation mechanism described above and described in Non-Patent Document 3 is implemented in the layer 2 as a module of the MAC processor 701 when viewed in accordance with the OSI network architecture. Will be done.
  • This embodiment describes a mechanism for scheduling a plurality of MPDUs in an aggregated frame, and its configuration is a module of the MAC processor 701 that embodies this embodiment, that is, It will be realized as a scheduling control unit 706.
  • processing functions of the scheduling control unit 706 as a configuration example for realizing the present embodiment in the wireless transceiver will be schematically outlined.
  • the scheduling control unit 706 acquires information on the compartment length indicating the length of each compartment data unit, and based on this acquired information, each compartment data Unit size Z length is determined, and the compartment data unit size is arranged in ascending order. Based on the determined size, each compartment data unit is assigned in ascending order, that is, in the ascending order. Arrange. This process can be handled programmatically.
  • the scheduling control unit 706 of the present embodiment when a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame and wireless transmission is performed, a plurality of component MSDUs are included in the aggregated MPDU.
  • the shortest of these, the compartment M PDU is scheduled in ascending order of their packet lengths in such a way that the compartment M PDU is arranged at the top of the aggregate MPDU.
  • the component MPDU having a relatively small size within the aggregated frame is relatively relative to the position portion where the reliability is expected to be relatively high in the main body portion of the aggregated MPDU, that is, relative to the head portion thereof. Scheduled to the nearest part.
  • each MSDU has a certain overhead associated with it
  • successful transmission can be obtained for a larger number of MSDUs.
  • the allocation and allocation of data units based on the priority, and further the allocation and allocation of data units based on this priority are allocated and allocated to the data units based on the packet length of the first embodiment. Arrangement allocation combined with the above will be described.
  • a data unit having a higher priority has higher reliability in a transmitted packet (also in view of the potential for bit error).
  • Multiple data units to be transmitted within the same wireless packet are scheduled according to their priority in such a way that they are allocated to segments.
  • the latter allocation assignment according to the present embodiment is the method described in the above-described two embodiments, that is, a method of integrating an array based on weights based on priority and an array based on data unit lengths.
  • the data unit is weighted and both the weight and size of the data unit are transmitted. It ’s like a target.
  • the weight is the number of retransmission attempts for the current MSDU (the current MSDU), its length, the corresponding MSD It is not limited to the service type of the traffic stream to which u belongs and this embodiment! It can be calculated based on any other means!
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart describing an algorithm for generating one aggregated MP DU from a plurality of compartments MSDUs according to the present embodiment.
  • This figure describes one of the technologies according to the present invention for dealing with the arrangement Z scheduling of multiple components MSD U in an aggregate frame structure for the purpose of improving throughput. It is directed to prioritizing traffic by both type Z class of multiple component packets and their size.
  • a weight for an MSDU that can be transmitted in the current transmission opportunity is calculated in step 802, and They are assigned. Based on the rule that higher weights are assigned to MSDUs with higher priorities, in step 803, the MSD Us are sorted in order of their weights, from highest to lowest. For a plurality of MSDUs given the same weight in step 802, the second sort operation is executed in ascending order of the length of the corresponding MSDU.
  • multiple compartment MPDUs Depending on their relative weights, they will be placed in reliability dependent zones, with shorter weights being closer to the PLCP preamble in the relationship between each weighted location.
  • the packets are arranged in ascending order of packet length.
  • step 805 a compartment MPDU is generated for each MS DU, and these compartment MPDUs are aggregated to generate an aggregate MPDU for output generation. .
  • the weight allocation process described in step 802 may be replaced with a process that gives the same weight characteristic to all packets. This will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • the first sort operation 803 has no effect, and as described in the first embodiment of the present invention, the plurality of compartment MSD U forces arranged in ascending order of the MSDU size in step 804 are also included. Aggregate MPDU power that results in the generated. Alternatively, the same effect can be achieved by omitting steps 802 and 803 in the flowchart 800.
  • this flowchart is a process chart that is a combination of sorting by weight and sorting by length, and is illustrated as a supplement to the description in the present embodiment.
  • step 802 By assigning the same weight characteristic or simply omitting steps 802 and 803, this figure also shows the sort processing corresponding to the first embodiment.
  • the processing functions of the scheduling control unit 706 as a configuration example for realizing the present embodiment in the wireless transceiver will be schematically outlined.
  • the scheduling control unit 706 performs, in the weight calculation process, the priority, the number of retransmission attempts of the current target MSDU, the length thereof, the service type of the traffic stream to which the MSDU belongs, and the present embodiment. Calculate and assign a weight for each compartment data unit based on any other means not limited. In the weight descending order arrangement processing, the compartment data units are arranged in descending order of the assigned weights (first sort processing). On the other hand, the scheduling control unit 706, in the compartment length information acquisition determination process, acquires information on the compartment length, which indicates the length of each compartment data unit, and acquires this information. Based on the information, determine the size Z length of each compartment data unit.
  • the data after weighted descending order processing is used as the second sorting process for two or more compartment data units that have the same order of arrangement by weights for the first sort.
  • the compartment data units are arranged in ascending order based on the size of the determined size.
  • the scheduling control unit 706 of the present embodiment when a plurality of data units are aggregated into one frame and wireless transmission is performed, the plurality of compartment MPDUs are relative to each other. Depending on the target weight, it is placed in the position part that has a relationship with the reliability, and in the relation between each part with the same weight, the packet length is set so that the shorter packet is closer to the PLCP preamble. Arranged in ascending order. As a result, the component MPD U force having a relatively high priority within the aggregated frame is relative to the position of the main part of the aggregated MPDU that is expected to be relatively reliable, i.e., relative to the head of the position. Is scheduled to the closest location.
  • the present embodiment it is possible to obtain more stable transmission reliability and robustness for a component MPDU having a relatively high priority.
  • the conventional frame aggregation technology effectively copes with the fluctuation of the radio channel with much consideration, by arranging the data units in consideration of this, This improves transmission reliability against errors caused by changes in channel conditions and reduces the access overhead by using frame aggregation technology.
  • Embodiment 3 of the present invention a dynamic fragmentation method will be described, and more specifically, for a plurality of fragment data units, their optimum sizes that will satisfy the requirements of a predetermined threshold fragment error rate are set. Describes techniques that can be used to ensure that the probability of MPDU fragment errors is below a given threshold, regardless of location within the aggregate MPDU.
  • the present embodiment relates to a dynamic fragmentation scheme, in which the fragmentation threshold of one data unit is the position of the data unit in the context of the transmitted packet. That is, a smaller threshold is taken as the channel drift increases.
  • the purpose of this embodiment is to maintain a uniform fragment error rate within the context of a large data unit, which ensures that transmission succeeds for data units that are defragmented at the receiver side. It is intended to be
  • FIG. 9 illustrates a dynamic fragmentation mechanism embodied by the present invention, which provides a common threshold for all fragments. To achieve the error rate, it is shown that the fragmentation threshold is dynamically reduced as the training sequence separation increases (that is, the channel drift increases and the BER increases). Yes.
  • the transmitted MSDU is fragmented before the generation of the aggregate MPDU.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 described above describes a mechanism for fragmentation.
  • the purpose of fragmentation is to “aggregate” the same aggregated MPDU.
  • the present technology differs from the technology of Non-Patent Document 2 in that fragmentation is performed using a dynamic fragmentation threshold.
  • each compartment MPDU has an individual FCS, which enables selective retransmission, and the dynamic aggregation proposed in the present technology.
  • the objective is to ensure that the MPDU fragment error probability is below a predetermined threshold, regardless of its location in the aggregated MPDU.
  • Fragment position is a function of pktPosn.
  • BER or its average value [ mean]
  • fragSize defines the number of bits in the fragment.
  • Equation (1) is needed to maintain a certain threshold error probability P for fragments.
  • Equation (2) By using the method described in Equation (2), it is possible to determine the optimal size of each of the MPDU fragments that will satisfy the threshold fragment error rate requirement.
  • the average BER expressed in equation (2) is a function of the packet position. BER also depends on environmental conditions (multipath) and terminal mobility. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B, the absolute value of the BER also depends on the SNR at the receiver. Therefore, since the transmitter does not have an accurate statistical value of the received BER, this value may be selected empirically using external information feedback or reciprocity, or the transmission It can be foreseen that this selection may be made using a look-up table of pre-calculated values on the machine side. It is expected that, among other parameters, such information will be related to frame error rate statistics or fragment error rate statistics and SNR.
  • this figure shows the MPDU900 composed of the header 901, the MSDU 902, and the FCS 903 force described in the present embodiment in FIG. The effect when applied to is described.
  • a new set of aggregated fragment MPDUs 911 to 914 (these are collectively represented by 910) can be configured based on MSDU 902 of MPDU 900.
  • 911 has the largest size, while 914 is the smallest.
  • the channel drift effect shown in Fig. 4 is also related to each MPDU (911 to 914).
  • Show. 920 in the figure represents a channel estimation value derived from the training sequence at the beginning of packet transmission (not shown in the figure, see 401 in FIG. 4), and 921 represents the estimated value power. Represents the actual channel drift.
  • the MSDU size sorting method described in the above-described embodiment may be used.
  • the expression (1 ) may be used.
  • the dynamic fragmentation scheme may be applied to larger MSDUs that are placed in locations that are expected to have a higher probability of error.
  • the configuration embodying the present embodiment will also be realized as a scheduling control unit 706 that is a module of the MAC processor 701.
  • the processing function of the scheduling control unit 706 as a configuration example for realizing the present embodiment will be schematically outlined.
  • the scheduling control unit 706 first uses the method described in Equation (2) in the optimum sizing operation processing based on the dynamic fragmentation threshold shown in FIG. Determine their optimal size that will meet the threshold fragment error rate requirement. Next, in the fragmentation process by the optimum size, the fragmentation by the decision size is performed. Furthermore, in the aggregate configuration process of multiple fragments, a plurality of fragment MPDUs are “aggregated”.
  • a predetermined threshold fragment is obtained for the plurality of fragment data units. Determine the optimal size of those that will meet the error rate requirements and ensure that the MPDU fragment error probability is below a predetermined threshold, regardless of its position in the aggregate MPDU. ! /, The effect is obtained.
  • the present embodiment effectively copes with radio channel fluctuations by performing fragmentation that takes this into account, and improves transmission reliability against errors caused by channel state changes. As a result, it has the effect of improving the throughput.
  • the present invention can be applied to a transmission method used for packet-type wireless terminal equipment that aggregates a plurality of data units into one frame or performs wireless transmission collectively.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Small-Scale Networks (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé de transmission destiné à transmettre une pluralité d'unités de données, soit dans une trame encapsulée, soit ensemble. Dans ledit procédé, une unité de contrôle de la planification agence, en fonction de la longueur de chaque unité de données de compartiment, les unités de données de compartiment individuelles dans l'ordre croissant, en partant de la tête d'un corps de trame. Au cas où les unités de données devraient être encapsulées dans une trame et transmises sans fil, un composant MPDU de taille plus petite est prévu dans cette trame encapsulée jusqu’au lieu de positionnement du MPDU encapsulé estimée avoir la meilleure fiabilité, c'est-à-dire jusqu’au lieu de positionnement la plus proche de la tête. En conséquence, la quantité de MSDUs à réussir leurs transmissions augmente. Ceci a pour effet de réduire la mauvaise efficacité des retransmissions.
PCT/JP2005/004247 2005-03-10 2005-03-10 Procede de transmission WO2006095432A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2005/004247 WO2006095432A1 (fr) 2005-03-10 2005-03-10 Procede de transmission

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2005/004247 WO2006095432A1 (fr) 2005-03-10 2005-03-10 Procede de transmission

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006095432A1 true WO2006095432A1 (fr) 2006-09-14

Family

ID=36953043

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2005/004247 WO2006095432A1 (fr) 2005-03-10 2005-03-10 Procede de transmission

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2006095432A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009164754A (ja) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-23 Fujitsu Ltd 無線通信システムにおける信号多重方法および送信局
JP2010219660A (ja) * 2009-03-13 2010-09-30 Kyocera Corp 無線通信装置および無線通信制御方法
JP2012182840A (ja) * 2012-06-08 2012-09-20 Fujitsu Ltd 送信局及び受信局

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06205384A (ja) * 1992-12-28 1994-07-22 Nec Corp 動画像符号伝送方式
JPH0888646A (ja) * 1994-09-16 1996-04-02 Fujitsu Ltd 電文蓄積配送装置及び電文蓄積配送方法
JP2001016226A (ja) * 1999-07-01 2001-01-19 Nec Corp Ａｔｍセルの送信制御方式及び送信制御装置
JP2001086190A (ja) * 1999-09-09 2001-03-30 Mega Chips Corp データ伝送における誤り制御システム
JP2003258807A (ja) * 2001-11-30 2003-09-12 Alcatel 高度マルチポイントアクセスシステムのためのｉｐプラットフォーム

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06205384A (ja) * 1992-12-28 1994-07-22 Nec Corp 動画像符号伝送方式
JPH0888646A (ja) * 1994-09-16 1996-04-02 Fujitsu Ltd 電文蓄積配送装置及び電文蓄積配送方法
JP2001016226A (ja) * 1999-07-01 2001-01-19 Nec Corp Ａｔｍセルの送信制御方式及び送信制御装置
JP2001086190A (ja) * 1999-09-09 2001-03-30 Mega Chips Corp データ伝送における誤り制御システム
JP2003258807A (ja) * 2001-11-30 2003-09-12 Alcatel 高度マルチポイントアクセスシステムのためのｉｐプラットフォーム

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009164754A (ja) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-23 Fujitsu Ltd 無線通信システムにおける信号多重方法および送信局
US8615000B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2013-12-24 Fujitsu Limited Method of signal multiplexing and transmitter in radio communication system
US9497735B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2016-11-15 Fujitsu Limited Method of signal multiplexing and transmitter in radio communication system
JP2010219660A (ja) * 2009-03-13 2010-09-30 Kyocera Corp 無線通信装置および無線通信制御方法
JP2012182840A (ja) * 2012-06-08 2012-09-20 Fujitsu Ltd 送信局及び受信局

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11134468B2 (en) Medium access control for multi-channel OFDM in a wireless local area network
US20180191480A1 (en) Block acknowledgement with fragmentation acknowledgement signaling
US7697561B2 (en) Communication apparatus, communication method, and communication system
KR101394063B1 (ko) 다중­사용자 통신 방식들에서 클라이언트 개시 전송들을 관리하기 위한 방법 및 장치
Selvam et al. A frame aggregation scheduler for IEEE 802.11 n
US8594007B2 (en) Sequential ACK for multi-user transmissions
US10708892B1 (en) Resource request for uplink transmission
US20080232490A1 (en) System and method for incorporating dynamic orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing into wireless network protocols
US20090074088A1 (en) Adaptive Fragmentation for HARQ in Wireless OFDMA Networks
WO2005104442A2 (fr) Concaténation de paquets dans des réseaux sans fil
CN112787792B (zh) 使用触发信息的无线通信方法、和无线通信终端
KR20110031137A (ko) 무선 통신 시스템을 위한 데이터 송수신 장치 및 방법
WO2021036648A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de transmission de données
Saif et al. Impact of aggregation headers on aggregating small MSDUs in 802.11 n WLANs
US20160374081A1 (en) Short uplink responses for downlink transmissions
Maqhat et al. A-MSDU real time traffic scheduler for IEEE802. 11n WLANs
Maqhat et al. Performance analysis of fair scheduler for A-MSDU aggregation in IEEE802. 11n wireless networks
JP4543049B2 (ja) 通信装置および通信装置の通信方法
Maqhat et al. Scheduler algorithm for IEEE802. 11n wireless LANs
WO2006095432A1 (fr) Procede de transmission
JP5787369B2 (ja) 優先度及びシグナリング電力に基づくリソース割り当て
US11882557B2 (en) Adaptive UL duration selection
Chosokabe et al. A channel adaptive hybrid aggregation scheme for next generation wireless LAN
Zhou et al. An uplink medium access protocol with SDMA support for multiple-antenna WLANs
KR101770598B1 (ko) 무선랜에서의 패킷 전송 방법 및 장치

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: RU

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05720518

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 5720518

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP